Guns, Profiling, and White Males: Explaining the Left’s Obsession with Gun Control

Cooper Sterling

The tragic mass shooting of innocent children in Newtown, Connecticut has prompted a renewed zeal for gun and magazine bans by gun control advocates.

The nation’s liberal elites, from pundits to politicians, have seized on this heartbreaking slaughter and depicted it as—first and foremost—a gun control crisis. Members of the NRA and other defenders of gun ownership are portrayed as cold, senseless, uncivilized oddballs who value their guns at the expense of human lives. The unstable nature of the young shooter in Newtown has been largely obscured by the emotional emphasis placed on “assault weapons” and high-capacity “magazines,” which are often mislabeled as “clips.” One columnist for the Huffington Post described the “craziness of millions of gun owners” as “deep crazy.”

In case anyone doubts the Mainstream Media’s (MSM) central focus in the wake of the Newtown shooting consider the tracking results from a recent Nexis search. In a search of the “news” database (all news outlets, including newspapers, wire stories, weekly news accounts, etc. since the date of the shooting), using “Newtown” and “mental health” as search terms in the lead (first paragraph) and headline, retrieves 583 articles. A comparable search using the terms “Newtown” and “gun control” in the same search strategy of the same “news” database retrieves 2,415 articles. (The three searches were conducted on the same day close together to utilize and compare the same level of coverage in Nexis.) The emphasis on guns in the Newtown story is more than four times greater than the emphasis on the mental health of the shooter in the two-week news cycle that followed the mass shooting.


The prevailing media-driven, anti-gun hysteria is based on an irrational phobia of firearms. The clamor for gun control is occurring at a time when homicide rates are at a 50-year low. Far fewer people die from homicide than die in motor vehicle accidents. However, no one would conclude that we should ban cars because automobiles are deadly. For most of us, the convenience of mobility, individual preference, and attentiveness to avoiding high-risk situations (preventive measures against fatal vehicle crashes) trumps the risk factors of death by automobile.

The fact that firearms protect against and repel violent crimes year after year is rarely mentioned in the MSM’s sensational coverage. Consider the recent New York Daily News coverage citing a study that claims that in three years more people will die from guns that car crashes. The article claims that in 2010, “31,328 people died by killer weapons.” This total includes suicides and accidental deaths in addition to homicides. How many “killer weapons” prevented the death of a crime victim? There is no mention of the “tens of thousands of crimes” that legally armed citizens prevent each year according to a 2012 Cato Institute study.

It is endemic among the cosmopolitan literati, who loathe Middle America, to dwell on the risks associated with firearms while disregarding or minimizing the benefits of firearm ownership. Journalists, editors, and media executives who are responsible for informing the public, on average, have very little experience with or knowledge of firearms. Guns are viewed as the property of assorted nuts and kooks, or in the words of Henry Allen, the Pulitzer Prize-winning critic for the Washington Post, “armed rednecks” and “gun-toting trailer trash.”

Criminologist Gary Kleck, a leading expert on gun control, notes in Point Blank:

The most fundamental flaw in advocacy of gun control as violence reduction is not that gun laws could not disarm anyone, but rather that doing so would not necessarily produce any net violence-reducing impact.

The rationale for gun control on which supporters have relied for over 20 years is based on an unduly simplified conception of the role of weaponry in human violence. The ownership and use of guns, even just among violent-prone people, have a complex mixture both of positive and negative effects on the rate of violent incidents and the seriousness of their outcomes, effects that often largely cancel each other out. The picture is complicated even further by the fact that the use of guns by crime victims to defend themselves is effective both in preventing completion of the crime and in preventing injury to the victim. Mass ownership and the frequent defensive use of guns by crime victims make criminal behavior more risky and may have a deterrent effect on criminals, especially on those who would assault inmates, rob retail stores, or commit residential burglaries.

Kleck’s point supports John Lott’s research, which shows that disarming law-abiding citizens will only elevate violent crime levels. In the wake of the latest mass shooting, some public officials are calling for a renewed ban on “assault weapons.” The problem with such a ban is the impractical impact of such a law given the so-called definition of an “assault weapon,” which is largely based on cosmetic characteristics of civilian versions of military-style rifles and handguns. The rate of firing, accuracy, caliber, velocity, and loading of rounds are comparable to many garden-variety semi-automatic weapons. In fact, the 1994 “Assault Weapons Ban” exempted 900 types of firearms from the ban. The distinction is essentially superficial. Laws should not be based on false premises of public safety. Just as many innocent children would have died if Adam Lanza had used a semi-automatic pistol.

Does the heinous nature of the Newtown mass shooting entirely explain the zealous intensity of the mass media’s recent focus on guns and gun control? The Left’s irrational obsession with gun control goes beyond the latest mass shooting. Anyone monitoring the national scene since Newtown is witnessing an emotional antipathy toward the last trace of political leverage among an identifiable demographic: an overwhelmingly White male gun culture. What the MSM and gun control advocates ultimately detest is the gun culture in America, which is too White, too male, and too conservative.

The tradition of gun ownership is as old as the Republic. It reflects the pre-1965 demographic of America as an overwhelmingly White—and more civilized—nation. As a native Midwesterner, guns were rampant in our neighborhoods where few homes didn’t have some sort of firearm. We came of age hunting with our fathers, uncles and cousins, acquiring rifles and shotguns in our mid-teens. We learned to safety shoot guns and would never think of pointing one at an individual or otherwise improperly handling one. We knew the damage that various guns were capable of and we respected their appropriate use under safe conditions. We shared the same interests, respected one another, and valued our Second Amendment rights. And we were all sane!

This bastion of White political clout, as exercised vis-à-vis the pro-gun lobby, is the real source of irritation for Nina Totenberg, Bob Costas, Don Lemon, and other liberal media celebrities who attempt to sway viewers with gun-phobic rhetoric. In their minds, the gun culture represents a throwback to the sinister era of a more homogeneous nation, united in folkways, customs and traditions, where gun laws were minimal, bank tellers weren’t shielded by bullet-proof glass, doors and windows were routinely left unlocked, store owners experienced very few crimes, and downtown areas were largely safe and free of violent criminals. America’s White male gun culture, and all that it represents, is a nightmare for the quintessential pundit of the Fourth Estate—those cosmopolitan advocates of “diversity” and “equality.” It is a throwback to Mayberry, R.F.D. (The Washington Post cites a new Gallup poll [12/27/2012] that shows an “unprecedented number of Americans support the right to own a handgun [74 percent], while just 24 percent would support a ban.”)

Although violent crime has declined over the years (weapon related violence dropped 63 percent from 1993–2001), mass shootings with multiple victims have increased. Recent incidents in Newtown, Connecticut, the Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, the Aurora, Colorado movie theater, Tucson, Arizona, which injured Rep. Gabby Giffords, as well as Colombine High School, and University of Texas in Austin (1966), involving Charles Whitman (who killed his mom and wife prior to a shooting rampage that slaughtered 14 others), often involve deranged White male perpetrators. Major exceptions to this are the massacres at Ft. Hood (2009), Binghamton, New York (2009), Virginia Tech (2007), and the Long Island subway (1993), which involved non-White assailants.

A recent CNN “Newsroom” broadcast with Black, gay host Don Lemon, featured on the Daily Caller, probed the topic: “Searching for blame, after Newtown” and raised the question: “Should White men be profiled?” Here’s the Daily Caller coverage of the observations of CNN guest David Sirota on,

“Should White men be profiled?” The discussion, which aired on “CNN Newsroom” hosted by Don Lemon, was based on a column by David Sirota published just days after the Newtown shooting.  Sirota explained his reasoning and suggested there was a double standard.

“I think we should ask the question, ‘Why is America, 30 percent White guys and 70 percent of the shootings in the last many decades have been at the hands of White guys?’” Sirota said. “I’m not saying we should racially profile White guys, but I do think it’s interesting to note that had the shooters, had 70 percent of mass shooters been, let’s say, Arabs or African-American men, I think the conversation right now would be a very different conversation where we’d be talking—we’d be having a much less nuanced, a much uglier conversation.”

Sirota argued that when Blacks or Muslims are arrested for violent crimes, the Black suspect is portrayed as a “thug” and the Muslim is viewed as a “terrorist” while White males are considered as “individuals.” One wonders if Sirota listens to local nightly news broadcasts, where Black perpetrators are deliberately described in vague unassuming terms as “young teens” or “youths” when newscasters refer to young Black assailants or Black flash mobs.

The other aspect of Sirota’s argument is that the reason this mass shooting isn’t viewed as just another violent crime—what makes it so tragic—is that anyone with commonsense understands the nature of ordinary violent thugs and the differences between your average thug and the profile of a deranged White mass shooter. The assailants reflect differences in personality, ethnicity, and race. Plus the former is far more common than the latter. What is different in such mass shootings from, say, the daily urban homicides in the “no-go zones” in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Chicago is the expectation and normalcy of violence and disrespect for human life in largely Black areas. Most people who reside in townships like Newtown expect to drop their kids off at school and see them alive again at the end of the day—that some deranged White kid would shoot up the school is completely unanticipated. It is the one thing that makes any parent numb who has watched this story unfold. It will remain an enigma to Sirota and the other media pundits in the MSM.

In terms of gun use by Black males in violent crimes, a Northeastern University report in 2008 found that although homicide rates were relatively stable in recent years, homicides by Black male juveniles “rose by 31 percent between 2002 and 2007” and that “guns were the weapon of choice in most of the killings.” According to “black youth,” a study by the Children’s Defense Fund found that in 2008 and 2009, “gun homicide was the leading cause of death among black teens…. Young black males die from gun violence at a rate 2.5 times higher than Latino males, and eight times higher than white males. Gun injuries are suffered by black teens at a rate ten times higher than white teens.” The National Crime Victimization Survey by the U.S. Department of Justice (September 2003) found, “Firearm violence rates for blacks age 12 or older (8.4 per 1,000 blacks) were 40 percent higher than rates for Hispanics (6.0). Blacks were 9 times more likely than Whites to be victims of gun-related homicides.” Figures compiled by the Bureau of Justice Statistics show that Blacks commit 56.4 percent of all gun-related homicides despite constituting around 13% of the population (Black males around half that, and young Black males much less); 41.9 percent were committed by “whites” (presumably Hispanics are included in the “white” category of offenders since 1.7 percent constitute the remaining category of “other”).

A June 2, 2011 symposium, “Black Male Gun Violence,” hosted by the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Social Work, discussed the phenomenon of Pennsylvania having “the highest percentage of Black homicides in the nation.” Pittsburgh Chief of Police Nathan Harper, referring to Pittsburgh police’s 2010 crime report, noted, “Our data over a 10-year span shows that we can expect, on average, around 52 homicides a year. Philadelphia has about 300 a year, which is why Pennsylvania was number one in Black homicides,” he said. “If not for Black-on-Black violence, we’d only have about 10 homicides a year.” (New Pittsburgh Courier, June 8, 2001, “city edition, A1.) All in all, public perceptions of “safe” areas—largely White suburbs, exurbs, or rural areas—still reflect the corresponding data for gun-related violence even when considering the recent spate of mass shootings. Even Obama, in the second presidential debate, when asked about what his administration had done to ban “assault weapons,” conceded, “frankly, in my hometown of Chicago, there’s an awful lot of violence and they’re not using AK-47s. They’re using cheap handguns.” Obama didn’t elaborate on the race of the perpetrators in the explosion of gun violence in Chicago, but he really didn’t have to. It doesn’t take a Nobel Prize to understand that most of Chicago’s rash of gun violence is committed by young black males.

The administration’s response to the Newtown shooting is Obama’s call for a taskforce on gun violence. One wonders if this will be another government-sponsored taskforce with recommendations that are never acted upon. In 1993, the National Research Council issued a report Understanding and Preventing Violence, a 480-page comprehensive analysis by a distinguished panel of experts that offered numerous recommendations. On the topic of “firearms and violence,” the report noted, “Our review of available evidence revealed several promising preventive strategies, none requiring new laws, which are ripe for rigorous evaluation. We also concluded that like ‘drug-related violence,’ ‘gun violence’ may be best understood in terms of illegal markets and reduced through tactics that police already apply in illegal drug markets.” In terms of “assault weapons,” the NRC report concluded,

Given the imprecision of the term assault weapon, it should not be surprising that there are no generally accepted estimates of the number of such weapons in the United States, of ownership patterns, of their lethality compared with other weapons, or of their uses in crimes (Zimring, 1991). Therefore, legislative efforts to restrict their availability are proceeding with very little basis in knowledge.

What is the point of having another “taskforce” issuing another report that politicians either ignore or excuse-away the findings and recommendations?

One final consideration with this illogical gun control obsession is that these same advocates who expect to round up and confiscate millions of guns in some mandatory gun buy-back program are the same Leftists who claim that it would be impossible and impractical to round up and deport millions of illegal aliens or entice millions of illegal aliens to self deport. Anyone with eyes to see the obvious will grasp the fact that “progressives” will stop at nothing in seeking to destroy the bonds of a White male gun culture and gaining another amnesty for non-White illegal aliens in the name of making America “safe,” “diverse,” and “equal.” It’s crystal clear why our elites promote the mandatory rounding up of millions of firearms while opposing the mandatory deportation of millions of illegal aliens—both accomplish the same radical ends!

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

242 Comments to "Guns, Profiling, and White Males: Explaining the Left’s Obsession with Gun Control"

  1. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 30, 2013 - 7:22 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:

    I appreciate you back, in that unlike the vast majority of people, you have the knowledge and personal interests that would allow you to identify the nature of the movement (i.e. what it will look like in 10 years), and….I guess if you really were on the side of your father’s tribe I suppose….you could see the peril ahead, and get inside the movement and work to undermine it.
    It’s something you could do, that a thousand others couldn’t. But whether you will, or will want to, I dunno…

  2. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 29, 2013 - 11:31 pm | Permalink

    Mickey, another point that you may have been right about, there may be a Popper revival. I was very skeptical when you first stated this here but I started reading a strange book called The Beginning Of Infinity by David Deutsch of Oxford born in Haifa, Israel 59 years ago. It’s the one of the more interesting philosophy and science books I’ve seen in a while and he’s a total Popperian. Rand was a total believer in inductionism and empiricism combined with reason but not in contradiction to it as in Kant. Popper’s hostile to induction. Deutsch may be a libertarian though his political comments halfway through his book are just a few banalities
    on Churchill & Hitler, ‘Good War’ nonsense. Popper I think was a moderate Social Democrat and I never understood why Szasz & Hayek were high on him. Szasz in particular was a hardcore libertarian, Hayek more compromised. I haven’t read Popper since the mid-90s so I’m going to reread him.
    I didn’t care for him before.
    But I think you may have been ahead of the curve in predicting a Popper revival so I want to give you credit for that even though we disagreed on other things.
    I appreciate your many intellectual contributions to this site.

  3. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 29, 2013 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

    Agreed, Mickey. Your logic is unassailable here.

  4. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 29, 2013 - 4:46 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:

    I suppose when there are comments one may visit a site every day, or several times a day. When there are no comments one will visit about as often as new articles come out.

  5. January 29, 2013 - 1:42 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    Perhaps someone has a few thoughts
    On the Jewish Elites in Mexico and their
    American Peers in America and the
    Complementary & reciprocal roles
    They play in an Engineered dysfunctional
    Border and security along with cooperation
    in the flooding across of our bordeers and
    Joint endeavors In the drug & flesh trade along
    With gun running to serve the long term
    Interest of Organized Political Jewry
    In Mexico and the U.S.

  6. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 28, 2013 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, John, I agree even when the comments have attacked me. I believe in more free speech, not less.
    Of course Dr. MacDonald has every right to any policy he so chooses on his sites. And I do greatly appreciate being able to interact with several extremely people like Trenchant.
    So a great Thank You to Dr. MacDonald !
    But speaking only for myself I am not inclined to read where I can’t comment because that implies one way communication where the site host makes the sole intellectual contribution.
    I experienced this on Ayn Rand Objectivist and Rothbardian Libertarian Cult sites and I just stopped reading them.
    Also so-called racial sites like American Renaissance where any even Jewish dissent from predominant tribal conventional wisdom is verboten. I haven’t looked at them for six months and my days are much brighter.

  7. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    January 26, 2013 - 1:31 pm | Permalink

    Everyone knows there are plenty of fringe types and that people tend to be more extreme from behind a computer.
    I enjoy the comments as much as any article and I enjoy some of the more extreme views. I take them with a grain of salt.
    It’s refreshing to read diverse opinions after having to read and watch mainstream media political correctnes, only for so many years.

  8. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 26, 2013 - 12:52 pm | Permalink


    Seconded. Many people who can’t design or build a house can accouter it with window treatments and striking furniture and thereby increase its livability and market value immensely.

    Frank Lloyd Wright contractually enjoined those who commissioned some of his houses from adding anything so bourgeois as curtains for privacy. Is this really the model of interaction we want to emulate?

    Like others, I too wonder whether this a pause in commenting or a permanent policy change. If the latter, I extend my thanks to all the other commenters for, as a rule, adding the gravy to the great article meals KM has served and the frosting to his blog desserts. Especial thanks, in alpha order, to the Admiral, Alice Teller, Athanasius, Bobby, buckle, Hans, Hooper, Jason Speaks, m, me, Michael Colhaze, Scooter, thm, Trenchant, and Vlad Writes, whose rancor-free comments opened my eyes, once or often, to facts or ways of thinking I had not encountered or had simply failed to grasp for years or decades. (There are at least a dozen others whose handles have momentarily slipped my mind. Sincere apologies to them.)

  9. bravetruth's Gravatar bravetruth
    January 26, 2013 - 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Does the DailyKos or HUFFPO moderate wackos or worry about it?

  10. bravetruth's Gravatar bravetruth
    January 26, 2013 - 12:29 pm | Permalink

    Without specifics can anyone paraphrase the type of comments that prompted this surprising decision? I haven’t been watching closely. And who are we afraid of looking bad to? The SPLC?

  11. January 26, 2013 - 11:00 am | Permalink


    Re KMD’s decision –fair enough. But TOO’s commenters might still comment articles at the Addendum of my blog (kevinmacdonaldespanol at WordPress) if I start to reblog the coming TOO articles there…

  12. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    January 26, 2013 - 10:20 am | Permalink

    I, for one, always appreciated the free-wheeling freedom of this blog, even though there were unfortunately always trolls present, along with some excessive, over-the-top, and off topic commentaries. I hope that Kevin, whose time is valuable and can’t constantly monitor the blog, will come up with sensible guidelines and trusted moderators to keep the comments section alive, healthy and productive. This is one of my favorite websites, bar none!

  13. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 26, 2013 - 10:18 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: @bravetruth:
    It certainly seems that our good host has had enough of our antics. I understand and respect his reasons, but I am sad to see the community here dispersed. I read but do not comment on many other blogs. Perhaps someone more tech savvy that I can suggest an alternate platform.

  14. bravetruth's Gravatar bravetruth
    January 26, 2013 - 9:01 am | Permalink

    So is it shut down or not? Alice, you were a favorite. Where else do you post?

  15. The Admiral On Horseback's Gravatar The Admiral On Horseback
    January 26, 2013 - 6:50 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: I guess she’s referring to Dr. MacDonald’s wise decision to curtail the comments section. See his short blog post.

  16. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 26, 2013 - 3:51 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Are you going somewhere?

  17. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 25, 2013 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

    Thank you to all the many thoughtful white voices I have encountered here. I have learned from you, quarreled with you, and most of all been heartened by you. Find a new way to fight on. May we meet again in the battle.

  18. January 25, 2013 - 9:03 pm | Permalink


    but was that learning used to create a cogent, thoughtful article to enlighten others?

    Yes. See these collection of articles and click on the second linked article under the heading of “Basic”: the Swede’s comment posts turned into a long, comprehensible article.

  19. sanjay's Gravatar sanjay
    January 25, 2013 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    but was that learning used to create a cogent, thoughtful article to enlighten others? Did that Swede offer to write a piece to explain the specifics of swedish conservatism?

    that is the problem with comments and threads. millions of articles, billions of comments. published articles have a minimum standard depending upon editor, but comments are harder to police, often lower in quality and status, and contain less convincing power.

    lets hope the new comments policy will convert some commentators into writers.

  20. January 25, 2013 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

    “…readers and intellectuals may cite or quote from one’s article, but rarely from comments”

    I disagree. As some of you may know, before encountering WN, I was immersed in the counter-jihad movement. Of the many articles I read in Larry Auster’s VFR and Gates of Vienna (GoV), the most didactic class I received was a long thread where a conservative Swede explained his worldview. I learnt more from that single thread than from the whole legacy of thoughtful, well-reasoned, VFR and GoV articles put together.

    Similarly, sometimes Fender says things at TOO with no academic etiquette at all. I like that because you need the whole input of the right hemisphere of the brain: emotions! Remember that famous scene of Kate Winslet (playing Marianne Dashwood) telling Hugh Grant (playing Edward Ferrars, “Mr F”) that his poem-reading was rather dull in Sense and Sensibility?

    We need lots of Winslets in the movement in addition to the phlegmatic “Mr Fs”. We need lively threads in addition to the more academic presentation.

  21. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 25, 2013 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

    Pierre, thank you for your response to Sanjay. I appreciate his comments too but I have both submitted essays as well as comments on a few other threads. In most cases to be brutally honest it wasn’t worth the trouble. Not only site censorship without reason but lack of site impact in some cases.
    I did live in Sydney for two years and my brother’s still there half the year for his international business. The other half he’s in Newark and prefers that because there is no legal censorship as in Sydney.
    Australia is a Nanny Police State par excellence. The state is involved in everything from outlawing guns to banning ‘holocaust’ dissent to policing the internet and the inhabitants act like British socialist drones in accepting it all.
    I had a very hard time finding straight males in Sydney.
    It’s true that the organized Jewish community plays a very negative role in Australia as they do everyplace else.
    They are in the forefront of advocacy of every awful statist-collectivist idea and legislation but what should be surprising about that ? Judaism is a religion of 10,000 Commandments to regulate and control every aspect of life.
    Zionism is the attempt to restore tribal rule by the Rabbinate to the tribe which is now mostly atheist. Zionism is as doomed as Communism was. Pride goeth before the Fall.
    When systems collapse they are at the height of their power.
    Just like greed does in individual crooks power lust does in the much bigger statist crooks.
    Contrary to Doomsday Pat Buchanan the Good Times are ahead of us if only we promote the better, truer explanations.

  22. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 25, 2013 - 12:25 am | Permalink

    @sanjay: It’s similar to being a member of a fishing club as well as going fishing. Fish tales and fish tails are complementary, not substitutive.

  23. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 25, 2013 - 12:00 am | Permalink

    @sanjay: Aren’t they two different species? Most comments are from individuals who will never have the time or willingness to submit scholarly articles, even assuming this were not beyond them.

  24. sanjay's Gravatar sanjay
    January 24, 2013 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:
    please submit formal articles. comments are lower in the value chain. articles require a great deal of critical thinking, energy, effort, references, and without question they are higher in value chain.

    readers and intellectuals may cite or quote from one’s article, but rarely from comments. while comments can certainly generate a lively discussion, articles will bring the best out of commentators.

    @Pierre de Craon:
    thank you for your interest. please consider focusing your energy on hostile elite, not us.

  25. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 24, 2013 - 10:35 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: It would appear that political, anti-Zionist comment is tolerated, or have I understood it incorrectly?

  26. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 24, 2013 - 9:25 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: Seconded overall, Pat, but your last three paragraphs especially.

    I was in Sydney and environs (on R&R from Vietnam) for eight days commencing Thanksgiving Day 1968; it was by a considerable margin the happiest week of my life. Indeed, for five or six years thereafter, I corresponded occasionally with the wonderful Ozzies I met there. They were wonderful people in a wonderful land, a land I fell passionately in love with. For that reason preeminently, I end up nearly in tears every time I read something you or anyone else writes about what’s happened and happening to that demi-paradise. This country (the USA) was already in crisis in 1968—the fault lines had appeared everywhere, though I for one certainly had no idea then who was exploiting and widening those faults for its own Tribal benefit—but your country seemed then like an adult version of the happy, buoyant, and confident land of my infancy and adolescence. For the next twenty years my dream was to relocate there, but it wasn’t to be. Now the same plague-bringers who rule this collapsing nation are visibly gaining strength day after day in yours, too. May the Judases in both lands rot in hell!

    @Jason Speaks: Thanks for the tip, JS. The hate and desperation of these hip losers and their laughing and applauding self-destructive white audience could hardly be clearer.

  27. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    January 24, 2013 - 7:26 pm | Permalink

    E! Entertainment takes on the Mantra (specifically the video with the girls just done). They try and use humor to diminish it, but it isn’t effective:

  28. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 24, 2013 - 5:27 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Well said.

    Is Sanjay the official spokesman of Occidental Observer?

    If not, could Kevin MacDonald please explain the recent change in policy towards commenting on articles?

    At first I thought that the closed threads were due to some internet attack but I see that the latest post “Frank Salter on Race and Nation in Australia” is closed to comments.

    I have some things I would like to say with regard Mr Salter’s series and some of the points he raises but am unable due to the new policy.

    Of course, it is the blog owner’s prerogative to close comments but it would be very much appreciated to have an explanation of the change in policy.

    Are we being induced, as Sanjay suggests, to formulate our comments into essays and submit them to OO for approval? If so, I haven’t seen anywhere on the blog a like instruction to do so.

    Mr MacDonald closes that essay stating: “The fact that Quadrant was willing to publish this work by a highly qualified academic in a mainstream conservative publication is a huge blow in the opposite direction.”

    Perhaps, but mostly not. Australia is rapidly being shutdown in terms of any “free speech” that is not in full concordance with the ruling media and political dynasty of communist anti-Western/anti-White policy and propaganda.

    We have the media inquiry instigated by Labor PM Ms Gillard, driven by the appointed Jew Mr Ray Finkelstein QC.

    We have NSW “conservative” Premier Mr O’Farrell “…who is concerned there have been no successful criminal prosecutions in the history of the NSW laws and that they have fallen out of step with community expectations.”, now demanding an “inquiry that will consider strengthening anti-discrimination laws to make it easier to convict people for serious racial vilification.

    Note well: The inquiry has been welcomed by the president of the Anti-Discrimination Board, Stepan Kerkyasharian, as “a great opportunity to deal with this matter”.

    Mr Kerkyasharian is, of course, a Jew.

    As is the Chairman of the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, Mr John Searle.

    It is illegal in Australia to point out what I have above, that certain drivers of anti-discrimination legislation and proponents of racial vilification laws in Australia are Jews.

    The prominent neoconservative opinion writer Andrew Bolt, himself a lover of Israel and all things Jewish, was himself set upon by a coterie of Jews and taken to court for “hate speech” towards Aboriginals.

    You can read about that also in Quadrant, and note all the Jews who orchestrated the campaign against him, as well as the aforementioned Justice Finkelstein. But, Bolt will never note that the Jews, on the whole, despise and revile him – he loves them!

    Furthermore, it is illegal to do so in Australia.

    That is why it is important that blogs such as Occidental Observer, administered out of the U.S.A. continue to allow comments.

    You cannot rely on Australia to lead anything. Our bi-party system is in lock-step to shutdown White Australia, and criminalise White Australians.

    Please reconsider your comment’s policy Mr MacDonald, or, at the least, explain why it has been implemented.

  29. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 24, 2013 - 12:57 pm | Permalink


    Please use your creative energy towards writing, speaking, activism.

    What reason is there to think that these individuals haven’t been doing precisely those things? Just the list of writers that could be compiled from their dialogue would yield profitable, insightful reading that would fill several years’ worth of one’s free time. Besides, what examples of such activity are you yourself providing?

    We need new writers, new blood, new energy.

    What is truly needed is a renewed awareness of the principles that formed Western man and informed the states that Western men and women created. These principles are old, of course, and as such are anathema to Tribal propagandists, who have evidently persuaded you, along with millions of others, that new principles and ideas, like new i-toys, are ipso facto good simply because they are newer than last month’s models.

    We need to latch firmly on to old writers, old energy. They are the best remedy for the sluggish flow of new blood and the widespread failure to address new problems, not in new ways and with new ideas, but rather with new strategies that reflect, that are true to, our old Western ways and old Western principles.

    No point in excessive commenting.

    Pot to kettle: please call your office ASAP!

  30. sanjay's Gravatar sanjay
    January 23, 2013 - 5:35 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: @Trenchant:
    please consider submitting thoughtful, compelling articles for TOO and essays for TOQ. No point in excessive commenting.

    Please use your creative energy towards writing, speaking, activism.

    We need new writers, new blood, new energy.

  31. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 23, 2013 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, I’ll read it and save it.

  32. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 21, 2013 - 9:38 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:Here’s a typically good short paper by Benson using real world examples from American history. Rand should have studied the parallel (non-State) justice system erected by the early American Jewish community for the purposes of mediation and arbitration.

  33. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 21, 2013 - 8:08 pm | Permalink

    Great argument, Trenchant, and in Atlas Shrugged Francisco defended Rearden’s mills with plenty of private guns, a point Rand seemed to have forgotten when she made her stupid indifference to gun controls comments on the Raymond Newman radio show a few years before she died.

  34. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 20, 2013 - 9:24 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: The idea that bearing arms confers a survival advantage is implicit in the pro-guns argument, otherwise why not disarm and rely entirely on police?

    Second, that an armed citizenry is more able to resist tyranny is a rebuttal of Rand’s legal philosophy. If the government creates tyrannical laws, then resisting tyranny is illegal, and guns serve no purpose.

    On what basis could a government’s objectivity be assumed? I would say rather that politics is the battleground of partisan interests; law no less. The less monopolization, the greater the effective checks and balances to despotism.

  35. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 20, 2013 - 7:49 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Riggenbach is a shocker. Fancy not featuring James J. Martin in his The Libertarian Tradition and Emma Goldman, frustrated bomber, instead.

  36. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 20, 2013 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

    “The use of physical force—even its retaliatory use—cannot be left at the discretion of individual citizens. Peaceful coexistence is impossible if a man has to live under the constant threat of force to be unleashed against him by any of his neighbors at any moment.”

    Division of labour means that this Randian caricature is improbable. In the absence of a monopoly law-and-order arbiter, Mr. Brawn gets the job of looking over my house, and those in the street who need this sort of muscle. People would either take up the slack themselves (arms, anti-burglary measures), or the demand for security would bring forth supply of watchmen/enforcers. Just like everything else.

    Benson’s To Serve and Protect shows how vibrant is the industry for private security services.

  37. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 20, 2013 - 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Trenchant, one of the interviewers for that 1975 Reason interview was my boyfriend, Mike Hardesty. The interview was in a West LA motel and appeared a year later in Reason.
    Eric Garris, webmaster at Lew Rockwell and was present in the room but not a questioner. He is jewish and had no objection to the interview.
    But here’s where it gets interesting, 29 years later in 2004 Eric got angry at Mike over another matter and via email accused Mike of advocating the ‘holocaust’ !
    Mike easily rebutted that and Eric dropped it.
    Jim Martin died around that time, March, 2004 and in December 2004 Raimondo let Riggenbach post a tribute to Martin provided that he slam Martin’s long association with IHR. Mike wrote Riggenbach and gave him a thorough intellectual spanking. Riggenbach apologized and wrote that he would write a book on ‘holocaust’ revisionism setting the record straight.
    Move forward to late spring 2007 Mike writes Jeff asking where is the book and Jeff wrote he never promised to write one !
    Though Mike had it in writing from him !
    Typical of the flakes in the libertarian ranks, at least many of the movement ones.
    I’ll check out Mr. Benson, I keep going back and forth on this,
    thought that Rand made a good argument against competing governments in The Nature Of Government, Dec 1963 The Objectivist Newsletter reprinted in The Virtue Of Selfishness.
    Then I read Rothbard’s response in For A New Liberty, 1973 & 78. We can mull this over. Thanks.

  38. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 19, 2013 - 10:48 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: One author who influenced my gradual shift from a small government conservative to a conservative anarchist was Bruce Benson. I came to believe that his view of law as a service benefiting from competitive pressures no less than any other was more defensible than that espoused by Rand.

  39. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 19, 2013 - 10:07 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: The great James J. Martin, himself confined to history’s oubliette. It’s hard to imagine today’s Reason Magazine featuring heresy such as this:

    Riggenbach’s valedictory to Martin is fair, if one discounts his disdain for the latter’s long association with IHR.

  40. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 19, 2013 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Yes, Pierre, my boyfriend met Leonard Liggio several times from 1969 to the mid 70s, in NYC, DC and Menlo Park, CA.
    Leonard always picked up the tab at restaurants whether it was a dozen SDS types in DC or a few libertarians in Menlo Park.
    Leonard now runs the Atlas Society in DC and recovered in 2011 from a heart attack. My boyfriend Mike hasn’t seen Leonard since the late 70s and Leonard like Rothbard later disavowed his New Left phase which in Leonard’s case went pretty far, he was business manager of the Communist National Guardian in NYC during its Maoist phase.
    He got purged for having too expensive a coffee table is what Mike heard ! All before I was born at the end of 1975.
    Mike was very close for decades to Jim Martin, the revisionist historian and protege of Harry Elmer Barnes. Leonard would refer to Jim as our leading Spanish Civil War and WW2 revisionist including the shoah business racket.
    A nice guy and a great scholar.

  41. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 19, 2013 - 1:31 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: On the off chance, I looked him up on Wikipedia and was surprised to see he has an entry. Odd that he isn’t described in the entry as a rabid anti-Semite (☺).

  42. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 19, 2013 - 1:23 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Do you or your friend know Liggio? Is he still among us? He and my brother were high school classmates, and I sat with him twice at Sobran lunches. A sweet, modest man who wore his great learning lightly.

  43. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 18, 2013 - 2:44 pm | Permalink

    Trenchant, appreciate you’re putting the broader perspective into focus as usual. The RP Newsletters which written by Lew were fine but Lew is an opportunist and he also appears to be living in Rothbard’s 1965-70 New Left alliance fantasy world.
    My boyfriend who’s thirty years older knew all those people back then including Murray & Joey, Karl Hess who lived near him in DC, George Resch who recently died outhere , Liggio, Childs, etc. Block was in that group too.
    We keep asking Lew why the focus on fascism when the Communists murdered 200 million people in the last century and he just evades the queries.
    Trenchant, would like to discuss this further but off to COSTCO now.
    jo, thanks for the historical background, makes sense to me.

  44. jo neace krause's Gravatar jo neace krause
    January 18, 2013 - 6:09 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: The Brits are of course hide bound with their traditions, which includes anti guns. When I was living there in the 60’s, the population could not believe what was happening with all the Africans coming in. People in the market place said things to me like, “England was a nice place before all the Blacks ruined it.” or “They’re coming over in boat loads!” As an American I was taken aback by such outspoken “racism”, but I could not tell anyone who was behind the new British immigration lawsat that time because I did not know. “Colonalism comes home to roost” said the London Times.

  45. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 18, 2013 - 3:40 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:Ironically for someone who champions civil society over the State, Rockwell has chosen to focus only on how individuals extract personal advantage from the latter, ignoring the ethnic, sectarian, or racial ties between individuals. The various Ron Paul reports that so fascinated the MSM show his choice is borne of expediency and not ignorance. I don’t wish to judge him too harshly, because the Institute is a rich font of sound economics.

  46. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 17, 2013 - 2:24 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, Trenchant. I had never heard of Jones before the recent appearance of him on Morgan’s show. I don’t have cable and only watch old shows like M Squad or The Lieutenant with my boyfriend.
    Your comments make sense to me.
    Lew Rockwell has been publishing misinformation about Nazi Germany and control. Apparently the Nazis greatly liberalized the very restrictive gun controls of Socialist Weimar which outlawed private guns. And there was no legislation in Nazi Germany that forbade Jews to own guns.
    Gary North, one of the top honchos at LRC, had his usual nonsense on this subject today.
    A friend of mine, Caryn Goddard, (originally Gottfried) is a full blooded Jew, and strong opponent of gun control, so she wrote LRC today about it. Dr. William Pierce published a monograph on this which is available on Amazon. Pierce was an avowed National Socialist but a highly educated physicist. My boyfriend knew him back in DC over 40 years ago, when Pierce had a bookstore in Georgetown.
    Caryn noted that LRC and much of the Right always harps on nazism & fascism but nary a word about the Communists who killed at least a hundred times more people.
    We grew up near each other in a hilly part of the Sunset district in SF but never met until the 90s when we were neighbors in central Tel Aviv.
    Israel by the way outlaws private gun ownership but it’s easy for Jews to get guns as every Jew serves in the army from 18 to 50. Arabs can’t get guns because Israel is a racist state.

  47. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 16, 2013 - 11:23 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:I’m clear out of Visine® so haven’t watched these sorry spectacles. Grief calibrated to nudge blubbering, but just short of running the kohl and blusher.

    Along with the saccharine stories, a foundation will be in the offing, all proceeds going to educate future generations on the evils of an armed citizenry. Perhaps Lieberman or Schumer can pencil in some trustees.

  48. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 16, 2013 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    Jones v. Morgan is the old good cop, bad cop routine, respectively. Distrust of the bad cop tends to foster reflexive trust in the good.

  49. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 16, 2013 - 9:36 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    One of my comments that might have illustrated my mindset didn’t clear moderation, so I’ll be more allusive. I’d point you in the direction of Gerard Holmgren in the first instance, then Morgan Reynolds and finally Judy Wood (I’m agnostic about her conclusions, but the photos she has collated are amazing, and challenged my preconceived ideas. Most importantly, the questions she raises deserve reflection, not summary dismissal).

    If you spend a little time familiarizing yourself with the above, then you’ll appreciate why I believe Jones is an enormously successful media performer (no shortage of patronage), and why it is that KM isn’t syndicated across the country. One speaks out against real power, the other only seems to.

  50. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 16, 2013 - 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Trenchant, can you elaborate on your claim that Jones gives disinformation ? Ron Paul solidly endorsed his performance on Morgan’s show. I think heat mixed in with light is too much for many to take. I’m not saying that you’re one of them.
    Piers has come off as an emotionalistic horse’s behind. I don’t what you mean by ‘well signaled’ as he is a liability to the the gun grabber cause.
    Also please elaborate with specifics on your criticism of Taki
    on the gun issue.
    I might end up agreeing with you but I need more information on both your points on Jones and Taki.

  51. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 16, 2013 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Apropos the Connecticut horror/circus, is there video footage of the funerals out and about? I never watch TV news (Disclaimer: use of the term is not meant to signal acceptance of its accuracy or honesty) and never listen to radio news for more than twenty minutes a day (enough to cover traffic and weather and to [fail to] satisfy my curiosity about whether the Jets were paid off to buy Tim Tebow and then bench him); still, after all the hullabaloo, I thought for sure there’d be wall-to-wall coverage of organs playing and politicians grieving—well you know what I mean.

  52. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 15, 2013 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Taki’s Magazine also gives credence to the proffered version of the slaying, so is counter-productive. I will not agonize over deaths that haven’t been proved, and the cynicism of the perpetrators of this sham turns my stomach.

  53. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 15, 2013 - 9:54 pm | Permalink

    I regard Jones as disinformation, not bad PR. In many ways, he’s worse than Piers Morgan, whose message is patently unattractive, but at least well signalled.

  54. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 15, 2013 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Trenchant, I agree with you on Machan. Even Rand couldn’t take him and he still hasn’t learned to write in english after 60 years of living here. He used to claim Hungarian Freedom Fighter status but he came in 1953, not after 1956. He is the worst possible advocate of miniarchism possibly excepting John Hospers and Robert Nozick, both thankfully deceased.
    Thanks for the tip on that letter.
    Your probably right about Jones being bad PR. Did you like Pratt ? I’ve been debating gun control with some leftist Brit multicultural white on Taki’s, mostly on the Piers Morgan thread. Been a pleasure wiping him out.
    Yes, I’m very unpopular with the tribe. In the past I’ve been threatened twice by some leftist bull dykes types who are also ardent Zionists. Watch my back.

  55. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 14, 2013 - 1:21 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: When I saw him on C-SPAN a few years ago giving the keynote address to a hall full of Randians, my heart sank and my opinion sank farther. The latter shows no sign of climbing out of the pit.

  56. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 14, 2013 - 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the note, Kevin. Moderation’s a small price to pay for the privilege and high honor of being associated with you and your site, even as a commenter. What say I just lay the blame on the infiltrating minions of the IJC (international J_____ conspiracy)?

    [wink wink, nudge nudge]

  57. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 13, 2013 - 8:56 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Tibor Machan’s minarchist perspective is unattractive to me. I mean I find it philosophically indefensible.

  58. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 13, 2013 - 8:43 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Jones, of course, is right that regimes always seek monopoly control over guns, Chinese, Russian, whatever. But the point is not Jones’ (theatrically) strident stand on the 2nd, but that he confirms the Sandy Hook event as real, not a State psy-op with rent-a-crowd. Similar style with that mother of all psy-ops, where he serves to direct the public away from the collusive, active role of media in the event’s planning. Lights, camera, action!
    Hoppe’s Democracy, above, in case.
    For me: “ALT”, held down whilst “0252” is keyed gives “ü”. Numbers from the number-pad, not above the alphabetic characters. Number Lock must be on.

    Take care, there are plenty of Maccabees with little patience for those marchers out of tribal lockstep.

  59. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 13, 2013 - 8:25 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, Pierre !

  60. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 13, 2013 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

    I haven’t figured out how to get the two marks above the ‘u’ in his name on my laptop.

    Whilst holding down the Alt key, type 129 sequentially on the number pad; then release. Then your ü appears. If you use a laptop, you need to hold down both the Alt and Fn keys as you type the subscript numbers 129, which usually appear on the J, K, and 9 keys, respectively.

    • January 13, 2013 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

      Pierre: I don’t know why your posts always come up for moderation. It is not intentional.

  61. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 13, 2013 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    I see your points but in dealing with a lowlife thug like Piers Morgan I think Jones was effective by not being nice.
    Perhaps Larry Pratt did a better job. The NRA has been weak on this, hiding out for a week.
    I don’t think that if St. Francis were the spokesman for the right to own guns it would make the slightest to the anti-gun rights crowd.
    I’m confused as to what you mean by the Chinese and Russians ? Both regimes did seize private weapons as is true of every tyranny in history.
    But maybe I’m misunderstanding your point here.
    I just received a large volume in testimony to Hoppe.
    He looks exactly like Tibor Machan, a Brandenite who gets much wrong including everything on Jewish issues. Maybe that’s his Hungarian guilt complex.
    I will read it, I’ve still yet to read Hoppe’s works on democracy and private defense. I wasn’t too impressed with his little monograph on Austrian economics, at least the philosophical parts where he unsuccessfully tried to defend Kant’s philosophy, even going so far as to cite Bruce Goldberg who penned a vicious hatchet job on Rand for briefly debunking Kant in her title essay in For The New Intellectual in 1961. Hoppe even managed to mangle his own footnote in this case and when I wrote him about it he replied asking me why I was writing him ! When Branden replied to New Individualist Review appropriately about the Goldberg piece, they never ran his full letter, only selected excerpts. They lasted from 1961 to 1968 out of Chicago.
    With your vast reading you may have read some of the Rothbard essays in Economic Controversies but hopefully there will be some new ones for you and it’s nice to have his best essays are in one volume.
    My boyfriend knew Murray and Murray would joke about we all have to support our fellow self-hating Jews !
    I’ll read Hulsmann (I haven’t figured out how to get the two marks above the ‘u’ in his name on my laptop.) Thanks again for the recommendation.

  62. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 12, 2013 - 6:29 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: I think I’ve read most of Rothbard’s papers individually from LvMI, but not this work. I like Hülsmann because unlike most American economists, his undergraduate degree is in philosophy (like Mises’ law education, offering a good grounding in verbal logic). He’s picked up errors in some parts of Austrian theory that had escaped others. The presentation is similar to that of Hoppe, very methodical.

    Back to guns. You can see why Alex Jones is such a useful shill. In this rollicking bit of theatre, he manages to confirm both the stereotype of the crazy gun-owner (though much of what he says is true, the bombast is likely to turn many off), and, more importantly, the official storyline of Sandy Hook, and that other notorious TV special effects event (both of which are rationalized, not contested). Bringing in the Chinese and the Russian to the gun confiscation debate is a classic. His Zionist minders should be well pleased with his stunts (he shares an attorney with Holly Bronfman Lev).

  63. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 12, 2013 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Trenchant, many thanks as usual for your most trenchant comments, pun most definitely intended ! I appreciate the link as I always read and save the ones you are kind enough to list here. I’ve heard great things about Hulsmann though have never read him directly. For 18 months I have been recommending Rothbard’s Economic Controversies as the best single work on political economy extant. It is almost 1,000 pages of his greatest essays, some never published before, and the rest in obscure academic journals.
    Of course outlawing fractional reserve banking as fraud, abolishing the Fed/FDIC and instituting a 100% Gold Standard
    commodity dollar are the real solutions rather than nationalization.
    You’re right about Wharton too and the Harvard & Stanford MBA programs whose graduates are taught never to look beyond the next quarter.
    Glad you are rereading Szasz as I am too. His book ‘Insanity’
    is one of his best.
    The Rothbard book mentioned above is available for 25 dollars on Amazon with free shipping. Until Jan1 there was no Calif sales tax ((9%) charged but the UnDemocratic Party changed that.

  64. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 11, 2013 - 10:56 pm | Permalink

    There is no question that the Wharton’ed-up bank robber in grey flannel is infinitely more a social menace than the lug in track-suit and balaclava with the sawn-off.

  65. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 11, 2013 - 10:44 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Sadly, monetary economics is completely beholden to the Fed and the FDIC/ taxpayer buttressed fractional-reserved commercial banking system. The government as debtor is a huge beneficiary of these zero-rate policies. Not only is the redistribution of wealth from saver to borrower unjust, the damage wrought in wrongful allocation of resources is disastrous. Whole sectors that should have been allowed to die are kept on life support, sucking precious lymph from vital ones.

    On monetary theory, I’m particularly fond of Jorg Guido Hülsmann, who follows in the footsteps of Menger, Mises, and Rothbard (not the errant Wieser/Hayek strand ☺), but who has pushed further into new territory, as well as correcting and refining their work. His personal site has great papers; here’s a taste:

    What can I say? There is no hope for any reprise of Western civilization absent a completely different monetary architecture, true and sound from foundations up. The current edifice must be comprehensively dismantled, lest it come down on our heads (more likely than dismantling or contained demolition).

    Tangent back at you: I’ve got a Szasz book in my in-tray to read. Thanks.

  66. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 11, 2013 - 7:14 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, Trenchant, for the latest two sources that you have listed here. As always I will check them out.
    I wanted to bring up a topic that may be off topic so I apologize.
    My boyfriend who is older received his monthly statement from Citibank and on his two money market accounts of over $212,000.00 he received a total interest payment of $35.06 !
    The interest rate has gone from 0.30 to 0.20 in just two months ! This is theft, pure and simple. I know the Fed has had this zero percent rate for years which is exterminating savers and seniors but two years back the interest rate paid was 0.79, a long way down from 2007 but still much better than now.
    Why are we standing for this ? We were forced to bail out these banks like Citibank to the tune of trillions and Citibank’s CEO Pandit the Bandit was paying himself multiple millions yearly. Same with Dimon at Chase and the rest of these bankster criminals.
    We should either demand full repayment of the stolen interest and/or nationalize these crooks without a penny of compensation.
    I wrote my two fellow San Francisco Jews today in the US Senate, Feinstein and Boxer, to make these very points.
    Since both are billionaires I can hardly wait for their responses !
    But this is something that seriously effects tens of millions of Americans and are we tolerating this ?
    These banksters are even lower than the street criminals who rob banks because they take no risks and rob us with a pen !
    They are really much more destructive than all the criminals with illegal guns combined.

  67. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 9, 2013 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

    James Tracy, professor in media studies at Florida Atlantic University, has embarrassed his employer by not retracting claims that Sandy Hook was an actors’ exercise.

  68. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 9, 2013 - 11:03 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming:
    Kaitlin Roig (plays teacher shepherding her students) vs. Riley Harmon.
    Laugh or cry?

  69. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 9, 2013 - 10:54 am | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Laura Phelps (actress in the Sandy Hook soap) has a doppelgänger called Jennifer Greenberg Sexton. Wolf Blitzer and CNN would never be party to such a farce. Never.

  70. Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks's Gravatar Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks
    January 8, 2013 - 11:18 am | Permalink
  71. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 7, 2013 - 9:24 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, Trenchant. This guy is a long time scoundrel. CNN must be trying to compete with MSNBC for the left-libtard class.

  72. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 6, 2013 - 9:18 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: The Ministry of Truth endorses CNN’s reporting without reserve.

  73. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 6, 2013 - 8:24 pm | Permalink

    @Marcy Fleming: Piers Morgan, the one who photoshopped British troops for the Daily Mirror? The leopard’s spots…

  74. Peter Hart's Gravatar Peter Hart
    January 6, 2013 - 4:52 pm | Permalink

    I read an article on David Duke’s we site abouyt a year ago that may be relevant here. If memory serces me correctly Switzerland has conpulsory mioitary service for males (and females ?). People (males are required to own a gun. The violent crime rate or murder rate (I do not remember exactly which term was referd to) with firearms for Switzerland is very low compared to the (Crazy – as believed in Canada) USA. However David Duke did point out that when you compare this same statistic using only the white population of the USA it turns out that the USA is only slightly higher than Switzerland. Question: How come that never gets mention when discussing gun control in the main strem media?

  75. Marcy Fleming's Gravatar Marcy Fleming
    January 5, 2013 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    A great essay, many thanks ! For the 1% of us Jews who dissent from tribal mores there’s Jews With Guns and other organizations less compromising than the NRA such as Gun Owners Of America and the Second Amendment.
    When I lived in Israel although technically private gun ownership is illegal most of the Jewish population are packing heavy heat because they are required to be in the army from 18 to 50 and this is both sexes.
    Female schoolteachers carry assault rifles with them as a matter of course in Israel.
    The Arabs who are 25% of Israel are effectively disarmed as are the millions of Arabs in the Israeli-Occupied areas.
    Besides the irrationality and hypocrisy of most US Jews on guns, I find the worst group to be the Brits. Even David Irving had an incredibly stupid anti-gun tirade on his site the day after the CT. shooting. My boyfriend engaged him at length on this and Irving was just another leftist windbag a la Piers Morgan of CNN, another really stupid Brit, part of a people that sold their heritage out for free dentures as Ayn Rand noted 60 years ago. They have sunk into a Third World socialist police state and appear beyond hope.
    I just had some exchanges with some anti-gun Brits on the Taki site in the comments section below Taki’s own article on guns. His piece was not too bad but it brought out the anti-gun nuts from their ratholes.
    Appreciate your timely piece and as usual the mainstream Jewish groups are on the wrong side.
    Oh, vey !

  76. Annabelle's Gravatar Annabelle
    January 5, 2013 - 8:35 am | Permalink

    Guns are inannimate objects with no meaning.

    The violence surrounding guns comes from the media, the entertainment industry and the video gaming industry.


    Unless every white man in this country and every white church organizes to go up against this evil, we will lose our right to bare arms.

    The only thing stopping the jews is the fact that we are armed.

    The Jews will use their one great strategy of DIVIDE AND CONQUER to take one gun at a time away.

    It is time to stop talking and fight the Jews with their own medicine. We let them define what gun violence is and what it is not.

    The only meaning guns have is what we give it. We are letting the Jews create the meaning while they make billions create the violence around guns and who we are as a people.

  77. Survivor's Gravatar Survivor
    January 4, 2013 - 6:49 pm | Permalink

    Oops, that didn’t come out right. The second greatest white error in world history, and the greatest white error of the 20th century.

  78. Survivor's Gravatar Survivor
    January 4, 2013 - 6:43 pm | Permalink

    Couldn’t disagree more, fender. You have to deal with the Jews as a religion, not a race. Once the Christian world was fragmented it was only a matter of time before someone fell into the racial trap the Jews had set for them. And what happened? The Jews won the whole world, for one tragic mistake in thinking.

    Sure, the way the Church dealt with the Jews was circular. But that’s just the cost. You fall, you repent, you rebuild, you fall. The very idea that you’re going to deal with the Jews as a race is Jew-implanted weakness. It was the second greatest white error of the 20th century, and perhaps of world history, right after the Reformation.

  79. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 4, 2013 - 1:26 pm | Permalink


    “The Nazis were pikers compared to the Church. The Church waged a 1500 year battle against the Jews, and at the same time built Western Civilization.
    The Nazis proved that the only authority that works against the Jews is the authority Christ demonstrated. MORAL AUTHORITY.”

    It’s too early in the year for this kind of stupidity.

    The Christian way of dealing with the jewish problem was to kick them out for a while or baptize them, then let them back in and hope that they changed. Complete stupidity.

    NS Germany accomplished more in a decade than the Church had in a millennia, and that’s because you have to deal with the jews as a race, not a religion.

  80. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 4, 2013 - 3:58 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Yes indeed. Good point!

    I recommend you go to YouTube and search for “The Corporation” … a recent Canadian documentary film written by Joel Bakan, and directed by Mark Achbar and Jennifer Abbott.

    Five Star Rating! Well worth sitting down to watch. Duration is 2 hours 24 minutes!

    You will then have the info I was using when responding to you earlier.

  81. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 4, 2013 - 12:44 am | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: She is a sickening example of a self-serving politician. I swear, the people who keep electing her must be sadomasochistic.

  82. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 4, 2013 - 12:24 am | Permalink

    @Briz: One can only speculate about the access Stratfor enjoys with DHS, NSA, etc.

  83. 91's Gravatar 91
    January 4, 2013 - 12:07 am | Permalink

    How about if Israeli troops ‘combat’ this [cough] problem?

  84. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    January 3, 2013 - 11:59 pm | Permalink

    Mark Levin has a tape of Senator Feinstein talking about why she needs to have a gun and a concealed permit. Pretty damning stuff.

  85. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 3, 2013 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

    @Survivor: Ditto. Brother, you just refuted another long standing false belief. Bravo!! Truth be told, in terms of cruelty, the German Nazi’s compared to the so-called Marxist regime in the Soviet Union, were equivalent to a nineteenth century womens Tea Social vs. the James gang. I’m so utterly sick of the way this part of WW11 history is depicted. Hundreds of thousands of these German soldiers compared to the Asiatics were highly educated people. I read an account of the Red Army as it entered Germany. So many of its soldiers, thought that a flush toilet was a foot washer and had never seen one in their lives.

  86. Briz's Gravatar Briz
    January 3, 2013 - 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Sorry for the off topic. But i think its important: Robert Kaplan at The Wall Street Journal is worried that nationalism/ethnocentrism around the world is returning, and proposes using the United States to combat this trend. Lets hope americans can resist being used for this purpose. If things escalate, the US could become the next “progressive” USSR, used as a tool to combat the return of nationalism and “reactionary” forces, whether in China, Europe, or Russia. The epicenter of the Transnational Left is becoming the United States. Although i’m not american, i fear for the future of the US.

    • January 3, 2013 - 11:33 pm | Permalink

      For some reason he doesn’t seem upset by the rise of the ethnonationalist and religious right in Israel.

  87. January 3, 2013 - 9:16 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    You undoubtedly noted the “I make no laws” part. I believe the Christmas address is the one of the few, if not the sole, opportunity to step outside the government line. There is no question she had and has a speechwriter, however, in 1957, there were still a large part of the population that remembered her as the lorry driver/mechanic apprentice in the Women’s Auxiliary Territorial Service, and that cut her a lot of slack.

    Macmillan was a political enemy of Enoch Powell, and, I believe, a supporter of the insanity. Even his old buddy Churchill the sot had misgivings.

  88. January 3, 2013 - 8:58 pm | Permalink

    well said. let the whites organize into a cohesive, proud, powerful, ultra-fertile force, and white-Jewish, white-black problems will automatically take care of themselves.

    it is our own lack of organization, cohesion, solidarity, self respect, that allows enemies to undermine us.

  89. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 3, 2013 - 7:54 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: I think that one would have to do an examination of the then current policies of the Macmillan government to determine what everything the queen said truly meant, since as you know (others may not), the words she spoke were either written for her by the government or approved by it prior to broadcast. The authenticity of the smile is beyond question, however.

  90. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 3, 2013 - 7:19 pm | Permalink

    @Survivor: Great comment! No argument from this quarter.

  91. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    January 3, 2013 - 6:47 pm | Permalink

    @Roy: The big massacre will come when our hostile elites feel Whites aren’t being replaced fast enough and are tired of sharing the planet with us. Either we’ll be armed and ready or helpless.

  92. January 3, 2013 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    Loopholes only exist if a court decides they are loopholes.

  93. January 3, 2013 - 6:02 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I vaguely remember watching it all those years ago. TV had only been recent in my city at the time.
    Retrospectively, I believe that it was not only religion that to which she referred, but their society in general. The tidal wave of non-whites to Britain, which began with a trickle in 1948, had surged by 1957. The Commonwealth, at that time, was a trading block with preferences for each others goods. The idea was to prop up Britain’s sagging industries. Educating Africans, the West Indies, and Asians was OK, as long as they went home and took the “Buy Britain” message with them.

  94. Survivor's Gravatar Survivor
    January 3, 2013 - 4:25 pm | Permalink

    I do not agree that the Nazis were the most potent enemy the Jews have ever seen. The Nazis were pikers compared to the Church. The Church waged a 1500 year battle against the Jews, and at the same time built Western Civilization.

    I think WW2 was a trap. The top International Jews told the Nazis “oh, please don’t throw our German brethren in the briar patch.” So what did they get for being thrown into the briar patch? What they had yearned for since Christ but was denied them by the Catholic world — total sovereignty.

    The Nazis proved that the only authority that works against the Jews is the authority Christ demonstrated. MORAL AUTHORITY.

  95. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 3, 2013 - 1:33 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: I did not say that Lawyers “decided” … I told you that Lawyers exploited some loopholes in the 14th. The Supreme Court has usually done whatever big money has told them to do, especially post 1913. As they say in my parts …and the rest is history me old son.

  96. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 3, 2013 - 12:48 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: I just watched this. Thanks for the link. She may be the last reigning Western monarch ever to have drawn attention to the critical importance of religion to one of our societies. She certainly would never be permitted to speak thus in the present day.

    Her smile at the end was heartwarmingly genuine; a thousand watts of radiance.

  97. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 3, 2013 - 11:32 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Done; at least for some 360 days to come.

  98. January 3, 2013 - 10:50 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    That Dick Clark was ever a “TV personality” is a greater mystery than most. He is gone, but should be forgotten.

  99. January 3, 2013 - 10:44 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    Lawyers did not unilaterally decide that corporations were persons, the US Supreme Court did.
    I can only re-iterate: no sane person would consider a company or corporation to be a person. Draw your own conclusions about the US Supreme Court.

  100. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 3, 2013 - 5:32 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon: Thanks for the point on Dunblane and Icke.

  101. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 3, 2013 - 5:01 am | Permalink

    @Roy: You have a naive understanding of the world, and evidently don’t know your history.

    If you study European (and British) history with more care and diligence, you will soon find confirmation that it is THE STATE that is the most proficient at killing innocent citizens … never private gun owners.

    And when I say “the State”, I mean rogue elements operating with impunity within the confines of government and state institutions.

    Even in Europe and Britain, most “mass shootings” have been organized by occult forces pushing hidden agendas. The mass shooting that took place (13 March 1996) in the affluent, cathedral town of Dunblane, in Perthshire, Scotland is one such provable case.

    The Dunblane shooter, Thomas Hamilton (43 yrs) was found to be closely linked to Scottish judiciary, politicians, and other luminaries, in a large paedophile ring. This revelation eventually forced George Robinson, then head of NATO, to step down and retire from public life for reasons that were of course invented for public consumption. George Robinson deserve to swing from gallows.

    David Icke (and others) have campaigned for many years on this matter, and caused much damage to some very evil people while doing so. David deserves a medal for his efforts in this regard alone. Look up the case of “Hollie Grieg” if you wish to learn more.

  102. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 3, 2013 - 4:44 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Misinterpreted? It matters not.

    I can inform you that Corporations became legal ‘persons’ following the 14th Amendment.

    As you will already know, this was originally intended to enshrine Black Emancipation, but instead Lawyers subverted the law such that Corporations became the 14th’s principal beneficiary.

    That is how it has been ever since they spotted the loophole.

  103. 91's Gravatar 91
    January 3, 2013 - 12:40 am | Permalink


  104. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 3, 2013 - 12:34 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Wow. Whoever the staffer is, he’s read way too much of the NT to suit the White House sept of the Masters of the Universe.

    I can’t imagine that Barry even had a clue as to the meaning of the words. He may be the most primally secular non-Jew I have run across in my entire life. He’s the sort of guy to whom, even if he lives to be 120, death will come as an astonishing surprise.

  105. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 3, 2013 - 12:28 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Do the internal politics of my church—either the conciliar neochurch of the media scandals or the True Church now persisting only in the catacombs (mutatis mutandis) of the modern world—have any bearing upon the Impenetrable Mystery of TOO Moderation? Hell no. The former are rooted in classics even older than the late Dick Clark (who can escape hearing that name a million times each January 1?)—namely, the Seven Deadly Sins. The latter, on the other hand, is really mysterious!

    No offense, obviously. If we can’t seriously tick one another off in squabbles about unions, what chance does this anodyne topic have?

  106. Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks's Gravatar Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks
    January 2, 2013 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

    Never Again

  107. Rudd's Gravatar Rudd
    January 2, 2013 - 7:23 pm | Permalink

    How loud do the jews in this country yell when Palistinian children are murdered by Israeli talmudic jews.

  108. January 2, 2013 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

    “It’s crystal clear why our elites promote the mandatory rounding up of millions of firearms while opposing the mandatory deportation of millions of illegal aliens—both accomplish the same radical ends!”

    If you ever think that a nation ruled by Jews (as the US now is) egging on gun ‘control’ is good for the inhabitants thereof, ask a Palestinian that very question- he who cannot buy a gun in Isra-HELL.

    “Anti-gun is a code word for Anti-White.” REVISION, 2013.

    Think about it.

    “Anti-Christian is a code word for Antichrist. [John 8:44]”

    Think about it, too.

  109. jeff's Gravatar jeff
    January 2, 2013 - 3:16 pm | Permalink

    if professor seidman is so sure that he doesnt want the constitution anymore, then he should start packing and we can all pitch in and get him a one-way ticket to north korea and he can renounce his citizenship and be gone, and he can take piers morgan with him.
    does anyone that is a normal reader here believe that we might have a better chance of breaking free from the empire than trying to change it ?? after all, our founders broke free from britain, they did not try to change it from within. i think that a strong secession movement in a particular state or states and pushing such a governor etc, might be a better option, as well as such open threats of defiance may actually get more change than what we are getting now from washington, and perhaps would could then change it from within.
    the liberals are ranting that atheists ect need to ridicule Christians in public etc; it is about time that the silent majority of whites(predominantly believers in God) start speaking the truth boldly and without apology.
    and if you have trouble with the anti-semitism angle with people, then refer them to brother nathanael kapner at or to gilad atzmon(google him); they are both ethnic jews who rail against jewry and zionism.
    i have found that this softens people compared to hearing supposed “antisemitism” from white guys like most of us and professor macdonald. in fact, i believe it would be wise to get them to post articles on this site. having sane truly american jews on our side helps deflect the “race hate charges” against us.
    and it brings serious credibility to our views.

  110. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    January 2, 2013 - 12:43 pm | Permalink

    I agree that we all have to stand up and fight. Make massive calls to the Congress and Senate regarding not only gun control but also amnesty. Write letters and emails. Hammer them 24/7. We have the numbers but we have to be even more relentless/pushy as they are, because they got a huge head start.

  111. January 2, 2013 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

    @Bob Wallace:
    The blame ascribed to the Jews, or Ike’s reptilians is the intentional destruction of Western societies.

    I don’t buy into Ike’s reptilians. This link was a warning from HM the Queen. It was ignored in the UK, Canada, and Australia. It was also ignored in the US, if anyone was listening.

  112. Roy's Gravatar Roy
    January 2, 2013 - 12:04 pm | Permalink

    I think gun control is neccessary to avoid future massacres. Here in Europe we do have a strict gun control and yet we are not, obviously, immune to mass shooting. If one is able to buy arms as easy as one buy underwear some are of course tempted to use them with the same carelessness.

  113. January 2, 2013 - 12:00 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    And Happy New Year to you, Alice.
    At the risk of offending Pierre, another of the great mysteries of life is the complexity of the internal politics between the different religious orders of the RC Church. I have often noted that it makes our political class look like rank amateurs.

  114. January 2, 2013 - 11:48 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    I think you have misread my comment. Companies have existed for centuries. The Governor and Company of Adventurers of England trading into Hudson’s Bay, at one time the largest landowner in the world, never existed as a person, nor would any sane person, including James II, in the 17th century would have considered it a person.
    In my view, no sane person since that time would consider a company or corporation to be a person.

  115. January 2, 2013 - 10:08 am | Permalink


    Actually is a term I stole from Svigor, who comments over the boards and has a blog, “Raider of Arks: Toward White Zionism” at WordPress.

  116. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 2, 2013 - 5:12 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    “So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.”
    2 Corinthians 4:18

    I wonder which staffer picked this quote for Obama in the aftermath of the event?

  117. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 2, 2013 - 2:47 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Chutzpah has no idle gear, nor reverse. Drive only.

  118. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 2, 2013 - 2:36 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:If you can emote on cue, follow a mindless script without fluffing your lines or giggling, have no scruples over thirty pieces of silver, then sexing-up the c.v. for an MBA will be a cinch, and that corner office 180° view is yours!

  119. Survivor's Gravatar Survivor
    January 2, 2013 - 12:33 am | Permalink

    Excellent review, chechar. I just wish you wouldn’t use the term “white zionism.”

    White Zionism is a term for whites who believe in Israel’s right to exist over their own.

  120. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 1, 2013 - 11:46 pm | Permalink

    I certainly hope we can avoid such dire examples but I will not bet the ranch on it. We live in a system based on lies and unreality. It is complex and fragile. All of our leaders refuse to face reality. Who knows what will happen. Sensible people plan for the worst and hope for the best.

  121. GT's Gravatar GT
    January 1, 2013 - 10:25 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Looking for answers? Here’s a start. It’s not as entirely hopeless as Fender would have us believe. Please spread these links far and wide.

    What you’ll see in the rebellion

    Bracken: When The Music Stops – How America’s Cities May Explode In Violence

    Bracken: The CW2 Cube — Mapping The Meta-Terrain Of Civil War Two

    Bracken: What I Saw At The Coup (Fiction)

  122. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 1, 2013 - 9:28 pm | Permalink

    @Survivor, by trying to do something, I guess you mean liquidating smaller neighboring countries in cynical collusion with the USSR, all the while horribly neglecting opportunities to knock the UK out of the war?

  123. Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks's Gravatar Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks
    January 1, 2013 - 9:22 pm | Permalink

    @Biff Preston:

  124. Biff Preston's Gravatar Biff Preston
    January 1, 2013 - 9:11 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article! I failed to mention that earlier and I should have. I have enjoyed reading all the Cooper Sterling articles. They touch on the kinds of subjects that I personally find to be very important. I have noticed the new talent at The Occidental Observer and I’m not just impressed, I’m a little envious, I wish I was a more experienced writer. I feel inspired to learn more to do just that, among other good things. It’s refreshing to see that we have highly intelligent and talented people on our side.

    I’m going to refer The Occidental Observer to five friends in addition to a couple of family members. This article is going to be one among several that I will include in my appeal to them. I’m going to start supporting with what I can and I’ll be considerably better off in the near future. I began many years ago the attempt to figure out what was behind the change that America and the entire West for that matter was going through. I have reviewed many sources of opinion and analysis and The Occidental Observer is in my opinion the best source of news and analysis concerning the crisis that we face. I would really like to see we of European ancestry build an ethnic framework and I can see the Occidental Observer being a part of that.

    Here is a part of the enemy’s framework right here, part of the “out in the open part” at least

    Remember there are a lot more of us than there are them and we have just as many highly intelligent people as they do, make no mistake about that. Our people are kept as guilty and disunited as our media and schools are able to make possible but that can only count for so much in this changing social climate. I’m going to do what I can to inform people and get as many on board as possible. The time is ripe for such activity. I’m on board and I’m not going anywhere. Kudos again on the article Cooper! Spot-on analysis and very much appreciated.

  125. January 1, 2013 - 8:20 pm | Permalink


    Absolutely. See “Towards White Zionism”, my essay-review of “Separation and its Discontents”:

  126. Survivor's Gravatar Survivor
    January 1, 2013 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

    “The moment White Europeans organize into a mirror image of Judaism, the Jewish problem will disappear.

    We have already done so. It was organized by the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei between 1920 and 1945.”

    That’s why the mirror image must entail the much maligned “universalism.” It needs to be the world we convince, else it will end up just like WW2, one country trying to do something and the rest, Jew controlled, piling on.

  127. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 1, 2013 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I would like to believe that this is a parody—though a parody of what is not something about which I’d care to hazard a guess. Yet you leave me with little choice but to take it at face value. Are there really so many aspiring Jewish ektahs in this country that Uncle Izzy can’t get them all jobs at least as stand-ins in one of the shlock films that Great Uncle Shmuel’s studio is producing?

    My mind keeps returning unbidden to one question: how does someone in this racket describe it on his résumé when he gives it up to apply for admission to an MBA program?

  128. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    January 1, 2013 - 6:42 pm | Permalink

    A commenter above used the term “one world order” and I figure that provides enough of an opening for me to share a short story.

    I’ve been watching virtually no television lately, but today I happened to see a few short segments (a total of about one minute) of the Rose Parade.

    There was a United Nations float. Then, a short while later, I saw a float titled “The Global Face of AIDS”, and it won “best use of roses” award.

    I thought others might be interested, so that’s why I’m writing this.

  129. Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks's Gravatar Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks
    January 1, 2013 - 6:23 pm | Permalink


  130. jeff's Gravatar jeff
    January 1, 2013 - 6:16 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: mary, are you a male or a female ?? your name suggests female but your post says that someone said of you, “he’s an antisemite.”

  131. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    January 1, 2013 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

    From the author: “Anyone monitoring the national scene since Newtown is witnessing an emotional antipathy toward the last trace of political leverage among an identifiable demographic: an overwhelmingly White male gun culture.”

    Yes, the fight for Second Amendment rights has been conservative America’s one and only success story in the last half century (though the left might also try to add Wisconsin and Michigan’s recent union busting victories to the list.) Even one victory, however, is one too many for the world Marxism that seeks to destroy all remnants of a nation’s former self. This was true of the left that rose to power in Russia nearly 100 years ago, and it’s true of the left as it exists in the US today. What Michael Bellesiles couldn’t accomplish with fraudulent research a dozen years ago Dianne Feinstein will try to accomplish with Newtown today.

    The tactic of the left has remained the same for generations – create long term policy to deal with short term crisis. And the more fraught with emotion, terror and anxiety that short term crisis is, the better. Minimum wage and other New Deal programs had similar, though less dramamtic, storylines.

    As the author stated, the rate of violent crime has been going down for close to 20 years. When this decrease was first acknowledged by the media about 10 years ago, the root causes were deemed “inexplicable” by pundits and journalists. When the NRA and other gun advocates started taking credit because of newly enacted conceal-carry laws, however, leftist explanations (“social programs” deserved the credit) started coming out of the woodwork. It seems the ultimate “truth” of the leftist world vision couldn’t be undermined by anyone else’s truth, regardless of how credible it was.

    In reality, the NRA was unwise to claim full responsibility for the decrease in crime in America during the late ’90’s and early 2000’s – any future increase in violent crime would cast serious doubt on their claim, and most statistical trends tend to be cyclical. In truth, conceal-carry laws were only one reason the crime rate went down. The other reason was that, despite their political capitulation with the left, most judges were starting to get tough on hardened criminals, and prison sentences have increased substatially over the last couple of decades as a result. This is why we currently have over a million people in prison in America today , with black advocates wailing about it loudly (since black advocacy is, by demographic nnecessity, also criminal advocacy.)

    The crime rate is likely to start increasing as leftist activists get their way in the current political climate of Obama and win lighter sentences and earlier releases for violent minority offenders (all part of attaining “racial equality in the criminal justice system”.) The resulting increase in crime will be attributed only to vast supplies of guns, however. And the NRA will be blamed.

    But all is not lost. Keep in mind, this story is only a few weeks old. The counter attack from the right hasn’t begun in earnest, yet. I’ve always said that guns and gun rights were the most implicit of all of the “implicitly white” movements that TOO often talks about. Whites who are far too timid to talk about violent blacks roaming the streets have no problem at all talking about violent criminals roaming the street. Maybe a rallying point?

  132. January 1, 2013 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    @Bob Wallace:
    guns without a strong White European identity, heritage, fertility are useless. there is no substitute for weak identity and will.

  133. January 1, 2013 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    Jews won because Jewish diaspora in every European and American State worked like a hub of spider web.
    Whereas Germany alone among all Western States became a mirror image of Judaism. Isolated, alone, it worked hard towards freedom, but failed.
    Jews are targeting our mental balance. As KMac quotes in SAID
    [The Greeks] despaired of their bright Olympus, and at best
    only retained sufficient courage to resort to suicide. The Greeks
    were not gifted with the power of living down their evil fortune, or of remaining true to themselves when dispossessed of their
    territories; and whether in a foreign country or in their own land
    they lost their mental balance, and became merged in the medley of barbaric nations.

    Weak willed, pathological White Libs are also merging in the medley of non-white tsunami.

    The question is, if we lose our freedom, our land, our property, and become total slaves to Jews, swamped in the medley of non-white invaders, will we lose our identity and mental balance?

  134. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 1, 2013 - 5:23 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: Read sanjays post in reply to fender’s and tell me if, after having closely observed European-Americans today, that it isn’t highly probable.

  135. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 1, 2013 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

    @sanjay: sanjay, I happen to agree with your summing up of the present psychology of the white male and female. They, for the most part, are in such a state of mental confusion, brought on by drugs, endless propaganda, charlaton type religious pastors and leaders, popular feminized culture, that the ultimate prospects for their future cannot be but what you described. They are not equipt and are essentially defenseless, no different from what the Eloi were against the Mohrlocks in H.G. Wells’ “The Time Machine”. Read Sanjays conclusions on the prospects for whites folks and gage your own awareness of what’s going on with them in the good old U.S.

  136. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 1, 2013 - 5:09 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Here’s the Fetzer piece.

  137. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    January 1, 2013 - 5:06 pm | Permalink

    John Adams wrote in a letter to H. Niles, February 13, 1818.

    But what do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was affected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations…This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution.

  138. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 1, 2013 - 4:55 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas:
    Well done! People are looking for answers. We can provide them calmly and sensibly. We are on the cusp of huge change. Will we look back and say that we were mute because someone we didn’t like or respect might disapprove of us?

    For anyone interested in a very common sense analysis of the madness of the liberal mind check out Cambria Will Not Yield.

  139. January 1, 2013 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    “No, gun control is Goy control. ”

    The states are getting freer and freer with firearms. Concealed carry gains every day. An Illinois court has just ruled the state cannot ban concealed carry, and it’s apparently going to the Supreme Court.

    I used to live in New Mexico and they have open carry. I’ve seen 21-year-old women carrying semi-automatics in a holster on their hips.

    You might as well blame everything on David Icke’s blood-drinking shape-shifting space reptiles as blame it on Jews.

  140. Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks's Gravatar Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks
    January 1, 2013 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Mandatory Mental Health Screening for
    Psychiatrists, AIPAC, Duals, Congress,ADL, SPLC,

  141. Taras's Gravatar Taras
    January 1, 2013 - 4:16 pm | Permalink

    Liberals and Jews are do not care about violent crime or how many people get killed with guns, they have a much more sinister motive that that. Gun control does not control crime, never has, never will and the proof of that was written in the blood of untold numbers of whites murdered globally since the advent of gun control. No, gun control is Goy control. The Jews and other hostile non-whites ruling the nation want whites at their mercy, because what is coming next is another massive genocide against whites in America, Europe and other formerly white nations such as Canada and Australia. The very fact most of the victims at Sandy Hook were white ought to tell everyone something. As the author correctly noted, gun ownership was the norm when this nation was a mostly homogeneous white nation, and like all of our other traditions and culture, these hostiles in control of the country seek to do away with that, then they intend to exterminate us next. Naysay all you like, but a cabal of Jews both inside and outside of the former Soviet Union murdered tens of millions of Slavs in the most inhuman, and horrific manner one can imagine. They got away with it once, they will try it again once white Americans are disarmed. That is why we must refuse to surrender our arms, even if some of us do so at the cost of our own lives.

  142. Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks's Gravatar Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks
    January 1, 2013 - 4:07 pm | Permalink

    @91: @91

  143. Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks's Gravatar Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks
    January 1, 2013 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Endorsed & wish to associate with that comment

  144. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    January 1, 2013 - 2:52 pm | Permalink

    Good article. Yes, by all means we need to call congressman and let them know how we feel about this issue. No doubt Diane Feintein’s assault gun ban is crazy and includes every gun made, but she’s still outnumbered, so I don’t think it will fly. They might pass a partial ban on the AK’s and Uzi’s, but they’ll never pass a ban on regular guns, unless the Emperor bypasses the legislature and signs another executive order. If he does that, he just might have a civil war. I read a piece that quoted police chiefs as saying that gun confiscation is not something they want to have anything to do with. Their officers would all call in sick that day. Still, by all means send those emails and letters and make calls.
    KM is right that we aren’t making strong inroads about the issues that concern us. Just last night I held court at a party, and I talked about Israel kicking out the blacks and the hypocrisy involved (and I got agreement from liberals!!!) and I talked about the Bolsheviks and the reason for the Nazis quick rise to power, and this was met by astonished comments such as, “I never heard about this in school. Are you sure about this?” So, it was a good evening. I planted some seeds and managed not to alienate anybody, and this is rather astonishing since I’m used to pissing people off right and left. And like the fellow above mentioned, I could care less if some sh**head liberal decides that I’m an anti-semite racist no good. In fact, I’m starting to revel in that label. One person last evening actually said that very thing in jest, “Oh, he’s an anti-semite,” and it was not a put down but simply a good natured rib. In other words, I’m getting through and my logic makes sense, so they have to accept what I’m saying. This is how we build strength, by simply stating the facts. If you speak the truth boldly, there isn’t much a dumb brainwashed liberal can do except call you names and run away. They have no ground to stand on when it comes to a discussion regarding the pernicious influence of the Jewish elite. Also, and this is key, I spent a bit of time clarifying the fact that I’m talking about political and intellectual elites, and not the stray powerless Jewish dude who owns the corner store. This is key because it suddenly exempts the Jews they KNOW, who of course are probably not media chiefs and banking elites scumbags, etc.

  145. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 1, 2013 - 2:31 pm | Permalink

    @me: Thank you for reminding me of something I had entirely forgotten. I graduated from a small, private Catholic high school in 1962, and though it had no gun club sensu stricto, there was a hunting club overseen by one of the faculty members who enjoyed game shooting. Though I had no interest in either at the time, I do now recall that there were lots of hunting venues then within 90 minutes of the city. I’d be surprised if such were the case today.

    Happy New Year, me.

  146. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 1, 2013 - 2:21 pm | Permalink

    @91: It looks as if the link you meant to include didn’t get through the upload process. What book were you referring to?

  147. 91's Gravatar 91
    January 1, 2013 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Professor MacDonald, would you write about Agenda 21?
    And check ‘democrats against agenda’?

  148. 91's Gravatar 91
    January 1, 2013 - 1:46 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    Come on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Kaku [kookoo] has had a show on HNPR [heeb radio] for 20?

  149. 91's Gravatar 91
    January 1, 2013 - 1:43 pm | Permalink

    @Biff Preston:
    SPLC is the hate group in power, that points its finger
    at ‘haters’ [cough].

  150. 91's Gravatar 91
    January 1, 2013 - 1:38 pm | Permalink

    @Biff Preston:
    I dont have the name of the jooish, Female Prof in [Minn? Wisc?] But if I did I would post.
    She claims Whites can NEVER be victims of ray-cysm.

    She is ‘in’ the social ‘sciences’ [cough].

  151. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 1, 2013 - 12:27 pm | Permalink

    @ Prof. MacDonald:

    We still aren’t making tangible progress in changing the basic trajectory of White dispossession.

    Yes, because those being dispossessed are still too busy defending, instead of attacking. Reacting, instead of taking real initiatives on the ground.

    Realistically, the only ways dispossession is going to be stopped is either through the Higher Courts, or through the use of force of arms.

    The political process in both the United States and Britain (plus much of Europe) has been moribund since the early 1990s, following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    The only thing voting now does is give legitimacy to criminality and entrenched, demonic dogmas.

    Each of us must take immediate steps to withdraw from the system (i.e., “The Matrix”) entirely … or to the maximum extent possible … before devoting all energies towards creating alternative, localized replacements. Doing so would soon starve our oppressors of the oxygen and fuel necessary to fire their engines of destruction with.

    Once we begin making ‘them’ react to our agenda, tangible progress will be rendered self-evident.

    The fastest way to begin the process is to remove one’s fear, and start showing open contempt for those who think they are gods. Withering and merciless mockery must also be hurled at ‘them’ constantly.

    Obluma is an easy target. So is Hillary-Rodham, Valery Jarrett, and Susan Rice. I really don’t know how anyone could take such wenches so seriously. Only in Matriarchal Amerika, eh?

  152. Annis's Gravatar Annis
    January 1, 2013 - 12:21 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert
    He probably is part of the conspiracy. Most all scientific progress in the world has been made by White people, so if they get rid of White men who will create that Type One Earth? jews or Asians? I think not. The one world order is about controlling the resources of the Earth and having power and wealth, not science.

    I’ve read a lot of the stuff on your site about psychobiology, I think I remember correctly that is what its called. As an ordinary person without any credentials or knowledge about the science of it all, I tend to believe what you say. A lot of the pills that are continually marketed are downright lethal to us.

    I think madness is the result of inadequate and improper child rearing although of course there could be physical problems such as the causes of retardation.

    Charles Dickens wrote a lot about child labor in England. In America we have a summer vacation from school because children were needed to work the farms.

    I don’t know if other progress such as the invention of farm machinery was responsible for the new ideas of making child labor illegal or if making it illegal as a result of different thinking, allowed for societies to make progress.

    But things have changed and we do have agencies that deal with child abuse. Its just impossible to deal with the mental abuse which is not as apparent as a bruise.

    We cannot apply any diagnoses to Lanza because we don’t have the information and can’t trust the media to give us the facts about what happened.

  153. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 1, 2013 - 12:04 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Not so! The British East India Company was a bone fide corporation long before 1776. Some believe the Stars & Stripes (Old Glory) was actually modelled on the BEIC’s corporate flag. I am one of those.

  154. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 1, 2013 - 12:00 pm | Permalink


    The moment White Europeans organize into a mirror image of Judaism, the Jewish problem will disappear.

    We have already done so. It was organized by the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei between 1920 and 1945.

    And yes, the problem did disappear, so as you correctly suggest the formula is indeed correct and valid.

    But back in the 1940s, stupid Americans supported by their Faggot English co-conspirators, dropped a carpet load of bombs upon the length and breadth of Germany such that every major town and city had been either destroyed or badly damaged. Some senselessly, such as Saxon city of Dresden.

    It is those two propositional countries that have given us the problem we are facing today as a race.

    The enemy are those we keep voting for!

  155. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 1, 2013 - 11:52 am | Permalink

    @me: I once carried a sheathed sword onto a passenger jet at Bangkok’s Don Muang Airport in 1980. There was a slight expression of surprise and worry in the delightful face of the Air Stewardess as she took it off me for safe stowage in their ‘special’ locker. Once at my destination, it was handed back to me with a smile as I departed the cabin for Immigration Controls.

    Aaah, back in dem heady days before Clinton and Herbert Walker Ding-Dong Bush! Men were men, and the women were hot and randy.

  156. January 1, 2013 - 11:49 am | Permalink

    I poster inadvertently.
    The concept of a company or corporation as a citizen would have been alien to late 18th century America.

  157. January 1, 2013 - 11:46 am | Permalink

    @Biff Preston:
    The U.S. Supreme Court has made many decisions that are not Constitutionally based. The most absurd is that corporations are people. If that is truly the case, then a Corporation can be President of the US, without ever having registered to vote or appear on a list of voters.
    Further, if Corporations were truly people, they would not have more rights than citizens through different tax laws, bankruptcy laws, and of course bail out money for criminal activities.

  158. Moe's Gravatar Moe
    January 1, 2013 - 11:41 am | Permalink

    When you try to argue with a liberal about blacks committing more crimes than whites, your garden-variety liberal will always say “crime has no color.” That is, with the exception of when a white male commits some sort of crime, be it the mass shooting or some other media driven crime such as the Trayvon affair.

  159. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 1, 2013 - 11:37 am | Permalink

    The moderation policies here are among the great mysteries of life. I can only assure you that you are in good company. Happy New Year, Curmudgeon!

  160. January 1, 2013 - 11:33 am | Permalink

    Yesterday, at approximately 10:00 AM CST, I posted a link to an article by Dr. Jim Fetzer at Veterans Today. My post was awaiting moderation when I logged off.
    The article was a critique on the manner in which the police handled the televised “evidence”, the information provided in the television interviews, and the inconsistencies in the reports. The conclusion was that this was a psy-op to use as an excuse for a gun grab.
    There were also links to previous articles suggesting who was behind the shootings, including the hypothesis by Michael Harris, former Republican candidate for governor of Arizona and GOP campaign finance chairman.
    The VT website has been all over this as a set up since day one.

    I can only assume the moderators of this site would view the views expressed by Michael Harris and others at Veterans Today as being too harsh for some sensitivities.

  161. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 1, 2013 - 11:24 am | Permalink

    White men, contrary to the endless lies told about them, are a pretty easy going lot. As long as it is possible to live reasonably well, move to another area, pay for private schools and so on, they are willing to do so. They are not very interested in running other people’s lives, they simply want to be left alone. They were entirely willing to lay down the white man’s burden.

    As it becomes increasingly clear that we are running out of places to move and that this government will never be satisfied
    white men will stand up. We often make the mistake of assuming, perhaps unconsciously, that those egomaniacs who gain a voice in the media actually speak for the majority of men. In a lovely piece on Leigh Fermor in Taki’sMagazine, Derek Turner writes:

    Leigh Fermor’s generation did not weary the world with self-analysis; they just did things, quietly or showily according to taste.

    Millions of men still live this way. It is not wise to push them too far.

  162. January 1, 2013 - 10:48 am | Permalink


    The “Therapeutic State” is a phrase coined by Tom Szasz since…1963! But very few if any WNsts are familiar with Szasz’s critique of psychiatry, let alone with the more recent criticism of other authors.

    The collaboration between psychiatry, the pharmaceutical companies and government leads to what Szasz calls the “therapeutic state”, a system in which disapproved actions, thoughts, and emotions are repressed (“cured”) through pseudo-medical interventions.

    Ask the millions of male, rebellious white children who have been drugged into submission by the therapeutic state by means of fraudulent diseases such as Attention Deficit Disorder and many more.

    It is a shame that my paper dealing with this topic was not published at CC (because of my strong criticism of rock music at that webzine). I can only hope that sooner or later Dr MacDonald gives some thought to it here at TOO.


    Dixie: in case you have some connection with OD would you be interested in publishing it there? I spent years of my life researching this subject.

  163. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    January 1, 2013 - 10:15 am | Permalink

    @ Biff Preston, Jan.1, 2013, 2:02 am.
    Rappaport is a well known Italian Jewish name. These people belong to the Cohen tribe.
    @ Annis, Jan.1, 2013, 8:04 am.
    Michio Kaku is a Japanese-American scientist. I find his ideas of three types of planetary civilizations too fantastic, but it is possible that his statement that those who resist the coming of a One World Order are “terrorists” indicates that he is part of the global conspiracy.

  164. dixie's Gravatar dixie
    January 1, 2013 - 10:04 am | Permalink

    Dan says:
    Lanza’s mom is a Mayflower type. Née Champion.”

    Champion, when associated with English people at all, is NORMAN name, I thought. Hailing from the South, the whole idea of “plymouth rock” is a sort of joke (a rock the size of a golf ball stuck on the shore after the Civil War”) when the “mayflower” became the center of the world, to inbred provincial Northeast types.

    The Mayflower was JUST ONE BOAT that came years after Jamestown (the real center of the colonies). Do you have any idea how MANY boats were coming and going then? Lots.

    To think anything originated with the Mayflower is kind of a joke (back in the real world). And while the passenger list of that particular boat never interested me, particularly, it wasn’t known for the Norman types.

    I don’t get your post.

  165. dixie's Gravatar dixie
    January 1, 2013 - 9:55 am | Permalink

    Actually, though, “MENTAL HEALTH” is on the rise as a response, and it’s not just “mental health—yes or no” like it’s some pundit show, but WHAT IS SAID about mental health.

    What’s being said is that it’s used to push national health care, pre-screening of children, drugging of children and Big Pharm. The psychiatric narrative is completely incompatible with “christianity” which TOO often pushes (albeit without ever having much sophistication about the in-fighting among christians, the radical differences between itself and Orthodoxy or Protestantism, enough to be a different religion, indeed).

    Anyway—- nowadays the ‘priests” of all sects get Psychiatric degrees in tandem with seminary and push Big Pharm narratives in their “churches.” (Right alongside “diversity” training).

    For future, Pharm psychiatriac narrative and disarming population will continue to compete and to increasingly (with “national health care”) complement each other—- the psychiatric control, controlling the mind, is even more important (and key to the success of governments, some feel) than physical control.

  166. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    January 1, 2013 - 9:21 am | Permalink

    An order to remove guns is an attack on white people and will lead to whites owning illegally held firearms. Many Americans share here that they can only get their country back via an armed struggle. Ironically, an order to remove privately held firearms would expidite the arrival of such a struggle.

  167. Annis's Gravatar Annis
    January 1, 2013 - 8:44 am | Permalink

    Oh yeah, this scientist claims we are terrorists if we don’t go along with the one world order. No wonder they want to disarm us.

  168. Annis's Gravatar Annis
    January 1, 2013 - 8:40 am | Permalink

    Obviously they are trying to destroy Western civilization so they can set up their one world order and we are being bombarded from every side, not just their attempts to take our guns.

    I found this fascinating video – I came across this video by the chinese scientist that we see everywhere on the Discovery, Science etc channels.

    This is THE THREAT that we are up against. This is what they claim is the reason for their one world order. THEY ARE USING SCIENCE NOW to push their OWO. Can we not become a Type One planet without integration or dissolving Western civilization?

    This guy’s argument is compelling and I want to hear our intellecuals’ replies to this. Hope that can happen. I would love to hear Kevin’s opinion about this.

    Are we simply dull witted backward people who are standing in the way of the brilliant jews who are bringing about the first phase toward man becoming Gods, Type One Earth?

  169. Righteous Hammer's Gravatar Righteous Hammer
    January 1, 2013 - 6:06 am | Permalink

    The article touches on the fact that the overwhelming majority of the gun control nannies have no knowledge or experience with firearms. I can certainly attest to that. I recently had what may amount to a friendship ending argument with a misguided, lost soul, urbanite liberal friend of mine. He began the conversation by asking my opinion on gun control in this ‘Post Newtown World.’ He wanted my opinion bc I am a veteran of our current Talmudic Terror Wars and, in his mind, a real-life walking Rambo. Needless to say, he didn’t like my answer. He admitted his lack of experience with weapons and when confronted revealed his gross ignorance of existing fire arm laws. And yet, he still felt qualified to give his (read media’s) view that there is no longer a need for private citizen fire arms and that they must be confiscated. I was stupefied. As the conversation went on I had to drop the J-bomb on his head in order to explain that contrary to media myth, guns are not the problem. Rather, the disgustingly decadent pop culture pushed mainly by the anointed ones that is displacing US in the land that OUR forefathers settled and built is causing the combustible environment. The pretentious coastal attitude that the gunophobes speak with is very evident. My Bill Maher, Rachel Madow viewing friend is no exception. After refusing to stop using the dreaded J-bomb during what was now an argument, my perhaps former friend broke off the discussion by storming off and leaving the venue. I’m sure his hyper-sensitive brain lost respect for me but I couldn’t care less. I lost no respect for him bc I had virtually none for this sad, shell of a ‘man’ anyhow. However, he is one of our brothers and does have some potential. Not vanguard potential, but potential nonetheless. For this one reason alone, if he’ll have me, I intend to continue my efforts of assisting him in discovering his inner Aryan. It is no easy task as I’m sure TOO readers know. Im forced to constantly remind myself to be patient and not blame the victim for his sad mental state largely induced by forces unseen by him and instead reserve that fury for those responsible.

  170. Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks's Gravatar Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks
    January 1, 2013 - 5:14 am | Permalink

    Ghost of Christmas Past
    Pravda Warns Americans
    Do not give up your guns!

  171. The Lavon Factor's Gravatar The Lavon Factor
    January 1, 2013 - 2:21 am | Permalink

    @Biff Preston:

    Just don’t say ” Angry Israeli Man “

  172. Biff Preston's Gravatar Biff Preston
    January 1, 2013 - 2:02 am | Permalink

    @91: I’m reading that article right now. Every so called expert mentioned in the article, that is written by the Jew, Alexander Kafka, who’s opinion is mentioned, is a Jew. Professor Louis Seidman, Sanford Levinson, Kathleen Sullivan, Stephen Siegel, Mark Tushnet, Lee Epstein, William M. Landes, Richard Posner and Michael Klarman. I don’t believe that Michael Rappaport is a Jew. He’s the only one.

    I get the impression that Prof. Seidman is not exactly a big fan of the first and second ammendments from reading this article.

    Here’s one statement he makes.

    “Without constitutional grounding, on what basis would court rulings be made?”

    “Well, on what basis are they made now in cases involving limits on affirmative action, say, or the freedom to have gay sex? Those decisions, Seidman writes, are “at best tenuously tied to the constitutional text,” and reflect, instead, a mix of policy judgment, interpretation of tradition, moral boundaries, and so on.”

    I get the impression that he appreciates the so called “holistic approach” to college admissions.

    It’s definitely an article written by a Jew and quoting a number of other Jews, with Louis Seidman being the most prominent. No question about it. There are a few other quotes I could pick apart. I read through it pretty fast so I didn’t scrutinize it too thoroughly, but I can see that like so many constitutional lawyers that I have been made aware of that Louis Seidman has no concept of honesty whatsoever.

  173. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    January 1, 2013 - 1:45 am | Permalink

    The angry white men in America, as a group, will never rise up in arms against the government or social order. The only circumstance for this to happen is an all out civil war, but the powers that be will not let this happen. In all other circumstances we have to think about jobs and mortgages and the kids’ education and a million other things that all come first.

    Realistically the guns are useful for two reasons. First, personal protection. But there are easier ways to protect oneself, such as moving to suburbia, than to keep shooting at the wouldbe robbers. The second reason is psychological, which is a somewhat nebulous and a very much subjective reason.

    Those who want to disarm the white America are not particularly worried about grandfathered assault weapons. Their timescale of thinking is much longer than the 50 years that a gun realistically can survive in a working condition. All that matters to them is that there are armed whites in America now, and there will be none 50 years from now.

    Happy new year!

  174. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    January 1, 2013 - 1:22 am | Permalink

    Professor MacDonald is living proof that the pen is mightier than the sword.

    • January 1, 2013 - 9:10 am | Permalink

      Would that that were true! We still aren’t making tangible progress in changing the basic trajectory of White dispossession.

  175. Rob's Gravatar Rob
    January 1, 2013 - 12:55 am | Permalink

    I had the admins remove my previous comment.

  176. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    January 1, 2013 - 12:41 am | Permalink

    @Rob: And add to all that, many Whites in the military would not co-operate. Just because people like Charles Krauthammer would be on tv calling for “martial law for the good of the Union,” many WHites would not fire on their own.
    And if ordinary White civilians just stopped working, blacks and browns would not pick up the slack. Just the act of work stoppage would have a huge impact.

  177. NM156's Gravatar NM156
    December 31, 2012 - 11:52 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Fighter jets high tech weapons didn’t do a thing to stop the PLO, IRA, the Bosnians and Kosovars, the Shining Path, the Viet Cong, the Taliban-how long of a list do you want? It’s a long one, and it’s the history of revolution and insurgency throughout the second half of the 20th century, all conducted with small arms.

  178. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 31, 2012 - 11:04 pm | Permalink

    According to the New York Post:

    “Gunman Adam Lanza, 20, and his mother, Nancy Lanza, had been parishioners at St. Rose of Lima Roman Catholic Church in Newtown. Adam also had gone to the church’s school as a child after his mother pulled him out of nearby Sandy Hook Elementary School, where he conducted his murderous rampage Friday.”

    As I mentioned before Nancy Lanza, was born and raised in New Hampshire. Her mother’s name has been reported as Hanson.

  179. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    December 31, 2012 - 11:02 pm | Permalink

    The truth about liberals and guns is simple. They hate guns and don’t want to own them, thus, you must not be allowed to own them either. Whatever liberals don’t like must not be allowed to exist. This is the liberal mind.

  180. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 31, 2012 - 10:42 pm | Permalink


    Lanza’s mother was from some sort of a broken home in New Hampshire. Nancy Lanza’s mother has been reported as being named Hanson.

    That’s all been swept under the rug too.

  181. George's Gravatar George
    December 31, 2012 - 10:03 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    “Am I really the only one here who sees that the relentless attack on white men is because all the world fears you? ”
    – Obviously not, except that it is not “the world” that fears us it is rather Jews that fear us, and “the world” (or at least non-whites of the world) do their bidding willingly since Jews dole out the goodies they stole from us (i.e.: China getting OUR industrial and manufacturing technology, capital and material from transplanted former US corporations, and domestic blacks and browns getting our wealth and health care redistributed to them in many ways).
    “They are terrified of the day when you finally say enough is enough or even greet the next bit of nonsense with the contempt it deserves.” – Which is why they (mostly Jews) are crying loud and fiercely for “gun control”. Yes, some of us at least know it on a conscious level, others (I think) sense it at some level- a vague fear of what the future portends. As for the arrival of that “day when we finally say enough is enough”, I for one have been waiting for “that day” for the last two decades, and I am still waiting. But, this current “gun issue” will be the telling event. If this passes and gun owners meekly hand in their arms like the British did, we will have the same problem the Brits are having now , or worse- eventually we will be in the same dire straits as the Afrikaaners are now.
    Do you remember the incident some years back when one group (I believe it was a pro-gun organization, but can’t recall) posted the addresses of the Congress persons on their website (if I remember correctly, accompanied with suggestions that the public “pay them a visit”). Do you recall the stark TERROR that some of those same congress critters exhibited on the news? Yes, they do fear us.

  182. Hans's Gravatar Hans
    December 31, 2012 - 9:53 pm | Permalink

    @Bob Wallace: Bob, good to see your name here. Wondered what you were doing since you were rudely dismissed by Lewpus Rockwell. That would be a great story to tell in full on TOO.

  183. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 31, 2012 - 9:33 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    There has been no silence in my neighborhood. Both the guns shops and Walmart sold out of ammunition before Christmas. My FB pages are covered both with protests against any suggestion of more gun control and pictures of cute little girls who bagged their first buck on a hunting trip with Daddy over Christmas vacation. There is more than one way to send a message. Announcing with great solemnity that resistance is futile is not among them.

    Happy New Year!

  184. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 31, 2012 - 9:22 pm | Permalink

    Am I really the only one here who sees that the relentless attack on white men is because all the world fears you? Any one would assume that they would fear many other groups more. They know that other groups will accept the strong arm when it comes, perhaps even with a sense of relief. All of the talk of angry white men is entirely justified. You have every reason to be angry and they know it. They are terrified of the day when you finally say enough is enough or even greet the next bit of nonsense with the contempt it deserves.

  185. 91's Gravatar 91
    December 31, 2012 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

    @Biff Preston:
    Meet Prof Seidman,

    This is via Mediaite:

    Georgetown University constitutional law professor Louis Michael Seidman has just about had it with the focus of his 40 years of academic study. As he writes in the New York Times on Monday, it is the Constitution itself which has allowed for the series of legislative follies that finally resulted in the “fiscal cliff.” Seidman says that it is time for Americans to realize what lawmakers have known since the constitution’s inception – it is okay to ignore it.

    “As the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downrght evil provisions,” Seidman writes.

    Our obsession with the Constitution has saddled us with a dysfunctional political system, kept us from debating the merits of divisive issues and inflamed our public discourse. Instead of arguing about what is to be done, we argue about what James Madison might have wanted done 225 years ago.

    He goes on to detail the number of American politicians who have used every opportunity to sideline the Constitution; from John Adams to Abraham Lincoln to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

    “In the face of this long history of disobedience, it is hard to take seriously the claim by the Constitution’s defenders that we would be reduced to a Hobbesian state of nature if we asserted our freedom from this ancient text,” Seidman adds.

    He says that the freedoms enshrined in the Bill of Rights are time-tested and should be preserved, but the system of established powers. Seidman says that there is a real threat that American dysfunctional governance could rend the republic sunder, and it is far more preferable that the Constitution be junked than the Union.

    Seidman concludes that, though Americans will probably not give up on Constitution any time soon, his recommendation is the best of a series of bad choices facing the nation:

    If even this change is impossible, perhaps the dream of a country ruled by “We the people” is impossibly utopian. If so, we have to give up on the claim that we are a self-governing people who can settle our disagreements through mature and tolerant debate. But before abandoning our heritage of self-government, we ought to try extricating ourselves from constitutional bondage so that we can give real freedom a chance.

  186. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    December 31, 2012 - 8:59 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    And before we all move into Apocolypse mode, I suggest we take advantage of normal modes of persuasion. Everyone should be contacting several congressmen and letting them know we don’t want any restrictions on guns. Politicians do get a feel for how the population thanks.

    If they think the pro-gun side has been cowed into silence, then they may move.

  187. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 31, 2012 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

    @George: Good point.

  188. Jaego's Gravatar Jaego
    December 31, 2012 - 8:31 pm | Permalink

    Turn it back on them: focusing on these White Kids while so many more Black kids die shows the racism of the Liberals.

    Arming teachers is “stupid” or “insane”.? But the Israelis do it. Are they calling Jews stupid and insane?

    We can’t have guns? Then why does Feinstein? Our kids can’t have guards? Then why does Sidwell Friends have 11?

    This is the Line in the Sand. We must not allow them to disarm us. We must counter attack by showing their hypocrisy. Even many Liberals want guns for themselves and a few might even come over to our side. Most hate us too much – more than they love themselves.

  189. George's Gravatar George
    December 31, 2012 - 7:38 pm | Permalink

    “Anyway, it’s a prelude to an Holodomir. Disarmament is insanity…”

    Yes, but have you wondered just how many fellow white men (and women) actually see or at least have some instinctive feel for what is coming? For example, just about all online ammo retailers have sold out of everything that fits into an semi-auto rifle: .223, 7.62X39, magazines (of all types), and of course the semi-auto rifles themselves.
    Talking to the local gunshop owner (a gen-X er I think), he tells me that the gun owner-buyers out there are buying so that their purchases will be “grandfathered”. I respect the man too much to have laughed out loud, but inside, I was cackling. I hope that these poor people do not really believe that ex-post facto law will be honored by the Jews that run the system. When (and not IF) Feinstein and Biden get their way, a lot of people out there will become criminals overnight. Nearly all of them white, of course. Holodomor indeed! So the question in my mind is; are those people stockpiling ammo and guns doing so because they are “gearing up” for some real or imagined “confrontation” , or are they buying into my local gun seller’s argument that their purchases will be grandfathered?

  190. 6V4Al's Gravatar 6V4Al
    December 31, 2012 - 7:37 pm | Permalink

    Woo-hoo, great article, very worthy of a last minute donation.

  191. December 31, 2012 - 7:37 pm | Permalink

    We all know what Jews are doing to us, but the source of the pain is actually our own radical individualism, an aspect of white pathology, the topic of next TOQ issue.

    In SAID, pg 136, KMac remarks, “In individualistic societies, sexual pleasure tends to become a goal in itself, removed from its reproductive consequences, while Judaism remained committed to fertility and high-investment parenting as religious commandments.”

    The moment White Europeans organize into a mirror image of Judaism, the Jewish problem will disappear.

    Anyway, I am heading out with my family, so happy new year to you and your family, Hope whites wake up in 2013 before its too late.

  192. Biff Preston's Gravatar Biff Preston
    December 31, 2012 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

    @91: Your welcome. I’m sure that what your going to see in Michael Kimmel’s book is a case made that white nationalism, masculinity, mental illness and gun violence are all tied in together. It’s very much in line with the mainstream Jewish idea and liberal idea in general that any manifestation of whites expressing any ethnic interests is pathological and dangerous. I suspect you will see more highly ethnocentric non-whites, other than Mr. Kimmel, promoting the very same sort of criticism of whites that Mr. Kimmel is in the coming months. Don’t you just love the culture of critique?

    Carolyn Yeager came up with that I thought was a very good idea. she is of course a radio talk show host and white advocate. that we need something like an anti defamation league of our own. When Jews like Henry Allen,David Sirota or Michael Kimmel come out and specify whites, or worse yet, white males who espouse white ethnic interests as being a very dangerous problem then perhaps we should put them on a list of our own, with picture and personal information included, much like the ones the Anti Defamation League of B’nai Brith and Southern Poverty Law Center have on their websites. Those 3 Jews right there are only a small drop in a large Jewish bucket of Jewish editorial and opinion writers who write stuff with pretty much the same anti-white flavor so unfortunately our lists would probably be quite a bit longer than the ones of the ADL of BB and SPLC. We’re defamed constantly so I thought that was a good idea.

  193. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    December 31, 2012 - 7:30 pm | Permalink

    Black, brown and yellow shock troops roughing up White gun owners with Jewish politicians giving the orders is a real possibility. Mentally, Jews are already there. This is part of the reason Jews groom White women for politics. I’ve seen it firsthand. Politics is becoming women’s work in many areas. Once they’ve packed enough brainwashed and flattered White women into office, look out. The tribe will have a White woman announce the “historic laws against gun violence.” Then we’ll be at the precipice.

  194. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 31, 2012 - 7:27 pm | Permalink


    “Like immigration, gun banning is something we better make sure White people know who’s behind it all. Too many think it’s just “Obama.”

    Good point.

    We can do that with other groups, too.

    We can tell people in the Men’s Rights Movement about the huge role Jews played in the feminist movement.

    We can tell opponents of the homosexual agenda the huge role Jews played in pushing the homosexual agenda.

    We can tell parents who are concerned about the content of modern t.v. and movies that Jews produce most of it.

    We can tell the Occupy Wall Street protesters about the role Jews have played in the financial mess.

    We can tell people who oppose our involvement in the Middle East about the role Jews played in that.

    We can tell opponents of illegal immigration the role Jews played in opening the borders.

    (I’m not an expert on any of these issues.)

    The internet is a great tool for sharing important facts. There are some good YouTube videos that address these issues, but I think there is room for improvement. Just some clean, short, easy-to-understand videos that can help the average person understand each of these issues. Maybe each topic could have its own video.

  195. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 31, 2012 - 7:04 pm | Permalink

    In that case I suggest you work on your presentation style, you sure had me fooled. Resistance does not begin when they come to the door. It begins by saying hell no from day one.

    Happy New Year and don’t give up on us quite yet. We may have a few tricks left.

  196. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 31, 2012 - 7:01 pm | Permalink

    Budding thespians, this 2013 promises much.

  197. me's Gravatar me
    December 31, 2012 - 6:59 pm | Permalink

    As late as the 1960s New York City high schools had shooting clubs and would carry their 22 rifles on the subway.
    What has changed? As that question to a liberal – you’ll get a stutter and blank, angry stare in response.

  198. me's Gravatar me
    December 31, 2012 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

    I have always found this aspect of jewish elite curious. Why such fervent attempts to ban guns. Why has the ACLU never defended the 2nd amendment.
    Part of it, I think, a large part of it, is Jews have always feared populists uprisings and civic minded classes. When you are the corrupt elite the last thing you want is a well armed, patriotic middle class.

    Of course ‘they’ don’t see it that way – they see every white middle class family that goes to church on Sunday and has chaste daughters and sober sons as one goose step away from the SS.

    [side note did any one see Mike Bloomberg’s big lie the other day – that he is one of the most fervent defenders of the 2nd amendment.. man, when they lie they don’t mess around, do they? )

  199. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 31, 2012 - 6:54 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    I’m not saying you should give up. I don’t want to abolish the second amendment and if there is some kind of “civil war” in America, I do hope armed Americans put up a resistance. I’m just saying that things have changed, and if Americans are going to resist having their guns taken away from them, they need to understand what they’re going up against, and they need to be prepared to face an almost certain death.

  200. 91's Gravatar 91
    December 31, 2012 - 6:46 pm | Permalink

    I will add to my above, and that is with over a million black men
    incarcerated. The killers are drawn from that 3% of the population.
    It is ‘not for nothing’ Soros had that California Initiative a few
    years back [no prison time for druggies].

  201. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    December 31, 2012 - 6:44 pm | Permalink

    @sanjay: Really well stated. The Jewish strategy means to dismantle us gradually being careful not to shock us with abrupt actions. Divide us. Chip away at us. Because if we recievied any big shocks, we might actually focus on the source of pain…them.

  202. 91's Gravatar 91
    December 31, 2012 - 6:42 pm | Permalink

    @Biff Preston:
    ‘whites and school shootings as well as masculinity.’
    He and his will never mention most murders in USA
    are done those within 3% of our pop.
    [young black males] and his media pushes violence at us.

  203. 91's Gravatar 91
    December 31, 2012 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    from link:

    The book also received impressive reviews in The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post Book World (front page review), and The New York Times Book Review, which noted that this “concise, incisive” book “elucidates the masculine ideals of the past 200 years…just as shelves of feminist books have elucidated the feminine.”

  204. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 31, 2012 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de CraonThere are caves, and there are caves.

  205. 91's Gravatar 91
    December 31, 2012 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

    @Biff Preston:
    Thanks. Another Mole [Professor and cnn writer] exposed.

  206. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 31, 2012 - 6:26 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:The American Life imitates art. Hollywood loves SWAT dramas. The genre has a rosy future.

  207. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 31, 2012 - 6:13 pm | Permalink

    @mark: The A talent does fiction, the B, evidently non-fiction. I’m more comfortable when the scary movie ends with stars and their roles in the final credits.

  208. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 31, 2012 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: It’s almost forty years ago that I saw my first NYPD SWAT team in the (well-armored) flesh. My blood ran cold at the site of putatively civilian policemen more heavily armed than any soldier I’d seen less than a decade earlier in Vietnam. When I heard a few people around me say something to the effect of “Wow, cool gear,” I knew something had gone horribly wrong in this country.

    As is true of most other people, most of my forebodings have been dead wrong. This was one that wasn’t.

  209. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 31, 2012 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Thank heaven (i.e., the sky) that your own cave has a Wifi connection, fender.

    Happy New Year! Dream better dreams in 2013.

  210. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 31, 2012 - 6:05 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara:
    Why should they bother if we are so spineless we surrender first?

  211. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 31, 2012 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    Tail – I knew it was tail……

  212. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 31, 2012 - 6:02 pm | Permalink

    There is no end of reasons and excuses to give up. If we follow your advice to quit first we will never find out how tough we are. There is huge psychological difference between armed men, or even sweet little old ladies, who refuse to be disarmed and those who bow before the government with their tale between their legs because it is all lost anyway.

  213. December 31, 2012 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    The anarchist newspaper in my old home Detroit, the Fifth Estate, was anti-gun control — just like the Black Panthers! — but they did one time give an interesting response to the “we need guns to fight the government” line that perhaps reconciles you and Fender. Yes, the modern government has technologically overwhelming force. So, why the continuing resistance in Afghanistan, Iraq, and 60-70s Viet Nam? Because a revolution or upheaval only gets traction when the Army and Police go over to the side of the people — and then, they unlock the armories.

    So we the people don’t need tanks and rocket launchers, since they would only be effective if the army FIRST went over to our side, and then we’d get them from the troops.

  214. December 31, 2012 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    “Anyone with eyes to see the obvious will grasp the fact that “progressives” will stop at nothing in seeking to destroy the bonds of a White male gun culture and gaining another amnesty for non-White illegal aliens in the name of making America “safe,” “diverse,” and “equal.””

    Just a thought or two.
    Do these Leftist think that Americans are buying millions of guns & truck loads of ammunition, just so someone can just walk down the street and collect them? Have you heard all of the talk about the ‘Zombie Wars’ and Zombie killing weapons? Now ask yourself, how much difference is there between a Zombie and Leftist?

  215. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 31, 2012 - 5:55 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    The Afghans are a people shaped by harsh living conditions and centuries of militant resistance against invaders. They are battle-hardened experts who live in caves in mountainous valleys and have no fear of death because they have no hope of luxury.

    Your average White male midwestern Kwan has spent his life eating cheet-ohs, watching blacks chase balls around fields, and praying to jeebus that he comes down from heaven to save him from the “muslim commie” who’s suddenly taken over ‘murrica. You can’t compare White kwan men to Afghan fighters; the latter are a much better breed of men.

  216. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 31, 2012 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    That must be why everything is so nice and peaceful in Afghanistan. I am not even talking about asymmetrical warfare. This government and country would come to a complete halt the moment we refused to comply.

  217. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 31, 2012 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: I fear that when Diane Sawyer tells her rapt audience to board the cattle-train for a communal delousing, a shockingly high percentage will actually do so.

  218. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 31, 2012 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    You’re not looking at the facts. This isn’t the 18th century where the government and the people have the same weaponry. In 1776 citizens had muskets and the British army had muskets. In 2012 citizens have shotguns and rifles and the army has cruise missiles, attack helicopters, F-18s, unmanned aerial drones, heat-seeking missiles, EMPs, satellites, tanks, miniguns, and any number of high-tech weapons. It won’t be much of a battle.

  219. norm s's Gravatar norm s
    December 31, 2012 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Not surprising considering who owns 96 % of the MSM

  220. The Lavon Factor's Gravatar The Lavon Factor
    December 31, 2012 - 5:25 pm | Permalink

    And the Paycheck Anti-Ethno Conservatives as well?

  221. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 31, 2012 - 5:16 pm | Permalink

    Interesting link. Thanks.

  222. The Lavon Factor's Gravatar The Lavon Factor
    December 31, 2012 - 5:13 pm | Permalink



  223. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 31, 2012 - 5:07 pm | Permalink

    With as much respect as I can muster, has it ever occurred to you that it is precisely the fatalistic attitude, which you continue to impress upon us, which permitted a tiny number of Jews to kill millions of your kinsmen?

    If white people ever made a sincere resolution to quit trying to scapegoat other whites, and really face our problems, no other group on earth could stop us.

    Dr. Mac Donald has done us all a valuable service, and his work is brilliant.. Like all scholars his work has a very narrow focus. We are also players here. Jews don’t win through raw power, they win through seduction. They have sold us a pretty song and we do not want to return to reality. The answer and the power is still in our hands, if we are willing to toughen up, quit taking the easy way out and stand up again. We might begin with a little truth.

    Americans have a right to possess guns not because we like sport shooting or to protect our families. We have guns to fight tyrants. I won’t be giving mine up.

  224. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 31, 2012 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    @Tom: You mean you haven’t figured out yet that it was all a Vatican-directed plot? Only Protestant kids were supposed to be killed, you know.

    I hope that the folks who think you are on the AIPAC payroll are right. Heaven knows that no one would pay you to do your own thinking.

  225. Biff Preston's Gravatar Biff Preston
    December 31, 2012 - 4:53 pm | Permalink

    I recently came across an article written by a repulsive Jew named Michael S. Kimmel, who wrote an article at that caught my eye. He has much to say about whites and school shootings as well as masculinity.

    If you read the editors note you will see that Michael is writing a book due to be published in 2103 titled “Angry White Men”. I wonder what delightful things he will have to say about masculine white males in his new book.

    Michael believes that “Angry White Men” are a dangerous threat that need to be watched. I wish Michael! I really do. Michael doesn’t like masculinity either. You see Michael is a self proclaimed pro-feminist male. I suspect though that Michael is specifically pro-feminist with regards to white non-jewish and non-hispanic males, though I wouldn’t expect him to come out and admit that. Michael also believes in gun control among other wonderful things.

    Meet Michael

    Michael teaches at Stony Brook College and here is his website

    Ain’t Michael swell?

    I do agree with one thing Michael says. There is a culture of violence being promoted and much of it by Michael’s co-ethnics both in Television and movies as well as the music industry. I don’t expect Michael to say much about the ethnic angle. I suspect he will tow the party line of “were all Americans” while at the same time demonizing heterosexual white males. I guess we’ll have to wait for his book.

    Here’s an article Michael wrote about the dilemma he had in having his Hebrew offspring circumcised.

    I wonder if he will raise his son to be a male Jewish feminist? I suppose time will only tell.

    I just thought he might be worth mentioning. I came across him while doing some of my usual “digging” and he made my stomach a bit nauseous.

  226. mark's Gravatar mark
    December 31, 2012 - 4:15 pm | Permalink

    I agree fully with Vlad. This is an interesting link.

    What it sort of insinuates is that people who could pull off 9/11 can pull off anything. And always rather sloppily at that.

  227. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    December 31, 2012 - 3:52 pm | Permalink

    White/yellow spree killers just aim properly. If a black could shoot straight it would be Armageddon in Chicago or St Louis or Detroit.

    Anyway, it’s a prelude to an Holodomir. Disarmament is insanity.

  228. December 31, 2012 - 3:17 pm | Permalink

    white libs will not be in camps. white lib. girls will be prostitutes, white lib. guys will flip burgers. Or they will dissolve with intermarriage.

    Or they will migrate to China, Thailand, Bali with their bongs, and work for a few yuan and bahts till they die from overdose.

    It is the white patriots who will be tortured to death in camps.

    Flood them with immigrants, take away their guns, take away their property, indoctrinate them in schools, on TV, radio, movie theater, and finally exterminate them. that is the jewish agenda. that is where jews are at their best.

    We need to become a mirror image of judaism as the last 2 pages of CoC warn us. Powerful, cohesive, disciplined, loyal, alert, fertile, capable, undying spirit, all for one, one for all.

  229. fender's Gravatar fender
    December 31, 2012 - 3:03 pm | Permalink

    I have no idea why we’re even interested in America anymore. Let it die. The White liberals will be the first into the camps when the jews and their mud foot soldiers openly declare war.

  230. The Lavon Factor's Gravatar The Lavon Factor
    December 31, 2012 - 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Associate with that meme!

  231. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 31, 2012 - 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Peter Lanza, Adam Lanza’s father, is a vice president of General Electric (GE), and he is also a vice president of Ernst & Young. The fact that GE owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC may account for some of the reporting in this tragic case. The reporting has shifted away from who was Adam Lanza, and what were his motives, to the subject of guns.

    There are lots of questions unanswered:

    Is Lanza of Italian origin? Is he a Roman Catholic? I do know there are Jews named Lanza out there.

    Who were the doctor or doctors who diagnosed Adam Lanza? What treatment, and or drugs were prescribed?

    Why did the CT medical examiner say all wounds had been caused by handguns, not by a rifle or long gun. (I saw/heard that one myself on TV, so did a lot of other people.)

    If the school was locked, why was #Lanza let in carrying a rifle? If that is the case.

    The reporting has been terrible, and it’s pretty obvious the media has an anti-gun agenda. Not who, what, where, why, when?

    • Dan's Gravatar Dan
      December 31, 2012 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

      Lanza’s mom is a Mayflower type. Née Champion.

  232. December 31, 2012 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

    The white death rate from firearms is .32 per capita, which is bit lower than Holland’s (.33). The firearm death rate for American blacks is over 17 per capita. That is 39 times the white rate.

  233. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    December 31, 2012 - 11:53 am | Permalink

    So many of the Congressional gun ban sponsors are Jewish that it’s unmistakable. Jews own it. But this is one issue where Whites don’t want to sell out or believe the first thing the MSM says. I’ve always felt that this issue is a perfect opportunity to show typical Whites the intent of organized Jewry. The connection is so strong that it strikes a cord with average people. The idea of being disarmed while a hostile elite calls us “red necks” and “trailor trash” hits too close to our basic instincts of self preservation. Like immigration, gun banning is something we better make sure White people know who’s behind it all. Too many think it’s just “Obama.”

  234. December 31, 2012 - 11:53 am | Permalink

    In 2009 there were 17,000 cases of suicide by gunshot. That same year 13,000 firearm-related homicides occurred. America is South Africa’s depressed cousin. We can turn this around by spreading a postive message of White Fraternity and offering relevant critiques of (judeo-liberal) modernity.

    • Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks's Gravatar Zionist Cheka Bolsheviks
      January 3, 2013 - 1:48 am | Permalink


  235. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    December 31, 2012 - 11:01 am | Permalink

    Gun ownership, religious freedom, free press and free speech are the only things standing between us and the left’s total control of our lives, thoughts, money, and future. I think they hate the Bill of Rights, and wish we had a parliamentary system. Enough immigration and the votes that go with it, and then they can change the constitution, and get everything they want.

  236. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 31, 2012 - 10:17 am | Permalink

    Happy New Year to Isadore “Joe” Lieberman.

  237. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 31, 2012 - 10:10 am | Permalink

    Of course, the Left would never dream of bringing grist to its own mill!!

    It’s going to be an interesting 2013.

Comments are closed.