In addition to my duties as host of The Political Cesspool Radio Program, I serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the Council of Conservative Citizens and American Third Position.
That being said, I am pleased to announce that my friend, Dr. Virginia Abernethy, recently joined Bill Johnson, Dr. Kevin MacDonald, Dr. Tom Sunic, and me as a fellow member of the A3P Board.
Dr. Abernethy is an emeritus professor of psychiatry and anthropology at Vanderbilt Medical School. Her interdisciplinary post-graduate training in anthropology expanded into studies of human population and the interface of culture, population, and the environment. For 12 years, she was the editor of the ecology and social science journal, Population and Environment.
Abernethy is an expert regarding the “Demographic Transition” theory, the idea that fertility rates are automatically reduced with economic or social improvements. Dr. Abernethy is a member of the Board of Directors for Carrying Capacity Network.
Dr. Abernethy received her Ph.D. from Harvard University; M.B.A., Vanderbilt; and B.A. from Wellesley College.
Advertisement
Heidi Beirich, of the Southern Poverty Law Center, didn’t approve of Dr. Abernethy’s decision to team up with A3P.
Racist activist Jamie Kelso announced this past Friday that long-time professor Virginia Abernethy has joined the board of the white nationalist American Third Position (ATP) political party.
(Snip)
Abernethy, a self-described “white separatist” and emeritus professor of psychiatry and anthropology at Vanderbilt Medical School, has a long history of working with racist groups.
(Snip)
With the addition of Abernethy, the ATP board is now populated by the top tier of American white nationalists. The chairman of the group is corporate lawyer William D. Johnson, and board members include virulent anti-Semite Kevin MacDonald — an academic like Abernethy — and white nationalist radio host James Edwards.
(Snip)
Abernethy, who is also a leading nativist, has had some success in the past pushing her anti-immigrant agenda. In 2004, she was the chief spokeswoman of Protect Arizona Now, a campaign that backed a harsh anti-immigrant referendum known as Proposition 200 in that state. Though her racist background became public before the vote and helped spur the proposition’s denunciation by almost every Arizona newspaper editorial board, the referendum still passed with 56% of the vote.
Abernethy has some other interesting connections. She has held leadership positions in two organizations that claim to work toward a reduction in U.S. population as part of an effort to protect the environment. Though Carrying Capacity Network and Population-Environment Balance portray themselves as pro-environment, both are really greenwashers — groups that use environmentalism as a smokescreen to severely restrict immigration to the U.S.
Partly because of the addition of Abernethy to ATP’s board, the party has become the most serious white nationalist organization in the U.S. It is also growing quickly. In 2010, the party had 10 chapters in nine states.
I’m surprised that the SPLC could take a time-out from attacking the American Family Association long enough to write this article about American Third Position.
Despite all the propaganda and name calling coming from left-wing attack dogs, the mission statement of A3P is fairly simple and straight forward.
The U.S. political system works in favor of the two entrenched, nearly identical Democrat and Republican parties, and against all “third” parties; especially those parties that are pro-American and anti-globalist. Nonetheless, the American Third Position, a new political party, intends to fill a tremendous need in the United States today by providing the leadership and elected representatives necessary to return our nation to its rightful owners — by liberating it from the ‘banksters and gangsters’ who are ruthlessly plundering our American blood and treasure.
If you agree with that mission statement, then I encourage you to check out the American Third Position by clicking here.
Reposted from James Edwards’ site, The Political Cesspool.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
“The ATP board is now populated by the top tier of American white nationalists.”
Yes it is !
I see a talk of Mark Weber is on the A3P site. No offence but could someone at A3P explain what it is that Weber ‘brings to the table’.
Is he a direct mail expert like Morris Dees ?
“No offence but could someone at A3P explain what it is that Weber ‘brings to the table’.”
“Subculturalism”, I guess. But he’s not alone (Sunic, Kurtagic, among others, are in the same boat).
Anyone who has studied American political landscape from objective source – should know that no political and banking institution can function without the infiltration of pro-Israel Jews or their Goyin poodles.
American patriots don’t need a new A3P, but a Revolution like Iran to free their nation from the traitors within.
“We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world – no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small group of dominant people,” – President Woodrow Wilson.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/who-rules-the-west/
If I were Dr. Abernathy I wouldn’t fool around with the SPLC. If the SPLC gets too rough, I would file a police report with the local top police official saying that I feel that I am being threatened by the SPLC.
That way if there an attack on Dr. Abernathy’s life, or damage or destruction of her property the police will know where to look.
In Dr. Abernathy’s case, a letter to the local top cop, pointing out that she has taken a bod position with the A3P, and that she is concerned that her safety & property maybe put at risk because of the allegations, and political smears of the SPLC.
Tom, good advice. Since the SPLC has a record of harassment and vilification that goes up to, if not crosses, the line of incitement to violence, everyone should be keeping details of phone calls, personal confrontations, etc., to preserve a record for any necessary police investigations.
Congratulations to A3P for getting Dr. Virginia Abernethy. A very impressive group!
It’s nice to see an intelligent woman come on board for the good fight .
It’s such a refreshing change from the all too typical ” you go girl ! ” feminist male bashing that is counter productive to the pro white cause .
I think this answers the assertion of the so-called “Mens Rights Movement” that tends to attach itself to pro-White advocacy groups.
Fellas? See? White women are NOT all perfidious b****es like you thought.
Bell Curve reality dictates that, women being what we are, there just aren’t as many of us capable of effective White advocacy as there are men.
BUT, the *VERY MOMENT* one arose, she took to the task.
Thank you, Dr. Abernethy!
The GOOD FIGHT is exactly what it is. Now I just hope Dr. Abernethy can influence the next generation of women who have bore the brunt of tribe inculcation and see no value whatsoever in protecting their ethnicity. Yet seeing such an esteemed group on the A3p panel is exciting indeed. Someone has to stand up and say, ENOUGH!
The SPLC’s puzzling attack on the “American Family Association” makes sense in that it is entirely in keeping with Jewish ethnic objectives which is to reduce White fertillity. Within this jewish paradygme anything which encourages what might be native (and thus likely White births) is implicitity “racist” or rather “anti-semitic” in the sense that it is not philosemitic. I recently read an opinion piece in an Australian newspaper to the effect that contemporary 29 year old women “don’t feel any need to have children”. The article came across as proactively nihilist, somewhat dismissive of those that do have children and discouraging of young men and women having a look at their fertillity before it was too late in a sort of faux liberatarian style. Suspicious I googled a bit and found the author was consciously Jewish (a hip styled commediene). I quickly made comment in the newspaper that young people should think about this seriously because the the rapid decline in fertillity that occurs after 35 may lead to a painful loss in choice. The anger contained in the invective and rhetorical denounciations to this reasonable statement was telling and predictable:- I was accused of reducing women to ‘baby making machines’, of not caring about the 7 billion people on the planet etc. There is a very powerfull “culture jamming” going on the prevent Westerners dealing with their demographic issues.
I will be interesting to investigate Abernethy opinion on “Demographic Transition” theory. My analysis suggests that falling White birth rates are a response to increases in private housing and public infrastructure costs caused by immigraion driving up housing costs. (Up from 38 weeks of average male weekly earnings in 1960′s Sydney to 5 years today)
@ Bear, june 28,2011-9:04 pm.
This experience of yours is once again proof that the idea that the Jews are plotting our GENOCIDE is no paranoia at all.They try to promote it by all means:non-White immigration,miscegenation,transracial adoption, abortion, homosexuality,lesbianism,man-hating feminism,voluntary sterility to “save” the planet from overpopulation and harm to the environment and promiscuity with no intent for marriage.There seems to be stuff in food and medicines that is sterilizing and even makes boys less masculine.
With “racism” they simply mean the existence of Whites as such,with “anti-Semitism” they mean any action that makes Whites less vulnerable to their destructive plans.
There is no end to the diabolical wickedness of these people.
@Franklin Ryckaert, The ‘western world’ i.e. white people need pro-natal programs. We simply need to address our basic demographic problems not only from the point of view of racial decline but from the point of view of population aging. (this latter argument is usually used to encourage immigration which leads to a further decline in White birth rates)
A moratorium on immigration of itself would be pro-natal as it would cut down on job competition, competition of quality housing, the costs of ‘white flight’ to safer but more expensive suburbs and the burden of white to minority cross-subsidies to the unending streams of welfare dependent and subsidized minorities. Experience in Germany and Europe in the 70s suggests that simple pro-natal programs i.e. “baby bonus’s” and subsidies increase the birth rate of Muslim/Turkish immigrants disproportionately. What is needed is a way of rewarding working White women, assisting them back into the workforce several times with education, and rewarding them with a kind of ‘motherhood’ pension pro-rota with income earned so that parenthood doesn’t become dysgenic.
There is a strong deliberate corrosion of family culture, its been a long time that there has been a functional family on television (my Three Sons, the Waltons?) and as I noted any attempt to enhance respect for the institution is met with deconstructive howls of rage and claims of exclusion.
I do not think that homosexuality or feminism were movement invented to promote a decline of core values but these movements, which Whites would have had anyway due to naturally evolving tensions, were certainly turned into movements that have been coopted into becoming means of attack on the critical aspects of our culture needed for our race to reproduce. Without the influence of the Jewish feminists (gender ethno-marxists) liberal feminism might have turned into a constructive movement that brought men, women, employers together for the good of society. Sure, there would still have been anger and passion but I feel we must be careful to acknowledge that women do have issues that need action ; for only then can we avoid these issues being turned into schisms. We have to imagine what feminism would be like without the gender-marxist deconstructive attacks on the White male patriarchy that have been been used to alienate men and women from each other, turned men into perplexed eternal children and helped split our society politically.
The same really holds for homosexuality; Pim Furtyn rather helped the cause in Holland, a country which has now officially renounced multiculturalism and will no longer support it financially.
We should realize that protection and enrichment of the lives of women, their freedom, is something our hated White western culture is actually best at instead it is reviled. The truth will out and women are a natural on our side. To be fair so is the acceptance of homosexuality, again the ‘immigrant bashings’ of gays in Holland should let them know whose side they should be on.
Bear,
I very much appreciated reading your comments here. They are levelheaded and thoughtful.
I think that we, too often, see and deal with womens’ rights and homosexual rights as if those movements were monolithic things. At times, it is understandable that we do this. The excesses of “feminism” (the demonetization of European men, the family and male sexuality) and homosexual culture (“We’re here, we’re obnoxious, and, if our being in your face 24/7 makes you uncomfortable, that’s your problem!”) really are bizarre and destructive. However, I am thankful that I live in a culture were women are, more generally than in most other cultures, seen as equals, and where a reflexive bashing of all homosexuals is seen as unfair, unreasonable and thuggish.
Also, I am very much in agreement with you about the issue of our birthrates. Step one: stop immigration; step two: work on creating a social/economic order that is, at the very least, stable and, thus, family-friendly. Going on and on about the “evils” of family planning leads nowhere. After extensive reading and having conversations with white working class and middle class couples, I cannot help but conclude that one of the main reasons our birthrates are low has to do with the combination of economic instability and our stronger ability to foresee the consequences of our decisions. In other words, if hardworking white couples from such backgrounds struggle to keep up with their rent, and struggle to avoid going into deep credit card dept, their decision to wait to have children (or to have more than one or two) makes a lot of sense.
Anyway, thanks for your comments.
I wonder why we don’t copy the SPLC paradigm and use it against them? We could easily send out faculty-wide emails targeting anti-white instructors. That would be hilarious for Marxist Professors to receive the same treatment so easily afforded to our intellegentsia, namely Professor MacDonald. What they are doing is called “character assasination.” Yet, two can play that game, especially if framed the right way. As Saul Alinsky so fiendishly stated, you use the morals of the enemy against them. The morals of the SPLC are framed around anti-white sentiment.
-Suredly we can come up with a way to highlight their anti-white rhetoric and shame them the same way they attempted to shame us. But to run around in “fear” of them is ridiculous. They are the bullies, not us. The truth shall set us free as we own the moral highground.
“Partly because of the addition of Abernethy to ATP’s board, the party has become the most serious white nationalist organization in the U.S. It is also growing quickly. In 2010, the party had 10 chapters in nine states.”
Well said, Heidi–Congratulations all around!
Welcome, Dr. Abernethy, what a honor to have you on the board.
Hear, hear! Prof. Abernethy is a national treasure.
If the Zionist-washers at $PLC were really concerned about racism, they would target AIPAC.
Philip – ‘Racism’ at AIPAC only means criticism of Israel and Holocaust. If Zionist-washers at $PLC target one of over 50 pro-Israel lobby groups – would not they be deported to Iran?
Listen and learn the truth from the old lady who faced Zionist crowd for 50 years in the White House.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/helen-thomas-u-cant-criticize-israel-in-the-us/
Congratulations with the joining of your ranks by such an accomplished woman! It is now virtually impossible for the Jews to depict White advocacy as a movement of uneducated loutish men a la skinheads or KKK as they like to do.In their world view,in which only Jews are intelligent and “goyim” stupid and easily to be manipulated,it must be utterly disquieting to see their opponents being led by people who not only are intelligent and well educated but also fully aware of the JQ.Full speed forward!
The SPLC is a textbook example of institutionalism. Protecting minorities from physical violence or true discrimination is no longer necessary, but they must justify their existence somehow (not to mention their $100 million + discretionary fund.) Portraying university professors and assorted talk show hosts as the next Adolf Hitler(s) seems to be their strategy.
The SPLC exists only to perpetuate itself.
@ Jim, june 29,2011-11:30 am
SPLC and institutionalism.
“institutionalism” may be part of the explanation,it presupposes however that they ever were sincere in their fight for oppressed minorities.For what I have understood of Jewish behaviour,it is part of their strategy to use minorities as a battering ram to destroy society.Since that aim has not yet been completely achieved,they keep on inventing newer and newer dangers to minorities,even if they seem ridiculously bogus.
@ Bear, june 29,2011-9:25 am.
There is – or should be – a form of constructive feminism (as contrasted with its destructive Marxist variety) that takes into account a womans desire for education and economic independence without harming her nature-given function of motherhood, which is for all normal women their real desire.
I cannot imagine a way to promote a higher White birthrate BY THE STATE without at the same time promoting same for racial minorities,unless the state becomes openly (and legislatively) “racist”.Even in hyper-ethnocentric Israel the state does not dare to withhold child support from its fertile Arab minority.The only solution is to found a PRIVATE ORGANIZATION that propagates higher birth rates for White couples and – if need be – finantially supports them. Such an organization could be supported by donations.Better this than giving money to Africa. The state cannot forbid that.
Yes, my country has officially renounced finantial support for multiculturalism.
It is a clear signal that ethnic minorities are not that welcome anymore. But still, that is a far cry from the real solution to the problem,which is repatriation.
I experience the sense of “race replacement” daily when I walk on the street.
A moratorium on immigration is only temporary relief. Only a total stop of non-White immigration and a policy of state-organized repatriation will do. This idea of course is at present taboo.But taboos do not last forever,there will come a “the emperor is naked” moment.At least officials now recognize that “multiculturalism has failed” (Cameron, Sarkozy, Merkel). Next step is to recognize that there is a solution to this failure : repatriation. Repatriation could be combined with development-aid to the countries of return inorder to make it acceptable to their governements.
I think most Whites secretly want this, but are too afraid to openly say so.If prominents start talking about it and political parties make it part of their programs, the masses will follow.
Certainly a private pro-natal, pro-white (not overtly so) organisation if succesfully created can do several things to increase the White birth rate. It can counter the anti-natal but pro-immigration perspective supported by business and jewish ethnic interest groups. It can also counter some of the nihilism and alienation that White people specifically feel from the idea of bringing forth the next generation, the idea that children are horrible sprats that can’t be controlled and the humans (White humans) are horrible. I think the negative image of Whites created by hollywood is a big part of the problem, it creates a nihilism: the lack of positivity and confidence, of dreams of a future. From a survey conducted in Australia it was noted that young girls if asked how many children they often answer 3-4, they only give up on that number as they get older. Men who claim not to be interested in children often become profoundly loving of them once they’ve had one. The natural emotions are suppresed by various means. I think it will be possible to appeal to young White men and women to treat each other with kindness as far as relationships go so as not to waste each others time. Again appealing to some kind of punishing god I feel will not work simplu appeals to decency.
It can do all of this from a non religious perspective: religion doesn’t appeal to a big portion of the White population and it helps not to be preaching and judging in order to access openess. I think it shouldn’t be overtly White nationlist but it should let White folks become aware of their deomographic peril. It has to use sophisticated dissemination technques “stealth marketing” to get to the target.
It might also provide help with work/family balance and exploiting existing govenment schemes to the max.
Financial support for White couples is another matter that I think will be possible. I certainly think we do need to build up a White welfare organisation to create a sense of community and to defend our interests. A hell of a lot of money is taxed from Whites and spent on certain minorities and the buerocracy necessary to support them.
As far as state organised repartiation goes: that can easily be done on a voluntary basis: the BNP propose to subsidise airfares and relocation expensese of those wishing to unimmigrate. Certainly some will enthusiastically take up the offer if they think they have made a mistake.
No welfare state, regardless of colour. It weakens and corrupts all who receive it, and empowers only the “giver” (really the transferor).
**Richtig**, Franklin! Bring back the **Lebensborn** program, among other “Great Ideas of the Third Reich”.
Are you 1m 90, blond and blue-eyed???
Oh, yes, Franklin, lots of good ideas. Most of them didn’t survive the encounter with Jesse Owens. [Not that Owens was treated badly in Berlin. The German athletes were better sports than **Reichsfuehrer** Himmler.]
Barb
“I think this answers the assertion of the so-called “Mens Rights Movement” that tends to attach itself to pro-White advocacy groups.
Fellas? See? White women are NOT all perfidious b****es like you thought.”
Of course not all white women are perfidious b****es, just most of them. Look at this post someone wrote on altright that explains our situation very well.
“*This* is the fundamental problem. Not Jews, not Democrats, but the biological struggle between the forces of feminism and masculinism.
The explanation for female behavior is well established and grounded in solid evolutionary biology:
Maximization of Cost (F)
Increasing the costs, particularly of sex, to the greatest possible extent.
The female instinct is to create an adverse environment for males so that only the fittest prevail. The female may consciously or subconsciously want a mate, and try to some extent to win one, but she simply cannot help but make the task of the male as hard as possible, and will instinctively use any and every means at her disposal to do so. Females, even more than males, are prisoners of their instincts. An exception to this rule may be made however. Because ‘the gene is selfish’ i.e. it seeks to reinforce itself, these obstacles will also instinctively be removed in the case of a male who expresses female characteristics. – Simon Sheppard, The Evolutionary Origin of Some Female Characteristics http://www.heretical.com/sexsc…
Alternative strategies exist which achieve practically the same thing. The lioness requires
her mate to copulate many times in a day before she ovulates, and by this means she demands fitness in the male, since the diseased or infirm male cannot maintain the necessary stamina. This is in contrast to the domestic cat, which ovulates automatically on copulation.
By making the task of the male as difficult as she possibly can, increasing his load by any means available to her, the human female enhances the fitness of the male. Since by the equal transmission of characters the female shortly acquires his abilities, continuous resourcefulness is required by him, accelerating the evolutionary process and enhancing the fitness of the species as a whole. The dynamic of the Laws, combined with the equal transmission of characters, probably accounts for humans’ rapid evolution.
The equal transmission of characters involves the male, in the long term, effectively
competing with a copy of himself. This is a subtle form of the celebrated Tit For Tat strategy (TFT) which has been the object of computer models and is a very common and robust strategy in nature. -Simon Sheppard, The Female as Enemy http://www.heretical.com/shepp…
See also, “Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males” pts. I-III:
http://www.heretical.com/shepp…
http://www.heretical.com/shepp…
http://www.heretical.com/shepp…
The explanation for contemporary male behavior, on the other hand, is a total mystery. We could enslave all wimmin beginning tomorrow and lasting into perpetuity, yet we don’t. What the hell is the matter with us?”
“The explanation for female behavior is well established and grounded in solid evolutionary biology:”
No. You’re leaving out an important modifier. *White* women (not Africans and not Near East women) went through the Ice Age. The Ice Age selected AGAINST perfidy and “The female instinct to create an adverse environment for males so that only the fittest prevail.”
The Ice Age selected for monogamy, as Dr. MacDonald has described. An Ice Age woman absolutely required a hunter bonded to her and her only, in order that her children would survive. Since the ratio of men to women is 50-50, certainly a woman in the Ice Age would strive for the best mate she could get, but she couldn’t AFFORD to be impossible to please, or she herself, and most certainly her children WOULD NOT SURVIVE.
So, no, White Women are not nearly so psychologically prone to seeking out the Big Man as an African woman, who evolved in an environment where she could, absent a man, support herself.
Jason says
Of course not all white women are perfidious b****es, just most of them.
You realize when you write something like that, most people stop reading? That statement is obviously false.
“*This* is the fundamental problem. Not Jews, not Democrats, but the biological struggle between the forces of feminism and masculinism.
The way you’ve framed it is incorrect. Sure, there is a struggle and competition of sorts between individual men and women, and males have to compete for females, and females, due to biology, are choosy. But quite obviously, males and females also cooperate a great deal in order continue their bloodlines. Cooperation is as important as competition.
The gist of your post is that we should quit worrying about the Left and Jewish influence. I leave it to the readers to guess the obvious motivation of the poster.
@Barb, I am uncomfortable with some of descriptions of female behaviour in sociobiological terms such that they appear scheming and manipulative. Men also compete to attract females and can also be made to appear scheming and manipulative: they puff up their masculinity, social status and connections or unintentionally misrepresent the strength of their attachments. Some end up impregnating multiple women and provide no support!
A lot of White female mating behaviour is surely directed at ensuring a reliable male to female attachment forms (again “attachment theory” a branch of pschology Proff McDonald alludes to in culture of critique). Man or woman, we must all play the game and when analysed at a sociobiological level it is the same as we see in an elephant seal colony.
I guess that if Abernethy is from Harvard, she must rejoice at seeing the White Middle class slipping into the underclass, then she will argue that Whites have an opportunity to repopulate, since they are now poorer and less educated, they will have lots of time to make babies; and confirm her theory…thank god for Harvard, I mean where would we be without those Harvard pedophiles!
[ The explanation for contemporary male behavior, on the other hand, is a total mystery. We could enslave all wimmin beginning tomorrow and lasting into perpetuity, yet we don’t. What the hell is the matter with us?” ]
Because the wimmins forbid us to do so ?
I can’t say the thought has not crossed my mind . lol
I have , on several occasions , debated with feminists and asked them since they felt there was a ‘ battle of the sexes ‘ then why did men not fight ?
Because if men did seriously fight then surely women must know that it would not be much of a battle .
The reason men would not enslave women is because that would defeat the purpose of the big game . The big game being natural selection .
The Battle of the Sexes is a cultural fad.
Most White women are *not* feminists. Most women like men and want to pair-bond with one.
But, culture DOES have an impact on people, at least for a while. So many women, particularly young ones who are foolish because they are young, not because they are women, try on feminism / “sexual liberation” in their exploratory youth. They then come to regret, with mental maturity in their late 20s/ early 30s, their poor choices at 20.
But culture cannot overrule nature forever. That’s the reason fads come — and go. Feminism shall go, too.
“The reason men would not enslave women is because that would defeat the purpose of the big game . The big game being natural selection .”
Right. If men enslave women who hate men and force them to breed, then the man-hating will be passed down. Better to let the man-haters rage for just a while until the maladaptation dies out because the man-haters failed to have children.
Just a few words on what SPLC’s Heidi Beirich probably means by “greenwashers.”
Let’s say you show that you care about the environment by always having a nicely fanned-out glossy display of environmental magazines on your big expensive coffee table, and you also stick a pretty environmental decal smack on your car bumper for all to see, and even go so far as to a fight a planned development for years that victoriously results in a 10,000-unit subdivision being reduced to 9,700, with maybe “setbacks” for homes planned too near to a beach bluff and a couple of protected squirrel trails, or such like. All that is well and good in Heidi World.
But should it ever cross your mind that the United States policies of continuing to welcome in hundreds of millions of immigrants and illegals, and offspring, will eventually result in the paving over of countless square miles of woodlands, pushing countless species to the brink, increasing pollution that will undo the gains of such things as the clean air and water acts of the 1970s, expensive shortages of this, that and other resource, and will eventually turn your own quiet leafy green neighborhood, noted for its whispering hypnotic Rainbirds swishing back and forth over freshly cut grass, amidst the fluttering of tiger swallowtails and your innocent children safely playing, all to be someday transformed into something between today’s downtown Detroit and your average smoking stinking over-the-horizon Third World shanytown, and so you decide to form a group of like-minded citizens to try to politely influence the political process–well Sir, well ma’am, you have now revealed yourself as not really caring one flying fig about the environment.
You are motivated by hate! And all of your alleged efforts to save what is left of the environment and a traditional quality of life that people of European heritage once routinely and proudly took for granted as ‘the American way’ are now unmasked as what they are: the diabolical actions of racist “greenwashers”!
- – - -
Border Enforcement + Immigration Moratorium = Job, Crime and Eco Sanity.
I like the way your mind works, tma_sierrahills.
Bear,
Thank you. Yes, I agree.
It seems to me, much of the bile spewed by MRM members is in reaction to feminist denial of the realities of the Bell Curve.
In IQ, men and women have similar averages, but the distribution in men is wider. Which means, there are more male geniuses — AND more male embeciles to burden the rest of us.
Which also means, most women are just average. Most women have the same ability to think as most (slightly fewer in number, but nevertheless, most) men can. To repeat, average.
The Bell Curve applies in other areas, too, including qualities of leadership and willingness to face social approbrium for speaking the truth.
Again, here, too, most women are just average. Some men are average, and demonstrate leadership abilities and social courage levels that are similar to most women. The outliers when they occur are generally men.
Because the Bell Curve is real, a woman like Virginia Abernethy, who falls far to the right in qualities of leadership and social courage, will come into being more rarely than a Dr. MacDonald / James Edwards / Bill Johnson.
Feminists deny all this and screech that the lower avg. achievement of women is due to oppression by meany men. This fact is false on its face, and MRMs are right to refute it, just as loudly as the feminists assert it.
HOWEVER, MRMs are ALSO guilty of forgetting the Bell Curve. Because (often Jewish) feminists call attention to themselves, and average people are easily overlooked, MRMs are guilty of overgeneralizing the perfidy of (often Jewish) feminists to all (or most) White women. Truth is, feminist feelings of man-hate are to the far side of the Bell Curve. Most White women like and love White men and want to pair-bond with one.
So, for a woman of Virginia Abernethy’s stature, a White woman who’s far, far to the right of MOST MEN in willingness to lead and face social approbrium for telling the truth, to join us WNs and take up the task of White Advocacy from virtually the very first moment she was in a position to do so, PROVES that feminist, anti-White-male, screeching perfidy is NOT the default position of White women. (If the MRMs were right in their assumptions of White women, the wait for a Dr. Abernethy would have been long, indeed!)
Thank you again, Dr. Abernethy!
“The Jewish controlled western feminism has destroyed the old-fashioned western family structure. They’re after Muslim family structure in the name of women liberation. In Muslim society, mother plays the central role in raising the family,” Henry Makow PhD, a Canadian Jewish academic and blogger.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/03/20/the-gender-jihad/
Barb , if there were more like you then much would be solved almost instantly !
By the way , it is feminists who really are enslaved by their erroneous ideology , and yes they will be bred out as that is a simple cause and effect thing .
We desperately need these highly intelligent people that are willing to risk everything to support Whites, people like Dr. Virginia Abernethy, Bill Johnson, Dr. Kevin MacDonald, and Dr. Tom Sunic. It’s what has been missing from White Advocacy.
Why do we need intelligent people so much? I saw a recap of Glenn Beck’s sign off episode tonight – he literally ended up praising MLK and condemning Andrew Jackson as an “Indian killer”. He also put down Manifest Destiny.
The low IQ route won’t work. I’m not saying Beck was honest – I have no idea – but he followed the path of the low IQ person who never bothers to educate himself. He starts off making a few implicitly pro-White statements and quickly gets cowed into MLK worship and trips to Israel. Tragic.
The whole lot at Fox News should be tarred and feathered. They know who runs this country and the damage wrought by them. Yet, they take their fattened checks and keep their mouths shut like the goyim puppets they are. If Beck was at all sincere in his polemics, he should have known that the tribe would never back a white goyim over one of their own. And he should have really known that if the tribe wanted to espouse patriotric rhetoric that would invigorate the white majority, they would have done it a long time ago.
Moreover, look how Fox News highlighted the Weiner scandal while subconciously indicting white non-Jews caught in similar acts. In order to pass judgement on Weiner, Fox first had to remind its audience of every non-Jew sex scandal in American politics for the last 10 years. This was done, ostensibly, to thwart any conclusions by the audience which would place the tribe in a bad light.
as just one factor …
IMO , if the culture were taken back and so that having family was not portrayed as backwards and negative , rather that family was shown in a positive light , then there would be a white baby boom .
Getting back to the appointment of octogenarian Abernethy…
In 1964 Mario Savio of UC Berkely said: “Never trust anyone over thirty”.
In 2011 Kevin MacDonald of Cal State Long Beach says “Never trust anyone under seventy”.
Is this progress?