| An recent interview with Russian nationalist leader Alexander Belov.
Parliamentary elections in Russia took place on December 4 under a great of scrutiny from external observers and nationalist dissidents inside Russia. Nationalists face an increasing crackdown by the Putin regime which has recently banned a number of nationalist protest groups despite a huge turnout for the recent annual Russian March which attracted thousands of Russian nationalists and patriots from various groups.
The election results indicate that Putin’s United Russia party has lost support (losing 77 seats) but they still have an absolute majority of seats in the Russian Duma. The full result is as follows: United Russia: 238 seats; Communist; 92 seats: Just Russia (Social Democrats); 64 seats: Liberal Democrats (nationalist) 56 seats.
Below is an exclusive interview with one of Russia’s most prominent Nationalist activists, Alexander Belov. The interview is conducted by Preston Wiginton, a former participant in the Russian March who lives in the United States.
Hello Alexander,
Congratulations on a successful Russian March.
I would like to ask you some questions concerning the Russian March and the current condition of Russia.
1. According to the media, there were about 5,000 people on the March. What was the real turnout?
The media quoted different figures. From 5,000 to 20,000 people. Major media outlets have referred to a representative of the Ministry of Interior who claimed 7000 attended the march. I believe that the actual number of participants was more than fifteen thousand people
2. After the events at the Manege Square in Moscow last year, which resulted in clashes between nationalists and the police over illegal immigration, and due to the upcoming presidential elections and elections to the Duma, was there more value in the Russian March this year?
Events at the Manege Square have become iconic for Russian nationalists and influenced the attitude of many open-minded citizens. The absence of fair elections is also a factor for active citizenship.
Advertisement

3. I’ve heard that some persons running for the Duma were using the slogans of the Russian March. Can you comment?
Nationalism is now the most popular ideology. Of course, it is obvous that political parties are trying to respond adequately to the mood of the masses. Beside me on the march were registered candidates for deputies to the Duma from the Liberal Democratic Party, the Just Russia party and Just Cause.
4. According to you, will Russian nationalism have an impact on the upcoming elections?
The vote? Unconditionally. However, the results do not reflect the growth in support. The fact that all the results are well known beforehand. Elections in Russia do not differ much from elections in North Korea.
5. November 4th is supposed to be a day of Russian unity and freedom remembering previous invaders throughout the history of Russia. For example, the expulsion of the Polish-Lithuanian troops from the Moscow Kremlin, the Russian-Polish war of 1605-1608, etc. Now the nationalists are calling for the expulsion of the new invaders. Who is the invader and occupier of today in Russia?
Today, the main occupant is the criminal and cosmopolitan regime that has seized power in Russia via Putin and his friends. The regime has pursued a policy to reduce the indigenous population and replacing it with easy to control elements of the mass immigration from Third World countries.
6. Has the demographic situation changed after the first Russian March in 2005?
In some regions, there have been some minor improvements. However, the general trend of decreasing ethnic Russian population remains.
7. Does Russia have the same problem with the spread of Islam in the West?
Yes, this is a problem. Unlike in the West, there is the presence in the Russian Federation of areas where Islam is the traditional religion. But today, new forms of aggressive Islam are actively infiltrating traditional Russian territories (the Northern Caucasus, the Volga region, etc), and recruiting new adherents themselves out of millions of migrant workers arriving in the central regions of Russia from Central Asia and Transcaucasia. Many of the Muslims who moved to these regions of historic residence of the Russian people are not assimilated and they are trying to impose their own rules. This irritates the local people and backfires on the authorities who allow this to happen.
8. What problems are these new immigrant invaders bringing to Russia?
First, violent crime. The most violent crimes are committed by immigrants. Up to 70% of rapes and 50% of violent crime in Moscow. Because of this, Moscow is the first in Europe by number of murders per year. Their crimes are brutal and senseless. For example, recently an immigrant from Uzbekistan killed a young mother and her one-year-old child in the park by smashing his head on a tree.
Second, immigrants create economic problems. In Russia, there is a high unemployment rate. Their places are occupied by immigrants ready to work for less money. Most of them work for cash, do not pay taxes, but enjoy the social welfare of the state. The economy is not growing, because instead of investment in the improvement of production and purchase of equipment businessmen prefer to use slave labour. In construction there is a joke: “40 Tajiks do the work of one tower crane …”
9. Do they cause unemployment or underemployment? And at what rate?
The average Russian citizen can not provide for themselves and their families for 100-200 dollars a month. And immigrants from Central Asia can since $100 would be enough to maintain a large family in Tajikistan or Uzbekistan
Today in Russia exists the largest number of working-age people since 1917. At the same time, unemployment reaches 10-12 million people. And illegal immigrants are now 10-15 million people in Russia.
10. Is there a conflict of language? In the U.S. there are signs in Spanish and in English. Sometimes when you go to the store owners can only speak only in Spanish. Is there something similar in Russia? Can you trust those who do not speak in Russian when they talk to you?
There is no major linguistic conflict – yet. But the trends are becoming obvious. For example, in Tatarstan, where the proportion of ethnic Russians is more than 50%, the number of schools teaching the Russian language is decreasing. In that region there are numerous protests against coercion of students to study the Tatar language.
In the large cities, in some schools, students and teachers of Russian teach illiterate children of immigrants. The teachers have to give them more time to explain the basic things. As a result, the level of education for everyone decreases.
11. Has crime increased with the arrival of immigrants to Russia? Could you give some examples?
Today, Moscow has the highest number of murders in Europe. Over 60% of violent crimes committed in Moscow are by immigrants. More than 70% of rapes are committed in Moscow are by immigrants. Growth in the number of immigrants have a negative effect on the crime situation.
12. Do immigrants exploit the Russian system?
Immigrants enjoy social benefits and guarantees, but they do not pay taxes.
13.Do the immigrants at least have some respect for the Russian?
There a small number of immigrants who are trying to behave decently. But as the number of immigrants increases, local residents feel intimdated. They face constant harassment, humiliation of human dignity and violence. This immigrant aggression particularly affects women and children. Many of the Russians are forced to sell their home and move into other areas where there are less immigrants.
14. It is often said that immigrants perform work that Russians do not want to do. Is this true? If not, is there a Russian who could work the same way?
Immigrants are tightly integrated into the corruption schemes. For example, janitors in Moscow officially get paid about $ 600 a month. They are mostly natives of Central Asia. But if a citizen of Russia attempts to get a job in the corporation employing street sweepers, they are refused. Since many immigrants give more than half of their salary to the the mafia and corrupt officials, they live in conditions unfit for human rights. The average salary in some central regions of Russia (Kursk, Vladimir, Tver) does not exceed $200 per month. Ethnic clans seized the whole sector of the economy – market trade, transport and construction. In these areas, it is mostly immigrant labour. Attempts by local residents to do legitimate business in these areas can be dangerous for obvious reasons.
15. What do Russians think about the seizure of their lands by hostile immigrants? How do ordinary Russians feel living next to non-Russians?
In the various regions of Russia the displacement of native Russian by the process of immigration has different specific causes. In Siberia and the Far East, the land is bought by the Chinese, who are using mainly economic methods to displace the ethnic Russinas. In southern Russia, North Caucasus Russians are displaced through threats, violence, corrupt government officials. Particular tension is created in the North Caucasus by ethnic clans who have seized all the profitable economic concerns and corrupted the idea of public service.
16. Does the high birth rate among immigrants threaten the ethnic integrity of Russia?
Population pressure is felt today because of increasing immigration. In Russia, there is a negative trend in fertility among Russian and other Christian nations. The average Russian family have no more than two children, while Muslims have four or more children in each family.
17. I often hear that in Russia, there are more than 160 ethnic groups. Most of them are small tribes that make up a very small percentage of the population of Russia. How do they react to Russian nationalism?
Most of the indigenous peoples of Russia support the Russian nationalists. They understand the danger to themselves and the threat of uncontrolled immigration and corruption to their future in Russia.
18. Are there any places in Russia where one can go to be free from immigrants?
In regions that are largely free of immigrants this is due to the poor economic situation. Immigrants tend to go where the most money is to be made.
19. Do many Russians support your views? How many in the polls? And how many on the streets?
Today, the majority of Russians adhere to one degree or another of nationalistic views. More than 50% of Russian citizens support the slogan “Russia for the Russian.” Every year the number of people willing to express their political stance on the streets increases. Today, there are more people participating in nationalist campaigns and more people have left the party that is currently in power.
20. Is there any collaboration with other parties in Russia on these issues? Liberal Democratic Party? Yabloko ? Communist Party? Just Russia? Or the National Bolsheviks? Please comment on each.
We are open to cooperation with all forward-looking groups. We are already working with several parties on specific issues. For example, with the Liberal Democratic Party we have created the Russian Committee, which is developing proposals for legislative and legal support for Russians. In some regions the Communist Party openly cooperated with the nationalists and gave us a place in the regional lists. The National Bolsheviks often take part in street rallies in conjunction with the nationalists.
21. What role does Dmitry Rogozin, a former leader of the Motherland Party play in Russian nationalism today?
I hope you watched the movie “Braveheart” with Mel Gibson. Dmitry Rogozin has the leading role as the ‘Scottish King’ in Russian nationalism.
22. What solutions do you and your nationalist organizations offer in order to save Russia? For example, how do you think you will solve the problem of very low birth rate in Russia? What ways could lead to Russian prosperity? What can be done to preserve the authentic cultural, ethnic and racial heritage of your people?
The state should stop the policy of promoting abortion. The Russian Federation has the largest number of abortions in Europe. Up to 2 million a year. The nationalists are promoting and defending traditional values. Promoting healthy lifestyles. Public condemnation of same-sex unions and other cultural distortions. We lead the fight against alcoholism and drug addiction. Last year illegal drugs in the Russian Federation killed about 40 thousand people.
The power to change the situation in Russia will have to be led by the people or the Russians will be swept away. Any new government and new Russian state will be focused on supporting the native Russian people, while maintaining ethnic diversity in Russia. Please note that maintaining “ethnic diversity” in Russia means maintaining those that are an integral part of the Russian Federation and who support the Russian people. It does not mean increasing ethnic diversity in Russia by more Third World and Mulsim immigration.
23. Does Putin or Medvedev understand the importance of race and do they believe that Russia is impossible without the Russians?
No.
24. Why does the current government allow immigration of non-whites while the ordinary people in Russia speak out against it?
The authorities in Russia are corrupt and incompetent. On many issues they are guided by outdated notions. For example, they still believe that attracting a large number of unprofessional, uneducated immigrants will have a positive impact on the economy.
They also think that by attracting immigrants from Central Asia and the Caucasus this will help the process of integration. Also, the thinking in the Kremlin is that Russia will have influence in these regions as a result of more immigration to native Russian lands.
There is also a more radical view. Some nationalists say that immigrants are needed in order to dilute the native population and undermine its special rights to the land. And, thus, more immigration will simplify the process of exploitation of the population and natural resources.
25. Are Putin and Medvedev just cracking down against nationalist groups politically or are they trying to drive them underground?
The state in the Russian Federation has launched a full-scale repressive machine. At the moment, we have recorded more than 1,200 persons convicted for their political beliefs. Activists of nationalist organisations are dismissed, expelled from universities and there are implications for their families as well. Databases of “unreliable citizens” (usually nationalist) have been made of more than twenty thousand people throughout Russia. Precinct police officers have been instructed to watch for these people. they keep track of their contacts, political activities and movement.
26. Do you collaborate with other nationalist organizations in other countries or are you planning to cooperate in the future?
Yes, we are in contact with several European nationalist organisations. Currently, the most active contacts occur through Berlin and Paris. However, we aim to deepen and expand cooperation with all the savvy nationalists and patriots from other countries.
27. What, in your opinion, is the future of Russian nationalism?
Russia has no other future! Only nationalism!!!!
Thank you very much for your answers, Alexander! I have enjoyed my part in previous Russian Marches. Also, I like to receive information from a direct source. The media often lie when it comes to nationalism. I hope this interview will be posted on many nationalist websites in order to enable people to find out what is really happening in Russia.
During the elections of the Russian Duma, Alexander Belov was kidnapped by police on December 3rd, while the elections were held on December 4th, 2011. He was released on December 5th unharmed.
Preston Wiginton is an independent activist who has been to Russia many times. He participated in the Russian March in 2007 and 2009 as a speaker. He spoke mainly on how the abuse of Civil Rights and the rise of multi-culturalism and mass immigration has created conflict and destruction in America and has been a great burden to the American taxpayer.
|
“23. Does Putin or Medvedev understand the importance of race and do they believe that Russia is impossible without the Russians?
No.”
This seems to conflict greatly with a number of widely reported Russian government programs which were initiated by Putin to encourage and even provide financial incentives for White Russian couples to have more children.
Something just doesn’t jive here. I am keenly aware of how deeply the jews hate Putin and I am aware that they are pulling out all stops to prevent him from returning to the office of President. Thus, disinfo is likely to play a role in some of their chicanery.
Buyer beware.
Luke.
Excellent comment for a fuzzy piece. It seems an easy guess on whose payroll the two great democrates really are.
@Luke:
Putin has gone on the record as saying that the idea of Russia for Russians is “stupid.” However, I don’t think Putin is openly hostile to his people the way West European and American leaders are. Putin is, above all, a pragmatist; his first task is to ensure his own power. If that means bowing to nationalists, he’ll do it. If that means bowing to internationalists, he’ll do it.
I pray that God blesses and guides Russia, its leaders and its citizens; the same goes for White people all around the world.
I truly believe that White people will never die; we will be alive billions of years from now, and forever.
Great comments Luke; as with any information today, it must always be viewed through the lens of it’s source, and “qui bono”. Poor Mother Russia, she has been through so much! Initially I was extremely excited when Putin threw the oligarchs (most of whom were Jewish) out of Russia and confiscated some of their enormous, ill-gotten wealth; I thought Putin might be Hitler reincarnated!:) But then there were the photos of Putin with the Jewish Rabbis much like the other Wewstern powers leader’s…hard to tell if he is nationalistic or just playing both sides against the middle; remember, he is A former KGB officer:)
Putin, in 2006: “I instruct the Russian government immediately to make decisions to regulate trade at wholesale and retail markets and control the presence of foreign workers there, to increase the accountability of market administrations for violations of migration regulations both by market officials and by traders, and to toughen visa regulations for foreigners violating Russian laws,” Putin said.
Putin said crime was rife at Russia’s markets and cited recent clashes between ethnic Russians and foreign traders.
He said authorities should take measures to “protect the interests of Russian producers” and “the native population of Russia.”
Putin’s orders came as Russian authorities announced a tightening of immigration controls against Georgians amid a major crisis in relations with Tbilisi over spying allegations.
So who are you going to believe? Really Dr. Mac, it’s a stretch to compare Russian immigration woes with ours, it is, after all, a traditionally multi-ethnic nation… and don’t forget, Putin put the “C” back in Russia, I mean Christianity; not the inhuman, small letter “c” communism.
The so-called “Russian Nationalism” is no different than the Jewish-funded “nationalisms” all around Europe. These Zionist evildoers are affraid the westerners are awakening and have started criticizing Israel and Zionism.
In 2009, five of the seven multi-billionaire Russians were Jewish. When Putin cracked on them, they took refuge in Israel, UK and the US. One of them, the Jewish media tycon and politician, Boris Abramovich Berezovsky, is leading the anti-Putin campaign with the help of CIA and Mossad.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/05/jewish-dissidents-want-regime-change-in-moscow/
2,000,000 Russian abortions per year says a lot. Says much about all European countries as well. Is it that people have no choice or too many choices? I don’t think the asiatics have more resources than Whites yet they freely reproduce. If White people can’t return to something resembling traditional values all will be lost. I think only very strong nationalist feelings and actions will work now. These Russians may be at the breaking point soon. They are the proverbial canary in the coal mine for the rest of us.
As the infamous leader of the judeo-bolshevik coup d’état Lenin taught: The best way to control the opposition is to lead it.
Mr. ‘Belov’ was born to a Judaic couple of Leo Katz and Mary Cohen. ‘Belov’ also used to go by the name of Potkin which was that of his stepfather.
Another amusing nugget for your consumption: any comment regarding Judaic activities (read: criminality) posted on the fora of ‘Belov’s’ Movement Against Illegal Immigration would be swiftly deleted with the offending poster banished to the dark hole of Bansville.
In 2008 a split occurred between a Slavic upper echelon of the movement and the crypto-kosher leadership after the latter expressed enthusiasm toward György Schwartz-financed orange ‘revolutions’.
Even more prominent among the self-styled Russian ‘nationalists’ is the leader of Liberal-Democratic Party named Vladimir Zhirinovsky. Born and raised Valdemar Edelstein in what was then Soviet Kazakhstan. Side note: the grave of his father Wolf is situated in Israel.
The past 20 years of Zhirinovsky’s “unbridled advocacy” for the ostensible benefit of ethnic Russians have so far resulted in millions of them dying off through alcohol abuse; counterfeit liquor poising; suicide; stress; hear attack and so forth.
All the while real-estate holdings of the Zhirinovsky clan have been expanding to absurd levels.
The Russian people have suffered greatly in the past 100 years. Nationalism is their right. I have met many Russian people, and they are in general, decent folks with a slight ly cynical disposition.
@Rehmat: Rehmat, thanks for that information. You seem to be a very intelligent person. I can even understand some of your objections you have written on this forum. That is, I understand why you feel like you do. All I can say is, that most of the Americans that write here, already feel betrayed, and rightly so, so you might take that into account when you get some of the strong reactions of many Americans here.
I have found myself in the rather strange position of aligning myself quite strongly with the Nationalist movement in the United States, yet in Russia, where I live, I have ended up more or less on the opposite side. As a non-Russian citizen, I of course do not directly involve myself in politics, but in terms of general outlook, I have gravitated more and more towards what is generally conceived of as the Russian liberal class. This is also augmented by my wife’s involvement with this group. And recent events have driven us both further in that direction.
This past Saturday, my wife participated in the largest protest in Russia since 1991. Estimates vary, but it is widely believed that 70-80 thousand people showed up at Andrei Sakharov square to voice their opposition to the ruling regime. While the crowd represented a number of different interests, the underlying driving force is the newly emergent, urbanized, liberal class, accompanied by a fair sprinkling of older, dissident-minded (in the Soviet sense) academics, scientists and other representatives of the intelligentsia. But mostly it was our generation – those under ‘30.’
My wife said that it was clear that the crowd represented the best of Russia – the most thoughtful, courageous, best-educated cross-section of society. She also noted how polite and open everyone was, a stark contrast from ‘normal’ Russian life. For the reasons mentioned above, I have mostly been a spectator to these developments, but it’s been exciting to see the sprouting of a civil society in Russia with enough force to make the behemoth Russian state take notice.
Conspicuously missing from the intelligentsia and this assembling of the ‘best of Russia’ were the self-defined nationalists. In fact, at least one nationalist organization had its own ideas on Saturday: they had apparently planned a provocation-type event whereby they were planning to seize the stage being used by the various speakers and launch their own program. This never materialized for reasons of which I am not entirely sure. I heard that many of them were denied entry by the police, an intervention that had been requested by the official opposition leadership. I am not exactly sure how this played out but almost everyone in my circle of acquaintance agrees that the nationalists were a potentially disruptive force to the protest. (It can be fairly objected that there were in fact reasonable nationalist representatives at the protest but they have made very little contribution in terms of organization, participation or intellectually to this nascent movement).
Ultimately, I find myself saying many of the same things about the Russian nationalists that are said rather slanderously and falsely about the White Nationalists in the States: the Russian version is sorely lacking in intellectual weight, relying on virulent and incendiary leaders whose slogan-based messages appeal more to teenagers and militaristic provincials. I find little reason to support them and much reason to fear that they would prove to be utterly incompetent and possibly brutal leaders if given the chance.
On the flip side, I don’t find the cultivation of a racialist perspective to be a critical project in Russia for the simple reason that it already exists. Even most of the liberals hold views that would elicit strong censure from the American ruling class. The emergent figure in the opposition movement is a lawyer/blogger/activist named Aleksey Navalniy, a fellow who while clearly aligned with the liberals (and ran for office once representing Yabloko), holds views on immigration which in Europe or the US would have him harnessed with the “Far Right” label and alternatively ignored and disparaged in the media. Here, however, no such thing occurs. His rise has been unhindered, and perhaps bolstered by his view on immigration. If anything, he has the chance to create a decent coalition which may well include the more thoughtful of the nationalists.
On a side-note, observing the American political scene from afar (though 5,000 miles is hardly far enough) and in contrast to the scene in Moscow, I am struck by how far it’s deteriorated into platitudes, and ever more extreme expressions of devotion to the Party. Hearing the Republican candidates outdo each other with promises to Israel, the Pentagon and ‘projecting American strength’ reminds me of the sycophantic Commissars of Stalin. One says, “Comrade Stalin, let’s shoot 1,000 enemies of the people”, where as the next, saddles up to the vozhd and says “Josef Vissarionovich, let’s shoot 3,000 and imprison their families.” And the latter takes the day while the former is suspected of treason.
@fender:
The recent altright article Dark Hero speculated that Putin in fact might just be another De Gaulle.
Off topic, but my rule for watching a relevant video on youtube is that if it makes me cry…it’s good.
http://www.youtube.com/user/childrenofelohim777
Something I’m noticing more and more is that the most moving and couragious moments are coming from women
@Mickey Meadows:
I cried too over the poor spelling and lack of historical insight.
@steve:
Communication is about the transmission of one person’s ideas/feelings/throughts to another person. In that purpose, things like spelling and grammar are only significant to the extent the second person has not understood.
There are other reasons why spelling and grammar may be important, to do with courtesy and giving a good impression. However, in a situation such as this we find ourselves on this website, it has to be recognized that people will be coming from all kinds of social background and personal history, including levels of intelligence and levels of education.
Indeed, because european-descendent peoples are facing a genocide, it is almost certain that – eventually – people will be coming from every conceivable walk of life. Old/young, educated/uneducated, law-enforcers/criminals, straight/gay/transexual, wealthy/poor, good/evil, pagan/christian, etc, etc, etc.
Every part of our body has a stake in a genocide. All will come as and when they wake up.The problem for those of us already awake is how to make it so that they don’t come when it’s too late.
@steve:
Communication is about the transmission of one person’s ideas/feelings/throughts to another person. In that purpose, things like spelling and grammar are only significant to the extent the second person has not understood.
There are other reasons why spelling and grammar may be important, to do with courtesy and giving a good impression. However, in a situation such as this we find ourselves on this website, it has to be recognized that people will be coming from all kinds of social background and personal history, including levels of intelligence and levels of education.
Indeed, because european-descendent peoples are facing a genocide, it is almost certain that – eventually – people will be coming from every conceivable walk of life. Old/young, educated/uneducated, law-enforcers/criminals, straight/gay/transexual, wealthy/poor, good/evil, pagan/christian, etc, etc, etc.
Every part of our body has a stake in a genocide. All will come as and when they wake up.The problem for those of us already awake is how to make it so that they don’t come when it’s too late.
The video I linked to, was good because it tugs at an emotional level. It helps that little bit. I can imagine someone who is not too far from awake but still asleep, being finally tipped over by a video like that. I doubt they’d care much eitehr way about the spelling or whether the author has a degree in history.
This will be hard for Western nationalists who think that Putin is saving the White race. On the short run, truth hurts ; on the long run, it heals. Let’s hope that all the deluded Putinophiles will see that Putin is just yet another traitor, no more.
@Sandman:
According to Prolife.org – Abortion world-wide kills more people every two months than the Nazis killed Gypsies, Christians and Jews (Holocaust) in 12 years (approximately 42 million abortions occur every year world-wide).
The 2007 PEW Religious Landscape Survey showed that a full 84% of US Jews support legalized abortion in all or most cases. According to 2000 National Jewish Population Survey, some 10,000 Jewish women undergo abortion per year. Many of Jewish lobbying groups such as ADL, AJC, RACRJ, CJW, JAC, ISA, etc. are pro-abortionists. In 2009, some of them campaigned against the Stupak Amendment which called for the elimination of insurance coverage for abortion.
Abortion like Holocaust industry is a big business. Abortion is several billion dollars annual industry in America. Both have powerful lobbying groups which make millions of dollars in political contributions to pro-abortion and pro-Israel candidates running for election.
American Catholic blogger, Joanna Francis in an article entitled ‘Jew murder Christian Babies at Sea’, wrote: “Jews have been the driving force behind legalizing abortion in Christian countries, such as the United States, France, England, Canada, et al. But in some Western nations, the people still have a modicum of common sense, and refuse to allow Jews to get rich performing their favorite pastime: Jewish ritual killing of Christian babies“.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/11/13/adl-abortion-is-not-holocaust/
Any nationalist movement that loses sight of the Jewish Problem becomes merely a blinded and castrated Gladiator, deluded by false whispers promising freedom, fighting and bleeding to little avail, for the amusement of the hidden Emperor (i.e. International Jewry).
Organized Jewry is an international problem and can only be defeated through a sustained, international effort. Only coordination between nationalist representatives from all of the nations, has a chance of removing the Jewish boot from the neck of Humanity.
Race realism is necessary and must not be suppressed, but crude expressions of racial supremacy (or calls for a “race war”) scare people, and so they turn to organized Jewry for protection, strengthening its claim on moral authority.
A universal nationalism based on the rights of each nation to self-definition, self-preservation, and self-determination can have wide appeal. That’s why David Duke has been vilified and persecuted–his ideas truly threaten organized Jewry.
Organized Jewry has spent billions of dollars to make certain ideas and persons Taboo. The winning counter-strategy is an appeal to Truth (as a recent article on this blog has reminded us), Justice, and Tradition. White nationalists (and non-White nationalists) have Truth, Justice, and Tradition on their side. The Enemy has built a fortress of lies and hypocrisy. They have no respect for Truth, Justice, and Tradition–and so they underestimate their power.
Gandhi inspired tens of millions of people to confront a hostile alien elite by appealing to Satyagraha (“the path of Truth”) and Swadeshi (“self-sufficiency”). White Nationalism has just as much moral legitimacy, and can invoke the same moral principles, as these celebrated anti-colonial movements. Whites objecting to mass immigration and domination by hostile alien elites need not fight alone–if they appeal to universal principles. Think of the international sympathy for Tibetans in their struggle against occupation, cultural annihilation, and slow genocide by relocated Han Chinese.
I urge you to read David Duke’s latest posting here, in which he argues against Jewish supremacist notions and for universal nationalistic self-determination:
@Rehmat, Agreed. The Jewish feminist,male or female, has always supported abortion. That includes media and advertising workers. Because they want to attack/destroy the most vulnerable member of the White family; the unborn child. I’d say just about all Jews are in favor of eliminating us any way they can. I’ve personally known many Jews and that feeling always hangs in the air. And I’ve never met any who opposed abortion. Not one.
@Dr. Faust:
“Gandhi inspired tens of millions of people to confront a hostile alien elite by appealing to Satyagraha (“the path of Truth”) and Swadeshi (“self-sufficiency”). ”
Ghandi’s enemies were the English. The English are what we might call a civilized people. Things like civil disobedience and pleas for the truth worked against the English because they were (are) a reasonable people.
The tribe, however, is a vicious band of middle eastern fanatics that has 3,000 years’ worth of banditry, warfare, and every kind of extremism (religious, political, social) imaginable behind them.
They can never be reasoned with. You can’t simply ask a people like that to stop oppressing and genociding you. They can’t stop and they can’t control themselves. The same goes for all peoples with deep roots in aggressive tribalism.
@Hooper:
I suspect sentiments such as this are widespread and contribute to Putin’s and Medvedev’s increasing distrust and opposition to the Russian Nationalists. A recent articles from Reuters, which was elaborated on in a Forbes article Putin, Russian Nationalism, and the Future of the Opposition described and obviously defended Medvedev’s current position.
Anyone interested in Russian nationalism should see the movies “Brat” and Brat II” (the sequel). Here’s the first one on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy55jULdGZ8
In the second one, he resxues a Russian prostitute from a black pimp in Chicago, and there’s a great scene that is clearly influenced by first person shooter video games.
@Luke
@Sandman
@Jarvis Dingle-Daden
@Hooper
The four telling comments linked above, each from a valuable albeit different perspective, ought to be prompting and guiding the discussion on this thread quite as much as the interview itself. The fact that so far they have been largely ignored should be a cause of at least embarrassment, if not shame, yet little evidence of either emotion can be detected in other comments.
The fact that Putin has been a devil figure for the entirety of the Tribal media here in the States needs to be examined and explained in light of Belov’s claims, and the revelations JD-D has made concerning Belov’s history and affiliations and perhaps his true loyalties ought to be coloring the matter further still. As I type, nothing of the sort has happened hereabouts.
Would to heaven that someone with an informed grasp of the big picture might step forward to place all these jigsawed bits into their proper places! In the meantime, as one of doubtless many ignorant of what is really going on in Russia, I heartily thank the four gentlemen for the precious information and perspective they provide.
The picture Messrs. Wiginton and Belov offer is a flat Modernist canvas filled with primary colors and straight lines. The real world, however, even as regards Russia, needs to be seen in three dimensions.
Billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov enters the fray:
http://rt.com/politics/prokhorov-presidential-program-election-977/
Of course his aims are to liberalize Russia and make it more business-friendly….in other words sell Russia to his tribal friends in Brooklyn, London, and Tel Aviv and bring in a few million Somalis for fun.
HYPERLINK