Discourse is war.” ~Søren Renner
This is a call for items that can be included in the White Genocide Evidence Project. Please post quotations or evidence as comments to this article, preferably in the format described below
Contributors will help create a database of evidence documenting the intentional destruction, displacement, and denigration of the White race in all White nations—White genocide. These contributions will be quotations or other evidence, buttressed as much as possible by references, which will eventually be converted into a final product to expose the perpetrators of White genocide. Hundreds of online discussion forums and websites have already compiled immense lists of hateful, slanderous, or genocidal quotations against the White race. The idea is to collect and synthesize these quotations (and any other evidence) into a polished, presentable, unimpeachable, and independent end-product suitable for public dissemination to the population at large.
Many realize the “open borders” movement is a thinly-veiled attempt to dilute and thereby destroy all White nations—Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everybody. White people are libeled and demonized by cultural Marxists in academia, vilified by public slander, and robbed of the right to self-identify — all in order to instill a destructive sense of false White guilt. Anti-Whites advance these agendas and claim “the race problem” will disappear if all the White nations assimilate and interbreed with an overwhelming flood of non-White immigrants. These malevolent social engineers yearn for a blended humanity in White nations—mocha-skinned people and societies without race by homogenous default. What they never mention—and what is left to nationalists to publicly emphasize—is that this plan for “diversity” only applies to White nations. If this patent truth were well-recognized, everyone would recognize this scheme as the systematic eradication of the White race—White genocide.
Ideally, the people promoting, financing, conspiring in, and implementing White genocide will be brought to justice before an international genocide tribunal. Additionally, the people and organizations pushing for White genocide can face criminal prosecution or civil litigation in various nations. Countless lawsuits have been filed seeking monetary damages or criminal charges against people, firms, or organizations linked to alleged atrocities of the Second World War or modern ethnic conflicts. In the same manner, the forces responsible for White genocide will attract a cottage industry of lucrative lawsuits seeking monetary redress. Wealthy individuals, endowed foundations, and multinational corporations share complicity in the drive to destroy the White race. These deep pockets are ideal targets for lawsuits. This project can provide the groundwork for a prima facie complaint in international or domestic courts of law.
As stated, the ultimate purpose of this project is to reproduce all of the quotations and evidence into an independent website unaffiliated with any group or faction. It will serve as an objective testament to the persecution and genocide of White people worldwide. This website will be an invaluable resource to awaken others to the existential issues facing the White race. Furthermore, this project will deter many anti-White individuals from engaging in further hostilities against the White race because it will publicize these crimes to the world and increase the likelihood of criminal prosecution and civil litigation.
Please submit direct quotations, written or spoken, that implicate one or more persons, organizations, or governments under the United Nations definition of genocide (see contact information below). Remember the burden of proof is upon the prosecutor or plaintiff; specific details are invaluable. Context, publication details, and verifiable references are all extremely important. If a particular quotation lacks any of these attributes, provide it anyway because others can perhaps contribute by filling in the gaps.
This is the nature of the project—a worldwide collaboration to create a voluminous, detailed, and well-referenced database of quotations and evidence to implicate agents and organizations responsible for White genocide. Quotations are the easiest to find and thus the primary focus. However, talented and resourceful researchers can submit voting records, corporate policies, lobbying agendas, political agreements, or immigration policies, which are all very helpful. Creativity is encouraged.
Format for submissions:
Name
Nation
Background: occupation, organizational link(s), position(s) of authority
Genocide violation: part A, B, C, D, and/or E as defined in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II (see details below)
Quotation
Context of quotation
References: any URL, print, radio, television, or other reference(s) for the quotation
***EXAMPLE***
Noel Ignatiev
Professor of American history at the Massachusetts College of Art
Co-founder and co-editor of Race Traitor Magazine
Marxist activist and critical race theorist
United States of America
A B C D
“The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists…Keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”
Calling for the destruction of the White race
http://harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abolish-the-white-race.html
http://www.vdare.com/roberts/harvard_genocide.htm
Keep in mind that under international law, genocide is not confined to murder or physical violence and White genocide is not always explicit or related to immigration policy. Evidence of moral degradation, ethnic cleansing from neighborhoods, policies to suppress White birthrates, interracial violence, vilification of the White race, and other such attacks contributing to White genocide is encouraged as well. For more information on the concept of White genocide, please read None Dare Call It White Genocide, excerpted below:
The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake – this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national history. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.
International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity, with grave punishment for violations. As far as the international recognition of the reality of race, ask the ghosts of Saddam Hussein or Wilhelm Frick if the Kurds or Jews, respectively, are mere social constructs. Race is an internationally-recognized reality and is a major factor in the crime of genocide. In the future, the political and economic elites that are responsible for the policies of White genocide may face trial before an international tribunal. The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
Raphael Lemkin, who originated the term genocide, defined it as follows:
“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean destruction of a nation… It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity but as members of a national group.”
Facing the Future as a Minority
It is not factually inaccurate to talk of genocide against whites but in my opinion it is bad tactics because there is a credibility issue in trying to reach uncommitted whites which is made worse when such charges are made. Delegitimation’ is a better way to put it
The most liberal whites might accept that non whites (like Palestinians) are being subjected to ‘genocide’ but the word is a very hard sell when it’s referring to white people collectively and as as victims. Palestinians are not inhibited about saying they are Palestinians but white people have a long way to go before they think of themselves as a people in that sense.
“The most liberal whites might accept that non whites (like Palestinians) are being subjected to ‘genocide’ but the word is a very hard sell when it’s referring to white people collectively and as as victims. Palestinians are not inhibited about saying they are Palestinians but white people have a long way to go before they think of themselves as a people in that sense.”
Uhh…hence the project to document the problem…
“Uhh…hence the project to document the problem…”
Calling it “The White Genocide Evidence Project” will be counter productive. I disagree with John Burnam about there being no need to worry about the consequences of ineptly couching arguments because white nationalism’s creditability is already zero (or even negative). Genocide is their word which they have invested with solidly anti white connotations and that is what will be on peoples minds when they hear the word , not a UN definition.
In my opinion it’s bad tactics to act like we are not under threat of genocide when in fact we are.
I use the term a lot these days, and as a result I’m waking people up to the threat against them. I have to wonder what those of you are doing to make people aware of their own genocide when you are opposed to the use of the word. It’s to imagine why anyone would come on this site opposing the project, unless you really aren’t opposed to White genocide in the first place.
p.s. the Palestinian population is growing, not diminishing. They’ve had a 30% increase in the past 10 years. I can’t help but note the people opposed to this project can’t keep their facts straight.
Does anyone have any info on when the mass immigrations started into white countries, particularly Europe, compared to when white birth rates started declining? It’s hard for me to imagine this immigration going on if whites weren’t having more children.
As soon as women get unfettered control over their fertility the birth rate falls.
From what I can tell it all started after we bombed Germany into oblivion in the 1940s in order to “save Europe”. And remember, after they surrendered we responded by starving millions of Germans to death and raping their women on a massive scale. Funny the media never talks about that.
It should be increasingly obvious to all that the Allies/All Lies fought WWII on the side of Communism, not democracy.
We had a good 10 years after that, then the Pill, feminism and the Hippy movement all came out in the 1960s. The “Civil Rights” Act of 1964 and the Immigration Act of 1965 also occurred around that same time.
*were having more children.
|
“Even the best of the Gentiles should all be killed.”
Genocide Advocated by the Talmud:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html
|
Christian Miller:
“Many realize the “open borders” movement is a thinly-veiled attempt to dilute and thereby destroy all White nations—Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everybody.”
Let me repeat my post from the Kelso-thread:
“There is a myth in the “internet-whitepride community” that only European countries are forced to admit third-world immigrants.
In Saudi Arabia, about 31% of the population is foreign-born. There are over eight million migrants from countries all around the world (including non-Muslims): Indian: 1.3 million, Pakistani: 900,000, Bangladeshi: 400,000, Filipino: 500,000, Egyptian: 900,000, Yemeni: 800,000, Indonesian: 250,000, Sri Lankan: 350,000, Sudanese: 250,000, Syrian: 100,000 and Turkish: 80,000.
See here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia#Population.2C_language_and_social_issues
”
And Mr. Miller it would be unwise to use UN convetions as an argument.
It is exactly these UN conventions (like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) that give everyone the “right to migrate”. No country can base its immigration laws exclusively on ethnic/racial principles as long as these UN conventions are in power.
Ethno:
And let me repeat: That 31% of the population cannot vote or obtain citizenship. Aren’t you being purposely disingenious to neglect that little fact?
One can disagree with ethnonationalism on both counts.
The obvious difference being, that there is no pressure to “mix” and socialize with imported foreign workers in those nations, and they and their offspring do not get the rights of citizens. It’s exactly the opposite with White nations.
Also. Mr. Miller is wise – not unwise – to use the UN conventions as to genocide. The UN Conventions exists, regardless of whether we like it or not, so there is no reason to leave them solely as tools for our enemies.
One thing is clear – not talking about White Genocide as ethnonationalism suggests due to some sort of ideological quibbling does nothing to promote White interests, and talking about White Genocide does not damage the movement’s credibility – since it already has none, or negative.
Scooter:
“And let me repeat: That 31% of the population cannot vote or obtain citizenship.”
Of course they can.
Read the Wikipedia article:
“…a 2004 law passed by Saudi Arabia’s Council of Ministers, which entitles expatriates of all nationalities who have resided in the kingdom for ten years to apply for citizenship…”
There is no ethnic/racial boundary for obtaining citizenship in Saudi Arabia – except for Palestinians (their own Arab kin!!!).
John Burnam:
“One thing is clear – not talking about White Genocide as ethnonationalism suggests due to some sort of ideological quibbling”
There is no White genocide. There is, however, a genocide against the Swedes, Norwegians, the English… but a White genocide – NO!
The above mentioned peoples are being displaced not only because of non-European immigration, but also because of immigration from other European countries.
Why are some of you silent about this fact?
If you have no problem with European immigrants – great. I will send you 100,000 Albanians.
Ethno:
After that ten years, if they don’t get kicked out, the same article points out that the Saudi law can (and no doubt is) be interpreted as requiring the new citizens to be Muslim. The same article points out they don’t even have freedom of religion – any Muslim who converts to Christianity is subject to the death penalty. You know your 31% figure is extremely misleading. Tells us what percentage of those 31% ever bevome voting citizens.
From the National Review:
January 13, 2004, 11:30 a.m.
Immigration, Saudi Style
A radical disconnect.
By Mark Krikorian
President Vicente Fox of Mexico on Monday backed President Bush’s guestworker/amnesty proposal at the “Summit of the Americas” in Monterrey, Mexico. Whether this helps or hurts its political prospects on Capitol Hill is another matter, but one question has not been asked during the week the Bush proposal has been debated: What would America’s labor market, and society and polity, look like if Bush’s plan were actually implemented?
Some have suggested that immigration promotes the “Brazilianization” of our economy, as the rich benefit from the importation of servants while native-born blue-collar workers see their wages suffer.
This is certainly true with regard to mass immigration as a whole, but the president’s specific proposals suggest a different country as a model: Saudi Arabia. That country, and its Gulf neighbors, are home to a permanent guestworker class, millions strong, lacking any real possibility of becoming full members of the host society. These foreign workers are very large in number, with the six million in Saudi Arabia accounting for about one-quarter of the kingdom’s population. And they have virtually no chance of becoming citizens, even after living there for decades.
How would the president’s plan “Saudi-ize” America’s immigration policy? A Saudi approach to immigration has three characteristics: large numbers, permanence, and lack of political rights
Ethnonationalist has some good points, but I think Europeans (in Europe) needs to find a middle ground between the Euro-American concept of whitness and the old national categories, for instance in terms of meta-ethnic group identity (Slavic, Celtic etc).
@Scooter,
That NR article is from 2004, before that new law…
Yes, Saudi Arabia discriminates against Christians, but that has nothing to do with the fact that its immigration policy is not based on RACE.
Black Muslims from Chad, Nigeria, Mali…; White Muslims from Albania, Macedonia, Bosnia; Muslims from the Caucasus, Pakistan, Indonesia… all of this non-Arabs can freely immigrate to Saudi Arabia.
@Geiseric,
There was already an experiment like that called Yugoslavia, and we all know how that ended.
Can these people become citizens?
Ethno:”There was already an experiment like that called Yugoslavia, and we all know how that ended.”
The Yugoslavian case needs to be analyzed in terms of a “hierarchy of identites”. In Yugoslavia, obviously, religious and pseudo-national sentiments were stronger than ethnic identities. The Yugo civil war was more about religion (Catholic Croatians vs Orthodox Serbs and Islamic Bosnians), not ethnicity.
The supra-national, meta-ethnic model worked for centuries in Scandinavia and (to some extent) in the German Reich.
@Kevin:
“Can these people become citizens?”
Yes.
http://archive.arabnews.com/?page=1§ion=0&article=58980&d=14&m=2&y=2005
@Geiseric:
It wasnt a religious war.
This “religious war” interpretation of the Bosnian war was invented by uninformed CNN-reporters like Christiane Amanpour an Jim Clancy.
The reality was different. I think that no war in history was so “ethnicised” as that one.
Muslims that ethnically identified as Croats (or could trace their ancestry to the Croats that converted to Islam during the Ottoman occupation) were accepted in the HVO (Croatian forces). There were even Muslim generals (like Nijaz Batlak) in the HVO.
In the same way, Muslims that could trace their ancestry to Serb converts to Islam were accepted on the Serbian side.
One prominent example is Emir Kusturica:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emir_Kusturica#Politics
As for the “Muslim army”… it was actually at least 30% non-Muslim (mostly people from mixed marriages).
Ethno:
You still have not produced statistics showing what percentage become citizens, not just rosy press releases saying who is “expected to benefit”. Even if all those “expected to benefit” actually become citizens, it is a far cry from the 31 percent of the population figure you put in your original quotation, plainly implying Saudi Arabia has open borders when they really are exploiting foreign workers they never intend to let in their country. I think they have the right to do that – but don’t mislead your readers, please.
1/6th of 30% is approximately 5% of the population! That is a monumental difference.
Why eve waste your time with this non sense. ethnonationalism: Obvious fact is, that these aren’t White Europeans immigrating to Saudi Arabia, India, Pakistan, Sudan or wherever else you mentioned.
The people immigrating to those countries are from neighboring countries, the vast majority being racial kin with very similar or the exact same cultures and even religion. And they still have less rights in reality, on the ground, regardless of some policy written on paper. Plus their numbers are nothing compared to whats happening in traditionally White countries.
Anyways, you could put forward the most academically correct, eloquently written argument and it would get smashed to pieces when I walk outside or drive through the cities around here, it looks like a massive demographic change in a very short amount of time relative to history. Easily a form displacement and even ethnic cleansing.
Its all going somewhere and its not a nice place.
This is a very interesting idea. I think we should also gather anti-White statements and actions by people that may not rise to the level of genocide. For example, school programs that slander Whites, corporate and government programs that exclude Whites, and anti-White statements by newscasters and opinion makers.
Anything where White children are exposed to this kind of hate should be highlighted. I would suggest we all start keeping a journal for ourselves of such items.
For example, I remember a Spanish teacher telling us that Hispanics had more right to most of the US than Whites did. Comedians like Chris Rock and others routinely make anti-White statements. Television shows, going back to the 70s routinely mock Whites. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation excludes Whites from many of its programs. SBA loans are usually legally tilted in favor of non-Whites. We need to keep all of this from going down the memory hole.
Jason, the examples you gave actually DO rise to the level of genocide when ini place over a period of time and targetted at young White people who have no defense against demoralization, stigmatization and delegitimization. They are being denied an identity and a right to a self-respecting image of themselves and their ethnicity.
If you will consider carefully what Lemkin says at the bottom of the article, this is quite easy to see.
We have been conditioned to think of “genocide” as only an easily recognizable physical attack against a people or their living space. An attack against the non-physical aspects of identity are often more deadly than a physical attack because the victims don’t even know they are under attack until the “bindings” that hold their identity in place have been loosened and destroyed beyond repair.
Our people, and especially our children, have been under this sort of attack for at least 3 generations, and the results are observable in the anomie, anti-social attitudes and general lack of purpose. This stuff is deadly!
Where do we send our information?
Good question. I have yet to see any address put up by Christian.
I hope he will have some sort of basic site up soon, so we can see what’s already there and not make duplicate suggestions. Wouldn’t want him to get 10,000 submissions of Susan Sontag’s anti-White quotations.
I suggest that the site have a “form based” submissions page, structured just as outlined in the article, but with a request to see if the suggested addition is already in the database. If Christian wanted to allow some sort of “like” system for existing entries, that might help him decide how to weight the usefulness or salience of the entries. Just a suggestion.
@Christian,
While you are collecting “negatives”, you may want to structure your site to allow submissions of “positive” ideas for activism. You may not want to publish these on the same site, but port them over to another site for those interested in activism.
Example: Jason mentioned “programs that exclude Whites”. I’ve attended some “diversity fairs” at local schools where there was “diverse” food sold by students and groups. Nearly always there was element of “diversity” which was not included: the diverse European American peoples.
Since nobody can expect “academia” in its current state to see this as a problem, much less do something to include us as part of “diversity”, anyone who is “awake” and “active” can get involved in a very safe manner. Find a local restaurant, or some White students and enlist them in setting up a stand or stands under the banner of “European Foods” or similar name. Then prepare and sell foods that fit.
The idea is to have an EXPLICIT PRESENCE and a SELF-NAMING taking place. For obvious reasons you won’t paint your sign with “non-hispanic white cuisine”!
This is a “safe” way to get involved “inside” the diversity racket, take a seat at the table and show off your heritage. Better make the food good though, Don’t let the taco stand upstage you!
@Christian;
Sorry about taking over the thread, but I’d like to offer help if you want it, as in helping to manage the site once it’s up and functional. I’m not a programmer, but I can do moderation-type work, and would be really interested in helping catalog the “positive” stuff I alluded to above. Dr. MacDonald has my email address, and we’ve known each other for a while. Feel free to contact me through him if you are interested. Thanks.
Libertarian-Democracies have below replacement level (2.1), dysgenic, fertility rates. These populations are projected to slowly die off after ageing as a consequence. A TFR of 1.3 means a halving population over 60s years, a TFR of 1.1 means halving in 30 years. These self-destroying political-economies import (largely non White) immigrants from non Libertarian economies in an effort to compensate, i.e. to keep their economies going and to provide consumers for businesses and Financial Services etc. The self-destructive nature of the system does not seem to have been understood by many.
It is not genocide, if anything it’s a mass ‘suicide’, as the electorates keep voting for a system of self-destructive, anarchistic ‘non-governance’.
Note, most non Libertarian nations resist this being imposed upon them. Those are biological fit nations. They are often poor, but technically, they are biologically fit.
“It is not genocide, if anything it’s a mass ‘suicide’, as the electorates keep voting for a system of self-destructive, anarchistic ‘non-governance”
So the question would be: Under what conditions does a “genocide” have the appearance of a “suicide”? It’s obvious that any group serious about committing genocide, and intelligent enough to pull it off by non-violent means, would ALSO be intelligent enough to DISGUISE it to prevent themselves from being a target of blowback once the genocide attempt was discovered.
I think the group that is most likely to be behind such a sinister plan has tipped its own hand and ripped its own mask off with the plethora of articles out about the demise of Whites being a type of “suicide”.
The sort of genocide that’s being played out relies on demoralization: the loosening and destruction of the moral “binders” which hold together the integrity of self-identification and identity of the people under attack. This is almost impossible for the target to spot in the early stages of the attack because such demoralization is easily disguised in universalistic “truths” carefully tailored to the unique psychology of the victim group … tailored so the victim group slurps up the kool-aid w/o any forced needed.
I think we must be careful about blaming ourselves for this by labeling it a “suicide”. That would fit very nicely with the psychological profile we have, that of blaming ourselves first for everything that happens.
When an enemy understands our psychological profile, they can “embed” the demoralizing inside of it, using our propensity to blame ourselves first as a way of making the subtle genocidal attack “invisible” to us once the demoralization process proceeds far enough.
We are dealing we an enemy who has developed VERY SUBTLE techniques, and we’ve NEVER been confronted with this kind of situation before in the whole history of our existence. We need to be very aware of our own propensity to “fool ourselves” with Universals, & etc. The enemy is certainly aware of this weak spot in our group.
Longley, while a don’t always agree with your posts, I read them all and have seldom down-marked them. You do bring some “diversity” to the table, and I can accept that.
I’m not writing this comment to go against your ideas, but as a warning to other readers that we must be VERY CAREFUL about words, and not allow what Tom Sunic calls Semantic Shifts or Lexical Distortion to distract us or put us in a position of self-deception about what is happening. I’m also cognizant of my own potential for self-deception. This stuff is very subtle.
@ Protocols of Albion [February 28, 2011] …
A very perceptive comment you have posted there Protocols. Congratulations. And I was also pleased to see you acknowledging David’s many excellent and intelligent contributions here at TOO, over the past several weeks. Those who childishly believe he is part of a ‘plot’ have indeed, lost the plot!
It is unfortunate that we have a group of regular visitors who feel deeply intimidated by counter arguments, however well they are presented. And of course there are others who are simply acting out their petty grudges against those who habitually take them outside their comfort zones: hence the heavy down-voting against obviously well-informed contributors.
A future Ethno-European Leadership will need to stamp down hard on this kind of bitchiness and petty self-centeredness.
Protocols of Albion … while reading your above comment, I was moved to again open my copy of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to identify the most appropriate clause. But, I am certain you are cognizant of the most appropriate links already.
Yes, we as a racial group have been ‘played’ or ‘gamed’ by a multi-generational cabal who have long employed psychological techniques and behavioural analysis as “weapons of mass destruction”. They have successfully embedded deep into the brains of those of European stock, an emotional allegiance to abstractions [ref: thesis of Prof. MacDonald] that trumps any genetic or blood allegiances. There are many “whites” who are even prepared to damage their own parents, siblings, or offspring in order to get just a little further ahead in this material world … dominated as it is by Judaic virtual reality.
This is an excellent idea and the naysaying from the usual suspects confirms it.
Just having the list of quotes and the list of the people who are anti-White activists will go a long way to putting the White Genocide Meme out there. This is something everyone can do, it “scales” large and small, and while – at first- the average unconverted White person may scratch his head – “genocide?” – but the quotes speak for themselves. Whatever legal case may be made in the future, right now, this is a propaganda battle.
I see it as absolutely pointless to get into debates with those who are *ostensibly* on our side but quibble over the definitions of genocide, international law, etc. Maybe David Longley has convinced me – I’m going to look at behavior rather then people’s self-asserted intentions.
OK, after Wikileaks comes… whiteleaks? Genoleaks? I’m not sure if the UN track is the right move, but in general this sounds like a good idea. A kind of database for anti-white racism.
A database of explicit instances of anti-White racism is a good idea. There are a plethora of “News & Jews” sites which are addicted to obsessing over the same thing 24/7, but don’t DO much of anything. While Christian’s idea is not an explicit call to action, it forms a silent and haunting repository of what White people are up against, for anyone interested in seeing, and isn’t polluted with the usual “avatars” based on certain obsessions with historical uniforms & etc.
I would suggest to Christian and others that a huge repository of this information already exists at http://www.resistingdefamation.org. They’ve been building this repository for about 20 years now. While their focus isn’t the same as Christian’s, it’s an invaluable resource for both knowledge and actionable ideas.
I disagree with the premise that there is a CONSCIOUS and WIDESPREAD CONSPIRACY to kill the white race. I think instead the white race is self-destructing as a result of worshipping the false God of “Democracy”……
“It is impossible for an honest man to gain high office in a Democracy” Adolf Hitler
“Democracy is the best government money can buy!” unknown
In a Democracy white people will vote themselves to hell without any help from the Jews
See: Democracy, The God that failed. on youtube or read “Whats wrong with Democracy”
As long as you support the system (Democrat-Republican) whose VERY FOUNDING PRINCIPLE is “all men are created equal” how can you possibly expect anything different??? How??
Sorry but there is just too much evidence that what is occurring is a deliberate plan, mostly put into place by Jews.
Quotes from Noel Ignatiev and Wesley Clarke seem to confirm this in my mind.
White people still live in several African, Asian, Middle East and South American countries even though their White colonial era is gone.
No non-White nation has occupied any White European country for the past 50 years.
The non-White Africans, Asian and Latinos were brought into the White countries by White colonists from their foreign colonies – as cheap labor.
And now for the quote – here is one from a 101% White American John Kaminski: “When you read the history of Israel from objective sources, you discover that it is an outlaw state, created by the powers that be by stealing the land from its original inhabitants, and systematically exterminating them ever since”.
I don’t think I need to explain that it were Whitefolks who created Israel and have been protecting it for the last 62 years.
On February 8, 2011 – The Jewish Chronicle reported that Ronald Lauder (Reagan’s ambassador to Austria), President of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) has “called for Israel to be admitted into NATO in order to guarantee its survival in the future. NATO membership “would send a strong signal to other countries not to take on Israel”.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/israel-needs-nato-membership-for-its-survival/
When Rhemat says “No non-White nation has occupied any White European country for the past 50 years.” it’s obvious he hasn’t visited Southern California or much of the Southwest United States. Definitely under occupation, even without full political domination … yet.
It’s also obvious Rhemat has not visited the “no-go” zones all over Europe where Eurabia has established outposts which self-exempt themselves from the laws of the nations they’ve colonized.
Please spare us any whining about Israel’s problems. We have our own and aren’t interested in wasting resources on theirs.
“No non-White nation has occupied any White European country for the past 50 years.”
What do you call “Northern Cyprus”?
“As soon as women get unfettered control over their fertility the birth rate falls.”
This is so true that it’s music to my ears…
Chechar:
As soon as women and men start competing for the same jobs (“equality”) the MARRIAGE rate falls, along with the rest of society, which makes the birthrate a moot point. imo
What can be done about it. It sounding like music won’t help. Why not just leave it at liberate women?
The political system which liberates women via the universal franchise (vote), Human Rights and Equality legislation has always been Libertarian-Democracy (aka Liberal-Democracy, aka political-economic anarchism). It’s considered good for short-term consumerism (much in the way that Catholicism once was, except the latter was effectively governed by male eunuchs, a principle copied by whom from the Egyptian Pharaohs? We just have a new way to the same dysgenic end via women and the feminized-brained. This, cynically and imperceptibly to most is promulgated as good for growth of the economy and fiat-money supply (but see the massive wealth differential and the egregious subterfuge of fairness).
What’s venal is that replacement consumers for falling, dumbed down, Libertarian populations are being sourced from elsewhere via immigration and enforced secularisation. Venal, but legal.
Note, for comparative, expository, purposes that China runs Democratic-Centralism (a single party hierarchical electoral system and governance) and passed eugenics legislation in the 1990s to better manage its demographics, whilst one of the leading genetics in the EU/UK remarked in April 2004 that we in the EU were passing legislation which would do exactly the opposite, i.e. legally forbid this.
How many people diligently reading any of these comments grasp what is going on? How many are interested (a genetically expressed operant which can be observed as a rate of behaviour)? How many of those who are not interested enough are nevertheless respectful enough to listen to what others tell them these days? That disrespect is part of right-wing Libertarian ‘political-correctness’ as it sustains confusion and anarchism. See youth music etc, especially punk in the late 70s. Note this was just driven by money, no grand conspiratorial agenda, just making money from consumers whist undermining the state – think back to the 70s (and even Rock n Roll in the 50s, or jazz before that. It’s the same with ‘modern art’. This was not left-wing driven, it is right-wing driven). The inept (in the West) left is always blamed to facilitate right-wing Libertarianism. Nobody takes these leftist groups seriously you will note.
What laws exist to make some regulative behaviours less frequent? Who effectively, democratically voted for these laws? What is wrong with Libertarian-Democracy?
Finally, on the subject of mistaken issue of ‘genocide’ note the ‘holocaust’ here (note the demography figures, and note the date of the article is 1914) and here too. Subterfuge? See Poland/Russia early last century.
Cui Bono?
Birth control may make birth rates fall, but is that always a bad thing? Are we to have a trillion people on earth? We have 7 billion now. And they fall for all races when they are given the opportunity.
Whats happening to the white race is no more complicated than this:
when people elect vultures to positions of power they can’t reasonably expect the vultures to keep them alive, much less protect them. Democrats are VULTURES!….
————-
BUT.. most people are not FOOLS in matters of politics, (busts out laughing) so when they see the harm the vultures are causing they through the bums (vultures) out, and elect the wolves….Wolves are REPUBLICAN
————————
But wait, as I stated before, most people are not FOOLS when it comes to politics (snigger, giggle) and they KNOW the fault can’t be with the system itself, and are loath to admit their system of Government has failed throughout history, so they find a snake in the grass, who is indeed a danger, and blame the snake for their own folly….
The JEW is a SNAKE!
Unlike Protocols of Albion, I actually am a programmer. While I may not be as trustworthy as he/she ;) I can also help you. I’ve always wanted to take part in a full-fledged information house.
Wesley Clarke and Tim Wise should provide a bountiful harvest of White-hating quotes that could be included in this project.
Democracy is not the problem that some of you people think it is. Our current politicians are the problem. Back when our democracy was run by white men, we were the envy of the world. Would you consider an authoritarian governement run by negroes to be superior to a democracy run by white men?
To win a stakes race you need thoroughbreds.
The problem is that a well-functioning democracy requires a well-informed electorate. And who is informing the electorate, both in the academy and in the newspapers?
I agree. Whites, as a population, live better and create more wealth, under almost any social system, even socialism. Even under dictatorships Whites have functioned better than Africans, Latinos and most Asians. This is historical fact.
Of course, under freer systems of representative government, private property and the rule of law, they have thrived like no other. The US had a very small government and a very capitalistic system from 1776 until the last couple of generations. In that time we experienced incredible advances in the standard of living and were still 90% White as of 1965 (after almost 200 years of a very free system).
This is historical fact on a massive, multigenerational scale. So the preoccupation with what kind of political system we should have is a bit misguided, in my opinion.
Because it is also true that I would prefer to live in a socialist Sweden than a capitalistic Latino country (if such existed), because I would be safer, wealthier, enjoy a better culture and be freer in most respects.
So, we need to focus on the White population and preserving it, not getting too sidetracked over which political system we should have. If we don’t save White civilization, the point is moot.
You still seem a mite confused.
How will anyone ever bring about any change in collective behaviour without a change to the current political system?
That system is not just killing off White people. See Japan, S Korea etc. Have a look at the Japanese figures and think about their economy etc. Look for population projections into the future as the populations age. How will they cope without immigration? I suggest you need to take a more allocentric perspective as you appear to be radically wrong. Even secular Jewish people are in decline, so it’s unlikely to be them who are ‘orchestrating’ all this.
If anything is, ignorance is orchestrating this.
No I am not confused. White cultures have thrived for centuries under freedom, representative government, and the rule of law. The trolls keep pushing the line that we need to embrace totalitarian political systems. The trolls always say the same thing, over and over. I now wonder if Longley has been playing the role of Der Weenerschnitzel and other trolls from the past.
It’s the same pseudo-scientific junk repeated over and over.
It’s an interesting idea, but if you’re looking for direct quotes like the infamous Ignatiev and Sontag ones, I’m afraid you won’t find too many. I also think that kind of evidence is of only limited usefulness. Ignatiev and Sontag are fundamentally of only minor significance. By placing so much emphasis on them, you give the impression that the genocide of Whites is supported only by a handful of kooky intellectuals, when in fact it is a serious program being carried out by all of our major institutions.
The people responsible for this are not stupid, however, and in general do not come right out with their intentions. I don’t think it hurts the case to admit that – *of course* they are not going to be honest about what they are doing. But I think you need to do something more along the lines of what MacDonald did in The Culture of Critique to make the case – looking at where the ideas came from, how they were put into practice, and the Jewish identities and ethnic motivations of the people involved.
I could not disagree more with the poster “I” above.
Obviously, this depends on the number that counts as “too many.” The infamous Ignatiev comment is one too many. I challenge the idea proposed by “I” that “that kind of evidence is of only limited usefulness.” This poster seems indistinguishable from the “concern troll” strategy – [my quote] “while I agree with you, this is too much, too far, too radical, won’t help us.”
So posters like “I” are literally suggesting that we simply not bother with publicizing and documenting quotes like Ignatiev’s.
MacDonald himself has pointed out the strategy of trying to control the limits of discourse – even leftist Jew Noam Chomsky has written descriptions of how “elite groups” try to limit discourse to a very narrow range – and he’s right, but misleading in that he only portrays those “elite groups” as White, and never Jewish (even if only implicitly.)
But that’s exactly what MacDonald did to make the case. “I” is simply saying, [my quote] “Sure, criticize the Jews but don’t use such loaded terms as genocide for what they are doing.”
I could not disagree more – the word “genocide” is legally applicable, not to mention factual, and especially – takes the “victim card” away from the genociders and gives it to us.
Which is *exactly* what “concern trolling” and “controlling discourse” is all about. The poster “I” above is 180 degrees off from what we need – strong, aggressive rhetoric that clearly focuses in on the anti-White movement.
Those who promote passivity and exhibit an exaggerated concern for the outgroup read like “concern trolls” to me.
I’d like to end this post with a George Carlin joke – “when people say, lead follow, or get out of the way – I obstruct.”
Well, you’ve misrepresented what I wrote so badly that I’m not sure there’s much point in responding, but anyway…
LOL. I obviously meant “too many” in the sense of “very many”, as in, you won’t find “very many” Jews coming right out and saying that they want to abolish the White race. I don’t think anyone is going to seriously dispute that. Ignatiev is certainly the most prominent Jew who has publicly been that direct.
Not what I said at all. I think it’s worth publicizing and documenting, and people have done so. Still, the premise of this “White Genocide Evidence Project” seems to be that you can build a convincing case solely on the foundation of such quotes, and I don’t think you can. This is not like an episode of Perry Mason or Murder She Wrote where the bad guy is just going to fess up to the whole thing. We’re not that lucky.
I didn’t say that at all. I think the use of the term “genocide” is perfectly appropriate and I even used it myself: “you give the impression that the genocide of Whites is supported only by a handful of kooky intellectuals…” You are brazenly lying here.
You seem to have missed my point entirely: Noel Ignatiev and Susan Sontag are just not that important. They are worth talking about, but the cornerstone of your case should not be the “abolish the White race” quote. People are used to academics saying off the wall stuff, and are not going to take you seriously if that’s your whole argument. It makes your case look weak. So what if Ignatiev says this crap? The same is true of people who think quotes from the Talmud about how it’s okay to have sex with a three year old are going to bring legions of people over to our side. It doesn’t work, because people know that those quotes are irrelevant and people just perceive it as desperate.
The Jews who are important and who are doing the most damage generally do not go running their mouths off like Ignatiev and Sontag. In fact, the important Jews, who go through the trouble of concealing their true intentions and creating the seemingly morally righteous ideology of “diversity”, probably view Ignatiev and Sontag as annoying pests, and can simply disavow them if necessary.
I think it is telling that Ignatiev can get away with saying what he says and still maintain a professorship at Harvard, whereas someone saying “abolish the Black race” or “abolish the Jewish race” certainly could not do so. I think it’s worth pointing out that Ignatiev is Jewish and that his views reflect a broader sentiment within academia, especially among Jewish academics. But I don’t think that the Ignatiev quote is a “smoking gun” that obviates the need for a more comprehensive and rigorous argument, as some seem to believe.
Well “I” we’re just going to have to disagree here
I disagree completely, the cornerstone of our case *should* be the documented record of anti-White statements promoting genocide, and it makes a very – *strong* not weak – case.
But again, there are those who do not want to follow this strategy, they want to dismiss the eliminationist rhetoric from the likes of Ignatiev as “irrelevant” or they want to simply distract people’s attention from it.
Why? Who knows what people’s “real intentions” are. But it’s clear there’s a lot of people out there – many ostensibly on our side – that are desperately trying to keep this long history under wraps.
I had liberal friends I personally know forward me the Tim Wise anti-White rant that was popular a while ago. Dismiss it? Why?
Our enemies make our case for us. Let the trials begin!
@John Burnham – John, don’t pass by the fact that Raphael Lemkin, the man who invented the term “genocide” was a Jew! Lemikin elaborates the boundaries of “genocide” more broadly than the Geneva articles do. The fact that his subtle analysis was done from the standpoint of a Jew should not pass unnoticed. We can USE that!
All of the documents collected, together with commentary by the publishers (us), should be very carefully translated into German, French, the Scandinavian languages, a few of the Eastern European languages, Russian and any other languages deemed relevant.
These translations should be done by people who have a perfect command of English and the target language. Please do not rely on any Internet-based computerized translation application.
Havard Professor, Noel Ignatiev, wrote the following in the September-October, 2002, edition of Harvard Magazine:
“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.”
So, in just about the most classic example of “incitement to racial hatred” you will ever see, the youth of America were informed that the abolition of the white race is a “desirable” thing.
Has this “racist” boffin ever been castigated for voicing such an opinion? Has he been kicked out of Harvard? Have the media and the PC politicians howled this ant-white racist out of the country? Oh no, none of these things have occurred. You see, the learned prof preaches his genocidal philosophy at the W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research, an institution whose courses, as you might imagine, are almost wholly taken up by black Americans. And Iganatiev, himself, is Jewish.
And, in this day and age, we do not hold the Jew to account, even if he advocates the extinction of our race to those who are, perhaps, most likely to take his advocacy seriously.
Iganatiev’s own journal and website, Race Traitor, is dedicated to the philosophy he espouses above.
In the same Harvard Magazine article from which the quotation above was taken, he promises us that:
“Race Traitor will not abandon its focus on whiteness… The editors meant it when they replied to a reader: ‘Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed—not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”
From the 11th to the 13th of April, 1997, a three-day conference was held in Berkeley, California whose theme was: The Making and Unmaking of Whiteness. Iganatiev titled his own offering to this symposium: The Point Is Not To Interpret Whiteness But To Abolish It. This, in part, is what he said on that occasion: “We are anti-white… We hold that so-called whites must cease to exist… white people must commit suicide as whites in order to come alive as workers, or youth, or women, or whatever other identity can induce them to change from the miserable, petulant, subordinated creatures they now are into freely associated, fully developed human subjects… When it comes to abolishing the white race, the task is… to gather together a minority determined to make it impossible for anyone to be white”.
If you had visited Iganatiev’s website, (now defunct) you would have found the following:
“The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race… Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive…
The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interests above class, gender, or any other interests they hold… Race Traitor aims to serve as an intellectual center for those seeking to abolish the white race… Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”
Finally, this pearl of Iganatievan wisdom is taken from the Spring, 1994, edition of Race Traitor: “Up to now the philosophers have merely interpreted the white race; the point, however, is to abolish it. How can this be done? We know how devilishly difficult it is for individuals to escape whiteness… But we also know that when there comes into being a critical mass of people who, though they look white, have ceased to act white, the white race will undergo fission, and former whites will be able to take part, together with others, in building a new human community.”
Much more evidence of anti-Whiteness can be found in the article, Interbreed and Blend, here:
http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page.php?iCategoryId=465&iParentId=452
And in The Runnymede Trust and Race Law here:
http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page.php?iCategoryId=517&iParentId=66
Evidence of the massive criminality imposed upon the UK by its laeders can be found here:
http://www.iamanenglishman.com/rogues_gallery.php
And here:
http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page.php?iCategoryId=1488&iParentId=1390
@ Christian Miller …
I commend your initiative. It represents a potent strategy. I shall support your efforts in whatever practical ways I can.
Nevertheless, a few words of warning:
(1) As you might know already, the United Nations is a tool of the elite globalists … the same people who are the ultimate authors of white genocidal policies. Ideally, we would achieve our aims while remaining well outside of U.N. auspices;
(2) Use of the term “White” remains problematic for many of us. You will find comment exchanges on this topic under different article threads in the February archive;
(3) This type of project needs to be multilingual. It would be folly to promote your objective only in the English language. It is essential that you eventually reach out to speakers of French, Spanish, German, Swedish, Italian, and Russian.
AngloSaxon, your are right about point #2.
Before this thing goes public there must be more discussion, or some decision by the “heavies” like MacDonald and others of on this level, of the use of the word “White” in the context of an online public document like this. I suggest bringing this up with Bo Sears over at http://www.resistingdefamation.org as well. He’s had a lot of experience with proper “namings and labelings” to make them suitable for different contexts and purposes.
I for one don’t think “White Genocide” is appropriate for this particular project, even though I’m completely on-board with its use by BUGS and WhiteRabbit activists. The latter are engaged in taking down anti-Whites in blog wars, but Christian’s proposal is a different animal entirely.
This needs to be done very carefully.
TE:
I’m sorry, but there is just to much evidence it is a deliberate plan”
I said CONSCIOUS and WIDESPREAD. Obviously, there are a minority of Jews who consciously and deliberatly meet and discuss the destruction of their supposed enemies, They are the fanatics. But most Jews are thinking about the same things you are, whats for breakfast, when am I going to get a raise, etc.
No its not a plan, its a RELIGION…You know, Gods chosen people? It functions in much the same way as the “Divine Provedence” crap did in the destruction of the American Indian culture. few wanted to actually kill indians, that was secondary to getting the land. Thus, there was no Conscious and widespread conspiracy to commit genocide (kill all Indians) there was only the RELIGIOUS belief (Judeochristianity) in the basic inferiority of the Indians. Sound familiar?
Henry, I’m glad someone has finally made the point you just made. Too many people think a “conspiracy” by the “Jews” consists of some group of evil rabbis in a secret dark shtetl tower (or fiddling on a roof?) poring over plans to destroy the evil goyim. This is just SILLY.
You rightly say that most Jews are just ordinary people trying to get through life like the rest of us, and that they aren’t CONSCIOUSLY trying to do evil to us. But when one looks into a “religion” which has had most of its male adherents saying a morning prayer for a millenium, and that prayer says, in part, “Thank G-d I wasn’t born a goy or a woman”, this utter contempt for us, the “goyim” gets embedded in a DEEP way in their culture and outlook on the world. Sadly, it’s embedded at such a deep level that it seeps into “yiddishkeit” at all levels, and even Jews of good will have a hard time avoiding some of it seeping into their undertanding. And that has serious results when “they” meet “us”.
Peas in a Pod don’t to engage in conspiracy, all they have to do is be the peas they are due to the pod they grew in. They have no other option.
Due to this deeply embedded contempt and supremacy, usually skillfully hidden by deception and self-deception, their outlook has always been a toxic mix of paranoia about the “outside” world and both pride and guilt about their “obvious superiority”. This paranoia is so intense that it leads to “pre-emptive offense” as a favored method of defending their perceived enemies. This is manifested by psychological and intellectual movements which “pre-emptively” destructure the moral and social “glue” which maintains the integrity of their “enemies”. And then their target realizes what’s going on an a mirror defense gets pulled out of the quiver.
Insanity has consequences! Nobody likes it, but it’s what’s for dinner, and will be for a long time.
Your comparison to what happened to the Amerinds was excellent, and should be copied by everyone for use when confronted by anti-Whites leveraging the “Indian Genocide by Whites” to rationalize their anti-white animosities.
defending AGAINST their perceived enemies.
Is there an edit function available for this comment system?
Scooter:
“would you consider an authoritarian government run by negros superior to a democracy run by white men?”
Thank you! You have discovered a rare thing indeed, The ONE THING on earth worse than a Democracy!
It was my pleasure, Mr Baxley. The many authoritarian regimes in Africa show little advancement against poverty, disease, crime, corruption, etc. They have no problem with dysgenesis because no one wants to move there!
Athanasius:
“An informed electorate is essential to a well junctioning democracy”
Well functioning, and Democracy, are oxymoronic. For the exact reason you rightly point to, namely in a Democracy (government of the lowest common denomenator) THE ELECTORATE IS INFORMED BY THE CROOKS AND CON MEN THAT THEY THEMSELVES ELECTED!
All Democratic institutions tend to dumb-down its people precisely because it allows dumb people to vote.
If all the Jews and Negroes suddenly vanished from the earth we would still be left with the same DYSGENIC system (Democracy) that created them in the first place.
What brought slaves to America?…Democracy
Having brought them here in the first place, what then did a 180 degree turn and gave them full citizenship?..Democracy
What set up and founded Israel?..Democracy.
The #1 reason that whites can’t seem to get their act together and function as one people is they have been DEMOCRATIZED, and no longer see themselves as white but rather “Christian” “democrat” and “republican”
This is a splendid idea. Ideally it should be attractive, well written, entertaining. Search engine optimisation techniques should be used so that more people find it.
Tell us the URL so that can link to it.
PS A very recent survey tells us that 48% of Englishmen would consider voting for the BNP, the well know ‘extreme right wing party’ – http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/feb/27/support-poll-support-far-right
@ Mr. Miller
Please post a link to wherever we should send material.
Ethnonationalism,
The ideas that you promote, namely narrow nationalism at the expense of white racial survival are precisely the ideas that led to the great, insane slaughter of 1914-1918 and its logical continuation between 1939-1945.
It led to white suicide.
Once all of Western Europe becomes submerged into the Third World, Albania will also be overrun by the non-white flood.
If by a miracle the Albanians manage to keep their country white while the rest of Europe becomes an extension of the Third World, I bet Ethnonationalist will desperately seek asylum in Albania.
Frank Edwin Stone:
“Ethnonationalism,
The ideas that you promote, namely narrow nationalism at the expense of white racial survival”
It’s actually the other way around: it seems that some WNs promote “white racial survival” at the expense of the survival of particular European ethnic groups.
I completely agree with Kevin MacDonald about the role of Jewish movements in Western societies and that (ironically) the Jewish model could help the West survive…
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/WestSurvive.htm
…but Whites are just a too large and too heterogeneous group of people(s) to develop a common “White” group identity.
I have never advocated getting rid of White nationalities, especially within Europe. However, Whites have to understand that they have common interests and pursue them. Whites in Sweden should support French nationalist parties and both should support the emergence of White identity and interests in the US. In the US, people of Irish background have to realize that they must band together with people of German background, etc. All Whites should be horrified at the incredibly wasteful White civil wars of the 20th century which ultimately resulted in the rise of powerful forces that if not curtailed will mean the end of European civilization entirely.
@Kevin MacDonald:
“I have never advocated getting rid of White nationalities, especially within Europe.”
I know. I was referring to “some WNs” (like those Stormfront guys).
Serbian Politicians try to Mongrelize Serbian People
Serbian Single Men To Marry 250,000 Asian Women?
http://www.javno.com/en/world/clanak.php?id=177603
Social Minister in Serbia to Import 250,000 Asian Brides
http://forum.stirpes.net/immigration-crime/19751-socialist-minister-serbia-plans-import-250-000-asian-brides.html
Wanted: 100,000 Modest Brides
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=24&art_id=nw20080904151423207C350891
These links are over two years old, so I don’t know what the current situation is.
Or Serbia just has a low birth-rate and needs to prevent population declne like everyone else. It’s not as bad as many other European nations though.
You are focusing on the wrong thing. There are not enough (non Muslim) babies.
You are focusing on the wrong thing. There are not enough (non Muslim) babies.
Albanian Muslims have far more of a right to live in the Balkans than a bunch of Serbian-Thai “Christians”.
“These links are over two years old, so I don’t know what the current situation is.”
The plan was not accepted.
Protocols:
No worries, I put “against” in its proper place, and thanks for agreeing with me…..You could lose your job for it you know :)
When I first became aware of the Jews way back in the 60s I also attempted to scapegoat the jews for all the evil in the world including my own shortcomings. I wish the Jew and ZIonism WERE our only problem!
Submissions can be [b]posted directly to the comments[/b], in the format provided.
Tim Wise
United States America
Anti-White race huckster, professional polemicist http://www.timwise.org/about/
A B C D
“Because you’re on the endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving…”
“It’s OK. Because in about forty years, half the country will be black or brown. And there is nothing you can do about it…”
“And they know how to regroup, and plot, and plan, and they are planning even now — we are — your destruction.”
“We just have to be patient. And wait for your hearts to stop beating. And stop they will. And for some of you, real damned soon, truth be told. Do you hear it? The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”
Article, Daily Kos, 11/3/2010 “An open letter to the white right on the occasion of your recent successful temper tantrum”
Celebrates and promotes White genocide, cruelly taunts White Americans about the upcoming deaths of individual American Whites and the larger dispossession of White American society, makes specific references to physical death of White Americans (heartbeats, “tick tock”), and gloats about the growing Mexican invasion into America and displacement of White American culture by using Spanish phrases. After the well-deserved outcry against Mr. Wise’s hateful and genocidal screed, Mr. Wise attempted to cover his tracks by deleting some of the more opprobrious sections. The original is preserved in its entirety at multiple websites, including some listed below.
http://delightsome.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/tim-wise-tries-to-edit-his-hate/
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/11/an_open_letter_2.php
http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/2010/11/10/genocide-in-tim-wises-america/
ALTERED VERSION: http://www.timwise.org/2010/11/an-open-letter-to-the-white-right-on-the-occasion-of-your-recent-successful-temper-tantrum/
General Wesley Clark
United States of America military General, former Supreme Commander of NATO
United States of America
“There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multiethnic states.”
April 24-25 1999, CNN interview:
http://www.vdare.com/francis/political_class.htm
http://bigpeace.com/nmay/2010/07/05/from-europe-who-will-protect-us-from-nato/
http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc0904/article_805.shtml
As for the project (which I support by the way) the national media black-out of the “Knoxville Horror” should prove to any thinking person that the white elite think the murder of whites is certainly not newsworthy. and the documentation is already there.
unless of course the white person is a Jew, like the Az. politician that got part of her brain blew out by a psychopath
And by a bone fide Jewish psychopath to boot!
Re: use of “genocide” “White” and international law.
What’s the easiest way to identify all White people? Tip-toeing around with “European” and such is precisely what avoids a unified front. Your enemies call you White whether you like it or not. In race politics, you need a clear identifier, and “White” serves that purpose well. It’s not anti-racist, it’s anti-WHITE for a reason. Think about it.
Why use the enemy’s words against him? Need I explain this? If it cannot be pursued in actuality, then this accentuates the hypocrisy and double-standards. Either way, it’s good for White interests and White identity.
You are using ju-jitsu when you use “anti-White” and “White genocide” because you’re capitalizing on the conditioning already provided by the enemy. Nothing can be more evil than genocide, and nobody can realistically defend genocide, which is why it is important to point out that policies and individual actions amount to White genocide. Consult Bob Whitaker’s “The Mantra” at http://www.whitakeronline.org/bobsmantra.htm
@ Christian M …
By all means use the term “White” for the reasons you have given. But remember that the label “White” as a tag for Ethno-Europeans is peculiarly American (as I have already pointed out on two previous occasions here).
Europeans do not identify with the label “White” … and this movement won’t go very far if anyone attempts to railroad it as an exclusively “Made in the USA” project.
So, we shall have to take a little more time and search for a more meaningful and self-authored label that can project us into the distant future.
In other words, we can use the term “White” to throw back into the faces of our enemies, but going forward we need to see ourselves collectively as something far more than “White”, or other than just “White”. I have already rejected the silly label, “Caucasian”. I hope others will too. So what we need to come up with will have to be new, or a new variation on something old.
David Longley said on February 28, 2011 – 5:45 pm
“Or Serbia just has a low birth-rate and needs to prevent population declne like everyone else. It’s not as bad as many other European nations though.”
“You are focusing on the wrong thing. There are not enough (non Muslim) babies.”
Yes, and that deficit will continue even if these Serbian men have babies with the Asian women because they will be non-white babies.
I don’t even get how adding the Asian women to Serbia is supposed to help the birthrate anyway.
Serbia’s problem is that they aren’t squeezing enough babies out of the women they have.
This idea is insane, like a company with its factories running at one-quarter capacity going around trying to buy extra factories!
If you need more production, use the factories you already have.
Yes, and that deficit will continue even if these Serbian men have babies with the Asian women because they will be non-white babies.
Longley is promoting a culturist doctrine.
He’s saying that the Serbs shouldn’t worry if their descendants are highly different than them in genetics as long as those dastardly Muslims never take over the land.
Never mind that the Muslims the Serbs face are far more similar to them than the Serb’s half Mongoloid children would ever be.
Madness.
First of all, the original ‘articles’ must be some kind of joke. Just some minister spouting off. For starters, Serbia (and Bulgaria) had large Chinese and Vietnamese populations remaining from the communist period. I’ve heard that they’ve left Sofia, but I’m not sure about Belgrade.
In any event, while there is a logic to the notion that Asian women would be more willing to stay at home and have children–I can’t imagine many Serbs wanting that. They just fought three wars to preserve their ethnos, why would they breed themselves out of existence?
Now as to your point, Reginald, the Serbs very much view the Muslims as a separate ethnos-but this IS rooted in culture. Just as we have the phrase ‘turning Turk’ in English, the Serbs view the Muslims of Bosnia and the Sandjak as having become Turks. The Moslem Slavs represent to the Serbs treachery in the face of 500 years of humiliation to the Asiatic hordes, as well as the collapse of their medieval civilization.
You don’t seem to get a lot of what I post here. Are you sure you give it enough time?
That is clearly true. They are trying to prevent population decline as it’s bad for the economy, social welfare etc.
No, it’s like the EU bringing in 20 million from Africa and S Asia (see 2007 Frattini link posted in earlier threads)
How do you do that in a free society, a Libertarian democracy where people are free to choose and do as they wish?
But they will have consumers, workers etc they reason. They will probably be Serbian and non Muslim too. What is the problem with Muslims in a Libertarian democracy? I have explained this.
I have been describing what is happening. I am not promoting anything. Discriminate more.
Note how you tell others what I am saying even though it is not in the comments, or logically implied by the comments? That is called making things up. Fantasy. It is what you are saying.
See said that as a canonical idiom of propositional attitude. They are mental.
This is our major problem. It is self-destructive behaviour. These idioms create confusion, and lead people astray. Good for Hollywood profits and bankster mediated befuddling though.
Are you read to listen and learn yet?
Please submit evidence/quotations in the comments, e.g.
General Wesley Clark
United States of America military General, former Supreme Commander of NATO
United States of America
“There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multiethnic states.”
April 24-25 1999, CNN interview:
http://www.vdare.com/francis/political_class.htm
http://bigpeace.com/nmay/2010/07/05/from-europe-who-will-protect-us-from-nato/
http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc0904/article_805.shtml
Tim Wise
United States America
Anti-White race huckster, professional polemicist http://www.timwise.org/about/
A B C D
“Because you’re on the endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving…”
“It’s OK. Because in about forty years, half the country will be black or brown. And there is nothing you can do about it…”
“And they know how to regroup, and plot, and plan, and they are planning even now — we are — your destruction.”
“We just have to be patient. And wait for your hearts to stop beating. And stop they will. And for some of you, real damned soon, truth be told. Do you hear it? The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”
Article, Daily Kos, 11/3/2010 “An open letter to the white right on the occasion of your recent successful temper tantrum”
Celebrates and promotes White genocide, cruelly taunts White Americans about the upcoming deaths of individual American Whites and the larger dispossession of White American society, makes specific references to physical death of White Americans (heartbeats, “tick tock”), and gloats about the growing Mexican invasion into America and displacement of White American culture by using Spanish phrases. After the well-deserved outcry against Mr. Wise’s hateful and genocidal screed, Mr. Wise attempted to cover his tracks by deleting some of the more opprobrious sections. The original is preserved in its entirety at multiple websites, including some listed below.
http://delightsome.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/tim-wise-tries-to-edit-his-hate/
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/11/an_open_letter_2.php
http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/2010/11/10/genocide-in-tim-wises-america/
ALTERED VERSION: http://www.timwise.org/2010/11/an-open-letter-to-the-white-right-on-the-occasion-of-your-recent-successful-temper-tantrum/
Great finds, Christian M. General Wesley Clark gives us the opinion of the elite. Tim Wise gives us the hate that animates the anti-White movement in its purest form.
Anti-White Hate Speech:
I swiped this from an Internet site that recently had its conference canceled for the second time in two years (and refuses to acknowledge its enemy).
http://tinyurl.com/yd55j4f
Examples from such:
Dr. Kamau Kambon, former visiting professor of Africana Studies at NC State University, made the following remarks at Black Media Forum on the Image of Black Americans in Mainstream Media. This was a program presented on October 14th at Howard University and broadcast by C-SPAN.
And then finally I want to say that we need one idea, and we’re not thinking about a solution to the problem … And the one idea is, how we are going to exterminate white people because that in my estimation is the only conclusion I have come to. We have to exterminate white people off the face of the planet to solve this problem … [We need to] get very serious and not be diverted from coming up with a solution to the problem and the problem on the planet is white people.
Mike S. Adams, Exterminating Whitey, Oct 21, 2005, Townhall.com.
and:
Amiri Baraka (poet laureate of the state of New Jersey) —
Come up, black dada nihilismus. Rape the white girls. Rape their fathers. Cut the mothers’ throats. [from “Black Dada Nihilismus.”]
And, don’t leave out our brethren in SA:
Variants of the hit ‘Kill the Boer’ have hit the social networking site Facebook… One entry called on ‘fellow black people’ to ‘take [their] land’, and ‘rape every trespasser, namely white whores … till the last breath is out. … White kids will be burned, especially those in Pretoria and Vrystaat.’
Afrikaner farmers are being exterminated at the genocidal annual rate of 313 per 100,000 inhabitants. Or, in the estimation of Dr. Gregory H. Stanton, who heads Genocide Watch, four times as high as is for the rest of the population, making farming in South Africa the most dangerous occupation in the world.
Thank you for that website!
Everyone: websites full of such quotations are especially valuable. There are many websites that have collected these quotations, please, pass them along if you find them.
I added he following when Patrick Grimm had those hateful quotes and “poetry” posted on “NewsfromtheWest” regarding the selection of Professor Giovanni to speak at the memorial of the slaughtered students”
“No one who wonders that, however, is familiar with the poetic oeuvre of one of Cho’s own teachers, Virginia Tech’s Distinguished Professor of English and Black Studies, Nikki Giovanni.”
The True Import of Present Dialog, Black vs. Negro, by Nikki Giovanni
Ni**er
Can you kill
Can you kill
Can a ni**er kill
Can a ni**er kill a honkie
Can a ni**er kill the Man
Can you kill ni**er
Huh? Ni**er can you kill
Do you know how to draw blood
Can you poison
Can you stab-a-Jew
Can you kill huh? Ni**er
Can you kill
Can you run a protestant down with your
’68 El Dorado
(that’s all they’re good for anyway)
Can you kill
Can you piss on a blond head
Can you cut it off
Can you kill
A ni**er can die
We ain’t got to prove we can die
We got to prove we can kill
Ironically, the author of these lines was asked to deliver the closing remarks at Virginia Tech’s convocation memorializing the 32 slaughtered by Cho. For some reason, Giovanni didn’t read The True Import.” – NewsfromtheWest
‘It is NO accident that the more virulent the remarks blacks and others make about whites, the more celebrated, lauded and applauded, and rewarded with sterling positions and honors they become. Why? The Jews of course. The “poetry” of all three of these acclaimed affirmative-action “professors” is amateurish, gangster-rap rants charading as “poetry.” Only the Jews could pretend to believe such nonsense.
The selection of hate-Whitey Giovanni to speak at the Virginia Tech convocation was likewise no accident. It was to rub Whites’ noses in their deserved slaughter.
These most memorable quotes made me think of another unbelievable hate Whitey hit piece from another “professor” teaching at Syracuse University. These are excerpts from a column that were posted on American Renaissance some time back whereby the writer, “Professor” Boyce Watkins, was rightfully SAVAGED for his blatant lies by the talented posters there, but his propaganda was left to stand where published. To my knowledge, there never was a retraction.
“Nifong Trial Lets The ‘Dukes Of Hazzard’ Off The Hook”
Dr. Boyce Watkins, Black Athlete Sports Network, June 20, 2007
“OK, Mike Nifong committed misconduct. I’ll go ahead and say that right now. I recall watching the start of the Duke rape trial last year, as District Attorney Nifong appeared to be as cocky as Star Jones fresh out of liposuction.
What is interesting, however, is how the dirty light shined on Mr. Nifong has taken the focus off the Duke boys, who apparently enjoy drinking till they puke and degrading black women in their spare time.
Since the trial took place, these guys have received high paying jobs on Wall Street, heroic half-time docudramas on national television, and an unprecedented extra year of eligibility from the NCAA. Most accused and acquitted rapists don’t get such royal treatment.”
http://blackathlete.net/artman2/publish/Commentary_1/Nifong_Trial_Lets_The_Dukes_Of_Hazzard_Off_The_Hook.shtml
Got that folks? The “Duke boys” were tried and acquitted. Didn’t know that, did you? Most likely because we all know it NEVER happened…!
And yet, WHO in their right minds (but the White-hating Jews) would give such an obvious liar and libeler as Watkins a wide audience after writing such preposterous claims? Straight from this braggadocio’s mouth on his personal website:
“…Dr. Watkins has presented his message to millions, making regular appearances in various national media outlets, including CNN, Good Morning America , MSNBC, FOX News, BET, NPR, Essence Magazine, USA Today, The Today Show, ESPN, The Tom Joyner Morning Show and CBS Sports.”
Still naively believing the Jews are benign and mean you no harm?
Voir Dire
This White Genocide Evidence Project is a profoundly important idea. So necessary it HAD to happen, and yet such a thing takes a brilliant person to actually devise. Of course the genocide has already begun, an obvious example being the purposely lax immigration enforcement allowing illegals to kill whites in everything from DUI-related deaths to outright murder. Part of what is likely the most gigantic and insidious crime ever to hit the West, particularly since it has been mostly an inside job, the crying need is to document and piece together a chain of evidence, a paper, video, audio, electronic trail tracing perpetrators to victims. Think of yellow crime-scene tape going up all around the nation, with countless dedicated citizen investigators, with their notebooks and cameras in hand, calmly compiling evidence and puzzling it all out, at about the same time that it begins to dawn on the other side that name-calling and innuendo will no longer work their evil magic.
There is no way you guys can prove that there is/was a White genocide in Europe (maybe in the New World, but not in Europe).
Let’s take Germany.
How did Germany become multicultural?
It all started in the 1960s with the famous “guest worker program” (Gastarbeiterprogramm).
Germany signed this guest worker agreements with Italy, Greece, Portugal, Spain and Yugoslavia (so there was clearly no intention of “destroying the White race” in Germany).
Then the USA put political pressure on Germany to sign a similar agreement with Turkey.
Still, the majority of the guest workers were from other European countries. (Virtually every family on Balkans has some relatives living in Germany.)
The guest workers were allowed to work in Germany for a few years, and they couldn’t apply for German citizenship.
As time passed, Germany became more liberal, and most of the guest workers didn’t return to their native countries. Many of them intermarried with Germans, etc.
Ethnonationalism,
you are very wrong again.
The entire occupation of Germany was a genocidal project.
It all started with the French occupation of the Ruhr in 1923 in which the French used black Senegalese soldiers in French uniforms for the dual purpose of humiliating the Germans and inject Negro blood/genes into the German bloodstream.
There was an Englishman , whose name I do not recall right now, who campaigned against this horror and danger to the white race.
He pointedly worried about the white race in his writings, not just the German ethnos among the whites.
The Nazis, after they came to power, forcibly sterilized the resulting mulatto offspring to protect the German gene pool.
After the catastrophe of 1945, genocide and ethnic cleansing was perpetrated upon the German people on a scale unprecedented and unimaginable in European history.
The fact that you do not seem to know anything about this does not surprise me.
This is the most hushed up, taboo, chapter of European history in the 20th century, on par with the critical Jewish role in the Communist/Bolshevik takeover and mass murders.
15 million Germans were expelled from GERMAN territory, which was simply given to Poland and Russia. In the process 2.5 million were killed and practically all women raped.
3 million Germans were expelled from the Sudetenland and a quarter million bestially murdered in the process, including babies drowned in latrines in front of their mothers.
The Benes decrees which authorized the ethnic cleansing of Chechoslovakia of Germans and Hungarians were not lifted to this day.
The criminal terror bombing of entire German cities, with the clear aim of killing as many German civilians as possible, was the order of the day. The fire bombing of Dresden, an unprecedented war crime, killed between 100-200 thousand
civlians, that of Hamburg around 50 thousand.
The Anglo-Saxon pilots slaughtering their own Saxon kinsfolk, mainly women and children.
War criminal Churchill used other psychopats, such as Bomber Harris to do the killing.
Eisenhower, a man of German descent, committed his own little genocide by delibarately starving German prisoners of war in his death camps.
The number of Germans POWs who were thus starved to death
is estimated at 1.5 million. They were simply categorized “Other Losses”.
An estimated 3-4 million German soldiers never returned from Siberia, from Uncle Joe’s paradise.
The term in use only among Negroes in American uniform in occupied Germany, “motherfucker”, in common slang use today, stems from the Negroes’ unfettered access to hungry, defenseless German women. The number of mulattos born in the few years after after the German defeat is unknown, because to even raise the subject immediately led to arrest under the de-Nazification campaign, but is estimated at 15 thousand minimum.
The de-Nazification campaign was designed and enforced primarily by Jews. anyone who opposed it, such as General Patton, were destroyed.
The result was a puppet “German” government, which licked the boots of the Jewish occupation.
This was the so-called ‘Germany” that imported the guest workers and let them stay and intermarry with the Germans.
The Nurmberg Laws which forbade sexual relations between the Germans and non-Aryans were, of course, repealed by the occupiers.
The unstated aim was to open the door for unfettered race mixing, thus promoting an insidious, non-violent form of genocide against the Germans first, and all the white race later, by logical extension of the idea.
Anybody who objected was immediately branded a Nazi and was imprisoned or lost his job.
The situation during the first 2-3years after the German surrender was so bad, that, for example, a 12 year old German boy was executed by the British for giving the Hitler salute. The British killed so many German civilians that they introduced the guillotine. It was cheaper than bullets.
The British and the rest of the Allies are paying the price for their crimes: they have about 30 years and will disappear forever from the face of the Earth.
The man who sells his soul to the Jew and commits genocide against his own Folk can expect nothing less.
I think that the apparent policy of allowing minorities in the Allied armies to rape women in Axis countries would be worthy of study. The French also unleashed Moroccans on Italian women.
Athanasius, please stop your tired old method of trying to create conflict between various White nations. It’s all too obvious what you are up to and it won’t work.
I want a France to survive as French, Germany to survive as German, Ireland to survive as Ireland, Russia to survive as Russian, England to survive as English and Italy to survive as Italian. I want Australia, New Zealand and America to survive as White dominant societies.
We are in a struggle for survival worldwide and we don’t need to revisit the civil wars of the past. We aren’t falling for it.
You’re either extremely paranoid, or a troll/agent provocateur yourself. I must admit, I find myself at times sympathizing with your posts, because I too have a strong emotional attachment to the receive narrative in the USA. My grandfathers fought for the US against the Allies, and my other relatives fought in Europe against them.
Having said that, I don’t feel the need to be intellectual bound to the accepted (acceptable) narrative. The Allies did many questionable things both during the War and in its aftermath. Given control by elements hostile to European civilization in both the American and the British governments, is it forbidden to explore the motivations behind letting a bunch of sub-Saharan Africans rape German women or letting a bunch of Moroccans rape Italian women?
I meant to say, “against the Axis.”
Athanasius, it is not wrong in certain contexts to talk about just about anything. But to endlessly harp on supposed Allied wrongs doesn’t help promote White Advocacy.
Guess what? There are atrocities in war. WWII involved literally tens of millions of soldiers across the globe. To harp on one side over and over can only serve to undermine our cause.
If you have a sincere interest in the war, why not take that issue to some site devoted to exploring WWII?
If I was trying to save France from committing suicide, I wouldn’t go and find some old wound in French history that created a civil war and endlessly irritate it. I would be trying to find common ground.
I’m merely raising the question as to whether there was a conscious effort to the break the spirit of the Axis by allowing Africans to rape German and Italian women. Such an inquiry is relevant to this site because our current hostile elites also promote such sexual contact through both direct and indirect means.
This is not the best site for that Athanasius, because you first need to establish that your accusation is a fact. That’s can’t possibly been done here, you need to talk with historians and experts. Here, it just becomes inflammatory loose talk that is decisive.
I have relatives that served in WWII in several roles and I never heard anything remotely like that. It is rather interesting that you don’t mention the well documented massive rape of German women by Soviet forces. I guess that doesn’t set well with your crowd?
I didn’t think there was still much debate as to whether Stalin wanted to break the German ethnos. If it is controversial, then sure, we can discuss the manifold atrocities of the Red Army. Soviet policy basically annihilated a 1600 year old German presence in Eastern Europe. Not to mention what they did to Ukrainians, Ruthenians, Romanians, et al. I am not sympathetic to the Soviet regime one iota.
Along the same lines, I didn’t know that it was controversial that the French unleashed their goumiers (North African soldiers) on the Italian women. Maybe it is controversial to the Franco-Jewish filmmakers who are busy making movies praising the role of the goumiers in the war so that Arabs seem to ‘deserve’ their place in the France of 2011.
Trawling for book material. Books make money (not much if books of this ilk mind).
Can people here see how The Enlightenment was a likely demographic, eugenic, consequence of the reversal of the dysgenesis (unwittingly?) engineered by Catholicism?
O.K.,let’s see if I can get this right without making a spelling mistake.
David G. Myer whose textbook has been by the university of Manitoba for almost
several decades writes on page 392 on chapter on prejudice:
Prejudice appears among White Americans who, as Figure 11-1 shows, openly dislike African Americans. Most Americans believe that “the increasing diversity that immigrants bring to this country….mostly threatens American culture” (Moore, 1993)….
Questions concerning intimate interracial contacts still detect prejudice. “I would probably feel uncomfortable dancing with a Black person in a public place,” detects more racial feeling then, “I would probably feel uncomfortable riding a bus with a Black person.” This helps explain why, in a survey of students at 390
colleges and universities, 53 percent of African-American students felt excluded from social activities (Hurtado &others,1994)…..
In another survey, only 3 percent of Whites said they wouldn’t want their child to attend an integrated school, but 57 percent acknowledged they would be unhappy if their child married a Black person (Life, 1988).
In the same chapter, Myer explains the sources of prejudice.On the section authoritarian personality, Myer writes:
The emotional needs that contribute to prejudice are said to predominate in the “authoritarian personality.” In the 1940s, University of California, Berkeley, researchers–two of them had fled Nazi Germany–set out on an urgent research
mission. They wanted to uncover the psychological roots of an anti-Semitism so poisonous that it caused the slaughter of millions of jews and turned many millions Europeans into indifferent spectators”
HelloEverybody said on March 1, 2011 – 5:02 pm
“In the same chapter, Myer explains the sources of prejudice.On the section authoritarian personality, Myer writes: The emotional needs that contribute to prejudice are said to predominate in the “authoritarian personality.””
Are said by who to predominate in the “authoritarian personality”?
and also this:
“In the 1940s, University of California, Berkeley, researchers–two of them had fled Nazi Germany–set out on an urgent research mission. They wanted to uncover the psychological roots of an anti-Semitism so poisonous that it caused the slaughter of millions of jews and turned many millions Europeans into indifferent spectators”
‘…two of them had fled Nazi Germany…’, there’s your clue right there.
Those European ‘indifferent spectators’ were well aware of the fact that the Jews were and remain their deadliest enemy.
I recommend replacing ‘White’ with ‘European.’ Whenever people hear of a white anything, they tune out because they think it’s racist. ‘European’ is more specific and it doesn’t have a negative connotation to it. PR is everything.
Here is a video of a song, that was also broadcasted on Swedish television. This (disgusting) video not only radically promotes racial mixing (for Whites, of cource) the rapper and the blonde girl (who has sex with the negro) are both jewish.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u-mihtgTm0
Yes, I have seen this. Do you have any information about the rapper and/or the girl? Name, background, country of origin. Anything is appreciated regarding this piece of propaganda, thanks. All I can find is the Youtube videos.
Jason Speaks wrote:
“to endlessly harp on supposed Allied wrongs doesn’t help promote White Advocacy. ”
The Allied wrongs were not “supposed”, but cold , hard facts.
The evidence is not disputed, except in the case of Eisenhower’s death camps, where Jewish activists constantly reedit the Wikipedia entry on James Bacque.
There were Jews of conscience, like Viktor Gollancz, who protested the genocide on the German people, but they were the rare exception to the rule.
If the destruction of Germany which occurred 65 years ago would truly belong to the inglorious past I would be inclined to accept the argument that bygones should be bygones.
Unfortunately that is not the case.
Occupation troops , masquerading as NATO allies are still in Germany, the National-Masochist dictatorship masquerading as a democracy, installed by the Allies, is still in power.
The prisons contain more political prisoners than the former East German Communist puppet system did.
As late as 1989, Mitterand and Thatcher dropped the mask and openly came out against German reunification.
This with Soviet troops massed a few hundred miles from the English channel.
Every year they celebrate D-Day as “Liberation”.
They are trying to build a monument to the murderers of the RAF, who killed over one million German civilians.
They already built a monument to Bomber Harris, the Murderer In Chief. That statue is under guard, because people defaced it with red paint, signifying blood.
The Holocau$t Industry is booming, with ever more survivors stepping forward demanding more and more. It seems that the laws of biology do not apply to Jews.
The Polish government recently protested a planned national memorial day for the victims of the greatest ethnic cleansing and murder in the history of Europe, if not the world.
The Jews in Germany are screaming in protest.
France just recently lifted the ban on the use of the German language in Elsass-Lothringen.
The clause forbidding the union of Austria and Germany is still in effect, although it is slowly eroded through the back door of the European Union.
The Benes decrees are still in force.
No, the past is not dead.
How right you are, Frank Stone! The lesson here is that the past is invariably prologue, eventually, to the perpetrators themselves, and their deluded people. Not one in a thousand people in the USA has any idea about what happened in Central Europe during and after WWII. The White West is finally suffering the consequences of its earlier blunders, but because of Jewish media control, its people haven’t a clue about such things, or what is coming their way. Because of their intellectual emasculation and their willful ignorance, the White-Anglo world is in very deep trouble.
FE Stone, could you please explain this paragraph of your post above? What exactly are you referring to? Thank you.
“The Polish government recently protested a planned national memorial day for the victims of the greatest ethnic cleansing and murder in the history of Europe, if not the world.”
Barkingmad,
I try to keep the rust off my German language skills acquired during my time over there in the 3rd Armored Division, therefore i regularly read online publications in the German language.
I read the “Junge Freiheit”, “Zuerst”, “alpen-donau.info”, the NPD website,” DeutschlandEcho ” and a few others.
Spiegel, Stern and Focus are just as anti-German and anti-white as the Jew York Times.
Here are some (politically correct) links in the English language:
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/02/17/2743020/jewish-leaders-condemn-memorial-day-for-expelled-germans
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1357623/Suggestion-Commemoration-Day-honour-Germans-expelled-Nazi-occupied-lands-WWII-sparks-fury.html
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/europe/news/article_1376127.php/Memorial_for_Germans_expelled_from_Eastern_Europe_faces_delay
http://www.amazon.com/Terrible-Revenge-Second-Revised-Updated/dp/1403973083/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1299127374&sr=1-1
Barkingmad,
here is one more link:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=66657
Frank, I read those PC articles you posted from the lamestream media
All are worthless and disgusting!
Far be it from the government-controlled media to post the truth about the “German Resettlement.”
How dare those present-day, murderous Germans with dreams of re-creating a Fourth Reich believe that rape, murder, torture and other unspeakable acts against helpless women and children rises to the same level as the Holohoax!
All Whites, especially German Whites are worthless! In perpetuity!
Here is a fantastic article about General Patton who realized at the end of the war that we’d been fighting the wrong people:
General Patton Discovered the Truth
http://tinyurl.com/3alo3yy
Thanks for the other info as well.
Please everybody, pass this on! Post Frank’s info and Duke’s videos wherever and whenever you can, I do (and am often censored). The more that know and understand what and who we Whites are up against, what they really think about us and their desire to “Genocide” us the better.
This is our survival we are talking about here!
I’ve documented some of this poison in the following publications:
FREEDOM UNDER SOCIALISM? – my magnus opus, see in particular the chapter on race
MAGNUS HIRSCHFELD: THE MAN WHO INVENTED “RACISM” – a vastly under-rated publication if I say so myself
ADOLF HITLER: ANTI-”RACIST” – what would the enemies of Western Man have done without him?
All the above can be found on my main website.
Tks for your links, FES. I shall get-a-reading. – Barkers.
I’m currently taking a Sociology class at a Midwest college. In addition to the very biased textbook, there is another book titled “The Sociologically Examined Life” that is required as well. The anti-white overtones sewn throughout the entire thing is nothing short of stunning. Basically, the book implies that any obstacles any non-white person or society (or woman) encounters is the fault of the white male. It’s disturbing to know that young, naive kids are being exposed to this but I can’t help but think of the author as naive and weak… almost child-like. Creepy.
Robin, that is creepy and I had forgotten how many similar books I had to read in college and high school. By the way, I wouldn’t worry much about arguing with the teacher or anyone else in class about the issues. Your goal is to get a good grade. You can do more as a White advocate by improving yourself than banging your head against a Marxist professor that will never change anyway.
Robin:
They have been peddling that worn out crap since before you were born, assuming you are of the usual college age. I went to school way back then and argued with my professor every week in class, to no avail. When it came time to turn in our essays – I looked her in the eye and stuffed my paper in the middle of the stack – daring her to try to find it and cheat me out of my grade. The class was so large she didn’t know my name. The proctors who handed out the test checked our ID’s at the door to make sure we got the book with our name on it. But the “professor” didn’t know our name because she was too lazy to pass out the exam books. I’m betting it is easier to be anonymous now with computer tests but I’m not sure.
It is far more important to get a good grade than argue though, in spite of my stubborness at the time. It was, however, personally satisfying to defy her, and I did make an “A”.
The instructor is a pretty nice guy. He really hasn’t talked about the content of the book I mentioned, but seems focused on the history and science of Sociology. Most of the assignments revolve around the vocabulary and the ‘scientific method’ and not so much into any specific ideology (seems like every chapter has a section that reassures the reader that this is an ‘actual’ science).
It’s his class and he required the book so I have to believe he sympathizes with the author’s sentiments but I’m focused on satisfying the weekly requirements and earning an good grade.
The eminent scholar, Michael Hoffman, produced an outstanding series of DVD’s called “The Judaic Mentality.” He painstakingly documents Zionist Jewish writers in the biggest Jewish paper of all, The New York Times and other publications, brazenly, openly calling for the death of Germans TODAY.
His exquisitely crafted and documented “HATE WHITEY: THE CINEMA OF DEFAMATION” is likewise imperative. http://www.amazon.com/review/R29QG2DBS3KFJW
Excellent, it would nice to get that book made available again.
Jason: I have the CD’s and many of Michael’s books including “Hate Whitey: The Cinema of Defamation” and his most recent production, the astounding “Judaism Discovered” which I’m still reading.
The problem is he’s big on protecting his personal work (understandably), but perhaps for the sake of this vastly important project he would permit the sharing of the aforementioned booklet and the content of his 3-piece CD, “The Judaic Mentality.”
Voir Dire, yes if you have any contact with him, please let him know there is an audience over here. Maybe he could write some articles for TOO?
The Judiac Mentality is a DVD set? How would I buy it?
Also, maybe the author would give a gift to the world and place it on a torrent site???
Stalin’s Jews
We mustn’t forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html
Jewess Commie Leader in Germany openly calls for the end to all White Nations!
From CofCC
http://incogman.net/02/2011/so-many-goyim-hating-jews-so-little-time/#more-54971
http://incogman.net/03/2011/jtf-jew-creep-exposed-as-christian-hater/#more-56515
“[To lower the birth rate, we will] “…squeeze consumers through taxation and inflation; make housing very scarce by limiting construction; force wives and mothers to work outside the home to offset the inadequacy of male wages, yet provide few child care facilities; encourage immigration to the cities by providing low wages in the country and providing few rural jobs; increase congestion in the cities by starving the transit system; increase personal insecurity by encouraging conditions that produce unemployment and by haphazard political arrests.”
—E. Grebenik, “On Controlling Population Growth,” in Biology and the Human Sciences. (ed.) J.W.S. Pringle, Herbert Spencer Lectures, 1970, Oxford 1970
http://servv89pn0aj.sn.sourcedns.com/~gbpprorg/obama/incogman/the-death-of-america-by-a-thousand-cut.html
Grotesque, Anti-White, racist 2011 Super Bowl Pepsi commercial
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVQrH0aHGAc
This blogger keeps a running compilation of the Jewish media’s relentless debasement of our culture and hatred of Whites
http://www.antiwhitemedia.com/2011/02/mgm-jews-transform-shakespeare-play.html
Top Rabbi Exposes Jewish Racism!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYBsDwjezQI
Madoff wife says “Gentiles Are Responsible For This”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je67KlCpV84&feature=related
How do these things get out to the general public so they will begin to take hold with the average person? Even the most strident conservative that posts on FoxNews will instinctively jump to the defense of Jews… regardless. It’s like a conditioned response.
In the aftermath of AmRen posting the following piece, I emailed the running commentary to Professor Boyce Watkins and invited him to the debate where his credibility had been totally demolished by the many intelligent posters there. I found the commentary in the “Waybacktimemachine” archive. He “dropped in” but made a complete fool of himself as he could not address the FACTS that the “Duke boys” had been completely exonerated through DNA evidence and that there never had been a trial nor the “boys” acquitted at said trial, despite his very (employed by the Jews’ News) public claims to the contrary. Why he nor his employer were never sued for such egregious slander and lies by the parents of the Duke students remains a mystery.
“Nifong Trial Lets The ‘Dukes Of Hazzard’ Off The Hook”
Dr. Boyce Watkins, Black Athlete Sports Network, June 20, 2007
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20070625201301/http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2007/06/nifong_trial_le.php#comments
Voir Dire:
I assume you read this (because you are always on top of things!):
Were the Duke lacrosse players wrongly accused of rape paid $20MILLION each in secret settlement?
From the BBC, of course, not the American Piss-stream media. Interesting how often we have to go overseas to find news about pertinent American issues.
http://tinyurl.com/4qmdjks
Also see here for vile, racist, black rap lyrics:
http://tinyurl.com/6h55hp9
Thank you for that link, Boudicca, and your kind thought. Great finds and links too! And no… I was not aware of that settlement, but given the likelihood that they have probably never donated any money to these many starving-for-funds groups fighting for restoration of White rights or those who went to bat for them during their horrible ordeal is to their everlasting shame.
Correction to the following which has yet to be posted “(Note: this article has not yet been made available online, but I have the edition with this damning, outstanding article).” The piece on international, organized Jewry’s role in the terror inflicted upon and the threat of armed warfare against White South Africaners’ and Rhodesians’ if they failed to succumb to Black, Marxist rule was available online at one time (which is why I supplied the link), but has since been deleted. Wonder why??? The following must-read piece on the Koch brothers by one Sasha Levine has a very revealing insight. She (He?) says that the Koch brothers funded “The John Birch Society” which published “The New American.” Eustace Mullins always maintained that it was an anti-communist front group funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, but never provided any proof. Levine doesn’t provide a source either, but I’m inclined to believe her/him (since they are the ultimate insiders of their brethren’s doings) given what I’ve learned about the Koch brothers.
http://thenewamerican.com/node/5059 (Note: this article has not yet been made available online, but I have the edition with this damning, outstanding article)
http://www.observer.com/2010/daily-transom/how-libertarian-koch-bros-benefit-corporate-welfare
Voir Dire, with regard to the Koch brothers, you aren’t implying they are Jewish are you? Because as far as I can tell they are not. Also, I can’t really see anything wrong with their political beliefs. They seem better than most rich and influential people today.
The article from the leftwing New Yorker doesn’t seem all that convincing. They have an obvious bias against anyone conservative. In addition, it would be almost impossible to do business in the US without being intertwined with the government in some way, given how large the federal government has grown.
The Jewish Souther Poverty Law Center’s latest smear campaign against American patriots (with Professor MacDonald’s picture featured prominently in their own campaign of hatred against Whites)
A new report from the Southern Poverty Law Center on “hate groups” warns of the explosive growth in 2010 of extremist, “patriot” organizations, among them the Constitution Party, Oath Keepers and WorldNetDaily.
Read more: Yikes! Guess who was named dangerous ‘patriot’ group http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=269413#ixzz1Fe1wNsUD
Jason: I will write to Michael Hoffman and will also disseminate the news of this critical project far and wide to every patriot hosting their own blogs that I’m aware of.
Thank you, thank you…, Mr. Miller, (and the technically savvy programmer and others for offering to help) for undertaking this daunting project. You are a patriot extraordinaire. After intensely studying and writing about this tribe for the past three years, I have collected a wealth of damning information (especially regarding financial crimes) but have never organized it in any meaningful way. I’m now inspired to do so.
Brother Nathanael Kapner’s “realzionistnews,” Jeff Rense’s “Rense.com,” Patrick Grimm’s “NewsfromtheWest” and yes… even AmRen are veritable treasure troves to be mined when time permits for those soldiers looking to contribute.
Everything from Brother Nathanael’s meticulously documented and researched criminal library deserves to be in there.
Both Newsfromthewest and the blogger, Hoff2, at the following have collected an impressive archives of hard-to-find and censored online books as well:
http://jewise.wordpress.com/
Seeing the thumbs-downs this morning, I take it this project does not sit well with the Jewish trolls. Tough!
In 1976, backed by British leaders and the “world community,” U.S. Secretary of State “Henry Kissinger summoned Smith to Geneva and gave him a heavy dose of power politics. If Rhodesia would not agree to immediately allow majority rule, Smith was told, her oil supplies would be cut off and more sanctions would be imposed.
“http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/world-mainmenu-26/africa-mainmenu-27/318-ian-smith-and-the-fall-of-rhodesia
Excerpts “From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe” (emphasis mine)
Smith asked Kissinger about things like history, culture, civilization and loyalty. After all, Rhodesia had fought for the West in the great battles of the 20th century, including World War II and the Korean War. Kissinger firmly told Smith something truly sad and even frightening, “I am afraid those things have no place in the modern world.”
KISSINGER ADDED THAT ‘WHITE REGIMES WOULD NOT SURVIVE IN SOUTHERN AFRICA.’”
HENRY KISSINGER, meanwhile, did meet with Smith in Geneva. But if Smith thought that he would receive kinder treatment from the former secretary of state and advisor to Republican presidents, he was in for a rude awakening. Precisely what threats or pressures were brought against him is not known, but Smith, who had previously pledged not to surrender to the terrorists ‘in ten thousand years,’ was a changed man after the meeting. He is said to have aged 10 years in that one week in Geneva.
IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT SMITH WAS THREATENED WITH A MILITARY INVASION OF RHODESIA BACKED BY THE U.N., THE U.S. AND THE U.K. THAT IS ENTIRELY PLAUSIBLE, AS SUCH TALK WAS IN THE AIR AND DETAILED PLANS FOR A MILITARY INVASION OF SOUTH AFRICA HAD BEEN DRAWN UP AND PUBLISHED BY POLICY WONKS AT THE CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR PEACE.”
http://thenewamerican.com/node/5059 (Note: this article has not yet been made available online, but I have the edition with this damning, outstanding article)
We must realise that our most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the mind and consciousness of the Negro race that for many centuries whites have oppressed them, we can mould them to our program. The terms colonialism and imperialism must be included in our propaganda. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against whites, we will endeavor to instil in whites a guilty complex for enslaving Negros. We will raise the Negro to prominence in the world of sports, entertainment and professions; with the high prestige we will create for them, Negros will be able to intermarry with whites and thus begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” – Israel Cohen
“A Racial Program for the 20th Century” Authentic or Hoax
http://www.savethemales.ca/the_book_the_bankers_made_disa.html
‘Gentile sperm leads to barbaric offspring’
Rabbi Dov Lior says Jewish Law prohibits sterile couples from conceiving using non-Jew’s sperm, as it causes adverse traits. On subject of single mothers he says, ‘Child cannot be 100% normal’
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4006385,00.html
How Zionists Divide and Conquer by Professor David Duke
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9agA3ofc5Q
“I began to review events of the past to which I had paid little attention before, like the expulsion of the Jews from the civil rights movement in 1966. Jews had funded the movement, devised its legal strategies, and provided support for its efforts in the media and in the universities and wherever else they had power.” – David Horowitz
Excerpt from Curtis Maynard’s “David Horowitz and the Mechanics of the Zionist Exploitation of Blacks
http://www.rense.com/general75/mech.htm
Suppression by the Jewish media of “minority” on White crimes needs its own special category so great is the crime. I also have a stomach-churning collection of such crimes I’ve been saving since my days of blogging at American Renaissance. The following is just one example:
Posted by me on the now deceased Curt Maynard’s blog:
Curt: Wondered if you’d come across this unbelievably nightmarish but (not a word, but it SHOULD be) Africanesque Black-on-White crime?
Whites’ collectively were smeared for years by the Jews’ News over the dragging death of James Byrd. Ever heard about this unspeakably horrific torture/murder of a White handicapped, wheelchair-bound man by a black, female Monster? Just what I thought…! Warning… Nauseating, graphic details – Voir Dire
Phoenix Woman Admits Torturing, Killing Disabled Man
http://www.azfamily.com/news/homepagetopstory/stories/phoenix-news-081909-burned-body-arrest.f6bea024.html
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2009/08/phoenix_woman_a.php
Voir Dire:
Do you have a link for the article From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe?
I can no longer find this damning article posted anywhere on line
THX
Link and video of the bone-chilling confession to the Phoenix paper has been pulled, but here is a thus-far preserved update. Please save videos and links such as this before they can be buried from memory:
A White stranger tortured to death by a Black sociopath over a RUMOR of snitching (WHO promotes “snitching” as an egregious crime in black culture?)
UPDATE: Woman who confessed to torture killing to appear in court
by Tess Rafols and Catherine Holland / azfamily.com
azfamily.com
Posted on September 8, 2009 at 6:20 AM
Updated Monday, Sep 14 at 10:46 AM
Gallery
SEE ALL 2 PHOTOS »
PHOENIX — The Phoenix woman who confessed last month to the torture killing of a Valley man is slated to appear before a judge today.
Woman’s jailhouse interview
UNCUT: Simpson talks to 3TV about the murder she has admitted to committing, plus her motive behind the crime.
Related videos:
Background:
Search Video:
Detectives have called the murder of Terry Nelly one of the worst crimes they’ve ever seen.
Angela Simpson, the woman who confessed in a jailhouse interview with 3TV to killing and dismembering Neely will appear in Maricopa County Superior Court today.
Neely’s body was found in a burning trash can in the parking lot behind a Phoenix church in early August. Detectives arrested Simpson two weeks later. A grand jury indicted her charges of first-degree murder and kidnapping on Aug. 27.
When she spoke with 3TV’s Marissa Wingate, Simpson said she did not feel at all guilty about killing the man she believed to be a “snitch.”
“I’m a little upset that I won’t be able to, you know, kill more snitches, but I have no remorse about killing him [Neely],” she after, after coldy explaining what she did to the wheelchair-bound man, all while making him watch in mirror.
“He needed to see what he deserved,” she said when asked why she made him watch.
Simpson’s video arraignment is scheduled for Tuesday morning.
Police also arrested Edward McFarland, believing he helped Simpson dispose of Neely’s body.
Grand jury indicts Phoenix woman in torture killing
PHOENIX — A grand jury has indicted a Phoenix woman accused of torturing, killing and dismembering a man whose body was found burning in a trash can earlier this month.
The body of Terry Neely, 46, was found on Aug. 5. Investigators arrested Angela Simpson in connection with the case less than two weeks later.
On Thursday, a grand jury indicted Simpson on charges of first-degree murder, kidnapping and abandonment or concealment of a dead body — all felonies. In a jailhouse interview with 3TV’s Marissa Wingate, Simpson, 33, admitted killing Neely, who was confined to a motorized wheelchair, because he was a “snitch.”
“I beat him to death. … I killed him and cut him up,” Simpson said.
Since that interview, Simpson has refused to talk to the media again.
According to Phoenix police investigators, Neely had been stabbed 50 times and beaten. A nail had also be driven into his head.
Police also arrested Edward McFarland, believing he helped Simpson get rid of Neely’s body. McFarland is charged with abandonment or concealment or dead body and hinder prosecution.
“The level of cruelty alleged in this case is severe, and we will aggressively prosecute this case,” said Coutny Attorney Andrew Thomas in a news release. “Our office will determine in the near future whether to seek the death penalty for this defendant.”
Phoenix woman admits torturing, killing disabled man
PHOENIX — In a jailhouse interview with 3TV’s Marissa Wingate, a Phoenix woman admitted killing a man confined to a motorized wheelchair after torturing him for days because he was a “snitch.”
Angela Simpson, 33, told 3TV she promised Terry Neely sex and drugs in order to get him to come to her North Phoenix apartment.
Once there, Simpson said she beat Simpson with a tire iron, hammered a nail into his head, pulled his teeth and strangled him with a television cord.
“You made him watch it through a mirror?” Wingate asked.
“Yes, I did,” Simpson replied calmly. “He needed to see what he deserved.”
Wingate describe Simpson as articulate and straightforward. When Wingate asked her why she killed Neely, the answer, to Simpson, seemed simple.
“I don’t want my children or the people I consider family to be in a place where there are snitches,” she said.
Neely lived in an assisted-living home not far from Simpson’s apartment and often rode around in his motorized wheelchair. Simpson admitted that she barely knew Neely, but she did consider him a snitch.
“He told on a righteous person years ago,” she said. “He told me that.”
“I beat him to death. … I killed him and cut him up,” she said.
Simpson told Wingate she dismembered Neely’s body and stuffed it into a trash can, which she then torched. The burning trash bin was found outside a North Phoenix church on Aug. 5. Police arrested Simpson for the murder on Aug. 19.
Simpson, who was already in jail when police caught up with her, told Wingate this is not the first time she’s killed.
“I believe informants and child molesters should be killed … period,” she said.
Simpson said she was “kind of relieved” that police arrested her. She also said she takes medication and might be considered mentally ill.
“I think something’s wrong with the world that I live in, but, according to other people, yes, somethiing is wrong with me.”
Wingate asked Simpson if she felt guilty about Neely’s death.
“Guilty? For ridding the world of a snitch? No, I don’t feel guilty,” she answered.
Police make arrest
PHOENIX — Phoenix police say they have made an arrest in the brutal murder of a man whose body was dismembered and stuffed into a trash can that was then set on fire.
Investigators say Angela Simpson, 33, was behind the killing of Terry Neely, whose body was found on Aug. 5.
Simpson reportedly thought Neely was a snitch working with law enforcement.
She told police that she lured Neely inside an apartment near Peoria and 12th avenues by offering sex.
Once inside the apartment, police say Simpson began beating Neely with a tire iron and hammer. She also pulled out his teeth and strangled him with a television cable.
She said she tortured Neely for three days.
According to autopsy results, Neely sustained multiple blunt-force head injuries and a 3-inch nail had been driven or hammered into his brain. He was also stabbed approximately 50 times, his throat was sliced and he was dismembered.
Simpson admitted that she dismembered Neely and placed him in a trash can. She borrowed a car and drove to a church at Ninth and Peoria avenues and set the trash can on fire.
Simpson allegedly committed a robbery along with Edward McFarland, better known as “Cracker” last week. He reportedly told his apartment complex manager about the gruesome murder but threatened to kill him if he told polilce.
ORIGINAL STORY
PHOENIX — Phoenix police have released the name of the murdered man whose body was found in a burning trash can in the backyard of a Phoenix church earlier this week.
According to investigators, Terry Neely, 46, was living at an assisted-living facility. With the help of surveillance video, detectives have determined that the last time Neely was seen alive was when he left the facility in his motorized wheelchair on Aug. 2 at about 8 p.m.
Police have confirmed that Neely’s body had been paritally dismembered when it was found stuffed in the trash can in the area of Ninth and Peoria avenues Wednesday morning. He was later identified through fingerprints.
Neely’s motorized wheelchair was not found at the scene. At this point, police do not know where it is.
Phoenix Police investigators are asking for assistance in finding the motorized wheelchair — – and any information regarding his death. If anyone has any information about this incident or saw Mr. Neely with someone on Sunday evening they are encouraged to call the Phoenix Police Department, Violent Crimes Bureau at 602-262-6141 or Silent Witness at 480-WITNESS. For Spanish, call 480-TESTIGO.
ORIGINAL STORY: Man’s body found in burning garbage can at Phoenix church
PHOENIX — Investigators have identified a body found in a burning garbage container early Wednesday morning.
Fire crews were called out to the Covenant of Grace Church at Ninth and Peoria avenues at about 5 a.m. to deal with a garbage can that was burning in the back parking lot.
As they were dousing the flames, firefighters spotted a badly charred body stuffed inside the garbage can.
So far, investigators only say the victim is a 46-year-old white male. There is the possibility that the body had been dismembered. Police, however, have not yet confirmed that.
Church officials are stunned by the gruesome discovery made on their ground.
“It’s upsetting to us,” said Pastor Leonard Griffin. “We are sad for the family of the victim. We have no idea who the person was or what the situation was. We’re here as a lighthouse for the community to try to help spread the peace of God here. We just hope we can take this tragedy and try to turn it into something positive and good for the community.”
According to church officials, there was an event last night at about 9:30, but everybody who was there has been accounted for.
It’s very early in the investigation and at this point, detectives have very little to go on. They’re not even sure how long the body might have been in the garbage container. Investigators are trying to determine if the body was dumped at the scene or if the victim was actually killed there. His name has not released pending next of kin notification.
Investigators are asking for help from the community. If anyone saw or heard anything, or has any information about this incident, they are encouraged to call the Phoenix Police Department, Violent Crimes Bureau at 602-262-6141 or Silent Witness at 480-WITNESS. For Spanish, call 480-TESTIGO.
http://www.azfamily.com/news/local/59240822.html
One of the most important DVD’s you can own by heroic architect, Richard Gage, founder of the 1300 + and growing “Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. His organization has scientifically proven that the World Trade Centers and Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition by thermate. Get a copy as I have done and share it with everyone in your family, co-workers and friends. They will be shocked!
This extraordinary individual has suspended his successful career and is touring the country to educate fellow Americans about the demolition of those buildings and calling for a new 9/11 investigation. He also has a debate scheduled for March 6 with journalist Chris Mohr that you can listen in on:
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-02-20/richard-gage-vs-chris-mohr-onstage-debate-march-6th-university-colorado#comment-246484
9/11 Blueprint for Truth: Architecture of Destruction
https://www.ae911truth.net/store/?redir=storeThe
The Smoking Gun: Larry Silverstein caught on a PBS documentary boasting that he told firefighters to “pull” Building 7 (the best investigative piece on Zionist Silverstein replete with videos)
Larry Silverstein and 9/11
http://crimesofzion.blogspot.com/2007/06/silverstein-and-911.html
Dam of Lies
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/29/dam-of-lies/
Fact-based links straight from the controlled media’s own documented events in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 when the mask slipped by a few honest journalists genuinely horrified by the unfolding drama
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html?q=fiveisraelis.html
Must see video: Jewish lawyer attempting to smear a brave Aussie standing up for 9/11 truth movement
Voir Dire says:
January 1, 2011 at 7:18 pm
JB:
As evinced by the following disgusting display, the Jews’ inherently know in their bones their warmongering brethren are the masterminds behind 9/11.
Look too how tightly controlled the interview was that Geraldo Rivera conducted. It was strictly confined to talk about Building 7. Why was architect Richard Gage not the guest when he has begged for media coverage of his group’s all-important efforts. He would never have agreed to restrict the dialogue to that sole building and is simply too dangerous to the Jewish oligarchs who own our media in totality. Moreover, to Gage’s everlasting credit, he encourages people at the end of his “Blueprint for Truth” DVD to further explore the events of 9/11 and talks about Larry Silverstein’s having just signed an extremely lucrative lease for the World Trade Towers not long before the horrors unfurled.
It’s no different than how they’ve managed to censor anyone from using the term “Jew” on virtually every Jewish-owned-and-controlled online forum.
They seem to understand on some visceral level, the term connotes with things thought (and I’m being nice here) unsavory.
Thank you for your superb writing and fearless courage, and I commend Gordon Duff for his bravery in posting your pieces on “Veterans Today.”
http://www.bollyn.com/a-brave-aussie-stands-up-for-911-truth
Thank you, Voir Dire. There is a lot of information there. Please keep the links and sources coming!
I am very interested to here of your treasure trove of evidence. I am working on a way to allow submissions of large chunks of evidence, rather than just quotations via posting as comments.
Here is a good opportunity for some of the regular posters on here to chime in on a MSM site about whites being oppressed. I don’t know that I would say too much about the Jews right off the bat but a good way to enter in some thought provoking dialogue for the casual commenter who is oblivious to what’s really going on. Over 7K comments so far, so it’s pretty lively.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/12/21/white.persecution/index.html
Great. I think we should engage in online posts like that when we can. And yes, develop a language that makes people think – not put them off.
See “Genocide by stealth – Part 1″.
In Oct 2009, Andrew Neather, who worked for Mr Straw when he was Home Secretary, and as a speech writer for Mr Blair, stated:
“It didn’t just happen: the deliberate policy of ministers from late 2000 until at least February last year, when the Government introduced a points-based system, was to open up the UK to mass migration.”
. . .
“The PIU’s reports were legendarily tedious within Whitehall but their big immigration report was surrounded by an unusual air of both anticipation and secrecy.
Drafts were handed out in summer 2000 only with extreme reluctance: there was a paranoia about it reaching the media.
Eventually published in January 2001, the innocuously labelled “RDS Occasional Paper no. 67″, “Migration: an economic and social analysis” focused heavily on the labour market case.
But the earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.
I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date. That seemed to me to be a manoeuvre too far.
Ministers were very nervous about the whole thing. For despite Roche’s keenness to make her big speech and to be upfront, there was a reluctance elsewhere in government to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all for Labour’s core white working-class vote.
This shone through even in the published report: the “social outcomes” it talks about are solely those for immigrants.”
. . .
“The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 foreigners were granted the right to settle in the UK. By 2005 that had risen to 179,000; last year, with immigration falling thanks to the recession, it was 148,000.
In addition, hundreds of thousands of migrants have come from the new EU member states since 2004, most requiring neither visas nor permission to work or settle. The UK welcomed an estimated net 1.5 million immigrants in the decade to 2008.
Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom.
But ministers wouldn’t talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn’t necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men’s clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.
In part, too, it would have been just too metropolitan an argument to make in such places: London was the real model. Roche was unusual in that she was a London MP, herself of east European Jewish stock.”
This is genocide – premeditated and carried out as government policy.
Someone else already posted this but it is worth posting again. It’s an excellent audio of how we can use different language to change the way other people think about White Advocacy and stop the genocide of Whites. Here is the link again:
http://www.whiterabbitradio.net/audio/ridingshotgun6.mp3
I’d love to contribute, but where is the contact information mentioned in the article?
Nils,
You can post it as a comment right here, or there is a categorized sidebar button “White Genocide Project” at majorityrights.com
If you have very large files or a voluminous cache of evidence, let me know and you can email it to me.
We must be doing important work here, with the White Genocide Evidence Project and at The Occidental Observer generally, because it seems like quite a few people devote time to giving a “thumbs down” to legitimate comments.
Keep up the good work, mates!
A statement made by the Jewish/Swedish journalist Göran Rosenberg at a workshop arranged in November 2008 by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research:
“Göran Rosenberg recalled that historically, Jews had always thrived in nations and empires with multicultural, pluralistic and tolerant environments, while they fared badly in strong ethnic or nationalistic societies. European Jews have always been the emblematic stranger or ‘other’. Therefore, by definition, a society where the stranger is welcome is good for the Jews, although they have not always appreciated this link.
The term ‘Multicultural Europe’ is a tautology, he said. Instead, he described Europe as a mosaic of different cultures, which is both its curse and its blessing. Jews are facing a situation in which the nation state is becoming diverse and pluralist. Should we affirm this development or should we be afraid of it? This trend upsets many Jews who prefer a homogeneous nation state and this puts Jews on the ‘wrong side’. If we want to be ‘the other’, the non-conformist in society, we need to work out ways our nation states can be re-ordered to accommodate pluralism. The real challenge is to create a European framework for these multi-diverse nation states. The future of European Jewry is dependant on our ability to shape a multicultural, pluralistic and diverse society.”
http://www.jpr.org.uk/news/detail.php?id=116
In 1831, Stephen Girard left his vast fortune to fund a private boarding school specifically for “poor, white orphans.” His will was overriden by the trustees and now the money goes to African Americans. This is more evidence of whites being financially and legally dispossessed.
Thank you, that is a great story to remind us all of how Whites used to value other Whites. And how Cultural Marxism has worked to destroy it.
This is less straightforward but more important.
The Ford Foundation has been the most important American charity.
(1) “Henry II’s father, Edsel Ford, created the Ford Foundation in 1936 as a legal way for the family to escape the so-called “soak the rich” taxes imposed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration on estates worth more than $50 million. The foundation would receive the bulk of the elder Henry Ford’s estate, as well as an endowment from Edsel’s, resulting in a 95 percent (non-voting) stake in Ford Motor Company valued at almost $493 million. This guaranteed $25 million of dividends per year, making the Ford Foundation by far the richest charity in the country. ”
“Based in New York City from 1953 on, the Ford Foundation became increasingly independent after Ford Motor Company went public. Henry II resigned as chairman in May 1956 but continued to act as a trustee until 1976. By that time, the foundation had become known for its support of such causes as public broadcasting, the arts and humanities and the development of business, education and community in poor countries around the world. Until the establishment of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000, the Ford Foundation consistently ranked first among U.S. foundations for the most assets and the highest annual giving. ”
It has moved against the values of Henry Ford. Whoever tries now to support pro-White policies that Henry Ford would likely have approved of will find himself opposed by a Leftist network lavishly funded by the Ford Foundation.
(2) “Because Ford’s leading officials pursued an ever-more leftist orientation politically and ideologically, the Foundation naturally began to direct its funding disproportionately toward donees of similar leanings. When Henry Ford II eventually resigned from the Foundation’s Board of Trustees in 1977, he expressed his profound disgust with how the institution and most of its trustees had drifted so radically to the political left over time.”
“The degree to which the Ford Foundation’s values and ideals have continued to move leftward since Henry Ford II wrote those words is reflected in the objectives and worldviews of the organizations it currently supports. These objectives and worldviews include: the weakening of homeland security and anti-terrorism measures on the theory that they constitute unacceptable assaults on civil liberties; the dissolution of American borders; the promotion of mass, unchecked immigration to the United States; the redistribution of wealth; the blaming of America for virtually every conceivable international dispute; the depiction of Israel as an oppressor state that routinely victimizes its Palestinian minority; the weakening of American military capabilities; a devotion to the principle of preferences based on race, ethnicity, gender, and a host of other demographic attributes; the condemnation of the U.S. as a racist, sexist nation that discriminates against minorities and women; the characterization of America as an unrepentant polluter whose industrial pursuits cause immense harm to the natural environment; the portrayal of the U.S. as a violator of human rights both at home and abroad; the depiction of America as an aggressively militaristic nation; and support for taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand as an inalienable right for all women.
By using its enormous wealth (derived solely from investments in international securities) to promote these ideals, the Ford Foundation plays a major role in shaping American culture, popular opinion, and public policy. ”
About the only part of this that Henry Ford would probably have agreed with is criticism of Israel. The rest is divisive of and harmful to American Whites and their traditional values and culture.
Where are the legacies and charities that have “drifted” in a pro-White direction? As far as I know, it doesn’t happen.
So this is not random “drift”. It’s something that bears investigation.
A vast amount of money and cultural influence has been lost to White causes, and lack of money is now perhaps the greatest weakness of the pro-White cause.
Note to Boudicca: Sorry it took me so long to respond back; first chance I’ve had to revisit this project. Here’s a link to the full article preserved on (NOT free – they censor like the good little tyrants they are) “FreeRepublic:”
From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1878197/posts
Response to Jason Speaks:
“Voir Dire, with regard to the Koch brothers, you aren’t implying they are Jewish are you? Because as far as I can tell they are not. Also, I can’t really see anything wrong with their political beliefs. They seem better than most rich and influential people today.”
Jason: Please see Henry Makow’s piece at the following (as well as the links he provides – especially the Levine piece in the “New York Observer”). The Koch brothers are most assuredly Jewish and some of the biggest corporate welfare parasites on Leviathan’s (read: TAXPAYERS’) teat.
I think Makow muddies the water with all his talk about “illuminati” and “masons” but still makes important contributions nonetheless:
The Zionist Billionaires Who Control Politics
http://www.henrymakow.com/koch.html
Is Free Republic actually starting to allow criticism of Israel and/or NeoCons/Israel Lobby? I tried to post some critical material of Israel and the Israel Lobby about 3 months ago, and was immediately banned.
So is the assertion that the Koch brothers are crypto-Jews? I can’t find anything on their religion or ethnicity, except a reference to their ancestors being Dutch, which doesn’t tell us much. I see Makow’s assertion that they are Jewish or crypto-Jews or at least Zionist, but nothing beyond that.
It does seems strange that their father helped found the John Birch Society. I did not think of the JBS as an organization that promoted Jewish aims.
I’m just curious, because if they were Jewish, or especially if they were in some way promoting either Cultural Marxism or NeoConservativism, that would be important and surprising, given their support for the John Birch Society and the Tea Party.
I have long suspected a Jewish subversive was behind the devastating Section 8 housing laws that have destroyed so many formerly, perfectly nice, White neighborhoods and foisted the dirty crime bomb that comes from resettling the ghetto’s public housing projects into those neighborhoods and callously destroying what oftentimes amounts to the primary nest egg the middle-class has towards their retirement (putting aside for the moment the 14 TRILLION in lost equity the banksters’ have currently annihilated in this financial collapse). I finally found it. It was right under my nose all along.
Few people know that these insidious housing vouchers pay up to 1600. dollars a month. This is an entry-level ticket into some pretty nice neighborhoods, but never quite enough to gain entry into the gated-enclaves and posh areas these social engineers and our political “elites” reside in. This is of course, just another diabolical means of demoralizing and eliminating the prosperity of a once-broad middle class. The following excerpt from this exemplary article IS the smoking gun, but the whole piece is a MUST READ:
American Murder Mystery
Why is crime rising in so many American cities? The answer implicates one of the most celebrated antipoverty programs of recent decades.
By HANNA ROSIN
“Polikoff is a hero to Betts and many of her colleagues. In August 1966, he filed two related class-action suits against the Chicago Housing Authority and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, on behalf of a woman named Dorothy Gautreaux and other tenants. Gautreaux wanted to leave the ghetto, but the CHA offered housing only in neighborhoods just like hers. Polikoff became notorious in the Chicago suburbs; one community group, he wrote, awarded him a gold-plated pooper-scooper “to clean up all the shit” he wanted to bring into the neighborhood. A decade later, he argued the case before the Supreme Court and won. Legal scholars today often compare the case’s significance to that of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.”
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/american-murder-mystery/6872/
Christian: Thanks for your feedback, and for your most worthy effort. As soon as I organize my absolutely overwhelming and staggering compilation of financial crimes I’ve been collecting for two+ years, I will get them to you via email.
“I have long suspected a Jewish subversive was behind the devastating Section 8 housing laws that have destroyed so many formerly, perfectly nice, White neighborhoods and foisted the dirty crime bomb that comes from resettling the ghetto’s public housing projects…’
Correction to above paragraph: Should have read “project’s residents…”
PROOF OF STAGGERING LEVELS OF PERVASIVE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WHITES BY OUR FEDERAL LEVIATHAN AND VAST OVERHIRING OF BLACKS (PLEASE SEE THE LINK THAT FOLLOWS FOR FULL REPORT WITH GRAPHS FROM ADVERSITY.NET WHO’S DOING CRITICALLY IMPORTANT WORK)
IN 2007 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTINUED TO DISCRIMIATE AGAINST WHITES AND MALES
Equal Opportunity Vs. Equal Results
Today Adversity.Net released its seventh annual analysis and critique of federal overhiring of selected races in the name of “affirmative action”.
The government’s official statistics show a pattern of “un-hiring” and “retiring” white males and other non-preferred groups while overhiring blacks and other preferred groups by dozens or hundreds of percent above their proportion in the civilian work force. It is alright for the feds to violate the AA creed of “proportional representation” as long as the disproportion favors certain races.
Adversity.Net’s analysis is based on the U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s annual report “Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program”.
This year’s OPM report—covering federal Fiscal Year 2006—among other things boasts that the feds hired 6,912 new minorities last year while at the same time “dis-hiring” or “retiring” 6,280 white males and other non-preferred groups.
As always, the OPM report is confounding in two regards. First, the OPM defines “women” as minorities which category includes women of all races including “white”. Second, the OPM continues to refuse to publish any data whatsoever regarding employment of white males, and studiously avoids presenting data which depicts the decrease in employment of white males and other non-preferred groups.
From FY 2001 through FY 2006 a net total of 48,033 new minority employees have been hired by the feds. During the same period there has been a net decrease of 3,960 white male employees in federal jobs
The feds exceed their hiring quotas for blacks in all 23 independent federal agencies.
In fact, in the top three independent federal agencies for black quota hires, the other preferred groups did not do so well.
CSOS (Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency) overhired blacks by 808% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.
GPO (U.S. Gov’t Printing Office) overhired blacks by 503% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.
PBGC (the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation) overhired blacks by 409% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.
Almost all the other preferred race / gender groups in these three agencies were hired at rates at or below their proportion in the civilian labor force.
————————————————————————————————————
Similarly, in 17 of the 18 federal executive departments, blacks were overhired by 14% to 363% over their proportion in the civilian labor force. The graphic below illustrates the dramatic overhiring of blacks by the top three federal executive departments:
HUD (U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development) overhired blacks by 363% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.
The Department of Education overhired blacks by 329% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.
And the U.S. Department of State overhired blacks by 231% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.
Most of the other preferred groups were hired by these three agencies at significantly lower levels than blacks.
*Source: Annual Report to the Congress, Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program, FY 2006
http://adversity.net/fed_stats/OPM2007/default.htm
HIDDEN DEEP WITHIN OBAMACARE – RACIAL PREFERENCES
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/hicks-hidden-deep-within-obamacare-racial-preferences/?singlepage=true
“RACIAL/GENDER QUOTAS IN THE FINANCIAL BILL
http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2010/07/08/diversity_in_the_financial_sector_98562.html
Voir Dire:
Thanks for the link. I’ve noticed more and more on Freep are starting to “get it” viz. Jew-controlled American instead of the usual neo-con crap I’m used to reading on there. People ARE awakening. More are realizing the insane wars in the Middle East are being fought NOT to “keep America safe” but to keep Israel safe. Our precious young White males are being sacrificed for Zionists cause. People ARE getting this. I’ll be damned if any of the males in my family puts his life on the line for an ethnic group that seeks genocide against his race in his own homeland.
ALL of the non-statist financial sites I read and trust highly recommend using a proxy or even double proxies when “surfing” the Internet because of government (and/or other) snoops whose hobby it is to destroy lives. My very savvy 17-year old uses an Onion/TOR router. I use a proxy service located far far far off-shore, my IP address located in countries found on four different continents.
I read an article recently about a judge in Indiana that:
ruled, for the first time, that news media outlets can be ordered by the court to reveal identifying information about posters to their online forums.
–Indianapolis Star, March 2011
Have you noticed that more and more msm outlets and even some Internet forums that used to allow anonymous postings now demand that posters reveal their name, email address, home address and phone # before being allowed to post? You gotta be kidding! Your name, home address and your employer would be handed over to the ADL before the day was out.
This will become increasingly common as the Zionists feel the heat of awakening in White America, as more and more of us are “on to them” via Internet forums such as this one and Duke’s.
It is no wonder they want to take control of the Internet (some say they already have) and demand that anyone who uses it be issued an identification number. Also watch for more calls for Hate Speech laws, backed by punitive fines and hard jail time, as in Europe.
We are in a fight for our survival, nothing less.
Boudicca: You’re welcome, Sir, and thanks for your response. I hope you’re right about “Freepers” but I refuse to waste my time posting anywhere that censors though past experience (ie. blogging on AmRen, Breitbart, American Thinker and such) forced me to become an expert at using veiled language to communicate to others regarding the War-on-the-West-by-stealth which may come in handy should they ever prevail in destroying free speech here as they’ve already done to the rest of our largely-once free Western nations.
“It is no wonder they want to take control of the Internet (some say they already have) and demand that anyone who uses it be issued an identification number.”
The Coming Jewish Lock-Down Of The Internet
http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=515
The Jewish hand behind Internet – Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, MySpace, eBay…
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/media/internet/news.php?q=1262024557
Yahoo GOOGLE YOUTUBE Busted Selling User Info To Feds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_eagDsaj40&feature=related
Yahoo Sells All Its Users Private Email Contents to Spy Agencies and Police for Small Price 2009 December 9
http://cryptome.org/isp-spy/yahoo-spy.pdf
Eric Schmidt On Privacy (VIDEO): Google CEO Says Anonymity Online Is ‘Dangerous’
“Google knows what you watch, what you search, and even with whom you’re friends. The availability of all this information raises an important question: Where does Google CEO Eric Schmidt stand on the issue of online privacy?
Schmidt has previously said, “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.”
In a more recent interview with CNBC conducted at the Techonomy conference earlier this month, Schmidt offered an additional look at his views on online privacy and anonymity.
Speaking on a panel at the event, Schmidt argued that anonymity on the Internet is dangerous. “In a world of asynchronous threats, it is too dangerous for there not to be some way to identify you,” he said.
Schmidt took the stance that governments may eventually put an end to anonymity. “We need a [verified] name service for people,” he said. “Governments will demand it.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/10/eric-schmidt-privacy-stan_n_677224.html
Read more: Google’s ‘evil’ agenda exposed in new book http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=40668#ixzz1ESGD72x5
The Jewish Mentality Book I (The content of scholar Michael Hoffman’s 3-CD set which I in an earlier post mistakenly referenced as “The Judaic Mentality”)
Copyright ©1996 by Michael A. Hoffman II. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wash.html
Meet Dov Charney
http://feministgal.blogspot.com/2009/01/meet-dov-charney.html
American Apparel CEO held teen as sex captive — lawsuit
Saleswoman accuses Charney of treating her as a sex captive while she was teenager
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41992215/ns/business-consumer_news/
4 More Women Sue Dov Charney For Sexual Abuse
by Justin Fenner | 12:54 pm, March 24th, 2011
http://www.styleite.com/media/dov-charney-sex-abuse-lawsuit/
Sexy marketing or sexual harassment? (My Note: Or Sicko Pervert Jew?)
For American Apparel CEO Dov Charney, he’s just building a new kind of company
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14082498/
Glowing Praise from the Jews’ News about this pervert back in 2005
Living On The Edge At American Apparel
Dov Charney’s fast-growing clothing company is built on pro-labor policies, racy ads, and a sexually charged culture
Only a handful of chief executives appear in their own ads. Even fewer appear in them without any pants on. But Dov Charney, the 36-year-old in charge of hip clothing maker American Apparel Inc., is not your typical corporate chieftain.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_26/b3939108_mz017.htm
The Open Borders Lobby and the Nation’s Security After 9/11
By: William Hawkins and Erin Anderson
FrontPageMagazine.com | Wednesday, January 21, 2004
There are few issues so important to the life of a nation as the integrity of its borders and the nature of its citizenship. These are issues that define its identity and shape its future. When a nation is at war, moreover, its ability to regulate and control its borders is a security matter of paramount importance.
The following text by William Hawkins and Erin Anderson describes how America’s borders have been under assault for forty years with consequences that are measurable and disturbing. The assault has been led by an open borders lobby that is sophisticated and powerful. Many of its components, moreover, have a history of antagonism to American purposes and a record of active support for America’s enemies. Its funders are multi-billion dollar entities, who are unaccountable and unscrutinized. They have more discretionary incomes at their disposal to influence these issues than is possessed by either political party, or any business group, or even the federal government itself.
As Hawkins and Anderson show, the open borders campaign was already instrumental in damaging the nation’s ability to defend itself before 9/11. Yet not even this terrible event has caused its activists to have second thoughts, or tempered their reckless attacks. Instead, the open borders lobby has expanded its efforts to eliminate America’s border controls to include the active defense of terrorists and terrorist organizations and a continuing assault on the very policies the federal government has adopted to defend its citizens from terrorist attacks.
A Ford Foundation newsletter the authors cite features an interview with Georgetown law professor David Cole, a leading academic figure in the open borders campaign, who has written a book attacking America’s immigration laws and their protections against terrorist groups. In the interview, Cole denounces, “the criminalization of what the government calls material support for terrorist organizations. This is a practice that was introduced … through the immigration law, … It criminalizes any support of any blacklisted terrorist organization without regard to whether one’s support actually had any connection whatsoever to terrorist activity that the group undertakes.”
The Ford Foundation interview with Cole was published with hindsight in September 2003, ten years after the first World Trade Center bombing and two years after the September 11 attack. As Hawkins and Anderson point out, the anti-terrorist law which Professor Cole is denouncing was introduced as legislation and passed during the Clinton Administration in response to the first World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist plots. It was a bi-partisan effort to put a check on terrorist support groups that were using use the liberties afforded by the American legal system to aid and abet terrorist activities. Shortly after the interview with Cole appeared, it was revealed that the Ford Foundation had granted millions of tax-exempt dollars to terrorist support groups and other radical organizations in the Middle East.[1]
The Ford Foundation’s sponsorship of Professor Cole in underwriting his book and promoting his conclusions is but a reflection of Ford’s larger role as the central funder of the open borders lobby, and the architect of many of its radical agendas. Elsewhere in their text Hawkins and Anderson describe how this $11 billion leviathan took a small civil rights group called the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund which was based in San Antonio Texas, poured more than $30 million into its treasury, revamped its political agendas, moved its offices to Washington and turned it into one of the largest and most powerful proponents of radical immigration change in the nation.
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=14499
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=14486
The nation of Israel has halted immigration and is building a state of the art wall to stop illegal aliens from Africa. However, the Los Angeles Jewish Journal boasts of aiding illegal immigration into the United States to supposedly help Israel.
http://incogman.net/03/2011/jew-rats-trumpet-traitor-alliance-with-illegals/#more-58341
The Saudis aren’t FORCED to take non-Arab immigrants, they want labor to do their dirty work.
Islam is an more universalist religion, particularly when it comes to race.
ALso I bet 2/3 or better of their immigrants are fellow Arabs.
Also is ‘”ethnonationalism” a Jewish mole?
I’ve posted the White Genocide Mantra on the Kansas City Star blog and had saw the whole thread taken down by the paper within an hour.
You think the White Genocide charge won’t work? It sure scares the h e double ll out of the left.
As to English being displaced by Polish immigrants etc, the BBC documentary on Enoch Powell stated the immigration issue became some what muted in Britian when a fair amount of immigrants began to come from Eastern Europe. Brits saw them as white of course and their English speaking children as English.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5dmG5ht60A
In yet another example of censored Black-on-White murder by the Jews’ News (in this case, my local “Raleigh News & Observer”), here is another heinous crime committed by Blacks with no photos of the perpetrators. I found out their ethnicities from another local television station who did run the photos, WRAL (2nd link; note two there are three photos – one of a White male though it indicates charges were later dropped against him for a lack of evidence. Even here though, I had to deduce (from an earlier piece in the N&O which said the two indicted murderers were brothers who resided at the same address) that the two perps were the Blacks because it is not made clear by WRAL since they do not identify the pictures with names. By design doubtless.
http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/09/29/709061/2-arrested-in-january-slaying.html#storylink=misearch
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/9001629/