Keith Vaz MP
Just as the British establishment thought it had buried the Lord Greville Janner child abuse story it is coming back to haunt them in the most unexpected ways. For one of Janner’s closest political associates and stoutest defenders has been filmed by a tabloid newspaper hiring young male prostitutes and asking for drugs.
When the news broke this weekend “family man” and father-of-two Keith Vaz MP immediately owned up and resigned from his prominent position as chairman of the House of Common’s most powerful watchdog committee.
Vaz was groomed and supported by Lord Janner early in his career. The two were “minority” Labour MPs in neighbouring Leicester constituencies (Vaz’s parents are from India); they were close political allies and thought to have shared many confidences. They were both enthusiasts of mass Muslim immigration and deprecated the Leicester White community’s angry resistance. Vaz became a community leader for Leicester Muslims while Janner became the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews — the most prominent position in the Anglo-Jewry community.
Although not a Muslim himself, Vaz has stood shoulder to shoulder with the Islamic community and has done his part in ensuring that Leicester became one of the first towns in Britain to go majority non-white. In 1989 he led a march of thousands of radical Muslims calling for Salman Rushdie’s “Satanic Verses” novel to be banned. According to Wikipedia, he described that occasion as “one of the great days in the history of Islam and Great Britain.”
In 1991 Janner’s name came up at the trial of a care worker who was accused of abusing boys in his care (my account of this is here). The Judge in that case had bent over backwards to rule out evidence implicating Janner. In particular the Judge ruled out the accused’s statement in court that “One child has been buggered and abused for two solid years by Greville Janner.” Another witness also told the court that Janner “regularly sodomised” him when he was in care, aged 13.
In the House of Commons it was Keith Vaz MP who rose to assure fellow MPs that his old friend was “the victim of a cowardly and wicked attack.” In the same speech Vaz suggested the law be changed so that prominent people could not be accused in open court.
Now, of course, we know very different. The Greville Janner affair was dragged into the open in the face of tremendous official obstruction and indifference. When it finally exploded two years ago one jaw-dropping revelation followed another. It turned out that police investigations had been mysteriously derailed, three chances to prosecute had been missed, there had been love letters from Janner to one boy. A second judge even helped Janner in a cover-up. Dozens of former residents of Leicestershire homes for boys came forward to claim that they had been abused by Janner in a scandal that went back four decades.
Lord Greville Janner
This fresh scandal will bring a renewed focus on the accusations that swirled around the former president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews because of his connection to Keith Vaz. The only part of the Keith Vaz story that is doubtful is the suggestion that it “will shock Westminster.” In fact lurid stories and rumours around Vaz have been circulating for years and this rent boy episode would be one of the milder ones. No doubt this will be followed by a flood of other revelations. The influential Guido Fawkes website has suggested
It is widely known around Westminster that Vaz — who owes his career to Greville Janner — was the unidentified MP in this Sun front page from last year.
The headline on that Sun front page says “Top Labour MP is paedo” but does not name anyone. It is likely that some journalists will be asking again why Keith Vaz protected Janner. Vaz has refused to respond to inquiries on this.
As one of Britain’s most prominent minority politicians Vaz’s name has never been far from controversy. He is seen as someone who sails close to the wind. He has been accused of expenses abuse, taking undeclared financial donations, helping to fix passports for Indian billionaires and much, much more.
These new revelations will also be embarrassing for another close friend of both Lord Janner and Keith Vaz. As Speaker of the House of Commons, the daintily flamboyant figure of John Bercow is privy to more inside information than most. The Guido Fawkes website has said that a year ago he fully knew that Vaz was under police investigation for drug use and “historic” sex crimes. The website says that Bercow protected Vaz. Not only that, but Speaker Bercow appears to have gone out of his way to do some backstage string-pulling so that Vaz would be appointed to the plum job of chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee; the rum manoeuvring on this can be found here. The relevant material is from Col. 915 onwards. The Parliamentary language may be obscure but MPs are complaining that Keith Vaz appears to have been parachuted into an important position and neither they nor the press have not been given the chance to scrutinize the appointment. Also — and very unusually — Keith Vaz was the sole nominee. Vaz has resigned from this position. Doubtless Bercow will be facing questions as to why he was so eager to get Vaz this job.
This comes at a pretty unfortunate time for those in the political and legal establishment who wanted the Greville Janner affair buried and out of the way. Janner’s death, aged 87, just before Christmas last year seemed to end the proceedings and leave the whole matter conveniently unresolved for good.
But the accusations against the co-founder of the Holocaust Education Trust were so appalling, the stink of an establishment cover-up so overpowering, that some kind of hearing was necessary, to give the 22 accusers an opportunity to state their case in open court. To this end it was decided that a little-used procedure, called a “trial of facts,” would be held to hear the evidence. In this procedure a jury would be asked to decide — without pronouncing whether Janner was guilty — if the abuse had taken place. Not ideal then but, if nothing else, it would also bring closure and create an impression there had been at least some attempt at justice.
There was much institutional resistance from the legal establishment. Prominent Jewish legal figures like Jonathan Caplan QC and David Pannick QC were not alone in being willing to defend the DPP’s original decision not to prosecute.
So, in the end, even this grudging concession was not to be. Instead the “trial of facts” hearing was dropped and instead the Janner case was bundled into the massive and much more wide-ranging nationwide inquiry into historic institutional sexual abuse.
This was bizarre. For this huge UK-wide inquiry was tasked with not only looking at historic sex abuse by Muslim rape gangs preying on children from local authority care homes but it would also investigate the Roman Catholic Church, the Anglican Church, National Health Service, schools and so on. And now it will also include the case of Greville Janner.
This melange is totally unwieldy and unmanageable, but perhaps that is no accident. The powers-that-be are keen to nuance sex abuse scandals with the wrong kind of ethnic overtones into a broader caseload. That way, the unmistakeable racial contours of say, the Muslim rape gang assaults, could be submerged into a national picture and the authorities will be able to show that, taken overall, it is White men who are responsible for most of Britain’s rape and child sexual abuse.
The insistence that there is no racial component to the child rape epidemic in northern English towns has long been an article of faith for police chiefs and politicians such as in Manchester where an assistant police chief said “the case was not about race,” but “adults preying on vulnerable young children. It just happens that in this particular area and time, the demographics were that these were Asian men.” It is a variation of the strategy adopted by Labour politicians such as Rotherham’s Sarah Champion MP who said that White men were the main sexual offenders in the UK overall.
But still the Greville Janner affair has a long road ahead of it. From the outset this nationwide inquiry has been plagued by bad luck. The first two chairwomen had to resign when it was discovered they were too close to the institutions they would be investigating. (But given the wide-ranging nature, was there any legal figure in Britain who was free of such connections?)
Eventually the government secured the agreement of a New Zealand judge called Lowell Goddard to steer the inquiry on a huge salary. But the hapless Judge Goddard may not have appreciated the disapproval of the legal establishment to the whole affair.
Soon there were newspaper stories that the scope of the Goddard inquiry needed to be reined in. There were complaints about the cost, there were off-the-record briefings to the media that Goddard herself was “autocratic” or that she made too much money and took too much time off. There were rumours that she was clashing with government lawyers and civil servants over exactly how much independence she would have. At the beginning of August she became the third chairwoman to step down — or was fired, depending on which story you read.
Separately, but at the same time as this was happening, the Janner family was stepping up its own campaign to have the Janner proceedings halted.
Lord Janner had always been stoutly defended by his children; Daniel Janner QC, Marion Janner OBE and Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner. They have promised to spend his entire £2 million estate in the fight to clear his name, if that is what it takes. They are lucky in that, unlike the victims of Rotherham, for example, the media are hanging on their every word.
On 26 July of this year The Times ran a long story headlined “Janner family snub unfair abuse inquiry” in which “sources close to the Janner family” revealed that they had twice refused to take part in Judge Goddard’s proceedings and branded them as unfair because the accused man was not there to answer for himself. Five days later, The Sunday Times decided there was still enough mileage to run pretty much the same story from the same angle. The result was another big article headlined “Janner’s son hits out at macabre child sex inquiry.” In this article Daniel Janner complained bitterly about being interviewed by the police. Perhaps unwisely, Daniel Janner agreed to do this excruciating interview with Channel 4.
Daniel Janner’s assertion of his father’s innocence seems not to have been dented by evidence that Greville Janner lied about his relationship with a convicted paedophile who was part of a paedophile circle.
The BBC have also been happy to place their resources at the disposal of the Janner family. In a fawning interview last month, the BBC generously devoted time to the emotional objections of Janner’s daughter Marion. A BBC platform was also found for the most prominent Janner daughter, Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner. She is a British media personality and can often be found sounding off on BBC outlets on her many causes which include Holocaust remembrance, stamping out anti-Semitism, flooding Britain with refugees and so on. Just over a year ago, at the height of the Janner child abuse scandal, this memorable clip shows how the BBC gave her airtime to celebrate her father’s role in Holocaust remembrance.
It was curious that the BBC should celebrate Janner in this way, given the accusations that continue to swirl around him. The BBC have never seen fit to celebrate the charitable works of their own departed DJ Jimmy Savile in similar fashion. This is despite the fact that Savile also is the subject of sex abuse accusations not much different from those in the Janner case.
The Huffington Post also gave Rabbi Janner-Klausner a huge amount of space in which she seemed to place the blame for the campaign against her father on anti-Semitism.
“It has been dire,” she says, giving a hint of the toll the allegations have taken. “The Janner family has experienced the most putrid, toxic anti-Semitism. It is extreme stuff. It is beyond comprehension. Vile, vile fascist anti-Semitism. This is full on lunacy. And it reminds you that it is there.”
Today, long after the story broke, accusers are still coming forward to tell their stories. They include respectable businessmen and men with their own families. Even a male Jewish historian has given evidence to the police about how he was once propositioned by “respectable family man” Greville Janner when he was in his twenties.
The publication of lurid details of the evidence against Janner, a pillar of the Anglo-Jewish community, a former vice-president of the World Jewish Congress, the Jewish Leadership Council and many other communal organizations, must have been embarrassing for the Jewish community. But there is no danger of a rapid conclusion to this case. At a preliminary hearing it was announced that the beginning of proceedings will be delayed until 2017 — at least.
But if anyone thought the Greville Janner case was going away, the renewed attention on Keith Vaz will have changed that. In the days ahead there will be much interest in Mr Vaz’s history and habits and that is a road that goes back to Leicestershire in the 1980s.
Dealing with Dysfunction: A Review of "What It Is Like to Teach in Failing Schools," Part 1
Björn Höcke and the Potential Return of Sanity in German Politics
Words as Weapons: Asymmetry and Advantage in Linguistic Competition
The Self-Defeating War Hypocrisy of the Left
A Review of "Fistfights with Muslims in Europe: One Man's Journey through Modernity"
I don’t want to sound like I’m defending Janner but what is going on here is extremely sinister. If these fanatics can take down powerful Jews, no one is safe, and I mean no one, women as well.
I’ve written extensively on this but it has a lot to do with feminism not to mention ambulance-chasing lawyers and police officers who’d rather chase old men for imaginary crimes than armed criminals who might shoot back.
In the UK there is no statute of limitations, so any demented female can come forward and accuse a man of raping her 20 years ago. At one time the police would not have tolerated this; now they are supposed to believe the “victim”.
Check out the International False Rape Timeline.
In the US you have the Cosby scandal. There is a case against Cosby re the Constand allegation but the others are all liars, many have never even met him.
This is extremely amusing because you have two victim narratives colliding; again, check out my articles on this.
This is an apology for two inaccuracies in ‘Why did Keith Jaz protect Greville Janner?’ In my copy I described Vaz as a Muslim. As commenters have pointed out, Vaz is many things. Muslim he is not. He describes himself as a Roman Catholic.
It has also been pointed out that Greville Janner was not in court when the convicted child-abuser Frank Beck said the words “One child has been buggered and abused for two solid years by Greville Janner.” Janner was not, in fact, cross-examined at Beck’s trial.
I have made these changes.
FCB, this link from your great piece (on Bercow’s maneuvering) does not work, do you have anything else that would allow it to be found?
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070725/debtext/70725
I’ve changed the link to the Parliamentary hearings. This is correct: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070725/debtext/70725-0015.htm
Begbie writes: The relevant material is from Col. 915 onwards. The Parliamentary language may be obscure but MPs are complaining that Keith Vaz appears to have been parachuted into an important position and neither they nor the press have not been given the chance to scrutinize the appointment.
Also – and very unusually – Keith Vaz was the sole nominee.
Vaz is a portuguese sephardic surname.
Probably his ancestors came as conversos/marranos with the true catholics from Portugal to Goa, India. As we know the conversos often are crypto jews. Lots of them ended up in the New World as well.
To me the man looks jewish, id est sephardic.
Kudos to that Jewish historian mentioned in The Jewish Chronicle Online. His seems to have been a singularly principled stand.
Vaz succeeded Peter Bruinvels as MP in 1987. Bruinvels was one of the last old time Anglicans. He is sorely missed. It is a sign of the Conservative Party’s decadence that he was never offered another opportunity to be an MP
Peter Bruinvels: last of the old time Anglicans? He may be a lay member of the Church of England but scratch the surface and he is as kosher as John Bercow and Greville Janner.
I thought Keith Vaz, descended from Luso-Indians from Goa who settled in the British colony of Aden, was a nominal Roman Catholic. What is the source for calling him Muslim?
Do we have him confused with Keith Ellison of the USA, who is indeed a black Muslim convert?
Just a little nit.
Maybe it has to do with the fact that Vaz led a march of 3 thousand Muslims calling for the banning of The Satanic Verses in 1989. According to Salman Rushdie Vaz said that the demonstration as “one of the great days in the history of Islam and Great Britain”. Maybe there is an assumption that Vaz is Muslim based on that.
Goa is one of the most Spiritually Demonic places I have ever been to on the planet…, and as a loaded kommando cycle tourist of some 20 years…, I’ve been to a “few”.
The churches are boarded up and moldy, the people seem to live in a state of perpetual fear, hard and highly addictive drugs are not only wide spread, but attract the lowest of the lowlifes of the mangy mongrels of the White World, to say nothing of the Indian lowlifes they attract.
The inhabitants are a seriously criminal cocktail of the worst that India, Portugal, Africa (slaves set free who interbred with the Portuguese)…, and I suspect a good amount of Kerala Province Jewish admixture as well as Dravidian Islamics are selectively bred to produce a Nasty Viral Breed of Humanity that is on par with something so surreally depraved one would hardly believe it could exist…, but it does.
If Vas is really from Goa, I suspect his only allegiance is to the Beast Incarnate that is Rothschild.
Fascinating. I wish you could write more about your experiences in Goa in a blog somewhere and provide a link here.
Keith Vaz is many things but he is definitely not a Muslim! The British press state he is of Goan origin and is a Catholic.
Catholics seem to be overrepresented in the English and Welsh prison population. I wonder how many of them are non-English (many of them are probably from Poland, Ireland, etc.)? Anglicans seem to be the least crime-prone:
– http://www.brin.ac.uk/2011/religion-of-prisoners-england-and-wales-2010/
Poland tops league for foreign inmates in UK’s overcrowded jails ahead of Ireland and Jamaica with almost 1,000 behind bars
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2614279/Poland-tops-league-foreign-inmates-UK-jails-ahead-Ireland-Jamaica.html
‘Lord’ Janner used dementia to stay out of prison. Ernie Saunders, one of the all Jew Guinness Four used Alzheimer’s Syndrome to get out of it. Ernie is the only one ever to get over it.
Vaz is a Christian: the name Keith is a huge clue.
IMO, one should always try to look at the actions of individual Filth Jews from a Top-Down Hierarchical Perspective aimed at Eventual Domestication of All Life on the Planet.
As such it comes as no surprise that The Rothschildian Beast-Chief Incarnate would Orchestrate the Allotment of Considerable Resources in the ongoing “advertising” of this and other “…Sex Scandals…”.
For the Sublimating, Nurturing and Correct Channeling of Sexual Energies are Essential Keys to the Eventual Overthrow of the Beast that is World Jewry.
Therefore, by “advertising” this “scandal” far and wide, the Rothschildian Beast is targeting;
1) Thought Preoccupation of the Target Demographic (mostly White Youth) on Deviant Sexual Practices. (for Islamics and Jews are largely incapable of Pre-frontal-Cortically-Dependent, Delayed Gratification Behaviour and have largely already abandoned themselves to the Semitic Enslavement Paradigm.., moreover they largely do not subscribe to the Jew Owned, for White-Goyem consumption, Mass Media) The above has Huge Overtones with respect to Crippling the Sublimation, Nurturing and Channeling of Sexual Energies and therefore Lowering Spiritual Energy and hence the Will Power, Insight and Ability to Overthrow the Beast that is World Jewry.
Subliminally encouraging the spread of sexual degeneracy helps to desensitize, habituate and eventual normalize Spiritually Crippling Behaviours.
2) The Subconscious Lowering of Overall Expectations of Justice among the target demographic (Whites) and therefore destroying Hope, Faith, and the Will to Counter Attack.
3) The giving of the gradual impression (coupled with other Jew Orchestrated Pro-Deviancy Lobby Groups’ Attack-Advocacy) that this sort of perverse behaviour is so wide spread that it should just be accepted. The Filthy Jews and other Semites are thereby working toward eventual exoneration in the practices of Sexually Assaulting the “Human Cattle” that they have convinced themselves they have a right to own and do with whatever they please.
Was the KKK not in part born out of the need to mete out Correct Justice,
as opposed to the Slithering Jewish de-Rationalization of Justice,
to the likes of Sexual Deviants as exemplified in the Mary Fagan case?
http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/American_Knights_of_the_Ku_Klux_Klan_(February's_Legacy)
How far has White Pride has sunken…?
Merely one hundred years ago Degenerate Jews like Jenner or the likes of the Islamic Rape Gangs would have been dealt with in a Proper White Manner.
The long term solution to this problem is the strict adherence to White Principles and Lifestyles that Elevate Spiritual Energy.
According to Wikipedia Vaz is actually Roman Catholic not Muslim: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Vaz
We have the same problem in the United States, leadership very much out of touch with the population of their country.
Leadership? That’s not what I call ’em.
The determined efforts to deny any ‘racial ‘ and / or religious dimension to the paedophilia activities of Muslims and prominent Jews contrasts strongly with the even more determined efforts of the political establishment to hang the same dimension on whites. This was of course strikingly evidenced in, for example the Lawrence affair and its interminable aftermath. There, it will be recalled, MacPherson failed to establish any racist attitudes in the police officers involved and in a deep desire to hang racism on the police one way or another had to resort to the old leftist catch- all, ‘institutional racism’. In this way it smeared eviscerated and demoralised the entire police force and confirmed and strengthened the second class citizenship of the native British in their own country.
This is conspiratorial rubbish. I wrote an article about this sometime ago:
http://www.thelatestnews.com/the-brittan-and-janner-controversies/
Basically there is a case against Janner – one complainant. Incidentally, Janner did not testify at the Frank Beck trial, and many people believe Beck to be entirely innocent. Re Operation Yewtree, you might like to check out the short video I made about it recently. The police were deliberately provoking these allegations. They spent the best part of two years chasing an imaginary paedophile ring that was supposed to have been murdering boys. The BBC made a brief investigation and proved it was rubbish.
As rape does not require corroboration – including in the United States – you might like to think twice before you back any of these damned liars and fantasists. If the name McMartin is not familiar to you, you have surely heard of Salem.
One point I had to laugh at though was when Daniel Janner talked about corroboration by volume, ie dozens of liars coming forward to give the appearance of a strong case. I couldn’t help thinking about Auschwitz when he said that.
“Basically there is a case against Janner – one complainant”
Aren’t there at least SIX complainants suing his estate? But even then how many do you need? Isn’t one enough?
@Alexander
Thanks for the input. We always need to double-check these sorts of things. Would be interesting to see how much of this case can actually be substantiated (keeping in mind that abuse cases are often hard to substantiate even when they really happened)
@ Kai Wesselchak
US readers can discover why the Janner case is exceptional by starting an online search with Guy Adams, “Child sex claims…Greville Janner”, Daily Mail, October 4, 2014, article 2779973.
This comment is an ad for an online ‘newspaper’, presumably Jewish, as usual. The piece is clearly described as an ‘opinion piece’ and adds nothing to the factual basis of these issues.
Vaz isn’t a Muslim. He’s a Roman Catholic (his family were probably St Thomas Christians, originally) who moves with ease between all communities; whether they be Christian, Muslim. Hindu, Sikh or Jew. No door is closed to this creep. Certainly one of greasiest of political operators.
In a Satanic Cult, Ugliness is Art and Perversion is Cool
http://www.newnationalist.net/2016/09/03/in-a-satanic-cult-ugliness-is-art-and-perversion-is-cool/
Huge leap in number of Jews behind bars
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/146678/huge-leap-number-jews-behind-bars
In numbers: Huge leap in number of Jews behind bars
Increase in Jewish prisoners 2002-2015 [Includes numbers for Muslims, Christians, etc.]
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/146679/in-numbers-prison-population-revealed
Thank you for this powerful expose of the Loathsome Toad Keith Vaz, who has escaped punishment again and again, despite a litany of Third World corruption and sleaze. What’s appalling is that he is still trying to cling to power by “stepping aside” temporarily and not actually resigning! It has been a national disgrace allowing him to preside as Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee for so many years, pompously grilling people like Boris Johnson and issuing his bloated opinions on a regular basis, sanctimoniously lecturing the indigenous people of the British Isles on their lack of political correctness, and crushing the indigenous British police force underfoot. It should not be up to him to decide his position now. He should be sacked on the spot from every political post he holds, booted out of Parliament altogether, and preferably sent to prison where he belongs. Ditto Pakistani “Lord” Ahmed, who spent only 10 days in prison for the hit & run killing of a European man, and went straight back to his seat in the House of Lords.
@ Bramble
“Baron” Nazir Ahmed claimed his conviction was the result of a “Jewish conspiracy” – good company, eh Rerevisionist?
Not to be confused with “Baron” Waheed Alli, multimillionaire “gay Muslim”, and another “noble” pain in England’s bum (no pun intended).