The Jewish War on White Australia: The Anti-Defamation Commission and “Click Against Hate,” Part 3 of 4

Brenton Sanderson


Go to Part 1
Go to Part 2

EXCERPT 3: “I was brought up in a racist country”

Brett Kaye: So somebody asked the question of whether I was brought up in a racist household. The answer is no. But I was brought up in a racist country.

Child: What country’s that?

Brett Kaye: I grew up in South Africa, and let me tell you how it is racist. When I was your age …, I grew up in a political system that was called this…

Child: Apartheid? …

 

Brett Kaye: You remember me from last year. So, apartheid, made up of two words in a language called Afrikaans which is kinda like Dutch, means separate-ness. And what apartheid meant, realistically, was because I’m a white fella, life for me was good. A-OK. It meant I would live in the best areas of the city, it meant I could go to the beach (other people couldn’t), it meant people who were white went to white schools, Indians went to Indian schools, blacks went to black schools. Whites lived in black… in white neighborhoods, Indians in Indian neighborhoods, blacks in black neighborhoods. When I was at the park there was a park bench that said [banging the table] “White People Only.” Public transport? There was a bus just for white people, a bus just for Indian people, and a bus just for black people.

Child: Isn’t Indian black?

Brett Kaye: Nup. They were considered to be three separate classifications, Hospitals for white people, hospitals just for Indian people, hospitals just for black people. Black people and White people were not allowed to get married, were not allowed to live in the same house. … What it meant was that white kids and black kids and Indian ones would never ever spend time together because they weren’t allowed to be in the same areas. How do you think a White kid your age, a black kid your age would have felt about white people. Think about it. How do you think black kids who lived two hours out, who lived in houses with no electricity, no running water, no power, made their houses out of whatever materials they could find around? How would that black kid feel about white kids?

Child: Spoilt or jealous?

Brett Kaye: That they were spoilt, that they were jealous, and what does jealousy lead to?

Child: Hate?

Brett Kaye: Hate. There was a lot of hate. What do you think a white kid might have felt about a black kid? Yeah…

Child: Maybe they thought that it was unfair and feel sorry.

Brett Kaye: Maybe. Sorry for them. What do you think maybe if I said to my parents “I want to go hang out two hours away in this neighborhood?” What do you think my parents might have said to me?

Child: No

Brett Kaye: Why?

Child: Because they’re a black person?

Brett Kaye: So they wouldn’t have wanted me to hang out with a black kid because it wasn’t the right thing to do. Hang out with black kids. So there was a lot of racial hatred happening.

Kaye gives the misleading impression that White South Africans simply stole all of the housing, electricity, running water and other infrastructure that existed in South Africa and selfishly hoarded it for themselves, rather than being responsible for the creation of these things which never previously existed in southern Africa. For Kaye, apartheid South Africa was “racist” because “Black and White people were not allowed to get married.” Somehow, the prohibition of marriage between Jews and non-Jews in Israel (which is subject to a two-year prison term), the walls of separation between Palestinians and Israelis on the West Bank, and the different legal treatment forPalestinians and Israelis don’t render that state “racist,” but is an indispensable part of the Jewish people’s right to “self-determination.”

Perhaps White parents would be reluctant to let their children play in Black South African neighborhoods because these are some of the most dangerous places on the face of the Earth, with horrifying levels of violent crime. Of course, the question presents itself as to why Kaye, who grew up in a South Africa supposedly wracked with “racial hatred,” now lives in Australia. He was ostensibly one of the many thousands of Jews who quickly fled the “rainbow nation” after the end of White role (for which the organized Jewish community and a great many individual Jews fought unceasingly), doubtless in response to the tsunami of violent crime and social dysfunction that now grips that failed state. Unlike the many poor Whites who remain, Kaye had the wealth and connections to flee the wreckage for new host.

The vibrant new post-racist South Africa

It’s interesting that Kaye, a zealous proponent of “diversity” and “difference,” in escaping from the disaster zone of post-apartheid South Africa, fled to a Whiter (i.e., less dysfunctional) nation. This has not, however, prevented him from throwing himself into pro-Jewish and anti-White activism in his adopted country. Historian Suzanne Rutland has noted how South African Jews “arrived [in Australia] with a strong sense of Jewish identification and a very low intermarriage rate” and that “many are still coming, largely because of the high level of crime and a sense of insecurity.”[1]

EXCERPT 4: “My reality was different”

Brett Kaye: Let me tell you how my reality was different. So the people who remember me from ******* from last year might remember my religion. Do you remember what my religion is?

Child: Jewish?

Brett Kaye: Jewish. Correct. Now that’s important for this discussion for no other reason than because the school that I went to was a Jewish school and the school made a decision that anybody who wanted to come to the school was allowed to. And those people who could afford to — anybody who could pay extra on top of school fees — that could then fund those kids who wanted to come to the school but couldn’t afford to, like most of them black kids. So I grew up with kids of all different religions and all different races and all different nationalities in my classroom. When I finished school at the end of Year 12 lots of the kids who were in my class were Muslim, Christian, and of course lots of Jews. So I was lucky in that sense. Why do tell that story? Because we learn hatred when we are young. We also learn tolerance when we are young. [inaudible] And all of those different layers make the people that we are, and ultimately the people that we become. So I wanted to tell that story because when I see people still today I see people’s color because that’s the way I was brought up. But I learnt to appreciate people’s differences and to value them and that, I think to me, makes, makes life exciting. Difference, difference makes life exciting. We’ve got to celebrate difference.

Setting aside Kaye’s dubious claim that “lots” of non-Jewish children attended Jewish schools in apartheid South Africa, if children are indeed “lucky” to grow up in a context of racial and religious diversity, why does Israel maintain segregated schools, and why does Kaye not denounce this actually existing (as opposed to South Africa’s now historical) arrangement? If it’s imperative that children learn to appreciate, value and celebrate “difference” because it “makes life exciting,” why does the organization he represents (the ADC) have an unshakable commitment to the preservation of Israel as a “Jewish state”? Why no denunciation of Israel for failing to celebrate difference by blocking all Syrian and other non-Jewish refugees, who would, according to Kaye’s weasel words, only make life in Israel more “exciting”? Instead of condemning “the Jewish state” for implementing its own version of apartheid, and its absolute failure to “celebrate” difference, Kaye is quite content, in his spare time, to lead groups of tourists on “A Musical Journey Through Israel.”

EXCERPT 5: “But you don’t look like a Jew”

Brett Kaye: So as a definition we’ve got here: stereotypes are generalized or ready-made ideas of how persons or members of a group look or act — I know all about those people because I’ve heard about them or read about them, who I might never have met. Yet when I go to some schools, I would say half the schools I go to, and I tell them that I’m Jewish, most of the kids for me for them I’m the first Jewish person that they’ve ever met. So last week, for example, I was in ******** Secondary College and out of about eight groups of kids that I saw everybody but one said I was the first Jewish kid person that they had ever met. And when I tell them that I’m Jewish, the first thing is like, they be like, in shock and then after a while when they’re confident enough to discuss it with me (this was a bunch of Year 9 kids), [coughs] so I said to them ‘Why are you so shocked?’ and eventually, after a while, they go ‘You don’t look like a Jew.’

Brett Kaye actually does look and sound like a Jew

And I said to them ‘Well what does a Jew look like?’ And they were like a bit nervous and embarrassed, and stuff like that, and they said ‘Well you don’t sound like a Jew.’ I said well what does a Jew sound like? And they said ‘Well you don’t speak Jewish.’ I said yeah because there is no such language called Jewish. Um, there are some Jews who speak Hebrew and who live in Israel, but I speak English because I grew up in South Africa, now I live in Australia. Hebrew’s not my language. English is my language. So stereotypes are very interesting. Yes sir?

Child: Like so if you ask someone like, say those kids that didn’t know what a Jew was and you’re like, you’re not a Jew but you ask them what’s a Jew and they know that some people maybe say people who you know have all the curls on their head and…

Brett Kaye: The stereotypical Jewish look yeah with the black hat, the curls and the long black coat like you see maybe in a bookstore or in the movies, whereas most Jews aren’t dressed like that, or live like that. Interesting. Okay. Right. A few words. I’m going to spend a long time because I think it’s too late in the day. The first word is defamation. Right, defamation. The verb for defamation is defame, I defame someone. …

Brett Kaye: And you know sometimes … paparazzis get sued for defamation. Paparazzi are the press that keep taking photos of people because sometimes they might publish something, and even what they publish lowers a person’s reputation… Nowadays, if I want to defame someone what do I do? I could just get into my Instagram and send a quick post, get on my Twitter and do a quick Tweet, get on to my Facebook and send a quick message, and all of a sudden, update my status with thousands of people who, all of a sudden, see what I’ve had to say about someone. Defamation is so easy today. Remember when I said at the beginning of the session we were going to talk about the Internet and its dangers, we’re going to talk about why people hate, and then we’re going to talk about how people who hate get access to the Internet? Well here we go. These are examples. Defamation: lowering someone’s reputation. The next word: incitement. In-cite-ment. What does that mean? I’m gonna tell you an example. I’ve heard that across the road down the street there’s a new family that’s moved in from Syria, they’re refugees, I don’t want them living in my neighborhood. So, after school I’m gonna go when it gets dark, I’m gonna get some spray-paint and write on their walls “go home to where you came from.” I want you guys to come and do that with me. That is incitement. Tell me…

Child: Getting someone to do something bad

Brett Kaye: That’s exactly what it is. Incitement: influencing others to do the wrong thing.

Child: Could that also be peer pressure?

Brett Kaye: Yeah. Absolutely it is. If I influence other people by putting pressure on them to do something wrong, that is incitement. If I post a racist meme, because I don’t like a group of people, and other people see that meme and they start to feel bad about that group of people too, that is incitement. Incitement to hate. Trying to make other people hate people because I do too. And there’s so much of it. You guys have seen it. You guys look on your [inaudible] or your Facebook or whatever it is you’re on and you have seen racist memes and cartoons and trolls writing the most terrible, terrible things. You see it all the time. But we’ve got to click against it. We’ve got to click against the hate. Report it. Yes?

Interestingly, it’s never “hate” or “defamation” when a Jewish-controlled Hollywood is attacking “rednecks,” or “white trash,” or “Euro-trash,” or “dumb blonds” or preachers or Germans. But it suddenly becomes hate and defamation when people make factual pointed criticisms of Jews or other non-Whites. In fact, Hollywood subjects White people to an endless barrage of insults where White women are routinely depicted as stupid, brainless sluts, and White men are depicted as weak, wimpy, foolish and useless. The blonde male as arch villain is a longstanding Hollywood trope. Ruthless, avaricious bankers are always depicted as sociopathic WASPs rather than as the Jews who actually dominate the banking and finance industries. Unappealing Jews or Blacks are cast as leading men and the love interests of attractive White women, regardless of how improbable this is in the real world.

Because Blacks and Whites (except in marginal cases) do not naturally mix this has to be propagandized. So the message from the Jews who run Hollywood to White women is to go mate with Blacks because they are cool, noble, athletic, powerful, and sexually superior. All these memes are continuously put out the Jews of Hollywood to persuade White women to do what they would not do naturally. This psychological warfare through the construction of culture continuously chips away at the margins of White society and over time has an erosive effect — it erodes the stable homogenous, White bulk of the population. It systematically attacks White heterosexual normativity. Through their control of the mainstream media and entertainment industries, the anti-White agenda of a tiny Jewish minority has become the mass culture of the contemporary West. In this culture there are no taboos about attacking, insulting and defaming White people.

Go to Part 4


[1] Suzanne Rutland, The Jews in Australia (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 135.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

20 Comments to "The Jewish War on White Australia: The Anti-Defamation Commission and “Click Against Hate,” Part 3 of 4"

  1. ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
    July 21, 2017 - 10:34 am | Permalink

    The rich jews who voted for the erstwhile one-man-one-vote PFP (Progressive Federal Party, led by its goyim stooge Frederik van Zyl Slabbert), bankrolled by Harry Oppenheimer (who converted to Christianity in order to be able to get into the boardroom of the Anglo-American corporation, which controlled 80% of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and its cartels), they stayed in the rich Johannesburg suburbs of for example Saxonwold and Houghton. Using Google Earth you can drive a virtual car down for example Jan Smuts Avenue (Saxonwold) and Houghton Drive (Houghton) with the street view function. There you will see luxury houses, and if you look closer, you can see electric fencing and high walls.

    Lots of jews lived in Hillbrow. Mr. Kaye is welcome to move back to paradise:

    http://deathofjohannesburg.blogspot.com/2006/07/tour-through-hillbrow-part-1.html

    That deathofjohannesburg blog – that is the place I had to drive through in the mornings to work, and back from work for quite a few years. Strikes, protest marches, loadshedding, car hijackings, shooting. Loadshedding 2008 – all of downtown Johannesburgs traffic lights did not work. You must have seen the mess when the whole of Africa and its minibusses try to pass an intersection – everything stops in the middle, sidewalks, curses fly, you hoped it would not turn into a AK-47 shooting spree. You stay late at work until 21:00, before that it was impossible to drive.

    Once there was a salary dispute with the traffic police about 2008, if I remember correctly. They blocked the highway from downtown leading out of Johannesburg. This was the peak traffic hour after work. The regular police told the traffic cops to move it and clear the highway. They refused, and the next moment bullets started flying to and fro. I heard it on the radio, and luckily there was an off-ramp just before this mess, or I would have landed right in the middle of it.

    That scene on the http://www.suidlanders.org (suidlanders=southlanders) homepage (they are currently on a visit to the USA) where they rock the bus, that is downtown Johannesburg. It looks like the suburb Braamfontein. There you will find Liberty Life, started by Sir Donald Gordon, also one of the tribe. He has comfortably retired in the UK.

    https://suidlanders.org/

    • Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
      July 21, 2017 - 6:17 pm | Permalink

      You seem to know a lot about South Africa. I hope you will go to

      https://infogalactic.com/info/Main_Page

      and rewrite some of their articles. They were cloned from wikipedia and you can imagine the lies. infogalatic is being promoted as an alternative.

      • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
        July 26, 2017 - 11:40 pm | Permalink

        When I emigrated, I had to leave behind a lot of books (I left with only a suitcase in my hand under very difficult circumstances, like a refugee). Today I have to rely on my memory. This would be perhaps a bit thin for supplementing Infogalactic, for I would need credible references to support my changes. Like-minded people inside South Africa will be able to do a better job of this.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      July 24, 2017 - 8:55 am | Permalink

      If you are an ex South African, perhaps you could comment on the separate bus narrative. In the early 70s a White non Afrikaans woman was in one of my university classes. She refused to answer political questions about apartheid, but would give her observations on how it actually worked. One was on the “Blacks to the back of the bus” or “separate buss” stories.
      The Blacks to the back was true, but there was no hard line of where the “back” started. The whites started sitting at the front, and the blacks from the rear. Sometimes there would be more Whites in a bus, and they would be sitting or standing in the back half, and sometimes there would be more Blacks who would be sitting or standing in the front half. On very a crowded bus there would be some mingling of people standing.
      The separate buss wasn’t really separate. There were bus routes that Whites would seldom, if ever be on, because of where they went, and there were bus routes where Blacks or Indians seldom, if ever went. In those cases the same rule applied. The White(s) would be at the front.
      I met White South Africans on both sides of the apartheid debate who would be more than happy to engage in the debate, but the one that struck me the most was a Boer who asked me if I had ever heard a news story about a White European family visiting SA, renting a camper van and traveling through one of the Black territories never to be seen again. He claimed it happened at least once a year, and that was the reason for apartheid.
      Obviously, he understood the consequences of dismantling apartheid.

      • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
        July 24, 2017 - 11:12 pm | Permalink

        I have never seen whites in black busses or vice versa in those years (1980’s onward). Those rules – I have not personally witnessed such a thing. I just experienced separate bus services. We had the Group Areas Act in place, so blacks travelled to their townships after work, and we into our suburbs. The bus routes did not overlap, at least not where I stayed, so no reason to travel together. Perhaps this was the case in some rural areas, I do not know. The country is big.

        On the other hand I mostly did not utilise public transport (very underdeveloped. A car is as necessary as a pair of shoes over there). Back then blacks were transported mostly by the Putco company in the Johannesburg/Pretoria region.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PUTCO
        http://www.putco.co.za/

        Please be careful on what white South African individuals claim. They are not exempt from exaggeration and careless observations.

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          July 25, 2017 - 7:36 am | Permalink

          Thanks for the explanation. In the woman’s favour, she did insist that people go to SA to see for themselves, rather than rely on what they heard or read.

          • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
            July 25, 2017 - 11:56 am | Permalink

            The old so called Apartheid system came down so fast, that the real danger exists that many of these day to day facts back then may fall through the cracks, if it is not formally documented somewhere, say for example in a masters thesis by a student. If our generation, that is the baby boomer generation (in a South African context I call us the Bush War generation), has passed on, then it means the time witness generation has passed on, and with it all our knowledge. This is a pension job for us, but many of us have landed in squatter camps, where there is no means left to write down these experiences.

            I see the old police force (at senior officers level) has done some effort to document their experiences, that is good. It is a mix of Afrikaans and Enlish (official languages back then), but that does not matter, as long as it has been documented. Otherwise that history will be lost foreverfor posterity, and a twisted history will remain:

            http://www.samirror.com/

            The few public dissertation I manage to read online about the old days, give me grey hair. You can distinctly see how the left wing narrative has crept into our universities. Left wing narrative means the contents sound more and more like the old anti-Apartheid narrative spread overseas back then.

            Once the castle of Afrikanderdom, the University of Stellenbosch has now been informally renamed by some observers as the University of Stalinbosch. Very sad.

  2. White Devil's Gravatar White Devil
    July 21, 2017 - 12:57 pm | Permalink

    And they wonder why so many people hate them. I wonder if they ever at all delve into any self-reflection and consider some of the points of this article.

    • Peter J's Gravatar Peter J
      July 21, 2017 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

      The messianic complex does not really allow self-reflection. You are right and everyone else needs to do what you tell them…thats the start and the end of the matter.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      July 22, 2017 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

      I think it has to do with the Jewish I.Q. pattern– the extreme elevation of verbal I.Q. Their minds are so “verbally slick”, that they continuously spin lies without conscious awareness.

      The hallmark of the Jewish psyche is clever, self-serving talk.

  3. Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
    July 21, 2017 - 6:14 pm | Permalink

    “…Kaye, who grew up in a South Africa supposedly wracked with “racial hatred,” now lives in Australia…”

    That’s the crux of matter isn’t it? The Jews are total POS. The only way I can imagine anyone doing the foul things they do, the constant manipulation, lies and destruction is that they are a tribe of psychopaths. Even if they’re not there seems to be no difference between them and a tribe of psychopaths behavior.

    I wish that there were some way to reason with them but as of right now I’m convinced that the only way to deal with them is to remove them root and branch away from our societies and have no intercourse with them at all. It may well be that we can be just as cruel and devious as they are but…who wants to live like that? I don’t care what happens to them we should dump them all in Israel and then let them fend for themselves whatever may be.

    • NostalgicNationalist's Gravatar NostalgicNationalist
      July 21, 2017 - 8:58 pm | Permalink

      And that is the problem. Whites are simply not that devious. Our experience of colonialism shows that. Every society we colonized was changed minimally, to the extent the indigenous inhabitants could revert to their traditional culture once left to their own devices. If Whites decided to leave North America and Oceania tomorrow, the indigenous inhabitants still posses all their cultural characteristics that they could found a society based wholly on their culture. No other conquerors have been as tolerant of their subjects traditions as Whites.

      Meanwhile the Jewish experience of colonization of White socities proves their only end game is the complete destruction of White culture. In fact most Whites would even reject the notion people could be so destructive, and I daresay that is why Whites will always fail at finding a solution to our current predicament under Jewish colonialism.

      Whites future is summed by that of the naive Robin, who will continue raising the Cuckoo impostor, despite it being a competitor hiding in plain sight.

      Whites are as blind as the Robin. There are some things instinct and biological predispositions can simply not override even when all the visual cues are there screaming something is not right. You are never going to override Whites preference for outgroups, just as a Robin can not override it’s instinct to raise young hatched from an egg it thinks has originated with it.

    • Walter's Gravatar Walter
      July 22, 2017 - 12:40 am | Permalink

      Yes, historically they were removed from cities, and there is a section in Europe where they were banished. Of course the whole sticky, psychopathic mess starts up all over again, era after era. I do think it’s time to do something significant.

  4. NostalgicNationalist's Gravatar NostalgicNationalist
    July 21, 2017 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    You just need to look at the damage these ex-South African Jews can do when they get a platform of influence. The “Australian” singer and ex-South African Jew Troy Sivan springs to mind. Portrays White fathers in a negative light and perpetuates the whole cycle of Jews attacking traditional White normality and normalizing subversion and femininity in men to yet a new generation of impressionable White youth.

    Jews, and all other non-Northern Europeans should never be allowed to exist in White socities because they are incapable of assimilating or being patriotic towards them. It is an unconscious, innate biological disposition, this undermining of the out group culture, that they participate in without even knowing it. Be it Troy Sivan or Brett Kaye, they all express these same personality traits independent of one another.

    Juxtapose the unsuccessful way in which the Non-White fails to assimilate into an Anglosphere Western society vs the successful way in which Northern Europeans successfully assimilate into an Anglosphere Western society and one comes to the conclusion the non-White personality is heavily influenced by their genetic makeup which predisposes them to their own group. People say Asians and Indians assimilate into Australian society- but go to your local footy club on the weekend and you will only see White football players. The truth is Asians and Indians do not socialize with people outside their own ethnic group. Subversion and rejection of the out group culture is a non-White racial characteristic. The sooner Anglosphere societies at large recognize and embrace this the better for Whites everywhere.

    Curiously Whites are the only people who embrace the outgroup culture as their own.

    I don’t see a solution to the Jewish problem with this knowledge. I mean you have Sivan subverting a whole generation of teenagers, while at the same time Kaye is hard at work subverting the next generation of White children. It will never end because Whites are predisposed to accept, and prefer, the outgroup culture over their own. We are stuck in a perpetual cycle that will ultimately conclude with our biological extinction.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      July 21, 2017 - 11:00 pm | Permalink

      You can only fight ethnocentrism with ethnocentrism. Trying to fight ethnocentrism with inclusivism is in vain. Whites still have to learn this basic lesson.

    • Thorgrun's Gravatar Thorgrun
      July 22, 2017 - 8:04 am | Permalink

      The” perpetual cycle”, is broken when trauma/pain, breaks down conditioning. Realism breaks down the conditioning and there is nothing like real life experience of a death of a loved one, working a lifetime and realizing that the whole US monetary system is gamed by a hostile elite, bent on extracting the labor of the working man. Many of the Goy are quickly in the “recovery period”, we just don’t hear about how damaged and disaffected the working man has become, due to the malignant media.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      July 22, 2017 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

      One isn’t sure whether the animus towards traditional families originates from Sivan’s declared homosexuality or his sense of Jewishness (father, the Jew, mother a convert).

  5. NostalgicNationalist's Gravatar NostalgicNationalist
    July 21, 2017 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

    In regards to McDonalds observation on Whites preference for outgroups and by extension their culture. Could one not see the history of European colonization as a manifestation of this biological tendency?

    Afterall were the young sailors not undertaking those long dangerous sea voyages out of the expectation of being confronted with a more exciting culture? Did they not embark on those journeys out of a boredom with their own culture? The same went for European soldiers fighting in distant lands.

    The same phenomenon with the Western military can be seen today, with soldiers signing up for cultural enrichment and excitement in a foreign land seen as more exciting and exotic than their own.

    If you look at the history of White elites, you see a peoples obsessed with fetishizing the other. White elites would travel to other nations seeking cultural enrichment, although the logistical limitations in the past meant their travels were confined mostly to Europe. You see a fetishization of French culture in the royal courts of the 18th century.

    Catherine The Great is a prime example of this phenomenon in Whites of preferring the outgroup culture. Also the leading intellectuals in Europe at the time also displayed this same behavior in the idealistic way they saw Russia. See here: https://www.culturalweekly.com/forgotten-love-triangle-voltaire-diderot-catherine-the-great/

    It was only once the White middle class gained the financial parity with the elites of the past and had the free time to indulge their pleasures, that we see the same phenomenon reoccurring in the average White person.

    Modern Whites are obsessed with travelling to exotic and distant lands in search for a culture deemed more interesting than their own. This is a suicidal trait of preferring the other in Northern European Whites that no other peoples share.

    It is the Europeans failure to appreciate their culture for the exotic thing it is that explains why multiculturalism has materialized unchallenged only in the West.

    • NostalgicNationalist's Gravatar NostalgicNationalist
      July 21, 2017 - 10:14 pm | Permalink

      *MacDonald.

      I forgot to add it was White European elites who would try and compete with each other to see who was the most culturally enriched by attempting to acquire the most exotic items from alien cultures around the world.

  6. Ger Tzedek's Gravatar Ger Tzedek
    July 21, 2017 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/dna-links-prove-jews-are-a-race-says-genetics-expert-1.428664

    Jews are a race, according to Jews. But races do not exist, according to Jews. Whatever convenient, whenever.

Comments are closed.