Liberals vs. Mother Nature: Freddie Mercury, AIDS, and Minority-Worship

Who is the biggest hate-criminal in the world? There’s only one contender and you may be shocked to learn that it’s a female. Worse still, that female is as immortal as she is immoral. For millennia, she’s been hating on humanity, discriminating between different groups and imposing inequality, preventing women from matching the intellectual, cultural and physical achievements of men, flatly refusing to allow sub-Saharan Africans to flourish in science, mathematics and philosophy.

Hateful, horrible and heretical

Yes, let me introduce you to that hateful, horrible and heretical harridan known as Mother Nature. Quite clearly she is the biggest hate-criminal there ever has been and ever will be. Forget the Patriarchy: it’s the Matriarchy, the rule of Mother Nature, that really explains why the world is such an unfair and unequal place.  She’s responsible for that vast and on-going hate-crime known as human evolution, whereby human beings in different environments have acquired different bodies, brains and psychologies. In other words, race exists and different races aren’t equal. Mother Nature hasn’t treated Homo as a special, post-biological genus. She didn’t relax natural selection when human beings invented new technologies like fire, the bow-and-arrow, and the written word. Instead, she accelerated it. Neanderthals had to be robust and muscular because they hunted at close range, but that selective pressure was removed when Homo sapiens developed throwing-spears and poisoned arrows. Slender Bushmen bring down giraffe and rhinoceros with ingenuity and cunning, not brute strength and aggression.

But Mother Nature doesn’t commit her hate-crimes at the same rate all over the earth. There are hot-spots of hate, that is, places where human evolution has operated in particularly interesting and complex ways. One of the most intense hot-spots is the Indian subcontinent, the region of Asia that stretches from Pakistan in the west to Bangladesh in the east and Sri Lanka in the far south, with India in the middle. The subcontinent is what you could call an S.S.S.I. — a Site of Special Scientific Interest. Mother Nature has been very busy there for a very long time. Whether you’re interested in geology, zoology, or botany, in archaeology, anthropology or linguistics, in religion, literature or philosophy, the Indian subcontinent is a fascinating place.

The Indian subcontinent

But the most important part of its dazzling variety may turn out to be its genetics. It’s one of the places where Mother Nature has most comprehensively blasphemed against the liberal dogma that “We’re All the Same under the Skin.” In fact, we aren’t, and the Indian subcontinent provides abundant proof. The genetic complexity introduced by ancient invasions and migrations was further enhanced by the intricate rules of the Hindu caste system, whereby different professions and classes were banned from intermarriage. This created a whole series of ethnicities and micro-ethnicities, as genetic lines separated, occupied different cultural environments, and evolved in different ways. Literacy and mastery of complex intellectual systems were compulsory for Brahmins, but prohibited for Dalits.

Sectarian supernovae

Today, India is one of the most genetically complex and cognitively stratified nations on earth. It has groups with high average IQ and groups with low average IQ. The self-taught Indian genius Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887–1920) was a Tamil Brahmin who contributed more to mathematics in a short lifetime than many millions of sub-Saharan Blacks have in centuries. He was like a supernova outshining all the millions of stars in a galaxy.

You could say the same of the Pakistani scientist Abdus Salam (1926–96). He contributed more to physics in seventy years of life than many millions of Blacks have in centuries. And he won a Nobel Prize in 1979 for his contributions. It was the first scientific Nobel ever won by a Muslim — at least, that’s what infidels outside Pakistan would say. But in Pakistan itself it’s illegal to say Salam was a Muslim, because he belonged to a heretical sect known as the Ahmadis, who are persecuted in Muslim countries (and outside them — see the murder of the Ahmadi shopkeeper Asad Shah in Glasgow). But is it genetically significant that Abdus Salam was Ahmadi? Has the group evolved or preserved higher intelligence by separation and interbreeding? Or were Salam’s caste and clan the important thing? He was a “Jat of Rajput descent from Jhang on his father’s side” and “a Kakazai from Gurdaspur” on his mother’s.

Biology is bigger than biography

These are interesting questions, and I think Salam’s genetics are worth serious investigation. He was a rare scientific supernova in a mostly quiescent galaxy, because the Muslim world has contributed very little to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) in recent centuries. But the Ahmadis are only one of the sects and micro-sects that make the Indian subcontinent such a fascinating place for anthropologists and students of religion. Another and much more famous Indian sect has contributed another human supernova to the world. In fact, he far outshone Salam and Ramanujan, because no special scientific or mathematical expertise was needed to appreciate what he did. I’m talking about Freddie Mercury (1946–91), the lead singer of the world-famous rock-band Queen.

Freddie Mercury

Freddie Mercury was born Farrokh Bulsara in Zanzibar to a family of Parsis, one of the oldest and most interesting religions in the world. Thanks to the film Bohemian Rhapsody, a recently released bio-pic devoted to his life, Mercury is receiving a lot of media attention at the moment. But I can guarantee that only a hate-site like the Occidental Observer will try to speak the full heretical truth about him. Mercury was bigger and more interesting than modern political correctness allows him to be, because mainstream journalists will write about him biographically, but they won’t write about him biologically. That is, they won’t speculate about his genetics or the neurological basis of his homosexuality. And they certainly won’t discuss his death from AIDS in anything but the most cautious and politically pious way.

A Parsi Petri

It’s understandable that liberal journalists keep quiet about his biology, because Mercury was a living embodiment of the hate-scientist Gregory Cochran’s appalling dictum: “Homosexual men are nature’s Petri dishes.” However, in Mercury’s case the Petri dish was interesting long before any virological experiments were conducted there. As noted above, Mercury was a Parsi, so he was the result of a long experiment in genetic separation and interbreeding conducted in the Indian state of Gujarat.

Etymologically speaking, Parsis are Persians, because they descend from Zoroastrians who fled the Muslim conquest of Persia, or modern Iran, from the 7th or 8th century AD. Zoroastrianism itself seems to date from “the early 2nd millennium BC” and was a significant influence on Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The Magi of the New Testament, who brought gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh to the infant Jesus, were Zoroastrian priests, and English words like “magus” and “magic,” descending from Latin and Greek, are testament to the respect felt by the ancient world for the occult wisdom of the Zoroastrians. Indeed, ancient Persia and modern Iran are more hot-spots of hate, places where Mother Nature has been at work in fascinating and complex ways. Iranians are not Arabs: they’re genetically, linguistically and culturally distinct, and for their numbers they’ve made a much bigger mark on the world than Arabs have. For example, the world-famous poet, astronomer and mathematician Omar Khayyam was Persian, not Arab (just as the world-famous warrior-sultan Saladin was Kurdish, not Arab). Iranians and Arabs are racially distinct because differences in language and culture have maintained differences in genetics.

Luck and opportunity

Parsis who migrated from Iran to India have adopted Indian languages, but they’ve maintained cultural and genetic differences between themselves and their non-Zoroastrian neighbours. Their high average IQ is one difference from the Indian average: Parsis are famous for their success in business and science. They’re also famous for their philanthropy, and unlike Jews, another set of culturally and genetically distinct over-achievers, they’ve been liked and respected by the majority among whom they’ve lived for many centuries. Even by Parsi standards, however, Freddie Mercury was exceptional: he won much more fame and popularity than any of his genetic kin.

He owed a lot of that to luck and opportunity, of course, but he could not have exploited his luck and opportunities without the high intelligence and creativity granted him by his Parsi ancestry. All members of the rock-band Queen were in fact notable for high intelligence: the guitarist Brian May (born 1947) had a BSc (Hons) in physics, the bassist John Deacon (born 1951) had a BSc (Hons) in electronics and the drummer Roger Taylor (born 1949) had a BSc (Hons) in biology. Mercury never acquired a degree of any kind, but he was the creative heart of the band, one of the best and most charismatic front-men in the history of popular music.

A gay stealing the day

And if you want proof of that, watch the twenty minutes of his performance at Live Aid, the charity concert held at Wembley Stadium in London in 1985. Although the hundreds of millions who watched Live Aid at the time weren’t aware of it, they were being given a masterclass in human bio-diversity. You’ll read in countless places that “Queen stole the day,” but it’s not true. Farrokh Bulsara the Parsi stole the day from the overwhelmingly Northwestern European singers and musicians who performed at Live Aid. Whatever you think of the music when you watch Queen’s performance, you’ll be dazzled by the Mercuriality. Freddie Mercury’s charisma and extraversion are both quantitatively greater and qualitatively different than anyone else’s. Brian May, John Deacon and Roger Taylor were his backing musicians, peripheral figures glimpsed occasionally in the mega-watt glare of their singer. They brought White male competence and dedication to Live Aid, just as White males had supplied the technology for rock music itself, but Freddie Mercury was from a different world.

And he was indeed from a different world, both geographically and genetically. And perhaps microbiologically too. Mercury’s homosexuality was central to his flamboyant, exhibitionist personality, but homosexuality is a biological puzzle. It reduces reproductive fitness and would be eliminated by natural selection if it had a simple genetic basis. So what causes it? The hate-scientist Gregory Cochran suggests that it’s caused by some kind of brain pathogen, possibly associated with urban living. And this “gay germ” hypothesis does account for all the known facts, from the persistence of homosexuality in urban populations to its absence among hunter-gatherers. But the hypothesis has another great advantage: as Cochran himself points out, it causes liberal heads to explode. Liberals really do not like the idea that homosexuality could be caused by a bacterium or virus. It demeans a sacred minority, undermining the dignity and self-worth of oppressed folk who have already suffered far too much.

A disguised form of religion

In short, the gay-germ hypothesis is blasphemous to liberals. And “blasphemous” is the right word, because liberalism, for all its claims to secularism and rationality, is a disguised form of religion. The purpose of liberalism is to meet the psychological needs of liberals, not to explain reality or provide solutions to the problems liberals claim to be concerned about. Homosexuals are a sacred minority whose sexual orientation elevates them above their heterosexual oppressors. How could a sacred minority owe its very existence to a brain pathogen? Blasphemy! But the same liberals would mock creationists for denying that human beings have evolved from apes. Liberals tell creationists that human beings aren’t special. Humans are material beings subject to the same physical laws and evolutionary processes as all other animals. Darwin completed the revolution that Copernicus began, by demonstrating that man had no more sacred and special place in biology than he had in cosmology.

So liberals would say to creationists, but liberals have sacred and special groups of their own. That’s why they’re horrified by the gay-germ hypothesis. It’s so crude, so biological, so subversive of the nobility and specialness of homosexuals. But that’s no reason to suppose that the gay-germ hypothesis is wrong. Liberals can’t reject the gay-germ hypothesis on emotional or ideological grounds. As they themselves would gleefully point out to creationists: Reality isn’t governed by human ideas of right and wrong. Much as liberals might dislike to accept it, Freddie Mercury may have owed his marvelous homosexuality to a mere micro-organism.

A hate-crime called AIDS

We can only speculate about the cause of Mercury’s homosexuality, but he was certainly affected by another micro-organism. It was a fatal one called the Human Immunodeficiency Virus, or HIV for short. This is the retrovirus responsible for the unpleasant disease known as Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, or AIDS for short. Freddie Mercury is undoubtedly the most famous victim of AIDS, but no mainstream commentator would contrast his miserable premature death with the longevity of his three heterosexual bandmates, all of whom are still alive in 2018, or with the longevity of his father Bomi Bulsara (1908—2003) and mother Jer Bulsara (1922—2016). You could call AIDS one of the biggest hate-crimes ever committed by Mother Nature, because it has struck disproportionately and devastatingly at two of the most sacred groups in liberal ideology, namely, homosexuals and Blacks.

But Freddie Mercury’s death from AIDS confirmed his status as one of the most biologically interesting entertainers who ever lived. He was a Parsi, a homosexual and a victim of HIV. All three aspects of his life-story offer key insights into the work of Mother Nature. The third and final aspect shows her at her worst, as a multi-million-slaying hate-criminal singling out vulnerable minorities simply because of the way they behave. For liberals, promiscuous sex should not lead to fatal diseases. In an ideal world for liberals, fatal diseases would strike those who condemn promiscuous sex, rather than those who practise it. But we don’t live in an ideal world for liberals. Instead, we live under the reign of Mother Nature, who ignores liberal ideas about the proper regulation of reality. Indeed, by creating AIDS she confirmed the hate-think of St Paul in his Epistle to the Romans: “Men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.”

Jumping from ape to man

Obeying St Paul’s strictures against “unseemly” sex would have prevented the AIDS epidemic among Western homosexuals. And obeying other religious strictures would have prevented HIV infecting human beings in the first place, because Judaism bans the consumption of apes and monkeys. HIV is a mutation of the viral family SIV, the Simian Immuno-Deficiency Virus, which may have infected a hunter of bushmeat in Central Africa when he was bitten by a chimpanzee or came into contact with chimpanzee blood sometime before the First World War. The hunter may then have disobeyed further religious strictures and transmitted the virus to prostitutes in Léopoldville, the capital of the Belgian Congo. Certainly the higher average promiscuity of sub-Saharan Africans was key to the development of HIV, as was increased migration in the region facilitated by industrialization and the building of railroads. But attempted humanitarian interventions by Westerners may have been key to the development of HIV too. Doctors in Africa re-used syringes during vaccination programmes against sleeping sickness, which was an obvious way for the virus to infect new hosts and establish itself permanently.

It’s obviously not right that attempts to prevent one disease should facilitate the spread of another disease, but that is how reality often works. Good intentions do not guarantee good results, but I think Christians tend to disregard this truth or dismiss it as unimportant. The Christian elevation of pure intent over knowledge and caution has been bequeathed to liberalism. However, where Christians seek to win the approval of God and a place among the Heavenly Elect, liberals seek to win the approval of their peers and a place among the Earthly Elect. For example, liberals display their purity of heart by supporting mass immigration and anti-racism. That’s why they are then so reluctant to admit the bad consequences of mass immigration and anti-racism in places like Rotherham and Huddersfield. Indeed, they seek to conceal those bad consequences and to demonize those who want to expose them.

Viral liberation

Liberals also displayed their purity of heart by supporting “gay liberation” in the 1960s and ’70s, just as HIV was taking its first big step outside Africa. This was the result of more good intentions with bad results. When Belgium granted independence to the Democratic Republic of Congo in 1960, many educated Whites left the country and UNESCO (the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) brought in Black Francophone replacements from Haiti. The Haitians then acquired HIV from Congolese prostitutes during their stay and took it back with them on their return across the Atlantic. In those days Haiti was a popular holiday destination for American homosexuals, because poverty in the country meant many men and boys there were willing to sell themselves for sex. The poverty and poor governance of Haiti are in fact more of Mother Nature’s hate-crimes, because Blacks have lower average IQs and higher average tendencies to crime and corruption. Blacks are not suited for running an advanced society, as the destruction of Zimbabwe and Chicago has proved in recent decades. But Haiti has been proving it ever since 1804, when Haitian Blacks liberated themselves from French rule.

Gay sex-tourism in Haiti may explain the first known death from AIDS on American soil, that of a Black teenager called Robert Rayford in 1969. He had presented himself for treatment to doctors in St Louis, Missouri, in early 1968. At the time, they were baffled by his symptoms, which he told them dated from late 1966 and which included genital sores, pelvic swelling, chlamydia, shortness of breath, and general debility. But tests in 1987 on preserved samples of his blood and tissues revealed that he had been infected with HIV, probably through work as a male prostitute. Anal intercourse is highly unnatural, because the rectum is not designed for penetration and the rectal walls are thin and easily damaged. Liberals, of course, scoff at the idea of “unnatural sex,” which is why they do not like to face the truth about AIDS and “gay liberation.” Promiscuous, drug-fuelled sex is not natural and the AIDS epidemic among Western homosexuals was not the fault of Ronald Reagan or homophobia.

Haemophiliacs are not a sacred group

Blood transfusions and the use of blood-products aren’t natural either and they were another way in which AIDS was transmitted to unsuspecting people in the 1970s and ’80s. Mother Nature does not take account of good intentions or human ignorance, but the haemophiliacs and others who died after receiving infected blood were not a sacred group to liberals. Homosexuals were and are a sacred group, central to the minority-worship that is such an important part of liberalism. Thanks to his homosexuality, Freddie Mercury is a liberal icon who has even been forgiven the sin of racism. In 1984 Queen performed a series of concerts at the “luxury resort” of Sun City in Bophuthatswana, a nominally independent enclave in what was then the pariah-state of “Apartheid South Africa.” Peter Feldman, a Jewish art critic in South Africa, condemned the concerts held by Queen and other famous Western performers: “They used to say, ‘We’re doing it for our fans, we’re not politicians,’ but the truth is, they didn’t care. They were being paid millions to perform there.”

But Freddie Mercury was gay and Queen’s concerts in “Sin City” are now forgiven, just like the racism of that other liberal icon Gandhi, who lived in South Africa as a young lawyer and called “black Africans Kaffirs, a derogatory term, for a larger part of his stay in the country.” Gandhi was a firm believer in the inferiority of Blacks and objected to their mixing with his own racial group: “About the mixing of the Kaffirs with the Indians, I must confess I feel most strongly.” Gandhi was right: racial mixing is a bad idea. It’s unnatural and Mother Nature punishes those who practise it, just as she punished those who practised reckless gay sex. AIDS has been one of the biggest hate-crimes in history, but liberals will never bring the perpetrator to justice. Mother Nature is still at large, still fomenting inequality and punishing those who flout her rules. She gave Freddie Mercury the high intelligence and creativity that allowed him to become a star. Then she killed him for his promiscuity.

Mother’s Little Helpers

But did Mother Nature make Mercury a promiscuous homosexual in the first place? Homosexuality is definitely natural in some sense, because homosexuals don’t choose their sexual orientation. If the gay-germ hypothesis is correct, Mercury owed his homosexuality to a microbe. And if that microbe is associated with urban living, that will come as no surprise. Like the agriculture on which they depend, cities and civilization are profoundly unnatural things. Mother Nature punished human beings savagely when they began to grow crops, keep domestic animals and settle together in large numbers. Populations increased, but men and women had shorter and unhealthier lives. Unlike nomadic hunter-gatherers, they no longer left parasites and pathogens behind but lived on top of them, year in, year out. They also acquired diseases from their domestic animals. And all this had profound effects on their genetics. City-dwellers in Europe and Asia were selected for resistance to diseases like cholera and small-pox.

That’s why these diseases were so devastating when Europeans introduced them to the New World. Europeans weren’t just militarily superior to Amerindians: they were also microbiologically superior. And this was profoundly unfair, if you judge reality by some human standards. But you shouldn’t judge reality by those standards, because reality is governed by Mother Nature, not by human beings. She commits hate-crimes with impunity and she’s never going to stop. Indeed, she’s preparing to commit a whole lot more, because she’s been busy installing collaborationist governments across the Western world. From Trump and Bolsonaro in the Americas to Salvini and Orbán in Europe, more and more Western leaders are beginning to work with Mother Nature. Like Freddie Mercury, liberalism works against her. That’s why, like Freddie Mercury, liberalism is going to die young.

32 replies
  1. Luke
    Luke says:

    ““About the mixing of the Kaffirs with the Indians, I must confess I feel most strongly.” Gandhi was right: racial mixing is a bad idea. It’s unnatural and Mother Nature punishes those who practise it, just as she punished those who practised reckless gay sex. ”

    I can offer one very depressing and disturbing example of how toxic the Hollywood jewish brainwashing has been for White America.

    A few months ago, I met for the first time the brother of a White male who I have known for a number of years. This brother was from California – the epicenter of the most toxic and fatal strains of liberalism and all of the associated mental diseases that are embedded within the liberal mindset. This White male claimed to have voted for Trump, but after having a short conversation with him about politics and about the direction of the country – which I helped swerve into a discussion of Alt-right, White racial nationalism and the nightmarish prospects for Whites in the rapidly darkening America – it became clear to me that this guy was not even a tiny bit red pilled on the all important issue of race or about the critical need for Whites to start practicing tribalism and embracing identity politics and demanding racial loyalty among their families and friends.

    Here is the truly shocking and depressing kicker to this conversation. This guy announces to me that his white daughter had been involved with a black guy in a relationship that lasted about a year. And, as he was confessing this detail to me – he seemed to adopt what could only be described as an attitude of self-righteous pride over the fact that he raised a daughter who had so little pride in her own race and who felt so little loyalty towards her own race that she decided to become a race mixer. I studied this fellow’s face closely as he was delivering this news and the thought flashed through my head that this guy, despite having voted for Trump and despite other comments he had made about how he was growing uncomfortable with the direction of politics in California – but, the brainwashing that he had absorbed had been so powerful and so diabolically effective that he had become a SJW of sorts. A cuckservative, or more accurately, a cuckcasian.

    So, instead of being disappointed in the racial disloyalty of his daughter and instead of taking her inexcusable behavior as a personal insult to her white father and white mother and as a sign of disrespect – this White male chose to (unbelievably) take pride in what his daughter had done and use it to give himself a lifetime get out of jail free card that he could use to deflect any accusations of him being a racist.

    “See here? I raised a white daughter who was a coal burner so that PROVES I am not a racist!”

    Incidentally, I asked him if he was aware of the crime statistics regarding the incredibly high percentage of white females who wind up being killed by their black boyfriends, who seem to take breaking up as some kind of insult to their black male egos and who have a habit of showing their displeasure in violent and often fatal ways. He looked at me with total surprise and said that he had never heard or read anything about that – implying that I was just some ‘racist’ white guy who was pulling his leg.

    These are the kinds of White humans who I want nothing whatsoever to do with. They are blue pilled and they are just as big of an enemy to our people as are the culprits who brainwashed them.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      I can’t speak for others, but daughters will do what they want, irrespective of their father’s wishes. My daughter’s friend, with whom she spends considerable time, lives with a Black. My daughter thinks he’s “nice”. Despite my years of disparaging interracial relationships, I could see her falling for the usual bullshit line of “you won’t sleep with me because I’m Black”. Cut the guy some slack on that one.

      • Barkingmad
        Barkingmad says:

        @Curmudgeon. Maybe daughters (and sons) wouldn’t do whatever they want if they lived at home with their parents till they get married to a proper man. For the past 3 generations and more, parents simply cannot wait to kick the kids out the moment they’ve finished high school. Independence is important, you know!

        It is a miracle that more girls don’t become mudsharks when you consider how many millions of them live alone (or with an equally immature room mate).

        If you have daughters and sons who cannot wait to bolt from the family home to live in some godforsaken apartment, then either their family life has been awful, or they are bad seeds. Normal people want to stick with their families til they are older, or married.

  2. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    I suspect that the “gay germ” like the “gay gene” will never be identified. That does not mean, however, that biology does not play a part. There are several places on the planet, where some diseases have a higher incidence, across races. For example, about 30 years ago, forms of bowel cancer and Krohn’s disease, in Canada’s prairie provinces were among the highest in the world and crossed ethnic groups. Another example involves the North of England, before cultural enrichment, having astronomical rates of spina bifida.
    We now know that BPA makes boys more feminine, but apparently does not make girls more feminine. Could this be a cause for the “explosion” of homosexuality? In a similar vein, Dr. Terry Wahls has reversed her MS with a Paleo diet that is, in essence, customized to her biology. Each of us lacks certain micro nutrients that, in turn, manifest themselves in our ailments. Is it the lack of micronutrients that cause homosexuality?
    Either or neither way, the common factor is biology, just as it would be if it were a gay germ. Germs are transmittable. Biology would have to be involved if some bodies are susceptible to the germ and others not.

  3. Dave Bowman
    Dave Bowman says:

    Every time I read a new essay by Mr Langdon I find myself thinking, “This is the finest essay he’s ever written – and one of the finest I’ve ever read on the internet”. Until the next one. Then I think the same thing again.

    Thank you sincerely, Mr Langdon, for this wonderfully-measured, word-perfect examination of liberal idiocy and the outcomes for those who insist on trying to re-model reality – or Mother Nature – to their own woefully ignorant, retarded worldview. I really struggle to describe my amazement and pleasure at how clear, readable, admirably restrained, perceptive, direct, cutting and devastatingly powerful this really is. No liberal could ever find a way to argue with a word of it – although of course they would try. All I can say is that it reminds me more than anything else of a glorious, equally sarcastic, caustic poem by Kipling which might well have been written for today’s ship of liberal fools. The poem concludes:

    And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
    When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
    As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
    The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      23andme sells your genetic information to the pharmaceutical industry, hardly a “high” science regime. It’s there to promote more harm to us.
      IMO, if homosexuality were truly genetic, there would have to be a significantly higher rate (which apparently is zero) in great apes, given that we share 98% of genes with them. After all, we’re all the same, aren’t we?

  4. HK Wills
    HK Wills says:

    Twenty years ago I read an interesting book: The Left-Hander’s Syndrome. It was written by a British Columbian psychologist. As its title suggest it was all about left handedness. It turns out all humans are genetically programmed to be right-handed. Something – hormones, blood sugar levels or something else – goes wrong in-utero for the left-handed fetus and causes the right hemisphere of the brain to become dominant. Not too big a deal as the human body is largely symmetrical. In the late 1990’s a very large and rigorous study on homosexuality was published ( I don’t recall the title or authors). I do recall their finding that monozygotic (identical twins) share their sexuality only 48% of the time. Since identical twins share 100 % of their genes this ruled out a purely genetic explanation for homosexuality. It occurred to me that the etiology of homosexuality may be along the same lines as left-handedness: a biological phenomenon not a consequence of genes (genes or a suite of genes that code for homosexuality have yet to be discovered). In the case of homosexuals the outcome is, from a Darwinian perspective, disastrously maladaptive: the sexes are not reproductively symmetrical so to speak.

    Cochran’s germ theory may be on to something. At least it is a good working hypothesis.

    • Chaotic neutral
      Chaotic neutral says:

      First of all, great article, with some caveats. I was thinking in terms of twinning too. I’ve known numerous pairs of identical twins where one was gay and the other not. There is scientific evidence according to the study you cite. This is highly suggestive, that a rare disorder would frequently overlap with a rare phenomenon such as twinning. I have heard of the theory that homosexuality may be related to differential hormonal exposure in the womb, similar to south paws. Identical twins are the same genetically and usual in upbringing and environment, so these factors seem likely lower in significance. How are they different? Room in the womb! The uterus is small and disorders and malformations of twinning are relatively common, for example, the parasitic twin phenomenon. Twins interfere with the in uterine implantation of one another. Owing to the other factors, near identical genetics, environment, and usually constant physical proximity, would not that argue against an infectious cause? Twins would usually both be gay, rather than the opposite. I’m politically neutral to the cause of homosexuality, btw.

      Another point is how do we know that homosexuality was rare in hunter gatherer communities? They left few records, and tribes were always comparatively small. It takes a fairly large population for a homosexual community to form, for them to become visible. Cultures have to be relatively sophisticated to characterize the phenomenon at all. I think this claim is bunk or at best unknowable.

      True that gay promiscuity played a role in the spreading of aids, but equally true did not tattooing and iv drug abuse play a role in the spreading of hepatitis c and b, diseases which have had a greater impact on heterosexuals? Why not highlight instead the role of open borders immigration and globalization and the idiotic East Asian military campaigns that our wise leaders have foisted upon us? The rise of aids in the USA seems eerily a couple of years after the 1965 immigration act to me! Why do the Paleocons seem so overjoyed at the misfortune of the gay community with the aids epidemic?

      Disgusting about the sex trade in Haiti; perhaps they reap what they sow! Are you saying that Abdus Salem had an Indian Brahmin mother?

  5. Rob Bottom
    Rob Bottom says:

    If the gay-germ hypothesis is correct, Mercury owed his homosexuality to a microbe. And if that microbe is associated with urban living, that will come as no surprise.

    I think chemicals such as artificial hormones in the water supply are much more likely causes of the homosexuality and gender-bending behavior we see today. If there’s a genetic component, one could predict that there would be more homosexuals in urban areas than among nomadic tribes simply due to towns and cities supporting much larger populations and genetic diversity. Adding to that, if some percentage become homosexuals as a result of sexual abuse in adolescence (which seems to be the case), wouldn’t it be more likely to go unnoticed in a city rather than among a close knit hunter-gatherer tribe? It’s questionable if homosexuality is even less common in nomadic peoples, as there are stories of “two spirited” people possessing both male and female personality traits, including, one would imagine, sexual proclivities.

    Like Freddie Mercury, liberalism works against her. That’s why, like Freddie Mercury, liberalism is going to die young.

    We are already beginning to discover genes strongly associated with a positive and negative impact on intelligence that are distributed in ways that line up with IQ testing. There will almost certainly come a time when geneticists in China (or some other country not tied down by political correctness) will collect enough evidence that the liberals will have to concede what we already know.

    It would be nice if the sort of liberalism that makes multiculturalism possible would die off, but there’s a very real possibility that our hostile elites will simply weaponize these hate-facts against whites anyway. White privilege will become “genetic privilege”, and we will be told that it is our moral duty to continue to do that which goes against our collective interests. They will not stop to explain why white societies should allow themselves to be taken advantage of in this way anymore than they were prepared to when integration began. Whites who refuse to interbreed with other races will be social outcasts for not “doing their part” to better the one race, “the human race”. I can already see it.

  6. Ricsi
    Ricsi says:

    Very anti-liberal article and spot on with the truth. Glad to see you mentioned certain leaders who are trying to fight back,you could certainly include Putin and maybe even Trump in that,but it is a hard fight considering who is really behind promoting these behaviours that Mother Nature so despises.

  7. bruno
    bruno says:

    There is so much greatness within KMac’s creation. If only works such as that above could be presented in the schools in the Western world.

  8. Ray
    Ray says:

    Home education is key. Yeah, yeah. I know. They’ll be deprived of being socialized. No lock downs, school shootings, drugs pushed on them and homosexuality normalized. The trade off is beautiful, though, as a parent can watch uncorrupted souls, bodies, and minds develop normally. My daughter’s friend tried to tell her when they were 6 years old that “it’s ok for girls and girls to get married”. She learned that at school. After telling her that is not true, she said “Yeah, Dad, that’s just weird.” She’s seen the oddity of one of her softball teammates that is being raised by two butches. The girl is obviously being groomed. My son has seen the behavior of one of his hockey teammates who is of a typical mixed race disaster. No Dad= No discipline. Bottom line-when your children are spending 8 plus hours a day amongst the children of degenerates and teachers who are trained to promote the jew agenda, they will come to accept it as normal and eventually embrace it.

  9. Jim Russel
    Jim Russel says:

    I’m new here and this article was a puzzle. Its purpose was not discernible from its content. So much so that I was tempted yesterday to post a four-word comment asking why it was published. What is the relevance of Freddy Mercury to today?

    Some of the people reading here are not “part of the scene” and maybe they won’t understand what seems to be jokes about popular culture. I for one am a genuine outsider who is divorced from the madness that seems to have infected almost everyone, on all sides of the supposed left-right divide.

  10. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    This is an excellent article to share with one’s Libtardian relatives, acquaintances, coworkers, etc…

    The progressive-regressives are so sanctimonious regarding their self-assumed monopoly on being one with the earth, one with nature, promoting animal rights (ignoring the fact that some of the first laws protecting animals were enacted in the Third Reich). While, on the other hand they gleefully (and falsely) accuse the ‘evi’l conservatives/racists/Republicans/—–(you fill in the blank) want to wipe out all life in their pursuit of monetary profit. Hence, I think this would be a good article to politely ask for their feedback on, seeing how they champion Mother Nature.

    OK, regressives! You say you love Mother Nature? Then read this and embrace Her!

  11. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    Mr. Langdon: Good points positing interesting questions. But you owe me a beer for enticing me to watch that video: so hard on the ears and especially eyes. And that retro-Woodstock girl in the crowd, clad in a bikini. Overall Hollywood manufactured trash.

  12. PaleoAtlantid
    PaleoAtlantid says:

    Nature and her eternal, immutable, irrevocable laws will always have the last say. Liberals, Marxist and Jews delude themselves into thinking they can change or at least moderate reality by making pronouncements and writing wish lists, they can’t. Sanity will return but unfortunately only after uncomfortable and uncompromising lessons.

  13. JM
    JM says:

    Powerful essay!
    There is a lot of diversity in the spectrum of male homosexuality – from hard core through bisexual to adopted and then shaken off. There is also plasticity in sexual behavior, more so in females than in males, though present in both. I suspect the greater incidence in homosexual practice today has been heavily affected by the decline of religion/social censure and the ascendancy of acceptance/encouragement/reward so that the existence of any tendency in that direction by puberty be it determined genetically, in the womb or after birth, finds expression today, whereas once it was passed through and ended in heterosexual partnership.

  14. sylvie
    sylvie says:

    I seriously think this Darwinistic approach is counterproductive to our cause, for many reasons, not the least of which being that it can be easily caricaturized: since flying is unnatural to man, aircraft crashes are “hate crimes of Mother Nature” punishing the passengers, and so on. The author himself gives the cue with his “unhealthy city life”. This kind of rejection of liberalism leads nowhere.

    And if the gay Freddy Murphy is a good choice proving racial IQ is doubtful, too. He is a genius only for some disturbed teenagers.

    • Chaotic neutral
      Chaotic neutral says:

      Good remarks! Hey are you the same sylvie that Greg Johnson blocked from counter currents? Why do you think he blocked you?

      • sylvie
        sylvie says:

        well, read my “blocking comment”.
        I didnt like how he kicked the “fascists”, “National Socialists” in the ass without having any reason to do it. This is cheap virtue signalling which he normally refuses.

  15. Rerevisionist
    Rerevisionist says:

    Langdon obviously isn’t aware that ‘AIDS’ was a fraud manufactured by Jews, in 1984. His parable is incomplete – whatever may be thought of the Zanzibar singer, he had no innate defence against deception. And he died as a result.

    • Barkingmad
      Barkingmad says:

      Germs don’t cause disease; disease causes germs – but 99.9% of the population doesn’t get it, and never will. An industry has arisen around this disease and its supposed cause.

      I recall a female scientist who, ridiculing the HIV hypothesis, said that she’d gladly have sex with any man who was diagnosed as having socalled AIDS “so long as he’s handsome enough, of course”. LOL.

      There’s rumblings that anyone denying the standard issue ideas about HIV/AIDS will be found guilty of “AIDS denialism” and punished accordingly.

      • Rerevisionist
        Rerevisionist says:

        There is an automatic Jewish ‘denialist’ tag to anyone challenging a jewish fraud. 9/11 denialist, and so on. I think ‘Hitler denialist’ will come to be used of anone who (like me) considers the Hitler and the NSDAP were part of world Jewry.
        I hate having to promote my site, but goes into detail. The whole thing is another Jewish fraud.

        • Barkingmad
          Barkingmad says:

          @Rere. No need to apologize for promoting your site. Thank you very much for letting us see it. It’s quite something. I only scanned it briefly but I see no mention of the granddaddy of them all, Aids Inc., Scandal of the Century by John Rappoport. I bought this book more than 25 years ago and it was what really got me going, though it fell on fertile ground in that I never bought the germs-cause-disease nonsense as regards any illness in the first place.

          1. Male homosexuals are inherently weak. Not a moral condemnation but a simple fact. (It’s not a crime to be weak, it’s a crime to do things that weaken you even more.)

          2. They generally do things (much drug taking, for example + anal sex) that would harm even people with much stronger constitutions.

          3. The “germs” (bacteria/viruses/parasites) march in to try and deal with the mess created by the bad behavior. Nature’s way.

          4. But the “germs” get the blame and the homos (and heterosexual weaklings too) get much pity and support. We have modern medicine to thank, with its fixation on microorganisms: “Poor innocent victims! That nasty HIV virus!!”

          5. LOL.

  16. steve
    steve says:

    I learned more about Freddy Mercury here than I really wanted to know; ‘back in the day’, Queen was considered cornball and third rate, even using the VERY LOW standards of the ‘rock world’. With the passage of time and the legitimizing of pop garbage culture, it has been deemed necessary to idolize them; I don’t.

    • Franklin
      Franklin says:

      Mother Nature? Damn it’s a female causing all this trouble?…. I believe it is a result of choice. No bacteria, virus, genetics cause a man to suck another. Or bend over and grab them ankles. They choose to do that. You quoted Romans ch 1 and sure enough, that what is explained in the text. We choose. No excuses whatsoever. Although I enjoyed the article immensely and have sent it on to my sons, I disagree with the theory. It’s calvanistic, in that it’s original sin and all men are born sinners. That’s a great excuse. I couldn’t help it, I was born that way… what a load of crap… all men and women are responsible for their choices.

      • Barkingmad
        Barkingmad says:

        It is too bad that the word “sinner” is so loaded. There is a more nuanced, non-moralistic definition. Sinner/sin just means we are born into a difficult world, we are in a state of imperfection and are prone to mistakes of one sort or another no matter how hard we try to not be this way. Everything humans do produces an effect one way or another. That is what is meant by “sin” as explained to me by an evangelical. She said, “We are not sinners because we sin; we sin because we are sinners [ie, cannot help ourselves].” This doesn’t offend me at all. It is true.

        There’s no cure. It is the human condition.

  17. Misterioso
    Misterioso says:

    Interesting article. Dogma is everything and most so called civilized people will never accept the precepts that this author is trying to put forth. Never wanting to offend and being made to feel guilty for their intelligence and success. The left has been on a roll for centuries and leaders like Trump, Balsonaro, Salvini and Orban are just a blip on the radar. I am convinced that Mother Nature the great hate criminal is the only one that can fix this problem. And fix it she just might do.

Comments are closed.