![]() |
| w |
|

Oy, the Humanity! An Israeli Jew Takes on the ADL
Andy Nowicki
July 29, 2010
Except for a very brief moment at the start of
Defamation, a
smart, mordant, and incisive documentary which examines the tendency of forces
within contemporary Judaism to exploit the Holocaust for political ends, we
never see the man behind the camera, Israeli Jew Yoav Shamir. One imagines,
however, that this fellow had his poker face honed to perfection, because he was
able to pull off a terrifically effective undercover job.
Clearly no fan of the Anti-Defamation League and like
organizations, Shamir during the making of this movie managed to sell himself as
a sympathizer, and somehow won the confidence of Abraham Foxman and other
high-level figures within the ADL, who in turn seemed totally unaware that they
were ultimately going to receive a cinematic drubbing at his hands. Indeed, one
even almost sympathizes with Foxman and Co. for opening themselves up to the
soft-spoken filmmaker from Tel Aviv with such touching, open-hearted naiveté;
they must have figured that Shamir’s Jewish background and professed interest in
exploring “anti-Semitism” must have meant that he could be trusted not to break
from the party line.

That is, one is tempted to sympathize, until one is reminded of
Abe’s
ardent obnoxiousness and brazen chutzpah in brandishing
the “anti-Semite” slur like a sharpened, poisoned
machete, and holding it over the heads of others
to threaten and bully them into submission. In a particularly
galling moment, we witness a meeting between Foxman and
a government delegation in Ukraine, who want to
know how to get along better with Jews in the
Western world. During this meeting (which Shamir, incredibly, was
allowed to film), Foxman high-handedly lectures the
delegation that people of their country have no
right to use the word “holocaust” to describe the
killing of up to five million of its people by Stalin by deliberate
starvation in the 1930s. “You need to be sensitive… be
careful that it (the Ukrainian famine/mass
murder) not be played as ‘your genocide,’ because
that would be counter-productive,” the ADL-leader intones, like
a principal sternly admonishing naughty pupils. And of
course, the members of the delegation solemnly
nod and snivelingly agree, knowing that their
interests are served by pleasing the likes of Foxman and his ilk, however
outrageously out of line their demands might be. None of
them thinks to ask why the murder of millions of
Jews matters more than that of millions of
Ukraine nationals. One hopes the reasonable question at least
crosses their minds.
Following the meeting, Shamir asks Foxman why, if anti-Semitism is
so
potent a force in the world today, people care so much
about pleasing the ADL and its sister
organizations. Dishonest Abe then shows his flair at
sophistry: it’s
anti-Semitic
in
itself,
he maintains, to even
think
that the
Jews are so powerful as to be feared, so the fact that people like
this pitiful delegation of yes-men are so eager to do
his bidding just shows how
anti-Semitic
the world has become! Once more, Shamir dryly
acknowledges this “logic,” letting its absurdity speak for itself.

Shamir also speaks candidly to Harvey and Suzanne Prince, an
elderly
Jewish couple who are members of the Los Angeles
division of the ADL and close confidants of
Foxman. Shamir asks Mrs. Prince if she thinks it’s
useful to bring up transgressions from long ago — say,
the commission of early twentieth-century pogroms
by Eastern Europeans, or the lurid atrocities of
Krystallnacht by Germans in Nazi Germany, in order to create
guilt in one’s potential enemies, and thus obtain a
tactical advantage over them. She
enthusiastically agrees with the proposition, calling such
a strategy “the American Jewish way,” and adding,
“Absolutely — we need to
play
on that guilt.”
A moment later, her husband notes acerbically that she certainly
never
seems to forget anything
he
ever did wrong in the past, and things grow a bit
tense between the long-married couple. Clearly, according to Mr.
Prince, a self-described “moderate,” there ought to be
limits to the practice of guilt-mongering for
profit, though it is unclear where those limits
lie and if the travails of a “whipped” Jewish husband might also
hold analogously true for gentile nations henpecked by
the ADL: if, that is, there is a point where it’s
just not decent to bring up the past to induce
guilt and subservience in one’s interlocutors. Must the descendants
of a nation that allowed anti-Jewish outrages long ago
be scolded forever into the future, like an
embittered, vengeful fishwife who never forgives
or forgets her husband’s transgressions, and who could never conceive that
she
might not be a picnic to live with either?
There are many more eye-opening moments spent among the ADL-ers,
including a deliciously uncomfortable moment where
Shamir asks to hear about the so-called rise in
anti-Semitic incidents in the United States, and the
tabulator of these statistics is hard put to find any
allegation that doesn’t sound absurdly trivial.
Then there are the interviews Shamir conducts
with others: a generally amiable group of young Black men in
Brooklyn who complain that the police actually
favor
Jews over African-Americans, as well as the
humorously droll statements of various Jews
across the world, including Shamir’s own outspoken grandmother (“Jews
love money. Jews are crooks!”) and famously combative,
tenure-denied and currently unemployed college
professor Norman Finklestein, each of whom
contemptuously mocks those engaged in Jewish ethnic hustling in unsparing
language that makes the careful, restrained verbiage of
Israel Lobby author (and non-Jew) Walter
Mearsheimer seem relatively tame by comparison.
But the most powerful segment of the film involves a group of
Israeli
teenagers who are flown to
Auschwitz on a field trip. The kids are familiar
adolescent characters: rowdy, rambunctious,
immature, emotional, prone to gossip and mischief, at
times sweetly wide-eyed in their innocence. They are
both annoying and likable simultaneously, as
teenagers can be. In any case, this group is in
no mood to have their consciousness raised during their exciting trip
together: much to the consternation of their adult
chaperones, they just want to have fun. Over the
course of the trip, however, these kids are
repeatedly bludgeoned with the message:
You are Jews
and the world hates you; you must in turn hate and fear the world if you hope to
survive! Their faces are pushed into the
gruesome tales of the events that took place in
the notorious camp, and at night their handlers tell them stories
of how the present-day country of Poland is still rife
with neo-Nazi violence. A harmless comment to
some members of the group uttered by an old
Polish man is interpreted as viciously anti-Semitic; Shamir tries to
correct their misconception, but to no avail; they have
been instructed how to perceive reality, and
won’t be dissuaded.
The kids, being hedonistic at heart, do manage to put up some
resistance to the relentless stream of emotionally
compelling propaganda being pumped into their ears,
but they can only hold out for so long. Near the end of
the trip, a lovely young Jewess breaks down and
tells Shamir that it has finally happened: she
has learned to “hate” her enemies; the implication is clear that she
has come to view the Palestinians and Arabs as cut from
the same cloth as the Nazis. This scene has a
viscerally searing quality, similar in feel to
Orwell’s account of his hero Winston Smith succumbing to the horrific
manipulations of the Ministry of Love and learning to
embrace the pernicious ruling ideology of
Oceania. The corruption of innocence portrayed
here is simply breathtaking, and heartbreaking to behold.
And this is what truly sets
Defamation apart from the average documentary: its delicate sense of
poignancy. Shamir’s argument seems to be that
indulging in paranoid delusion about the coming of a new Holocaust
simply isn’t a good way for Jews, or anyone, to live.
Hating those one takes to be one’s enemies and
constantly fearing the worst from them may in
fact be a self-fulfilling prophecy, bringing out the worst in everyone,
oneself and one’s enemies alike. If Jews want to thrive
and inspire good will from others, Shamir appears
to be saying, they should eschew such a spurious
mindset, and not dwell so much on bad things that were done to
them in the past.
One wonders if Defamation
will have any tangible influence on any of its
target audience. But even if his work doesn’t
significantly affect Jewish-Palestinian, or
Jewish-Gentile relations, Yoav Shamir deserves
praise for his courage in crafting such a provocative and fearlessly
taboo-shattering, yet highly compassionate document on
this most sensitive of contemporary topics.
Andy Nowicki (email him) is the author of
Considering Suicide,
published by
Nine-Banded Books. He is a regular
contributor to
The Last Ditch, and has also published
articles for New Oxford Review,
American Renaissance, and
Alternative Right. He lives in
Savannah, Georgia with his wife and children, and teaches college English.
Permanent link: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Nowicki-Shamir-Foxman-ADL.html