Menachem Rosensaft is a Jewish anti-White columnist with access to the mainstream media. At TOO we have often noted the hypocrisy of Jews who are strong advocates for Israel as an ethnostate but oppose any manifestation of ethnonationalism by Whites. (At this time, there are 36 articles listed under the category of “Jewish attitudes on Israel versus the Diaspora.”) A recent comment by “Tom” on yet another article on the topic had the following image. As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Indeed!
You can’t make this stuff up.
You cannot compare America and Israel.
Israel is a nation-state, defined by its basic laws as a Jewish state.
As far as I know, the US Constitution does not define the US as a state of any particular ethnic group.
Now, if the founding fathers of the US had written words like “the US is a state of the Anglo-Saxons” in the Constitution, that would be a whole different thing…
America was always at least implicitly White. In Chapter 8 of Culture of Critique I discuss the work of a historian who points out that there were always three competing views of America:
Beyond that, any country that is 90% White can choose to stay that way. By enacting the 1924 immigration law (entirely constitutionally) it was saying just that. That law is certainly an example of American ethnonationalism. The point of the Culture of Critique is that the thrust of the Jewish intellectual and political movements was to de-legitimize the ethnocultural strand of American culture in favor of the proposition nation concept deriving from the Englightenment and to use that to promote the presently dominant multiculturalism.
Thanks to Tom for bringing that image to the attention of T.O.O. and thanks to Dr. MacDonald for giving it even more attention.
Have a good weekend, everyone.
Thanks for posting this collage. Its a good side by side comparison.
Jew pushes 3rd world immigration on America and Europe, but not on Israel.
Jew pushes interracial marriage, housing, schools for Whites, but not for Jews.
Unless Whites grow a set and march on Washington DC, this genocide of Whites and their children will not stop.
At least he recognizes it won’t be going away
Yea, yet another example of jewish hypocricy and double standards. Just look what they are doing to us now, oy vey! We already KNOW the score and HOW the enemy behaves. Jews act as they do, BECAUSE they are jews. Detailing and complaining about their behaviour, is about as productive as doing the same for rats, cockroaches or locusts.
I have said it before, and I will continue to say it: the White ruling class is our NUMBER ONE ENEMY, for it is THEY who willingly collude with the jews and facilitate their agenda. Since ancient times, there has been a symbiotic relationship between jews and the White ruling class. If we purge ourselves of the latter, then the former will lose their grip, and fall, also.
the Naturalization Act of 1790 gave citizenship to only free white persons, it was sined by most of the founding fathers.
You can’t compare Israel and the USA? Why not? Have you lost your logical thought process? The Jews are total hypocrites, and they mean to get rid of us. Of course you can compare the two nation states. America was founded by white Christian Europeans. And, ironically enough, WE gave the Jews Israel! And they stab us in the back? It’s UNFORGIVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes a picture is worth a 1000 words here.
This is incredible …… Pass it around it speaks for itself.
Contemptible people who show such hyprocrisy
@ethnonationalism:
http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_preamble.html
If you do not know what the word “Posterity” means, you might want to click on its hyperlink, in the text of the Preamble, to find out….
Judaic hypocrisy and double-talk have been recognized as epic ever since the Roman times.
What puzzles me is the reaction of non-Jews who never cease to be taken aback by it.
Particularly when a Judaic editor of a Judaic-published ‘newspaper’ extends a platform to one of his fellow tribesmen to spew fresh doses of it.
People in power call the shots and do whatever helps them and hurts their enemies . The Jews are no different. Strategy, not hypocrisy. If we are to criticize Jews, we have to do it from the standpoint that they are harming us, not that they are hypocrites.
Hypocrisy!!!!!! Not strategy. Double dealing, lying, filthy, SCUM.
“The Jews are no different.”
Yes they are. They are entirely different. That’s the point.
.
“Strategy, not hypocrisy.”
Hypocrisy is their strategy.
.
“If we are to criticize Jews, we have to do it from the standpoint that they are harming us, not that they are hypocrites.”
According to their alien morality they aren’t hypocrites. Their morality is “is it good for the Jews?” They are only hypocrites by our standards not their own. That’s why they have no shame.
That’s the critical point. They are completely alien to us in the most fundamental way.
- inbred population: particularist morality
- outbred population: universalist morality
The aim of pointing out their hypocrisy (by our standards) should not be to point out their actual hypocrisy but to illustrate they don’t conform to our concept of morality at all.
Passed by the United States Congress,
“An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790).
TEXT SOURCE:
Documentary History of the First Federal Congress of the United States of America, March 4, 1789 – March 3, 1791.
14 vols. to date.
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972-1995. 6:1516-1522
1 Stat. 103-104. edited version: De Pauw, Linda Grant, et al., eds.
“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.”
It is clear that our Founders wanted a White America, not an America full of Browns, Blacks, Asians and Jews. In fact, America’s ‘only-Whites-are-American-citizens-with-full-rights’ feature did not end until the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
Notice that the requirement of needing to be White to be a citizen is gone. In other words, up until 1868 only Whites were ‘real’ citizens of America.
@mike
Our audience is not the rats, cockroaches, or locusts. Our audience is the Whites that still believe Jews are just “whites with a weird religion.” Consistently pointing out their hypocrisy/chutzpah (same thing) is useful, even necessary.
Yes, it’s called “Christianity.” That’s why the Pope wears a Jew beanie, and the southern Baptists want to bomb Iran for Israel, and why the “Christian Identity White Nationalists” fully support the Jew agenda, only claim that they are the “True Jews” themselves.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6dgppKq8UU
Like Washington and Al Qaeda, they pose as enemies while collaborating. You know how the lumpen-fundies in Oklahoma are banning Sharia, while at the same time voting for conservative Republicans funded by Wahabbist Saudis? How the Vatican Bank, while decrying the oppression of the poor, invests all their money with the international Jewish financial institutions? How American mercenary companies like Blackwater/Xe/Academi and Halliburton move their headquarters to Dubai?
Get Yankees and Red Sox fans drunk in a bar and you might get a fist fight. The owners of the teams are more likely to sign a deal with each other. This isn’t really difficult to figure out is it?
Kevin MacDonald
May 27, 2012- 12:21 am | Permalink
America was always at least implicitly White. In Chapter 8 of Culture of Critique I discuss the work of a historian who points out that there were always three competing views of America:
Roger Smith (1988) shows that until the triumph of the cultural pluralist model with the countercultural revolution of the 1960s, there were three competing models of American identity: the “liberal” individualist legacy of the Enlightenment based on “natural rights”; the “republican” ideal of a cohesive, socially homogeneous society; and the “ethnocultural” strand emphasizing the importance of Anglo-Saxon ethnicity in the development and preservation of American cultural forms.
Smith, R. M. (1988). The “American creed” and American identity: The limits of liberal citizenship in the United States. Western Political Science Quarterly 41:225–252.
Beyond that, any country that is 90% White can choose to stay that way. By enacting the 1924 immigration law (entirely constitutionally) it was saying just that. That law is certainly an example of American ethnonationalism. The point of the Culture of Critique is that the thrust of the Jewish intellectual and political movements was to de-legitimize the ethnocultural strand of American culture in favor of the proposition nation concept deriving from the Englightenment.
END QUOTE
That is a very interesting point. But I think that the points raised by some Americans to deny the ethnic component of America was not based on any real realities on the ground. Slavery was confined to Black people, and that says it all.
Who is going to support Israel after America becomes a bankrupted multicultural country?
jewish racism against goy. white racism against non-whites. both stink. how about this revolutionary idea, no one is superior to another?
This is coming to a head. My God, look at my state, California. They can’t tax the whites enough to pay for the browns. And the browns just keep failing and failing, by every known measure. For the left to embrace this brown invasion is nothing short of treason.
Israel will probably be freer to do what it wants after our election, because Romney will win and the GOP may get both Houses of Congress. Politics is getting more racial in the US and everyone is sensing it. Both sides know that the only votes up for grabs are the White “independents” or whatever they call themselves. Blacks, browns and Jews will vote for Obama. And apparently all the White groups are now leaning Romney.
The elites would prefer Obama, but I sense they are already adjusting to a Romney win, if you read the commentary. I don’t know how this will play out, but I find it amusing that White Nationalists were so cocksure that Obama would win again.
If Romney wins, this may heat up racial divisions even more. If the GOP happens to get all of Congress and the Whitehouse, there will be furious anger on the Democrat side. There could fairly substantial budget cuts (maybe, maybe not), as well as social legislation the Left hates. The OWS types will get even more violent in the streets (not predicting race war or Final Collapse here people, just strife).
Should be interesting over the next few years. The important thing is, politics is getting more racial and even our elites have to acknowledge it in public.
Imagine being born from a tense aggressive woman and then, throughout your childhood being kept tense and nervous and aggressive yourself because you are told a hundred times a day that the whole World hates you – that is, all of the rest of Humanity hates you, roughly seven or eight billion Human Beings hate you1 First of all with the hormones which cause aggressive behaviour flooding you in utero and then the brainwashing, what chance do you have to be a normal human person? Not much. You are sick. On top of all that you are told that you are superior. How confusing! Then you understand that normal human beings are just cattle actually, and that they are created entirely for your use and they have no other purpose1 Obviously you are very sick indeed. Compassion is bred out of you and you have no conscience nor any shame. You cover the actual feelings of inferiority by being arrogant and you have no capacity or the ability to REASON. How can you? You are living in a World of Human Beings – so many of them, and you are not allowed to like them even. You are basically psychopathic or sociopathic. How could you be anything else. Dignity and honour are completely outside of the experience of these benighted people. It all began with “the sinister Levites” to quote Douglas Reed in “The Controversy of Zion.” and it has gone on generation after generation ever since! Crazy and not very intelligent. (After the sinister Levites told the poor wretched little group in Judea that they must no longer talk to their neighbours “the people wept.” (They also wept when they were told that they could have only ond god in future and they destroyed Asherah – poor old Yahweh’s consort! No wonder he has been a nasty piece of work ever since!)
No one can make a serious study of anti-semitism without an honest and objective study of the history of Jewish behavior. They are their own worst enemies. To know them is to not love them.
@Jason Speaks:
Great point, Jason. The media will use the charge eve when there are excellent reasons other then race to vote against Obama. In Arkansas there was recently a ruling that transsexuals may use the bathroom with which they identify, regardless of genitalia and Kentucky and West Virginia could have voted against Obama based on his policy on coal. Nope- it is all our racism. I think folks are beginning to decide that if they are going to have the name they may as well have the game.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/whats-the-matter-with-kentucky/2012/05/23/gJQAMF5hkU_blog.html
Collectively, the Jews are the quintessential people of the double standard. Stridently promoting ethnic-nationalism among themselves, while decrying any kind of White ethnic identity as a “scourge”. Meanwhile, the sleep walking Anglosphere remains oblivious to the deadly masquerade party.
This guy should put his priniples first and do “ALIYAH”if he isn’t an Iraelli citizen.He obviously cares more about Israel than any Western country including the U.S.i’M not in the “smash Isreal” camp andi wouln’t push the palestinian causet the panMuslim front is a bigger danger to the west than the existence of a Jewish -Isreali state.The problem is as PROF Mcdonald points out the Orwellian doublethink of certain members of Ethnic minorities (Jews in this case).Ihave heard similar opinions about all Muslim populations being desirable in the”Muslim arc”,but wanting free entrance to western countries.Iremember thr late (and for me not lamented)Gaddafi gloating that Muslims would conquer Europe without firing a shot by birth rate and Immigratio.
@ethnonationalism: The United States was founded and established by White men. In order to keep our Western culture we need to keep it majority White because different races and ethnic groups create different types of countries. They have different ideas of “justice,” “fairness,” “equality,” etc. which affect our political system, economic system, social cohesion, etc.
@anon:
In a war, you feed false intel to your enemy so that you can get him to make poor decisions. That’s the what the Jews do, because they know they’re at war with us 24/7. It’s Whites who don’t realize that this war is happening, so they listen to everything Jews tell them to do. Strategy, not hypocrisy. It would only be hypocrisy if Jews weren’t totally hostile to us. Our morality sucks because it doesn’t work for us, their morality is good because it works for them.
@fender:
just shows how resilient we are. We are totally asleep and blind to constant warfare againt us. Yet here we still are. I don’t mean us, I mean our whole people. Intact, here.
You can see the sources of Tom’s graffiti at:-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/menachem-rosensaft/peter-brimelow_b_1338565.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/menachem-rosensaft/israels-jewish-essence-is_b_995736.html
Would it make sense to prosecute Rosensaft for inciting race hatred?
The saddest thing to me is that if they’d simply let well enough alone, if they’d stifled the urge to ruin our country with massive thug world immigrants, we would NEVER have bothered them. But now that they’ve “done it again,” now that they’ve once again destroyed the host country….anti-semitism will rise up and there will be a backlash against their deceitful behavior. It’s almost as if they can’t help themselves. Their betrayal goes against everything that is decent in humanity. We allowed them to come here when they had nowhere else to go. We gave them a new country. And for our efforts, they ruin our beloved country. It’s really quite insane.
@James Whistler:
You don’t blame a leper for being a leper, a snake for being a snake, or nation-wreckers for being nation-wreckers. It’s who they are.
“The point of the Culture of Critique is that the thrust of the Jewish intellectual and political movements was to de-legitimize the ethnocultural strand of American culture in favor of the proposition nation concept deriving from the Englightenment and to use that to promote the presently dominant multiculturalism.” Dr. MacDonald
Exactly. In “The Closing of the American Mind,” Jewish author Allan Bloom laments the decline of the Enlightenment point of view and wrings his hands over the self-segregation of the Blacks. He claims that integration has failed because Blacks insist on being Blacks. He states that the Founders had always intended racial equality to come to prevail in American life — that this was, in fact, the true goal, or desired outcome, of the “Declaration of Independence” and the U.S. Constitution ab initio.
Rosensaft claims to be the son of “Holocaust” survivors. The problem remains that the term “Holocaust” survivor has been extended to mean anyone Jewish who might have been sent to the camps had he/she lived in Germany at the time. (Henry Kissinger is now a “holocaust” survivor.) It matters not a whit that they might have been living in the United States, Australia or Inner Mongolia at the time. If they had been in Germany and would have been sent to the camps, they are now “Holocaust” survivors. I have been unable to find out if the parents of Rosensaft were actually in the camps, or does he now claim them as survivors, though they might have been nowhere near Germany when the so-called holocaust occured. Does anyone know? Or, is Rosensaft self-righteously cloaking himself in moral sanctimony to help gloss over (ineffectively) his glaring double standards?
At the risk of stating the obvious and being repetitive, this is just another example of “Jewish ethics”–that is to say, what’s good is what’s good for the Jews.
@Felix:
No, Felix, you are missing the point. All extant Jews who were alive at the time of V-E Day, in 1945, are now Holocaust survivors, because Hitler intended to conquer the entire world– and he intended to do so for the sole purpose of exterminating the Jews, down to the last man, woman, child and zygote! World War II, in which Hitler tricked the British and French Empires into declaring war on his country, was nothing but a necessary cover for the total annihilation of World Jewry, beginning in Germany itself, but ending only at the ends of the Earth, wherever the last Jewish infant, floating among the reeds, in a handcrafted basket, was to be found and slaughtered by the victorious, bloodthirsty Huns.
Roger Smith (1988) shows that until the triumph of the cultural pluralist model with the countercultural revolution of the 1960s, there were three competing models of American identity: the “liberal” individualist legacy of the Enlightenment based on “natural rights”; the “republican” ideal of a cohesive, socially homogeneous society; and the “ethnocultural” strand emphasizing the importance of Anglo-Saxon ethnicity in the development and preservation of American cultural forms.
Rights vs. ethnicity- why? What if rights-bearing Whites want to establish a community that bars non-Whites? That would not violate natural (property) rights. It would violate “civil rights” which are created by legislation and are the opposite of natural property rights. “Civil rights” are bogus fantasy rights.
The Naturalization Act of 1790 said the country is open to “free White persons.” This is hardly consistent with “proposition nation.”
America- founded on NATURAL RIGHTS FOR WHITES! Amen.
White individuals can form groups. And keep other groups away. By forming contractual, gated communities, for example.
INDIVIDUALISM VERSUS GROUPISM IS ABSURD FALSE DICHOTOMY.
(I hadn’t read any of the above posts. It seems others have similar views).
What we need is writers willing and able to retell our history from our point of view. Imagine an article written in standard English demonstrating the strongest points Cuddihy made in The Ordeal of Civility, illustrated with this video and a few others on you tube.
i would love to see a reappraisal of the etiquette demanded under Jim Crow contrasted with the Code of the Street by Elijah Anderson. He describes a world in which it is considered an undeniable challenge to look someone straight in the eye. How many times have we heard the absolute outrage at a system so evil that it objected to black men looking whites in the eye?
Enough time has passed to demand a version of the story which is not distorted by the passions of the moment. Videos will help.
That type of blatant hypocrisy proves there’s only one way to deal with this enemy, and it’s not through voting and protesting.
Any Jew who was alive between 1933 and 1945 qualifies to wear the badge of survivor of The Holocaust ®.
Irrespective of whether their actual physical presence @ that time was confined to Buenos Aires, or Cape Town, or the Ural Mountains.
No, I’m not being sarcastic.
Sidebar: By war’s end the Allies reportedly liberated something under 40 thousand kosher inmates of concentration camps. That would be total number by early spring of 1945.
Yet in the mid 2000s certain Israeli government official floated a figure of ’2 million survivors’ who ‘urgently need our help’.
We can’t even agree amongst ourselves, (and we are the awakened and enlightened ones) so how can we awaken and enlighten the lumpen masses of White asses? We can’t.
There can be no revolution before its time. And their can be no revolution without a viable and functioning alternative to the horrors of the present regime. The time is not yet, and the alternative has yet to be formulated. “White Nationalism” is an abstract construct, that (as yet) lacks concrete and formal expression. We are living in the equivalent of last days of the Weimar Republic; either a popular leader, with all the anwers, emerges, or we fall to communism and disappear in the ensuing blood-bath. Whatever happens, though, it is still some time in the future.
Before majority non-European immigration into the US there were various European nationalities and movements against their immigration into the US like the Irish in New York.
“Benjamin Franklin opposed German immigration, stating that they would not assimilate into the culture.[111] Irish immigration was opposed in the 1850s by the nativist Know Nothing movement, originating in New York in 1843. It was engendered by popular fears that the country was being overwhelmed by Irish Catholic immigrants. In 1891, a lynch mob stormed a local jail and hanged several Italians following the acquittal of several Sicilian immigrants alleged to be involved in the murder of New Orleans police chief David Hennessy. The Congress passed the Emergency Quota Act in 1921, followed by the Immigration Act of 1924. The Immigration Act of 1924 was aimed at limiting immigration overall, and making sure that the nationalities of new arrivals matched the overall national profile.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gangs_of_New_York
@ethnonationalism: pretty disingenuous -and it think it is that kind of hypocrisy that angers a lot of people. Perhaps you don’t see the hypocrisy. That goes far in explaining the historical animosity between our peoples.
@Jarvis Dingle-Daden: that even in includes Gertrude Stein! (poor woman, had to attend lavish dinners with german generals and all)
@mike:
Mike outs himself as a White-hater. Mike puts Jewish interests before White interests. That’s why his solution to the Jewish problem is to get rid of White people, lol.
It’s not as though I’m on the side of the Uncle Toms, mind you. But Mike is clearly on the side of the Jews. Otherwise, why say our own kind is a bigger problem than our enemies?
@mike:
Agreed. We need to Ride the Tiger, like Evola said.
Don’t lie about Hitler and his intentions. Mainly, he wanted to save his country from the Jewish led Bolsheviks.
It is astonishing to me, that the J bombs aren’t flying more and more–Helen Thomas and Rick Sanchez notwithstanding. Like Edmund Connelly correctly pointed out in Margin Call…the
cast/ scoundrels are all goys. All you all waitin’ for Americuns to wake up… be waitin’ a long, long time homies!
@Junghans: Tha Anglo-sphere is stil prosperous, The Jewish negative impact was stronger felt in Russia, Ukraine and Hungary.
@ethnonationalism:
Actually the US constitution specifically states that the purpose of the USA is to secure the blessings of liberty for “ourselves and our posterity.” Not Mexicans and Mexicans posterity, not Asians and Asian posterity, ourselves and OUR posterity. The USA is state intended to be for a specific people and their posterity.
@ethnonationalism:
@ethnonationalism:
Actually the US constitution specifically states that the purpose of the USA is to secure the blessings of liberty for “ourselves and our posterity.” Not Mexicans and Mexicans posterity, not Asians and Asian posterity, ourselves and OUR posterity. The USA is state intended to be for a specific people and their posterity.
@James Whistler:
On the off chance that your comment was meant to chastise me for mine, please go back and read it through again, slowly and carefully. If you still feel that I was maligning your hero, I will be perfectly willing to concede your ability to miss the point….
Kevin:
“America was always at least implicitly White.”
Yes.
But what makes a nation-state a nation-state is that it defines itself EXPLICITLY as primarily surving the national strives of a specific nation or ethnic group.
See, for example, the opening words of the Constitution of Slovakia:
http://www.slovakia.org/sk-constitution.htm
or the Constitution of Croatia:
http://www.constitution.org/cons/croatia.htm
Or any other nation-state in Central Europe…
It is very similar to the Israeli basic laws…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Laws_of_Israel
The US, of course, is not that type of state. Never was.
Israel is a product of the kind of nationalism that developed in Central Europe in the 19th century. The same kind that brougt down the great multiethnic empires like the Habsburg monarchy, and later the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia.
The US is a product of totally different strives, needs and forces.
That is why there is no comparison between Istrael and America.
There are differences, but the point is that America did have an explicit sense of being White during the 1920s among a significant number of elite intellectuals with access to the mass media. Those feelings were very widespread. And, as the historian I quoted said, there was always a sense of Anglo-Saxon ethnicity that was quite explicit. In Eric Kaufmann’s book on the rise and fall of anglo-America, Jefferson is quoted as having a sense of descending from Anglo-Saxon tribes. This persisted, and it was the logic for Chinese exclusion and for the Northwestern European bias of the 1924 immigration law. Any differences with European ethnonationalism are trivial.
Moreover, Jewish ethnonationalism has nothing at all to do with European nationalism in terms of influence. Rather it is traditional Jewish ethnocentrism along with the traditional idea of a Jewish homeland and return to Israel.
@D. K.: Thanks for the laugh. How utterly absurd. As so many have often observed, they are their own worst enemies.
@Jeff:
Good point: “Actually the US constitution specifically states that the purpose of the USA is to secure the blessings of liberty for “ourselves and our posterity.” Not Mexicans and Mexicans posterity, not Asians and Asian posterity, ourselves and OUR posterity. The USA is state intended to be for a specific people and their posterity.”
Hitler isn’t my hero. On the other hand, as I’ve read more about the war, I’ve learned that my people were not the demons that the Jewish media has led us to believe. I’m half German, and all of my life i was ashamed of this fact. The Jews have destroyed the spirit of the German people, much in the way they’ve destroyed the American spirit. Nobody talks about how the Jews own and ran the banking system in Germany and flaunted their wealth, poked fun at the German citizens, etc., a complete parallel to the current situation in the USA. They controlled the stock market, the arts, the media, just like today’s America. And they pissed too many people off. The Bolsheviks killed many millions of Christians, so Germany had reason to be anxious.
Then I find that many jews died not from being “gassed” but from disease and starvation. The Allies bombed the railroad supply lines so the camps went without food. The “poison gas” turns out to be a non-lethal spray for lice.
The real true story is that the world wars cost a huge loss of life for all of humanity, not just for the Jews who want the monopoly on victim-hood. Communists killed over 100 million people. The Holocaust saw a loss of life of maybe one tenth of the Jewish claims. I’m not saying it was a picnic, but the Jews were not the only group to suffer in the wars. And then they refuse to recognize the “Armenian Holocaust” because they don’t want any competition! I’m sorry, but that strikes me as comical! It’s just so….ingroup.
@Tom:
If you put it that way, that would exclude everyone who is not a descendent of the original British settlers.
Not bad… finally some real ethnonationalism in North America.
The problem with American Jews is that they expect America, a multiethnic and multiracial country, to support a nation-state like Israel.
And the official explenation is that America and Israel in some way share the same values (???).
I mean, how can America and Israel share the same values, since they are completely different kinds of states?
Kevin:
“Moreover, Jewish ethnonationalism has nothing at all to do with European nationalism in terms of influence. Rather it is traditional Jewish ethnocentrism along with the traditional idea of a Jewish homeland and return to Israel.”
I think we have to distinguish between traditional Jewish ethnocentrism and nationalism as a political project.
Herzl’s movement appeared at the same time (late 19th century) when European peoples (Czechs, Poles, Bulgarians etc.) formed movements for the creation of their own nation-states.
I can generally agree with what Tony Jugt wrote here…
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2003/oct/23/israel-the-alternative/?pagination=false
@James Whistler:
James, I hope you are no longer ashamed of being half German. I am full German, my kids half like yourself, but never, never ever did I think I was less or should be ashamed for who I am, and I taught the kids the same. But I was always made to feel as though I was supposed to be ashamed, as others looked upon me as “German?” uuuh, dreck! I did not have nothing to do with the past, and so I refused to be responsible for something I am NOT responsible for, and will not allow anyone to milk me attaching a false guilt trip on me. I encourage all other Germans or half-Germans to do the same. Again, here in the US they are reaching too far, and they are being found out. They play the fidle on the emotions and poor me syndrome to the american people. And as uninformed as they are, they buy all sorts of none-sense. But… Lies have short legs. James, good comment my brother!
@European:
” I did not have nothing to do with the past, and so I refused to be responsible for something I am NOT responsible for, ”
Even if Germans did commit atrocities their talking point shouldn’t be, “I wasn’t responsible,” but “So what? You jews committed far worse atrocities in the USSR, and until you atone for them, we will not feel guilty about what we did.”
@James Whistler:
I sympathize with much of what you say and feel (I too am part German, although a thoroughly mongrelized European American), even though I have no sympathy for Nazis (nor fascists generally– nor, indeed, collectivists of any stripe!). What I wrote, however, was written from the projected point of view of Organized Jewry itself; Felix, for one, appreciated the joke….
@ethnonationalism:
Not exactly, it was a little more nuanced than that, and recognized as such by our Founders. Naturally, there the English, the Scots and the Ulster Scots. Then there were the the “Dutch” who were mostly Germans, Swiss and actual Holland Dutch. Add in French Protestants and the remainder of Swedes, Finns, Danes who made up New Sweden and you have North Western Europe pretty well represented.
Btw, I am very, very, very distantly sort of related to the Muhlenbergs, one of who was Speaker of the House of Representatives when the Naturalization Act of 1790 was passed.
@ethnonationalism: So, cannot historically White nations now decide that it is high time to become explicitly ethnonationalist? If multiculturalism is a huge mistake, then correcting that mistake is certainly justified.
European nations need to claim their historical homelands because, for one thing, the populations of these nations did not decide to allow foreigners in, the leaders did. If the White European people(s) do not want a multiracial society, let them fight to regain sovereignty in their historical homelands — which they have essentially been robbed of by corrupt, immoral, and foolish leaders.
Concerning Biblical religions — the three big ones:
Fundamentalist Christianity teaches that Christ will return to rule the whole world.
Likewise, Islam teaches that Islam will one day rule the entire world.
Do Jews seriously expect us to believe that Judaism does not also have the same ambition for World Government?
Hint: Einstein campaigned vigorously for World Government. In the name of “world peace,” of course. But I think he also included in this peace-concept the prevention of another Jewish holocaust.
Therefore, are we reasonably to believe that such a government, brought into being by Jewish advocates and men of international power and influence, would NOT place Jews in the top positions? If the goal of such a world government is to eliminate antisemitism from the world, and if Gentiles are believed to be naturally inimical to Jews, then Organized Jewry would need to supply all the supreme leaders and hold the highest positions of authority and power.
@ethnonationalism:
You cannot compare America and Israel.
Israel is a nation-state, defined by its basic laws as a Jewish state.
As far as I know, the US Constitution does not define the US as a state of any particular ethnic group.
Now, if the founding fathers of the US had written words like “the US is a state of the Anglo-Saxons” in the Constitution, that would be a whole different thing…
You are quite confused. Even if the U.S. founding documents were silent on the character of the United States (which they aren’t: see reference to “our posterity”); even if the ethnic character of the United States weren’t obviously European (which it is, as is clear from legislative history, attitudes, and demographics); it is up to us, the people, to determine the rules of our territory.
Rosenzaft is quite clearly making moral judgments that Jewish nationalism is an imperative while European nationalism is a “scourge.” Or do you think his opinion of German nationalism depends on whether Germany’s founding documents were “explicit” that Germany was a German state? Somehow, I think he would find a way to disapprove of German nationalism.
Oh, and by the way, Israel’s claims to legitimacy as a Jewish state are quite dubious, as its supposed “Jewish essence” (Jews are a minority in Israel) was imposed on the natives against their consent.
@ethnonationalism:
Israel is a nation-state, defined by its basic laws as a Jewish state.
This is a false premise. Nowhere do Israel’s basic laws state that Israel’s essence is exclusively or even predominantly Jewish.
@Adeimantus:
“then Organized Jewry would need to supply all the supreme leaders and hold the highest positions of authority and power.”
As in the USA & the UK today where Jews are vastly over represented in the corridors of power.
Bottom line Money rules — Bank of England + Federal Reserve.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt05.html
@ethnonationalism:
“Jewish ethics” is what’s good is what’s good for the Jews.
What is good for the Jews is good for all except the Antisemites.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6m0G7QqMG4
When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the
gospel, I said to Peter in front of them all, “You are a Jew, yet you
live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs?
- Galatians 2:14
@Felix:
Being a holohype survivor or one of their descendents is very lucrative. The ‘compensation’ the German government paid out and whose children are still forced to pay out 67 years after the end of WW2 ended is very substantial. Quite a few Jews would have become rich by virtue of the extra disposable income this gave them.
Israel had from day 1 neither constitution nor clearly defined borders. Israel had (however cleverly) codified into law discriminatory policies aimed @ non-Jew citizens.
So what makes Israel a measuring stick for anything at all ?
First question you oughta be asking is who and how controls “your” leaders. This should help to clear away a lot of fog. The whole shebang (read: repeated acts of treason; sabotage of national interest).
@Anonymous:
That may be true of Israel’s Basic Law, following passages from israel’s Declaration of Independence (May 14, 1948) leave no doubts about its explicit Jewish ethnic identification :
In short it explicitly declares the establishment of a Jewish state open for Jewish immigration. It couldn’t be clearer than that.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Compare the above mentioned particularistic passages from the Declaration of Independence of Israel with this famous universalisticpassage from the Declaration of Independence of the United States :
If may be clear that such lofty universalistic ideas offer no protection to hordes of Arabs, Indians, Chinese, Africans or Hispanics to “pursue their Happiness” in the United States since they are “created equal” anyway.
This may be true (that some leading Jewish spokesmen are hypocrites), in fact it probably is true, but I still think it is misleading to imply that they always get they way. I am not saying that you are implying this, but I am saying that many so-called white nationalists do imply this. This is why I’ve become a left nationalist and critiqued capitalism as the cause of imperialism and mass migration.
Pat Buchanan on the complete Israelification of the GOP. A good reason for conservatives not to vote for Mitt Romney. The Israel-firsters are the real danger to this country.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51787
@Franklin Ryckaert:
This right is the natural right of the Jewish people to be masters of their own fate, like all other nations in their own sovereign State.
a) This supposed “right” of “the Jewish people” is simply invented out of thin air. (Also, as you probably know, UN General Assembly recommendations have no binding effect.)
b) The statement asserts that “all other nations” have a right to be masters of their own fate in a sovereign state. Jewish opposition to European nationalism (a “scourge”) is therefore quite curious and hypocritical.
c) Presumably other peoples in Palestine (Christians, Muslims) have identical rights to be masters of their own fate. There is nothing that gives Jewish claims to Palestine more legitimacy than other claims. In fact, Gentiles formed a majority of people even in the part of Palestine that was proposed by the General Assembly for a Jewish State. To the extent that self-determination is based on democratic principles, the Jewish claim to Palestine is illegitimate.
@Tom:
And how many of these Swedes, Dutchmen, Frenchmen etc. were among the signers of the Declaration of Independence?
None.
Their role in the creation of the US was minimal.
@Tom:
This actually brings us back to my initial point.
America was then (as is now) a land of many ethnicities.
Not a nation-state like Israel.
@ethnonationalism:
America was then (as is now) a land of many ethnicities.
Not a nation-state like Israel.
Israel was (and is now) a land of many ethnicities. America has been more Nordic than Israel has been Jewish.
@ethnonationalism:
And how many of these Swedes, Dutchmen, Frenchmen etc. were among the signers of the Declaration of Independence?
None.
All are Nordics. The Nordic people founded this country. This is a Nordic nation.
Let me de-emphasize the “Nordic” aspect. Let us call it Anglo-European.
@ethnonationalism:
The Declaration of Independence was a good document to sign if you had a death wish. We tend to forget that today.
@Anonymous:
I don’t think there is anything wrong with the word Nordic, but North Western European Protestants is closer to the truth. It was North Western European Protestants who founded the country, and made up 98.6% of the White population. Maybe more. LOL.
@Adeimantus:
“So, cannot historically White nations now decide that it is high time to become explicitly ethnonationalist?”
Of course they can…
But, if you mean America, I doubt that there is any will for such a project among her highly heterogeneous population.
The closest thing to a nation-state in America are the Indian reservations…
@Svigor:
Far from being a White- hater, I am a White Nationalist and National Socialist; It is White leaders whom I hate, not White people! Jews are not the be all and end all of evil, anti-white behaviour; the White ruling class conspires with them, and has done so, since ancient times. Jews are hostile, racial aliens, but the White ruling class are race traitors; so that makes them even worse, no?
Mike is correct. If White traitors were out of the picture, Jewish animosity, no matter how fierce, becomes impotent.
Jews have hated Arabs for thousands of years, but have nothing on them compared to the stranglehold they have on Whites. The reason for this is Arab leaders don’t betray their people. White leaders do.
Without monsters like Clinton, Bush, Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy, etc. how far do you think people like Obama, Holder, Ginsburg, and their ilk would get?
@Anonymous:
anglo saxons are not nordic. they are a hodge podge -all white – but not purely nordic. the first ‘britons’ came from spain.
@me:
The Anglo-Saxons of the United States have always considered themselves to be Nordic peoples. Read the legislative history of the debates over immigration in the 1920s.
@Anonymous:
Since the end of WW2 the term “Aryan” has been replaced with the term “Indo European” or “Indo-Germanic”. The Nordics are merely a subgroup within the now anachronistic term Aryan. German National Socialist’s knew that the Nordics were merely a subgroup within the mixed Aryan/Indo-Europeans that comprised Germans and merely celebrated the Nordic components as that which united Germans. Is that anymore silly than the celebration of the mulatto we now have? I also have the impression that they seem to have been fascinated with people with a tendency to red hair and green eyes which seemed to be disappearing at the time.
Furthermore they saw the Nordic aspect present in Greece and Italy as well.
Hence regarding population of England, of which the founding fathers were made up; consisted of Celts, earlier Picts, and latter Angles, then Saxons, Normans (Francophone Norsemen) are all Indo-Germanic.
The point I am making is that the term is very misrepresented and misunderstood due to the miasma that surrounds WW2. It is a fairly broad term.
Either way we must be pan European as we simply can not afford disunity. It is also inconceivable that the Founding Fathers had any particular issue with French, Germans, Italians in modest numbers though they certainly had problems with the French as I recall who had anti-British sentiments.
German immigrants to the USA were notoriously liberal and anti-slavery likely due to the beliefs they developed in the process of casting of the quasi feudal systems they had lived under and possibly also from the close knit communities they came from. It was the genius of Bismark that united them, one of the most pragmatic and intelligent White men that ever lived. He seems to be inexplicably despised simply for forming White nation by the many Jewish biographers now rewriting history.
On the topic of hypocrisy; may I draw the readers attention to
Anglo-Saxons gave this country a time bomb in the form of 2-plus million Yiddische speakers 90% of whom (read: non-observant Jews) were either Marxist-leaning or outright communists.
While not neglecting to consign the nation to serfdom for the benefit of the Rothschilds along with the latter’s colluders, enablers, co-criminals and assorted non-Jew treasonous vermin.
By way of establishing privately held ‘Federal Reserve’, its collection body IRS and the mechanism aimed @ guaranteeing the infusion of monies from the citizenry known as ‘income tax’.
Always keep that in your head before going off on the Irish, Med-Europeans or Slavs.
“It would only be hypocrisy if Jews weren’t totally hostile to us.”
That’s my point. It’s hypocrisy by our standards but not theirs. “Is it good for the Jews?” is their natural biological state. It’s not a choice they make or can make. It’s innate.
.
“Our morality sucks because it doesn’t work for us, their morality is good because it works for them.”
Well maybe. Our morality works very well for us when we are homogenous and it works very badly when we allow cuckoos in the nest. Their morality works well for them in terms of non-assimilation because it always eventually leads to a backlash but i wouldn’t want to be like them.
They practice immorality, because they do harm to the host country every single time. Double standards and double dealing are not forms of “morality.” When they take over via money monopoly and then buy influence, and then force policies that are detrimental to the host population, how can that be called moral?
Jewish hypocrisy on ethnonationalism in Israel versus the Diaspora, a thousand words ain’t so bad either. See here:
http://www.voltairenet.org/Did-Former-Secretary-of-State
I hope this thread isn’t too old or too stale for this recent article I’m posting to go unnoticed by the forum. I especially hope Dr. MacDonald views it and possibly comments on it.
@Catiline:
Thank you, I hope all will read this link. I have always found it interesting that no matter how much money or support is at stake, our gifts to Israel never seem to come up for debate.
@ethnonationalism: There is much truth is what you say here. I believe that “America” is a failed nation at this point. It may break up into separate nation-states, primarily along racial lines, or it will decline into third-world poverty. I am hoping that Europe will witness the rapid social entropy in the U.S. and change course before its too late. European nations have roots deep in the soil of their ancient homelands.
@Adeimantus:
Call me sentimental but I am not ready to give up the USA and I think we can still get it all back.
I also expect that in terms of objective reality in terms the histories that are even possible, there aren’t that many that involve just Europe turning itself around. I think that there are plenty that involve the genocide going all the way, and plenty that involve Whites standing up and taking it all back. Whites have that potential in them. They are a very special people.
Another British woman jailed for a nervous breakdown in public at what is being done to the land of her ancesters
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9297324/Tube-passenger-jailed-for-21-weeks-after-video-of-her-racist-rant-went-viral.html
@Jason Speaks: I love the fact that politics is getting more racial. I love to see the various ethnic groups voting 90% for their own race – it gives whites a chance to vote for race and not feel ashamed. It proves how racist the other races are, and how stupid some white people are for ignoring race.
@Mickey Meadows: Mickey – to send a girl to prison for that is pathetic. How often do minorities go to prison for such verbal rants?
@ethnonationalism: America and Israel do share one thought in common – it is “smart” to back an apartheid government and make an enemy of a billion arabs. I ask people why we should be Israel’s guarantor? So we can pay them 4 billion a year and die fighting their wars? So we can be sure to antagonize the arabs who have the oil we need?
Why do we need Israel? God certainly could have stopped the destruction of the temple in 70AD and the murder of “6 million jews” if they truly remained his chosen people.
Screw Israel – screw the Mossad – screw AIPAC.
@Bear:
Point taken, Bear.
At the end of the day…. blood and soil…. ie…. race and land, is the natural and overriding imperative that governs all peoples. Jews are raceless, landless wanderers, whose sense of identity is rooted in mythology and paranoid/schizophrenic notions of superiority and perscution. Israel is not their homeland, it is simply their refuge from international law and centre of criminal activity. The very last thing that they want, is to be confined amongst their own kind, in a delineated, geographical location.
@Jerry Thompson: That double-dealing can’t be called moral, and recognizing it can’t be called anti-semitism. It’s called intelligence and insight, and calling them on it isn’t bigotry. It’s courage.
@mike: mike wrote:
I have said it before, and I will continue to say it: the White ruling class is our NUMBER ONE ENEMY, for it is THEY who willingly collude with the jews and facilitate their agenda. Since ancient times, there has been a symbiotic relationship between jews and the White ruling class. If we purge ourselves of the latter, then the former will lose their grip, and fall, also.
me: I’m not sure about that. Who owns the press and the banks? It isn’t the whites. If a member of a white ruling class refuses to facilitate jew agenda, he gets shut out. And the Tribe has ways to pressure any white ruling class member who goes astray.
There is a fallacy- I don’t know the name. It involves groups and parts of groups.
Jews own the federal reserve. The federal reserve is owned by jews.
Most violent crime is committed by blacks. Most blacks commit violent crime.
These are entirely different statements.
“Those colluding with jews are from the white ruling class.”
“The white ruling class colludes with jews.”
Also entirely different statements.
Maybe 2% of the white ruling class are psychopaths. They go to New York, Washington, and Hollywood. Analysis shows that most of the collaborators with jews are “from the white ruling class.” Most of the collaborators are white ruling class- but it doesn’t follow that most of the white ruling class are collaborators. 98% (estimate of course) are non-psychopaths. . .
The higher the fraction of a group does X (evil), the more the particular crime should be viewed as coming from a group and not from individuals. One of three blacks go to prison. If it were one of three-hundred, look at the individual case. Suppose 90% of blacks went to prison. Clearly, this would pertain to group traits.
What fraction of jews are psychopaths as compared to Whites? What fraction of the white ruling class collaborates with jews? A low percent- look to the individual case. The higher the percent, the more the group is involved.
“Maybe 2% of the white ruling class are psychopaths.”
According to Martha Stout in her book The Sociopath Next Door, the percentage of psychopaths is 4%.
I’ll say most of the white ruling class tend to be psychopaths, as they often elbow their way to the top.
@Mickey Meadows:
It saddens me to see people imprisoned for speaking their mind. But it does look as if many of your countrymen are getting near the breaking point. Is that true?
Yes, I think that people are very near the breaking point, especially whites in Los Angeles, Arizona, etc.
If the elites do not recognize that whites have rights, expect scores of Anders Brevieks to start blowing things up.
Jew makes documentary: Dumb, drunk and racist Australians
Trailer | Dumb, Drunk & Racist | Starts 9.30pm, Wednesday, 20 June on ABC2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VhIyT8SSSM4
Sneak Peek | Dumb, Drunk & Racist | Starts Wednesday, 20 June at 9.30pm, ABC2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khRP_MPI8sA&feature=relmfu
@ethnonationalism: I am getting to the point where I literally begin to spew smoke out of my ears, whenever I hear or see or read someone spouting this sort of rancid, clearly jewish concocted BALONEY with regards to the intentions of our 100 percent White European Founding Fathers when they established this nation – and made it perfectly crystal clear that they intended for it to be a homeland for White European people and their direct ethnic descendants. Let’s revisit the Federalist Papers, specifically paper #2 by John Jay:
“The Federalist No. 2
Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence
Independent Journal
Wednesday, October 31, 1787
[John Jay]
[excerpt]
With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people — a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.
This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.”
A few of the other posters did a fantastic job of pointing out the various institutions and provisions that were placed into the Constitution and official policies of the time that clearly, and without any question or doubt, specifically pointed to the racialist intentions of our nation’s Founders – and which specifically singled out ‘Whiteness’ as a criteria of qualification. So, there should be zero doubt or any more of this parroting of the jewish anti-White propaganda that America is a ‘credal’ nation and not a nation that was intended – from the beginning – to be based on blood and soil and that means a homeland for White European people.
Incidentally, this whole ‘credal nation’ horse manure was cooked up by virulently anti-White, Cultural Marxist trained jewish intellectuals – and then they began to incessantly peddle this poisonous, white-genocide hemlock with a deliberately orchestrated campaign, to coincide with their malicious efforts to get that 1965 White Genocide immigration policy passed. Prior to about the early 1960s, the overwhelming majority of a 90 plus percent White European nation took it for granted that America was intended to be a White European dominant nation – and the vast majority of White Americans would have laughed at anyone who suggested that their native homelands should be turned into a flop house for every non-White, failed garbage dump of a third world nation on the planet. So, in order to brainwash Whites for their coming race displacement and their own genocide, the jewish media began this ‘credal nation’ promotion and today, these vile and despicably evil jewish neo-cons and their White gentile puppets are singing this tune at the top of their lungs.
End result of 40-50 years of this jewish media brainwashing? Try this experiment: Walk up to the average nose-picking White moron on the street and ask them if they believe that our 100 percent White European Founding Fathers intended for America to be a homeland for, and always remain an overwhelmingly White European dominant nation. I’d bet a sizable sum that at least 85% or more of the Whites who were asked this question would automatically parrot that ‘America is a credal’ or ‘America is a propositional’ nation horse manure that was shoveled into their empty skulls by their mortal enemies. Idiots – programmed for self-genocide, and this can be traced directly to the jewish control of our mainstream media.
For anyone who needs a little more background on this ‘credal nation’ baloney, excuse the author’s spelling errors, but, please check out this link:
http://conservativlib.wordpress.com/2006/12/29/creedal-nation/
…To these folks America is not a country; it is an idea. A very abstract idea. And if the actual people are hesitant to swallow this idea, then, in the words of the Stalinist playwright Berthold Brecht, maybe we should elect a different people. We are a “creedal nation”, defined not by our language, our culture, our history, holidays, or any thing else save an “idea”. And they wish to proceed creedal to the metal. Their idea is based on a fragment of the second sentence of the Declaration of Independence, lifted out of context, though not an actual part of out Constitution or laws, cemented to the words of an immigrant poet Emma Lazarus, which were not given any official status either. For them America is a global boarding house, with as few social rules as possible, where the actions of the tenants are not to be judged, so long as they bend their knee to global equality, and personal interchangeability, and do not interfere with production. The people are valued not as individuals, or even as distinct groups – Vietnamese-Americans, or Hillbillies, or Scandie farmers, or Black Jazz singers, Cowboys, or anything else; just as economic production-consumption units. This is ominous. When Jack Kemp described the United States as the world’s first creedal nation, he was dead wrong, as evidenced by the recurring fundamental disagreements culminating in a civil war, and the many years of reconstruction and continued disagreement afterward. We became (if at all) a creedal nation only during the 1920s-1930s, under the influence of Carl Sandburg’s mythologized Lincoln, and FDR’s politicking. The first nation created explicitly on the basis of an abstract idea, a creed, was the Soviet Union, created at the beginning of the 1920s as the world’s First Proletarian Nation.”
One final concluding comment. Excuse me if I might sound a little redundant, but this point must be made clear. The reason the virulently anti-White jewish elites have been pushing this ‘credal nation’ baloney is because they had a premeditated, clearly malicious and diabolically nefarious (and criminal) desire to alter the racial demographics of America. They fully intended to try to reduce the White European descendants of the Founding stock of this nation – who are the direct posterity of our 100 percent White European Founding Fathers and therefore the demographic group who’s birthright the jews sought to deprive them of – to minorities inside our own native homelands. This means permanent subjugation to be ruled over by a motley collection of non-European peoples – 98% of whom are intensely hostile to the very concept of ‘whiteness’. And, with a sufficient amount of additional jewish media induced anti-White brainwashing – that last 2% will very quickly adopt virulently anti-White attitudes and resentments as well.
The consquences of being subjugated to domination and rule by non-Whites are vast and all-encompassing. How would 90% or higher tax rates strike you? How would the abolishment of the First Amendment right to free speech strike you? How would the repeal of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms appeal to Whites, followed by demands for Whites to surrender their firearms and means of self-protection against minority violence and crime? How would laws that prohibited Whites from marrying and having children with other Whites tickle the fancy of the vast majority of Whites? How would Zimbabwe-style land and property grab redistributions strike you? How would an entire nation transformed into a massive, continent-wide Detroit appeal to all these deracinated, brainless Whites who still refuse to wake up to the realities of race go over? How about new and even more aggressive affirmative action laws that would pretty much eliminate any job opportunities for whites that didn’t involve the most menial forms of manual labor – such as mowing the grass or scooping up the dog poop for affirmative action blacks who have now moved into Whitey’s old middle class house and who’re knocking down a 100K a year for doing nothing except for having been born black? How about watching as the nation of our 100 percent White European ancestors – rapidly transitions from a socialist nation to a hardcore Communist nation, which I am convinced is the ultimate end game objective?
Oh, and one last prediction. Once these parasitic non-Whites have achieved permanent majority rule over the White European minority – and once they have sucked us financially dry and once they’ve raped the last of our White females and grown tired of our race, who’ll no longer be useful as sources of nourishment or for their twisted and depraved sexual satisfaction – that’s when the ethnic cleansing and final extermination of the White race in North America will go viral.
@James Whistler: Brother Whistler – this sort of knife in the back should have been expected, for that is always the end result of making deals with the Devil.
Or, his crumb crunchers.
@Mark White: Answer: America might well be the #1 source of blood for Dracula of the Middle East, but once we are sucked dry – they’ll simply increase their voracious feasting off of European White nations, and Canada, Australia, etc. Eventually, they’ll suck every White nation completely dry – but that’s probably at least 100 more years away.
After all, in their Talmud – it tells them that all the money and wealth of the world that is in gentile hands is really theirs, since goyim are nothing but lowly animals, mere beasts of the field – and under their jewish supremacist, racist thinking – beasts are not entitled to ‘own’ anything.
Their goal, Brother Mark – is to steal and control 100 percent of the wealth of the entire world. Draining America dry is simply one of the biggest rungs in the ladder to their final objective.
@James Whistler: Brother Whistler: May I strongly recommend that you listen to this interview by Deana Spingola of Keith Johnson? They discuss WW2, and reveal the unbelievable amount of lies and deceitful, self-serving, malicious jewish propaganda that the White Western European nations have been fed as a result of the jewish control of our news and entertainment media – as well as a result of their disproportionate influence within our respective White European nation’s governments. They also go into great detail discussing the rise of the Police state here in America and expose the jewish cabal who’re behind the push to turn the USA into another USSR.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-iZdEtyJJso
Spingola has a radio show on Republic Broadcasting Network and Keith Johnson has a website, which I’ve provided a URL link to below.
http://revoltoftheplebs.wordpress.com/
Incidentally, I have a elderly lady friend who was born in Germany and was a little girl during the closing months of WW2. I’ve tried my best to help her learn the truth – encouraging her to view the One Third of the Holocaust documentary, and to show her that the jews are doing to America what they tried to do to Germany (Cultural Marxism, anti-White propaganda, relentless demonization of the host nation’s culture and people), plus what their role was in the 1917 jewish Bolshevik Communist takeover of Russia – but, this poor lady’s brainwashing has been too intense, too effective, and she refuses to pursue any solution that could remedy her deep-rooted, jewish media induced, White German guilt. This woman will go to her grave feeling guilty for the lies that the jews have told the world about what did or didn’t happen in WW2, and I think that is a great tragedy.
I hope you don’t make the same mistake. Free yourself, Brother Whistler. Cleanse your conscious and be proud of being of German descent. Your people are some of the finest of the White race, and I admire your people tremendously. Germany’s problems today mirror the problems with nearly every White European nation: Race treasonous White elites who are in bed with the jews and who are helping them destroy their own people and nations.
@Mickey Meadows: Not anymore, Brother Meadows. 50 plus years of parking those increasingly blubber-like white butt cheeks on the sofa, and gluing those eyeballs to the enemy’s most dangerous and deadly and effective electronic brainwashing device has taken a disastrous toll on the White race’s mental outlook, done irreparable harm to the White race’s psychological frame of mind, and has stripped them of their self-confidence and largely rendered the majority of Whites to a state of feeling guilty for having been born White. Think about it: how hard is it to find a fellow White who’s willing to take his own race’s side in any ethnic based argument or ethnic competition these days?
Combine that poisonous media brainwashing with the virulently anti-White Cultural Marxist takeover of the Christian church – and White people are being literally bombarded with anti-White poison, no matter where they turn.
The only ‘special’ White people left, are those of us who are TOO readers and who’re racially healthy and for some mysterious reason, have developed an immunity to jewish spider venom.
Face facts: America is done, stick a fork in it. It is impossible to save our entire nation. We’ve got at least 32% of our population who’re either black or mestizo and these people are breeding like rabbits, while our anti-White government is forcing White taxpayers to subsidize these irresponsible breeding habits of our racial competitors. We also have huge increases in Asians flooding into America, and while these aliens are largely less crime prone and more productive and in many cases, academically gifted – they still are NOT us and they have no right to dispossess Whites inside our native homelands.
The only viable answer is the breakup of the USA and the creation of an exclusively White Ethnostate. One where race treason will be a capital offense. And, one where there will not be a jewish problem – because jews will not be invited to share our living space and this time, there will be provisions hard coded into our new Constitution that prohibit their presence.
Israeli Interior Minister Eli Yishai: “Muslims that arrive here do not even believe that this country belongs to us, to the white man.”
From Haaretz…
there will be provisions hard coded into our new Constitution that prohibit their presence.
And pray we don’t get fooled again. . .
@TabuLa Raza: I assume you’re concerned about the 2,000 year old enemy tactic of concealing their genealogy and posing as members of the host population? Well, to that I’d say we can always resort to DNA testing in cases where there is any degree of suspicion or doubt.
By the way, I would cite two prominent examples of the end results of intermarriage between Whites and jews. Tim Wise and Jon Stewart. It would be an understatement for anyone to point out that these two individuals are virulently and passionately anti-White. Despite the presence of White genes inside both men – their jewish DNA is so toxic, so poisonous, that it clearly has overwhelmed their White European genes and these guys are at war with their own genes. They literally hate White Europeans with an intensity that is breathtaking to behold. DNA testing would help us avoid granting residency to these kinds of dangerous, ‘white looking’ individuals.
@Luke:
Stewart doesn’t have any White relatives.
@fender:
“Even if Germans did commit atrocities their talking point shouldn’t be, “I wasn’t responsible,” but “So what? You jews committed far worse atrocities in the USSR, and until you atone for them, we will not feel guilty about what we did.””
You have established an important point here; even if Hitler committed all the atrocities the Jewish media accuses him of (which he didn’t), his crimes would still pale in comparison to what the Jews have done to us. The gentile death count resulting from Jewish Bolshevism, and the two world wars which they perpetrated exceeds 100 million white people, and thats just in the 20th century. The Jews are the true masters of genocide on this planet; but when Hitler supposedly gives them a little taste of their own medicine its suddenly the most horrible crime in history? Sounds more like divine justice which was never delivered.
@Luke:
Just remember that every new generation is a new chance. Our cultural faults don’t get passed down via some genetic transmission. There is no such thing as a “spiritual” sickness, in the literal sense of the term. Whites can yet save themselves. And it will be more than those who read TOO. If fact, I rather suspect that if Whites every do rally to their own side, the typical “White Nationalist” won’t even see it coming.
@Jason Speaks:
The instruments of cultural transmission, most notably school curricula, is owned by our enemies. Until that can be changed, all WN’s will have to emerge, and continue to suffer from, the sickness.
The below is a link to the influential Marxist publication “New Statesman”
We need Muslim-Jewish unity against the far right
How can religious divisions be overcome in order to fight racism?
http://www.newstatesman.com/2012/05/we-need-muslim-jewish-unity-against-far-right
The anti Christian anti whie ethos is so deeply ingrained that’s the scorpion frog fable is correct.
@Astraea Shaw: Astrea comment at 7:12 am is one of the most perceptive and empathetic I have ever read.