Nikki Haley: Warmonger Extraordinaire!

Antonius Aquinas


It must now be a prerequisite of those who become an American ambassador to the UN to possess certain characteristics and traits, the most important of which are rabid warmonger, child killer, and outright liar.

Remember it was Madeleine Albright when asked about the US blockading Iraq which prevented medicine and medical equipment from entering the country that resulted in the estimated death of a half a million children who coldly responded: “I think that is a very hard choice, but the price, we think, the price is worth it.”  Then there is Colin “Weapons of Mass Destruction” Powell who told a bald-face lie about Iraq’s nuclear capabilities which paved the way for the US destruction of the country.

In her brief tenure as UN ambassador, Nikki Haley is fulfilling these requirements quite nicely.  Her latest crazed outburst came on the heels of the bizarre White House press release about another supposed Syrian government gas attack which warned President Assad that he would “pay a heavy price” if carried out.

While the State and Defense Departments were apparently caught off guard by the White House action, Ambassador Haley was not (probably given advanced notice) and issued an even more provocative tweet:

Any further attacks done to the people of Syria will be blamed on Assad, but also on Russia & Iran who support him killing his own people.

Not only has Haley appointed herself judge, jury and executioner of the Assad regime, but her wild accusation includes reprisals to the neocons’ ultimate targets of Russia and Iran.  Her ridiculous statement has now given Syria’s enemies the green light to conduct another gas attack which will be blamed on Assad and his allies, Russia and Iran.  Nice work, Nikki!

From a diplomatic perspective, the entire affair was bungled and amateurish, confirming once again that the Trump Administration is out of its league in conducting foreign policy.

That Haley was even chosen to become part of the Trump Administration has been odd from the beginning, but as things have unfolded quite telling.  Haley was a vociferous critic of the future president.  She, and the likes of another war-monger and Russophobe, Lindsey Graham, were consistently attacking candidate Trump for being “soft” on Russia and his immigration stance especially his wildly popular border wall proposal.  To Haley and Graham, Donald Trump was out of step with the Republican Party’s values such as diversity as represented by Haley who, herself, is of Indian heritage.

Yet, despite all of the vitriol heaped at candidate Trump, the newly elected president, in a surprising and ominous move, decided to choose the South Carolina governor, UN ambassador.  This, and a number of other selections to foreign policy posts, signaled that President Trump would abandon his promises and vote-garnering campaign talk of peaceful coexistence with Russia, a reduction of US presence in the Middle East, and in other hot spots across the globe.

While Haley has been an ardent warmonger from the start, President Trump did not have to select her for the post.  There were other more competent and surely less belligerent candidates available.  More than likely, the choice was probably a nod to his “advisor” daughter Ivanka, to curry favor among feminists.

While President Trump’s pick of Haley was an implicit betrayal of a large segment of his base, his foreign policy actions since becoming chief executive have been an explicit rejection of putting America first which he spoke of at his inaugural.  From escalating tensions with puny North Korea, dropping the mother-of-all-bombs on Afghanistan for no apparent reason, to making multi-billion dollar armament deals with the despots of Saudi Arabia among other troubling endeavors, Trump’s foreign policy is little different than his infamous predecessors.

While it looks like President Trump may have won the war, at least temporary, over the press and the anti-Trump Congressional forces about the fake Russian election involvement, he and his bellicose UN ambassador are now using the same underhanded methods to instigate a conflict to depose President Assad.  While the alternative media rightly showed how the mainstream press and politicos made up and manipulated stories to undermine President Trump, it should now be intellectually honest and call out the president and his UN ambassador for what they are doing in Syria.  In doing so, it may prevent the outbreak of WWIII.


Reposted from AntoniusAquinas.com
Antonius [email protected]
https://antoniusaquinas.com/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

14 Comments to "Nikki Haley: Warmonger Extraordinaire!"

  1. July 4, 2017 - 8:58 am | Permalink

    It seems unlikely that Ivanka or “feminism” had anything to do with the nomination of Haley and much more likely that Haley was chosen to appease the neo-con faction. Steve Sailer once wrote an article, “The Senator from Mossad,” about Lindsay Graham and his rather unusual connection to Israel. Graham once even bragged about his “Jewish” financial backers.

    It’s odd that Graham, a barely closeted homosexual, would be a Senator from a state as socially conservative Christian as South Carolina. In South Carolina, even the Black Democrats are socially conservative and Christian.

    SC has a history of rigging elections, originally to disenfranchise Blacks and in the modern era to disenfranchise White Christian populists (while also still disenfranchising Blacks.) The voting system in South Carolina cannot be discussed in polite company because it’s such an obvious fraud – to even bring up the hilariously transparent fake “voting machines” – on par with SC’s electronic gambling machines – is to open yourself up to charges of “conspiracy theorist.” But nevertheless anyone with a high schooler’s understanding of computers can see it for what it is.

    The South Carolina business elite gets what it wants, and the Christian sentiment has been apparently quite co-opted by Israeli business interests as well. Similar collaboration exists in Georgia and especially Texas, but South Carolina is really where it’s out in the open.

    But such things simply cannot be discussed in polite company, although Steve Sailer it to be commended for pointing out the Emperor has no clothes, in public no less.

  2. Sir Charles Pipkins's Gravatar Sir Charles Pipkins
    July 4, 2017 - 9:55 am | Permalink

    Trump needs to rid himself of that spoilt globalist witch of a (((daughter))), total muh feelz snowflake who has swallowed CultMarx kool-aid likr an alcoholic.

    Nepotism impairs his judgement. She’d be marching against him if she were not related.

    • Franks&Beans's Gravatar Franks&Beans
      July 8, 2017 - 12:57 pm | Permalink

      From my experience, Jews love Hindus and Indians since they claim that these Hindus did not persecute them like White Christian people did. That is why I see many Jews like Mark Zuckerberg lobbying congress for more H1B visas and professionals from India. I have also seen many Jews advocate Hinduism as an alternate religion, and they also advocate yoga and other eastern Hindu philosophies and practices.
      I do agree that Trump should get rid of his Christ denying jew daughter and son in law and have only pure white Christian people as his advisers.

  3. Peter's Gravatar Peter
    July 4, 2017 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

    I’m very happy to see this article on a warmonger and killer of Arabs. I believe when we have the moral high ground, we should point it out and that goes for non-whites being murdered too. I would like to see more articles expressing these thoughts. I think it helps our cause.

    The Jewish influenced US government has been murdering Arabs for Jews for decades and the ultimate achievement would be to some day get a president and other leaders to point out the Jewish murderers in the mainstream media, government and bribers like Sheldon Adelson that are responsible for behavior like this. Then Jewish power will have taken a hit. Until then, we’ll have more dead Arabs and masses of Arabs migrating to Europe.

  4. Fred's Gravatar Fred
    July 4, 2017 - 4:11 pm | Permalink

    I’ve always been curious about the concept of ‘moral hazard’ as it relates to geopolitical risk taking. When one backs or insures actions of another party unconditionally, the insured takes more risk if not outright foolish risks. In this case when guilt is prejudged the worst moral hazard is created. All to benefit our ‘friends’ in the Middle East. But moral hazard is still a hazard.

  5. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 4, 2017 - 7:15 pm | Permalink

    Née Nimrata Randhawa to Punjabi Sikhs. She looks white to me.☺

    • July 5, 2017 - 12:18 pm | Permalink

      Sikhs (Punjabis) are the other insidious religion that is ethnic in origin. A race masquerading as religion. And multiplying like rats.

      At least Parsis (Zoroastrians) are not multiplying like rats.

  6. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    July 5, 2017 - 1:51 am | Permalink

    I am surprised that serial liar and Jew-enabler Nikki Haley could take time off from defending precious Israel to do anything relating to Syria.
    http://forward.com/news/national/366971/how-nikki-haley-became-the-darling-of-aipac-and-even-trump-haters/.

    The Syrians who have been driven abroad by ZOG wars for Greater Israel and their alphabet terrorist insurgents are returning to Syria because Putin has been successful keeping ZOG at bay and liberating areas formerly held by terrorist armies
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/615466/Vladimir-Putin-refugee-crisis-Islamic-State-ISIS-Syria-Bashar-Assad

  7. m's Gravatar m
    July 5, 2017 - 9:03 am | Permalink

    In the scheme of things, the UN ambassadorship is a useless and meaningless diplomatic position. So generally presidents put someone who is useless and meaningless in it. Sure, she’s an embarrassment. But that’s about the extent of it. Her role is to curry (nice pun, eh?) favor with Big Jew on the International stage. Besides, ever since Jews coerced Carter into getting rid of Andrew Young, it’s been understood that you have to have be either a Jew or one of their toadies in the position. Again, it’s all just theater at the UN. No real work gets done there.

  8. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    July 5, 2017 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

    Oy vey, muh Saddam!….. I mean, muh Assad! Also known as, relentlessly shilling for Israel as a career requirement.

  9. T's Gravatar T
    July 5, 2017 - 7:42 pm | Permalink

    Ambassador Haley’s tweet in regards to Russia is indeed concerning as that country has long been identified as a geopolitical adversary of the United States as it has historically been a primary contender for the domination of Europe, specifically of Germany, the center of power on continental Europe. Conquer and control Germany, you dominate Europe. Defeat the one major contender that’s in play for this position, Russia, and you dominate the world. And when I speak of Russia having long been identified as a geopolitical adversary of the United States, I am not speaking of the Cold War era of the 1950’s, but rather the pre US Civil War era of the 1850’s.

    This was plainly outlined in a small, easy to read but dry, book of less than two hundred pages entitled The New Rome; or, the United States of the World which was published in 1853. It is free online and linked here

    https://archive.org/details/newrome00poes

    And here is an entry and thread from another site which explore the contents of this generally unknown book in more detail…

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853

    The book is basically a future geopolitical history of the world with an emphasis on the US and UK. It describes five major events which are to take place in this order and does so in plain non-Nostradmus like language…ie no practically indecipherable ‘quatrains’ here.

    1) The separation of the United States and the British Empire is intended to be but ‘temporary’ so as to allow the order of society being established in the New World time to experience its ‘realization’…ie the United States needs time to gain strength. In the future the United States and the British empire will re-unite. (bottom of pg.87 and top of page 88)

    2) At the time that the US and UK re-unite, thus forming ‘the Anglo-Saxon Empire’, the center of power of the British Empire will move from England to the United States, ‘its real center’, and the US will ‘take the lead’. (bottom of pg 87 and top of pg 88)

    3) The US and UK (‘the Anglo-Saxon empire’), ‘having received its legitimate organization’, will first proceed to co-jointly conquer and gain control of Germany, the center of power on continental Europe, and lay hold an ‘unyielding grasp upon the countries of the Germanic confederation’. (bottom of pg 95 and bottom of pg105)

    4) Immediately following the conquest of Germany by the US and UK, a struggle will ensue centered upon Europe (in time encompassing the entire globe) between specifically the United States and Russia. The United States will prevail in this struggle with Russia. (pgs 105, 107, & 109)

    5) The United States will ultimately acquire ‘the empire of the world’ economically by way of Capitalism. (the entire book)

    The book has a great many other forecasts, one amongst them being that in the future the world will have achieved controlled aerial flight, a field which the US is to dominate, and thru the projection of its air power alone the US will have the ability to defeat land armies via aerial bombardment. Another is that a global ‘net’ of instantaneous communication is to be established which is to break down most barriers between peoples and individuals, and while the context of this within the book is that they are clearly speaking of the telegraph it also quite well describes how the internet has been utilized.

    And whom exactly wrote this book? It was two individuals from out of Germany, a Charles Goepp and Theodore Poesche. Goepp, though born in Germany had been in the US since the time he was a small child. Poesche had been a 24 year old university student revolutionary leader in the German city of Halle in 1848. Upon the revolution having been crushed in Germany he would, after hiding out for a time, flee to London and reside there for a year or two. While Poesche was in London it is believed he likely met with the prominent Italian revolutionary Mazzinni before proceeding on to the US and collaborating with Goepp in the writing of this book. The publisher in 1853 was G P Putnam (now Penguin) with it offices located in New York and London.
    Below is a more detailed 37 page account of the two authors and the writing of this book published in 1912 by Julius Goebel Jr. It was called A Political Prophecy of the 48ers in America

    https://archive.org/details/politicalprophec00goeb?
    q=Julius+goebel+jr

    Julius Goebel Jr, the writer of this fascinating pamphlet, was a very much respected member of the US legal establishment during much of the 20th century. His father, Julius Goebel, was a professor at Stanford Unversity and was a close adviser and confident of the university’s co-founder Jane Stanford. The other co-founder of Stanford with her was of course her husband Leland Stanford, industrialist and politician, serving both as a US senator and governor for California and whose family was said in about 1900 to be worth approximately 1.5 billion in today’s dollars. The Pelz family which donated this copy of the Goebel pamphlet to the Library of Congress was the family Theodore Poesche married into and they had also been involved in the attempted 1848 German revolution as well. Both Goepp and Poesche would be quite successful in their fields, Poesche in particular having his career in Washington DC and whom would be called back to Germany to personally meet with Bismark to give the German government advice regarding the maintaining of statistics.

  10. T's Gravatar T
    July 5, 2017 - 10:42 pm | Permalink

    Some non-Nostradomus like quotes below from the The New Rome book which Goebel quite aptly called in his 1912 pamphlet, ‘a political prophecy’. They regard the future united front of the US and UK conquering and gaining control of Germany and the struggle with Russia for this position in Europe which is to ensue’…

    pg 105

    ‘The Anglo-Saxon empire shall lay its slow but unyielding grasp upon the countries of the Germanic confederation.’

    And literally immediately following the sentence above and on the same page appears this…

    ‘Then will the mastery of Europe be the prize of the death-struggle between the Union [the United States] and the Czar. That mighty power [Russia] now governs the continent from the coasts of Siberia to the German Ocean…

    A few pages further along describes how things are to develop. The US with its allies and Russia with its allies will be locked in a global struggle to determine just which of these two powers is to dominate Europe, Germany in particular (‘the hearthstone of Europe’ as the writers describe that country) being the great prize..

    pg 109

    ‘Thus the lines are drawn. The choirs are marshalled on each wing of the world’s stage, Russia leading the one, the United States the other. Yet the world is too small for both,
    and the contest must end in the downfall of the one and the victory of the other.’

    Finally near the end of the book, after the future development and geopolitical implications of aerial flight and the domination thereof by the US is described..

    pgs 155-156

    ‘It [air power] will give us the victory over Russian continentalism. American air-privateers will be down upon the Russian garrisons, to use our own expressive slang, ‘like a parcel of bricks’…

  11. T's Gravatar T
    July 6, 2017 - 9:08 pm | Permalink

    Also on pg 109 of The New Rome is this regarding Russia and the US in the future.

    ‘Russia has expended all her forces in making a formidable display on her Western border. The United States are already digging the trenches for an attack in the rear.’

    To give a little context to the above quote within the book, on pg 76 and 77, as reproduced below, it describes the US projection of power into the Pacific, starting with the acquiring of Hawaii, followed with the opening up of China and Japan to US trade, and then the apparent taking of some further territory (the Phillipines?) in the future. So the US is to be active in Russia’s Pacific rear areas and will indeed attack Russia’s weaker ‘back door’.

    Is the escalating situation between the US and North Korea at present being used as a pretext to ultimately open up a military conflict between the US and Russia? North Korea is China’s client, and China is in turn Russia’s, after all. Are we perhaps seeing Poesche and Goepp’s 1853 ‘political prophecy’ materialize before our very eyes?

    ‘The treaty for the acquisition of the Sandwich Islands [Hawaii] is concluded, and only awaits its ratification. These islands are the first stopping-place between this continent and Asia; they can hardly be called,geographically speaking, an American outpost. The expedition to Japan and China has already
    started on its mission of making a breach for the entrance of American enterprise into these walled-up magazines of wealth and civilization. But the spangled banner will probably find its first resting-place upon another country of those distant regions.’

  12. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    July 10, 2017 - 6:35 am | Permalink

    “To Haley and Graham, Donald Trump was out of step with the Republican Party’s values such as diversity as represented by Haley who, herself, is of Indian heritage”
    Maybe they just want two Christian nations (US and Russia) to weaken themselves fighting a pointless war with each other instead of uniting to face the common enemies and threats

Comments are closed.