Race, Immigration, and Obamacare 

Simon Krejsa

May 2, 2010 

Despite being one of the 30 million to 46.3 million "Americans" without health insurance — do such estimates include illegal aliens? — I oppose "Obamacare." But since I'm uninsured and have been so for the last 20 years, I'm understandably ambivalent on the issue for reasons of pure self-interest. How could someone like me be an impassioned enemy of Obamacare? From what I've read and understand, it's possible that Obamacare could help me in the short run but harm me in the long run when I become eligible for Medicare. And thus I opposed the bill and hope it's repealed.   

As for the interests of the country as a whole, though I don't have the expertise or knowledge to write authoritatively on the issue and make informed predictions, I'm skeptical of all "the end of America as we've known it" prophesies. And as a race-realist, I'm sickened and enraged by all the critics of Obamacare who either support or refuse to oppose an invasion of tens of millions of non-White aliens that will surely destroy America as we've known it by steadily displacing, and ultimately overwhelming, the historic European population. Singularly nauseating and odious are all the hysterical and apocalyptic critics of Obamacare who are fanatical supporters of massive Third-World immigration and the resultant transformation of the United States into a non-White-majority country. 

And these libertarian and "conservative" ideologues of the "treason lobby" pose as heroes and patriots who are fighting to "save the country" from "socialized medicine" and nationalized healthcare.  

Hypothetically, excluding paleocons and "racists" and "anti-Semites" and "xenophobes" and "White supremacists," suppose one gave the right these choices: The repeal of Obamacare in exchange for amnesty for 12–20 million illegal aliens, the cessation of all plans and efforts to stop the invasion of illegal aliens, and the annual doubling or tripling of non-White legal immigration; or give them the choice of accepting Obamacare in exchange for an impenetrable fence on the Mexican border and a virtual end to illegal immigration, the expulsion of millions of illegal aliens through mass arrests and various forms of "attrition," a 5–10 year moratorium on legal immigration, followed by a return to 1925–1965 rates of immigration that favored Northwest Europeans over Asians, Blacks and Mestizos and Amerindians, and an end to Muslim immigration.  

I know the answer of nearly all Republicans, the answer of virtually the entire mainstream right, the respectable non-"racist" conservative movement: The Jewish "Invade-the-world, invite-the-world" neocons and "minicons" and their non-Jewish lackeys and fellow-travelers; mainstream libertarians and economic conservatives, the idolaters of free markets and "globalism" and unfettered "turbo-capitalism," most of the rich and business class, "greednicks" who crave an endless supply of cheap and quasi-slave labor; the evangelicals and fundamentalists, the subneocon gasbags of Fox News and talk-radio: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Mike Huckabee, Bill Kristol, Charles Krauthammer, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Ann Coulter, John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Newt Gingrich, Stormin’-Norman and "J-Pod," Jonah Goldberg, Rich Lowry, Dick Armey, Grover Norquist, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, National Review, Commentary, The American Spectator, and now even The American Convervative under Ron Unz, ad nauseum.  

Virtually all would choose to destroy White America. I concede that Obamacare, if not repealed, could turn out to be almost as bad as many critics predict. But what's more likely to destroy "America as we've known it": Obamacare or massive non-White immigration?  

If Obamacare is so deleterious, how could Mitt Romney, as Governor of Massachusetts, have supported and signed into law a bill identical in many crucial respects to Obamacare? And Romney is intelligent, a mainstream Republican, an economic conservative, a free marketeer, a millionaire businessman. And, ironically, he's the candidate most likely to win his party's nomination for president in 2012 and run against Obama. 

Have the New Deal and the Great Society destroyed America? I would argue that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the immigration acts of 1965 have done significantly more harm than unemployment insurance, social security, Medicare, and welfare generally. 

Decades of "socialized medicine" haven't destroyed France, Germany, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Canada, Australia, etc. And should present trends continue, the inevitable ruination of Western Europe will have far less to do with socialized medicine than with suicidally low European birthrates, large and growing numbers of Muslims and Blacks and other non-European aliens, political-correctness and racial leftism and multiculturalism, the demonization of Whites as "the cancer of human history" and the "politics of guilt" and masochism and self-loathing, "hate speech" laws and the suppression of freedom of speech and thought. If native European birthrates increased to at least replacement levels, if non-White immigration were ended and millions of Muslims and Africans and other non-Whites were expelled, if "political correctness" and racial leftism and the politics of quilt were defeated or significantly weakened, if "hate speech" laws were abolished and freedom of speech and thought were revived, and so forth, these countries would not only survive as White entities but likely prosper, perhaps even economically, despite the bane of "socialized medicine" or "nationalized healthcare." 

Given the actualities of race and immigration and the transformation of the United States into a non-White majority country, the obligatory sanguinity of the right would be laughable if its effects weren't so portentous and catastrophic. Ironically, the Reaganite optimism of race-blind conservatives and Republicans makes inevitable the future hell-hole and dystopia envisaged by race-conscious pessimists. Mainstream conservative and Republicans foresee an America in which they not only succeed in repealing Obamacare but also in defeating all future bills to impose universal healthcare and expand "big government": the final defeat of socialized medicine, the repeal of much or even most of the New Deal and Great Society, the abolition of welfare, massive tax-cuts for the rich and business class, globalization and "outsourcing," free trade and open borders, systemic deregulaton, rampant privatization. To recite Marco Rubeo's simple catechism: "Free Enterprise, Limited Government, and a strong national defense."  

The paramount exception to limited government and reduced spending and huge tax-cuts will be the military and it's endless wars and occupations on behalf of "national defense," "defending our freedoms," global democracy, women's rights, Israel, and "fighting terrorism" as millions of Muslim aliens and untold gangs of terrorists and potential terrorists enter the country both legally and illegally, as did the 9-11 "jihadist" mass murderers.  

This is the future envisioned by the utopians and Pollyannas of the mainstream right: a non-White-majority country of 400–500 million people as a conservative-libertarian paradise. And, apparently, also "good for the Jews" and Israel. 

But not only are they oblivious to the future effects of "racial diversity" and "multiculturalism." They're so myopic and deluded that they don't even see or understand how mass immigration has already profoundly and irreversibly transformed electoral politics and American society generally. If not for massive non-White immigration and the transformation of the United States from a country that was almost 90% White in 1960 to approximately 65% European today, Obama would not have been elected president. And many members of the House and Senate who voted for Obamacare" would not have been elected. Without this demographic transformation and its socio-political ramifications, Obamacare would not have passed. So the election of Obama and the passage of Obamacare was a result of the immigration policies and demographic trends that virtually all mainstream and "respectable" critics of "socialized medicine" either celebrate or dismiss as largely irrelevant to the fortunes of the Republican Party and conservative movement.  

Let's assume that the Republicans take back the House and Senate in 2010 and succeed in repealing Obamacare, or in preventing its enactment by voting not to fund it until a Republican is elected President in 2012. Wouldn't it be ironic if "Obamcare" is repealed in 2013 or 2014 under President Romney. If so, they'll be crowing and strutting like roosters. The House and Senate, the "beltway," Fox News, talk-radio, etc. will be rife with happy talk and Reaganite optimism. They'll be singing "morning in America" in their giddy triumphalism, blissfully unaware that it's well past the 11the hour. 

But even if 12–20 million illegal aliens are not granted amnesty under Republican rule, will the invasion be stopped by building a fence and/or placing the military on the Mexican border? Will illegal aliens who commit felonies be deported and will millions more be expelled or driven to leave by "attrition" and other methods? Will we have a "moratorium" on legal immigration? Will legal immigration be reduced to pre-1965 levels and once again favor Europeans? Of course not, not even with an unemployment rate of roughly 10% and an actual jobless rate of over 17%. If anything, especially if the economy improves, it's far more likely that legal immigration will be substantially increased. See the new Vdare.com article by “Washington Watcher.” Legal immigration has increased slightly during the recession and worst economic crisis since the great depression! 

(Both increases in the supply of cheap labor from the Third-World and the repeal of Obamacare are good for the ethnic lobbies and for the rich and business class. The country as a whole and its middle- and lower-class White citizens be damned.) 

And so by 2040 if not sooner the United States will be a minority-majority country with a population of 400 million. Hypothetically, given the repeal of Obamacare and the failure of Democrats to pass another universal healthcare bill, how many people will then not have health insurance?  60 million? 70 million? 80 million? 100 million? So the need to impose socialized medicine will be far more exigent and compelling than it was in 2010. 

The United States will then have an electorate that will never again vote for a Republican president or give the House and Senate a Republican majority, unless the Republican Party becomes even more emasculated than it is now. Obama is a radical leftist whose boyhood hero was Malcolm X, a close friend of Bill Ayers, an acolyte of Saul Alinsky, an anti-White racialist who for 20-years was a member of the Rev. Wright's "Goddam America" Church. Even worse, Wright appears to be a mentor and father-figure. And he easily won the presidency over John McCain, a POW and war hero, a "moderate" and racial liberal and immigration enthusiast, with an electorate that was still roughly 75% White. Imagine what kind of specimen could and will be elected President in 2040 or 2050 and beyond! We will then have a president, probably Black or Hispanic, who's far more radical, left-wing, and anti-White than Obama. And imagine the House and Senate in 2040 or 2050, dominated by liberals, leftists, and true socialists, White and non-White.  

So even if Obamacare is repealed in 2011 or 2013 or 2016 and similar laws are defeated for years thereafter, the left will prevail. "Socialized medicine" is inevitable in a non-White majority country of 400–500 million people. And the bill then passed will create a European-style system more radical and costly and intrusive than Obamacare. And it will never be repealed, no matter how disastrous, for the people who'd repeal it will never again have the power to do so. Most likely, this will occur well before 2040. 

In the even more distant future, however, long after "socialized medicine" has been enacted in 2026 or 2033 or 2041, it's possible that the U.S. or what it's then called will be so bankrupt and ungovernable, so devastated by the insane policies that made nationalized healthcare inevitable, that it can no longer afford a system of universal heathcare. It's also possible that the country will no longer have a population that's intelligent and competent enough to efficiently manage a European-type heathcare system. If so, one can safely predict that the response of the anti-White government will be to deny healthcare to millions of poor Whites. Thus socialized medicine would still exist but not universal healthcare for Whites. 

So the only hope of saving the country from socialized medicine in the long run is to end and reverse massive non-White immigration, immediately or almost immediately, and expel the illegals. But that won't happen.