|
|
White Male Engineers as a Target of the
Hostile Elite
March 11, 2009
As an engineering student in the early 60’s, I was one
of 3000+ students, 99% of whom were white males. However, this is no longer
the case, and there can be little doubt that this bastion of white male
competency has become a particular target of the “diversity” establishment —
part of the hostile elite that dominates the US today. White males are being
marginalized in an area where they were able to earn above-average incomes.
Their eclipse in the scientific and technical realms is an important part of
the general displacement of whites among American elites.
The mantra of the diversity industry is that there are untold (and unverified) benefits for creating a diverse workplace. This ideology has penetrated to engineering schools at universities throughout America. In the 90’s, I attended a college reunion luncheon at which the Dean gave a slide presentation justifying their program for increasing “diversity” in the student body. Their advocacy of diversity bordered on fanaticism.
On a subsequent tour of the college, I
observed a large computer lab room filled with mostly Asian students.
I asked the Dean where the American students
were, and he replied “They’re probably watching football this Saturday.”
Welcome to the non-white technocratic elite.
There can be little doubt that
the result of these policies will be to lower the earning power and status
of an important segment of white males. An important consequence of this
marginalization of white males will
result in making them less desirable in the eyes of white females, since it
is well known that women are
attracted to men of power and wealth.
The following governmental policies are helping to
achieve the objectives of the hostile elite:
· The massive influx of Asian engineers and students facilitated through the H1B program. Presently, the H1B quota is 85,000 per year, including employment for 20,000 foreign students with advanced degrees. The result has been shown to be a decrease in engineering salaries.
· Outsourcing of manufacturing and outsourcing of jobs. Manufacturing is heavily dependent on engineers and other technical people. By outsourcing manufacturing, you eliminate the need for the many white technical people needed for support. Outsourcing of jobs is obviously detrimental.
·
Programs emphasizing
“diversity” in the student population reduce the number of white males
eligible to acquire a decreasing number of job openings. Affirmative action
in hiring further exacerbates the plight of the aspiring white male
graduate.
Since IQ distributions preclude blacks and Latinos from
providing the required numbers to displace white males, the strategy has
been to simply import engineers from Asia.
Microsoft’s Bill Gates is a major culprit in this effort
to undermine white males. Gates
testified before Congress about the need for unlimited H1B visas, with
specious claims about engineer or programmer “shortages” and the need to
import engineers in order to promote
innovation and competitiveness.
But there are no shortages and there is no reason whatever to think that
the engineers from Asia will have the skills to be truly innovative. In
fact, America and the West became great by tapping the skills of white
engineers and scientists.
Richard Lynn has
shown that even though Asians have IQ’s at least comparable to whites, they
are less creative and innovative.
Bill Gates’ claim
that non-white engineers are needed to make America competitive and
innovative is simply not based on any scientific data.
The bottom line is that a path to status and
earning power for some of the most intelligent white males has been almost
eliminated. Companies like Microsoft may benefit because importing engineers
lowers the salary scale for all engineers.
But it will not lead to innovation.
Indeed, one downside for the society as a whole is that creative,
intelligent whites may well decide to enter other fields where they can make
more money, such as finance. Or they may end up watching football games and
accepting lower-paid, non-technical positions.
The truly sad thing is that people like Bill Gates have
enough money to change the world in a positive way. Someone with Gates’s
money would be able to fund pro-white media and political movements that
would prevent the dispossession of whites and prevent the bloodshed and
social tensions that will inevitably result from importing huge numbers of
people of different races and cultures.
But the sad reality is that all of Gates’s efforts are
directed at undermining his own people. Not only is he spearheading the
displacement of white engineers and scientists, a glance at the website of
the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation shows its preoccupation with charity toward
non-whites — particularly Africans. Not surprisingly, Gates was a highly
visible
supporter of Obama in the recent election.
Gates would seem to be the paragon of the individualist white person. These are white men who have with no concern for their people but with a deep commitment to moral virtue and principle — part of the Puritan legacy of American culture. This Puritan legacy was a critical ingredient in the demise of the white Protestant elite in favor of the hostile Jewish-dominated elite we see today.
People like Gates and Buffet bask in the praise of conventional
opinion that is so hostile to the legitimate interests of white people. In
the end, they will usher in an era of ethnic hostility that is likely to be
much more brutal than anything in America’s past.
There are far too many whites like this. But if only one or two such super-wealthy people realized that their long term interests are bound up with preventing the dispossession of their own people, the revolution would begin.
John Williams is a retired engineer.
Permanent link: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Williams-Gates.html
