Is the Press freer in the United States than in Europe?

Tom Sunic

What follows below is the author’s translation of his piece in French (Fall 2012). The original text in French can be accessed here or here. It is published in Réfléchir et Agir, a political-cultural quarterly published in France. It can be roughly categorized as non-conformist “national-anarchist” journal with critical articles on art, literature and politics. The journal has published interviews with prominent French personalities from cultural and political life (Brigitte Bardot, Jean Raspail, Alain de Benoist, Vladimir Volkoff, etc).

America does not yet know freedom-killing laws that have by now become the trademark of the Federal Republic of Germany and France. Compared to the French Penal Code, especially the Fabius-Gayssot law, or the dreaded Section 130 of the Criminal Code in Germany, the famous First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution opens up avenues to freedom of expression that one could only dream about in Europe. Intellectuals who write for newspapers labeled “racist” or “extreme rightwing”, or heads of U.S. institutions who voice doubts about the official casualty figure of the Jewish Holocaust, such as The Barnes Review or The Institute of Historical Review, could be liable to a 4-year prison sentence in Germany, or subject to heavy legal fines in France. None of this exists as of yet in America, where one can see even proscribed European scholars such as Robert Faurisson and David Irving as guests of honor of different revisionist groups. Moreover, openly anti-Black, indeed racist gatherings are not uncommon in America, just as wearing the Waffen SS uniform, or sporting the swastika by U.S skinheads, or for that matter displaying the Celtic cross in one’s own back yard — all this baggage, all of this behavior is strictly protected under the U.S. legal system.

One must not be fooled, however. American media and especially the mainstream press attuned to the System, such as The Huffington Post, The New York Times, The Washington Post, let alone the major television channels, such as CNN, are careful not to venture into open discussions of the great taboos of our postmodernity: the Jewish question and the race question. It is not fear of judicial censorship that rules over the intellectual landscape in America; fortunately there is none for the time being. Rather, self-censorship among journalists and well-known professors, or the paranoid anticipation of inadvertently crossing paths with an “evil thinker” produces unprecedented psycho-anthropological knee-jerk reflexes. Fear of social ostracism and fear of being consigned to professional oblivion turn out to be stronger antidotes than fines, imprisonment, or the loss of job [American professors with tenure can’t be fired for expressing their views on politics or scholarly issues].


Similar to the French political and media environment, there are few American journalists and tenured professors who muster the courage to tackle in a critical and scholarly manner the topics of Judaism and multiculturalism. The founding myths of postmodern America, such as its self-assigned role of the supreme guardian of Good, its evangelical struggle against the supreme Evil, named the Shoah, as well as its belief in the myth of eternal economic progress, are carefully internalized by the media and the political class. Even the slightest misstep of an impulsive journalist or a nonconformist teacher means the kiss of death for his or her career.

The climate of self-censorship in the media and in the institutions of higher learning in America does not require state censorship as is the case in France. In America, journalists quickly learn to censor themselves. In fact, in the liberal system in Europe and across the Atlantic, there are differences in degree, tone, shape, and especially in style in the workings of the Inquisitorial System, but never any difference in substance. 

The SPLC: The Afterthought Police

The thought police in America, with its numerous outlets, are much less visible and much more subtle than in Europe — and therefore more efficient. For example, The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) claims to be a think tank but is essentially an assembly line for smearing those who have “evil thoughts” on topics such as race and Jewish influence.  It receives millions of dollars from anonymous sources with its prime goal being the blacklisting of all groups it labels as “extreme rightwing” and of all intellectual nonconformists daring to criticize the System. Indeed, the SPLC resembles a private spy agency whose ideological lines are drawn in the vicinity of cultural Marxism, and which is headed by Morris Dees, Mark Potok and Richard Cohen.

Long ago, it was the SPLC itself that launched the new rules of the language engagement and which continues to employ abusively the expressions such as “hate groups” or “white supremacist” for individuals of European ancestry voicing opinions critical of multiculturalism and opposing the disproportionate role of the Jews in the American media. In the French language, words such as “hate groups” or “white supremacists” have not yet assumed the same inquisitorial significance, in contrast to America, where these terms have a paralyzing effect on any intellectual or a politician daring to touch the modern Holy of Holies—i.e. the Jewish Question or the Metaphysics of Multiculturalism. Although in the Penal Code there is not yet a legal provision referring to “hate speech,” this expression, however, is propagated by the U.S. media on all wavelengths, and has by now become part of the new media jargon, serving as an increasingly powerful deterrent against all free spirits. Indeed, the locution of “hate speech” is so vague that it can easily lend itself to any interpretation; hence the label may strike anybody at any time.

The SPLC or the powerful explicitly Jewish lobby, the ADL, [(whose counterpart in France is the CRIF (Conseil représentatif des institutions juives de France ) (“Council of French Jewish Organizations”)] are not just intellectual espionage machines. The SPLC is also an outlet which informs the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security in the United States about White heretics suspected of spreading “hate speech” and who — by the process of guilt by association — are likely to become “terrorists” — a denotation with far more serious implications in America. Worse, the SPLC has also set itself the task of monitoring academic institutions, sniffing out and cataloguing “evil-minded” teachers whose syllabi depart from the Gospel of Multiculturalism. Not only are its targets young wacky self-proclaimed Nazis, but also many prominent scholars in the field of sociobiology, as for instance Professor Kevin MacDonald, or even politicians and writers, such as the former presidential candidate and the bestselling author Patrick Buchanan.

Of course, everybody in America is legally entitled to criticize everything on numerous websites and in fringe nationalist papers of the so-called extreme right, but in most cases, the intellectual scope of these papers and sites is limited and can in no way harm the System. It is clear that those different websites or webzines, run by racialist or nationalist groupings, with rare exceptions (such as high quality racialist magazines like The Occidental Observer and The Occidental Quarterly, or a newly launched political party The American Third Position Party) resort to a “binary language,” replete with vulgar, anti-Semitic and racist words, with no cultural veneer. It is therefore understandable why they can never be taken seriously by either the thought police, or by the U.S. government itself. Indeed one might even speculate that those countless extreme rightwing groupings are often used as a pretext by the U.S. government to scream from all Washington DC rooftops that America, in comparison to the rest of the world, is the only country of free speech. 

A new intellectual nervous tic: self-censorship

By contrast, in the mass media in league with the System, the rules of engagement are quite different. A correspondent of a television channel or an apprentice journalist wishing to reach lofty peaks in his career must heap eulogies on behalf of Jews and Israel. Former CNN host Rick Sanchez and the dean of the White House press corps, Helen Thomas, have recently been fired from their positions for comments considered critical of Israel and the Jews. Their sin was not considered a minor sin, as for instance when somebody criticizes undocumented mestizos. Theirs was a mortal sin. The very old and the very famous Helen Thomas had to pack up her bags for having uttered on, May 27, 2010, during the celebration of the Jewish heritage at the White House, that “they (Jews) should get the hell out of Palestine and go home.”

It is an unwritten rule, even in the American newspapers engaging in serious debates about the dogma of multiculturalism (e.g., the conservative daily The Washington Times) never to criticize the Jews or Israel. In this context one could detect, perhaps, a slight advantage regarding the freedom of speech in the left-leaning European press, such as Le Monde diplomatique and The Guardian, in which the reader can spot once in a while articles, if not critical of the Jews, at least critical of the state of Israel. This is something unthinkable in any major American newspaper of any persuasion. The slightest critical reference to the state of Israel, even without any allusion to the Jews in America, can easily lead to professional dismissal.

Professor Kevin MacDonald of California State University Long Beach, who himself was subject of professional harassment on the part of the ADL and SPLC for his allegedly anti-Semitic writings, notes in his book The Culture of Critique, which has become a bestseller in the non-conformist America and elsewhere:

By all accounts, ethnic Jews have a powerful influence in the American media—far larger than any other identifiable group. The extent of Jewish ownership and influence on the popular media in the United States is remarkable given that relatively small proportion of the population is Jewish.

Hence the paradox. On the one hand one is allowed to say and write anything in the United States, even things that are completely stupid and sometimes openly preach the overthrow of the American system. On the other hand, however, everyone, including the Jews themselves, live in perpetual self-denial, assuming that the influence of the Jews is non-existent and that the role of Jews vis-à-vis non-Jews is always the Same. This seems to be a typical American projection in observing the Other as the mirror image of its embellished Double. In reality, though, there are powerful Jewish lobbies in the media and in Hollywood who exert a tremendous pressure on public discourse and on the imagination of the American masses — as well as on the masses in Europe.

Dr. Tom Sunic ( is former professor of political science and a Board member of the American Third Position Party. He is the author of Homo americanus: Child of the Postmodern Age ( 2007).

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

122 Comments to "Is the Press freer in the United States than in Europe?"

  1. Vladimir's Gravatar Vladimir
    November 13, 2012 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

    @Dick Hedgerow:

    I certainly never argued against that point, and I am also entitled to my own perspective, though I very much welcome additions and corrections if they are of any value.

  2. Dick Hedgerow's Gravatar Dick Hedgerow
    November 13, 2012 - 11:59 am | Permalink

    Vladimir; With your diving into what is someone else’s perspective (of which he is entitled to without your additions and corrections), you have just proven the point of Mr. Vranich, that those two cultures are incompatible.

  3. Vladimir's Gravatar Vladimir
    November 9, 2012 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    @Scott Crane:

    Actually, I was not bragging about anything at all, but if you feel there is something specific about Croatia that you would like to enlighten me on, I would be much obliged.

  4. Scott Crane's Gravatar Scott Crane
    November 9, 2012 - 6:02 am | Permalink


    It wasn’t about comic relief. It was the arrogance of bragging about not having visited the area of which you speak so assuredly. In other words, you don’t know, do you?

  5. Vladimir's Gravatar Vladimir
    November 7, 2012 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    @Scott Crane:

    I didn’t see a better option at the time. If TOO readers dismiss my arguments because of this little piece of comic relief, so be it.

  6. Scott Crane's Gravatar Scott Crane
    November 7, 2012 - 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Good conclusion Bobby.
    Vladimir, seems you shot yourself in the foot with your taking a dump in a plane comment.

  7. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 7, 2012 - 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Without taking sides on the issues discussed by Faust Vranich vs. Valdimir, there is one lesson to be learned from them, to wit, multiculturalism is doomed and cannot be workable, no matter how much the elite try to push it onto people. These two clearly “European tribes”, could only live in the same nation because Marshall Tito threatened both of them with violence if they didn’t cooperate, which is indeed, the only way the leftist democrat party will be able to continue their insane multiculturalist quest for America. Stupid European-Americans that keep believing what the Republican Party spouts out about having to be more welcoming to “hispanics”,etc. are highly deluded. How much more welcoming are we supposed to be–give Mexico the whole United States!!?? STUPIDOS.

  8. Vladimir's Gravatar Vladimir
    November 7, 2012 - 1:33 pm | Permalink

    @Faust Vranich:

    I am afraid you made a false assumption: only because I didn’t let you go on pontificating to the unsuspecting audience about a little virtuous Western nation surrounded by Eastern savages doesn’t necessarily mean that I have any Serbian blood in me. It doesn’t even mean that I have ever been to the Balkans. Even if my personal contact with your country is limited to having taken a dump while flying over it, that doesn’t mean I should let you dupe TOO readers with your provincial tales of greatness.
    Regarding Operation Storm, (which was named after Operation Desert Storm and used the same tactics developed by the American military strategists) I am not sure of what relevance is the uniform that American military instructors whore when they tried their best to teach your peasants how to fight. Furthermore, neither the armaments you received nor the drones that were used in the operation require any uniform at all.

  9. Faust Vranich's Gravatar Faust Vranich
    November 7, 2012 - 8:55 am | Permalink


    I will not go into minutiae with your claims, since that would take too much space. I’m glad you posted though, as your post illustrates the completely different world view of our two cultures.

    I wasn’t comparing high German culture to Croatian high culture, but instead how ordinary people live and think. I could name a few remarkable Croatians, but you guys always claim them as Serbs. Let me name just one though, Faust Vranich, the inventor of the parachute. Leonardo da Vinci invented one too, but his (corkscrew type) is not the commonly used design of today.

    I still come to laugh when I think of how chocked Serbs described Operation Storm; “The US Army dressed up in Croatian uniforms.” Lucky then that the Americans didn’t dress up the blacks and Hispanics, that would have been too obvious. ;)

    I stand by what I said previously in my posts. But, just to be fair, let me mention some good things about Serbs:

    Excellent cuisine, perhaps even better than the Croatian.
    Excellet modern musical achievements.
    In general good litterature. Serbs often have a very vivid imagination and invented creatures like vampyres.
    Serbs do tend to be on the intelligent side. The sloth and incompetence I talked about is probably due to bad habits and culture. Proven by the fact that Serbs outsid Serbia generally turn out rather decent.
    Belgrade is probably the best city in Europe to party in, if you’re a young person.

  10. Vladimir's Gravatar Vladimir
    November 7, 2012 - 3:36 am | Permalink

    @Faust Vranich:

    To address only a few of your statements:

    1.”… they are utterly incompetent in general. Which was proven by them losing all the wars in the Yugoslavian conflicts.”

    It would actually require quite a bit of competence from a country the size of Serbia to win several wars against NATO.

    2. “Or the Finns who fought and won over the Russians despite being outnumbered 13 to 1. ”

    If you are referring to the war of 39-40, in case you didn’t know, Finland actually lost and ceded territory to USSR.

    3. “Our problem is they’re twice as many as us and completely worthless.”

    What a change of attitude from the end of both World Wars! The more the prospect of being partitioned as a losing nation loomed over Croats, the more they developed a taste for Slavic brotherhood with the Serbs. So frequent are your changes of heart in regards to your neighbors, that I had to compile a chart to keep track of Croatian sentiments in the chronology of 20th century :

    Year Croatian Sentiment towards Serbs

    1914 “Byzantine swine” (accompanied by atrocities
    against Serbian civilians while in the ranks of
    the Austro-Hungarian army.
    1918 “Slavic Brotherhood! Oh, please, we don’t
    want to be partitioned as losers! Can we
    pleeeease join your winning side?!
    1941 “Byzantine swine” (accompanied by a
    full-scale Ustasa genocide against Serbs)
    1945 “Slavic Brotherhood all the way!! Oh, can we
    not be on the winners’ side again even
    though we originally sided with the losers?!”
    1991 “Serbo-Communist swine!” (while expelling
    600,000 Serbs from areas which they have
    historically populated)

    Excuse me, my head is spinning a bit…

    Btw, what a heroic struggle that was against the mighty foe in 1991-95! Croatia only had NATO on its side while the Serbs had…er…hm…. Boris Yeltsin!! Your Operation Storm is something unique in the annals of military history. Against all odds, with only 150,000 troops you managed to prevail against an entire population of 250,000 Serb civilians and expelled them from their homes in Krajina! Who could even imagine such a feat? Surely, you were armed, trained, guided and aided from the air by the American military. But your epic victory truly worthy of the Croatian nation should not be belittled.

    4. “Our culture is closer to the German one than to the Serbian one.”
    Again, you will have to forgive me for not having heard of any Croatian Goethes, Schillers or Beethovens. I am sure there must have been many of those, since unlike Serbia which was absorbed by the Muslim Ottoman Empire, you were part of the Austrian Habsburg Empire for centuries, which must have facilitated your cultural development. Do doubt, there is a Faust in Croatian literature as well (no pun intended). However, the greatest Croat of them all was clearly Nikola Tesla. I am reminded of his Croatian genius every time I listen to the radio or switch on the light. (There have been some rather shameless rumors that his relatives were expelled from Croatia in 1990s because Teslas are actually Serbs, but I am not into gossip, especially if it besmirches the character of the great Croatian nation).

    I enjoyed your comments! Keep up the good work.

  11. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 6, 2012 - 8:58 pm | Permalink

    @Faust Vranich:

    Est-ce que vous-etes Francais?

    Hélas, non—au moins, pas encore! Je suis américain. The private associations that lie behind my nom d’Internet identify me to old friends and conceal my identity from others.

    What I wanted to say with my comparisons to Croatia was “Take heart, sometimes you have to struggle for many years before you can achieve your goal.”

    You have said it very well. I think many here have taken hope from your words. It is also good to learn more about a Western people that has suffered so many hardships yet persists in the face of all of them; a people that organizes its affairs so differently from the way Americans organize theirs, yet organizes them in a way recognizable and indeed intelligible to any student of the history we all share.

    But you too have plenty of heroic examples in your history, like Davy Crockett and the defense of Alamo. What’s happened with that spirit?

    The very existence of this website represents an attempt to answer your question. Professor MacDonald has some well-formed answers, and I think it’s safe to say that everyone who writes for the site and comments upon his articles shares at least some of his outlook. Yet as you see, very marked, sometimes very grave differences are present everywhere (e.g., those of your compatriot Tomislav Sunic, which have a far more recobnizably European cast than KM’s). These differences frequently generate animosity, especially among us commenters, little of which, regrettably, changes minds or encourages either political unity or mutual affection. Perhaps this is what the United States—a manufactured nation, after all—is fated to be: a society where neither ties of ethnicity and soil nor those of patriarchal affection and religion (mine is the same as yours, not incidentally) will serve to unify its people—at least not so long as the false god of democracy (which is definable as “rule by treasonous scoundrels in the pay of the Jews”) reigns over this land.

  12. Faust Vranich's Gravatar Faust Vranich
    November 6, 2012 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon (Est-ce que vous etes Francais?)

    Intermarriage is of no consequence at all. In our neck of the woods it works like this: You inherit your ethnicity stricktly from your father. What your mother is, matters not. And this used to be the rule for the rest of the world too, in countries adhering to the droit sangue (blood right) principle. This rule isn’t water-tight though. Sometimes the children of a mixed couple decide they want to belong to the ethnicity of their mother. This has normally to do with them living in the country of their mother. A neighbor of mine is Serbian, and his wife is too. Their only son has decided he wants to be Croatian and that he is now. Our conception of ethnicity does not have to do with race or pureness of blood. But there is one requirement, to be counted as a”real” Croatian, you should belong to the Roman Catholic Church. This the boy above did, he changed from Serb Orthodoxy to Roman Catholicism. He is accepted as Croatian by most, but not quite all of the people in the village. There are many other such cases, both from way back and in the present.

    I guess that the husband of your Serbian-Croatian couple changed his religious affiliation and became a Roman Catholic.

    In America you follow the droit terre (land right), meaning that you count those born in your territory as citizens, or nationals. I often hear from Americans “I’m part Irish, part German and part Italian”, or something along those lines. That is quite meaningless in my country and I have never heard someone referring to himself in that way.

    I didn’t really wanted to hijack this thread. What I wanted to say with my comparisons to Croatia was “Take heart, sometimes you have to struggle for many years before you can achieve your goal.” Another example would be the Spaniards, who fought the Moors for seven centuries until they too became free. Or the Finns who fought and won over the Russians despite being outnumbered 13 to 1. A truly heroic people.

    But you too have plenty of heroic examples in your history, like Davy Crocket and the defense of Alamo. What’s happened with that spirit?

  13. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    November 6, 2012 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    @Faust Vranich:
    Thank you for the history lesson and your heartening message of hope. Congratulations on your excellent English. I hope we hear more from you. You represent a part of the world about which I know little and would like to learn more.

  14. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 6, 2012 - 5:04 pm | Permalink

    @fender: P.S. fender, I should have added, that despite being acutely aware of Jewish influence, none of it matters to blacks, because their overriding concern is to screw up whitey, get the “man”,etc. I have this on the authority of a black guy I used to work with, and he was absolutely sincere, having lived in exclusively black areas his whole life.

  15. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 6, 2012 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Most blacks don’t even know who Jews are.

    Wrong!! Wrong as can be fender. I have worked at places blacks were employed, and have gotten quite an insight into how many of them think, etc.I can assure you without the slightest doubt, that given equal social circumstances,(living in similar places, similar jobs,etc.) blacks are probably more aware of Jewish issues,etc. than most utterly clueless whites are. For one thing, most of the liquor stores in black areas were once owned by Jews. Think of Jesse Jacksons, Farrakans and other blacks revealing comments on Jews, etc. Even black ministers, who are always Christian for the most part, are hyper aware of the Jewish influence. This is the reason, so many leftist and moderate Jews have essentially abandoned the black communities. Of course if they can use them to screw up some European-American issue, they still will.

  16. fender's Gravatar fender
    November 6, 2012 - 4:49 pm | Permalink

    @Faust Vranich:

    “England?” “Germany?” No: Judea. All of it. Europe, Russia, America, all of it is Judea. There’s no sense in talking about the actions of these “nations” when all of them are controlled 100% by jews.

    Your comments on blacks are entirely misguided. For one, most blacks don’t even know who jews are, secondly, the ones who do know consider them no different than Whites, and third, blacks are mostly too unintelligent to be any kind of ally for Whites.

  17. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 6, 2012 - 4:11 pm | Permalink

    @Faust Vranich: I have very much enjoyed reading your comments, sir, and I am glad to say I have learned quite a bit from them. One of my oldest friends, a man (now 69) whom I haven’t seen for a decade or more because his work keeps him away, is the American-born child of a Serbian father and a Croatian mother (both of them Catholics, as it happened). When he and I were young, my friend used to say that the biggest problem confronting Serbs and Croatians was that they intermarried so often!

    Would you agree that intermarriage and subsequent confusion of loyalties among the children continues to be a problem in your part of the world?

    Incidentally, I vividly recall both parents: the father was a surly, coarse individual. He and my friend fought constantly and bitterly in (I presume) his Serbian dialect. His mother, however, was a woman both gentle and sweet-tempered. The word that comes to mind is saintly, actually.

  18. Faust Vranich's Gravatar Faust Vranich
    November 6, 2012 - 2:02 pm | Permalink


    Jews haven’t had much, if anything, to do with our conflict. We Europeans are quite capable of f*ckups by ourselfes. It was in fact England, who after it became obvious that the Turks will become goners, inticed Serbia to pursue a policy of imperialism towards their neighbors on the Balkan peninsula. England did this as a move to stop the Germans from getting more influence in that area.

    Still today Germany and England flex their muscles via their proxies Croatians and Serbs. But not in the way that the proxies don’t have a will of their own.

    I think you Americans aren’t paying enough attention to your own situation. The Jews have you by the balls, not because they’re so superior, but because you people are so blind to what is happening right under your noses. Let me give you an example.

    Despite all the present accusations, screaming, hatred, etc the blacks in your country expect you whites to lead them to happiness and prosperity. They may have a somewhat lower IQ, but they’re not entirely stupid. They have, maybe in some subconscious way, understood something that white people haven’t; That there are no good prospects for them without the white folks. So why don’t you seek an alliance with them?

    When you have kissed and made up with the negroes, we may do the same with the Serbs. Our problem is they’re twice as many as us and completely worthless.

  19. fender's Gravatar fender
    November 6, 2012 - 12:31 pm | Permalink

    @Faust Vranich:

    Jews and globalists use narrow nationalism and past hatreds to pit Europeans against Europeans in such a way that both sides lose and jews win. This has to end. If Europe… ALL of Europe… isn’t united in racial solidarity (Nordics, Slavs, and Mediterraneans) then it’s going to be destroyed by the jews and their leftist immigrant-worshipping minions.

  20. Faust Vranich's Gravatar Faust Vranich
    November 6, 2012 - 12:05 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert
    The answer is simple, as I mentioned already, the Serbs litterally tried to exterminate us. Not physically, but culturally. You used the term “Serbo-Croatian”, which in itself was one of the tools of our intended destruction. Instead of calling our language, “Croatian”, the Serbs imposed the term “Serbo-Croatian”, something that has never existed before Yugoslavia. They said that they sacrificed something too, they adopted the Latin script, parallel to their own Cyrillian script. But that had nothing to do with Croatians. Adopting the Latin script was merely advantageous for them, living on a continent where that script dominated. So it wasn’t directly a sacrifice.

    There has been much debate on how similar or dissimilar Croatian and Serbian are. I say it doesn’t matter. There are other such close cousins, but nobody is talking about Swedish-Norwegian, or German-Dutch, or Spanish-Portuguese. And also, if a foreigner, like an American, learns Serbian, he will half the time not understand Croatian at all. If instead a native Croatian speaker learns British English, he will never be much handicapped in understanding the American or Australian dialects. The only English I was ever taught in school was the British variant, and I have never spent any significant time in any English-speaking country. One week in Malta and two weeks in Ireland is all I have spent in English-speaking countries.

    The cultural differences between Croats and Serbs aren’t like the minimal differences between Swedes and Norwegians, they’re instead worlds apart. Even when both cultures are gravitating towards the American culture, which is a world-wide phenomenon, Croatians and Serbs couldn’t be more different. We started to differentiate seriously when the Roman Empire split up into a Latin (Western) and a Grecian (Eastern) part, and that was a very long time ago. Outside observers say they can’t see any differences between us, but that is a stupid statement. What outside observers can see differences between the Germans and the French? Or Japanese and Koreans? Or Russians and Poles? I honestly can’t. However, I have never had problem discriminating between Croatians and Serbs.

    To summarize, you can’t camp with someone who harbors ill will towards you, no matter what likenesses between the two of you there might be.

    Croatia is already allied with some of the best allies one can have in Europe. Serbia would just drag us down, as it did in the times of Yugoslavia. Serbia is truly an economic basketcase. Serbs don’t want to work, or maybe they don’t know how to. They don’t keep their word and they are utterly incompetent in general. Which was proven by them losing all the wars in the Yugoslavian conflicts. Croatia is the richest of all former communist countries in Europe, save for Slovenia. In contrast to Serbia, Germany has been more than a faithful friend and also a brother in arms (against the Turks). Our culture is closer to the German one than to the Serbian one.

    So, no, there will never in the future be a “Serbo-Croatia” of any sort.

  21. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    November 6, 2012 - 4:25 am | Permalink

    @Faust Vranich:
    I understand that you peoples from the Balkans wanted to get rid of the Muslim Ottoman Turks. What I don’t understand is why you peoples from the former Yugoslavia couldn’t live together in one federal state that Tito had created. Are the differences really that great? Don’t you all speak Servo-Croatian? You Croats are Catholic and use the Latin alphabet, Serbes are Orthodox and use the Cyrillic alphabet, but is that really an unsurmountable hinderance to live together in one federal state? The various ethnic groups of Switzerland are far more different from each other, yet they live happily together in one federal state (“cantons”). Why not you?

  22. Faust Vranich's Gravatar Faust Vranich
    November 5, 2012 - 7:18 pm | Permalink

    I happen to be Croatian, just like the author of this article.
    Allow me to present a somewhat different view to what most here have expressed, meaning all is not lost yet.

    My people fought a war that lasted some five centuries, against the Ottoman Turks. Now, bear in mind that the Turks of the day were a military and cultural superpower. Croatia was never a superpower, or even significant power of any sort. It was content to exist in its natural borders and struggle to keep itself alive. But, because of its geographical positition it never “missed” a European war. Croatia struggled with its ally, Hungary, who wanted to magyarize (make hungarian of) the Croatians. The same thing with Venice, but to a lesser degree. And these were friends!

    Simultaneous with the wars with the Turks, our people were conscripted to do service in the 30 year war between Catholics and Protestants. Also, Croatians fought both for and against Napoleon.

    Finally the Turks were repelled. But then came WW1+2. No escaping those wars either. Contrary to popular belief, Croatians fought both for and against the Axis. After WW1 our utterly stupid academics joined our country with Serbia and other countries into something called Yugoslavia. Immediately the Serbs tried to assimilate us and make us into “Western Serbs”. It took us 70 years to wrestle us free from them.

    Never in our history did we ask our enemies (or supposed friends) to play fair. But we stuck to our Christianity, to our bloodlines and to our language and culture. Some of us betrayed the rest, they’re now part of other nations. Good riddance.

    Croatians, like Americans and other Europeans, aren’t too concerned about nationality, until theirs own is threatened. I regard the Turks and more recently the Serbs as a sort of gifts. Poisonous gifts from Providence, but nevertheless something that has made us stronger.

    We have now our own free and independent country, after hundreds of years in states together with other nations. It pays to fight and never give up, no matter how powerful the enemy seems.

  23. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    November 5, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    The absurd reaction to Mel Gibson’s The Passion was certainly a milepost on my road. I do not think it possible for any true Christian to remain unmoved by this portrayal. To have it called hate left me in an inescapable corner.

  24. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 5, 2012 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    @Rudd: I mentally put the word diverse in sneer quotes, and though they were (deliberately) absent from the screen, you seem to have seen that I was being consciously provocative.

    Of course, there can hardly be any doubt that “diversity,” in its contemporary sense referring to a white society inundated with and ultimately displaced by Third World riffraff, was one of the factors that eventually destroyed Rome and its civilization.

  25. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 5, 2012 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

    @Tom Sunic: I quite agree. And for Cicero or any other author whose language is or was something other than English, only a source in the original language will suffice.

  26. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    November 5, 2012 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

    @Heidi Beirich:
    Corollary : the more “hate speech laws”, the less democracy.

  27. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    November 5, 2012 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    @john thames:

    Haim Saban is unwittingly laying the groundwork for a rising tide of anti-Semitism.

    How many of history’s “anti-semites” were really patriots who were sick of having their countries ruled by an elite who defined themselves as being apart from the people of the land in which they were currently squatting? Truth, like water behind a dam, cannot be held back forever, and it does eventually break out.

    A neocon cabal, which dragged the US into wars harmful to the country, a cabal on Wall Street who brought the world’s economy to its knees by chicanery, filth passed off as culture, which poisons the country’s mores…what do all the players in these events have in common? Recognizing common elements to seemingly unconnected events isn’t hatred, it’s intelligence.

  28. Tom Sunic's Gravatar Tom Sunic
    November 5, 2012 - 12:54 pm | Permalink

    to Rudd and Pierre. We have to take with a great deal of skepticism every detail unless well documented by original sources. The German Theodor Fritsch wrote several well compiled books in German on what hundreds of European writers and poets — from Antiquity to Modernity — said about Jews. He was the bestselling author in Germany from 1933-45. But we must always insist on the original texts, not hearsays. Tom

  29. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    November 5, 2012 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon
    It does sound a bit familiar if you replace multicuralism for & I
    quote you”Republic was hopelessly corrupt and rotten to the core and for failing to embrace the new and diverse Empire that was replacing it as he watched.”
    There seems a certain inevitablity that is hard to accept in what is happening now that happened then. That word diverse knaws at me.

  30. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 5, 2012 - 10:02 am | Permalink

    @Rudd: De rien.

    Those were bad days for Rome. Some historians praise Cicero for his principled adherence and devotion to the lost cause of the Republic; others sneer at or denounce him for refusing to accept that the Republic was hopelessly corrupt and rotten to the core and for failing to embrace the new and diverse Empire that was replacing it as he watched. It’s worth remembering, too, that even as Octavian, reinvented as Octavius Augustus, was making himself sole ruler of the Roman world, he maintained all the Republican forms he had been instrumental in gutting.

    Any of this sound at all like rather more recent events and times?

  31. Heidi Beirich's Gravatar Heidi Beirich
    November 5, 2012 - 9:46 am | Permalink

    Democracy needs free speech
    Germany has banned free speech
    Germany is not a democracy

  32. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    November 5, 2012 - 9:31 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon
    Thank you for your very educational comments.
    You saved me from Tom Sunic’s question..

  33. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 5, 2012 - 8:39 am | Permalink

    @Tom Sunic: This putative quotation from Cicero has been bouncing around the Internet for years. No one has ever managed (or bothered) to source it, however, to the best of my knowledge. One frequently sees it described as “attributed” and loosely sourced to an oration in the Roman Senate in 58 BC.

    Unfortunately for this dating, the authoritative chronology of Cicero’s writings and speeches is still the one compiled by Allen and Greenough in the late nineteenth century and revised by Greenough and George Lyman Kittredge in 1901. Their chronology lists no orations whatsoever for the year 58.

    Is the quotation then a concoction or paraphrase? My bet is yes, almost certainly. The fact that neocons are crazy about it is also grounds for suspecting its authenticity. From the way it reads, it could have been assembled from passages from the Catilinarian orations (63), from the fourteen so-called Philippics against Marc Antony (44–43), or from any of the other speeches denouncing Antony made in those last two years of Cicero’s life (once Antony’s enemy, Octavian, made a pact with him, Cicero was doomed to death by proscription, as he well understood).

    If the quotation is to be considered authentic, a true classical scholar needs to step forward and provide chapter and verse.

  34. HolyHoaxer's Gravatar HolyHoaxer
    November 5, 2012 - 7:34 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: Well said : and too cool, types. They know it all.
    The Unfortunately truth about middle class Euro’s is that they are too polite and house broken . Too trained to see the nice side , too self indulgent with their own precious ideas , for which they expect all to say yes and smile polity (is this site really your place ? For tea and scones) , too worried about someone being offended and spiteful . The time for being too polite is over . Did you read John Thomas posts ? Invective rapier , moderated and controlled and intelligent and witty ( perhaps you missed this very important observation .@HolyHoaxer:
    There’s nothing wrong with ideas and wit .We are fighting fire with fire and water , completely out gunned . To move the magnifying glass away from the Fabulous European and put it over much less than fabulous International Jew and their many many lies .
    I’m sure we can find a job for you two as tea man and trolly pusher at my round table .

  35. November 5, 2012 - 6:03 am | Permalink

    @ Rudd. Good quote. Can you stp find it in the Latin original? best. Tom

    November 5, 2012 - 4:58 am | Permalink
  37. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    November 5, 2012 - 12:39 am | Permalink

    @holyhoaxer, on that subject, I remember this excerpt from a collection of responses to the famous William Cash article on Jewish media influence:

    ‘Mr. Cash’s article appeared at the same time that an anonymous Sony executive in Tokyo was quoted in the Japanese business weekly Keizaikai as saying, “… The U.S. film business is almost completely controlled by Jews. This is true of what we are doing as well and our job is to use them in an efficient manner.”

    The Japanese magazine then concluded, “What this person is saying is that you cannot ignore Jews if you do business in the U.S.”‘

  38. HolyHoaxer's Gravatar HolyHoaxer
    November 4, 2012 - 11:35 pm | Permalink

    @Igor Alexander: The Japs learn’t their lesson about Semitic hatred in the 80’s (80-89 ) when they were trying with all their cunning and aggression to colonize Japan , using Israeli ‘traders’ as the wedge in the door .This was a time when everything ‘cool’ was from in Japan and the US manufacturing prowess was whipped and Japan trade surplus was very large .
    But the Jap wouldn’t have a bar of them and their loud mouth Semitic aggressive negotiation tactics (which I have seen in operation in asia) . As we know on this sight no one hates with the intensity of the Jew . [ Especially now that they have painted themselves as the eternal victims of hate and racism ! ] . What was the International Jews response rebuff ? To spread hate and lies using the MSM . The World Jewish press whipped up the West into an anti Japanese frenzy (much like they are doing to an independent Russian (Putin) ) . Japanese people were given warnings when traveling overseas due to this . I myself witness a completely irrational attack by a drunken Australia in 1992 on a couple of Japanese guys outside their hotel–infact I intervened .
    Any country that tries to resist Jewish control (by miscegenistic colonization [Marry a Jap won’t get you a passport !]) gets ‘the treatment’ . In the end the Japs bought off international Jewry by allowing to arbitrage their huge savings .Once the pig got its snout in the trough it forgot about colonization : Wow , these Japs are so stupid , who wants to live their anyway . And so the fashion with all things Japanese died out .
    The Japanese have never been given an equal place at the table of the UN , because the UN is Just another Rocky-Rothy sham front for their machinations.As we are witnessing at the moment .

  39. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 4, 2012 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

    @Igor Alexander: Igor, I am in total agreement with everything you said. Any politically savy European-American knows, how utterly distracted, gullible and willfully stupid, I said WILLFULLY STUPID, that so many millions of European-Americans are. I apologize if this sounds harsh, but anyone with a degree of insight can see it. If this country is in a hopeless situation, the first first reason is the cowardice, ignorance, and lack of integrity deep inside most of us European-Americans, MYSELF INCLUDED. My, God, if we can’t even face the truth of our condition, then why concern ourselves with others, including leftists and the corrosive groups like the ADL and others aligned against our best interests. The absolute CRAP that has been going on against European-Americans and that has remained UNANSWERED BY THEM, is nothing less than SHAMEFULL, NOT TO SAY AN OUTRIGHT SIN!!

  40. fender's Gravatar fender
    November 4, 2012 - 10:26 pm | Permalink


    If I came off as talking down to you, it wasn’t my intention.

    That jews carry US passports is our fault for not recognizing that they’re a hostile people who could never be loyal to us.

  41. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    November 4, 2012 - 9:35 pm | Permalink

    I understand that they are a tribe unto their own. But they do carry US citizenship papers & we have prosecuted the Rosenbergs for treason. Pollard is in prison for selling out our
    secrets & he’s a citizen. I understand the jew is our enemy.
    You don’t have to talk down to me. I’m well aware of the jewish question.

  42. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    November 4, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

    Exactly, that is why such a man as Jonathan Pollard is a “hero” and a “martyr” to them. In Israel, supposedly America’s “best friend and ally”, he is almost revered as a “saint” . Of course all Israeli politicians (including Netanyahu) have pleaded for his release, and so have all Jewish organizations in the US. No shame here, just loyalty. It is amazing how consistent these people are in their tribal morals, but you must understand what those morals are.

  43. November 4, 2012 - 9:27 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: I have no doubt whatsoever that if the Defamation League of B’nai B’rith could flush the First Amendment down the toilet, they would do so in an instant; and that’s exactly what they’re trying to do, incrementally. Americans have already accepted the concept of “hate crime,” and outlawing so-called “hate speech” is only a step removed from prosecuting “hate crime.”

    The jews won’t try to get rid of the First Amendment outright; what they’ll do is try to create exceptions to its protections, arguing that since Americans aren’t allowed to yell “fire!” in a crowded theater and aren’t allowed to defame individuals, they shouldn’t be allowed to defame minorities or say things which could endanger them (Muslims, obviously, will not be among the protected minorities, and it will be OK to defame them with impunity). Western European countries and countries like Canada and Australia all have provisions in their constitutions protecting the citizen’s right to free expression, and yet they also all have laws against “hate speech”; I see no reason for why in another 10 or 20 years Americans won’t have accepted similar restrictions on their speech (assuming the U.S. hasn’t collapsed by then).

  44. fender's Gravatar fender
    November 4, 2012 - 8:13 pm | Permalink


    The jews aren’t traitors. A traitor is someone who betrays his own people. The jews don’t betray their own. The jews can’t commit treason against us because they’re not our people, and it’s time that Whites understand that. Jews are openly at war against Whites.

  45. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    November 4, 2012 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

    An interesting quote from long ago.
    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through…all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

    For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” – Marcus Tullius Cicero

  46. fender's Gravatar fender
    November 4, 2012 - 6:16 pm | Permalink

    The USA is already pretty much the Soviet Union. Jews are the commandants as usual, Whites are the prisoners as usual, and blacks and hispanics are the guards. Europe too is going to become a giant gulag, with jews in charge and arabs as the security guards. The ultimate jewish dream is to turn the entire planet into a gulag.

  47. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 4, 2012 - 5:15 pm | Permalink

    I completely agree with Dr. Sunic, on the American government allowing so-called extreme right wing groups, as a way of demonstrating our “free speech” to the rest of the world. It’s so politically expedient, I would almost say essential, for the American empire that the elite control, to demonstrate this “freedom” to the rest of the world. But, if any nationalist group actually started to gain REAL POWER, started to infiltrate the educational system, started to gain in millions of memebers, and had a leadership that wasn’t corruptible, THEN, we would see the true faces of the elite and what their attitude would be towards “right wing”,etc. groups, or any organizations that are becoming threatening to the status quo in any serious way. You better believe they would crack down. The elite that control the U.S. government, control things in a very modern way, and have learned a lot from their enemies of the past.

  48. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 4, 2012 - 3:46 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:Good morning Pierre, hope your’e doing well. I couldn’t AGREE more, Pierre. I’m reminded of a road trip I took in my youth with my best friend. We traveled froma suburb of Los Angeles, down highway 10, and all the way to New Orleans, Mississippi, all two thousand miles of it. Not to get too far off my point, but we did it in the dead of Summer during the bicentenneal (1976), in an aircooled 1963 Volkswagan beetle!! California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and finally Mississippi!!

    Now that I got that out of my system, as we headed towards New Orleans, we made a stop at the ranch of my friends uncle and aunt in Waco, Texas. I met his charming cousins and one of them wanted to show us Texas A&M University. It was interesting, with benches covered in rawhide in halls and other places. But what amused me, and this finally addresses your point, so many of the faculty there was young and went around smoking pipes with their noses high in the air,etc. They didn’t seem to realize what this looked like. And I listened to some of these “professors” talking and you’d think God himself was speaking. Yes, I know well what you mean about the hipsters, and too cool, types. They know it all.

  49. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 4, 2012 - 3:14 pm | Permalink

    @HolyHoaxer: What you call the “aging genteel” are not the problem by and large. The largest problem group consists almost entirely of the know-it-all, too-cool-to-be-fooled type that is, I suspect, more or less of an age with you. None are so easily deluded as those certain they can’t be.

  50. November 4, 2012 - 2:32 pm | Permalink


    No, my friends, it is you, who are corrupted. You stand by them. You send your young men to fight for them. You kneel.

    Oh, I see. It’s an anti-American rant. But why are you placing it here, on this particular blog of all places, rather than at the Washington Post?

    And what, pray tell, is your nationality? If you’re going to throw stones, the least you could do is tell everyone from which glass house you’re throwing them; unless, of course, you’re only trolling.

  51. November 4, 2012 - 2:24 pm | Permalink

    More about the Marco Polo incident:

    As part of its capitulation, the Bungei Shunju company had to submit to stiff and humiliating conditions imposed by the Wiesenthal Center. In addition to a Center-organized “education” seminar in Japan for company employees, Bungei Shunju staff members had to fly to Los Angeles for Holocaust indoctrination courses at the Wiesenthal Center. Still other staff members were to travel to Auschwitz, and then write a new article for publication about the Holocaust issue from the “proper perspective.” The Bungei Shunju company also agreed to publish a “proper” article deploring the Marco Polo episode, and to give $50,000 to the Wiesenthal Center.

    … Rabbi Cooper and two other Wiesenthal Center officials addressed the attendees, who were obliged to sit through showings of three Holocaust propaganda films: “Genocide,” “Echoes that Remain,” and “Liberation.” Cooper expressed the hope that the seminar would help in “building permanent friendships between the Jewish and Japanese people.”

    It boggles the mind. Not only is the issue recalled and the magazine shut down, but to add insult to injury, the crook-nosed crooks demand to be paid $50,000! Even more remarkable than the jews’ hootzpah is that anyone would have agreed to their conditions. The Simon Wiesenweasel Center must have made some severe threats for a foreign company to accede to those terms.

  52. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    November 4, 2012 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Comments well received.

    I rather maintain my opinion. Russia never kneels in front of Zionists and Israel.

    Asians even less.

    No, my friends, it is you, who are corrupted. You stand by them. You send your young men to fight for them. You kneel.

    Sorry, but there we are.

    Good luck, anyway. :)

  53. November 4, 2012 - 2:03 pm | Permalink
  54. November 4, 2012 - 1:36 pm | Permalink



    Indian ‘Hitler’ clothes store owners back down

    Two Indian businessmen who caused an international outcry after naming their clothes store ‘Hitler’ and using the Swastika as a logo have said their [sic] will now rename the shop.

    04 Sep 2012

    Their climbdown followed days of intense political pressure and protests from Britain, the United States, Germany and Israel. Local Jewish groups had visited the shop in Ahmedabad, Gujarat last week to register their anger.


    On Monday evening they finally backed down after being besieged by telephone calls from protestors. Rajesh Shah said they had been under ‘political pressure’ from local officials and protestors from all over the world.

  55. Gary's Gravatar Gary
    November 4, 2012 - 12:13 pm | Permalink

    @C. C. Conrad:
    The history of the 5000+ years of so-called civilization has

    been the tyrannical oppression of 99% who lived in abject

    poverty by the 1% elite who lived in opulence. Can 2% take

    over? Hell yes and with vengeance.

  56. November 4, 2012 - 10:37 am | Permalink

    @HolyHoaxer: We have our own propaganda that should be used much more often. Buy our books & other materials and put it into the hands of our next generation, now while we can. The book that I wrote – Jack’s War – could be just what you need. I wrote it so that it would appeal to wide range of white people, of any age or gender, that need a little push toward our side. This book encourages them without burdening them with a lot of facts, figure or politics. Just an easy to read little book that helps them along.

  57. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    November 4, 2012 - 10:22 am | Permalink


    “Can you think of one Northern European Protestant from the Colonial Era on television?”

    Or how about one who could qualify for the SAR or the DAR?

  58. November 4, 2012 - 10:17 am | Permalink

    @john thames: I am quite convinced that there are a lot of white people that would like to speak out on the issues that whites are currently struggling with. Men & women in high positions in the government, universities and business. But as you say, they would be running the risk of losing everything to do so. What such people need is someone to defend them, a counter balance to the bullies, so to speak. Once pro-white individuals know that it is safe to speak and act in accordance with their conscience they will do so.

  59. November 4, 2012 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    @90404: “Joos are better networkers. And Whites have guilt and Passivity. Look at Sweden, etc. 200 years ago, Vikings. Now, pussies!”
    Now the question becomes, why are the Jews better at networking? And what can we do to encourage that will to power in our people? Here’s a hint, it will take an emotional push, first, because the reason centers of the brain are a bit slower to respond.

  60. November 4, 2012 - 9:51 am | Permalink


    Russia (OK, oligarchs, yes, but no media control and oligarchs always run abroad after they have looted, they feel not safe..),

    Well, I’m not sure what the situation is like today, but not too long ago Russia would’ve been an excellent example of a country under jewish domination. I’d say the country being looted by jewish “oligarchs” is a pretty big deal; why do you play it down? And I’m pretty sure at least one or two of those oligarchs had large media holdings. And I can also tell you that at least one of those oligarchs who is now living in exile in the UK has openly boasted of using his ill-gotten wealth to try to overthrow the Russian government so that he and his jewish pals can go back there and continue looting.


    Tell that to the publishers of Marco Polo magazine:

    “To the Editor:

    I wish to commend the Simon Wiesenthal Center for its swift reaction to an article in the February issue of Marco Polo, a monthly publication of Bungei Shunju Company, one of Japan’s leading publishers. The Wiesenthal Center not only furiously protested the article through the Japanese Embassy in the U.S. and the Israel Embassy in Japan as soon as it appeared, but also requested Volkswagen and other international companies to cancel their advertisements in all Bungei Shunju publications.

    Volkswagen and Cartier accepted the center’s request immediately and two large Japanese corporations, Mitsubishi Motors and Mitsubishi Electric, quickly followed suit. As a result, the publishers, who had previously rejected a proposal from the Israeli Embassy to publish a counter article because they did not want to entertain any disputes over the article’s content, apologized to the Wiesenthal Center. They also announced that they would discontinue the publication of Marco Polo and recall all copies of its February issue. The magazine’s editor‑in‑chief was forced to leave his position the same day, and two weeks later the president of the Bungei Shunju resigned. l cheered when I read about these developments, because I had been extremely dismayed by this article and was also planning to protest.

    The article in question, titled “The Biggest Taboo in the Post World War Two Era; there were no Nazi‑run gas chambers,” was written by a physician named Masanori Nishioka. In it, Nishioka denies the existence of gas chambers and alleges that the Nazis planned not to exterminate the Jews, but merely to forcefully resettle them in the East.”

    (quoted from a letter to the editor in the Scarsdale Inquirer, March 3, 1995)

    I’m not exactly sure what your point was supposed to be (you might be understood better if you’d turn off the sarcasm and just say what you mean), but I disagree with at least these two examples that you provide.

  61. dixie's Gravatar dixie
    November 4, 2012 - 9:36 am | Permalink

    Mr. Tsunic is not American and speaks out of turn for “Americans” in what they “know and don’t know.” This article, in a sense is Lenin’s “two steps forward and one back.”

    The great problem of “white nationalism” (which must go in quotes for many reasons), is precisely this— that so many of its speakers are the “one step back.”

    While Mr. Tsunic is correct in stating “Americans” (whatever he means by that, lol) do not have the repressive laws that Europeans have actually ALWAYS had from the (real) American perspective, what seems like “great freedoms” to Europeans feels to Americans (those dating from the colonial era) as TOTAL REPRESSION, to the point that many will NEVER even reproduce children in such a horrible environment.

    A welfare state can, especially run by “euro ethnics” will never feel free to the colonial-era groups. Certainly, in the Balkanization the Rome conquered territories (like Mr. Tsunics “Croatia”) should be separate from the Northern Europeans never conquered by Rome (or other Idea-based “proposition nations.”)

    The battery of European serfs under the feudal religious systems, rome, etc, created a very “top-down,” people, (slaves), who can really see “America” as “free” (because they do not see how “relative” that freedom is.)

    Americans from the colonial era feel horrified, stifled, that the environment is not worth raising families in (because so much has been taken away in terms of being able to feel, think, observe, react, learn, and so on.) The Civil War was clearly decisive, burning the wealthiest area of “colonials” (code for Northern European Protestants) with the U.S. “total war” on the Americans.

    That ushered in the Fed of 1914, the “forever war climate,” the degradation of public education (the protestant America had been the most literate place on earth, for reasons connected to the self-responsibility required in protestantism for reading Bible and religious texts FOR ONESELF.)

    In the serfdom religions, the “high priests” hand down the dogma, or people are “selected” to pontificate (why we now have “Pundits” on our television). Supposedly, of course, these are the “best and brightest.” But even at that, what then of the “high priests” who are never allowed to marry or reproduce children? Wouldn’t that be a bit dysgenic? And indeed, many Americans say it was very dysgenic for Europe.

    Again—- in all this, Europe is “Lenin’s One Step Back.” The “White ethnics” (code for european catholics and jews) are very glad to be in a place “so free.” That the colonial era people are appalled by this “dumbed down level” will not be addressed (because that would mean giving that ethnic group “its due.”)

    The “white ethnics” want to hang on to the power they got in the 1960s power grab, and continue to appropriate the creativity of the Colonial era Americans and redistribute it as they see fit (socializing people from the south border of the country, which they opened, as Philip Hart, the Irish Catholic Banker opened it to his co-religionists, in 1965, along with his Jewish partner, Emmanuel Cellar, which is all a matter of record).

    This is how “the left” drives “white” nationalism via places such as TOO.

    TOO is mostly a foreign-written blog. And Northern European protestants from the American colonial area being “de-colonized,” i.e, genocided, (mostly in the Bible Belt, which is a code phrase for wasp), DO NOT WANT to join Lenin’s little “One Step Back,” which is so endlessly popular with the Europeans.

    PS– they’d like to see somebody on t.v. who looks like them. Can you think of one Northern European Protestant from the Colonial Era on television?

  62. JPLex's Gravatar JPLex
    November 4, 2012 - 8:28 am | Permalink


    At least everybody seems to agree that the Americans are fully and totally under the Jewish control. But still, of course, some Americans can draw comfort from the fact that maybe in Germany one cannot say that aloud. What a relief, they have it even worse…

    But hey, there are many, many countries where the Jews have negligible control. I give you some: Russia (OK, oligarchs, yes, but no media control and oligarchs always run abroad after they have looted, they feel not safe..), Japan, Korea, China, India, Finland. Just to name a few…

    So, please revel in self-pity, but I tell you, the battle is just starting. And the outcome is clear.

  63. November 4, 2012 - 6:25 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    “Then there is of course a secondary class, consisting of Whites who have entirely interiorized Jewish thinking and now have undertaken the holy task of persecuting their heretical brethern : the pathetic case of the anti-White Whites, variously known as “anti-racists”, “anti-fascists” etc.”

    These are the jews’ renfields. (Read Bram Stoker’s Dracula if you don’t get the reference.)

  64. HolyHoaxer's Gravatar HolyHoaxer
    November 4, 2012 - 5:59 am | Permalink

    @john thames: Great post John , you could be writing speeches for congress o better ; give those ass kissers something to talk about .

  65. HolyHoaxer's Gravatar HolyHoaxer
    November 4, 2012 - 5:46 am | Permalink

    @john thames:I like very much this line : …Oliver Stone said that Hitler did more damage to the Russians than the Jews …

    That,s a sly cut . Must have brought a few chuckles from the gallery.

  66. HolyHoaxer's Gravatar HolyHoaxer
    November 4, 2012 - 5:29 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Tell the aging genteel about the one and half billion hollow point bullets the DHS has bought without explanation and see if that builds synapse .

  67. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    November 4, 2012 - 5:05 am | Permalink

    Jews are anti White. They came into our nation as anti Whites. It is stamped on their foreheads We, the Jews, are an anti White nation. – a nation within a nation. Jews came in exuding anti Whiteness. They live and breathe anti White detestation.

    It was never we who were anti Semitic. It was never the white people who were racists. It was never the Whites that went into other nation and societies as hostile elites. It was not Whites who infested their societies as anti Semites, anti Blacks, anti Mexicans, anti Orientals…it was never white people setting up a hue and cry for laws against the liberties of people in their nations. But this is how these people come into the White Nation!

    Their media are biased and anti White. The ADL is biased and anti White. The Southern Poverty Law Center is biased and anti white. Hired help like Chris Matthews is a dysfunctional anti White. Liberals are anti White. Christian Zionists are anti White. Clergymen like John Hagee are anti White. The Civil Rights Act and Affirmative Action are anti White laws.

    Within our own nation we are drowning in anti White racism.

  68. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    November 4, 2012 - 4:21 am | Permalink

    We don’t have to go only by what others say about this oldest hate group, let us listen to what they themselves say. Here is a quote from one of their “psalms” (psalm 139) :

    19. Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God : depart from me therefore ye bloody men.
    20. For they speak against thee wickedly, and thine enemies take thy name in vain.
    21. Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? And am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee?
    22. I hate them with perfect hatred : I count them mine enemies

    For those who might concede that the Jews perhaps are no paragons of virtue themselves, but avert that we should be eternally grateful to them for having revealed “God” to us, here is a description of that “God”, again from one of their “psalms”, combining the horrible with the ridiculous (psalm 18) :

    6. In my distress I called upon the Lord, and cried unto my God : he heard my voice out of his temple, and my cry came before him, even into his ears.
    7. Then the earth shook and trembled ; the foundations also of the hills moved and were shaken, because he was wroth.
    8. There went up a smoke out of his nostrils,and fire out of his mouth devoured ; coals were kindled by it.
    9. He bowed the heavens also, and came down : and darkness was under his feet.
    10. And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly ; yea , he he did fly upon the the wings of the wind.
    13. The Lord also thundered in the heavens, and the Highest gave his voice ; hailstones and coals of fire.

    Yes, we have been “blessed” by this wonderful people in many ways, religiously, morally, culturally, economically, politically, but somehow I think the world would be better off without the numerous “blessings” from this oldest hate group.

  69. Bob Roberts's Gravatar Bob Roberts
    November 4, 2012 - 4:17 am | Permalink

    This statement of Sunic’s needs sharpening: “It is an unwritten rule, even in the American newspapers engaging in serious debates about the dogma of multiculturalism (e.g., the conservative daily The Washington Times) never to criticize the Jews or Israel.” “Never to criticize Jews” — true. But criticism of Israel is possible; take, for example, Roger Cohen in the New York Times, who acknowledges from time to time the immense power of the Jewish lobby in the Congress and says things equivalent to Buchanan’s Amen Corner remark. Probably gets a lot of hate mail from supporters of Israel. But over all, Sunic hits the mark pretty well, especially considering that he is Croatian.

  70. HolyHoaxer's Gravatar HolyHoaxer
    November 4, 2012 - 2:44 am | Permalink

    @m: Good stuff m but I would say there is a generation that has abandoned the MSM they are the computer Gamers (-40 ) . I think the brainwash is less comprehensive now that for a very long time .
    Young teens are particularly susceptible to free thought and questioning which might account for the promotion of sex and availability of drugs and such movie stereo types. If they can’t be nailed with good ol fashion propaganda more nefarious schemes are hatched . Never underestimate the total ruthlessness of the enemy .Who ever or what they are .

  71. HolyHoaxer's Gravatar HolyHoaxer
    November 4, 2012 - 2:06 am | Permalink

    @John hearns: Cynicism and ridicule as humor is the escape ‘they’ can’t moderate , censor or control once the intelligent get sick of being brow beaten . And since humor brings joy it becomes a dopamine peddle . :-)

  72. HolyHoaxer's Gravatar HolyHoaxer
    November 4, 2012 - 1:54 am | Permalink

    @Andrea Ostrov Letania: Andrea what an excellent observation made in crystalline clear language .The sacred cow must be protected and fed at all cost for the probable reason that Jerusalem is to be made the center of the NWO with Rothschilds World Court Building as the first stage .Thus the hollycow can never be questioned or ridiculed since the justice that is supposed to rest on this event will look like a sham . Which of course it is.

  73. fender's Gravatar fender
    November 4, 2012 - 12:46 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Absolutely right. And Nietzsche knew it too: he called the jews “the best haters there have ever been.” Read up on how the jew-bolsheviks of the cheka and nkvd mutilated their victims (women and children included) during the early years of the soviet union… how does one explain that kind of behavior? In spite of their power, the jews are still very much a slave race in perpetual revolt against the masters. Only slaves hate the way they do.

  74. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    November 3, 2012 - 11:54 pm | Permalink


    The Jews themselves are a hate group. They’re the world’s first and oldest hate group, in fact

    That was noticed already in Antiquity. This is what Roman historian Tacitus (ca 56-117) had to say about the Jews :

    ” …among themselves they are inflexibly honest and ever ready to show compassion, though they regard the rest of humanity with all the hatred of enemies.”

  75. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    November 3, 2012 - 11:40 pm | Permalink

    Speaking of “hate”, Jews seem to out do one another in immersing themselves in every aspect of the concept, as well as the word. That’s probably why they are known as the penultimate hate nation.

    What Sunic, Santomauro et al are essentially saying is that White America is an occupied, brainwashed nation, and a de-facto Jewish colony. We are currently misruled by a Jewish directed iron fist, hidden under a warm, fuzzy, velvet glove.

  76. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    November 3, 2012 - 11:31 pm | Permalink

    @Fender, Jews themselves are a hate group. Exactly right. Straight to the point and so very true. They would attempt to deny it by trying to make us believe that all those particularist wishes of power and prosperity are really meant for all of mankind. Not just their self centered little tribe. But their world is totally divided between Jew and Gentile. Anyone can see that so let’s just call them what they are, haters and supremacists.

  77. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    November 3, 2012 - 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Thanks to all the pro-White people who help make this site possible — the writers, readers, and commenters.

    And special thanks to the people who created it and maintain.

    (I haven’t read the article or comments yet. I just wanted to say thanks for this great place.)

  78. john thames's Gravatar john thames
    November 3, 2012 - 10:54 pm | Permalink

    “Schwarzism”. Beautiful, Miss Letania. Abslutely perfect.

  79. john thames's Gravatar john thames
    November 3, 2012 - 10:48 pm | Permalink

    The First Amendment is totally worthless: Repeat:totally worthless. People will not say what they really think if they can be fired and economically destroyed for doing so. So long as the First Amendment only protects you from the government, it is not worth the paper it is printed on.


    When Oliver Stone made the comment that Hitler and Stalin needed to be put in “historical context” the Israeli billionaire and Hollywood film producer, Haim Saban, went ballistic. He was further outraged by the additional comments of Mr. Stone that Hitler did more damage to the Russians than the Jews and that Israel’s media lobby distorts the facts on the Middle East. Saban opined that henceforth Oliver Stone should be allowed to practice his Fifth Amendment rights in retirement. What Haim Saban was really saying was that Jews should be allowed to define the limits of free speech and intellectual inquiry – upon pain of career destruction.

    Mr. Saban would undoubtedly argue that the First Amendment only protects citizens from government retaliation, not private retaliation. That is technically correct. However, Haim Saban must surely realize that, historically, Jews have provoked pogroms and expulsions through their anti-social behavior. Among the abuses which the Jews have committed are attempting to stifle criticism of their behavior and to suppress historical interpretations which they deem detrimental to their group interests. A good example of this process was the enormous pressure that was put on former President Jimmy Carter over the publication of his book “Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid”. Another example was the forced resignation of Marge Schott as the owner of the Cincinnati Reds for her qualified praise of Adolf Hitler. Now Oliver Stone, himself half-Jewish, is getting the “Mel Gibson” treatment.

    Haim Saban is unwittingly laying the groundwork for a rising tide of anti-Semitism. People do not care to be told what they can think and how they may express themselves. They particularly do not like to be dictated to as the price of a paycheck. Perhaps these minor considerations do not occur to the arrogant Mr. Saban. But to the man-in-the-street, certain considerations will flow through his mind. He will conclude that if one cannot criticize Jews, then Jews must be the real rulers of these United States. He will conclude that Jews are throwing their weight around and that maybe that evil man, Adolf Hitler, was on to something. He may even consider that the state of Israel is harming U.S. interests in the Middle East – and that super rich Jews like Haim Saban and their campaign contributions – are one of the reasons for U.S. support of Israel. He may even conclude that enforced silence is one of the big reasons for these abuses – and that perhaps those who enforce silence should themselves be silenced.

    These are dangerous thoughts indeed – and they lead to reactions well documented in history. Oliver Stone is quite correct that Hitler and Stalin need to be discussed in context. But to raise that context would perturb Haim Saban immensely. It would raise all the forgotten historical facts that he does not want examined. To put Hitler in context would mean recalling the injustices of the Treaty of Versailles and the immense Jewish involvement in same. It would mean remembering the names of the Communist revolutionaries in Germany and Hungary after the Great War – almost all of them Jewish. It would mean remembering all the Jewish commissars who served Joseph Stalin in the 1930’s and 1940’s – before he got around to purging them. It would mean examining Joseph Stalin’s attack plans in 1941 – before Hitler beat him to the punch. No doubt the context of all these matters would even disturb Mr. Stone and some of his mistaken notions. But that is what freedom of speech and intellectual controversy is all about – rocking the boat.

    It is blindingly obvious that there is a de facto Jewish approved religion of thought in these United States. This approved religion becomes ever more blatant in its efforts to crush freedom of thought and dissent. The issue is not one of bigotry and intolerance, for what is bigotry to one man is truth to another. Jewish Commissars of “free speech” like Haim Saban should no more be tolerated in these United States than the Jewish gulag commissars of 1930’s Russia should be allowed to die quietly of natural causes in their Moscow apartments.

    Haim Saban must learn that “freedom of speech” does not mean the freedom to fellate Haim Saban as the price of Hollywood fame and fortune. The House Un-American Activities Committee once rooted Jewish Communists out of the movie industry. It is time to root ethnic bully boys out of Hollywood, so that both Oliver Stone and Mel Gibson, men of surely diverse viewpoints, can have their say without fear of retaliation.

  80. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    November 3, 2012 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

    What a GREAT line! “The Jews themselves are a hate group.” I wrote this down! The truth of it JUMPED off the page at me!

  81. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    November 3, 2012 - 9:59 pm | Permalink

    @C. C. Conrad:
    Joos are better networkers.
    And Whites have guilt and Passivity.
    Look at Sweden, etc.
    200 years ago, Vikings. Now, pussies!

  82. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    November 3, 2012 - 9:57 pm | Permalink

    1965 Immigration Act.
    see: Pete Brimelows Book
    Pat Buchanans book, etc.

  83. November 3, 2012 - 5:54 pm | Permalink

    “Don’t you find it funny that out of 1,600 dailies, in the U.S., not one will report on those who advocate White interests as anything but ‘haters’? They say the media aren’t controlled. They say that we enjoy a free press. I guess all those 1,600 papers’ editors arrive at exactly the same conclusions independently.” — Alex Linder

  84. November 3, 2012 - 5:52 pm | Permalink

    “Is the Press freer in the United States than in Europe?”

    The Press is freer in Iran!

  85. Hedgerow's Gravatar Hedgerow
    November 3, 2012 - 4:48 pm | Permalink


    One of the interesting things about the SPLC is that religions generally get a pass. That is not true, though, for Christian Identity, which is labeled as anti-Semitic and racist by the SPLC. Judaism, however, gets a pass though it is racist. More hypocrisy from the SPLC.

  86. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    November 3, 2012 - 4:42 pm | Permalink

    To expound on the previous post, I think where the ADL histrionics finally jumped the shark was the campaign against Mel Gibson following “Passion of the Christ.” They’ll still get plenty of funding, but even the MSM has to take their fatwas with a grain of salt.

  87. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    November 3, 2012 - 4:42 pm | Permalink


    If the left was serious about combating “hate” and “racism” they’d demand that Judaism be outlawed entirely on the basis that it’s an inherently hateful and racist ideology.

    That is absolutely and completely and glaringly – TRUE.
    This should be an opportunity to turn the lefty dogs on their master.

  88. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    November 3, 2012 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    The SPLC still has the advantage of being the “go to guy” for the media when it wants to define the parameters of acceptable discourse. You will see this ad nauseum: “….. labeled a Hate Group by the SPLC, an organization that monitors extremists.” I think the ADL is fairly discredited, even though its over the top whining can sometimes intimidate possible dissidents in public life. Such groups are unnecessary in Europe where a parasite coalition of government thugs, 3rd world trash, and their “anti-fascist” subsidiaries can be counted on to harass perceived threats. The catch is lack of support for Israel and less aggressive “protection” of Jewish communities.

  89. fender's Gravatar fender
    November 3, 2012 - 4:08 pm | Permalink


    “The hypocrisy is still there: The SPLC will never call AIPAC, for example, a “hate group.””

    The Jews themselves are a hate group. They’re the world’s first and oldest hate group, in fact. If the left was serious about combating “hate” and “racism” they’d demand that Judaism be outlawed entirely on the basis that it’s an inherently hateful and racist ideology.

    As for a free media… or even freedom itself… neither exist when jews are around. The global mission of the jews is to strangle, oppress, and destroy. A nation is only free when its ruling elite act in the benefit of the people; the jews, as racial aliens, can only be hostile to the people if they should come to positions of power.

  90. The Admiral On Horseback's Gravatar The Admiral On Horseback
    November 3, 2012 - 3:19 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: Technically speaking, it’s very very easy for a government to censor the internet, and it gets easier every day. Google can catalogue and monitor millions of websites, and the technology used is getting every day more sophisticated. This of course helps when it’s used in a neutral manner – like a search engine should, just to deliver content to people which they really need. On the other hand, it could easily be used to monitor and catalogue hate speech, and I don’t have the slightest doubt that governments (including the US and Israeli governments) do use this technology for exactly that purpose. The two governments mentioned (and their numerous services) probably use the most sophisticated technology available, which is constantly getting better. I wouldn’t bet they won’t shut down “hate speech” on the internet. They can (or in the near future will be able to) easily do that, at least from a technical point of view it’s very easy.

  91. Hedgerow's Gravatar Hedgerow
    November 3, 2012 - 2:22 pm | Permalink

    The SPLC serves the role for Jews of helping to get around the problem of Israeli apartheid. The ADL looks ridiculous and hypocritical condemning White nationalism while defending apartheid Israel. The SPLC, by ignoring Israel and its defenders, helps solve that problem for Jews and for the media that uses the organization as a source. The hypocrisy is still there: The SPLC will never call AIPAC, for example, a “hate group.” However, the hypocrisy is less blatant. The SPLC, like the ADL, also pays lavish salaries, of course, to those who run it.

  92. November 3, 2012 - 2:02 pm | Permalink

    @m: The best way, for now that is, to destroy the efforts of anti-white groups, like the SPLC, is to change the minds of the masses. You can do this by giving them DVD’s or CD’s of written materials written by our authors. Buy the books that are written by people on our side and give them as gifts. Christmas & Thanksgiving are coming up, buy enough books for everybody on your gift list. You can & should also leave them in doctor’s offices, dentist’s offices or other public places. Make up business cards for your favorite pro-white book and leave them everywhere for the public to pick up. This way you can work to change the minds of the public so that the claims and accusations of the SPLC etc. no longer have effect. Of course, you can always just sit there and do nothing.

    Jack’s War

  93. November 3, 2012 - 2:00 pm | Permalink

    @m: True, and when we take over we won’t allow anti-white or pro-white-genocide speech.

  94. November 3, 2012 - 1:38 pm | Permalink

    @Andrea Ostrov Letania: Let’s do the math. Whites in the 1960’s made up 90% of the population in America. Jews make up 2% of the American population. How is it even remotely possible that THEY control anything? Yes. I know that they do have control, but the how & why is the question. Whites are still very numerous why don’t they just take over? If whites are so stupid as to allow some other group to run their lives, who’s to blame? If 2% can do this why can’t whites do it when they are 70% or 60% or even less? Here’s yer sign.

  95. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 3, 2012 - 12:09 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: I quite agree, but my own experience—that is, among my middle-class white acquaintances and neighbors—is that belief in Iraqi WMDs remains more an Alp than a foothill. I find this state of affairs stupefying.

    Syntactically, I prefer your plural treatment of MSM to my own robotically applied singular treatment. Still, it’s a choice both natural and hard to resist, given the univocal, indeed lockstep, character of the MSM.

    Apropos of little but the media and a word, dialogue, that at election time they hammer into our heads even more relentlessly than anytime else, I wish I could recall who it was that dismissed dialogue as “disguised monologue.” This movement can never have too many members whose eyes are wide open.

  96. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    November 3, 2012 - 11:13 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    A good introduction for the uninitiated to the idea that the MSM always lie is to mention that 100% of them lied about WMD in Iraq, which led to a disastrous war. Next one could mention that the MSM are 97% Jewish owned and that the Iraq war was an Israeli interest. That would both lead to the subjects of the Zionist lobby and the JQ in general.

  97. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 3, 2012 - 10:01 am | Permalink

    @m: Good comment, especially the first paragraph, where what you write, albeit familiar upon reflection, is so widely ignored in practice that it can hardly be restated too often.

    I think, however, that it’s critically important for people to stop overlooking one fundamental difference between past and present perceptions of the press. Since perception is the crux of Tribal control of everything, most of all the news and entertainment media and their “narrative” (to use a term I have belatedly and rather reluctantly taken on board), anything having to do with perception is overlooked at one’s peril.

    Everyone knows the name Joseph Pulitzer, of course, but few seem to comprehend the nature of the journalistic revolution he effected. To make a long story short, this immigrant Jew, who ran through several fortunes before he made his enduring mark in news control and management, loudly proclaimed that his papers would all be impartial, “objective” presenters of events and ideas. Furthermore and amazingly, he cowed his yellow-journalistic rivals into adopting his position. (Nota bene: up to that time, no American or European periodical had claimed to be anything but partisan, that being a fact of life too blatantly obvious to gainsay.)

    What was seen at the time (a century and a third ago) by everyone with half a brain as a vulgar exercise in Pulitzerian self-promotion has become an article of faith to virtually every American—even to many of the lying swine who make an indecently comfy living in what remains of the newspaper racket and in its various thriving e-successor rackets.

    Happily, most TOO commenters assume that the MSM lies, and lies reflexively, all the time. If we can persuade our sleepier white brethren to think as we do and, what is more, to stop taking for granted that, in its heart of hearts (or should that be “colon of colons”?), the latter-day press wants or ought to be “impartial” or “objective,” we shall have arrived at the dawn—or perhaps merely the first light—of the beginning of the counterrevolution.

  98. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    November 3, 2012 - 9:31 am | Permalink


    Solid posts Andrea.

    Not really, as I think you’ll see on a second reading. There’s some table-banging periphrasis of Michael Santomauro’s careful and articulate comment, preceded by the disastrous equation of a free press with a press “freely accessible to all”—as clear a contradiction in terms as I’ve ever seen. The icing on the cake is the one billionth cheap shot at Christianity published on this site.

    What the comments in question exemplify, sadly, is what Tom Sunic justly termed “fringe” protest speech, speech “with no cultural veneer,” whose “intellectual scope … is limited and can in no way harm the System. … [It] can never be taken seriously by either the thought police, or by the U.S. government. …”

    We can do much better, as Mr. Sunic’s article and Mr. Santomauro’s otherwise ignored comment both demonstrate. Indeed, we must do better.

  99. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    November 3, 2012 - 9:15 am | Permalink

    The propaganda continues (courtesy of BBC)
    The changing state of US ethnicity

  100. m's Gravatar m
    November 3, 2012 - 7:42 am | Permalink

    No regime, ever, has allowed much open criticism. To say that it is fundamentally different in the United States is happy talk. What is different is that inside liberal regimes, media are privately owned, and that ownership is minority. Yet even before minority control, pro-regime censorship was evident, especially during times of troubles, such as during the War of Southern Cessation.

    As long as a regime reflects the nature of the Majority, censorship is not unwelcome. To think so is of course anti-liberal, and to say so comes as a shock to most, but most are so caught up within a framework of liberalism that it is almost heretical not to support the tenants of individual freedom over the needs of a coherent civil union. The problem, again, is not censorship per se, but a minority censorship that controls all public discourse, and then uses that control for anti-Majority purposes.

    On the other hand, if Majority members “buy into” the minority pitch, and support it, then what can be said about their ability to discriminate? A people rise to their collective ability, and the collective understanding of most white Americans is not very high right now, or especially developed from a racial standpoint.

    We must, however, remember that racial awareness is something that has been lost. It was not always so. Therefore, what is needed is a “recovery,” and not a discovery. Obviously Majority members must abandon the controlled press, especially television, since that game is fixed. Jews control both sides of “respectable” discourse, and as a result nothing contrary can ever be said openly. Finally, through their “entertainment,” the most noxious anti-Majority propaganda is daily fare.

    Only by unplugging from the networks will the Majority ever hope to free their minds. But whatever the Majority finally decide, we may be sure that nothing will be done until SEC football season, and the NFL playoffs, are over.

  101. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    November 3, 2012 - 7:22 am | Permalink

    Anti-Israel comment is allowed in the UK from the ideological left as part of the pro-Palestinian project. Nothing in it (or very little) for white Europeans. In other words, Israel is attacked for being anti-Muslim.

  102. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    November 3, 2012 - 12:49 am | Permalink

    @Gregor, I once asked one of these losers if the Tibetans resisting sinicization were “Tibetan supremacists.” Hilarity ensued. These people love the moral high ground, and when that is threatened the mask of “tolerance” comes off, they become apoplectic with rage, willing to stoop to any low ro sulence heresy. Of course the situation is much more dire for our brethren in Europe who are putting their safety and freedom on the line.

  103. mark's Gravatar mark
    November 3, 2012 - 12:30 am | Permalink

    Great essay, Dr. Sunic.

    The $p£¢ is nothing less than a Jewish hate and terror organization, analogous in many ways to the Mossad. It uses deception and character assassination to enforce “what’s best for the Jews”. I’m wondering when its operators, and I mean that to include all American law enforcement agencies, will decide to use other means? We need to be ready for that, Gentlemen.

  104. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    November 3, 2012 - 12:15 am | Permalink

    Forgot to say ….

    Great article Tom! Hope all is well in Zagreb, and the slivovitz is still plentiful!

  105. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    November 3, 2012 - 12:14 am | Permalink

    But Marcus, you’ve got to understand that we Whites ARE all “White Supremacists”!

    The definition of “White Supremacist”, in the eyes of the usual suspects, is “Any White who still thinks they have a right to a White collective existence on Earth”.

    “Mere words” are GENOCIDAL when they are used to de-legitimize the existence of a people!

  106. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    November 2, 2012 - 11:55 pm | Permalink

    I like to read articles on, the biggest anti-immigration blog in France. It isn’t an intellectual blog. Many of the commenters there now accept that Jewish pro-immigration activism is a problem, but they refuse to see that the domination of the media (and of the government) by the Jews is the crucial point.

    The blog has a system where you have to register to read the comments, and they are systematically deleted after five days, in the hope that it will minimize the number of lawsuits.

    Anyway, information is being spread thanks to the internet, and I still hope it will eventually make a strong political impact.

  107. John's Gravatar John
    November 2, 2012 - 11:13 pm | Permalink

    @Andrea Ostrov Letania:

    I am not American, but I know that the first immigration law allowed only white immigration. When was the amendment which disallows discrimination by race/color added to the Constitution?

  108. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    November 2, 2012 - 11:02 pm | Permalink

    “It is an unwritten rule, even in the American newspapers engaging in serious debates about the dogma of multiculturalism (…) never to criticize the Jews or Israel.”

    Is it not simply because the owners of the newspapers, or the journalists or editors-in-chief are Jewish?

  109. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    November 2, 2012 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

    John hearns: “Nobody can escape, since we all have to deal with people who have been formed by it…”

    The corollary is that we see fewer people who have kept a European mindset. Without the Jews, there would be a huge amount of recent literature and movies produced in accordance with the European mindset. But that literature simply isn’t there.

  110. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 2, 2012 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Personally, I cannot even fathom, though it seems to be true, that Europe arrests people who doubt the truth of some historical event. When you stop and think about this, it’s mindboggling in the extreme!!

  111. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 2, 2012 - 10:44 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: Franklin, the questions you bring up are dead on. Your analysis of free speech for both areas is also dead on. I know for a fact, that here in the U.S. people have been literally deported, after Jewish groups decided they commited some kind of WW2 transgression against them. Furthermore, the Main Stream Media, never covered a word of it.

  112. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    November 2, 2012 - 10:40 pm | Permalink

    This is a a great topic and one which, for a long time now, I had been hoping Dr. Sunic would write about. Thanks Doc.

  113. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    November 2, 2012 - 10:37 pm | Permalink

    From my own limited research, I perceive that criticism of Jewry (by non-Europeans) and Israel (including natives) is allowed in Europe to a degree that would make Foxman, Potok, et al nauseous. We can’t even broach the topic. I guess this is because there is more concern about angering the large immigrant populations than a diminishing and scattered Jewry. Germany is an exception for obvious reasons.

  114. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    November 2, 2012 - 10:28 pm | Permalink

    Solid posts Andrea. I recommend perusing the Wikipedia article (and discussion page) on the American 3rd position for an interesting example of how the “foot soldiers” of the $PLC and other thought police operate, whether they are actual employees or not I don’t know. They cite a yahoo article and the $PLC homepage to support the claim that the party promotes “white supremacy.”

  115. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    November 2, 2012 - 10:26 pm | Permalink

    or more like…
    “since we all have to deal with people” (society)

  116. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    November 2, 2012 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

    @Michael Santomauro:

    Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually “think outside of the (Jewish) box.” –Michael Santomauro

    Nobody can escape, since we all have to deal with people who have been formed by it…. regardless of whether we are aware of “it” or not.

  117. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    November 2, 2012 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

    The difference between America and Europe with regard to freedom of speech about the Two Taboos ( Jews and Race ) is that in America the problem is “solved” in a privatized way – in accordance with its ethos of the free enterprize system, while in Europe it is solved by the State ( “Laws”), but the result is the same. In America private inquisitions ( ADL, SPLC ) persecute “heretics”, in Europe it is the State. In both cases it is the Jews who are behind it.

    Then there is of course a secondary class, consisting of Whites who have entirely interiorized Jewish thinking and now have undertaken the holy task of persecuting their heretical brethern : the pathetic case of the anti-White Whites, variously known as “anti-racists”, “anti-fascists” etc.

    The more Jews take power and the more the number of non-Whites increases, the more restriction of free speech will increase. There is no other way out of this predicament than through the use of free speech. Here lays the major battlefield. The Internet with its numerous websites allows us to wage a kind of guerrilla war in this struggle, but for how long?

  118. November 2, 2012 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

    “Hence the paradox. On the one hand one is allowed to say and write anything in theUnited States, even things that are completely stupid and sometimes openly preach the overthrow of the American system. On the other hand, however, everyone, including the Jews themselves, live in perpetual self-denial, assuming that the influence of the Jews is non-existent and that the role of Jews vis-à-vis non-Jews is always the Same.”

    It’s a Catch 22. We must say Jews are powerless because if you say they’re powerful, powerless Jews will use their great power to destroy you.

    But this goes back to the history of Christianity. Christians gained great power and used their power to crush all opposition. But they kept harking back to the time when Romans fed them to lions, and by using that trope, Christians made themselves the Eternal Victims–even though they’d gained all the power–and used their ‘powerless power’ to crush anyone who dared to challenge the Christian order. Jews learned from Christianity. They use the Holocaust to turn themselves into Jew-sus. Thus, Holocaustianity is the new Christianity, especially for secular Europe.

  119. November 2, 2012 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

    How can the ‘American’ media really be free–meaning freely accessible to all and free to report the news–when 95% of MSM is owned and controlled by Jews who are but 2% of the population?
    Sure, there are some free thinkers working in the media, but they know that if they deviate from the official line too much, their contracts won’t be renewed, they won’t be promoted, and/or they won’t be able to get jobs elsewhere(as word will get out among the Jewish employers about their dissent from the official line). What we have is many times worse than McCarthyism.
    Schwarzism, the prevailing reality in the media world, means you have to go along if you don’t want to be blacklisted from the media world.

    The American constitution says a person cannot be discriminated on the basis of race, color, or CREED. ‘Creed’ means belief, conviction, ideology, religion, or faith, but the grim fact is many people have lost their jobs for reasons of creed. For example, media, academia, government, and etc. continue to fire or refuse to hire people according to their creed on certain controversial issues. For example, if you credo involves belief in the reality of racial differences and how such differences impact social reality, you are effectively and even officially in some cases banned from holding many positions in government, media, academia, law firms, etc.
    And it was Chick Fil A’ s creed that led to their being banned from Chicago.

    Traditionally, liberals used to be for free expression and free speech while conservatives were for censorship for the sake of ‘community standards’ or ‘traditional values’. With liberals now being for speech controls and with conservatives being rather weak on issues of ‘free speech’, the future of free speech in this country is very troubling.

  120. norman S's Gravatar norman S
    November 2, 2012 - 8:15 pm | Permalink

    one does not even have to criticize the major taboos. Judge Nepolitano was fired for his support of Ron Paul and his opposition to the Patriot Act. Its ironic that RT now has a more free press than the USA.

  121. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    November 2, 2012 - 7:50 pm | Permalink

    Basically it is much worse in America for the reason the law is only one dimension of oppression. The American landscape represents the fully matured infrastructure of control. The hostile elite has replaced the WASP. Not so in European countries. Objects like ADL, AIPAC, SPLC and so on, are ready to stamp on anyone who transgresses and speaks up.
    That’s worse than the threat of a criminal record. The fear is worse. The coercion is worse.
    I’m not saying it’s better over here. Of course not..we’re all in the same boat. But the LANDSCAPE that will be defining this conflict for all of us, is currently that felt by Americans. Australia is already forming a carbon copy of America. Not a carbon copy of Europe….but America. Why? Because the American landscape is the jewell in their crown.

    Which is why we might as well be thinking about how we are going to deal with the situation, in terms of the American landscape, and not somewhere else. We will have to beat this where it is strongest, because where it is strongest will soon spread to everywhere.

  122. November 2, 2012 - 7:33 pm | Permalink

    What happened to Oliver Stone is a good case study. The Wall Street Journal reported that Stone said that “public opinion was focused on the Holocaust because of ‘Jewish domination of the media.’” Stone also said that the Jews “stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington. Israel has f—– up United States foreign policy for years.”

    Joe Sobran said:

    “Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.”

    Another example that illustrates exactly this is the firing of Rick Sanchez from CNN for saying the following about Jews as victims:

    “Very powerless people… [snickers] He’s such a minority, I mean, you know [sarcastically]… Please, what are you kidding? … I’m telling you that everybody who runs CNN is a lot like Stewart, and a lot of people who run all the other networks are a lot like Stewart, and to imply that somehow they — the people in this country who are Jewish — are an oppressed minority? Yeah.” [sarcastically]

    Michael Medved, Orthodox Jew and author of Hollywood vs. America: “It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture . . . Any Martian monitoring American television . . . would view Seinfeld, Friends, The Nanny, Northern Exposure, Mad about You, and other shows and be surprised to learn that fewer than 1 in 40 Americans is Jewish.”

    Brandies Professor Stephen J. Whitfield: “From its origins, Hollywood has been stamped with a Jewish identity, but nobody else was supposed to know about it. But somehow, no matter how thorough the attempt to suppress or disguise it, Jewishness is going to bob to the surface anyway.”

    Author Stephen Schiff: “The way Steven Spielberg sees the world has become the way the world is communicated back to us every day.”

    Neal Gabler, author of An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, wrote that “The American Dream—is a Jewish invention.” As he documented: “The storefront theaters of the late teens were transformed into the movie palaces of the twenties by Jewish exhibitors. And when sound movies commandeered the industry, Hollywood was invaded by a battalion of Jewish writers, mostly from the East. The most powerful talent agencies were run by Jews. Jewish lawyers transacted most of the industry’s business and Jewish doctors ministered to the industry’s sick. Above all, Jews produced the movies.”

    In 1996, reprinted in the May 27th issue of the New York Times, by Ari Shavit, an Israeli columnist describing his feelings on the killings of a hundred civilians in a military skirmish in southern Lebanon. Shavit wrote, “We killed them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own.”

    Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish. Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is “nothing more than a screen to present chosen views.” The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually “think outside of the (Jewish) box.” –Michael Santomauro

    Michael Santomauro

Comments are closed.