Mr. & Mrs. Bernard-Henri Levy.
Via Steve Sailer, I learn that prominent French Jew Bernard-Henri Levy is claiming credit for having persuaded President Sarkozy to press successfully for Western intervention in Libya.
In the New York Times story to which Sailer links, By His Own Reckoning, One Man Made Libya a French Cause By Steve Erlanger April 1, 2011, Levy is quoted saying:
“I’m proud of my country, which I haven’t felt for many years.”
In a well-conducted interview by Der Spiegel ”We Lost a Great Deal of Time in Libya Because of the Germans“ 03/30/2011 he reveals his activism stems from
“the moral and spiritual tradition in which I grew up. For me, it’s the definition of Judaism. Being Jewish means having more obligations than rights.”
Advertisement
Although generally described as a “Philosopher” Bernard-Henri Levy appears to be more of a loud-mouthed domineering ideologue of the stripe of Norman Podhoretz. He was actually born in Algeria. Steve Sailer does a perfectly good job of supplying perspective, but The Lies of Bernard-Henri Lévy by Doug Ireland In These Times March 3 2006 is a draught of exquisitely refined vitriol.
Levy has a history of demanding Western military intervention in such places as Bosnia and Darfur. With America’s Neocons clearly quite up to the task of making the Iraq venture happen, he chose to posture against its legality.
Why would President Sarkozy pay any attention to Levy, who said to Der Spiegel
I am an opponent of Sarkozy and his policies. I did not vote for him and I will not vote for him. But it’s no secret that we know each other well.
and who is obviously an arrogant and conceited hysteric?
While Levy told Der Spiegel
I told him that there would be a massacre if Gadhafi made it to Benghazi, and that the French flag that had been flying above the Corniche since the previous evening would also be soiled with blood in this massacre. He was very moved by these words. There are emotional moments in which even statesmen react in a very normal and human way.
when we consider who Sarkozy is, we may surmise something other than the French flag moved him.
Sarkozy’s father, who was born and raised in Hungary (where the family were minor — Christian — aristocrats) but emigrated to France, deserted his family in 1959 when his son was 4. His mother was the daughter of a Sephardic Jew from Salonika in Greece who converted to Catholicism on marrying a French Catholic, taking the Christian name Benedict. According to Nicolas Sarkozy, new President of France: Past and Future Ranaan Eliaz European Jewish Press 06/May/2007
Sarkozy’s grandfather, Aron Mallah, nicknamed Benkio, was born in 1890. Beniko’s uncle Moshe was a well-known Rabbi and a devoted Zionist who, in 1898 published and edited “El Avenir”, the leading paper of the Zionist national movement in Greece at the time. His cousin, Asher…was elected as the first President of the Zionist Federation of Greece and he headed the Zionist Council for several years.
Although Benedict integrated fully into French society, he remained close to his Jewish family, origin and culture.…Nicolas was especially close to Benedict, who was like a father to him. In his biography Sarkozy tells he admired his grandfather, and through hours spent of listening to his stories of the Nazi occupation, the “Maquis” (French resistance), De Gaulle and the D-day, Benedict bequeathed to Nicolas his political convictions.
The article opens with a very pro-Zionist quotation by Sarkozy.
Sarkozy’s son married the daughter of a wealthy French Jewish family – and for what it is worth, his second wife remarried to a Moroccan Jew.
So the critical impulse to involve America and the West in yet another Middle Eastern morass came from a Jew and an intense philo-Semite – politically one might even say a crypto-Jew.
Having the West in full scale military collision with the Muslim world – especially in nearby countries – is clearly helpful to Israel.
Few non-Zionists would see any benefit to those countries actually doing the fighting.
When these adventures are proposed, it is imperative to ask not why but who?
Facing the Future as a Minority
Israel-Firster Jew Bernard-Henri Levy could be right. He has many talents. He was the one who convinced US state Department to declare Holland Muslim academic Dr. Tariq Ramadan ‘a threat to US security’ in 2004 when Tariq landed at New York airport to take up his post at the Notredame University. He also wrote a plea that his friend Polanski be pardoned for having sex with a 13-year-old girl – because Planski, being a Holocaust survivor had already suffered to much.
There is no use offending some Hasbara idiot by calling Bernard-Henri Levy a professionally ‘Islamophobe’.
Paul Donnelly in Jeiwsh-owned The Washington Post, had called Tariq Ramadan, the Muslim ‘Martin Luther’
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/the-muslim-martin-luther/
What a typically wimpy looking Jewish chickenhawk. You can’t blame him, though. Why not send the dumb goy off to die in wars that advance the interests of world Jewry, if they’re dumb enough to go?
From The Lies of Bernard-Henri Lévy By Doug Ireland mentioned above:
A philosopher who’s never taught the subject in any university, a journalist who creates a cocktail mingling the true, the possible, and the totally false, a patch-work filmmaker, a writer without a real literary oeuvre, he is the icon of a media-driven society in which simple appearance weighs more than the substance of things. BHL is thus first and foremost a great communicator, the PR man of the only product he really knows how to sell: himself.
That’s good writing, and really puts the words to the picture. I know a few folks like that.
Mike
If what the http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/wow-that-was-fast-libyan-rebels-have-already-established-a-new-central-bank-of-libya/ claims is true then I doubt very much if Bernard-Henri was instrumental in persuading President Sarkozy to press successfully for Western intervention in Libya. Unless of course the man really is well connected, very well connected.
The significance given to the connnections made in this article are beyond spurious, and have the effect of undermining the credibility of other articles that make much more plausible connections. The intervention in Libya may be a bad idea but the British PM David Cameron was probably the major driving force behind it. He was the one who twisted arms in Washington.
Even if Bernard-Henri Levy thought his role in getting the war started was more important than it really was, his actions and intentions are still just as bad, and his hypocrisy is still just as shameful in saying that it was the intellectuals’ role to cool popular anger (when the Americans were trying to get Polanski flown to face justice in America) and later doing all he could to get a pointless war going.
Even if this man, this time played a smaller role than the one he thought he played, and boasts of playing, the point remains that if you have an influential cultural elite that thinks like this, and throws its weight around like this, with the moral hazard of not being of the same ethnicity as those who will pay the price of war, there will be blood. In the long run, if that “philosopher” / courtier doesn’t get the job done, another one will, and if not that time then a later time. That socially elite and politically active class needs to be displaced.
Regardless of what one individual may or may not have to do with this latest jew war outrage, the fact stands clear that Britain and France, in collusion with the traitors running this country, have been responsible for most of our wars of this century. We need to stop thinking of them as allies and look at them as the deadly enemies they actually are. This is not to disparage the honest whites of those countries who’ve had no more control there than we have here, but in no way should these countries be considered friends. Both these countries are so far gone into communism and race-mixing one can only wish for their earliest demise, like our own government. Right now the suicidal policies of all three governments are the best hope for the white race.
First of all the armed forces of of France and Britain couldn’t knock the skin off a rice pudding; they’re just window dressing for superpower- America. (The US has 100 times the number of helicopters that Britain has).
It’s not obvious to me that Zionists are at all happy about the Arab uprisings, eg LOUIS RENÉ BERES
I think the Libyan rebels are basically being helped because of the US elite’s moral idealist bias That ideology is authentically white as Kevin MacDonald has pointed out:-
Personally I doubt Jews ever convinced a white nation to go to war. They’re not ten feet tall you know !
I think it’s pretty obvious the Jews would prefer if these uprisings didn’t happen. The status quo was not exactly to Jewish interests but not exactly a threat either. Egypt was a dependable ally squeezing in the Gazans and it is clear that none of these countries would serve as a safe harbor for Islamic militants. The Mubarak regime was especially hostile to extremists and would not hesitate to torture them for pleasure or at the CIA’s bequest. What is emerging out of this picture is an unpredictable world, and who knows what will come of it. The Jews were NOT behind these uprisings. You’d have to be a complete paranoid freak to think that they were. What is clear is that every intelligence agency in the world is trying to influence events in these countries to their benefit.
Someday said:
“Personally, I doubt if jews ever convinced a White nation to go to war.”
No wonder he’s accused of troll-dom.
Ari Shavit, Haaretz News Service (Israel), April 5, 2003
“The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.
In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in the town (Washington): the belief in war against Iraq. That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history.”
Sheesh.
I was thinking of WW2, but yes Iraq is a war that can be laid at their door. Highly placed Jews known to be allegiant to Israel had ulterior motives to push for an invasion of Iraq (and they should not have been allowed to participate in the decision making process about it). However whether it would have happened without them is not so clear cut. The US political elite are quite capable of getting their country into stupid wars without any Jewish input, Vietnam for instance.
I think Jews are vastly more influential than the average person thinks but – in the long run – less influential than people here think.
Oh, that Bernard-Henry Levy, here arguing that the aging lecher Roman Polanski ought to get off scot-free for the anal rape of a thirteen-year-old gentile of no importance. Railing about how “shameful” it was (“shameful” sixteen times in one page, and then “ashamed”) that the Americans were till trying to get justice long after an American girl had been raped, and that not everyone was standing up for Roman Polanski, a survivor of anti-Jewish terror (in his youth, long, long ago).
Because it is shameful, finally, that we can’t, when we talk about his life, evoke his childhood in the ghetto, the death of his mother in Auschwitz, the murder of his young spouse, eviscerated along with the young child she was carrying, without the prayers of the new popular justice crying, “Blackmail!…”
When Bernard-Henri Levy says he puts great importance on his Judaism, I believe him. His moral scales were weighted heavily in favor of the famous director of the Holocaust movie The Pianist (2002), while concern for the girl raped or for the dignity of America’s laws was completely absent.
It’s easy to believe that his war-mongering might have been affected by what he thought the Jewish interest might be, much harder to believe that his advice would have been motivated by sincere concern for Libyans of no Jewish importance.
“It is shameful to see the intellectuals, whose role should be to calm the frenzy and cool popular anger, ratchet up, like Michel Onfray in Libération, the moment when “the worst are full of passionate intensity” (Yeats)…”
How about when the same intellectual who did his best to cool popular anger against an admitted rapist (who in the end never did have to go back to America and face justice) participated in ratcheting up not merely anger but missile strikes for no good reason? Isn’t that shameful?
You see this in almost every instance a Jew is accused of any crime. The whole tribe comes out swinging. That is unless the tribe was ripped off, a la Madoff. Madoff ripped off mainly Jews. Is it any surprise he was the only major figure to do time for his financial crimes?
John: Don’t you think it’s time we stopped parroting the anti-goyim canard that Madoff ‘ripped off mainly jews’? Get with it, bro.
From TOO:
A careful reader will note that there were real winners. We will call them the Jews, since they were Jews, This group would ultimately have large losses of imaginary paper “profits.” And there were big losers. Let’s call them the Goys or the Suckers, since they are non-Jews. Of course, the difference between these groups is their ethnicity. It is worth noting that the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, and the mass media in general, see this as a fraud that essentially affected only Jews. As we have seen, this is the exact opposite of the truth. Jews were winners, and non-Jews were losers.
To repeat: in Madoff’s scheme, Jews were winners, and non-Jews were losers. It was not just a Ponzi scheme, it was a Ponzi scheme structured around a massive transfer of wealth to one’s own ethnic group, a kind of previously undescribed Ethno-Nepotistic-Ponzi scheme.
Finally, this suggests that the real reason why Haaretz and Abe Foxman are so hysterical about the Madoff scandal and its possible effect of increasing anti-semitism is not because they fear irrational goyim who are overly eager to paint all Jews with the traits of Bernie Madoff. It is that there simply were very few real Jewish victims and quite a few non-Jewish victims: The so-called Jewish victims actually made money. And they made millions and millions and millions.
James Murray, TOO
The motivation for our involvement in Libya is, I believe easily discerned by looking at who were the major proponents of it: Joe Lieberman and his houseboy John McCain. Need one look any further?
Shame is one of BHL’s favorite weapons. He returned to Benghazi a few days ago and was interviewed by Al-Jazeera and he use a rhetorical formula, starting all his sentences with “It’s a shame that…” at least 7 times.
In France it is not a secret that Sarkozy is a Jew. In some circles he is called ‘le petit juif’ : the little jew.
What is also notable about Sarkozy is his staunch pro-Atlantic point of view as a nominally Gaullist president.
Last but not least Sarkozy has the Jewish habbit to conquer as much goyim wives as possible. This is also his weakness, because he attracts gold-diggers and his present wife Bruni is known as the greatest whore of France.
“…And I made a friend, it’s Nicolas Sarkozy. We are not on the same side [politically], but towards Israel we’re on the same side. And I am very pleased that for the first time, France has elected a Jew as the Republique’s [nickname for France] president.
We had Leon Blum and Strauss as ministers, but never a Jew as a president. It’s a nice accomplishment. And with Kouchner as minister of foreign affairs, what do you want more?”
Georges Frêche, socialist and was President of the Languedoc-Roussillon Region.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnvNDbj18_Q
The quickest way to discredit these professional tribal hypocrites,every time they propose public action socalled for “moral” reasons,is to ask where they stand when ISRAEL commits one of it’s usual crimes.Where did you stand Mr.Levy when Israel destroyed half of Lebanon just to liberate 3 (three!) soldiers,or killed 1400 people in Gaza with white phosphorus or killed 9 aid workers on the Mavi Marmora?”Being Jewish means having more obligations than rights”.Ah,that is the moral and spiritual tradition you grew up in?So you urged Sarkozi to intervene in Lebanon,Gaza and the Mavi Marmora,did you?
Whiteawake said “Both these countries are so far gone into communism and race-mixing one can only wish for their earliest demise…”
How can you even think such things! These countries are your brethren. Furthermore, it is the USA that is in the terrible race mixing and imminent loss of majority crisis. The UK cities like London are like 3rd world countries for sure, but over the country the demographics are still healthy…more than 90% English, Irish, Scottish or Welsh.
Almost certain, the USA whites will lose their majorities and continue to be dispossessed, because our Jewish cousins have been particularly viscious there. But by about 2025/2030 the UK and other European countries will start inviting American whites to come home and boost their own demographic situation. The destiny of all our descendents are inseparable now.
Mickey, I was speaking mainly of governments, but we have to realize the majority of whites left in these countries do not and will not ever support us. They have been so saturated with anti-race communism most of them will never get past it. The hatred I’ve come to feel for those countries did not come naturally; they are my ancestry. But their history of getting us involved in wars against our own interests can’t be denied and they must be held accountable. Just as I would in no way, under any condition, help a race-mixing relative, neither would I bat an eye to save Britain and France from their own folly.
This is purely antecdotal, but I’m pretty sure it’s indicitive of a larger reality: Most white Europeans I’ve met are quite contemptuous of America and white Americans. Even LIBERAL white Amrericans. And these were mostly people who were spending time in America, who’ve experienced it first hand.
This does NOT, I repeat, does NOT pertain to the Europeans who visit this site. Other exceptions are people who have become citizens, usually through marriage.
There are a variety of reasons for this, and a few of them valid (some Americans really can be crude, crass and pushy, and our hyper-militarism needs no explanation.) Mostly it’s a combination of jealousy (unacknowledged or unrecognized) and contempt for capitalism, though. Liberal brainwashing about white America’s evil past is part of it, too. Or it may just be plain old provincialism – don’t forget that, despite immigration woes, most countries in Europe could still be called ethnically homogeneous.
They may admire some things about Americans as a group, but mostly prefer to keep their distance. Based on the Europeans I’ve met here, I would NOT want to live in Europe. It’s my cherished heritage, but not my future.
Nothing irks me more than liberal Europeans who come as guest workers to feed off the American gravy train for a few years, all the while railing about “injustice” in America, injustices perpetrated by THEIR ancestors when the New World was still largely colonial.
At some level, I feel a sense of betrayal on the part of most white Europeans. I can’t IMAGINE who difficult it must be for European white nationalists or advocates. You have my genuine sympathy.
Now Aussies are a different matter altogether. I could live in Australia.
I meant to say “… ethnically homogeneous WHEN COMPARED TO AMERICA.”
David Cameron, in first speech as the new prime minister of UK, which he delivered at ‘British Friends of Israel’ – he claimed that he had Jewish family roots. The Opposition Labour Party’s leader, Ed Miliband, is also Jewish.
David Cameron is known as the “foreign policy klutz” with his feet “firmly planted in his mouth (for Israel)”. In April 2010 – David had claimed that both CIA and MI6 are wrong about Iran’s nuclear program. He asserted that Tehran is already have nuclear bombs.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/cameron-iran-has-nuclear-bomb/
Some of you should send your thoughts to LeMonde diplomatique. They might publish them, or at the least they would be an eye opener to the more or less comotose French.
http://mondediplo.com/_contact-us_
http://mondediplo.com/
One must give the Jews their due: they are a formidable people, they never sleep and never give up.
They infiltrated everything at all levels. They penetrate and control everything they can, without themselves being penetrated. Their unrelenting pressure on fellow, honest Jew Goldstone just paid off: he recanted in the press.
Talking about Sarkozy: he is just as Hungarian as he is Jewish, but he definitely looks Jewish and he was raised by the Jewish side of his family.
Which brings me to this video which speaks volumes on the subject. It shows the amazing, flawless performance of the Hungarian team at the Eurovision 2005.
It is a great performance and also it elevates the spirit: not a whiff of anything Third World, it is pure white European.
Then,……. an Israeli flag is visible in the audience.
It turns out that Israel participates in the Eurovision contest, as if it was a European country. The Jews never sleep.
Here is the video for your enjoyment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q007mOCiNLo&feature=related
The Jew never sleeps because his group is comparably small to the other groups in the rest of the world (although who knows if all the census figures are accurate). The Jew is constantly fighting for its existence, and with its back to the wall, it acts in a way that gentiles have never understood. The more forward thinking of us see the writing on the wall, look down the road 50 years, and see a disappearing White race. That is why we march forward while the rest of our people hit the snooze button. It is our job to show the long term effects of Jewish enforced multiculturalism and regain what we have lost.
I believe we are starting to have Whites wake up, Whites who can’t sleep either. Dr. MacDonald and other activists for the White cause are showing they can be every bit as tenacious as the Jews. It’s only a matter of cracking into the mainstream, and it could happen. We must be relentless in our pursuit of our goals. We could take a page out of the Jewish playbook actually. We lost precious ground in the 90s, that’s when multiculturalism really took of. Unfortunately, we have to claw our way back to a place we were at 30 years ago, and that’s going to take time and momentum.
Lets not forget that the Jews have some scores to settle with Gaddafi. While he eventually became a lapdog to the West, he started off as a pro-Palestinian. While he never reached Saddam status in their eyes, he was still a target if the opportunity presented itself.
It really took Sarkozy to get perspective from another Jew in order to bomb Libya, after all, each Jew has to realize how it can benefit their people before any action is taken. Then again, Sarkozy, being the weasel that he is, also saw it as a chance to reinvigorate his flagging poll numbers.
I think they’re split of this.
One lot want Libya to re-start the neocon interventionist project that was stalled by Iraq. (The central bank motive may also be a factor, if true.)
The rest are worried that the Arab Spring might lead to greater Islamist influence in the region. Fox represents the second with their relentless muslim brotherhood angle.
Cameron is a neocon and apparently descended from a rabbi also but i think his involvement is mostly due to his alliance with Sarkozy. I think Sarkozy’s motivation is more to do with his current polling in France.
So, I think Libya is more about internal French politics than anything else combined with the Cameron-Sarkozy alliance in Europe and *some* elements of US neocons around Rice and Clinton who went along with Cameron-Sarkozy initially to restart interventionism. However the bulk of them are worried about Islamists and have been trying to put a stop to the whole thing.
The Jews will spend every last dime we have, if we let them.
The rest are worried that the Arab Spring might lead to greater Islamist influence in the region.
It’s not Islamist influence per se that bothers them; life in Iran ain’t so bad.
It’s the TIMING.
Living in a Muslim Europe won’t be so bad with Israel gone or normalized.
The Jewish Liberia is useful as a reinforcer of jewish identity, as a brake on assimilation.
Assimilation is not a problem for the Jews of Iran. Assimilation is only a problem for Jews in white countries.
Some people mistake anti-Zionist Jews for our friends.
The truth is anti-Zionist Jews just think our goose is already cooked.
Israelite tribe may be 3500-year-old but, according to Jewish historian Dr. Shlomo Sand – Jews were only invented a century ago. Since the tribe is based on race – it’s population stands at 14.7 million and keeps shrinking.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/04/12/jewish-population-is-shrinking/
Frank Edwin Stone is right about you Rehmat. Arabs and negroes are both suckers for the Jew brainwashing of egalitarianism. Non-Whites actually think that equality in biology or life is a reality. Let me ask you something, if no two people are equal, how can two races ever be equal? If everyone is unique and different, then how can two groups of people EVER have the exact same potentials?
If you take a Muslim Arab and raise him in the same environment as Bill Gates, will that Arab have the intelligence, charisma, and motivation as Bill Gates? Not a chance. Never in a million years. Not everyone on this planet can be Bill Gates or Steve Jobs.
The Jew is just a higher evolutionary form of a parasite. The lower evolutionary form parasite is the African or Arab. Arab Muslims are disgusting creatures; we are only using Palestine as a tool to beat the Jews. I don’t care one iota about any Arab Muslim.
“Give a hammer to a White man and he will build civilizations. Give the hammer to the yellows and they will build more hammers. Give the hammer to the browns (Arabs/Latinos) and they will beat their wives with it. Give the hammer the blacks and they will kill white people with it. Give the hammer to the Jews and they will give the hammer to the blacks.”
The US bombing of Libya proves Obama is little more than a figurehead. In his heart of hearts I doubt the messiah wanted to launch all those cruise missiles, but alas he knows who got him elected.
In April 2009, Michael D’Antuono was forced to cancel unvailing of his portrait, The Truth, depicting Obama appearing much like Jesus Christ on the Cross, at Union Square Park (N.Y.), marking Obama’s 100 days in the White House.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/obama-the-promised-messiah/
|
‘Sarkozy the American’ mulled troops for Iraq: WikiLeaks
“Sarkozy is instinctively pro-American and pro-Israel,” the embassy wrote, according to the memos, noting what they called Sarkozy’s “Jewish heritage” a reference to his French Catholic mother’s Greek Jewish father.
The US embassy was also delighted that Sarkozy chose to appoint Bernard Kouchner, a staunch Atlanticist despite his left-wing credentials, as “the first Jewish foreign minister of the Fifth Republic.”
This, the diplomats wrote, would help move France away from its traditional pro-Arab stance…
http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/sarkozy-the-american-mulled-troops-for-iraq-wikileaks-20101201-18ftc.html
|
|
David Cameron could be a direct descendant of Moses, a Jewish scholar has suggested.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6677414.ece
|
Australia’s transnational-progressive foreign minister Kevin Rudd also got some blame …
“ONE of Europe’s highest-ranking diplomats has credited Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd with helping change the international mood on Libya, leading to implementation of a no-fly zone.
While stopping short of saying Mr Rudd had any direct impact on the UN no-fly resolution, the European Union’s senior foreign policy adviser, Robert Cooper, said Mr Rudd’s activism on the issue had been noticed by the key international players. ”
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/eu-credits-rudd-for-no-fly-jolt/story-fn59niix-1226028350961
Rudd is a full-on open-borders ideologue. His every waking moment is consumed with getting the world to act in unison on everything. Global groupthink, always and everywhere, that’s his agenda. He dreams of smashing national boundaries and heralding a world government. His manic diplomacy is the stuff of legend (and ridicule) here in Australia. He is an open-borders fruitcake. A total (but persuasive) one-worldism loon.
Perhaps Kevin Rudd learned his lesson, better to have powerful friends onside. This article preceded his rolling:
http://muslimvillage.com/2010/06/23/why-kevin-rudd-had-to-win-back-the-jewish-lobby/
Lévy is so … paltry, sordid, abject. Armselig and erbärmlich in German.
Taki’s take on him is quite to the point:
http://takimag.com/article/more_pie_for_monsieur_levy
And do not forget that BHL is Algerian by birth, As he cannot bomb Algeria (not yet) for throwing out his family and frienda, he bombs Libya.
Note Peter Suyvesant’s blog on TOO about the complicity of Jews with French colonialism and compare it with Levy’s own impression of his Algerian childhood: “…the moral and spiritual tradition in which I grew up. For me, it’s the definition of Judaism. Being Jewish means having more obligations than rights.”
“Being Jewish means having more obligations than rights.” Just so, Dirk. Most burdensome of all being the obligation to feather one’s own nest and those of one’s Tribe whilst, like cowbirds, laying one’s eggs in the nests of others (the despised goyim) and compelling those others to finance one’s upbringing, lifestyle, and diversions.
It’s the proverbial dirty job that someone’s got to do. Who better than M. Lévy and his ilk?
Same game plan, new country.
“Stability is an unworthy American mission, and a misleading concept to boot. We do not want stability in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and even Saudi Arabia; we want things to change. The real issue is not whether, but how to destabilize.”
From:
http://www.amconmag.com/article/2003/mar/24/00007/
@Born Agin Redneck
When i say “The rest are worried that the Arab Spring might lead to greater Islamist influence in the region.” i meant the rest of the neocons (i.e the ones who obsess about Israel) are split. I take your point regarding the more general meaning of “the rest.”
The reason for the attack on Libya is not oil. Did we benefit from the oil in Iraq? Aren’t gas prices still going up? The real agenda is to bring millions of African blacks into Europe. Young men arriving by the thousands in the Mediterranean islands are being transported to the mainland of Italy. The men’s stated destinations are France and England but don’t be fooled. Their destination are white countries.
Here’s a quote from an article at Vdare by Brenda Walker.
“Today, thanks to the Libyan conflict and the coalition air strikes, the agreement has been abandoned. And Gaddafi is threatening to wreak havoc by opening the floodgates again. He has promised to turn Europe ‘black’ unless his regime is left to stand.
‘There are millions of Africans waiting to get into Europe,’ the dictator said recently. ‘We don’t know what the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans will be when faced with this influx of people. Tomorrow, Europe may no longer be European.’”
The whole thing is a shell game. All the players in this game, Sarkozy, Cameron, Obama, Gadaffi are anti-white. You can read the rest here.
http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2011/04/04/north-africans-flee-the-arab-spring/
Sarkozy consulting BHL on anything makes Ronald Reagan look good in consulting a Card reader. The Monde Diplomatique has a great collection of the aberrations of BHL, what a disastrous character. What is worrisome is that anybody anywhere could give him any credence.
I had always heard that one can never lose betting against the intelligence of the American public, but it’s oddly reassuring to learn that betting against French intelligence is as sure fire a strategy for winning as is betting against American.
Qaddafi is ‘threat to western civilization’, because he made his country among the few, which are not under World Bank, IMF debt.
However, the liberation of Libyan civilians by death could mean that Barack Obama is trying to prove to Zionist Christian Professor Paul Kengor – that Obama is still the “G-d”.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/04/06/obama-jewish-president-messiah-or-g-d/
Bernard Henri Levy is a disgrace to any thinking person. How can he call himself a philosopher when his single preoccupation is to promote zionism? Philosophy being the love of wisdom, BHL is the opposite of a philosopher.
He used to have good looks when younger and that helped him a lot to get media attention. He is invited in many TV debates and he’s very lightweight when it comes to formulating ideas. He’s just one more of those “Never-Again-6-Million-Died” wind-up windbags and now he’s older he’s looking more and more like
Simon Wiesenthal. But I can see he got himself a beautiful shiksa for a wife.
Whether or not he likes Sarkozy, they are both jews, so perhaps his call to the president is just a cover story. Personally I believe the Rothschilds got Sarko to invade Libya by threatening him and France with a HAARP-generated Japan-style earthquake and that would make a mess, what with our 58 nuclear plants. So there was a need for a cover story, and our philosopher was happy to oblige.
Oh and didn’t you know, who owns the nuclear power industry? The Rothschilds of course!
In his latest book “Simon Weisenthal: The Life and Legend”, Professor Tom Segev describes the ‘Father of Holocaust’ Simon Weisenthal (1908-2005) as a fame-seeking myth-maker and an Israeli Mossad agent.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/simon-weisenthal-myth-maker-and-mossad-agent/
|
French Fraud Behind Libya War Drive
Justin Raimondo on Bernard Henri-Lévy
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011/04/05/french-fraud-behind-libya-war-drive/
|
It is not a mistake to have strong opinions.
The mistake is in having nothing else.
ww
The President of Libya Jumhurriya, Muammar al-Qaddafi, recently sent a message to Barack Obama, calling him ‘son’(!!): “As you know too well democracy and building of civil society cannot be achieved by means of missiles and aircraft, or by backing armed member of Al-Qaeda in Benghazi”.
The Al-Qaeda Qaddafi is talking about was created by the French, the US, British and Israeli intelligence service in 2010. The reason, former Mossad mole, French President Sarkozy was first to bomb Libya in support of the anti-Qaddafi alliance, the ‘Popular Front for the Liberation of Libya’ – because the front had cut a deal with Paris to give 35% of Libyan oil reserves to French companies. See the letter on top left, sent to to the embassies of Qatar and UAE in France on April 3, 2011.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/failed-qaddafi-project-and-the-blowback/
The statement from the three ‘Stooges of Zionism’ – Obama, Sarkozy and Cameron makes clear the war on Libya is not about protecting civilians but bringing about a more subverted regime change. Having ignored peace moves from the African Union, NATO is now set on escalating the bombing.
Libya: ‘Liberation via depleted uranium weapons’
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/libya-liberation-via-depleted-uranium-weapons/