The Sexual Subversion of America, Part 1 of 2

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon

An edited abridgement of E. Michael Jones’ 2003 essay, Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos, presented with pictures and captions by Lasha Darkmoon


“Sexual morality is contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life…. If only Americans knew, we are bringing them the plague!” — Sigmund Freud

I never liked the title of Rabbi Dresner’s book: Can Families Survive in Pagan America? This was published in 1995 by Huntington House out of Lafayettte, Louisiana.

The Jews had prospered in America, we learn from the book, but they had paid a price for their prosperity. The chosen people seemed to flatten into normality, according to Dresner’s pessimistic view, becoming what the prophets had warned against: just like the other nations.

They had succeeded beyond their wildest dreams in assimilating and achieving success. They even succeeded in remaking American culture in the course of the 20th century in their image, but in doing that they also discovered that they were no longer Jews.

Jews, according to Dresner, have tried all things. In the process they have exhausted modernity. And they have discovered, to their chagrin, the puzzling truth that

 no license has replaced the Law; no symphony, the Psalms; no country club, the synagogue; no mansion, the home; no mistress, a wife; no towering metropolis, Jerusalem; no impulse, the joy of doing a mitzvah; no man, God. (p. 329)


1.  Introducing Rabbi Dresner

Samuel H. Dresner was born into an assimilationist-minded Jewish family in Chicago in 1923. He was known in high school, at the time, as obsessed with sports and girls. Before long those obsessions were replaced by a loftier obsession. At the age of 15, Dresner became acutely and painfully aware of suffering in the world around him. As a result of his vision, he turned down what would have been a lucrative career in his uncle’s dress manufacturing business and decided to become a rabbi.

Dresner did not speak Yiddish. He was not a Polish Jew. His wife Ruth comes from a family of Orthodox German Jews. You would, however, not get this impression by reading Families, which is in many ways one long invidious comparison between the Jews of America and the Jews of Eastern Europe.

Dresner felt that Jews were better off, spiritually at least, in the ghettos of Eastern Europe. Now that they had arrived in just about every sense of the word in America, he was afraid that they had become “messengers who forget the message”:

For centuries the Jews, shut up in their ghettos, perfected their souls before God and had something to say to mankind. But no one listened. Now, Jews have the ears of non-Jews on every level of society. What a tragedy if now that the gentiles are listening, the Jews have nothing to say.

2.  Rabbi  Dresner’s assault on American Jewry

Rabbi Dresner was among the first to spot trends destructive of Judaism in literature, film and radical feminism.

I remember asking him what he thought of a piece I did on Jewish/Catholic Kulturkampf, which ended with an analysis of Alan Dershowitz’s The Vanishing American Jew. My point was that the Jews were putting themselves out of business by espousing sexual liberation. Dresner agreed with what I had to say, but added that Jews didn’t like to hear others (i.e., the goyim) say it. It was an honest response, and I valued his honesty.

In another conversation, he complained about me writing about “Jewish villains” and so in response I sent him a copy of my then just released book The Medjugorje Deception, with an inscription to the effect that there were no Jewish villains in it.

“What a tragedy,” Dresner points out, “if now that the gentiles are listening, the Jews have nothing to say.” When Families appeared, this gentile was listening, because he felt that this Jew had something to say.

Dresner singles out Isaac Bashevis Singer and Woody Allen for particular condemnation because of their contemptuous attitude toward things Jewish.

In wondering why Singer is so popular among American Jews and why his portrayal of Polish Jews as sexual degenerates had evoked no protest, Dresner levels a jeremiad of biblical proportions against American Jews, a group which he feels have made a caricature out of Judaism, not only by the vulgarism and crass commercialism that pervades their communal life, but, more to the point, by too often abdicating the intellectual life of the faith to the fads of the time.

The true creed of many American Jews, especially the intellectuals, has become whatever happens at the moment to be “in”: Marxism, deconstruction, consciousness-raising, permissiveness, liberation, cults, and sexual experimentation. (pp. 190-1).

If “the traditional family is under siege” in America, it is largely because of the influence of what Dresner calls “the Hollywood crowd”, a group of people who praise “rebellion, self-fulfillment, and promiscuity” and have a “debased view of the human body and spirit.”

According to Dresner, any study of the films which got produced from 1945 to 1985 would reveal “a radical shift in values”, one which turned the world upside down: “Hollywood came to adopt a permissive, value-free attitude in the course of a few decades,” and when it went down the drain, it dragged the rest of America with it:

The underground has taken over. The avant-garde has become the man on the street. Bohemia is Broadway. The filthy jokes formerly restricted to burlesque houses and certain nightclubs are now available on films and TV for the millions. Las Vegas is no longer a city but a condition. (pp. 316-7)

Hollywood, in short, got corrupted around 1945 and is now responsible for the moral decline of American culture.

3.  Hollywood’s decadence and subversion of morals

Dresner’s critique of Hollywood, however, is not as pointed as it needs to be. To say that the Hollywood elite came to adopt “a permissive, value-free attitude in the course of a few decades”, from 1945 to 1985, is not only not true, it misses certain salient points.

First of all, the Hollywood elite was then, and is now, overwhelmingly Jewish. Secondly, the Jews who ran Hollywood had always had this “permissive, value-free attitude” when it came to matters venereal.

Beginning in the 1920s, the outcry against Hollywood’s subversion of morals was so great that various forms of legislation — federal, state and local — were proposed as an antidote.

As a way of heading off this legislation, Hollywood’s Jews in 1934 entered into a voluntary agreement with the Legion of Decency, a Catholic operation. That agreement was known as the Production Code. The Catholics forced the issue by organizing boycotts at a time when the film industry was reeling from the effects of the stock market crash and their heavy indebtedness to the nation’s banks.

The most memorable and most effective boycott was organized by Cardinal Dougherty of Philadelphia, who forbade that city’s Catholics from watching movies in the city’s movie houses, which at the time were largely owned by Warner Brothers. His efforts created a situation in which Warner Brothers was losing $175,000 a week at the height of the depression.

The man who ran the Production Code office for the next 20 years was a Catholic by the name of Joseph I. Breen, a man who had no illusions about the attitudes of the Hollywood elite during the early 1930s:

They are simply a rotten bunch of vile people with no respect for anything beyond the making of money. . . . Here [in Hollywood] we have Paganism rampant and in its most virulent form. Drunkenness and debauchery are commonplace. Sexual perversion is rampant . . . any number of our directors and stars are perverts. . . . These Jews seem to think of nothing but moneymaking and sexual indulgence. The vilest kind of sin is a common indulgence hereabouts and the men and women who engage in this sort of business are the men and women who decide what the film fare of the nation is to be. They and they alone make the decision. Ninety-five percent of these folks are Jews of an Eastern European lineage. They are, probably, the scum of the earth (Gregory D. Black, Hollywood Censored, p. 70).

What was true then is a fortiori true today. Jews dominate Hollywood and always have.

4.  Jews dominate Hollywood, but you mustn’t mention it

The immigrant Jews who created Hollywood’s major studios were followed by another generation of Jews who founded the nation’s major TV networks — William Paley’s CBS, David Sarnoff’s NBC, and Leonard Goldenson’s ABC.

Today, about two-thirds of leading TV and movie producers are Jewish. Four of the five companies that dominate American entertainment are run by Jews: Gerald Levin, who once considered a rabbinic career, runs Time Warner, Michael Eisner runs Disney, Mel Karmazin and Sumner Redstone run Viacom-CBS, and the Bronfmans run Universal.

This fact is rarely discussed in the mainstream media because Jews control that as well.

When British journalist William Cash wrote about Jewish control of Hollywood in the October 1994 issue of the Spectator, Hollywood and its academic support troops reacted with a rage verging on hysteria.

In the November 13, 1994 issue of Los Angeles Times, Neal Gabler attacked Cash’s article as “an anti-Semitic bleat from a reactionary crackpot” which could have been dismissed out of hand “if it didn’t have a respectable platform in the Spectator and didn’t play to a pre-existing prejudice—that Jews control the US media.”

Neal Gabler, it should be noted, is the author of An Empire of their Own: How Jews Created Hollywood. Gabler, in other words, was attacking Cash for saying precisely what Gabler had already said in his own book.

According to Cash:

That every major studio head is Jewish today is no different from 60 years ago. “Of 85 names engaged in production, 53 are Jews,” a 1936 survey noted. And the Jewish advantage holds in prestige as well as numbers. In a recent Premiere magazine “Special Power Issue”—ranking the 100 most powerful people in the ‘Industry’—the top 12 were Jewish. There were no black or British industry executives ranked.

Jewish domination of Hollywood, however, cannot be limited to numbers. The numbers simply give a pale approximation of the extent to which Jews determine the cultural matrix out of which the nation’s films get made. Cash cites an instance of the “extreme measures” non-Jews engage in to succeed in Hollywood:

Bill Stadiem, a former Harvard educated Wall Street lawyer who is now a screenwriter in LA, told me that he recently came across an old WASP friend in an LA restaurant who had been president of the Porcellian at Harvard, the most exclusive undergraduate dining-club.

His friend, a would-be producer, was dressed in a black nylon tracksuit and had gold chains on his wrist. Dangling around his neck was a chunky Star of David. Stadiem asked: “Why the hell are you dressed like that?”

The WASP replied: “I’m trying to look Jewish.”

The Spectator, October 1994 


(LD: Dr Jones’ comments on the complete Jewish takeover of Hollywood were written in 2003 when it was still considered outrageous to suggest Jewish hegemony in Hollywood. It was okay for Jews to boast about the fact, but not for gentiles to deplore it. Since then, there have been much more emphatic claims of dominance.  “I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government,” Jewish columnist Joel Stein bragged in the Los Angeles Times in December 2008.  “I just care that we get to keep running them.” Mr Stein’s reckless candor in admitting that the Jews not only ran Hollywood, but America itself, was to cost him his job at the LA Times.)

5.  Jews v. Catholics

William Cash’s and Joe Breen’s candor about Hollywood fills in what Sam Dresner’s account leaves out. It shows that the battle over the sexualization of American culture was largely if not exclusively a battle between America’s Jews and Catholics.

From 1934 to 1965, Hollywood’s Jews were forced to repress their “permissive, value-free attitude” in matters sexual, or at least they were prevented from expressing that attitude in the films that they made. The golden age of Hollywood, which Dresner indirectly praises, was a collaborative effort: it was Catholics saving Hollywood’s Jews from their own worst instincts.

The Catholics eventually lost that battle, with dire consequences for the entire nation. Indeed, Rabbi Dresner’s book is one of those consequences. His book is also an indication that the history of American Culture in the 20th century is in many respects a history of the sexual degeneration of the American Jew.

That means the decline of the Rabbi Dresner Jew and the Rise of the Woody Allen Jew in his place, as an icon for the entire culture. The Catholics lost the culture wars because they internalized Woody Allen Jewish values on sexuality. The cultural prominence of Jews like Woody Allen was especially painful for Dresner—because they had become cultural icons by promoting sexual deviance.


Woody Allen

“Don’t knock masturbation. It’s sex with someone I love.”
Woody Allen, who was later accused by Mia Farrow of sexually molesting their adopted 7-year-old daughter Dylan.

The moral decline that Dresner complains about was in no small amount attributable to the cultural influence of American Jews, something he adverts to time and time again in his book.

6.  Jews are “despoilers of morality and corrupters of culture”

“Jews,” Rabbi Dresner tells us, “have played a less than admirable role in the sexual revolution” (p. 155). He continues: “Many liberal rabbis are in the forefront of the pro-abortion movement. In fact, surveys indicate that Jewish women are among the most likely of all groups to support “abortion on demand” (p. 39).

Dresner goes on to cite “a recent Gallup poll and a suppressed B’nai B’rith survey”, which indicates that American Jews are more likely to be divorced and less likely to be married than the average American; that “91 percent of Jewish women agree that every woman who wants an abortion should be able to have one”; that “50 percent of Jewish women signaled a high degree of affinity for feminism compared to only 16 percent among non-Jewish women”, and that Jews favor homosexual rights more than the general population.

The rootless Jews who dominate Hollywood and, as a result, American culture as a whole, have defined themselves, in Dresner’s words, as “despoilers of morality and corrupters of culture.”

Dresner is concerned that others have noticed the same thing.

He cites a letter to a California Lawyer which claims that “the progressive deterioration of morality can be directly attributable to the growing predominance of Jews in our national life.”

Dresner is, of course, appalled, but his book says essentially the same thing. Is Rabbi Dresner, then, an anti-Semite?

Given the canons of contemporary discourse, it depends on how we define the term. Israel Shamir, writing in the Israeli newspaper H’aaretz, recently said that anyone who objected to American global cultural imperialism could now safely be termed an anti-Semite. Unless, of course, he is Jewish, in that instance he is referred to as a “self-hating Jew”, a term which can be defined as referring to anyone who disagrees with the party line as articulated by Abe Foxman, the Bronfmans, the ADL, the AJC and all of the other leaders and organizations that have tried to turn Jews into the avant-garde of the Cultural Revolution.

Rabbi Dresner is at odds with the majority of American Jews. That, in turn, leads to a paradox: America has become more Jewish over the course of the 20th century, but Jews have become less Jewish at the same time, if we define the Jew the way Dresner does, as a follower of the Torah.

The Jew has become an American Cultural Hero, but he has become that largely by espousing sexual degeneracy.

7.  Jewish history is “one long battle against sexual deviance”

It should be obvious by now that Dresner does not like Woody Allen, the classic example of how America has become more Jewish while at the same time “American Jews are becoming less Jewish.”

Woody Allen, according to Dresner, has had a “persistent fascination” with incest. He has also been in psychoanalysis for over 30 years, which means that this fascination with incest, whether expressed in his writing or his seduction of his and Mia Farrow’s adopted daughter, Soon Yi Previn, is best explained by an analysis of Freud. Freud, too, was obsessed with incest.

In his book Moses and Monotheism, Freud makes clear that, as in the case of the Pharaohs of Egypt, incest confers god-like status on its perpetrators.

David Bakan has written a book in which he claims that Freud was a follower of the Jewish false Messiah Sabbatai Zevi and that his attack on Moses was really an attempt to abolish the law in the same way that Zevi did, which is to say through ritual impurity.

Jews who promote sexual revolution are following in this tradition: “They conjure up painful memories,” Dresner tells us, “of the infamous seventeenth century false messiah Sabbatai Zevi or his successor, Jacob Frank. Their coming was to mark a new age when the rule of Torah was to be superseded:What was forbidden is now permitted.” (p.160)

“In biblical times,” Dresner continues, “Judaism waged a battle against sexual excess not unlike the struggle now in progress — and in those earlier times, Mosaic law was victorious. Unbridled sexuality lay at the heart of ancient pagan religion.” (p. 66).

In Dresner’s view, Jewish history is one long battle against sexual deviance:

The early biblical narratives can be read as a continuous attack on the widespread sexual deviance that challenged and often seduced the Israelites, whose fallings away Scripture scrupulously records. (p. 82).  What crime was so great that it provoked God to destroy mankind, except for Noah and his family, with a flood? According to the most ancient understanding of the biblical story found in rabbinic sources, it was the violation of the natural order of sexual life (p. 83). God is long-suffering of all manner of crime, save sexual immorality. (p. 85)

The Jewish battle against sexual excess continues to the present day.


Richard Pacheco, retired Jewish porn star and self-confessed sexual degenerate.Asked if he still watched adult movies now that he was a Senior Citizen, the former rabbinical student replied: “Not much.  Occasionally I’ll toss one on for masturbation if my wife ain’t around.” (See here). We shall meet up with Mr Pacheco again in Part 2 of this essay.

Go to Part 2.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

251 Comments to "The Sexual Subversion of America, Part 1 of 2"

  1. Lasha Darkmoon's Gravatar Lasha Darkmoon
    February 14, 2013 - 4:07 am | Permalink


    Can you recommend a really good biography of Hitler and Hitler’s Germany? I am very wary of books by court historians who set out to demonize Hitler. It would be refreshing to find a book that gave us an objective and impartial account of Hitler the Man in his everyday surroundings.

  2. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 14, 2013 - 3:49 am | Permalink

    Dear Chechar,
    yes it’s blocked, I can’t WordPress at all. I’ll have a look though once I’m in a country I can! But I am well informed of the after and before of the War, who Mao’s advisers were, the Bolsheviks, the genocide of Germans and the holocaust of Germans.
    The comparison you make is very apt, you thoroughly understand the root of the problem. I believe those that understand it, can fix it.

    Here are inspiring words:
    “Du sollst an Deutschlands Zukunft glauben,
    An deines Volkes Auferstehen.
    Lass diesen Glauben dir nicht rauben,
    Trotz allem, allem was geschehen.
    Und handeln sollst du so als hinge
    Von dir und deinem Tun allein
    Das Schicksal ob der deutschen Dinge
    Und die Verantwortung wäre dein. ”
    – Albert Matthäi (1853—1924) based on a speech by Johann Gottfried Fichte

    And this is the fourth verse of the German anthem (the only verse which is currently still forbidden!) and my favourite one.
    “Deutschland, Deutschland über alles
    Und im Unglück nun erst recht.
    Nur im Unglück kann die Liebe
    Zeigen ob sie stark und echt.
    Und so soll es weiterklingen
    Von Geschlechte zu Geschlecht:
    Deutschland, Deutschland über alles
    Und im Unglück nun erst recht.”

    Dear Fender and Barking Mad,
    you two still have a long way to go to understanding the downward spiral you are on, getting out off it and onto enlightenment. (The thing that holds ye back the most at the moment is your inner desire to see Germany fail and the slavic people to gain rank.) But I am sure you will make it.

    Us germans are not destroyed and dead. We are injured and injured people can be cured!

  3. February 13, 2013 - 7:24 pm | Permalink

    @fender: To all >
    The ONLY people that can be considered to be “at the heart of our race”, or are fit to survive, are those that are fighting against white genocide. Those that put anything else first are not only failing to be “the heart” but they will probably not survive at all.

  4. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    February 13, 2013 - 6:50 pm | Permalink


    That may be sadly true. Barring a miracle, of course.

    Some people have ideas that there is a grand plan by some sort of God, Great Spirit, Great Mighty Poo (or something) whereby each variety of animal and human has been slotted to serve a purpose. Once that purpose is fulfilled, they’ll find a reason to die out. Just passing it along is all I am doing. Believing this sort of thing could serve to assuage a people’s deep grief at the loss of their greatness and apparent demise. It’s sure no worse than ideas about Judgment Day, Heaven & Hell, Reincarnation, Purgatory, Cyclical Energy of the Universe, bodily resurrection, long sleep prior to judgment day, etc. etc. etc.

  5. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 13, 2013 - 1:57 pm | Permalink


    You don’t seem to understand that modern Germans LIKE their multicultural dystopia and HATE their past. That’s the first sign that a people has been fully conquered and will never rise again. If things were different, if there were signs of large numbers of Germans rejecting their occupation government, then I’d agree with you. However, there are no signs that the majority of Germans are waking up, or ever will wake up. Therefore, for all intents and purposes, I consider Germany- and the idea of a German- to be have been destroyed in 1945.

  6. February 13, 2013 - 11:35 am | Permalink


    Thank you for your kind words.

    Those that hate being german and try to destroy everything german are in a coma (you know people in a coma have a chance of waking up though uncommon especially after such a long time of being in one).

    Like the Romantics of Woodsworth’s age, I spend lots of time in long walks. One of the things that I have told me over and over during those long walks is that the Aryan people are like Sirius Black in the Harry Potter film when he was without conscience after being attacked by Dementors. The image in my soliloquies is Black (before Harry sees a distant figure cast a powerful Patronus) having his soul sucked out his mouth in the form of a small, glowing, white dot.

    After the Patronus charm the white dot returns inside his mouth (following medieval imagery). Harry’s invocation of the Patronus later on the film is the climax of this movie for kids. And it is exactly what the Germanic peoples need: a charm to bring their stolen souls back to their bodies.

    I believe this can be done by conveying the Holodomor and Hellstorm message but…

    Unfortunately I can’t open word press

    Do you mean that my WordPress blog has been blocked in your country??

  7. White Realist's Gravatar White Realist
    February 13, 2013 - 5:53 am | Permalink

    Arthur Kemp wrote a new book.

    Nova Europa: European Survival Strategy in a Darkening World

  8. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 13, 2013 - 1:38 am | Permalink

    Dear Conrad,
    you are wise and I sense the german in you:)

    Dear Chechar and dear Junghans,
    you are very insightful. You are solving the problem at the root. I respect you and your work very much.
    Unfortunately I can’t open word press.

    Dear Fender,
    I object, we germans are still the heart of the white race, very much so. The rough and unique phase we are going through is going to make us even stronger. I get a feeling from you that you don’t want us germans to be the heart of the white race but rather the slavs. Which is the most natural thing ever because you are a slav and I respect that natural urge of yours. Although we are all white we still have differences. These differences are beautiful and fascinating.
    Let me inform you about modern day Germany. You must understand that Germany is an occupied country to this day. We are not sovereign and the government does not act in the interests of the german people. WW2 is officially not over yet, we never signed a peace treaty nor did we ever receive war loss compensation etc. The physical war with bombs has stopped. However we are now in an emotional war. In Germany (and even abroad) there is an emotional war against anything german, trying to destroy the german spirit, language, customs, race. Education, media and the government are trying to destroy anything german. In this part of the war we don’t have physically wounded people but emotionally wounded people. Those that marry foreigners and hate being german are as good as dead ( I guess the commentator “Rob” belongs to this group). Those that hate being german and try to destroy everything german are in a coma ( you know people in a coma have a chance of waking up though uncommon especially after such a long time of being in one). Those that aren’t proud of being german and try not to do german things are like someone with a broken rib or a fractured collar bone ( you know this is hard to heal but it can be done). Those that just go along with the anti-german thing are like someone with a broken leg (this can be healed with a bit of patience). Those of us that know what’s going on and say nothing are healed. Those of us that know what is going on and do something about it are the doctors!
    You probably laughed and enjoyed the anti-Hitler, anti-German movies in the cinema but now with all the anti-white movies and propaganda you are a victim too but you still carry on spurring the anti-german stuff you are so used to! You can imagine now what we germans feel like but you fail to acknowledge it. If anyone is a coward, it is those that are too weak to admit to the wrongs they did and are doing to the german people.
    If you follow history around the world you will notice something about light-haired, light-eyed people. When Persia was at it’s peak, the people where light-eyed and fair ( now they are mixed with arabs), same as ancient Greece, same as ancient Rome. Slavs tend to have light skin, high cheekbones, slanted eyes ( I guess you might have mixed with eastern asians before you came to europe), light color eyes and most have dark brown hair( Many slavs have blonde hair now because they mixed with germans). The Germanic peoples are more fair haired, straight nosed and have light colored eyes.That said I don’t know why slavs didn’t reach a height of culture like we Germans did though you are white like us and very hard-working people. It’s all very interesting.

  9. February 12, 2013 - 11:34 pm | Permalink


    These words by George Lincoln Rockwell reflect what we badly need at least in YouTube (without real oratory we won’t go anywhere):

    So I went to the speech, and what a thing that was! Few Americans today have ever heard an orator. They have heard talks, speeches, even ravings, perhaps, but it is doubtful they have ever heard an old-fashioned, roof-lifting, earth-shaking, soul-shattering oration. Gerald Smith is the master to end all masters of the human voice. Whatever else he may be, he can seize you by the lapels of your soul, jerk you out of your seat and hold you helpless and spellbound as long as he wants. He does not just roar and bellow. He whispers, he sighs, he wheezes, he coos; then he blasts with the power of a locomotive roaring through a tunnel. He laughs, he cries, he howls, he cajoles, he mimics, he screams, he begs, he goes back to whispering, sneers, leers, yells, bursts into hysterical laughter, then whimpers some heart-rending bit which leaves you limp. I sat in the balcony, literally on the edge of my seat. If Smith had said suddenly, “Jump!”—I think I would have done it.

  10. February 12, 2013 - 11:11 pm | Permalink


    Thanks for the link. But I insist that we need YouTube people who speak perfect English like Pat Condell although, unlike this silly counter-jihadist, that speaks out on the subject of justice for Germans.

    In the beginning was the Spoken Word, and I see no way to convey a highly emotional message except thru such Word.

    Read the best essay that has been published at Counter-Currents:

  11. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    February 12, 2013 - 10:35 pm | Permalink

    @Junghans: The link you provided doesn’t work, this is the right one:

    All the best!

  12. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    February 12, 2013 - 8:50 pm | Permalink

    For those here with an open mind, and who care to see the other side of the WWII story, do check out this website:

  13. February 12, 2013 - 7:40 pm | Permalink


    Click once more on my penname and you’ll see a post on the need to undemonize the German.

    More specifically for late readers, here:

    Make sure to listen the 12-minute clip of Wagner’s Parsifal at Bayreuth.

  14. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 12, 2013 - 1:34 pm | Permalink


    “if we germans have an undoing so do the rest of the white race as it has been in the past and is in the present because we are the heart of the white race.”

    You were the heart of the White race, as the Greeks and Romans once were. However, modern Germans are cowardly, effeminate tools with little or no use.

    I’m assuming that Western Europe can be written off in terms of race, so in my opinion the heart of the White race- if it survives- will be the Central Europeans in the near future. The Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians, and Romanians.

  15. February 12, 2013 - 4:41 am | Permalink

    The JFK quote can be found here with others.
    The truth of the matter as it applies to this generation of white people seems clear. There was a time when we were the masters of the world. We were the most respected people in the world. We set the standards of life and everybody benefited from this. Now what do we see?
    We are no longer the masters of our own cities. We are no longer capable of respecting ourselves. All of the standards of decency and morality have collapsed and the benefits once so plentiful have evaporated.
    Over the past several generations whites have spent their energies finding fault with each other, discovering reasons, real or imagined, to sew the seeds of disunity. Much time, energy and money has been invested in finding better ways to cut one an others throats. What choices has this left us with?
    WE ARE THE LAST GENERATION OF WHITE PEOPLE THAT HAVE ANY CHANCE OF SAVING OURSELVES FROM COMPLETE EXTINCTION. There are ONLY two choices before us, unity and life, or continued disunity and death.
    Jack’s War

  16. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 11, 2013 - 11:33 pm | Permalink

    Rob so charmingly says “Don’t worry, the German arrogance will eventually be their undoing, as it has been in the past.”
    Let me make it nice and simple for you dear Rob, if we germans have an undoing so do the rest of the white race as it has been in the past and is in the present because we are the heart of the white race.

    I must love ye and leave ye. Thanks for the discussion.
    “that damned liberal JFK once said something to the effect -Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now.
    Gandhi said something similar”
    Hitler and those demonized with him, us germans.
    I never knew they said that but I always thought the same and still do!

  17. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 11, 2013 - 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Dear Rob,
    I think you are bitter!
    You don’t understand why people like us, you don’t understand history nor the presence and you don’t understand what happened in your own life.
    The people like yourself that don’t like us are the brainwashed ones.

  18. Rob's Gravatar Rob
    February 11, 2013 - 11:07 am | Permalink

    Decided to look in here and I’m glad I’m wearing my boots.

    Barkingmad, your experience with Germans is not exceptional, it is typical.
    Having been born in Germany, I have many relatives there, none of which I’ve communicated with for decades. They disowned me when I was 10 years old, for wanting to live in the US.
    It took me decades to get past their brainwash.

    Don’t worry, the German arrogance will eventually be their undoing, as it has been in the past.

    The usual Germanophile loudmouths around here have been shown up in their shallow knowledge of Germany. They didn’t even know that Heike was a woman’s name. Even an imbecile can see the writing style is that of a simplistic woman or a teenager – or just a shill.

    One of them even acknowledged that his only real experience with Germans was a 3-year military stint. This too is typical of Americans who see things almost exclusively through an American perspective.
    We, who have actually dealt with Germans on a personal level for many years, know better.

    Even KMD doesn’t seem to realize that his infatuation with the Germans garners more enemies than friends.

    I’m comforted by the knowledge that most of Europe knows the German all too well, and they have few friends elsewhere, especially not in the US, notwithstanding a few loudmouths in “The Movement”, lol.

  19. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 11, 2013 - 9:56 am | Permalink

    No no no dear molecule,
    the german men were gods too.
    They were defending one of the greatest ideas ever. What would have happened if they had refused to fight? The polish, russians, english ( under influence and leadership of you know who) would have attacked and conquered us and invented lies about us and killed us in concentration camps. They were already killing and attacking us in Poland and the Ukraine before the war started. Were we just supposed to look away and turn the other cheek until they killed us all?
    The people in my family and others of that generation (that i was fortunate enough to meet) who survived and fought in the war, were like gods, so humble, so pure and so loving. Hearts of gold.

  20. molecule's Gravatar molecule
    February 9, 2013 - 3:21 pm | Permalink


    permit me to lightly tweak your accurate adn wonderful observations

    the American, French and English MEN of WW-2 will fall from hero, and be remembered as obedient cowards … true! (In fact they were brainwashed zombies, full of ego and disloyalty to their families and wives. No man leaves his children, and goes abroad to defend his wife. Only a traumatized brainwashed zombie could do that … the science of infliction of sexual traumas at childhood is a speciality of the Jews … it is an importantn part of the Zionist war machine … in America, as per the Medical Protocols of the Learned Elders of Pentagon Hospital, each hospital is given a quota for the % of infant baby boys who are to be surgically traumatized, with cortisol at 1.5x baseline. If inner city hospitals want full funding, they have to meet the quota. Way too huge a subject … short answer, the Jews have it down as a science … how to make a coward out of a man … the culture of free sex does it equally as well. Men are EXPECTED to enjoy sex with young women who are spreading their legs out of fear … of loneliness, homelessness, loss of fulfilment of their desire to participate in evolution, etc.)

    The non-German germanic MEN of eastern europe were barbarians. (I suspect there was obedience mindset there as well. I don’t know enough about the dark side of the culture, Count Vlad et at. This population of white men has been subjected to Jewish psycho-mutilation for many more generations than American men. American men are fast devolving into obedient non-thinking barbarians … just look at their use of Drones … they are now drone killers.)

    the German MEN failed by obedienct training as well. Collectivity does not mean obedience. It means individual dignity of everyone. MEN who are sexually mutilated by their mothers’ doctors, and who don’t defend their wives and children become obedient cowards and can be easily molded into war machine barbarians.

    The only “gods” who will emerge from teh ashes of WW-2 will be the German women! By the blood of their fingers, after the fire bombing of Dresden … correction after specific target bombing of cultural centers representing the highest evolution of european culture … by the Jews, and that is what they hate … teh German women, broken, raped en masse by Jews, and in tattered clothes, with their bare hands, often with fingertips bleeding, began the process, stone by stone, of rebuilding the German churches and cultural centers that the Jews had blown to smitherines, with their insane hatred of humanity and reality, and rage against all forms of peaceful, civilized, spiritually upward-evolving culture.

    The “Gods” who emerge from the ashes of WW-2 will be the German women. (not that we need any Gods … and the need for one, fi there is any, may be a new flaw that has been designed into the new german personality. The idea that god is anywhere other than within the desire of our wives to participate, through their control of the egg, uterus and breast, in billions of years of spiritual evolution, and express fulfillment for their lives by raising happy children … is a form of misogyny and spiritual alienation. The Jewish Bible, including Catholis and Protestant manifestations, are DEEPLY MISOGYNOUS.)

    Where were the men? Making a God out of HItler will not make providers and protectors out of men .. and that is their proper role as regards the desire in women for fulfillment by evolution.

    It’s a huge quesiton .. what has happened to the man in white men? Is killing off their own kind, men women and children, manly? heroic? what? They have lost their center. In the coming ages, women have to relearn how to build their own husbands. Otherwise the Jews will win. Without support of their wives, men will be unable to rebuild their dignity … The Jews have got us into a deep one here … They brainwash young women to hate men as well. The science of destruction of cultures by introduction of cultural misogyny is a tough subject. Most women think they know it. They don’t until they are a birthing mother, and their first child is taken away from them by a doctor, and returned to them in a state of deep shock … that is when the moral system in their hearts freezes … the freezing of the heart of the young mother is the actual target of genital violence, trauma and wounding of her infant child.

    Until we identify all Jewish practices as filth, the white races … indeed all races, will either be exterminated or reduced to slavery. Because white races do not make good slaves, the Jews have targeted us for extermination.

  21. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 9, 2013 - 3:16 am | Permalink

    When the true version of history comes out;
    the americans, english and french will come of as cowards,
    the Polish, czechs and russians as barbarians,
    the germans as gods
    and the jews as the devil.

    That said, I wouldn’t want to lose any of the above peoples because this world is a constant battle between good and bad. The good must always try to keep the bad under control. It makes life so exciting and reminds us constantly to do and be good.

    Dear Chechar and Molecule,
    the combination of the two of your posts is genius.

    Dear C.C.Conrad,
    I believe your book unfortunately isn’t available in Germany but on the contrary another book by the same name but an author called Diane Drew. Maybe I can get your book from abroad. I will put it on my list of books to read.

    As far as I know people from the USAF situated in Germany occupying our country can’t speak a word of german and don’t understand an iota of german culture, history etc. Off course you are a welcome exception to the rule. A huge asset to you would be if you could speak, read and write german. It would open a new world of information to you.

    Heike is a german female’s name. The male version is Heiko. :) Us german girls and women stand by our men and need to be informed on this subject matter in order to be able to understand and support our men and raise our children correctly.

    Conrad thank you for all the replies to my comments. I don’t have a lot of time to constantly check and comment on these websites. Like I said I commented here because I wanted to see how far along people on this website were. It was a pleasure to meet you here and best of luck with your work and your book.

  22. February 8, 2013 - 8:08 pm | Permalink

    @Heike: “Btw Heike is a typical german girl’s name! You have lost touch of your german roots a bit there I’d say! ;)”
    Entschuldigung, sorry about that SISTER. You’re right I am unfamiliar with German names, even though I spent almost 3 years in Zweibrucken, Germany with the USAF. One would think that I’d know better. I guess that I thought that you were a man because of the subject matter. I tried to get some background on the name while I was writing this note. Here’s what I found – “Heike is a given name of Germanic origin, most commonly but not exclusively female.
    Do you folks in Germany have access to the book that I wrote called, Jack’s War?
    Jack’s War

  23. sunsetDeleterick@@'s Gravatar sunsetDeleterick@@
    February 8, 2013 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    The German gov of the 30’s
    & 40’s was centralized in the
    Context of Emergency National
    More than anything else?

  24. sunsetDeleterick@@'s Gravatar sunsetDeleterick@@
    February 8, 2013 - 5:40 pm | Permalink


    Is it just me or is molecule a big negative
    For the Occidental?


  25. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 8, 2013 - 2:40 pm | Permalink


    Precisely. WN’s who say to stay away from WWII simply don’t get it. It doesn’t matter how friendly, respectful, or reasonable WN’s are, everything we say and support will be reduced to N*zism, and the masses see N*zism as the ultimate evil in history. Therefore the mainstream narrative of WWII needs to be drastically revised if we’re ever going to make progress.

  26. sunsetDeleterick@@'s Gravatar sunsetDeleterick@@
    February 8, 2013 - 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Better to use different name
    At a later point this year I will
    Try to come up with a few blogs
    To be submitted anonymously

  27. molecule's Gravatar molecule
    February 8, 2013 - 12:53 pm | Permalink


    your idea for using tools and methods of our enemy, against our enemy is right on.

    I see some danger in juxtaposing Acts 1 and 3 against Act 2, in that it may tend to validate Act 2. The overriding fact of Act 2 is that JEWS were PROTECTED while German culture was bombed to smitherines and dismantled, while completely harmless German women and children were bombed alive by Allied-Jewish forces (the obedient white American bombadiers being such brave heros, they would only did their murdering of helpless German civilians by night). Unless you buy into the Jewish propaganda (that Hitler did this and that to the Jews) Act 2 has to be shown to be a continuation of Acts 1 and 3 … Protection for Jews, Extermination for Whites, and most especially Germans and their language, literature, culture and science. Protection for Jews IS the overriding fact for Act 2.

    Hitler has to be undemonized … no doubt … but in doing so, do we transmute him from Jew-hating demon (in fact he was Jew protecting) to iconic hero for all-powerful centralized (i.e. Marxist) government. All powerful, centralized governments invariable end up as protection rackets for Jews.

    Hitler made several mistakes … they were generally trivial and can be admitted without passionate rage or demonization. His ONE singular mistake is the one for which he CANNOT be forgiven … He failed to give the order.

    You know which one I mean.

  28. February 8, 2013 - 11:20 am | Permalink

    Reposting without the word that the bot dislikes N_ _zi:

    I have created a mantra of my own (“What the Allies did in times of peace was incomparably more monstrous than the crimes attributed to the Germans in times of war—precisely because it was done in times of peace”) that would like to hammer on Westerners in general, and the German people in particular, thru audiovisual messages. We should be planning high-quality filming—think of David Duke’s well-planned videos.

    The Holodomor message. Besides my mantra we could convey my message stated way above about the “First Act” of the opera: Jewish Bolsheviks killing more civilians than Himmler.

    The Self-harming message. And we must mention the fact of a System feeding us twenty-four hours a day with the “Second Act,” the so-called Jewish Holocaust, maliciously omitting the other two (again, reread what Lasha said here in the comments way above).

    The Hellstorm message. Last but not least, we must speak out about the “Third Act” of the opera: the Allied forces committing a larger Holocaust than the one attributed to Hitler.

    The home-made films will be highly emotional—precisely the method that the System has been using for the Self-harming message. YouTube viewers, totally ignorant of both the Holodomor and the Hellstorm holocausts, will allow in their minds the plantation of the first seeds of a process to undemonize Hitler, the National Socialism, Germany, Europe, and eventually the entire West and the White people in general.

    Besides discussing these issues here at TOO I wish some of us will consider the project seriously: taking the First and Third acts of our grand World War II opera to the public view—for the first time since the War!

    Isn’t it really amazing that the System managed to hide the other two Holocausts committed in the 1930s and 40s—and for so long?

    Click on my penname for further details.

  29. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 7, 2013 - 9:56 pm | Permalink

    Dear C. C. Conrad,
    I thank you for your apology and the revisionist work you are doing. Even though you are doing it for your own good too and the good of all the people on this earth.

    I am german and that makes me white, so, off course Conrad, I identify with the white cause. Your revisionist work is key to fighting the anti-white movement. For a pro-white movement that is thorough, strong and deep slavs, americans, english etc ideally need to bear their souls and admit to their peoples wrongs . I sadly take into account that this may not happen so fast. Please don’t think us Germans are waiting for everyone else to apologize first before we join your pro-white movement. People will come and say sorry to us when they are ready and understand. I just wanted to see whether people on this site were ready and understood.

    I was told all the usual lies about ww1 and 2 but I never believed them because I knew the nature of my people too well. After some research my intuition was proved right.
    That said I would like to thank you again for the work you are doing, it is invaluable and it is through people like you and your work that I was able to research and find out the truth.

    Btw Heike is a typical german girl’s name! You have lost touch of your german roots a bit there I’d say! ;)

  30. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 7, 2013 - 8:56 pm | Permalink

    Dear Fender,
    I’m talking about your polish and czech people. Ye killed innocent german civilians before and after the war. 2 million of us in Poland alone. German men were rounded up and had to dig there own graves and with the shovels they digged their graves with, they were hacked to death by the czechs. Some of those who hacked us to death are still alive today and go unpunished. I suppose you thought the only slavs that did wrong were the russians. You simply know too little about history and this is only one example.

    I don’t feel bad about history Fender, I feel proud. You feel bad, you were fooled which you are slowly realising now.

    There’s a certain magic you and many others fail to understand.
    Take buddisim, there is a concept that you must suffer and after a period of suffering, you get stripped naked (not literally) and then you are set free. ( like Jesus too you could say). Anyway, it’s like what us german people are going through or have been through. Everybody ridiculed us, cursed us, punished us, blamed us and we took it all, we said sorry for every bruised knee and every scratched elbow anybody might have had and everything else imaginable under the sun, we even said sorry and took punishments for things we never did. Now we are free but you are still caught.
    It’s a certain magic.

    Verstehst du? ;)

    Thank you Fender for all your replies to my comments. I would love to stay discussing this but unfortunately I don’t have time to enter these sites and comment all the time.

  31. February 7, 2013 - 7:31 pm | Permalink

    @Heike: “The heinous crimes by the Slavs, Americans, English etc against the German people will never be forgotten. The day you come and say sorry, they will be forgiven.” [Capitalization added by author.]

    Brother Heike,
    My father was an air craft mechanic in the US Air force during that war. So, on behalf of my father & his generation I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. I did not understand the crimes committed by the Allies during WW2 until I started reading books by David Irving and other revisionists. Irving’s book about the bombing of Dresden was a shocking eye opener.

    I had the opportunity to meet with Hans Schmidt before his death (see his book – SS Panzergrenadier). He & his wife are very lovely people. I am sure that the German people remember quite sorrowfully the events of that awful war, as you do. You know quite well how the enemies of Germany, of that time period, preached hatred of your people. Now the same enemy is waging the same war, but this time it is against our entire race.

    Brother Heike, you know what they will do if they get the chance. We must fight the war that is at hand. This war will reduce all of our countries to ashes, but we will not be able to rebuild this time because our countries will be over flowing with the imported Negroid races that our enemies are bringing in.

    I hope that everyone here understands that we will lose this new war if we bog ourselves down in fighting old wars. This includes WW1, WW2, the American civil war, or any of the others.
    Jack’s War

  32. February 7, 2013 - 6:51 pm | Permalink

    @Heike: “To say the past is the past because you don’t want to go there and unearth some uncomfortable truths is cowardly. The lid on the pot of german suffering will boil over and won’t be kept on by brushing things over saying the past is the past.”
    I can agree to that. I have been part of the Revisionist efforts for quite some time. I try to help people to understand the lies regarding WW2. It’s going to take a long time to straiten that out I’m afraid. Nonetheless, we must unite for the cause of stopping the current attempted genocide of our race.
    Jack’s War

  33. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 7, 2013 - 4:44 pm | Permalink


    By “my people” I assume you mean Slavs. Soviet soldiers committed innumerable atrocities against German civilians during and after the war. Is that what you want to hear? I don’t deny those atrocities at all, and anyway, those were not “my people.” I have nothing but contempt for those who willingly and enthusiastically fought for the jew-controlled USSR (or the US or UK for that matter).

    In any conflict you fight for the people with whom you want to build a better world. Just because I’m Slavic doesn’t mean I would’ve fought for the USSR. Thousands of people from the USSR fought for Germany because they believed in what Germany was doing: freeing Europe from bolshevism.

    Don’t think for one moment that I would’ve tolerated atrocities committed against German women and children, but also don’t think for one moment that German soldiers didn’t execute or enslave innocent people during the war. I don’t hold it against Germans, but you can’t simply ignore history because it makes you feel bad; only jews do that.

    Verstehst du?

  34. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 7, 2013 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    Dear fender,
    I’ll tell you exactly what upsets me. The fact that you say german soldiers did the same wrongs as others. Why this upsets me…because it’s not true and because your people did way worse. Please take a look at before the war and after the war. The gruesome, barbarian murders of ordinary german citizens by your people.
    I believe I tried to see whether reasoning was possible but it wasn’t and therefore I believe it will sort itself out. Ta da magic!

    Same as:
    dear Molecule,
    you can only point out Hitler’s wrongs? Nobody elses?
    Oh I forgot Hitler has to be blamed for all the wrong. it was all his fault and us germans just have to be the ones in the wrong. Sorry I completely forgot!! The polish people behaved so gentlemanly towards the germans before, during and after the war, as did the english, the americans etc etc etc
    Oh sorry but I forgot they were under the influence of the jews so they have to be excused, that doesn’t count off course, they don;t have to say sorry for anything they did.
    Wink wink nudge nugde!

  35. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 7, 2013 - 2:00 pm | Permalink

    The heinous crimes by the slavs, americans, english etc against the german people will never be forgotten.
    The day you come and say sorry, they will be forgiven.
    Your weakness is your lack of being able to own up to the wrongs commited against my german people.

    Dear Fender, please tell me the wrong your people did? Can’t? Are you denying there is any? Let me tell you there is and horrendous stuff at that! Owning up and saying sorry is part of moving on. Don’t get it? You’ll have to get it!!

    You can all get narky with me, I have long forgiven because I know you did not know what you were doing. I know one day you will ask for forgiveness. I believe in my people. And I love my people. :)

    I trust you are all nice people. I wish ye all a good weekend.

  36. molecule's Gravatar molecule
    February 7, 2013 - 11:38 am | Permalink


    The Germans who were selectively targetted for extermination in WW-II were Christians, not Jews. The Christian understands the power of Forgiveness, and proceeds to build Heaven. The Jew hates both of those Christian powers, and prefers to seek Revenge … Eye for an Eye in endless downward spirals. Conrad is right. Your bitterness is based on misinformation. If it is endless it will destroy not only yourself (your soul), but also your family and friends, and possibly your nation as well. It makes me think you are a Jewish troublemaker trolling the site.

    Conrad was also right when he said something to the effect that the Full Truth is yet to be told about Hitler and WW-2. Not that anyone but God has full understanding of it. The Jews will pay their price eventually for their crass materalism and greed, and their lust for sexual deviancy, medical mutilation of women and children, and revenge, revenge, revenge. Endless revenge.

    The ONE quesiton that everyone is afraid to address about WW-2 is the famous BEFORE or AFTER question … Did Hitler move the Jews from the inner cities to the concentration camps BEFORE the civilian occupants of those cities were bombed to smitheries, by the Allies, who were 100% Jewish controlled, in terrifying holocausts of flames, or, did Hitler remove their dead bodies to the concentration camps AFTER the cities were bombed to smitherines.

    Face it Heike … Hitler was PROTECTING the JEWS. Or, someone in his government was. In any case, HItler NEVER gave the order to harm a Jew. And he went to great expense to PROTECT them. I don’t pretend to have full understanding, but Jews (and other criminals and sympathizers were moved to protection camps BEFORE the cities were bombed. Moreover, HItler reportedly used railroad cars and engines to pull them to move the Jews to safety when they were needed to maintain the supply line for the German army that Hitler sent deep into Bolshevik territory. Then, Hitler setup a highly centralized Marxist form of government, which just happens to be the kind of government which the Jewish bankers prefer. The Jews are smart enough to run an empty proprganda campaign, seemingly against themselves, while their agent sets up a Marxist form of government.

    Hitler was a part of WW-2. He will be remembered for PROTECTING the Jews … for using critical resources to move them to safety, B.E.F.O.R.E the Christian cities were bombed to smitherines by the Allies (Jews). He will also be remembered for setting up a Marxist form of government. Admittedly it used enough “honest” money and banking to orchestrate “an economic miracle” … exactly the economic war-machine miracle that the Jews would use to destroy the white races.

    So, there may be other sides to Hitler as well. I don’t think he had evil intentions, but the BEFORE or AFTER quesiton stumps me, along with setting up a Marxist centrally controlled government, along with using railroad cars to move Jews to safety, thereby reducing supply lines needed by his Army.

    People who deny the BEFORE or AFTER quesiton, who deny that Hitler was PROTECTING the Jews while sacrificing his own populations, who deny the misuse of railroad cars while his army needed their supply lines kept open, who deny that Central governments that are based on war-machine economic miracles are Marxist propaganda, and who advocate an endless cycle of revenge and humilation, withouit taking the first step themselves in forgiveness, are behaving like Jewish shills. They may not be Jewish, but they are proof that, in the case of that poor individual, the filthy Jewish mindset has momentarily seized the day.

  37. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 7, 2013 - 11:33 am | Permalink


    If logical thinking is the defining psychological aspect of the Germans, then I’m far more German than you are. You’re behaving like a jew with your hysterical “we did no wrong!” rhetoric.

    German soldiers committed atrocities just like many other soldiers did in WWII. They didn’t do it because they were German, but because they were soldiers, and during wartime, soldiers do cruel things.

    I have no clue why you’re getting so upset, as I’ve said nothing unreasonable. Take a breath and listen to some Haydn, then come back to me.

  38. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 7, 2013 - 12:54 am | Permalink

    Dear Curmudgeon,
    you understand!
    Dear Fender,
    my people that I love so much were insulted here. You telling me to stop being so sensitive is like a black man laughing in your face telling you to stop being so sensitive about anti-white issues! I’m glad you think it’s a tragedy but you are defeting the purpose saying us germans did wrong because we didn’t! Curmudgeon is right about Hitler rising, it is already slowly happening (ex: in Czech young czechs are honouring us Germans for the great we did to their country, built the beautiful Prague, the Cathedral there, the university etc as well as the presidency candidate wanting to give an apology to Germans who suffered so greatly, only narrowly losing national elections). Everytime you say something negative about us Germans you are pushing your people down at the same time (though you obviously think you aren’t), you don’t understand the vicious spiral! Maybe the strong ability of logical and analytical thinking as well as tackeling a problem at it’s core (very german) is the slight genetic between difference between slavs and germans.
    Even if you yourself are too weak to admit your slavish people did wrong and say sorry, it’s coming anyway and it has to come… :))))))))

  39. February 6, 2013 - 7:33 pm | Permalink

    Unfortunately, no honest discussion can be had about any of the events that led to WWII, WWII itself, and the alleged mass homicidal maniacs of the NSDAP.
    Why? Because the truth will be known.
    Similarly, no honest discussion can be held about non-White immigration.
    Why? Because of the mass homicidal maniacs of the NSDAP.
    The banking system, “capitalism”, art, music, or anything else dominated by the hostile elite?
    Not a chance, because you are one of the alleged mass homicidal maniacs of the NSDAP.
    Does someone see a pattern here?

    That damned liberal JFK once said something to the effect -Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now.
    Gandhi said something similar. Both assassinated, but that is just a coincidence..

  40. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 6, 2013 - 1:00 pm | Permalink


    No one is spouting anti-German propaganda here. Stop being so sensitive. When I say that Germans committed injustices during WWII, I am not saying those injustices were in any way unique or cruel. I’m just stating a fact. Believe me, I wish the Germans had won WWII. I can’t think of a worse tragedy than what happened to Europe between 1944 and 1945.

  41. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 6, 2013 - 12:49 am | Permalink

    Dear Astraea Shaw,
    it feels good when you are alone and someone sticks up for you and takes your side. Thanks. I myself have not read the book you talk about but I will put it on my long list of books to read about the truth.
    Dear C. C. Conrad,
    an honourable person is and says sorry for the wrongs done, the other side forgives and then they move on but you do not try to move on without saying and being sorry for the wrongs your people caused. To say the past is the past because you don’t want to go there and unearth some uncomfortable truths is cowardly. The lid on the pot of german suffering will boil over and won’t be kept on by brushing things over saying the past is the past.
    Our german have been experiencing anti-german propaganda for well over 70 years. Anti-white propaganda has only been around for 30 years. But now those whites who mocked Hitler and my people are themselves the victim of the same propaganda but still fail to recognize this or to empathize with us Germans but on the contrary repeat and use the anti-german propaganda.
    As you said you are of german ethnicity, I hope you will or are married to an ethnic german because to be of one ethnicity makes for a clear soul. To want us to be just one race of white people without ethnicities is one step closer to a one world person, a total mixture of all the people on earth.
    Just because I love my people and regard other whites as different ethnicities does not mean I do not support the white cause. Off course we can all work together, though we are different ethnicities we are all white and that unites us.
    Der Schlauere gibt nach!

  42. February 5, 2013 - 9:35 pm | Permalink

    @Heike: I tend to agree. There is one point that we might all want to consider in this matter. Most of the combatants in WW2 were so completely brain washed by the war propaganda that they did not know what they were doing. Everybody was confused by the Jewish / Leftist / pro-war propagandists that the truth didn’t come out for a long time. Some still do not know the truth. Maybe they NEVER WILL. BUT WE MUST AGREE THAT FROM NOW ON WE WILL NOT FIGHT AMONGST OURSELVES. We can eventually fix the rest – after we take control of the “system”. AND WE CAN’T DO THAT AND BE AT EACH OTHERS THROATS AT THE SAME TIME.
    Jack’s War

  43. February 5, 2013 - 7:52 am | Permalink

    @ Heike

    I like what you have said Heike. I have read General Degrell and the Grand Admiral Durnitz’s amazing book.

    I want to repeat that there are amazing books to be found at

    You may find there scientific studies about each of those camps – and there was not one homicidal gas chamber in any of them Did I mention before that the only homicidal gas chambers ever found were manufactured by the Bolshevicks – and they were Jews!

    Please people, read some of those books and watch the videos made by the admirable scholar Veronica Clark and go to and learn MUCH more.

    Grand Admiral Durnitz was a very fine and noble man. He was treated respectfully as a warrior by Montgomery, but when he was invited to a castle in France to meet Eisenhower – he was arrested and treated very disrespectfully.

    How typical! Eisenhower was a Jew. They do not know how to behave in a civilized way – they never have and they never will.

    Imagine throwing a glass of wine in the face of another guest at the dinner table of a friend – or business acquaintance! What kind of people do such things? Not decent civilized people!

  44. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 5, 2013 - 1:09 am | Permalink

    Nothing that’s not resolved fairly is resolved.
    I am still waiting for the day the Americans, Brits, Poles, Czechs apologize and admit to the crimes they did to us Germans. Us, Germans never commited atrocities, one off people may have jumped out off line and commited crimes but they were punished. What ye did to us was way worse than what we did to ye, believe it or not. Time to find out the real history and stop trying to win a conversation by saying ” people in my family died, people in my family were in a camp” do you think no one in my family died?, do you think no one in my family was in a US, Uk, Russia, Polish camp tortured to hell? and no one ever said sorry.
    My grandparents generation were great people, I look up to them and if I am one day as honorable people as they are I will be humbled.

  45. February 4, 2013 - 7:42 pm | Permalink

    @Heike: I like to read history and I can assure everybody that wrongs have been done by every side – to every side. But IF we are to survive this current attempt at the genocide of our race WE MUST ALL LET GO OF THE PAST. We must live by the phrase – NO MORE BROTHER’S WARS.
    Jack’s War

  46. February 4, 2013 - 7:35 pm | Permalink
  47. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 4, 2013 - 3:08 pm | Permalink


    Heike, Germans did commit injustices. I had relatives in the camps. However, that happens in war. It’s to be expected. Compared to the other armies in WWII, the Germans were very well-behaved and committed few atrocities, but to say they committed NO atrocities is ludicrous. When countries go to war, atrocities and injustices are inevitable, and I don’t hold anything against Germans.


    Today’s Germans are a very different breed. They spit on their ancestors and hate how powerful Hitler made them. They’re completely judaized, along with the Nordics and Anglos. I’d wager that today’s liberal Germans hate Slavs more than the N*zis did.

  48. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    February 4, 2013 - 2:24 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Hi, Mickey & Fender. I don’t disagree with either of you. As for poor Heike, she thinks that Hungarians are Slavs.

    When push comes to shove, it will most certainly NOT be the Slavs – Northern, Western, Southern, Eastern or any mix thereof – who refuse to co-operate with the Germans. It will only be the other way around. These are the folks who keep wanting Angela Merkel to run every aspect of their lives.

    Shucks, all I did was point out that over here, living as I do in a seriously multiethnic, multiracial area, virtually the only people who looked down their noses and me and mine were Germans. That’s all.

  49. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 4, 2013 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    Ye lovely americans do yer white thing. I support ye.
    Us europeans will go back to our national identities! i.e generation identitaire, that’s the Zeitgeist here!

  50. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    February 4, 2013 - 5:11 am | Permalink


    sure…the English used to feel that way about the Irish and Welsh. And also about their own lower social classes…which were in fact a different ethnic group entirely.
    There are similar stories across Europe. But fender is right….we have always been the same race and it is that race that is now being genocided right across.
    White ‘ethnicities’ make up the most homogenous human group at the continental group. We are far more related than any other group. So that’s the end of it.

  51. Lasha Darkmoon's Gravatar Lasha Darkmoon
    February 4, 2013 - 4:38 am | Permalink

    @leslie sage:

    “No dear, they are idealized portrayals of women, objects of sublimated desire which no real woman can attain. Lovely, yes.”

    Be sure of one thing, Leslie: idealized women like this actually exist, both in the realms of imagination and in the heavenly worlds. In this world, too, I’m sure such women can be found, though they are exceptionally rare.

    Chechar’s picture selection would have been approved by Burne-Jones. Here is a painting by Burne-Jones that belongs on Chechar’s site:

  52. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 3, 2013 - 11:39 pm | Permalink

    Dear Barkingmad,
    hehehehhe sorry I had to have a little chuckle at your comment! Is that the best you can do? Try to insult me? You will die a bitter man if you don’t understand. I presume you are Hungarian. I am delighted to announce that your people see the light and will this year for the first time hold a day of Rememberance for us Germans that were killed and hunted from our properties in Hungary.
    Dear Fender,
    I believe you want to be a good person. We, germans did not commit injustices against your people that is purely propaganda, it takes a strong minded man to admit that. I hope at some stage you will realise that Slavs and Germans are genetically very closely related and what better idea could the jews have had than to make us hate each other. They incited hatred against us germans before, during and after the war and your people largely believed it, as anyone would, which is not to be held against ye. I wonder whether you ever heard about Bromberger Bloody Sunday? Understanding history properly is vital to solving future problems.
    The English, Americans and french find it hard to lay off their pride and glory over winning the war, the polish and others find it hard to lay off the role of the victim but this pride role and victim role needs to be layed off in order to understand and move forward. A problem needs to be understood and solved from the core.
    I presume it’s night-time in america now. I wish ye both a good night.

  53. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 3, 2013 - 10:40 pm | Permalink


    I’m Slavic as well, though of the northern variety. The Germans did commit injustices against Slavs during WWII, but the past is the past. Today, Whites need to be united or else our common enemies are going to use our division and past hatreds against us.

  54. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    February 3, 2013 - 10:34 pm | Permalink


    You can’t even read English.

  55. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 3, 2013 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    Dear C.C. Conrad,
    Well said, we are good people, some say we are holy we are so good. We only attack to defend ourselves.
    Dear Barkingmad,
    you don’t understand history, we never harmed anyone, believing anything else is believing propaganda and destroying your own people in the process. I feel sorry you have so much hate for us, I guess it’s a lack of understanding.

  56. February 3, 2013 - 8:54 pm | Permalink

    @leslie sage:

    You are missing Schopenhauer’s views on art in his aesthetic theory, which includes what Lasha wrote, “chaste in the classical sense”.

  57. leslie sage's Gravatar leslie sage
    February 3, 2013 - 8:01 pm | Permalink

    @Lasha Darkmoon:
    No dear, they are idealized portrayals of women, objects of sublimated desire which no real woman can attain. Lovely, yes.

  58. February 3, 2013 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

    @Barkingmad: I hope that we white of this generation can get over the “petty nationalism” of the past generations. Let’s start over. Our race has been damaged by the many attacks on our race by other races, i.e. the mongols, Turks and others. Okay we have been damaged by this genetic admixture, we can fix this by instituting a healthy eugenics program. All we have to do is to be careful about who we mate with from now on. Choose wisely and work to improve your future generations and your race at the same time. Reason, logic & eugenics.
    Jack’s War

  59. KT's Gravatar KT
    February 3, 2013 - 4:52 pm | Permalink

    @Frank….”soaring intellects”?! Please, examples of the gifts of beauty , philosophical, artistic, or in any way life-affirming that jewry has bestowed upon the world.

  60. Lasha Darkmoon's Gravatar Lasha Darkmoon
    February 3, 2013 - 3:54 pm | Permalink


    Thanks, Chechar. You have a beautiful website. I adore those pictures on your homepage. So aesthetically pleasing and chaste in the classical sense.

    I haven’t had time to look around yet, but I’ve already seen quite a few interesting articles I intend to save and read later.

    Keep up the good work!


  61. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    February 3, 2013 - 2:52 pm | Permalink


    I simply tried to say something, though not too clearly or well, so I’ll clarify: As a Slav, 99% of the smirking, arrogant and “we are superior” treatment I’ve received (for being Slavic) were from Germans. I did not conclude, nor does it follow, that all Germans are like that. In high school, I met a couple of self-hating German girls who I believe were led to be that way because a teacher described some (apparent) atrocities committed by the Germans in WW 2. I came to understand, eventually, that those girls responded incorrectly. I wish they had told the teacher the truth about the war, but they themselves probably didn’t know it. We lost family and relatives in the war but my mum and dad never spoke a word against the Germans.

    My view of why only the Germans ever regarded us this way is that they were at one time the most cultured, accomplished, intelligent (and possibly moral) people on earth. And look where they are now, both in the US and in the old country – they know they are eating dirt but can’t handle it so take it out (sometimes) on their inferiors (that’s most nonGermans) because they don’t have the courage to really tell it like it is.

    Last I heard, the Germans thought it perfectly right to march into the Slavic countries because we were just dirt to begin with and the talented Germans could use the Slavs’ land more appropriately (for their own benefit, not ours).

    C’est la vie, dear, I don’t lose sleep over any of the above.

  62. February 3, 2013 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

    @Lasha Darkmoon:

    Ditto…. and if you click on my penname you’ll see that I just quoted your words in the comments section of my latest entry.

  63. February 3, 2013 - 12:03 pm | Permalink

    @Heike: Thanks, I thought that you’d understand once I explained the idea. I’m German too, by the way. One thing about us Germans, we are usually quite nice people – until one tries to screw us over, then we can be down right mean. But we’d rather be nice.
    Jack’s War

  64. February 3, 2013 - 8:18 am | Permalink

    There is a lot to be found of fascinating things at this website.

    Also, I highly recommend a video series, now in two DVDs at made by John McCarthy after he was released from captivity in Beirut. He was help by Mulim “fundamentalists” for five years in solitary confinement with nothing but a Bible to read – and he read it several times from cover to cover. When he came out he decided to go and look into things in the “holy Land” to find out for himself what it was all about.

    He spent many months meeting many archaeologists and scholars and going to digs. It is called “It Ain’t Necessarily So.”

    To me the most interesting and important part of that video was to learn that the tribal god of the people who lived in the very very poor place called Judea (which was a province or Egypt and where there are still fortresses and administration centres built by the Egyptians!) who they called Yahweh. This Yahweh had a consort whose name was – or is – Asherah. She was their equivalent of Ishtar or Astarte – she was Mother Nature and her main symbol was The Tree of LIFE!

    The “priests” decided one day (actually there were no priests – but that is another story) took the Tree and they “smashed her and burnt her and ground her fine to powder – and threw her in the river Hebron”!

    No wonder their wretched, spiteful little tribal god became such a miserable vengeful creation!

    Imagine invoking that! Imagine invoking a picture of spite and vengeance instead of the Buddha Amitabha or IsisMery, or Re – or Ma’at, the “goddess” of Truth and Justice!

    Imagine what the invocation of “Yahweh” does to the human mind!

  65. February 3, 2013 - 7:56 am | Permalink

    @ Frank

    Frank, I am not so sure that the Egyptian culture was “destroyed from within”.

    Christianity was the religion of ancient Egypt. “IUSA the KRST was born on the 25th. December, the Winter Solstice, of a Virgin called IsisMery.
    He taught in the Temple at age 12 and was baptized at age 30 by Anup the Baptizer, who was beheaded.
    He had twelve companions.
    He walked on water, healed the sick and raised the dead and he was crucified, died and was buried in a tomb of rock.
    He was resurrected, of course.

    A most vicious mob destroyed the great Library of Alexandria and murdered Hypatia the Seer. They skinned her alive and then scraped the flesh off her bones.

    They called themselves Christians – but perhaps they were actually a Jewish sect?

    I wonder how on Earth the Jews have managed to con the World into believing that the KRST was a Jew!


    If you have not yet read “The Bible Unearthed.” by Israel Finkelstein you should, asap. There was no “exodus”, no Moses (except for Akenaten), no Solomonj (that was actually Amenhotep 3rd!) and certainly NO Temple. The ONLY temple found – according to latest scholarshp – is a DESCRIPTION of an EGYPTIAN temple in the Old Testament!
    There MAY have been a David, but he was no king! He was perhaps the leader of a band of brigands or a small tribe! There is NO trace of a record of a “Kind David” in any of the records of any of the surrounding powers or cultures.

    And, by the way, the Song of Songs was the love song of a priestess of ancient Sumeria to her king and had nothing whatsoever to do with any wandering tribe of Habiru.

    That wandering tribe of Habiru ( or Apiru) were traders who travelled with their donkey caravans from city state to city state – practicing USURY where ever they could and corrupting society – just as they are still doing!

    The story about “Moses” is actually the story of Sargon the Great who was placed in a basket which was sealed with pitch (always seeping up through the sand in Mesopotamia) and set to sail on the River TIGRIS. A tyrant was looking for this child wanting to kill him

    His basket came to rest in the reeds at the bottom of the garden of the palace and Sargon was rescued and brought up in the Palace. He became Sargon the Great – and the rest IS history!
    The history of Hamurabi and his struggle to prevent the corruption of his culture and people by the wandering Habiru and their practice of USURY is where they got their invented “Moses” story. It was Hammurabi who was inspired by God to inscribe The Law on stone – and there is one in the Louvre today.
    I wonder how many have survived the Jew’s invasion and pillage of Iraq? There used to be lots of these rocks around – and at every crossroads.

  66. February 3, 2013 - 6:53 am | Permalink

    With reference to Himmler – I recommend, with enthusiasm, a book by Veronica Clark and Wilfred Heink called “Hitler and Himmler Uncensored.”

    It gives two speeches verbatim and delivered privately to close followers and not for the public so there is no propaganda value in either speech. In other words, these two speeches give the private and genuinely felt feelings of both men.

    They were honest and decent and there was never any plan to exterminate the Jews or anyone else.

    Germany was just trying to survive – as Germany and as Germans. It was not easy! Guess why.

    I also recommend “Hitler Democrat.” by General Leon Degrelle. I read this recently and it is the first book I have read about WW2 – or Hitler. I was so astounded to read some of the truth about WW2 and Germany and Hitler that I have bought some other books from the wonderful and I shall soon be getting into “Mein Kampf”.

    Veronica Clark’s Youtube videos are also VERY interesting, and Deanna Spingola is doing some great work. There is a lot of useful information on her website,

  67. Lasha Darkmoon's Gravatar Lasha Darkmoon
    February 3, 2013 - 5:15 am | Permalink


    “I speak about the “first act” of the opera—Jewish Bolsheviks killing more civilians than Himmler—; of the “third act” of the opera—the Allied forces committing a larger holocaust than the one attributed to Hitler. And I talk of a System that feeds us 24/7 ONLY with the “SECOND act”, the so-called J holocaust.

    Since my interlocutors have not read Gulag/Holodomor or Hellstorm history—the first and third acts of our grand WWII Opera—the first seeds of the process to undemonize Hitler are planted.

    Excellent point. I think you have hit on the crux of the matter here. In my opinion, ACT 2 (“The Jewish Holocaust”), has been given center stage, with the spotlight directed onto it, to the extent that it has now become the focal point of history. The object clearly is to deflect attention from ACT 1 (“The Bolshevik Revolution”) and “ACT 3 (“Allied Atrocities during and after World War II”).

    What needs to be emphasized more than ever now is the Jewish character of the Bolshevik Revolution as well as the Jewish vindictiveness so apparent in the post-WW2 ill-treatment of the Germans as seen in the Morgenthau Plan and in the numerous Jewish kangaroo court judges and torturers who presided over the Nuremberg trials.

    Act 1 and Act 3 shows the Jews in their hidden role as world-class oppressors and totalitarian tyrants, whereas Act 2 shows them in their made-for-the-public role as history’s tragic victims.

    Since the Jews control the mass media, Act 2 is naturally all we hear about.

    And every attempt is made to give a completely distorted presentation of Act 1 and Act 3, with the vicims of the Jews being demonized and the Jewish role in their mass murder being covered up as much as possible.

    It’s not surprising that Solzhenitsyn’s great book “Two Hundred Years Together” remain unpublished in English. It’s because here we have the Truth That Dare Not Speak Its Name.

    * * *

    A Swedish friend of mine sent me a link to this important video last week. Watching it requires some intellectual stamina (a) because it’s in Swedish with English subtitles, and (b) because it’s almost 2-hours long.

    Well worth seeing though.

    “In the Shadow of Hermes”, 2- hour video of the Bolshevik Revolution in Swedish with English subtitles. Genocide of 65 million White Russian Christians under the Bolshevik Jews. Based on the widely censored book, “Under the Sign of the Scorpion” by Juri Lina.

  68. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 3, 2013 - 4:52 am | Permalink

    Dear C.C. Conrad thanks for your reply. I like your answer.
    Dear Fender, I see what you are saying but I think we can still remain as different ethnicities.
    Dear Barking Mad, you sure are barking mad! You offended my people by saying we are mean. I don’t think you know us at all otherwise you wouldn’t say something like that. But I guess you believe the negative propaganda about us and believing that will cause your downfall! So liven up and love us Germans!

  69. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    February 2, 2013 - 7:42 pm | Permalink


    Heike, I am pure 100% of my particular southeastern European ethnicity, going back as far as I’ve been able to trace. Yet I indentify a bit more with the people who started the US than my own people (the descendants of the ones who settled in USA). I actually like them more; they may not be as aware of these, er, “issues” that we discuss here at TOO as eastern Europeans are, yet as friends and neighbors and associates, I find them generally to be nicer than my own bunch. For some of us, “nice” matters. The meanest toward us are those of German blood. They haven’t changed a bit, not the ones I know. They have a sense of superiority and let us know it.

  70. frank's Gravatar frank
    February 2, 2013 - 4:52 pm | Permalink

    @omop: It’s not that those countries which allow Jews in and to (par usuel) take over the critical subsystems of the society that are “in danger”—-they’re already toast. Look at the role the media play in our political existence—and then look at who dominates, even owns, these media.
    As I said above—Jews have, by dint of their soaring intellects, obsessiveness and talents, given much to Western civilization—but, because of their subconscious fear and hatred of “the other”, they have destroyed—repeat, DESTROYED—–every civilization which has hosted them.

    All civilizations ultimately rot from within (Egypt, Greece, Rome) but they will go through an acceleration of this process if they allow the Jewsto control things. There is not a single initiative which is designed to “change the order of things” which has not either been started by the Jews or seized and forwarded by them. Look at unionism/socialism, smut, relaxation of traditional mores, filthification of every aspect of our culture, attacks (ultimately successful beyond their wildest dreams) on education and any and all other Liberal efforts. Liberalism is the cancer, but the Jew are the promoters and promulgators, if not always the inventors.

  71. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 2, 2013 - 3:03 pm | Permalink


    If we don’t survive as a race we’re going to die as nationalities. In the past, there were enough Whites so that the race could be divided up into subgroups, but today all subgroups of Whites are dwindling in numbers, from Germanics to Slavs to Anglos. Simply put, we can’t afford to be divided in any way. There are too few of us and too many of them; 92% of humanity is non-White, after all.

  72. Heike's Gravatar Heike
    February 2, 2013 - 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Dear C. C. Conrad,
    Why do you want all white people to form one nation? We are all different, i.e German, irish, french etc or do you mean only the mixed- american-whites?
    I for sure want to remain german and not only white. Maybe white americans who are already a mix of different white europeans want to be white only. But there are different white ethnicities which should be respected.

  73. omop's Gravatar omop
    February 2, 2013 - 11:44 am | Permalink

    Ms. Darkmoon’s commentaries are justifiable and supportive of past points, ie…. “History is replete with the lesson that a country in which the Jews get the upper hand is in danger.”

  74. February 2, 2013 - 11:24 am | Permalink

    @Lasha Darkmoon: I sympathize with your position. I only hope that good people can rebuild a better country after the fight is over. After reading Wilderness Empire I hope that a similar experience will allow all whites will be able to unite and form one white nation and recover all of our lost territories. In the book Wilderness Empire the people suffering from what I call the Quaker disease were cured by Pontiac & his gang. One must read the book to understand what I am talking about here.
    Jack’s War

  75. molecule's Gravatar molecule
    February 2, 2013 - 11:01 am | Permalink

    As failed as I might be, I’m writing to offer inspiration. Humanity will not only survive, but it will evolve for the better, ultimately because of the indignation of women like yourself. Even if you were Jewish, or raised among a nest of misogynist uncles, who themselves were thought that they were “Jews” but were in fact only genitally abused and traumatized as infant children, and who then mistakenly went through life choosing the alternate fictition and simplistic pragmatism of their imaginary “bottom line,” over the complexity of reality and evolution by the ongoing indignation, righteousness and creativity of that springs into this world mainly through the hearts of women. It will be the indig-nation of women such as yourself and it will the resilience and persistence of your demands for restoration of innocence of women and children, that will bring about the change. Forget about the “men.” “Free sex” has successfully made a hoard of cowards and liars out of them.

    to quote; “No country can possibly retain its intellectual integrity or have access to the truth when…” To recall the story of your uncle (which is not your story alone…) that happens when young women such as yourself were forced, one by one, to surrender their innocence, and their indignation and their personal desire to participate in truthful evolution, to cowards pretending to be men. Young women are forced by economic means, to surrender their deepest desires to covens of men (so-called), who themselves were forced to develop and function off of, an array of alternate personalities (narcissism), because of ritualistic childhood traumas and surgical mutilations. The technical term for this alternate personality, from the notebooks of Dr.Mengele and MKultra, is trauma bonding. When the voodoo of this wound is properly administered, the cuts run too deep. The flood of cortisols alter the core neurochemistry that supports the personality. The voodoo inflicts limbic, pre-verbal, formative wounds (actually pre-formative as well) that warp all future thought …) Few of even the strongest of men are able to meditate through and forgive the wound that surgically removed the nerves at the terminus of their left vagus nerve trunk, which runs through their hearts, and enable their hearts to “cleave” and marry into the companion set of nerves of their brides. During any such meditation, where the righteousness of genital mutilation of children is challenged, the alternate, or wounded, narcissistic, corporate personality will quickly show its claw, and the meditation will stop. That “instant submission” your uncle, to the anger of his guest, when the wine was thrown in his face, was a part of his “limbic imprinting.” The heart is connected to the vagus nerve … and as OT says, the heart of the male who was surgically mutilated as an infant child is energetically cut-off (circumcised) as well. That is when instant obedience is transferred, at limbic levels, with pre-verbal memories of pain, of sheer helplessness and fear, to the most odeous and completely fictional character called Jehovah. That is the root of the Zionist/ Fascist/ Corporate Zombie/ Pentagon-Wall St. war machine economy.

    to quote again: “No country can possibly retain its intellectual integrity or have access to the truth when…” …when the DEEP innermost bodily desire of women, to seek expression of their desire to be a part of ongoing justice and evolution, through sensible use of their bodies, to which they are indeed intimately connected, is subverted. Sexual subversion of a country is not about this fiction called “the country.” To hell with “the country,” qua itself. It’s about suborning the innate indigNATION and sense of justice in women, and the crushing of the TRY in their hearts … their desire to express fulfillment of evolution through their reproductive choices. Men who do not have a desire to protect the indignation of women, and who do not have a desire to protect the innocence of the desire of his bride to express evolution in a wholesome reproductive, humaine and realistic way, are NOT men. In that case, the whole idea of “the nation” is pure fiction and chimera. As the Bible says, Their hearts have already been circumcised and they are as dead as, and as numerous as, pieces of sand. In the end, their ultimate joy will be a kind of revenge misogyny, expressed for example through violent and debasing sex. When the majority of “men” are functioning from alternate personalities (created by the voodoo of limbic torture mutilation of infant children who are in pre-verbal and even pre-formative stages of development), then, young women will then left with no sensible choice to express the try in their hearts. That is the essence of the misogyny. Most women have NO CLUE how deep it runs.

    God speed, Lasha Darkmoon! to your youthful indignation and to your personal courage and to the try in your heart to find fulfillment of justice and evolution in whatever way it can, for yourself and for others. God speed to all your endeavors. The passion of your article on sexual subversion of nations goes straight to the core.

    Sorry for the long post again … I have to stop. God help me.

  76. February 2, 2013 - 10:57 am | Permalink

    @Lasha Darkmoon:

    I agree with your explanation but… must take issue with your decision to remove the article. Personal vignettes were vital for Solzhenitsyn’s major works, both fictional and non-fictional. If NothAm will become a kind of Bolshevik too, anecdotes and personal confessions will be paramount to expose the new Stalinism.

  77. Lasha Darkmoon's Gravatar Lasha Darkmoon
    February 2, 2013 - 6:56 am | Permalink

    @Lasha Darkmoon:

    All this was related in my article, “My Zionist Uncle”, which I decided to delete because it was too personal and anecdotal.

    If you’re wondering how I could publish such an article in the first place, with my Zionist uncle still alive, no problem. He doesn’t know I write articles and has never heard of “Lasha Darkmoon”. Most of my family know nothing about my double life as an internet writer. If they did, I would be instantly disowned.

    This is a cautionary tale.

    It reveals the enormous success the Jews have had in brainwashing the public by the simple expedient of taking possession of Hollywood and the mass media.

    No country can possibly retain its intellectual integrity or have access to the truth when Jews control its media and muscle into every single area of influence in public life.

    It happened in Germany. It happened in Russia. Complete takeover. It has now happened in America.

    You would have thought that America would have learned from the experience of other countries which had fallen under Jewish hegemony. But no, Americans were all too easily taken in and by and large remain lethargically unaware to this day of their subjugation under Jewry.

    A major explosion is on its way, I feel sure, an explosion that will make the Bolshevik Revolution look like a Sunday School picnic. I can see it all coming.

    America’s Lenin and Stalin are with us right now, waiting patiently in the wings — to make their move when the time is ripe for the switch to totalitarianism. It will probably begin with gun control.

    When the population are disarmed and the sheep are shorn, that will be the time to lead them to the slaughter house. Most of them will go happily, unaware of what is about to happen to them until the blade begins to fall.

  78. Lasha Darkmoon's Gravatar Lasha Darkmoon
    February 2, 2013 - 6:38 am | Permalink

    @C. C. Conrad:

    “A glass of wine was thrown in my face by a Jewish woman guest…I was forced to apologize”…. And that is the crux. To submit to such crass and violent behavior and then apologize? …. If they throw wine in your face, push their head into the punch bowl!”

    If you had read the original article, now deleted, in which I related this incident at length — “My Zionist Uncle” — you will have learned that circumstances made it quite impossible for me to act in such an aggressive way. I would have liked to play the part of the spitting tigress and pay that woman back in her own coin, but I was in a weak position and realized that discretion was the better part of valor.

    I was a guest in the house of my rich Zionist uncle and aunt in Toronto at that time. I had very little money. I had nowhere else to stay. My aunt and uncle had given me hospitality and I was expected to behave myself and not antagonize my uncle’s important business clients, some of them Jewish, who had been invited along that evening.

    I had held my tongue throughout the dinner party, but toward the end of the meal the subject of Palestine cropped up and this Jewish woman began to say the most outrageous things — downright lies about the Palestinians interspersed with even greater lies about the Holocaust — until I could no longer hold my peace. Alas, I’d had one glass of wine too many!

    So I told the bitch what I thought of her and gave her the lash of my tongue. I verbally flayed her. The glass of wine she threw in my face was in retaliation for my verbal assault on her. So in a way she was justified.

    My uncle took the Jewish woman’s part and insisted I apologize, though my aunt did her best to smooth things over and was secretly sympathetic toward me. My uncle made it clear to me that if I did not apologize at once I would be kicked out of his house forthwith — on to the street.

    Cornered and in a weak position, I apologized, but regretted it a moment later when the Jewish couple stormed out of the house without accepting my apology. They did right. My apology was insincere. They could see that.

    To cut a long story short, I collected my belongings and left the house that same night, because my beloved aunt had given me enough money to check into the Sheraton Hotel. The next day I received a phone call from my uncle, inviting me back to his palatial house on the condition that I keep my mouth shut in future when he had important guests.

    I agreed, and so we all lived happily ever after!

  79. February 1, 2013 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

    @KT: “A glass of wine was thrown in my face by a Jewish woman guest…I was forced to apologize.”..and that is the crux. To submit to such crass and violent behavior and then apologize?The jew is the enemy in whatever coat he chooses to wear, zionist, socialist, moderate, conservative. If we Whites want to survive the first step is to stop considering their feelings and opinions, appeasement is acknowledgment of their perceived superiority/power. We’re better than them.”
    I agree but one must use their brains in such matters. Take a page out of the enemy’s play book. There are ways to say things which carry the point across while not getting into a fight. Once you have tried this approach, however, NEVER BACK DOWN! If they throw wine in your face, push their head into the punch bowl. They MUST be as polite as you.
    Jack’s War

  80. February 1, 2013 - 4:23 pm | Permalink


    “We live and move in an atmosphere of intense intimidation…” is quite perceptive, as are most of the rest of your comments regarding ‘Uncle Adolf’.

    Just as Bob Whitaker developed a useful mantra, I have developed something that usually silences the historical ignoramuses I discuss with.

    I speak of Solzhenitsyn’s last book that, because of a soft totalitarian System, has not been translated to English by a famed publishing house. I speak about the “first act” of the opera—Jewish Bolsheviks killing more civilians than Himmler—; of the “third act” of the opera—the Allied forces committing a larger holocaust than the one attributed to Hitler. And I talk of a System that feeds us 24/7 ONLY with the “SECOND act”, the so-called J holocaust.

    Since my interlocutors have not read Gulag/Holodomor or Hellstorm history—the first and third acts of our grand WWII Opera—the first seeds of the process to undemonize Hitler are planted. After all, as Irmin Vinson said in a book that Kevin MacDonald wrote the preface, “In almost any war one side can be dishonestly demonized even by a truthful enumeration of its crimes, if the crimes of its adversaries are suppressed.”

  81. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    February 1, 2013 - 3:58 pm | Permalink

    @Lasha Darkmoon: Lasha, hindsight being 20/20, you probably should have spit in the bitch’s face & busted out of there, post haste. Sometimes defiance is a must. At any rate, I think that the paragraph where you stated “We live and move in an atmosphere of intense intimidation…” is quite perceptive, as are most of the rest of your comments regarding ‘Uncle Adolf’. Anyone who knows the truth about the NS Era, constantly has to dance around the subject and hold one’s tongue, because of the negatively programmed White mindset that prevails everywhere in the English speaking world. We live and move about in an ideologically toxified atmosphere, a literal sea of ignorance, so to speak, and everything that we do and say is usually ludicrously contravened by some brainwashed individual or another.

    It is nice, however, when we can occasionally throw a wrench into the gears of the Jewish Moloch, rebut a preposterous inanity, or sow a few seeds of doubt amongst the clueless. Fighting this self-destructive historical process is certainly most formidable, but we have no choice, because the consequences of doing nothing, or failing, are so dire.

  82. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    February 1, 2013 - 12:46 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns:

    I sincerely believe that we three are all on the same page. The AH topic, alas, is like the aftermath of chicken pox: a herpes virus lurks permanently within oneself and waits patiently for a weakened immune system to do more harm. AH does us no good, just as he did his fellow Germans and Europeans no good, yet ridding our collective systems of him doesn’t seem to be on the cards.

    Just because AH, perhaps the seventh or eighth most harmful world leader during his time on earth, was not the Ultimate Villain our oppressors portray him as—they, of course are villain no. 1 and have been so since at least the end of the Viking threat to Western civilization—advancing him as a noble exponent and defender of our societies and civilization is daylight madness. We might as well begin lauding Nixon as a great American president simply because the six bums that preceded him and the seven that have followed were or are even worse!

  83. fender's Gravatar fender
    February 1, 2013 - 12:06 pm | Permalink

    @Lasha Darkmoon:

    “I was forced to apologize”

    No you weren’t. You could have just left; what would they have done to you? Instead you were humiliated and then you apologized, which only added to your humiliation.

    “and leave the room in disgrace.”

    You could have left the room the way a proud White woman could have, by holding your head up high and considering those around you to be lower than filth.

    Instead you did the Christian thing and apologized and shamed yourself in front of eeryone. This is why Christians are not capable of winning this battle for Whites.

    “and my uncle’s reputation was damaged”

    From whose perspective? You said the guy’s a zionist, which means his reputation is already damaged from our perpsective, and only our perspective matters.

  84. February 1, 2013 - 10:59 am | Permalink


    Click on my penname and search for the word “Christianity”. You’ll see a couple of recent articles where the authors rather point the finger at Christianity’s secular offshoots for our woes.

  85. KT's Gravatar KT
    February 1, 2013 - 10:42 am | Permalink

    “A glass of wine was thrown in my face by a Jewish woman guest…I was forced to apologize.”..and that is the crux. To submit to such crass and violent behavior and then apologize?The jew is the enemy in whatever coat he chooses to wear, zionist, socialist, moderate, conservative. If we Whites want to survive the first step is to stop considering their feelings and opinions, appeasement is acknowledgment of their perceived superiority/power. We’re better than them.

  86. Lasha Darkmoon's Gravatar Lasha Darkmoon
    February 1, 2013 - 7:08 am | Permalink

    @John hearns:

    “I was making a point and I do understand and agree with your point as well.

    I’m pleased to hear you say this, though you are saying it to someone else. Pragmatism is what we need. I take your point that if one honestly believes in White Nationalism or the need to undemonize Adolf Hitler and resuscitate his good reputation — for he once had a good reputation before the Jew-owned media got to work on him — then it is morally high-principled to do so.

    To kowtow to mainstream opinion and decide to keep your mouth discreetly shut about Adolf is, as I think you suggest, a bit cowardly — that is, if you happen to like Adolf. The easy way out is to join the herd and let everyone assume that you believe Adolf the Ultimate Villain.

    However, pragmatism demands discretion. Just try singing the praises of Adolf Hitler at a dinner party and you will suddenly find yourself the most unpopular guest. You need to survive, right? So if Adolf’s name crops up at a dinner party, you maintain a discreet silence.

    At a dinner party in Toronto a few years ago, in the house of my Zionist uncle, when we had about 20 guests, the subject of the Gaza War cropped up. Naively, I began to plug the Palestinian cause and referred to the Israelis as “war criminals” and “terrorists”.

    A glass of wine was thrown in my face by a Jewish woman guest. The evening was a total disaster. I was forced to apologize and leave the room in disgrace. The Jewish woman and her husband walked out in a huff and my uncle’s reputation was damaged as a result of my outspokenness.

    I wrote an article about this incident last year, “My Zionist Uncle”, but I had to delete it at the insistence of a Jewish friend.

    We live and move in an atmosphere of intense intimidation. There is very little free speech left now that the Jews own the mass media. Basically, we are free to say anything we want provided it meets with Jewish approval.

    On blogs such as this we have been allowed far more latitude. Because this is basically a forum for political dissidents who mistrust the mainstream media intensely, having been lied to once too often. But some have taken advantage of this freedom of speech to think out of the box and have crossed all red lines.

    There is a thin red line wherever we go and we must be careful to stay on the right side of it — if only for our own survival’s sake.

  87. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    February 1, 2013 - 12:02 am | Permalink


    I agree that pragmatism should be practiced in terms of lengthy and excessive discussion of AH and NS.

    I was making a point and I do understand and agree with your point as well.

  88. thm's Gravatar thm
    January 31, 2013 - 7:55 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns:

    Let’s turn every comment thread on this blog into an endless, unresolvable discussion forum on Hitler. There certainly seems to be people here that work hard to do that — no matter what the original subject of the thread is. Great way to inspire people to take an active part in working for White survival.

  89. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    January 31, 2013 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    I was not saying that Hitler WAS a demon, which is what you thought I was saying. I was merely saying that he had been thoroughly DEMONIZED and that his reputation would now seem to be beyond redemption.

    Yeah and being pro-white is precisely the same. It has been completely demonized and the reputation of pro-white is beyond redemption.

    I would say that standing up for what you believe to be good and truth is not dependent on what has been demonized. If it’s about having a popular opinion then be sure to take the easy route and let your TV decide for you as to who/what is bad and who/what is good.

  90. thm's Gravatar thm
    January 31, 2013 - 7:21 pm | Permalink


    Really? You have two agendas (idols?) that you seem to regularly promote in your comments on this blog. One is to repeatedly bash Christians and the Christian Faith and the second is to associate the cause of the European ethnic people with NS and AH. Curiously enough your positions are congruent with the ADL/SPLC etc efforts to discourage White people from participating in this cause and alienating them from it by also promoting those positions.

  91. KT's Gravatar KT
    January 31, 2013 - 9:46 am | Permalink

    My 2 cents worth…the people who write for this site obviously put much thought and work into their essays and too often their efforts are overlooked by commentors eager to voice their own opinions, push their agendas or feed their egos. It must be frustrating for the writers.

  92. sanjay's Gravatar sanjay
    January 30, 2013 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    ALERT: Memo to Dr. Macdonald

    I have the greatest respect for Prof. Macdonald, but I have big problems with some of the titles used in the past.
    For example in the link above, the titles say

    1. “Libertarianism and White Racial Nationalism”
    2. Libertarianism and Racial Nationalism — Or Better, White Racialism”
    3. “Libertarian Individualism or Racial Nationalism?
    4. The Prize essay is titled “Ayn Rand and White Nationalism”

    I think its a huge mistake to use the word “race” or phrases such as “racial nationalism” or “white racialism” in journals, essays, articles.

    I propose replacing the word “race” with the word “people”.

    for example we should say “white people” instead of “white race”. “white people’s interests” instead of “white racial nationalism”.

    the moment the word race is uttered, young white people, middle class white people, immediately recoil and their brains shut down.

    We no longer live in 19th or 20th century when political correctness had not completely subverted white minds.

  93. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    January 29, 2013 - 11:40 pm | Permalink

    @molecule: Whew, what a gawd awful, confusing, mixed up, inane comment that was. Thanks for the “clarification”, and for driving another spike through the heart of what’s left of this comments section.

  94. January 29, 2013 - 8:08 pm | Permalink

    Dr. Lasha Darkmoon:

    I have no idols.

  95. molecule's Gravatar molecule
    January 29, 2013 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    @Dr. Lasha Darkmoon and Chechar

    Be careful with WW-II. Both “sides” were running the same agenda. People get caught in the emotional trap that has been set. Hitler was good guy … no, he was bad guy. Allies were good guys … no, they were bad guys. Both sides were selectively (a) destroying white European populations and (b) selectively PRESERVING JEWISH populations.

    It’s not difficult to see the the Allies, FDR, Eisenhower, Lindemann (Chuchill’s military adviser … controller) et. al, were actively trying to exterminate white European populations, while advancing and enriching the populations of their Jewish occupiers. The Hitler question is the trap. Hitler has evolved into pure emotional propaganda. Both perspectives on him, i.e. good guy (trying valiantly to save European populations from Jews) and bad guy (orchestrating a holocaust to exterminate the Jews) are full of lies.

    Here are the FACTS that no one is allowed to discuss about Hitler. They boil down to this … Hitler was protecting the Jews.

    1. Observe that he had the Jews rounded up (at great expense and mis-allocation of critical resources in time of war), and moved from their mansions in their inner city “ghettos” to the safety of some rural emcampments far off the countryside. Typically, a few weeks to a few months later, the inner city, now populated only with white European women and children, were bombed to smitherines. Six Million White Women and Chilren were holocausted by American bombadiers (“heros”) who were hell bent on killing off their own kind. But they did this only AFTER Hitler had moved the Jews who had refused to leave Germany to safety.

    Please don’t fall into the false argument about how HItler “just had to” convert the German defensive Army into an offensive one, The Lebensraum argument is pure JEWISH BULL. It does NOT matter whether Hitler did or did not sent send the German Army deep into Russia. What matters is that, while his army was 1000 km in to enemy territory, he need to keep supply lines open. He needed to use his railroad cars and the engines to pull them, to haul the food, ammo, weapons, fuel, tires, tents, blankets, heavy stuff. Otherwise he is sabotaging his own Army. He used the railroad cars and locomotives to move Jews to safety of the protection camps (as Eustice Mullens called them) and he did this just before the inner cities were bombed to smitherings, exterminating only white European populations while saving the Jewish ones. By this allocation alone, which even the Jews admit happened, Hitler was using Railroad cars and locomotives to PROTECT the Jews while he was abandonning his duty to keep his army in critical supplies, after he had sent them deep into enemy territory.

    Don’t fall for the still ongoing propaganda about how HItler was hard on the Jewish bankers. Did he rail about the Jewish bankers, chase them out etc. It’s hard to not fall into the propaganda trap. It’s so enticing to want to believe, here’s someone who at least tried to save the German people from the explicit plans of the Jewish peoples and their bankers to exterminate, by holocaust, white European populations. Hitler’s economic miracle and war machine industries were financed by the same US Bolshevik President (Herbert Hoover!!!) and same Bolshevik bankers, who simultaneously financed Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, and their similar mass exterminations of and Jewish sexual atrocities against white European populations in Russia.

    Yes, all the historic videos of Hitler railing against Jews are preserved and they are still mounted on Jewish servers and published again and again for free. Do not for one second think the Jews are not smart enough to create a propaganda smokescreen, to protect them. Do not fall for their emotional enticements. Observe the second major fact about Hitler instead.

    In order to orchestrate the so-called economic miracle attributed to him, Hitler setup the ideal form of govermnet, for the Jewish bankers! He followed Marx to a tee. He setup a centrally controlled government, and by use of “sovereign currency” the got the German people to surrender political power to him as Der Führer. Once power has been shifted to a Marxist, i.e. centrally controlled government, the Jews use all forms of pensions, and blackmail, including sexual perversions and trafficing in children, to control the lower levels of the bureaucracy. Fascism is Marxism. Hitler was a Marxist. His so-called economic miracle is sold to us as propaganda today, but the miracle was mainly Marxist Materialism. Meanwhile, he converted the German army into an offensive unit, and then sent them abroad, where they would be unable to defend Germany from Allied bombing and Allied mass extermination of white European women and children, and then he used a critical resource, i.e. railroad cars and engines to move the Jews to safety instead of to supply his army.

    Eisenhower was smart enough to stage atrocities in the encampments and then bring in the Jewish-controlled camera crews for more anti-German propaganda.

    Hitler was a BAD guy.

    1. Instead of protecting the young German men who he had sent deep into enemy territory, he protected the Jews, and moved them to safety just before their cities, one by one, were bombed to smitherines … the Dresden anniversary approaches. Let us never forget.
    2. Instead of setting up a distributed system of government, he setup a TOTALLY centrallized system, which is ALWAYS dangerous because its burreaucracies are more unanswerable and more subject to extortion and corruption without any accountibility. That is why the Jewish Bankers, who are thoroughly dedicated to the radical extermination of white populations, actually loved Hitler.

    3. THe fact that white populations are hell bent on obeying Jewish leaders, and hell bent on killing each other, and hell bent on believing all the propaganda about Hitler (oh, he kicked out the Jewish bankers and used sovereign currency) etc., is proof that there may be something genetically wrong with the white European races. We will not defend our own kind from extermination, and we follow blindly, all forms of hideous propaganda and absolutely odeous bad-Jewish literature, like the so-called Bible.

  96. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 29, 2013 - 4:39 pm | Permalink

    @Dr. Lasha Darkmoon:

    yeah you’re plugging your site Lasha.

  97. January 29, 2013 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

    @Dr. Lasha Darkmoon:

    bringing his website into disrepute by … praising Hitler

    You are ignorant of history. The Allied forces perpetrated more atrocities in times of peace than those attributed to the Germans in times of war.

  98. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 29, 2013 - 10:59 am | Permalink

    Jewish attitudes on sex are based on their view that the physical body is ugly, and therefore sexual intercourse between bodies should be quick, frequent and to the point, with little or no consequence. This is what attracts them to porn and smut.

    In the ancient world, the jews watched as the Greeks cultivated their bodies into things of beauty and invested themselves in athletics just as much as philosophical study. The jews never had that duality- mind and body. It was only mind. The body was purely utilitarian.

    Take a look at the average jewish body: it’s typically either scrawny or plump. Very rarely have I ever seen a jew who looked physically fit, because they actually look down on that. Even Bobby Fischer said, “the jews are flabby.”

    The Greeks and Romans knew the benefits of a strong, healthy body. They were very much materialists who had little time for the Judeo-Christian concept of the “soul.” The body came first. To paraphrase Nietzsche, one must ask oneself, “What does my body think of my mind,” not the other way around.

  99. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    January 28, 2013 - 5:20 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    here’s looking at you kid :O)

  100. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 28, 2013 - 2:04 pm | Permalink

    @MIckey Meadows: Permit me to say in defense of KM’s actions that I have been given reason to think that the comments that actually appear may well constitute fewer than half of those flooding in to the site. Imagine the time and effort he and (formerly) Matt Parrott and several other anonymous “moderators” must have to spend in filtering out the Sayanim Squad and Lord alone knows whom else. The vile stuff from dixie and others (including a recent crude obscenity from her closest pal about which I myself formally complained to KM), which often gets axed ex post facto, is probably the merest tip of the iceberg.

    This is the first site on which I have written frequent comments. It will also be the last. I am quite prepared to face the fact that all things, be they good or bad, come to an end one fine day. Barring a last-minute resuscitation of commenting here at TOO, I bid you farewell, Mickey.

  101. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 28, 2013 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

    @sanjay: It’s about time for you to practice what you preach. Stop this vapid commenting and write something worth posting as an article or blog entry.

  102. MIckey Meadows's Gravatar MIckey Meadows
    January 28, 2013 - 7:52 am | Permalink

    Just mentioning I hope the comments block is lifted ASAP. The history of trolling on the site seems to be that actually they fail to change anyone’s mind about anything and eventually they give up and go and that actually provides a boost to everyone. A lot of the tactics that we see working all around us in ‘big society’ visibly fail in the ‘little comments’ section on TOO.
    I haven’t been visiting the comments so much so am not sure what has caused this can see a couple of new ‘faces’ openly batting for another side, but what I would say is…so what? They’ll get no traction. They’ll eventually realize they could be doing something more productive. They’ll go.
    It doesn’t hurt the reputation of the site. Comments sections are crazy wherever you go. No reasonable white person visiting TOO would expect the comments to be anything other than riddled by trolls and enemies. In fact, the reality is, the comments are amazingly free from such forces. That’s the big surprise for anyone reading comments at TOO. How richly productive and intelligent they are.
    I think KM should stop listening to complaints from “trusted opinions”. Come on…the first question those people need to answer is why they can’t stop themselves from rising to the bait, all the time. Not knocking them. I’m sure I know a few of them and they are some of the best people on the site. But that doesn’t write them or anyone a free pass for kicking up fuss and bother over problems that are basically INHERENT to the INTERNET. Get over it people. Re-open the comments.

  103. sanjay's Gravatar sanjay
    January 28, 2013 - 12:38 am | Permalink

    this is why the comments section has been curtailed. to prevent trolls from trashing the site.

    If commentators cannot even muster enough effort to write and submit decent articles on issues concerning whites, then how will we win back our land and freedom?

    all revolutions are led by and intellectual and martial elite, and unless we develop intellectual and martial virtues, we will keep rapidly declining.

    no pain, no gain.

  104. Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
    January 27, 2013 - 8:06 pm | Permalink

    If your argument has something to do with the loss of sensation then say so; don’t confuse the matter by saying things like ” torture mutilation and traumatization” which may fool some people, but not me. If the child does not feel pain and does not feel he was mutilated….where is the emotional or physical trauma?

    I’ll have to stop communicating with you though because you seem to have blinders on and after explaining that circumcision is pain free (Amongst Catholics), you go running on about screams and pain.
    Good luck to you.

  105. molecule's Gravatar molecule
    January 27, 2013 - 12:31 pm | Permalink

    How is it, or why is it, that the genital-mutilating Jews invariably fulfill their tribal compulsion to grab and deceive, by spewing half truths about superficial side issues. At best, it’s irrelevant half truth regarding a non-issue, to note that the skin that forms the shaft (ie, the sheath) of the penis may be enervated by a peripheral tactile nerve. DOH! The only functions of peripheral tactile nerves are those of peripheral tactile nerves. DOH! The nerves for sexual functions and marital relations run deeper. But, Oh! says the distractionist. If I perform a medical surgery, and carefully remove the nerves from your fingertip, then, VIOLA! when your hold out your erect finger, it will still LOOK just like a real finger. (Hehe, says the medical distractionist to himself, under his breath, you will never know the difference, until, one day, blind, you try to read the braille. Worse, yet, your future wife will have a 350 million year old biological expectation that you can read the braille … but haha, you can’t … for as many as I possibly could remove, the nerves were surgically removed.) It’s pure Jewish deception to say that there is no difference, that this surgical removal of nerves does not cause its intended harm, that the torture mutilation and traumatization of the neurochemistry of empathy and trust in the child has no effect on future personality.

    As far as I know, the deans of north American internship hospitals are almost all JEWS, or appointed by Jews. The Jews have a mantra or prayer for their medical voodoo, which goes something like, “By all variety of sexual perversion, and by use chemical and surgical violence in place of honest medicine, and by betrayals of all bonds of trust, but most especially the deep mother-to-child bonds of trust, and by violent alterations of the deep neurochemistry of trust and empathy (by an advanced form of surgical neurochemical voodoo called genito-sexual mutilation, i.e. MKULTRA), we shall wage war on … And then, their mantra suddenly stops … it omits to say, wage war on who, but most of us can see that by their racist supremacism alone, they wage, as if without any empathy whatsoever, their war of anger, greed and jealousy against the unnamed remainders of the whole of humanity, of which they proclaim themselves to not be a part. Because the differentiating feature of humans is that humans have empathy.

    Of course it would be deception, for the Jews to claim they should wage war on humanity by deception alone. Because, what other purpose might deception have, other than betrayal of trust. And being the misogynists that they are, there is no higher trust to be betrayed than the trust between a mother and her infant child. Genital neurochemical mutilation of a child’s trust of its mother is the ultimate in betrayal. It is the pentultimate Jewish orgasm. The violent neurochemical destruction of this trust, by the misuse of cortisol, is ultimate fulfillment for the Jew. The thought of it literally has the mohels drooling foam and spit out of their mouths.

    1950s research by the Russians and 1990s research in California (we are more than half a century behind them) proved that the neurochemistry of empathy is carried by the vagus nerve system … exactly the nerve system that is connected not to the tactile peripheral sheath of the penis (DOH!!), but to the inner cores of two of its internal organs, namely, the glans and a band of specialized nerves on the inside of the foreskin. In the human being, these are connected with the vagus nerve. See recent research listed in bibliography of the Human Rights Primer found on There is literally too much research on this to list.)

    You are right to admit that circumcision is ancient Voodoo. (At least that’s how I interpreted your potentially vague observation about bloodletting, etc.) A normal human being cannot listen to the screams of … oh god! of just-heartstopping pain … that these days-old infant children emit, while they are being genitally torture mutilated by a surgeon, literally tearing a 360° fingernail-like attachment off the sensitive glans, using blunt clamps and instruments. Some even use electrical hotwires to burn off the skin. Only a psychopath could fail to see it as torture mutilation of an infant child. This surgical technology goes way beyond mere stupidity. At about 3 minutes into the “operation,” the screams of the strapped down child will reach a creshendo, and then … it’s audible to a human being … something in the brain stem of the child snaps … a human being can hear it … even to an infant child, our Creator gave the brain a set of fuses to protect it from torture … these fuses set the limits to pain and then … the fuses are blown … the infant child’s brain goes into deep shock. The child’s consciousness goes elsewhere. It was when that government psychiatrists (also proven psychopaths and unconvicted serial child sexual mutilators), heros of experimental psychiatry, like Dr. Mengele, realized that when the child’s mind goes into deep shock like that, that is precisely the best time to “imprint” a new controllable personality within the child’s pre-formative personality, making full use of its deep limbic preformative encoding for self preservation … that by combining modern medical technology and surgical equipment, with ancient technology of Jewish torture-mutilation (voodoo), the a new neurochemistry for an alternate personality could be forced into being. The neurochemistry of the ideal corporate psychopath, the ideal killer-soldier psychopath, the ideal zombie-slave could be forced into being, out of the uterus of a mother, by genito-sexual torture mutilation and later also surgical medical rape, of the frightened and confused, but trusting, infant child. This is when the modern fascist form of psychiatry was born. This is when the ancient Jewish voodoo was revived as the new technology of medical fascism.

    By having proved themselves to be serial, sexual mutilators of infant children, the American MDs have proved themselves to lack empathy for all humanity. They work for a Wall St.-financed hospital system, that operates under the medical protocols of national security, as defined (in backroom dealings?) by the Learned Elders of MKULTRA and Wall St. medicine. Every father should sit down with his wife and their children, and spend a nice evening, perhaps after carving a nice turkey, and listen to the screams of innocence that emit from these goyem children, while they are being torture mutilated in the sound-proofed, double-doored, gaurded by armed guards, secret (closed to public) basements of American hospitals, where the infant children of the goyem mothers are torture mutilated. The father can explain how, when the child’s abdominal muscles try to squeeze the last bubble of air out of their blood, to have something left to scream STOP! with, the abdominal muscle literally tears itself away from its attachement points to the pelvic bone, causing strain and later hernias. Dismiss it as an irelevant side effect for the necessity of this ancient form of Jewish torture voodoo, and modern mass implementation of MKULTRA torture mutilation. Dr. Mengele should be so proud. Then explain the gastric rupture, and the later colic and digestive failure. Again, dismiss it as, just a side effect. By the protocols of medical fascism, each Pentagon hospital must turn out its quota of genitally mutilated, neurologically traumatized babies. This is torture voodoo applied to infants, using the crudest of surgical tools, like hemostats and claims.

    What was that Jewish mantra again … by betrayals of trust, we shall wage wars, and more wars, and endless wars. And what trust could be more vital to betray, at deep limbic levels, than the trust extended by a helpless infant child for its mother? Yet, the first surgical assignments given to freshman surgeons by the JEWISH appointed deans of the Wall St.-financed internship hospitals, is this violence shock trauma waged against the empathic nerve systems of the infant children of the goyem. (They use different methods and tools when they circumcise their own … that is, if they circumcise those of their own who are not designated for soldiery or corporate slavery!) And lo! behold! should any freshman wannabe-MD balk at this first assigned task, should any such arrogant freshman intern dare to question the appropriateness of inflicting this ancient form of mind-altering Jewish voodoo, advanced to the technology of MKULTRA, on an innocent infant child … this violent painful neurochemical alteration of the pathways of empathy in the child’s left vagal nerve trunk (just listen to the audiotapes of the screams … you can hear the neurochemical change when the fuses in the child’s mind blow, and its mind goes into protective hiding, at about 3 minutes into the pain of the torture mutilation ceremony), which connect the band of nerves (ridged band of nerves tied to the frenulum, the marital band that “cleaves” to a similar band of vagal nerves in the female, connecting her heart to her cervix, the cleaving forming the marriage of the two vagus nerve systems, connecting the hearts and limbic minds of the two celebrants; and, let us not forget the olefactory nerves in the ridged band, which after 350 million years of successful evolution one has to conclude connect with the limbic parts of the brain so as to offer some kind a deep intuitive sense of olefactory intelligence, such as safe or unsafe, clean or unclean, known or unknown, yikes!) and the glans (an internal organ normally covered and protected except during healthy marital relations) to the heart and the limbic mind…. the Jew-appointed dean of that internship hospital will politely inform the freshman student that he or she is not morally qualified to be a surgeon, because he or she has shown “too much empathy with the patient.” The Jew-appointed deans of Wall St.-financed internship hospitals have a duty to weed out the freshman interns (i.e. to promote the obedient torture-mutilator psychopaths, i.e. future MDs, from the human sympathizers). And, because this freshman is guilty of showing empathy and reason, and of challenging a direct order to inflict grievous and unnecessary neurochemical shock-trauma and violence and religious MKULTRA voodoo, while ignoring screams of abject terror by an utterly innocent child, the Jew-appointed dean will politely suggest to the empathic surgeon-wannabe might be better off pursuing a career in pharmaceutical sales.

    Like the Jews say, By all forms of sexual perversions, and by betrayals of all forms of trust, we shall wage war on … To give their neurotic desires the name of deception, would be the highest form of deception itself.

  106. Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
    January 26, 2013 - 10:22 pm | Permalink

    Do you have a source for the Moses M paraphrase?
    He also said,
    “It is hard for a woman with whom an uncircumcised man has had sexual intercourse to separate from him. In my opinion this is the strongest of the reasons for circumcision.” You beleive that as well?
    Doctors also used to believe in blood letting and trepanning – its all just ancient BS, including the crap about circumcision.

  107. Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
    January 26, 2013 - 9:53 pm | Permalink


    The skin of the penis is innervated by the dorsal nerve which is easily blocked.

  108. Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
    January 26, 2013 - 9:45 pm | Permalink


    That’s funny, I witnessed quite a few circumcisions as a resident and never saw any evidence of pain (not even with the local though I’m sure its possible). But hey, we all need a bogey man.

  109. molecule's Gravatar molecule
    January 26, 2013 - 2:31 pm | Permalink

    @Brahms … I don’t want to hijack the thread beyond making the important and now scientifically proven connection between early for formative neurochemical imprinting designed to produce a neurotic predisposals to violence (all forms, including sexual) or if sublimated, perversion, and genital torture mutilation of an infant child. Too many studies prove the connections. Links below. Also, there is no possible way to anethetize infant genital mutilation by tearing off the foreskin. The 70,000 nerves (10x what’s under a fingernail) in the marital band of the infant foreskin are directly connected to the deepest nerve system in the body. The left and right trunks of the vagus nerve system are the core nerves that first build the body. The central nerve system evolves later with formation of the spine. The nerve bundle in the foreskin is directly connected to the heart and innermost parts of the child’s brain. They are limbic and formative. Their violent removal alters the neurochemical (freezing it), and thwarts later development development of empathy. (links in references below) The child’s foreskin is attached 360° like a fingernail, and removal is necessarily violent and bloody, using Implements normally used to torture adult prisoners of war. There is now scientific verification to the claim of Moses Maimonades, famous Rabbi RamBam, who said in 12th C, “There’s a reason that we circumcise our soldiers and our slaves. Unable to keep their wives, their families will be unable to accumulate wealth, and they will become wards of the rabbinical state.” [sorry, it’s a grossly oversimplified quote. his actual language is MUCH grosser and more explicit.]

    There is no possible anesthesia for the inner vagus nerve system. except general anesthesia, for which the hearts and lungs of infant children are not strong enough. Claims of successful topical anesthesia are “other” motivated. Cortisol levels in the infant child’s limbic brain (amygdala) peak at 1.5 times baseline … at this point the child suddenly stops screaming, its body goes into deep shock, and its little brain blacks out. In spite of assurances from “doctor” the heart of every mother who has had her child returned to her in this state knows its wrong. It can take 2 to 6 months for the child’s body to dissolve and digest the cortisol levels. The memory is a neurochemical preverbal one. An adult soldier who gets his legs just blown off in Afghanistan has cortisol levels rise to 1.2 over baseline. Their immune systems are much stronger, but it can still take a while to dissolve the cortisols, sometimes known as the hormone of death.
    for starters– search for research report by Dr. Paul M. Fleiss, MD, on Also links, and audio archives and research report, A Human Rights Primer by Rich Winkel on

    The bottom line is that whenever trauma is inflicted to the innermost organs of an infant child, or of an adult soldier, the energies of those traumas are not instantly forgotton. They remain “hidden” in the body, and are unseen. until … the trauma (energy) begins to “act out” in a natural effort to seek healing. As the trauma begins to “act out” it can appear as sexual violence, or sexual perversion. Even the poet and beloved rabbi, Rabbi RamBam Moses Maimonades knew this and wrote about it. see zip archives on thoughtcrimeradio blogspot for reference.

  110. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    January 26, 2013 - 12:34 am | Permalink


    The vast majority of nonjewish babies are most certainly not given any anesthesia, local or otherwise, for circumcision. The pain has been measured and found to be consistent with the official definition of torture. So, some doctors then decided to give a needle, which injection is itself painful. The result? The pain was reduced by 1/3. What is 2/3 of torture, you halfwit?

  111. Edgar's Gravatar Edgar
    January 24, 2013 - 6:33 pm | Permalink

    My life was nearly ruined by these filthy scum and the vileness that they have normalized.

  112. Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
    January 24, 2013 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Molecule et al
    What is this nonsense about genital mutilation (circumcision) and sexual deviancy? Millions of Catholics, including myself, are circumcised. Circumcision, at least among Catholics, is a painless procedure via regional anesthesia. I admit, its a completely senseless and stupid thing to do but it causes no deviancy, I assure you. Now, a mohel uses no anesthetic (or hemostasis as they require blood loss for the ritual) – so you may want to update your theory a bit.
    The early Zionists were anti-circumcision and they were anti-assimilation (which is why they went to Israel if anybody’s listening). The were basically anti-everything that those here on TOO complain about (as I’ve tried to explain before) but I guess its easier to go the white nationalist route and consider all Jews the same. Are Zionists our friends? No, but we must understand the difference between World Jewry and Zionism; Hitler did.

  113. frank's Gravatar frank
    January 18, 2013 - 11:04 am | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    I disagree (although I don’t drink myself)—I think blogging and alcohol may be, in fact, a divine combination. Now let’s get to work formulating a verb (or noun) for this combo, shall we? “Blinking” is taken. “Blonking”? “Bloggo”? “Blogoholic”?

    Anyway, it’s refreshing to hear from one who is self-effacing and erudite, etc. and all them good things. Bless ye.

  114. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 18, 2013 - 1:25 am | Permalink

    @fender: Accurate and correct. Here is some damning supporting evidence from the Judaeo-United Kingdom:–regret-rest-lives-Thousands-women-using-new-NHS-device-banish-fear-pregnancy.html

    [N.B. Linked page may take some time to open. Daily Mail server is totally clogged with feminist and feminizing junk.]

  115. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    January 17, 2013 - 9:51 pm | Permalink

    “The rootless Jews who dominate Hollywood and, as a result, American culture as a whole, have defined themselves, in Dresner’s words, as “despoilers of morality and corrupters of culture.”

    I’ve mentioned something before, and want to bring it up again.

    And that is…

    There seems to be a movement (on the internet) with the goal of shifting blame from Jews to “Zionists”.

    This is very popular among Alex Jones’s fans and commenters under other alternative news sources. I often see comments such as “Get your facts straight — 99% of Jews are just like you and me. Zionists are the problem. Not Jews.”

    They point out that many Zionists aren’t Jews and many (or most) Jews aren’t Zionists. That’s what they say.

    I wonder if there is an organized movement devoted to writing those pro-Jew / anti-Zionist comments.

  116. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    January 17, 2013 - 9:45 pm | Permalink


    I think it’s past your bedtime Cheech.

    Now how about looking for that job?

  117. January 17, 2013 - 7:36 pm | Permalink


    The Best of Attack and National Vanguard Tabloid
    Ref: Issue No. 6, 1971


    History Rewritten

    Our encyclopedias and history books have been purged and rewritten. If you look up Portugal in the 1970 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, you will not find anything about the role of the Negroes and Jews in the history of Portugal, or anything about the decline and fall of Portugal. […]

    The Negroes have been eliminated entirely. They are not listed with the other ethnic groups in the ancestry of the Portuguese people. In the entire 15-page article, there is no clue that Negroes were ever present in Portugal or that they had any role or influence in Portuguese history. […]

    The 1964 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica still briefly lists the Negroes and Jews, along with others, as Portuguese racial elements, but with no details or elaborations. By 1966, the Negroes have vanished completely.

    Now, what has happened between 1911 and 1966 that makes us purge and rewrite history in such a way? […]

    In terms of rewriting and deliberately falsifying history, we are much closer to Orwell’s 1984 than the Soviet Union ever was. Big Brother protects us from dangerous knowledge.

    There is a great need for the American people to know what happened in Portugal in the 16th century, for we are repeating their experience. We are in the same predicament, at the same juncture, at the same crossroads in history. There is an amazing similarity between our situation today and Portugal’s in the 1500’s. Shall we take the same road?

    Travelers from other European countries were amazed to see so many Negroes in 16th-century Lisbon, as are travelers today in Washington, D.C. Our own capital is a large percentage Black, and, as was the case in Lisbon, the Negroes do all the manual labor and service jobs. […]

    It is too late to save the White Aryan people of Portugal, but we must save ourselves.

  118. January 17, 2013 - 7:24 pm | Permalink


    I don’t buy it. Take a look at the Annals of Human Genetics, 2000, vol. 64 (6), pp. 491-506: an article written by Portuguese scientists:

    “Black African trade slaves could have been the mediator of most of the L. sequence inputs, while the population movement associated with the Muslim rule of Iberia has predominately introduced U6 lineages.”

  119. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 17, 2013 - 6:40 pm | Permalink

    This is an area which I have been interested for years. You are very confused.

  120. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    January 17, 2013 - 6:00 pm | Permalink


    “”Many Portuguese males were leaving the country for the colonies, for Brasil especially, and the population of the nation dwindled to 1.5 million. A labour force was needed to work the farms, and since black Africans had begun to be imported in 1441 as domestic servants, this influx continued in numbers such that by 1550, the towns of Evora and Lisbon had a 10-percent black population. This lot of African slaves was not a happy one, and the black females were not afforded the same protection as the white slaves obtained through earlier conquests were. Consequently, young mestiço girls of mixed descent became prized as mistresses, though not necessarily as wives.
    “The mortality rate amongst the slaves was high, as they were not afforded proper medical attention. A large number, since they were already familiar with Portuguese culture and the language, were subsequently deported to Brasil, where their presence was needed far more than in Portugal itself. Manumission was possible, and many chose to flee the country upon being freed. However, a portion did remain in Portugal, and miscegenation meant that within a dozen or so generations, a considerable number of the 35,000 black Africans who had once lived in Portugal were blended into the mainstream of the Portuguese population. This sort of thing was not peculiar to Portugal alone; in fact, it occurred in nearly all of the slave-owning European nations, including Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Britain. The percentage of blacks was highest for Portugal, but the actual numerical figure was higher for Britain. However, in no nation in Europe (including Portugal) was the absorption of blacks significant enough to change the ethnography of the country.”—Ferreira, João. The History of Portugal.

    “”The influence of the Negroes, however, has been grossly exaggerated, with figures such as ‘100,000 in the sixteenth century’ or ’10 percent of the nation’s population in the year 1600′ being severely inflated. What can be truthfully said is that during the slave trade, a few tens of thousands of Negroes were brought to the metropolis of Lisboa. From there many were shipped to Brasil or to other European countries. Those who remained in Portugal were either sold to wealthy city-dwelling Portuguese, or distributed to the owners of large plantations in the south to provide farm labour, where almost all who survived eventually were absorbed by the population, leaving no trace whatever … Lisboa has been a magnet for Negroes from the colonies as well, and Negroid features seen in a few seemingly Caucasoid individuals are certainly the result of miscegenation between colonial Negroes and the Portuguese; these traits are not present in the native Portuguese population”—Machado, Carlos. My Portugal.

    “”Non-Mediterranean elements in the Portuguese population are rare and of little importance. A few Nordics are scattered throughout but are particularly concentrated in the north. Traces of Dinaric blood, as we have already seen, may likewise be found on the northern coast. … On the whole, the absorption of Negroes by the Portuguese has had no appreciable effect on the racial composition of the country. Portugal remains, as it has been since the days of the Muge shell-fish eaters, classic Mediterranean territory.”—Coon, Carleton S. The Races of Europe.

    “In a sample of 542 Portuguese people from all over the country, sub-Saharan mtDNA L sequences were detected at a frequency of ~5% (2.2 in the North, 4.3 in the Center, and 8.6 in the South). This gives the Portuguese an estimated total of 2.5% Negroid ancestry, which ranges from a comparatively large, but not racially significant, 4.3% in the South to a mere 1.1% in the North.”—González. Mitochondrial DNA Affinities at the Atlantic Fringe of Europe

    “In a sample of 328 Northern and 57 Southern Portuguese, no Y-chromosomes of sub-Saharan African origin were detected. Another study found 3 E(xE3b) sequences in a sample of 99 Portuguese, evenly divided between Northerners and Southerners. The estimated grand total of Negroid paternal admixture in Portugal is therefore 0.6%.”—Cruciani et al. (2004) Phylogeographic Analysis of Haplogroup E3b (E-M215) Y Chromosomes Reveals Multiple Migratory Events Within and Out of Africa. Rosser et al. (2000) Y-Chromosomal Diversity in Europe Is Clinal and Influenced Primarily by Geography, Rather than by Language.

  121. January 17, 2013 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Further quotes about what I said way above. Keep in mind that the Portuguese did it to themselves while at the same time being very Jew-wise, with the Inquisition making a good job not only on Jews but on crypto-Jews as well. This alone demonstrates that besides the JP we got other serious problems as well. Kemp wrote:

    “The contrast with the situation in Portugal immediately springs to mind: in that European country only about ten percent of the population was Black, yet in America at its very founding, the figure was already 20 percent: why did Portugal vanish as a world power and America then go on to become a great world power?

    The answer lies in the level of integration: in Portugal there was absolutely no segregation and mixed race unions were positively encouraged. In America, not only did the huge degree of racial alienation exist—but as a result integration was actively discouraged and, in many states, made punishable with prison sentences (many of these anti-miscegenation laws were only repealed in the 1960s).”

    Pierre, Pat, Alice et al: I blame Christian axiology for this. What would you blame for that Iberian “sin against the holy ghost”?

  122. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 17, 2013 - 1:33 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: The best lessons all come from discerning the universal within the personal.

    As for alcohol, its wonderful effects—OK, its lousy after-effects, too—never profit from mixture with anything, except maybe a handful of ibuprofen capsules.

  123. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    January 17, 2013 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Molecule, you have some good ideas. Especially your denunciation of infant genital mutilation. And conceiving and birthing in the same bed.

  124. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 17, 2013 - 12:33 pm | Permalink


    Rabbinic Judaism has completely deviated from the religion Jesus practiced 2,000 years ago. The adoption by orthodox Jews of the Talmud and the Zohar alone would guarantee that.

    Felix, I don’t wish to offend but you have much of your above comment (from which I quote) “back to front” or upside down.

    Jesus did NOT practise a religion. He simply set a good example, which was to be formulated and promulgated by his Disciples. Christianity did not come into existence until about 350 years AFTER the life of Christ, and even then under the auspices of a Roman Emperor.

    “Rabbinic Judaism” did not exist 2,000 years ago. It was then known as Pharisaism.

    The horse comes before the cart; does it not?

    Therefore, Orthodox Jewry was created by the teachings and examples found in the Talmud. Meaning they didn’t deviate from anything. It was the Talmud that came first. Before the Talmud, Pharisaism was maintained by the “Oral Tradition”. In other words, the Talmud encourages/creates Orthodoxy.

    As a statement, The adoption by orthodox Jews of the Talmud and the Zohar is quite misleading. Talmudists do not necessarily adopt or follow the Zohar. And equally, the Zohar can be followed without reference to the Talmud. For example, the pop-superstar Madonna has taken a great interest in the Zohar, but she does not (as far as I know) follow the Talmud.

    I hope this short missive clarifies.

  125. Michel's Gravatar Michel
    January 17, 2013 - 12:31 pm | Permalink

    A book relating to what is going on.-

    The Last Crusader – Isabella of Spain – by William Thomas Walsh – 1451- 1504 a catholic perspective –

    The book show that Spain in the 15 century was at war with muslims on its territory but at the same time prisoner of a powerful internal jewish grip – powerful crypto-jew nobles had a grip on the country – Isabella and Ferdinand had to use a special inquisition – a Royal Inquisistion – since even the catholic church was infltrated by crypto-jew up the Bishop Level. The crypto-jew – marranos – were so powerful that they though they were untouchable –

  126. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 17, 2013 - 12:18 pm | Permalink

    @Astraea Shaw:

    That even the psalms are almost verbatim taken from the hymns of ancient Egypt.

    Actually, the archaeological source is the Ancient Egyptian “Book of the Dead”.

  127. molecule's Gravatar molecule
    January 17, 2013 - 11:17 am | Permalink

    @tina … RIGHT ON! quote: “…Sex certainly ain’t fun.” Nor it is “for fun.” Especially not for the pornographic “fun” of the deeply misogynist Jews. Spontaneity is no substitute for joy. Even if in marriage, spontaneity can never be used as a smokescreen for denigration or disrespect of the deep internal desire of the female to express personal fulfillment by contribution to an upward evolution of consciousness. Toward that end, the healthy female has an innate and spontaneous power of judgment as to good and evil. Without that innate sense of good from evil, upward evolution of mankind cannot happen. The misogynists (Jews, Christians, …) are furiously jealous of that feminine innocence and power.

    What has happens to the feminine principles of innocence, modesty, chastity, cleanliness, …, when men cease to respect their powers and innate sense of duty as regards upward evolution of consciousness? What has happened to the men? Where have they gone to? Where are the fathers, grandfathers, uncles, brothers, boyfriends, husbands? Brainwashed by the deep misogyny and other moral atrocities within the OT, NT and the Talmud, men have devolved into cowards, liars, murderers, … child molestors (priests), serial child mutilators (doctors), cheats and equivocators (police, politicians and lawyers), quick buck/fast fuck hucksters (Marxists, Fascists, Wall St corporatists,), … When men are reduced to ejaculation machines, the hope for future upward evolution of consciousness is dissolved. Women alone represent that hope, since they alone control the uterus through which consciousness comes into this world. Without protection, the principle of innocence has no meaning, and Jewish existentialism becomes the so-called rule of law.

    quote “… Imagine how many people get filmed masturbating in front of a camera on the Internet.” Imagine the fear and loneliness that must have overtaken each of the MILLIONS of young healthy beautiful females who are drawn into the Jewish porn industry, for sake of money to feed their children? Where are their men? Where are their brothers? their boyfriends? Healthy young women are reduced to seeking validation and acceptance, and protection, by “working” for a Jewish pimps, jewish bedwetters, jewish gynocological photographers, … Imagine the depravity of the Jew (coward) who takes advantage of the fear and loneliness of a young female?

    Even worse, imagine the chastity and innocence and purity of a female who tries to join spiritually with (i.e. marry) with a male partner whose confused mind is trying to focus on immitating the Jewish/ Marxist/ Fascist idea that sexual relations are all about popping off another load? Not only is that spiritual disconnection selfish … it is misogyny. It is downward evolution of consciousness, which is exactly opposite to the innate desire of the female.

    The evolution of consciousness has fallen tino some deep deep shit right now. I don’t think women can count on men to figure this one out.

    I don’t know where you’re going to find the courage as a group, but it’s going to have to be a change in women that stops this Jewish downward evolution of mankind and consciousness.

    I wonder if Lasha Darkmoon is functioning as an apologist for Jewish amorality and depravity. They are serial child sexual MUtilators, and they are proud of it. Genital mutilation of an infant child is like abortion. It’s actual target is freezing heart of the young mother so that by guilt she remains under rabbinical control for the rest of her life. (Contrary to rabbinical teaching, genital torture mutilation of infant children is not the natural desire of a mother’s feminine heart …) Impression of false guilt is also like impression of false debts. It’s another Jewish misogynist trick.

    I don’t know how you are going to figure it out, how to make a men out of a cowards. Teach your sisters and daughters how to build a stove that cooks with red flame, and how to prepare a meal that makes men morally stronger. Teach your sisters and daugthers to never even thing of conceiving new consciousness, except that you are in the VERY SAME IDENTICAL bed in which you intend to birth the child. To the female body, conception and birthing are not separate events. If you think sex is not fun any more (and sex with a misogynist male is not fun) how about the deep misogyny of our Jewish controlled hospitals and medical system? Talk about not fun…! Home birthing and home schooling and home nurturing and protection of children from Jewish voodoo and demonology is your only choice for fulfillment of desire to participate in upward evolution of consciousness.

  128. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 17, 2013 - 3:39 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Ha, I meant that as a personal note about myself, as I have a tendency to get carried away at times, especially if it’s late and I’m tired and emotional.

    Blogging and alcohol definitely should not be mixed.

  129. tina's Gravatar tina
    January 17, 2013 - 2:29 am | Permalink

    I cannot help but wonder, how many people will be turned off, when certain groups or individuals use their power to degenerate humanity.

    Imagine, of all this modern technology would have been used for the bettering of the planet.

    Sex certainly ain’t fun. Imagine how many people get filmed masturbating in front of a camera on the Internet. Some of these people maybe watching you years later and it can be used against you if you run public office. Certainly, with sexualities easy and irresponsible ways, you can also give your power away to an illusion which is less than fulfilling.

    The type of sex which is promoted these days is for people whi do not know how to truly love.

    What a turn off that any group would determine our sexual life and we allow it.
    If people would know this, the porn industries profits would be cut in half.

    Isn’t it practical to rob the people of their life force so they can’t bring the changes to the society which we urgently need to survive the coming trends?

    All of this will weaken our resolve and good intention for a better life in planet earth. Yes, people have surely the right to explore what works for them and what does not work for them but if these explorations are exploited, then we have a problem. We are being manipulated and we do not explore life and share our discoveries with trust. With ongoing exploitative pressures, especially upon women to perform, we are unable to cultivate a rich life filled with true love.

    We must never forget that we are spiritual beings. We habe a body to used it for the physical, mental and spiritual unfolding of our potential and nature. Any type if exploitation is against the family affair we all have with the universe and with all life. Imagine, we are a family, ready to evolve, share fearlessly what works and what not. What are our true needs? Why are we here?

    We are not here to be a slave. We are here to become “____________”

  130. Molly's Gravatar Molly
    January 17, 2013 - 12:19 am | Permalink

    Orthodox Rabbi Daniel Lapin also blamed Jews for coarsening American culture in a piece he wrote for Jewish Press Online which appeared January 19, 2005. Rabbi Lapin cited Leonard Peikoff’s book The Ominous Parallels in which Peikoff described how Germany’s cultural decline helped bring the National Socialists to power. Lapin wrote:

    Not once in Mein Kampf did Hitler charge Jews with being complicit in the killing of Jesus…. Instead, he drew attention to the inescapable fact that through Jewish actors, playwrights and producers, the Berlin stage of Weimar Germany linked Jews and homosexuality in all its sordid manifestations just as surely as Broadway does today….Indeed, much of the filth in American entertainment today parallels that of Germany between the world wars.

    Of course, the National Socialists’ anger regarding Jewish debasement of German culture was not limited to their role in promoting homosexuality by means of plays and films. Joseph Goebbels was responsible for a film, Der Ewige Jude (1940), that discussed more of their concerns:

    Jews are most dangerous when they meddle in a people’s culture, religion and art, and pass their insolent judgment on it. The Nordic concept of beauty is completely incomprehensible to the Jew and always will be. The rootless Jew has no feeling for the purity and neatness of the German idea of art.

    What he calls art must titillate his degenerate nerves. A smell of fungus and disease must pervade it; art must be unnatural, grotesque, perverted, or pathological. These pictures [shown in the film], fevered fantasies of incurably sick minds, were once extolled by Jewish art critics as outstanding. These days we find it hard to believe such pieces were once purchased by every state and city gallery. Jewish art dealers and Jewish artists extolled them as the only true modern works of art. German cultural life was niggerized and bastardized – painting, architecture, literature and music—all suffered in the same way. For more than a decade Jews wielded their pernicious power: as art dealers, music publishers, editors and critics. They decided what should be art and culture in Germany.

  131. NeoconsNailed's Gravatar NeoconsNailed
    January 16, 2013 - 11:52 pm | Permalink

    I’ll cut to the chase like nobody else: Jews are the AIDS virus in any body politic. They howl to be let in because it’s cruel to exclude them from the good life (e.g. in the USA), but once the gates are opened to them they rush in and immediately start smashing everything until thrown out — case closed. Actually the AIDS virus was never so diabolically clever, so arrogant, so grating, and so protean as these monsters, so I don’t know what would make a better comparison.

  132. john thames's Gravatar john thames
    January 16, 2013 - 11:37 pm | Permalink


    The first Sherlock Holmes movie starring Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce was “The Voice of Terror”. Although few people know it, the movie should more aptly be called “The Voice of Communism”. A little historical background is necessary to understand the plot of the movie. After the First World War a great many Englishmen came to the conclusion that Germany had been unfairly treated under the Treaty of Versailles. This view point was particularly prevalent among the English upper classes. Examples of this kind of thinking would be the immensely wealthy Lord Londonderry and the heir to the English throne, the Duke of Windsor. These Englishmen made contacts with the Nazi government in Berlin and attempted to influence England into accommodation with Hitler’s Germany. The plot of “The Voice of Terror” has an anonymous highly placed Englishman portrayed as a Nazi agent making pro-German propaganda speeches over English radio. His Majesty’s Government solicits the famous detective to ferret out and identify the traitor. Holmes accepts the assignment and decides that the method to track down the traitor is to descend into the English underworld (the “proletariat”) and enlist their help. This is the elimination of class distinction in the pursuit of a common end. When the traitor is unmasked Holmes becomes a hero to the lower orders. The English upper class is exposed as virtual traitors. Holmes ends the movie by telling his uncomprehending Dr. Watson (the English middle classes personified, obviously) that “a new wind is blowing from the east” (Communism) that will reform everything in a “much improved world”. When Nigel Bruce obviously does not get it, Holmes chuckles, good naturedly, “dear old Watson”. The movie fades, implying that progress will come, with a hammer and sickle, regardless of social obtuseness.
    “The Voice of Terror” is a most enjoyable movie. The story is engaging and holds the viewer’s interest. But it is, nevertheless, pure political propaganda based on the political realities of the time. It employs the familiar Communist-Zionist techniques of taking key historical and literary figures and manipulating them in desired directions. Another example would be a forgotten play by Communist screenwriter Dalton Trumbo called “The Remarkable Andrew”. In this one, written during the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact when it was official Communist policy to keep the U.S. out of the war, Trumbo’s protagonist, General Andrew Jackson, gives a long soliloquy on why the U.S. should not intervene. Tarnation, thunders the general, why should we fight on the side of the same blasted English we had gunned down at New Orleans? That made no sense at all, as the “remarkably patriotic” general summed up his conclusions. Naturally, the “remarkably Communist” Trumbo changed his tune as soon as Hitler invaded Russia.
    It would be idle to multiply examples. This is how Communism in the movies and the theater works. As in the “ex-Communist” Sidney Lumet’s “Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead” one can almost see the hammer and sickle pulling Marisa Tomei’s hair as she takes it doggy style in the movies opening scene.

  133. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 16, 2013 - 10:48 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: Bless you for the inadvertent reminder that I too should resist this temptation (as should we all, I suspect)! The homely saw that we have two eyes, two ears, and one mouth to correspond with appropriate levels of indulgence in seeing, hearing, and talking is something not to lose sight of. Unfortunately, I’m not quite sure how to respond to someone who’d choose to point out to me that we have ten fingers!

  134. frank's Gravatar frank
    January 16, 2013 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

    Although this post may appear a tad off-topic, considering the academic and religious trend of the later posts, I nonetheless feel that it is illuminating about Jews, American culuture, WASP history, etc. First, when I was going to a secondary school south of Boston, we used to go to a place called Mattapan. It was almost 100% Jewish, and elderly shopkeepers were very wary of floods of teen-agers thumbing through their magazine racks. The attractions of these periodical “libraries”, was, of course pornographic magazines. These paradigmatic Jewish shop-keepers were exceedingly eager to sell these magazines, cigarettes and other items to us. This was the early 60’s, so the cigarettes were okay, and they didn’t bat an eye when they viewed our selections of porn-mags.

    When we strode around the streets of Haifa West, nary a Negro nor a WASP seemed visible. Then, a few years later, when the utterly-dependable imbeciles of the Massachusetts electorate started electing Ted Kennedy and Jewish or Liberal cohorts, things started to change. “Block-busting” was introduced legislatively. It was, as you all know, a method whereby liberals, squealing with delight, would subsidize the insertion of Negroes into areas which were previously out of their price-range. The obvious and inevitable consequeces always followed: drug-use, gun-violence, prostitution, and rampant crime. This was always fine to the Jews….UNTIL it turned against its masters. NIMBY arose and was swatted aside. While many were distracted by “forced” bussing, the (largely-Jewish) block-busters went to work on Mattapan!

    The stampede of Jews out of that suburban town was astonishing in its rapidity and permanence. The station-wagons with their Jew-Haul-its looked like the Winternational Drag-races! Mattapan is now a nearly-total “chocolate” community (w/ no apologies to “Schoolbus” Nagen). It now looks like a cross between Haiti and Nairobi. The Jews fell back into “their” enclaves of Cambridge, Brookline and Roxbury and went immediately to work on pricing their real-estate out of the reach of even the best Massachusetts attempts to insert “minorities” into their midst. Presently, Jews rightly fear Gov. Deval Patrick, because this Napoleon-sized Socialist is Hell-bent to re-impose Negroes all over the suburban map. White flight from black-infested schools (bussing, etc.) was a simple WASP diaspora. Jewish flight is into enclaves of towering real-estate valuations or other impediments to goy- or black invasion.

    I have always howled with laughter at Liberals’ hypocrisy, but nothing in that vein even approaches that of the Jews.

    I used to ask my mother why my Jewish classmates and (dare I say it?) friends were so neurotic. Her answer was “angst born of guilt”. How right she was.

  135. January 16, 2013 - 8:35 pm | Permalink


    Read William Pierce’s history on the white race instead if you like: he reaches to similar conclusions. Or is Pierce’s study also “a joke”?

  136. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    January 16, 2013 - 8:25 pm | Permalink


    I have not read the whole thing, but I have read substantial portions of it (on line).

    It’s a joke.

  137. Freki's Gravatar Freki
    January 16, 2013 - 8:25 pm | Permalink


    Instead a whole new theory is brought in without any attempt to root it in some actual data. […] That’s what drives me crazy. Lots of people have the idea that their ideas are as good as anyone else’s; evidence is irrelevant.

    I’m sorry if it drives you crazy, but that’s life. You make up a theory, e.g. on Jewish behavior, then you produce the data to fit in (“evidence”, as professors like to call it). Those on “the other side” of the debate, also have their “facts” and “truths” based on “evidence” (data). You have yours. OK?

  138. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 16, 2013 - 8:23 pm | Permalink

    @Tim: Thanks for that informative summary.

  139. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    January 16, 2013 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

    Maybe thy usual suss-pects were behind these dysgenics. [“Kill the best gentiles”]

  140. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 16, 2013 - 7:59 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Thanks for your kind words M. Craon, and also to Bobby above.

    Occidental Observer is a daily read of mine, the essays as well as the comment threads, so I haven’t been away as such, just resisting the urge to comment.

  141. January 16, 2013 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

    @Dark Henry:

    And here’s another quote from the same source, this time about the dark ages that you mention:

    “Racial effects of the age of theocracy

    ”The spread of Christianity unquestionably affected the growth of the European peoples: particularly in the policy, still held in the Catholic Church to this day, of celibacy for leading church officials.

    ”Although this policy of enforced celibacy amongst the priesthood, monks and nuns only ever applied to a relatively small number of Whites, it was nonetheless often the most intelligent members of society who became monks or nuns. This was so because during the Dark Ages, only the cleverest candidates were allowed to enter the priesthood: as the keepers of the arts and writing, the only way to gain any sort of education was to join the priesthood.

    ”Although there can be little doubt that, given human nature, the celibacy rule was broken, it must also be so that the policy of deliberate celibacy saw many thousands of Europe’s cleverest people dying childless, their genes lost forever. The persecution of these great minds with the accusation of paganism also unquestionably stripped Europe of many of its cleverest people: the cumulative effect of the Dark Ages was to set Europe back centuries in development.”

  142. January 16, 2013 - 7:11 pm | Permalink

    @Dark Henry:

    That author wrote about the Inquisition right after mentioning Giordano Bruno—not Jews. In other chapters he said this about the Inquisition:

    “When Spain was finally liberated from the non-White Moors, the long suppressed anti-Jewish sentiment broke out in full fury. In that year all unbaptized Jews were expelled en masse from Spain, and the … Spanish Inquisition, set up to enforce Christendom, was used to persecute Jews, who, because of their collaboration with the Moors, were regarded as the implacable enemies of White Spain.”


    ”Spain’s Golden Age

    ”After the expulsion of the Moors and the Jews, Spain entered its Golden Age. It created a huge empire, and along with Portugal, became one of the most powerful nations in Europe. Unfortunately for Spain and Portugal, both countries declined soon afterwards due to a change in their population make-up, as detailed in the previous chapter” (i.e., as a result of the interbreeding with non-whites that the Church allowed).

    I also agree with what KMD says about the Inquisition in his second trilogy study on Jewry.

  143. January 16, 2013 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

    It seems that there has always been someone or something that will try to put a stumbling block in our path. It could be a person, a group of persons or nature itself. At the moment it is this media borne cosmopolitan immorality. This is the way of growth and advancement. In the past, think Ice Ages, we had to find ways of growing food & preserving it, making clothes to keep us warm and shelters to protect us from the elements. Those that could not do this – died off. This period is no different. Those that are intelligent enough to go through this time will populate the future the others will be gone, as they should be. Reason, logic and eugenics must govern the path that lies ahead of us. Please read the article below.
    Chinese Eugenics
    Jack’s War

  144. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    January 16, 2013 - 6:50 pm | Permalink


    “If only Americans knew, we are bringing them the plague!” — Sigmund Freud

    This, too, is quoted all over the place. The best exposition I have ever read on this quote has come from a poster on the Occidental Observer called “Dan” who wrote this well over a year ago. I copy and paste his long comment verbatim because it is very valuable:

    Dan says:
    October 9, 2010 at 9:00 PM

    Lasha, the “plague” quote attributed to Dr. Freud (upon his arrival in New York Harbor, aboard the SS George Washington, on Sunday, August 29, 1909) itself first arrived in print (albeit in French) in 1956, as far as I have yet discovered, in a Jacques Lacan article in L’Evolution Psychiatrique (Volume 16, Number 2, pp. 225-252). Ten years later, it became a chapter in a Lacan collection entitled “Ecrits”– which has subsequently been published in English (including a 2006 translation by Bruce Fink that is subtitled “The First Complete Edition in English”). In English, the article-chapter is entitled “The Freudian Thing, or The Meaning of the Return to Freud in Psychoanalysis” (per Fink). Its subtitle states that it is an expanded version of a lecture given at the Vienna Neuropsychiatric Clinic on November 7, 1955.

    Lacan’s alleged source for the quote was Freud’s own “apostle to the gentiles,” so as to speak, Dr. Carl Jung, who was traveling with Freud on his sole trip to America. According to “The Cambridge Companion to Lacan” (by Jean-Michel Rabate), Lacan had visited Dr. Jung in Kussnacht, Switzerland, near Zurich, sometime during 1954. (Jung died in 1961, twenty years before Lacan’s own death.) Here is the passage in “Ecrits” (as translated into English by Bruce Fink):

    “Thus Freud’s comment to Jung (I have it from Jung’s own mouth)– when, having been invited by Clark University, they arrived in view of New York Harbor and of the famous statue illuminating the universe, ‘They don’t realize we’re bringing them the plague’– was turned against him as punishment for the hubris whose antiphrasis and darkness do not extinguish its turbid brilliance. To catch its author in her trap, Nemesis had merely to take him at his word. We would be justified in fearing that Nemesis added a first-class ticket home.”

    [“Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English” by Jacques Lacan, translated by Bruce Fink, p. 336 (2006)]

    The quote is what we lawyers would call hearsay. Do I believe that Freud could have said it? Yes! Do I believe that Jung would have made up the quote and fed it to Lacan? No! Do I believe that Lacan could have made up the quote and put it into Jung’s mouth? Yes– but, since Lacan used it publicly at least as early as November 7, 1955, and published it in 1956, two years after meeting Jung, and five years before Jung’s death, I think that it is very likely that Jung, in fact, did give the quote to Lacan, and that Freud, in fact, had said it, or something very similar, as the SS George Washington passed through the Verrazano Narrows, separating Brooklyn from Staten Island, just over a century ago now, when Drs. Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung and Sandor Ferenczi arrived in Upper New York Bay, en route to Clark University, in Worcester, Massachusetts, via New York City. As a joke posted on our bulletin board in law school once read: “Yes, it’s hearsay– but it’s damn good hearsay!”

  145. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    January 16, 2013 - 6:45 pm | Permalink


    the torture and lunacy of parts of the Inquisition; the suppression of learning and science caused by the Christian Dark Ages

    I just cannot agree with the above. You are buying into YKW black legend stuff. The Inquisition was one of the reasons there was a Spanish Golden Age in the XVI century. It put YKW in his place.
    As for the “Christian Dark Ages” you should read Régine Pernoud “Pour en finir avec le Moyen Âge” where the myth of the “dark ages” is destroyed. YKW, freemasonry and liberals have always tried to sell the “middle ages=dark ages” memo. I am not buying it.
    I wish the religious wars that caused so much pain to Europe had not happend. But who was behind the “reformation” movements? E.M. Jones “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History” tells you who, but you probably already know.
    Further, I don’t see you addressing the role of freemasonry at all.

  146. January 16, 2013 - 6:43 pm | Permalink


    Let’s imitate Pierre de Craon’s punctilious syntactic corrections for a moment. For “Sanctum” replace “Sanctus”.

  147. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    January 16, 2013 - 6:41 pm | Permalink


    I read the link, but couldn’t find the exact citation for this:

    “Sexual morality is contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life…. If only Americans knew, we are bringing them the plague!” — Sigmund Freud

    Can anyone please provide?

    * * *

    “Sexual morality is contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life” is a compressed quote for the fuller “Sexual morality — as society in its extreme form, the American, defines it — is contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life.” (Sigmund Freud)

    See here:,+%E2%80%9CSexual+morality+is+contemptible.+I+advocate+an+incomparably+freer+sexual+life%E2%80%A6.&source=bl&ots=oR1Blp9pEx&sig=mgyVR2PIJBGm2FC_na0DfbXW4pg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vDT3UL-lIMi20QXuv4DAAw&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Freud%2C%20%E2%80%9CSexual%20morality%20is%20contemptible.%20I%20advocate%20an%20incomparably%20freer%20sexual%20life%E2%80%A6.&f=false

    It is also quoted in lots of other places.

  148. January 16, 2013 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    @Dark Henry:

    That Swede is a retired blogger. But what would you think of what a published WN author has written about the same subject?:

    “The racial consequences of the Christian Wars, and in particular the Thirty Years’ War, were vast. The German population was reduced by at least one third, and probably more: when combined with the effects of the Great Plague of the 1300s, the German population actually shrunk by over 50 per cent in the course of 300 years: a massive decline which, if avoided, would certainly have changed the course of world history.

    ”When the history of the Christian Wars is read in conjunction with the 20th century conflict in Ireland; the torture and lunacy of parts of the Inquisition; the suppression of learning and science caused by the Christian Dark Ages and…[the author previously wrote that Christianity was the first religion to use genocidal evangelism to convert the Saxons—Charlemagne alone beheaded 4,500 of them and let’s not talk of how the Teutonic Knights exterminated the last white pagans], then no other conclusion is possible except to say that the introduction of Christianity has to count as the single greatest ideological catastrophe to ever strike Europe.”

    I agree, even though Pat has a point above that Christian art (that incidentally I love—recently I listened more than ten times the Sanctum of Beethoven’s Missa Solemnis) is a by-product of the white psyche.

  149. Joachim's Gravatar Joachim
    January 16, 2013 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    Looking forward to Part 2, Dr. Darkmoon. Maybe this series of articles will inspire a few out there to abandon the porn sites and other dysfunctional filth and stop masturbating to the jew tune. Any decent white nationalist should be disgusted to imbibe in the jew poison.

  150. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 16, 2013 - 6:17 pm | Permalink


    “That might not stand up (that Jewesses want white abortion); there is ample evidence that abortions fall disproportionately upon the lower classes, and in doing so, mostly upon non-whites.”

    That’s not how they see it. They’re happy even if one White woman aborts her baby. They would gladly let a thousand black abortions slide if it means a dozen Whites have them as well.

  151. January 16, 2013 - 6:15 pm | Permalink

    The point being that it is only the tribe that seeks world domination, irrespective of where they infest.

  152. January 16, 2013 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    @Desmond Jones:
    Virtually all claims of “pan” something-or-other wanting world domination are pure fantasy. The Slavs, Germans, and Russian all had territorial ambitions to be sure, but it was the “British” Empire that ruled 1/4 of the world’s landmass. Of course, it was “British” in name only. It was purely the muscle for the tribe that had re-infested Britain during Cromwell’s Commonwealth, and set up the trading company model that exists to this day – invasion through financial takeover.

  153. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    January 16, 2013 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    @Chechar: I read the article you linked by Conservative Swede. There are many true things stated there. Especially about the terrible consequences of WWII, the present semi-slaved condition of Germany, the responsability of the English, French and US elites, and how the present evil NWO regime has to fall before anything changes for good. All this most people here already know.
    Still I think that the article is missing the point with Christianity. The Christianity he has in mind is the liberal emasculated Christianity, pretty much all the Protestant churches and the Catholic Church post 2nd Vatican Council (Orthodox Christianity being mostly the exception after its tribulations under the USSR). Remember though that this is not the Christianity, the Christendom, I have in mind. The Christendom that built Western Civilization on the basis of Roman and Greek culture, the Chrisendom that put YKW and Islam in their place.

  154. submerging's Gravatar submerging
    January 16, 2013 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    I read the link, but couldn’t find the exact citation for this:

    “Sexual morality is contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life…. If only Americans knew, we are bringing them the plague!” — Sigmund Freud

    Can anyone please provide?

  155. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 16, 2013 - 3:53 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: Your comments on this thread have been pretty bloody dazzling. Why so long away?

  156. January 16, 2013 - 3:36 pm | Permalink

    @BOMFOG (and KMD’s reply above):

    “Every week I receive a number of letters from listeners who believe that I blame the Jews too much for the destruction of our society,” wrote William Pierce in the best single, solid article I know to explain the Jewish Problem to newcomers.

    “Seeing the Forest” is really the best one to explain the JP, and TOO commenters may link to it when asked the same questions that Pierce received in letters long ago.

  157. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 16, 2013 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping: I would say it all matters Lucy. We are being attacked simultaneously on multiple fronts, and for some it can get bewildering. Let those best placed to defend gun ownership do so. It is the role of men to defend their communities, so it seems logical that men should be prioritizing the defence of gun ownership.

    Meanwhile, I would have thought the repair and rehabilitation of sexual matters are best left for women to take a lead on. According to natural law, that is precisely where women’s power resides. So, all praise to Lasha’s edit and republishing! I’m on her mailing list so I would have gotten notification of a copy anyway.

  158. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    January 16, 2013 - 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Also, yeah they self chosen are anti-Christ.

  159. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    January 16, 2013 - 1:26 pm | Permalink

    A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: “Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?–He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old.”


    It’s been my opinion that the modern medical establishment is almost more harm than good , and that they falsely like to take credit for ” increased life expectancy”
    Here it is being stated that the life expectancy of those ancient times was at least 66, or 68, years of age.

  160. Frankie's Gravatar Frankie
    January 16, 2013 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    I’m still convinced that The photo is of a different Richard Pacheco :) The photos were aggregated by someone making a mistake.
    This is what the pertinent post porno pacheco* looks like now

    * win!

  161. omop's Gravatar omop
    January 16, 2013 - 12:35 pm | Permalink

    Its all here in black and white………

    The Babylonian Talmud is regarded as the authoritative version: “The authority of the Babylonian Talmud is also greater than that of the Jerusalem Talmud. In cases of doubt the former is decisive.” (R.C. Musaph-Andriesse, From Torah to Kabbalah: A Basic Introduction to the Writings of Judaism, p. 40).

    This study is based on the Jewish-authorized Babylonian Talmud. We have published herein the authenticated sayings of the Jewish Talmud. Look them up for yourself.

    We publish the following irrefutable documentation in the hope of liberating all people, including Jewish people, from the corrosive delusions and racism of this Talmudic hate literature, which is the manual of Orthodox and Hasidic Jews the world over.

    The implementation by Jewish supremacists of Talmudic hate literature has caused untold suffering throughout history and now, in occupied Palestine, it is used as a justification for the mass murder of Palestinian civilians. The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals.

    Some Teachings of the Jewish Talmud

    Where a Jew Should Do Evil

    Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.

    Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis

    Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.

    Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God

    Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.

    O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews

    Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile (“Cuthean”) the wages owed him for work.

    Jews Have Superior Legal Status

    Baba Kamma 37b. “If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”

    Jews May Steal from Non-Jews

    Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile (“heathen”) it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who “marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean…”

    Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews

    Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.

    Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”

    Jews May Lie to Non-Jews

    Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile.

    Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human

    Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.

    Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.

    Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.

    Insults Against Blessed Mary

    Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus’ mother was a whore: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.” Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the “uncensored” text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men.

    Gloats over Christ Dying Young

    A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: “Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?–He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old.”

  162. frank's Gravatar frank
    January 16, 2013 - 11:21 am | Permalink


    That might not stand up (that Jewesses want white abortion); there is ample evidence that abortions fall disproportionately upon the lower classes, and in doing so, mostly upon non-whites. That alone raises the question of whether or not Christian evangelicals would really want to accellerate the eclipse of the white minority with children who will grow up unwanted, unparented and prone to violence and moronitude.

  163. January 16, 2013 - 11:08 am | Permalink


    Have you read that book? If not, at least take a look at some passages of it:

  164. January 16, 2013 - 10:35 am | Permalink



    I feel that I am repeating this, so I hope no one minds too much. First of all it seems that Christianity was the spiritual of the ancient Egyptians. There is quite a lot of literature about this now. Read people like Ahmed Osman and DM Murdock in “Christ in Egypt.” I understand that there is much more. That even the psalms are almost verbatim taken from the hymns of ancient Egypt. Somewhere I have read that the Beatitudes came originally from Tutankhamun!
    What matters is that it was not first “given” to the World by a Jew called Jesus. “IUSA the KRST ws born on the 25th. December of a Virgin called IsisMery.
    He taught in the Temple at age 12 and was baptized at age 30 by Anup the BAptizer who was beheaded. He walked on water, healed teh sick and raised the dead and he was crucified, died and was buried in a tomb of rock and he was resurrected – of course.”

    How the Jews have managed to con the entire World into believing that that profound spiritual teaching came from a Jew is simply amazing – but that is the sort of thing they are so good at. I think it may have something to do with Constantine who was probably either fooled by them – and he must have been very foolish in that case – or he agreed to go along with the lie for his own ends.

    Christianity seems to me to be too deep for any but the wisest and gentlest and most compassionate of beings. Besides, it is obviously beyond Time and Space – beyond any understanding by the intellect. It is out of Infinity and the human heart – it is about Reality. It is about our Reality and Nature and the cyclical way of Life.

    The reason that the Jews are materialistic and so profane and degenerate is that they Think instead of Feel – and that started when the “sinister Levites” took them in hand and tole them that they could worship only one god (their petty tribal god they call “Yahweh”) and they destoyed – in front of the poor people, “Yahweh’s consort, Asherah – the equivalent of the other goddesses of Nature – and FEELING. So, they hate Nature to this day and they have very little understanding of the human heart – if any.

  165. Joachim's Gravatar Joachim
    January 16, 2013 - 9:30 am | Permalink


    I know of only a few Christians who have actually read the entire NT, let alone the entire Bible. They are so easily led astray. They’ve gotten most of their “knowledge” from Hollywood representations of Christians and jews. A careful and thorough reading of the NT would convince any sentient person that ALL jews are antichrists and never to be trusted, much less have them among us. Do not have anything to do with evil, it says.

  166. me's Gravatar me
    January 16, 2013 - 8:26 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping: Does sexual demoralization really matter all that much when the demoralized are being led, slowly and ineluctably, like lambs to the slaughter?
    yes because it is part of that process that dehumanizes, demotivates and pacifies us.

    As dr. darkmoon has documented before – THEY know its a weapon (thus it being force broadcast into palestinian homes, thus essays bragging that it helped bring down wasp america, thus Paul Wolfitz’s assertion that we should ‘bombard’ the Muslim world with our ‘culture’.

  167. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    January 16, 2013 - 7:39 am | Permalink

    @Tim: You make some good points with regard to rabbinic Judaism.

    The most fundamental, I would add, is for Christians to realize that today’s Judaism was most definitely NOT the religion of Jesus, and for Jews to claim Jesus was originally one of their own is ridiculous.

    Rabbinic Judaism has completely deviated from the religion Jesus practiced 2,000 years ago. The adoption by orthodox Jews of the Talmud and the Zohar alone would guarantee that.

    There was a schism that took place 2,000 years ago, and while Jews kept the brand name, which Christians discarded, I’d be hard pressed to argue that they remained heirs of any convenant. While one might quibble about the veracity of Christianity, for Christians to pretend that somehow the Jews are still the chosen people when Christ proclaimed a new covenant is ridiculous. Either there is a new covenant or there is not. And, although Paul wrote that God wasn’t finished with the Jews, if he had lived to see the destruction of the temple, he would probably have arrived at some very different conclusions.

  168. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    January 16, 2013 - 7:27 am | Permalink

    From Lasha’s sister, Lucy Skipping:

    Lasha received a stern email this morning from a character called “Commander Z”, objecting to her edited abridgement of E. Michael Jones’ memorable 15,000-word essay describing the Jewish attempt to demoralize Americans with their filthy sleaze and porn. Commander Z writes:

    Talk about Jews taking GUNS and turning this country into a Bolshevik Russia/Gaza. Quit wasting time!

    Fair enough. One apparently shouldn’t waste time discussing the sexual demoralization of America while the Jews are trying to confiscate guns, preliminary to unleashing a new “Red Terror” in America that will make the 1917-1953 White Christian Holocaust in Russia and the Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin look like a Sunday school picnic in comparison.

    Is Commander Z right to assert that, like Nero, we are fiddling while Rome burns?

    Does sexual demoralization really matter all that much when the demoralized are being led, slowly and ineluctably, like lambs to the slaughter?

  169. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    January 16, 2013 - 6:00 am | Permalink


    “I believe that the picture of Mr Pacheco in the article could be of a different Mr Pacheco?”

    No, this is a picture of Pacheco as a Senior Citizen, taken a few years after his retirement from acting in porn movies.

    See here:

  170. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 16, 2013 - 5:18 am | Permalink

    I quite like some of Hollywood’s productions in the adventure/drama genre. I do not, however, like to see them with a NASDAQ/DJIA ticker underneath, and end in the weather report. It’s too harrowing without the end credits.

  171. daniel's Gravatar daniel
    January 16, 2013 - 5:07 am | Permalink

    So, we’ve gone from a talk of Jewish promotion of irresponsible sex to a supposed justification for Nazi Germany’s imperialistic aggrandizement. It is typical of some of the stupid bias in this blog.

  172. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    January 16, 2013 - 2:22 am | Permalink

    @Desmond Jones:

    Thanks for not answering my question.

  173. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    January 16, 2013 - 2:12 am | Permalink


    There were no “national churches” in those centuries and no “revolution” by the papacy.

  174. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    January 16, 2013 - 2:10 am | Permalink


    “And forget a beautiful New Spain ruled by pure whites turned into brown Mexico because recent DNA studies have corroborated that many Portuguese in the Iberian Peninsula itself—forget Brazil—got their share of black blood.”

    Said the man who thinks that MARCH OF THE TITANS is a serious work of history.

  175. BOMFOG's Gravatar BOMFOG
    January 16, 2013 - 1:39 am | Permalink

    @Kevin MacDonald

    I’m a regular reader, but I’m having trouble understanding your 1:04 p.m. reply. What comments exactly drive you crazy? I’m not sure if what follows is something you endorse or something that drives you crazy.

    • January 16, 2013 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

      I was replying to a comment that basically said we shouldn’t exaggerate Jewish influence. He didn’t have any data to present showing where we were wrong. That’s what drives me crazy. Lots of people have the idea that their ideas are as good as anyone else’s; evidence is irrelevant. Religious thinking is particularly prone to that–e.g, Christian Zionists.

  176. The Goy Chevalier's Gravatar The Goy Chevalier
    January 16, 2013 - 1:32 am | Permalink

    I’m taking the liberty here of offering an interesting aside on the possible notion that the founding of the United States was one of the largest triumphs by Jews over European ethnic and cultural developement in the history of Western Civilization.

    Were the masonic founding fathers conscious change agents of international Jewry’s plan for world usurpation and domination — simply “Shabbos goyim” — or were they just too shortsighted to have researched the origins, history and ultimate aims of that fraternal organization? I know where my money goes.

    There’s enough research on the subject of the relationship between international Jewry and masonry to fill a library. It’s also why I wonder about men like Thomas Paine, George Washington, and Ben Franklin. I think I skimmed over a comment in this very thread to the effect that “Ben Franklin didn’t want the Jews in America.” Right, but he wanted to be a member of their secret club. Hrm…

    It goes without saying that history is written by those who win. And when those who have been winning have a proven track record of thievery, thuggery, mendacity, subversion, double-crossing, and general mischief, their version needs to be called to question.

    Vicomte Leon de Poncins’ work on the subject provided me with some direction. During one particular research phase, I found a book listed in the special collections catalogue of my university library entitled “The Jew and Masonry.” Written by Norman Fredrick de Clifford, a crypto-Jew WASP mason, the book details the historical and ideological development of masonry in light of its origin in Jewish (Talmudic) mysticism. It’s not simply a narration, it’s a justification.

    WASPs who had been (and still are) duped by the organization (sold to blue-lodgers as a way to network and establish “connections”) were known to raise concerns about the presence of Jews in their rank. I imagine none of those men ultimately ever saw the view from the top of the pyramid.

    Norman Fredrick de Clifford writes by way of introduction,

    “To the assertion of those Lodges which refused to admit Israelites, upon the principle that Masonry is essentially a Christian Institution with the Holy Bible as its greatest symbol, and upon which no Jew can be sworn, was opposed by the counter assertion that Masonry is not a Christian, but a Universal Institution, having for its object to rally under one banner and unite under one bond all religions.”

    Research in this area also pointed me to another very interesting phase in the development of this “nation,” and its corresponding political movement. I have not spent much time researching this movement and political platform, but its influence was, at least at the time, very strong and ultimately contributed to the development/refinement of the country’s political system as it functions today. No one ever cares much to discuss the Anti-Mason Party and the social movement that surrounded it. I’m not sure if it has to do with the fact that we ourselves, or our fathers or our grandfathers are or were masons, so that we are inherently unable to see anything bad in it, but its simply dishonest to say that “it’s nothing more than a glorified dinner club.”

    As Professor MacDonald has established, Western man’s biologically evolved disposition to place an extremely high value on individuality is generally the antithesis of group solidarity, preservation and self-determination. Also, see Brenton Sanderson’s recent articles.

    The United States of Entropy.

  177. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 16, 2013 - 1:19 am | Permalink

    @john thames: Very enlightening john, but utterly unknown to possibly 99.99 percent of European-Americans. It’s a kind of willfull ignorance and this willfull ignorance will cause us more and more problems as time goes by. Afterall, to the majority of Americans, ancient history is what happened yesterday. Unfortunately, the ancient advice that those with the longest memory are the best thinkers is also unknown.

  178. john thames's Gravatar john thames
    January 16, 2013 - 1:00 am | Permalink


    American conservatives frequently decry the collapse of the American social structure starting in the 1960’s. But they rarely get to the heart of what caused the collapse. The 1950’s were great because the Jewish Communists in Hollywood were driven underground. Once these Jewish reds returned to the movies it was only a matter of time before white, middle class America was destroyed. There will be those who will call this a gross oversimplification of an issue. But it really is not. America in the 1950’s was strong because the value system of the country was largely unchallengeable in those days. Communists like Paul Jarrico, Joseph Losey, Jim Berry and Hannah Weinstein were driven overseas and had to work out of England and Europe. Weinstein, in particular, worked out of Great Britain and produced the Robin Hood TV series from 1955-1959 in which the poor robbed the rich in accordance with Communist doctrine. Losey produced an infamous screen biography of Trotsky starring Richard Burton. Jarrico, writer of the infamous Song of Russia starring Robert Taylor finally returned to the U.S. after many years to become a professor of film at UCLA.

    Of course, the Communists never did disappear from Hollywood even at the height of the HUAC purge. CBS produced the highly rated “You Are There” show written by three Jewish Communists Abe Polonsky, Walter Bernstein and Walter Manoff. The Communists, Frank Rinaldo and Robert Lees, wrote the popular Abbott and Costello comedies that continued to be produced until the early 1950’s. Still, it was the 1960’s that brought the Communists back to Hollywood. Kirk Douglas brought Dalton Trumbo back into the open by formally crediting him and Jewish Communist Howard Fast with writing Spartacus. By the end of the decade the son of the former Hollywood Ten screen writer, Ring Lardner, Jr., was writing subversive comedy for M.A.S.H. The ‘sexual revolution” of the 1960’s was triggered in 1959 by the comedy Pillow Talk directed by “former” Communist, Michael Gordon. He followed this smash success with Boys Night Out with Kim Novak in 1962 and Texas Across the River with Rosemary Forsyth in 1966. The 1960’s mania for civil rights and racial equality was largely triggered by another “former” Communist, Jerry Robbins (Rabinowitz,) the director of West Side Story. The movie was scripted by the Jewish neo-Communist Arthur Laurents and scored by the Communist fronter Leonard Bernstein.

    The formerly blacklisted also started making their way back into the movies. Herschel Bernardi, the voice of the Jolly Green Giant, starred with Natalie Wood in Love with the Proper Stranger . Elmer Bernstein, the composer for the film, had caught the notice of House Un-American Activities Committee for having written musical reviews for a New York Communist newspaper in his youth. Zero Mostel, blacklisted in the ‘50’s, returned in 1966 in A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum. By the end of the decade pure Communist propaganda was appearing in Alice’s Restaurant with Arlo Guthrie and Tell Them Willie Boy is Here directed by Abraham Polonsky. The 1970’s brought crud like Archie Bunker with Carroll O’Connor and Mary Hartmann, Mary Hartmann with Louise Lasser. And let us not omit to mention 1969’s Midnight Cowboy directed by Communist Waldo Salt and starring his daughter Jennifer.

    The reader will note that these Communist productions are not the “in your face” productions like Mission to Moscow. They are essential soft core productions designed to implant Communist ideas by slant and indirection. If you do not like blacks you are an Archie Bunker style bigot, not a legitimately afraid of black crime and reduced property values. If you believe in traditional sex roles, then you want a “Stepford Wife”, per Nora Levin. But it is pure Communism sold by the medium everyone watches.

  179. January 15, 2013 - 11:39 pm | Permalink

    @Desmond Jones:

    No problem with me, as long as they’re whites. But the universalist/egalitarian problem within Christianity must be addressed to avoid miscegenation in the future. As you might know, I call white/dark mongrelization the Sin against the Holy Ghost: a sin that even (sinful) Billy Graham advocated among his evangelical faithful.

  180. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 15, 2013 - 11:14 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: The most excellent defense of Catholicism as it relates to the U.S. I’ve yet read and in line with what I’ve always believed.

  181. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 11:02 pm | Permalink

    In support of your thesis Chechar is Archbishop Mannix, a great defender of the Irish in Australia as well of course in Ireland.

    In the late 1940s and 1950s, Mannix spoke against the White Australia policy that was in action at the time. He described the policy as “crude” and said that Australia had much to learn from other races. In his opposition to the policy, Mannix stated in 1949 that “there is no colour bar in Australia”.

    From Wikipedia.

    One of his famous Australian adherents was B. A. Santamaria, who wanted to bring Chinese Catholics to Australia.

    Both were loved, followed, and repelled ultimately, by Irish Catholics in Oz.

    I would suggest to you that the encounter with non-Whites as the Catholic world advanced is something that wasn’t considered in her formation, nor her culmination. Later leaders struggled with the ever widening world which our people lived in, after finding them, as we did America herself.

    Yes, we have had problems. But, our faults never directed animus specifically at White nations organising themselves for their defence, as did the Puritan inspired Judeo-Americans.

  182. Desmond Jones's Gravatar Desmond Jones
    January 15, 2013 - 10:58 pm | Permalink

    @Chechar: And yet it is Kaufmann who writes that the religious, like evangelical Christians, will inherit the earth because of their high fertility rates.

  183. Desmond Jones's Gravatar Desmond Jones
    January 15, 2013 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: “What remains is the *fact* that the Puritan inspired Judeo-Americans chose to obliterate the only ethnocentrically White political platform in the 20th C that would advance our common interests.”

    Not according to Stoddard…

    The exponents of imperialistic propagandas like Pan-Germanism and Pan-Slavism put forth literally boundless pretensions, planning the domination of the entire planet by their special brand of national-imperialism. Such men had scant regard for race-lines. All who stood outside their particular nationalistic group were vowed to the same subjection…

    While Pan-Germanism was mainly responsible for precipitating Armageddon with all its disastrous consequences, it was Russian Pan-Slavism which dealt the first shrewd blow to white solidarity. Toward the close of the nineteenth century, Pan-Slavism’s “Eastern” wing led by Prince Ukhtomsky and other chauvinists of his ilk, went so far in its imperialistic obsession as actually to deny Russia’s white blood. These Pan-Slavists boldly proclaimed the morbid, mystical dogma that Russia was Asiatic, not European, and thereupon attempted to seize China as a lever for upsetting, first the rest of Asia, and then the non-Russian white world – elegantly described as “the rotten west.” The white Power immediately menaced was, of course, England, who in acute fear for her Indian Empire, promptly riposted by allying herself with Japan. Russia was diplomatically isolated and militarily beaten in the Russo-Japanese War. Thus the Russo-Japanese War, that destroyer of white prestige whose ominous results we have already noted, was precipitated mainly by the reckless short-sightedness of white men themselves.

  184. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    January 15, 2013 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

    @Catiline: What Roman “attack’ on sacral Anglo-Saxon something or other are you (and Fraser) blithering about? The “attack” would be the one on the National Churches by the Universal Church that came after the papal revolution of the 11th & 12 Centuries.

  185. January 15, 2013 - 10:39 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    If you post several comments in a row the spam-bot suspects you’re a spammer even when you’re not.

  186. January 15, 2013 - 10:37 pm | Permalink

    @Desmond Jones:

    But my point was simpler than that. There have been WN intellectuals—Pierce, Revilo Oliver, and more recently Tom Sunic and Greg Johnson—that have criticized Christian universalism as part of the software that’s killing us.

  187. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 10:35 pm | Permalink


    It’s hard to reply as my comments keep going into moderation.

  188. January 15, 2013 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    “Yet, what that Spanish and Portuguese did in their colonies was not a part of Spanish and Portuguese policy with regard their own.”

    Wrong. And forget a beautiful New Spain ruled by pure whites turned into brown Mexico because recent DNA studies have corroborated that many Portuguese in the Iberian Peninsula itself—forget Brazil—got their share of black blood.

  189. Desmond Jones's Gravatar Desmond Jones
    January 15, 2013 - 10:25 pm | Permalink

    @Chechar: The Red Giant theory misses the point that Prof. Fraser makes regarding the assertion of papal supremacy. It effectively divided the secular and spiritual realms, that were united in Anglo-Saxon sacral kingship until the quarrel between Becket and Henry II. The competing religious and secular legal codes become fertile soil for the Enlightenment not Christianity per se.

  190. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 10:21 pm | Permalink

    @Desmond Jones:

    The high percentage of intact families in the Puritan migration to America meant that they engaged in a much lower incidence of exogamy with the native Amerindian population (as was the case in the Spanish and especially the Portuguese colonies in the Americas)…

    Oh, for sure. Chechar has made this point often enough to make it his trophy on his mantlepiece. Yet, what that Spanish and Portuguese did in their colonies was not a part of Spanish and Portuguese policy with regard their own.

    Nor did either impose their nation obliterating policies upon the White world.

    In Australia you will find many white Aborigines with English surnames, whether or not it was official policy.

    What remains is the *fact* that the Puritan inspired Judeo-Americans chose to obliterate the only ethnocentrically White political platform in the 20th C that would advance our common interests.

    Chechar and you can argue as much as you like about Mexico, but Mexico is an outlier that has nothing whatsover to do with official Church teaching.

    America, on the other hand, was formed as a reaction to obedience, it had Jewish inspired roots, and it has come to the inevitable conlcusion.

  191. Desmond Jones's Gravatar Desmond Jones
    January 15, 2013 - 10:05 pm | Permalink

    @Catiline: Dictatus papae and papal supremacy.

    Jones’ criticism of the Puritans falls short on many measures. The OT was a prescription for ethnocentrism and control of sexuality. “Do not marry strange wives”. Dr. MacDonald has written that “The high percentage of intact families in the Puritan migration to America meant that they engaged in a much lower incidence of exogamy with the native Amerindian population (as was the case in the Spanish and especially the Portuguese colonies in the Americas), or with Black slaves (as in the Southern states), or even other European ethnic and religious groups (as in the Mid-Atlantic states). The leading Puritan families of East Anglia “intermarried with such frequency” that one historian dubbed them “a prosopograher’s dream” (Fischer 1989, 39). . . . ”

    The Boston Puritans like Grant et al fought ethnic displacement of the founding American through immigration restriction. Dr. MacDonald uncovered the words of a Colorado Congressman who spoke in defence of the Anglo-Saxon commonwealth that was America. Grant and Bilbo worked, in conjunction with Marcus Garvey, to repatriate African Americans.

  192. Taras's Gravatar Taras
    January 15, 2013 - 9:12 pm | Permalink

    @fender: I not only ignore any Jew’s opinion, I mock them and their opinions as payback for their mocking whites and by default, me.

  193. January 15, 2013 - 8:40 pm | Permalink

    @Dark Henry:

    See e.g., Conservative Swede’s “The Red Giant

  194. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 8:34 pm | Permalink

    Far out, now all my attempts are suddenly out of moderation. Please excuse my seemingly spam commentary.

  195. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 8:16 pm | Permalink

    I heard the other day that “Civilisation comes from race”, which makes sense. Just so, religion extends from ethnicity. So, our religions are an extension of our ethnicity within environment, not wholly, but substantially. And even though many White Americans, and British elites, today declare themselves agnostic or atheist, their systems of thought and approach to the world still bear the hallmarks of the ancestor’s religion.

  196. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 8:16 pm | Permalink

    People cannot help but be formed by the thinking of their ancestors, and even if we call ourselves lapsed Catholics, or post-Protestant, we are still imbued with a system of thinking that extends from our religious past.

  197. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 8:16 pm | Permalink

    In any case, I do not wish an argument between Catholics, Protestants and atheists, those of which are White, but am pointing out something that is not acknowledged, that is the particular sort of religious mindset of White Americans.

  198. Frankie's Gravatar Frankie
    January 15, 2013 - 8:15 pm | Permalink

    I believe that the picture of Mr Pacheco in the article could be of a different Mr Pacheco?

  199. Catiline's Gravatar Catiline
    January 15, 2013 - 8:13 pm | Permalink

    @Desmond Jones:

    “In 853, at the age of four, Alfred is said to have been sent to Rome where, according to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, he was confirmed by Pope Leo IV who “anointed him as king”. Victorian writers interpreted this as an anticipatory coronation in preparation for his ultimate succession to the throne of Wessex. However, his succession could not have been foreseen at the time, as Alfred had three living elder brothers. A letter of Leo IV shows that Alfred was made a “consul”; a misinterpretation of this investiture, deliberate or accidental, could explain later confusion. It may also be based on Alfred’s later having accompanied his father on a pilgrimage to Rome where he spent some time at the court of Charles the Bald, King of the Franks, around 854–855.”

    “In the year 883, though there is some debate over the year, King Alfred, because of his support and his donation of alms to Rome, received a number of gifts from the Pope Marinus. Among these gifts was reputed to be a piece of the true cross, a true treasure for the devout Saxon king. According to Asser, because of Pope Marinus’ friendship with King Alfred, the pope granted an exemption to any Anglo-Saxons residing within Rome from tax or tribute.”

    What Roman “attack’ on sacral Anglo-Saxon something or other are you (and Fraser) blithering about?

  200. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 8:04 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    In any case, I do not wish an argument between Catholics, Protestants and atheists, those of which are White, but am pointing out something that is not acknowledged, that is the particular sort of religious mindset of White Americans.

    People cannot help but be formed by the thinking of their ancestors, and even if we call ourselves lapsed Catholics, or post-Protestant, we are still imbued with a system of thinking that extends from our religious past.

    I heard the other day that “Civilisation comes from race”, which makes sense. Just so, religion extends from ethnicity. So, our religions are an extension of our ethnicity within environment, not wholly, but substantially. And even though many White Americans, and British elites, today declare themselves agnostic or atheist, their systems of thought and approach to the world still bear the hallmarks of the ancestor’s religion.

  201. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 7:52 pm | Permalink

    @Desmond Jones:

    In any case, I do not wish an argument between Catholics, Protestants and atheists, all of which are White, but am pointing out something that is not acknowledged, that is the particular sort of religious mindset of White Americans.

    People cannot help but be formed by the thinking of their ancestors, and even is we call ourselves lapsed Catholics, or post-Protestant, we are still imbued with a system of thinking that extends from our religious past.

    I heard the other day that “Civilisation comes from race”, which makes sense. Just so, religion extends from ethnicity. So, our religions are an extension of our ethnicity within environment, not wholly, but substantially. And even though many White Americans, and British elites, today declare themselves agnostic or atheist, their systems of thought and approach to the world still bear the hallmarks of the ancestor’s religion.

  202. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    January 15, 2013 - 7:51 pm | Permalink

    A huge number of abortion doctors are Jewish.
    We should have listened to Ben Franklin. He didn’t want Jews to be allowed into this country.

  203. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

    @Desmond Jones:

    Fraser’s book is a pretty hard read, so I am not sure exactly what you are arguing here from that particular section.

    With regard ” “the intellectual matrix out of which the United States grew” I’d go with a well informed Anglican in R. H. Tawney, who said of the founding Americans:

    If the only Christian documents which survived were the New Testament and the records of the Calvinist Churches in the age of the Reformation, to suggest a connection between them more intimate than a coincidence of phraseology would appear, in all probability, a daring extravagance. Legalistic, mechanical, without imagination or compassion, the work of a jurist and organiser of genius, Calvin’s system was more Roman than Christian, and more Jewish than either. That it should be more tyrannical than the medieval Church, as the Jacobin Club was than the ancient regime, was inevitable. Its meshes were finer, its zeal and efficiency greater. And its enemies were not merely actions and writings, but thoughts.

    P.114, Religion and the Rise of Capitalism.

  204. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2013 - 7:43 pm | Permalink


  205. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    January 15, 2013 - 7:35 pm | Permalink

    You are right, of course, that the true responsibility for our individual actions is ours. That does not absolve Jews from responsibility for the united and determined efforts in media and government which have fostered and enabled our fall. It can be hard to take in because we have all lied to and encouraged to turn a blind eye.

    I think that if you look into the documented history of Jewish activism you will be surprised. No harm looking.

  206. Petronius's Gravatar Petronius
    January 15, 2013 - 7:35 pm | Permalink

    Woody Allen is a rather ridiculous choice, really…

  207. Desmond Jones's Gravatar Desmond Jones
    January 15, 2013 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: Andrew Fraser in his ‘Wasp Question’ p. 74 outlines the assault upon Anglo-Saxon’s sacral kingship by the Roman Church which produced a separation of spiritual and secular authority. A distinctive Western legal tradition grew from competing legal traditions which is “the intellectual matrix out of which the United States grew”.

  208. Arch Stanton's Gravatar Arch Stanton
    January 15, 2013 - 7:21 pm | Permalink

    Well stated. Very succinct and to the point. I only wish I were so adept at stating these points. Thanks for the comment.

  209. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 15, 2013 - 7:19 pm | Permalink

    @Vlad Writes:

    “On a positive note, 91% of jewish women believe in abortion.”

    Because they’re living in a White country, so their support of abortion would mostly apply to White babies. In Israel a woman can’t get an abortion without approval from a committee.

  210. frank's Gravatar frank
    January 15, 2013 - 6:37 pm | Permalink

    I am reminded of the old “macrocosm/microcosm” perspective, especially when I note that the Jews have been rootles and destructive throughout their entire history. They go into “new” cultures, refuse to assimilate fully, cling to their own systemic beliefs and become termites. Everything they do, consciously or unconsciously, undermines and destroys their host culture and society. Their greatest “gifts” to western man have been Marxism and Freudianism.

    The microcosm? When I was a camper and a schoolchild, WITHOUT fail, my peers who told filthy jokes, did disgusting things, stabbed people in the back and had a prurience far beyond their (and our) years, were the Jews.

    Goyim of the World, UNITE! Marry country girls (or boys), avoid the cultural temptations of these sewer-rats, and teach the truth that the greatest gift to mankind was the Renaissance, the Enlightenment and the social, economic, scientific, financial and artistic legacy of that era. THEN teach them exactly WHO it was (and is) striving so Herculeanly to destroy it all. Just looking at what the Jews did to painting (my pursuit) via their galleries, critiques and the elevation of the utterly deconstructed trash these elements encouraged says it all. I recently went to the Portland (ME) Museum of Art’s magnificent show on Winslow Homer and the Hudson Valley School. THERE was the glory of the West! Then go to MoMa in New York and see how far we’ve been dragged down.

  211. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    January 15, 2013 - 6:31 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan: Harsh but mostly true words. America’s (and England’s) role during WWII was really miserable and, I have come to believe, the reason of their present state. They are being dissolved biologically before our eyes. Hitler’s revenge indeed, as Brimelow’s moniker goes, but the irony is that the self-chosen are mainly behind, the same ones that America was allegedly rescuing from the Nazis. As Revilo Oliver pointed out, they really hate and wish to kill or enslave the rest of humanity.

  212. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 6:28 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    Correction: “and Pinochet, though he wasn’t fascist.”

  213. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

    @Pat Hannagan:

    Rephrased, ” we are all Jews now, with none of the benefits.”

  214. Pat Hannagan's Gravatar Pat Hannagan
    January 15, 2013 - 6:13 pm | Permalink

    Having read the original Jones essay I find the concluding sentence, in line with Mr Jone’s thoughts throughout the essay, equivocating:

    If television is ‘the Jewish industry par excellence,’ are the Jews who control television responsible for its content and the effect of that content on the moral and social order? It’s long since past time when someone asked those questions. It’s now time that someone answered them.

    Dresner wants to blame the American White people for his own people’s perversion, like a pimp blaming his whores for his income. It’s yet another insight into the “morality” of the Jew, even its self-declared pious ones in the likes of Dresner but, there’s no need for Jones to indulge the Jew’s conclusions.

    How can it be that the Eastern European Jews, particularly those from Poland, were so viciously base and carnal, all of which they brought to America, yet blame the founding White Protestants for the debasement these Jews brought with them?

    Jones notes that before their arrival in great numbers and hoarded wealth which they used to invade the American polity, the American nation was a moral one, “puritanical” even. Yet Dresner blames the WASP society for the corruption of the Jew, and Jones indulges him.

    Don’t get me wrong, Jones has highlighted typical Jewish double-think, aka always blame the Goyim for Jewish corruption, but Jones is not forceful enough in his conclusions. Perhaps it is Jones’ Catholic desire that Jews be converted and so wants to gently point out the ethnocentric nature of their moral system, whether secular or religious, without being ethnocentric himself. Well, it may be academic but it’s also a recipe for failure. You can never appeal to the Jew in terms of common humanity. The Jew simply does not observe it, and never will, whether secular or religious. A Jew, is a Jew, is a Jew.

    This criticism of Jones notwithstanding he makes a point that cannot be repeated enough to an American audience:

    If we’re talking about Boston’s Puritans as the first and foremost influence in America, America was founded by a group of Judaizers, who followed a distinctly Old Testament version of Christianity, making America one of the most ‘Jewish’ of all of the ‘Christian’ nations. The Enlightenment, which was the intellectual matrix out of which the United States grew, abstracted Jewish morals from their religious context and made them the basis for a multi-ethnic ‘nation.’ America’s Jewish roots, in other words, go deep, but they also lead us to Rabbi Dresner’s dilemma.

    America, in other words, is and has been since her inception, a Judeo-American nation. It is her particular strain of Protestantism that has led her to world domination, and her own national disintegration.

    No wonder that these OO threads are so full of anti-Catholic idiots blaming the Vatican for all that ails them. They simply cannot see past their own Jewish eyes that what ails them is their own perverted love of the evil Old Testament* and its so called “chosen people”.

    Even should you point out to them, as Jones does here time and again, that it has been the Catholic Church and her adherents who have successfully opposed the Jew’s agenda time and again, it is never enough. They will always find a Catholic to blame for the Judeo-American disease of self-righteous carnal chivalry driven outward to remake the world in her own abominable image.

    That the Catholic Church is a pale imitation these days of her past glory is still not enough for these people, nor that these Judeo-Americans saw fit to destroy Catholic political reaction in the form of fascism (Mussolini, Hitler, Salazar, Franco – and Pinochet, though he wasn’t Catholic). That the Judeo-Americans, in solidarity with the Jew infested British elites, chose to wreck Europe for communism over fascism should be enough for them to at least apologise. But no.

    Just like the Jew is always a Jew (secular or religious), the White American of Puritan descent will always be a despoiler of beauty, a wrecker of nations – especially White nations, and a lover of himself which he glorifies as “individualism” which every nation must be “liberated” to express.

    But, anyway, that’s the way the Judeo-American world is, we are all Jews now.

    *Evil without the direction of the New Testament and 2,000 years of Catholic Church tradition and teaching. A fusion of Roman law, Greek Philosophy and monotheism.

  215. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    January 15, 2013 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

    Maybe you can make a succint comment summarizing your point and link me to the articles you have in mind for reference.

  216. January 15, 2013 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    @Dark Henry:

    This has been discussed at TOO threads before. It is a common criticism among some intellectual nationalists. Do you want me to expand on this?

  217. January 15, 2013 - 5:02 pm | Permalink

    @Tim: According to Maurice Cotterell god is electromagnetic energy. And according to William Bramley the Gods of Eden are aliens. Either way it is not what you think it is.

  218. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2013 - 5:00 pm | Permalink

    @Chechar: I have no idea what’s happening in Portugal now—I mean aside from the fact that I know that it, too, is caving in to the whole Tribal agenda of abortion, homosexual “marriage,” and Holohoax worship—but fifty years ago, under Salazar, it was a place that seemed to have its collective head screwed on right. Certainly more right than it is now.

    I think in particular of one curious factoid brought to my attention back then by, of all things, a short piece in National Review. Apparently some NATO-wide demographic survey turned up the curious coincidence that Portugal had the lowest literacy rate of any NATO nation but the highest per capita consumption of learned journals. The article writer (anonymous, as was frequently the case with NR in those days) didn’t know quite what to make of this. Yet the meaning seemed pretty clear to me: people who could read did read and, what’s more, read purposefully. How wonderfully undemocratic!

  219. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    January 15, 2013 - 4:52 pm | Permalink


    But never forget that the Enlightenment ideals of egalitarianism and universalism were an offshoot of Christian values

    I think you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Saying that the “Enlightenment” ideas of the French revolution and similar outfits were offshoot Christianity without further context is rather misguiding… As is Christian-hating falo-worshipping freemasonry had played no role on it.

  220. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    January 15, 2013 - 4:38 pm | Permalink

    @Barkingmad: I was thinking along the same lines. Given the post-33 AD history of rabbinical Judaism’s relations with white Christians (i.e., 100% antagonism), your surmise is entirely reasonable and is indeed the way for a betting man to bet. Even if the book isn’t part of the usual grift, so what? It wouldn’t be anything more than a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit; hence useless and pointless.

  221. Franz Seiler's Gravatar Franz Seiler
    January 15, 2013 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    The following reasoning applies to all people that have made the Kol Nidre a basic text of their lives. (As far as I’m informed (at present): This is all Jews!)
    The logical and material analysis of the Kol Nidre tells you that the Kol Nidre is materially and logically inconsistent in the same manner as the ancient “A Cretan says: ‘All Cretans lie!'” (Whatever way you look at this phrase, whatever way you turn it: It’s wrong!) So is the Kol Nidre! If all concepts etc.etc. you use are to be “invalid from the beginning” then also the concepts used in the Kol Nidre. So it’s wrong. Now, if you adopt, accept the Kol Nidre this is the same as adopting, accepting the notion as a guide-line for your life that wrong is right and right is wrong!!!
    What does it mean for the person that acts thus? This can’t be detailed in advance…. You have some glaring specimens of what it can lead to in George Osborne’s “1984”, in the sense and nonsense that Eli Wiesel, Siegmund Freud, etc.etc.etc. uttered…..
    Best regards

  222. Vlad Writes's Gravatar Vlad Writes
    January 15, 2013 - 4:22 pm | Permalink

    On a positive note, 91% of jewish women believe in abortion. I hope they apply it to their own pregnancies, though they rarely practice what they preach to others.

  223. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    January 15, 2013 - 3:43 pm | Permalink


    You beat me to the punch. I was going to offer, without your eloquence, that no one should be surprised that a group of people should become so obsessed with sex when their first rite of tribal initiation is altering the appearance of a newborn’s penis.

  224. Tim's Gravatar Tim
    January 15, 2013 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Just a few minor observations. Firstly, that orthodox Jews do not follow the Torah, or Books of Moses, as Dresner implies. They follow the “Oral Torah”, ie the oral law which they state, without the slightest evidence, was declared to the seventy elders who went up Mt Zion when Moses came down. You may read about some of the ungodly things this group of individuals, or their descendants at least, later got up to, at Ezekiel ch 8 v 10-11. This Torah which they embrace is better known as the Talmud, ie their commentary and elaboration on the Pentateuch of Moses, which places the rabbis’ determinations above YHVH’s declared statements. As Christ stated of them, they have made the Law of God of none effect by their traditions. They further make the point that “The Torah is not in heaven”, ie the Law of God is determined by men here on earth, and not by YHVH in heaven. Such is the declared sanctity of this book of theirs that God Himself is said to study it three times per day. This is the scripture they conform to. It is irredeemably evil. It has a goddess figure, whose name is Shekinah. This of course they keep hidden from prying eyes by referring to her as Hashem, or “The Name”, an appellation which can almost certainly be extended to include Satan himself.
    We are told that Jewish women tend strongly towards the abortionist standpoint; this can be directly attributed to these same rabbis, who have stated that the abortion of the “rodef”, ie the foetus or “pursuer”, is perfectly acceptable for any reason and at any time during gestation. This “pursuer” has no “nephesh”, or human spirit, hence its outlaw status. This is of course in direct opposition to YHVH’s position, exemplified at Jeremiah ch 1 v 5; “Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee…”
    I was not surprised to learn that Jewish women are far more likely to embrace feminism than their goyische counterparts. This preference would find its origin in the way that the orthodox Jewish male views the female; she is considered to be little more than a bag of excrement, she is not to be taught Torah; still less spoken to, or walked alongside, nor is she ever to escape from the rabbis’ extreme and pathological obsession with her menstrual cycles. Incidentally, the goyische woman is held by these rabid ( rabbid? ) misogynists to be perpetually in a state of “niddah”, ie menstrual bleeding, and thus perpetually unclean and unholy. Contrast their diabolical attitude with that of their true Messiah, who healed the woman with an issue of blood, after she crept up behind in the crowd, and touched Him.
    Quite a lot is made of the orthodox Jewish abhorrence at any idea of integration; this of course lies behind their complicity with the Nazis in persecuting their own people during WW2. It is entirely appropriate to state that the greatest anti-semites of all are the Jews themselves. Far from pitying these people, famous rabbis averred that they were reincarnated sinners, merely being punished for a willingness to integrate with the sub-human goyim in past lives.
    As a final point, Dresner states that God is long-suffering towards all crimes except those involving sexual deviancy. We would expect a rabbi to misunderstand God’s position on everything; so his comment is entirely understandable in this context.
    God has given us Ten Commandments, which it is required of us that we keep.
    “Fear God and keep His Commandments, for this is the whole duty of man”.
    If you examine those commandments, you will see what the rabbi does not see, ie that they deal with every facet of human life, but that the greatest Commandment does not concern itself with sexual immorality, but with our duty to love God, and our neighbour as ourself.
    The greatest truth about Judaism is therefore that there is not a word of truth anywhere to be found in it. The greatest tragedy of the goyim is that they have allowed these great fraudsters to incorporate themselves into the very heart of their various societies, and thereafter to corrupt and demoralize them.
    I am indebted to Michael Hoffman, whose online 1000-page work, “Judaism Revealed”, has been the source for most if not all these assertions.

  225. fender's Gravatar fender
    January 15, 2013 - 3:40 pm | Permalink


    “I don’t welcome any jew’s opinions.”

    I wish more Whites had this attitude. When we listen to them, we give up our autonomy. We’ll win when they start listening to us.

  226. Rob's Gravatar Rob
    January 15, 2013 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Speaking of culture wars, Rense has a freely accessible archive of an excellent critique of Elie Wiesel, authored by a university professor, here:

  227. molecule's Gravatar molecule
    January 15, 2013 - 3:12 pm | Permalink

    something is very wrong here…

    there is an effort to juxtapose Freud (who was a follower of Sabbatai Zevi and his successor, Jacob Frank) against Rabbi Dresner (where Jewish history is “one long battle against sexual deviance”).

    Studies in Europe (1950s to 70s) and in North America (1970s to 90s) show that all sexual deviance (ALL!) can be linked with psycho-sexual genital torture-muilation of infant baby boys. While the ability of the genitally mutilated child to bond and function normally in future marital relations is compromised, on physical, emotional and energetical levels, the real intention of voodoo torture mutilation of an infant child is the infliction of deep limibic guilt of the mother. Pre-limbic, pre-formative, and pre-verbal sexual violence and torture mutilation of the genitalia of infant male children is the beginning and essence of misogyny. When this torture-voodoo medical practice is fully understood, it is the pentultimate contributor, if not actual formative, pre-verbal, limbic SOURCE of all sexual deviancy.

    If Rabbi Dresner is trying to argue that the tribe that cherishes itself and prides itself on the genital torture mutilation of its infant children, for psychosexual, psychopolitical and religious mind control purposes, that causes the heart of the mother to freeze with limbic levels of guilt, and which causes the intimate mother to child bond to freeze and die as well, is the ESSENCE of sexual deviancy.

    The history of Judaism IS the history of sexual deviancy. The modern culture of sex and violence, and of misogyny and the deep jewish hatred of every form of mother-to-anything bond, and the infliction of deep levels of guilt on mothers, who tend to blame themselves when infant children under their protection are allowed to be psychosexually torture-mutilated, by bloodsucking torture mutilation specialists, is the deepest possible essence of sexual depravity. The fact that the torture mutilation specialist attempts to soothe the pain of the VERY bloody genital wound that he inflicts is not what harms the infant child. It is the limbic imprinting of the dark beady eyes of the bloodsucking rabbi, who coos at baby while he sucks him off and peers deeply into the pre-formative eyes of the infant child. The memory of “that look” is the beginning of MKUltra. Torture and soothe, with deep peering by evil beady eyes, and freezing the heart of the mother, and freezing the relationship between the child and its mother, is the … it is the very essence of Jewish Sexual Deviancy. BTW … Freud’s work cannot be understood, until the psycho-sexual effects of infant child sexual torture mutilation is fully understood. Without ever once bringing focus to it, the entirety of his life’s work is a defense of that practice. If Dresden is trying to defend Jewish psychosexual torture mutilation of infant children, by saying Jewish history is one long battle against sexual torture mutilation of infant children, AND THE PREDICTABLE RESULT of such practices, then he is a liar as well.

  228. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    January 15, 2013 - 3:11 pm | Permalink

    I’m not buying it. Dresner wrote that book for OUR consumption, that we might respond in our typically understanding way. He doesn’t give a sht whether or not his people become as holy as he fancies himself, not in the least.

  229. Annis's Gravatar Annis
    January 15, 2013 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Never in our history have we ever allowed jews to enter our nations, they just come on their own. All jews know their own sordid history. They know that their tribe always causes problems, yet they come into our countries following their elites and our sorry elites let them into our institutions.

    When a jew says the things that are said in this article then we can point to that jew and claim, we’re not anti semites, even jews say what we’re saying.

    But its not worth it. I don’t welcome any jew’s opinions. If a cute perky nanny causes problems between a husband and wife, that nanny wouldn’t be welcome at a marriage counselor’s office even though she was there and knows everything about the situation.

  230. Annis's Gravatar Annis
    January 15, 2013 - 2:29 pm | Permalink

    I thought I would enjoy watching the new cable show “Banshee” on Showtime. There is a really shocking scene in this premiere that is purely gratuitous and not needed for the story line. The show is actually pretty good if not for the porn. Of course young people will be glued to the tv and no matter what efforts we make we can’t prevent them from watching this stuff.

    A judge once said he knew porn when he saw it. So do I. Porn is nudity and sex acts.

  231. me's Gravatar me
    January 15, 2013 - 2:01 pm | Permalink

    @par: . But mostly it’s because the first world has moved to being post-Christian
    And behind every legal and other attempt to remove Christianity from the public square, schools, and history books (except when it is negative) you have the direct influence of Jewish groups like the ADL.

    BTW, you say you are Chrisitan; Are you aware of how Jesus and Mary are depicted in the Talmud.?

  232. January 15, 2013 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

    I wonder how it feels to be a parent and have a daughter that the jews have turned into a filthy whore. Maybe the jews didn’t do it but the parent did it by being ignorant and stupid. Got to laugh at that.

  233. January 15, 2013 - 1:32 pm | Permalink


    “…But mostly it’s because the first world has moved to being post-Christian.”

    Yes and no.

    It’s true that under Christendom whites were Jew-wise, which made them relatively immune to Jewish depredations. But never forget that the Enlightenment ideals of egalitarianism and universalism were an offshoot of Christian values, or that when Christianity was still very healthy in the Iberian peninsula the crazy Iberians—especially the Portuguese—ruined their gene pool through marrying with black slaves, or with Amerinds in New Spain.

    Arthur Kemp wrote: “Portugal’s dramatic and extremely quick decline from the most powerful and richest country in Western Europe to the most backward and poor country in that region, contains an extremely significant lesson. It only required an influx and absorption of just over ten per cent of non-White blood into mainstream Portuguese society to cause a significant shift in population make-up of that country. This shift in make-up immediately affected Portugal’s position and status in the world, with its decline being clearly linked to the absorption process.”

    The Pope had allowed interbreeding to take place since the 1530s. Look at the mess that so-called “Latin”-America is today.

  234. JP's Gravatar JP
    January 15, 2013 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Well, my my, so sorry to have bothered you and “Anglo Saxon” and the regulars. What is the purpose of this website, for your egos? You’ll be happy to know it worked, you’ll never see me again — brother.

  235. par's Gravatar par
    January 15, 2013 - 12:59 pm | Permalink

    I’m interested in reasoned critique of any and all groups–even (I’d hope) my own. Darkmoon’s (or Jones’) essay isn’t such a critique. It’s an exaggeration. It’s hyperbole.

    Look, I’m a Christian. I don’t see morality heading in the right direction in this country. Is it because of the Jews? Some Jews are pushing morality in the wrong direction, sure. But mostly it’s because the first world has moved to being post-Christian. Now that people have the choice, people are choosing a morality which comports with their post-Christian views. Let a population choose (and I do believe in freedom to choose religion) and religious pluralism will come about–we’re not made to all believe the same thing. That’s what’s going on. Abortion “makes sense” if you don’t believe in God. No creator, no story. Just devices in the here and now. What’s the story behind, say, a wrench? If it works like a wrench, it is a wrench. That’s the outlook when one doesn’t believe in a Creator. That’s to be expected given the diversity of beliefs out there.

    Overemphasizing how Jews have contributed to the problem isn’t cool. It’s sad. You’re not leaving the door open for Jews to choose to be the type of person they want to be. You’re forcing them to be the people you then hate.

    • January 15, 2013 - 1:04 pm | Permalink

      THese kind of comments drive me crazy. Jewish influence is not judged by looking at the data on media ownership, writing, and management, etc., and how the media reflects values that are mainstream in the Jewish community but quite different form the values of non-Jews. TOO has posted lots of stuff on this (e.g., Edmund Connelly), and I summarized it in the Preface to the paperback edition of Culture of Critique. Instead a whole new theory is brought in without any attempt to root it in some actual data.

  236. AAB's Gravatar AAB
    January 15, 2013 - 12:41 pm | Permalink


    If you add Las Vegas and Miami to the list then you have a pretty good list of five cities that embody characteristics of a Red Light district:
    1. Hollywood will sell you fake dreams of hedonism and materialism via loud noise, flashing images, and base graphics, all of which destroy your ability to think and reason ( and instead emoting all the time).
    2. New York will loan you the money to pursue your fake dreams of pleasure.
    3. Miami will import the drugs (cocaine, sex, etc) you need to have your fun, which will do nothing but stupify you and reduce your ability to think (which you need get out of the mire they put you in).
    4. Las Vegas will provide false hopes: the possiblity of winning money; and also imprint the meme that you can only become wealthy/better off if ‘luck’ is on your side.
    5. Washington will act as the hired thug of the Red Light district and will extract any money from you by threats of violence.

    All of these cities conspire to enslave you by reducing or removing your ability to reason. If you could reason then you would see that they were just trying to sell you lies. Reason and critical thought are the enemies of the Red Light District, that’s why they try to undermine them constantly.

  237. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    January 15, 2013 - 12:30 pm | Permalink

    Lasha’s published work is always a great read … even when it arrives in the form of an edit of another’s authorship. Kudos to E. Michael Jones … and eternal multis appreciations to Lasha Darkmoon!

    P.S. Prof. Kevin MacDonald.
    Regarding my original request posted yesterday … I am serious. The public commenting under published articles keeps getting out of hand, or gets hijacked by those “with ego issues”, or by those who have malicious intent towards us all.

    I realize you don’t have any time to waste on overseeing or editing such nonsensical and provocative (Yahoo! style) behaviour. Pettiness is sometimes best left ignored. That is understood. And I appreciate that whatever moderation is taking place here is mostly automated, for good and practical reasons.

    Therefore, as a workable compromise, I again ask that you (and/or your team) try and provide — if it is technically and financially feasible — the ability to collapse all comments posted by individual monikers in accordance with the preferences of each individual reader. In other words a block show/hide facility that can be operated upon individual monikers.

    We had something similar about 3 years back, regulated by a much-abused voting system. So, my hope is, that can be tweaked or re-jigged to operate as a straight forward binary on/off.

    Furthermore, many of us are just too busy to trawl through non-contiguous strings of 50 or more inane comments … often uploaded by known trouble-makers, or by the few who are emotionally or mentally retarded … in order to isolate the contributions of those who consistently post commentary here that enriches people’s thoughts and understanding. That manual filtering starts to get difficult once the total comment count gets above 170-200 (as it so often does these days).

    A collapse (show/hide per individual moniker) feature will slipstream that filtering process and by default raise the moral tone of this website to where it deserves to be, or if you prefer, to where I would like to see it!

    Thank you for giving this request your attention, and for all else that you do.


  238. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    January 15, 2013 - 11:22 am | Permalink

    Dresner agreed with what I had to say, but added that Jews didn’t like to hear others (i.e., the goyim) say it. It was an honest response, and I valued his honesty.

    Probably the single biggest problem of Judaism: Because they’re the “chosen” people, no one else has anything worthwhile to say to them. Success leads to arrogance. Arrogance leads to blindness. Blindness leads to self-destruction.

    In his book Moses and Monotheism, Freud makes clear that, as in the case of the Pharaohs of Egypt, incest confers god-like status on its perpetrators.

    It has often been claimed that the ancient Israelites were the most moral of the ancient peoples because their prophets spoke against sexual deviance. Here’s another take: Maybe other cultures didn’t write against sexual deviance quite so much because it wasn’t nearly as great a problem among them as it was among the ancient Israelites. Why preach against a problem that is not widespread?

  239. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    January 15, 2013 - 11:13 am | Permalink

    Speaking of incest, it seems likely to me that the generations of inbreeding have probably played a part in making Jews so disproportionately perverse and neurotic, as exemplified by the Freuds and Woody Allen. It seems like Jews are much more likely to be homosexuals than Gentiles, eg the feminist movement was/is spearheaded by lesbian Jewesses. I’d like to see a scholarly study on this, but I’m not holding my breath.

  240. Spectator's Gravatar Spectator
    January 15, 2013 - 10:53 am | Permalink

    I find it very encouraging to observe the confluence of insight brought to bear in a article by E. Michael Jones, edited by Lasha Darkmoon, and presented on the blog of Kevin MacDonald. Nice to see such heavy hitters on the same team.

  241. January 15, 2013 - 10:41 am | Permalink

    Of the three spheres of Jewish power in Washington, New York and Los Angeles, the latter (Hollywood) is probably the deadliest for western values.

  242. Will Fredericks's Gravatar Will Fredericks
    January 15, 2013 - 10:38 am | Permalink

    It’s always good to read something by E. Michael Jones and his Catholic critique of “rootless” Jews.

    Dresner goes on to cite “a recent Gallup poll and a suppressed B’nai B’rith survey”, which indicates that American Jews are more likely to be divorced and less likely to be married than the average American; that “91 percent of Jewish women agree that every woman who wants an abortion should be able to have one”; that “50 percent of Jewish women signaled a high degree of affinity for feminism compared to only 16 percent among non-Jewish women”, and that Jews favor homosexual rights more than the general population.

    The rootless Jews who dominate Hollywood and, as a result, American culture as a whole, have defined themselves, in Dresner’s words, as “despoilers of morality and corrupters of culture.”

    There is a key point in these general critiques of “Judaism” from a Catholic such as Jones which of course many WN overlook in discussing cultural matters like this – the role of secularization. Jews in general are much more secular than Gentiles. When you adjust these statistics for the influence of secularity the difference between Jews and Gentiles of comparable secularity is much less.

    There certainly is a tribal aspect to religion of course. A lot of Jewish anti-religious activity is motivated by the tribal motif of desecrating the Christian God, out of ethnic loyalty, and is often within the Jewish community (preferably out of earshot of Gentiles) described as such. But the widely expressed WN imperative to secularism and paganism out of duty to desecrate the Jewish God really doesn’t seem to be much different. In many ways this WN imperative seems just to be a mirror image of this Jewish tribal motif. Especially as the thinking of so many WN’s, as with so much of western secularism is so influenced by and so indebted to the thinking of Freud, (occasionally amusingly so) as I have noted in the past. When they critique Freud, and Freudian aspects of American culture, whether implicitly or explicitly, it is usually not done consistently and truthfully.

  243. Dubyasee's Gravatar Dubyasee
    January 15, 2013 - 10:34 am | Permalink

    I wonder with a weary heart, will White Europeans ever cast off the yoke of Jewish usury, perversion, and deception? White Europeans seem so willing to participate in their own enslavement, that it gives me little hope for the future.

  244. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    January 15, 2013 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    Excellent effort by Lasha Darkmoon.

    I think that anyone who is incapable of recognizing and accepting the fact that jews have, throughout world history, repeatedly proven themselves to be a highly corrosive, highly toxic and clearly poisonous influence within and upon White European nations – is someone who needs to put their name on a waiting list for a brain transplant, because the brain they’ve got has failed them.

Comments are closed.