Conference in the Netherlands: Towards a New Golden Age


The Dutch alt-right and identitarian group Erkenbrand, which has rapidly grown over the past years, will be organizing a major conference on October 14, 2017. Foreign visitors are very much invited to attend the conference, which will be held in English, as an opportunity to network across borders and foster an international brotherhood of awakened Europeans.

Tickets can be purchased at:

The speakers will include:

– Jared Taylor: a renowned race-realist and White advocate. He is the publisher of American Renaissance and the author of White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century.

– Marcus Follin – aka The Golden One: a Swedish body-builder and popular vlogger. He promotes a return to masculinity, martial virtue, and national identity.

– Joost Niemöller: a journalist who has written for leading Dutch newspapers and magazines, while never shying away from controversial topics. His 2012 book The Immigration Taboo: Ten Scientists Discuss the Facts provides a sobering, fact-based look at the costs of immigration to the Netherlands, including loss of social trust and ethnic differentials in IQ, crime rates, and welfare use. The book was widely discussed in Dutch newspapers and television shows. In 2013, he was fired by the Christian-oriented public broadcaster NCRV for an article he wrote on Martin Luther King Memorial Day asking whether differences in IQ could explain the social condition of African Americans. Niemöller, a non-ideologue and self-styled “realist,” has continued to write on controversial topics despite the threats of political correctness.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

6 Comments to "Conference in the Netherlands: Towards a New Golden Age"

  1. Jason's Gravatar Jason
    June 21, 2017 - 2:05 pm | Permalink


    But I did not understand ‘martial virtue’?

    Do you mean marital virtue?

    • Walter's Gravatar Walter
      July 1, 2017 - 2:18 am | Permalink

      Perhaps the virtue of being able to see strength as a strength, instead of the dull, vain version of strength as an aesthetic. ‘A whole lot of nothing that goes nowhere.’
      Strong men have their place. Sadly most get blobby in front of screens these days. If an angry man threatened them they’d run or freeze. Not cool.
      Man up men! There are still good women to protect!

  2. E.'s Gravatar E.
    June 22, 2017 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Wish this to be both enjoyable & productive.

    Unlike prior mass extinctions, our contemporary one, of course, is Homo sapiens-driven. Race, (a biological or sociobiological construct, of ancestral lineage & phenotypes/genotypes, and physical distinctions/discriminations that even non-sentient beings are able to reproduce without “culture”), is another casualty of our species comparative success at survival & environmental manipulation for better habitability. Yet, to date, it has been certainly imperfect; poor planning & control overall (“stewardship”), is quite characteristic of our development over time.

    The invisible hand, perhaps, extending beyond the individual, beyond race, to our species. (“Anthropocentrism”).

    Race (post-racialism) is an element of that dis-order; lack of organization, planning, foresight, and dispassionate, objective, implementation. While the natural world has gained the ideas and language and legitimacy for protection by (mostly the Western Civilizations), race is more complicated. There exist great contradictions; and certainly with regards to holistic implementation. The measures taken with regards to the biodiversity management of non-homo sapiens, is, of course, not applicable to homo sapiens; at least in the minds of any decent and moral Homo sapiens.

    (Hence “co-existence” is myth making, in absence of such myriad measures & controls applied to other species management but not to our own.)

    Of course, gaining control becomes more complicated when concerning homo sapiens’ biodiversity vs. non-sentient beings.

    And, of course, the extinction of race may not be entirely lementable, but of course, that depends on the races under consideration; and by whom & with what rationales.

    Anyway, much thanks to Guillaume, as usual; and all the best for event.

  3. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    June 22, 2017 - 2:42 pm | Permalink

    “The Immigration Taboo: Ten Scientists Discuss the Facts provides a sobering, fact-based look at the costs of immigration to the Netherlands, including loss of social trust and ethnic differentials in IQ, crime rates, and welfare use.”

    It’s more truly sobering to consider that these were nationalist talking points 50 and 100 years ago.

    10 years ago, nationalists were talking more about Salter’s Genetic Interests, our first great scientific idea of political significance for decades. Then 5 years ago the White Genocide meme got traction, because it was meaningful and biologically true.

    What a shame – and coincidence – that the altright arose to scupper and bury both discussions and reroute our propaganda into endlessly debatable social science stats and right vs. left shadow boxing.

  4. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    June 28, 2017 - 1:47 am | Permalink

    “He promotes a return to masculinity, martial virtue, and national identity.”
    In the past we have had too many wars in Europe where closely-related peoples were fighting each other for no purpose – eg WWII. Let us hope that the people, when faced with common threats that threaten all Europe, can avoid such wasteful wars and instead can defend against their common enemies.
    This has happened in S.Africa where there was a statue of Cecil Rhodes that the blacks wanted to tear down (I think it has gone now) outside a university (I think?). The Boer whites wanted it to stay up, ie the Boer whites and the British whites forgot their differences. They realised when they both face genocide there is no point dwelling on old disputes like the Boer war from over 100 years ago.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      June 29, 2017 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

      Rhodes was compromised multiply. Jews owned both his sense of ‘Whiteness’, and managed his purse and inheritance.

      If Whites are able to retake our legitimate claims in Southern Africa from invaders, it would be justified despite his interventions.

Comments are closed.