![]() |
|
Home Subscribe to The Occidental Observer Newsletter and be notified of updates through emails. To subscribe, go to our Subscribe Page |
Pro-White
Conference 2.0
William Sheldon
February 26, 2010
The
disruption
of the 2010 American Renaissance Conference in Washington, D.C. and David Duke's
2008 EURO Conference
in Memphis are forcing European Americans to question whether we still have the
right to assemble. No longer can we gather peacefully where we please. These
two events demonstrate the fact that hotels will not support our right to
assemble. Even worse, we have also learned that government law enforcement will
not protect our right to assemble. Our First Amendment right to assemble no
longer exists, it appears. How can we organize an explicitly White gathering in
this totalitarian climate?
On the blogs and email lists I see essentially three
strategies:
(a)
Do not change, keep trying to hold the
event in private facilities. Problem is, the current system is rigged
against us. We are sitting ducks for these thugs.
(b)
Buy up land somewhere and hold an event
on private land. Fine for small invitation-only gatherings, but for events
larger than a dozen it strikes me as pure fantasy. Even if it could be
arranged, it sounds creepy and isolated. When people go to conferences they
want to be close to restaurants and other amenities.
(c)
Hold the event in a public venue.
This is the best of the three, because it puts government into the picture as a
mediator. However, it does not address how to deal with terrorism from groups
like the One
People's Project.
It is also vulnerable to government hostility towards the organizers.
I would like to offer another scenario. Before
describing it I need to define the various components of an academic conference.
Speakers:
Good speakers motivate people to pay a registration fee and travel.
Lecture facilities:
Conferences provide a place for those attending to gather in one place and
listen and ask questions in real time.
Comfortable lodging:
People attending like to stay in an attractive, comfortable location, close to
the lectures.
Face
to face networking:
It is often said that the real activity at conferences is between
sessions. Conferences give people who share a profession, academic discipline,
or interest an opportunity to meet and talk in person.
The standard
approach to organizing a conference within our community is for one person or
organization to reserve space for attendees to gather and listen to speakers in
real-time (components 1 and 2), and also "book" a block of rooms (components 3
and 4 above) in the same hotel for attendees, perhaps at some discounted room
rate. The terrorism (yes, terrorism) against the organizers of the 2010 AmRen
Conference in D.C and the 2008 EURO Conference in Memphis demonstrate how
pro-White events can be disrupted and even cancelled through intimidation and
threats of violence towards the management of the hosting facility. We can
expect that the
American Third Position
will encounter the exact same problem when they try to stage a conference.
A New Model
is Needed
A modernization of our approach to staging a conference
through thoughtful application of commodity technology can preserve the
essential nature of the conference experience yet make it impenetrable to the
kind of tired, predictable harassment we have come to expect. The
vulnerable point in the current model is booking the lecture venue. This
is where our enemies attack. Our enemies focus on smearing the reputation
of the person or people organizing the event, then forcing the hotel management
into a "are you with or against the White Supremacists?" decision. Hotel
management caves in to the pressure every time.
The way to make that vulnerability disappear completely is
to remove the hotel management from the equation. Migrate the lecture component
to commodity collaboration technology called a "Webinar" (or "webcast"). The
model that I am proposing is actually a hybrid: traditional conference hotel
gathering (face-to-face networking must be preserved), with an embedded Webinar.
If we eliminate the need for a physical lecture space we can decentralize room
reservations, too. In fact, in the model I propose, the conference
organizers have no contact at all with the hotel management. The hotel
management does not even know that a conference is taking place within its
walls.
Webinars work as follows. Attendees register for the event.
In exchange for registering they are sent a URL (and optionally a unique code)
that they paste into their Web browser at a designated time of the event.
A webinar presenter can broadcast to dozens all the way up to thousands
depending on the software used (see note below on service options).
Browser-based Webinars are now common in business as an alternative to travel.
Hypothetical
Example
I will now illustrate through a hypothetical example how
this could work. Let's call this hybrid conference, EURO 2010.
David Duke
announces that on Saturday, September 4 (Labor Day weekend), EURO 2010 will take
place in Memphis. Speakers will include Duke; James Edwards of
The Political Cesspool radio program;
Greg Johnson, editor of The Occidental
Quarterly; Bill Johnson, Chairman of the American Third Position; and
others. The conference program starts at 9:00 am and ends at 5:00 pm.
Registration is only $50 because the costs and risk of organizing an event have
been radically lowered. Registrants receive a short list of Memphis area
hotels, all clustered within a short distance of each other, where they are
encouraged to stay during the conference. Why more than one hotel? It’s
optional. More than one hotel makes it even harder to pinpoint an attack on us.
Furthermore, if one hotel has no vacancies, it directs attendees to reserve a
room at one of the other options. The total size of the conference is
self-scaling. Registrants also receive a lapel pin that has printed on it a
distinctive but non-controversial symbol.
Actually,
the conference begins on September 3, at a local attraction. It could be
Graceland. It could be someplace close to the hotels. EURO 2010 organizers
choose a mid-morning walking tour of downtown Memphis, starting at
Confederate Park.
No event permit is necessary from the city because the quiet gathering is
informal, just a starting place. (Alternatively, a formal permit could be
requested if the organizers and attendees want to stage a public media event.)
There are
several benefits to the gathering. The walking tour gives attendees an
opportunity to meet up with old friends and perhaps make arrangements to watch
tomorrow's conference events in small groups. A nice secondary outcome of the
gathering is to give people an opportunity to be out in the fresh air with
like-minded folks, in a public place that has historical significance. If the
location itself holds special meaning to European Americans, as Confederate Park
in Memphis does for some of us, then the event itself adds to the lore of the
place. (For a growing list of other places special to European Americans,
review the entries on my blog,
ourgazetteer.org.)
At 9:00 am Saturday morning attendees turn on their laptop
computers and log into the conference Webinar. Folks without laptops join with
others who do have a computer — sharing resources encourages collaboration and
friendship building. Duke starts the conference off with a talk on the First
Amendment. In addition to audio, Duke makes use of the Webinar
application's ability to broadcast a video feed from his computer's built-in
webcam. To facilitate two-way interaction, the Webinar software allows
participants to send in questions via a chat window. Q&A is also
possible via telephone. A moderator helps Duke to sort through the
questions. It should be emphasized that Duke could be anywhere giving his talk.
He could be in one of the three conference hotels or he could be across town at
a friend's house.
As it turns
out, Duke and all but one of the speakers is broadcasting from the same hotel
suite. Some people registered for the conference are not even in Memphis:
Moscow, London, Los Angeles — all around the world. Attendees outside of
Memphis miss out on the full experience, although this problem could offset that
by getting together with friends and watching in a small regional group. During
his talk, Duke suggests that conference attendees log into Twitter in a separate
computer window or on their cell phones and use the hash tag #EURO2010 to post
comments and links. This twitter feed serves as a public conference
side channel.
Notice the general shift towards decentralization. At the end of the talk Duke
mentions that he will be eating lunch at the BBQ restaurant across the street if
anybody wants to join him.
Following
two more speakers, the conference pauses for a lunch break. A generous two
hours offers attendees plenty of opportunity to talk over their meals. An
incident breaks out at the BBQ restaurant. Jeffry
Imm
appears with a couple of cronies as Duke is about to walk inside. Imm starts to
verbally assault Duke, but something interesting happens. Two large groups of
conference attendees arrive and immediately stand between Imm and Duke. They
repeatedly pepper Imm with insults: "loser", "get a job", "idiot" while inching
him towards the curb until Imm backs down and slithers off humiliated. And
every bit of it is recorded on video by a half dozen different people —
attendees are strongly encouraged to carry some kind of video recording device.
Within an hour the video is uploaded to YouTube, the link is posted to the
conference Twitter feed and several blogs. Imm swallowed Duke's bait, and the
hook.
In the
afternoon session, one speaker chooses to reduce the size of his video feed in
order to make more room for a slide show that accompanies his talk, to emphasize
and illustrate the
talking points
he is trying to convey. The other speakers stick to the talking head style,
including Nick Griffin, who logs in from London. After the last speaker of
the day, attendees disburse into the lobbies of the hotels and make arrangements
to meet over dinner and drinks.
The continuum from implicit to explicit whiteness is
represented in the hotel lobby. Some participants wear their conference lapel
pins; others do not provide a single clue that they are registered for the
conference. Texting between cell phones is used by many to facilitate real-time
communication. Of course there are spies in attendance, but it hardly matters.
They have no easy target to attack. What the spies see around them in the
lobby are hotel guests. Conference attendees are energized by the cloak and
dagger mischief.
Experiment
Keep our enemies off balance. I can envision variations of
the Webinar model; for example, a Webinar could be used as a backup plan, in the
event that a traditional lecture venue contract is cancelled. Or the morning
session could be conducted through the Webinar, and right before lunch the
location of a large afternoon meeting room is revealed.
I recommend running two or more half-day, invitation-only
events. These experiments will help organizers work through the details of
operating the Webinar software, try out Twitter, carefully consider how much
information to release and when, etc. Through practice and attention, better
microphones, cameras, and lights can be integrated to lend a more professional
appearance to the Webinars.
With creativity and commodity technology it is impossible to
stop a pro-White conference.
Webinar
Options
DimDim (http://www.dimdim.com/):
$79/month for meetings with up to 1000 attendees.
GoToWebinar
(http://www.gotomeeting.com/fec/webinar/gotowebinar_pricing):
$499/month
WebEx (http://WebEx.com):
call for price
Adobe
Acrobat Connect Pro (http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobatconnectpro/):
call for price
William Sheldon (euamun@gmail.com) is founder and editor of the ourgazetteer.org project. He authored a two-part article in TOO: “Discovering Implicit White Communities.”
Permanent URL:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Sheldon-ProWhite.html
|
|