The Guardian’s definition of “far right”, and mine, differ considerably, which is the reason why I have not rushed to its website to read a two-page article published a few of days ago about “the threat of the far right in Europe” which, I am told, made no mention of the BNP or the state of race relations in Britain.
Guardian caption: A Roma family leaves a camp in northern France. Far-right groups across Europe are nurturing an anti-immigrant backlash.
The Financial Times simultaneously published a similar one-page survey, but this included a brief post-script item about the failure of the BNP to mobilise the full potential of anti-immigration sentiment persisting amongst the British electorate. It begins as follows:
In a pub garden in Birkenhead, a blighted post-industrial suburb in England’s north-west, Nick Griffin told the Financial Times that his party had a “once in a lifetime” chance to escape its white supremacist roots and emerge as an alternative for millions scorned by the London elite.
Less than 18 months later – following this year’s disastrous national election campaign, a savage internal power struggle and a court battle with the country’s equality watchdog that threatens to bankrupt the party – his dream is over.
The impression I have gained in recent years is that the only “far right” parties in Europe who have been able (allowed) to flutter near to the flame of power are those that have been able to convince the Establishment, the media and Jewry that they are most definitely not anti-Jewish, not “racist”, not against all coloured immigration (but only against the immigration of Muslims!) and not against the multi-racial society (just so long as it doesn’t include Muslims!) The Jobbik Party in Hungary may be the only notable exception to this.
This “far right” anti-Muslim/anti-Islam rhetoric is designed, of course, to make these “kosher fascists” more appealing to Jewry and, hence, the mass media. Whether that line of ingratiation really impresses Jewry’s learned elders — as distinct from their lesser brethren — is a matter I will touch on in due course.
The first of these post-WW2 “kosher fascists” was Gianfranco Fini, who started out his political career in Italy as an arm-in-the-air, Mussolini-admiring, Giovinezza-singing, MSI Blackshirt in the late 1970s, but within a decade or so was groveling at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem begging forgiveness. Since then his career zoomed upwards.
Until recently, Fini occupied the post of Speaker of parliament in Bercusconi’s (“right wing”) government, but now that Bercusconi’s administration is on the skids (due to the old roué’s extracurricular activities) Fini has resigned and is now positioning himself to become Prime Minister after the next general election.
It is no doubt a mere happenstance that the period of Fini’s conversion and rise to high office and the period when Italy became the No. 1 target for endless boatloads of illegal immigrants from Africa coincided.
Following Fini into the Wilderness of “Success”
The Dutch “far right” politician Geert Wilders is currently building a political career by means of a strenuous anti-Muslim/anti-Islam agitation which he promotes in tandem with a strident pro-Jewish/pro-Israel campaign. The one is part-and-parcel of the other.
On Sunday 14th December 2008, just as Israel was preparing to drop White phosphorous bombs on the crammed civilian areas in the Gaza concentration camp, Wilders was at the Begin Memorial Hall, Jerusalem, sharing the platform with some of the most rabid Arab-hating Jewish racists in the Zionist fold, including Arieh Eldad, a “far right” member of Israel’s parliament. You can find Eldad’s post-conference press statement here. If it has been taken down and you would like a copy, let me know.
Wilders knew well that the Begin Memorial Hall was built in honour of Menachem Begin who in the late 1940s was the leader of the Irgun Zvai Leumi terrorist gang. Among many other atrocities, Begin instigated and personally participated in the massacre of Palestinian villagers at Dir Yassein, the bombing of the King David Hotel and the kidnapping and slow-hanging with piano wire of British Army Sergeants Mervyn Paice and Clifford Martin. In the foreword to his autobiography The Revolt he insists: “Yes….I would do at all again”. The Israeli public were so grateful to Begin that they elected him prime minister in 1977.
Wilders is clearly hell-bent on out-grovelling Fini. But are his ‘brown nose’ snufflings doing him any good with the people who really count?
At the recent general election in Holland his party obtained, so it was reported, sufficient votes to influence which of the major parties formed the government. He has been given the additional advantage of being prosecuted under Holland’s version of the UK’s “Incitement to Racial Hatred” laws.
But is Wilders getting the backing of Zionist-Jewry’s Establishment — or just the support of chancers, mavericks and opportunists like himself?
Prof. Kevin MacDonald (Professor of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach) wrote a commentary on Wilders (and, by implication, other Populist grovellers) which you can read here. The main point is the failure of Jewish leaders to support Wilders despite his philo-Semitic statements and fervent support for Israel.
MacDonald’s final two paragraphs read:
The reality is that this is what the entire Jewish political spectrum wants, from the far left to the neoconservative right. Again we see that despite the well-oiled myth that Jews are beset by fundamental disagreements about policy, Jewish power is pushing in one direction throughout the West: Multiculturalism and the end of racially and culturally homogeneous White societies.
And it should be obvious that White advocates who attempt to recruit Jewish support in opposition to multiculturalism are engaging in a futile undertaking. The fact that the organized Jewish community favors Muslim immigration throughout the West even when so many Muslims are hostile to Israel and to Jews (to the point that Jews have been forced to vacate Muslim areas in many places, including Sweden) shows how committed they are to their campaign against the people and the culture of the West.
This explanation is probably broadly correct, but I venture to suggest that there may be exceptions, if temporary, to this global Jewish drive to destroy White ethnic homogeneity: most notably here in Britain.
The size of the Muslim population in many British towns and cities — especially in the north of England and the east of London — both in terms of overall numbers and as a proportion of the population, puts anything to be seen in Sweden in the shade.
From the point of view of Jewry in the UK, the issue is not the number of indigenous White non-Jews resorting to ‘White Flight’ from the home towns of their youth, but the increasing number of parliamentary constituencies which are electing Muslims to Parliament; constituencies which will never welcome Jewish candidates of any political party — even those which, two or three decades ago, were represented by frequently re-elected Jewish (usually Labour Party) MPs.
On top of this demographically charged political change there is the rise of Muslim business empires in Britain. These are increasingly able to bestow financial patronage to the major Establishment political parties, and do so.
These developments indicate that a power base is evolving which could have the potential to challenge the Jewish money-and-media dominance over the British body politic and this is making UK Jewry jittery, no matter what may be world Jewry’s overall strategy of encouraging White European nations to dissolve themselves into a multi-racial stew.
Hence, in the Jewish-owned sections of the UK media, there is a flood of anti-Muslim, anti-Islam stories. This barrage is so relentless that for the average Briton the words “Muslim” and “Islam” have become hardwired to the word “terrorist”. In the long run this campaign and the associated activities of the Jewish-backed English Defence League might be intensified to the point that Muslims return to their homelands — no bad thing, providing other varieties of immigrant followed in their footsteps!
At the moment, however, the campaign seems designed simply to put all but the most fanatical Islamists among the Muslim population on the back foot and, in particular, to scare Muslim religious, political and business leaders away from any thought of challenging the current status quo for fear of being depicted by media character assassins as “extremists” and “promoters of terrorism” — allegations which terminate careers, destroy businesses and ruin lives.
No similar such mainstream media campaign has ever been mounted in the UK against Afro-Caribbeans, who perpetrate more homicides and maimings per year in our country than have ever been inflicted by Islamic terrorists. Were any such campaign to be launched the “hatemongers” responsible would soon find themselves facing “Incitement to Racial Hatred” charges. The difference is that the Afro-Caribbeans do not represent a threat to Jewry’s scruff-of-the-neck grip on Britain’s Establishment.
Prof. MacDonald’s description of Jewry’s global strategy of promoting alien immigration to White European lands could well be a large part of the explanation why British National Party chairman Nick Griffin failed so signally with his decade-long charm offensive with Jewry.
Part of the explanation must surely also include:
- Griffin’s long earlier career as an anti-Semite — including in the mid-1990s his claimed authorship of a factual magazine exposing Jewish media ownership and influence (in fact written by Dr. Mark Deavin) — before he adopted what the more perceptive among the Jews recognised was a cynical, careerist-opportunist volte face. In this regard, he is quite different from Wilders whose philo-Semitic attitudes were apparent even in his youth. Why should the Jews take a chance with Griffin? There are plenty genuinely philo-Semitic non-Jews on the “far right” to pick from, as the media-backed progress of the so-called English Defence League (with its Jewish Division, its rabbinical advisers and its pro-Israel demonstrations outside the Israeli Embassy) makes all too clear.
- Griffin’s record as an ‘unreliable’ manager of funds subscribed to the cause. His approach has led him to engage in ‘trading’, ‘accountancy’ and personnel arrangements which have evoked disquiet and dismay. Senior party employees who have drawn his attention to arrangements which they felt to be improper have found themselves sacked upon the instant. The party has had five National Treasurers during the past 18 months. It is continually late in presenting its audited annual accounts to the Electoral Commission — a statutory obligation — incurring ever-increasing fines. The party’s auditor advised the Electoral Commission that it was unable to sign-off the last set of accounts. Various civil actions (and not just that brought by the EC) are grinding on. Why would the Jews wish to patronise the engine-driver of what appears to be an impending train wreck?
The long and the short of it is that it was the Jews who let Griffin down! …. If only they had grasped the hand of friendship that he extended for so long …. if only they had rewarded his conversion to philo-Semitism …. If only they had got the media a bit more on his side …. then by now they would have had a firm and obedient ally not only in the European Parliament but in the House of Commons and all his/the BNP’s financial problems would now be a forgotten nightmare!
Martin Webster (email him) has been a racial-nationalist activist in Britain since he was an 18 year old in 1961. From 1969 until 1983 he was National Activities Organiser of the National Front and a member of its National Directorate. In 1973 he was the first nationalist in Britain (pre- or post-WW2) to “save a deposit” (then set at 12.5%, currently set at 5%) in a parliamentary election when he won 16.02% of the poll at West Bromwich in 1973. Since 1983 he has not associated with any political organisation. He issues occasional e-bulletins to a world-wide circle of friends (and some enemies) who subscribe to his Electronic Loose Cannon newsletter, which comments on nationalist issues and parties, and his Electronic Watch on Zion whose title explains its purpose.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
Merging this story with the previous story about Fries, one can only imagine an encounter between Protestant reformer John Wesley and a Jew. :)
During Wesley’s time in the 18th Century there were few, or no obvious Jews in England, or in British America. One can only imagine John Wesley telling a Jew that he or she would be damned to hell for eternity, if they did not have faith in Jesus Christ as their savior. That’s what Wesley preached, and in an in your face manner.
Wesley’s love for the Jews would have driven a Jew to suicide. ;)
Dansk Folkeparti (Danish Peoples party) has been certified kosher though: http://www.eurojewcong.org/ejc/news.php?id_article=4073
Griffin’s treatment on Question time is an example of that is it?; and what’s that supposed to mean – ‘allowed’ ? To me it sounds like you are claiming that it’s all sown up and British Nationalism can never win the slightest real victory. Yet at the same time you seem to be saying that with a truly Nationalist platform the BNP would be able to achieve something. Which is it?
So someone with Griffin’s educational achievements went into nationalist politics for the money – Hah! The BNP are under attack on every front including bank accounts, transparent accounting would be a miracle ( and maybe a tactical mistake) in current circumstances. Of course it is possible Griffin is really out for himself, even the best man can start off idealistic but become embittered over time and begin to think it’s all about them. Isn’t that right Martin ?
I don’t think Kevin MacDonald was saying what Webster implies Geert Wilders’ Unrequited Love
In short it is not true that the Jews want to restrict Muslim immigration into western countries or are offering to take the heat off anti immigration politicians who concentrate on Muslims. It is correct that Griffin does think talk about Israel’s failings is ineffective, ( maybe he’s wrong and there is a way to contrast the self interested Jewish prescription for the west to the behavior of Jews in their own state).
One of the tactics of the cultural Marxists is to make the opposition’s message incoherent. They have achieved this remarkably well here in the States, as can be confirmed by listening to “right-wing” radio for five minutes. It would seem they have been nearly as successful in Europe.
I don’t see anything inherently incoherent in the European Right’s attitude to Jews – Prof. Kevin MacDonald: “And it should be obvious that White advocates who attempt to recruit Jewish support in opposition to multiculturalism are engaging in a futile undertaking.” Why will it be futile?
Of course the European Right isn’t going to get Jewish power-brokers on board, but neither is it going to get European Power-brokers on board, who like their Jewish counter-parts are responsible for the multiracial/multicultural nightmare that is the West (and which, incidentally, is also Israel).
One may as well say, “And it should be obvious that White advocates who attempt to recruit European support in opposition to multiculturalism are engaging in a futile undertaking.”
The target of the recruiters isn’t the elites, whether Jewish or European. The Right knows it’s not going to get a fair hearing in any elite media, nor in any organ of the state. The purpose of the exercise is an attempt to beat the opposition at their own game – which is what we’ve got to do at the moment because we must play be their rules. It’s called politics in the real world.
It is similar to the “conservatives” in the US on economics. Why would Jews support left wing economic policies, higher taxes, and more regulations, when they are such strong businessman?
@ Someday
Islamophobia is the new anti-Semitism (1)
Someday,
You make many excellent points; but with all due respect, I think you have misunderstood Martin Webster’s position slightly. As an Anglo-American (half-Amercan, half-English) who has lived in England many years, I can only offer you my own limited perceptions on this complex question. They are these:
The British Nationalist Party (BNP) once had some intellectual standing as a party that stuck up for the rights of the (White) native population of Britain. It was accused of being “racist”—nothing new there—and did in fact attract many people to its ranks who could be described as “racist”. These were mostly working class folk who were openly xenophobic and spoke the language of racists. Anyone with a swarthy complexion was a “wog”. All blacks were “niggers”. These simple folk had no love for the Jews either, referring to them openly as “Yids” and “kikes”.
Nick Griffin, though well-educated, originally tried to give his party (the BNP) some intellectual gloss by making out he was a true “nationalist”, a voice speaking up for native Britons: nice Brits, you understand, who “don’t mind foreigners in small doses—but hey, we don’t want to be swamped by them, do we?”
Griffin was anti-immigration and so was his entire constituency.
At the same time, Griffin’s reputation was tarnished by the fact that many of his most vocal supporters were out-and-out “racists”. The skinhead brigade were definitely an embarrassment to him. No true nationalist (aiming for respectability) wants to be supported by a bunch of skinheads who keep shouting, “WOGS OUT, KEEP BRITAIN WHITE!”
These things require finesse. “Wogs out!” lacks finesse.
Griffin however, needing all the support he could muster, was happy to allow his party to be swelled by this embarrassing fraternity. He made no real attempt to distance himself from the skinhead, neo-Nazi brigade. If he did, he did so in a remarkably ineffectual way. His reputation naturally began to suffer.
Then Griffin made a cardinal mistake: he sold out to the Jews. In an attempt to win support from powerful interests—and who could be more powerful than the Jews?—Griffin jumped into bed with the Jews. His refusal or inability to recognize that he had made a Mephistophelean pact with the Devil has been his undoing.
What is the average BNP supporter now supposed to believe? Basically, a pack of lies. What lies? Two lies above all: (a) That the REAL ENEMY OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION IS ISLAM AND THE MUSLIMS. (b) That it is therefore incumbent on everyone TO CUDDLE UP TO THE JEWS who are engaged in a death struggle with this identical enemy in the Middle East and all over the world.
Here is the syllogism: “The Muslims are our enemies. The Jews are at war with the Muslims. Therefore the Jews are our friends.”
Question the major premise and substitute the proposition “The Jews are our enemies”, and the syllogism collapses.
Th sad truth is: Islamophobia is now the new anti-Semitism.
Islamophobia is the new anti-Semitism (2)
Martin Webster is absolutely right in noting the growth of a politically correct Islamophobia in Britain—a hatred of Muslims that is also deliberately fomented all over Europe and America: a hatred stirred up by the Jew-owned media.
Organized Jewry plays a double game. Kevin MacDonald, I believe, has drawn attention to this several times. In America, one segment of Jewry attempts to court the Muslim community and simulates friendship. But this is only done as a weapon against White Americans. Jewry is doing its best to foment race hatred in America between White Americans and Muslims. And It is succeeding only too well.
Back in Britain now, we see this: a mass media that is philosemitic to an extraordinary degree but which never loses an opportunity to say bad things about Muslims and Islam.
It portrays Islam as an evil religion hell-bent on world domination for the Muslims. It never refers to the world domination implicit in the Talmud. Or, for that matter, explicit in the Protocols. Oh no, it wouldn’t dare do that!
Not a day passes when Muslims and Islam are not vilified in ALL the media outlets owned by one particular British Jew: the pornographer Richard Desmond. This unsavoury specimen, apart from owning several TV porn channels, also owns the Daily Express and the porny tabloid the Daily Star.
Every single day you can expect to see a screaming headline in one of his vile papers informing the British public how unspeakably evil all Muslims are.
Richard Desmond: the less said about this dung beetle the better. He behaves like psychopath…striding round his newspaper offices doing an imitation of the Nazi goosestep and bellowing out “Heil Hitler!” while giving mock Nazi salutes.
His newspapers, when not attacking Muslims, are devoted almost entirely to sleazy pictures of young women flashing their assets. And the rest consists of advertisements for sex services.
You can judge the depths of degradation to which Britain has fallen by this one fact alone: this human trash was invited to tea at Downing Street several times by Britain’s war criminal Prime Minister Tony Blair. Yes, Blair and his bigmouthed wife Cherie were happy to tinkle teaspoons with a genocidal Jewish pornographer in exchange for backing by the Jews.
What does all this have to do with Nick Griffin and the BNP?
This: Griffin is doing exactly what Blair did—sucking up to the Jews. Therefore, like Blair, he is an opportunist. A man not to be trusted. Because he has sold out. He has betrayed his constituency by cuddling up to the Enemies of his people.
Follow Griffin and you follow the Pied Piper to your destruction.
Which brings us to America. The country where it’s all happening. Where the future of the world is being made right now.
Hasn’t Obama sold out to the Jews too? How is America any different? Isn’t America also a country now under Jewish domination?
Of course it is.
Xanadu
(Lasha Darkmoon)
It’s easy to be 100% authentically nationalist if all you want to achieve is to be that.
The priority is to reclaim the country, there is only one way – electoral success.
If you agree the electoral success is the objective then it seems to follow that you believe all Nick Griffin had to do was concentrate on criticizing Jewish influence and he would have managed to achieve far more electoral success than he did talking about the Islamic threat. What is your evidence, ie examples from when Webster was running political campaigns, for that conjecture.
It looks as if the UK will get proportional representation, if it does one of the biggest barriers to Nationalism will be removed, do you really think that would go ahead if the BNP showed signs of a a major breakthrough because I can tell you it wouldn’t.
It seems that Nick Griffin gets the same treatment in England that David Duke gets in America.
The big difference between Griffin and Duke is that David Duke hasn’t sold out to the jews.Duke’s youtube channel has excellent videos exposing the dangers of organized jewry in America.
Discussing a tangentially related subject, Professor Francis Boyle discusses Jewish racism. Click on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5wtE9wd1uU&feature=player_embedded
Someday: “The priority is to reclaim the country, there is only one way – electoral success.”
This is why every major politician in America and Europe feels the need to grovel to the Jews: because the Jews, and the Jews alone, appear to have the power to confer electoral success by media control and “the power of the purse”.
If Nick Griffin can get more votes by cuddling up to Jews by his Muslim-bashing, he will doubtless have a few more electoral successes. The Jew press in Britain will say a few nice things about him, giving him a veneer of respectability, so long as he appeases the Jewish Lobby. Which he can only do by stirring up hatred against Muslims and portraying Islam as the source of all evil.
So how is Griffin any different from Bush and Blair, Obama and McCain and Hillary Clinton and all the other innumerable grovelers to Zion? Where did all this groveling to Zion get America?
Only more under Zion’s heel.
I suggest that this problem will NOT be solved by “electoral success”. By which you clearly assume that America and Britain are democratic countries in which the people get what they want. In fact they are NOT democratic countries for the simple reason that the people NEVER get what they want. They get promises—promises that are invariably broken.
You will notice that elections are commonly rigged when the wrong side is winning. The will of the people is constantly flouted. They vote for peace, and what do they get? War!
And no matter which party they vote for, they end up with Zion.
The sooner we all realize that we live in a crypto-fascist state masqueradng as a democracy—the better for us all.
The only thing that can save America now is in fact a military coup or a revolution.
Something will have to be done one day to curtail the excessive power of the Jews—which is constantly abused—and to wrest the media away from them.
America is not an Israeli colony. But that’s what it’s beginning to look like. So is Britain and much of Europe.
Bombs, Body Scans & Israel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YCJxYgwLAY
If your success depends on others then they are your keepers.
Look! Jews wouldn’t have the influence in the West that they do have without the help of Western political and social elites who have sold out their own kind in order to feather their nests. Why is it so difficult to take this on board? I don’t get it. The problem isn’t ‘the Jews’ it’s the traitors in our midst – many of whom are now beginning to court Muslims as the means of remaining in power. Remove the traitors and Jews (and Muslims) would be powerless.
Xanadu…
How exactly is Nick Griffin giving in to the Jews? What has he done?
The BNP foreign policy position:
http://www.bnp.org.uk/policies/foreign-affairs
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/345th-Soldier-Dies-in-Afghanistan-as-ConDem-Regime-Continue-Defence-Cutbacks
@ Masculinity
How exactly is Nick Griffin giving in to the Jews? What has he done?
In adopting a virulent Islamophobia, Griffin is following a Jewish agenda. The Jews want to stir up race hatred, particularly against Muslims. They want to show Islam in as bad a light as possible. Why? So that people in Western countries, sick to death of all the Muslim immigrants in their midst, back Israel in its genocide of the Palestinian people and turn a blind eye to their landgrabbing ways in the Middle East as they extend the borders of Eretz-Israel up to the Litani River in South Lebanon.
The same people, the Jews, who stir up hatred in the Jew-owned media against Muslim immigrants, are the identical force behind multiculturalism. They are the ones who encourage that immigration.
Griffin’s Islamophobia is exactly what the Jews want. So Griffin is now a tool for Jewry, whether he knows it or not.
If you were a Jew in America or Europe, wouldn’t you like all the White folk around you to channel all their rage for job losses and increasing poverty and homelessness onto the Muslim immigrants, thereby deflecting that rage from the Jews who are not only directly responsible for the increased immigration but also for the job losses and homelessness and poverty of ordinary Americans? (Through their control of the money supply and their vast financial scams).
The root of all these problems can be traced to the hidden hand of Jewry. You are wasting your time if you start blaming the Muslims for everything! Talking about Al Qaeda and how they they plan to do another 9-11 and so on. That’s all a lot of rubbish intended to distract your attention from the Jews.
Yes, I know. It would be nice not to have too many foreigners around. Stealing our jobs and so on. But are the Muslims to blame? Can’t you join the dots and see what has been happening?
America bombs Vietnam. Why? Because it means millions of Vietnamese have lost everything in Vietnam and now flood into America as refugees and immigrants. Which is just what the Jews want. Which is why Kissinger gleefully ordered the bombing of Vietnam, knowing it would mean a new flood of immigrants to America.
War is the best way to craate new waves of immigrants. You bomb Iraq, you get millions of new refugees. You bomb Afghanistan, you get millions of new regugees. You bomb Iran, you get millions of new refugees. Where do they go? To the West. To Europe and America.
Which is just what the Jews want.
War, you see, is a means to multiculturalism. Which is in turn a means to the destruction of the White race.
Xanadu, Maybe you’re right and the there is no way to win through the current system, but if there was no one like Griffin who tried to play the game then there will never be a way to know that. Please consider that you may be wrong and limited but surprising successes are indeed possible. The actions taken against Griffin have come after his electoral successes, more of that will make it increasingly obvious to ordinary Whites that the system is rigged. It’s essential that there is a Nationalist party participating in elections and that involves trying to prioritize the time given to subjects, getting votes requires addressing peoples most concerns in a tiny window of opportunity, not hammering on about your thing .
Net jeremiads that tell whites only a deus ex machina uprising can save them will certainly lead to the destruction of the White race if they are believed.
@ Someday
“Please consider that you may be wrong…”
I never cease to consider that I may be wrong, Someday. Indeed, I often hope I AM wrong!
“Net jeremiads that tell whites only a deus ex machina uprising can save them will certainly lead to the destruction of the White race if they are believed.”
Your belef in democracy and due process is very touching, Someday. But you must consider the possibility that the democracy you believe in is a myth. A figment of the collective imagination fostered by the Jew media.
The ballot box is no cure becasuse the ballot box can be rigged. How can people vote sensibly if the Jew-owned media lies them into voting for the policies that spell their own ruin?
Did Americans “vote” for the 1965 Immigration Act that opened the floodgates to immigration? No, of course not. Americans got what they did NOT vote for! They got what the Jews wanted!
I see no reason to believe, Someday, that a military coup or an armed revolution against the existing order would spell the demise of the White race. On the contrary, the whole object of the military coup or armed revolution would be to procure the continuation of the White race.
There is an old Latin proverb I would like to quote for you: REMEDIO AMARO AMARAM BILEM DILUUNT. Literally, “With a bitter remedy they wash away the biter bile.” Or in plain English, “Drastic remedies for drastic diseases.”
The ballot box isn’t going to do the trick, Someday. Democracy is dead. It died long ago. In fact, it never existed except for a brief moment in Ancient Greece.
All we have is the semblance of democracy, with the people being conned into believing they gave their consent to the scoundrels they voted for.
The best thing people could do in future is NOT TO VOTE. Ever. To boycott all elections.
By voting, people only give legitimacy to the reigning tyranny.
Xanadu – I am always suspicious of those that talk of ‘Jewish genocide of Palestinians’ – especially when they tie it in with the term ‘Islamophobia’. It makes me think of left wing agendas…
There are no such people as Palestinians. ‘Islamophobia’ is an attempt by Muslims and their brothers in arms (the left) to relegate the perfectly legitimate concerns about Islam to a mental disorder.
If ‘the Jews’ are behind the imposition of multiculturalism/multiracialsim on the West, who is behind the imposition of multiculturalism/multiracialism on Israel?
The fact is *some* Jews and *some* Europeans are behind the world-wide imposition of multiculturalism/multiracialism as a means of securing their own power/authority for all time.
The best thing people could do in future is NOT TO VOTE. Ever. To boycott all elections.
By voting, people only give legitimacy to the reigning tyranny.
You’ve got to be kidding, Moonwalker.
Elections provide an excellent opportunity to educate the public and shift it towards a more racial position. But it can’t be done overnight. Give them too much and your efforts will backfire.
Philosemitism, whether sincere or cynical, is exactly the right strategy for the times. The “Honorable Aryan” way of speaking unvarnished truth as one sees it (more myth than reality, I suspect), ignoring the existing biases of one’s audience, is a ticket to ongoing irrelevance.
Elections won’t work, anyone with a lick of sense realizes that. The parties are too comprised. A third party will be crushed. Hopefully in a way that will help ignite the masses.
In the two major parties, an individual can only go so far without help from the tribe and without being beholden to them. Usually these people are blackmailable, like Obama or other closeted homosexuals.
Elections might hold a bit more promise in Europe, but not in the USA. With most major areas going with electronic ballots sooner than later election fraud will reach new heights in the US.
No one speaks the unvarnished truth all the time, that’s for sure. But it’s also undeniable that Jews never speak the truth.