Reaction to Trump’s election: Pride, narcissism, and (over)privilege at the BBC

Francis Carr Begbie


You might think that after a disaster as humiliating as the election of Donald Trump that our anointed elites would take this opportunity for a bit of humility — that this would be an opportunity for introspection and some soul-searching self-reflection.

Well, the good news is that you would be wrong. For this would involve a level of self-awareness far beyond our narcissistic elites.  All around they are demonstrating a complete inability to understand the forces behind their humiliation at the hands of a man they dismissed as a joke from day one and whose demise they predicted every inch of the way.

This self-deception was wonderfully on display in an immediate post-election edition of the BBC’s flagship current affairs programme Newsnight, broadcast to the nation the day after and including a number of American interviewees. In a specially extended version of the show, programme editor Ian Katz dispatched Emily Maitlis, Mark Urban and David Grossman to find answers on the day after the result.

In both London and Washington a stellar line up of the finest brains from the media and the academy were assembled to help them chew it over.

Entertainingly, the vanity, narcissism and entitlement of the BBC presenter-ocracy was fully on view, proud and undented. To the accompaniment of the Beatles tune “Fool on the Hill” anchor Emily Maitlis could barely contain her rage and sputtered about how “a game show host and someone who owned a beauty pageant” could become president.

Populism, uprising, nationalism versus globalism; as with former President Bush’s puzzlement over “the vision thing,” they seemed to be able to mouth the words but comprehension was lacking.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

With every guest, Emily Maitlis showed that old habits die hard or not at all. She dripped condescension from the outset, snapping at immigration traitor, pro-Israel fanatic former US Congressman Eric Cantor who was perhaps trying to redeem himself given the new winds in the Republican Party: “We talked about the vulgarity of this man … This is a man who talked of grabbing women by the pussy. Is that a man you are proud [of]?” An angry school teacher furious with the behaviour of her immature, irresponsible charges.

Easily the funniest moment in the programme came during a virtuoso splenetic performance from historian Simon Schama who seemed to think it was Germany in 1933 all over again. Race, he said, was more important factor in the election than the economic arguments.

Wriggling in his seat, as if it was subjected to regular electric shocks, he said.

It is really weird to me how we pussyfoot around the toxic malodorous element of race which has played an important part of this.  Anti-semitism has long been part of populism… [beginning] in the early twentieth century. Even today there were sinister references by the likes of senator Jeff Sessions to George Soros who was singled out as a particularly odious figure in this international banking conspiracy.”

(To which many people in the Alt Right might have replied: “couldn’t have put it better myself.”)

Schama almost lost it completely when co-interviewee and neocon stalwart Melanie Phillips told him to calm down a bit.

“It is not a moment for calm, it is not a moment for calm.” he screeched.

Melanie knows very well what these anti-semitic dog whistles are like. This too is part of populism. We are facing a cataclysmic moment. Melanie is right to say it is a populist revolt. It is nothing to do with conservative republican politics. It amuses me to hear that Eric Cantor imagines that things are going to go on as they always did in the Republican party …  [that they] will restrain Donald Trump. They won’t. George Washington warned about despotism and that is what we are facing.

Melanie Phillips, for her part, agreed the most important problem was anti-Semitism, but she saw it coming from a completely different quarter.

There are noxious elements around. … Clearly some of the people supporting Trump are anti-semitic and racists but that is also true of people on the left.  There is no sign that he (Trump) personally is anti-semitic or racist. People call people racist when they want to restrict as he does, legal immigration.  Anti-semitism is now at record levels at liberal universities overseen by liberal professors and liberal vice chancellors.

Studio presenter Evan Davies muttered about how they had to give up something to people worried about the loss of their traditional societies and really act on illegal immigration. But Schama wasn’t listening. He was worried about David Duke.

Donald Trump re-tweeted a neo-Nazi tweet. It is not a coincidence that David Duke, KKK Imperial Wizard, is exhilarated and rejoicing with the advent of Trump who is his man. We will see race crimes, hate crimes explode now. We will have a far-right supreme court which will reverse Roe [v.] Wade.

As a glimpse into the fevered imagination of at least one strongly identifying Jew, it could not have been more revealing. Before Schama actually self-detonated on air, the programme moved on to more heavyweights.

Neoconservative think tanker Danielle Pletka, senior vice president of foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, complained she had no idea what Trump’s policies were. Which was not very helpful.

Mary Kaldor, professor of global governance at the London School of Economics, complained that Trump was “wildly unpredictable” in his stated foreign policies. “He says ‘I love Israel,’ then he says he wants to be neutral between Israel and Palestine.”  For her the real danger seemed to be peace. Or as she framed it, Trump getting friendly with Putin to create an “alliance of authoritarian right wing leaders.”

But it was the Pulitzer prize-winning historian of communism Anne Applebaum who painted the most apocalyptic scenario. Applebaum, who has never seen a “Deep State” she didn’t like, said that Trump had been disdainful for NATO and cannot understand why America needs to be in Europe. His admiration for Vladimir Putin as an ideal was very worrying.

Europeans need to start from the assumption that United States is not a reliable partner. We need to keep repeating that until it sinks into people’s brains.

She really said that.

Applebaum said Trump sees no need for a relationship with the UK. He said that Trump, who has spent millions developing his two golf courses, which include Turnberry, is, apparently, “not an anglophile and has no interest in Britain. Hillary Clinton does.” Surely, asked presenter Grossman, the Brexit referendum puts Britain and the USA on the same page? Applebaum: “No, no, no.”

Both these women think it makes the election of Marie le pen more likely. Likely correct, and thank god for that!

Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Fed, was wheeled on to say that he, a lifelong Republican had not voted. He also explained that Trump would not be able to get rid of the current Federal Reserve Bank chair Janet Yellen without a complicated impeachment process.

Earlier in the show, Maitlis tried to get Republican Eric Cantor to condemn Trump but got no change. Cantor responded lamely about Trump’s promise to build a border wall. “I’m not so sure that is going to happen” — showing (not surprisingly) that he remains an immigration traitor at heart. And he continues to show his allegiance to Israel.  Cantor said he was less interested in Trump’s immigration policies than his Middle East policies, including his intention to get rid of ISIS.

Lissa Muscatine, Hillary’s former speech writer, assured Maitlis that her old college friend had bounced back as strong as ever.

Elsewhere David Grossman did a breakdown of the vote to show that women and Hispanics had leaned to Trump in far greater numbers that anyone thought possible. (In fact, a solid majority of White women voted for Trump, proving Schama right: Trump voters are racists.)

In the end one could not help noticing one interesting if rather awkward fact about that edition of BBC Newsnight.  The editor, two out of three of the main presenters, and all seven of the main interviewees in Washington and London were Jewish. Not bad for a group said to represent less than 0.4% of the British population.

I should note, however, that there were a smattering of Vox pop style three-second sound-bite interviewees of men in baseball hats celebrating in bars and so on. There was also an abortive panel of a Hispanic man, black woman and Jewish New York Times reporter, and there was a Latvian politician down the line. But otherwise it was an extremely Kosher programme.

The BBC operates one of the most aggressive affirmative action policies in the Western world. In keeping with its position as the Vatican of political correctness, a finger is kept on the scales of employment opportunity to ensure that jobs are skewed heavily for favoured groups.

But given that self-awareness is one area where the elites are notably deficient, it might be s good idea to remind them of the massive Jewish overrepresentation on display here.  This is one very privileged group indeed. Overrepresented and overprivileged, one might say.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

83 Comments to "Reaction to Trump’s election: Pride, narcissism, and (over)privilege at the BBC"

  1. Winston1984's Gravatar Winston1984
    November 15, 2016 - 6:01 am | Permalink

    BTW, @ BBC / Newsnight…
    Katz & Grossmann… sounding like “chosen”:
    with Mitlis instead that as such comes out open
    three out of four, that is 75% of those in question,
    150-fold compared with 0.5 of them in population..
    Might be a case in point.. But Nothing to see here, move on..
    Besides, icing of the cake showing at a glance
    Of course unrelated.., no more than mere chance,
    ALL those spelt in red of the same tribe & commonance..

  2. Stephen Fowler's Gravatar Stephen Fowler
    November 14, 2016 - 1:57 am | Permalink

    Mention of alt-right and Breitbart (for the first time?) in DM newspaper (biggest website paper in Britain)
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3932706/Meet-Steve-Bannon-Trump-s-chief-strategist.html

  3. anarchyst's Gravatar anarchyst
    November 13, 2016 - 3:48 pm | Permalink

    It is interesting to note that when the jewish Bolshevik communists took over in Russia, they destroyed or “repurposed” all Christian and Orthodox churches. Not one jewish synagogue was touched.
    Sorta tells you something…

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      November 16, 2016 - 9:42 am | Permalink

      Antisemitism was banned as a crime immeditaley after Lenin took power. The law was one of the first, before collectivisation amd private property seizures.

  4. T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
    November 13, 2016 - 10:31 am | Permalink

    :”Lost” Soros interview where he admits to taking wealth from jews during WW2:

  5. Kevin Boyle's Gravatar Kevin Boyle
    November 13, 2016 - 8:00 am | Permalink

    Exactly! Thus the racists who demand the right to define our culture call us racists if we even discuss theirs.
    Begbie. You damn anti-Semite.

    I watched the show. It was a scream. Hysterical jews on stilts. These people OWN the media but even that outrageous fact cannot save them from themselves nor help them understand anything other than their own obsession to dominate.

    • Emmanuel's Gravatar Emmanuel
      November 14, 2016 - 2:20 am | Permalink

      The BBC and most media in the UK are occupied territories, but to a lesser degree than in my own country across the Channel, where they are the official inquisition, terrorising anyone who dares say the truth about them, or the illegal state of their hearts, where their true allegiances lie. The main criterion to work in the media in France, is that you have to be a Jew, or a Zionist goy introduced by a Jew.
      An investigative journalist running a site called PANAMZA, has established proofs that Israel was linked to all the recent attacks in France, he is vilified, ostracised, harassed and constantly threatened.
      Rolland Dumas, Mitterrand’s Minister of foreign affairs, received the same treatment for denouncing their influence, not to mention stand up comedian Dieudonné, and many others.
      In France their influence goes far beyond the media, arms industry, media of course, publishing, education, history, advertising, cinema, judiciary, and of course the most important sector; politics.
      So there you have it, France, just like Gazza, is an occupied territory too.

  6. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    November 13, 2016 - 7:55 am | Permalink

    A real investigation of 9/11? I agree that such a move would likely lead to the unraveling of the entire system of control of the (((hostile elites))) who rule over us. But it seems highly unlikely that Jewish power would sit idle while such an investigation was initiated. Recognizing the danger, they would almost certainly take measures to put a quick end to such an endeavor, by whatever means necessary. Their control over the MSM, even in its discredited state, may allow them to cover up these “necessary steps” just as they covered up the coup against JFK in Dallas half a century ago. But then again, such a move might just be the spark that ignites a violent revolution.

    I myself have been skeptical about Trump from the beginning. Not just because of his connections to Jewry, but because I cannot imagine that Jewish power would have gifted him so much free air time if they saw him even remotely as a real threat. I suppose it is possible that their own arrogance completely blinded them to the potential threat from Trump, but I seriously doubt it.

    I still hope Trump will install an American government, but we should all be prepared for betrayal, as that seems far more likely. In either event, this election has been a great victory for White America. The awakening has begun and it is unlikely to be rolled back by Jewry. With less than 6% of the people still believing that the MSM is credible, the old tools for manipulating public opinion are no longer as potent as they once were. There is much reason for hope, but we are still a long way short of victory.

    We would do well to remember what happened the last time that a major power regained control over their own nation…Freedom turned out to be short lived for the German people. Let us hope that we do not suffer the same fate.

  7. Stephen Fowler's Gravatar Stephen Fowler
    November 13, 2016 - 4:59 am | Permalink

    I wonder how many watched this and at the end thought ‘that was fair and balanced’. The BBC are not even trying to appear impartial any more.

  8. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    November 13, 2016 - 3:11 am | Permalink

    The Biased Broadcasting Corporation is a laughing stock in Britain. They are openly propagandizing black nationalist bs as we speak. Because this is the race that has cintributed most to civilization, right (((Miss Maitlis))), (((Mr Sharma))) !!!

  9. Glen's Gravatar Glen
    November 13, 2016 - 2:43 am | Permalink

    The election was never about the goyim vs. jewry. It was a war between two factions of jews: U.S. vs. Russian. Both factions are pro-Israel. One faction more obviously so (U.S.) and the other is more circumspect (Russia). Jews orchestrating the U.S. sphere of influence (which includes British jews) are more into “invading and inviting the World.” Jews orchestrating the Russian sphere are “not quite there” at this time. This probably has something to do with Russian history. Russia’s goyim are more hip to jewry’s divide, dilute, and conquer tricks. U.S. goyim are blind as bats. Remember, too, our jews are descendants of jews who were “encouraged” to leave Russia by Stalin. Jewry’s U.S. faction lost this election. Pretty amazing, don’t you think? Trump’s appointment of James Woolsey is the “gracious hand” extended to the losers. As to Newt Gingrich, he is a useful snake. If I were Trump I’d want to keep him close.

    My two cents, anyway. Go ahead and bomb away!

  10. stephan_b's Gravatar stephan_b
    November 13, 2016 - 12:53 am | Permalink

    Great article. I’d forgotten how ludicrous Schama’s performance was on that broadcast and it was good to laugh at his convulsions all over again. What an appalling buffoon he is. On the question of the very high jews-per-broadcast (jpb) coefficient for this edition of Newsnight you made me wonder why. Why did this happen? Was it all part of the plan? If so, what could the plan have been?

    I considered the role of the Programme Editor, Ian Katz, who is also a jew. Did he decide that only jews could properly assess the real meaning of Trump’s victory? If so, he was wrong. They all seemed caught up in their own tiny neurotic worlds. Or did Mr Katz just happen to know lots of other jews who all owed him favours he could call in? Either way it was strange and unsettling. Suppose Mr Katz was a Buddhist and the programme had been almost entirely populated by other Buddhists. Would this have triggered a response from the license paying viewers? You’d hope so.

  11. Celt Darnell's Gravatar Celt Darnell
    November 12, 2016 - 9:33 pm | Permalink

    If Trump causes a massive civil war amongst the tribe, with the Melanie Phillips vs the Simon Schamas, it’s another reason to thank God for the Donald.

    Honest men prosper when rogues fall out.

  12. Celt Darnell's Gravatar Celt Darnell
    November 12, 2016 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

    Only sorry I missed the BBC program. I was watching things in America and that was thoroughly enjoyable.

    So many upset globalists, so little time to laugh at them all…

  13. freey's Gravatar freey
    November 12, 2016 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

    I thought I was watching a special episode of “JewsNight”. Not the first time the programme has been weighted in such a manner.
    They have things like the BBC Asian network etc so maybe a BBC Jew network would be appropriate. At least the core interest group is identified but given the extent of their prevalence perhaps a BBC Anglo Saxon network might be a more suitable response.

  14. a's Gravatar a
    November 12, 2016 - 3:19 pm | Permalink

    What maybe you don’t realize is while the BBC doesn’t represent the opinion of Main Street fellow, some Main Street fellows are made to sway by the combined effect of BBC + mainstream press.

    Let’s say they change the mind of 5% of their audience.
    The virus starts propagating, and can only grow from that.
    Be sure that if they do the propaganda work they do, 24/7 as they do, it’s worth doing it.

  15. Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
    November 12, 2016 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

    Yet another wonderful article from Mr Begbie, as always expected. Thank you, Sir.

    On the subject of the Left’s sudden, total bemusement and emotional collapse, I ran across this video link, re-linked from The Burning Platform, which, apart from the guy’s disdain for Trump, completely nails everything that’s wrong with the Left and why they lost. It’s well worth the few minutes to watch and listen to his hilarious yet dead-on rant. Unfortunately, although the guy is British and obviously some second-rate TV or radio show presenter ranting to some off-screen colleague, I don’t recognise either his face or his voice, so I don’t have the slightest idea who he is. Any enlightenment from our learned TOO colleagues will be welcomed.

    I sincerely hope the viewing of a hard-left liberal type in unguarded, angry, total meltdown mode will educate, inform and most of all, highly amuse all my TOO friends.

    https://www.facebook.com/viralthread/?fref=nf

    • robert quinn's Gravatar robert quinn
      November 13, 2016 - 12:34 am | Permalink

      Just saw that this morning. Yes, a Lefty media Brit (to be redundant), and no one I’ve ever seen before either. I’m guessing a New York location. Still, as you noted, a telling, accurate rant. Would that more leftists shared his sentiments, but even he admitted none of his friends would accept such truths if proffered in public. (Full disclosure: I’m meeting a Trump-hating Lefty from Oz tonight for drinks. She’s devastated, her friends are devastated. It’s Pauline Kael Syndrome. No one she knows voted for Trump. How could it happen? I’ll be eating my cheek linings for the appetizer trying not to laugh.)

    • stephan_b's Gravatar stephan_b
      November 13, 2016 - 1:24 am | Permalink

      @Dave Bowman – the ranter in the Facebook video is a stand-up comedian called Jonathan Pie. He used to be on RT from time to time. Being a presenter talking to an imaginary cameraman is his shtick. He performs live in the UK as well.

  16. gibbons's Gravatar gibbons
    November 12, 2016 - 11:40 am | Permalink

    Now that Trump won and got in, partly with help from shock troops or shock trolls of the Alt Right, will he do a NIGHT OF THE LONG KNIVES?

    We must never trust him. Rohm trusted MY FRIEND HITLER and look what happened to him.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Friend_Hitler

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIMk30a8JIU

    We need to be realistic and subtle in adding pressure him.

    If we push too hard and fast for ‘radical’ stuff, he will be forced to push back and purge all remnants of Alt Right in order to work with Establishment that holds all the levers of power in media, finance, and government.

    Trump seems like the kind of guy who might use one woman to get somewhere but then dump that woman for another woman once he gets there.

    He’s been a master user all his life. He needed the Deplorable vote to become president, but he needs the powers-that-be to run the government.
    Napoleon certainly had no use for the radicals. Even though he fought artistocrats, once he beat them, he chummed around with them, now with the hoi polloi.

    On his rise to power, we counted for something. In power, we count for nothing. If anything, he has to distance himself from us to work with the powers-that-be that will surround him from all sides.

    When that happens, the pepe meme won’t do us any good.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      November 13, 2016 - 1:04 pm | Permalink

      “We need to be realistic and subtle in adding pressure him.”

      True enough, but Mr Trump, as well as, anti-Trump protesters should remember:

      The working class is the true embodiment of the nation!

      Kai Murros(1969-)

      “On his rise to power, we counted for something. In power, we count for nothing.”

      That is why it will be a revolution more from the bottom than the the top. The first act will come by way of the European male, but it won’t come as expected.

  17. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    November 12, 2016 - 9:20 am | Permalink

    A little more from across the pond.

    “I have personally been on the ballot in Nevada for 26 elections”

    http://www.reid.senate.gov/press_releases/2016-11-11-reid-statement-on-the-election-of-donald-trump#.WCdOYXqaT0T

    Yes, Mr. Reid it’s time to stand down!

  18. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    November 12, 2016 - 8:31 am | Permalink

    Uh, those names sound resoundingly Jewish and therefore perfect pitch in their shrieking against a bulwark of White genocide, dispossession, Hostile Elite’s relentless drive to “own everything and control everything”.

    The complete absurdity? They are paid out of tax payers public funds, even though the general public most often disagrees with their ideology and policy.

  19. Montefrío's Gravatar Montefrío
    November 12, 2016 - 3:55 am | Permalink

    When the beeb world service news dropped Lillibullero as their signature tone, I dropped them. Good move, as it’s turned out!

  20. November 12, 2016 - 1:01 am | Permalink

    Behold the pitiful white ethnomasochism on display here:

    ‘I am scared out of my wits’: Paul Auster on US election – BBC Newsnight

    • November 12, 2016 - 1:08 am | Permalink

      Correction: Auster is a Jew.

    • Green Man's Gravatar Green Man
      November 12, 2016 - 8:48 am | Permalink

      His syntax was mixed up but did he say effectively ‘yeah i’m a Jew from Brooklyn’ and agree he’s a liberal stuck in a bubble. I thought perhaps he is being ironic there or maybe Brooklyn is where the ‘liberals’ live. But then he says about Trump ‘he’s an elitist, ivy league, went to Columbia University therefore he is all that is most contemptible to us”. WTF, is that the enemy? The enemy of ‘us’? People with a elite education are contemptible? I thought civilisation depended on getting the best people the best education and the USA was the best at that and expanding that quality to more and more people. He spends his energy trying to undermine that? I am more worried than ever about the fault-lines in society.

    • Scott Comin's Gravatar Scott Comin
      November 12, 2016 - 6:15 pm | Permalink

      The media is totally and completely anti White Christian European American male! NO WONDER I HAVE BEEN SO DEPRESSED AND SELF HATING FOR YEARS. thank you Kevin Macdonald for helping to save my dignity; if not my life! My wife cannot understand. White women can’t, but I see it clearly now. She called me racist for advocating for myself. White Christian European Males in America and world wide better wake up and fast.

      • Eric's Gravatar Eric
        November 14, 2016 - 1:59 am | Permalink

        Here’s a question to pose to your wife. What single group is the common enemy of each of these groups: Feminists, LGBT, Blacks, Hispanics, Environmentalists, Jews. In every case it’s the straight, white male.

  21. Steelback's Gravatar Steelback
    November 12, 2016 - 12:37 am | Permalink

    The little I saw of the BBC election coverage was execrable.

    I saw Maitliss in her evening frock laughing about how they had got all their election poll predictions utterly wrong.

    It didn’t seem to dawn on them that if you don’t do your research properly the result will come as a surprise!

  22. John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia's Gravatar John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
    November 11, 2016 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

    “Easily the funniest moment in the programme came during a virtuoso splenetic performance from historian Simon Schama who seemed to think it was Germany in 1933 all over again.”

    Really? That actually struck you as funny? You laughed or grinned or something? I doubt that.

    • Peter's Gravatar Peter
      November 12, 2016 - 5:56 am | Permalink

      I could see someone laughing at that. The Jews are such phonies, exaggerating their fears beyond reality. Of course, they are the dangerous ones. 1933 was a perfectly reasonable reaction to what was done to Germany and war mongering Jews made National Socialist Germany into what it became. Jews started the fight, just as the nation wide rioting in the US going on now is a result of the Jewish Lügenpresse. After laughing, you might cry realizing the seriousness of what is happening.

    • Aitch's Gravatar Aitch
      November 12, 2016 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

      Actually, I too found Schama’s hissy fit extremely funny. He’s like one of those ludicrous characters in ‘Viz’. It’s impossible to take him seriously.

  23. Lothar von Trotha's Gravatar Lothar von Trotha
    November 11, 2016 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

    Oof, I could’ve gone a lifetime without burning my eyes with a glance at Melanie “Phillips.” You could tell after a moment’s glance that, uh, “Phillips” is not strictly an appropriate surname.

    According to her Wikipedia, the evil British immigration authorities forced her father to change his name from the Polish, which they couldn’t pronounce. All at once, if one believes this little story, her crypsis is itself hidden, the toothless idiot British goyim can’t figure out how to pronounce Polish names, and her family was oppressed by being forced to change their names while she just happens to be involved in the media and speaking “as a Brit” to Brits on what they should do in the world in conference with (((Simon Schama))).

    Amazing how a picture truly tells a thousand words with these people. Within a second, just looking at “Phillips” and who she’s speaking with, to, and for, and what the result of it is intended to be, is all you ever needed to know about those people. They seem to operate with a permanent shroud of at least 100 deceptions going on at any one moment for their entire lives, all of them destructive to us.

    • Lucy's Gravatar Lucy
      November 12, 2016 - 11:04 am | Permalink

      Hello Lothar, my comment is a bit off topic, but it makes me angry to see all those (((Polish))) chosenites. Poland’s present first lady and the former one – and every president or party leader’s wife since the end of WWII – have all this background. They pose as Poles when performing “patriotic” acts and pull out the Shoah card when it appears as more beneficial to the Cause. I think that the hatred to Russia that reigns supreme in Poland (my former homeland) would starve to death if those in power (politics and media) were more “boorish” Polish, i.e. not inspired by their agenda and less enriched with the “genius” gene.

      • anarchyst's Gravatar anarchyst
        November 13, 2016 - 4:46 am | Permalink

        I don’t know of any Polish people who have a liking for jews. Every Polish person I know has a hatred of jews because of that jewish invention–communism. When the eastern bloc countries were sacrificed (actually stolen and sold) by jewish interests at Yalta and turned over to communism, it was no secret that ALL government agencies, secret police, et.al. were run by jews. Yes, there were gentile communist officials, but almost all of them were only nominally communist and were good Catholics who attended Sunday Mass. The Catholic Church played a major role in blunting communism and making life somewhat more livable for the ordinary (none-jewish) Polish citizenry. Almost every Polish person that I have known, even on their deathbeds professed a hatred for jews.

        • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
          November 16, 2016 - 9:27 am | Permalink

          The hatred has a much longer history than Communism and Soviet ruling, not only in Poland, but in the whole Eastern Europe (and Central too).

  24. November 11, 2016 - 7:15 pm | Permalink

    I propose a new salute now.
    — Heil Merkel
    — Multikulti heil

    Also, führer Hitler wanted united Europe before it was cool, before führerin Merkel.

    • Stefan's Gravatar Stefan
      November 12, 2016 - 12:42 pm | Permalink

      Merkel is from the communist youth propaganda ministry. Ideologically, they represent two opposite poles. Hitler didn’t want a Europe totally destroyed by immigration and devoid of state sovereignty and culture. Hitler wanted a Europe united in a common cause as a bulwark against Bolshevism.

      Stop spreading your Alex Jones bullshit.

      • November 12, 2016 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

        I am not spreading Alex Jones bullshit and don’t even have time to know what he thinks. I think it is a good thing to attack these guys from any and all positions. I think that even the controlled opposition is doing us good, as it widens the range of things we can say, increases buzz, increases resistance to our genocide. I am too much aware of who Merkel is. As for Hitler. He did some beautiful things. Jus imagine how Polastine (aka Poland) would have been without him. That said, he screwed up for us all. He found so much good will in the Ukrainian and other Soviet people, he fucked it up. The surrendered Soviet soldiers were just about too happy to fight on his side, until they were mistreated too much.

        • Stefan's Gravatar Stefan
          November 13, 2016 - 9:39 am | Permalink

          Yes, he could have just sat back and let the Bolsheviks overrun Poland couldn’t he? You types always leave out that little aspect, that the Communists came into Poland from the East, so Hitler Called their bluff and halted them at Warsaw. Not to mention the massive military buildup that they had made on Europe’s Eastern border, which the German’s pulverised during the first month of Barbarossa. And just think, if it wasn’t for the Wehrmacht, they might never have found the Katyn pits that the Bolsheviks had made whilst executing all the Polish officers using German ammo from the Ribbentrop pact.

          No, Hitler never ‘screwed it up’ for you my friend, you and your treasonous leaders did by abandoning Europe and siding with Jewry and Bolshevism.

      • November 12, 2016 - 8:27 pm | Permalink

        I paid attention to the Trump campaign. Many things that he says are of IQ about 90. That said, anything that he says has been studied by very, very wise men.

        What I care about is not whether Alex Jones is right or wrong. What I care is the outcome: save as many as possible Whites in this White genocide, assimilate as many Jews, cut to size as many more Jews. When I voted this time, there was a Republican Cohen. You guessed it, he didn’t get my vote. Don’t know whether he won, but if we act all like this, they precipitously remain helpless. They are already scared, but the ball is still rolling against us.

        I methodically study the candidates before I vote, I spend time on them. Foremost cancel the Jews, then Blacks, then choose for viewpoint and position.

        • November 12, 2016 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

          I have raised this issue too many times. It would be very nice if we push that the religious affiliation of all candidates comes out. The opposing candidates can out each other with grace. That would take too much power off these guys. Trust me in one thing. Rich as Jews are, they wouldn’t feed other Jews for long. They rather dump them in the Goy administration. Should we vote out all Jews, that would become huge problem for them.

          One can put it like this, harmlessly:
          “I am Christian Orthodox. I also vote for religious affiliation. It would be very nice to know the religious affiliation of all candidates.” I mean, all instances of power matter, not only the office of president, which basically is a pop icon.

  25. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    November 11, 2016 - 5:41 pm | Permalink

    iOMG – just up – James Woolsey appointed National Security Advisor
    http://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-wednesday-edition-1.3843587/will-trump-try-to-re-shape-the-world-former-cia-chief-and-trump-adviser-explains-how-1.3843590

    Trump is draining the swamp alright. He is opening the sluice gates and wrangling the alligators into the executive .

    He could not pick a more deep swamp operator than Israel Firster – James Woolsey. The only question here is: “Is there enough Jew ass on Capitol Hill for this disgusting shabgoy to kiss?’

    This is not an appointment of someone who wants to address the increasingly militarized global police/surveillance state that is running amuck against American citizens. This is not an appointment by someone who is going to put America first.

    This is an appointment of someone who is going to put Israel First and go after Iran (at the top of Israel’s list in the mandated ZOG wars.

    The alligators are coming out of the swamp to take up offices in the Trump executive. They will need all the help they can get to tidy them up and hose them down.

    We are had. Never Hllary but now I am totally in sympathy with the protestors.

    • royAlbrecht's Gravatar royAlbrecht
      November 12, 2016 - 4:56 am | Permalink

      1) At first glance, this indicates that We were all taken and Trump is in fact going to be the Rothschilds’ Face of Terror to White Nationalism. White Racialists should start preparing to be rounded up and either executed point blank or at the very least (but don’t hold your breath) thrown into FEMA camps to be exterminated once the round-ups are completed.

      2) Unless Trump is stalling the Mossad Assassination attempts by appointing Rothschild Mandated Terrorists that will give the appearance, –
      until Trump is actually sworn in and has real power,
      of Trump’s willingness to lead the USA into a coordinated assault on Iran,
      and after being sworn in does a reshuffle to someone who is not psychopathically insane, –
      European Nationalists and White Advocates will soon taste what it is like to be interned in a post WW2 German internment camps where the unconditionally surrendered German males were systematically starved to death.
      In short…, it means White Advocates will be in a real life or death struggle for their survival.

      3) Although I view the CBC to have about as much credibility as a Jew with a cross hung around “its” neck and,
      given Trump’s willingness to shake things up after key points in his assentation to power have been realized
      (I am definitely no expert on the American political system, but from what I have gathered, the Republicans will soon control the House, the Senate AND the Presidency…, in short…, Trump is on the road to Absolute Power)
      there may be a chance that Trump is stalling Jew Assassination attempts on his family by giving appearances that he is in line with the Jew World order…,
      at least until he is in a position to put those Filthy Jews in their Rightful Place in Hell…, but don’t count on it.
      OR
      That the CBC is using reverse psychology to try to get Trump’s loyal base to abandon him by publishing really bad news for Whites.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      November 12, 2016 - 9:31 am | Permalink

      We are had. Never Hillary but now I am totally in sympathy with the protestors.

      Welcome aboard the USS Wake Up to the Reality! As of this morning, Trump has publicly disavowed full repeal of Obamacare, and Salamander Gingrich—what in the name of all that’s holy is that wad of effluent doing on any honorable man’s advisory team!—has laughed off the idea that a border wall will ever be built, let alone paid for by Mexico.

      Will it take the appointment of Bill Kristol or Charles Krauthammer as DJT’s White House chief of staff to awaken others to the truth that, yet again, we’ve been duped? Yes, the likely end of the Clinton crime machine is cause for elation, but looking for anything more substantive is a waste of time.

    • November 12, 2016 - 12:32 pm | Permalink

      Jews aren’t wasting any time with their new boy Trump. I just saw a video where Trump proclaims he will put Israel first “from day one.” Jews will no longer be “second class citizens” but will now be first class citizens from day one of his administration. Unfortunately I lost track of the URL.

      It’s just as I surmised when I first saw Trump become a viable candidate. I wrote he would be the Jews’ Trojan condom who would lead America to yet another global war. It looks like I may yet have the last laugh to a joke only Jews would consider funny.

      Think about it. What could be expected from a Wall Street billionaire and former TeeVee reality game show host? After all, Jews pulled the very same reverse deception with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. When will the stupid goyim awaken to these ancient, hoary Jewish tricks of their trade.

      This and This just in.

      The idiot goyim have been easily and thoroughly programmed by the Jews sports mentality that Team America is numba one. Barring some sort of divine intervention, Jews are going to melt us, our country, and our civilization into dusty glass because we allow ourselves to entertain such foolish notions.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        November 13, 2016 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

        @ Arch Stanton:
        Your soundbite (06:34):

  26. Floda's Gravatar Floda
    November 11, 2016 - 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Gott im Himmel!!

    Katz, Urban, Maitlis, Grossman, Shama, Applebaum, Greenspan, Yellen, Kantor, Muscatine, all on the BRITISH Broadcasting Corporation, discussing (Kvetching) about a Goy POTUS elect and how he might upset their Kosher little apple-cart.

    During the primaries Trump said on stage, ‘If I win, you’ll find out what really happened on 911’. No wonder they’re nervous.

    I still say Trump will order a re-investigation into 911, a proper one, if he does that his support among Whites around the World will go off the clock. That’s the Tribe’s worst nightmare.

    • kikz2's Gravatar kikz2
      November 12, 2016 - 12:16 pm | Permalink

      he also did have the balls to say, standing hip deep in AIPAC, that allies would no longer be paying ‘wholesale’ rates for their protection. so.. i remain cautiously hopeful. he, like monarchs of old has intermarried w/them. this should prove some weighty insurance.

  27. Pat Kittle's Gravatar Pat Kittle
    November 11, 2016 - 3:14 pm | Permalink

    The ol’ “Are-Jews-a-Race?” gambit resurfaces, as Simon Schama declares:

    “It is really weird to me how we pussyfoot around the toxic malodorous element of race which has played an important part of this. Anti-semitism has long been part of populism…”

    Yes, Jews are a race when they’re claiming victimhood.

    But when guilty they are always “White“!

    We must never speak of the “6 million Whites” — and we must never speak of “Wall Street bankster Jews.”

  28. Lynda's Gravatar Lynda
    November 11, 2016 - 2:54 pm | Permalink

    The Beebocracy has no shame. This is the network that protected Jimmy Savile, serial pedophile for years and gave to the Alt Right lexicon the term ‘WTC-7 effect’. They actually staged a demo of how ‘the news’ even the factoids are staged and scripted in the political theatre. Most people didn’t even bat an eye. They expect to be entertained, not reliably informed.

    The Judaic Supremacy utilizes its media cadre to create a schmo screen to instruct, program, wow, delude, divert and entertain the rubes.

    Go back to see
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=677i43QfYpQ
    BBC reports 911, WTC 7 collapse before it happens (on livestream)

    This is them. They are bought and paid for entertainers, reality technicians and population sitters for the Owners and they are proud of it. They are out there and OK with telling tvland : ‘this is us. this is what we do’.

    I don’t actually have a television because at a certain age I became too much like my grandfather. Back in his day, when a news muppet came out with some too obviously egregious lie, my grandfather would just pull his colt and pop the set. It went up with a blue flame. (And he would just build another one after awhile).

    If I watch TV, I watch at the coffee shop or the pub. And post election the mediacracy is now re-playing what they consider to be Trump’s ‘blooper reel’. And the yada yada buzzes around how outrageous he ‘was’ with all these irresponsible statements and accusations and now that he has to adopt a ‘presidential style’ they will be following the development of his presidential style and yada yada.

    One of the campaign bloopers they played was Trump’s statement that “Obama created ISIS”. That got a laugh from the latte crowd which joined in the tv muppets on the newscast – of which Trump truthfully asserted on many occaisions : “you’re liars. you’re all paid liars’. That did not phase them in the least.

    Despite Trump’s many truthful assertions for which there is multiple and congruent evidence and which an authentic public inquiry would be able to quickly and efficiently substantiate, most people can not accept the fact that the president of the ZOGUSA created a terrorist organisation to wage war on the nations that General Wesley Clark stated “there is a mandate to take down 7 nations in 5 years’.
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/we-re-going-to-take-out-7-countries-in-5-years-iraq-syria-lebanon-libya-somalia-sudan-iran/5166
    AKA – the ZOG wars.
    They don’t get it. They don’t want to get it. They want to be entertained.

    And the JewMSM has hit the motherlode in entertainment value with Donald Trump.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      November 11, 2016 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

      That did not phase them in the least.

      faze

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        November 11, 2016 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

        Perhaps Lynda’s image was drawn from something Captain Kirk or Picard might have said: “Their phasers were on stun.”

        Beam me up, Beebocrats.

  29. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    November 11, 2016 - 2:08 pm | Permalink

    Get Melanie Phillips off “Galilee, Samaria & Judea” as she calls them, and you can get some good sense on other matters. A case of clinical Ziophrenia.

    As for “vanity and narcissism”, well, you couldn’t accuse the POTUS-Elect of those traits, could you?

    Seriously, folks, will that Wall get built, those Rust Belts come alive again, those Muslims kept away….? From across the Pond I hope so, but the grass-roots pressure must be kept up.

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      November 16, 2016 - 9:15 am | Permalink

      Actually it seems that part of that Wall is already built. It was built under Bill Clinton, years ago.

  30. Peter's Gravatar Peter
    November 11, 2016 - 12:19 pm | Permalink

    A new definition of the expression “anti-Semitism” is needed very badly and has been for at least 90 years. It is used to tear down and demean Gentiles (primarily whites) and empower Jews, who are the real racists. Until others recognize the racist attitudes Jews have, Jews will continue to take over everything in every country they have a few people in. Jews love to use the word to demean others and put them on the defensive. I would advocate calling the Jews racist every time they accuse someone else of it. There is a lot of evidence of their racism and accusing them is necessary to take back power from them and put them on the defensive.

    “The editor, two out of three of the main presenters, and all seven of the main interviewees in Washington and London were Jewish.”

    The last time the Federal Reserve Chairman wasn’t a Jew was in the 1970’s. The man served for one year and his predecessor was also a Jew. This is the kind of domination Jews have in virtually all areas of power. They should be thrown out of any country concerned for the welfare of its citizens and all countries should be concerned about that.

    Patrick Buchanan says Trump should go forward 100% with his policies right away and not give an inch toward his enemies. That sounds good.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      November 11, 2016 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

      @ Peter

      Buchanan is right, but I have a queasy feeling this “ain’t gonna happen”. Check the appointments. Trump needs an ideological education over Christmas – at least study Buchanan’s books, if not bring him into government. Stop tweeting and start reading.

      • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
        November 16, 2016 - 9:13 am | Permalink

        Are you sure it’s him who tweets ? Are you sure every important man who tweets (including the Pope) does it by himself ?

    • Pat Kittle's Gravatar Pat Kittle
      November 11, 2016 - 5:53 pm | Permalink

      Whenever I’m accused of antisemitism I simply define the term for my accuser.

      ————————————–
      “Antisemitism” (definition):

      A term endlessly brandished by Israel’s war criminals (& their apologists) with the intention of suppressing all questioning of their long criminal history; lately losing much of its oomph.

      • John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia's Gravatar John Bonaccorsi, Philadelphia
        November 11, 2016 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

        Well, then, your response to the accusation is trite.

        (My own response is “Yes, I’m antisemitic.”)

        • Pat Kittle's Gravatar Pat Kittle
          November 12, 2016 - 9:43 am | Permalink

          I was responding to Peter, who wants “a new definition of… ‘anti-Semitism.'”

          I also respond to the accusation like this: “To be called antisemitic by the likes of you is a Badge of Honor.”

          Whatever makes it clear that we don’t grovel is fine with me.

      • Baldy Pete's Gravatar Baldy Pete
        November 12, 2016 - 5:32 am | Permalink

        My reply is: “I never mentioned a derogatory word against the Palestinians.”

        Jewry squeal’ anti-Semite’, all the time, so as to be associated with those lands; which makes expulsion of the real Semitic peoples far easier.

  31. T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
    November 11, 2016 - 12:05 pm | Permalink

    “The (((liberal))) is continually angry, as only a self-important man can be, with his civilization, his culture, his country and his folks back home. His is an infantile world view. At the core of a liberal is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

    P.J. O’Rourke

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      November 11, 2016 - 5:24 pm | Permalink

      @ T.J.
      Sadly P.J. O’Rourke said much the same re a spoiled child – demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless – about Donald himself on British TV a short time ago.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        November 11, 2016 - 7:49 pm | Permalink

        O’Rourke is a great source of biting remarks, no doubt about it. I’ve quoted him myself. But he’s also a total sellout to the neoco[he]ns.

        In one sense, I get why he’s sold out. He’s got a son in his early twenties whose livelihood Papa O’Rourke wants to secure. Should P. J. toss too many snarks in the wrong direction, a career as a tenured associate professor at a community college in Iowa might quickly become the closest thing to the big bucks the kid will ever see. Fortunately for Junior, Pop has more wit than principle.

        • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
          November 16, 2016 - 9:10 am | Permalink

          He “tiene famiglia” ( has a family to be worried about).
          That one reason Catholic priests ought not to be married. And State chiefs too, if possible.

  32. November 11, 2016 - 11:42 am | Permalink

    It’s veterans day, but I decided not to take the day off. In fact it’s a perfect day to reflect on Government.

    “He also explained that Trump would not be able to get rid of the current Federal Reserve Bank chair Janet Yellen without a complicated impeachment process.”

    This is interesting, so others outside the fed mouthpiece can be unceremoniously dumped in the waste can of election defeat? Yet even lower members of the Federal Reserve are sacrosanct, virtually beyond presidential command that can, with stroke of a pen, make law presidential decree by executive order?

    People should understand the Fed chairman is nothing more than an overpaid mouthpiece, chosen for their ability to communicate, or miscommunicate, the Jewish cartel’s ideas and plans to the masses. The Fed’s “chairman” is an individual with no vested interest in the “Federal Reserve System” outside a paycheck.

    It is noteworthy that while they appoint a woman as their spokesman, none of the owners of the central banks are women. The central bank is a male dominated patriarchy, resembling the Jew’s second Temple hierarchical structure. Go ahead, show me evidence to the contrary, prove me wrong.

    Typically the Fed takes a broke-dick academician, usually Jewish, without a pot to piss in, and appoints them “chairman.” The appointment is then rubber-stamped by the president to make it look “Federally” official.

    Think about it, virtually every appointment in government from Supreme Court justices on down, is open for dispute. So when have you ever heard the appointment of a Fed chairman disputed by anyone?

    In the usual Jewish manner, the more confusingly verbose the individual, the better the “communicator.” Remember how they used to have an interpreter to tell the unwashed masses what Greenspan was really saying?

    Does anyone remember how Greenspan was an unabashed gold bug who wrote a paper on the subject. Quote:

    “This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.”

    That was before Greenspan became chairman of the fed, at which point he did a 180 degree reversal on this view.

    Such is the power of the “Federal Reserve System.” As G. Edward Griffin pointed out in his book Creature From Jekyll Island the name itself is a lie.

    “When you look at it, you realize that what they created there was not federal, there are no reserves, it’s not a system at all in the sense of diffusion of power and these Federal Reserve banks aren’t even banks. [ . . .] It was brilliant strategy.”

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      November 11, 2016 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

      This is the place- a brilliant speech about fractional reserve and the international gold market. http://tinyurl.com/zjb69m6

      Read the Greenspin gold article carefully [it seems that miss rand failed to do that]. He called for a fractional system- a little bit of gold over here, and lots of fake warehouse receipts over there. These latter are fake loans, upon which will be charged interest.

      Did the super-genius ayn rand believe this to be a real gold standard? She could not see the fractional fakery? She allowed the article to be published. . .

      A real gold standard has physical gold available for each paper claim. This tends to make banking about as profitable as a hot-dog cart. . .

      Greenspin here:

      A free banking system based on gold is able to extend credit and thus to create bank notes (currency) and deposits, according to the production requirements of the economy. Individual owners of gold are induced, by payments of interest, to deposit their gold in a bank (against which they can draw checks). But since it is rarely the case that all depositors want to withdraw all their gold at the same time, the banker need keep only a fraction of his total deposits in gold as reserves. This enables the banker to loan out more than the amount of his gold deposits (which means that he holds claims to gold rather than gold as security of his deposits). But the amount of loans which he can afford to make is not arbitrary: he has to gauge it in relation to his reserves and to the status of his investments.

      http://www.constitution.org/mon/greenspan_gold.htm

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        November 11, 2016 - 5:10 pm | Permalink

        @ T.J.
        John Galt’s banker was an Irishman!

        Last time I looked, the Mises Institute ATTACKED “fractional” reserve financing.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          November 12, 2016 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

          There’s a Free Banking faction within the LvMI community, though the Rothbardian anti-FRB one predominates.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      November 11, 2016 - 5:16 pm | Permalink

      “When you look at it, you realize that what they created there was not federal, there are no reserves, it’s not a system at all…”

      I disagree. The Federal Reserve Banks are federal, in the sense that they supply currency to all of the US, and therefore, are as federal as Federal Express. As for the Reserve, the reserve all rights to themselves to control US currency. On top of that, they Bank on the fact that the overwhelming majority of the goyim haven’t a clue on how badly they are being swindled.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        November 11, 2016 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

        Great explanation, my friend! If you were thirty years younger, you might get a high-paying job as an apprentice spin doctor on Little Justin Trudeau’s staff, with several guaranteed appearances a month on CNN and the CBC “news.”

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          November 12, 2016 - 1:19 pm | Permalink

          Well, many thanks for the compliment. I spent many hours with lawyers, to whom I refer as liars, and learned quickly that “normal people” had no idea that the meaning of words were so fluid. Hence, the mental gymnastic ability of judges (as one lawyer acquaintance puts it) to make shit up as they go.

          One small correction mon ami, when referring to the CBC (or JBC) “news” is always (((news))).

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          November 12, 2016 - 8:49 pm | Permalink

          Your fraternal correction is humbly welcomed.

      • Floda's Gravatar Floda
        November 11, 2016 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

        Yes, and I remember when JFK took the decision to start printing US Dollars as ‘coin of the realm’ back in 1963, without bothering to mention it to the Tribe, it took just a few weeks for ‘someone’ to see that his head was blown off in Dallas.

      • Montefrío's Gravatar Montefrío
        November 12, 2016 - 3:43 am | Permalink

        This needs wider distribution, but unless the new US prez and nearly all who voted for him can be made aware of it, there is no hope for the most-needed change in the USA. Should it be made there, others may follow. Read the books, join the organization! http://www.publicbankinginstitute.org/

  33. Charles Frey's Gravatar Charles Frey
    November 11, 2016 - 11:39 am | Permalink

    Typical. I am certain all the souls of the British fallen would cheer the still living, if they were to march on Broadcast House on November 11; even if it meant to forego a visit to the cenotaph – to listen to those who programmed their death in the first place.

  34. francis's Gravatar francis
    November 11, 2016 - 11:36 am | Permalink

    Excellent article. The BBC lost an anti English discrimination case as back as 1997 but still continues discriminating against us English. Google BBC v Mark Souster for the case.

  35. Swifty 27's Gravatar Swifty 27
    November 11, 2016 - 11:01 am | Permalink

    No one in England cares much for the BBC, let alone takes any notice of its left wing bias programming. This is a corporation which covered up for decades the paedophile activities of Jimmy Saville for christs sake. The BBC implied all of us who voted for Brexit were inbred nazis so it was no surprise to see the laughable newsnight show on Trumps election victory. Please dont think the BBC represents the views of the ordinary Englishman because nothing could be further from the truth.

    • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
      November 12, 2016 - 4:07 am | Permalink

      Unfortunately the (((BBC))) is still regarded as a national institution, and the sheeple are still compelled to fund its propaganda by way of the £140pa “license fee”.

    • Stephen Fowler's Gravatar Stephen Fowler
      November 13, 2016 - 5:03 am | Permalink

      Just like CNN – on the side of the globalists and far-left. All Western nations are afflicted with the same problem of a far-left TV media. But that is changing as more people switch to the internet for news, and that will include more TV-like websites.

  36. anarchyst's Gravatar anarchyst
    November 11, 2016 - 10:19 am | Permalink

    Media lies and fabrications have been going on ever since there were “journalists” (I use that term loosely).
    From “Remember the Maine” in the Spanish-American war (actually a powder magazine explosion–not an attack) to walter duranty’s extolling the “virtues” of communism while one of the greatest artificially-engineered (by communists)famines in the Ukraine was taking place, in order to force the “collectivization” of privately-held farms, to walter cronkite outright lying about the American military’s effectiveness during the 1968 Vietnam “Tet offensive” (in which much enemy life was lost) journalism has always been a “nasty craft”. In cronkite’s case, the North Vietnamese were ready to settle (and capitulate) until cronkite’s lies about the supposed American “defeat” were publicized. Cronkite’s lies gave the North Vietnamese new resolve, as they realized that they had the American “news media” on their side. There has always been a certain sympathy for communism and totalitarianism in the so-called “mainstream media”. All one has to do is to look at the journalists fawning over Cuba’s Fidel Castro and how wonderful life is in that communist “paradise”.
    Journalists HATE the internet because it exposes their “profession” for what it really is…with the internet, anyone can be a true journalist. This is why the same “mainstream media” is calling for the “licensing” of journalists–something that would have been unheard of (and treasonous) in previous decades…
    So-called professional journalism is its own worst enemy…

Comments are closed.