Are Jews Smarter?

There’s an article on Jewish intelligence from 2005 in New York, “Are Jews Smarter,” by Jennifer Senior. It’s a story of the good, the bad, and the ugly. Senior identifies herself as Jewish with  the result that, as always, there is a tension between pride in Jewish intelligence and accomplishment and fear that there might be negative consequences if people buy into the idea that Jewish intelligence results in Jews being better able to pursue their interests and, in particular, being better able to influence culture and the political process in a way that conflicts with the interests of non-Jews.

The general tone of the article can be seen from her statement that “Ascribing an ethnic or racial explanation to any trait more ambiguous than skin color is by definition a dangerous idea, the kind of notion that can seep into the political arena with disastrous consequences.”

Advertisement

The focus of the article is Harpending and Cochran’s study of Ashkenazi IQ. Senior is amazingly dismissive of the article: “The paper contained references, but no footnotes. It was not written in the genteel, dispassionate voice common to scientific inquiries but as a polemic. Its science was mainly conjecture.” Now I have problems with C&H’s approach too, but it’s ridiculous to describe their paper as conjecture or as polemic. And standard procedure in the hard sciences is to use references, not footnotes. The article does mention the main point that several Jewish genetic diseases are associated with IQ and brain metabolism and that they are exceedingly unlikely to have come together in the Ashkenazi population by chance. But Senior doesn’t mention the overwhelming evidence that in general IQ is highly heritable and that a great many other genes contribute to IQ–probably hundreds. The genetic basis of IQ goes far beyond the few genes for genetic diseases found at unusually high levels among the Ashkenazim.

In fact, she doesn’t even take the idea of intelligence seriously, making the idiotic comment that “intelligence isn’t even possible to define, except maybe in the sense that Justice Potter Stewart famously said of porn: He knew it when he saw it.”

In other words, let’s just throw out a century of research on the validity and reliability of IQ testing as well as research on the biological basis of IQ. And never mind the long history of behavior genetic studies showing a very substantial heritability for IQ–whether Jewish or not.

On the other hand, the article does cite genetic data indicating that race is more than simply a social construction. Now race realists have always known this, but it’s nice to see it in a popular magazine. Ironically, she makes it sound like the biological basis of race is a recent discovery made possible by the work of Jewish scientists.

During the past year, the taboos surrounding the genetics of race and ethnicity have been significantly eroded, in no small part because of the efforts of Risch. A population geneticist at the University of California at San Francisco, a fiercely independent thinker, a fun gossip, and a liberal Jew, he published a paper in the American Journal of Human Genetics in February that rather boldly claimed that the races we claimed to be almost always corresponded with our continents of ancestry. It seemed to represent the consensus view that’s slowly emerging among geneticists. Many have now stopped quarreling with the same vigor about whether race is or is not a genetic fact.

The science of race is presented as a conversation among Jewish scientists. (Incidentally, she cites IQ data showing that Jews are almost 6 times more likely to have an IQ over 140 than northern Europeans, but even if true, it would imply that there are a great many more northern Europeans than Jews in that range.)

Then another Jewish scientist is quoted:

“I am not sure that most geneticists have agreed to ‘races’ per se,” says Ostrer. “But continental groups or clusters, yes.” To deny these clusters, he says, would be folly; it tells us to willfully ignore what all of us can see—that people look different all over the world. He quotes me a line from Jews: A Study in Race and Environment, written by his NYU predecessor, Maurice Fishberg: “One can pick out a Jew from among a thousand non-Jews without difficulty.” Ostrer is now writing a book himself, about genetics and Jewish history. He has decided to call the first chapter “Looking Jewish.”

Not races but clusters?? Now there’s a new discovery! I rather doubt that anyone who has believed in the reality of race ever thought anything else. But it’s nice to see Fishberg’s work on looking Jewish taken seriously.

Population geneticist David Goldstein has a nice comment on self-censorship by geneticists on the topic of race–without noting the role of Jewish social scientists, particularly Franz Boas and his followers, in disestablishing scientific study of race and race differences in the West:

“Until recently, most human geneticists almost . . . disallowed discussion about genetic differences among racial and ethnic groups. Really. So many awful things had been done with genetic research in this last century that they developed a policy of ‘Just say no.’ But there’s actually a lot of difference between groups, when you consider there are 10 million polymorphic sites on the genome. So it’s not scientifically sound to rule out the possibility of differences corresponding to our geographic and ethnic heritages. It overlooks the basic point: The genome is just a huge place.”

Senior provides a cultural alternative to the genetic theory:

Yet there are many who’d find a very different way of explaining the intelligence of these patients. They wouldn’t invoke their extra dendrites. They’d invoke their mothers.

To say that the Jews have a history of emphasizing scholarship is not just the fantasy of ethnic chauvinists and Woody Allen fans. To look at a single page of the Talmud is to understand this, with its main text at the center, its generations of rabbis arguing around the rim. The dialectic and critical reasoning are at its core.

But the cultural explanation is not really an alternative explanation to the genetic explanation. Eugenic explanations of Jewish intelligence emphasize that Jews who were good at scholarship had a variety of advantages, including good business and marriage prospects (see here).  Moreover, behavior geneticists have long known that the environments provided by bright parents are quite different from environments provided by dull parents, and the natural children of these bright parents benefit more from the stimulating environments provided by their natural parents than dull children would.

Perhaps most revealing about the article is that the entire subtext is not whether there is truth to be had on Jewish intelligence but whether it’s good for the Jews. Sadly, that about sums up the approach of the Jewish intellectual movements reviewed in The Culture of Critique.

In any case, the topic continues to excite. I just received John Glad’s new book, Jewish Eugenics, and Richard Lynn’s book on Jewish intelligence should be out soon. Best to ignore Senior’s article and use the time on better things.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

179 Comments to "Are Jews Smarter?"

  1. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    January 26, 2011 - 6:26 pm | Permalink

    “Perhaps most revealing about the article is that the entire subtext is not whether there is truth to be had on Jewish intelligence but whether it’s good for the Jews.”

    Interesting. You don’t really see Asians playing up or toning down their apparently higher IQ to any great degree, at least not to the extent that jews do. I think jews should focus less on how the world perceives their intelligence and more on how the world perceives their deviousness (as in jews taking credit for studies that link intelligence to race. Oh, excuse me…”cluster.”)

    • Brad Anderson's Gravatar Brad Anderson
      May 9, 2011 - 1:02 am | Permalink

      William Feather said that “A single fact will often spoil a most interesting argument.”
      Here, the fact is that Jews, like Asians, present a non-representative sample; specifically, Jews were “culled” by the events of WWII eliminating the less-intelligent half of their population, while likewise only the more intelligent and educated Asians are ever tested from among the 2 billion among them in the world.

      Non-representative sampling is a primary source of statististical error, and is most often likely to be the source of errors in testing for IQ’s in differing populations.

      From a simple perspective of observation, the European population has produced and contributed more to global advancement throughout history than the remainder of the world combined, with the civilizations of Greece, Rome, and the remainder of Europe being the main contributors. However here we are to believe that Semites and Asians are more capable, and thus Greece and Europe was simply “lucky” in somehow inheriting a more hospitable environment– a laughable notion, when considering that the term “Western” (as in “Western influence”) pertains exclusively to European heritage.

      Rather, political foibles simply prove anti-European in quashing the claims of antebellum and pre-WWII genetic superiority of European races, and so such studies are biased accordingly.
      Likewise, the political agendas are discernable from the desire to bias policy-decisions away from populism toward Aristrocracy, by implying that persons of superior intellect should be the natural rulers over the rest of society– rather than simply allowing democracy and the free market to make such decisions.
      In any event, it’s easy to see the man behind the curtain.

  2. felipeb's Gravatar felipeb
    January 26, 2011 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

    What is most clear is that Senior’s knowledge of and interest in science is limited to the work and ideas of Jews. No one else matters. Senior is a racist in the most pejorative way.

  3. Gray Prince's Gravatar Gray Prince
    January 26, 2011 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

    A question that I’ve always had about Jewish IQ is whether their brain volumes are in fact larger than other Europeans’. IQ has supposedly been shown to correlate with brain volume betwixt other races, but I wonder if anyone has studied differential brain volumes between Jews. I’m curious about this subject because I wonder whether their IQ is strictly limited to the verbal/analytical at the expense of the visuo-spatial centers, that is, have they selectively bred themselves to create persons with hypoplastic visual creative abilities but expanded analytical centers that are more useful for wealth concentration? There are very few Jews who excell in the visual arts or poetry, which may draw on the visual cortex. In general Jewish designs and characters(eg. Shrek) seem painfully unaesthetic to me. I’m curious whether these differences reflect a biological difference of the brain or a difference in aesthetics and cultural value.

  4. Glen's Gravatar Glen
    January 26, 2011 - 7:21 pm | Permalink

    …’there is a tension between pride in Jewish intelligence and accomplishment and fear that there might be negative consequences if people buy into the idea that Jewish intelligence results in Jews being better able to pursue their interests and, in particular, being better able to influence culture and the political process in a way that conflicts with the interests of non-Jews.’

    Surely their is also a tension between their acknowledging and using Ashkenazi IQ as a locus for Jewish racial pride, and thereby allowing it to be widely known that racial groups do actually differ in mean IQ.

    Jews would love everyone one to know that Ashkenazi IQ is about one standard deviation higher than whites, yet are appalled that it might become widely known that say Sub-Saharan Africans have a mean IQ of 70, or that Middle Easterners have a mean IQ of 85.

    The negative consequences this would have for the self-interested Jewish programs of mass Third World immigration and multiculturalism in the West are obvious.

    • Chip Carver's Gravatar Chip Carver
      January 26, 2011 - 11:55 pm | Permalink

      Glen, the difference between Whites and Jews in IQ is not a standard deviation (15 points). This was pointed out by Richard Lynn (The Intelligence of American Jews – you can find it online – even though it gets ‘killed’ sometimes, lol) – and yet somehow Jews and others cling to the “115 average” myth, created from one study on children from a school for “the gifted”. Others have erroneously quoted Lynn as stating the Jews have an average IQ of 114+, but not true. Their verbal scores average just under 108 compared to white ‘controls’ at 100, but Jews are outscored by Whites in visuospatial ability. Yet no one wants to point out the difference, only acknowledging Whites doing better at these types of tests/questions than Jews, but rarely posting the scores. The 7 – 8 point difference in verbal IQ is an advantage if one is raised to take advantage of this.

      Lynn also points out that it’s been terribly hard to nail down averages for Jews due to samples always coming from small samples of their population (somewhat controlled some may think). What’s amusing is that some of those considered “White” in testing samples wouldn’t be considered White by too many people today, especially on this site. But they are considered White when it comes to tests, and they knock down the White average in the US.

      Too many WN’s fret about IQ. There are other cognitive abilities that cannot be measured as of yet. Whites excel in divergent thinking (being able to link unrelated items and ideas). Whites are also the only racial group that seems to have a balance, meaning even levels of, ability between two areas that can be measured, verbal/analytical and visuospatial. This and the divergent thinking abilities may be the root of white creativity and inventiveness. Asians excel at visuospatial tests, and this helps in some areas of mathematics. However, they are as a group, uncreative (I know, I went to school with and work with many Asians). They are noted for their abilities in mathematics but many people are not aware that about 99% of all the Asian Mathematics majors end up going into Applied Mathematics when it’s time to work. An area that requires the least level of being able to think outside the box, be creative.

      A friend of mine who majored in Physics back when we were in college joked that a lot of Jews went into Theoretical Physics because not only were there a) so many gullible non-Jewish physicists who would openly spout their ideas and see them stolen (with a Jewish network in place to make sure their fellow tribalists will be able to claim the ideas as their own should things go to court) and b) in that field there weren’t many penalties for being wrong. All these years later I can see much more in his remarks, and they cover areas others than physics. Those ‘jokes’ might be more than just an idea one could consider jokes. For all their supposed or real brainpower, Jews have never been able to create their own civilization. They’ve never been able to maintain any of the societies that they’ve hijacked. Look at the US. The Jewish plan is going to fail. They’ve never been able to run any country without the wheels falling off. Look at Israel. Without US aid, it would collapse in on itself in a month.

      Being a smart and organized group can allow you to lie, cheat, steal, and destroy a society of atomized individuals, no matter how smart they may be. That’s the main reason for their success. This is why they shriek and go berserk when they see Whites getting organized. Numerically there are many more smart Whites than smart Jews. They do not want to see “them”, the most hated of “the other” organized. Period.

    • Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
      January 27, 2011 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

      What’s the secret code for enabling the addition of 100 thumbs-up icons to Chip Carver’s fine, fine comment?

    • brian morrison's Gravatar brian morrison
      January 27, 2011 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

      edgar j steele’s book DEFENSIVE RACISM
      http://www.DefensiveRacism.com/
      here is one of his last emails before disappearing into the american gulag system – after a failed assassination attempt.
      http://mail.aol.com/33124-111/aol-6/en-us/Suite.aspx
      this man’s is a voice is one we need. he has effectively been silenced. just what was he saying?

    • brian morrison's Gravatar brian morrison
      January 27, 2011 - 7:29 pm | Permalink

      regarding egdar j steele: here’s a general recap on his story. it is important –
      http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=4625#more-4625
      and some rancid juicy juice at the jewish plot taking him down -
      http://www.originaldissent.com/node/122
      we need this man’s voice.

    • brian morrison's Gravatar brian morrison
      January 31, 2011 - 11:23 am | Permalink

      here is that ‘last email’ referred to two posts prior
      http://www.nickelrant.com/rants/100521rant.htm

  5. January 26, 2011 - 7:52 pm | Permalink

    “The paper contained references, but no footnotes. It was not written in the genteel, dispassionate voice common to scientific inquiries but as a polemic. Its science was mainly conjecture.” Now I have problems with C&H’s approach too, but it’s ridiculous to describe their paper as conjecture or as polemic. And standard procedure in the hard sciences is to use references, not footnotes.

    What is the difference between a reference and a footnote?

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      January 27, 2011 - 2:14 am | Permalink

      @ William W …
      Yes, good question. I believe what was actually meant by the original statement is this … [it is] standard procedure in the hard sciences to use CITATIONS and not long explanatory footnotes.

    • January 27, 2011 - 4:04 pm | Permalink

      For the +1 and +1.5 SDs look at the demographics of NYC and the mean IQs of the other two major (2m+) ethnic groups (i.e. Hispanics and Black-Americans), as Gentile Whites are just a small minority, about the size of E. Asians if the US Census Bureau data and NY State Archives are to be believed.

  6. The lawnmower man's Gravatar The lawnmower man
    January 26, 2011 - 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Naaa , they just appear smarter because Colonist Jews are not socialized to run a country so their parents can intellectually radicalize them all .When you run a country without a slave force a large part of the society has to be trained and socialized to do the critical jobs like plumbing , electrician , building agricultural work,etc. Colonist Jews socialize their children to become banker , bankers , property developers , stockbrokers and the hated lawyer , pornographers and the other assorted band of Hollywood arseholes : basically where ever the easy money is make– don’t be a smuck and do an honest job!
    You see the difference when you meet Israeli’s who have to run their own country and so the actually give a fcuk about the outcome of their citizen socialization , this makes them far more serious and conservative in personality ; they are not socialized to be a band of marauding intellectuals .Though this is not really true because they import Third Worlder slave as laborers , cleaners , prostitutes at a third of the Israeli wage .
    Wow and I thought they were egalitarian communist all living in Kibbutzes !

  7. Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
    January 26, 2011 - 8:35 pm | Permalink

    ANTI-SEMITISM LINKED TO LOW IQ

    I have enjoyed reading Kevin MacDonald’s stimulating blog discussing the high intelligence of the Jews.

    Professor MacDonald mentions Jennifer Senior’s citation of IQ data that reveals that Jews are SIX times more likely to have an IQ of 140 than most other northern Europeans.

    It goes without saying that I am delighted to hear this.

    That Jews have an edge on non-Jews in the IQ stakes has always been apparent to me. I don’t mind this. I like it.

    As a young female academic with an IQ of 150, whose Jewish friends are all similarly endowed with high IQs, I think this will definitely help Jews to combat the rampant anti-Semitism we see displayed all around us with such worrying frequency.

    It can honestly be stated that anti-Semitism itself, whenever it is found in a particular group, is a sure indication that that group is not particularly intelligent.

    The IQ level of anti-Semites has often proved to be appallingly low. Proof of this? Consider the mindless stupidity of the following anti-Semitic comments made in 2010.

    According to the prestigious Simon Wiesenthal Center, the biggest anti-Semitic slur of 2010 was this:

    “Jews should get the hell out of Palestine. They should go
    home to Poland, Germany, America and everywhere else.”

    Isn’t that stupid?

    This was said by Helen Thomas, former UPI Senior White House correspondent in May 2010. The imbecility of that comment is obviously inseparable from a low IQ. No intelligent person would speak so slightingly of Jews.

    Wherever Jews are, they have a right to be. Do Jews have a legal right to be in America? Of course we do! We have as much right to this country as White Americans!

    We Jews have fought and died beside White Americans in foreign wars. America is joined at the hip with Israel. Our two great countries have common interests. Never forget that.

    With Jewish brains and White American muscle power working in unison, we can conquer the world.

    Equally anti-Semitic was Helen Thomas’s fatuous December 2010 comment:

    “Congress, the White House, Hollywood and Wall Street are
    owned by Zionists. They put their money where their mouth
    is.”

    Dreadful! This appalling woman should be silenced! I understand she is of Lebanese origin. This would account for her inflammatory language, given that Lebanon is overrun by terrorists such as Hezbollah who have probably had a very bad influence on her.

    Former Malaysian Premier Mahatir Mohammad shocked the entire world in 2010 by saying this a few months ago:

    “Jews have always been a problem in European countries.
    They had to be confined to ghettoes and periodically
    massacred.”

    Disgraceful! This is the evil Islamofascist who a few years ago had the audacity to say: “Jews rule the world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.”

    This comment elicited universal opprobrium when it was first uttered a few years ago. When I first heard it, I wept.

    Another anti-Semite, a German this time, caused outrage among my friends and neihhbors in Brooklyn by his wounding comment that “All Jews have a certain gene. This makes them different from other people.” (My italics)

    Gosh, you just can’t say things like that!

    The innuendo here is that Jews are an alien race from Outer Space. Not quite human. Extraterrestrials…like David Icke’s lizards.

    People who make observations like this are clearly evil as well as unintelligent.

    My conclusion? As long as there is anti-Semitism, there will be low IQs to go with it. This is my firm conviction.

    Moral: if you want to be smart, don’t knock the Jews. Be led by us for your own good. We are your dear brothers in the Judeo-Christian tradition and have your interests at heart.

    Here are the other big anti-Semitic slurs of 2010:

    http://www.wiesenthal.com/atf/cf/%7B54d385e6-f1b9-4e9f-8e94-890c3e6dd277%7D/TTASS.PDF

    • TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
      January 27, 2011 - 1:56 am | Permalink

      Miriam K,

      Gosh! I love your modesty.

      What you don’t seem to understand is, you are not European/Americans…understand? It’s unatural for anyone to allow a foreign people to rule over them…understand?

      Once European/Americans realize your control over them – a foreign people – then all the IQs in the universe won’t preclude you from getting the boot.

      IQ of a 150 – lol – more like 15
      Tick Tock Tick Tock

    • heretic's Gravatar heretic
      January 27, 2011 - 2:07 am | Permalink

      Funny post! “…don’t knock the Jews. Be led by us for your own good.” Nice!! It’s either very subtle tounge-in-cheek mockery by a non-jew (although, you used the word “we”) or it’s a jewish polemic. If it’s sincere, it’s full of what Kevin MacDonald describes as endemic Jewish self-delusion. “What, us? We’re innocent, helpless, victims!” Seriously? I mean, all claims of anti-Semitism aside for a moment, are you capable of any self-reflection on what Jews as a group (not Jews as individuals) could do better or even more honestly, are doing very wrongly?

      I mean, I’ve seen criticism of Chistians, Catholics, Muslims….but criticism of Jews seems to “elicit comments of universal opprobrium” as you say.

      I fear for the Jews. It’s an old parable. The boy who cried “wolf!” and then laughed at the townspeople when they came running. Well, at some point the townspeople had an epiphany about the boy…and well, you know the rest of the story. Historically, Jewish hubris always catches up with them. Unfortunately, I think we may see a bad outcome should the economy of the West collapse and the world devolve into war. Too many parallels between now and the 1920′s and 30′s…if you know what I mean.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      January 27, 2011 - 9:08 am | Permalink

      Miriam,

      I fervently hope you are simply a cartoon cutout of a racist Zionist Jew – a construct of some malevolent Propagandist and therefore not a real person – someone deliberately designed to laugh at from behind our hands in the ways we laugh at all cartoon cutout characters that prod at our belief systems.

      The alternative – that you are indeed a living, breathing Jew who holds the views you do – fills me with dread for the future of Judaism and Jews everywhere, because if you are truly representative of your Tribe then sooner or later you and your ilk will wear out your welcome everywhere with everyone.

      It’s inevitable.

      Eventually we, the rest of us, will have to shut you down or move you out simply as a means of self-protection.

      Indiscriminate, repulsive animosity and unrepentant arrogance like yours is endemic of a Sickness, a Corruption of the Soul that can only end badly. Badly for you, that is. And for those just like you.

      It’s worth pointing out that comments like yours, written by you and your fellow delusionists alike, display for all to see the fraud perpetuated with the never-ending mantra of “brainy Jews”.

      Your post proves perfectly the flawed thinking behind that mountain of merde.

      In my own extensive experiences both working and living with Jews in several separate professional fields and not-so-professional endeavours I’ve found Jews to be diligent students of whatever field of study they involve themselves in but in almost all cases I have found these excellent students to be grossly lacking in the skill sets necessary for truly creative work or thinking. The “idea” has to be already present for them to do what they do best – twist it to their own ultimate advantage while working diligently to display their cleverness to one and all. Which to me in no way translates into intelligence. I think Shakespeare, a genius student of the human condition, nailed that fact down in “The Merchant of Venice” hundreds of years ago.

      The academic view that Jews are more intelligent has me confused. By what standard are Jews considered “smarter” than white Europeans? And who wrote those tests, anyway?

      What is the measuring stick for intelligence if not the ability to think creatively – an ability I have found sorely lacking in the Jews I have worked with for over 40 years?

      This subject is nowhere near my area of expertise. I honestly would like a serious answer to this question – What is the measuring stick for intelligence if not the ability to think creatively? Surely someone in this field of study can explain to me and everyone else who is confused by or ignorant of the procedures involved what that measuring stick is and how it came to be the accepted method(s) of determining intelligence.

      Now, that being said, I wouldn’t dare to suggest that my experiences working and living jaw to jaw with Jews is the final word. But my experiences certainly suggest that the accolades directed at Jews for their superior intelligence appear to be overblown. How can my life time of experiences be so at odds with accepted academic wisdom?

      …Anyone?

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      January 27, 2011 - 9:26 am | Permalink

      Miriam,

      I mistakenly “copy and pasted” an earlier version of my rebuttal to your comments – not my finalized version. Here is the revised first paragraph of the post I submitted earlier:

      I fervently hope you are simply a cartoon cutout of a racist Zionist Jew – a construct of some malevolent Propagandist and therefore not a real person – someone deliberately designed for the rest of us to laugh at from behind our hands in the ways we laugh at all cartoon cutout characters that prod ungently at our belief systems and comfort levels.

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 27, 2011 - 9:36 am | Permalink

      I can’t help but believe that Miriam is some type of troll. If not, then anyone reading her passage who was not an Anti-Semite will most certainly be one now. The Jews represent such a small portion of the population in relation to the world because throughout history host populations have found them to be absolutely intolerable. This has happened time and time again, and I’m just going to go ahead and blame it entirely on Miriam K. You can almost see some young white European strolling down the street and running into some incarnation of a Miriam K in his own time. Perhaps a conversation ensues between the two and suddenly the thought occurs to him, my god, these people have got to go. And that’s an occurrence that has played out thousands of times over, and eventually leads to the ouster of Jews from each and every single country they have ever wormed their way into.

      Now it’s just a matter of running into these people on the internet.

    • Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
      January 27, 2011 - 3:06 pm | Permalink

      Miriam’s purported high IQ is comprised of a 110 Verbal Analytical (VA) score, a 95 Spacial Visual (SP) score, and a 300+ Chutzpah-Impudence (CI) score.

      Whites tend to score well below 100 on the CI scale, making our overall average appear “low”, and hence “dumb” from those endowed with high CI scale scores.

      The problem with a high CI score usually leads to a high incidence of the dreaded “Pitchforks and Pogroms” effect, which overrides and negates any superiority achieved by a high VA scale score.

    • Jim's Gravatar Jim
      January 27, 2011 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

      You’re right, Miriam.
      Henry Ford, Martin Luther, John Maynard Keynes, Alfred P. Sloan, Renoir, Wagner and George Bernard Shaw…all idiots.

    • January 28, 2011 - 8:30 am | Permalink

      Michael Santomauro January 26, 2011 – 8:36 pm “Why is it okay for white Jews (Ashkenazim) to sub-divide themselves from the Sephardic lower IQ? (Forty-five percent of Israel’s population has the Sephardic IQ of 88.)

      And it is not okay for other White ethnics to be able to do the same when reporting IQ scores?”

      A good illustration of the more general, problematic quantifying in (to classes) issue which I have repeatedly pointed out blights much of this work and talk especially given the small populations concerned. In the UK for example, the Jewish population is ~300,000 (about the same size as the British Chinese population). This would lead one to initially expect ceteras paribus that nationally any school year group’s data would comprise roughly 3000 pupils. If one then looked to the composition of our Faith Schools (which are state funded and which therefore run the National Curriculum SATs at 7, 11 and 14 until recently) one might expect to be able to use some of those data to estimate Jewish IQ given that UK SATs (not the same as your US SATs, but these are standardised tests in English, Maths and Science) are essentially IQ proxies (r=~0.7). However, one is then faced with the fact that these schools do not necessarily comprise a representative sample of the Jewish population, and what’s more, when one looks closely at the data, one observes that the balance of females to males is highly skewed towards females. It is still not clear to me why this was so when I looked at these data back in 2004/5. If interested, I refer you to my suggestion to arthurdecco viz NYC and SATs/NAEP relative to other White US citizens in other state/cities, as this is an interesting genetic/epidemiological matter given that this NYC sub-population comprises, not only an interesting endogamous group (and hence gene-barrier), but given its relation to the other major ethnic groups in NYC and the city’s place in the nation’s economy, something worth some further analysis?

    • Brad Anderson's Gravatar Brad Anderson
      May 9, 2011 - 1:23 am | Permalink

      “With Jewish brains and White American muscle power working in unison, we can conquer the world. ”

      If I didn’t know better, I’d swear this was a fake post written to incite anti-semitism, by ADMITTING that the Jews think that Americans exists to be their muscle for Zion.
      Guess again, Yenta. The facts are that people throwing around stratospheric IQ scores are notorious liars, and you simply don’t want people getting wise to your schemes.
      Americans are tired of being a tool of Zion at the expense of our own national security, and incurring the wrath of Islamic fundamentalist nutbars like Al-Queda, the PLO and other extremists– all for the Jewish benefit.
      Sure you have the “right” to live where you want; but we’re not obligated to defend you in the proces. 9/11 happened because of US involvement on behalf of Israel, and we’re tired of fighting your battles.

  8. January 26, 2011 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    My Letter to Ms. Senior:
    Oct. 19, 2005
    Re: Are Jews Smarter?

    Dear Ms. Senior:

    Why is it okay for white Jews (Ashkenazim) to sub-divide themselves from the Sephardic lower IQ? (Forty-five percent of Israel’s population has the Sephardic IQ of 88.)

    And it is not okay for other White ethnics to be able to do the same when reporting IQ scores? For example, at the very minimum, it would show Northern and Western Europeans to be comparable if not slightly higher than the Jewish-white IQ, when you eliminate the Eastern European IQ. In some categories the European-White IQ is way higher, such as in spatial reasoning, even for all White ethnics including the Eastern European. This is rarely reported in the mass media. I wonder why? It reminds me of a joke from the Jewish comedian David Steinberg, who is married to an Italian-Catholic: “Whenever I go to family gatherings, the Jewish side breaks things, and the Italian side fixes them!”

    In folk psychology and folk sociology, when it comes to E. Q., even my Jewish supremacist acquaintances and friends will think they have been culturally short changed, thinking of themselves as an unhappy lot.

    In aesthetics Jews “seem” to have an inferiority complex when it comes to physical aptitude, which I have argued with my Jewish friends, is absolutely uncalled for! For instance, in “folk talk,” my Jewish girlfriends believe what is often said (even by Bobby Fischer) about Jewish men in the “below the belt” department, that they have been short changed from all that inbreeding.

    And what about Jewish women? Again, referring to David Steinberg’s promulgation of the joke: “What moves more Jell-O or Jewish women in bed”. The rate of Jewish men running away to marry “shiksa’s” for the under 35 age category is as high as 35-50%, depending on which data you want to embrace.

    Are we to make a correlation from any of this?

    The point being, it is hard to define what is a “Jewish brain” in the secular world. You mention the high percentage of Jewish Nobel Prize winners since its inception in 1901, yet about two-thirds of the Jewish winners come from inter-faith/inter-ethnic backgrounds. For centuries before 1901, the portion of Jewish contributions to the high sciences is almost void.

    To refer to chess master Bobby Fischer (another one of those 1/2 Jews), is slanderous to Jews. Your readers should be aware that he hates Jews with a fervent passion, and blames virtually any bad that is happening in the world on organized Jewry.

    You wrote: “Of course, there’s another side to this shining coin. Jewish cleverness has also been an enduring feature of anti-Semitic paranoia.”

    The implication here for your readers misunderstanding is that anti-Semitism is the result of Jewish intellect. Historically it has been as a result of resource competition, belief in a moral and intellectual superiority and a fierce policy of non assimilation with the host countries which initially offered you admittance with friendliness. Anti-Semitism is not in any way a mental illness.

    Western Civilization is a European-white accomplishment and Judaism has always been an appendage. Not the other way around.

    We are a better world today because Western Civilization took the road to Athens over the road to Jerusalem.

    If we had a proper scientific study involving IQ tests that are not skewed to fit one group in particular (by, for example, including musical intelligence tests that are currently excluded because some people “don’t believe in” musical intelligence) then all this Jewish intellectual narcissism would disappear up its own arsehole. Which is precisely why we will never see such a thing, for it would be truly “anti-Semitic”.

    As long as we’re playing with racism and stereotypes, where do Jews rank in the greed and power scale? Or the bad landlord scale? Or the cause of social inequality, war and exploitation of lesser people scale?

    One last thing, it’s too much of a reach to think that Charlemagne “lured” Jews there to lend money. Give me a break!

    Peace.
    Michael Santomauro
    ReporterNotebook@gmail.com

    • Gray Prince's Gravatar Gray Prince
      January 26, 2011 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

      Part of the reason that there were no significant Jewish scientists before 1800 is that the Ashkenazic Jewish population did not really exist before 1700. Eastern European Jews underwent a sort of ethnogenesis and population expansion during the 18th century. They represent a coevolution with the modern civilizaiton, a group which has literally evolved in response to certain niches created by modernity.

    • January 27, 2011 - 6:22 am | Permalink

      Part of the reason that there were no significant Jewish scientists before 1800 is that the Ashkenazic Jewish population did not really exist before 1700.

      Either that or it’s because of most Ashkenazi Jews having been segregated from European Christians and heavily restricted in occupation prior to the French Revolution.

    • Brad Anderson's Gravatar Brad Anderson
      May 9, 2011 - 1:33 am | Permalink

      I also can’t think of a better example of bad manners, than Jews fleeing to a country, being welcomed in, and then insulting their hosts as “inferior.”
      (EXCEPT then wondering why they’re despised, and attributing it to this “inferiority”).

  9. John's Gravatar John
    January 26, 2011 - 8:44 pm | Permalink

    New York magazine is basically a rag based around meaningless consumer culture. It also often features stories about Jewish people and topics. This article MacDonald is referencing is five years old and I specifically remember reading it at the time it was released as my girlfriend at the time had a subscription to the magazine.

    What you all might even be just as interested in reading is this article also featured in New York magazine much more recently:

    http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/58190/

    The article is full of Jewish supremacist beliefs and blatant racism. It states the following:

    “The fact is that Jews are exceptional. There can be no debate that various historical factors—including a communal reverence for intellectual acuity, along with centuries of marginalization—primed Jews for, first, survival, and then uncommon achievement.”

    It’s a short piece but highly indicative of what Jews think of themselves.

  10. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    January 26, 2011 - 11:31 pm | Permalink

    Yes.

    Kevin, you can make a good case for excluding non-Whites from our nations on this fact. Eventually all the high-brow jobs will go to Jews and Asians.

    Jews have greater verbal skills that’s why they are politicians, lawyers, professors. Asians are better at engineering type work. Both these groups are pushing Whites out of higher education.

    Whites will be left to pick up the trash.

    TT

    • Glen's Gravatar Glen
      January 27, 2011 - 1:21 am | Permalink

      ‘Asians are better at engineering type work.’

      More like Asians are better at intellectual property theft of engineering type work done by whites.

    • TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
      January 27, 2011 - 2:04 am | Permalink

      Glen,

      CofC is where I got that info…it says East Asians are generally better at engineering/technology than Whites. Maybe Kevin has got new ideas concerning this.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      January 27, 2011 - 2:35 am | Permalink

      @ TicTac …
      Jews have greater verbal skills that’s why they are politicians, lawyers, professors.

      Their (i.e., the Ashkenazim) brains are ‘feminized’. These are males with minds that are inclined to the feminine. Verbal skills are feminine skills.
      Being ‘deceitful’ and ‘sneaky’ are feminine or Yin attributes. Clinging to each other no matter where they go is another female (Yin) behaviour.

      Asians are better at engineering type work.

      This is a meaningless statement because the word ‘Asian’ is not pre-defined. What are you attempting to include when you use the adjective, Asian? Bangladeshi? Nepalese? Filipino?

      Japanese industrial and scientific skills were all imported directly from Europe, but especially from the United States. During the 1950s, British Motor Engineers were assigned to Japan to oversee the establishment of the Japanese Motor Industry.

      QUOTE >> The several waves of quality control methods that have swept U.S. manufacturing since the 1950s are almost unthinkable except against the backdrop of Japanese industry achieving a world class reputation and thus producing stimulus. The movement is very closely associated with an American mathematician and physicist, W. Edwards Deming, although Deming was one of two prominent individuals who helped the Japanese forge their approaches to manufacturing; the other was Joseph M. Juran, a Rumanian immigrant to the United States.<< ENDQUOTE
      http://www.inc.com/encyclopedia/quality-control.html

    • Glen's Gravatar Glen
      January 27, 2011 - 2:57 am | Permalink

      The Chinese have basically pillaged the intellectual wealth of the West to drive their industrial expansion. They have perfected the art of industrial espionage. People can talk all they like about high east-Asian IQ – but the flow of engineering and scientifc innovation is entirely one way.

      The Chinese and Japanese are so smart and yet they are seemingly unable to develop universities that Chinese or Japanese students would attend in preference to any decent Western institution. Despite being so smart they still need to learn from the white man to be regarded as properly educated.

    • TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
      January 27, 2011 - 12:12 pm | Permalink

      Anglo Saxon,

      Per head of population Jews are a little bit better. But at any given time, we -Aryans – have many more people with higher IQs than Jews. C’mon guys, it’s obvious: obviously Jews are smarter than say the followers of Alex Jones. But Jews are obviously inferior to the followers of Kevin MacDonald. :)

    • Brad Anderson's Gravatar Brad Anderson
      May 9, 2011 - 1:44 am | Permalink

      “More like Asians are better at intellectual property theft of engineering type work done by whites.”
      There’s no question that reverse-engineering and other IP theft is done by Asian countries from Western ones.

  11. M Schwartz's Gravatar M Schwartz
    January 27, 2011 - 12:55 am | Permalink

    Professor MacDonald,

    One of the interesting things from the article was the response of Abe Foxman (which also surprised Senior).

    I’ve just been reading some of Lynn’s book on eugenics (the google books version) and will look forward to seeing his new book.

    ***In fact, she doesn’t even take the idea of intelligence seriously,***

    That’s par for the course with most journalists it seems. The Snyderman/Rothman survey showed this quite clearly. Also, the BBC interviewer of Thilo Sarrazin seemed ignorant of iq research.

    • January 28, 2011 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

      “TicTac January 27, 2011 – 12:12 pm Per head of population Jews are a little bit better. But at any given time, we -Aryans – have many more people with higher IQs than Jews. C’mon guys, it’s obvious: obviously Jews are smarter than say the followers of Alex Jones. But Jews are obviously inferior to the followers of Kevin MacDonald. :)”

      Have you studied the characteristics of the upper tail of the Gaussian (Normal) Distribution, and have you looked into the demographics (especially of NYC and London) as suggested? Have you factored in comparative demographics (e.g. ethnicity & birth-rates) after looking at sub-scales of IQ (verbal vs spatial), bearing in mind the feminization of the Liberal-Democracies through Civil and Human Rights over recent decades? People don’t live in nations, they live in geographical areas. I suspect most readers here have not. Why not? What is that, and other odd behaviours, prima facie evidence of?

  12. mark's Gravatar mark
    January 27, 2011 - 3:58 am | Permalink

    Miriam K said:
    January 26, 2011 – 8:35 pm

    “We Jews have fought and died beside White Americans in foreign wars. America is joined at the hip with Israel. Our two great countries have common interests. Never forget that.”

    “With Jewish brains and White American muscle power working in unison, we can conquer the world.”

    Isn’t that the way it always is—the Jews themselves being the biggest promoters of anti-semitism?

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      January 27, 2011 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

      “We Jews have fought and died beside White Americans in foreign wars…”

      This must be why the people who banged the drums loudest for the bankruptingly expensive wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were named Kristol, Perle, Krauthammer, Podhoretz and Wolfowitz, yet when one reads the lists of those killed or wounded in battle, one only finds names like Hernandez, Washington, Smith, Schultz, Kowalski and O’Hara.

  13. January 27, 2011 - 6:29 am | Permalink

    Sometimes, all is not what it seems. That’s often the case when reading what good Analytic philosophers have written. I recall Jerry Fodor once remarking in print how philosophers often lose readers through doing this, but, it’s true, they do it, and there’s a point to it, and if one is wise, one spends some time working out why they do it as part of learning how to do Analytic philosophy instead of metaphysics. Why was Oedipus’ relationship with Jocasta tragic? Why does “the victor at Jena and the vanquished at Waterloo” work so well, and why all the fuss about The Morning and The Evening Star, Bachelors and Unmarried Men etc? What is meaning, and should it just be put out with all the other mentalistic trash?

    There’s now good evidence that, whatever it ‘is’ that we pragmatically refer to as the relation of ‘intelligence’ or its proxies (Proficiency Levels in English, Maths and Science in PISA and UK SATs, similar measures exist in the USA after NCLB), it’s highly heritable and relates usefully to the economy/workforce. This consensus, like so much in behavioural genetics, is largely based on Quantitative Genetics results of the Twin Study design (not Molecular Genetics which for technical/statistical reasons is ‘hard’ to get convincing evidence on). However, what’s not so well understood (in these times of apparent global IQ dimming), is that the heritability message is also reinforced by a slurry of negative evidence for man made environmental impact on educability, i.e there’s a dearth of evidence that we can do what many people going into the helping professions often wrongly take for granted. Here I’m referring to professionals such as teachers, psychologists, social workers, probation officers, parents, and especially politicians. The truth is that after decades of investment in all manner of enrichment or treatment interventions from early education (e.g. HeadStart) to clinical therapies and forensic rehabilitation programmes, the basic message still (see Martinson in the 70s) seems to be negative, i.e. ‘Nothing Works’.

    It’s far more realistic to work on the assumption that behavioural diversity is largely genetic, that this diversity has to be accepted for what it is, and that it ‘just’ has to be far better managed – which practically means not putting some people in positions where certain behaviours are highly likely, and actively putting people in positions in a culture where their behaviours are best for all concerned – hence my reference elsewhere to ‘apposite allocation’ in controlled-environments.

    That’s now the way things seem to be going (cf. NOMS in the UK), and has been for some time. The problem, it seems to me, is that many still have not grasped why this change has had to come about. The truth is we’ve been humbled.

    When Herrnstein published his paper IQ and Falling Birthrates” in The Atlantic in May 1989, he’d been working on this (cf. his 1969 and 1971 paper and book) and Behavioural Economics for a long time. Sadly, most of the work in Behavioural Economics (the far more important of the two strands of his and his colleagues’ work in my view, and the more original aspect of his and his colleagues’ work (cf. Chung’s work at Harvard in the 60s – Shin-Ho was at the NIMR in my division when I was a lowly graduate student there in the late 70s), has been poorly understood by many, largely, no doubt because it was being done in an area of behavioural science which has long had little or no truck with psychology, not even mainstream Learning Theory, which, like Cognitive Psychology it regarded as hopelessly mentalistic or intensional pseudoscience for reasons perhaps best explained by Skinner’s contemporary and one time co-Chair at Harvard, Quine). There’s a price to be paid for writing off the majority of psychology as mentalistic nonsense, just as there is for asserting that there are important individual and group differences in behaviour, especially if one writes about ‘Beyond Freedom and Dignity’ and communitarian communities as the likely scientific conclusion, when most around you are aggressively committed, if not constitutional Libertarians (whether they ‘know’ it or not), chasing The American Dream.

    Over the last few weeks, like many others, I’ve posted a few comments to this board in an effort to stimulate some healthy critical discussion in the wake of some research on Jewish IQ published with Lynn half a decade ago. That in turn, in my case, was part of an ongoing unpublished project in policy R&D having looked at and worked practically on education (school behaviour) as well as community and prison based offending behaviour. All of that has been directed towards better understanding and ultimately better managing the rate of reported and recorded offending behaviour in the UK (and elsewhere) which has been rising since the end of WWII (the UK prison population has doubled in the last two decades), and why our Liberal-Democratic societies have seemingly been becoming more and more self-centred (narcissistic/arrested-developed). As I have remarked elsewhere, I think we should be focusing upon our skewed birth-rates (differential fertility) as a function of our Libertarian/Liberal-Democratic political economic system, as empirically, this seems to be a ‘biologically unfit’, i.e self-destructive system. It is also something which we are doing to ourselves en masse, not something we can blame on any one group (secular, e.g. non Orthodox, Jews have the a below replacement level fertility too).

  14. Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
    January 27, 2011 - 8:43 am | Permalink

    @ AngloSaxon

    “Their (i.e., the Ashkenazim) brains are ‘feminized’. These are males with minds that are inclined to the feminine. Verbal skills are feminine skills. Being ‘deceitful’ and ‘sneaky’ are feminine or Yin attributes. Clinging to each other no matter where they go is another female (Yin) behaviour.

    You make no secret of your anti-Semitism, sir. For that I need to thank you. Such candor is refreshing.

    However, you add insult to injury by your withering attack on women. To speak so condescendingly of the gentler sex is pretty unchivalrous, if not downright disgraceful.

    I was hoping Kevin MacDonald would send a clear signal to the posters here that he will not tolerate any misogyny on this site. If you are gentleman, Anglo-Saxon, you will apologize.

    As a woman, I deeply resent your comment that women are “deceitful” and “sneaky” by nature. This is hate speech.

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      January 27, 2011 - 9:20 am | Permalink

      “Hate” speech: An accusation usually made to stifle honest discussion.

    • January 27, 2011 - 9:34 am | Permalink

      Miriam K January 27, 2011 – 8:43 am “As a woman, I deeply resent your comment that women are “deceitful” and “sneaky” by nature. This is hate speech.”

      It’s worth remembering that Some(x)=Not(All(x)), All(x)=Not(Some(x)) and Not(All(x))=At_Least_One(x) in these exchanges.

      The point was about brain-gender and behaviour. Is it conceivable to you that those referred to, perhaps as a function of their higher verbal than spatial abilities, just may not be as spatially aware of their behaviours and their consequences (cf makeup, make-overs, cosmetic surgery etc, all related to narcissism more acceptable in human females than in males, even today), as they tell themselves they are? Or do you think all people have 100% insight into/awareness of their behaviours? If so, why do they not have 100% insight into their other bodily functions?

      Is it possible that some are offended by such assertions primarily because they fear that acknowledging such behaviours won’t make them appear as nice/attractive? As an example, how many times have you heard females (and feminized males) assert that they only make themselves look good in order to make themselves feel good? What may they not be paying attention to? Behaviour is controlled by its consequences, intentions often come later (‘reasons are not causes’), and what we call ‘feelings’ are private behaviours, i.e behaviours not as easily shaped by the reinforcing verbal community. These also tend to be paleo-striatal/cortical/limbic not neostratial/neocortical (distance reception and motor – for an explication see here, here, and heremediated and thus tend to be a poor guide to our sophisticated behaviours generally.

      Take a look to the statistics on the number of females vs males choosing subjects/professions like engineering vs verbally based (service) professions, and have a look at the frequency of males vs females with IQs above 120 (the female range is smaller, less very low IQ females too). Also have a look at the PISA results especially at the upper tails of the distribution for Readings vs Maths by sex, it seems to hold across the world (see the technical appendices).

      In birds sexual attraction phenotypes are reversed, but in primates/humans, females appear to be biologically designed to lure, and this is emitted at quite a young age, often unknown to themselves sadly – which is why adults try to protect them from themselves.

      People (of both sexes) are not as aware of their behaviours as they like to think, and pointing this out is not hate speech, it’s just educational. It’s why we do research after all.

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 27, 2011 - 12:35 pm | Permalink

      Haha, Miriam, you could just say that Anglo-Saxon is taking a page out of your Jewish Larry Summers’ playbook. Mr. Summers said the following:

      “So my best guess, to provoke you, of what’s behind all of this is that the largest phenomenon, by far, is the general clash between people’s legitimate family desires and employers’ current desire for high power and high intensity, that in the special case of science and engineering, there are issues of intrinsic aptitude, and particularly of the variability of aptitude, and that those considerations are reinforced by what are in fact lesser factors involving socialization and continuing discrimination. I would like nothing better than to be proved wrong, because I would like nothing better than for these problems to be addressable simply by everybody understanding what they are, and working very hard to address them.”

      In regards to IQ, there are plenty of white Europeans’ whose IQ would blow yours away. I honestly don’t know what my IQ is, but scored in the 99 percentile for my LSAT, which probably places my IQ on the high-end. Although I’ll be the first to admit that my mathematical abilities fall somewhat short. Who really cares though? Plenty of people who go on to prestigious law schools are thoroughly reprehensible people and simply ingratiate themselves to the most abject aspects of our current plutocracy. Many astounding mathematicians or “quants” have gone on to Wall Street and created some of the most destructive forces in economic history. It is really the context in which these abilities are used that determines their usefulness and just about any Jewish individual with a high IQ has used their high IQ in a thoroughly destructive manner, with some very notable exceptions. More and more we see any Jew with an intellectual edge simply looking out for their tribe. Fine, but you will also see the white intellectual reacting to this runaway exploitation, something whites let happen because of feelings of sympathy in the wake of World War II. That sympathy is quickly evaporating in the face of individuals like you Miriam, who awaken more and more whites with intellectual aptitude.

      There are individuals like Daniel Tammet, a British individual whose IQ must be through the roof. If anyone has watched the documentary The Boy with the Incredible Brain, you will be amazed at some of his abilities, such as learning the Icelandic language in a week. He is a white European whose IQ is probably astronomically higher than just about everyone in the world. And yet, you can tell there is something missing from his cognitive abilities. Extremely high IQ is often associated with autism, a point made in the documentary, leaving individuals with IQs that high emotionally crippled. Mr. Tammet appears to be able to cope and interact in socially adept ways, but would I want him running a country or being a part of the political elite? That really depends on a lot of factors, but I would go with no.

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 27, 2011 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

      Btw, anyone with some time to kill might want to check out the documentary here.

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 27, 2011 - 12:41 pm | Permalink

      Hmm, I guess you can’t “embed” videos in posts. Anyone, here’s the link.

      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4913196365903075662#

    • European's Gravatar European
      January 27, 2011 - 1:28 pm | Permalink

      Miriam, to your statement:
      As a woman, I deeply resent your comment that women are “deceitful” and “sneaky” by nature. This is hate speech.

      You have no idea how deeply you insult and how hateful you are. Your post is full of hate appearently not recognizable to yourself.
      That woman can be this way is a fact, and you prove it in every comment you post.

  15. Grim up North's Gravatar Grim up North
    January 27, 2011 - 8:46 am | Permalink

    We should all thank miriam for this fascinating look into the topsy turvy, contridictary mind of the zio facist.

    Lets analyse what she said for a minute.

    Firstly she waxs lyrical about the higher proportion of high IQs in Jews but later goes on to defense when essentially the same thing is said by a gentile.

    She then says “you can’t say that sort of thing” when she evidently means YOU(gentile) can’t but I(jew) can and will.

    Secondly there is the statement re. jews ruling by proxy. Oyy how she wept bless her heart.

    Confusingly she then goes on to say (in true Bond villan style) with our brains and your brawn we can rule the world bwa ha ha!!!
    Sounds to me like you wish to use proxies to fight your battles!

    She also shows the legendary totalitarian streak by saying helen thomas needs to be silenced.
    Would that be ADL silenced or MOSSAD silenced?

    The final part of the post is just breathtaking in its arrogance.

    Let me paraphrase

    You have my best intrests at heart and I should allow myself to be ruled by you for my own good.

    Of course this really means goy know your place in the new order. Breathtaking arrogance.

    Thanks for the offer but I have read how it worked out for the russians.

    As for her opinion (as that is all it is) that anti semitic veiws are indicitive of low IQ thwt is not what I see. I see a climate of fear in which gentiles won’t speek out about Jewish influance for fear of losing status/livlihood. Once they relise PC views won’t save them we will see how her opinion holds water.

    Sorry about spelling and grammer post done on mobile phone and i am just a dumb goy after all!!!

    • January 27, 2011 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

      “once they realise their PC views won’t save them we will see how her opinion holds water”

      Yes, blood will tell, but only after Big Brothers machines take ..ALL.. the jobs. Say….thirty years from now?
      Its happening now in the middle east (Tunisia, etc.) Sadly the mob will predictably install the same type of system (or worse)
      The new mob-leader will be good-looking, articulate/charasmatic, and SHREWD

    • January 28, 2011 - 9:49 am | Permalink

      Three of the links in an earlier post appear to be working.
      See here, here, and here, and look up the published research “Separate Neural Systems
      Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary Rewards”
      by
      Samuel M. McClure, David I. Laibson, George Loewenstein and Jonathan D. Cohen. This is Behavioural Economics.

  16. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    January 27, 2011 - 9:19 am | Permalink

    While I can’t attest to them be inherently smarter, they are less ethical than other groups. When you don’t believe in an afterlife, when you believe destiny has chosen you and your own, and that everyone else is inferior, dispensing with treating anyone outside your group without some degree of chicanery becomes laughably easy.

    • January 27, 2011 - 11:14 am | Permalink

      Do you know of any reliable research which shows that any ethnic group has a significantly higher prevalence of DSM-IV defined Axis II Cluster B disorders than other groups?

      I ask because some think this this the way of the Libertarian world, i.e. The American Dream.

  17. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    January 27, 2011 - 9:39 am | Permalink

    It occurs to me that, despite a respectable amount of scientific evidence that some specific flavors of jews might be as much as 15 percentage points higher, IQ-wise, than the average White European – that this ‘supposed IQ advantage’ (which I tend to think is greatly exaggerated due to the incredible narcissistic self-adulation and conceit that is rampant in this tribe) seems to not be sufficiently valid to prevent the jews from continuing to repeat the same mistakes throughout history or from refusing to give up their clearly self-destructive and extremely hazardous obsession to put their steel boots on the necks of White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic and Germanic peoples, worldwide. Particularly, now – that the Internet is allowing white European nationalists to communicate and network across the globe and share their findings on the identity of Enemy #1.

  18. January 27, 2011 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    I don’t accept the “jews are HIGH IQ” theory at all, having spent a lifetime around them.

    Mourant, himself a jew, scientist of blood groupings at Oxford said Jews are 5% negro in their genetics.

    I do think their strategy and cohesion as a group has enabled them to achieve their pernicious goals.

    Almost every single worthwhile invention no matter which field, medicine, computers etc claimed by jews is oft times appropriated/stolen research from White gentiles.

    The myth of their super-intelligence is a nice cover for their nefarious deeds. One might suggest then that the Oligarchs, all but one a jew, in Russia are all geniuses, when they are just organized criminals.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      January 27, 2011 - 10:59 am | Permalink

      What makes you think being clever is not an advantage in organized crime? John Gotti had an IQ of 140 on the prison test, I think I read somewhere that in high school he tested at 150.

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 27, 2011 - 1:19 pm | Permalink

      Actually, I believe school records confirmed that he scored a 110 on IQ an test and later told everyone that he scored 140 on a prison test. I do not see any verifiable information that he was scored anywhere near that high.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      January 27, 2011 - 2:05 pm | Permalink

      A successful tough guy like Gotti would boast about a IQ test? I think not.

      Clever people (like Jennifer Senior) don’t talk about their IQ, they play the game and insist that intelligence is indefinable while making light of how they would undoubtedly fail a test. That’s because they know they’re not going to be taken seriously.

      You can bet there are criminals who have proven IQs of 150 I doubt it was an disadvantage for them.

    • Southron's Gravatar Southron
      January 29, 2011 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

      “Mourant, himself a jew, scientist of blood groupings at Oxford said Jews are 5% negro in their genetics.”

      There are some smart Negros, more than you’d think – the ruling classes of Africa, etc. I recall reading that Obama’s father – after he divorced Obama’s mother- married and had kids with a Jewish woman, brought here back to Africa. Obama’s dad was a very smart guy. Again, the ruling classes of Africa aren’t dumb.

      See my comment below – Jews travel far and wide seeking to absorb the ‘smart genes’ of all racial groups; though they seem to prefer Whites, they have no problem absorbing the coveted DNA of smart and accomplished Africans, Asians, Indians, Hispanics, etc in order to enrich the overall Jewish gene pool.

  19. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 27, 2011 - 11:52 am | Permalink

    A stunning post Barbara! A Tour-de-force of historical Jewish behaviour, strategies, and tactics.

    I have never allowed myself to enter the “Jew is more intelligent camp” for many of those reasons you have just succinctly summed up in your piece.

    But interestingly, you have appended a couple of other reasons I had not gotten around to identifying. So, I am more than happy to find myself an agnostic on this issue. I personally find Yiddish or Asiatic Jews (for that is what we are really talking about) the most pathetic and pitiable group on the face of the planet, with some of the higher castes in India close behind.

    Deceit and the authoring of highly destructive practices and industries should never be classified as ‘intelligence’ in my book, no matter how financially rich and politically powerful it has made them (on average). I have met too many ‘rich idiots’ in my life to be otherwise impressed. These ‘Jews’ have only gained because generations of our leaders have been utterly corrupted and thus been rendered effete. The few that did stand up were murdered, such as Admiral Forrestal, General Patton, and President John F. Kennedy; or publicly defamed, such as Senator Joe McCarthy.

    And I will tell you all this. The Jews would NEVER have gained the power they currently enjoy had it not been for the Rothschilds. The multi-trillion dollar wealth of this bloodline acting as sponsor is the sole reason why we must discuss this tribe of misfits and genetic mutants.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      January 28, 2011 - 5:36 am | Permalink

      Barbara has not commented on this post so it’s a mistake, got 9 thumbs up though.

    • January 28, 2011 - 8:04 am | Permalink

      Those two guys who thumbed you down sure showed you, Someday.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      January 28, 2011 - 8:13 am | Permalink

      @ Reginald …
      I have just posted two responses to you with links discussing the respective Blair and Cameron ancestries, as you requested. They have been marked for moderation (which is why you can’t see them yet) as they contain five URLs all told. They should appear onscreen after say 4 hours?

    • January 28, 2011 - 8:32 am | Permalink

      I thank you Anglo Saxon.

      They should appear onscreen after say 4 hours?

      Yes.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      January 28, 2011 - 9:16 am | Permalink

      To avoid confusion, they will (eventually) appear on this other thread:
      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/01/british-genetics-101/

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      January 28, 2011 - 9:10 am | Permalink

      Right, and that is just the ones with opposable thumbs!

      Seriously though, I think we should all make a real effort to cut down on typos in the otherwise awesome contributions we are all making. The small comment window and lack of a preview is conspiring to make us look more than a little inept.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      January 29, 2011 - 10:01 am | Permalink

      If my comment gets too large to see in the comments window, I transfer what I have written to Word to complete and review before I copy and paste the results into the small window provided for comments. And even then I screw up sometimes. heh heh

  20. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    January 27, 2011 - 12:04 pm | Permalink

    Selection for winning debates over issues in Talmudic scholarship seems a likely explaination for the characteristics of jews which are of most concern to nationalists. Trading, estate managing, and money lending require a head for figures but are they occupations where you need to create the impression that you are trustworthy and convince someone one of your point of view? I don’t think the mysterious Jewish ability to set intellectual tastes and fashions which can be seen in art, music, literature (and virtually all other aspects of culture) came from a bunch of money lenders and arendators.

    Talmudic disputation might have been the origin of much of the Jewish intellectual advantage. I think Frost’s artisan theory can’t be a total explaination but it has a bit more to recommend it that the linked article allows. An artisan selling his own products would need to have a talent for sales to succeed and the Jewish baby boom was strongest among artisans (only so many jobs for estate managers and money lenders). The Jewish move into artisan occupations made the population explosion possible. The Talmudic disputation genetic adaptations maybe were carried to a higher level by the high fertility artisanship through it effect on re-enforcing Jewish fertility and selection.

    • January 27, 2011 - 1:44 pm | Permalink

      “Selection for winning debates over issues in Talmudic scholarship seems a likely explaination for the characteristics of jews which are of most
      concern to nationalists.”

      This is why studying Quine’s ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ (1951) and ‘Word and Object’ (1960) especially chapters 2 and 6) carefully is worthwhile, as this amounted to a devastating logical critique of analyticity (including mathematics) as no more than a system of pragmatically useful empirical truths or else tautologies for those of us who are somewhat cognitively afflicted (i.e all human beings). Over the next decade or so, it effectively put an end to many a career in philosophy, as argument alone is useless (if not downright dishonest/subversive) without relational data, and is why one hears so much of evidence-based practice these days. Note, this is not at all obvious, and requires one to become familiar with some of the basics of the C20th history of logic and computer science, paying particular attention to the problems encountered when quantifying into contexts which use the intensional verbs of Natural Language. Those who carried on regardless in philosophy and cognitive ‘science’, have a lot to answer for. We learn specialised languages because the bog standard one’s are not good enough for some important jobs.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      January 28, 2011 - 8:31 am | Permalink

      In Poland by the end of the 18th century, [Jews] … dominated virtually the entire economy except agricultural labor

      It seems that, whatever the occupations which reward IQ with reproductive success were, Poles were not doing them. Morever intelligent Poles would ofter become priests or nuns. Compare that with England where Englishmen took roles vacated by Jews who had been expelled in 1290. English clergy were freed from celebacy mid sixteenth century.

      It seems to me that Poles ought to be less intelligent than the English on average. But according to Richard Lynn Poles are quite a bit more intelligent than the English are.

  21. January 27, 2011 - 12:33 pm | Permalink

    Some helpful constructive criticism. Where are these measures of ‘EQ’? How are they arrived at? IQ (like the PISA scores) refers to normative, standardised (i.e peer referenced – in OECD PISA they are representative 15 year olds) measures of emitted behaviours. That’s their utility, especially when these measures are used in relation to other measures (e.g sex, ethnicity, family income etc).

    What you are talking about/referring to appears to be unmeasurable, so how can anyone possibly know what it is, or whether what you say is true or false rather than fabricated (but written eloquently like a Hollywood script or novel?). This is what I am saying is a large part of our current problem, i.e. we have, especially in recent decades (as society has become ever more feminised and liberalised) become immersed in disconnected verbal behaviour, and now have an unhealthy obsession with style/appearance/mental life over substance/behaviour. The alternative way to talk about what you are probably tacitly referring to may be to refer to the other statistical Factor which is widely used in Individual Differences, i.e. Personality. The problem with that is that most of those measures (the so called Big 5) are based on self-report scales, and most people don’t give accurate accounts of their own behaviour, for all sorts of reasons, which makes them woolly indeterminate constructs, and where there are woolly constructs there’s often endless, bitter, argument because the people involved don’t reliably know what each other are referring to. Constructs are fine, but they have to be useful, and that comes down to reliable measurement. Attentive readers will have observed that DSM-IV is based on observations of behaviours by professionals, not self-resports.

  22. January 27, 2011 - 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Im just a dumb country boy but even I have got sense eneugh to see that whites are smarter. What other race could possibly have accomplished their own destruction in such a short span of time?

  23. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    January 27, 2011 - 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Guys,

    give credit where credit is due – don’t underestimate our enemy.

    Imagine if Jews had the lowest IQs out of all the races, then we would look pretty dumb, yeah? (Troglodytes with IQs of 80 ruling over us!) I don’t think it’s a bad thing to acknowledge that Jews are good at certain things. And there’s good reasons behind their success: “Jewish society had been designed to produce intellectuals… Jewish society was geared to support them.” They choose their mates wisely, we just opt for looks, personality. It isn’t just a fluke of Nature… it’s eugenics. This is what gives them an advantage over us. We also should be practicing eugenics.

    TT

  24. solly's Gravatar solly
    January 27, 2011 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Ya think ‘Miriam’ might be a spoof?

    • January 27, 2011 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

      Does it matter? All that matters is what’s written surely?

  25. January 27, 2011 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Intelligence and wisdom are not always the same. Being smart eneugh to chop down a tree is useless is if you don’t have the wisdom to stand out of the way

  26. Palestinian's Gravatar Palestinian
    January 27, 2011 - 3:30 pm | Permalink

    I want to elaborate on Chip Carver’s post above. My background is in theoretical physics (PhD) and I agree with much of what he is saying. My own observation tells me that Jews have excelled in fields that require ONLY abstract thinking but failed (or at least averaged out) in fields that require applications. For example, you will find many successful jews in abstract mathematics, theoretical physics, Marxism, and even abstract art (such as analytical cubism, post-expressionism etc) but you will rarely see them excelling in Engineering, Experimental sciences such as Chemistry or Biology or even in impressionist art (think of Monet & Renoir. No jewish impressionists!) So my personal conclusion is that they have a stronger ability of thinking abstractly better than most human groups. Beyond the abstract thinking, I do not see their mental capabilities any better than the rest of us. In my field, I can only think of one jewish experimental physicist who was successful, Rabi (nuclear).

    Comparing them with the Asians, you will quickly find that Asians are more inclined to succeed in fields that require applied knowledge, such as engineering and experimental physics and electronics. The evidence is clear: Here in America, lots of theories are created and the Japanese take them and convert them into engineering marvels. In my field, how many great Japanese theoretical physicists do I know? Well, Yukawa was a genius but he is the only one I know.

    So I think it is important when we say that “Jews are smarter”, we must specify in what areas of epistemology, exactly.

    • Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
      January 27, 2011 - 3:57 pm | Permalink

      “So I think it is important when we say that “Jews are smarter”, we must specify in what areas of epistemology, exactly.”

      Exactly! The big problem with having a single “number” that somehow reflects overall “intelligence” is that it doesn’t account for different types of “knowing”. The “epistemology problem” must be dealt with before any numerical scales have significance.

      In spite of Von Mises’ dictums against “poly-logism”, and his insistence that there is no such thing as “different knowings” … such things do appear to exist. Any putative “solution” to conflicts must begin with recognition of what’s “real” as opposed to what we want to “believe”. The way the human brain tends to approach that problem does not lead to optimism.

    • Gray Prince's Gravatar Gray Prince
      January 27, 2011 - 6:32 pm | Permalink

      Do you realize that there are in fact more Jewish Nobel laureates in Physiology and Medicine than in physics?

    • V. Plener's Gravatar V. Plener
      January 28, 2011 - 11:29 pm | Permalink

      Gray Prince should note that those awards (Nobel Prize) he mentions are the most contentious, with accusations of Jewish theft of ideas, stealing credit for the work of others, individuals not being Jewish at all but Jews claiming them to be so, others merely being half Jewish. I clearly remember when I was in college several Jews in a chemistry class insisting Alexander Fleming (discoverer of Penicillin among other things) was a Jew. Hilarious. That Scotsman was definitely no Jew. With the Nobel Prize in all areas now being influenced by so much behind the scenes pressure from Jews, Asian countries screaming racism and offering bribes and other shenanigans, those once wonderful awards are now something that might not be what they seem to be on the surface.

    • Eman's Gravatar Eman
      January 29, 2011 - 3:56 pm | Permalink

      V. Plener:”I clearly remember when I was in college several Jews in a chemistry class insisting Alexander Fleming (discoverer of Penicillin among other things) was a Jew. Hilarious. That Scotsman was definitely no Jew.”

      There is historical as well as genetic evidence that there was/is a substantial Jewish element in Scotland stemming from covert immigration of mostly Sephardic Jews there in the 12th Century which ended up slowly taking over much of the country; see – http://www.amazon.com/When-Scotland-Was-Jewish-Archeology/dp/0786428007

      The very extensive involvement of Jews in Scottish Rite Freemasonry over the centuries – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Rite#Birth_of_the_Scottish_Rite – along with other evidence such as the Scottish role in the Enlightenment, seems to confirm this. Keep in mind that Scotland was for most of history was a barbarous backwater, not even able to be conquered by the Roman Empire – and it’s unlikely the native population would’ve become so accomplished without some external genetic inputs. These Scottish Jews were very covert crypto-Jews, most converted to Christianity, slowly absorbed the native population of Scotland and interbred amongst themselves for centuries, and over time their old Jewish roots seem to have been mostly forgotten or buried very deep to hide them.

    • M. Thorn's Gravatar M. Thorn
      January 29, 2011 - 9:44 pm | Permalink

      V. Plener, most of us here could have predicted that no matter who invented or created whatever (like Scots Presbyterian Alexander Fleming) there’s always someone who will come along and show that somehow the individual in question must have been a Jew. They’ll even present books that claim DNA evidence which on closer inspection isn’t DNA evidence at all. It’s hilarious how far these screechy confidence men will go.

    • Gray Prince's Gravatar Gray Prince
      January 30, 2011 - 8:00 am | Permalink

      The Nobel Prize is ridiculously fraught with politics and controversy from both the Jew and Gentile sides. There are some ridiculous Jewish wins, such as the case of Prusiner, which can be attributed to nothing but politics, but there are similar cases on the gentile side. Sometimes Jews have won for really important discoveries, such as Karl Landsteiner for blood groups. Many times, I observe that non-Jews will have originated a particular line of inquiry, and Jews are great at coming in later to steal the show, like the case of the Salk vaccine. Alexander Flemming was certainly not Jewish, but one of the people who shared the Nobel Prize for purifying penicillin and making it into a drug, Boris Chain, was a German Jew, and I think Chain played a much greater role than Florey, who seems only to have been included because he happened to lead the research group. We should give credit where credit is due.

  27. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 27, 2011 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

    A personal observation: There are lots of really dumb Jews, but they are rarely independent thinkers. They follow the rules, Jews are great at making rules, do what they are told by their guru or rabbi and generally benefit from ethnic networking. All Jews benefit from the assumption that Jews are smarter.

  28. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    January 27, 2011 - 4:03 pm | Permalink

    While an IQ test had me five points under MENSA I always scored in the 99 percentile in the Iowa Achievement Tests all during school. So Jews don’t intimidate me.

    (See, by citing my achievement tests and displaying egotism I am pushing back at them with the same tactics they use.)

    They should not intimidate you because they are clearly more pushy than smart. I am sure that Jews cheat and compare a more gifted segment of their population with the broader one.

    What they totally lack is moral constraints in either their psyche or culture. This is their advantage. Whites are more docile than in the Viking days. Presumably because two World Wars, the Civil War and Korean and Vietnam conflicts reduced genetic contribution from the warriors.

    Just learn to push back at them – everywhere. Giving up Christian docility has been liberating. Hope they get more of us to see through the controlling yoke of religion.

    A couple of times a year I remind my Congressman that jews are dumb and criminal in their bungling of the economy, the intel agencies, border security, the SEC, derivatives regulation etc. Doesn’t do any good so far but become as hard headed and focused and pushy and willful as they are. In the end we will prevail…though it will be among the ruins of Western civilization.

    The post-Western world will be a new age for sure.

  29. Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
    January 27, 2011 - 4:23 pm | Permalink

    I am hopping mad that this new rating system has wiped me off the page. Not once, but twice! Yes, I am absolutely incensed and spitting feathers.

    I therefore appeal to Professor MacDonald to reconsider the utlity of such a device that discriminates unfairly:

    (a) Against Jews Because of the large number of anti-Semitic posters on this site.

    (b) Against misogynists Because of the large number of women-haters on this site. (Experience has taught me that most White Nationalist men are patriarchal types who regard women with condescension and contempt.)

    (c) Against high-IQ females of Jewish ethnicity. Because of acute jealousy manifested here by low-IQ posters of an anti-Semitic and misogynstic bent.

    I repeat: the present thumbs up/ thumbs down rating system is deplorable. I therefore call on Professor MacDonald to scrap it at once so that people like me — and other Jews posting here in crypsis — are not humiliated and unfairly discriminated against.

    The thumbs down marker clearly ostracizes its victims and puts them into little ghettos of obscurity where their comments remain unread. It is a cruel and discriminatory device that violates the human rights of Jewish females of exceptional intelligence. It has to go.

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      January 27, 2011 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

      Sorry,

      (b) “Against misogynists” should read “against women”.

    • January 27, 2011 - 5:11 pm | Permalink

      “The thumbs down marker clearly ostracizes its victims and puts them into little ghettos of obscurity where their comments remain unread.”

      Excellent! Libertarian populism is de rigueur here Miriam. What most people don’t like isn’t merely flagged to others as ‘wrong’, and what most people or the gatekeeper likes flagged ‘right’, what’s unpopular gets buried and slightly textually corrupted to boot making it harder to read. Still, that’s the Libertarian Orwellian Memory Hole at work, and it’s how American, narcissistic reality has been being shaped for years. In fact, it’s the anarchistic process of Liberal-Democracy in microcosm. Still, I bet lots of people take sneaky peeks just because it’s verboten. We don’t just live in a corrupt, dysgenic, narcissistic-feminized society, it’s one which actively reinforces subversion too! It’s all good for Financial Services and the economy ;-)

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      January 27, 2011 - 6:07 pm | Permalink

      You really WERE mad, weren’t you, Miriam? I happy to learn that. It couldn’t happen to a nastier person.

      …oh…and thanks for your spirited and reasoned rebuttal to my comments directed at your earliest post, Miriam.

      As for this last batch of your thoughts Mr. Longley, (January 27, 2011 – 5:11 pm), I have to say I agreed with almost everything you typed.

      I always open every hidden post.

      “News is what they don’t want you to know. Everything else is publicity.” so said Bill Moyers

      Mr. Moyer’s declaration applies here as much as it applies to the New York Times. Everyone has an agenda. Everyone. Even you and me.

  30. observerx's Gravatar observerx
    January 27, 2011 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Richard Feynman had an IQ of only about 125. The way he was played up in the media tells a lot about networking and promotion.

    • O. Ring's Gravatar O. Ring
      January 28, 2011 - 11:32 pm | Permalink

      Feynman did prove that hard work and study can allow someone who is not considered as smart as their competitors in certain fields can succeed, if they work hard. And yes, Feynman was competent in a couple of areas of physics but the Jewish media elevated him to the apex of the pyramid.

  31. K.H.'s Gravatar K.H.
    January 27, 2011 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Average or below average intelligence plus animal cunning, relativistic morals, and cultural parasitism can be shaped to look like high intelligence; especially when scientific definitions of intelligence are truncated by “political correctness”.

    Jewish intelligence is a myth when defined by creativity or originality.

    Jews traffic mainly in stolen ideas with a primary focus on marketplace.

    What appears to be Jewish intellect is simply obsessively paranoid reactions to Western thought with liberal doses of ethnic chauvinism and perversion disguised as inquiry.

    Western Art and Literature proves the myth of Jewish intelligence as does the near imbecility of the Talmud.

  32. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 27, 2011 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

    I read the replies to miriam’s post and although there were exceptions I have to say the overall impression I get is that of defensiveness, insecurity, self-doubt, and I am wondering why? So what if the Chinese do better on IQ tests, so what if the Jewish do. Whatever it is that Whites have, it has resulted in us producing more than 95% of inventions and discoveries of note. We are the ones who invented the scientific revolution. We are the ones who invented the Industrial Revolution. We had the Englightenment. We invented modern democratic concepts. We discovered modern economics and the free market. We changed the world, we invented the world. We went to the Moon.
    You know….I just want to say, stop thinking and talking about Jews all the time, and start believing in what we are. I appreciate that we have to understand what the Jewish People are collectively trying to do to us. We need to recognize that we’ve been asleep and while we were sleeping people most of us thought were friends were actually plotting our ethnic demise and the loss of our homelands through mass third world immigration. But we shouldn’t need to be buying into their beliefs that they are superior. Just look at the record of accomplishments! In the end that’s all that counts when it comes to the relative genius of peoples. I mean, come on! Don’t start making this place sound like losers in the locker room. We invented the freakin’ modern world!

  33. giovanni's Gravatar giovanni
    January 27, 2011 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

    IQ tests measures analytical abilites mostly and a group of people that interbred and trained almost only in finance and law for generations to the exclusion of any other intellectual field can mesure well

    I was stunned when I read in Israel Shahak http://radioislam.org/historia/shahak/english.htm that music, history, math, philosophy and science not to mention any visual art were basically forbidden by the rabbis for 2k years
    But I re-read Paul Johnson in its much approved History of the Jews and he has to go back di Maimonides in 1160 to find anything relevant to culture and science (and even so Maimonides does not make the cut in any antology)

    I was equally stunned when I read about the Talmud since as any dumb gentile I knew next to nothing about Jewish culture and religion pre-Woody Allen, Einstein and Steven Spielberg
    I tried to be fair and not only get passages of the Talmud through critical commentary such as Shahak or Hoffman and online I found the 24 volume thing. And I understood why nobody ever mentions it college, graduate school and any academic or cultural envirnomente. It is garbage, 15k pages of stupid nonsense, a twisted and convoluted, boring, idiotic kind of gigantic civil and penal code. How can people even admit to be related to this kind of sick, paranoid, mind numbing crazy exercise ? And for centuries the best and brightest were dedicated basically only to learn, discuss and elaborate this idiotic enciclopedia ? Not to mention that its purpose is to justify anything to advance the material interest of a small elite group within a majority, it is a manual of manipulation and exploitation with a twisted and abstruse ethical code for the group itself

    If for 2000 years a group that has as a rule not to mix its blood with others and keep its DNA separate does not cultivate any intellectual pursuit except commerce and trading and the “commentary of the Law” in the Talmud….maybe Cochran and Harpending should test for a subset of the IQ for the Askenazy… the laywer and finance IQ….
    Educated Europeans for 2k years cultivated the greek and latin classics, music, astronomy, history and applied themselves to technology and commerce
    Jews for 2k years cultivated the Talmud and accounting/finance/trading
    If Cochran is right that 2k years are enough to select some intellectual qualities in a small group that does not mix its DNA much…. well the kind of IQ has to be qualified

    The reputation of jews as brilliant dates from around 1840-1850, Voltaire and Diderot and the rest of the Enlightment described them in many (nasty) ways but little credit is given to their mental abilities. It should be noted that the majority of Jews during the Renaissance moved to Poland and Ukrain where they were making a living in a backward environment as middlemen between landlord and peasants and their main quality in that role was ruthlessness. There was however a minority of Sephardis in England, Holland, Germany, Italy and Austria who where known for financial and also technical skills above average. But with some exceptions in Italy nothing at all in science, music, culture, history and arts of any kind.
    When Marx and Disraeli were making themselves known around 1840 they seemed not proud at all of their people in terms of intellectual heritage and only later in life Disraeli recovered its pride writing about the Rothschild (not a music composer or philosopher)

    Today obvsiously we grow up reading Jewish authors or stuff influenced by jewish minds from Marx to Adorno to Milton Friedman to Alan Greenspan to Jim Cramer (in my field of Economics if you take out the Jews a 4 year curriculum could shrink to a semester) And in the arts, cinema and popular music the influence is even more pervasive because of the monopoly of literary, media and cultural critic combined with the ownership of the media, talent agencies, art galleries, studios

    But again, if Cochran is right that 2k years are enough to select some intellectual qualities in a small group that does not mix its DNA…. and in those 2k years all you used your mind was for money lending, tax farming and trading and the idiotic, twisted Talmud reading…. and almost no culture, no arts of any kind….

    ….then the whole culture of the West is heavily bent by people whose ancestors developed a very narrow range of sharp mental abilites. But if you are above average in finance and speculation and in law and political discourse, follow a group solidarity logic and work as a network and are trained not to feel any moral guilt when the victims are outside the group

    well…. this seems a brilliant cultural-genetic recipe to create a true world elite, THIS IS THE PERFECT FORMUJLA TO ACHIEVE MATERIAL SUCCESS and defeat anybody esle ….
    and after having cultivated in a closed and separate environmente per 2k years your people they go out in the open

    …. you might end up with 80% of NY and LA billionaires and key finance and media personalities…..and 60% of US campaign contributions, 2/3 of key White House positions, not to mention the FED, FMI, World Bank….and from NY influence the world with the help of another 20 or 30% of key finance and media personalities in France, England, Australia, Austria….

    How do you prove that ? I do not know… compare just about everything now in culture and social institutions with just about everything until World War I….. it does look like that now everything is in the hands of very clever people, that practiced a lot in finance and law and much less in the ethics, arts, culture, human solidarity and compassion that the West cultivated in the last 2k years

    If Cochran and Harpending are right and 2k years of interbreeding and focused mental training in a closed community are sufficient to modify some mental qualities…. yes it can be a big problem….

  34. January 27, 2011 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

    Who is smarter than whom is beside the point IMO. What if they are ? Does this give them the right to be “Gods chosen people” with all that implies, while forbidding all others to claim any sort of group loyalty Or racial identity other than worship of THEIR God (PC Holocaustians, etc.)
    They can not continue to have their cake and eat it too. Either they are racists or they are NOT Gods “chosen”
    This is I believe, a neurotic position, Cognitive Dissonance, Etc.

  35. Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
    January 27, 2011 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    @ arthurdecco

    “You really WERE mad, weren’t you, Miriam? I’m happy to learn that. It couldn’t happen to a nastier person.”

    So sad. Tears well up in my eyes when I read things like this. I try so hard to be liked and comments like this simply do my head in and break my heart. I wish I knew how to be more popular and well beloved.

    Yes, I know some Jews can be dreadful. But we Jews don’t have a monopoly on evil, you know. Who was responsible for Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Not Jews. Who was responsible for Dresden? Not Jews? Why was responsible for Auschwitz? Not Jews.

    The White race, “the cancer of humanity” to quote Susan Sontag, was guilty for ALL those war crimes!

    And now you blame Israel for what goes on in Gaza and in the Disputed Territories, Judea and Samaria. So hypocritical. All we were doing when we launched Operation Cast Lead was self-defense. We were defending ourselves from rocket attacks made on Sderrot by Palestinian terrorists.

    It was either them or us.

    We decided it would have to be us. Our sense of Chosenness determined our choice. Yes, my friends, after Auschwitz it was “Never again!”

    All this Jew-bashing is unacceptable. It’s a crime against nature. It has to stop.

    If you don’t stop the anti-Semitism voluntarily, we will have to get it stopped by legislation.

    Unfair criticism of Israel needs to be criminalized. Habitual offenders need to be caged. Solitary confinement and enhanced interrogation methods are options that need to be considered carefully.

    Those who are caught reading the Protocols should definitely be put to death, as in Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution. Promoters of 9-11 conspiracy theories, especially those suggesting Jewish involvement, should be given the electric chair.

    I am not suggesting gratuitous or unmethodical violence. No way. I am suggesting that legislation be passed first that makes all this punishment of anti-Semitism 100 percent legal.

    The goyim needed to learn once and for all that they are no longer top dogs.

    Their insolence will no longer be tolerated. They must recognize their servile condition and accept it meekly and humbly.

    It is their destiny henceforth to be slaves.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      January 27, 2011 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

      So now I know you’re a construct. I’m relieved.

      Afterall, no one could really be as evil as you appear to be, could they?

    • January 28, 2011 - 6:51 am | Permalink

      If you don’t stop the anti-Semitism voluntarily, we will have to get it stopped by legislation.

      This is probably satire, perhaps by Lasha Darkmoon.

      It reminds me a lot of Hitler’s very strange passage from Mein Kampf, where he misused that exact word “voluntarily” in much the same way.

      If this earth has sufficient room for all, then we ought to have that share of the soil which is absolutely necessary for our existence. Of course people will not voluntarily make that accommodation. At this point the right of self-preservation comes into effect. And when attempts to settle the difficulty in an amicable way are rejected the clenched hand must take by force that which was refused to the open hand of friendship.

      Asking people to do something “voluntarily” with an underlining threat of forcing them to do it against their will if they don’t do it “voluntarily”, is NOT asking them to do it voluntarily.

      It’s rather just a perverse attempt to make a robbery look like a verbal argument gone wrong.

      But actual Jews are too sophisticated to come out and be that over the top, at least not on a website like this one.

      That makes me think it’s satire, though it’s good enough a satire that it probably reflects the thought process of people who actually exist.

    • January 28, 2011 - 6:52 am | Permalink

      If you don’t stop the anti-Semitism voluntarily, we will have to get it stopped by legislation.

      This is probably satire, perhaps by Lasha Darkmoon.

      It reminds me a lot of that very strange passage from Mein Kampf, where the author misused that exact word “voluntarily” in much the same way.

      If this earth has sufficient room for all, then we ought to have that share of the soil which is absolutely necessary for our existence. Of course people will not voluntarily make that accommodation. At this point the right of self-preservation comes into effect. And when attempts to settle the difficulty in an amicable way are rejected the clenched hand must take by force that which was refused to the open hand of friendship.

      Asking people to do something “voluntarily” with an underlining threat of forcing them to do it against their will if they don’t do it “voluntarily”, is NOT asking them to do it voluntarily.

      It’s rather just a perverse attempt to make a robbery look like a verbal argument gone wrong.

      That makes me think it’s satire, though it’s good enough a satire that it probably reflects the thought process of people who actually exist.

    • January 28, 2011 - 6:56 am | Permalink

      It is their destiny henceforth to be slaves.

      Okay, that seals the deal that this is satire.

      Well, either that or it’s Rabbi Ovadia Yosef.

      http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-spine/78490/goyim-were-born-only-serve-us-the-moral-wisdom-rabbi-ovadia-yosef

    • Gray Prince's Gravatar Gray Prince
      January 28, 2011 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

      As a homosexual Jewish male, I am probably the only one on this forum with the IQ to comprehend the rightness of Miriam’s comments. On one point I differ: I am altogether dissatisfied with the muscle mass of the white males I see around me. We must pass legislation to breed their puny bodies against the dark-skinned races to create a meatier brand of serf.

    • T. Ank's Gravatar T. Ank
      January 28, 2011 - 11:40 pm | Permalink

      Try harder Gray Prince. What Jews are known for more than intelligence is their being scatological to a staggering degree, far more so than any other group.

    • Eman's Gravatar Eman
      January 29, 2011 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

      ‘Miriam’ is an obvious troll who can be safely ignored.

      “Who was responsible for Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Not Jews.”

      Jewish scientists working in the USA were the people who invented nuclear weapons – thus Jews are the people primary responsible for the nuclear bombing of those Japanese cities.

  36. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    January 27, 2011 - 8:27 pm | Permalink

    I originally posted the meat of the following comment above in response to a shamefully racist screech from Miriam in which she slandered Helen Thomas among others, but I ended up fleshing out my original thoughts after I saved the original as a Word document.

    Now, because I’ve read more of the interesting contributions to this thread I’d like to repost it with my alterations included for possible comment:

    Miriam, I fervently hope you are simply a cartoon cutout of a racist Zionist Jew – a construct of some malevolent Propagandist and therefore not a real person. I would prefer you to be someone deliberately designed for the rest of us to laugh at from behind our hands in the ways we laugh at all cartoon cutout characters who prod ungently at our belief systems and comfort levels from behind the walls between fear and understanding that are deliberately raised high by Propagandists who regularly employ caricatures like you as tools because the alternative – that you are indeed the living, breathing Jew who holds the views you do fills me with dread for the future of Judaism and Jews everywhere. If you are as representative of your Tribe as I suspect you are, based on your comments, then sooner, rather than later, you and your ilk will wear out your welcome everywhere with everyone.

    It’s inevitable.

    Eventually the rest of us will have to shut you down or move you out in order to survive as self-respecting, empathetic, socialized human beings – all things you have demonstrated emphatically you personally are NOT and have no interest in becoming. The repulsive animosity and unrepentant arrogance you so casually put on display for all of us to read in your post suggests a Sickness in you – a Corruption of the Soul, if you will – that can only end badly for you and anyone else who thinks like you.

    It’s worth noting that comments like yours help discredit once and for all the disgraceful fraud perpetuated on us by the never-ending self-congratulatory braying about “brainy Jews” by other Jews in our always-lying, closely-held myth-making media machine. Your post displays perfectly the flawed thinking behind that mountain of poo. Your original comments weren’t intelligent. And by “intelligent” I mean “perceptive, sensible or rational, able to store and process data effectively and honestly, self regulating” as outlined in my dictionary.

    In my own extensive experiences both working and living with Jews in several separate professional fields and through some not-so-professional endeavours I’ve observed Jews generally, though not always, are diligent students of whatever field of study they choose to immerse themselves in. They inevitably do a good job because they study their assignments responsibly and then follow their learned lessons carefully. On the other hand, in almost all cases I have found these excellent students to be lacking the skill sets necessary for truly creative thinking. They depend on others to do that for them. Neither their socialization, nor their religious myths and manuals, or even their DNA appears to teach or even encourage creativity. Instead, these excellent students have demonstrated to me many times over a penchant for reflexively regurgitating approved truths and for tearing-down-to-build-again in much the same ways male dogs immediately cover the scent of a previous pisser when confronted with the olfactory presence of a potential competitor. Could it be that my Jewish co-workers’ brain stems are their primary responders because their cerebral cortexes are almost always left out of the most basic of their decision-making calculations? lol That might explain AIPAC and the Middle East…

    I started noticing a long time ago that the creative part of any project, the “idea” or “spark”, had to be already present for the Jews involved to do what they do best – which is to twist that “idea” and the situation surrounding it to their advantage by working diligently promoting their self-declared cleverness and grabbing the credit for any and all ideas that developed under their purview with their superiors in public while at the same time they were quietly but furiously working behind the scenes to undercut and discredit their competitors (read: co-workers) with muted slanders and subtle innuendos poured into the right ears. Appallingly base behaviour by any reasonable standard… Shakespeare, a genius student of the human condition without rival, nailed that fact down in “The Merchant of Venice” hundreds of years ago.

    The academic view that Jews are more intelligent than white Europeans has me confused. By what standard are Jews considered “smarter” than white Europeans? And who wrote those tests, anyway? What is the measuring stick for intelligence if not the ability to think creatively – an ability I have found sorely lacking in even the most wildly successful of those Jews I have worked with over the past 40 years?

    I freely admit I know nothing about this subject if the measurement of intelligence other than what any curious adult person would learn by simply living and reading in this world. That’s why I hope someone is willing to answer my question – What is the measuring stick for intelligence if it isn’t quantifying the ability to think creatively? Surely someone in this field of study can explain to me and everyone else confused by or ignorant of the procedures involved in determining what that measuring stick is and how it came to be the accepted method of measuring intelligence.

    Now, that being said, I wouldn’t dare to suggest that the conclusions I’ve drawn from my experiences working and living jaw to jaw with Jews for 40 years are the final word. But my experiences certainly suggest that the accolades directed at Jews for their superior intelligence appear to have been greatly exaggerated. I’d like to know how my lifetime of experiences can be so at odds with accepted academic wisdom?

    …Anyone?

    …in clear, understandable English? LOL

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      January 27, 2011 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

      Please excuse my typos above. I hope the post still makes sense. If it doesn’t just think of it as a tone poem…(wink)

    • January 28, 2011 - 7:21 am | Permalink

      A thoughtful post, and one which deserves a thoughtful answer. Elsewhere in comments to featured articles in this blog I’ve made several points (albeit now hidden because of many thumbs downs?) bearing on key issues to do with quantifying into classes, sampling, and knowing what we are talking about on this issue. I have a particular interest in getting that right, and yet it would seem that many others posting here have not. Then again, some have correctly said that there is an issue of sampling, given the small population base rate – 2% nationally in the USA, albeit concentrated in three main areas, and 0.5% in the UK (again concentrated in a few areas), and on more than one occasion I have tried (with links) to get readers here to look closely at the demographics of NYC and differential measures of ability (IQ, NAEP, SATs) suggesting that those interested look into these data at city level by White vs Hispanic vs Black-American in the light of what’s known of IQ mean scores, sex differences/brain-gender and the genetics of NCAH and the HPA-Axis. No response, just thumbs down.

      I’ll leave it at that for now, but you may find this short article by Adrian Wooldridge published in 1995 worth close attention, remembering that those who have aggressively denied the validity or reliability of, and relations between IQ, ‘race’ and SES in the past have often done so in order to discredit the B-W difference – why?

      To end, for now, I’ll ask you a heuristic question: what did the paper with Lynn in 2006 (and Lynn’s US paper before that) set out to achieve on this score? Note, the work published in 2006 began before C&Hs paper was published, and Lynn’s first paper was published before theirs.

    • Gravitas's Gravatar Gravitas
      January 28, 2011 - 7:55 am | Permalink

      @ Arthurdecco

      On the crazed mind and evil soul of Miriam K

      Brilliant post, Art. You said it all. You haven’t made it clear, however, if the woman you are berating, Miriam K, is to be taken seriously or not.

      You start off by saying, in an earlier post, that you can relax now that you know that MK is a “construct” and not a “living, human being.”

      I wondered if you were implying that Miriam K was a “spoof”, as poster Solly suggested earlier on…?

      In your recent longer post, you appear to have swung round toward the idea that Miriam K is in actual fact a REAL JEW, the type of Jew we all hate and who brings shame on ALL Jews.

      In other words, you suggest that MK is a Jewish supremacist — the type of extremist Jew found today among the ultra-orthodox community in Israel who receive their inspiration from their rabbis.

      I am referring to religious leaders like Rabbi Kook who openly stated that Jews were incomparably superior to non-Jews.

      We goyim, according to Rabbi Kook, are subhuman scum with “animal souls”. We exist only to be used, exploited, and trashed by Jews. We are their cattle.

      Only recently a book was published in Israel called The King’s Torah which openly advocated the murder of non-Jews and even of their babies, claiming that such infants would only grow up to become enemies of Israel later on. So they might as well be shot in their cradles.

      Its author was an important ultra-Orthodox Jew called Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira. A fruitcake if ever there was one. The Israeli government was powerless to stop this nutter inciting hatred — thanks to his huge following among the radicalized settler community.

      It would seem that Miriam K is a Jewish supremacist of this type.

      I regard her as an evil and dangerous woman, but I think it is a good thing that she should decide to post on this site and give us a glimpse into the dark recesses of her disordered mind.

      We behold before our eyes the sickness of Zionism.

      Out of the bubbling cauldron of Talmud and Zohar rises the foul froth of the Zionist fallacy: that the Jews are entitled to steal someone else’s land (Palesine) and get away with it: and that they are entitled to take over America, Europe, and the rest of the world.

      Miriam K can be seen an object lesson in Evil — in what happens to human beings when Zionism is pushed to its extreme and is allowed to addle the mind and corrupt the soul of its victims.

    • Gravitas's Gravatar Gravitas
      January 28, 2011 - 7:57 am | Permalink

      @ arthurdecco

      For more details on extremist Jews and mad rabbis, see here:

      http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/CompleteGuideKillingGentiles.html

    • January 28, 2011 - 10:44 am | Permalink

      “Reginald January 28, 2011 – 6:51 am Asking people to do something “voluntarily” with an underlining threat of forcing them to do it against their will if they don’t do it “voluntarily”, is NOT asking them to do it voluntarily.”

      This is the language of realpolitik, i.e the verbal behaviour of international trade/economics, diplomacy, ultimately sanctions and non verbal military action. As to ‘voluntary’, I suggest you look up the term operant, as it’s all ‘voluntary’ emitted behaviour. What matters is what controls this and how we vary as a function of individual (genetic) differences. How that works is what Behavioural Economics is all about (see Herrnstein 1990 Rational Choice Theory: Necessary but not Sufficient linked to elsewhere). The domain of common-sense folk psychology language and concepts is, as Quine said at Skinner’s retirement party, ‘strictly for the birds’.

  37. Glen's Gravatar Glen
    January 27, 2011 - 8:49 pm | Permalink

    ‘The multi-trillion dollar wealth of this bloodline acting as sponsor is the sole reason why we must discuss this tribe of misfits and genetic mutants’

    You said it Anglo. Ashkenazis are indeed genetic freaks. They serve as a stark warning to all of the dangers of inbreeding depression. They used eugenic practices to create a race of psychologically aggressive, hyper-ethnocentric, physically repellent zealots and the world is suffering the consequences. The history of the Ashkenazis should read as a parable of the dangers of repeatedly defying nature. They are Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein come true.

  38. felipeb's Gravatar felipeb
    January 28, 2011 - 4:56 am | Permalink

    Mr. Longley, you seem to have mastered reading the guts of the PISA report. My skills fell short. If it would not impose upon you could your direct me to or explain whether the Israeli data shows much of a difference between Jews and non-Jews? Note that Israel’s results were dismal.

    • January 28, 2011 - 7:48 am | Permalink

      Have a closer look at the demographics of Israel, it’s only about 75% Jewish, and even that’s quite racially mixed. OECD PISA endeavours to representatively sample schools in a nation state (or area) and has tried to be very strict about this (see what happened to the UK in early years of the project) as the ultimate interest of the OECD is the workforce and economics. As one digs deeper into PISA, one becomes aware that unlike measures of IQ, NAEP or SATs, the measures are not strictly of individuals per se either.

      To return to your main point, ask yourself, is NYC Jewish? Thinking carefully about this gives one some idea of how difficult, and important, the issue of quantifying in, actually is, and how much goes awry when we gloss over it. Be sure to follow up the other link to an analysis on NYC data, as it has not been remarked upon.

  39. Grim up North's Gravatar Grim up North
    January 28, 2011 - 6:59 am | Permalink

    I think we can agree that Miriam is not a real person. Although I can imagine this sort of talk on settler radio about Palestinians or perhaps on a Rothschild yacht I find it hard to believe that an induvidual claiming to be that which you do would type the drivel at the end of ypur last post.

    I will thank you though. Aswell as giving me a damn good chuckle your post prompted me to read about Jewish involment in allied war crimes.
    Frederick Lindemann 1st Viscount Cherwell lead scientific adviser to HM Gov is an interesting and overlooked figure on the road that led not just Dresden but also arguably Hiroshima as he was one of the brains behind saturation fire bombing.

    Also obviously Oppenheimer needs a mention regarding the atomic strikes although he appeared to have a consciencse “i have become the destroyer of worlds”…. and all that unlike Freddy “lets burn the poor” Lindemann.

  40. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    January 28, 2011 - 8:19 am | Permalink

    @ Grim up North

    “I think we can agree that Miriam is not a real person.”

    I’m not so sure, Grimmo. I’m inclined to agree with Gravitas that Miriam K is a genuine Jewish supremacist. An evil nutter.

    If Rabbi Kook or one of those mad rabbis were to come onto this site and start shooting their mouths off, they would sound like “spoofs”, wouldn’t they? You’d think, “Hey, these guys can’t be real!”

    And of course you’d be wrong.

    There is something in Miriam’s tone that makes me think she has to be a real human being, albeit one with severe psychological problems. A supremacist Jew and extreme Zionist on the verge of a nervous breakdown.

    Her posts are remarkable for the note of sincerity and visceral anger they strike.

    I don’t think this can be simulated.

    • January 28, 2011 - 9:18 am | Permalink

      It doesn’t matter who the person is (we appear to be narcissistically obsessed with fame and authority without seeing how and when, i.e. false ‘credit assignment’ and blame is everywhere), or whether they mean what they say, are are just being satirical/provocative etc. For example, many posting here do so anonymously. Why? What matters is what’s written, and how it’s written (the verbs and referents) i.e how reliably what’s said describes empirical reality (i.e its truth value) not how eloquent or persuasive it is. What criteria do readers use to judge what they read here? How many thumbs up or down a comment gets? If so, see The X Factor and other ‘reality TV’ shows for the dire consequences etc. Truth/falsehood isn’t a function of convention or populism.

  41. January 28, 2011 - 9:55 am | Permalink
  42. Bohemianh's Gravatar Bohemianh
    January 28, 2011 - 10:36 am | Permalink

    Could it be they teach their children two langauges, study, study, are mainly weak of strength, so they stear the children toward soft jobs? When you have many relatives that are doctors, lawyers, CPA’s, financial people? what options and doors are open for them? How many jews do you see working at McD’s? driving a tractor? swinging a hammerl?driving a long haul truck?

    • January 28, 2011 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

      First, remember, the point of the research is that the evidence suggests that IQ is largely genetic, i.e. intelligence is not learned or significantly positively subject to Shared Environment. However, that aside, a) do you know what proportion of US Jews learn Hebrew (apart from the bare essentials) and b) if the genetic evidence was not as it is, would you not expect other kids in bi-lingual homes to also have benefited (e.g Hispanics)?

      As I keep saying, look into the demographics of NYC.

  43. Svend's Gravatar Svend
    January 28, 2011 - 10:38 am | Permalink

    http://www.opinion-maker.org/2011/01/british-intelligence-reports/

    If true, they’re evil. Not smart. Evil.

  44. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    January 28, 2011 - 12:29 pm | Permalink

    The Coen brothers are smart so when is KM going to do True Grit?

    1) Note the casting as in the Jewish actress who plays Mattie Ross (this movie is a conceit)

    2) The snake pit evokes holocaust memorial (shaft of light penetrating a dark recess is classic holocaust iconograph)

    3) Mattie ‘innocently’ awakens the snake sleeping amongst the dead

    4) Ageing wasp (Rooster) liberates her but he is “grown old”

    5) Mattie’s last word of dialogue is “TRASH!” towards an indifferent member of the goyim

    6) Graveyard scene invokes Private Ryan

    7) Executive producer Steven S.

    8) Mattie’s character is the most intelligent and articulate (verbally dexterous)

    9) The film makes no moral demands upon her to change

    10) The Coens however ARE warning their fellow Jews:

    i) that the Rooster generation is dying out

    ii) to smarten up and not be given to “headstrong ways”

    iii) that Mattie’sinsolent behaviour could lead to physical (material) loss and isolation

    iv) (though her blood lust is not morally reprehensible per se)

    v) that Jewish aggression is scarring even some Jewish elites (the Coens) for whom life is good

  45. the pine mountain kid's Gravatar the pine mountain kid
    January 28, 2011 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Senior really hasn’t understood that the Jew’s “are not “alone in the sense in being one of the oldest cultures. I’m sure she’s forgotten about the Asians,the Greek’s, they to have very high IQ’s along with those cluster’s of almost every other culture[some more then other's]. Just because they have a nack for getting what they want, dosen’t mean they know how to use it or take care of it. I hope they are thinking about the state of our Economy! because a big part of the mess is there’s….

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      January 28, 2011 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

      If there really were anything as absurd as a “chosen” people, it would have to be the Chinese. THEY actually have been around in an unbroken cultural chain since the dawn of time and have an archaeological and historical record to empirircally prove it. Also, they come as close to being as numberless as the stars in heaven or the sands on the seashore as is possible.

  46. January 28, 2011 - 1:38 pm | Permalink

    “The science of race is presented as a conversation among Jewish scientists. “

    Is this not a sign of narcissism, which, when extreme, is regarded as a developmental disorder, possibly best seen as modular arrested cognitive development? Note: human females (on average), mature earlier, human males later. Human females tend towards having higher verbal than spatial ability, and human males the reverse.

    Lenin referred to Left-Communism (anarchism) as an infantile disorder. Precocious children can be very annoying and self-centred, whilst appearing to be quite bright in specific areas.

  47. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    January 28, 2011 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    TT: “Jews have greater verbal skills that’s why they are politicians, lawyers, professors.”

    In the past, a salesman was supposed to have good verbal skills, and Jews were probably seen as good salesmen. Personally, as a customer, I would rather buy from a non-Jewish salesman who looks like me.

    Today, it seems that most job positions have to be filled by people with not just good verbal skills, but also “good interpersonal skills”, even if it is simply a computer programmer’s job. It may be a natural evolution of society, but I think the portrait of the perfect candidate has probably been influenced by Jews who work in the media, the advertising industry and human resource departments. Now, it seems that the perfect recruit is someone with Jewish characteristics. It gives Jews an advantage.

  48. C. Anard's Gravatar C. Anard
    January 28, 2011 - 11:45 pm | Permalink

    Oppenheimer never made that quote when the bomb test was successful. That’s another Jewish myth. According to Oppenheimer’s own brother and others who were present at the test of the first atomic bomb, when the bomb exploded Oppenheimer merely said “It works.” You can look this up if you like.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      January 29, 2011 - 8:30 am | Permalink

      Oppenheimer actually meant “It works. You can have all the plans so Comrade Stalin can blow up 50 million Westerners if the old mass murderer feels like it”.

      It is unlikely, for example, that … [Stalin] would have approved North Korea’s invasion of South Korea in 1950 had the American atomic monopoly still existed.”

      Jews’ handing over of atomic secret after secret to the USSR shows how far gone these great intellects were; they thought of the gentiles who had just saved them from Hitler as the real threat.

  49. Anglo Norman's Gravatar Anglo Norman
    January 28, 2011 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

    People should keep in mind that the authors of the Bell Curve, Richard Lynn, Rushton and others believe at least 25% of IQ is influenced by environment, and Jews and Asians spend a lot of time making their children study, learn instruments etc. Jews also ceaselessly (from what I witnessed) teach their children to always look for all the angles, look for ways to take more from the goyim. That type of training can carry over into other areas, including academic areas.

    • January 29, 2011 - 4:36 am | Permalink

      “Anglo Norman January 28, 2011 – 11:50 pm People should keep in mind that the authors of the Bell Curve, Richard Lynn, Rushton and others believe at least 25% of IQ is influenced by environment”

      Regardless of what you think some might believe, Non-Shared Environment actually includes all manner of physical/chemical effects (not enrichment programmes etc), so it’s perhaps best to think of ‘environment’ as all that which non genetically physically adversely impacts upon genetic expression (e.g. hypoxia, drugs, clouts around the head, disease etc). This is why the evidence seems to suggest that the good things which that can be done educationally etc basically just amount to Child Protection. Otherwise, why the dearth of evidence for efficacy of educational, clinical and forensic programmes?

      Most people (including many in intelligence research) do not understand the full implications of recent research. It is bad for psychology and those who live by it, and this has not sunk in for many yet.

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      January 29, 2011 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

      You make some great points, and although this comment may offend some, I wish we gentiles would stop wasting so much time following professional sports for hours at a time each week. While the pursuit of physical fitness is important, (and amateur sports are a good way to achieve it), spending so much time and money to watch people who are mostly overpaid street thugs and were shunted through college taking rocks-for-jocks courses kick around a pigskin is a waste of time and treasure.

      It is good for our children to be athletic (“Mens sana in corpore sana”) but to hook them on “panem et circenses,” on 21st century gladiatorial combat, at an early age will put them at a disadvantage to their Asian and Jewish contemporaries.

  50. January 29, 2011 - 7:17 am | Permalink

    Quote
    “Some of the people that are excluded from decisions can feel, just that, excluded and you don’t get the full contribution of everyone to a joined-up decision”
    End Quote
    Sir Gus O’Donnell

    “Joined-up government” (and thinking), “silos”, “transparency”… Where did all of that sort of talk come from, when did it become de rigueur and why?

  51. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    January 29, 2011 - 10:40 am | Permalink

    I believed all the hype about Jews NOT being racially superior to Whites and underestimated them to my own cost. It was a kind of self-deception. Yeah, Jews are all stupid idiots so I won’t have to be too intelligent to defeat them. I’ll just take it easy… relax. Wrong. Jews are deadly intelligent and to deny this is to deny their success… which is blatantly obvious.

    Our enemy has definately gained my respect. Strangely… I’ve lost some for Gentiles. The mass of the Gentiles has no hope of defeating Jews…that’s for sure. It’s the small percent of Aryan intellectualls who can only deliver us.

    TT

    • Southron's Gravatar Southron
      January 29, 2011 - 5:21 pm | Permalink

      “Jews are deadly intelligent and to deny this is to deny their success… which is blatantly obvious.”

      No one should underestimate Jewish intelligence (verbal intelligence mostly) and especially their networking abilities. There are many Whites who are more intelligent than Jews, but they so often lack decent social/networking abilities: for instance, note all of the lone White geniuses throughout history, many who toiled in obscurity, remained profoundly alienated from their less intelligent countrymen and contemporaries, and were often childless/unmarried because they were too intelligent and considered too eccentric to lead ‘normal’ lives amongst ‘normal’ people: think of the cloistered life of a lone White genius like Isaac Newton. Now compare Newton – a reclusive and eccentric White genius – to a group of tightly networked modern urban international Jewish businesspeople, or scientists, academics, mass-media personalities, etc. Newton is technically smarter than all of those people in most respects, but those Jews are very verbal, very social, and most importantly very networked…so though they are not as brilliant as a person like Newton they are are able to make much more of a public impact than your occasional lone White genius.

      In an important private speech to top Nazis in 1944, Hitler admitted that Jews are biologically superior to Nordics because of their high intelligence and networking abilities:

      “Hitler admitted that the German people were multiracial, and that this had made them a strong people. Further, for the first time we witness Hitler admitting that not only were Jews biologically superior to Nordics, but that Bolshevism had a superior educational system to his own.” – http://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Most-Significant-Speech-Platterhof/dp/1934703990/

    • Gray Prince's Gravatar Gray Prince
      January 30, 2011 - 7:42 am | Permalink

      I’m curious TicTac, in what manner did you “underestimate Jews to your own cost”? I wish you would elaborate that remark. I do agree that the white masses are hopeless. It’s really just a matter of low IQ, sadly.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      January 30, 2011 - 8:07 am | Permalink

      Arabs don’t have high IQs but they seem to understand the necessity of counteracting Jewish influence.

      The Arab secret weapon: consanguineous marriage .

    • TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
      January 30, 2011 - 1:28 pm | Permalink

      Grey Prince,

      if you are good at something… you kinda get over confident – believe in your own superiority. Then you realize “they” have access to gizmos & technology that most people don’t even know about. That is…until they hit you with it. Then you know… :)

      Gentile masses are pretty dumb. The reading public in America is mainly Jewish… so I heard. Which explains a lot.
      Gentiles have to be TOLD what’s going on. When they should be finding out for themselves.

      TT

    • Gray Prince's Gravatar Gray Prince
      January 30, 2011 - 3:33 pm | Permalink

      TicTac,

      Well, here’s an opportunity to tell everyone!! You really must elaborate. What are you so good at?

    • Gray Prince's Gravatar Gray Prince
      January 30, 2011 - 4:15 pm | Permalink

      TicTac,

      You are also confusing intellect with paranoia.

    • Matthias's Gravatar Matthias
      February 4, 2011 - 12:35 pm | Permalink

      Southron: The author of the book you link to on Amazon, the “Platterhof Speech”, is a fraud. In it she claims that Hitler said “Jews were biologically suprerior to Nordics” and Germans were a mixed race. Ridiculous! The book is a hoax, and Veronica Clark is a nutter, or an infiltrator fighting her own battle against “racism”. Here is another sample of her work. Read it and judger for yourself.
      “An excellent way to end the problem of white privilege in America is to infiltrate neo-Nazi and white nationalist organizations. A person can join, observe, and report what members of these organizations say and do to anti-racist activists and organizations. One must assume the traits and language of these organizations. It is not that difficult, but one has to be careful not to reveal one’s true intentions to the organization one joins.
      Once a person has been accepted and is trusted, that person can then go about using any number of psychological techniques to undermine the racist intentions and mentalities of these organizations, supplanting them with ideas of racial tolerance and diversity. A person has to do this subtly, or he or she will be attacked. However, if a person succeeds in infiltrating these organizations and changing their attitudes towards other races, it will have been well worth it. Both sides will ultimately benefit. Inherent white racism and privilege has to be undermined for the good of all Americans.
      Joining neo-Nazi, patriot, white nationalist, and historical revisionist movements will be of great help in this respect. These organizations are brimming with anti-Semites and racists, so these are ideal grounds for psychological techniques in the fight against racism in America.
      To conclude, one cannot emphasize enough the need to be real and genuine in this process. Otherwise, one will be suspected of infiltration.”
      So this fraud, Veronica Clark, discovers that Hitler was a diversity-lover and has to share her amazing find with all of us evil, anti-semitic racists. Deplorable that anyone would fall for such tripe.

  52. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    January 29, 2011 - 10:54 am | Permalink

    By my way of thinking Harpending & Cochran’s explaination for Ashkenazi IQ (In which a – relatively late – adoption of managerial and financial jobs was the cause of Ashkenazi intelligence : (“The majority of the Ashkenazim seem to have been moneylenders by 1100 AD [...] We suggest that there was an increase in the frequency of particular genes that elevated IQ as a by-product of this selective regime, which led to an increased incidence of hereditary disorders” [likeTay Sach’s disease]) takes a bit of a knock in Peter Frost’s latest.

    Tay Sach’s disease is unusually common among French Canadians: an evolving gene pool .

    An economic niche existed and had to be filled. In the absence of ethnic outsiders, middle-class French Canadians would have had more opportunities to go into business, marry earlier, and have larger families

    Frost’s post shifts the balance toward more (not total)causality for his explaination I think, for the hereditary disorders at least.

    • January 30, 2011 - 1:33 pm | Permalink

      Looked at CYP21 yet?

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 4, 2011 - 9:35 am | Permalink

      “Looked at CYP21 yet?”

      Yes David, as KM says the “focus of the article is Harpending and Cochran’s study of Ashkenazi IQ” ( ie ‘The Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence’). if you look in that paper CYP21 is mentioned a couple of times. Their reference is ‘Nass, R. and S. Baker, 1991 Androgen e ects on cognition: Congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
      Psychoneuroendocrinology 16: 189{201′.

      Cochran and Harpending don’t seem to think congenital adrenal hyperplasia is all that significant. if you know different then I am listening.

    • February 4, 2011 - 10:43 am | Permalink

      “Someday February 4, 2011 – 9:35 am Yes David, as KM says the “focus of the article is Harpending and Cochran’s study of Ashkenazi IQ” ( ie ‘The Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence’)”

      It may be an amazing coincidence (and I have reasons for believing the contrary), but I suggest Kevin McD wrote the article because I’d linked to the 2005 article in an earlier comment (go and look). Along with many genetic mutations, C&H did indeed mention CAH, but if you’d looked more closely at what I’d written you would have noticed that I have been referring specifically to NCAH not CAH (it’s the inter ethnic prevalence rates which matters on this point), as well as to NYC demographics and hegemony.

      I have also suggested that you and others look more closely into the research into the high intelligence of the Ashkenazim (in America and Britain) which was being done in the mid noughties. Who was doing that work, why were they doing it? Can you reference it? You may learn something of interest.

      My overall Socratic/heuristic point has been that you and others here have not been listening/paying attention. You have made some false assumptions.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 4, 2011 - 11:43 am | Permalink

      So your ” overall Socratic/heuristic point ” has been that I and others here “have not been listening/paying attention. and made some false assumptions.”

      OK I am listening and paying attention now – tell me what you are getting at about NCAH inter ethnic prevalence rates, NYC demographics and hegemony. It really will not do for you to suggest that your readers look more closely it it themselves. Make your case here and now please David.

      You have repeatedly implied that you understand something which I and others do not about NCAH . It is time for you to put up or shut up.

    • February 4, 2011 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

      Someday February 4, 2011 – 11:43 am “You have repeatedly implied that you understand something which I and others do not about NCAH . It is time for you to put up or shut up.”

      Indeed I have. Why? As to your last sentence, that’s precisely my point. It’s been posted already. You should therefore go and read my past comments since early January, as well as the links. Good research takes years you know, and I’ve made it easy for people here, but look at the response.

      You should perhaps be more grateful that I’ve taken the time to post ove rthe past few weeks? Instead, you appear to be displaying ‘entitlement’, whilst making out that this is quite common in your community. That it is your right. This concerns me, as it is diagnostic and prognositically poor for understanding and empathy.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 4, 2011 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

      David , If I am willing to pay attention you could at least do me the courtesy of presenting your case. It is perfectly simple for you to copy and paste and/or link to any and all relevant comments or pages where you have made your case.

    • February 4, 2011 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

      Someday February 4, 2011 – 12:50 pm “David , If I am willing to pay attention you could at least do me the courtesy of presenting your case.”

      You really don’t get it do you? Do you consider yourself ‘special’? A chosen person perhaps? ;-)

      “It is perfectly simple for you to copy and paste and/or link to any and all relevant comments or pages where you have made your case.”

      You appear to think that I should service you. In addition, you appear to think that you would be doing me a favour by your learning something. Rhetorical question: how does that work exactly?

      Finally, I have not made ‘a case’, I have been kind enough to offer you (and others here) the benefit of some research. This appears to have been a waste of time and effort in many cases. You should do as advised. You should go and do some work. You might also consider reflecting upon your behaviour in these exchanges (in your own best interest, not mine).

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 4, 2011 - 1:44 pm | Permalink

      David I think you are giving me and the other readers of your comments far too much intellectual credit. Is it realistic to expect that someone reading your commenting on the internet will immediately understand that you have something worthwhile to to say? No, unless you have a reputation for being brilliant people are going to be very sceptical at first and not pay much attention. Lets assume you do have something worthwhile to say – it would take a genius to recognise that after reading a few comments, and I’m no genius.

      I am offering to give my full attention if you wish to present an extended version of the hypothesis about NCAH inter ethnic prevalence rates, NYC demographics and hegemony which you have already made in previous comments.

  53. me's Gravatar me
    January 29, 2011 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Look where this wealthy wasp is putting his money – par for the course for most wealthy wasps. I don’t know who’s smarter, but I can tell you who’s acting dumber:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/sports/ncaafootball/30rhoden.html

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      January 29, 2011 - 4:09 pm | Permalink

      This is one of the most annoying tendencies among WASPs and Whites in general – wasting their money on narcissistic ego monuments. Almost every major university receives millions in donations for grand stadiums and the like, complete with a shiny plague with the donors name on it, while that same university works to commit cultural genocide against Whites. This is where our lack of ethnocentrism really hurts us.

  54. Southron's Gravatar Southron
    January 29, 2011 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

    Excellent comment by ‘Chip Carver’ above.

    Especially the part about Jews stealing ideas: “A friend of mine who majored in Physics back when we were in college joked that a lot of Jews went into Theoretical Physics because not only were there a) so many gullible non-Jewish physicists who would openly spout their ideas and see them stolen (with a Jewish network in place to make sure their fellow tribalists will be able to claim the ideas as their own should things go to court)…”

    Jews have long been idea thieves. And stealers of good genes too. With their control of America’s top colleges and universities they very often identify and mollycoddle smart and alienated young Whites, Asians, Indians, Hispanics, even Blacks and others and have them marry in to the Jewish tribe – bring them in to the Jewish fold to gain their brain power: thus Jews then gain these smart genes at the expense of the person’s native ethnic group. Jewish gene thievery is one of the main secrets of their continued success over the centuries since Jewry is always being infused with new ‘smart blood.’ I believe Dr. MacDonald has written before about Jewish gene thievery.

    There are legions of ‘seductive Jewesses’ around the USA and elsewhere looking to seduce very intelligent yet lonely/alienated men (mostly White men but also Asian men, Indian men, Hispanic men, Black men, etc) and bring them in to the tribe, thus gaining those smart genes for Jews and taking them away from the person’s native gene pool; they especially want the genes of smart Whites: see – http://seductivejewess.wordpress.com/

    • January 30, 2011 - 5:15 am | Permalink

      “Jason Speaks January 30, 2011 – 2:13 am Oh I am sure Haidt, Baron-Cohen, Pinker, etc., will always favor Jews. However, just the acknowledgment that all humans are not born totally equal in every trait, and/or tabula rasa, is a huge step forward. It means the evidence is getting to obvious to ignore. Whites, Africans, Asians …. have some significant genetic differences.

      Yes. From my perspective, that was very much the point see Lynn finds here>).

      On another point, note how what you describe is typical human female behaviour, not male? Networking, and mutual emotive verbal hyperbole serving to praise (and often, behind their backs, the opposite)? Is this not how females groom and bully? Note also how the entertainment industry and media wraps up how brilliant its products are in the same sentences in which it ostensibly reviews them. This appears to be institutionalised human narcissism – i.e. sourcing and grooming supply. Is this not an accurate, although to some once pointed out, unattractive, if not shameful, description of our ever more self-centred Libertarian culture? Is this not arrested development being championed? Dysgenesis being celebrated?

      I’ll put it nicely: people appear to be ‘selling’ themselves, and some can’t get enough of it. But note, many non-Jewish academics (and its not just academics) do exactly the same. Modern academia has gone much the same way as the entertainment industry. Academics are often feminised males (see high verbal, which excludes most androgenised Blacks), so my concern is, where will folk draw the class lines in their Brave New World, if they are, at root, alienating males?

    • January 30, 2011 - 7:08 am | Permalink

      An article by Winston on the (typical) behaviour of leading psychologists before the war. He published a similar article by E G Boring. Females were treated muc the same way.

      That’s all changed today of course. For example, the subject, and ‘the profession’, is now 80% female in the UK. It’s certainly not what it once was.

      Which is all more than just a little odd/unexpected statistically given the Null Hypothesis and the IQ distribution, to say the least.

      Some won’t like that. Some will give it the thumbs down. Then again, some will give their own demise the thumbs up.

      Watch how you quantify in.

  55. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 29, 2011 - 3:22 pm | Permalink

    I wonder if Dr. MacDonald has any opinion on whether the intellectual climate is slowly changing with regard to intelligence, race and other ethnic differences? Obviously, it’s not changing with the old guard in the humanities, but some well-known researchers are now saying IQ has a genetic basis and that some ethnic differences have a biological basis.

    Recent statements by high profile researchers like Jonathan Haidt and Simon Baron-Cohen (both Jewish I believe) suggest the next few years will bring an avalanche of data to support a genetic basis for certain ethnic differences.

    • C. Chesire's Gravatar C. Chesire
      January 29, 2011 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

      Haidt and Baron-Cohen still spend too much time praising their own, albeit in roundabout ways.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      January 30, 2011 - 2:13 am | Permalink

      Oh I am sure Haidt, Baron-Cohen, Pinker, etc., will always favor Jews. However, just the acknowledgment that all humans are not born totally equal in every trait, and/or tabula rasa, is a huge step forward. It means the evidence is getting to obvious to ignore. Whites, Africans, Asians …. have some significant genetic differences.

  56. barb's Gravatar barb
    January 29, 2011 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    “As a woman, I deeply resent your comment that women are “deceitful” and “sneaky” by nature. This is hate speech.”

    As a different woman, I deeply resent YOUR pushy, whiny high-heeled-foot-stamping-on-faces-forever, attempts to shut up posters whose opinions you don’t like by screeching “HATE SPEECH!”

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      January 29, 2011 - 8:04 pm | Permalink

      Tsk, tsk, such inflammatory language simply cannot be tolerated! Your lack of self-restraint, dear Barb, gives me cause for grave concern. I would suggest a mild anti-depressant such as prozac. Indeed, a visit to a psychotherapist might not be amiss.

      How did you guess I wore high heels?

      All the better to stamp on your ribs, honeychile, and grind your bones with my cruel 6-inch stilettos! :)

    • Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
      February 19, 2011 - 11:58 pm | Permalink

      Is Miriam real? Speaking as another woman on this board, I certainly hope so!

      Miriam, I have clicked on all your posts and think you are a hoot in a big Attention Whore kind of way. You remind me of this delightful Jewess “plus model” I stumbled across when I flipped on the Dr. Phil Show. She was so deliciously obnoxious, so self-absorbed yet so totally non-self-aware that she stole the show. She was so bad, she was good. My favorite part? Watching all the apologetic Jewish members of the audience cringe in embarrassment and go out of their way to disassociate themselves from her clueless behind. I never laughed so hard in my life.

      Now, Miriam, honey, sit down, take a load off your feet. Kick off those high heels, because they must be pinching your toes about now. Take a chill pill, because this may come as a shock to you.

      You are familiar with those slobbering philosemites AKA the Christian Zionist rapture bunnies? And, of course, you are obsessed with antisemitism, but try to get your high IQ brain around this concept. There is option 3. It’s called Frankly Miriam, we don’t give a damn about Semites. That’s where the greatest number of people fall, because I’m one of them.

      If you carry on in person the way you have on this board, the only reaction you are going to generate from such people is a bemused look, a shrug, and the fleeting thought as they walk away from you, “Gee that woman is a weird, annoying twit.” Then, they won’t give you another thought except to avoid you in the future and ignore you where they can’t.

      Yes, I know. Rather anticlimactic after all that holocaust drama, isn’t it? But there it is.

      Now that we have established that people are not as fascinated with you as you think, dare we hope that you can stop trying to call attention to yourself and contribute something useful to the conversation? History, background, genetics? What you know rather than what you are?

  57. barb's Gravatar barb
    January 29, 2011 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

    “For example, you will find many successful jews in abstract mathematics, theoretical physics, Marxism, and even abstract art” … “but you will rarely see them excelling in Engineering, Experimental sciences such as Chemistry or Biology or even in impressionist art”

    So what you’re saying is, Jews excel in fields where baffling with bullshyte is a viable business plan.

    • January 30, 2011 - 3:50 am | Permalink

      “barb January 29, 2011 – 6:39 pm “you will rarely see them excelling in Engineering, Experimental sciences such as Chemistry or Biology or even in impressionist art”

      That’s a desription of bright females is it not?

      A point has been made on this very issue several times, but those interested in more than just reinforcing their prejudices will have to dig deep into the verboten dross. ;-)

      One third of the Ashkenazim carry one polymorphic CYP21 allele for NCAH which is the most prevalent autosomal recessive condition known to mankind. This group expresses at the highest prevalence at a rate of 1/27 (it is a mild homozygous, autosomal recessive individual difference, i.e hardly a serious disorder at all). However, this CYP21 polymorphism does impair the enzyme 21-OHD which is critical in the synthesis of sex steroids (at root from cholesterol in the adrenals). The polymorphism slightly shunts affected females (in utero and later) towards the male hormones, and through the excess, shunts males towards female hormones, probably by a HPA-Axis feedback loop. One phenotype (and there are others referenced elsewhere) is that affected males tend to be shorter in stature. Note that normally, human females tend to be shorter than human males through the effect of their higher estrogens closing their epiphyseal plates earlier. Might this shunt physical brain-gender subtly too? Are there any advantages to having a slightly feminised brain, especially in a feminised culture/economy?

  58. January 29, 2011 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    A couple of thoughts on the topic of Jews and intelligence.

    1. I might grant you that the average Jew is a few IQ points above the average white Gentile. It also appears that the average eastern Asian (Chinese/Japanese/Korean) is likewise slightly more intelligent than whites. However, it takes more than sheer intelligence to make a civilization great. There is no shortage of virtues that stem from traits other than raw intelligence.

    2. The Jews, being a significantly inbred ethnic group, pay the price for their high intelligence in the form of the several genetic disorders that afflict their fellow tribesmen in a much higher proportion than the general population.

    3. I have never met nor have I heard of any Jewish farmers, Jewish car mechanics, Jewish carpenters, Jewish construction workers, Jewish plumbers, Jewish electricians, etc. Jewish parents obviously will not accept their children going into any “blue collar” occupation. I guess those “dirty jobs” are reserved for the goyim.

    • January 30, 2011 - 2:08 pm | Permalink

      “I might grant you that the average Jew is a few IQ points above the average white Gentile. It also appears that the average eastern Asian (Chinese/Japanese/Korean) is likewise slightly more intelligent than whites. However, it takes more than sheer intelligence to make a civilization great.”

      Such as what? If other measures were as useful, we would have found and used them.

      The important points about IQ are means and population sizes, not THE average individual. It’s the relatve number of able people at the higher end of the Bell Curve and how and why this impacts upon other measures like GDP. Look to Africa (especially) to see just one example of of what happens when this area of the Gaussian curve is denuded by a low mean IQ.

      Sadly, it seems to me that many people reading and then posting to this site really don’t really understand what they are being told, as ‘g’ is a statistical FACTOR data reduced from human behavioural diversity. Nay saying is a bit like saying that there are lost of other things which are more important in physics than mass and force, or in chemistry than atoms and electrons. It’s how this variable is being used which people should be paying far closer attention to, but, I fear, from much that I have seen posted here, most really don’t get it, nor do they know how to go about trying to, which requires far more respect and self-criticism – behaviours which here, are demonstrably, and woefully, rare.

  59. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    January 29, 2011 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    Jason Speaks @ January 29, 2011 “This is one of the most annoying tendencies among WASPs and Whites in general – wasting their money on narcissistic ego monuments.”

    My Response, Typed with Capital E.Y.E. = I
    equals
    IRONY:

    Yeah…you’re right, Jason. That’s a WASP trait for sure!

    I know I’ve never heard of a Jew demanding naming rights decision-making rights in return for their athletic or academic cash contributions to a university. Naah…that never happens. It’s always WASPS doing that.

    Idiot.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      January 30, 2011 - 2:10 am | Permalink

      I think the context of my remark makes what I mean pretty obvious. Yes, of course, Jews and many others waste money on ego monuments. But what I was saying, which was pretty obvious, is that far too many Whites spend money on things like stadiums, while more Jews spend money on causes meant to serve Jewish interests. Jewish millionaires lavish Leftist/Jewish causes with tons of money while hardly any White millionaire I can think of gives money to help out Whites.

      And I think you know that, you troll.

    • Chip Carver's Gravatar Chip Carver
      February 1, 2011 - 12:10 am | Permalink

      Jason is correct on this one.

      But it should be mentioned that Jews doling out “contributions” to Jewish causes are lauded in the media like divine saviors. There’s only praise and support, accompanied by the feigned awe of gentile media personnel (if they know what’s good for them) next to the true, hanging jaw, wide-eyed awe of media folks from The Tribe. There is only propaganda in the positive. Witness some of the press Michael Milken received after his joke of a jail sentence. At one point I was wondering if the Jews would soon be lobbying for a bill that would allow a non-President to have his visage immortalized as the latest addition to Mt. Rushmore. If a White millionaire / billionaire were to give money to truly worthy White causes and foundations, meaning those looking out for and working to ensure that our race moves onward and upward, then the individual in question would be castigated ceaselessly by that same media, not that I think that’s a good reason to avoid backing your people. Sure, it is also likely that the Self-Chosen may choose to retaliate with their current control of banking and Wall Street, but that could be used as a concrete example to show who’s in charge, who they hate, and what they will do. Believe me, I’m not taking this type of thing lightly, but sooner or later some kind of “fight” is going to occur. At some point the Jews will want to get rid of the billionaire Whites. After all, what good are they? They’re only in the way. Are there any “Forbes” Whites who are fully aware of what’s going on and who are secretly waiting for things to turn, for their chance to be able to step forward and provide greenbacks to the politically savvy and skilled who deserve it? Any White billionaires ready to give money to those people who would ensure that their wealthy white benefactor’s grandkids aren’t someday forced by legislation to marry some Kadara from Nigeria? I doubt it. I do hope I’m wrong though. For now we’ll have to put up with seeing goofs like Bill Gates sending laptops to the Congo and then grinning like a five year old, waiting for a pat on the head from dad. Except Dad in this case is the ADL or some other group that has to make sure they’ve gotten all the chortles out of their systems before they step on stage and solemnly declare Gates a friend to all humanity, a man who makes a difference. Oy vey.

      Another part of the problem that has so many Whites at the top of the money-chain ignoring their own is a peculiar drive that too many White people in general possess; the need to be “liked”. I’m not talking about everyday being nice to people in general. Too many Whites have a need, a desire to get their chance to bask in the approbation of someone, something that they can’t quite put their finger on. Whether it’s the aforementioned Bill Gates giving flash drives to cannibals or bewildered White children trying to kiss the tails of non-whites in schools, it’s rampant. And it’s this need which inevitably has Whites kissing the feet of not only the Jews, but everyone else around them who isn’t White. Yes, it’s a function of the artificial situation we’re in, everyone here knows that. But Jews certainly aren’t worried about being liked, not in the same way. Sure, they have their media tell everyone how bright, accomplished, wonderful they are, besides them doing this with each other at the dinner table, in school, at sabbath, anyplace they get together. Has it really made non-Jews like them any better? Jews really only care about their fellow Jews thinking highly of them. But for all the propaganda, in private, most Whites, even those brainwashed stem to stern by the multi-cult lie, will carefully peek over each of their shoulders, then tell you about something “wrong” that they’ve noticed in regard to Jews, whether it’s a brief mention of the rampant paranoia or the uncouthness that seems impossible to hide, bumping, roiling under even the most expensive of suits. The Jews have devoted decades to the art faking sincerity, yet on some level, even a lot of dullards pick up that it’s a put-on of some sort. For the most part, other non-whites are like the Jews when it comes to being liked. They aren’t too heavily engaged in the game at all, at least not in the same way Whites are. The non-whites may say one thing, but their actions show don’t care what Whites or anyone else but their own think of them. They want Whites to stand back, get out of the way and play second fiddle or worse. Or they want Whites to be scared or intimidated by them, and I do not mean that in only the physical sense. This White problem with bending over backwards to be liked has been induced by Jewish brainwashing in the schools, in the media. Little doubt the root of this problem for being liked comes from something innate in most Whites. Some of the source is obvious. And it wasn’t wanting to be liked per se, it from other drives or needs for approval, toeing the line for authority some might think. Psychological needs were noted by our current overlords and taken advantage of, twisted. Twisted just like our tendency to be helpful with others, with strangers, our unique form(s) of altruism, our sense of guilt which no other races seem to possess, least of all Jews. All of these uniquenesses have been perverted, poisoned, and used as weapons against us, especially guilt and the need for approval, to be liked. This is why it is important to study our enemies closely and use the same tactics against them, use their inescapable drives and needs to cut them off at the ankles. K Mac and others have shown again and again that something as simple as critiquing Jewish behavior, history, movements, drives them batty. Well, even more batty. Because they believe that this type of critique is a behavior, an occupation, a right, a weapon that is strictly reserved for use by the Self-Chosen.

      This “being liked” problem will likely disappear as conditions worsen. Whites didn’t have it in this form in the past, and the deteriorating social climate and tightening control of those running the big show at the moment will actually help bury this peculiar expression of one part of our psychological make-up. By this I mean that even the most doltish of Whites will see that very few “outsiders” like us. They may want to be like us when it comes to our best qualities, and that’s part of the problem. They can’t.

  60. solly> solly>"Miriam K" 29 Jan 8:04
    January 30, 2011 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

    The devil wears Prada?

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      January 30, 2011 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

      6-inch Manolos…only the best.

  61. Brendan's Gravatar Brendan
    January 30, 2011 - 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Jan. 30, 2011
    This may be a bit off topic.
    In searching for information about genetic things I discovered two curious things.
    One thing I found is that Ashkenazi Jews had some gene defects
    as a group, but one of these lemon genes is a cell defect [it is called CCR5 delta 32]
    which endows a high degree of immunity to HIV 1. There were various study estimates
    of the degree of incidence of this defect in Ashkenazim with the highest being in the 30′s %.
    The other curious genetic info item I discovered, NOT specific to Jewish people, is the assertion that psychopathology, with a key defining feature being absence of empathy ability, is genetic.
    And it may be endemic in the ruling elite.
    I had never heard of “ponerology” before yesterday, but it purports to be a branch of psychology
    and would seem to have the potential to explain a great deal as to the behavior of the ruling elite.
    A Polish psychologist, recently deceased, wrote a book which has been translated into English,
    see below:
    Political Ponerology: A Science on The Nature of Evil adjusted for Political Purposes
    by Andrew M. Lobaczewski
    “I [, Andrew M. Lobaczewski,] am a very aged clinical psychologist. Forty years ago I
    took part in a secret investigation of the real nature and psychopathology of the macro-social
    phenomenon called “Communism”. [p. 19]
    The book’s webpage is:
    http://ponerology.com/

  62. Walter E. Haas's Gravatar Walter E. Haas
    January 31, 2011 - 1:40 am | Permalink

    O-Ya
    The average IQ is 100.50 % don’t have it.Military in past, and I assume present require 100 for better MOS’s jobs in military.

    IQ test are a good generalization of IQ.It is true some questions may be based on the culture giving the test.
    There are exceptions that have special abilities which
    won’t show up on test.Always take test times 3 to be sure of average results.Also a different test may show different IQ
    level.Of course cold turkey is most difficult when you don’t know outline of test to be given.If test is legitimate it may be truest IQ level.

    A German police dog is one by DNA.We know character of
    these dogs.Some are low IQ,and have bad character like people.Of course they have to be trained to be police dogs.

    The human animal is no different than a bulldog meaning DNA is dominant.Mix a German dog with bulldog and you have a mutate of DNA.

    Zionist are racist as the Nazis desired to be.Both felt they were superior.The secret is they have probably mixed together in secret.This is what trans humanism is about.
    The NWO.This is probably why jewish woman in Sweden said
    jews will have much more influence in Sweden in the future.
    Henry Kissinger is a German jew-CFR-NWO-NAU

    Henry Makow has stated the royal blood of Europe is jewish mix.Leaders of Israel have stated they are the rulers of the gentiles which are animals.Begin Stated this in famous speech.Leo Zagami in the 2012 Armageddon-You Tube explains the connection.

    Yes jews may be smarter than animal mixed gentiles.If you mix genes you had better know what you are doing.If you want power have your enemies mix their genes with inferiors,so you can rule.Sharon stated in speech gentiles know Israel rules USA.Rothschild and Rockefeller plus the Royal Families with The Committee of 300 Rule the world.

    What is the point about jews IQ.It is very simple mixed blood
    degrades pure blood.This is a reality,and fact.Of courses fools will deny it.Yes it is relative statement.Yes it is true sometimes there are exceptions.Thomas Paine was exception
    as the Royals found out.That is why they hate him today.

    Certainly we see the result of race mix.Obama black and white.DNA does not lie when tested.Schopenhauer the philosopher said you get will from the father and intellect from the mother.To be a real jew your mother must be jewish.

    It is my opinion a female gets her intellect from the father,and
    and a male from the mother.

    The rich usually have offspring with their own class as the Royals do.Mixed blood is mixed blood.Incest has been dominant to preserve bloodlines.

    Gentiles are the strongest animals,but their brains have been
    corrupted with their DNA.USA public schools third world prove it regardless of fact elite have retarded education to
    keep power.Norman Dodd interview reference.

    Jews private sector are richest 50% USA.Percent in government out of proportion to their number 2%,or less.

    Gentiles are stupid,and they prove it by who rules them.Who is that.It is the gentile and jew New World Order,and the puppets,and those committing TREASON by violating the U.S. Constitution for greed and power and stupidity.

    The joke is they are going to hell with the rest of us.

    Jews are gods on this earth.Gentiles will be ruled with a jew foot on their head as they deserve.Abstract Speech Sharon of Israel.

    Walter E. Haas Search Google.com Oath keepers.Blog
    God Bless America

    European IQ test last I checked were more difficult,but that was a while back,so maybe not today.

  63. Walter E. Haas's Gravatar Walter E. Haas
    January 31, 2011 - 11:16 am | Permalink

    Correction: Sharon said in speech the gentiles knew Israel rules the USA.Begin said gentiles animals,and we will be their slaves
    in Speech.Speeches may be found at Google Search???

    Jan 31 2011-1:40 A.M Reference on this topic.

    Walter E. Haas Search Google.com Oath Keepers.Blog
    God Bless America

  64. Liz's Gravatar Liz
    February 7, 2011 - 4:25 pm | Permalink

    People get the impression that Jews are smarter because they are in the spotlight.
    They own the publishing companies so works and opinions that get published tend to be overwhelmingly Jewish.
    They own the newspapers and visual media outlets so all those works get publicity. Even the nobel prize has become an institution seeking out and acknowledging the Jewish accomplishment.
    Just because a panel of Jewish experts (existing for any cause)says the Jewish work is the best does not make it so.
    Here’s how it goes:
    Create an “Institute for Such-and-Such”, appoint your friends as the board of directors, they vote you to be the CEO, your uncle publishes your book which is basically a rehash of your dissertation and suddenly your an “expert”. Your cousin calls oprah and fox news and you get street cred. Any dissention is anti-semitism or racism.
    In other words, they are vigorous self promoters and own the means by which to do so.
    Stop worshiping the Jew and hanging onto his every twisted word. His preeminence is all artificially created.
    (Not you, personally but our unenlighted White bretheren.)

  65. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 17, 2011 - 11:35 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Decco:

    She has to be a construct. No Jew has ever admitted the Protocals even exist. To do so would mean severe punishment from the tribe.
    About the asians: Fine little yellow guys, most of them. I have worked with them for over twenty years in engineering, plus my formal schooling. Easy to get along with, hard workers, occasionally funny, worse than the usual engineer when it comes to picking up women. They are just culturally different, though. They seem to think a second rate copy is acceptable just because it is cheap. They are not creative, and they don’t think like a craftsman. Whether they are smarter or not, and believe me, I’ve met their smartest and would consider them just above average, doesn’t matter anyway because their mentality just doesn’t value greatness.
    We will get them all in the end.
    To the gentleman who felt his IQ was 5 points below Mensa but scored in the 99th percentile, I have good news. Mensa goes by the 98th percentile and above on a standard test of intelligence. IQ is a reasonable proxy but not what we use. However, it has gotten kinda boring and the women are few and far between, not to mention usually not very pretty.

  66. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    February 20, 2011 - 12:21 am | Permalink

    Okay, a few comments about the IQ tests. Generally you have to look at who writes these tests to see exactly what group they are testing for. The IQ test has resulted in a lot of smart people thinking they are dumb and quite a few blithering idiots (who are running this country) think they are freaking geniuses.

    Why do Ashkenazis score highest on IQ tests. Could it have something to do with the fact that the people who created them WERE Ashkenazi Jews? To me, they don’t mean squat. How many brilliant bums are there out there? Too many to speak of. Stupid is as stupid does. I’d rather see this country run by the street smart than the book smart any day in the week.

    Now, for my $.002 worth (if it’s even worth that much), the same thing that helps the Jews hurts the Jews. They are great at networking and self-promotion and yes, they eventually razzle dazzle their way up to very pivotal, powerful positions, but they have never built a mighty civilization. If all foreign aid stopped to Israel, it would dry up and blow away within a week. They always run their host countries into the ground before they are ignominiously run out of every country they take over. So color me unimpressed.

    I am going to be charitable and assume that maybe the first generation Jews who initially acquire the power are true geniuses. But with nepotism, they inevitably hand over the keys to their kingdom to their stupid son or nincompoop nephew. And I think it comes from the idea that because they are ‘G-d’s” chosen darlings, their brilliance must come out sooner or later and they are just too damned big to fail. Where oh where have we heard that one before?

    Is there a word in Hebrew or Yiddish that translates to hubris? I don’t get that impression at all.

  67. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    February 20, 2011 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Of course Jews are smarter than the western Goyim. Why else you think they ‘re ruling the very western countries from where they were expelled in the past.

    One doesn’t need a high IQ to understand why the US taxpayers are paying a major portion for Israeli R & D which spends 5% of its GDP, highest among the OECD countries plus $3 billion towards Israel’s $13 billion annual defense budget, highest among the Middle East countries and one-third towards Israel’s medicare while 52 million Americans cannot afford the basic medicare.

    Iranian under USraeli sanctions for the last 30 years and the so-called “lower IQ than both Americans and Israel” – have achieved scientific growth eleven times faster than any other country in the world, according to the NewScientist magazine (February 2010).

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/02/20/canadian-report-iran-has-worlds-fastest-scientific-growth/

  68. flavia's Gravatar flavia
    February 26, 2011 - 11:46 am | Permalink

    No- they’re good swindlers and sheisters. They are good at arguing. They are good at deceit, exploitation and other acts of wickedness. That’s it.

    How can we even argue about this? These are a people that have been kicked out of over 100 countries. These are a people with no foresight, no future time orientation, and no ability to control their basal blood lust for money and power. No willpower, no abstract thinking, no concept of cause and effect. NO INTROSPECTION! Being able to shout with big words does not a smart person make.

    • February 26, 2011 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

      flavia February 26, 2011 – 11:46 am

      “No- they’re good swindlers and sheisters. They are good at arguing. They are good at deceit, exploitation and other acts of wickedness. That’s it.

      How can we even argue about this? These are a people that have been kicked out of over 100 countries. These are a people with no foresight, no future time orientation, and no ability to control their basal blood lust for money and power. No willpower, no abstract thinking, no concept of cause and effect. NO INTROSPECTION! Being able to shout with big words does not a smart person make.”

      Note: That’s also how large numbers of human males (and even mature human females if the truth be told) say about human females in general.

      Natural Selection seems to have thus made human females (on average, relative to huan males) a) shorter, b) less muscular and c) less bright, whilst also making them sexually irresistible to most human males, perhaps so the latter don’t throw the former out of their countries?

      Now, just relax sexual dimorphism a little to make it a bit of a brain-gender continuum, and what might one get as an explanation?

      See CYP21 and NCAH…. ;-)

  69. flavia's Gravatar flavia
    February 26, 2011 - 5:51 pm | Permalink

    David Longley said:”Natural Selection seems to have thus made human females (on average, relative to huan males) a) shorter, b) less muscular and c) less bright, whilst also making them sexually irresistible to most human males, perhaps so the latter don’t throw the former out of their countries?

    Now, just relax sexual dimorphism a little to make it a bit of a brain-gender continuum, and what might one get as an explanation?”

    This is a pathetic attempt at a correlation. You make the erroneous assumption that Jews are targeted because they are not as intelligent. You then conclude, if Jews are targeted because they are not as intelligent, women, who are also not as intelligent, will also be kicked out of 193 countries.

    This is so stupid so as to no warrant a response, but what the hell, I don’t have anything to do right now…

    Jews do not get kicked out of countries due to not being as intelligent. They get kicked out because they create disharmony everywhere they go. They are ruthless in attaining power, and when they do- act in ways that are harmful to the majority and their culture. They are also turned on, because of ruthless business practices that can and have crippled entire nation’s economies.

    Women do not get kicked out of countries for the same reason children or invalids don’t get kicked out of countries….

    We do not have a group evolutionary strategy that is bent on destroying the majority population and strip mining her of all her resources.

    The problem isn’t intelligence!! It is your destructive tendencies towards the Gentiles.

    (BTW-Women’s intelligence tends to select for averages. The Gaussian is much more clustered around the middle, while males tend to have more geniuses and dunces. On average though, men and women are generally of equal IQ. Women just have less geniuses and dummies, but more people of average intelligence. )

    • February 26, 2011 - 6:14 pm | Permalink

      flavia February 26, 2011 – 5:51 pm

      “This is a pathetic attempt at a correlation. You make the erroneous assumption that Jews are targeted because they are not as intelligent.

      False.

      ” You then conclude, if Jews are targeted because they are not as intelligent, women, who are also not as intelligent, will also be kicked out of 193 countries.”

      False.

      “This is so stupid so as to no warrant a response, but what the hell, I don’t have anything to do right now…”

      These are your erroneous inferences. Your time would have been better spent reading my comments and links from early January on sex and IQ.

      “Jews do not get kicked out of countries due to not being as intelligent. They get kicked out because they create disharmony everywhere they go. They are ruthless in attaining power, and when they do- act in ways that are harmful to the majority and their culture. They are also turned on, because of ruthless business practices that can and have crippled entire nation’s economies. “

      This is one of the reasons why females have also been excluded. They cause havoc. Possibly as a consequence of their higher verbal than spatial IQ and their aversion to logic, engineering and thus building and appreciating sustainable infrastructure. It’s brain thing.

      “Women do not get kicked out of countries for the same reason children or invalids don’t get kicked out of countries….”

      Possibly true. It might be better if some were, perhaps ;-)

      “We do not have a group evolutionary strategy that is bent on destroying the majority population and strip mining her of all her resources.”

      The term ‘group evolutionary strategy’ is a somewhat over worked term especially in tha hands of psychologists. Evolution works in terms of consequences, selecting behaviours (and thus genes), i.e via operants. It is not teleological.

      “The problem isn’t intelligence!! It is your destructive tendencies towards the Gentiles.

      (BTW-Women’s intelligence tends to select for averages. The Gaussian is much more clustered around the middle, while males tend to have more geniuses and dunces. On average though, men and women are generally of equal IQ. Women just have less geniuses and dummies, but more people of average intelligence. )”

      I suspect I know more about this than you do. ;-)

      You did not understand my comment. Take some advice:-

      Do as you are told. Take a hint. ;-)

1 Trackback to "Are Jews Smarter?"

  1. on February 26, 2011 at 10:32 am

Comments are closed.