Remembering Greville Janner on Holocaust Memorial Day

Francis Carr Begbie

The slogan for today’s Holocaust Memorial Day is “Don’t Stand By” — a reference to the widespread Jewish belief that many people in Britain and elsewhere turned a blind eye to Jewish suffering during World War II.

Just in case anyone misses the insinuation, the HMD website spells it out.

The Holocaust and subsequent genocides took place because the local populations allowed insidious persecution to take root. Whilst some actively supported or facilitated state policies of persecution, the vast majority stood by silently — at best, afraid to speak out; at worst, indifferent. Bystanders enabled the Holocaust, Nazi Persecution and subsequent genocides.

This attempt to spread responsibility for the events of 1939–1945 from the perpetrators to Britain and every other White country in Europe has long been an aim of Jewish ethnic activists, and now it seems they have been successful.

A good example is the Holocaust Explained website, intended as an education site for schools and funded by Jewish organisations as well as municipal authorities. It explains that the British have much to be ashamed of in their treatment of Jews before and during the war. So British schoolchildren who up until now have been told their people had a “good war” will now learn another story: Britain is culpable.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Atonement is healthy. A willingness to confront harsh truths about one’s past shortcomings is an admirable and necessary trait.

So it might be reasonable to ask if the Jewish community in Britain might not be prepared to do some soul-searching itself. Specifically it might ask itself how it was that it allowed its community to be led by a suspected child rapist who was widely believed to have been preying on vulnerable boys in care for decades.

During this time Greville Janner QC reached the highest pinnacle of Jewish communal life and, as President of the British Board of Deputies, he provided leadership for his entire community for six years.  He was the founder of the Holocaust Education Trust and as vice president of the World Jewish Congress. He was deeply involved in campaigning for financial restitution for holocaust victims. He sat on the Community Security Trust and the Jewish Leadership Council. He was the confident of Prime Ministers at home and other leaders abroad. For decades the Jewish community in Britain had no more prominent ambassador.

At the end of his career, he was given the ultimate accolade of elevation to the House of Lords and as Lord Janner of Braunstone, was no less active as a roving emissary for the Jews of Britain. It was hard to imagine a prominent dinner, reception or conference would have been complete without him.

Yet at the same time he was widely suspected of raping vulnerable boys in council care homes in Leicestershire. Three police inquiries into his behaviour were mysteriously derailed in 1991, 2002 and in 2007. Yet despite incriminating corroborated testimony, government lawyers refused to proceed with a prosecution.

After the allegations were voiced publicly in court in 1991, during the trial of Frank Beck, a Leicestershire care worker and child abuser, Greville Janner was cheered by supportive colleagues in the Commons when he angrily denounced the allegations against him.

But it was a different story last year. Eventually after widespread public pressure, the humiliated Director of Public Prosecutions was forced into a U-turn. She announced that criminal proceedings would begin.

Following this, Roger Bannister, the assistant chief constable of Leicestershire, said: “There is credible evidence that this man carried out some of the most serious sex crimes imaginable over three decades against children who were highly vulnerable and the majority of whom were in care.”

Sadly Lord Janner died in December before the charges against him could be tested.

A government inquiry led by Queen’s Counsel has confirmed there were serious shortcomings in the police investigations and law officers’ decisions.  There was evidence to charge Janner in 1991 and the decision not to charge him then was wrong. In 2002 police failed to supply allegations to the law officers and in 2007 there was again “a realistic prospect of conviction for offences of indecent assault and buggery” and a failure to arrest and interview him.  The shamefaced Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said:  “It is a matter of sincere regret that on three occasions, opportunities to put the allegations against Lord Janner before a jury were not taken.” Saunders reputation has never recovered from a decision last year not to go to court because Janner was suffering from senile dementia.

However his illness did not stop the 87-year-old founder of the Holocaust Education Trust from taking part in parliamentary debates, travelling to Israel for conferences and collecting a hundred thousand pounds in expenses. He was also compos mentis enough to sign over his property deeds to his children thereby putting them out of range of any damages litigation.

The victims were devastated at the cancellation of a “trial of the facts“, due to take place in April. In this procedure a jury would have been asked to decide — without reaching a decision about whether Janner  was guilty — if 22 alleged incidents of abuse from the 1960s to the 1980s had taken place.

Since Janner’s death there has been a steady stream of revelations about this respected figure. A waspish Guardian obituary confirmed that despite 27 years as an MP, he never rose to senior ministerial status because of the rumours that swirled about him. For years threats of legal action saw off the rumours, a danger that has passed now.

And there was a suggestion of financial impropriety. Tory members forced him off one sensitive committee because of one of his many lucrative extra-parliamentary interests, advising well-paid industrial executives of precisely the sort of matters the committee was investigating. Janner sat on the board of the Ladbrokes betting chain run by “controversial” businessman and Jewish community leader Cyril Stein.

Janner’s reputation is now gone.  Even the kindergarten school in Galilee that was named after him has removed the plaque bearing his name.   But the questions remain.

It is a shame that there will be no opportunity to hear from Janner’s close friends in the Jewish community. For instance it might have been interesting to hear from the former Director of Public Prosecutions in 1991, a Jewish lawyer called Allan Green, exactly what happened to derail that first inquiry.  Green has chosen not to comment.  And then there are the other associates such as Community Security Trust chairman — and ex-jailbird — Gerald Ronson. Lord Stanley Kalmes for whose peerage Janner lobbied, was a former treasurer of the Conservative Party. Had they heard any of lurid rumours about Janner that were so widespread since at least the eighties?

Curious is it not, that there is wide debate about another public figure involved in a similar politically sensitive scandal. The DJ Jimmy Savile was also up to his neck in rumours for a long time, and today “who knew what” about Savile is seen as a legitimate question. So why is no-one in the media asking the same about Janner?

Loyalty is an admirable quality, as his family and community have demonstrated.  His daughter Rabbi Laura Janner has hinted darkly at anti-Semitism being the real motive for the allegations. Since the story re-emerged last year she seemed to cope by sending as many Syrian refugees to Britain as possible.

It has taken a Jewish dissident writer to do what no one in Fleet Street dare do, and point out that when Janner was carrying out his — alleged — rapes, sometimes — allegedly in the marital bed —  he was also the leader of the Jewish community in Britain. Gilad Atzmon believes that the leadership of the Jewish community should issue a public apology.

At the least, all these prominent Jewish organisations ought to issue an apology or at least admit to gross misjudgement in letting a person who was a suspected paedophile remain a leader of prominent Jewish institutions for almost five decades. Would the English church enjoy such impunity? Would the British Muslim community get away with any of its leaders being associated with buggery and paedophilia? I’ll let you ponder this one.

We have become inured to watching the Jewish state get away with racist policies, murder, ethnic cleansing, WMD and so on. But here in Britain, it is astonishing, yet far from being surprising,  that the head of the Jewish community managed to escape trial for decades over substantive charges of sexual assault, paedophilia and buggery.

If Jewish power is the capacity to silence the discussion of Jewish power, in the case of Lord Janner, it also managed to delete the fact that Britain’s suspected arch sex offender was also the leader of the Jewish community.

It is indeed hard to see how any of this happening to a prominent member of the Catholic Church or Church of England for instance without the connection being loudly pointed out.

On January 27 Britain commemorates Holocaust Memorial Day. At thousands of events children, parents and teachers will hear the words of Eli Wiesel who has written for the Holocaust Memorial Trust about those bystanders who failed to help:

I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.

How sad that that the Jewish community is not prepared to listen and speak up for the victims of its leading light, Greville Janner.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

45 Comments to "Remembering Greville Janner on Holocaust Memorial Day"

  1. Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
    February 2, 2016 - 2:00 am | Permalink

    FKA Max is exactly correct. The Jews are a tribe of psychopaths. If you internalize this one small idea all of their history and behavior becomes sensible.

    The Talmud is just a book to train psychopaths.

  2. John Mortl's Gravatar John Mortl
    January 29, 2016 - 5:52 pm | Permalink

    There is now this belated concern that the British will be tarred with a brush that they helped to create! It’s one thing to to promote vicious atrocity propaganda during a conflict and possibly right after to distract from the Allied atrocities and the wanton destruction of a economic competitor (A version of the Morgenthau plan) but after the heat of war hatred started to dissipate they could have, as after the first world war, retracted or at least stop promoting the bizarre hate propaganda. Were they so blinded by their hatred of the Hun to not see that they gave a highly intelligent people who were crafty enough to persevere as a religious com ethnic entity over a millennium, a cudgel which would be exploited to the fullest extent? Did they not see that after they had the Germans, with the help of the victorious Allies, fall in line with their egocentric world view they would and did apply this formula to others, starting with the more vulnerable, picking off one after the other? Now the penny has finally dropped when it’s too late short of a total upheaval of the induced current mindset which the British are still nurturing.

  3. T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
    January 28, 2016 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Possibly Scott David Speidel [aka Hadding Scott]

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      January 29, 2016 - 2:31 pm | Permalink

      Thanks very much.

      Putting aside the matter of who or what Hadding is—with the further stipulation that I do not assume that everyone I usually disagree with or even have a marked distaste for is a secret Jew—the link you offer allowed me to read things about which I had known little or nothing. One of the least appetizing of those things is material strongly suggesting that Kevin Strom may well actually be what I had long thought he was only set up as being.

      What do you think, T.J.?

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        January 29, 2016 - 10:09 pm | Permalink

        The enemy wants Whites gone. They would start with WN leaders. The default position is to assume frame-up, until proven otherwise. I barely know anything about KAS and have never met anyone in the movement. I have an engram against NS and assume all NS to be controlled opposition.

        >>>I think the most telling details of all are that Strom’s main accuser, his wife Elisha, was having an affair with the FBI AGENT who was “investigating” Strom — which should have triggered an automatic mistrial!! — and yet Elisha was SO nutty that she turned on and threatened the FBI man as well and she went to jail!…. and 2) Strom, a supposed pedophile, was awarded custody of his children BY THE COURT when he and Elisha split up!<<<

        It is very curious that Elisha became a mod at VNN around this time. The saying NO JEWS JUST RIGHT mysteriously disappeared, and just as mysteriously re-appeared.

        My post, and the one I was responding to, were removed as of this morning [Friday]. Then my post mysteriously re-appeared this afternoon, while the first post [from "SIGH"] stays missing. I wonder why my post was removed and then re-posted.

        This reminds me of "JOKE AND DAGGER" from Spy vs. Spy [Mad Magazine] [jewish publication].

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          January 30, 2016 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

          Thank you. One of the results in your Google link took me to Northwest Front, a site and movement in which I have never been interested (not least because I am old and childless). That was where I saw the strongly negative characterization of Strom.

  4. John's Gravatar John
    January 28, 2016 - 6:54 am | Permalink

    It’s astonishing how these villains are constantly able to get in leadership over us.

    The move comes partly as a result of fierce debate over past statements made by Greens member and European parliamentarian Daniel Cohn-Bendit, who, in his 1975 autobiographical book “Der grosse Basar” (“The Great Bazaar”), described intimate experiences with children as a teacher in an alternative Frankfurt kindergarten. In one passage he writes: “You know, a child’s sexuality is a fantastic thing. You have to be honest and sincere. With the very young kids, it isn’t the same as it is with the four-to-six-year-olds. When a little, five-year-old girl starts undressing, it’s great, because it’s a game. It’s an incredibly erotic game.”

    The enormous role played by Jews in the events of May 1968 in Paris and their aftermath is striking. All currents of the far left, anarchist, Trotskyist, Maoist had Jews among their primary leaders. Alain Geismar, Alain Krivine, Pierre Victor (né Benny Lévy), Henri Weber, Roland Castro, André Glucksmann, and of course, Daniel Cohn-Bendit: so many of the most familiar faces and names were those of Jews. Though they did not act as Jews, that they were Jews, and occupied a particular place in post-war French society because of this, cannot but have weighed in their participation. And indeed the Jewish presence on the French left was a long standing one. Communists were an important part of the pre-World War II Jewish community, and the Jewish role in the Resistance was out of all proportion to their place in the nation, notably through the armed fighters FTP-MOI and its most famous avatar, the Manouchian Group. But Jews had also played a large role in groups farther to the left, in particular among Trotskyists. In the sixties, added to the Trotskyist Jews were the Jewish Maoists who had grown out of the classes given by the Communist philosopher Louis Althusser at the École Normale Supérieure. Among them was Robert Linhart, leader at the time of the uprising of the Union de la Jeunesse Communiste Marxiste Leniniste (UJCML). The UJCML, in die hard Maoist fashion, had under-estimated the significance of the student uprising, missing the boat entirely. Bitterly attacked by the members of the group for their failure, Linhart had a nervous breakdown and was replaced by Pierre Victor, as the group reformed as the Gauche Prolétarienne (GP). Linhart was, like other members of the GP, to work in a factory, a period in his life that produced one of the political masterpieces of the era, “L’Etabli.” Linhart’s daughter, Virginie, in her book “Le jour où mon père s’est tu” (The Day My Father Went Silent) attempted to explain the reasons behind the massive Jewish presence in the movement.

  5. Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
    January 28, 2016 - 2:32 am | Permalink

    Remember that Morrell guy (I think that was his name) who tortured and murdered German civilians at the end of World War II? The Polish goverment tried to extradite him from Israel, Israel refused.

    Of all the Germans who have been prosecuted for crimes against Jews (many on the flimsiest of evidence), and they won’t allow ONE Jew— a Jew who by all accounts is guilty as hell— to face trial for crimes against humanity.

  6. John's Gravatar John
    January 28, 2016 - 12:08 am | Permalink

    “Jewish power is the capacity to silence the discussion of Jewish power”

    I’m gonna remember that because it’s so true.

  7. FranksandBeans's Gravatar FranksandBeans
    January 27, 2016 - 10:19 pm | Permalink

    I read this article on CNN. Ann Frank’s half sister is comparing Trump to Hitler and is appalled that he wants to build a wall to keep people out. That reminds her of the Berlin wall. I say we need to send some Syrian refugees to her house to show her why they need to be kept out.
    So it is ok for BB Nethenyahu to build a wall to keep Israhell Jewish, but white countries must all be multiculti.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      January 28, 2016 - 9:46 am | Permalink

      Does CNN have an explanation of how this woman could be related to Anne Frank in any way, given Mrs. Frank died in a concentration camp before Anne, and Mr. Frank married this woman’s mother after Anne died?
      This couldn’t be an exaggeration of a relationship to give an idiotic comment some credibility, could it?

      • FranksandBeans's Gravatar FranksandBeans
        January 29, 2016 - 2:20 am | Permalink

        I made a mistake. It is step sister. Not half sister. Didn’t you read the article? I posted the link.

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          January 29, 2016 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

          I had read an article prior to seeing your link. The fact remains that Anne Frank was dead before this woman’s mother married Otto Frank. That is why I used the term “related to Anne Frank in any way”.

  8. Colin Wright's Gravatar Colin Wright
    January 27, 2016 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

    ‘…So it might be reasonable to ask if the Jewish community in Britain might not be prepared to do some soul-searching itself…’

    ‘Ve didn’t know!’

  9. Stritchplatte's Gravatar Stritchplatte
    January 27, 2016 - 8:16 pm | Permalink

    It seems like only yesterday when my jew neighbors in the Polish village of Pulaskiova came running into the yard knocking the fence gate down and letting my chickens get loose. Good thing I had the pig hogtied ready for slaughter. My first thought was, “What are those fucking kikes up to know” but then I saw the all the Germans out front of Natans house. What you want Natan? He was down on his knees in the pig shit begging and whaling about having to go to work. So I told him, “You moron you have let all my chickens loose and the Germans are capturing them, go out and get my chickens back, you thieving yid!” So Natan ran out grabbing the chickens and tossing them back into my yard. The Hauptmann in command smiled at me and ordered Natan to lay face down in the pig shit mud. He ordered his men to drag Natan out by his feet and throw him into the waiting truck. I traded some eggs for a pair of gloves and a hat, my wife was given a warm coat and new shoes that Gryspans and the children got chocolate. The rest of the jews in the village spent the next hour packing and hauled off nearly everything. I had to stand guard with my shotgun to prevent them from untying my hog. The Hauptmann lost him temper when He realize the jews were grabbing everything from everywhere and ordered them on the trucks and off they went. The next three years were peaceful until the jews showed up again with the “liberation”. Bolshevik jew scum.

  10. January 27, 2016 - 12:35 pm | Permalink

    This attempt to spread responsibility for the events of 1939–1945 from the perpetrators to Britain and every other White country in Europe ….

    It should say alleged or supposed perpetrators. As it is, TOO is taking an editorial stance that the Jewish account of “the events of 1939-1945” is accurate.

    • January 27, 2016 - 1:45 pm | Permalink

      This essay is a typical exercise in conservative rhetoric, which is to say, rhetoric that avoids challenging taboos.

      Francis Carr Begbie is saying here that if it is okay to spread the blame for the Holocaust (taking the story at face-value) to other White nations, then British Jewry should share the blame for a prominent British Jew’s sexual crimes.

      British Jews in general have to take the blame for a sex-criminal while we accept blame for gassing millions. Of course the Jews won’t really fret over Greville Janner, but our people will fret over the Six Million. Am I the only one who sees that this analogy doesn’t really work in our favor?

      • White Ethnostate's Gravatar White Ethnostate
        January 28, 2016 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

        Well said, Looks like the red pill is still in Begbie’s esophagus or stomach & hasn’t been absorbed throughout his body & brain.

        The people who lied to us about Iraq war, Syrian war, Libyan war, Debt, Deficit, 2008 financial crisis, the savings & loan crisis, the subprime loans, gulf of tonkin, etc want us to believe 6-Million nonsense.

        If someone lies to you 9 out of 9 times, will you believe him the 10th time?

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      January 27, 2016 - 2:12 pm | Permalink

      I’d settle for “responsibility onto the official narrative of the events”

    • Floda's Gravatar Floda
      January 27, 2016 - 4:16 pm | Permalink

      Far from accurate, I have written on this before: Around 20 years ago, my numerous nieces asked me to record their Grandmothers early life and Wartime experiences as an employee of the German Army in Ukraine where she was an interpreter. She was aged 76, and living in the New South Wales southern highlands, still sharp as a tack.

      I’ll get down to when she spent several days seeking shelter and food in Auschwitz:

      In December 1944 my mother was aged 24 and six months pregnant with me. She and my father had spent the greater part of that year fleeing on foot from Eastern Ukraine. Upon arriving in Upper Silesia, Germany’s most Easterly state my father said they had to separate. He was an Officer in the Wehrmacht who knew it was suicide to stay and fight the Red Army, so he deserted. If he was caught, it was execution for both of them on the spot. He took a Moped and rode it to Halle (Near Berlin) where he had a Brother. He told his Brother to expect his wife and baby in about six to nine months, all being well. He then took the Moped (Petrol Powered Bicycle) all the way to the Rhineland where he donned his other Brother’s Private Uniform and in company of like minded Wehrmacht soldiers eventually surrendered to US Soldiers. He lost 50% of his body weight in a US POW Camp which he always said was the most dangerous time of the war.

      This left my mother a Ukrainian schoolteacher alone in a country losing a very big War.

      In late December 1944 she was with a group of about 25 women all fleeing West towards Berlin, among them were about six Nuns. It was late afternoon when walking through another small Town they came across what she called a “Giant Factory Complex’ it was Auschwitz. The women were looking for somewhere to spend the night, two of the older Nuns approached a Guard who took them inside while the women outside waited. It was late afternoon, freezing cold and snowing.

      A few minutes later one Nun appeared and beckoned the other women to come inside.

      At this point I asked her what she remembered from her stay there 50 years later: She recalled the SS Guards first, ‘All were very old and stooped, but polite to a fault and seemingly very pleased to have the company of Nuns so close to Christmas’

      ‘We were invited to dine with the Guards at several long tables I remember having hot soup, pea and ham soup and bread. The Guards told us we could stay until the older Nuns were rested and able to resume their journey, but not more than a few days’.

      ‘I remember sleeping on a dry wooden floor in what might have been a gymnasium, it must have been close to a bakery because I could smell the sweet smell of baked bread’

      ‘I know that I traded a Vienna loaf for a fine pair of leather boots with a woman there, she was I think, one of the inmates but that’s all I can remember. We ate at the same table every evening, the SS Guards always warned us not to seek shelter in Barns where animals might have lice as Typhus is spread by lice. They told us this in no uncertain terms and told us there had been epidemics among their Camp (Lager) which had caused many deaths’

      ‘My memory of those few days is that it was a boring place which everyone just wanted to leave. We were in no way restricted as to what we could do or who we could speak with’

      I asked my mother, if the SS Guards had an inkling the war was lost, or indeed, was conversation on this subject at all permitted?:

      ‘Oh yes, but all of them were quite sure it would end as did the first War, with an armistice’

      I shook my head at this, the best guesstimate for the date she and those ladies were there, is the last half of December 1944. Auschwitz was ‘liberated’ by the Red Army on 21st January 1945. God alone knows what happened to the ‘Old Gentlemen’ of the SS.

      Of course I finally got around to asking her if she or her companions saw or heard anything about the ‘Gaskammer’, in which it was claimed up to 4 Millions had been sent to heaven.

      At this, she became once more my childhood Mother when extremely angry. her face became hard, then she leaned to her left side and symbolically spat on the floor, sort of an Eastern European thing, saying, ‘What rubbish! Look, were were about two dozen women we spent maybe three days there, among our group were some educated people, one was a Doctor, one a Chemist and the Nuns. Women talk, if there were people there, thousands murdered every day, we would have known about it, I was there, that story is propaganda, a lie!’

      She gave birth to me on March 31 1945 in Koenigshutte (Now Chorchov) about 12 Miles Northwest and then once again in a group of female refugees, wheeled me through Opole, Bresslau where the Hitler Youth elite fought the Russians to the last Teenager, then Dresden ‘where the flies were as big as sparrows, and the women could smell death from 20 miles distant’.

      Eventually we arrived at my Uncle’s place in Halle. My father was released in October 1945 and walked from the US POW Camp in France all the way to Halle.

      • Derek's Gravatar Derek
        January 29, 2016 - 4:01 am | Permalink

        That was beautiful, and much more inspiring than the fake stories peddled by Jews, all of whom seem to have been descendants of survivors of the “death camps”.

        Look at this inconsistent propaganda, and the comment I made pointing the contradictions out had been removed:

        (In reference to the picture taken at the Old Town Square, Prague, questioning why the children look so healthy and plump)

        [“The picture was taken, I think, about a year after their liberation, after they’d had time to recover from the terrible conditions that had endured for some years – A holocaust hustler claiming the children had had a year to recover]

        My reply:

        I don’t think a year had passed:

        “Born in Berlin, Bela, was the youngest of six Jewish orphans liberated from the Theresienstadt concentration camp in Czechoslovakia in April 1945.”

        “When none were found on August 15 1945, Bela became one of 301 children aboard a Lancaster bomber, bound for England.”

        From the above it *seems* that they went to the UK in August, thus the picture, which was taken in Prague, couldn’t have been more than a few months after their liberation.

  11. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    January 27, 2016 - 12:18 pm | Permalink

    Thank you Carolyn.

  12. FKA Max's Gravatar FKA Max
    January 27, 2016 - 11:58 am | Permalink

    Very good piece, thank you very much.

    I have been researching the link between psychopathy and the prevalence of it in the Jewish community. So far my research clearly indicates, that there is a higher occurrence on average of this personality disorder/psychopathology in the Jewish community. The main reason for it most likely being high rates of intermarriage between Jews, and since there is a high probability, that psychopathy is hereditary, the outcome of these cultural practices is self-evident. Another reason, could also be, that psychopaths in the Jewish community are not exposed or punished, as not to put a bad light on the Jewish community. This might be well-intentioned, but actually leads to the opposite outcome described in this article, namely that Jews get judged more harshly by outsiders, because they do not punish corrupt elements in their community appropriately. By not punishing criminal elements in their own ranks, even innocent Jews are seen as accomplices to these crimes by outsiders. Another possibility could be, that psychopathic traits and behavior have been intentionally bred and promoted in the Jewish community, because it has served a favorable purpose for the collective survival and success of the Jewish community. Despite occasional difficulties with this trait, overall it was/is deemed favorable and desirable to have, as long as Jewish psychopaths are taught and trained to be psychopathic not against their own, but only towards outsiders, for the good and financial/worldly success of the greater Jewish community.
    What is important to note, is that there is a difference between pedophilia and the abuse of children by a psychopath, even though psychopaths are disproportionately often involved in violence against/sexual abuse of minors, many of them are not pedophiles. I will elaborate on why this distinction is important, but first the study, which points this difference out:
    Psychopathy among pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters.


    Among men who commit sexual offenses against children, at least 2 distinct groups can be identified on the basis of the age of the primary targets of their sexual interest; pedophiles and nonpedophiles.

    In the present report, across 2 independent samples of both types of child molesters as well as controls, a total of 104 men (53 pedophilic and 51 nonpedophilic) who had sexually offended against a child age 13 or younger were compared to each other (and to 49 non-sex offender controls) on psychopathy as assessed by the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI).

    In both samples of child molesters, the nonpedophiles scored as significantly more psychopathic than the pedophiles.

    These results provide further evidence of the importance of distinguishing between these groups of offenders.

    I am pointing this out, because I believe that Greville Janner is not a pedophile, but a psychopath. The importance of making this distinction, is that (and this is just speculation/assumption on my part, I have no data to verify this, yet) child abuse/molestation committed by nonphedofilic psychopaths is more violent i.e. rape, beatings, potentially murder, etc., than child abuse committed by pedophiles, i.e. fondling, etc. This of course, does not justify or sanctify pedophilia in any way, but the severity of abuse committed by psychopaths is greater I believe.

    Secondly, this distinction is also important to consider when we look at conviction rates. Again, I have not data, yet, to back this up, but I think that psychopathic child molesters have a lower conviction rate, because they are better liars, and get away with their crimes for longer, because they are often wealthy, highly educated (clergy, etc.), well connected, glib, etc., just like in the case of Greville Janner. I believe too, that Jimmy Savile, was not a pedophile, but a psychopath, who engaged in child molestation. Psychopaths are highly promiscuous, and men are four-times as likely to be psychopathic than women:

    The diagnostic criteria for psychopathy also include pathological lying, deception (cunning) and manipulative behavior. The psychopath feels only very superficial emotions and has no real feelings for anyone; but he has developed a great ability to deceive. He can be charming to the point of being charismatic. He typically shows highly-developed verbal intelligence and lies with disconcerting aplomb. He is unable to empathize, but learns to simulate it, sometimes with a tendency to histrionics (Latin histrio, “theater actor”). The psychoanalyst Helène Deutsche makes this trait the mark of “as-if personalities” endowed with purely mimetic “pseudo-emotions,” devoid of inner experience, “a little like an actor with good technique, but not animated by any actual life.” (2) But the psychopath is more than that: he is a manipulator. It is through his extraordinary ability to feign, trick, trap, and capture that the psychopath draws his power. Although he himself is immunized against guilt, he becomes a master in the art of using guilt to dominate others. In any situation, the psychopath projects a persona, which can vary according to circumstances. The opinions he wears in public are all disguises that he tailors to his own advantage. However, lying is so deeply embedded in his nature that the question of his “sincerity” is almost irrelevant: the psychopath can beat a lie detector. The truth has no value in his eyes, or merges with the version of events that suits him. The psychopath is unable to put himself in the place of others, and thus to view himself critically. Confident in any circumstance of being right and innocent (and superior), he considers the resentment of his victims as irrational and pointless.

    Although those close to the psychopath – at least those who learn the hard way his true nature – can judge him raving mad, the psychopath is not “sick” because he does not “suffer.” He is innocent of neurosis, and never requests psychiatric care (except as a strategic calculation). He is not psychotic, and cannot be regarded as maladapted to social life. On the contrary, he is, in a certain sense, over-adjusted. That is why the real mystery, from a Darwinian point of view, is not the existence of psychopaths, but their low proportion in the population.[ The explanation for this is, that psychopathy is a negative frequency dependent evolutionary strategy: In negative frequency-dependent selection, the fitness of a phenotype decreases as it becomes more common. This is an example of balancing selection.]

    Jewishness and selective empathy

    The most optimistic low-end estimate of the proportion of psychopaths in the Western population is 1%. This 1% should not be confused with the famous 1% who own half the world’s wealth; but a study of senior executives of large companies, published under the title Snakes in Suits, shows that psychopathic traits are widespread among them (3). This is not surprising; modern society values psychopathic traits and favors the upward mobility of psychopaths.

    The fact that Jews today are disproportionately represented among the elite (they form half of billionaires in the United States, while representing only 2.4% of the population) (4) does not allow us to conclude that psychopathy is more prevalent among the chosen people[This conclusion is wrong in my opinion, but the author probably just said this to be politically correct. My research has has led me to believe, that psychopathy is more prevalent in Jews, especially the high-functioning kind, that is associated with higher IQs]. In a way, quite the opposite is the case: Jews demonstrate among themselves an extraordinary capacity for empathy, or at least familiarity that breeds exceptional solidarity to the point of self-sacrifice. But the selective nature of this empathy suggests that it is addressed less to the humanity of others than to their Jewishness.

    • January 27, 2016 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

      Thank you for your views on this issue. I think psychopathy needs to be subjected to far more critical examination. If humankind is to survive, this highly destructive mental aberration must be addressed.

      “Another reason, could also be, that psychopaths in the Jewish community are not exposed or punished, as not to put a bad light on the Jewish community.”

      What is missed here is the Jew’s totally different cultural environment. These are a people that value what non-Jews usually consider criminal traits. Lying, stealing, extortion and murder are virtues among the Jews. If you have doubts, then go to their movies and watch how Jews portray what normal non-psychopathic people consider “low life scum”. As usual, when viewing life through the Jew’s dark looking-glass, everything is inverted and reversed.

      Perhaps most glaring among these characterizations is found in the mafia movies where bloodthirsty, mafia killers are portrayed as “good fellas.” They’re really kind, but stern, lovable people that are really chust goot biznessmen. After all, who can blame a bizness man for breaking the kneecaps of a low life scum that doesn’t meet their benevolent loan-shark’s payment on time? This vice-as-virtue is a key element in the vast cultural gulf separating Jews from the rest of humanity.

      “This is not surprising; modern society values psychopathic traits and favors the upward mobility of psychopaths.” [ . . . ]
      “Although he himself is immunized against guilt, he becomes a master in the art of using guilt to dominate others.”

      Again, one only needs look at the Jew’s movie portrayal of the Jewish family, especially the infamous Jewish mother who riddles her children with guilt. So what is the children’s reaction? They simply dismiss mom’s guilt inducing eccentricity. What is seen in this portrayal is the very mechanism highlighted in the above statement “he himself is immunized against guilt”. According to their movies, one of the primary roles of the Jewish mother is to inoculate her child against feelings of guilt.

      This alludes to a point I have made repeatedly, psychopaths are bred, this cultural mental aberration is a genetic trait, but from where did it spring?

      At the risk of wearing out my welcome, I will once again publish an extract from the Forward to my book.

      “Your father staggers to his feet and like a drunk on a binge, lurches away from the butchering table with a beatific look on his face, even as the priest calls for the next sinner to step forward. Suddenly you feel the full emotional horror of the fate awaiting the other animals brought to this slaughterhouse. All the while, these men called priests, howl, chant and dance about, reciting their ritualistic incantations that beg god’s forgiveness. It was a horrifically, bloody spectacle.

      The bloodlust continues well into evening. What you never witness is the secret ceremony inside the Tabernacle’s tent where the high priest in a final act of crazed bloodlust, drinks the sacrificial blood before the mercy seat. The Levirate injunction against consuming blood is a public admonishment to restrict the use of blood products. However, the priesthood exempted itself from its own laws and secretly did not observe such restrictions. This covert act, along with the more acceptable act of consuming sacrificial meat, will later be replayed by Yeshu during his last supper, when he symbolically offers wine and bread representing his body and blood to his disciples.

      A few days later, the priests fold their moving slaughterhouse, the Tabernacle tent, and move on. They will move to the next tribe where the sacrificial cycle will again be played out.

      Consider the effect this gruesome spectacle might have on a child. Blood spewing everywhere, chanting priests mesmerized in crazed bloodlust, driven on by the howling and grunting of animals bleeding out the last of their life on the ground. This cacophony is accompanied by the restless bleating and bellowing of animals awaiting their fate. Sinners, with hands raised towards heaven, cry out for god’s forgiveness. Imagine your parents continually consumed with the thought of blood and the avoidance of it, thoughts that translate into an unnatural obsession about the red, gooey stuff.

      “Extrapolating this bloody horror over generational millennium, led to the creation of a psychopathic culture of bloodlust. This psychopathy is not a preference, not a peculiar, incidental, twist in a few exceptional personalities, but a culturally inbred condition – one that can neither be altered, nor escaped. The culture of blood has permeated the very core of Judaism until it has become a genetic component of their race.

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        January 29, 2016 - 3:05 am | Permalink

        What book is that? I’d like to read it.

        • January 29, 2016 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

          “The Conspiracy of Man”. Simply click on my name in any of my postings and the conspiracyofman website will come up. Note, this excerpt is from the forward not posted on the website.

          One thing I promise, you have never read or heard the Bible’s stories related in this manner. These are stories that have real and profound non-religious meaning in a real world. It’s just that these stories have been imbued with the magic and mysticism of generations of religious zealots.

          Although I am on the final chapter, which is what Christians call “The Passion,” due to editing constraints, I have only posted the first three and one half chapters of the book. Chapter four the longest of the chapters is a rewrite of the entire book of Genesis as these stories would have been told to Jesus.

          Chapter five are the laws, and if you don’t get a real bang out of sitting down with a book of legal minutiae, e.g. federal regulations, you probably won’t enjoy this chapter. However, these laws are the absolute lynchpin to understanding what the Bible is really about.

          The very word “Torah” means both “law” and “instruction”. Therefore the title describes the first five books of Moses as books of legal instruction.

          Essentially the Bible is a cookbook of recipes describing how various methods of the use and manipulation of wealth and power from a tribe’s religious followers and outsiders as well.

          Read introduction “To Serve Man for a better description.

  13. Ed's Gravatar Ed
    January 27, 2016 - 10:59 am | Permalink

    And the Jews feign surprise at the “rising anti-semitism” like all con artist criminals do. Of course people would demand Jews be removed once they see the truth about Jews.

    Great display of Jewish hypocrisy! The entire nation of Israel remains silent over the Jewish genocide/holocaust of the Palestinians, but all white nations should feel bad about their enemies getting what they had coming.

    A Jewish comedian joked last year that after his grandmother was educated in Jewish history, she couldn’t believe the Holocaust only happened once! Jews are well aware of what they are doing. They will pay dearly in the very near future.

  14. tadzio308's Gravatar tadzio308
    January 27, 2016 - 10:15 am | Permalink

    Pedophilia has been used by the very Jewish media to damage and destroy the Roman Catholic Church. It is the usual projection strategy. Attribute to others that which you have done yourself.

    All institutions dealing with youths fall prey to deviants. Some more than others. The Roman Church is so large that inevitably, given human frailty, there will always be grist for the mill. A small number have even inhabited the higher clergy. There is no evidence that the incidence is greater than in other similar institutions. But the raw numbers may be larger.

    All and all the response of the Church has been marked by compassion and humility while suffering a barrage of unabashed acrimonious hatred. To my knowledge the Church has never attacked or marginalized victims, their families, their careers or their businesses.

    Compare this to the horrendous behavior of Jewry when its rabbis have been exposed. Victims are marginalized. Family businesses have been destroyed. People are ostracized. Rabbis decree that only traitors report crimes. The Roman Church enforces no doctrine of mesirah that hampers public prosecutors.

    And all you hear is Silence.

    Sexual abuse of children is rampant among those practicing Judaism. There are passages in the Talmud that condone pedophilia or at least minimize its moral depravity. When exposed the bulk of the Jewish community forms a phalanx around the perpetrators and declare the good reputation of the synagogue is of greater value than the innocent purity of their own children. Israel today is home to pedophile rabbis in contradiction the duties of treaties of extradition. This may result of the greater incidence of pedophilia among the high strung unstable population of Jewry.

    More Silence from the media.

    The case of Lord Janner is business as usual in the Western world ruled by an immoral hostile elite that condones more sexual misconduct than just ravaging little girls and boys. Israel and Jewry has ever been the hub of sex trafficking in all its lurid practices. The pornography industry is a Jewish industry. No religion indulges perversion more than Judaism.

    And ever more Silence in America and Europe from on high.

    If you want to confirm the extent of the world’s Numero Uno unreported cesspool of deviant crimes against children it is recommended that you peruse the issue at Many other matters are covered but the mountains of information there will give a peek behind the curtain of Silence that is enforced by mainstream outlets.

    The tawdry career of Lord Jenner is not an exceptional case.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      January 27, 2016 - 2:03 pm | Permalink

      “All institutions dealing with youths fall prey to deviants.”
      This is true, and I suggest that it need not be at the level of an institution. After all, in family child molesters are not uncommon.
      I offer this comment, not as a criticism of Roman Catholicism or deny the role of the Jewish controlled media, but merely to point out that there has been written accusations of sexual misconduct by RC priests for decades before the onslaught began.
      While sorting my father’s possessions on his death more than 40 years ago, I came across a book written by Lucien Vinet, titled “I Was a Priest”. While flipping through it, I recognized that one part of the forward was written by a neighbour, who, unbeknownst to me, had been a priest, and his wife a nun. Without going into detail, the general accusations made in the book were that the Jesuit seminary in Quebec, where Vinet had attended, actively promoted homosexuality, and routinely shifted priests to other parishes if sexual misconduct of any kind became too obvious.
      Now, the esteemed M. de Craon has, on more than one occasion used a phrase something like ‘the Jesuits stinking the place up’. Not being a Catholic, and recognizing his depth of knowledge on the Church, I can only defer to his assessment. The accusations in the book may well be limited to the particular seminary in question, or perhaps to the Jesuits in Canada. I have some difficulty wrapping my mind around a world-wide “Jesuit plot”, much less a Church-wide plot, I suppose it is not entirely out of the realm of possibility, however remote. However, the point to which I return, is that the book was published in 1949, not by Jews, but the Protestant League. In context, there was, until the mid to late 60s an underground religious struggle going on in Canada which manifested itself in the political arena locally, provincially, and federally. Whatever the motives for publishing the book, and its subsequent reprints, the fact remains that the accusations predate the Jews picking up on the mantra.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        January 27, 2016 - 11:29 pm | Permalink

        Curmudgeon my friend,

        I shan’t emulate Max and use 10,000 words of copy-and-paste bafflegab where 100 words of sense would suffice, especially in an area where KM and his crew would prefer we not venture at all. But I will say what follows; as it is necessarily without full documentation, no one need take my word for any of it.

        Sight unseen, I am prepared to accept the claims of M. Vinet’s book and of your former neighbor’s foreword. My own researches have led me to conclude that the infiltration of the Catholic clergy by Marrano Jews, very high ranking Freemasons, and criminally deviant homosexual pedophiles (the three categories obviously have a good deal of overlap)—an infiltration that had been warned about and guarded against from the time of the Enlightenment—began to reach critical mass in the USA and Canada in the first two decades of the twentieth century. (Some think the rot set in earlier in Europe, others think later. I simply don’t know enough to say for sure, but if forced to bet, I’d go for earlier.)* As the Jesuits had functioned as the primary bloodhounds and whistle-blowers during much of that time—in the nineteenth century using their brilliant Rome-based journal Civiltà Cattolica to expose one plot and group of individuals after another—the Society itself became a prime target for the infiltrators, and sadly they made grave inroads there.

        Not surprisingly, sexual deviance and doctrinal deviance, the latter certainly including the tendency to kowtow to the Jews, went hand in hand. By the 1920s the US northern Midwest had become the first stronghold of prelates and clerics who were secret perverts, heretics, and apostates (sadly a sizable number of their clerical colleagues and friends directly across the Canadian border were allied with them). It now seems almost certain that some, perhaps most, of the cardinals and archbishops who should have led the charge against the corruption either were corrupt themselves or were simply too cowardly to act.

        I could name a bunch of names, but this isn’t really the time or the venue. I feel confident in saying, however, that the first important leader of the pack was George Cardinal Mundelein.

        In his various books, Léon de Poncins, the great French historian of conspiracies, documented the course of twentieth-century Jewish infiltration of the Catholic clergy and hierarchy in Europe, but he understandably didn’t dig as deeply into the American church. Yet the money and intellectual firepower (e.g., John Courtney Murray and Gustave Weigel, both Jesuits) of the corrupted American church were factors almost as important to the Vatican II sellout as the more famous German, Dutch, and Italian prelates and theologians whose names and notions filled many columns of type fifty years ago.

        Sad to say, this is only a fragment of a very distasteful story.
        * It was no coincidence that Pascendi Dominici Gregis, the 1907 encyclical of Pope St. Pius X that described and condemned theological Modernism and required all priests to swear a solemn oath renouncing Modernism and affirming their adherence to the immemorial doctrine of the church, was written and published when it was.** That is, the Vatican was very well informed of the growth of sexual and doctrinal corruption and aimed at killing the snake once and for all. But like Macbeth, alas, Pius X only scotched it.

        ** Indeed, one big fan of the conciliar revolution who taught me theology in college blithely remarked that most of the council fathers and periti had perjured themselves at the time of their ordination and continued in a perjurious state for decades thereafter. He thought that this state of affairs was just dandy.

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          January 28, 2016 - 10:12 am | Permalink

          Thank you Pierre.
          Once again a fountain of information. It has become evident to me, over the years, that fomenting dissent and corruption within the spectrum of Christianity has been a master stoke of the evil ones within the tribe. The focus is always on the differences, not the similarities. At the risk of fomenting discord, a significant parts of M. Vinet’s book did focus on the differences. However, much of the context was why he found certain things objectionable, and how, in his opinion, they were nothing more than tools to control. In retrospect, I suppose it could be viewed as a form of corruption from the original purpose.

        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          January 28, 2016 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

          Your reference to Leon de Poncins books aroused my curiosity as I had read a few of his books years ago, which I needed to import from an obscure little publisher, so I was happily surprised to find that his books are now available at Amazon. Excellent books, well-written and informative, and that they are now available to all and in the mainstream is a good sign, a bit of light in the darkness.

    • FKA Max's Gravatar FKA Max
      January 27, 2016 - 5:59 pm | Permalink

      I don’t think the Catholic Church/Vatican is as lily-white and pure as you believe it to be. But you make some good points in its defense, especially when compared to the under-reported abuses committed in and by the (highly organized, coordinated, and psychopathic) Jewish community. Be they of a sexual, financial, political, or legal nature, etc.
      I think the real problem is, that hierarchical organizations and institutions, which wield a lot of power and authority, be that worldly or spiritual power, attract a certain type of personality. The Roman Catholic Church to me is foremost a corporation. One could say/analogize, that its bishops and cardinals are CEOs and the Pope is the Chairman of the Supervisory Board.
      I do not think it is a coincidence, that clergyman is a popular career choice among psychopaths. Even though not very well-paid, these careers offer much prestige and power:

      According to Dutton, the ten careers that have the highest proportion of psychopaths are:[11]

      Media (TV/radio)
      Police officer
      Civil servant

      All Christian denominations (and all important organizations and professions in general), but especially the Roman Catholic Church, because of its worldwide power and reach, should require their priests to take the Psychopathy Checklist test, before they ordain them or elevate them to the status of bishop or cardinal. This would prevent a lot of abuse and resulting justified bad press:

      It was actually rumored, that some banks used the Psychopathy Checklist test not to weed out psychopaths in their hiring process, but to actually find them and offer them employment, specifically with the purpose for them to be as cutthroat as possible in the service/to the benefit of the bank:

      There have been anecdotal reports that at least one UK bank was using a psychopathy measure to actively recruit psychopaths.[27]

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        January 29, 2016 - 9:01 am | Permalink

        I had to think about your list of psychopaths before replying. Psychopathy includes individuals with enormous egos. It also includes people who are inherently dishonest and/or untrustworthy.
        Your list has a number of occupations where large egos are a must, such as surgeons and police officers. These occupations, by their nature, require the individual to have an absolute iron clad belief in their ability.
        There are also occupations where deception is part and parcel of the occupation, such as the media (TV, radio), journalist, and of course salesmen (or women).
        There is a third category that has elements of both. That being lawyers, CEOs and in some circumstances clergy.
        As for civil servants, that is an enormous net to cast. Is the civil servant clerical staff as likely to be a psychopath as a director? If so, are those psychopathic clerical staff in a position to do more than damage themselves and a handful of co-workers as opposed to a director doing policy development that will damage the population as a whole?
        What is glaringly missing from the list is politicians, and in particular career politicians. Public opinion polls have consistently placed politicians as being dishonest, untrustworthy, and egotistical. Lawyers are also publicly seen as being dishonest, untrustworthy, and egotistical. Interestingly, a significant proportion of politicians are lawyers.
        Your vision of the Church as being a corporation is, in the broadest sense, accurate, mainly because it is hierarchical. Yes, it has assets, but it is the hierarchy that is the main feature of Catholicism, and other Christian denominations.
        Judaism, on the other hand, is not hierarchical. It is more like Communist guerilla cells. There is an overall goal/belief but how they get there is a local issue. I am certain that rabbis are not considered clergy in the list. If they were, there is no doubt in my mind, that psychopathic clergy would not only be on the list, but at the top of it.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      January 28, 2016 - 12:05 am | Permalink

      All institutions dealing with youths fall prey to deviants. Some more than others. The Roman Church is so large that inevitably, given human frailty, there will always be grist for the mill. A small number have even inhabited the higher clergy. There is no evidence that the incidence is greater than in other similar institutions. But the raw numbers may be larger.

      Dear tadzio,

      Apart from the reference to a “small number,” I don’t disagree with anything you have written here. Nor is my long comment to Curmudgeon meant to suggest that there is an argument in progress in which I have chosen to take his side rather than yours.

      What I think is that the number of deviant clerics and prelates in our church, at least here in the States, is frighteningly large—perhaps even a quarter to a third of them. But given that almost every institution in North American and European societies whose mission is “dealing with youths” is a government agency, an NGO, or a QUANGO, my deep conviction is that their officials and staff are deviant and corrupt in the majority, not just a sizable minority. I think, too, that the corruption quotient among rabbis and in Jewish organizations is the worst of all. Any Jewish parent who trusts his children to one of those monsters merits capital punishment at their hands.

      I think, thus, that I may safely describe myself as being in full agreement with your major premise.

  15. January 27, 2016 - 8:09 am | Permalink

    For what really needs to be said on this “Holocaust Memorial Day” — created by Israel for the consumption of the goyim (in Israel they have their own special commemoration called Yom ha Shoah in the spring — go to Thanks.

    • Rick's Gravatar Rick
      January 27, 2016 - 9:24 am | Permalink

      Thank you Carolyn for pushing this issue and the envelope as hard as you have been doing. People are finally opening their eyes to what you have been saying for years. The Holocaust mythos is the linchpin of white displacement.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      January 27, 2016 - 3:47 pm | Permalink

      I agree. Without the keystone of the Nuremberg Trail Holocaust, the whole edifice comes down.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      January 27, 2016 - 4:49 pm | Permalink

      The Pantheon of Heroes for truth.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        January 27, 2016 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

        When will Merkel open an exhibition on the horror of the gulags?

      • January 27, 2016 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

        I guess by “Pantheon of Heroes for truth” you mean the Revisionists that are recognized and listed at the jan27 site. They are impressive, aren’t they. Thanks for saying so.

        • Calm's Gravatar Calm
          January 28, 2016 - 9:19 am | Permalink

          (Mod. Note: Irrespective of the merits of this “comment” post, it’s way too long. Other commenters please note that comments are comments, and not long treatises. If you want to submit an article length piece like the below, please contact the TOO editor, rather than using the comments section.)

          I believe that the attacks against Jewish Folks in Germany in 1930-31, was not explicitly against the Jewish Folks, but rather against the “Ruling Class” or the “Prominent Upper Class”.

          One needs to recall that these attacks upon “Prominent” individuals was taking place immediately after the 1929 stock market crash and the beginning days of the Great Depression. Pawnshop owners were attacked. Anybody who even smelled of wealth was attacked.

          There were attacks against the “Educated Class” because the whole of humanity wanted revenge against those folks who have all the PHD’s after their names ….. Because the best educated came from the most wealthy families and had been proven to be the best liars!

          Poor Folks across Europe remembered how the “Prominent Folks” flaunted their wealth during the Roaring 20’s, and after the crash of ’29, the Poor Folks resented having to take their family heirlooms and valuables to a pawnshop just to feed their families. A majority of pawn shops were owned by Gypsies and Jews and would indicate why to this day the word “Gypsy” has a narrative which is almost identical to that of Jewish folks.

          I have little doubt that the word “Jew” was being spewed from the mouths of people standing in crowded soup lines simply because the two or three main Financial/Banking houses in the universe at the time were of Jewish origin. It would be only natural. In the same way that “Muslim” is spewed within the crowded U.S. funeral lines after a terrorist attack.

          The population of Europe began to force their governments to begin seizing all valuables/assets of the “Prominent Folks”. (Not specifically “Jewish Folks”.)

          The population across Europe viewed the “Richness” as being earned from the avails of crime (fraud) and thus should be seized as what is done with prostitutes and pimps.

          I am quite positive that if each country within Europe (immediately after the crash of 1929), had deliberately set out to arrest and imprison the top 10 thousand “Prominent” individuals within the finance/regulatory system of each country, a majority of those being arrested would of been Jewish Folks simply because of the inordinate amount of prestige, wealth and influence they held within all of Europe at the time. And because they were the best educated as well.

          I don’t think that these arrests and attacks could be claimed as being “Anti-Semitism”. It was unavoidable because if you arrested just 10 business leaders from the Ruling Class (most prominent people) within any European country at the time, there is little doubt that a majority of those arrested would of been of Jewish origin.

          Religion (and thus anti-Semitism) was first introduced into the mix by the Jewish Folks themselves.

          As Hitler began to seize the assets and wealth of “Prominent People” in Germany, the American Jewish Congress declared a “Holy War” against Germany and encouraged a boycott of German products on March 12, 1933. A mere 3 years into Great Depression or after the crash of 1929. “Holy War” is the exact term used by Samuel Untermyer at the time.
          (I find it ironic that the Jewish Folks would encourage a boycott and yet today would heap scorn on the BDS movement.)

          It was the worldwide Jewish leadership – not the Third Reich – that effectively fired the first shot in the Second World War.

          Few people know the facts about the singular event that helped spark what ultimately became known as World War II – the international Jewish declaration of war on Germany shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power and well before any official German government sanctions or reprisals against Jews were carried out. The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily Express of London described how Jewish leaders, in combination with powerful international Jewish financial interests, had launched a boycott of Germany for the express purpose of crippling her already precarious economy in the hope of bringing down the new Hitler regime. It was only then that Germany struck back in response.

          In early 1933, Hitler was not the undisputed leader of Germany, nor did he have full command of the armed forces. Hitler was a major figure in a coalition government, but he was far from being the government himself. That was the result of a process of consolidation which evolved later.

          Despite all this, the leaders of the Jewish community refused to relent. On March 27 there were simultaneous protest rallies at Madison Square Garden, in Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Cleveland and 70 other locations. The New York rally was broadcast worldwide. The bottom line is that “the New Germany” was declared to be an enemy of Jewish interests and thus needed to be economically strangled. This was before Hitler decided to boycott Jewish goods.

          This New York Daily News front page headline hailed the massive anti-German protest rally held in Madison Square Garden on March 27, 1933. Despite efforts by the German government to alleviate tensions and prevent the escalation of name-calling and threats by the international Jewish leadership, the rally was held as scheduled. Similar rallies and protest marches were also being held in other cities during the same time frame. The intensity of the Jewish campaign against Germany was such that the Hitler government vowed that if the campaign did not stop, there would be a one-day boycott in Germany of Jewish-owned stores. Despite this, the hate campaign continued, forcing Germany to take defensive measures that created a situation wherein the Jews of Germany became increasingly marginalized.

          It was in direct response to this that the German government announced a one-day boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany on April 1. German Propaganda Minister Dr. Joseph Goebbels announced that if, after the one-day boycott, there were no further attacks on Germany, the boycott would be stopped. Hitler himself responded to the Jewish boycott and the threats in a speech on March 28 – four days after the original Jewish declaration of war – saying:

          “Now that the domestic enemies of the nation have been eliminated by the Volk itself, what we have long been waiting for will not come to pass.

          The Communist and Marxist criminals and their Jewish-intellectual instigators, who, having made off with their capital stocks across the border in the nick of time, are now unfolding an unscrupulous, treasonous campaign of agitation against the German Volk as a whole from there….

          Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity are being launched about Germany. Horror stories of dismembered Jewish corpses, gouged out eyes and hacked off hands are circulating for the purpose of defaming the German Volk in the world for the second time, just as they had succeeded in doing once before in 1914.”

          I believe that it was only after the “Holy War” speech by Samuel Untermyer and where he introduced “Religion” in 1933, that “Deathly” Anti-Semitism took center stage in Germany.

          There are many claims as to the viciousness heaped upon Jewish Folks within Europe at the time.

          I believe that this was because in the early 1930’s millions and millions of refugees streamed into Europe after fleeing Joseph Stalin and his henchmen in Russia.

          Millions upon millions of refugees with a vicious hatred towards Joseph Stalin and most especially towards those who held the most senior posts within the in the Soviet security apparatuses. And, in 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts were of Jewish origin.

          I have little doubt that the word “Jew” was being spewed from the mouths of the millions of Russian refugees standing in crowded soup lines in downtown Germany with an awful hate-on towards the Jewish Folks.

          During the bitter winter of 1932–33, 25,000 Ukrainians per day were being shot or dying of starvation and cold.

          In 1932–33, Stalin unleashed genocide against Ukraine’s independent-minded farmers. Six to seven million Ukrainians were shot or purposely starved to death. Starving Ukrainians even resorted to cannibalism. The man who directed this genocide, Lazar Kaganovitch, the Soviet Eichmann ….

          From 1934–1941 alone, some 7 million victims were sent to the system of concentration camps known as the “gulag,” including one million Poles, hundreds of thousands Lithuanians, Latvians and Estonians, and half the entire Muslim Chechen and Ingush people. Volga Germans, Crimean Tatars, Bashkirs, Kalmyks followed. Stalin’s gulag did not need gas chambers: cold, disease and overwork killed 30% of inmates yearly.

          I am not claiming that the Jewish Folks “deserved it”.

          What I am trying to point out is that the harassment and arrests of “Prominent Folks” in Germany (1929-1933) began as “Class Warfare” was not specifically aimed at a particular “Religion”.

          I believe that Hitler began with a “Peoples Revolt Against The Ruling Class”.

          I don’t think that the holocaust had anything much to do with Religious Belief, but rather it was the People rising up against “Inequality” and it just so happened that Jewish Folks held the most senior posts within the Financial/Regulatory System.

          And the same thing is happening today as the World Economy continues to crumble.

          Today, as in Europe during the 1930’s, people across the universe are really pissed off and they want the “Economic Terrorists” (those in charge of supervising the finance/regulatory systems) strung up on lamp posts out behind some gas station and in some sinister dark alley..

          People are just as angry at all the Elites (Not specifically the Jews) as they were all across Europe during the 1930s.

          On My Mind; Wall Street Worries
          Felix Rohatyn, the investment banker, has gone public with his concern, testifying before a Senate committee about the ”cancer called greed” that is threatening the financial industry. He talks of his fear of a vicious ”backlash.”
          Fear of a particular backlash led to private meetings among some top Jewish figures in the industry, bankers, chief executive officers, heads of brokerages. The central topic was the fact that so many of the men caught cheating or about to be indicted were Jewish. There was concern that the backlash might carry a decided tinge of anti-Semitism. The anti-Jewish arbitrageur jokes are all around the street.
          Anybody with an ounce of sensitivity knows that anti-Semites do not need excuses to hate Jews. There is no need for Jews on Wall Street to feel called upon to explain the number of Jews involved any more than there is for the members of any race or religion to try to explain their evildoers.
          But anybody with an ounce of sensitivity also knows that this good advice will not prevail. Every minority group whose members are caught doing dirty worries anyway, even though it knows it should not have to.
          The religion of the crooks and near-crooks is not the issue. Anti-Semitism is not the issue either. The issue is that Wall Street every day practices what the people believe is just plain wrong. That is dangerous to Wall Street and to the rest of us.
          By A. M. Rosenthal
          January 31, 1987

          I believe that we are being told that the holocaust against the Jewish Folks was carried out because of their religious beliefs because the Upper class don’t ever want anybody to think about (much less talk about or even entertain the thought) of attacking them in the same way as what happened in Europe after the crash in 1929. Especially after the Capitalists watched their mentors (in the 1930’s) being strung up on lamp posts.

          So the Capitalists sell us the holocaust as being a war against a particular religion and not against a particular Prominent Class of people.

          It suits the American Capitalists quite well to blitz the population with the “Myth” of the holocaust being a “Religious” war and not a “Class War” as it really was.
          Why is it that it is quite Okay to talk about the holocaust against the Aboriginals in North America and yet not about the Jewish Holocaust?


          I suspect that Hitler was referring to these matters in 1925 which was just a short few years after WWI.

          In an historical context, WWI ended in November 1918 and Hitler had expressed views in 1925 as he was attempting to explain why Germany lost.

          Within the complete quote Hitler referred to Arthur Schopenhauer and Erich Ludendorff.

          Schopenhauer was an atheist who had claimed …. “While all other religions endeavor to explain to the people by symbols the metaphysical significance of life, the religion of the Jews is entirely immanent and furnishes nothing but a mere war-cry in the struggle with other nations.”

          Erich Ludendorff was convinced that the German Army had been betrayed by Marxists and Republicans in the Versailles Treaty.
          Ludendorff was also extremely suspicious of the Social Democrats and leftists, whom he blamed for the humiliation of Germany through the Versailles Treaty. Ludendorff claimed that he paid close attention to the business element (especially the Jews), and saw them turn their backs on the war effort by letting profit, rather than patriotism, dictate production and financing. Again focusing on the left,

          Karl Marx was Ancestrally Jewish, his maternal grandfather was a Dutch rabbi, while his paternal line had supplied Trier’s rabbis since 1723, a role taken by his grandfather Meier Halevi Marx.

          Because Hitler said this just after the end of WWI, …. What “Organization” owned the majority of money lending facilities within Germany during WWI? And, Which “Organization” was most prominent within Britain and financed the war effort against Germany?
          I suspect that Jewish Folks held the majority of the most prominent positions within banking facilities and the Intellectual Class worldwide and not just within Germany.

          And, let us not forget what happened after after World War II and the holocaust …..

          Many, many, of the same Jewish Folks who fled Europe during Hitler’s rampage arrived in Hollywood and New York, and set up film studios. Hollywood financed, produced and distributed 90 percent of U.S. media in the early television days. (The ADL would prefer people say that many executives in the industry “happen to be Jewish” at the time.)

          Many of the same people who had just experienced and fled from the discrimination, stereotyping and racism by Hitler and Goebbels, committed the identical type of “Branding-Crime” here in North America.

          It was some of these same people who fed us images of First Nations People as being untrustworthy savages and who spoke with a forked-tongue and blacks as inhuman. (I often refer to the racism and/or what happened to the blacks and other minorities within the media within North America (Between 1940 and 1970) as being a Hollow-Cost.)

          Have you ever seen a “scheming Jew” in a Hollywood movie?

          “…. there’s a whole army of actors like Joe Pesce, that serve the niche of playing Italian Mafiosi. But no actors playing the scheming Jew because that is not a Hollywood Role. ….. The role of the scheming, subversive, money-loving Jew is just not allowed ….

          ….As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between “The 700 Club” and “Davey and Goliath” on TV all day….”

          There are a few other things which took place immediately after World War II and the holocaust and which fueled Anti-Semitism.

          “After the Germans murdered the Jews of Europe, they received the Marshall Plan and the Palestinians received the “Holocaust bill.””
          –Richard Melson, Comment, February 23, 2011–

          In 1948, with Hitler dead less then 2 years, …. At the very heart of the newly formed country of Israel, …. at the highest levels of government, …. within the Israeli cabinet, the Jewish folks were actually talking about committing a holocaust against the Arabs and which is the exact same crimes as Hitler was being chastised for.

          “We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.”
          –-David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978–
          –Israel Koenig, advisor to the Israeli Knesset, The Koenig Memorandum (Al Hamishmar newspaper, September 7, 1976)–

          Many people dispute the above mentioned statement, and everybody “Lawyers-Up”, and then it just becomes a contest between someone with one Phd after their name or others with 3 doctorate degrees battling it out in Mouse Land.

          However; the “Palestine Holocaust” did take place regardless.

          Letter from David Ben-Gurion to his son Amos
          “When we acquire one thousand or 10,000 dunams, we feel elated. It does not hurt our feelings that by this acquisition we are not in possession of the whole land. This is because this increase in possession is of consequence not only in itself, but because through it we increase our strength, and every increase in strength helps in the possession of the land as a whole. The establishment of a state, even if only on a portion of the land, is the maximal reinforcement of our strength at the present time and a powerful boost to our historical endeavors to liberate the entire country.
          We shall admit into the state all the Jews we can. We firmly believe that we can admit more than two million Jews. We shall build a multi-faceted Jewish economy– agricultural, industrial, and maritime. We shall organize an advanced defense force—a superior army which I have no doubt will be one of the best armies in the world. At that point I am confident that we would not fail in settling in the remaining parts of the country, through agreement and understanding with our Arab neighbors, or through some other means.”
          Obtained from the Ben-Gurion Archives in Hebrew, and translated into English
          By the Institute of Palestine Studies, Beirut
          October 05, 1937

          Jewish Folks Looted Arab Homes in the same way Hitler had done in Germany just a mere 3 years earlier.

          Looting, Looting, and More Looting
          The systematic looting of more than 60,000 Palestinian books by Israeli forces and the attempted destruction of Palestinian culture.
          November 23, 2001

          The Causes and Character of the Arab Exodus from Palestine: The Israel Defence Forces Intelligence Service Analysis of June 1948
          The Ethnic cleansing of Palestinians began (according to Israeli documents) on the 1st of December 1947.
          391,000 had been uprooted and expelled by the time the 1948 War began despite the fact that 181 expressly forbade the alienation of property.
          By Brewer August 5, 2011 at 8:58 pm
          UNGA resolution 181 passed on 29 November 1947. It recommended that the Security Council institute measures to partition Palestine and called for the end of the Mandate on 1st August 1948.
          UNGA resolutions are recommendations only. 181 would not become enforceable until reconstituted as a Security Council resolution.
          No populace would willingly cede sovereignty over half of its territory.
          The notion that Palestinians contributed to the conflict by exercising their right of withholding consent for a demonstrably unjust proposal while the opposing faction were already driving civilians from their homes is post facto nonsense.

          Since I pointed earlier about the “Jewish-Gentile Divide” ……

          Here is how the “Tribe” Performs within the world.

          “…. The Netanyahu government, which has preached the gospel of sanctions and Iran-hating for years. For the world to be reminded by this case that Israel continues to be in business with the Iranian regime (though Iranian oil no longer flows through it, the pipeline continues to carry oil), is an inconvenient fact Bibi wishes to avoid.”

          I believe that the evidence shows that Israel has done more harm to the interests of the United States than any Arab country ever thought of doing.

          “It is difficult for me, even in the so-called “year of the spy,” to conceive of a greater harm to national security than that caused by the defendant [Jonathan Pollard] in view of the breadth, the critical importance to the U.S., and the high sensitivity of the information he sold to Israel.”
          –Caspar W. Weinberger, secretary of defense, March 03, 1987–

          The Apollo Affair: NUMEC Investigations and where Israel stole all the nuclear secrets from the U.S.. And, in later years, attempted to sell it all to South Africa.

          “…. 80 percent of the ecstasy seized in North America originated in the Netherlands, …. The State Department is certain that Israeli organizations are linked to the laboratories in the Netherlands and are responsible for the worldwide distribution.”

          Israel’s Star Role In Global Drug Trade

          Since I was born after World War II (in 1948), I hold no sense of responsibility for what happened to the Jewish Folks and the holocaust. …. But, the holocaust against the Arabs and Palestinians carried out by Israel and its supporters happened during my lifetime and on “My Watch” so to speak, and I am quite dismayed.

          For my complete lifetime, Jewish Folks have been entering courtrooms across the universe seeking compensation and the return of properties, artwork, and other valuables which were seized during Hitlers Reign.

          Never once did I ever hear a Jewish Person claim that the holocaust was too long ago, or the facts had changed on the ground as they made their compensation claims …. But that is what the Jewish Folks are telling the Palestinian People.

          And, on My Watch …. in My Lifetime …..

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        January 29, 2016 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

        Apropos commenter Calm, we’ve all heard the rumors, but can we get an answer to the question on everyone’s mind: Will Calm forthwith be declared the new captain of this site’s Olympic Long-Windedness Team, or must the announcement of the change at the top await a formal statement from gubbler wishing his successor well? The other team members and I really hope to see this matter resolved soon.

        • January 30, 2016 - 6:09 am | Permalink

          Cardinal Newman said (something like) one of the highest achievements of oratory is to deftly insert a concealed barb, hidden amidst a flood of verbiage. Maybe we have a form of ‘spot the ball’ contest?

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          January 30, 2016 - 8:35 pm | Permalink

          You cite an eloquent authority, Rerevisionist. I suspect, however, that Newman’s boat, like mine, would have capsized in Calm’s flood long before the barb’s prick became a concern!

          Did you see that on another thread, gubbler responded to Calm’s challenge with his own longest comment ever? KM or his moderator gave gubbler the same “henceforth keep it shorter or else” warning that Calm got here.

Comments are closed.