|
|
|
Decapitation
Edmund Connelly
August 31, 2009
In a truly chilling essay on the Israeli-American plan to decapitate potential
leaders of Iraqi nationalism, retired sociologist James Petras describes both
the plan and its effect.
Entitled
The US War against Iraq: The Destruction of a Civilization,
the tract documents how “Top Zionist policymakers who promoted the war did not
initially directly pursue the policy of systematically destroying what, in
effect, was the entire Iraqi civilization. But their support and design of an
occupation policy included the total dismemberment of the Iraqi state apparatus
and recruitment of Israeli advisers to provide their ‘expertise.’” In other
words, “The dismantling of the secular civilian bureaucracy and military was
designed by the Zionists in the Bush Administration to enhance Israel’s power in
the region.”
I would hope readers have read at least one of his four indispensable books
exposing the massive power of Zionists in America and the world at large (see
books
1,
2,
3,
&
4)
The current essay delineates an age-old strategy of neutralizing an enemy nation
by knocking them back into a more primitive form. As Petras writes,
The ‘divide and rule’ tactics and reliance on retrograde social and
religious organizations is the commonest and best-known practice in pursuing the
conquest and subjugation of a unified, advanced nationalist state. Breaking up
the national state, destroying nationalist consciousness and encouraging
primitive ethno-religious, feudal and regional loyalties required the systematic
destruction of the principal purveyors of nationalist consciousness, historical
memory and secular, scientific thought. Provoking ethno-religious hatreds
destroyed intermarriages, mixed communities and institutions with their
long-standing personal friendships and professional ties among diverse
backgrounds. The physical elimination of academics, writers, teachers,
intellectuals, scientists and professionals, especially physicians, engineers,
lawyers, jurists and journalists was decisive in imposing ethno-religious rule
under a colonial occupation.
To establish long-term dominance and sustain ethno-religious client rulers, the
entire pre-existing cultural edifice, which had sustained an independent secular
nationalist state, was physically destroyed by the US and its Iraqi puppets.
This included destroying the libraries, census bureaus, and repositories of all
property and court records, health departments, laboratories, schools, cultural
centers, medical facilities and above all the entire
scientific-literary-humanistic social scientific class of professionals.
Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi professionals and family members were driven by
terror into internal and external exile. All funding for national, secular,
scientific and educational institutions were cut off. Death squads engaged in
the systematic murder of thousands of academics and professionals suspected of
the least dissent, the least nationalist sentiment; anyone with the least
capacity to re-construct the republic was marked.
What really draws one’s attention is Petras’s insistence that we are witnessing
a premeditated “systematic elimination of intellectuals in Iraq.” Alert readers
will immediately recognize this brutal tactic, as it has been employed by the
same tribe in both smaller and larger cases.
For instance, during and after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the heavily
Jewish leadership eliminated millions of competing non-Jewish leaders and
members of the middle- and upper-middle class, as Yuri Slezkine so brilliantly
exposed in
The Jewish Century.
In fact, Slezkine even called such Jews “Stalin’s willing executioners,” a point
Kevin MacDonald picked up on.
No wonder, since, as Slezkine tells us, quoting Leonard Schapiro, “anyone who
had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka stood a very good chance
of finding himself confronted with and possibly shot by a Jewish investigator.”
Estimates are that up to twenty million non-Jews died during that awful period.
Another example of the elimination of the elite of a conquered people is the
Katyn Forest Massacre, which even the sometimes squeamish
Wikipedia admits
“was a mass murder of thousands of Polish military officers, policemen,
intellectuals, and civilian prisoners of war by Soviet NKVD. … The number of
victims is estimated at about 22,000.”
Tomislav Sunic, author of
Homo Americanus,
was born and raised in Eastern Europe under communism and knows the effect this
genocidal campaign had on non-Jews in those lands. As he noted
in an interview
with a guest on his radio show, the Jewish-led onslaught of communism took a
drastic genetic toll on the peoples of that region, something which points to an
intent as clear as that currently on view in Iraq. As Sunic
notes,
the result was “aristocide”:
Although the true body count of Bleiburg is subject to emotional disputes, one
thing remains certain: Bleiburg meant the violent disappearance of the Croat
middle class in 1945.
The word "aristocide” first entered into the English vocabulary thanks
to Nathaniel Weyl, a former American Communist of Jewish origin, who became a
celebrity in the fifties after converting to a radical anticommunist and a
denouncer of his former communist comrades. In his essay “Envy
and Aristocide,” Weyl
describes how envy prompts less intelligent people to criminal behavior and
malice.
Weyl's concept of aristocide makes it easier to comprehend the real reasons for
the sanguinary behavior of Yugoslav Communists, who, in the aftermath of WWII,
carried out gigantic killings against civilians of the Croatian, Serbian and the
ethnic German middle class. In their incessant purges the Yugoslav secret
police, the
OZNA
and the
UDBA,
were not only motivated by ideological reasons, i.e., the famed ‘class
struggle,’ but rather by primordial emotions of envy and knowledge that many
anticommunist and nationalist Croat intellectuals, were more handsome, more
intelligent, or had more moral integrity than themselves.
One of the more fascinating accounts of the deliberate culling of high-IQ people
comes in Biblical scholar Richard Faussette’s essay “Race and Religion: A
Catholic View,” which appeared in
Race and the American Prospect,
edited by the late Sam Francis. Though Faussette situates his arguments in the
Old Testament, his analysis is a sociological one in the mold of evolutionary
psychologist Kevin MacDonald’s theory on
group evolutionary strategies. (See
also Faussette’s companion piece
here.)
Faussette describes how Cyrus the Persian let the Hebrew people go to rebuild
their temple in 538 B.C. The “father of history,” Herodotus, was born in 485
B.C. and completed his signature work,
The Histories,
around 425 B.C., roughly a century after Cyrus ended the Babylonian exile. In
The Histories
Herodotus illustrates the savagery of biblical antiquity:
[Periander] sent an agent to Thrasybulus to ask what was the safest kind of
government to establish, which would allow him to manage the state best.
Thrasybulus took the man sent by Periander out of the city and into a field
where the crops were growing. As he walked through the grain, he kept
questioning the messenger and getting him to repeat over and over again what he
had come from Corinth to ask. Meanwhile, every time he saw an ear of grain
standing higher than the rest, he broke it off and threw it away, and he went on
doing this until he had destroyed the choicest, tallest stems in the crop. After
this walk across the field, Thrasybulus sent Periander’s man back home, without
having offered him any advice. When the man got back to Corinth, Periander was
eager to hear Thrasybulus’s recommendations, but the agent said that he had not
made any at all. In fact, he said he was surprised that Periander had sent him
to a man of that kind – a lunatic who destroyed his own property – and he
described what he had seen Thrasybulus doing. Periander however understood
Thrasybulus’s actions. He realized that he had been advising him to kill
outstanding citizens, and from then on he treated his people with unremitting
brutality.
Faussette goes on to describe how warfare among tribes in the 6th
century B.C. sometimes entailed “murdering the finest of your own people who
stood up to you
and the same or a refined genocidal strategy for any people you conquered
[emphasis added].” He then asks us to consider the Persian treatment of the
Ionians:
Whenever the Persians took one of the islands, they ‘trawled’ for the
inhabitants. Trawling involves forming a chain of men with linked arms across
the island from the northern coast to the southern coast, who then traverse the
whole length of the island hunting people down…
When they [the Persians] had conquered the settlements, they picked the best
looking boys and castrated them, cutting off their testicles and turning them
into eunuchs; they also took the most attractive girls and sent them to the king
as slaves.
The victors then gave the Ionian land to others. “For all practical purposes;
the Ionians had been ‘spewed out’ of the land. . . . Groups posing a potential
threat were subdued and domesticated.”
Okay, the 6th century B.C. was a long time ago. But what if a similar strategy
is again being pursued — and we Whites are the target? Personally, I think there
is abundant evidence to support such fears. Last year, for example, I posted an
article in
TOO
titled,
The
Washington Post’s
Willing Executioner?
(which the
ADL somehow found less than amusing.)
In that column I observed how a writer for the Post averred that “whiteness is a
huge problem.” Now, that kind of printed claim worries me, especially since I
appreciate how the radical turn in Russia nearly a century ago resulted in
rivers of non-Jewish blood. Now Jews have risen in America. Ominously, as Kevin
MacDonald has noted, “If there is any
lesson to be learned,
it is that Jews not only became an elite in all these areas, they became a
hostile elite—hostile to the traditional people and cultures of all three areas
they came to dominate.”
Elsewhere,
MacDonald expanded on this theme, noting that the current American regime is
“maintained less by brute force than by an unrelenting, enormously
sophisticated, and massively effective campaign to constrain political and
cultural activity within very narrow boundaries.” A violent communist death is
not yet necessary because dissenters “are not yet trundled off to jail or beaten
with truncheons, but are quietly ignored and marginalized. Or they are held up
to public disgrace, and, wherever possible, removed from their livelihood.”
In
Homo Americanus, Sunic, however,
envisions a worse scenario for any group in America that might be targeted:
“Thus, in order for the proper functioning of future Americanized society, the
removal of millions of surplus citizens must become a social and possibly also
an ecological necessity.” MacDonald identifies what sectors might be targeted
“and therefore worthy of mass murder by the American counterparts of the Jewish
elite in the Soviet Union—the ones who journeyed to Ellis Island instead of
Moscow.” They are the European-derived whites populating vast areas of the
American nation, particularly in the so-called “red states.”
Can’t happen in the Good Ol’ U.S. of A., you say? Well, why do we read stories
such as
"Army combat unit to deploy within U.S."?
Further, why does the Army have something called
Field Manual No. FM 3-19.40?
Have a look — you can learn all about “MILITARY POLICE INTERNMENT/RESETTLEMENT
OPERATIONS.”
Getting back to James Petras on Iraq, he wrote: “The US had decided to adopt and
expand the Israeli Mossad’s covert operation of assassinating selected key Iraqi
scientists on an industrial scale.” Why do I find the pairing of “assassination”
and “industrial scale” so terrifying?
In any case, even if my fevered imagination needs a rest, there is still
abundant evidence that we Whites are being “spewed out” of our lands. For
instance, one California resident who has been following population trends
points to the “The Inland Empire,” a two-county area east of Los Angeles. Last
Sunday the
New York Times
triumphantly
profiled
what is happening to this population of four million.
As coastal areas around Los Angeles become exorbitantly expensive, many Whites
opted for the more affordable areas of the Inland Empire, causing the population
to triple.
As has happened elsewhere in Southern California, Latinos and others have
followed Whites, as the
Times
documented with respect to Moreno Valley. According to my informant, heavily
White areas like Temecula and Murrieta Valley are also undergoing “Mexicanization.”
Steve Sailer
added his own perspective to this unhappy story. The mortgage default rate is so
high, Sailer notes, that the region is “ground zero for the mortgage meltdown.”
My informant tells me that as well-paying jobs disappear, “foreclosure rates are
skyrocketing.”
Huge homes are being abandoned, then purchased to be used as rentals, which
attracts Mexican families. “These high school classes will be majority Mexican
and non-white in a few years. It’s a pattern that has repeated itself across
California. The
demographic profile
of the Murrieta Valley Unified School District tells the sad story of white
displacement.”
For instance, from a high of 63.2% in 2001/2002, White enrollment has fallen to
only 50% two years ago. Thus, he concludes, “We’re past the tipping point here
in Southern California.”
Are we “past the tipping point” for America in general?
