Back when only the founding population had suffrage, the opposing political factions were often organized around alternative philosophies of government. Even then, ideologies were often stalking horses for individual, regional, occupational, or denominational agendas. Within the past century, both these sincere ideological differences and parochial interests have been overshadowed by a new force in American politics: tribalism. The concomitant empowerment and demographic explosion of identity groups competing and conflicting with White American interests created a series of tectonic shifts in the fault lines beneath the surface of the American political landscape.
White Americans have a taboo against pursuing their group interests and an affinity for ideals and abstractions. They also retain the fiction that their representatives are beholden to them, despite a wealth of evidence to the contrary. In light of these factors, the ambitious politician seeking White votes is beset with the task of parroting a rhetoric that is rooted in abstract ideology, yet aligned with White American group interests. Once elected, it’s then in his interest to renege on both his implicit and explicit promises, as the lobbyists swarming around him pay more and pay more attention.

Non-Whites don’t have the taboos against promoting their group interests, and only bother wrapping their agenda in ideological abstractions when they need some White buy-in. They are; however, cognizant of the double-standard and never cease to exploit it to their advantage. Dorian Warren, an anti-White academician, relies on this blatantly obvious “identity for me, but not for thee” hypocrisy in his recent article “The Long Racial History of the Tea Party’s Deficit Trojan Horse“. His primary thesis is that deficit spending on big government programs is bad for Whites and good for his people, and that White Americans who ostensibly support “tea party principles” are acting in accord with their group interests.
Professor Warren is absolutely correct. He sees through the subterranean forces driving White American voters. Granted, few of them truly recognize why they’re doing what they’re doing and those who do feign ignorance. Failing to do so would violate the “racism” taboo. Warren is beholden to no such taboo, and can openly and explicitly advocate for his group interests. He comes right out and says it. He supports deficit spending because it’s disproportionately spent on his people…
A quarter of all African Americans live in poverty today, compared to 14 percent of Americans overall and 9 percent of whites. African Americans account for nearly a quarter of those receiving food assistance. More than a quarter of African Americans get health care through Medicaid. The typical black family has a dime for every dollar of wealth held by the typical white family. And all of these numbers are echoed among Latino families and other people of color.
Expanding the size and scope of America’s federal government must continue, as it’s central to the perpetuation of the ongoing transfer of wealth and entitlements from our group to his. Twenty years ago, Clinton rode into office on the slogan, “It’s the economy, stupid!” A more apt slogan might be “It’s about race, stupid!”
The history embedded in these ideas becomes tangible when looking at the policy outcomes they have been used to promote. Conservative activists-turned-Supreme Court justices like Clarence Thomas and John Roberts have used them to actively undermine federal civil rights and affirmative action efforts. From Reagan forward, Republican lawmakers have used the limited-government idea to hammer away at the social programs that were created in the 1960s to deal with the legacies of Jim Crow and slavery—welfare, equitable public education, Medicaid and Medicare. Indeed, throughout the Regean era, the “welfare queen” and “smaller government” tropes lived side-by-side, justifying a broad anti-federal agenda.
His call for a “strong, robust and powerful federal government that continues to be an instrument for racial equity and social justice” may resonate within the stately halls of the Institute for Research in African-American Studies, but it pierces the illusion held by Whites that the government’s insolvency is a problem to be solved by curbing fiscal irresponsibility and cutting back on bureaucratic bloat. This federal government is very effective and efficient. It’s working very well…it’s just not working for you, Whitey!
What escapes Warren is how flat the taboo against “racism” is starting to sound to ordinary people outside the government-sponsored anti-White cloisters he and his colleagues infest. He presumes that the federal government can continue swiping the foreign debit card and his people can keep swiping the race card indefinitely when, in reality, both cards are overdrawn and fast-approaching their expiration dates. If we hope to seriously defend ourselves and our way of life against the rising tide of “people of color”, we must expose this masquerade of concealing our legitimate interests behind arbitrary ideological avatars. And if we can’t expose it, then let’s hope Professor Warren and our other enemies keep doing our job for us.






Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?




“The typical black family has a dime for every dollar of wealth held by the typical white family.”
That’s because the typical black family spends a dollar on entertainment for every dime the typical white family does.
if the average negro family spends that much more than whites on entertainment, then the average negro household must be pretty fun!
Or hair care. The amount of money spent on trying to turn nappy, easily breakable Negro hair, into something like White hair, is mind-boggling. And then there’s nails, other cosmetics, expensive toys, and autos.
Too bad soon they won’t need any votes from whites at all. They will be able to democratically bleed us dry and destroy everything we’ve built without the aid of liberal whites.
Right on dude!
If less than 2% Jewish population which controls the Congress, Senate and Wall Street did not bother you – why you’re so paranoid of 23% Afro-Americans?
What are you hidding under the so-called ‘White skin’?
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/04/02/us-doesnt-need-enemies-when-it-has-israel-as-friend/
I sure hope you weren’t born in Canada, because you don’t seem to have an adequate grasp on the English language.
How can you look at yourself in the mirror, Rehmat? You, and every Muslim who comes to the West, sells out his Palestinian “brothers” every day. You ally yourself with Jewish interests and help to empower them in the West, and further their conquest in the Middle East! You want to help Palestinians? Go back to Pakistan.
@Athanasius
You are entirely right.
Are you a nationalist? Go back and happily leave in your beloved country among your own.
Today it was Floriile (Flowers Day)! Happy name day to all of you! Be as happy as my flowers were today!
Sorry “live happily in your country”! My fault!
I’m not sure what your issue is with me, Razvan. You are Romanian, correct? I’m quite supportive of Romanian nationalism, even though I don’t believe everything Iorga or Codreanu ever said. Still, I might BE a Romanian, for all you know.
Second of all, how would my going back to ‘my own country,’ (my family has been in the New World for over 100 years) help defeat Jewish interests?
So other than the fact that I don’t think Vlachs should rule the entire Balkan peninsula, and the fact that I think that the Cumans and Pechenegs settled in Romania, what has got your panties so in a bunch?
???
I really appreciated you point regarding everybody should live amongst his own.
It was Floriile, I supposed that you know the meaning so I was just trying to be friendly. I was happy as a lot of my flowers bloomed yesterday in my garden and attended a small party.
Lighten up.
But Canada is not an English colonial land anymore. Its 51% population is non-White settlers. It’s government is not controlled by the White nationalists but the boot-lickers of your kike brothers.
So forget being a English Literature teacher – and start writing in Hebrew, says your Jewish boot-licking brother Stephen Harper.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/kent-attack-on-israel-is-an-attack-on-canada/
No one wants you, or your pedophilic, disgusting, Semitic religion in the West. You are in Canada at the indulgence of those “English” colonials. THEY built the country, you contribute nothing, but are a parasite.
And I thought it was the Talmud-quoting filth like you they don’t here.
Are you saying Holy Mary was victim of pedophilic Islamic religion? She gave birth to jesus when she was 12-year-old. That’s what your Talmud says.
Are not the greatest numbers of child-molesters found in the world happen to be rabbis, preists and nuns?
Who control world’s porn industry – Jews or Muslims?
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/israels-pornographic-stimulus-plan/
The mullahs and imams seem to be doing their part in the child molestation department: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4084951.stm
The situation is even worse than the article suggests. Increased social spending increases the attractiveness of the United States to poor immigrants. More social spending means more poverty in the United States. It is self-defeating.
The more that taxation and social spending, it seems to me, is devolved to the local level the less that Whites will be financing the replacement (via support for alternate communities) of their own culture.
Congressman Raul Grijalva understands what is at stake, and he is not happy about it. He sees cuts in social spending as a disincentive to Mexican immigration and therefore a threat to his interests.
To make matters worse from the perspective of those who are less than friendly to Whites, many people in the Tea Party crowds insist on wearing such emblems of White culture as colonial era three-cornered hats.
I think White flight from integrated areas needs to be encouraged. If they can, Whites should raise their children in safe places with good schools — private or public. The example of White liberals in Congress should be followed: They live in White areas and send their kids to largely White schools, where they are less prone to physical attacks for being White. Don’t listen to what liberals say; watch what they do. Not even Obama will send his kids to Washington public schools.
The US econony is not in mess due to non-White immigrants but due to warmongering White elites and Jewish fat cats in the Wall Street. The later received $10 trillion as bail-out money, which could have fed the great-majority of White folks on welfare for next three decades. The White warmongers are wasting $653 billion per year on wars mostly for oil and the Jewish “Little Finger” in Palestine.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/obamas-iraq-strategy-oil-bonus-for-israel/
Rehmat, I get that you don’t like White people and especially dislike Americans and British, but I think you would have to admit that the massive illegal Mexican immigration/invasion has a bad impact on the American economy.
And while there has been money wasted on recent wars, it is nothing compared to the tens of trillions wasted on Great Society programs over the last 40 years. Also, the policy of Government to promote housing among poor Blacks and Mexicans played a big role in the financial crisis, along with Jewish controlled Wall Street houses like Goldman Sachs.
Of course he doesn’t think that. He goes to Latino and Black sites and also talks about how the Jews are screwing them and how Islam can liberate them from big bad whitey.
That’s all well and good… but what really irritates me is that Muslims are just like Jews in that they are always aggrieved and will never admit any of the (extensive) evil that they have done.
Rehmat,
Your response is a non sequitur. You changed the subject. I said social spending serves to attract poor immigrants thereby increasing poverty in the United States. It is self-defeating. You did not challenge that.
Until the European peoples realize that Zionists are waging a cunning propaganda war AND a ethnic war nothing will change. In Australia (though where not very important in the scheme of things) the barrage is picking up place .Show trials and Tv properganda in on the march. One of the State Tv sites-SBS recently made a one eyed documentary called immigrant nation .The usual game was played which is to transpose values for 2010 to 1950-60 and as Always the bad old days! Sure alot of immigrants got verbally roughed up Life used to be a lot tougher ,harder less sanitized and people were also like this. When people live and work in a regimented, hard hot flyblown country (no air conditioners , old mate) it makes people angry–This SBS is human nature.
What this documentary was really doing was vilifying the European people that had settled and built this country AND MADE IT WORK under extremely tough conditions .These one-eyed race warriors forget that this is the reason immigrants are queuing to get in.BECAUSE WE AND OUR SYSTEM MADE IT WORK.
Even when we were marched off in two World Wars to support our overlords and their agenda , which as it now appear is our racial destruction .
The constant barrage of propaganda on TV is disgraceful and disgusting.The tactic is to try and stop anyone from opposing the creation of a society where white people are just another minority and Zionist can then take the commanding heights as has been done in USA .There (is) will be Israeli colonies in every Western country that keep a tight control of our leaders and tell them what to do .What is being done is incredible obvious If European-None Jewish Journalist could get out the indoctrinated loop for a while . One only has to look the the very special consideration given to Israel and their Colonists to see that Western Governing structures are very very compromised.
The Head of SBS Tv is a Jew and he has recently appointed (anointed) another UNQUALIFIED Jew to work as the programing Editor in Chief done of course deliberately to promote their ethnic groups vision of how Australia should become . One constantly sees Jewish Journalist doing the same thing. There is always a Jewish journalist covering the Middle East, USA or the political spin from Canberra (Aust Capital); now how does this come about??
Firstly, the largest CIA presence in the entire world can be found (of course) in the United States of America. It is of course headquartered in Virginia. But, the CIA’s second largest presence in the entire world, can be found in Australia. Not many people know this, not even Australians.
Secondly, Australia is subject to the whims of both the British ‘Crown’ and its traitorous Monarchy; both of which represent the “head of the Snake” whose tail is the so-called, “New World Order”.
Nothing will change in Australia until you rid yourselves of these two influences. Meanwhile, and until then, you will continue to collectively look and sound like a Dachshund on a tight leash: full of potential but forced to breed with mongrels.
“Firstly, the largest CIA presence in the entire world can be found (of course) in the United States of America. It is of course headquartered in Virginia. But, the CIA’s second largest presence in the entire world, can be found in Australia. Not many people know this, not even Australians.”
This is complete BS. We are to believe that the second-biggest CIA presence on earth is in … Canberra? Which is a very small city. Where would you put them all? Nonsense. I think the CIA has more important work in, say, Kabul and Baghdad. The Aussies have totally fucked up their own country, the CIA has nothing to do with it.
@ K Eggers [April 17, 2011 - 8:17 am]
As I wrote in my original comment — the one that got you all emotional and full of yourself — not many people know this.
I recommend you study these two articles VERY closely:
(1) http://www.rense.com/general2/wx.htm
(2) http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8858
There are also other factors (e.g., research the fate of Goff Whitlam in 1975) that clearly point to the CIA having a great deal to do with Australia’s loss of political independence.
Hey Smart Guy: So there’s a big base at Pine Gap in the middle of Australia, and that means what, exactly? And that has what to do with mid-1970s poliical scandals? Those who think the CIA runs everything (they have nothing to do with Pine Gap, btw) know literally nothing about the Agency – they are not that effective, I can assure you.
Moreover, the existence of Pine Gap is very well known in Oz, don’t think you’ve uncovered the “great secret” here. There’s a very detailed Wikipeda entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Gap
Yeah needless to say, Rense.com is not a serious site. It mixes conspiracy theories with the paranormal (ghosts) and UFO stories. I suppose Jeff Rense is an Alex Jones wannabe, except he’s not as good. In fact, I wonder if the purpose of the site is to make any questioning of the elite structure of this country seem “crazy”.
Be warned.
Actually, the only reason Rense mentions UFOs, the paranormal etc. on his site is to use them as a type of shield to allow coverage of zionist activities, in the hopes of having to put up with less jewish interference in terms of them trying to shut his site down. But he still catches hell for posting a lot of accurate information about exclusively jewish malfeasance. Kind of reminds me of David Icke, who I believe cooked up the whole reptile people story as a cover / shield /code. In the end, the lizards are simply jews, lol.
Itz Code, so you really think Rense doesn’t believe in Reptile people, ghosts and UFOs, but uses them as cover? Well first off, you are probably right that he doesn’t believe any of that stuff. He is probably just using it, either for ratings or as cover. But these failed DJ types don’t strike as reliable characters.
And I’m afraid his site, far from being a gateway for people to learn about Jewish influence, simply discredits any discussion of the topic, which is what Jews want.
For one thing, why are people posting Rense links on this site? We already know about Jewish influence. Shouldn’t it be the other way around? Should there be links on the Rense site driving traffic this way? The flow of traffic should be from Rense to here, not the other way around.
Just to be clear, I meant to say the flow of traffic should be from the Rense site to TOO, not the other way around. Let’s see links on the Rense site referencing TOO articles, not the other way around. Maybe I missed them, but I don’t see any links for TOO on his website. He has lots of links for survivalist ripoff paysites, but I don’t see any links to any of MacDonald’s work.
If he was serious about discussing Jewish influence and was merely using Reptile People as a cover, wouldn’t he at least put some links to serious discussion of Jewish power like that of MacDonald? Again, maybe I missed those links but I didn’t see any.
Anglo Saxon says :Nothing will change in Australia until you rid yourselves of these two influences.’That is the Cia & Freemason Influence , you mean.
There not much that can be done about either for the forseeable future.What can be done is to make it known that the Majority of the population in Australia , object to being deracinated by multiculturalism–Football & Woolworths supermarket isn’t enough to stop the common people from violently objecting to dumping of millions of Chinese and Middle Easterners. The sneaky pricks (mostly Labour gov) that run Aust 7 States have used a particularly cunning tactic. That is to underfunding the Medical Training in Aust Universities and so force the market to look overseas for ‘ThirdWord’ doctors. By doing this they blunt the objection of the common people to the human dumping by injection these Doctors over the common people , thereby socializing them to rulership by None-European peoples.
This multicultural snake does indeed have many heads And the ‘We the people must keep a very close eye on our leaders activities for they are not in a position to reject that which our Overlords demand , but if ‘We the People’ dig in heels Vociferously Object , Analytically Enquire and our Journalist ask the obvious questions like : Your Jewish and don’t you think this biased your judgment on this issue? Or Is it this good for the Founding European People of this country?Do they not have claim to make right to this society ? Basically the Journalist have got to stop being Cowards ! Without fear or favour should it not be ? They can’t sack everybody. Wear your crown of thorns with pride!
That is to underfunding the Medical Training in Aust Universities and so force the market to look overseas for ‘ThirdWord’ doctors. By doing this they blunt the objection of the common people to the human dumping by injection these Doctors over the common people , thereby socializing them to rulership by None-European peoples.
That’s EXACTLY what happened in the United States. Doctors were actually RECRUITED from India and Pakistan. There were (still are) too few medical schools and even those admitted additional blacks and hispanics due to affirmative action. Now most of our doctors are from hostile minorities. Better hope you don’t get sick.
But this can’t be a coincidence that this happened in both the USA and Australia. It’s infuriating.
@ Athanasius [April 18, 2011 - 12:06 am]
Yes, the exact same tactic has been used in the United Kingdom. A very high proportion of practising doctors and medical staff generally now employed nationwide, are either of South Asian or Caribbean stock.
Similar tactics were used in France; the only difference was that the ethnic background of the Third World people being used were different. In France, it is mainly people from the Maghreb who have been promoted due to a French form of “affirmative action”.
So, a clearly discernible pattern exists across much of the so-called Western World. Such a pattern would normally suggest there MUST exist one, coordinating organisation (or conspiratorial group) overseeing it all.
Jason Speaks:
Rense features Prof Kmac’s articles on his site all the time, lists Kmac as a “Rense Columnist”, and interviews Prof Kmac on his radio show. Easy to miss because the Rense website is nothing if not voluminous.
http://www.google.ca/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=0h&oq=rense+&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GZAZ_enCA380CA380&q=rense+kevin+macdonald
@ Anglo Saxon
Of course, we can’t even say: “Do something for your race and become a physician.” At least in the US, the number of white doctors is tightly controlled, so any white who decides to go to medical school (and gets in) is just taking the spot from another white.
Now, most Americans are used to it. That don’t think it’s at all strange that we, the richest country in the world, with supposedly the best universities, had to go recruit doctors from primitive third world hellholes like India and Pakistan.
K Eggers:
Sometimes Anglo Saxon sounds like a prophet, other times, a total nut case. I think when he takes his medication he is quite sane, and makes quite a bit of sense. When he is off of it, he makes outrageous and unsubstantiatable claims that make him sound crazy…..
As for the doctor situation, Larry David (yes I realize he is a jew but he is quite funny) had a great episode of “Curb Your Enthusiam” where he questioned the credentials of a black doctor due to “the whole affirmative action thing..” and was naturally hated by all because of it.
Now you are becoming desperate Scooter!! It is clear you are a fool and a loser: your endlessly asinine comments (and your obsession with writing personal attacks) betray that fact.
Regular visitors to these pages will have long ago recognised that to be called silly names and epithets by jealous little boys such as ‘Scooter’, ‘Jason Squeaks’, ‘K. Eggers’, and ‘Someday’ is to receive confirmation that you are on target with your commenting.
Apart from this being just loud baby-talk … I would challenge our little Scooter to provide hard evidence that actually shows exactly when and where I have made “outrageous and unsubstantiatable” claims.
Here is a real example of an utterly “outrageous and unsubstantiatable” comment, which nobody bothered to pick up on; perhaps because its author is already a readily recognisable freak, and a troll ….
Only those with an IQ below 95 (or imposters) will have trouble recognising that such infantile ramblings have no place on this website.
Come on AS, you cannot be serious about pushing Rense.com. It’s silly. Comparing this site to Rense is like comparing Harvard to Hamburger University. Like I said, if you guys can find a way to drive traffic from Rense to THIS site, that would be helpful. The opposite flow takes us backward.
Whenever I go on youtube or other sites, I find ways to get traffic over to this site.
Wow! And Anglo Saxon accuses OTHER people of gatekeeping! Here he tells someone to leave the site forever!
Anglo-Saxon
I’m not sure what happened to my previous post. But I found that Philip Willkie (son of Wendell) spent a lot of time lobbying for foreign doctors in small towns!
What a degenerate family.
In any event, this topic, which severely affects whites all over the Western world, and is not very well understood, deserves an article here.
Anglo Saxon asked for it, so here is a recent nutcase comment of his:
Anglo Saxon April 17, 2011 – 5:04 am | Permalink There is always a Jewish journalist covering the Middle East, USA or the political spin from Canberra (Aust Capital); now how does this come about??
Firstly, the largest CIA presence in the entire world can be found (of course) in the United States of America. It is of course headquartered in Virginia. But, the CIA’s second largest presence in the entire world, can be found in Australia. Not many people know this, not even Australians
(You can’t make this up, can you A-S?)
Now, I can’t remember where you put your quote, but I’m sure you will remember it – you said the United States was not a legally constructed country, and you also said the UN wasn’t a legal entity – just some jew banker construct. Please explain those gems!
@ Scooter [April 19, 2011 - 4:24 pm]
As regards meaningful debate and exchange of information, you really are a complete waste of time. And, as I have already told you, a loser to boot.
There is nothing you will be told. You (believe you) know it all already.
Hey … seems like you already have a “mutual masturbation society” going with 3 or 4 of your commenting chums, here on this website who are as equally subversive and obsessed with name-calling as you are. My advice is that you be content with that.
Some achievement … eh?
Just leave the real debates and informative exchanges to the mature and heterosexual types who actually come here with sincere intentions, in the (sometimes vain) hope of sharing worthwhile information.
I truly struggle to recall where & when you have contributed anything of worth. All you want to exchange (apparently) is rancor and name-calling. If I met you in person, I’d probably scare the wits out of you. In the real world, I doubt you add up to much (the terms “loud bark” and “no bite” spring to mind).
And as for the United States not being a “legally constructed country” … you (apparently) don’t have the intellect to use words correctly, which is a prerequisite when discussing law.
Whether you wish to believe or laugh at what I write is totally irrelevant. The fact is, the United States only exists (in law) as a Corporation, and NOT as a nation governed by a Constitution. And furthermore, the USA was legally declared bankrupt in 1933. You have been that way ever since (in law). This is why you have been ruled (for many years) by Maritime Law, which in turn helps to explain why your birth certificates are listed on the NY Stock Exchange (you are a mere slave, to be traded, according to the Gnomes of Manhattan) … AND why a total joker like Obama (a shady character who actually has a criminal record!) managed to get elected to the White House … that is to say, after putting aside the total stupidity of the average American voter, who alone has the capacity to fall for such a heist.
The U.N. is waaay off topic for this comment thread. Out of respect for this article’s author, Matt Parrot, I shall not use his page in order to (yet again) sit you in a corner wearing yet another Dunce’s Cap. Even though it would be rather too easy for me to do.
Anglo-Saxon:
You must be off your meds again because you made my case for me! ROFLMAO!
I guess that govt. mental health care system in the UK ran out of money!
You’re THAT upset that I Rehmat’s feet to the fire for his comments?
Yawn! For the benefit of our resident loser … and more importantly, for the benefit of those who foolishly allow themselves to be swayed and/or influenced by garrulous losers, here is a little bit of truth about the United States of America:
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Did the USA Declare Bankruptcy?
http://fskrealityguide.blogspot.com/2007/09/did-usa-declare-bankruptcy.html
QUOTE:
“In 1913, Congress signed a surrender treaty to the international banking cartel. Congress ceded its sovereignty to the Federal Reserve by surrendering its money printing authority. The 16th amendment sold all US citizens into slavery via the income tax. After 1913, bankruptcy was inevitable, although it wasn’t formally declared until later [...] In 1933, President Roosevelt formally declared bankruptcy to the US public. He told them that the US government was defaulting on its promise that dollars were backed with gold. He demanded that US citizens turn over their gold in exchange for worthless dollars [...] Even though bankruptcy was declared, President Roosevelt kept the US government going by executive order. The US government has been operating under marshal law since 1933, although this has been carefully kept secret from the general public.”
*****************************************
2003© Copyright Dan Sewell Ward, All Rights Reserved
The United States of America is bankrupt. Literally.
http://www.halexandria.org/dward282.htm
QUOTE:
Keep in mind that if slaves don’t know they’re slaves, then the likelihood of insurrection is nil. That’s why as long as everything is covert, there’s little possibility of a change in the State-of-affairs.
“the illusion held by Whites that the government’s insolvency is a problem to be solved by curbing fiscal irresponsibility and cutting back on bureaucratic bloat. This federal government is very effective and efficient. It’s working very well…it’s just not working for you, Whitey!”
Yup. That’s why homogeneous White countries like, oh, Christ, you know the list, Scandinavia, Holland, Switzerland, hell, even Canada are “high-tax” paradises for White folks. Even the Asiatics are living high on the hog. In America, the choice is, “free market” libertarian “it’s just common sense” tea party bullshit to enrich the rich, or “socialism” to enrich the negroes. Damn Americans are stupid.
Yes indeed … and also entirely dominated by their garrulous and infinitely demanding womenfolk.
A very unfortunate “double-bind” I would suggest.
Anglo Saxon – stop trashing American women. I’m sick of it. Firstly – lots of “Americna women” are Jews, Blacks ,and Mestizos. Gabbling loudmouths ALL. Judging from data emerging from Europe – perhaps European women aren’t as loud. They are too busy copulating wih African and dark Muslim males, to engage in conversation.
FYI – this prevelant attitude among White men is a disaster. DO try to remember that Jewish porn, suffused thorugh “normal society” and eargerly embraced by males of all Races, preceded feminism by at decade. Also – the smarmy, childish, self-deafeating attitutes, constantly exhibited BY males, in this sad, Aspergery little “Movement” drives OFF White women.
You all want some non-existent Victorian image of a simpering, doting Mommy-Wife, who you all wish to “save and protect” – but despise if she actually says anything. This is a GAPING flaw in White MEN. You cannot deal with “garrulous American women”. So how on Earth are you going to deal with Blacks, Mestizos, and the most garrulous people on Earth – Jews.
Ya know – one of the chief reasons Jews have been SO successful is they USE their women to advance their causes. Always have. Strong minded, and mouthy White women would be an ASSET – but you are too insecure and fragile in your own sense of self, that you cannot comprehend this fact.
PATHETIC.
@ Ciaran [April 17, 2011 - 10:20 am]
Is it possible you are being hysterical, loudmouthed, and arrogant?
Frankly, most people would not equate “garrulous and infinitely demanding womenfolk” with “trashing” … as you have put it. I was simply describing (in a very generalized way) how a great many non-Americans see its womenfolk, through personal experience.
Perhaps you have just demonstrated, in your own small way, why a great many people all around the world find American (white) women highly problematic, due largely to your exaggerated sensitivity to even the slightest criticism.
Histrionic Personality Disorder:
Excessive emotionality and attention-seeking; dependence upon reassurance, approval, and praise; sexual seductiveness; over-concern with physical attractiveness; emotional exaggeration and shallow expression of emotions; self-centeredness; strong drive for immediate gratification of desires; impressionistic speech.
AS – I agree with that poster regarding your flip flops – alternately sane, and reasonable, and alternatly nutcase.
YOU just demonstrated my point. Thanks. And that trite, boring ritualized snark tactic re: pulling up some bizaare and irrelevant snippet from some online “psychiatric” diagnosis – very Jewish. Yawn.
@ Ciaran [April 18, 2011 - 7:54 pm]
Even fools serve a purpose.
Your sanctimonious attacks have certainly exposed a deep prejudice among at least one of the persons charged with ‘moderating’ comments on this poorly policed website.
Many readers will have noted TOO’s shameful and immature tolerance of your venomous personal attacks.
There will be no advancement of the White Cause for as long as self-appointed websites such as TOO allow and tolerate disrespectful, rude, and ignorant women like you to spill their slanderous bile on its webpages.
I of course don’t know who or what you think you are (doubtless you are possessant of a grossly inflated opinion of yourself) but it is clear you are not a lady … you are part of the problem, not the solution.
Anglo-Saxon:
You make the most sense when you point out that our women here in America are hard to control. Ironically, they should be grateful to the men here for giving them more freedom and rights than anywhere else in the world, but they just keep on bitchin’ (well, a lot of them do, anyway – some however, are great wives and mothers)
Warren is beholden to no such taboo, and can openly and explicitly advocate for his group interests. He comes right out and says it. He supports deficit spending because it’s disproportionately spent on his people…
It’s shortsighted of him, though.
Wouldn’t it make far more sense for Dorian Warren to support cutting aspects of the federal budget irrelevant to his people’s financial welfare to pay for that part of the budget disproportionately spent on his people?
Cutting such programs would carry no penalty for Blacks, while shoring up the medium and long term viability of the Welfare State which disproportionately pays out to Blacks.
I allude of course to Medicare and Social Security, two programs which actually disproportionately benefit people of European descent due to the nature of America’s demographic profile.
The irony of ironies is that the guy going after Medicare isn’t Black, but rather some White Republican named Paul Ryan.
The only real bone of contention between someone like Paul Ryan and someone like Dorian Warren is that Ryan wants a large percentage of the savings he’d get from cutting Medicaid to go to giving the top bracket a seven point reduction in their tax rate.
It’s weird though how a combination of responsibility and a love of the rich led Ryan to promote a plan which would do far more to defend the interests of Blacks against the looming debt crises than anything the actual Blacks have proposed.
I wonder if old white people helped vote Ryan into office?
That would be another irony…
“Wouldn’t it make far more sense for Dorian Warren to support cutting aspects of the federal budget irrelevant to his people’s financial welfare to pay for that part of the budget disproportionately spent on his people?
Cutting such programs would carry no penalty for Blacks, while shoring up the medium and long term viability of the Welfare State which disproportionately pays out to Blacks.”
What’s strange to me is that you, the author and seemingly every commenter, proceed from the fallacy that direct monetary payouts are, in total, beneficial to the recipients, in multi-racial-and-ethnic societies. Yes, it may put a short term smile on their face, but creates dependency, destroys resilience, empowers racial demagogues, and fuses individual reliance to a bankrupt, savior state. Or has the alternative right ceded the argument that time is a very relevant variable in economic planning? Our we hastening the end by this approach? Or are we not supposed to be any smarter than a welfare mammy when it comes to economics?
I read this article twice and still didn’t understand it. The welfare state is carefully crafted by our masters to balance a fine line between obedience and class warfare. In a multi-ethnic society, if you flipped a switch and all of the minority benefits shifted to White beneficiaries, chaos would ensue, and it certainly wouldn’t benefit Whites 3-5 years from now.
Y’all need to watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A
Mike
FWM,
The “farm” metaphor used in that video is very insightful. I’m not innately opposed, however, to the fact that there are elites (farmers) who rely on nations for their sustenance. Sheep do, after all, enjoy better lives on the farm than they would in the wild. If the shepherd’s fleecing the flock, but also protecting the flock, feeding the flock, and so on, then it’s a symbiotic relationship. The metaphorical “farm” is civilization, no?
In a nutshell, our problem isn’t that we’re being “farmed”, but that the farmer’s off feeding his grain to sheep in another pasture while a wolf in a pair of overalls with a straw hat propped upon his head is busy slaughtering the livestock, pillaging the farm. Unlike the farmer (indigenous elite), the wolf (invasive elite) has no long-term interest in the vitality of the livestock.
The bottom line is that external threats to the farm’s livestock are not illusory, and that competent elites – good shepherds – play a pivotal role in protecting the livestock from those threats. Our elites more or less did that for a long time before they became as decadent and derelict as they now are. Tradition is, within this metaphorical construct, about restoring the constructive and symbiotic relationship between the shepherd and flock which makes for a thriving farm.
Even in this late hour, we can all leave the farm behind and nobody will stop us. To see the cage is indeed to be free to leave it. There’s a virtually infinite expanse of wilderness to lose yourself in and nobody will come looking for you unless you, say, mail explosives that you assemble in your nature cabin to random professors. Unplugging from the grid, going back to nature, going ghost, and such are all possible and they’re the best things to do for some folks.
Excellent reply. Thanks. I get it now. Mike
[i]This federal government is very effective and efficient. It’s working very well…it’s just not working for you, Whitey! [/i]
It is much worse than that . Socialism does not work for anyone of any color . Blacks would be much better off in a free market country .
Whites would be much better off and they would be able to survive in a free market country .
But , the first choice would be a free market white nation .
A part of me is becoming disillusioned with White people. The people on this site and those who consider themselves White nationalists almost appear to be a different breed then the average White person. In fact, we may come to a point where we have to realize that White people are not all they are cracked up to be, and that there is only a small minority that realizes the peril of a hostile out-group. There is something “missing” from most White people’s brains, especially American Whites. This is partly cultural but may also perhaps have some genetic component. Regardless of the cause, I’m not sure how to remedy the situation short of all of us actually populating an area, driving out aliens, and starting an Israeli-style homeland for Whites with our type of viewpoints. I used to think that type of thing was crazy, but I’m starting to see a lack of options through any other method. There is most certainly no real democratic method that will reverse the course we’ve been on.
I almost look forward to the day when Whites wake up, are completely outnumbered demographically, and wonder why their new minority overlords are not treating them the way they thought they would treat them. And yeah, it will make me feel slightly better to say, “I told you so.”
Whites are by nature more abstract, more idealistic. This has been a driving force behind the art and innovation that’s propelled us to such great heights. It does; however, come at the cost of being relatively less in tune with our instincts and more vulnerable to manipulation than other groups. All we have to do is reach them with a vision that captivates their imaginations and invigorates their spirits.
Our people must be on a crusade of one kind or another. It’s in our blood. Our prerogative is to find some alternative to the current crusade of doing away with ourselves that the invasive Jewish elite have constructed and our treasonous native elites have been promoting and enabling.
Well, economics will force the issue–but will it be too late? The fact that the military is being taken over by hostile elements doesn’t bode well for any kind of separatism. I feel that the first order of business should be to try to take control of a few major universities… but where to go from there? Banking? Media? the Bureaucracy?
We need both the requisite economic incentive and the spiritual inspiration to reproduce—and of course to stop immigration—if possible even encourage people to return home.
All good points. But remember, what we really need is more than a handful of people who share our beliefs. Right now we can’t dream of taking over a university or a bank or even a dry cleaner at this point. With the numbers we have, we basically can’t do anything. If and when we get more numbers, then the opportunities will avail themselves. The key is more people.
The good work of TOO is to raise the consciousness of Whites who are open to having it raised.
John we speak with the same voice. I think the best way to “wake up” white citizenry in America is to highlight exactly how “unequal” America has become, resulting in a new white second-class status. I would highlight the hypocrisy of allowing people of color a racial identity while criminalizing all gestures of white identity. Many white citizens, such as myself, have grown up as minorities surrounded by a sea of color. We have grown up witnessing people of color rise to power via ethnic identity time and time again. So all one has to do is remind whites that people of color have utilized ethnic identity to gain power and prestige in this country while the white majority has exponentially LOST power. Therefore would it not be wise to adopt the strategy of racial identity amidst the onslaught of competing racial identities? Looking to colleges as a potential vehicle of change, I would send groups of good looking white youth to colleges around the country highlighting anti-white policies in an attempt to organize white youth just as the tribe has organized for their ends. During my time at college I often wondered why white students were barred from having an ethnic club while every other ethnicity was publically celebrated? When white people come to terms with this reality, I would argue that unity will soon follow. Refusing to arm oneself with the power of racial identity is to curse oneself to a knife in a gun-fight.
Video of pale-skinned Israeli Khazars in Tel Aviv protesting against the immigration of African negroes into Israel April 6 2011.
Note that youtube has disabled comments for this video.
These Khazars have some kind of mental block–no mirrors in their houses.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-y24SzbCY&feature=player_embedded
It is indeed important to expose the blatant Jewish Double Standard: multi-racialism for all White countries but mono-racialism for Israel.David Duke does it all the time.It helps to undermine their “moral” argument for our destruction.
Oh man, that video is priceless.
Wow fantastic video. Yes it does expose the Jewish double standard. Please show this video to everyone you know. It also highlights why I don’t have as much problem with Jews living in Israel as I do with Jews in the West.
Excellent video! Where do I send money to negroes who want to immigrate to Israel? Perhaps they also need Mexicans for their illegal construction projects?
@ John
{ In fact, we may come to a point where we have to realize that White people are not all they are cracked up to be, and that there is only a small minority that realizes the peril of a hostile out-group. There is something “missing” from most White people’s brains, especially American Whites. }
Were you always pro white ? I will bet that 99.9 % of the guys on here were not .
I know I was a liberal big time up until about 15 years ago .
( I must admit I was always a free thinker )
I think that a white person just has a kind of revelation and then there is no turning back . They become pro white and unshakable . Because it is deep and it is natural and good .
I bet that there is a kind of over filled dam that is going to break and there will be a very rapid transformation to a racial awakening of whites . It just needs to hit a point that is a kind of unknown but it is inevitable that it is coming and not that long off . ( that’s as specific as I can be , lol )
If you must know, I have been “pro-white” for almost my entire life. I would say that at a very early age I thought racism was generally a bad thing, but as soon as I became old enough to begin to form independent thoughts, around age 10, I began realize the intrinsic differences between the races.
I hear some old-timers on here whining about how they grew up in all White towns and never could have foreseen what would occur. It was something they took for granted. I’m sorry, but I grew up in an all White town as well. My father was mildly racist and anti-semitic. If your father wasn’t, then that was a short-coming on his part, and his father’s father wasn’t, then it was a short-coming on his part as well. Furthermore, if you had two brain cells to rub together, these issues should be self-evident and instinctual. Basically you’re admitting to being brainwashed against your own nature. It demonstrates that you are easy to manipulate. I find this to be the case with most White people, which is why I posted the above comment.
Americans let materialism and consumerism replace blood and honor, and you can see the manifestation in our current society. A tremendous burden for this result lies on the baby boomer generation. What a trash generation filled with unbridled greed, egoism, and weak-willed behavior, completely blind and subservient to every Jewish led agenda. There were individuals who ran against the grain for sure, but most of them had to turn 50 in order to see what was at the tip of everybody’s nose. This generation infected their children, and raised a generation with no concept of racial differences or honor. They basically let MTV raise their kids while they were off having a mid-life crisis.
/rant off
I will not debate your point that people can be “awakened.” I would argue that this is happening at a very very slow rate. Some people are hoping that economics will result in an awakening. People in the White community have been saying this for decades. You see this common trait amongst White nationalist. It’s defeatism and there is no guarantee it’s ever going to come.
If you’re an average White person getting your fix of MTV and too busy reading US Weekly, I doubt you’re ever going to be awakened. The problem is, a vast majority of White people fall under this category. We on this site hold up many of the great White minds as paragon of what our race can achieve, rightfully so. The problem is there are also many Whites who in reality fail to meet our expectations of them, and probably never will.
( I must admit I was always a free thinker )
^
Just wanted to clarify what I meant ….
That my being a true free thinker soon lead to me realizing that a ” liberal ” ( as in the popular political designation) is not a free thinker at all , but rather a controlled thinker and so I soon got free from that mind box .
“Non-Whites don’t have the taboos against promoting their group interests, and only bother wrapping their agenda in ideological abstractions when they need some White buy-in.”
Yup. They don’t believe in any of it themselves.
.
“In Australia (though where not very important in the scheme of things)”
Everywhere’s important in the scheme of things because this is a multi-national chess game and every act is an example. As evidence look at how they reacted when a nationalist party did well enough to become part of a governing coalition in Austria.
Concerning the “swiping the foreign debit card” — I wonder what the creditor, i.e. China, thinks of its debtor, when it is becoming more and more retarded and more and more filled with dysfunctional non-Whites.
Maybe the Coalition of Chaos will finally decide to have an explicit race tax on the Whites to repay China.
Tax, in all countries of European descent, is generally about taxing the White and give to the Coalition of Chaos and, of course, to the military, which is used for meaningless and outrageous activities in the Middle East.
We need to accept that the broad mass of Whites in America is beyond saving, too polluted by the broader (Jewified and Negrified) popular culture. Charles Murray’s recent speech on the State of White America – given, amazingly, at the hard-Zionist AEI – made the case coherently that the bottom third of Whites are utterly dysfunctional, displaying the social decay (substance abuse, criminality, illegitimacy) of Blacks; interesting that the out-of-wedlock birth rates for whites is now what it was for Blacks in the 1960s – the trends are easy to see and frightening. It will only get worse as the culture gets more debuached and the real (not financialized) economy continues to contract. A certain Austrian painter once noted that European Americans were doomed due to said realities (“My feelings for America are hatred and loathing – half Jewified, half negified, all subservient to the dollar”).
Yet we need not worry overly about this, since it’s been building for many decades. What will matter is a hardened cadre of men, real men, a vanguard if you like your ideology Leninist. But the timing must be right, and it surely is not yet; the real crisis is coming. Then, a cadre of real men, a la Codreanu or Evola, could be decisive.
Never forget that the locked train car that the Germans secretly dispatched to Petrograd in 1917 had about 20 men in it, and they took over the biggest country in the world and set a revolutionary course like the planet had never seen.
Sure, but didn’t they also have something like 20 million in gold from the Warburg bank with them? That’s in addition to the 20 millions Trotsky got from Schiff.
Mr. Eggers, my 1953 copy of the Austrian painter’s TT whose quote you butchered reads thus:
“I don’t see much future for the Americans. It’s a decayed country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of social of social inequalities . . . Everything about the behavior of American society reveals that it’s half Judaized, and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold together – a country where everything is built on the dollar?
Remarks January 1942 recorded by Martin Bormann
Correction: they took over the largest contiguous empire the world had ever seen (not “the biggest country”).
It was the Mutiny in Petrograd that proved decisive.
The so-called Bolshevik “revolution” was masterminded from Lower Manhattan, in a building just around the corner from Wall Street. As far as I know, that building, and even the office rooms used, still exist. Perhaps someone could confirm or correct me on that?
This is why Manhattan should eventually be made to go the same way the North East of Japan (circa 80 km from Tokyo) is currently going. Humanity will have their revenge, and I wouldn’t bet on even New York’s sewer rats being left alive once it is all over.
Unfortunately, Tea Party Whites are totally cool with bailing out Wall Street, giving billions of dollars annually to Israel, fighting wars against Israel’s enemies, and otherwise transferring enormous amounts of our wealth to Jews.
Social Security is not an entitlement like welfare, medicaid, food stamps, or subsidized housing. Retired and soon-to-retire Americans (the boomers) have paid into social security our entire working lives. If you started working at 15 and retire at 65 you paid for 50 years. The deduction is printed on every paystub and the government OWES you that money. Payment wasn’t a choice but taken right off the top of each and every paycheck.
SS was sold to the American people as a government guaranteed retirement plan. To reneg on the boomers now would expose them all as stark-naked thieves. Raising the retirement age and nibbling away at medicare is politically safer than sinking their fangs into SS.
I think SS is why tea parties have a lot of older white people. Retired grandpas and grandmas on social security have heard all the talk and know the government wants to end it while spending hundreds of billions every year on unwanted, unneeded immigrants.
Here’s an idea.
On the same day all over America white people walk off their jobs and head straight to the welfare office. Apply for welfare, subsidized housing, medicaid, food stamps, energy assistance, unemployment. Every freebie you can get. Fill out the forms, get an appointment, and call every day to find out if they sent your check yet. Grind the system to a halt.
Warren is basically admitting that tribal Blacks and Leftists are running a scam, something we already knew, because it is the same elaborate scam pioneered by Jewry. And as the Jewish Bolsheviks demonstrated, it is a scam that is both toxic and likely to turn murderous unless arrested.
But what prevents Whites from explicitly advocating for White interest? Is it Christianity, as some here seem to believe, or is it the fear of being smeared as a Nazi or being thought of by others as a White supremacist?
An honest and open tea partier might say: there’s more than one way to skin a cat. We don’t need to explicitly advocate for Whites, but White advocacy is implicit in the tea party movement.
To paraphrase something I read by Hunter Wallace awhile back, it’s simply easier, less controversial, less polarizing, less dramatic and more effective to simply call oneself a “conservative.”
I’m not saying those explicitly advocating for Whites aren’t entitled to their perspective and should be shunned and marginalized; indeed I think they serve an essential intellectual function in the overall process of correction so long as they don’t descend into easily stereotyped and mocked self-parody.
But IMO, it would be constructive to get over any fantasies of breaking up the country and setting up some pure-White homeland in the U.S.; if that’s what someone really wants and needs, they could move to, say, Iceland.
Better to take the high road and either argue intellectually for White culture, accomplishments, indispensability, etc, or just call oneself a conservative or join the tea party.
The fact that the tea party is supported by cyphers such as Sarah Palin implies, at least to me, that it is actually a way of deflecting true white interests and of delaying the outburst that is building up in the hearts of many.
It’s often forgotten that the tea party was original a strain of the Ron Paul freedom movement that more recently has been somewhat hijacked by the neocons and their Establishment GOP stooges like Palin, Hannity, and to a lesser extent lately, Glenn Beck (who seems to have wised up quite a bit on the Jewish question).
Remember the ways of cohesive Western Jewry and its ilk: ingratiate, insinuate, usurp.
The neocons would love it if White advocates and true conservatives and small government libertarians were to fracture off; they could take over what’s building as a massive political influence for themselves.
Don’t let these parasites co-opt, steal and control yet another political mass movement for their own self-serving interests. This may be the absolute LAST chance to save the country.
Take what belongs to you instead of stomping off in a defeatist huff yet again(!), Whitey, or prepare to go the way of the Russian Whites, who were out-maneuvered, out-thought, and out-strategized by Jewry and the Left.
The problem with attempting to engage in crypsis is that we can and will be derailed again, as those who’ve attempted to do this have been over and over again. We lack the group cohesion and network of exclusive organizations to pull it off. We will once again be led down a blind alley because we lack the tribal infrastructure necessary to pull it off on the necessary scale.
The most obvious example of how this phenomenon plays out is with the War on Drugs, which was originally a proxy for defending White American group interests by pathologizing and prosecuting common non-White behavioral patterns. It required creating this silly faux ideology about the incipient dangers of marijuana and cocaine that was necessary to excuse and explain locking away somebody for decades for ingesting a chemical in the privacy of his own home.
Sure enough, contemporary “conservatives” don’t have the slightest idea why they support these absurd policies, don’t know why crack and coke have wildly different sentencing patterns, and assume that the previous generation of conservatives were simply hysterical. While the tea party movement might be motivated by race, its ideological avatar of libertarianism foreordains that it will devolve into little more than a big tax break for the wealthy.
Future generations will be forced to assume that our generation took to the streets with an angry demand that rich people pay less taxes and people with medical issues and the elderly be cut off and left to fend for themselves in their much-vaunted “free market”.
As I understand it, the only two coherent options are to either try to ram our heads through the taboo against explicit White Advocacy or get serious about organizing some sort of occult/secretive resistance movement capable of actually encrypting the agenda without losing the key.
This is a good argument against calling yourself conservative, “Tea Party”, etc. You are leaving yourself vulnerable to that kind of thing.
The only successful example of this I know of is attacking “The Israel Lobby”, which is working, and which Jews can’t really wiggle out of unless they decide to stop supporting Israel. The trick here is that the “code” word has to be tied to the explicit term in some indirect but inseparable fashion.
@ Matt and I,
What about White advocacy inside along the lines I suggested above, respectfully arguing “intellectually for White culture, accomplishments, indispensability, etc.?
The tea party isn’t the Tea Party. It is a fluid political/intellectual movement that is evolving and open to different perspectives because it recognizes there‘s something wrong with the country; It hasn’t yet been totally usurped by the Establishment GOP and the neocons. There’s still time to turn it in the right direction.
But fracturing into an ineffectual, easily stereotyped White minority is a recipe for suicide.
No offense to the working class, but it’s a “peasant” strategy: build up something, and then let some cheeky, entitled big shot come along and steal it, and then slink off, wounded and bitter?
A lot of Whites need to get over their peasant mentality/complex. It’s guarantees for defeat.
Why not respectfully argue for White sovereignty and self-determination, as well? You seem convinced that attempting to actually get what we want – which is the ability to preserve our heritage and our way of life among our own and governed by our own – is a beyond-the-pale recipe for failure. In my opinion, attempting to merely make a case for Whites being confident within the Cosmic American context is itself a recipe for failure, as Whites simply lack the ability to preserve their identities in an integrated context due to a low birth rate, a low level of xenophobia, and an innate will to power that manifests as a compulsion to either lead or control non-White minions within easy reach.
As I understand it, the only way Whites can remain White without some sort of separation into an ethnic nation is to adopt something similar to the Jewish market-dominant minority strategy, a niche I would rather not see my people in, one that’s already covered.
You’re correct. The fight isn’t over. This article hopefully serves as an effort to persuade tea party supporters to be less intimidated by the anti-White taboo. Personally, I feel from firsthand experience that the “leadership” of the tea party and its libertarian ideology would be better off discarded rather than influenced or overtaken. That’s largely due to my own firsthand experience of dealing with tea party supporters who are very receptive to our message, against free trade, and socially conservative and tea party leaders who are ideologically supportive of free trade, in cahoots with the corporate globalist agenda, and altogether disinterested in any dimension of our struggle other than the economic one.
It’s not about giving up, just about giving up on that particular banner. I know you as a libertarian see this from a different perspective and I could see why you would rather embrace and extend rather than replace and upend.
Well, doing stuff that’s ineffectual is certainly ineffectual. Failure is suicidal. I just lack your pessimism about the prospect for capturing the White American imagination with an ethnonational vision and I also lack your optimism for the prospects for White Americans within a multi-ethnic regime – even if they’re awakened and feeling their oats.
As stated earlier, I’m not slinking off wounded and bitter. I’m warning White Americans that the vehicle they’re climbing into is headed off the side of a cliff. Since the vehicle is integrally constructed on economic theory and libertarian ideology, it’s integrally opposed to thinking and behaving “collectively”, as I believe our people can do and need to do to save themselves.
Isn’t that what TOO is, among other sites?
How? Currently the Tea Party is basically led by Fox News and talk radio. If you have a plan for taking it over, great, but until someone does that I don’t think we should be pretending that there’s going to be much good coming out of the Tea Party movement or that they share much in the way of common goals with us.
I don’t see what you’re describing here – the Tea Party? But then you are advocating the Tea Party at the same time. I am confused.
I suspect it is both these things, Chris Moore.
I am personally convinced we will have no racial salvation until such time we find the guts to dump Christianity into the trash can of history.
Anglo-Saxon–
I simply do not understand this attitude. There are three ways (in various combinations) that people hostile to Christianity seem to perceive it:
1) It is a long running Jewish conspiracy to make Romans and Germans amenable to Jewish interests.
2) Constantine suppressed traditional Greco-Roman society (Theodosius if the polemicist is a bit more intelligent) for his own nefarious purposes and later Charlemagne did the same to the Saxons.
3) The Nietzschian/Rand-roid critique (slightly different) Christianity imposes slave morality and keeps Europeans (individuals if you’re a Rand-roid) from reaching their heroic capability.
There are problems with all three critiques, and we could argue them at length–but I just want you to see (and hopefully acknowledge) another view.
Christianity IS mos maiorum for me. It IS the way of my father and my grandfathers. It DOES preserve my culture and provide a framework for living a ‘heroic’ life. European culture was defined by Christianity for 1500 years… you cannot separate the two, and attempts to do so in the current environment are doomed to be superficial and highly influenced by Jewish intellectual poison.
@ Chris Moore [April 17, 2011 - 1:27 pm]
I responded to your comment yesterday, but my words have since been removed by this site’s Censor(s). I am beginning to question which side of the fence those who have been charged with ‘Moderating’ these TOO Comments lists are on. Frankly, there is a strange set of values, and a contradictory set of rules, being inconsistently applied at this site, and someone of greater maturity and wisdom needs to get a grip!
For example, three or four commenters [posing under familiar monikers] are being given a “free pass” to post insults and initiate slanderous exchanges while others are being cut for petty or heavy-handed reasons. The “right of reply” is also being denied, and this is unforgivable. Some of those closely involved with comment moderation at TOO appear to have lost the ability to distinguish between friend and foe!
Anyway, back to my response. You wrote earlier:
I would say both.
The second is fairly self-explanatory. But the first requires some justification as I know how sensitive some are to perceived attacks on Christianity.
What most readers stubbornly fail to understand is that Christianity was not a creation of Jesus. It was a creation of the Roman Empire during its gradual (250 year?) death throws. Even the exact role of the Apostle Paul is now being questioned as our understanding of the actual origins of Christianity increases almost by the month.
An excellent article — http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4803.htm — and recently re-linked on the Jeff Rense website, exposes some of the inconvenient truths that duped Americans would rather ignore or pretend don’t exist.
Here are some choice quotes:
Joshua Jehouda, a prominent French Jewish leader, observed in the late 1950s:
“The current expression ‘Judaeo-Christian’ is an error which has altered the course of universal history by the confusion it has sown in men’s minds, if by it one is meant to understand the Jewish origin of Christianity . . . If the term ‘Judaeo-Christian’ does point to a common origin, there is no doubt that it is a most dangerous idea. It is based on a ‘contradictio in abjecto’ which has set the path of history on the wrong track. It links in one breath two ideas which are completely irreconcilable, it seeks to demonstrate that there is no difference between day and night or hot and cold or black and white, and thus introduces a fatal element of confusion to a basis on which some, nevertheless, are endeavouring to construct a civilisation.”
~ (l’Antisemitisme Miroir du Monde pp. 135-6).
… and …
Rabbi Martin Siegel, reflecting a Messianic zeal, was quoted in the 18 January 1972 edition of New York Magazine as declaring:
“I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish.”
Repeat: because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish.
I have been personally aware of this “game play” for some considerable time, yet whenever one attempts to post a comment in the hope of exposing this Pharisaic strategy, whilst also pointing out the stupid naiveté of many so-called Christians, one simply invites violent opprobrium (and/or censorship by immature moderators working for TOO).
In my opinion what we think we know as “Christianity” was long ago turned (or perverted) into a noose that is slowly strangling the ability of White people to defend themselves against covert genocide.
I don’t think most people here are defending post-Vatican II/Harvard Divinity School/Pat Robertson/Hagee Christianity.
When most of us say Christianity, we mean the religion preached by Basil, Chrysostom, Aquinas, and/or Luther.
Athanasius [April 19, 2011 - 2:53 pm]
Once milk has turned sour, almost everyone throws it away.
Christianity has turned irrevocably sour.
European man’s original (environmentally sensitive and peace loving) belief system — mischievously mislabelled “Paganism” by Xtians and Talmudic Pharisees — awaits a renaissance.
@ Athanasius [April 19, 2011 - 12:54 pm]
At this moment of writing, I now see that my earlier comment, which had been deleted, has since been reinstated. I do hope other readers are not getting too confused with the choppy flow of debate.
Listen, I do respect your viewpoints! Very much. And, I feel I fully understand the import of what you are saying. I acknowledge the accuracy in much of what you have written.
But, I believe we have failed, as a race and a culture, to understand and acknowledge the big picture.
I haven’t the time to write another lengthy comment … long enough to fully explain and justify my argument … but can I just remind you that ‘Christianity’ advanced and established itself throughout much of Northern Europe by employing the following methods:
(1) Eye gouging;
(2) Removal of limbs;
(3) Insertion of hot pokers down the throats of objectors;
(4) The forced pouring of molten metal into the mouths of objectors;
(5) Burning alive;
(6) Other, similar obscenities and depravities.
This is not a so-called ‘religion’ I want anything more to do with.
Christianity is Asian and does not belong in Europe. It is alien to Europe, and was a demonstrable mistake from the very beginning. The idea that Christianity ‘civilized’ authentic Europeans is an insult, and historically inaccurate. A subversive myth if you will.
I look forward to the day when all European children can grow up never having to learn anything about Jerusalem and “Is-Ra-Hell”.
Many (if not most) of our most cherished legal traditions come directly from Germanic tribal traditions when they were still in their pre-Christian era!!
As for ‘Americans’, they will do whatever they themselves wish to do … but presumably only AFTER they have finally sorted out who and what they actually are as a people.
If you read the front page story of the Sunday NYT today, it should now be obviou- beyond a shadow of a doubt- that numbersusa.com ,FAIR and CIS are takig a ride on the good ship propostion nation. I thought that Beck’s statements were disgusting. All three are trying to curry favor with the very institutions and people who are open about their strong desire to race-replace the Native Born White American Majority. In the long run,numbersuasa,CIS and FAIR will do more harm them good. The fact of the matter is, all three are comfortable with race-replacement. I say, let amnesty pass now, since the current demographic momentum makes it a certainty anyway. Let’s get on with the big one now. The passage of Amensty is the only thing that will wake-up millions of sleeping Native Born White Americans..it will happen over night…no question about it. Then finally, the politics of millions of Native Born White Americans will go into the full-blown-hard-core racial mode.
This is the typical idea of “WORSE IS BETTER” you find so often among WN.It is actually an idea born of despair and is flat wrong.Worse is NEVER better and certainly not when you are talking about race-replacement.The more non- Whites you have in your country the more difficult it will become to eventually remove them.Waiting for the magic moment the masses will “wake up” is in vain; masses are sheep and will never wake up.All you need is a dedicated minority that will try to influence politics by lobbying.This is what a group of Jews-a small minority of a small minority population-did with so much (devastating) success.You should imitate them in reverse.
People parroting the whole “WORSE IS BETTER” shtick really ought to invest two hours in watching “Mugabe and the White African”. The prospect of our people blathering on with universalist anti-White platitudes until the bitter end, even in the face of unspeakable horrors, is very real. The man literally rattled on his integrationist bullshit until beaten so severely he could no longer hear or think, then sat around expecting “God” and “justice” to prevail until his farm was burned to the ground and he, an elderly brain-damaged man, was physically removed from the charred remains of said farm.
Jupiter’s super-clever scheme of targeting the people who are making tangible gains in the struggle to curb immigration is hands-down the most idiotic scheme in the sprawling pantheon of idiotic schemes our movement takes seriously. And even if his scheme did work, if helping make the White situation worse succeeded in pissing Whites off and going explicit, would he expect them to then turn to us for leadership after we’ve been busted openly plotting to make their situation worse?
There is also the matter that the rich think white workers are overpaid.
MP: “Whites simply lack the ability to preserve their identities in an integrated context” due to a low birth rate, a low level of xenophobia, and an innate will to power that manifests as a compulsion to either lead or control non-White minions within easy reach.”
Low birthrate wasn’t always the case…within Christian moral authority Western civilization, for example, where Whites reached their pinnacle, and it can be turned around again. Yes, this requires faith.
Problem: many White Americans, divorced or alienated from the traditional Christendom of Wester civ, have long had a money-worshipping Judeo-streak in them, and in some ways have today been totally Judaized. Jewry has run amok, and grafted its “ethics” on them more than ever. That’s one reason the country is falling apart.
The more refined elements of Whitehood need to step to the fore, and take these compromised Whites down politically along with the Israel-first Zionist Jewry they’re in bed with. It can be done, as Zionism is increasingly an albatross.
MP: “socially conservative and tea party leaders [are] ideologically supportive of free trade, in cahoots with the corporate globalist agenda, and altogether disinterested in any dimension of our struggle other than the economic one.”
No question international liberal state capitalism and corporatist-globalist economics are dysgenic for Whites. White liberal capitalists would probably argue that Whites are merely the first to start shrinking, soon everybody will be shrinking, and this is good because the earth is at its environmental breaking point. I disagree, but that’s another debate.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but your political prescription would amount to White nationalist socialism. This would require the break up of the U.S., which is exactly the kind of thing the neocons can point up to characterize any White advocacy as “dangerous” and “extremist,” easily marginalize it, and hijack the entire Right.
Additionally, this fractures the White block by a) peeling off the most White conscious element; and b) allowing Leftists to stereotype the entire Right as “dangerous” and “extremist.” Conservative Whites then go out of their way to demonize the White advocates as beyond the pale in order that they themselves can’t be tarred as America-hating extremists.
I’m a libertarian nationalist who believes in free enterprise, cost-benefit-analyzed trade (not open borders free trade, globalism or liberal international statist-corporatism).
One more point: the prophetic Pat Buchanan saw all of this coming decades ago, and in his writings comprehensively laid out many of the right moves that could have put us on another path that would have prevented most of it.
Today, instead of learning from his experience and wisdom, White nationalist reactionaries want to go off half-cocked and break up the country.
Not a smart move.
@ “I”:
I’m saying Jewry is in the prcocess of snuffing out the last vestiges of traditinal Christian moral authority, and this is all in conjunction with its modus operandi of ingratiate, insinuate and usurp, and that White-advocates who are in process of isolating themselves and divorcing themselves from the tea party and allowing the neocons to hijack the tea party movement are essentiall surrendering the field like headstrong but beaten peasants who will “go their own way.”
They may see it as a smart strategy, but I see it as another victory for Zionist Jewry and the Left in stealing the country.
I don’t really see it as having been “ours” to begin with. Certainly it is not ours now. We are not “surrendering” anything, other than a delusion that the Tea Party is pro-White.
Look at the history of attempts to promote racialism within conservatism over the last 60 or so years. It has a pretty dismal track record. Are we using them or are they using us? It appears to be mostly the latter. Nearly all prominent racialist thinkers and activists ultimately come to this conclusion.
I’d rather see us draw a very clean line between ourselves and conservatives. Stop letting them infiltrate and subvert our movements. Expose them for the phony opposition that they are and drive more people to our side.
I don’t think this country ever really “belonged” exclusively to any really cohesive, explicitly White group either, but the WASPs were a pretty effective moral authority for a long time, and could be replaced with a generic Christian moral authority that isn’t a) fanatically money-worshipping, or b) anti-White racist.
The problem isn’t that there’s not enough room for us all, the problem is that Leftists and Jewry want to slowly plunder and eradicate Whites and America’s good credit by usurping White, Christian and conservative moral authority in its entirety, and they’re using a powerful central government, its vast regime of anti-White laws, and a dysgenic liberal-capitalist-globalist economic system to do it. They’re further helped by greedy, cynical or craven Whites on both the Left and Right.
I think Whites and the country can recover (which will be good fore everyone, as in “win-win“) with the right political leadership that’s willing to take the steps necessary to take back the government and then use it to change the moral tenor and turn up the heat on the Scurrilous Ones, or at the least, deconstruct the anti-White dysgenic laws and economic system to one that is White neutral.
I’ve read 6% of criminals commit 70% of all crimes. I’d bet the farm that at least 70% of the worst anti-White racism and treacherous political and economic policy is originated, instigated and perpetrated by under 6% of the country.
It’s just a matter of identifying and isolating the <6%.
And hasn’t MacDonald’s research gone a long way toward doing just that?
If amnesty is inevitable, then the question is: would it better to have it now or later. I say that it would be better now, when Whites are larger percentage of the population, than in the future when they are a smaller percentage of the population.
As far as numbersusa.com goes, as the demographics of the US changes White Americans can expect increased taunting from nonwhites which will escalate into into increasing levels of discrimination against and violence against White Americans. It will become increasingly untenable for numbersusa.com to base immigation reform exclusively in terms of the racial interests of nonwhites. My prediction is that the White Americans who now send money to numbersusa.com will stop sending money to numberusa.com..especially after amensty passess. The way amnesty will pass is through the stealth method of not enforcing immigration law and with law suits against states that pass laws against illegal immigration. Worse could be worse, if millions of White Americans do nothing when things get worse. I do not beleive this. I believe they will get through the cognitive dissonance stage and go into the full-blown race-revolt stage. Matt Parrot and Rykarett seem to be unaware of a well estabished fact of human social psychology that economist have uunderstood for years:human beings do no react to distant threats. Humans react to immediate threats, before they do something about the threat.
By the way in “debates” I have with immigration enthusiasts, I always say to them that the passage of amnesty would be a gift to not only to immigation reform but to the developement of a rapid increase in White racial conciousness….if there was one thing that would do this..it would be the passage of amnesty…the gloves on both sides will come off. Black Political Scientist Carol Swain has been basically making the same point in her books and pubic talks..she is of course very fearfull about this ..I,on the other hand, would not be fearfull of an eruption of White racial conciousness. I think Professor Swain is justified in her fear. Leftists race-replacement enthusiasts are well aware that the passage of amensty could very well-with high probability-could ignite a rapid increase in White American racial conciouisness-over night. That is way I challenge them to go ahead and pass amnesty. It is not too difficult to get a leftist and a poltical liberal to see the obviousness of this. The only question is whether or not this would lead to a race-based poltical movement to shut all nonwhite immigration down to 0…and to deport hostile nonwhite fifth columns..it is very obvious and easy to argue that it would.
Someone of you here believe that numbersusa.com is sacrosanct and off limits to criticism. But that’s only because you and your family have not been harmed by post-1965 nonwhite immigration. I believe in telling the truth about post-1965 nonwhites. They are not innocent bystanders..they actively participate in our race-replacement…I can speak with first hand expereince about post-1965 nonwhite economic violence and physical violence against my family and myself…therefore, I have 0 tolerance for the lies of numbersusa.com-heavily funded by a homesexual Jew Hedge fund multimillionaire-CIS and FAIR.
FAIR (fairus.org) had a big role in defeating amnesty last year. Check out their site to see where they stand (not the NYT which has an agenda to undermine their support).
As for the ethnostate, I can fantasize what might happen if a rumor got out that a white enclave was developing. We already have white flight for implicits–how about white flight on steroids? Things could get real explicit real fast. I can imagine a waiting list over the horizon. Cold anyone stop this momentum? Yes, things would get hot but this is the big card we hold. “They” know that implicit racism is widespread and it terrifies them.
The only thing that will wake up the white masses is the end of bread and circuses. When Wal Mart shelves are empty and there are no more professional sports on tv, we might be able to coerce the average white Joe Sixpack to lend us his ear for a moment, until the next round of easily procured cheap entertainments is available.
Zog and it’s various lackeys and cohorts aren’t stupid. They know what they’re doing. Keep ‘em dumbed down with a never ending parade of cheap sugary foods, booze, drugs, and outlandish entertainments based on humiliating one’s neighbors whilst stroking your own ego because you didn’t end up with a house full of garbage, cats, feces, or tweekers.
Keep ‘em chasing their tails endlessly with non issues like gay marriage and abortion. As long as we can enslave some poor hapless Asians on the other side of the world and stock our store shelves with a never ending supply of cheap placators, white people have no reason to awaken to anything, tucked away in their little homes, tv’s on, fridges full, the mind and body subdued, the yoke of mental slavery self applied and most importantly, enjoyed.
As the old adage goes, “When will revolution come? When the price of a loaf of bread reaches 100 Marks.”
I 100% agree with this sentiment, but in the meantime we need to be preparing for a reality in which Wal-Mart always has cheap garbage to sell and the TV is always buzzing. We honestly cannot count on globalization to not keep pumping cheap goods into our economy. On the surface, it looks unsustainable, but with advances in technology, efficiency seems to be increasing exponentially. This is on top of an unlimited Third World labor pool. These two factors may produce a crumby economy that merely sputters along indefinitely, but an economy that doesn’t crash quite the way many people think it will. Don’t forget, the Fed can produce endless streams of money for Wall Street and game the system.
Matt Parrott
You miss my whole point. I wouldn’t openly call for amnesty..in the sense of publicly saying that it would be a good thing…my “enthusiasm” for the passage amnesty is in the realm “oh you want amensty..there will most definetely be consequences that you will not be able to ignore…in the ignition of White racial conciousness realm”. So it is warning to those who would be enthusiastic about its passage. My postion is purely tactical. If liberal immigration organizations such as numbersusa.com,CIS and FAIR openly represented the racial interests of White Americans they wouldn’t get a toenail through one Republican Congressman’s office door and amnesty would definitely pass..but it would just pass sooner than later when Whites are smaller percentage of the population. But when amnesty does pass-whether it be by stealth or by a Republican-Democratic bipartisan vote for it…the current strategy of liberal immigation reform organizations-numbersusa.com,CIS and FAIR will no longer be politically viable. In retrosepect, it will be obvious that these three organizatoins did way more harm than good….all they are doing is forestalling a race-based oppostion to post-1965 nonwhite immigration..and I wouldn’t be suprised if the heads of these three organizations jumped ship and switched their allegiance to the racial interests of post-1965 nonwhite invaders…this is my second prediction.
The passage of amnesty is very highly likely. Opposing its passage by pretending that White Americans don’t have racial interests that deserve protecting will not prevent the passage of amensty. You need to face up to the fact numbersusa.com,FAIR and CIS are fundamentally iostile to the racial interests of White Americans. Nothing could be more obvious. You want proof? Just go ask the well to do owners of numbersusa,CIS and FAIR.
Worse is better. Race-replacement can not be halted and reversed through the current political system.
Now of course, my whole argument hinges on the claim that the passage of amnesty is inevitable.
You missed my whole point first. Whites can and will sit around while stuff gets worse and worse and worse to the point of being bludgeoned to death in a charred wasteland surrounded by rapacious, murderous, monstrous thugs.
With the deeply inspiring but perhaps too-little-too-late exception of Orania, Whites lacking a mythic vision can and will stand around and get robbed, raped, and killed down to the last one. This is the unfortunate lesson we can learn from the regions where Whites are much further along than we NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS are. On one level, it’s disheartening, but only partially so, as we needn’t wait for things to get godawful before we get started.
With great regret, I have to agree with Matt, the idea that “worse is better” is a pipe dream. Whites (as a group) will smile themselves to death as they are robbed, beaten, raped and finally killed. At the most, they will die in bitterness as it finally dawns on them that the “Powers that Be” don’t give a shit about them and that “life really isn’t fair”. And should any unlucky sheep dare to resist or complain, it will be the Whites (again as a group) who will rain down moral indignation coupled with police terror surpassing that of the Abolutionists of the past. I personally lived through a time when Whites were widely targeted by non-whites and most of them justified every crime of violence purpetrated against them (late 60′s and early 70′s) instead of kicking some ass; even subvertly with no chance of getting caught. My experience with my peers has been that they would show no mercy toward me (or any other white) for any offense (real or imagined), but lick the boots of the most candy ass obnoxious “non-white”. Fact, not fiction.
“Whites” per se are a pretty mean bunch. Lacking any sense of honor etc. Just see how they are in daily life. If anyone thinks the White masses will “RISE UP” they are living under a delusion. Even a percentage of the WN types are pretty worthless. The best line is the one that anyone who doesn’t dress like a preppie is “hurting the cause”, oh yeah from Pierce’s NA to A3P all shun NS imagery and where have they gotten us?
Think of America as one large PRISON, who will watch your back? Yeah you figured it out already…
“Whites” per se are a pretty mean bunch. Lacking any sense of honor etc.
- Thats like saying Arabs per se are a pretty civilized bunch, setting the bar for ethical beheadings.
Wow, Moderator how about weeding this dead-end cynicism?? Their agenda is rather obvious.
@MOD I didn’t close my italics properly, sorry.
The “Tea Party” in my area (SW Florida) is already publicly advertising that it isn’t “racist”. Thus with their hearty consent, their enemies already control the terms of discourse.
So much for the terminally Libertarded.
The reason “white Americans” don’t respond as an ethic group is they have never been one. And they never will be one, either. The foundational myth of American White Nationalism is that a generic “white American” ethnicity ever existed. This proposition was copied uncritically from Jewish agit-prop.
There were English Americans, German Americans, Irish Americans and a complete stew of Central European Catholic Americans. Then there were the southern Europeans, Catholics all. These groups only had sufficient time to lose most of their former cohesion. They did not have enough time to form wider cohesive “white” bonds.
Put another way, Zionist Israel Zangwill’s mythical “Melting Pot” was no more effective among these European tribes than it is between “Europeans” in America and Africans, Asians, et al.
Some people have now adopted an article of faith that a common “white American” identity will emerge from the experience of common oppression by the Jews and their non-European descended mob. This is future speculation. Time will tell.
We do know four things about that population pool. The first is this supposedly embryonic “white American” people have no common history beyond the one manufactured for them by Judeophile regime historians. And they never will have any more history than that.
The second thing we know is these people have no common unifying religion. And a great many of them are at direct odds with each other over religion.
The third thing we know is they have no common origins either in Europe or more recently in North America.
The fourth thing we know is they do not have any common economic interests or even common institutions like schools.
In these circumstances it would be extremely unusual for unity of purpose and goals to emerge from what is merely randomized chaos.
Welcome to Amerokwa.
I would disagree in part.
1) The experience of the two World Wars, whatever else they have have done, developed a sense of Americanism among disparate American groups. People came back from Europe or the Pacific and moved out of their ethnic enclaves into white suburbs. (after WWI, vets also began to socialize beyond ethnic boundaries)
2) We all come from Christendom. There existed a consensus before among the branches of Christianity in the USA (though deference was given to Protestants), why can’t it exist again?
Blah blah blah. “Hi. I’m Bob. I used to be a White Activist but I burned myself out and now believe the appropriate thing to do is spread my discouragement to other Whites. You should give up for the following reasons…”
This whole “your identity is invalid” shtick can be applied to all sorts of other identities. Germany’s a relatively recent and somewhat arbitrary construct, and that was no impediment to their unifying as a people. The “Latino” identity construct spans several races, languages, and hemispheres, yet they act as an identity group. Hell, Indians and Japs are working together in America now as fellow “Asians”.
Even that most cohesive ethnic group of all, the Jews, is pretty amorphous, with all sorts of sub-groups and edge cases that would lead one to conclude that merely being “Jewish” doesn’t necessarily mean all that much.
In the grand scheme of things, we’re pretty darn homogeneous, really. Foreigners can spot a White American easily enough. Why can’t you?
White Americans tell the same jokes, share pretty much the same fusion of enlightenment and Christian roots, eat pretty much the same food, and are all headed for pretty much the same fate – albeit that fate is sort of an epic Temple Grandin contraption at this point – but we’re working on that.
I don’t get out much, so maybe everybody outside of Indiana is deeply rooted in their original European ethnic identity. As for me and the people I know, we’ve been here for centuries, are a fusion of multiple European identities, and don’t quite get what people like you who are apparently fresh off the boat from Europe are talking about.
What strikes me as queer is that people who don’t buy our whole “White American” ethnic identity can’t just leave it at that and cultivate their own. They have to either set their own vision of identity up against that one or, even worse, go out of their way to convince people that we have no history, folk traditions, culture, or way of life to rally to.
For all your disappointment in “Amerokwa”, you’re more despicable than Joe Six Pack who watches football while the world falls apart. At least he has his ignorance and myopic local worldview to excuse him. You get the big picture, understand what’s going to happen to us, and you choose it, embrace it, and come here to kneecap those who are fighting it.
There actually seems to be a lot of similarity among the various White groups in America. The differences among Germans, English, Irish , Scottish and Scandinavian are barely noticed. Italians probably stand out a bit more in terms of appearance and behavior, but at the end of the day, we don’t have any trouble with cohabitation. A majority of all White groups want a similar form of government (small, limited, lawful).
Now, if you are trying to build some socialistic form of White unity in America, that is a non-starter. Most Americans won’t go for it for all sorts of reasons. So if you dream of Whites lined up in a uniform lines chanting slogans in unison …. that’s not gonna happen.
But the vast majority of Whites in America (and Europe) actually do have similar genetic, economic and political interests. It’s just a matter of getting them to see it and feel like it’s not some pathology to talk about preserving White Civilization.
I don’t disagree, Matt. But it is true that even in Indiana, Martinsville or Bedford (where most people are Scotch-Irish, or in the case of Jasper, German) is quite a bit different from the Region. Drive along US 30 in Merrillville, and you’ll find Croatian Fraternal Halls and Chetnik (Serbian) Halls within a mile of each other.
Is that why people in the Region are more liberal? Even still, if memory serves, Visclosky voted against the Dream Act.
Athanasius,
Well, to indulge in some ethnography, I believe Southern Indiana is more a product of Appalachian migration inland while Northern Indiana is more of a Rust Belt/Foundry area, with some more recent European immigrants and folks who are generally a bit less “folksy” than what we have in Kentuckiana.
I live only a hundred miles North of my home, and have for about a decade. Within that one short span of space and time, my accent has been affected by being away from home enough that my friends comment on me having lost my accent and people from up here still comment on my accent. That sharp linguistic difference, from “worsh” to “wash” and “poe” to “pole” and so on reflects the different origins of the populations inhabiting those two parts of Indiana.
As for Merrillville and the rest of the Gary region, that’s only technically Indiana. That’s Chicago. There’s a different accent there, too, actually.
Oh, I agree.
In my opinion, people north of Martinsville have a neutral accent all the way to Rensselaer (where the Chicago accent begins). However, that’s in the towns and cities. In the countryside, where you have people who immigrated from New England across PA, there is a distinctive accent. (Of course, there are many Southerners who came during the War to work in the Rust Belt towns and they maintain their Kentucky accents–and unfortunately this has class ramifications today).
All I meant was that it’s only in the Region that you really have whites with non-American ethnic consciousness.
Ex Pro White Activist understands what head-in-the-clouds types of the Rah Rah Brigade do not. Parrot knows not of what he speaks when it comes to Germany or Jewry, or even the lumpen proles here in the U.S. referred to by their skin color, “whites”. His articles read well but, as is tragically the case with all such efforts, articles are merely words, meaningless words, and lack reality in the material struggle for power and control between groups on this planet. Instead of weighing the truth of Ex PWA’s statements he lashes out, as he’s done time and time again. Ex PWA isn’t worse than any tool from Kwa, as Matt says, nor is he worse than Matt. He, the strawman, and Matt are three kinds – the realist, the retard, the true believer – that, in the big scheme of things, are marked for extinction.
Stick with your family, Matt. Cultivate friendships. Forge new relationships. But rid yourself of the pipe dream of thinking that you’ll form something politically effective out of the “white” people of this place, a people that destroyed itself 150 years ago, then did the bidding of the Chosen for the last century. Most whites deserve to be destroyed. At least the ones here do.
Tad,
You got me. My article is indeed merely a string of words, words strung together by somebody with no real power. And here I am, merely a bag of organs, contributing this blog, which is merely an arbitrary arrangement of electrons in the ether. And since my nation was on the wrong side of your cryptkeeping hobby horse, it’s beneath contempt and marked for extinction.
While I did mock XPWA’s “All is lost” shtick at the outset, I also weighed the truth of his statements, dissecting them in depth.
Probably most White people in the US have ancestors from two or more European countries. Lots have both Protestant and Catholic ancestors as well.
It depends somewhat on which part of the country you’re in. On the West coast, people are not as concerned with their particular European background as people on the East Coast are, and tend to identify as simply “White”. Certainly the idea that “White” does not exist as a group strikes me as being totally wrong intuitively and at odds with what I’ve experienced my entire life.
In general, the idea that Whites do not have enough of a shared identity to warrant White nationalism is totally absurd. No ethnic group is entirely homogeneous or devoid of population substructure. This is a totally stupid reason to not defend ourselves.
XPWA is not a white race denier. He is denying the short-term prospects for inter-ethnic cohesion between the Irish, Anglos, and Germans, and the strength of the bond between Parrot’s white mutts of Indiana. This is entirely consistent with nationalist claims of white individualism. Given the fratricidal American and European wars of the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries, and the patronizing noblesse oblige racism upper-class whites show toward non-whites at the expense of working-class whites, I’d say XPWA is on target. Parrot doesn’t like it, so he responds with a strawman and vituperative condescension, and laughably calls it a “dissection.”
I respectfully but optimistically disagree. There IS a White Tribe Rising. Moreover, it is one whose sympathies trend towards the original Anglo Saxon Protestant founding population. I say this as a White who did not come from the founding stock, but whose Non-Anglo Saxon Protestant ancestry admired the WASP system and tried to assimilate to it by learning the language and adapting all the customs but Protestantism. I would go so far to say that, as the American Catholic Church increasingly engages in blatant pandering to Mestizos and agitates for open borders, that my generation will probably be the last to be Catholic. One of my siblings regularly attends a Protestant church and the rest of us are lapsed Catholics.
So, I think religion, as usual is going to be the organizing principle around any racial politics. We see the RCC going after the Mestizos and we see Islam going after the Negros, all that is needed is for one of the Protestant churches to step up and aggressively court Whites and all bets are off.
Whites have one unifying tongue; English. Whether our origins are British are not, all White immigrants, after a generation or two are Anglo by adoption. All that leaves is religion. This is where I believe the Anglican Church, by embracing a leftist liberal doctrine screwed up by embracing homosexuals and other aspects that are anathema to more fundamentalist or conservative Christian sects. Because she was perfectly positioned to attract disaffected White Catholics, IMO.
Really, though, White unity is not as fractured ethnically as one would assume. Patrick Buchanan was speaking for many White Catholics when he expressed dismay that there were no more WASPS presiding in SCOTUS. I would say any fracturing is to a lesser degree along regional lines (you still have some idiot Yankees – who still live in lily-white states, trying to lecture the South about race relations. Mix in some Somalis and that will change). Then there are class lines, because we all know that Whites’ tolerance for Non-Whites is in inverse proportion to Whites’ exposure to Non-Whites.
So, for self-preservation reasons, I believe it is up to the founding WASPs to recognize how many Americans became de facto WASPs by adoption and using that concept to network with and offer leadership to Whites who are not ASPs.
Well , I think a person would have to be totally out of touch with the here and now to hold the idea that whites do not form a very defined group of people .
I mean just the whole very real and wide spread policy of “affirmative action ” pretty much illustrates that whites are very much defined by all groups .
Next ?
You fell for the strawman. XPWA’s point was that the inter-ethnic cohesion between the Irish, Anglos, and Germans is probably less than that existing in that mestizo-indian stew (with a dash of salt n peppa) we call Hispanic. Furthermore, the white American mutt is not a member of an ethnic group. He’s an “individual” first, foremost, and last.
By definition most of the people involved in WN over the decades have been those people least effected by the anti-white conditioning pouring out of the schools and mass media. They were least effected because they were built differently. However that difference is what made them largely ineffective when trying to reach the people who were susceptible to the anti-white conditioning. It’s not surprising that ineffectiveness has made them bitter.
With White rabbits you *have* to sieze the moral high ground first. It is not optional. As a minimum you have to create a level playing field by negating the moral high ground the multicult gives itself through control of education and mass media. If the NS types actually read and understood what the NSDAP said they’d understand that is exactly how they did it.
I know some people can’t understand this because of how they’re built but that’s okay. It only needs a few who understand it.
The above is exactly right. It is imperative to gain the moral high ground or at least take WN from the realm of pathology in the public mind. Maybe it is hard for many WNist to understand this point. Most of them are impervious to the propaganda that has afflicted their White brothers and sister.
But they must understand that Whites need to have it slowly and carefully explained to them in a manner that strikes them as moral and reasonable. Aristotle said you need three things to be effective in persuading a group: Ethos, pathos and logos.
1. Ethos – We have to have credibility and appear ethical. We need to come across as serious adults that have social legitimacy and operate within moral constraints. This means no skinhead, bullyboy or hardcore survivalist types as the public image.
2. Pathos – Whites need to believe we have their interests at heart and care about their future and families. They need to feel that White Civilization is good and that it is under threat of being wiped out.
3. Logos – We need to actually have logical arguments for our side. Luckily, MacDonald, Salter and many others are providing those arguments.
Wandrin – excellent post. Thanks.
The circumstances in which the rise of the NSDAP took place in were totally different. Discussion of parallels with that era is a specialty of anti-white theoreticians. Unless the cataclysmic events of WW1 and its aftermath (especially the strength of German communist parties) are included in the discussion it is a very misleading one to have.
Is there a strategy which, under current conditions, will inexorably bring masses of whites to the nationalist cause if the organizations would just follow it ? I very much doubt such an ‘ideal solution’ is possible
Matt . . .
Regarding the “folksy” Hoosiers in Southern Indiana:
Have you noticed there are very few blacks that live in the region south of I-70 and north of the Ohio River in Indiana? That is, the southern half of Indiana is almost exclusively White (with a recent Hispanic incursion).
Exceptions are the river cities of Evansville and Jeffersonville.
It’s almost as if blacks have an aversion to the southern half of the state. The Fountain Square area of Indy, for example, has always been White as is Southport, Greenwood, Franklin, etc. – all the way to the Louisville metro area.
Interesting stats:
Indiana is 9.2% black.
Bloomington is 4.2% black
Columbus is 2.7% black
Greenwood is 0.4% black
New Albany is 4.9% black
Well, Blacks may have merely not bothered with the area because there have never been any jobs there. As I argued in my book, we’re sort of a unique case due to our being refugees from the South – almost as homogeneously White as New England and almost as racially conscious as the Deep South.
The reason there are blacks in Indiana (and Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Northern Ohio) is because they came to work in the factories during the two World Wars (primarily the Second).
Jason
“Aristotle said you need three things to be effective in persuading a group: Ethos, pathos and logos.”
Very interesting, and encouraging to think he came to the same conclusion so long ago.
My only quibble is his rules implicitly apply to the multicult as well but they’ve never been challenged on that basis. As the other side have the high ground at the moment then i believe the first step needs to be attacking them over their double standards and internal inconsistencies to create some space. I don’t think the
“slowly and carefully explained to them in a manner that strikes them as moral and reasonable.”
part will work until the current Logos is at least partially knocked down. That’s not to say they should be done sequentially – they both need to be done at the same time to make certain they overlap – just that for any individual trance person the multicult ideology in their head needs to be partially knocked down before they’ll accept something new.
I’ll save that Aristotle to give me ideas, ty.
Wandrin,
I got it from a speech teacher long ago (Aristotle’s rules) and it always made sense. Of course, it’s just a guide, a way of thinking about it, but it does help. On the multicult thing, it just occurred to me that the ancient Greeks never imagined that most people on earth were capable of rational discourse anyway. I’m sure Aristotle was only thinking of the groups that could be reached by reason.
That’s great that you’ve read “Rhetoric,” Jason. I bet you didn’t read it in school, either (unless you went to a private school). I didn’t…. and that is part and parcel of how public schools attempt to disarm us.
You making comparisons between situations that shouldn’t be compared. The flaw in your analysis is that it ignores the scale factor. The problem is that things haven’t gotten worse enough in America. It is as simple as that. However as things have gotten worse in American, there has been a very noticeable pickup in 1) immigration reform activity and 2) and increased anxiety among White Americans about the racial transformation of America…I am talking about people who niether give a penny to nor visit a White Nationalist type web site. I here these conversations all the time in places I never would expect…lots of very nasty comments about the Asians..and never a decent comment about BO. I’ve lost count the number of times White guys -complete strangers to me-have-out of the blue…in the Deli for coffee in the morning- will turn to me and express their dusgust for BO. Millions of White Amerians across the natoin are most definetly going through the transformation process..they are going to have to go through it much quicker or they are gong to be in very big trouble. The confort zone-and it isn’t all that confortable these days-for millions of White Americans has to be competely destroyed.
Listen, I have absolutetly no control over what is going to happen in America. But it is not unreareasonable to think that things will get much worse. Worse is aready here..worse will even get worse. The most important thing for Native Born White American Patriots to do right now is to work out a framework..simple and very easy to understand..that millions of out fellow Native Born White Amerians can plug into when life for them in America becomes unbearable…this is way I am strongly opposed to raising the race and IQ issue..nothhing but a sidetraking distraction(I am more more than willing to debate Dennis Magnan on this issue on Altenative Right..but he will never take up the offer)…. Amnesty will make this a reality. I accept the fact the there will be Amenesty one day in America…It is already a fact of life in American..especially in California..ad it will happen in Arizona..nonwhites in Arizona will vote for it. This ony goes show the level of menadacity that numbersusa.com engages in when it bases immigration reform completely-and I mean completely-in terms of the racial interessts of high fertility post-1965 nonwhites who are actively participating in our race-replacement. Numbersusa.com’s vicitories are illusionary in the long run…and the long run is that long..it as actualyl quite short. When numeberesusa.com’s loyal members experience racial discrimination,violence,rape.. you name it at the hands of high fertility post-1965 nonwhites the donations will dry-up…and I predict that the organizations founder will swtich his allegiance to post-1965 high fertility nonwhites..or he will just become totally irrelevant..same.predcition for CIS and FAIR.
I don’t agree with the view that millions of White Americans are infinitely elastic in terms of what they are willing to put up with. Anyone who believes this is just not paying attention to what has and is going in White Ameriaca.
I think what is especially needed is community outreach fashioned after minority based outreach. White people need to know they have a safe place to fit in, a place to feel welcome and protected. White’s need a business and social network to advance worthy minds and promote our cause. I remember the once prominent Elk’s lodge organization which produced many wasp leaders throughout the decades. Ironically, the last 30 years has seen the near death of the Elk’s lodge in terms of membership decline. Whites suddenly stopped feeling the need to meet with like minded individuals.
I am getting so sick of this. Its like going round and round in circles. Its the same old arguments and debate over and over and over and over.
Talk talk talk talk talk talk talk.
Then volunteer. If you can’t find something local, our Hoosier Nation group will gladly plug you in to an active workgroup. And if you can’t find a workgroup doing something you feel is worthwhile, we’re always open to ideas and will do what we can to throw our support behind you if you have a plan of your own.
What Barb said….
Matt Parrot
Take a look Peter Brimelow’s post this moring on vdare.com. He makes the case for my position. The Republicans-the very group of poilticians that numbersusa.com hopes will indefintely hold-off amensty- will in the end, betray the Amnesty cause…exactly what you would expect from an organization owned by corporations….all of numbersusa.com’s lobbying efforts ultmately will be a complete waste of time..the end the only major accomplishment of Roy Beck and numbersusa.com will be to let Ciela Munoz and LA RAZA defines the terms of the debate.
Wake up ad smell the coffee Matt.
Darwinian theory is instructive in the case of the typical American white.
Having looked at TWINS studies very carefully it is clear to me that political ideologies are genetically linked. So these so-called whites should not be considered part of any White/Aryan breeding program. It would be like deliberately continuing unhealthy strains of a dog breed.
They are not of us, they are not US. They are something else and evolution is leading the real White/Aryan onward and upward, i.e. WE are evolving a NEW race, a true White/Aryan race.
The so-called Whites, and their adoration of the jew Lander, are on the path of extinction and I say, GOOD RIDDANCE TO BAD RUBBISH.
Are Politics Genetic? The New Science of Political Physiology
Liberals, conservatives may have different brain structures – USATODAY April 9, 2011
Simply the best of our race were killed off leaving the lesser to breed, such as they have.
Alfred,
You get it. As does GT, but then, he always does.
I have to disagree with Parrott’s definition at the opening. It is NOT ‘Tribalism/tribalising’ that is occurring–if only real tribalization were occurring. No, what is happening is faux-tribalism–that’s the whole problem in that respect. This exploitation of this weakness–false pseudo-tribalism–is one of the strongest weapons in the enemy’s arsenal.
To all you Nay-sayers, regarding White Collective Identiy – we’ve never had to do that before. We’ve only really fought each other, through-out history. We’ve never had to regard the varying strains of Caucasoids, before, as “White”.
Whites are the “Show Me” Race – we, alas, need direct experience of the Otherness, of the Other, before we act a One.
How many of you remember Katrina? There weren’t too many White stories, in the Media – but there were a few. The most spectacular White Story, that bubbled through the Kosher Pressure Cooker, was the White Experience in the Dome. Remember the handful of stories,told by saucer-eyed Whites, that found their Collective Identity toot suite, whilste surrounded by the swarming, maddened, violent lawless, savage, Jungle Bunnies?
I do.
I remember that very well.
I don’t want Whites to be that heavily surrounded – but if that what it takes- then that’s what is takes. Please remember that the Whites, trapped in Ebony Thunder Dome, all made it out alive – and they were obviously reborn, to the new reality. Lots of Blacks did not make it out alive…
I
Ciaran, this is good point.
But I want to draw attention to more important issue that sits in back of my mind.
I will here disclaim any hatred or ill-will towards other races. It might seem obligatory, but I do have friends of many races, and on the individual level I love these people.
The point–
How safe is posting on this website?
Why do you people refuse to publish a post discussing the security of posting on a website such as yours. I suppose many people are out there, in the darkness, afraid to post because of real or imagined threats.
There is sense of paranoia amongst the populace that you must either affirm or dispel, so that conversation can flourish.
Perhaps this is best approach, before you delve into deep thoughts you should clear the air.
“and almost as racially conscious as the Deep South.”
Well, maybe.
I can’t think of a single White Hoosier whose cares about racial issues . . . or event thinks of them.
On the one hand, Indiana sent a large contingency to fight against the South during the “Civil War.” On the other hand, the Hoosier state is still known for the Klan that dominated its political landscape through 1925.
When I bring up racial issues among friends, they look at me as if I just shouted the “f” word in church. Taboo.
btw, the Indy Star is reporting four murders on Indy’s Eastside today. I’m old enough to recall when everything east of Tech High School was White . . . except a very small black neighborhood just east of Irvington.
Things change.
@ “articles are merely words, meaningless words, and lack reality in the material struggle for power” – Tad, defending Ex PWA
Presently a plan to save us is being discussed at Counter-Currents. What’s Tad & Ex PWA’s plan?
Why should “plans” be discussed on open forums?
“What’s Tad & Ex PWA’s plan?”
It’s Greg Johnson forum. Greg doesn’t like “snarkiness” in those who disagree with him or Harold in whole or in part. For this and other reasons XPWA and I have decided not to bother with it.
I actually posted a comment on that Counter Currents thread, pointing out (among other things) how you guys just keep repeating “nobody else has a plan” over and over again, even though lots of people have plans. Most of these plans have serious flaws in them, but then again, so does Covington’s. My comment was not allowed through.
Have fun with your totally controlled and one-sided “debate”. And with the delusional fantasies that the CC server is being hacked because someone doesn’t want the word to get out about Covington’s brilliant plan.
@ “Have fun with your totally controlled and one-sided “debate”. And with the delusional fantasies that…”
We already had the experience of open debates about Covington’s plan here at TOO and at OD even the very articles were very hostile to him. I believe that Greg wisely chose to censor all ad hominem attacks. Presently, the non ad hominem, legitimate criticism at CC has already piled up and all of us are awaiting for Covington to reply.
P.S. Which is your plan. Since detail must be lengthy please link to articles, another blog, etc.
Can we all come together under the banner of one white tribe here in the fractious US? Of course we can, if we want to. The question then becomes, how do we get our white brothers and sisters, who have seemingly everything to lose and nothing to gain by listening to us, to do so? How do we convince comfortable people that things are going to get a lot less comfortable in a future that is beyond their scope of understanding much less even caring? I pose the question to any white person who cares to listen:
If your car had to break down in a neighborhood at night, and you had to get out of your car to look for help, what kind of neighborhood would it be?
Majority White, majority Asian, majority Latino, majority Black.
Don’t tell me your answer, I don’t care. Tell your answer to yourself, honestly. When no one is looking or listening, stand in front of the mirror and tell yourself the answer.
Fenria, you are absolutely right. And the problem of how to get Whites to see this is a big one. Our enemies have control of the education system and can propagandize our children for almost 20 years. I think the best thing we can do right now is develop the ideas necessary for Whites to rally behind. I think it is going to take awhile before they (Whites) are ready to be honest with themselves.
Ciaran
“the Whites, trapped in Ebony Thunder Dome, all made it out alive – and they were obviously reborn, to the new reality. Lots of Blacks did not make it out alive… ”
Spot on.
.
fenria
“If your car had to break down in a neighborhood at night, and you had to get out of your car to look for help, what kind of neighborhood would it be? Majority White, majority Asian, majority Latino, majority Black.”
Good line.
.
“How do we convince comfortable people that things are going to get a lot less comfortable in a future that is beyond their scope of understanding much less even caring?”
What works best for me is before i hit people with lines promoting any kind of alternative vision or viewpoint i soften them up by hitting them with the other side’s double standards. You can see in their eyes and body language when they crack and then you can then start in on the alternative message.
.
Anybody here seen this article by a jew complaining about the anti semitism in lib/progressive blogs, etc, such as huffpost and daily kos?
http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres9/BlogsAntiIsraeli.pdf
Oh by the way, pointing out to White people how little they get for the tax dollars is very effective. I’m not big on government programs, but we should at least get some nice stuff for the huge public spending we have. And yet we don’t.
Point out to White people that Europe at least has high speed trains and roads that are far superior for their money. You can hardly drive on an American road without knocking your car out of alignment. And then point out to them that the public spending money goes somewhere – just not to anything that helps us.
And why is it acceptable for Democrats to gloat that the demographic changes coming in America are good for them and their policies? Isn’t this an implicit admission that political traits are dependent on genetic traits and ethnicity? Clinton, Obama and others say all day long that the Browning of America is good for them – so why can’t Republicans talk as openly about the role of race in politics and how White people are about to get screwed over?
Ask your conservative White friends that question.
Nice point. Also why are conservative whites oblivious to the importance of pop-culture and its anti-white agenda, allowing marxist tribe members uncontested reign over this territory for the last 100 years? In TV land, Fox news, Mel Gibson’s Passion and vignettes from the 700 club seem to be the only outlets for white conservative entertainment. Otherwise, white girls are inculcated with images of Katy Perry embracing a black lover on MTV while white males watch their culture ripped to shreds in movies such as Meet the Zohan and Meet the Fockers. Historically the white reaction to these discriminatory Hollywood depictions has been to ignore the problem. Don’t go to the movies is the popular response but falls short for teenagers and young adults who don’t want to lose social status for going against the pop-culture flow. Plenty of sitcoms depicting derogatory images of blacks have been cancelled due to organized protest by black groups on Warner Bros. movie lots. I would hope whites could muster this same type of activism as God knows the activist paradigm has already been provided by the tribe and colored groups.
Avenue Q, the musical, had a song titled “Everyone’s just a little bit racist.”
Everyone’s a little bit racist
Sometimes.
Doesn’t mean we go
Around committing hate crimes.
Look around and you will find
No one’s really color blind.
Maybe it’s a fact
We all should face
Everyone makes judgments
Based on race.
It seems to me, that singing this stanza would be a good way to let the air out of the gravitas balloon of race and posit the ultimate human truth, we are all just a little bit racist (and why are whites the only ones who are supposed to deny this?)
Any White American who is not color-blinded, will notice that White society is more threatened by the Crypto-White within it. These turncoats are known to sell their mothers if the price is right. How many non-colored politicians one finds among the colored race who give priority to a foreign Jewish entity’s interests than the interests of the White society they live in?
To my knowledge, the only two US lawmakers who voted against US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq – happened to be Afro-American women. They’re not against those wasteful wars because there were Black people in Afghanistan (none) or Iraq (none) – but because they were patriotic enough to realize that those wars were conceived in Israel for Israeli interests.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/helen-thomas-steps-on-lobbys-toes-again/
My children are watching “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang” on Easter morning while my wife makes breakfast. The movie is being broadcast on ABC Family, whose slogan is, “A New Kind of Family”. There was a commercial advertisement for an upcoming show called “Switched at Birth”. In the commercial, a beautiful, deaf, young white woman is being shown around her new private school by her parents and school officials. Every single student that they pass is scowling and curling their noses at the new student. This obviously makes the young woman feel uncomfortable. Sensing that the negative treatment is motivated by her escort party, she tells the adults that she’d like to walk around alone. She isn’t on her own for one minute before she finally meets the first person to treat her kindly. He is a handsome, articulate, funny young man named Liam. And best of all, he knows sign language. Oh yeah, and he’s as black as the ace of spades. That’s right, a black guy at an exclusive private school named Liam. And while every white student is petty, negative and judgemental, this guy is funny, soft spoken and well adjusted. I am desensitized to the propoganda that I see everyday on the jewtube. But this characterization was so nauseatingly unrealistic that it infuriated me. It makes me sick that fellow white folks do not see what’s going on. Are they worth saving? Are they worth fighting for? Its very frustrating! I’ve come to the conclusion that the best we can do is marry racially conscious white women and have many children. Then raise those children to have a healthy racial awareness. Trying to change complete strangers is a waste of time.
How would anyone even know she was deaf from just looking at her? Pure Propaganda and not even very cleverly done.
Why do you let your children watch television?
I agree with you – we need to have as many white children born to like minded people as possible. It is possibly our greatest hope.
Hopefully, the intellectuals on this site will also continue to provide a counterpoint to the anti white culture that passes for entertainment these days.
@Boggsy…Wow not abc family!lol You don’t want Lil Jonny going to school thinking its Ok to kiss Lil Bobby in true Disney fashion.
@guthuy, My wife and I monitor what they watch. They were watching “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang” which is an older movie with a cast that is 100% white. That said, there are occasions when something comes across that screen that my wife or I must explain. The key is staying vigilant. The t.v. isn’t used as a babysitter. If there’s 25 minutes that need to be filled while the wife is making dinner, and there’s something appropriate on, the kids will watch some t.v.. It has actually afforded me many opportunities to point out specific examples of subversion and propoganda. We went to my mother’s house today for Easter. She lives in a declining neighborhood in Philadelphia. I was able to show my children the contrast between the few blacks they’ve seen depicted on t.v. and the ones they saw slobbing around my mother’s neighborhood. It was a great lesson on the workings of the mass media. We choose not to completely isolate our children. It isn’t necessary. As long as you shower them with love, keep an open line of communication and instill a healthy sense of racial awareness, a little jewish propoganda isn’t going to corrupt them.
good answer.
Burgermeister, she was communicating in sign language so everyone was able to see that she was deaf.
Someone please tell me what have the MUSLIMS ever contributed to mankind….Excluding suic. bombers, making the world a miserable pl. , flying planes into builds. Also to the happy negro… of course there are more white son welfare . In the USA. Minorites only make up 15 % of the pop.
Muslims are a pretty broad group, so it would be very difficult to generalize, but right off the top of my head, I’m thinking Algebra and the Alphabet (could be wrong). Also, I am pretty sure no flight school Muslims flew planes into the Twin Towers; ask those dancing israelis, they sure were happy about something. As for “Suicide” Bombers, that is a tactic of resistance which fits their cultural make-up, but, at least it is a form of resistance (although, their choice of targets raises the question of whether or not they are “False Flag” operations) but, as long as they keep it over there, I couldn’t care less. As for the number of “Minorities” in America, my best guess is, collectively, counting illegals and non-euro people who look white, they probably now make up more than 50% of the overall population.
Stop wasting your time hating “Muslims”, they are not OUR problem as long as WE keep them “over there”. What they do to the people who are trying to eliminate them is their business.
The alphabet that we currently use was ultimately invented by Phoenicians (i.e., they invented the predecessor) well over 2000 years before the advent of Islam. That is why the Greeks named books (biblia) after the city of the Biblos. How do you think that the Iliad, Cicero, or the Gospels were written down if the Moslems invented the alphabet?
Al Khwarazimi (the Moslem “inventor” of algebra) called his book “Indian mathematics”–that should tell you something.
I agree that we shouldn’t be worried about Yemen or Afghanstan of Pakistan. But if you live in the UK, France, Germany, Greece, Serbia, or now even Italy or Spain–Muslims cannot be ignored.
Muslims did make important contributions between the 7th and 12th centuries to science, but as I pointed out to Rehmat, most of those Muslims were not Arabs, but Persians(Aryans).
Since then their contributions have been meager.
It’s not that there weren’t Moslem contributions to science–but that the narrative as it’s currently constructed is Jewish propaganda. The narrative is meant to reflect badly on Christendom while simultaneously portraying Islam as a progressive force (it does, after all, resemble Judaism more than Christianity). Anyone who buys into this is foolish or pernicious.
The Moslems briefly benefited from the agglomeration of Byzantine, Sassanid, Indian, and even Chinese science. But they themselves moved just as sternly to retard it through inquisitorial means (see the Mutazili).
thank you, guthuy.
@scooter…I have several close friends and many aquaintances who have zero children. I have a couple of buddies who are married but do not want kids. WTF is that all about?! We have a few friends who have started families and nearly every one of them has no more than two children and that is all they want. I have two friends in particular who live in 5,000 sq. ft. houses, and they both only have two children. In both cases, mom makes six figures and is never home. In the one family, as would be expected, both sons have major behavioral issues. These kids have a full blown, state of the art movie theatre in their house and they are miserable! This family is living, breathing proof that the best things in life are not ‘things’. I have four children and my house is the size of my friend’s master bedroom. But my kids are well adjusted, well behaved and happy. All four of them were racially aware by the age of 3, no kidding. And most importantly, not one of them has ever seen the inside of a daycare. How many white women today are willing to sacrifice their career and their Audi to stay home with four screaming kids? How many white men are going to sacrifice the 4×4 crewcab with the turbo diesel engine? Most 35 year old white men today are infintile. They’re too busy with their fantasy football team to be worried about raising kids. You think they give a rat’s ass about saving the white race? I love to see educated and intelligent white nationalists like the ones on this site. It sure as hell beats the dudes in the white hoods. If we are going to change anything, I believe it has to be a top down movement. But all these intellectuals need to have big families or we don’t stand a chance. just my 2 cents.
“There is something “missing” from most White people’s brains, especially American Whites. This is partly cultural but may also perhaps have some genetic component. ” – John
It is our soul, John, that is missing. In exchanging a spirit of self-sacrifice, and a mindset devoted to the ‘good of the many,’ we have been co-opted by those (as the Apostle says) ‘whose god is their belly.’ From the simple desire to bring children into the world, to living above our means, and at the same time, saying we are NOT the most advantaged race on the planet, we lie- to ourselves, and to our former colonial possessions.
Christendom’s one claim to fame (if one can call it that) was that we WERE the ‘Chosen People’ of God- the Church, in all her glory. As Dr. McDonald wrote on this very site, lambast them all you will, but the recent royal wedding was an overt display of Explicit Whiteness… and for that, we must cheer, no matter how one feels about ERII, Phillip, Charles and Camilla, etc.
NO amount of top-down autocratic rule will EVER coalesce us. It has to be (as the Tea Party initially was) a loose, unstructured yeomanry gathering together to say, ‘NYET’ to the ‘International Banking Bolsheviks’- even to the point of gathering pitchforks, torches, and ropes. The Saxon (as Kipling noted) MUST learn to HATE, and hate with a Godly hatred, that alone is our justification for action against our enemies, ‘both foreign AND domestic.’ [Ps. 139:22]
WHy is it that (supposedly) O’Bama has killed O’SAMA, when the former has been in hot water for not even (YET) giving us a TRUE BC? It’s all smoke and mirrors, and we need to shrug off this sort of despotism, no matter what the epithet. I now am a proud racist- for my kith and kin, my clan, my tribe, my Folk, whatever you call it. But it will never, and can never, be before the ‘Tribal God of Christianity’- that ‘White Man’s Religion’ that was hijacked over ninety years ago, and made ‘universal’ when it is the most racially/cuturally/particularistic faith on the PLanet…. what other ‘God’ do you know, has INCARNATED HIMSELF into OUR ETHNOS, as the “Second Adam” (i.e., he who blushes, is ruddy in the face, fair- teh EXACT meaning of the word ‘ADAM’ in Hebrew)
The Jews? Never were a part of the Chosen People, never were David’s seed and Abraham’s line. They are merely upstart imposters, as Koestler told us all in 1976…
I have become increasingly attracted to you by your stance on what the politically correct media call ‘positive discrimination’. I have recently seen it myself. During my battle to achieve justice, I became aware that it would be particularly easy to sabotage the war on white men that the PC elite perpetrate.
There is a home office quango called Centre for Police Training Excellence, commonly known as Centrex, whose main purpose is the imposition of PC gobbledygook upon the recruitment of police officers. I have learnt that they automatically contact any female or ethnic minority candidate upon receipt of an application from a member of these groups and offer them training and tips to pass the official assessment attended by everybody, including white men. They do not publicise this PC persecution, so white men are kept in ignorance of this. As a white man myself, I only found this out by overhearing a conversation between two female applicants to the police. One asked the other ‘Are you going to this training day?’ I was astonished as, an applicant in the same position; I had not received any such invitation. I immediately interrupted this conversation and asked a series of questions which established that the left wing Hampstead elite train the people they like to pass the absurd tests they use to determine who can become a police officer. These tests themselves are full of bureaucratic nonsense; their function is to provide the aforementioned class with such incomprehensible PC speak that nobody recognises the irrelevance of the criterion used to assess candidates. An assessment matrix is used, in which the heaviest weighting is given to the most nonsensical, PC and subjective (to the point of absurdity) criterion – ‘Respect for Diversity’! Fail this and it is an automatic fail. The whole assessment is designed to give as much power as possible to the Hampstead Assessors so they can weed out anybody who is not likely to be sensitive to their Marxist anti-white male brainwashing: they follow the dogma of the Frankfurt School that the masses are untrustworthy and so a socialist elite must control society, primarily by inventing ‘politically correct’ terms for debate which change constantly so as to confuse and emasculate the masses. ‘Respect for diversity’ might sound a vague and obscure concept, but this is done deliberately so that it acts as a wild card against anybody too intelligent, thus enforcing the Frankfurt School’s anti-meritocratic relativism.
Up to this point everything I have described is completely factual; however, I will now indulge a powerful hunch – The ‘Respect for Diversity’ criterion is the means by which Hampstead imposes its social engineering upon society. Certain buzzwords may be taught, such as multiculturalism, patriarchy, feminism, diversity, which is used in the real test. The assessment consisted of activities that had nothing to do with the job being assessed – one was expected to role play a manager of a shopping centre who has to appease PC women who complain that they are not getting enough positive discrimination. Throughout the entire day no assessment activity had the slightest contact with policing; it was all a political fix to get the candidates the Labour Party feel will do their bidding. This acts as a signal to the assessor to admit that candidate; those who speak in logical, grammatically coherent everyday language are excluded. Thus I failed to pass.
I complained about the abuse I received to an employment. It was when I got the Notice of Appearance from the solicitors that a thought occurred to me: This whole system of political correctness and ‘positive discrimination’ can be brought down by its own bureaucratic poison. A kind of poetic beauty in the abuse they have given white males being redirected against them by using their own tools! I noted from the responses of the legal firms who both the police and Centrex used to represent themselves that they were taking me seriously: both were top of the range employment specialists. One of them was based in the heart of the City of London and the other was employment law specialist of the year according to its headed paper. Lawyers do not come cheap, but these lawyers were doubtlessly charging an astonishing hourly rate – possibly into four figures. By bureaucratising the police force and society to this extent, the PC elite have created a rod for their own back. I have worked out that the defence of the ‘positive’ discrimination will have cost BOTH of these organisations into four figures and more probably five, since by their nature legal proceedings are long and drawn out with a constant need for professional advice from both parties to, for example, arrange appointments at tribunals, attend tribunals, obtain witness statements etc…
I am sure you can see by now the value of taking a large number of police forces to court. However, people will always need police force, whereas silly PC guanos like Centrex are not necessary and it would be the latter organisation that a critical mass of white men all targeting it whose existence can easily be threatened. I cannot see how if hundreds of white men independently applied to the police, failed the assessment, then all took a small police force and Centrex to employment tribunals it would be possible for the Marxists to maintain their stranglehold on police recruiting. I say ‘small’ forces because these would be better to attack than large forces like the Metropolitan Police, which because of its economy of scale could more easily absorb the threat to its humiliation of white men. Thus before orchestrating an attack on the abusive recruitment policy it is necessary to choose targets that are small forces; it might also be beneficial to attack forces away from media centres, as these are largely indoctrinated with the same Marxist – Feminist – Zionist ideology common to the PC elite and one would not get a sympathetic hearing – they would simply cover up the ‘positive’ discrimination. However, local provincial press might prove useful as men in smaller, rural areas will be more outraged and take it more personally than metropolitan men, as well as the fact the press may actually publicise this abuse.
One of the problematic areas for us will be related to evidence; however, this can be overcome by again using their obsessive bureaucratising against the PC elite. It was pure coincidence I found out about this through an overheard conversation, but we can use the Freedom of Information Act (2004) to request information about the terms under which we were interviewed and what facilities and expertise other candidates had access to which a white man did not. They are statutorily obliged to give this information. I bet the PC Labour Party was not expecting this to be an effect of that Act. There are also advantages which we can exploit by using the principle: it only takes one tree to make a thousand matches; it only takes one match to burn a thousand trees. Yes, ethnic minorities and women are given materials and training unavailable to white men, but I shall list a number of reasons that the position of the PC Elite is precarious, viz.
1) It only takes one whistleblower inside the recruitment department of a police force to publicise this. A white woman who works for the PC quango ‘Positive Action’ subgroup would probably be the best person to use. Unlike ethnic minorities, a white woman’s sense of loyalty to PC gobbledygook is merely opportunistic rather than ‘in the blood’, since she might have father, brothers, sons, partners who she feels are not getting a fair chance, especially if she is working class, a class least equipped to adopt the nonsense of the Hampstead brigade. The best way to ensure a victory would be to use the Admin-Security day, which is when a group of prospective police candidates attend a day to verify issues such as parents’ background, qualifications, no security risks etc. If, on one of these days, the honest female (she may need to be paid off) says to another candidate something incriminating about advantages she has that a number of white working-class male candidates in earshot do not have, this would form a solid foundation for a case that would cause maximum disruption (in terms of cost, time, resources) to a police service. The men present should walk out there and then, noting date, location, those present and precisely what was said. The more specific details given by the female stooge the better: date, location, those involves, those who organise it etc. There is no way anyone could prove that she was ‘in’ on the justice operation.
2) There is a political reason for the high price that the Hampstead Labour Elite are prepared to pay lawyers (under the guise of the police service): They are terrified of the publicity. Most reasonable people would be shocked if they knew how politicised and left wing ‘their’ police services were, as they do not have the status or time to undergo the long initiation process into the PC elite. Thus, even if they alter the law so much that they are allowed to abuse decent white men, the negative publicity that would ensue from the popular recognition of this fact would damage them and the election-prospects of their beloved Labour Party.
3) There is a beautiful asymmetry in the positions of the parties at an employment tribunal. However, to fully exploit this it is vital that correct procedure is followed, so any party or parties prosecuting the police can do this at NO COST providing they follow certain instructions. Go to a citizen’s advice bureau and get the correct forms from a lawyer that works there. The lawyer should help you to fill in the form, which they should provide. Follow all the lawyer’s instructions carefully, as otherwise the defence will be able to reject the application on a procedural technicality. I believe it is the Sex Discrimination Act (1976) and the Race Relations Act (1976) that should be used by the prosecution. To cause maximum damage, name both the police force applied to and Centrex as separate respondents. I did so and one hired the ‘employment specialist of the year’ (according to their headed paper) and one chose a City of London solicitor based on Chancery Lane. I am guessing neither cost less than a five-figure sum when the entire process was accounted for!
4) The criteria used for assessment are absurd. Even to somebody who does not see through the PC-gobbledygook of the media the procedures are absurd, hence the fact that they take such pains to avoid publicising them. Since sunlight is the best disinfectant (which is a what an employment tribunal case forces them to do), they are terrified of their cosy anti-white working-class male PC clique being held up to scrutiny as it implies a system of government that is rotten and self-serving, rather than a genuine attempt to find the best individual for the job. I will give you an example of the sort of trash that passes for ‘assessment’ – its political motivations would be obvious to any casual reader of a newspaper: ‘You are a shopping centre worker (this, remember, is meant to be an assessment for the police – and every single unit of the day required one to play just this part!). There is a woman who is crying and upset because she got her job through positive discrimination and some of her colleagues have said naughty things to her. Go and talk to her.’ On reflection, it is very clear why they are prepared to pay lawyers so much – they are on the run; they know how absurd their recruitment process is. If the above example is not evidence that recruitment is ruined by crackpot Harmanites, I do not know what is. Absurd role plays more suited to a quango in Hampstead Jewish Socialist Women’s Outreach Project with no relevance whatsoever to policing are used to recruit people for the police whose ‘qualities’ (some might say ‘psychoses’) are more suited to that organisation. Never at any point is one required to role playing something that is actually relevant to policing. It is precisely this absurdity the ZFE exploit by training the ‘target’ (i.e. no intelligent, white or decent people) groups in their exclusive ‘positive action days’; if the assessment was not absurd it could be anticipated and so ‘undesirables’ might succeed.
5) The Freedom of Information Act (2004) makes it possible to access information about how white people are being persecuted by the ZFE. Constantly use this to waste the ZFE’s time, as the statistics can show hypocrisy: For example, women-only swim sessions at public pools, when the BNP (a private organisation!) is not allowed to discriminate in its own membership! Bombard the ZFE’s time with spurious complaints and time-wasting on any issue you can think of.
One more thing that would undermine the ZFE’s ‘positive’ discrimination schemes would be a policy of complete non-cooperation with job application forms and census schemes. By spreading the message to all white men and lovers of freedom not to fill in any personal information, the whole project becomes distorted and discredited. When asking about race, sex, sexual orientation etc. a box should by law always be available which says: ‘prefer not to say’ and this box should be filled in every time. If large sections of the population refuse to participate in these crackpot schemes, results are distorted and cannot be used as a further basis for the Zionist Harmanite Orwellian doublethink of ‘Equality’, when all ‘Equality’ means is inequality and a vent for their rabid hatred of truth, freedom, white people and men.
I asked the man how representative the police are of people with red hair – he said they do not keep those records. I asked how representative the police are of blonde hair – he said he did not keep those records. For some strange reason it is permissible to discriminate against certain groups, all of whom are overwhelmingly white.
One other way Harperson’s thought police can be sabotaged is simply by non-cooperation with the bureaucratic impositions on job application forms (or any other type of form). If every white person – and especially every white man (who are most persecuted by her puppets in her daddy’s medical ‘profession’ and media parasites) – simply ticks boxes marked ‘RATHER NOT SAY’ to every question about what one’s race, sex, or sexual orientation is, it will undermine her Orwellian bureaucratic machine. I believe that by law every form should have the option of not stating irrelevant personal information, so if it is not there one should make an issue of it and not tick any box, but say clearly ‘rather not say’ in one’s own writing at the bottom. For this is the way the PC Elite manipulate data to stop talented people getting jobs and then give the job to imcompetent but politically brainwashed people with the ‘right’ sex, race, or political beliefs: otherwise known by the deeply Orwellian name of ‘positive (!!!) discrimination’. This policy of non-cooperation seems to be a no-brainer because it is perfectly legal and requires little effort yet could destroy treacherous scum like Harman and her medical / media / PR-industry PC brigade. Now that the Zionist Media have one of their own in charge of the Labour Party, we should all bet on them to win the next general election, as they will be even more biased than usual. For example a racist anti-red-haired, anti-white Zionist-controlled party that still has Harriet Harperson in it won the Oldham by-election – the British public really are for the most part ignorant puppets to their thoughtcrime – and the woman is called ABRAHAMS – yet another Harmanite ginger rodent abuser. She is probably related to the ‘male’ sponsor of Harridan Harperson David ABRAHAMS! One rule for those hypocritical rats – John Bercow was pleased that the youth parliament was ‘more representative’ (a euphemism for the ZFE to increase their social engineering control therough ‘positive’ discrimination) when as a Jew he is eight-times over-represented in parliament: Do as I say, not as I do and go and die in my wars in the Middle East while you are at it.
Best Wishes.
There is a home office quango called Centre for Police Training Excellence, commonly known as Centrex, whose main purpose is the imposition of PC gobbledygook upon the recruitment of police officers. I have learnt that they automatically contact any female or ethnic minority candidate upon receipt of an application from a member of these groups and offer them training and tips to pass the official assessment attended by everybody, including white men. They do not publicise this PC persecution, so white men are kept in ignorance of this. As a white man myself, I only found this out by overhearing a conversation between two female applicants to the police. One asked the other ‘Are you going to this training day?’ I was astonished as, an applicant in the same position; I had not received any such invitation. I immediately interrupted this conversation and asked a series of questions which established that the left wing Hampstead elite train the people they like to pass the absurd tests they use to determine who can become a police officer. These tests themselves are full of bureaucratic nonsense; their function is to provide the aforementioned class with such incomprehensible PC speak that nobody recognises the irrelevance of the criterion used to assess candidates. An assessment matrix is used, in which the heaviest weighting is given to the most nonsensical, PC and subjective (to the point of absurdity) criterion – ‘Respect for Diversity’! Fail this and it is an automatic fail. The whole assessment is designed to give as much power as possible to the Hampstead Assessors so they can weed out anybody who is not likely to be sensitive to their Marxist anti-white male brainwashing: they follow the dogma of the Frankfurt School that the masses are untrustworthy and so a socialist elite must control society, primarily by inventing ‘politically correct’ terms for debate which change constantly so as to confuse and emasculate the masses. ‘Respect for diversity’ might sound a vague and obscure concept, but this is done deliberately so that it acts as a wild card against anybody too intelligent, thus enforcing the Frankfurt School’s anti-meritocratic relativism.
Up to this point everything I have described is completely factual; however, I will now indulge a powerful hunch – The ‘Respect for Diversity’ criterion is the means by which Hampstead imposes its social engineering upon society. Certain buzzwords may be taught, such as multiculturalism, patriarchy, feminism, diversity, which is used in the real test. The assessment consisted of activities that had nothing to do with the job being assessed – one was expected to role play a manager of a shopping centre who has to appease PC women who complain that they are not getting enough positive discrimination. Throughout the entire day no assessment activity had the slightest contact with policing; it was all a political fix to get the candidates the Labour Party feel will do their bidding. This acts as a signal to the assessor to admit that candidate; those who speak in logical, grammatically coherent everyday language are excluded. Thus I failed to pass.
I complained about the abuse I received to an employment. It was when I got the Notice of Appearance from the solicitors that a thought occurred to me: This whole system of political correctness and ‘positive discrimination’ can be brought down by its own bureaucratic poison. A kind of poetic beauty in the abuse they have given white males being redirected against them by using their own tools! I noted from the responses of the legal firms who both the police and Centrex used to represent themselves that they were taking me seriously: both were top of the range employment specialists. One of them was based in the heart of the City of London and the other was employment law specialist of the year according to its headed paper. Lawyers do not come cheap, but these lawyers were doubtlessly charging an astonishing hourly rate – possibly into four figures. By bureaucratising the police force and society to this extent, the PC elite have created a rod for their own back. I have worked out that the defence of the ‘positive’ discrimination will have cost BOTH of these organisations into four figures and more probably five, since by their nature legal proceedings are long and drawn out with a constant need for professional advice from both parties to, for example, arrange appointments at tribunals, attend tribunals, obtain witness statements etc…
I am sure you can see by now the value of taking a large number of police forces to court. However, people will always need police force, whereas silly PC guanos like Centrex are not necessary and it would be the latter organisation that a critical mass of white men all targeting it whose existence can easily be threatened. I cannot see how if hundreds of white men independently applied to the police, failed the assessment, then all took a small police force and Centrex to employment tribunals it would be possible for the Marxists to maintain their stranglehold on police recruiting. I say ‘small’ forces because these would be better to attack than large forces like the Metropolitan Police, which because of its economy of scale could more easily absorb the threat to its humiliation of white men. Thus before orchestrating an attack on the abusive recruitment policy it is necessary to choose targets that are small forces; it might also be beneficial to attack forces away from media centres, as these are largely indoctrinated with the same Marxist – Feminist – Zionist ideology common to the PC elite and one would not get a sympathetic hearing – they would simply cover up the ‘positive’ discrimination. However, local provincial press might prove useful as men in smaller, rural areas will be more outraged and take it more personally than metropolitan men, as well as the fact the press may actually publicise this abuse.
One of the problematic areas for us will be related to evidence; however, this can be overcome by again using their obsessive bureaucratising against the PC elite. It was pure coincidence I found out about this through an overheard conversation, but we can use the Freedom of Information Act (2004) to request information about the terms under which we were interviewed and what facilities and expertise other candidates had access to which a white man did not. They are statutorily obliged to give this information. I bet the PC Labour Party was not expecting this to be an effect of that Act. There are also advantages which we can exploit by using the principle: it only takes one tree to make a thousand matches; it only takes one match to burn a thousand trees. Yes, ethnic minorities and women are given materials and training unavailable to white men, but I shall list a number of reasons that the position of the PC Elite is precarious, viz.
1) It only takes one whistleblower inside the recruitment department of a police force to publicise this. A white woman who works for the PC quango ‘Positive Action’ subgroup would probably be the best person to use. Unlike ethnic minorities, a white woman’s sense of loyalty to PC gobbledygook is merely opportunistic rather than ‘in the blood’, since she might have father, brothers, sons, partners who she feels are not getting a fair chance, especially if she is working class, a class least equipped to adopt the nonsense of the Hampstead brigade. The best way to ensure a victory would be to use the Admin-Security day, which is when a group of prospective police candidates attend a day to verify issues such as parents’ background, qualifications, no security risks etc. If, on one of these days, the honest female says to another candidate something incriminating about advantages she has that a number of white working-class male candidates in earshot do not have, this would form a solid foundation for a case that would cause maximum disruption (in terms of cost, time, resources) to a police service. The men present should walk out there and then, noting date, location, those present and precisely what was said. The more specific details given by the female stooge the better: date, location, those involves, those who organise it etc. There is no way anyone could prove that she was ‘in’ on the justice operation.
2) There is a political reason for the high price that the Hampstead Labour Elite are prepared to pay lawyers (under the guise of the police service): They are terrified of the publicity. Most reasonable people would be shocked if they knew how politicised and left wing ‘their’ police services were, as they do not have the status or time to undergo the long initiation process into the PC elite. Thus, even if they alter the law so much that they are allowed to abuse decent white men, the negative publicity that would ensue from the popular recognition of this fact would damage them and the election-prospects of their beloved Labour Party.
3) There is a beautiful asymmetry in the positions of the parties at an employment tribunal. However, to fully exploit this it is vital that correct procedure is followed, so any party or parties prosecuting the police can do this at NO COST providing they follow certain instructions. Go to a citizen’s advice bureau and get the correct forms from a lawyer that works there. The lawyer should help you to fill in the form, which they should provide. Follow all the lawyer’s instructions carefully, as otherwise the defence will be able to reject the application on a procedural technicality. I believe it is the Sex Discrimination Act (1976) and the Race Relations Act (1976) that should be used by the prosecution. To cause maximum damage, name both the police force applied to and Centrex as separate respondents. I did so and one hired the ‘employment specialist of the year’ (according to their headed paper) and one chose a City of London solicitor based on Chancery Lane. I am guessing neither cost less than a five-figure sum when the entire process was accounted for!
4) The criteria used for assessment are absurd. Even to somebody who does not see through the PC-gobbledygook of the media the procedures are absurd, hence the fact that they take such pains to avoid publicising them. Since sunlight is the best disinfectant (which is a what an employment tribunal case forces them to do), they are terrified of their cosy anti-white working-class male PC clique being held up to scrutiny as it implies a system of government that is rotten and self-serving, rather than a genuine attempt to find the best individual for the job. I will give you an example of the sort of trash that passes for ‘assessment’ – its political motivations would be obvious to any casual reader of a newspaper: ‘You are a shopping centre worker (this, remember, is meant to be an assessment for the police – and every single unit of the day required one to play just this part!). There is a woman who is crying and upset because she got her job through positive discrimination and some of her colleagues have said naughty things to her. Go and talk to her.’ On reflection, it is very clear why they are prepared to pay lawyers so much – they are on the run; they know how absurd their recruitment process is. If the above example is not evidence that recruitment is ruined by crackpot Harmanites, I do not know what is. Absurd role plays more suited to a quango in Hampstead Jewish Socialist Women’s Outreach Project with no relevance whatsoever to policing are used to recruit people for the police whose ‘qualities’ (some might say ‘psychoses’) are more suited to that organisation. Never at any point is one required to role playing something that is actually relevant to policing. It is precisely this absurdity the ZFE exploit by training the ‘target’ (i.e. no intelligent, white or decent people) groups in their exclusive ‘positive action days’; if the assessment was not absurd it could be anticipated and so ‘undesirables’ might succeed.
5) The Freedom of Information Act (2004) makes it possible to access information about how white people are being persecuted by the ZFE. Constantly use this to waste the ZFE’s time, as the statistics can show hypocrisy: For example, women-only swim sessions at public pools, when the BNP (a private organisation!) is not allowed to discriminate in its own membership! Bombard the ZFE’s time with spurious complaints and time-wasting on any issue you can think of.
One more thing that would undermine the ZFE’s ‘positive’ discrimination schemes would be a policy of complete non-cooperation with job application forms and census schemes. By spreading the message to all white men and lovers of freedom not to fill in any personal information, the whole project becomes distorted and discredited. When asking about race, sex, sexual orientation etc. a box should by law always be available which says: ‘prefer not to say’ and this box should be filled in every time. If large sections of the population refuse to participate in these crackpot schemes, results are distorted and cannot be used as a further basis for the Zionist Harmanite Orwellian doublethink of ‘Equality’, when all ‘Equality’ means is inequality and a vent for their rabid hatred of truth, freedom, white people and men.
I asked the man how representative the police are of people with red hair – he said they do not keep those records. I asked how representative the police are of blonde hair – he said he did not keep those records. For some strange reason it is permissible to discriminate against certain groups, all of whom are overwhelmingly white.
One other way Harperson’s thought police can be sabotaged is simply by non-cooperation with the bureaucratic impositions on job application forms (or any other type of form). If every white person – and especially every white man (who are most persecuted by her puppets in her daddy’s medical ‘profession’ and media parasites) – simply ticks boxes marked ‘RATHER NOT SAY’ to every question about what one’s race, sex, or sexual orientation is, it will undermine her Orwellian bureaucratic machine. I believe that by law every form should have the option of not stating irrelevant personal information, so if it is not there one should make an issue of it and not tick any box, but say clearly ‘rather not say’ in one’s own writing at the bottom. For this is the way the PC Elite manipulate data to stop talented people getting jobs and then give the job to imcompetent but politically brainwashed people with the ‘right’ sex, race, or political beliefs: otherwise known by the deeply Orwellian name of ‘positive (!!!) discrimination’. This policy of non-cooperation seems to be a no-brainer because it is perfectly legal and requires little effort yet could destroy treacherous scum like Harman and her medical / media / PR-industry PC brigade. Now that the Zionist Media have one of their own in charge of the Labour Party, we should all bet on them to win the next general election, as they will be even more biased than usual. For example a racist anti-red-haired, anti-white Zionist-controlled party that still has Harriet Harperson in it won the Oldham by-election – the British public really are for the most part ignorant puppets to their thoughtcrime – and the woman is called ABRAHAMS – yet another Harmanite ginger rodent abuser. She is probably related to the ‘male’ sponsor of Harridan Harperson David ABRAHAMS! One rule for those hypocritical rats – John Bercow was pleased that the youth parliament was ‘more representative’ (a euphemism for the ZFE to increase their social engineering control therough ‘positive’ discrimination) when as a Jew he is eight-times over-represented in parliament: Do as I say, not as I do and go and die in my wars in the Middle East while you are at it.
Best Wishes.