![]() |
|
Home Subscribe to The Occidental Observer Newsletter and be notified of updates through emails. To subscribe, go to our Subscribe Page |
The Mysterious German Professor
Elizabeth Whitcombe
September 3, 2009
The Atlantic Recording Company's history strangely parallels the Jewish-American
elite's cultural revolution after World War II. This elite promoted Frankfurt
School teaching in a effort to weaken the middle classes — their political
nemesis. Atlantic Records prides itself on plugging the same socially
destructive
behavior.
The significance of this connection is that
Atlantic Records was one of the most influential recording companies during the
sexual revolution, the Civil Rights movement, and era of immigration reform. A
connection with Adorno would suggest that the company at its origins was intent
on tapping the expertise of one of the greatest propagandists of the 20th
century.
The Frankfurt School
Adorno was the Frankfurt School's music critic. His forte was analyzing
the psychological and political impact of music on listeners. He was also
interested in how new recording technology changed the listening experience.
Of course the point of all this interest in the technical side of music was Adorno's passion for finding out how to use music to achieve the Frankfurt
School's leftist political aims.

Adorno knew what made music intellectually challenging, as well as what made it
appeal to the masses.
Very broadly, popular music appeals to our expectations about what sounds
should follow one another; intellectual music challenges those expectations.
Adorno considered Jazz to be one of the worst forms of popular music. He though Jazz reconciled erotic urges with traditional Western Culture: that it transformed people into insects.
He was both right and wrong. Any music
with a strong, steady beat tends to absorb the listener's attention — the beat
has a
focusing effect on
music.
The jazz of the 1920–1930s was often made from traditional tunes played loudly
with a syncopated beat — an easily produced commodity that wasted energy that Adorno thought should be spent
in revolution.
Everything about big-band music went against Adorno's philosophy.
Adorno’s desire for a socialist revolution led him to favor Modernist music that
left the listener feeling unsatisfied and dislocated — music that consciously
avoided harmony and predictability. He believed that only discord could usher in
what Herbert Marcuse would later describe as the “return of the repressed.” This
is why Adorno endlessly praised the work of
Arnold Schoenberg,
his coreligionist and avant-garde composer.
A recent collection of Adorno's music criticism,
Essays on Music
contains the essay
Why is the New Art so Hard to Understand?,
originally published in 1931. In his usual opaque style, Adorno explains why the
general public instinctively rejects Schoenberg and “the new music”:
The difficulty of understanding the new art has its specific basis in this
necessity of consumer consciousness to refer back to an intellectual and social
situation in which everything that goes beyond the given realities, every
revelation of their contradictions, amounts to a threat.
In other words, in order to understand this music, people had to get beyond
their consumer consciousness and realize the contradictions of middle class
life. The omniscient Frankfurters were very proud of their ability to reveal to
“stupid” consumers the contradictions in the Western society and the
psychological inadequacies of the middle class.
Plato
thought that new art styles could trigger social revolutions. This is why Plato
believed that the State should carefully censor the arts to make sure they
preserve the values that society is based on. Adorno and the rest of the
Frankfurt School wanted to use the “new music” to undermine Western middle class
values, as described more fully in my essay,
The Difficult Class.
Adorno's goal was to present his political message as the solution to the feelings of dislocation that “the new music” invoked. Adorno thought that these feelings of dissatisfaction could be used against Western Culture: He wanted listeners to associate these negative feelings with traditional lifestyles, and look toward the Frankfurters for something “better."
Adorno's hopes for the revolutionary potential of Schoenberg's music were dashed
because very few people wanted to listen to it. Schoenberg's music has never been popular outside of
academic circles, partly because you have to be highly musically trained to find
it even interesting, much less beautiful. Even if one can appreciate the studied discord of his pieces,
listening to Schoenberg is hard work.
After World War II it became clear that Adorno’s hopes for Schoenberg's work were unfounded. The most widely respected Frankfurt School historian, Martin Jay, says that Adorno had stopped publicly criticizing contemporary popular music by 1960. This suggests that he may have changed his mind on the revolutionary potential of popular music even before that time.
Atlantic Records
Atlantic Records was founded in 1947 by
Ahmet Ertegun,
a Turkish-American, and
Herb Abramson,
who was Jewish. Much of the growth of
Atlantic occurred after 1953 when music producer
Jerry
Wexler, also Jewish, joined the firm.
The story about Atlantic's first sound engineer is intriguing.
Atlantic moved out of Washington, DC.
and into a building at 234 W 56th Street in New York in 1947. There a
“German
Professor”
helped the young businessmen record their first jazz albums.
Ertegun told this story many times, but no one ever found out who the “German
Professor” actually was.
There are clues though. According to Ertegun, “the studio had this German professor who did the bulk of the engineering.” The professor was “a little middle-aged German doctor” who was “really difficult to work with.” Ertegun claimed that, the professor “wouldn't let us turn up the bass, or touch anything, but we were told he was a master, so we put up with him.”
Ertegun also claimed that the professor “didn't know anything about popular
music” but that that he was “technically reliable.”
There are only so many German professors with knowledge of music recording and a negative attitude toward jazz and popular music in any city — but especially so in 1940s New York. The publicly available evidence points to Adorno being that mysterious sound engineer.
Ertegun recorded music that more established performers like Count Basie
considered “ignorant.”
Ertegun specifically wanted to produce music that appealed to the masses, not
the musically trained. As noted above, Adorno really disliked this type of mass
production and made a point of telling us so in his essays, particularly
On Popular Music
(1941) and
On the Fetish-Character in Music
(1938). See my
Adorno as
Critic for more information on this.
Nevertheless, Adorno was a brilliant music analyst who had been thinking in terms of multi-track recording for a long time. He understood recording technology and its effect on music and he knew the music industry inside-out. Adorno knew a lot about how music affects people's thinking and he had written extensively on the dumbing-down effect of pop culture.
There would seem to be two possibilities. One is that Adorno helped Ertegun achieve a popular musical sound even though Adorno himself hated popular music for all the reasons noted above. This would seem to be unlikely. Why would the Adorno as a self-conscious revolutionary participate in something he saw as reactionary?
The second possibility is that by the late 1940s Adorno understood that popular music could be used to further the cause of revolution. Adorno and the other Frankfurt School theorists and New York Intellectuals were well aware that popular music could be used to manipulate the masses in communist, fascist, and capitalist societies. As alienated intellectuals living in New York in the 1930s and early 1940s, they had excellent reasons to dislike popular culture: In the US, it upheld the capitalist status quo. In National Socialist Germany it reinforced anti-Semitism and racialist ideology. And in the Soviet Union, it was part of Stalinist repression.
But it's a completely different ballgame when they had the power to influence popular culture, as they did after World War II. If these leftist intellectuals had the power to influence popular culture, they could use it to manipulate the masses in the directions that they wanted — toward liberal cosmopolitanism, breaking down racial barriers, and promoting Black cultural icons.
Atlantic Records was certainly involved in these trends. By all accounts
(including Ertegun's), Atlantic Records led the way breaking down racial
segregation in 1950s America. Ertegun says he promoted Black music when nobody else would. (He
used a stage name so he wouldn't
embarrass
his family.) Ertegun is credited with having set America on course for
appreciating Black culture and replacing White cultural icons with Black ones.
This is only a half-truth. According to Ertegun's partner
Jerry Wexler,
Atlantic was in the business of “taking the gospel songs and putting the devil’s
words to them.” They weren't representing Black culture, but a self-destructive
Black sub-culture. They were promoting icons that spoke for society's
underbelly: unrestrained sexuality, violence, and drugs.
The message that Ertegun promoted is the same message that Herbert Marcuse
plugged in
Eros and Civilization
and Adorno pushed in
The Authoritarian Personality.
Based on psychoanalysis, their message was that socialism could only develop if
people free themselves of their sexual repressions. In
The Culture of Critique, Kevin
MacDonald described the basic ideas as follows:
In
Eros and Civilization Marcuse accepts
Freud’s theory that Western culture is pathogenic as a result of the repression
of sexual urges, paying homage to Freud, who “recognized the work of repression
in the highest values of Western civilization—which presuppose and perpetuate
unfreedom and suffering” (p. 240). Marcuse cites
Wilhelm Reich’s
[he of
orgone energy
fame] early work approvingly as an exemplar of the “leftist” wing of Freud’s
legacy. Reich “emphasized the extent to which sexual repression is enforced by
the interests of domination and exploitation, and the extent to which these
interests are in turn reinforced and reproduced by sexual repression” (p. 239).
Like Freud, Marcuse points the way to a nonexploitative utopian civilization
that would result from the complete end of sexual repression, but Marcuse goes
beyond Freud’s ideas in Civilization and
Its Discontents only in his even greater optimism regarding the beneficial
effects of ending sexual repression. (Ch. 4)
Clearly the Frankfurt School intellectuals had come to find virtue in appealing
to base pleasures and unrestrained sexuality.
Such views fit well with
Eric P. Kaufmann's emphasis on the role of leftist intellectuals in
the rise of expressive individualism as a theme of the 1960s counterculture that
in many ways remains dominant today. Such views are quite
opposite to those of Plato who believed that they would weaken the state and
pave the way for tyranny.
Atlantic branched out into rock music in the 1960s, and by the 1990s they were
into “gangsta rap.” I can't think of a better example of “polymorphously
perverse”
sexuality than
The Rolling Stones,
or a more degenerate icon than
Snoop Dogg.
In the years following World War II the music recording industry was massively
consolidated. In
1967
Atlantic Records was bought by what is
now the Warner Music Group, although Atlantic continued to operate under its own
label.
But Atlantic Records/Warner Music Group isn't just an unfortunate anomaly. The preponderance of the modern recording industry promotes lifestyle choices that the Frankfurters came to identify as being conducive to social revolution. EMI, Universal and Sony have signed a corps of artists who espouse the same morally weakening messages. As I discussed in The Difficult Class, this revolution has concentrated power in the elite and disenfranchised the middle class.
The Columbia University Connection
The Frankfurters had been revolutionary propagandists since the beginning of the Institute for Social Research in Germany in 1923. Refugees from National Socialist Germany, the Frankfurt School moved to Columbia University in New York City in 1934.
Columbia University was also very important to the scientific side of Roosevelt's war
effort. The Office of Scientific Research and Development recruited heavily from
Columbia for the Manhattan Project. The
OSRD
was also interested in psychology and psycho-acoustics — topics that were more
in tune with Adorno's research.
The connections between the Frankfurters, Columbia University, the OSS/CIA and
the OSRD are important because when the "German Professor" was called away from
Atlantic Records in 1947, he was replaced by
Tom Dowd, a Columbia University
student straight from the OSRD's Manhattan Project. Dowd’s high-level
connections made him a likely candidate to replace the prickly Adorno once
Atlantic had established its signature sound.
The German Professor suddenly stopped helping Atlantic Records in 1947. Ertegun
recalled only that Dowd had been sent to help Atlantic “because
the professor can't make it.”
No one seems to how Dowd got the job.
Tom Dowd was a classically trained musician as well as a Manhattan Project
researcher.
Dowd
stated that his bomb work was paid for by the OSRD, which was closed in 1947. He
claimed that he couldn't continue studying nuclear physics at Columbia because
he knew a lot of very current, sensitive information on the bomb project and
didn't want to have to sit through lectures that were a decade old. (See
Tom Dowd and the Laugage of Music,
a film by Mark Moormann.) Fortunately for Dowd, Adorno was unhappy at work.
The Bomb and Personality Profiling: Closer Than You Think
John Marks, author of
The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and Mind Control,
shows that there were many links between the Manhattan Project and the CIA's
“mind control” initiative known as
Project
MK-ULTRA. MK-ULTRA was organized along the Manhattan Project
model, and Manhattan Project contractors were hired by MK-ULTRA for top-secret
research into psychotropic drugs.
The MK-ULTRA program was also interested in profiling personalities — work that
the Frankfurt School had been concentrating on for the US Government since the
final years of the war.
I have been through the MK-ULTRA files at the National Security Archives. I
would like to clear up a common misconception about them. The LSD research was
only a part of this organization's interests. Their main goal was to figure out
the most efficient way to manipulate people. The LSD projects were simply the
most sensational and not even the most effective.
Many of the MK-ULTRA programs were designed to analyze different personalities
and how they are likely to respond to certain situations. MK-ULTRA teams tried
to map out the beliefs and insecurities of certain ethnic groups, like Blacks;
and social groups, like lower-class inner-city residents; and religious groups
like Evangelical Christians. They were building a database of how to manipulate
ethnic politics and special interest groups.
The Frankfurt School's work on “authoritarian personalities” in the 1930s was
repackaged for American audiences as Studies in Prejudice,
including the landmark The Authoritarian Personality and other books that
attempted to develop psychological profiles of White Americans. In
general, these works are
more
ideological than scientific, typically relying on psychoanalysis
as a very pliable means of attaining its political goals of depicting White
Americans with ethnocentric tendencies as victims of variously formulated
psychiatric disorders.
The CIA's MK-ULTRA program picked up where the Frankfurters left off by
analyzing politically-organized minority groups. Tom Dowd belonged to a very
select group of students who had the security clearance to be exposed to the
type of work that the Frankfurters were doing through the US government. Tom
Dowd would have been an obvious choice to replace Adorno at the
recording studio.
Conclusion
In this article I have not provided evidence proving that Atlantic
Records is an offshoot of Frankfurt School social engineering. I have provided
circumstantial evidence that shows cooperation between the two organizations was
very likely. Much of what the Frankfurters were doing was beyond public
scrutiny. But when an entire industry devotes itself to ideals espoused by a
handful of aging leftist radicals, it is a strong indication that something is
amiss.
Governments have always existed to control society. Humane philosophers
recognize that a legitimate government exercises control in a way that
benefits its citizens. Anything else is tyranny. Music companies like Warner
promote behavior that is corrupting and damaging. Just ask the
joker
in the White House.
Elizabeth Whitcombe (email
her)
is a graduate of MIT in Economics with a concentration in
International Economics. She is a financial analyst and free-lance writer living
in New York City.
|
|