We’re Rich; We’re Jewish; We Have Big Houses

Last year, in keeping with his writing on Jews and money, John Graham wrote a blog called “We’re Rich; We’re Jewish: We Rule.” His point was that Jews have lots of money and use it to advance their interests, in this case promoting gay marriage in New York from a Republican base.  He noted that “the NYT avoids the most significant aspect to this story, but the Capital J blog at the JTA.org website is made of sterner stuff:

The New York Times runs a piece today on how the big money behind the push for sanctioning gay marriage in New York State is coming from Republicans.

The figures named are also Jewish….But I mean every name. Here’s what a quick Google search came up with:

–Paul Singer: on the boards of Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs and Commentary

–Daniel Loeb: Appeared at events for YIVO and the Jewish Enrichment Center.

–Clifford Asness: Likened Obama’s proposed tax policies to pogroms. (Yes, philanthropy would be nicer than name calling, but this is still a form of identification.)

–Steven A. Cohen: this excellent Tablet piece by Allison Hoffman exposes a rabbi who tried to use Cohen’s Jewishness in a scheme to extort money from him, but otherwise notes that Cohen’s philanthropy does not have much of a Jewish slant…

And then there’s former Republican National Committee chairman, Ken Mehlman, who’s organizing the whole GOP push, and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who also backs the initiative (but is no longer a Republican.) Jewish, Republican, pro-gay rights by Ron Kampeas – May 14, 2011

“But I mean every name.” That’s exactly the sentiment I am feeling now as I read just the beginning of a YAHOO! FINANCE article titled “Living Very Large.” It is about Americans who are building massive houses despite the pronounced trend among average Americans to scale back on size.

Just in order of what I’ve read so far we find:

— Hyatt hotel heir Anthony Pritzker has a new 49,300-square-foot mansion. Wiki says that “The Pritzker family is one of America’s wealthiest families, and has been near the top of Forbes magazine’s “America’s Richest Families” list since the magazine began in 1982.”

— Hedge-fund manager Cliff Asness [mentioned above] is building a 25,900-square-foot, Colonial-style home with an indoor swimming pool and tennis court in Greenwich, Conn.

— Nearby, a 31,500-square-foot mansion is being built for Lee Weinstein, founder of data-center concern Xand, with 15 bathrooms (plus additional powder rooms), a 2,500-square-foot master suite and a basement with a theater, wine cellar, juice bar, dance studio and sauna.

— Twenty miles away, in Westport, Conn., Melissa and Doug Bernstein are creating a compound of more than 30,000 square feet with a stand-alone ice-cream parlor, plans show. The main house alone is 29,500 square feet and includes a gym partially covered by glass; there’s also a guest cottage, pool cabana and rec-room-and-garage building. The property also has a pool, tennis court and playground.

Advertisement

Only with number five on the list, Jim Ellis, “who co-founded a cellphone insurance provider,” do we find someone who might not be Jewish.  Sixth, however, is back to Jewish, as software mogul Larry Ellison (listed as America’s third richest man) is working on a 18,000-square-foot-plus compound.

Following Ellis is someone I can’t find much information about, Gene Pretti, who heads an investment-management firm.

The few remaining homeowners named include two non-Jews: New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady lives in a Los Angeles home that is an 18,300-square-foot limestone structure reached via bridge over a pond that separates it from the driveway. Another, whose “home” comes in at a whopping 70,000 square feet, is Prince Abdulaziz ibn Abdullah ibn Abdulaziz Al Saud, son of the king of Saudi Arabia.

So why did WSJ reporter Juliet Chung choose these particular individuals? Is this somehow representative of the American super rich? Or does it speak to conspicuous consumption, especially among Jews?

I’ve written about Jews who are famous for lavish displays of personal wealth: for throwing extravagant bar mitzvahsbirthday parties, weddings, and just regular parties. A prominent example is the story about the owner of a Long Island firm that specializes in making bulletproof vests for the U.S. military, vests which many critics claim are defective. CEO David Brooks has been in deep trouble, as ABC reports:

A class action lawsuit, which was recently settled for some $35 million, charged Brooks and his top executives with issuing misleading financial statements and then selling over 10 million of their own shares in the company and receiving over $200 million in illegal profits. . . . Following that stock sale, Brooks again raised eyebrows when he threw his daughter a lavish bat mitzvah, which reportedly cost $10 million. The party featured performances by Aerosmith and rapper 50 Cent and took place at the New York’s famed Rainbow Room.

To be sure, this situation is nowhere near as unjust as that recounted in Deuteronomy 6:10-11, where God brings ancient Jews “into the land that He swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give you — with great and good cities that you did not build, and houses full of all good things that you did not fill, and cisterns that you did not dig, and vineyards and olive trees that you did not plant . . .”

I guess what I take away from this Yahoo article is the fact that Jews are simply hugely prominent in our culture, yet so many non-Jews still fail to make note of it, let alone what it might mean.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

57 Comments to "We’re Rich; We’re Jewish; We Have Big Houses"

  1. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    February 11, 2012 - 12:19 pm | Permalink

    I was thinking the same thing when I read the article. So many jews on the list, and so many rich from managing other people’s money. Hence the reason I invest my own funds in my own businesses.

  2. Winston's Gravatar Winston
    February 11, 2012 - 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Envy can be a very negative emotion, Mr. Connelly.

  3. SG's Gravatar SG
    February 11, 2012 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    The Pritzkers were seminal donors to Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign; in fact, they have been one of his biggest sponsors for years.

  4. tadzio's Gravatar tadzio
    February 11, 2012 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    Not being a Biblical scholar I am curious as to whether Deuteronomy or any other Book or the Talmud sings out: and which others will defend for you. Vast American resources are used to defend racist Israel and Jews are the only significant demographic that is greatly underrepresented in the US military.

    Jews are not of us by choice. They hate us. They have persecuted us at every opportunity for over 2,000 years, cumulating in the greatest ethnic massacre in Europe’s history, the Holodomor. Up to 8,000,000 million Ukrainian Christians were starved to death by the overwhelmingly Jewish communist system of the USSR.

    The method was most cruel. Watching your children starve as one starves would make any man yearn for a gas chamber and a capsule of Zyklon B. What a blessed mercy that would have been. But it was beyond the compassion of Lazar Kagonovich and his Jewish cohorts.

    No Holodomor, no Holocaust.

  5. de Maistre's Gravatar de Maistre
    February 11, 2012 - 3:20 pm | Permalink

    It is just unbelievable how silly people can be.

    But a good way of starting the discussion is to ask the following questions:

    Does there exist powerful people?
    Do powerful people exercise power?

    If they answer yes to these elementary questions, you can proceed with more details.

  6. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    February 11, 2012 - 3:33 pm | Permalink

    @Winston:

    Envy can be a very negative emotion, Mr. Connelly.

    Hi Winston

    I think it is possible that Mr. Connelly is not envious. He’s merely pointing out the extreme amount of money and power of a particular group of people.

    It’s like if I write a story about murderers, that does not necessarily mean that I myself want to be a murderer.

  7. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    February 11, 2012 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

    The part of Conn. mentioned was once among the loveliest in America. Beautiful, old houses and stone walsl, many dating back to colonial times, built by American craftsmen over the centuries, became tear-downs or garden sheds, or merely overshadowed by ugly monstrosities.

    No sense of place, history or beauty remains.

  8. KingTut's Gravatar KingTut
    February 11, 2012 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Jews are certainly very talented for business, like their Assyrian and Sumerian neighbors were, but whether they are more intelligent, overall, than Whites remain to be seen. Today, because of dysgenism among Whites, maybe; but it was certainly not the case 50 short years ago. Their astonishing economic success has more to do with (1) their historic control of banking and compound interest lending and (2) the emotional and anachronic emphasis Whites have always put on bravery and “muscle” rather than on money and influence.

    What clearly brought the downfall of white civilization was… banks. With counterfeit money (whether it is by fractional banking or brute clipping/ printing), it is very easy to write down cheques at will and buy, say, prominent newspapers when their goyim owners die. Once you control the medias, you control what people buy and which politicians they vote in office. Eustace Mullins, Charles Lindbergh and Henry Ford had understood this at the time, and the latter concluded that it was impossible, because of this fact, for Goyim businessmen and millionnaires to try to beat Jews on their own field.

    The USSR was notably funded by American East-Coast bankers (probably using counterfeit capital in United States dollars via the Federal Reserve, created 4 years ago), before the golem turned back on their creators in the form of the very anti-Semitic Stalin.

  9. KingTut's Gravatar KingTut
    February 11, 2012 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    on his* creators.

  10. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    February 11, 2012 - 5:04 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller

    :”No sense of place history or beauty remains.”

    It’s true Alice–with regard to most Amerians. When asked about it, many Americans will excuse their ignorance and lack of respect for their history and culture by saying something inane like, ” we aren’t like Europe, or anywhere else, we are a dynamic country and have no use for honoring old relics or places in the U.S., because we are progressive and forward looking. It’s amazing. Europe, for example, takes the trouble to perserve their historical places thousands of years old, and we Americans who should be greatfull for seeing things two-hundred years old, would rather marvel at a new “strip mall”, or shopping center. Talk about a misplaced sense of values.

  11. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    February 11, 2012 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

    Ellison was aadopted?
    Was he raised Jewish?

    Theres a story in a mag about how someone laughed at his ordinary house so he spent 60? million on a Japanese Samurai
    estate!

  12. anarchyst's Gravatar anarchyst
    February 11, 2012 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Read the talmud to see what jews think of us “goyim”. When I was quite young, I befriended kids who (I thought) were like me. We got along well, invited each other to our respective houses, shared many interests and, in general enjoyed each other’s company. In EVERY case, where my friend’s household was jewish, I WAS NOT WELCOME when they found out that I was not jewish. The questioning often began innocently enough, as to “what synagogue does your family belong to?”. When I replied that I was not jewish, the reaction was invariably the same. I was “disinvited” in EVERY case. Now, I KNOW that all jews are not like that but . . .

  13. anarchyst's Gravatar anarchyst
    February 11, 2012 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    Read the talmud to see what jews think of us “goyim”. Jewish insularity serves them well. It is a shame that this same “insularity” is not permitted for us gentiles. The so-called “civil rights” (for some) movement was heavily supported by jews, so far as to be part of the “freedom riders” movement that invaded the south during those turbulent times. It seems that those (jewish) northerners that went south to cause trouble had money; apparently they did not have (or need) jobs. It is easy to see how the average southern citizen felt when outsiders came in to destroy the “natural order” of civil society. It seems that the jewish mantra “multiculturalism and diversity for thee, but not for me” is alive and well. Us gentiles are expected to embrace multiculturalism and diversity while at the same time, turn a blind eye to the admirable traits of insularity and single-mindedness of preserving one’s culture and rejection of multiculturalism and diversity by our jewish friends.

  14. Edmund Connelly's Gravatar Edmund Connelly
    February 11, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    @Winston:
    As I wrote this, I wondered if some would see it as envy on my part. It can be seen that way, true. But I honestly don’t feel envy in this case. I’d be happier in a home of 2,000 square meters if other external factors were met.

    I think my main point was in my conclusion: Jews today are literally everywhere. Why is this? Is it good? Bad? Neutral? Not long ago all four major sports league commissioners were Jewish? Coincidence? Let’s look into it. Three of nine Supreme Court justices are Jewish. Why? What might it mean? And on and on.

    Such questions intrigued me beginning back in the early 1980s, yet even today so many otherwise intelligent people do not or WILL NOT see it. And without seeing it, of course they can never be brought to the point of DOING something.

    Most of you readers are no doubt Jew wise. So how many times have you opened a magazine or watched a show or read a list of, say, owners of retirement homes, and most or even ALL of the names were Jewish? After studying this phenemon for decades, I can say that it is not in my interest to live in such an environment.

  15. Edmund Connelly's Gravatar Edmund Connelly
    February 11, 2012 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    @90404:
    I confess I used Wiki to establish Ellison’s Jewish identity. It’s quite interesting. For instance, Ellison’s adoptive father, “adopted the name Ellison to honor his point of entry into the USA, Ellis Island.” How touching. Or maybe it was a clever use of crypsis. In any case, I’ve always seen Ellison identified as Jewish and would expect him to contradict it if he didn’t agree.

    Here’s what Wiki says:

    Larry Ellison was born in the Bronx, New York City to Florence Spellman, an unwed 19-year-old. Ellison’s biological father was an Italian-American U.S. Air Force pilot, who was stationed abroad before Spellman realized that she had become pregnant by him. After Larry Ellison contracted pneumonia at the age of nine months, his mother determined that she was unable to care for him adequately, and arranged for him to be adopted by her aunt and uncle in Chicago. Lillian Spellman Ellison and Louis Ellison adopted him when he was nine months old. Lillian was the second wife of Louis Ellison, an immigrant who had arrived in the United States in 1905 from Russia. Larry Ellison did not meet his biological mother again until he was 48. . . .

    He was raised in a Reform Jewish family. Ellison grew up in a two-bedroom apartment in Chicago’s South Shore middle-class Jewish neighborhood. Ellison remembers his adoptive mother as warm and loving, in contrast to his austere, unsupportive, and often distant adoptive father, who adopted the name Ellison to honor his point of entry into the USA, Ellis Island. Louis, his adoptive father, was a modest government employee who had made a small fortune in Chicago real estate, only to lose it during the Great Depression.

  16. February 11, 2012 - 6:31 pm | Permalink

    How do we counter this wealth and power?

  17. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 11, 2012 - 7:18 pm | Permalink

    If the Jewish community spent all its money on big homes that would be a improvement. Unfortunately, they also spend a ton on political and social activism. And of course, that is part of the reason they got those big homes!

  18. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    February 11, 2012 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

    You wrote;To be sure, this situation is nowhere near as unjust as that recounted in Deuteronomy 6:10-11, where God brings ancient Jews “into the land that He swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give you — with great and good cities that you did not build, and houses full of all good things that you did not fill, and cisterns that you did not dig, and vineyards and olive trees that you did not plant . . .”

    And don’t forget v12 which tells how these same people were brought out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage And yet we read in John 8:33 that they are indeed Abraham’s seed ,i> and were never in bondage to any man.

    Otherwise another great article from Edmund but may I suggest that we are giving the Jews an identity that they didn’t earn – shades of the claims of the above article?

  19. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 11, 2012 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

    Slightly OT– We’re Anonymous:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrJ551FFWp0

    Personally I think it’s nonsense. Anonymous is most likely the CIA. But if it’s genuine then maybe it means people are finally waking up to the Israeli problem.

  20. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    February 11, 2012 - 8:31 pm | Permalink

    @anarchyst:
    But the ones who are not like that never quite forget the honor they are doing you by accepting you.

  21. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    February 11, 2012 - 8:44 pm | Permalink

    @fender:
    Either way – someone will see it. Every little bit helps.

  22. blue rose's Gravatar blue rose
    February 11, 2012 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Anonymous took down cia.gov

    http://rt.com/usa/news/anonymous-hacked-cia-hackers-049/

    Anonymous is an interesting phenomenon, especially with the use of the ‘V for Vendetta’ masks. I don’t think they are going away any time soon either. Is it a CIA-backed phenomenon? I read from the Sorcha Faal articles I receive (obviously everyone knows his/her articles should be taken with a grain of salt, though overall useful information is always given), that according to SF there is a war for control going on within the CIA itself. One is the Obama faction, and the other is countering to gain back control of the USA. If that is true, could well be somewhere CIA within Anonymous working for the good.

  23. blue rose's Gravatar blue rose
    February 11, 2012 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

    Well…it’s certainly clear there is a great gulf existing between the rich and the rest of us. “Americans are now buying larger homes”. What they are buying are fortresses for themselves. Not only the Jews, but CEOs, capitalists, politicians, Hollywood celebrities, and hip hop artists.

    I’d love to see the insides of those mansions of the new aristocracies. Here is something I found to be mind-boggling, but will be only for the rich: yacht island concepts. “At Yacht Island Design we like to do things differently”. See their design concepts. I wonder if any of these designs have already been purchased:

    Concepts:
    Streets of Monacco
    Tropical Island Paradise
    Project Utopia
    Oriental Chuan
    Eastern Promise

    http://www.yachtislanddesign.com/

  24. Solly's Gravatar Solly
    February 12, 2012 - 9:34 am | Permalink

    Do you suppose this psychological need to buy homes 90% of which you can’t actually inhabit derives from a profound inferiority complex? Seems to me that that is the way it works with ostentation.

  25. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    February 12, 2012 - 10:06 am | Permalink

    And speaking of yachts, the vaguely cruise ship-like shape and style of that mansion in the photo is a brilliant example of low brow wealth. Rodney Dangerfield lives!

    It’s no accident that the world’s notion of “the ugly American” roughly coincided with the rise of jewish wealth in the US.

  26. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    February 12, 2012 - 11:11 am | Permalink

    @Edmund Connelly: I think it bears noting that White genes are regressive. Anytime a White reproduces with a non-white, and I include jews in that category, the non-white genes will almost always overwhelm and dominate (destroy) the fragile White genes.

    I’m sure that most of the TOO community have noticed how virulently, almost maniacally anti-White creatures like Tim Wise and Jon Stewart are – and these are but two examples out of many others, of white genes mixed with jew DNA. I suspect that this boiling hot caldron of raw hatred for the white genes inside their bodies is a demonstration of just how toxic and domineering their jewish genes are and this causes these types of mutants to be at war with themselves.
    Which puts them at war with the entire White European people.

    Tip: Avoid miscegenation as though it were a plague, because it actually is a plague.

  27. Hedgerow's Gravatar Hedgerow
    February 12, 2012 - 1:26 pm | Permalink

    With New England Puritan ancestry on my father’s side and Scotch Presbyterian on my mother’s, I was conditioned to see ostentatious displays of wealth as being vulgar.

    As we gazed at a fat, elderly, Jewish woman dripping with jewelry, I once reflexively commented about her gaudy appearance to a Jewish girl next to me. She did not say anything, just grinned.

  28. Winston's Gravatar Winston
    February 12, 2012 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

    “White genes are regressive”

    What proof do you have of this absurd assertion?

    The posters on this site seem to get scarier and crazier by the day.

  29. Winston's Gravatar Winston
    February 12, 2012 - 2:02 pm | Permalink

    So your “main point was in my conclusion: Jews today are literally everywhere.”

    I eagerly anticipate your future writing on Jewish garbage men, janitors, orderlies, medal of honor winners, NBA players….and hog farmers.

    Your point was hardly that Jews are everywhere. Your point was that these Jews are super rich and have mansions and “we” aren’t and don’t, and this is somehow not right or fair.

  30. Jed's Gravatar Jed
    February 12, 2012 - 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Winston, are you being obtuse on purpose? “Us” not having big mansions is most certainly not the point, nor is the idea of a Jewish janitor, and you know it. Stop playing at semantics.

    Here, I will spell it out for you.

    We have a major financial crisis in the US. A lot of Americans lose their homes. But Jewish wealth increases, Jews make money on bailouts, Jews build insane mansions while lecturing us on “social justice” and the need for us to give our wealth to blacks so they can kill and rape us with less difficulty.

    The US army is de-facto Israeli and fights people in the Middle East that have less than nothing to do with the US. And while we do this, Jews are vastly under-represented in our armed forces, i.e., those who fight and die.

    The lawmaking bodies in this country are Jewish far out of proportion to their size in the population. The supreme court, which basically runs the country, is staffed by 2 full blooded jews and at least 1 crypto-Jew. Out of 7 members. One of the Jews recently said the US Constitution is an unsuitable source for making a constitution.

    Jews have been behind every social movement in this country’s history, that has had a Leftward (read: hateful and destructive) slant.

    Despite the fact that White Christian Americans slew their own kin for Jews, and treated Jews better than any people in history, even better than the Persians of the time of Ezra, the Jews hate us with an unending, Satanic hatred.

    May God send us a deliverer to extricate us from the hand of the Jewish pharaohs who enslave us.

  31. February 12, 2012 - 7:10 pm | Permalink

    This certainly explains why a Judaic murdered Huey Long. A wealth cap? Oy vey I smell anti-semitism!

  32. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 12, 2012 - 8:04 pm | Permalink

    @blue rose: Every instinct tells me Anonymous and V and all those groups oppose White groups with a passion, so keep an eye out for them. Even if they oppose “Zionism”, it is likely from a Left wing perspective that still hates Whites as much as Zionists.

  33. tadzio's Gravatar tadzio
    February 12, 2012 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Re: King Tut – “the very anti-Semitic Stalin.”

    Rubbish. His wives were Jewish as was his long term mistress, Lazar Kagonovich’s sister. At least two of his three children married Jews without his disapproval. There were Jews and non-Jews with Jewish spouses on the Politburo up until his death. Jews never relinquished their dominance of the KGB. They squeezed out everyone else from the universities.

    Yes, Stalin killed many Jews after power struggles but as the communist party was heavily Jewish, who else was there to lose?

    Stalin’s anti-Semitism was concocted by the ADA in the late 40s to distance American Jews from the correct perception that they were heavily anti-American and pro-communist. It is a fraud.

  34. Dr. Faust's Gravatar Dr. Faust
    February 12, 2012 - 8:24 pm | Permalink

    @fender:
    I agree. “Anonymous” seems to be an Israeli or US intelligence agency-backed operation. The intention of this false flag operation appears to be to justify planned restrictions of internet freedoms.

  35. Hans's Gravatar Hans
    February 12, 2012 - 9:08 pm | Permalink

    @Edmund Connelly:

    I’d be happier in a home of 2,000 square meters if other external factors were met.

    Your property taxes will be lower, your maintenance costs will be lower, your utilities, and on and on. These stupid Jews building these massive mansions are wasting a ton of money with nothing to show for it. Who in their right mind would envy them?

  36. Hans's Gravatar Hans
    February 12, 2012 - 9:23 pm | Permalink

    @Jed:
    You nailed the point, Jed.

  37. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    February 13, 2012 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    How do we counter this wealth and power?

    Take vows of poverty.

  38. February 13, 2012 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    Question: How aggressive are our Jewish friends in promoting multiculturalism and gay marriages in Israel?

  39. Me's Gravatar Me
    February 13, 2012 - 8:10 pm | Permalink

    “I’d be happier in a home of 2,000 square meters if other external factors were met.”

    @EdmundConnelly: I think you meant 2000 square feet. 2000 square meters (21,000 square feet, or half an acre) would be on the level of these mega-mansions.

    Getting back to your original article, I am happy when Jews spend money on trivialities. Every dollar they put into building and outfitting a castle is a dollar that won’t go to the Jewish establishment, including the $PLC. These homes seldom recover their market value on the resale market. People who can afford a home like that want their OWN dream home, not a used one.

    Also, would you please stop referring to Wikipedia as Wiki… a wiki is a generic name for any user-editable web site.

  40. me's Gravatar me
    February 13, 2012 - 8:24 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: exactly Alice- they have no interest in history or aesthetics – many in fact ‘fear’ the outdoors and are suspect of northern european’s reverence for nature (it hints of ‘nazi’) – when we see an old house or church we think ‘history’ they think oppression – and want to tear/burn it down/erase the past. That is why they are such fierce modernists.

    I strongly suspect one day all the wasps who donated family fortunes to the nature conservancy will be in for a rude surprise – its some of the most valuable real estate in the country, one day some Stein & Witz law firm will find a loophole in the permanent covenants protecting the land, the Nature conservancy will be accused of anti-semitism, a jewish president will be put in place and they will ‘redefine their mission’ (like with the seirra club) to have a ‘global outlook”, which will have nothing to do with preserving nature.

  41. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    February 13, 2012 - 9:01 pm | Permalink

    @KingTut:

    The Jews are not necessarily more intelligent, say, than “Anglos”. They simply have historically been, and are, more ORGANIZED, CLANNISH, AND MUTUALLY SUPPORTIVE than any other racial or religious group.

    You don’t hear of any Councils of Presidents of Major English (or German, Scottish, etc.) organizations, do you?

    The Scottish Enlightenment (and KMac!), for example, conclusively demonstrate that Scots are quite intelligent but better known for feuding than mutually supporting one another.

    Just imagine, for instance, how powerful the Scot Diaspora would be if every person with a surname prefixed by “Mc” or “Mac” pulled together as one and gave preference to each other to the exclusion of all others.

    That obviously appears to be at least one of the fundamental Jewish “secrets” to success. In causation it certainly seems at least equal to heritable intelligence.

  42. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    February 13, 2012 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

    @tadzio: @tadzio: tadzio
    February 11, 2012 – 2:17 pm | Permalink

    ” Vast American resources are used to defend racist Israel and Jews are the only significant demographic that is greatly underrepresented in the US military.

    Jews are not of us by choice. They hate us. They have persecuted us at every opportunity for over 2,000 years, cumulating in the greatest ethnic massacre in Europe’s history, the Holodomor. Up to 8,000,000 million Ukrainian Christians were starved to death by the overwhelmingly Jewish communist system of the USSR.

    The method was most cruel. Watching your children starve as one starves would make any man yearn for a gas chamber and a capsule of Zyklon B. What a blessed mercy that would have been. But it was beyond the compassion of Lazar Kagonovich and his Jewish cohorts.

    No Holodomor, no Holocaust.”

    It would be best to remind the readers of this post that there is absolutely NO PROOF the Holocaust occurred in the way Jewish Zionists claim it did. I, too, believed their lies for decades.

    Read the science, not the propaganda, before you make up your mind. It’s still all available for now, until they manage to strangle the internet like they have our Main Stream Media by buying it all up.

  43. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    February 13, 2012 - 10:44 pm | Permalink

    Big garish houses and hideous ultra-expensive modern art are simply the Jewish way. Nothing will change their one-up mentality or improve their taste because that mentality is an ingrained part of their culture. Value is what the kitsch costs. If it cost more, that is what counts, not the aesthetics.

  44. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    February 14, 2012 - 1:43 am | Permalink

    Edmund Connelly…remember Aaron Spelling!
    and Mr Sterling….
    and a friend of mine knows some very riche jews in Malibu that donate alot to the Dems…they got in on Intel early,
    I may be mis spelling the name…the Pochevskis

    Donald Sterling – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Sterling
    Donald T. Sterling is an American real estate mogul, attorney, and the owner of the National … estate, which he began when he purchased a 26-unit apartment building in Beverly Hills. … Sterling and Los Angeles Lakers

  45. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    February 14, 2012 - 2:00 am | Permalink

    anarchyst
    Yes a friend with a very jewish last name [who is not jew]
    DJs thru a jew promoter here in LA and ‘its just jews with jews,
    they avoid goys’.

    and Bingo…..MAJOR DEMOCRAT FUNDER…..

    Personal life

    Palevsky was married six times and divorced five. He had five children. He was married to his first wife, Mary Joan Yates (Joan Palevsky), from 1952 to 1968. With her huge divorce settlement, she became a renowned philanthropist. With Max, she had two children, Madeleine Moskowitz and Nicholas Palevsky. His second wife was Sara Jane Brown, whom he married on September 6, 1969. In November 1972, he married Lynda L. Edelstein, his third wife. Jodie Evans, his fourth and sixth wife and widow, is a political activist. At the time of his death, he had four grandchildren………..

  46. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    February 14, 2012 - 2:08 am | Permalink

    Max Palevsky and Ellison made $ in Intel.

  47. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    February 14, 2012 - 11:12 am | Permalink

    Although a few Jews may have made money on their self-proclaimed “genius,” most are beneficiaries of their tribal networking and bribery machine. Jew helps Jew helps Jew, bribes goy, helps Jew helps Jew, bribes goy, helps Jew helps Jew, bribes goy, helps Jew helps Jew helps Jew…!

    They’re not geniuses, they’re slimeballs where morals and ethics do not exist in their business acumen.

    There you have it in a nutshell.

  48. me's Gravatar me
    February 14, 2012 - 2:01 pm | Permalink

    @Joanne Dee: unfortunately when low ethics are widespread and mainstreamed – as they are now in America, virtue almost becomes an ‘anti virtue’ for example, Ben Franklin’s classic ‘way to wealth’ is made something of a mockery – the thrifty and industrious can easily have their fortunes stolen from them or simply have their wealth inflated into oblivion – its a system that penalizes honesty, thrift and long term thinking, where only ‘suckers’ invest in the common good – and it actually encourages- almost forces – people to live a debt/finance driven lifestyle.. so they make money coming and going.

    BTW, I would like to mention that there seems to be another ‘me’ or “Me” here, while i find nothing objectionable to his posts they are not mine, err.. me.

  49. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    February 15, 2012 - 6:54 pm | Permalink

    me, you’re right. Perhaps these things were imbedded into the culture to preserve it and to prevent ‘the people that shall dwell alone’ from taking over through deception and other unsavory practices. The trouble for us is that they were more than successful, the trouble for them lies ahead in the not too distant future. Most everyone is aware of the coup.

  50. Leo Braun's Gravatar Leo Braun
    February 17, 2012 - 12:46 am | Permalink

    @Joanne Dee: “Perhaps these things were imbedded into the culture to preserve it and to prevent ‘the people that shall dwell alone‘ from taking over through deception and other unsavory practices”!

    • Joanne, where we lived … I didn’t hear one word of Polish. I didn’t know such a language existed (to the extent it existed, I knew it was language of goyim). Poland? I had no idea about. Our language of instruction was Yiddish. We wrote in Yiddish, learned history in Yiddish … and studied maths in Yiddish.

    I first encountered Polish language when I was seven, as I entered my first class on the second floor of Talmud Tora. During the first week of studies, when the teacher spoke in Polish, we did not understand a word. So we began to shout: “retzt Yiddish, retzt Yiddish” (speak-our-language).

    We made such a commotion that the shames arrived and turned to us to clarify the issue: Children, you must learn Polish, because we are in Poland“!

  51. Leo Braun's Gravatar Leo Braun
    February 18, 2012 - 12:30 am | Permalink

    @Luke: “White genes are regressive. Anytime a White reproduces with a non-white, and I include jews in that category, the non-white genes will almost always overwhelm and dominate (destroy) the fragile White genes”!

    • Well, according to the biological facts disclosure, Jewish women inherited originally (rhesus-free) RH negative blood. Indicative of the authentic source, Jewish people innate connection, inherited naturally at birth.

    Some 85% of humans these days are RH positive as amid worldwide population remained 15% RH negative blood descendants of the earlier species. No wonder for birth complications and frequent child afflictions. Because, once coming in contact with the incompatible foetal/baby’s blood, pregnant mother’s organism of the RH negative blood will produce antibodies. Geared up to eliminate her positive blooded baby in the womb by targeting red blood cells. Thus depriving baby of oxygen, since her body fights the Rhesus Factor as a foreign element. At the time when RH positive blood mother’s organism does not reject the (rhesus free) RH negative blood baby, she is carrying.

  52. Leo Braun's Gravatar Leo Braun
    February 18, 2012 - 11:09 pm | Permalink

    @pessimist:

    “Oh, yeah it’s clear there that a lot of Jews have some European blood in them. It’s a result of bringing in select Goy women and [Shiksa] girls into their family (which happened in pre-WWII Poland, where wealthy Jews would purchase promising young Polish girls from their peasant parents for a sizable chunk of silver coins)”!

    • Actually, it would surprise me a lot, if such acts of the intercourse were a common practice to procreate? Because before the First World War, casteless Jews confined in the segregated shtetls (*) didn’t know Polish but Yiddish and some Hebrew. A few who knew some Polish, conversed poorly. Except for doctors, lawyers, and such others of the gifted characteristics in the professional class. Who didn’t inhabit shtetls or wore ethnicity on their sleeve — unlike the conspicuous — shtetl Jews. Yet by far, the most significant factor that set Poles and Jews apart was grounded in economics. Where courtesy of the established arenda system, entrepreneurial Jews became estate managers, tax collectors, or merchant capitalists who wallowed in opulence.

    * Shtetl = self imposed ghetto, since the Jewish leaders in positions of responsibility made sure that the segregated kehilot subsisted within the walls ironically built to keep danger out. Consequently in 1791, blue-blooded Jewess, Catherine the Great of Russia created gigantic internment to horde six million casteless Jews within the area extending from Baltic to Black Sea.

    Incredibly, diabolical apartheid covered 20% of the European Russia as segregated territories grew to include 15 Russian provinces, along with the 10 Polish towns and townlets. What lasted for 130 years during 1791-1917 period. Shrouded by the obscure designation: “Pale of Settlement” (concealing in fact hideous plot), denoting burning stake (pale) of the final solution (settlement). Astute readers to peruse American Jewish Committee observations, depicted on page 308 of the published “A Great History of a Great People“!

  53. Leo Braun's Gravatar Leo Braun
    February 19, 2012 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

    @pessimist:

    “It would surprise me in the least that such practices were common in countries with a strong and unmonitored Jewish presence”!

    • In fact religious freedom and the self-governance assurance were strong incentives for the Jews to move to Poland as in 1264 King Boleslav (Boleslaw/Boleslaus) issued a charter – giving entrepreneurial Jews complete freedom under the privilege known as Kalisz Statute. Regulating Jewish legal and social status in Poland until the 18th century. Culminating in founding Kehila/Kahal institutions and the Council of the Four Lands. Authorising Jews to engage in trade, assets running and money-lending.

    Although it would seem that the oligarchic magnates (distinguished by their wealth and land holdings) selected likewise ambitious Jews for the arenda undertakings because of their ability to cover the leasing cost and assets running expertise, direct negotiations soon gave a way to the Kahal overseers role in selecting arendators for tamed magnates.

    Council (of the Four Lands) edits of 1671-1677 prohibited entrepreneurial Jews from leasing farming land or estates directly from the magnates without Kahals involvement. Subsequently arendators were compelled to purchase a license in order to bid on the forthcoming leases. Last but not least, arendators were forbidden to use Gentiles as a silent partner — just to get around the bidding for an arenda — without a license.

  54. Leo Braun's Gravatar Leo Braun
    February 21, 2012 - 12:04 am | Permalink

    b>A Boon or Bane for Jews in Poland?

    Distinctive economic exploits in Poland, led to the unique Jewish political development (echoing an earlier phase of Jewish political life in Europe). Where annually convened legislative assembly, known as the Council of the Four Lands, presided to oversee the entire network of Jewish communities: Wielkopolska (Greater Poland), Malopolska (Little Poland), Wolyn (Volhynia) and Chervona Rus (Galicia).

    Consequently, Va’ad Arba Artzot dealt with judicial, educational, cultural and religious matters, managed relations with Polish town-councils and the Catholic Church, collected taxes, arranged medical, sanitary services as well as having implemented poor kehilot relief, courtesy of the charitable groups proliferation.

    At first there was a tremendous sense of Jewish emancipation, nowhere else in Europe was there anything to compare with what amounted to the internal Jewish political autonomy or self-rule. Indeed such was the prestige of the Council of the Four Lands that it sometimes intervened in the affairs of Jewish communities outside Poland.

    However there was an ominous side to this development — a very peculiar pattern in Jewish arendators interdependent relations with the crypto Jew aristocracy. Ironically, such a close knit relationships had to be broken for the final emancipation of the Jews. A rather familiar pattern which actually stretches as far back as Alexander the Great era.

  55. Leo Braun's Gravatar Leo Braun
    February 21, 2012 - 9:37 pm | Permalink

    @Luke: “Avoid miscegenation as though it were a plague, because it actually is a plague”!

    • How anyone to come to such conclusion without learning about the facts of life, depicted above. Concerning Jews who sold their skills and services since time immemorial to the crypto Jew rulers in return for a degree of autonomy — traditionally this meant protection of their religion. Essentially based on one big lie of being God’s chosen people, just because a rhesus-free Jewess couldn’t procreate (beyond the first child) with a rhesus factor affected Goy. Unlike the rhesus-free Jew propensity to have offsprings with a rhesus factor affected Shiksa.

    Hence a derogatory lingo to keep the biologically incompatible people apart, what sadly endured since time immemorial, and still taboo for discussion in the 21st century. What for biology lectures or sex education when such a fundamental essence being omitted? Nevermind the reason behind the traditional Jewish law which determined Jewish identity by matrilineal descent. Ratified by Rabbis of the Mishnaic period 200BC-200AD. Whose services involved oppressive means of exploiting the poor.

    Amazingly, there are intriguing parallels between the Cleruch system in Ptolemaic Egypt, which followed Alexander’s conquest of Egypt, over two thousand years ago … and the Arenda system of medieval Poland. Jews had served in all ranks of the Alexandrian Greek army — in the infantry and cavalry, from humble footmen to officers and paymasters. In most cases lower status Jews served in military units of mixed ethnicity.

    Certainly Jews had been involved in the Cleruch system, a mechanism for imposing Empire’s rule on the countryside. Where along with migrant mercenary soldiers from other parts of the Empire, Jews were given plots of land and hence evolved into minor landowners, tied by gratitude and obligation to the imperial bureaucracy. This inevitably led to polarisation and resentment between the immigrant cleruchs and the native peasantry.

    Attentive reader to detect a parallel with the current imperialist conquistadors system which protects US economic and political interests in the Middle East in return for US support for the apartheid regime of the exclusively Jewish state, rooted in brutal zionist colonisation Palestinian land. Driven by the psychopathic junta over the years, whatever it takes! Culminating in abrogated human rights in debauch Israel. Where women are treated with the utter disdain!

    Polish Jew historiography is surely right when it often describes the Arenda system as heaven for the capitalist Jews, paradise for the crypto Jew magnates, and a living hell for the serfs. Casteless Jews freedom has always been compromised by the institutionalised roles of the exclusive brethren. As one of 17th century Poland’s leading rabbis, Joel Sirkes, put it: The danger was vast from the shouting of the Gentiles in a majority of places, who complain that the Jews reign and rule over them and hold them as much as did (the almighty chosen) kings and princes!

  56. Anty Ep's Gravatar Anty Ep
    March 2, 2012 - 11:07 am | Permalink

    Only heads of state or fools live in places that big.

  57. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    March 20, 2012 - 2:43 pm | Permalink

    These people have very bad tastes and like all showoffs can be ignored. But unless they earned their money through government pull there can be no question of taking it away from them. Redistributing it among a thousand parasites instead of one would not be helpful at all.
    Envy is a very destructive emotion and should be avoided.

Comments are closed.