Subscribe to The Occidental Observer Newsletter and be notified of updates through emails. To subscribe, go to our Subscribe Page
A review of Norman Finkelstein's The Holocaust Industry
December 10, 2009
If you’re like me and have been through the American education system, you as a child may have never learned a word of Greek or Latin, the history of the Bible or been assigned to read a work by a great philosopher. You probably do remember, however, learning about Martin Luther King, the Klan and the “six million who perished.” What gets placed in a curriculum is a zero-sum game and Western civilization had to lose for the cult of victimhood to win.
other unfortunates we’re supposed to feel sorry for, the Jews are successful,
and the crimes against them didn’t take place in the United States. For them to
become a protected class, the
holocaust, a historical event, had to be turned
into The Holocaust, a religious one.
professor Norman Finkelstein wrote
Industry to bring to the world’s attention the exploitation
of Jewish suffering in World War II. His book also explains how we got
here. Thanks to the Industry, Israel, “one of the world’s most formidable
military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a
‘victim’ state, and the most successful ethnic group in the United States has
likewise acquired victim status.”
This is a
recent phenomenon. In 1963 Hannah Arendt published
Eichmann in Jerusalem. At the
time there were only two other English language scholarly books on the
Holocaust. One of them was Raul Hillberg’s The Destruction of the
European Jews. His thesis advisor at Columbia University told him
“It’s your funeral” to discourage him from touching the subject. Until the
late 1960s, there was only one university course offering on the holocaust in
the United States.
themselves were indifferent to the events many of them had fled. In a 1961
Commentary symposium on the subject of “Jewishness and the Younger
Intellectuals,” no more that two of thirty-one writers stressed the holocaust.
It was almost completely ignored in a 1961 roundtable sponsored by the journal
Judaism on “My Jewish Affirmation.” There were no museums, no
monuments and no organizations dedicated to keeping the memory alive.
In 1956 after
President Eisenhower pushed Israel to withdraw from the Sinai, his support among
American Jews actually increased in that year’s presidential election.
Attitudes would be different after the June 1967 war with the Arab states.
Norman Podhoretz noted that after the conflict Israel became “the religion of
American Jews.” To trace this journey from indifference to obsession,
Finkelstein informs us that in 1955 and in 1965 the entries for Israel in The
New York Times Index went on for 60 column inches. In 1975 the Israel
entries filled 260. Now Jews would compare any situation the Israelis
found themselves in to the peril Jewry faced in 1930s Germany. They told
themselves they wouldn’t be like those that quietly went into the gas chambers.
Unfortunately, Finkelstein’s liberalism distorts his understanding of the change
in Jewish activism. According to him, right after World War II talking
about the holocaust was taboo due to US support of West Germany. In later
years the Arabs would align with the Soviet Union and Israel became an important
ally. The Jews were once again “matching in lockstep with American power.”
What the author doesn’t admit is that by the 1960s Jews were American
power. Mearsheimer and Walt’s
The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy
demolishes the idea that the alliance with Israel provides any benefit for the
United States. It is a nuisance at best and bankrupting the nation at
Finkelstein doesn’t seem to see the rise in Jewish activism in the 1960s as part
of a larger trend in American culture. He points to a few neo-cons who
oppose affirmative action and ignores the critical role of Jewish left wing
activism in establishing the culture of victimhood — what has become the culture
of Western suicide. Finkelstein writes that of “Blacks, Latinos, Native
Americans, women, gays and lesbians, Jews alone are not disadvantaged in
American society” — as if who gets to play the identity politics game is decided
by an objective measurement of who the victims are!
blind spots, the author does a fantastic job of exposing the gang of charlatans
and frauds that constitute The Holocaust Industry. For a fee of $25,000,
survivor Elie Wiesel will tell you that the “secret” of Auschwitz’s “truth lies
in silence” and that The Holocaust “leads into darkness,” “negates all answers,”
“lies outside, if not beyond, history,” “defies both knowledge and description,”
“cannot be explained nor visualized,” and is “never to be explained or
transmitted.” To him, to compare Jewish suffering to that of others is a
“total betrayal of Jewish history.” A parody of a New York tabloid once
had the headline: “Michael Jackson, 60 Million Others, Die in Nuclear
Holocaust.” The parody included a letter supposedly from Eli Wiesel in
which he protested “How dare people refer to what happened yesterday as a
Holocaust? There was only one Holocaust.”
Not only does
Wiesel think that Jewish suffering is in a class of its own, but he and
organized Jewry guard their unique status in a very creepy way. He
withdrew from a conference on genocide because the slaughter of Armenians by the
Turks would be mentioned. Jewish
organizations have lobbied against a day of remembrance for the Armenians.
when the victims of violence are the enemies of Jews, compassion goes out the
window.” To Wiesel, Arabs hate Jews for their existence. American Blacks
are simply a race of ingrates, unable to appreciate what the Jews have done for
Wiesel not only appears to suffer from a histrionic personality disorder, he is also an inveterate liar. After surviving a death camp, he claims to have read Kant’s A Critique of Pure Reason in Yiddish. No such translation exists. He once met a “mysterious Talmudic scholar” who “mastered Hungarian in two weeks, just to surprise me.” He told The New York Times that after being hit by a taxi in Times Square he “flew an entire block. I was hit at 45th Street and Broadway, and the ambulance picked me up at 44th.”
While there’s a debate over whether Night by Wiesel is a memoir or novel, other writers have been exposed as frauds. Jerzy Kosinski wrote The Painted Bird, supposedly about his time as a young Polish Jew who wandered alone through rural Poland during the World War II. Finkelstein notes that one reader described the book as “the product of a mind obsessed with sadomasochistic violence.” Poles are depicted as pathological torturers of Jews. Kosinski’s work became required reading in many high school and college classes. On the speaking circuit, Kosinski would describe himself as a “cut-rate Elie Wiesel.”
Wilkomirski’s Fragments is a more recent hoax in the field of
Holocaustology. According to Finkelstein the book is similar to
The Painted Bird in that the author presents himself as a child victim of
The Holocaust and “each chapter ... climaxes in an orgy of violence.”
In this book it’s the Germans who are the irredeemable sadists. After he’s
freed, young Benjamin goes to Switzerland, where he’s taunted by the kids at
school. They point at him “and make fists and yell ‘He’s raving, there’s
no such thing. Liar! He’s crazy, mad, he’s an idiot.’”
Turns out the children were right. Wlkomirski spent the whole war in Switzerland and isn’t even Jewish. Nor is his name Binjamin Wilkomirski. It’s Bruno Dössekker. The fraud wasn’t exposed until the author of Fragments had had his book translated into a dozen languages and become a star through his participation in documentaries, Holocaust fund-raisers, and of course, the speaking scene.
Finkelstein says that with all the lies we’ve been fed, it’s amazing that there are so few Holocaust deniers. But he doesn’t cite the worst of the worst. For example, there’s this 1988 story from The New York Times:
[retired butcher Morris Hubert] was sent to Buchenwald. ''In the camp there was
a cage with a bear and an eagle,'' he said. ''Every day, they would throw a Jew
in there. The bear would tear him apart and the eagle would pick at his bones.''
''But that's unbelievable,'' whispered a visitor. ''It is unbelievable,'' said
Mr. Hubert, ''but it happened.''
they’ve yet to find an eagle to put on trial for the crime.
authors of Holocaust memoirs provide entertaining stories. Even worse,
Jewish organizations have turned the Holocaust religion into a criminal
Industry. In fact, they may have pulled off the biggest robberies in human
First, it was
claimed that Swiss banks were denying heirs of Jewish holders of accounts their
money. In 1995 two Representatives of the World Jewish Congress including
President Edgar Bronfman met with Swiss bankers. Bronfman would later
humbly tell the Senate Banking Committee that he spoke on behalf of “the 6
million, who cannot speak for themselves.” The Swiss could only find 775
unclaimed dormant accounts, holding $32 million. When the Swiss offered
this number as a basis to begin negotiations, the WJC rejected it as too low.
The WJC would
mobilize the American political establishment to lobby on its behalf.
Bronfman recruited Catholic New York Senator Alfonse D’Amato to his cause — a
move that assured D’Amato would receive Jewish money and votes. The House
and Senate banking committees took up the issue. An aide to D’Amato would
later brag that they forced the Swiss “into the court of public opinion where we
controlled the agenda. ... [w]e were judge, jury, and executioner.” A
study supported by D’Amato’s office and the Simon Wiesenthal Center would claim
that “dishonesty was a cultural code that individual Swiss had mastered to
protect the nation’s image and prosperity” and that “Swiss greed was unique.”
In 1996 a
parade of elderly Jews gave testimony before the US Congress on the malevolence
of Swiss bankers. They presented no evidence that they actually had
assents in the banks. To top off the spectacle, D’Amato for some reason
brought none other than Elie Wiesel to address Congress. Testified poor
Wiesel: “Is there no limit to pain? No limit to the outrage?”
this event, the Swiss had set up a commission headed by former Chairman of the
Federal Reserve Paul Volcker with three members of the World Jewish Restitution
Organization and three from the Swiss Bankers Association. They would
abide by whatever the group decided. Jewish organizations wouldn’t let up
in the media, hoping that the Swiss would settle before the commission issued
its report. After stories got out of indigent survivors, the Swiss in 1997
put $200 million into a “Special Fund for Needy Victims of the Holocaust.”
commission was dangerous to the Industry for two reasons. First, as with
the Holocaust itself, so many ridiculous stories had been told that some of them
would inevitably prove to be illegitimate. Second, if the owners of the dormant
accounts were identified, they themselves would be compensated, and not Jewish
mouthing the Swiss through the media failed to extort enough money, the Jews
filed class action lawsuits and ordered boycotts of the country. Volcker
protested that such actions would interfere with the work of his commission, but
that was precisely the point. In January 1997 chair of the Jewish Agency
Avraham Burg threatened, “Until now we have held back international Jewish
pressure.” New York Governor George Pataki publicly supported sanctions on
Swiss banks. Local state governments in Illinois, Rhode Island, New Jersey
and New York passed resolutions threatening a boycott unless the Swiss settled
with organized Jewry. The city of Los Angeles was the first to impose
sanctions. Other governments followed suit.
In June 1998
the Swiss made a final offer of $600 million. Head of the ADL Abraham
Foxman called it “an insult to the memory of the victims.” By August the
bankers finally gave in with a $1.25 billion settlement.
A year after
the settlement, no plan was drawn up to distribute the money to actual Holocaust
survivors. By December 1999 only half of the $200 million originally given
in 1997 had reached the victims. Finkelstein’s last edition of the book
was released in 2000 but as of 2009 only $490 million of the $1.25 billion had
gone to individual claimants. The rest went to such worthy causes as
lawyer fees, Jewish organizations and Holocaust propaganda, presumably to help
create a new generation of suckers. Holocaust programs in schools are
recommended or required in seventeen states.
his committee's Report on Dormant Accounts of Victims of Nazi Persecution in
Swiss Banks cost $500 million. They took all the accounts found to
have belonged to Jewish victims of the Holocaust and modified them to their 1945
value. They then multiplied the number by ten to reflect long term
investment rates and came up with a number of $380 million. Moreover,
there was “no proof of systematic destruction of records of victim accounts,
organized discrimination against the accounts of victims of Nazi persecution, or
concerted efforts to divert the funds of victims of Nazi persecution to improper
the Swiss, the Holocaust Industry went on to try to steal from the Germans.
They demanded $20 billion in compensation from German Industry for WWII slave
labor. Full-page newspaper advertisements appeared claiming without
evidence that pharmaceutical corporation Bayer “directed” the experiments of
Josef Mengele. President Clinton lobbied for restitution. Never mind
that monetary agreements reached shortly after WWII already covered slave labor.
Germany had given the modern equivalent of close to a billion dollars to the
Jewish Claims Conference. The organization characteristically used much of
the money for their pet projects. In 1999 German corporations would agree
to hand over another $5.1 billion. The country’s government has to date given
more than $60 billion to Jewish organizations.
The Holocaust Industry continued East but found it much more difficult to whip up hysteria against impoverished former Soviet countries. The demands against Poland were so great that Jewish Week reported that the parliament was afraid that Jewish claims would bankrupt the nation. The fear of American pressure stops European countries from standing up to this blackmail. A Knesset member recalled his meeting with the uncooperative Prime Minister of Romania: “But I ask one remark, in the middle of the fighting, and it changed the atmosphere. I told him, you know, in two days I am going to be in a hearing here in Congress. What do you want me to tell them in the hearing? Whole atmosphere was changed.” The US is the muscle behind organized Jewry. Bronfman, the WJC president, in 1998 claimed that his organization alone had amassed around $7 billion in Holocaust compensation.
It’s not a coincidence that the only countries who’ve fallen for this scam are White ones, and not Arab nations that expelled Jews in the 20th century. As Kevin Macdonald wrote in The Culture of Critique:
The key for a
group intending to turn Europeans against themselves is to trigger their strong
tendency toward altruistic punishment by convincing them of the evil of their
own people. Because Europeans are individualists at heart, they readily
rise up in moral anger against their own people once they are seen as free
riders and therefore morally blameworthy—a manifestation of their much stronger
tendency toward altruistic punishment deriving from their evolutionary past as
current altruistic punishment so characteristic of contemporary Western
civilization: Once Europeans were convinced that their own people were morally
bankrupt, any and all means of punishment should be used against their own
people. Rather than see other Europeans as part of an encompassing ethnic and
tribal community, fellow Europeans were seen as morally blameworthy and the
appropriate target of altruistic punishment.
It takes a special sort of goyim to fall for the scam: Holocaust propaganda helps create a people prone to extortion, and the money stolen goes to fund more Holocaust propaganda. Not to excuse the behavior of the thieves themselves, but the success of the Holocaust Industry is simply another symptom of a people that has lost its way.
Richard Hoste (email him) writes on race, immigration, political correctness and modern conservatism. His articles have appeared at VDARE.com, The Occidental Observer, The Occidental Quarterly and TakiMag among other places. His blog is HBD Books, where he regularly reviews classic and modern works on these topics.