Jews play a "leading role" in promoting multiculturalism in Europe

In this You Tube video, Barbara Lerner Spectre, who runs a government-funded Jewish study group in Sweden, makes the following remarkable statement—remarkable because she does not attribute anti-Jewish attitudes to irrational prejudices or even Muslims who hate Israel. Instead she says that it’s because of the “leading role” played by Jews in the  movement  toward multiculturalism:

I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

Her comment is an example of the  age-old Jewish self-concept of a “Light Unto the Nations”: Jews saving Europe by leading it to multiculturalism. One wonders why she thinks Europe could not survive as a set of monocultural societies. Israel and many other societies function quite well with a recognized dominant culture and people and, as repeatedly emphasized here, multicultural societies have a hosts of costs and no visible benefits. The better question, of course,  is how Europe can survive multiculturalism. By definition, it can’t.

The interview is part of a longer set of interviews available here.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

158 Comments to "Jews play a "leading role" in promoting multiculturalism in Europe"

  1. John Griffin's Gravatar John Griffin
    November 29, 2010 - 6:17 pm | Permalink

    Netanyahu says Israel must create ‘humane response’ for African infiltrators ‘until they are removed from the country’.
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3990776,00.html

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu explained why he supports the idea. “There is a growing wave threatening Israeli’s workplaces, a wave of illegal infiltrators which we must stop due to the harsh implications on the State’s character,” he said …

  2. John Cameron's Gravatar John Cameron
    November 8, 2010 - 11:41 am | Permalink

    Since there have been many postings here discussing the either the merits or deficiencies of Christianity, let me relate an interesting story.

    Several years ago I was driving a rental car in Austria. As night approached I started looking for a hotel. I finally found one just south of the city of Innsbruck. It was small gasthaus.

    After unpacking, I went down to the hotel restaurant for dinner. After finishing my meal I wandered over to the small hotel bar. There were about five people there having drinks. All were Europeans and all spoke some English.

    As time progressed, we all got a little tipsy. I soon discovered that when tongues are loosened by alcohol, all pretenses at political correctness start to fall away. Four of the five men in the bar wer Austrians and as soon as I mentioned my dislike of the Tribe, a virtual flood of inventiveness start pouring out of the Austrians’ mouths. It was like a dam bursting. If my fellow drinkers were any example, the Austrians must be the most most virulent anti-Tribalists in the world. Virtually all of my fellow drinkers knew of how Austria had been defeated in World War One because The Tribe got the US involved on the opposite side in order to get the Balfour Doctrine implemented.. They also know how Tribal bankers were instrumental in promoting the post war inflation in Austria that seriously damaged its r post war economy.

    I mentioned before that four of the five men were Austrians. At first the fifth member of our drinking group seemed to be a little vague about his nationality. I knew he wasn’t German speaking because of a his rather strangely accented but excellent english. As time progressed and we all got a bit drunker he started to open up and began to actively join in our conversation.

    He mentioned that he had at one time been a rather high official in the Solidarity Movement in Poland headed by Lech Walensa (sp) . Now he headed his own successful company and was was staying at the family run hotel on company business.

    Hesitantly at first, he told us an interesting story about why the Solidarity Movement became centered itself specifically around the Catholic Church . It wasn’t entirely because the Polish were that religious. It wasn’t just because the pope at the time was Polish. There was also another more important reason altogether.

    Previous reformers in Communist Poland had been repeatedly betrayed by Jewish members of their reform groups. The founders of Solidarity all remembered Katyn Forest and who were the founders of the Polish Communist Party. The leaders of Solidarity were convinced that no reform would be possible as long as Tribe members were allowed to participate in any fashion whatsoever. They looked around for a way to exclude these potential traitors and decided that membership in the Catholic Church would be a prerequisite for even the lowest position in the Solidarity leadership. To prevent the possibility of phony “conversos” trying to gain entry, all new potential leaders in Solidarity was subjected to a rigorous examination of their family’s Catholic credentials.

    After the fall of Communism, the Poles started to move away from the Church. This drift toward religious apathy resulted in a concurrent rise of Tribal influence in Poland. Media there increasingly fell into Jewish hands, multiculturalism began to hold sway, and hate crime laws were increasingly implimented. Poland quickly became as corrupted by the Tribe as it had been under the former Communists.

    There writers on this forum who criticize Christianity better take this into account. I would like to say that there are plenty of banners that we besieged Gentiles can organize under but we all know that is certainly not the case. Protestantism as a force is now spent. It now comprised of either gay friendly, diversity friendly, mainline Protestant with an increasingly feminized clergy or sects or Israel friendly, pathetically stupid evangelicals.

    I hate to mention it to critics of Christianity, but believe it or not is no strong Druids World Congress or Zeus Fan Club. The increasingly timid Mormon Church leadership is worthless and is heavily influenced by people like the Marriot family despite the fact that it is one of the biggest buyers of porn in the hotel industry.

    Therefore, we are left with only one option to be the framework of our new army, the Catholic Church. If someone can tell me of another option, tell me it right now. It ain’t going to be the increasingly ancient Ron Paul or Ralph Nader. And it certainly won’t be any sort of political party doing the organizing since we have already seen how easily they can be marginalized. There is simply no other group with the finances and media presence to accomplish this sea change other than the Catholic Church. Not one.

    PS by the way, I am not a Catholic and haven’t been to any sort of religious service in over thirty years.

  3. GoyAmongYou's Gravatar GoyAmongYou
    October 9, 2010 - 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Robert Lindsay is a Noahide and he doesn’t even know it, lol
    What a fool

  4. Hoff's Gravatar Hoff
    October 6, 2010 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    She got six million dollars from the swedish taxpayers in 2001. There is official documents to prove it.

  5. October 1, 2010 - 4:16 pm | Permalink

    Todo dinбmica y muy positiva! :)
    Gracias

    Socco

  6. enosigaios's Gravatar enosigaios
    September 29, 2010 - 1:01 pm | Permalink
  7. enosigaios's Gravatar enosigaios
    September 29, 2010 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Hey darn jews!!!!!! Enough with the sarcasm @*&%#!!!!!!!!!
    Leave the christian flock alone

    (hehehehe)

  8. enosigaios's Gravatar enosigaios
    September 29, 2010 - 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Hey zealots!!!!! Hey christian zealots!!!!!

    Here is your master talking!!!
    Bow to your master now!!!!!!!

    http://www.patriot.dk/ravage.html

  9. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    September 29, 2010 - 11:18 am | Permalink

    eurodele wrote:

    “This is why some now hold that the Jewish-Zionist international banking elite must to some extent be distinguished from run-of-the-mill Jews. This elite, headed by a small handful of imperial Zionists who already completely control the economies and politics of nations all over the world, would gladly throw their non-elite Jewish flunkies into a pen of famished hogs if it suited their purposes – in fact, they’ve done it before – and in the near future, it will again suit their purposes.”

    That is why I credit their lack of control over the internet information systems with the exponential, mathematical growth of Anti-Zionist Jews out there. I don’t think this would be possible if it didn’t exist. They are familiar with how the Zionists helped generate those sacred six million dead WWII allegedly holocausted by not letting Jews escape Europe. They are aware with how Zionists scared Iraqi Jews into second-class servitude in Israel. They’ve heard about 9-11′s Dancing Israelis and look at every new “terrorist incident” with the same cynical eye the rest of us do wondering what False Flag Mossad is planting now?! “For lack of knowledge, my people are killed.” Thank the Almighty for the internet!

    Getting back to slightly OT, an earlier poster called monotheism a culture’s will to power. Not necessarily. I believe monotheism is an elite’s will to power. Take Rome which ruled as an empire for centuries. No monotheism. Every family had guardian gods and ancestral gods, including the emperor. However, he became a god after he died via apotheosis. If he became too crazy while suffering delusions of godhood while he was still alive … well, the Roman made sure his apotheosis came prematurely so he could realize them and leave Rome in peace. Then along comes Constantine who converts to Christianity. He no longer claims to be God, but as Bishop of Rome, now he speaks for him, which is the next best thing! And by dragging the pagans kicking and screaming into the Christian paradise of his making, he is doing it for their own good, because he is saving them from eternal Christian hell fire! Not a bad racket at all. There was much more freedom in both this life and the afterlife for polytheists. At least any hell was of their own making, not some big lake of fire for any and all infringements no matter how small.

  10. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 28, 2010 - 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Robert Lindsay: “Of all of the comments on the video, the increasingly anti-Semitic Kevin MacDonald’s is probably the most sensible. However, even he misses the point. He says that in the video, Spectre admits that European Jews are hated because they are at the forefront of multiculturalism.”

    Whether or not Ms. Spectre actually said this is all but irrelevant. The plain fact is, she might as well have said it, because it’s a direct implication of chronic Jewish meddling in European affairs (to which she forthrightly admits). This implication is readily apparent to any intelligent person, including any fully conscious White European.

    As regards anyone’s opinion that such an observation “misses the point”, I’d have to agree with Dr. MacDonald regarding its relevance.

    Robert Lindsay: “In fact, she says no such thing, and there is no evidence for this anyway. There is little anti-Semitism in Europe.”

    Very dubious if not clearly false. The only distinction to be made here is that European anti-Semitism is well-grounded in history and current events rather than irrationality. Granted, its existence has been underplayed by the Zio-European media and even criminalized by the legal termites of Big Jewry, Inc., but the fact remains that it is merely simmering under the trembling lid of the Judeo-European melting pot, steam from which is even now beginning to scald the hypersensitive noses of Euro-Scandinavian Jews like Spectre.

    By the way, I trust that Ian Fleming readers everywhere remember that SPECTRE stands for “Special Executor for Counter-Intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion.” To a James Bond fan, Ms. Spectre need merely speak her name to let everyone know exactly where she and her more influential Tribespeople are coming from.

  11. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 28, 2010 - 9:20 am | Permalink

    Clytemnestra: “A Christian god opposing a Jewish god would imply that Yahweh is the false god, if you will.”

    That’s basically the right idea, but considerable finesse would be required to avoid having the “new religion” stomped on as soon as it became visible. After all, White-supremacist strains of Christianity have already emerged in various locales, and the Jews have easily managed to contain them using the mass media and the power of the state. Theologically, the problem is very complex … and if not properly solved, the new religion would quickly crumble along planes of fracture determined by its own internal inconsistencies.

    “They may not like each other, but all these racial populations: White, Negro, Mestizo, Asian have reached consensus about the Jew and it is not a positive one.”

    The Jewish hope is that these groups will be too busy fighting each other to worry about going after relatively small and isolated pockets of Jews. It’s a simple extension of their divide-and-conquer mentality. Are the Jews right about that? Maybe. But it’s moot, since this is really all about a tiny handful of Jewish elites who can always work from a position of safety somewhere in the world while hanging the rest of the Jews out to dry. To the Jewish elite, ordinary Jews are expendable tools of political domination who never fail to respond slavishly to their transparent “good-for-the-Jews” manipulations.

    “The big risk that they are running is when they all realize they all have one common problem and simultaneously turn on the Jews, as Mohammed predicted will happen in the Koran. That is why I am convinced they are playing a dangerous game of chicken by pushing multiculturalism.”

    Right. But the dangerous game of multiculturalism has another side as well: too many Ashkenazi Jews look White. Thus, the mass importation and empowerment of Blacks in Jew-controlled nations is likely to backfire on them; they will be identified and attacked as “white” in any Black-White race war even if they shout “Wait, I’m just a harmless little Jew, here’s my license, it says “Hymie Schlepperman’!”. (The same goes for Mestizos in the US and Muslims all over the world.) But again, the plutocratic Zionist elite couldn’t care less about that.

    This is why some now hold that the Jewish-Zionist international banking elite must to some extent be distinguished from run-of-the-mill Jews. This elite, headed by a small handful of imperial Zionists who already completely control the economies and politics of nations all over the world, would gladly throw their non-elite Jewish flunkies into a pen of famished hogs if it suited their purposes – in fact, they’ve done it before – and in the near future, it will again suit their purposes.

    The sooner we face a certain fact, the better off we’ll be: this is all about world conquest by a handful of filthy rich, mostly Jewish oligarchs, nothing more. The instigation of racial conflict is just a means to their end. All we’re doing here is trying to hold together what remains of our race as they finish their mad scramble to the top of the heap, at which point it won’t much matter what we’ve accomplished. They are confident that at this point, they finally have the power and technology to establish a perpetual world dynasty … even if they have to torch the entire planet and retreat into underground (COG) facilities before emerging to reclaim their kingdom.

    In other words, all of this racial conflict is merely symptomatic of a deeper and far more insidious problem: the will to power, and the plans for eternal tyranny, of a filthy rich Zionist elite consisting of Jewish oligarchs and their contemptible goyish cronies, who will absolutely not rest until mankind has been crushed forever under the heel of their bejeweled boot.

  12. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    September 27, 2010 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

    Forgot to stay on topic with this topic about Jews being at the center of pushing multiculturalism in Europe.

    If they are, IMO, this is a major, tactical error on the part of worldwide Jewry. Oh, they think they are safe from a united racial majority from ever turning on them like they have in the past, but they also overlook something else.

    Prior to globalization, the Jews were chased out of one country only to be welcomed with open arms by another country who they had not burned yet. Because these disparate countries had their own issues with each other, and their attitude that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” every time Jews were the victims of a pogrom, they could count on a soft landing somewhere else.

    Now you have several minorities in each country, courtesy of Jewish immigration enthusiasts, in an age of where information is readily accessible at the push of a button and freely obtained from all sources. They may not like each other, but all these racial populations: White, Negro, Mestizo, Asian have reached consensus about the Jew and it is not a positive one.

    The big risk that they are running is when they all realize they all have one common problem and simultaneously turn on the Jews, as Mohammed predicted will happen in the Koran.

    That is why I am convinced they are playing a dangerous game of chicken by pushing multiculturalism.

  13. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    September 27, 2010 - 7:49 pm | Permalink

    The left hates Christianity for the same reason it hates Orthodox Judaism. They don’t want some deity telling them what to do.
    Jews hate Christianity for the same reason they hate Hitler. Both Christianity and Hitler offer a replacement ideology to their Chosen People mythos. Hitler had his Master Race and Christianity has its New Israelite or Lost Israelite theology, if its CI being discussed.
    Talmudic Pharisees despised Jesus, because he was a reformist who was too much of an egalitarian for their tastes. The poor little Essenes rabbi was speaking truth to the power of his day. Power won out. They crucified him and pretty much destroyed his following in Judea. Talmudic Jewry triumphed, so that should have been the end of it.

    In the Levant, might makes right. For example, Mohammed gained a lot of traction, because he won. The course of Islam was decided in favor of Sunnism, because they won. Therefore that was what Allah willed. Killing Jesus should have shut him up for all eternity. Jesus was executed just like all the other Messianic pretenders out there and he should have been forgotten by history just like all the others were.

    Some Jews backed Paul taking Jesus’ Essenes philosphy to the Gentiles to destroy Roman culture, but the last thing they anticipated is Paul’s self-aggrandizing ego generating a new religion that would take on a life of its own by creating a rival ideology that appropriated their god, Yahweh, and eventually establish its own replacement theology people by White European Japhethites who would convince themselves they are True Israel and Israel is Esau/Edom, whatever. Though they call him the god of Abraham, at least the Muslim Ismaelites call THEIR god “Allah.” No wonder Christianity annoys the hell out of Jews!

    The Israelites are a Semitic people like the Assyrians – indeed, both of them were Akkadian in origin. The Europeans are Japhetic peoples, a term not so widely used in the common nomenclature but usually replaced by “Indo-European” in opposition to Semitic, though the definition “Indo-European” is restrictive, since the Japhetic group covers a larger spectrum of peoples. They are quite different from the Semites by history, culture, spiritual and physical features, genetics and in almost every other aspect.

    So, is annoying the Jews, in and of itself, a good reason for White European Japhethites to cling to some alient, mutant Semitic religion? I don’t think so! I think one of the reasons why Christianity is becoming so weak and tepid throughout the White Japhethite Western World is that is similar to a baboon’s heart beating in a human chest. It works for a while, but badly and eventually stops, killing the body.

    The obvious cure would be to eliminate Christianity altogether, but it would be like chemo on the cancerous European system. The only other alternative is to sever Christianity from Judaism altogether by creating a “Christian” god, if you will, that is a separate and independent entity altogether from the Jewish god, Yahweh. IOW, revisit the Marcion “heresies” which, I feel, come closer to the truth. Of course, the problem is that this established a foothold for polytheism and monotheism presents more “will to power” for a people. A “Christian” god opposing a Jewish god would imply that Yahweh is the false god, if you will. Imagine how that would further upset the Christian applecart which has already put White European Japhethites between a rock and a hard place.

  14. enosigaios's Gravatar enosigaios
    September 27, 2010 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    It is more than obvious that the christians in this discussion are interested in the unifying qualities of christianity and not in its inherent wisdom and quality. And of course they stay speechless when faced with the fact of their being antisemitic while simultanously worshipping a jew and his whole jewish family.
    Polytheistic original and true Europe was mentally masculin and healthy and bears the responsibility for all the higher qualities of her peoples.
    Polytheistic Europe is the true family of the white race and she and only she can fight the BS universe that judaism stands for.
    Ony if Europe denounces christianity will she ever be clean again; her true self.

  15. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 27, 2010 - 7:19 am | Permalink

    @ Der kleine Wießel

    Der kleine Wiesel: “Primarily what it means is that you don’t understand the idea of racial differences.”

    Good grief. You’ll just never get it at all, will you, DwEebelina?

    What it means is that you place far too much emphasis on empty rituals like circumcision. You clearly spend way too much time talking and thinking about this particular one, to the extent that you even apply it to the minds, hearts, and various other internal organs of your White opponents.

    But as this passage makes clear, no mere rite or ritual can change one’s status in the eyes of God. To achieve salvation, a deeper transformation is required; one must be reborn in His image. From this, we may infer – using logic, now – the following: to the extent that a particular race couples to a particular relationship with God (as the Jews have purportedly contrived), the performance or non-performance of such a rite or ritual cannot change one’s race.

    Thus, when your Uncle Hymie separated you from your prepuce, neither part was anything but Jewish before or after the procedure. That’s why you’re still a “schmuck” instead of a “foreskin”.

    And NOW may we have some peace and quiet from you?

  16. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 26, 2010 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

    Bubble Biter: “Now, you have no idea what that means, do you?”

    Primarily what it means is that you don’t understand the idea of racial differences. It means that you haven’t got the slightest understanding of the biological basis of race and its significance; and accordingly, that you have no understanding of evolutionary psychology, which depends on the existence of such differences and seeks to illustrate their significance. It means that like all Christians, you think human races are either already basically the same or can be made the same by means of a little religious hocus pocus; e.g., that a Jew will lose his racial characteristics when a little water is sprinkled on him and the proper incantation is made; that he somehow becomes a “new creature” when he joins you in kissing the posterior of the great and powerful rabbi Jeebus. But this is not science, only a foolish religious misconception, and all history proves it.

    I think you should have read nearer the top of the page in Galatians.

    “If anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he deceives himself.”
    - Galatians 6:3

    You’ve been deceiving yourself a long time now, Bub; such an awfully long time. Isn’t it time you stopped? Of course it is. Yet we both know you can’t, don’t we?

    So, I’ll let you have the last word here. By all means, indulge in some more childish namecalling, and make yet another vain attempt to show everyone how smart you are.

  17. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 26, 2010 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

    Der little Wiesel: “…a considerable amount of Bub’s pus, and stinking, decomposing flesh, but such tactics are sometimes necessary when dealing with the infected.”

    First he steals Groucho’s shtick. Now he steals mine.

    What boldness! What daring! What … originality! ;-)

    Dweeberfeld: “Yet the struggle is now over.”

    Wait a second. Is that entirely consistent with Nietzsche? Didn’t Nietzsche say

    “Where there is a struggle, it is a struggle for power”?

    Der Wiesel “struggling for power” is like a fresh dog rocket struggling to smell like Chanel no. 5.

    Dweebergerkind: “There is no need to continue an exchange with this poseur, who above suddenly pretends a great familiarity with historian Edward Gibbon’s monumental The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire…”

    Alright, I admit it – it’s been a long time, and I could probably have paid more attention. But at least I remember the controversy and the true primary reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. Dweeberella, on the other hand, wouldn’t be able to correctly identify a gibbon if the ape tied him up with lianas and made sweet love to him with an unripe 18” banana.

    Dweeba Lee: “…doltishly referring to Gibbon as ‘Gibbons’, probably confusing him with the deceased outdoorsman Euell Gibbons, or maybe television talk show host Leeza Gibbons.”

    A relative, actually (middle name). As distinguished from some of Dweebie’s close relatives, who actually *are* gibbons.

    (But now I must apologize to gibbons everywhere. As I explained in another post, their average IQ may well be higher than the Dweebster’s, which – as far as appearances are concerned – may fall below that of an urwagwa-guzzling Ugandan with HIV dementia.)

    By the way, Dweebs, you plague-raddled little pusbucket you… since you’re such a Bible expert, here’s a little quote from Galatians that we actually discussed in church today.

    “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.”

    Now, you have no idea what that means, do you? It’s kind of deep, and you’d obviously be way out of your depth in a breath-inflated Walmart kiddie pool.

    But as you can plainly see in any mirror, what it comes down to in your case is this: the “new creature” generated by your Uncle Hymie the Rabbi when he performed the blessed procedure on you was a schmuck that falls into minor depressions and doesn’t know when to shut its puckered little peehole.

    So would you please shut it already, and let people have some peace and quiet for a change?

    Thanks in advance.

  18. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 26, 2010 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    My apologies to any who have found themselves disgusted at my shovel decapitation of this Christian zombie. True, it had the undesired effect of spattering the forum with a considerable amount of Bub’s pus, and stinking, decomposing flesh, but such tactics are sometimes necessary when dealing with the infected.

    Yet the struggle is now over. There is no need to continue an exchange with this poseur, who above suddenly pretends a great familiarity with historian Edward Gibbon’s monumental The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, doltishly referring to Gibbon as “Gibbons”, probably confusing him with the deceased outdoorsman Euell Gibbons, or maybe television talk show host Leeza Gibbons.

    What this proves to me, Bub, is that you never even heard of Gibbon before I mentioned him here. You are not only unfamiliar with his work and haven’t read it (for, besides your getting his name wrong, no one who had read it and understood it would possibly make the assessment of it you did), as usual, you try to bury your ignorance by making pompous, self-aggrandizing statements, heavily larded with personal attacks on others. In addition to these, while hypocritically decrying the same tactics when turned back against yourself, your clumsy attempts to brown nose various parties here is almost as nauseating as your oily, sleep-inducing prolixity. You use words to sidetrack an argument, to conceal your ignorance, to puff yourself up. How you look is everything to you; the philosopher’s search for truth, and arriving at a new and better understanding, means nothing, save as a target for your mockery. For you, satiating your desperate and seriously pathetic need to appear “smart” is all that’s important. I suggest you someday open another book you pretend to revere, but have amply demonstrated you haven’t read. It’s called the Bible. Christian zombies like you, Bub, who are circumcised in their hearts and are inwardly Jews, should pay particular attention to this passage:

    A curse is on you, scribes and Pharisees, false ones! for you are like the resting-places of the dead, which are made white, and seem beautiful on the outside, but inside are full of dead men’s bones and of all unclean things.
    - Matthew 23:27

    http://www.goozlepipe.com/images/zombies/zombie_bub.png

    Even Jeebus curses you, Bub. You better start praying and kissing his Jewish tookis right NOW!

    - Der weiße Engel aka “The Living Embodiment of Evil” :-)

  19. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 26, 2010 - 11:20 am | Permalink

    Right. And the Jews are now (as always) moving legal, political, and cultural mountains to deprive White people of Christianity because … you guessed it, Christianity is ever so bad for White people!

    Yes, this makes quite a bit of sense. Really it does. Because, you see, the Jews are really trying to *save* the White race, not subjugate and destroy it! (Gosh darn it, how could we ever have missed something so obvious?)

    Well, I don’t know about anyone else, but I’d really like to express my undying gratitude for the new influx of genius philosophers we seem to have attracted lately! Yes, indeed.

  20. Romper Stomper's Gravatar Romper Stomper
    September 25, 2010 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    Point is on point with his remarks. Yet we still have nincompoops who will spend every waking hour defending superstitious, mystical hogwash from the Middle East instead of realizing we are in a primal, animal struggle with a hateful, vicious and almost incomprehensibly self-centered and hypocritical enemy.

  21. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 25, 2010 - 11:10 am | Permalink

    @ Anonymous

    “My beef with Christianity is that it gives Jewry a big advantage … If you are a devout Christian, you must believe that Jesus was the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy.”

    My own perspective is theological in a rather technical sense, and thus occupies a higher level of discourse than anyone’s personal conception of a “devout Christian”. I think of Christianity in terms of its more advanced core principles, including monotheism, teleology, moral symmetry, and an emphasis on compassion to counterbalance the inhumane and antisocial tendencies of humanity even within racial collectives.

    As I see it, the role of Jesus as a cognitive and behavioral human exemplar need have nothing to do with his Judaic roots or Judaic prophecy; emphasizing the Judaic precursors of Christianity at the expense of the content of Christianity is absurd, and was clearly never the intention of Jesus himself. It was merely appropriate to the traditions of the culture in which Jesus found himself…the culture to whose outcasts he directly ministered. His “mission”, as it were, forced him to work from the precepts and prophecies of that corrupt and decadent culture, but do not affect his message in any permanent way. As far as moral and spiritual content is concerned, the connection between Judaism and Christianity, and the Old and New Testaments, is basically circumstantial.

    Thus, I do not subscribe to many of the interpretative niceties attached to Christianity aside from what I see as its core principles, and will not be held to them. In fact, I regard many of these interpretative elements, and their susceptibility to rampant abuse by the usual interested parties, as the reason that Christianity is now vulnerable to the sort of historical criticism that one often hears of it. I thus make a very sharp distinction between Christianity on the one hand, and Christian bureaucracies and their historical mistakes on the other, and never treat them as equivalent (in fact, they cannot be treated as equivalent in anything resembling a cogent way). This is how I can maintain that Christianity per se need not answer for the conceptual and historical abuses of its various interpreters and bureaucrats.

    Some may hold that I’m not entitled to be called a “Christian” with this perspective. But again, that’s mere opinion. The fact remains that I’m entitled to my own logically sound interpretation of Christian principles, and if anyone wants to argue (or for that matter agree) with me about Christianity, this had best be kept in mind.

    I hope this helps clarify my position. I also hope that intelligent readers will remember it even if one or two unsavory and less-than-stellar participants blindly continue to pursue their polemical business as usual here.

  22. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 25, 2010 - 7:53 am | Permalink

    You are welcome to call it whatever you like, enosigaios.

    However, it was intensely disputed at the time it was published, and some parts of it are disputed to this day…for example, the idea (not actually seen in Gibbons’ work itself, to my knowledge) that Christianity was the overwhelming primary causal factor in the fall of the Roman Empire. (That was Nietzsche’s contention; Gibbons himself names a variety of ostensibly independent factors.)

    In reality, although Christianity played a part in the fall of Rome, it was more likely to have been symptomatic, albeit in a reinforcing way, of conditions that were quite independent of it…notably, the importation of a huge social class of foreign slaves, the propensity of Roman politicians to clean out the national treasury on their behalf, and increasing attention to personal wealth-preservation on the part of a decadent ruling class.

    It’s really just common sense: economically abuse a large number of people for a long enough time, and they can be relied on to adopt a worldview (not necessarily Christianity, but perhaps something else, e.g., Bolshevism) which psychologically or materially relieves them of some of their misery.

    I don’t usually recommend Wikipedia, but it may be worth checking out on this topic:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_History_of_the_Decline_and_Fall_of_the_Roman_Empire

    It does a fair job of highlighting the controversy.

  23. Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
    September 25, 2010 - 7:49 am | Permalink

    I stand four square with Der weiße Engel, although I can’t condone name calling, endless polemical tirades and uncouth language.

    My beef with Christianity is that it gives Jewry a big advantage, the historical antipathy of Catholicism to Jewry notwithstanding. If you are a devout Christian, you must believe that Jesus was the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. And since the Old Testament was written by Israelites (Jews) and concerns their mostly mythical trials and tribulations and names the Jews as the chosen people of their God, these Jews MUST be special. Large numbers of professing Christians do believe this. It’s the ultimate Trojan horse for the white race.

  24. enosigaios's Gravatar enosigaios
    September 25, 2010 - 7:03 am | Permalink

    @ Eurodele

    I would not call the work of Gibbon about the Empire “controversial”…

  25. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 25, 2010 - 5:01 am | Permalink

    You don’t do much of your own thinking, do you, Der kleine Wiesel? (I can scarcely blame you – you’re so many fries short of a Happy Meal that it would be foolish to even try.)

    In particular, I notice that no matter what arguments are placed before you, you always enter one of two modes. You either: (1) immediately rant, fume, and indiscriminately belch hatred and contempt without a hint of rationality, spewing venom in all directions, soiling yourself with rage, and finally retreating to go beat your meat and/or your soggy melon against a brick wall as a stress reliever; or (2) before reverting to 1, you smugly cite various controversial writings and their authors as sources of ironclad authority, resting your case on how smart you think they are regardless of how many other authorities disagree with them (nobody here is fooled into thinking you’ve actually read any of them in their entirety).

    Under no circumstances do you ever engage in logical analysis, reason from first principles, or venture forth with an original idea. You don’t have that much confidence in your own brainpower, and rightly so. You know all too well, somewhere deep down inside yourself, that if you try to think or say anything original bearing on the actual content of a discussion, somebody much smarter than you will spot all the inconsistencies and conceptual errors you’re sure to make, and deduce that you’re nothing but a screaming, grimacing, rouge-rumped baboon who can be easily slapped around, intellectually speaking, by anyone but another dummy like you.

    You’re not only wasting the time of others, which is quite obvious to everyone here; you’re wasting your own time as well. So here’s some honest advice. A soulless drone like you only goes around once, and due to your habit of eliminating through your oral cavity, you’ll be very lucky to get even that. Limitations as profound as yours can be ignored only at your gravest peril. So the sooner you realize that you’re not cut out for intellectual activity, the safer and better off you’ll be. I know you don’t want to listen to the truth; it’s not what you want to hear. But for your own good, this particular truth is one from which you should not continue to run away.

  26. skullnboner's Gravatar skullnboner
    September 25, 2010 - 12:42 am | Permalink

    Der weiße Engel kicks ass! A real pleasure following up on his retorts. I certainly can’t match his verbalisations, but I get it. I love the ‘trojan horse’ analogy. I have long used it myself as an anology (among others) in desription of the role of not just Christianity, but Mohammedism also….what many of us like to refer to as the Abrahamic trinity.

    It’s beside the point it’s all fiction of course, but it requires sanitisation from the mind, if white folks are to escape the mind-trap, stand for truth, wisdom, honor and other virtues necessary to creating a strong free-thinking, realistic civilisation for themselves. Otherwise, it’s just the same old pattern that will be repeating itself.

    Love your blog incites Kevin! As for “The Living Embodiment of Evil”…I am sure you won’t be intimidated by the butt-kicking you should continue to place squarely on the horses’ ass ( I mean the ideology of those corraled by the ‘trojan horse’ mindset, not as a personal attack).

  27. point's Gravatar point
    September 25, 2010 - 12:03 am | Permalink

    The Jews had a Purpose. It is especially hard to believe that the White Race, being as intelligent and advanced as it is, that it would still be enmeshed in the same superstitious belief in the spook world as are the most primitive savages of today, or as were our aborigine ancestors of past millenniums. It is even more unfortunate for the White Man that this control over his mind through belief in spooks should be foisted upon him by his mortal enemies, the treacherous Jew.

    Yes, it was the eternal parasite upon the back of mankind, the Jew, who wrote the White Man’s so called “Holy Book,” invented his religion for him, disseminated and propagated it first among the Romans, and now has poisoned the White Man’s mind with this primitive, poisonous superstition in order to control his mind, control his destiny, and to destroy the great White Race itself.

    More than 100 Billion Dollars per year to Perpetuate this Swindle. How ironic! How tragic! How stupid of us to succumb to this silly spooks-in-the-sky story, for the perpetuation of which the White Race is fleeced to the tune of more than 100 billion dollars a year in the United States alone. This does not include the indirect damage done to us in impairing our ability to think straight, the damage done in loss of time spent in these Jewish houses of spook worship called churches, in damage done in diverting us from our main purpose in life— the survival, expansion and advancement of our own race— and promoting our own best interests.

  28. Ion's Gravatar Ion
    September 24, 2010 - 9:52 pm | Permalink

    @ Romper Stomper

    Intelligent Whites eventually figure things out by themselves.
    If at a future point some CEKA-like organization is created and there won’t be enough whites to oppose it, it would not be the fault of people like eurodele and DWE, but because the white race is simply exhausted and lost its will to exist.

  29. Ion's Gravatar Ion
    September 24, 2010 - 9:45 pm | Permalink

    Regarding some of the people than have been brought up, I just want to point out that Dawkins has written and has said in public that he considers the topic of race to be insignificant.

    I’m not aware that Hawkins has written anything about race, but I’m certain he also considers it a trivial matter.

  30. Romper Stomper's Gravatar Romper Stomper
    September 24, 2010 - 9:12 pm | Permalink

    One has to wonder if Der weiße Engel and eurodele are carrying on their ‘discussion’ in order to drive newcomers away. To disturb people who may be on the fence. Interesting argument but not one bit of what they are tossing back and forth will awaken other whites, not one bit of what they are discussing will help in the upcoming, unavoidable and very messy showdown with the ultimate haters, the jews. We’re far beyond the topics and situations that drive their quibbling.

  31. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 24, 2010 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

    Bubble Biter: “By the way, the Roman Empire fell largely on its own … Very few if any competent White historians would argue otherwise…”

    This was not the learned historian Edward Gibbon’s opinion, as Bub might realize if he had even a little knowledge of the subject he is bloviating about. Like Nietzsche, Gibbon, too, blamed Christianity for the fall of Rome. But naturally Bub, bless his icy little circumcized Jewish heart, knows much better than Gibbon, a bona fide White genius who devoted his life to the subject. After all, he watched the movie “Quo Vadis” once, and really approved of Peter Ustinov’s performance as Nero, so he’s now an expert on classical civilization, just like he became an expert on quantum physics by tuning in to the Art Bell show. I wonder how he obtained his impressive “knowledge” of theology? By being buggered by a priest?

    Do everyone a favor and shut your pus-running hole, Bub. Try to remember that nobody likes a know-it-all.

  32. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 24, 2010 - 2:52 pm | Permalink

    “- Der kleine wießel aka The Living Embodiment of Evil”

    …living up to his name as never before, hating Christ as only a true Jew can do!

    (By the way, the Roman Empire fell largely on its own, having been terminally sated, morally decadent, and well into a state of decline when helpless Christians were still being torn apart by hungry lions to the jeers and cheers of sadistic rabble with a positively Nietzschean taste for blood. Indeed, Christianity is arguably what enabled its remnants to blossom anew in Europe, including Hitler’s Germany. Very few if any competent White historians would argue otherwise, even under the disapproving Jewish snouts of their academic superiors.)

  33. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 24, 2010 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Bubble Biter: “… the rise and flowering of Western Civilization and the modern university system … ”

    Yes, just look at it, Bub. The post-infection history of the West resembles a field of poisonous, evil flowers, opening one by one through the centuries. And such a flowering it is; such a stench of decomposing flesh! Yes, it’s all your handiwork – you inward Jews, you brothers of the invisible circumcision of the heart. Nobody made you do any of it! It flowed inevitably from your Jewish nature. One development followed another in a cold and irresistible progression, right up to the present, making manifest all the hate in your cold, rotting, zombified hearts. From internet porn to musical stylings of Jay-Z and Lady Gaga, from pretty blonde girls pushing strollers containing baby monkeys to Mayan savages streaming across the border, from the collapse of the Roman Empire to the smashing of its resurgence in the Reich, none of it would have been possible without you rabid SCUM.

    Go and hang yourselves, hypocrites! Fly off into the arms of your precious rabbi Jeebus, if you can ever work up the courage of your so-called convictions. Kiss his feet and hairy brown Jewish behind for all eternity, for all we care, but remember this: YOU walking dead are the true assassins of the White race.

    - Der weiße Engel aka “The Living Embodiment of Evil”

  34. gryphon's Gravatar gryphon
    September 24, 2010 - 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Secular Racialist: “Jews definitely hate Christians” Der weiße Engel:”Not all Christians,just the White ones

    You are both (partially) wrong. Jews hate Christ more than anyone else.

  35. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 24, 2010 - 12:59 pm | Permalink

    Re: Der kleine Wießel

    Talk about “zombies”! What do you call something named “Der kleine Wiesel” who gets squished like a cockroach every time he opens his hyperactive know-nothing yap, yet keeps on coming like a runaway case of genital herpes?

    Der kleine Wießel: “To sum up, what Nietzsche said is this: Christianity is a memetic poison, designed and spread by a Jew, in order to infect Whites and bring down their native civilization, the Empire of Rome. All the evidence shows he was right.”

    OK. First, about the Dawkinsian neologism – it wasn’t used by Nietzsche. Maybe it vaguely makes sense in this context, but its worshipful invocation by a brown-nosed Dawkins fanboy smacks of pure conflict-of-interest.

    That being noted, the phrase “all the evidence” clearly includes the rise and flowering of Western Civilization and the modern university system, before the last vestiges of Christian scholasticism were expunged by the close genetic relatives of, you guessed it, Der kleine Wiesel. To avoid confounding this evidence with the mischief perpetrated by said relatives, let’s confine ourselves to the period ending no later than the beginning of the 20th century.

    Perhaps Der kleine Wiesel will now be so kind as to explain to everyone how these key material correlates of Christianity – which do in fact include a very large portion of “all the evidence” – qualify as poison daggers thrust deep into the guts of the White race.

    By the way, Der kleine Wiesel, I hear your last two job applications were turned down. (You should have expected it – in this Jew-hijacked economy, not even paperweights and doorstops are in demand.) But I understand that George Romero has a new Holocaust zombie flick in the pipeline. It’s called “Night of the Living 6,000,000″. Right up your alley!

    And please…no more porno links or self-portraits. They’re more than a little off-topic and inappropriate in a forum dedicated to constructive commentary about rehabilitating the White race and restoring its preferred culture.

  36. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 24, 2010 - 11:23 am | Permalink

    It doesn’t at all surprise me that all of the Christian zombies that are to be found lurching mindlessly around this site support one another and attack together. Zombies attack en masse, as any fan of the genre knows. These inward JEWS, as Paul calls them in the Romans 2:29, are all circumsized in their hearts. They therefore have become, as Nietzsche pointed out, subverters of White culture and haters of the White race. They are mentally Jewish. To turn Whites into such creatures is the whole point of Christianity.

    The Bubble Biter, or Bub, as we affectionately call him, who in his previous life as a human evidently read a popular science book or two, and who took Philosophy 101 back in the day, now fancies himself an expert on quantum theory, cosmology, and logic. The great philosopher and philologist Nietzsche is a second-rater compared to a genius like him; evolutionary theorist Dawkins is a fool; even physicist Stephen Hawking, Newton’s successor in the Lucasian chair at Cambridge, receives a reprimand from Bub, the intellectual titan. This is insane, of course, but what else can be expected of a Christian zombie? His brain is 99.9% rotted out by the Jeebus infection.

    Above, Bub and his sidekick “me” several times make the ridiculous argument that because the Jews hate Christianity, it must be good for Whites. They are quite impressed with themselves and think it’s their strongest point. But the zombie analogy is perfect to show how this is completely wrong. What happened is that the Jew Paul/Saul of Tarsus came up with a way to infect Whites with a poison idea, much like a genetic engineer today might come up with a virus or strain of bacteria to turn Whites into zombies. This poison idea spread like an infection throughout the ancient world, and destroyed the native White civilization of the time, just as Paul/Saul planned. OF COURSE Jews don’t want to contract this plague themselves. It’s equally bad for Jews too. That’s why they hate it. But it is also, and primarily, BAD FOR WHITES.

    To sum up, what Nietzsche said is this: Christianity is a memetic poison, designed and spread by a Jew, in order to infect Whites and bring down their native civilization, the Empire of Rome. All the evidence shows he was right.

    Here’s looking at you, Bub.

    http://www.goozlepipe.com/images/zombies/zombie_bub.png

    - Der weiße Engel aka “The Living Embodiment of Evil”

  37. Isolde's Gravatar Isolde
    September 24, 2010 - 7:25 am | Permalink

    Eurodele: Thank you for your patience and perseverance.You have correctly identified “Little weasel’ as someone who dominates and discourages others from discussing on this blog. He has met his match in you. Congratulations! It is a pleasure to read your intelligent posts. This blog used to have a very smart contributor called Edward but I think he’s given up the fight.

  38. Can't take the stink of Zionism's Gravatar Can't take the stink of Zionism
    September 24, 2010 - 6:55 am | Permalink

    Jewish concern for Europe:

    Dirty Little Secrets

    http://www.rense.com/general92/dirty.htm

    The hidden, awkward origins of World War 2

    The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events:

    Just think about the following:

    Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).

    Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)

    Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).

    Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

    etc etc etc (see rense.com article with URL above)
    _____________________________

    According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8):

    ‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

    ‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’
    Other authors agree with this:
    “There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.” (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).

    “The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.” (Martin Bernal, Black Athenavol. 1 pp. 367, 387).

    “The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.” (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).

  39. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 24, 2010 - 6:12 am | Permalink

    Re: Der kleine “Living Embodiment of Evil” Wiesel

    So that’s it then. That’s the hard-won outcome of what would otherwise have been a constructive discussion on Jews, multiculturalism, and the bearing of Christian monotheism on White civilization …

    a mathematical proof that Der kleine Wiesel is a self-hating Jew!

    Here’s the proof.

    1. Der kleine Wiesel hates those who respect themselves but deny respect to others.

    (“The world is full of assholes who want respect, but give none to others.”)

    2. Der kleine Wiesel respects himself but denies respect to others.

    (Inflated self-respect: “I (Der kleine Wiesel) follow in the footsteps of giants.”

    Denial of respect to others: “You … are both JEWS, circumsized [sic] by Jeebus himself, and herewith are outed as such. … [I hereby] expose fifth columnist Jews for the swine they are”)

    3. Hence, Der kleine Wiesel is a self-hating Jew (his Jewishness having been previously established by his tireless subversive activity and attempts to discourage and demoralize constructive White participants in this forum with his trademark witches’ brew of atheism, materialism, nihilism, misogyny, anti-Whiteness, and anti-Christianity, along with a wide range of mental pathologies and personality disorders prevalent among Jews).

    The problem is, we already knew that Der kleine Wiesel is, or is doing a bang-up job of imitating, a discombobulated self-hating Jew superficially pretending to be a White person. So where’s the great insight that’s supposedly always flowing from the pen of this brave “follower in the footsteps of giants”?

    Perhaps it fell out of his pocket as he tried vainly to climb up out of the last giant footprint he tumbled into, presumably because it was obscured by a bug-level dirt clod.

    But this clearly suggests that when Der kleine Wiesel was separated from his foreskin by his Uncle Hymie the Rabbi, Uncle Hymie goofed up and discarded the wrong part!

    And that his family, being unable to make the distinction, never even noticed.

  40. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 23, 2010 - 8:01 pm | Permalink

    @ Bubble Biter

    You didn’t answer the questions I posed because you are ashamed to admit your first loyalty is to the rabbi Jeebus, and no wonder! You OUGHT to be ashamed, Bub. According to the Bible, you and your little sidekick “me” are both JEWS, circumsized by Jeebus himself, and herewith are outed as such. I cite as my authority Romans 2:28-29:

    28 A man is not a Jew if he is only one outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and physical. 29 No, a man is a Jew if he is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a man’s praise is not from men, but from God.

    me: “this behavior is disruptive … ”

    If to expose fifth columnist Jews for the swine they are is disruptive, then so be it. I follow in the footsteps of giants.

    me: “We do not ask him to believe, but only to respect …”

    Oh, don’t be such a crybaby! The world is full of assholes who want respect, but give none to others. You and Bubble Biter are prime examples. I have shown you both more respect than you deserve, so stop whining.

    me: “Der weiße Engel you are truly the living embodiment of evil.”

    Why, thank you, me. Mind if I use it as a sig?

    - Der weiße Engel aka “The Living Embodiment of Evil”

    Kewl. :-)

  41. abc's Gravatar abc
    September 23, 2010 - 7:51 pm | Permalink

    Just want to voice my support for eurodele.

  42. me's Gravatar me
    September 23, 2010 - 8:31 am | Permalink

    aquanis” and “augstine” use specious reasoning to justify their cowardice in the face of death. …. Therefore, what I am saying is that you should ignore those two cowards and take the Bible as your only authority

    The troll in his own words – belittling and insulting two philosopher theologians that helped shape the west- perhaps the most important since Aristotle and Plato.

    He cannot help but know this behavior is disruptive and counter productive – yet he continues to do it. We do not ask him to believe, but only to respect – he cannot …

    I know it’s a ‘kitschy’ term to anti-Western, Anti-Christs such as yourself – but Der weiße Engel you are truly the living embodiment of evil. You have the black soul and heart that we so often see in Jews. There’s no other way to describe it.

    Everyone, I suggest we just ignore him, he keeps repeating the same non-sense over and over (and over) like an autistic child banging on one key of a piano.

  43. JJ's Gravatar JJ
    September 23, 2010 - 6:52 am | Permalink

    Maurice Samuel, Rothchild’s official biographer found Nietzsche’s Anti-Christ quite useful-oh, when he plagiarized that work was his concern merely, what’s good for the goy? Injecting Christian intolerance into a JQ discussion will quickly sidetrack it, our opponents will surely note. I view anyone who does it as an agent provocateur.

  44. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 23, 2010 - 1:22 am | Permalink

    You’re really a rather sad and hopeless little sack, aren’t you, Dweeberstein?

    You sit there on the bulbous duff you don’t know how to wipe for yourself and mock “Jeebus”. You entertain yourself by drawing “Flying Spaghetti Monster” cartoons like the other genius philosophers over at “The Brights’ Net”, Panda’s Thumb, Internet Infidels, and Pharyngula. You even ejaculate counterhistorical assertions about how Christianity was foisted on Whitey by Big Jew in order to destroy him.

    But out here in the real world, the Jews crucified Jesus. They wrote horrible things about him in the Talmud. They curse his name at every available opportunity. They’ve been implacable enemies of Christianity for thousands of years, trying to destroy or subvert it wherever they found it, murdering or viciously abusing its believers whenever it was possible to do so without reprisal. They’ve even used every legal trick in the book to suppress its public display all over these United States.

    Yet there you sit with “Nietzsche for Dummies” on your lap, telling people far smarter, or perhaps that should be less demented, than you are that Jews have been consciously using the very thing they appear to hate the most to lead unsuspecting Whites down the primrose path to perdition. That their hatred for Christianity has all been just a big, fantastically well-coordinated act by a vast troupe of master thespians who were really up to their elbows in it, baiting hooks and setting traps for “Jeebus lovers” nonstop!

    The unavoidable conclusion is that you’re totally without metacognitive capacity. You obviously can’t hear the words you say or how ridiculous they sound; you can’t see your true reflection in a mirror. All you can do is babble and drool and wait for one of the trustees to come, loosen your restraints a bit, and spoon a little applesauce into your mouth.

    Don’t worry. It’s time for you to take a little nap now. When the doctors read your latest Internet fantasies, they’ll no doubt have some nice new meds for you to swallow.

    My sincere advice: swallow them.

  45. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 22, 2010 - 9:58 pm | Permalink

    Bubble Biter: “But as I’ve remarked, that wasn’t the right question.”

    Nonsense, Bub. Not only is “What’s in it for them?” the right question to ask of anything that comes from the Jews, but Nietzsche wrote a whole book showing why “To destroy Roman civilization and injure White people” is the correct answer to that question in the case of Christianity. So far, your only response has been to expel more gas, biting every emerging bubble and savoring the scent. Since you like to puff yourself up as the most intelligent of the Santa believers on this forum and are in a way a spokesperson for the rest, this is particularly disappointing. Frankly, I was hoping for better. :-( I’d wager your dear Santa oops I mean Jeebus must be very disappointed in you, too.

    Try again, Bub. You can start by telling us why you believe a Jewish rabbi came back from the dead, and why you think he’s God. That answer’s gotta be pure comedy, especially coming from a self-proclaimed anti-Semite, probably the funniest thing you’ll ever write. Go ahead. We’re all ears.

  46. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 22, 2010 - 9:01 pm | Permalink

    me: “a. you didn’t see my post about augstine and aquanis, or as usual, you chose to ignore any fact that goes against your Dawkins dogma.”

    No, as I said before, it’s clear that “aquanis” and “augstine” use specious reasoning to justify their cowardice in the face of death. The philosopher David Hume soundly refutes them in his essay on suicide, as I suspect you must be aware but are too ashamed to admit. Therefore, what I am saying is that you should ignore those two cowards and take the Bible as your only authority. Recall, me, that in the Old Testament, there are six suicides, and none of them are condemned; two even are apparently commended. Keep also in mind that Jesus himself set a fine example for you. He freely allowed himself to be executed, deliberately choosing to die on the cross so that poor sinners like you might be redeemed. Remember, too, that it’ll be over with very quickly. Whatever pain there is will be brief, and it’ll be the last pain you’ll ever feel. Before you tie the knot around your neck and jump off the chair, recite to yourself this Bible verse:

    “O Death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?”
    1 Corinthians 15:55.

    As you swing and your face turns purple and your tongue swells up and protrudes out of your mouth, you’ll be an heroic example to all Christians, me. People will stop calling you a hypocrite, and with any luck, you’ll start a trend among your pious brethren, one which will leave the world a far better place. Even more exciting, once you’re dead and welcomed into paradise, you’ll be with your beloved Jewish Master for all eternity. You will be able to shower kisses upon his hairy Jewish tuchis forever and ever. How could a simple goy like you ask for anything more? It’s a win-win situation for all concerned.

    me: “I didn’t resort to personal attacks against you, …”

    You most certainly did. Your comments weren’t directed at my arguments, but against me, personally. The issue is not me, me. It’s not whether I am “hateful”, or “hostile”, or “ignoring the obvious”, or anything else. It’s whether my arguments are correct. If you think they are not, you should say why. Produce your evidence, and make a sound argument, not a personal attack.

    me: “First off it would be up Nietzsche to prove his thesis, which is ridiculous.”

    In the opinion of many, including Dr. Oliver, and also, I think, Dr. Dalton, he did prove his thesis.

    I would suggest you at least read Nietzsche’s The Antichrist before pronouncing it ridiculous. Otherwise, your airy dismissal of a book you haven’t read is what is ridiculous; but, one must admit, typical for a Christian.

    Just in case it’s still not clear, what I’m asking you to do, in addition to reading the book, is to produce some cogent arguments against Nietzsche’s thesis. If you can, that is. For example, though you are generally suspicious of Jews, explain why you make an exception and follow the teachings of this Jew. Why doesn’t your ordinary suspicion about Jews apply to him? Or, explain why you think this particular Jewish rabbi is God. Or, explain why it’s not nutty that you believe that he came back from the dead. See what I mean?

    me: “I want to see a scholarly critical refutation of my theory that hilter was a zionist and nazism was a plot to create israel …”

    Then why not make a case for it and write a book about it, containing plenty of evidence and argument to support your idea, as did Nietzsche with his theory?

    Since your claim seems to be based more on wishful thinking than anything else, I’m sure this would be a much shorter book than Nietzsche’s. Very short; in fact, probably amounting to less than a page. But might make an entertaining read, and give everyone a chuckle or two, even more so than your usual stuff.

  47. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 22, 2010 - 8:57 pm | Permalink

    @ Der Bubble-butt kleine Wiesel (what a picture!)

    “Nevertheless, that is the question posed by Nietzsche, and the one which he posed himself.”

    But as I’ve remarked, that wasn’t the right question. Being the second-rate philosopher he was, Nietzsche couldn’t think of a better one to ask.

    The question to ask would have been: “What is it about the Abrahamic monotheistic religions that gives them such unifying power, and how can I help turn this to the advantage of my race?” Instead, he vented his spleen against humanity by spewing out an irrational blend of atheism and nihilism as forcefully as possible. No doubt about it, Nietzsche was a most impressive writer in the grand literary tradition of German philosophy. But when it came to rationality and logical consistency, he was a dummkopf, a ham-fisted bumbler lurching crazily around the philosophical ring and swinging wildly at phantasms.

    Regarding Nietzsche and the Jews, here’s what people like you fail to grasp: as far as their behavior toward you is concerned, the Jews are behaving in near-perfect accord with Nietzschean philosophy. Even now they are dealing with you from a position of utter strength, stepping on your scrawny neck like that of a chicken. They have all the power, the will to victory, and absolutely no compassion for a little self-professed goy like you. What they have instead is the monotheistic functional equivalent of the Nietzschean superman: a super-God who represents their collective will and group utility, and who has “chosen” them to crush your entire race and suck dry their empty husks and use their bones as toothpicks.

    “Well fine then!” you might say. “Let us fight fire with fire, and take our own cues from Nietzsche! Let us be supermen!” But if so, then you’re still missing the biggest piece of the puzzle: a coherent monomaniacal God representing the will and spirit of an entire race and lighting wildfires in the hearts of fanatical true believers. Instead, you have nothing to offer but another opportunistic demagogue, belched up from the bowels of a corrupt political system, perching atop a writhing dogpile of amoral self-styled “Ubermensch” determined to sate their own appetites even if they have to gut their own race to do it, and without the inner strength of a unifying spirit that promises to redeem them whether or not they die in its service.

    How some insignificant little creature like you can have his neck so firmly stepped on by the “Chosen of God” and yet fail to understand the unifying power of their belief system is a total mystery. Suffice it to say that the White race can’t afford your kind of ignorance. So assuming that you’re not lying when you claim to be White, why not do yourself and your race a huge favor, and stuff a rag in your foam-flecked flytrap the next time you feel the urge to launch into another imbecilic Nietzschean (atheistic, nihilistic, misogynistic, anti-Christian, etc.) rant?

    Try to think about it a little.

  48. me's Gravatar me
    September 22, 2010 - 7:00 pm | Permalink

    You should have hung yourself by now, hypocrite.
    a. you didn’t see my post about augstine and aquanis, or as usual, you chose to ignore any fact that goes against your Dawkins dogma.

    I didn’t resort to personal attacks against you, I simply stated your position which I doubt you would disagree with – you are openly hostile to the christian fabric of the west ,and those christian figures in it, correct?

    frankly everyone I think Der weiße Enge is just a pathetic troll looking for attention.

    case in point “critical refutation of Nietzsche’s thesis that the Christ cult was a Trojan horse, designed by Paul as a way to bring down the Roman Empire, would be welcome…”

    First off it would be up Nietzsche to prove his thesis, which is ridiculous.
    The jews hated and persecuted Paul.
    Secondly we have the clear examples of Christianity being the one thing that saved the west- at Malta, in Spain, at Tours

    I want to see a scholarly critical refutation of my theory that hilter was a zionist and nazism was a plot to create israel – since it has been the driving force behind deflecting criticism of the Jewish state.

  49. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 22, 2010 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Secular Racialist: “Jews definitely hate Christians…”

    Not all Christians, just the White ones.

    Thesis: The Jews’ alleged hatred for Christians is only an aspect of the Jews’ hatred for Whites.

    Proof: What they actually hate becomes obvious when you consider that you won’t find Jews condemning negro Christians, or negro Christianity. Nor do you find them condemning latrino Catholics, or latrinos in general. From this we can conclude that it’s not Christianity they hate, it’s Whites, and by extension, any organization under which Whites collect.

    Secular Racialist: “I think Jews are quite well aware that they need us to be predominantly Christian in order to parasitize us effectively…”

    Right, and this fits very well with what I’ve said above, and with Nietzsche’s idea of Christianity-as-subversion.

    @ Bubble Biter

    “The question is not the impenetrable matter of why and how Christianity was designed …”

    Nevertheless, that is the question posed by Nietzsche, and the one which he posed himself.

    Feel free to attempt to answer it again, Bub, IF you ever have a lucid moment. IF.

  50. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 22, 2010 - 3:05 pm | Permalink

    Secular Racialist: “The idea that Christianity will ever regain the status it once held seems pretty unlikely at this point. The people we need to get on our side (intelligent, wealthy, influential) are essentially all secular already. So the movement has really no choice but to be secular and that’s probably for the best.”

    The problem with secularism is that beyond mere cultural habit and preference, it reduces to abstract genetic self-interest. The key word here is “abstract”.

    Genes lack personal utility; they experience no needs or wants. Asking a person to “defend his genes” equates to asking him to defend those genes that are inside him and his immediate family, and this need have nothing to do with defending his race. In fact, it is currently far more advantageous, in terms of personal survival and reproduction, for a White person and his offspring to sell out to the Jews than to do the opposite, which is why so many have been and are now doing it. After all, people don’t get rich by neglecting expedience.

    Greed and personal self-interest are perhaps the most salient defining characteristics of the elite of any race. It is quite obvious to any neutral observer that the average White elite would much rather have rich mongrelized descendants than poor or even middle-class White ones; given a choice between being a poor White and a rich non-White, most wealthy Whites would unhesitatingly choose the latter, if only because they couldn’t bear to live as members of (the) hoi polloi. This situation will not change as long as the Jews control the money and the media.

    Keep the issue entirely secular, and the only way to enforce racial purity will be at the point of a gun, as it was in Nazi Germany. Better try for something more resonant with deeper currents in human psychology.

  51. Secular Racialist's Gravatar Secular Racialist
    September 22, 2010 - 2:08 pm | Permalink

    Regarding this notion of Jews hating Christianity – I’m not sure that’s the case. Jews definitely hate Christians, and in particular seek to denigrate them and establish their dominance over them, which they have done quite successfully in the US. But that’s quite different from Jews wishing to see Christians abandon their religion altogether. I think Jews are quite well aware that they need us to be predominantly Christian in order to parasitize us effectively, which is why they imposed Christianity on us in the first place. Indeed, most of the resistance to Jewish authority in America is coming from secularists (White nationalists and the anti-Zionist left), and the most pro-Jewish Whites are the Christians, especially evangelical Protestants (full disclosure: I was raised Protestant).

    Unlike the Protestant Church, which off the top of my head has never led any effective movement that opposed Jewish power, the Catholic Church historically kept the Jews at bay, but that’s no longer true. In any case, American Whites are mostly of Protestant background and most of them would be more likely to become atheists than become Catholics, so Catholicism alone will certainly not save us.

    In general, Christianity is on the decline in the West and has been for hundreds of years. The idea that Christianity will ever regain the status it once held seems pretty unlikely at this point. The people we need to get on our side (intelligent, wealthy, influential) are essentially all secular already. So the movement has really no choice but to be secular and that’s probably for the best.

  52. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 22, 2010 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

    @ General

    Der klein Weisel: “A literate, scholarly, critical refutation of Nietzsche’s thesis that the Christ cult was a Trojan horse, designed by Paul as a way to bring down the Roman Empire, would be welcome…”

    The question is not the impenetrable matter of why and how Christianity was designed; it is the well-decided matter of how Christianity functioned to bestow global coherence on White European civilization, previously a territorial patchwork of squabbling, warlike pagan tribes. There are plenty of scholarly treatises on that topic.

    “… both interesting to read and appropriate for this blog.”

    BS Alert: As a brief examination of his profoundly disordered contributions will quickly reveal, Der klein Wiesel is absolutely the last participant to judge what is or is not welcome and appropriate for this forum. (He’s lucky he hasn’t been involuntarily institutionalized … or perhaps not so lucky. I do know that the rest of us aren’t so lucky.)

    “But it is quite beyond you, isn’t it? You can’t refute the thesis, or even any part of it.”

    The real problem, of course, is that refutation is a two-way street. One can refute a thesis to the highest standards of logic and history, but if your audience includes just one little moron who insists on stopping up his ears, jumping up and down, and yelling (to paraphrase): “Nya-nya-nya-nya-nya-nya, can’t heeeeeear you, can’t heeeeeear you! You suuuuuck! Nyaaaaaaaaaaaah! (Curse, chuckle, insult!!!), no communication can or will occur.

    Newcomers take heed.

  53. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 22, 2010 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

    Sledgehammer: “There is no evidence that the Nazi leadership attempted to physically exterminate the Jews of Europe. … The Romans never tried to exterminate the Jews in 70 AD. ”

    I didn’t say they did. But if they truly wanted to eliminate the infection, they should have.

    @ Bubble Biter

    http://www.goozlepipe.com/images/zombies/zombie_bub.png

    Poor Bub. He’s got eternal life now, but what good does it do him?

    @ GoyAmongYou

    Thanks for the repost, but it’s not clear what your point is. Is it that you approve of the White on White genocide called the Albigensian Crusade? If so, then the blessings of eternal life are also yours.

    http://www.goozlepipe.com/images/zombies/zombie_bub.png

    @ me

    As usual, you limit yourself to a content-free personal attack, and a weak one at that. I’m also a little disappointed to see you posting again. You should have hung yourself by now, hypocrite. What’s the excuse this time? Couldn’t you find any rope, or even a cliff to throw yourself off of? Don’t you realize, your Jewish Master is waiting for you with open arms, and wants you to join him in paradise? Go to him now! Go!

    “O Death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?”
    1 Corinthians 15:55.

    @ all Christian zombies

    A literate, scholarly, critical refutation of Nietzsche’s thesis that the Christ cult was a Trojan horse, designed by Paul as a way to bring down the Roman Empire, would be welcome, both interesting to read and appropriate for this blog. But it is quite beyond you, isn’t it? You can’t refute the thesis, or even any part of it. (By literate and scholarly, by the way, I mean something more than calling Nietzsche names, or claiming that he died of syphilis.)

    In case you assorted mental giants and aspiring theologians need some Cliff’s Notes to Nietzsche, you can read Dr. Dalton’s articles in the archives.

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Dalton-Nietzsche2.html
    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Dalton-Nietzsche3.html

    There’s probably no danger of it happening, but if any of you do ever have a lucid moment, please keep this challenge in mind.

  54. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 22, 2010 - 7:32 am | Permalink

    (Slight qualification: Actually, swearing unconditional allegiance to a foreign power is arguably criminal for elected officials sworn to represent the American people when it conflicts with their oaths of office, as it clearly establishes willingness or even intent to criminally violate the oath. However, it is clearly immoral for all US citizens under any circumstances.)

  55. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 22, 2010 - 7:18 am | Permalink

    “Compare the words of Barbara Lerner Spectre with those from mostly American and Canadian Jewish youths in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsWDcFiPo2s
    The contrast is very revealing about the Jewish mindset.”

    This video is a must-see. It proves conclusively that a significant percentage of young American Jews are traitors willing to swear unconditional loyalty to a foreign power.

    There is no doubt whatsoever that this video documents treasonous (criminal) behavior to American legal standards, raising the question of whether the little darlings will be prosecuted for their crimes here in the US.

    Why, sure they will! ;-)

  56. Sledgehammer's Gravatar Sledgehammer
    September 22, 2010 - 6:54 am | Permalink

    Everyone,
    Compare the words of Barbara Lerner Spectre with those from mostly American and Canadian Jewish youths in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsWDcFiPo2s
    The contrast is very revealing about the Jewish mindset.

    @Der weiße Engel

    There is no evidence that the Nazi leadership attempted to physically exterminate the Jews of Europe. What the evidence does show is that they wanted the Jews OUT of Europe. Many Jews of course died during the war for a variety of reasons. That is what happens to people during times of warfare. The Romans never tried to exterminate the Jews in 70 AD. They also did not expel them from the land. They crushed their rebellion as they crushed many other rebellions in their provinces. The story that the Romans ethnically cleansed Palestine of Jews is but another Zionist myth to justify their illegal state and ethnically cleansing of the Palestinians. Btw, some 70 years later, under Hadrian, the Jews rebelled again and were again crushed by the Romans.

    @Chris Moore

    There are a lot of ridiculous myths about Hitler, some of which are that he was part Jewish, a homo and crazy. None of that is true. Ain’t me saying it but one of the foremost experts on the man, the now late historian Prof.Dr.Werner Maser in his “Fälschung, Dichtung und Wahrheit über Hitler und Stalin(2004)”.

  57. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 22, 2010 - 5:55 am | Permalink

    So the little weasel is a card-carrying “Bright” then! This, in conjunction with the prolonged-exposure-to-volatile-compounds hypothesis, would pretty much nail down the DWEeb phenomenon to everyone’s permanent satisfaction. (Good work, me!)

  58. me's Gravatar me
    September 22, 2010 - 5:32 am | Permalink

    Der weiße Engel = they hate it because they hate everything white.
    That’s just silly. They dont fly off the handle and go into a tirade over a movie about baseball like they did about the Passion.

    You have demonstrated two things however.
    a. however much you claim to be ‘rational’ you are actively ignoring what is an obvious reality to any casual observer. This is not uncommon about people who claim to embrace reason as a supreme value – (Ayn Rand, the French revolution – history is littered with examples)
    b. You are as hateful and hostile to western civilization and a significant number of its great men, art, philosophy, architecture , theology because they were Christian. You are in short, hostile to the very fabric of western civilization.

    Which only proves my point you and ‘brights’ like you are just as destructive as multicultalists or the hostile Jewish elite.

  59. GoyAmongYou's Gravatar GoyAmongYou
    September 22, 2010 - 4:30 am | Permalink

    Der weiße Engel says:
    September 21, 2010 at 8:04 PM

    @ Bubble Biter

    “This insipid Christian “love” is only a Jewish narcotic, developed by them to render the host insensitive to the parasite’s bite. Worse, to be a Christian is to embrace not only sickness, but even Death. “O Death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?” – 1 Corinthians 15:55. Thus was this rabbinic Christ cult the original White Death Cult.”

    Talking about “Death Cults” …
    The Catholic Church used to hate what is hateful:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharism
    But earlier on, you dismissed the Albigensian Crusade as somewhat rude and intolerant … therefore un-White… (maybe un-Christian?)

    Oh, well …

    Marcus Eli Ravage must be gloating on his grave =p

  60. Spooky's Gravatar Spooky
    September 21, 2010 - 11:27 pm | Permalink

    If the world got so enmeshed in lies that people could no longer take it, what would they do? They would gather together and sort out the Truth from the lies, and carefully protect the Truth so they would know who was speaking Truth and who was speaking lies. The truth would not evolve, but it would be revealed, over time. People would know truth from a lie the second it was spoken. Not insofar as what may or may not have happened yesterday, but insofar as the Truth of the human soul. A civilization would be built. The purveyors of lies would be constantly storming the gates of that civilization, but to no avail. Until they convinced a monk to tell people that it wasn’t objective Truth that mattered, but the Truth inside oneself that was revealed when reading a book. Therefore, everyone came up with their own Truth, and the purveyors of the lie broke down the walls that had been so painstakingly built over 1500 years, and then came to love those that corrupted them as purveryors of the Truth! If there is anyone rotting in hell, it’s Luther.

  61. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 21, 2010 - 8:04 pm | Permalink

    @ Bubble Biter

    A case-in-point: The effectiveness of the modern crusade against “hate”, which does so much injury to the White race, and is used by the Jews to such racially debilitating effect, flows directly from the mindset fostered by your Christ-insanity, Bub. So does the Christian love of all things weak, diseased, and deformed, which is one of the Christian religion’s more noteworthy characteristics. This insipid Christian “love” is only a Jewish narcotic, developed by them to render the host insensitive to the parasite’s bite. Worse, to be a Christian is to embrace not only sickness, but even Death. “O Death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?” – 1 Corinthians 15:55. Thus was this rabbinic Christ cult the original White Death Cult. Classical civilization would have, and could have, approved of none of this, because this sort of hucksterism was, and is, antithetical to the essence of the White race. The ascendancy of the Jew over Whites, represented by the Death Cult of Jesus (who called himself, with characteristic Jewish antiphrasistic mendacity, the Way, the Truth, and the LIFE,) could only take place as White classical civilization died. Today, its unworthy successor is inhabited mainly by a race of zombified pod people, Jews-in-spirit like Bub here.

    http://www.goozlepipe.com/images/zombies/zombie_bub.png

    @ Gregory

    I think that Hitler was in some ways the revenge of pagan Rome, and the Reich he attempted to establish a Roman Empire redux, right down to the symbolism of the Reich eagles. Hitler represented a recrudescence of reason in Whites, of their still-not-entirely-subdued vitality; a love of strength, and freedom; and a godless, fanatically anti-Semitic, essentially Roman militarism.

    Whether the Holocaust happened exactly as the Jews say seems to me very unlikely, yet it is also hard to deny that many Jews died in the War. Whether the total came to a full six million or not, the only thing that we can say now with certainty is that it was not enough. Just like the Romans in 70 AD, the Germans failed to completely eliminate the infection.

  62. tuy's Gravatar tuy
    September 21, 2010 - 7:59 pm | Permalink

    The Scandinavians were integral in the formation of many of those nation-states mentioned, but in particular France and England. However, like all whites, they blend, fade, and disappear.

  63. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 21, 2010 - 6:43 pm | Permalink

    “Adopting a Jewish mindset and groveling at the feet of a Jew doesn’t exactly favor White racial cohesion”

    Yet another powerful, rock-solid, certainty-packed calculation from the greatest mind of its generation! Clearly, Dweebster has the brain of a world-famous Nobel physicist!

    Now all he has to do is pull his old brain out, install the new one, and dispose of the poor physicist’s decerebrate corpse before the cops raid his porno dungeon.

    (As far as his old brain is concerned, the upgrade won’t make any difference at all – it can’t possibly be used any less after replacement than it was before its removal.)

    “In fact, it would not go too far to say that Christ-insanity is the primary cultural reason why Whites have no racial cohesion.”

    Absolutely! Why, the influx of Jews and their evil political machinations had nothing to do with it at all! ;-)

    Has anybody else been wondering whether Dweebenfelderkind works around glue or other volatile compounds for a living? (It would explain quite a lot more than his writing ever did.)

  64. The Amazing Gregory's Gravatar The Amazing Gregory
    September 21, 2010 - 4:46 pm | Permalink

    ^^ I doubt he loves Hitler … A few posts earlier he implicitly acknowledged that he believes the Holocaust did in fact occur, so I doubt he thinks highly oh him.

  65. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 21, 2010 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Bubble Biter: “Now we finally know what it really is, instead of Christianity, that makes us so special and provides us with a sound basis for racial cohesion! ”

    Adopting a Jewish mindset and groveling at the feet of a Jew doesn’t exactly favor White racial cohesion, Bub. In fact, it would not go too far to say that Christ-insanity is the primary cultural reason why Whites have no racial cohesion. This ought to be obvious to you and your fellow Jews-in-spirit, but mysteriously (?), you just can’t figure it out. Your flight from reality into Judaic Never-Never land has many unfortunate consequences, including intellectual enfeeblement, it appears.

  66. September 21, 2010 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Der weiße Engel obviously hates all White people who ever were, are, or ever will be Christians — which is the vast majority of Whites that historically comprised, currently comprise, or will in the future comprise Western Civilization. He then has the chutzpah to profess to be a White advocate!

    Der weiße Engel, given your hatred of White Christians and Western Civilization, and your love of Zionist personality types like Hitler, wouldn’t you be more comfortable living in Israel? Or is that where you’re writing from?

  67. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 21, 2010 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

    “The Jews hate Christianity because they hate just about everything,…”

    Could this by any chance be an overly broad statement?

    The way most of us heard it, Jews love what is good for the Jews, and hate what is bad for the Jews. The fact that they hate Christianity therefore means that it’s bad for the Jews, which, in the obvious context of linear competition between Jews and Whites in a 0-sum contest for resources, means that it’s good for Whites.

    That’s simple math, by the way. (Strange, isn’t it, how some people don’t seem to know any of that, yet give themselves all sorts of credit for top-notch critical thinking? But then again, what kind of world would it be if everything had a rational explanation.)

    “…and especially everything that happens to be, by whatever accident of history, White.”

    This sounds a bit like the Jewish (Jared Diamond) theory of White achievement we were talking about not too long ago: that Western Civilization is all quite accidental and of no real credit to White people. I mean, if “everything White” is due to some “accident of history”, then that really makes us kind of accidental ourselves, doesn’t it?

    But let’s look on the bright side. Now we finally know what it really is, instead of Christianity, that makes us so special and provides us with a sound basis for racial cohesion!

    Thank heaven for genius.

    “whatever collectivism it fosters is specifically, explicitly, and intensely ANTI-racist…”

    If it’s “specific”, “intense”, and “explicit”, then perhaps some fantastically smart (just ask him) little “Bible expert” who sees Christianity’s every flaw can spare a few supporting quotes for all of those poor White Christian slobs, and let’s not forget all those real and aspiring White porno-sluts, who are simply too stupid to see things clearly!

    Unless, of course, there’s nobody fitting that lofty description in our poor, miserable, and above all, unworthy little forum here … :-(

  68. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 21, 2010 - 2:33 pm | Permalink

    Chris Moore: “Christians have to rely on persuasion and gaining hearts and minds.”

    Ah yes, calm and loving persuasion. That must have been what the Crusades were all about, and the Thirty Years’ War, and the burning at the stake of heretics like Giordano Bruno. That must have been what all the suppression of heresies was about, and White-on-White genocides like the Albigensian Crusade. That must have been what the outlawing and plundering of the pagan temples and destruction of the ancient libraries were about.

    No wonder you live in a fantasy world and like to make stuff up about Hitler. Your Jewish mindset is obvious.

  69. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 21, 2010 - 1:56 pm | Permalink

    me: “I notice you STILL can’t answer the quesiton, which amuses me more each time you try to divert the subject.”

    That’s funny, because what I notice is that you are still too stupid to understand that I already HAVE answered your question. No doubt your immutable stupidity will never change, but I’ll rephrase my reply just because the point deserves emphasis and others may yet get something out of it. “Why do the Jews hate Christianity?” he asks. The Jews hate Christianity because they hate just about everything, and especially everything that happens to be, by whatever accident of history, White. For example, the Jews hate the Boy Scouts, the Jews hate Red State America, and the Jews hate corporate America. They hate the dead White men who created Western civilization. They hate the military, especially the Whiter elements like the Marine Corps, the Special Forces, and the general staff. Wherever and under whatever auspices White people are to be found congregating, the Jews will hate that thing, just as they used to hate classical civilization, until they destroyed it by subverting it from within by the Trojan horse of your stupid Christianity. However, the smoldering ruins of the Empire were still White, so they continued to hate what was left. Your takeaway point: The Jews HATE, and they especially hate White people. That’s what they DO. But does it follow that belief in the lunatic doctrines of Christianity is good for Whites because the Jews hate it? No, not at all. In fact, it is very BAD for Whites, first and foremost because it causes them to replace reliance on reason and their own autonomy with faith and a slave-like, childish, unquestioning devotion to an inherently meaningless collection of Jewish fairy tales, leaving them vulnerable to whatever mountebank or charlatan may chance by to exploit them; a flock perpetually ready to be sheared. Also, whatever collectivism it fosters is specifically, explicitly, and intensely ANTI-racist, as you would readily perceive were you not such a dolt.

    Now, enough excuses. I urge you to reject the cowardly and obviously specious reasoning of Aquinas and Augustine. Prove that you are not a hypocrite, and you really do believe in a life after this one. Kindly go and hang yourself and join your beloved Jesus, your Jewish master. And take the Bubble Biter with you.

  70. torgrim's Gravatar torgrim
    September 21, 2010 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Geiseric, Good list of contributors from Scandinavia. Someone that should be added, Norman Borlaug, Norwegian/American, he should be remembered as someone that has made a contribution to humankind.

    en.Wikipedia.org/Norman_Borlaug

    Also, to all the Scandinavian and German pioneers in America that used their heads and hands as in a “Concert of the Land” that has made food so abundant for so many.

    And to say to Gryphon; Yes if I was Greek Orthodox, I would agree with you, that Hellenism and Greek Orthodoxy are the cornerstones of your culture and to some extent, western civilization. I will say that the Greek Orthodox Church protects the Greek people, and so helps the people to survive.

  71. September 21, 2010 - 7:17 am | Permalink

    Der weiße: “If Hitler is Jewish, then that means that the Jews bear ultimate responsibility for the Holocaust, and also can be given all the blame for starting the Second World War, right?”

    I’ve always said, from statist authoritarian Zionist personality types on the Right to statist authoritarian Bolsheviks personality types on the Left, these warmongering Jews are trouble — in part because they don’t proselytize due to their racism, and so they inevitably turn to the State to do their bidding through coercion, whereas Christians have to rely on persuasion and gaining hearts and minds.

    Everywhere they go, war seems to follow, so there’s no question the Judeofascists of both statist Right and Left spell trouble and doom for the societies that tolerate them, but so does tolerance for their Gentile admirers, emulators and partners. Western Civilization can never bloom again with greedy, envious and morally stunted back biters, back stabbers and treacherous malcontents perpetually plotting her destruction and putting their infantile ambitions and personal desires ahead of the organic whole. This is the real reason the West is in decline.

    Purging the Judeofascists and their collaborators (both material and spiritual collaborators) is the only possible way to return the health of the Civilization; indeed, the only way it can possibly survive.

  72. gryphon's Gravatar gryphon
    September 21, 2010 - 5:48 am | Permalink

    I’m from Greece a Christian Orthodox country.I agree with Kevin MacDonald. “enosigaios” is arrogant. Neopagans are worse than leftists or liberals.Christianity and Hellenic/Roman civilization are the cornerstones of Western civilization. They are complimentary.As you say “if Christianity is so bad then why the Jews hate it so much”.For me the problem with Christianity in USA is that you have all those false teachings based on Old Testament.I mean here in Greece or in any other european country (except England) orthodox or catholic if someone says “The Bible said that the Jews are God’s chosen people ” people will laughing at him.They’ll think that his is stupid.

  73. me's Gravatar me
    September 21, 2010 - 4:37 am | Permalink

    No, hypocrite, you don’t get off so easily. As Schopenhauer says in his essay on this topic, there is not a single word in the Bible against suicide
    - once again you show no understanding about the subject- Aquanas is very clear about -as is Augustine then again having never read either (cornerstones of western philosophy and morality) and spending most of your time hating western civilization as much as any multicultural hostile Jewish elite – I am not surprised.

    The bible is but one ‘authority’ – if it said everything we needed we wouldn’t have need for luther, aquainas, etc – it is this rich tradition of discourse and clarification that pagans and Dawkins type atheists want to jettison whole. In the CoE we call it a three legged stool of scripture, reason and tradition.

    I notice you STILL can’t answer the quesiton, which amuses me more each time you try to divert the subject.

  74. The Amazing Gregory's Gravatar The Amazing Gregory
    September 21, 2010 - 3:21 am | Permalink

    Here are the pictures I referenced:

    http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/7228/20100921125643.png
    http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/6389/20100921125944.png

    For some reason they didn’t appear in the first post.

    Perhaps the site admin could make it easier for posters to embed pictures in their replies in the future …

  75. The Amazing Gregory's Gravatar The Amazing Gregory
    September 21, 2010 - 3:19 am | Permalink

    Regarding Scandinavian contributions to European civilization:

    I think the author that did the best job of assessing what peoples contributed the most in building up European civilization is Charles Murray in Human Accomplishment (2003).

    Here’s a list of European countries by the number of significant figures that have contributed to the arts and sciences:

    So even though there has been a significant number of Scandinavians that have made contributions to the advancement of Europe, it is dwarfed by the number of those originating in the stronghold of Britain, France, Germany and Italy.

    Also, there likely have been no contributions significant enough to have halted European progress for more than a few years or decades, had they not have been made by Scandinavians.

    But as others have pointed out, we have to keep in mind that Scandinavia has always had relatively few inhabitants compared to the rest of Europe.
    And, with the exception of a relatively small number of regions, most of Europe has not produced significant figures that have contributed much to the advancement of its own civilization.

  76. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    September 21, 2010 - 1:17 am | Permalink

    “What have Scandinavians given to Western Civilisation? How many great artists, composers, architects,scientists etc. have they produced in comparison with Spain, France, Germany,Italy,Britain or even tiny Holland?”

    Tricky question. One would have to take into consideration that Scandinavia has been very scarcely populated compared to continental Europe over the last 800 – 1000 years. A few names of possible interest: Edvard Grieg, Edvard Munch, Sibelius, Alfred Nobel, Henrik Ibsen, Knut Hamsun, August Strindberg, Anders Celsius, Kierkegaard, Tycho Brahe, Ole Romer, Leif Eriksson, most of the Western European dynasties in recorded, post-Roman history, George Washington (of Scandinavian descent), among many, many others.

    “The Vikings and Germanic tribes were illiterate untill taught to read and write by the Catholic Church.”

    Not quite. The Runic alphabet has been around at least since the 2nd century AD, and is probably much older than Christianity.

  77. torgrim's Gravatar torgrim
    September 20, 2010 - 10:50 pm | Permalink

    Isolde said, “It is difficult even trying to communicate with people who’s knowledge of history is so abysmal and their prejudices against Christianity so strong.”

    Yes, it is difficult communicating with people that accept what the Church has passed for history for a thousand years and prejudice against the Germanic peoples.

  78. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 20, 2010 - 10:29 pm | Permalink

    “Um, yeah, the opinions of our two arrogant forum fatheads clearly outweigh those of pea-brains like Nietzsche, Oliver, and Dawkins.”

    Obviously, repeated name-calling and argument from authority do not add up to a dialectical gold standard. Intelligent people are too apt to recognize and dismiss them as at irrelevant at best, and misleading and sophistical at worst. This is especially likely where the authorities being cited are notorious madmen or ax-grinding hacks, as happens to be the case with at least some of these gentlemen.

    Even if these people were the “intellectual giants” they’re cracked up to be – fit to stand with the likes of Plato and Aristotle, Galileo and Newton, Shakespeare and Goethe, Euler and Maxwell, Jefferson and Franklin, et cetera, which they clearly are not – intellectual gigantism is not to be confused with intellectual infallibility. That’s not how things usually work “out in the field”, so to speak.

    For these reasons, this kind of discussion is generally best confined to constructive argumentation, i.e., point-by-point justification or refutation of some definite hypothesis, principle, or theory … unless, of course, one is fearful of being caught in silly mistakes and exposed yet again as a blowhard or unregenerate dummy.

    In that unfortunate position, I suppose it’s the only choice one has.

  79. torgrim's Gravatar torgrim
    September 20, 2010 - 9:00 pm | Permalink

    @Isolde,

    Unlike you I am not going to denigrate a whole people due your lack of knowledge. Why don’t you read the two books that I recommended and come back later, after you have taken a two aspirin and digested the information. As to your cheap shot about “what have the Scandinavians ever done, asp” you need to do some research. Do you even understand the massive differences in populations between Scandinavia and Europe?

  80. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 20, 2010 - 7:32 pm | Permalink

    @ Chris Moore

    Sure, why let the facts stop you from believing nonsense? Actually, I am rather fond of the idea of Hitler’s supposed Jewishness. If Hitler is Jewish, then that means that the Jews bear ultimate responsibility for the Holocaust, and also can be given all the blame for starting the Second World War, right? So any Jew who believes this is sawing off the branch on which he is sitting.

    @ Jane Sampson

    Heh! Good one.

    @ me

    No, hypocrite, you don’t get off so easily. As Schopenhauer says in his essay on this topic, there is not a single word in the Bible against suicide.

    As far as I know, none but the votaries of monotheistic, that is to say, Jewish religions, look upon suicide as a crime. This is all the more striking, inasmuch as neither in the Old or in the New Testament is there to be found any prohibition or positive disapproval of it; so that religious teachers are forced to base their condemnation of suicide on philosophical grounds of their own invention. These are so very bad that writers of this kind endeavor to make up for the weakness of their arguments by the strong terms in which they express their abhorrence of the practice; in other words, they declaim against it. They tell us that suicide is the greatest piece of cowardice; that only a madman could be guilty of it, and other insipidities of the same kind; or else they make the nonsensical remark that suicide is wrong, when it is quite obvious that there is nothing in the world to which every man has a more unassailable title than to his own life and person. …

    The rest is here:

    http://hackvan.com/pub/stig/life/Schopenhauer_On_Suicide.html

  81. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

    Whites should love Christianity because the Jews hate it. No, I’m not kiddingNo, I’m not kidding, that’s really the best reason they can come up with!
    That’s the best answer you can ‘come up with’ – its really not an answer. And no, you’re lying that’s not what we have said – we asked you, in your own words to explain WHY they and the left hate it so much.

  82. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 7:00 pm | Permalink

    and if they took their own blather about God seriously, these two nitwits would kill themselves.
    Even in “jest” you show your ignorance of Christian theology. Taking one’s one live is one of supreme sins against God. (incidentally so is infanticide, which was common in pagan europe) You know remarkably little about a religion you purport to hate so much.

    I have asked you in earnest to truly seek to understand what is is undeniably one of the core building blocks of western civilization before you go advocating its distruction, Of course my advice will go unheeded, just like my question to you will go unanswered.

    Why do jews and left hate Christianity so much – why are they trying to marginalize and destroy it?

  83. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

    still can’t answer the question Der weiße Engel - so you have to resort to strawmen and picking out grammatical errors (which are really typos but you knew that – you’re just desperate)

    Dawkins
    Dawkins is indeed an idiot and a fool. He has been widely criticized by historians and poltiical scientists alike for showing a complete lack of understanding of geo-political conflict, and blindly applying his ‘religion is the cause of all evil’ theory to conflicts where it is obviously not (northern ireland, indo-pakistan, israel-palesitne to name a few). I am therefore, not surprised you admire and follow him.

  84. Jane Sampson's Gravatar Jane Sampson
    September 20, 2010 - 6:37 pm | Permalink

    And the libertarianism you worship comes from?

  85. September 20, 2010 - 6:27 pm | Permalink

    When one looks at Hitler’s racial rage syndrome, his towering egocentricity, his anal-retentive, control freak issues, his penchant for ethnic cleansing, and his fanatical obsession with bloodlines, the man oozes “Zionist personality type” through his pores. This isn’t to say his anger was totally unjustified, or that the man wasn’t formidable, but clearly his Jewish side came out under stress.

    History shows the German people deserved better than Hitler. Of course neo-Nazis who are either crypto Jews or who don’t want to believe they worship a Jew, will disagree.

  86. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 20, 2010 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Um, yeah, the opinions of our two arrogant forum fatheads clearly outweigh those of pea-brains like Nietzsche, Oliver, and Dawkins.

    And just see what clear thinking these two mental giants offer us! What pristine, sparkling, pellucid logic: Whites should love Christianity because the Jews hate it. No, I’m not kidding, that’s really the best reason they can come up with! Pathetic! Maybe Whites should try to infect themselves with rabies, because no doubt the Jews hate rabies. Or maybe they should just get it over with and kill themselves now, because the Jews hate and fear death, so that must mean it’s a really good thing for them; yes, very healthy. But wait! Come to think of it, the promise of a better life after death actually is Christian doctrine, and if they took their own blather about God seriously, these two nitwits would kill themselves, because then they could go and be an eternal annoyance to him instead of us. Sadly, it turns out they are hypocrites in that area, too.

  87. Isolde's Gravatar Isolde
    September 20, 2010 - 5:49 pm | Permalink

    What have Scandinavians given to Western Civilisation?
    How many great artists, composers, architects,scientists etc. have they produced in comparison with Spain, France, Germany,Italy,Britain or even tiny Holland?
    Please, the Catholic Church didn’t go to ‘war” with the Anglo-Saxons or Vikings. It is difficult even trying to communicate with people whose knowledge of history is so abysmal and their prejudices against Christianity so strong. The Vikings and Germanic tribes were illiterate untill taught to read and write by the Catholic Church.

  88. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 20, 2010 - 3:44 pm | Permalink

    me: “If Christianity is so ‘bad’ and so ‘Jewish” why do the jews hate so much? Why is the left – who are obviously trying to bring down Western civilization -trying to marginalize and destroy it?”

    Excellent point, me. The Jews hate Christianity because, having been kept together for thousands of years by a strong monotheistic religion, they understand its sheer cohesive power. They want no one to have this power but themselves.

    Anyone who maintains that atheism, materialism, paganism, or nihilism has this kind of sustainable cohesive potential either knows nothing at all about history, philosophy, or psychology, or is an enemy of White racial cohesion. This is so obvious that it bears no real argument.

    It’s nice to see that this forum has not yet been completely corrupted by its worst element. Keep up the clear thinking, and don’t let a mere pea-brain or two get you down.

  89. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 20, 2010 - 3:42 pm | Permalink
  90. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 20, 2010 - 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Chris Moore: “Maybe it was [Hitler's] Jewish blood at the root of this egocentricity.”

    There is no credible evidence Hitler had any Jewish blood. If you are alluding to the recent sensationalist story in the Jewish press purporting to reveal genetic proof his Jewishness, please see here and here for clarification.

  91. torgrim's Gravatar torgrim
    September 20, 2010 - 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Isolde, said and Chris Moore agrees;

    “Western Civilization was based on Catholicism, Roman Law and Greek Philosophy.”

    I do not think that this thread is following the issue about Barbara Spectre and her most revealing speech, so I have up to now stayed silent about Christianity and It’s relevance to the survivability of Europeans.

    However, with the last statement by Isolde I need to say that a little education is in order. If interested in history please read, “The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity”, by James Russell PhD. It is a good source of just how much the older culture of Europe influenced Christianity and how it morphed a hostile cult from the middle east into something quite different from other religions of the ME.

    Also, the philosophy of the Greeks did not originate from Christianity, it was from Greek thought based on their Elder Religion.

    As to the idea that the Germanics, ie. Anglo Saxons, Vikings, etc., had no civilization and all law flows from the Roman Law Code, is just wrong, to put it mildly. The winners write history. The Church won a long protracted war in western and northern Europe, centuries long. One of the reasons that there is such a dearth of knowledge is that books were burned, Elders,leaders of the ancient religion were killed. Some of this knowledge survived, because it was at an outpost of Europe, Iceland. From there the old Germanic laws were recorded and if again, if interested check out the book by Professor Laurence M. Larson, “The Earliest Norwegian Laws”, Columbia Univ. Press, 1935. A translation from two extinct languages, Latin to Old Norwegian and finally in 1935, to English. This rather rare work, tells exactly what the so called lawless “barbarians” had for laws. From there comes the Anglo-Saxon common law, which Jefferson has written,.. comes American common law. Roman law brought with it feudalism, the plantation, and Divine Right of kings. This is eastern thought put in law.

    Germanic law was more in the tradition of republican rule, the assembly and basic rights of free men, private property, and inheritance.

    As to the the Scandinavians not losing life and property in WWII, tell that to the Norwegians, especially after Churchill parachuted troops, under supplied with winter clothing, etc. into Norway, forcing a confrontation. Most of the towns on the entire coast of Norway were shelled into rubble and smoking debris, except for Bergen, an old German, Norwegian trading town.

    I don’t know what the “wussy” remarks have to do with Scandinavians must be something personal….in the mind of the writer, like lack of experience with Scandinavians, but then again, there are not that many to meet, as we make up a small part of the earths population.

  92. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 20, 2010 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    “How have i displayed arrogance?”

    An imbecile who is incapable of writing even a short post to this forum without a dozen grammatical errors and spelling mistakes wonders why it is arrogant for him to dismiss Oxford professor Dawkins’, U of Chicago professor Oliver’s, and U of Basel professor Friedrich Nietzsche’s opinions of Christianity as “blatant ignorance”? That’s rich.

    I’d explain it to you, but I’m sure it would go right over your head, along with everything else I just said.

  93. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t it time to stop worshipping Jews?
    isn’t it time to stop repeating the same nonsense over and over?

    and instead of posting this nonsense, how about answering the question:

    If Christianity is so ‘bad’ and so ‘Jewish” why do the jews hate so much? Why is the left – who are obviously trying to bring down Western civilization -trying to marginalize and destroy it? “

  94. mark's Gravatar mark
    September 20, 2010 - 1:26 pm | Permalink

    Luke 2:21
    “And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.”

    Jesus was circumcised on the eighth day as was/is Hebrew custom.

    Luke 2:27
    “And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law.”

    That’s Hebrew law they’re talking about.

    Luke 2:32 (referring to Jesus)
    “A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.”

    Isn’t it time to stop worshipping Jews?

  95. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 1:06 pm | Permalink

    “giant” would not be describe Nietzsche’s view/analysis of western civilization and Christianity – smart people can believe and do stupid things.
    mad from brain cancer, mad from syphilis, doesn’t matter, its still madness.

  96. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    September 20, 2010 - 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Getting brain cancer is not a good sign. Cancer goes to your weakest body part.

  97. September 20, 2010 - 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Nietzsche mad with syphilis?

    As I have pointed out before, the story of the STD insanity of Nazi-inspiring Freddy was a typical Frankfurt School character assassination, and has since been proven false. Even if it boosts their arguments, TOO readers can do better than to unthinkingly regurgitate unfounded jewish slanders against Western intellectual giants.

    Nietzsche ‘died of brain cancer’
    May 6 2003

    Friedrich Nietzsche … ideas adopted by Nazis.

    Friedrich Nietzsche, the philosopher thought to have died of syphilis, was the victim of a posthumous smear campaign by anti-Nazis, new research shows.

    A study of medical records has found that, far from suffering a sexually transmitted disease that drove him mad, Nietzsche almost certainly died of brain cancer.

    The doctor who carried out the study claims that the universally accepted story of Nietzsche having caught syphilis from prostitutes was concocted after World War II by Wilhelm Lange-Eichbaum, an academic who was one of Nietzsche’s most vociferous critics. It was then adopted as fact by intellectuals who were keen to demolish the reputation of Nietzsche, whose idea of a “superman” was used to underpin Nazism.

    The Telegraph, London

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/3313279/Madness-of-Nietzsche-was-cancer-not-syphilis.html

  98. September 20, 2010 - 11:10 am | Permalink

    Isolde: “Western Civilisation was based on Catholicism, Roman Law and Greek Philosophy.”

    That’s my view too, more or less. But when the Church became hopelessly corrupt, Luther came along and those who couldn’t stomach the corruption split away, which was good for them, and ultimately good for the Catholics and Western Civilization.

    Christianity is very conducive to rejecting, splitting away from, and separating itself from corruption that takes on a air of evil; in fact, that may be the defining characteristic of the religion, as that is exactly the process that Jesus went through, (and the process that America is going through in fits and starts right now via the Tea Party movement).

    I certainly can understand why White nationalists would think that Christianity is itself corrupting in the context of Judaized Christian Zionists like George W. Bush, John Hagee, and factions of the evangelicals, though. But these formulated their view of Christianity around their highest priority, which is American materialism, and they molded their Christianity to fit their greed instead of subordinating their greed to Christianity, which is why they are so sympathetic to their fellow money-worshippers, the Jews, and so vulnerable to succumbing to evil.

    As I see it, the problem with White nationalists is that like Hitler, they prefer culture to civilization, and go about picking fights with civilization-advocates who don’t. Like Hitler, they end up making too many enemies to overcome, and allow the mythical “perfect” to become the enemy of the good. This might be perfectly acceptable in times when there is not a hostile, Jewish and Judaized elite in ascent that is arraying all kinds of forces and coalitions against Western Civilization, but like the various factions in the early Soviet Union that fell to the Bolshevik juggernaut, these atomized White nationalists put their stubborn insularity, contrarianism and culture of defiance ahead of the survival of the very Civilization in which they evolved. Hitler should have formed an alliance with the West when it became clear Bolshevism was threatening the world. Instead, he let his egocentricity run away with itself, and tragedy followed. Maybe it was his Jewish blood at the root of this egocentricity.

    Remember, we are all in agreement that the Judeofascists and their corrupt collaborators are the biggest threat to the survival of Whites, Christianity, the West, sovereignty, and the concept of any kind of worthwhile existence as free men. They are enslavers.

    In my view, these factions of Whites need to stop picking fights with anti-Jewish Christians by pissing all over Christianity, and concentrate on the main enemy — the corrupt Jews and their collaborators, because all their self-righteous White principles won’t do them much good when we’re all in chains.

  99. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 8:19 am | Permalink

    Such titanic arrogance!
    How have i displayed arrogance? I don’t suffer fools, I will grant you that, but all I have done is bring up simple facts – by the way, I sincerely doubt you’re read and understand Nietzsche – probably just some third hand rubbish from a “neo nazi’ (and for once we can use this term literally) manual. I would suggest you read Aquinas- I know this is probably beyond your intellectual capacity- I don’t say this as an insult but a simple assessment of your cognitive abilities. You have demonstrated that you have little or no real knowledge of western history.

    At the very least, and I realize this advice will go unheeded – before you so roundly condemn the basic structure and building blocks of western civilization that first seek to understand them a little more..

  100. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 8:11 am | Permalink

    without a jew god,
    keep repeating the same ignorant nonsense “desert God, blah blah blah.” and you’ll confirm you’re both a fool and malicious. We bring up irrefutable points you keep repeating the same nonsense – yet you claim to led by reason? Well, actually its pretty typical – one who rejects religion turns science or ‘reason’ into a quasi religion and usually ends up being neither scientific, reasonable or religious -but wildly irrational – French revolution is a classic example, the Richard Dawkins crowd is another.

    The crutch of religion is for the weak
    one more, stupfiying ignorance – Cromwell was weak? Luther? The Knights of Malta? Are neopagans really this ignorant.. oh let’s see:

    PS. even if jesus condemned the jews he was still a rabbi.
    Rabbi is just a word for teacher – is not mean pharisee high temple priest. So I guess teachers are now a ‘jew desert’ thing, eh?

    I’m saying faith definitely isn’t a White value.
    Case closed -any sensible person who reads the nonsense of neo-pagans realize they just as destructive to the west as the multiculti crowd.

  101. Isolde's Gravatar Isolde
    September 20, 2010 - 6:18 am | Permalink

    The only country that succesfully managed to reclaim its land from Muslims,expel jews and defeat jewish bolsheviks was conservative Catholic Spain.
    Jews don’t fear Protestants ( judaised Christianity) or Hindus or Budhists. They detest the Catholic Church because it is (at least until Vatican 2) the only institution that can combat them.
    Hinduism, Budhism, Taoism did not create civilisations comparable to that of Western Europe.
    Until the 50′s everyone knew that Western Civilisation was superior to any other. Western Civilisation was based on Catholicism, Roman Law and Greek Philosophy. Who transmitted the thoughts of the Greeks and Romans when Europe was overrun by illiterate, pagan barbarians ? Why the monks who painstakingly copied the writings of Greeks and Romans by hand for centuries. Who educated the pagan barbarians, founded the first schools, hospitals and universities? Why the Cathlic Church.
    Read “Civilisation” by Kenneth Clark or ” How the Catholic Church built Western Civilisation” By Thomas Woods.
    Look at the societies built by your pagan Vikings. They are the most wussified, pussified, feminised,politically correct societies in Europe. The Scandinavian countries did not partcipate in the World Wars so their male population were not decimated in battles. The ones that emigrated to the USA formed equally wussified societies eg. in Minnesota.

  102. enosigaios's Gravatar enosigaios
    September 20, 2010 - 4:10 am | Permalink

    @ me

    between fool and malicious (as you suggest) I will pick “mentally sane”, because my friend I am an antisemite without a jew god, this is contrary to you.

  103. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 20, 2010 - 2:00 am | Permalink

    me: “Nietzsche called [Christianity a Trojan horse], and he was perhaps the greatest scholar and writer on this subject.
    - and also crazy from syphilis. and like Dawkins, he didn’t bother to research or understand the subject he was so fond of attacking. ”

    Such titanic arrogance! That’s also a Jewish trait. Too bad neither you nor Bubble Biter can lay the slightest claim to either the intellectual resources or scholarship that could back such arrogance up.

    me: ““That means that Christianity is nothing but a rabbinic cult”
    and the ignorance and lack of understanding continues. once again you brush off (probably have never read, much less understood)10+ centures of western philosophy and theology, Aquanas et al (its not ‘fair’ for me to bring them up.”

    What is specifically Christian in those 10 centuries of Western philosophy is not good, and what is good is not Christian. And how does the Christian belief in Jesus coming back from the dead differ from the Lubavitcher belief that Rabbi Schneerson will come back from the dead? Both are equally ludicrous cults that subordinate the good of their members to the collective good of the cult. That’s why Christians would rather the White race perish than that the cult of Christianity be destroyed. They are loyal to their cult and its Jewish master, not their race. So their collectivism is only incidentally White, and totally useless as a tool for the preservation of race.

    me: “so we should replace a meaningful religion with a meaningless one. Great. ”

    The crutch of religion is for the weak. Before Christianity Whites didn’t need it, and it doesn’t need to be replaced with anything.

    me: “you are saying that Faith is not a European value?”

    I’m saying faith definitely isn’t a White value. It derives from the Jewish/Oriental mentality of slaves submitting to a master, and it isn’t consistent with the White spirit, the essence of which is freedom. Christian faith tames and corrupts Whites by cozening them to place their lives in the hands of a Jewish God, instead of retaining control of themselves. The ancients who relied on reason above all would have considered that both a mistake and a horrible misfortune.

  104. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 12:48 am | Permalink

    few really took the old gods seriously, and there really wasn’t any theology back then, only a collection of myths.
    so we should replace a meaningful religion with a meaningless one. Great.

    They had to abandon the individual autonomy of reason that exemplified them as a people up to that point and rely instead on faith
    oh yeah those ‘reason’ based utopias have worked out great – French Revolution, Bolsheviks, etc. and anti-christianity’s done wonders for the fabric of British society . Any other great ideas?

    you are saying that Faith is not a European value?

  105. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 12:37 am | Permalink

    “It’s quite clear that it is this kind of Christianity that Jews fear. ”
    Darren exactly – notice the ‘neo pagan’ just glosses right past it, and goes right back to his name calling ‘its a desert religion, rabbanic cult’ blah blah blah” ignorance and more ignorance.

  106. me's Gravatar me
    September 20, 2010 - 12:35 am | Permalink

    Nietzsche called it a that, and he was perhaps the greatest scholar and writer on this subject.
    - and also crazy from syphilis. and like Dawkins, he didn’t bother to research or understand the subject he was so fond of attacking.

    “That means that Christianity is nothing but a rabbinic cult”
    and the ignorance and lack of understanding continues. once again you brush off (probably have never read, much less understood)10+ centures of western philosophy and theology, Aquanas et al (its not ‘fair’ for me to bring them up.

    Well at least you admit you don’t really care for the west. >Thanks – like I said, i consider you guys as worse and enemy as the worst sort of leftist.

  107. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 19, 2010 - 9:00 pm | Permalink

    me: “enosigaios – you are anti-western – whether out of ignorance or malavence – you are anti -western- anyone who cannot or will not percieve that the very fabric of the west is christian – and to remove it would irrevocably destroy the west is either a fool or malicious.”

    You seem to be implying that the interests of the West and Whites are identical, yet Whites had a fine civilization long before the advent of Christianity, and the hope is that they will continue to exist long after Christianity is gone. If the choice is between the continued existence of the Jewified West and the survival of the White race, I unhestitatingly choose the latter. By contrast, I think Christians would rather see the White race die than Christianity lapse into desuetude.

    me: “New age, made up neopaganism is as destructive as the worse sort multiculturalism. You have theology, except what a few crackpots on the internet make up -it has no history nor reverence, no gravis. It is nonsense. You can say these are ad hominens but they are not, they are simply descdriptive – i can rattle off Luther, Aquinas , Augustine — and if youd like to call them fools or anti western , go ahead – pagans have never and will never produce a theolgoy even close – because it is not truth.”

    This is not really an apt comparison. At the height of the pre-Christian West, few really took the old gods seriously, and there really wasn’t any theology back then, only a collection of myths. The sort of earnest lunacy that is Christian theology had to wait until Whites had acquired the Jewish mindset of intolerance, sin, and a willingness to engage in endless, Talmud-style disputes about the esoteric meaning of “Scripture”. In other words, in order to become proper Christians, Whites had of necessity to become mentally Jewish. They had to abandon the individual autonomy of reason that exemplified them as a people up to that point and rely instead on faith, another Jewish characteristic. Also, as enosigaios correctly points out, Christ was a rabbi. That means that Christianity is nothing but a rabbinic cult. Any collectivism among Whites that evenuates through it is, therefore, thoroughly contaminated by a Jewish spirit. Such a collectivism can easily be turned in racially self-destructive directions. It is child’s play for Jews and their subalterns to manipulate.

    me: “To call Christianity a trojan horse is an insult and blatant ignorance of the history of the West.”

    Nietzsche called it a that, and he was perhaps the greatest scholar and writer on this subject. So did Revilo Oliver, another great writer and scholar. Who here would be arrogant enough to call these two men blatantly ignorant, except maybe you and the Bubble Biter? How about some of that much-vaunted-but-little-seen Christian humility?

  108. Darren's Gravatar Darren
    September 19, 2010 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

    In Separation And Its Discontents Dr. MacDonald discusses how Christianity formed the ideological foundation for a European collectivism against the Jews.

    It’s quite clear that it is this kind of Christianity that Jews fear. It is hard to tell how much of this kind of Christianity remains or can be resurrected. Much of Christianity today has become very supportive of Jewish interests.

  109. me's Gravatar me
    September 19, 2010 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

    Here is question neopagans can never answer:

    If Christianity is so bad – why do the jews hate is so much – if Christianity is so bad why is the left trying to marginalize “

    Look at the Jewish reaction to the Passion – have you ever seen anything so hateful and furious? Ask yourself, what are the really afraid of?

    Those are questions neo-pagans just gloss over because it clashes with their silly ‘theory’ that Christainity weakens the west… any of you idiots ever read about the Knights of Malta?

  110. me's Gravatar me
    September 19, 2010 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    enosigaios – you are anti-western – whether out of ignorance or malavence – you are anti -western- anyone who cannot or will not percieve that the very fabric of the west is christian – and to remove it would irrevocably destroy the west is either a fool or malicious. Take you pick.

    New age, made up neopaganism is as destructive as the worse sort multiculturalism. You have theology, except what a few crackpots on the internet make up -it has no history nor reverence, no gravis. It is nonsense. You can say these are ad hominens but they are not, they are simply descdriptive – i can rattle off Luther, Aquinas , Augustine — and if youd like to call them fools or anti western , go ahead – pagans have never and will never produce a theolgoy even close – because it is not truth.

    To call Christianity a trojan horse is an insult and blatant ignorance of the history of the West.

    You guys (neopagans) are worse than the most left leaning liberal – as you would destroy the west from within – like a trojan horse.

  111. enosigaios's Gravatar enosigaios
    September 19, 2010 - 4:36 pm | Permalink

    @ Chris Moore

    You can have jesus as a “wise” person in history if you like but it is outrageous to worship him his father his mother and all of his pupils (all jews) as your gods, it is just crazy.
    I am european and Europe has no shortage of native gods. Infinitely more important and beautiful (you can never beat Minerva).
    It is unfair to a nation to be forced to worship an alien god, it makes the nation sick.
    Christianity is a sect of the judaic religion. Everybody in it is an ethnic jew.
    This is where it all began, when emperor Constantin gave official status to the christian faith inside the Roman Empire; it was a fatal mistake.
    Before that no one had ever heard of the jews. They knew the phoenicians but not the jews.
    This action of the emperor gave this tribe an eternal stronghold inside the mind of the west.
    It is not their fault, it was an error of the Romans.

    It is all a mind game the jews have learnt to play since then.
    They know that we are owned by them. OUR GOD IS A JEW – HE IS ONE OF THEIR OWN. How more indignantt can we be?
    Christianity is a trojan horse, yes – by mistake, but a trojan horse non the less.
    Go back to your native beliefs and the jew will get what he always deserved: OBLIVION.

    “….Which of them has proved victorious for the time being, Rome or Judea? Surely there’s not the slightest doubt. Just think of who it is that people bow down to today in Rome itself, as the personification of all the highest values—and not only in Rome, but in almost half the earth, all the places where people have become merely tame or want to become tame—in front of three Jews, as we know, and one Jewess (in front of Jesus of Nazareth, the fisherman Peter, the carpet maker Paul, and the mother of the first-mentioned Jesus, named Mary). This is very remarkable: without doubt Rome has been conquered. …”

    Friedrich Nietzsche

    PS. even if jesus condemned the jews he was still a rabbi.

  112. Jane Sampson's Gravatar Jane Sampson
    September 19, 2010 - 4:17 pm | Permalink
  113. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    September 19, 2010 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

    @Ionut: Study the Chinese. They and the Jews are almost exactly alike, but the Chinese really are as “numberless as the stars in heaven” and they really are as old as the sands of time. The Jews, despite all their claims, are neither.

    There is no way to prove what will occur at this point, so we shall have to watch and see how history plays out. I expect the Chinese will eat the Jews for dinner, make sweet and sour pork out of them.

    As to their vaunted “power of persuasion” the Chinese can be easily as duplicitous as the Jews and suffer from no guilt about the “holocaust.”

  114. Ionut's Gravatar Ionut
    September 19, 2010 - 2:33 pm | Permalink

    @ Felix

    Why do people underestimate the Jews’ power of persuasion so often?

    You say that Jews will fail in winning Chinese sympathy because many more Chinese died in Mao’s Great Leap Forward.
    I’d enjoy seeing this, but don’t believe it will play out like that.

    I’d like to remind you that during WWII between 50 and 70 million Europeans died, yet whenever the topic of that war is brought up, most westerners will automatically think of the Holocaust, and very often not give a second thought about the casualties the European peoples suffered.

    Believe me, the Jews will have no trouble convincing the Chinese that body counts are not important.

  115. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    September 19, 2010 - 1:43 pm | Permalink

    Geiseric: “So why are there Holocaust centers in Denmark? Obviously because we’re all (Germanic) goys. Who cares if Eichmann had a German passport?”

    There’s no business like Shoah business.

    The endless whining about the Holocaust, as if no one else ever suffered, would be intolerable were it not for the happy realization that all this narcissistic self-pity is creating a lot of justified resentment and disgust as blowback, for now, and will ultimately result in further chosenite alienation from the rest of humanity.

    (I just read that over 50,000,000 Chinese died during “The Great Leap Forward” alone. No matter how hard the chosenites try, the Chinese simpy aren’t going to give a sh_t about the deaths of a mere 6,000,000.)

  116. Darren's Gravatar Darren
    September 19, 2010 - 12:20 pm | Permalink

    Here is a page on Jewish domination of the Swedish media:

    http://www.mosaisk.com/Torben-Lund/Bonnier-Hjorne-Klein-Jewish-Media-Scandinavia.php

  117. mark's Gravatar mark
    September 19, 2010 - 10:48 am | Permalink

    KM said:

    “So far, that’s the big stumbling block: The topic of Jewish influence is not open for public discussion.”

    Perhaps Thilo Sarrazin or one of his colleagues will be getting around to that shortly.

  118. Johnny's Gravatar Johnny
    September 19, 2010 - 9:57 am | Permalink

    Chris Moore says: September 18, 2010 at 8:00 AM

    “…but can someone please explain to me why there is such hostility towards Christianity in certain White consciousness circles?”

    I am Swedish, and we (Vikings) had our own religion (Asa Gods) that was later replaced with Christianity by early monarchy. Christianity was enforced upon the people, the priest where controlling the population and held the people in fear of God, priest came home to your house and controlled your knowledge about the bibel.

    The long blody wars between Catholics and Protestants also created the understanding that religion was madness and only lead to war, very common understand among Swedish people today.

    When science revealed nature’s mystery more and more, people became less religious and even started to curse religion; all our swearwords in Sweden are a curse against Christianity like Fan, Devil, Hell– not sex words ike the F-word so common in the USA l.

    People who emigrated to USA (25% of the Swedish people did) were free to have or not have their religion; they were not forced to be religious.

    That is my understanding why Christianity is much more popular in USA then in Europe and especially north Europe.

    Very interesting conversation. In Sweden multiculturalism was promoted by the polish Jew David Schwartz in 1964 and made into law in 1975, and today we have severe problems with unemployment, welfare costs and crimes among Turk, Arab, African immigrants. We now have the second highest rape statistic per capita, after Lesotho in South Africa, twice as high as USA.

  119. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    September 19, 2010 - 1:24 am | Permalink

    @Torgrim: You’re right, we need a MacDonaldian analysis of post-war Sweden. The Danes also helped the Jews during WW2. So why are there Holocaust centers in Denmark? Obviously because we’re all (Germanic) goys. Who cares if Eichmann had a German passport?

    • admin's Gravatar admin
      September 19, 2010 - 9:13 am | Permalink

      I would love to see more analyses of European countries. I did a little in the chapter on immigration, but it was just scratching the surface. Ms. Spectre’s comments indicate that Europeans, and certainly European elites, are aware of Jewish promotion of multiculturalism. But it should be publicized and openly discussed. So far, that’s the big stumbling block: The topic of Jewish influence is not open for public discussion.

  120. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 18, 2010 - 11:53 pm | Permalink

    @ Murphy

    If you’d like to be escorted somewhere with this revolting little dimwit, form a comedy team with him, or be his “brother”, knock yourself out. But if it’s all the same to you, I prefer to keep a bit more distance.

  121. Murphy's Gravatar Murphy
    September 18, 2010 - 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Can security escort the Marx Brothers comedy troupe out of here, please?

  122. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 18, 2010 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

    @ Bubble Biter

    ROTFLMAO. Porn links?? I’m sure you spank your teensy micropenis to a lot of porn, especially tranny porn, you cheeky little monkey you, but I never posted anything of the kind. That’s pure invention on your part. I’d call it a lie, but it’s only a lie if the person making the statement can distinguish truth from falsehood, and I suspect you can’t. You’ve begun hallucinating, overdosed on your own jenkem.

    Logorrhea, delusions of grandeur, elaborate fantasies of persecution, projection of all your own inadequacies onto others … you’ve got it all, Bub. Congratulations, you’ve now lost contact with reality entirely! You are a TRUE religious nut.

  123. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 18, 2010 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

    @Der Weisse Engel

    No problem, dweeberella. I knew you wouldn’t read it, if only because it’s way over your empty grapefruit-sized head. (Don’t feel guilty – I don’t click on most of your porn links even though they’re the smartest things you’ve ever posted here.)

    I just wanted to clear things up for your “anti-fan club”…you know, the people you’re always trying to fool into thinking that you know your ass from a hole in the ground, when the reality is that you couldn’t find it on a gps-equipped toilet seat while engaging in passionate coitus with a bovine proctoscope.

    In fact, I felt so bad about you missing your ass that out of sheer compassion, I tore it off and handed it to you. (You didn’t feel it, of course, so no biggie.) The important thing is that now everybody has some closure, and you’re free to scamper on back to Porno Land and browse all the free Jewish smut you can shake your scabby little stick at.

    Have fun.

  124. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 18, 2010 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    @ eurotwerp

    I hope nobody wasted their time reading all that twerpy twaddle. I sure didn’t.

    twerp   n. Slang.
    someone who farts in the bathtub and then bites the bubbles.

    More words count for less, Bubble Biter.

  125. September 18, 2010 - 3:58 pm | Permalink

    Hard to believe that Sweden has been more brainwashed than White’s in the U.S.

    I viewed a video of a White Swedish man of 18 being beaten by three or more savage invaders and two Swedish men around 35 walked by with briefcase’s and did not say a word.

  126. Akimgu's Gravatar Akimgu
    September 18, 2010 - 1:45 pm | Permalink

    Of COURSE the two-faced jews want diversity: for everyone but the JEWS! The smartest thing to come out of Spectres mouth was her fathers schmekel.

  127. torgrim's Gravatar torgrim
    September 18, 2010 - 1:39 pm | Permalink

    @Geiseric,

    Well that would explain the extreme left policies in Sweden and the police state, like censure of any rightist groups or for that matter a lot of really whacky nanny state programs.

  128. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    September 18, 2010 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    “… the poor Swedes, the people that gave Jews refuge during WWII.”

    There’s no observable gratitude in the chosenite camp. In fact, the Jewish WW2 migration to Sweden may well have destabilized post-war Sweden in a fatal way.

  129. torgrim's Gravatar torgrim
    September 18, 2010 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

    Paul Hausser said; “Barbara “Spectre”…Look at that pious arrogant smiley look on her face and those hollow dead black ashkenazi eyes.”

    You forgot, grandmotherly, soft spoken, and demure body language.
    A double message if there ever was one.

    However, her words were direct, this is what she has planned for Europe and the poor Swedes, the people that gave Jews refuge during WWII.

    Scandinavians are slow to piss off, but when it happens and they have had enough, just remember the berserker rage, spoken of in the myths of old.

    Of course, the cause of the rage will be forgotten down the media black hole and only the reaction to this kind of arrogant provocation will be remembered.

    Sort of, like, history repeating itself, when International Jewry declared war in 1933 on Germany, another forgotten piece of cause and effect leading up to WWII?

  130. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 18, 2010 - 10:18 am | Permalink

    Good grief. Enough is never enough for this impudent little monkey, is it?

    DWEeb: “The only thing that distinguishes science from philosophy (or theology) is its ability to reliably get results when it’s applied out in the world.”

    There are several obvious mistakes here. Where do we begin?

    First, philosophy is largely the study of pure and applied logic, which may also be said of science (scientific theories are built on logical frameworks and then applied to physical reality). This makes science “philosophy with an empirical emphasis” (which is consistent with the fact that historically, “science” used to be called “philosophy”). Conversely, much of what still goes by the name “philosophy” also has a strong empirical emphasis. Take, for example, the philosophy of science, on which science relies for validation of its methodology.

    Secondly, where theology is the study of God, and God is defined as the Creator of the perceptual (i.e. empirically observed) universe, it obviously overlaps with cosmology (which was originally a branch of Aristotelian metaphysics). That’s why so many cosmologists, physicists, and astrophysicists are now writing popular books with what can only be described as theological import.

    Next we have empirical science itself, and the meaning of “reliably” therein. Scientific reliability or predictability requires knowledge of the entire control pathway through which a given effect is hypothetically caused; only with such knowledge can specific effects be reliably predicted from specific causes. But science often tackles phenomena for which such knowledge is lacking, because it is impossible to be certain that knowledge of causal pathways is complete. This unavoidably leads to experimental anomalies and indecision regarding which data constitute “evidence” for what theories.

    This is well-known to actual scientists, as it explains why even the hard sciences are full of opinionative squabbles. In fact, there are more opinionative squabbles in the hard sciences than the soft ones. That’s because the soft ones are more intensively PC-regulated.

    DWEebette: “This connection to objective reality is what makes it impossible to fake a physical science such as chemistry. Wishful thinking is immediately shown up for what it is.”

    Not always true. If causal pathways have not been exhaustively identified – i.e., if causal efficiency is not fully understood – then the effect cannot be reliably matched with the cause, and neither confirmation nor disconfirmation can properly occur.

    DWEebella: “It’s why there isn’t any such thing as “politically correct” chemistry or astronomy.”

    Total nonsense. This implies that if two people, one an outspoken White Nationalist and one an affirmative-action Negro darling of Academia, Inc. (one of these immediately springs to mind), were to come up with two superficially coherent theories of cosmology, they would receive equal attention in academia and the mass media. How absurd!

    In reality, serious attempts at confirmation would be lopsidedly lavished on the Negro cosmology while the White Nationalist cosmology was roundly ignored, and the entire course of scientific research and theorization would be skewed as a result. That’s because research budgets and academic papers always pass through the PC microfilters installed in the minds of academic Jews, their minions, and MSM “science reporters”.

    If consummate airhead DWEeberfeldenthal believes anything else, then he understands nothing about PC and academia. But then why is he continuing to shoot off his loud, content-challenged mouth, and what is he doing here but sowing disinformation, generating needless turmoil, and making himself look like an idiot’s idiot?

    DWEebsteinbergeroff: “Disciplines like anthropology have few applications, and so are not ordinarily susceptible of being tested against reality.”

    Nonsense. The entire modern social engineering agenda is an “application” of fanciful Frankfurt-style theories of sociology, psychology, anthropology, and (non-analytic) philosophy. While they cannot be formally tested against reality for political reasons, they have been tested and classified as failures by history itself.

    On the other hand, hard science is often mined for “confirmation” of ideological pseudoscience. For example, Relativity Theory is often cited as hard evidence the moral relativism must be correct…after all, in a materialistic world, as goes matter, so goes that which supervenes on matter. The same goes for quantum mechanics; in the presence of Heisenberg uncertainty, how can physical truth itself be anything but socially determined? This kind of misappropriation extends even to pure mathematics through such fields as many-valued logic and undecidability.

    And then, of course, we have the “hard” science of biology, particularly evolutionary biology. This is so completely saturated with PC atheist-materialist dogma that only an utter fool, e.g. DWEeberellastein, could possibly miss it.

    Here’s a tip for the DWEebster. In the science of psychometrics, there’s an old rule of thumb about IQ. It says that where an IQ differential between two subjects A and B is large, say 30 points or more, two observations will be made.

    (1) Where a disagreement arises between A and B, the higher-IQ subject will be right, and the lower-IQ subject wrong, about virtually every technical problem that happens to come up.

    (2) Communication will tend to be one-way. That is, the higher-IQ subject will understand every brain-dead but remotely intelligible utterance of the lower IQ subject, but not vice versa. In fact, the low-IQ subject may not even comprehend why he’s wrong in any given case, and will therefore continue to argue as though he’s right.

    On the basis of our interaction thus far, any objective and intelligent observer would surmise that my IQ is at least that much higher than DWEeb’s. I obviously know a lot of things he doesn’t, and see many errors in his reasoning that he can’t see himself. (If he disputes this, then he need merely provide his physical address, and we’ll send a licensed psychologist over there lickety-split to test him and lay to rest any doubts about his glaring lack of personal intellectual qualifications to bloviate on complex open problems of science and philosophy.)

    Accordingly, hard science says that the DWEeb can’t win even one argument with me, let alone the dozen or so he has contentiously inaugurated. It follows that if the DWEeb has any respect at all for science, he’ll immediately give up, tuck his long prehensile tail between his bandy simian legs, and skulk dejectedly away. On the other hand, if DWEeb refuses to do so, this will provide the hardest possible scientific evidence that his intelligence is every bit as low as most people no doubt think it is.

    So, does DWEeb care more about science, or more about his own futile, time-wasting attempts to reinflate his floundering but still bloated ego?

    Gee, I wonder. ;-)

  131. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    September 18, 2010 - 9:11 am | Permalink

    Though I haven’t been a believer for a long time, I think Christians, at the very least, should be honest enough to admit that their religion and Judaism are starkly different, embracing fundamental ideas irreconcialably opposite one another. Plus, if they really believe that Jesus came to establish a new covenant, they need to overcome any discomfort they might have and admit that the old covenant is ended.

    Christians SHOULD study rabbinic Judaism. (More people should.) Even if they did find it disturbing, they would better understand what Jesus message was and how innovative it was for its time.

  132. September 18, 2010 - 8:00 am | Permalink

    @ enosigaios,

    I’m all for welcoming a renaissance of forgotten and overlooked aspects of Western cultural heritage, but can someone please explain to me why there is such hostility towards Christianity in certain White consciousness circles? This sappy, Judeo-Christian Zionist/Judeophile liberal veneration of Jewry is unquestionably a materialistic, post-Christian, modernist phenomenon that has nothing whatsoever to do with authentic Christianity.

    In fact, Jesus couldn’t have been clearer about what he thought of corrupt organized Jewry, and prophetically warned us of the evils of the Talmudists in his condemnation of “the Jews” in general and the Pharisees in particular. One example among many: “You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”

    The fact that successive generations of modern Westerners ignored his warnings and totally reinterpreted the gospels to suit their own shallow and materialistic lifestyles and agenda, or ignored his “anti-Semitism” altogether, or condemned Christianity in its entirety as passé because of its “anti-Semitism,” is a reflection on them, not him.

    Granted, it was largely atheistic Statism that indoctrinated these “progressive” post-Christian attitudes, but a child could see that it has been Jewry pulling the strings of mass Statism since the days of Marx, at least. Additionally, modern “new world man” generations of Westerners also simply thought they knew better, and so they put their fingers in their ears when it came to the wisdom of the ancients.

    Yet certain Whites (and of course, as always, liberals why try to blame “religion” in general) still want to scapegoat Jesus for the fact that the Judeofascists are so powerful today — as if he didn’t warn the world in a way so that even the mentally challenged could understand it centuries ago.

    Unbelievable.

  133. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    September 18, 2010 - 7:26 am | Permalink

    Jim: “How can “bad science” suddenly become “good science” merely by producing socially palatable results? … Does science REALLY work that way?”

    Leave it to eurotwerp to miss this, since he has so much trouble discerning the difference between science and theology. The only thing that distinguishes science from philosophy (or theology) is its ability to reliably get results when it’s applied out in the world. This connection to objective reality is what makes it impossible to fake a physical science such as chemistry. Wishful thinking is immediately shown up for what it is. It’s why there isn’t any such thing as “politically correct” chemistry or astronomy. Disciplines like anthropology have few applications, and so are not ordinarily susceptible of being tested against reality. In such areas, any theory and its opposite are then, in a sense, equally plausible. In that case, the usual way of determining the better theory is by who is advocating it, or (without explicitly saying so!) examining the probable results. A Jew with great PC bona fides such as Jared Diamond can then use any method he wants and it is approved. A non-Jew with no PC cred, like Rushton, is accordingly damned no matter what he does. From probable results, if adopting the theory has the potential to damage Whites, then it’s a good one. If adopting it would tend to strengthen Whites, it’s bad.

    We see this in other areas too. Affirmative action, discrimination or bigotry when practiced by the wrong people, is waved on through because it hurts Whites. Things that are unconstitutional and an outrage to the politically correct when done by the wrong people, or have the effect of helping Whites, suddenly become acceptable to them when done by the right people, or are understood to hurt Whites. Of this sort of thing, one could give literally hundreds of examples.

  134. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    September 18, 2010 - 6:03 am | Permalink

    Barbara “Spectre”.

    How appropriate isn’t that the name of the evil organization James Bond was fighting.

    Looks like Ian Fleming was trying to tell us something

    Also notice how this witch is an American.

    Looks like they get their introductory undergraduate multicultural education in the USA and then go to Israel for “graduate studies” then on to Europe for the infliction of the evil they learned in both places

    Look at that arrogant pious smiley look on her face and those hollow dead black Ashkenazi eyes. That is the classic Jewish look of a 50-75 year old “educated” Jewess

  135. Kratos's Gravatar Kratos
    September 18, 2010 - 3:21 am | Permalink

    I have an inclination to do everything that Jewish people don’t like. More Muslims and third world please!

    About time USA introduced legislations to trade with countries who take in third world immigrants, and not those who build walls against them.

  136. enosigaios's Gravatar enosigaios
    September 18, 2010 - 1:02 am | Permalink

    Ok mr MacDonald!! you decided to not let me speak.

    I hope what I said did not hurt you too much (or your beliefs).

    However, it is my belief that this is where the problem is to be found.

    PreChristian religions should be readopted in their countries of origin.
    This would for ever uproot the jewish cancer from inside the western man’s soul.

    I hope I made you REthink (surely it had crossed your mind).

    thank you,

    enosigaios,
    Greece

  137. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 17, 2010 - 7:47 pm | Permalink

    If we’re talking about the “softer” sciences, the answer is yes. It’s not supposed to work anything like that, of course, but in the Jew-dominated higher education system of today, this is precisely the way it works. Perfect orthodoxy rules.

    Conversely, if one transgresses any sacred tenet of any of the asinine junk theories preferred by the university power structure for consistency with the culturally degenerate goals of elite social engineers, one had better not be too attached to one’s academic career (unless, like Professor MacDonald, one has miraculously received tenure).

    A few short generations ago, the current situation would have been straightforwardly described as intellectual prostitution. Now it’s called “responsible scholarship and proper respect for academic consensus”. (Translation: intellectual prostitution.) Quite simply, most current academics in PC-intensive fields have sold their souls for a small salary and a modicum of prestige that could vanish at any moment.

    Yet these same people self-righteously profess to intellectual integrity, scholastic freedom, and their “sacred obligation to preserve and advance the sum of human knowledge, passing the torch to each new generation of mankind to guaranty that the precious flame is never extinguished!”, etc.. Translation: “We think as we’re told, teach what we’re supposed to, and don’t make waves. And if you don’t like it, we’ll cut you loose and pretend you never existed in order to protect our own asses.”

    How to express this with the proper delicacy and sensitivity? It’s not worth it, so let’s just stick with the truth. For the most part, modern academics outside the hard sciences are shameless ten-dollar whores without a scrap of intellectual dignity and drunk as skunks on degrees and affiliations certifying their resemblance to nothing more than clip-winged brown-beaked parrots trained on the same broken record.

    In that crowd, Jared Diamond no doubt qualifies as a pillar of science, academic excellence, and scholarly integrity. With a maraschino cherry on top.

  138. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    September 17, 2010 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

    “This little Jew Goldstone reminds me a bit of his tribesman Jared Diamond, who ascribes virtually all of the unique achievements of White civilization to various meaningless accidents.”

    To follow that tangent for just a moment…
    I’ve never read Diamond’s book (I saw the movie…I wasn’t impressed.)
    I find it interesting, however, that he resurrected an old (and probably valid) 19th century anthropological concept/theory, Environmental Determinism, to support (in part) his theory. Environmental Determinism was apparently deemed “bad science” in the early 20th century because it lead to “racist” conclusions about the differences between populations.

    Here’s wiki’s take on Environmental Determinism:
    “The fundamental argument of the environmental determinists was that aspects of physical geography, particularly climate, influenced the psychological mind-set of individuals, which in turn defined the behaviour and culture of the society that those individuals formed. For example, tropical climates were said to cause laziness, relaxed attitudes and promiscuity, while the frequent variability in the weather of the middle latitudes led to more determined and driven work ethics. Because these environmental influences operate slowly on human biology, it was important to trace the migrations of groups to see what environmental conditions they had evolved under. Key proponents of this notion have included Ellen Churchill Semple, Ellsworth Huntington, Thomas Griffith Taylor and possibly JARED DIAMOND. Although Diamond’s work does make connections between environmental and climatic conditions and societal development, it is published with the stated intention of disproving racist and eurocentric theories of development. ”

    —————-

    I’m not a scientist or anthropologist… I don’t pretend to be one, but there’s one thing I’d like to know: How can “bad science” suddenly become “good science” merely by producing socially palatable results? Diamond seems to have decided beforehand what his scientific conclusions were going to be, then went about looking for methods that would give him the results he wanted, and the fact that he used politically incorrect methods wasn’t going to stop the world from accepting his politically CORRECT results.

    Does science REALLY work that way?

  139. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    September 17, 2010 - 10:03 am | Permalink

    me said: “No invading army – not even the Mongol hordes – inflicted the psychological, genetic, and cultural damage a small group of determined jews have. Its almost embarrassing.”

    Read the 27th chapter of Genesis. The tradition of lies and deceipt began with their founding father Jacob, later called Israel, and even if it is just a myth, a culture’s foundation myths tells you plainly about them and how they regard themselves.

    Read it and understand.

  140. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    September 17, 2010 - 9:53 am | Permalink

    I’ve never seen so many (well constructed) metaphors in one short article!

  141. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 17, 2010 - 8:28 am | Permalink

    Kirk, thanks for a couple of very informative links.

    Sadly for my digestion this morning, the material found there presents a rather discouraging picture. The picture is one of jackals defecating on what remains of the corpse they have just consumed in the knowledge that a new and meatier corpse lies just over the next hill.

    Apparently the Jews, having infested Western societies like a swarm of crab lice and precipitated their rapid decline, are now smirking and sardonically generating a bit of mock-historical analysis of “our” mistakes and deficiencies as they expectantly plump up the pillows and fluff up the down comforter of Asia, compulsively flattering their new prospective hosts and promising to rewrite history and economics in their favor. Compulsively feathering their new nest, they prepare to flee the scene of their recent crimes like plague rats from a burning outhouse. A new mansion awaits, begging to be turned into another outhouse and burned to the ground by “God’s chosen people”.

    This little Jew Goldstone reminds me a bit of his tribesman Jared Diamond, who ascribes virtually all of the unique achievements of White civilization to various meaningless accidents. According to anthropologists (etc.) of Diamond’s ilk, we White people simply “lucked out” in building Western Civilization, had our improbable run, and must now suffer catch-up and (infinite) payback from the former losers (who, let’s face it, are a lot better than we are … and who, by the way, just happen to be the newfound best friends of the Jews, tee hee!).

    Jewish intellectuals like Mr. Goldstone have the minds and ethics of cockroaches. Now that the kitchen light has been switched on again, they appear to be scurrying madly for the dark space under the refrigerator of Asia. They will never modify this behavior pattern; they will never change their natures even in the exterminator’s shadow. It’s just who they are, now and forever.

    If the truth be told, we should default immediately on our “obligations” (onerous debt) to China. This would awaken the Chinese to the true source of the problem: international Zio-bankers. Suddenly, away go the fluffy down comforter and the alluring pillows, and here comes a big can of Raid!

    It’s a beautiful dream.

  142. me's Gravatar me
    September 17, 2010 - 6:01 am | Permalink

    This woman has verified everything Kevin MacDonald has said about jews over the years.
    yes but in a cynical display of power – as with Oliver Stone- anyone who said this in MSM would be called anti semitic, even if they quoted her?

    its a mad mad mad world

  143. Ion's Gravatar Ion
    September 17, 2010 - 1:50 am | Permalink

    from the first article kirk linked to:

    ”One somewhat daring approach to immigration would be to encourage a reverse flow of
    older immigrants from developed to developing countries. If older residents of
    developed countries took their retirements along the southern coast of the
    Mediterranean or in Latin America or Africa, it would greatly reduce the strain on their
    home countries’ public entitlement systems. The developing countries involved,
    meanwhile, would benefit because caring for the elderly and providing retirement and
    leisure services is highly labor intensive. Relocating a portion of these activities to
    developing countries would provide employment and valuable training to the young,
    growing populations of the Second and Third Worlds.”

    Incredible, huh?

  144. kirk's Gravatar kirk
    September 17, 2010 - 12:54 am | Permalink

    Here is an extensive article from a recent FA issue by a certain “Jack A. Goldstone”:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/24424882/The-New-Population-Bomb-the-Four-Mega-Trends-That-Will-Change-the-World

    It is obvious in his recommendations that european populations are proscribed. He openly states that their declining demographics must be corrected through third world immigration (in order to …defuse the bomb, you see) and of course without any concern for compatibility of religions, cultures, races. It’s like a general arranging his troops on a global scale, puts a brigade over here, pulls up a regiment over there etc.

    Not surprisingly, this same Goldstone seems to be part of a revisionist trend in the studies of the history of the West, that tends to minimise the significance of the unique achievements of western civilisation or at least downsize them to fit a relativistic interpretation, a central tenet of multiculturalist ideology. Here’s an example:
    http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/10/114.html
    Notice how he tries to overemphasize “chance” and “accidents” as key factors in major breakthroughs of western civilisation, while at the same trying to elevate and praise the achievements of the Chinese.

  145. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    September 16, 2010 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

    This woman has verified everything Kevin MacDonald has said about jews over the years.

    Why else would a jewish woman feel compelled to leave America and go to another country so that she can tell them “I’ve come here to change the ethnic makeup of your country even though you won’t like it and will probably hate me for doing it, because it’s my job as a jew to do such things. Oh, and did I mention? It’s for your own good.”

    As repulsive as remarks like this are, they do serve the white race well, as they hasten the inevitable cataclysmic response.

  146. sabril's Gravatar sabril
    September 16, 2010 - 10:39 pm | Permalink

    What about Sweden?

  147. alex gregorish's Gravatar alex gregorish
    September 16, 2010 - 7:29 pm | Permalink

    History always repeats itself.

  148. September 16, 2010 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    “except for the fact they are succeeding beyond their wildest dreams.”

    I get your point, but I’m not sure how remarkable their accomplishment really is.

    At its height, the Nazi Party only had 8.5 million members. There are around 14 million Jews. Let’s suppose only half of them are Zionists (probably a very low estimate). 7 million cohesive, determined, single-minded fanatics can accomplish a hell of a lot. And when you factor in Jewry’s age old religious instruction in the art of ethnocentricity, power acquisition and subversion, honed over millennia, what’s remarkable is that their ascension took as long as it did, and that they are today already again becoming pariahs in more and more circles.

    Clearly they’re not as invincible as we’ve been led to believe. In fact, it probably won’t be long before even craven politicians will have to think twice before aligning themselves with Zionism, which is increasingly looking like a sinking ship.

    Just as the post WWII generations completely mismanaged and squandered America’s moral authority and cat bird seat, so to have Zionists squandered Jewry’s.

    Arrogant, entitled pricks tend to fall fast and hard, especially in the Age of the Internet.

  149. me's Gravatar me
    September 16, 2010 - 4:38 pm | Permalink

    Their mentally unbalanced delusions are unbelievable
    except for the fact they are succeeding beyond their wildest dreams.

    No invading army – not even the Mongol hordes – inflicted the psychological, genetic, and cultural damage a small group of determined jews have.

    Its almost embarrassing.

  150. me's Gravatar me
    September 16, 2010 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

    i don’t believe the ‘self deceipt’ anymore the more the mask comes off the more and more self serving they become.
    and Jews will be resented because of our leading role
    tiresome to ask but are they leading the way for israel too?

  151. me's Gravatar me
    September 16, 2010 - 4:28 pm | Permalink

    which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last centur
    notice no explanation why it must take place – the arrogance and hatred are astounding .

  152. September 16, 2010 - 2:14 pm | Permalink

    So organized Jewry instructs us that it is inevitable that the “Europe is not going to be the monolithic [Christian] societies they once were in the last century.” Europe will now be “transformed” into a patchwork of multi-cultural societies without identity, “and Jews are going to be at the centre of that” transformation.

    This sounds more like a confession by Jewry of planned premeditated murder for group gain and advancement than it does a social, cultural or political forecast.

    So in addition to Islam, it is now clear that Jewry has declared war on Christian Europe. These death cult Zionists and their suicidal Left-Right followers won’t be happy until the entire world is at their throats, which shouldn’t be long now. Yet apparently in their own minds, they’re on the cusp of world domination.

    Their mentally unbalanced delusions are unbelievable. Americans and Europeans have been tied at the waist by our corrupt elites to a cult of maniacs. I say cut them all loose and send them hurtling to Israel, where they belong.

  153. Spooky's Gravatar Spooky
    September 16, 2010 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Oops. I don’t think Barbara got the memo.

  154. torgrim's Gravatar torgrim
    September 16, 2010 - 12:56 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know, what can one say to such arrogance? So, this model of “light unto the nations”, moves from the US to Sweden and begins a Greek named organization to “transform” Sweden? If I didn’t see this smiling trickster on video saying these things I would have thought it impossible for someone to say such things!
    Do these people really think that they can do an act of aggression and not be held responsible? What am I missing here?

    Warning; to those that think we are asleep.

  155. eurodele's Gravatar eurodele
    September 16, 2010 - 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Jews were of critical importance in paving the way for massive Muslim immigration to North America, Europe, and Scandinavia.

    From the Jewish perspective, Muslim immigration serves two purposes which add up to another Jewish win-win scenario:

    (1) Muslims, who are xenophobic and obstinately resistant to cultural assimilation, invariably provoke anti-Muslim sentiment, i.e., strong antipathy toward the hereditary enemies of the Jews, and

    (2) Muslims cause turmoil and division in White Christian societies, making them more vulnerable to Jewish control.

    Even if a few disgruntled local Jews may have to go on the lam as a result, that’s evidently an acceptable price to pay, as far as international Jewry is concerned, for progress toward Jewish long-term goals.

    Nevertheless, I won’t be surprised if I hear at some point that this reporter was roundly criticized by the Abe Foxmans of the world for “encouraging anti-Semitism”.

    In fact, I’ll be quite surprised if I don’t.

  156. TGD's Gravatar TGD
    September 16, 2010 - 12:07 pm | Permalink

    If Jewry weren’t so damn smug, they would realize that the third world takeover of the white countries that they ceaselessly promote will some day turn its ugly fangs on them.

    Now about that other Jewish trait, arrogance. Two Jewish brothers, David and Ed Miliband, are duking it out for head of the British labo(u)r party. WASP replacement again. See here.

  157. September 16, 2010 - 11:37 am | Permalink

    Frankly the most “anti-semitic” stuff to use that ridiculous term, meaning THE TRUTH, is oft times found in Jewish writings. They mean it, of course, for inside consumption, but they are often quite clear on the reality of the situation. Whereas if you or I were to say the same then one is immediately branded a “hater”

    Miriam Faine, an editorial committee member of the Australian Jewish Democrat, as quoted in CoC:

    The strengthening of multicultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian.

    If I might digress I would ask KM to read Brimelow’s post and ponder what a difference there is in the SUPPORT this professor is getting vs the psychological terror visited upon an upright Professor whose only crime was doing academic research in his field and then publishing it:
    http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/09/16/new-frontiers-in-civil-rights-bisexual-hispanic-dominatrix-professor-alleges-discrimination/

9 Trackbacks to "Jews play a "leading role" in promoting multiculturalism in Europe"

  1. john
    on October 14, 2010 at 6:48 am
  2. on October 1, 2010 at 4:01 pm
  3. on September 28, 2010 at 7:04 pm
  4. on September 28, 2010 at 4:06 am
  5. on September 26, 2010 at 11:00 am
  6. on September 25, 2010 at 11:55 am
  7. on September 17, 2010 at 6:59 am
  8. on September 16, 2010 at 10:29 pm
  9. on September 16, 2010 at 2:33 pm

Comments are closed.