Gender Bender: Feminist Ideology Goes Off the Deep End

R. Houck


Recurring in feminist ideology is the notion that gender expression and gender roles are almost entirely based upon expectations set by society, not biology. Feminists often take issue with the “gendering” of toys, characters, and expectations. On some fundamental level, I do not take issue with the idea that sex roles can change throughout history. Throughout cultures the world over, and through the ages, men and women have held many different roles in different societies. The idea of fluidity makes sense; it accounts for historical changes in masculine behavior (think Vikings vs. modern Swedes). Fluidity as a concept allows for variances in biology and traits between men and women.

People should be free to do, say, and be, whatever they want. The issue I have with modern feminist theory is the idea that culture, not biology, plays by far the most important role in shaping behavior. Not only do feminists assail the idea of “traditional” gender roles, they are working towards making it illegal to even notice fundamental biological realities. Further, they assert that society not only shapes the roles men and women occupy in society but also that there are no biologically based differences at all between men and women.

This anti-biologism leads to the idea that gender is anything a person wants it to be — that a person could decide to change gender identification as often as [insert pronoun] wants — even from day to day. The theory that gender is completely voluntary and has nothing to do with hormones or body parts is having effects in the real world. New York City passed a law that makes it illegal to address a person by the wrong title, pronouns, or gender. All businesses, professionals, and landlords are required to address a person by their preferred title or pronoun. If a man wants to be referred to as “her”, “ze”, “xir”, or any other randomly imagined name, employers, professionals, and landlords are required by law to abide, else they face a fine of $125,000 to $250,000. “Mis-gendering” a person, is now illegal in New York City. The law also includes provisions to inhibit enforcing a “gendered” dress code at work. Meaning, you cannot ask a male employee not to wear a dress and high heels to work anymore.

In California, State Senator, Scott Weiner, has introduced a bill that would require care facilities to accommodate a person’s preferred gender and pronoun. If they do not comply, they would face a fine and a prison sentence of up to one year. Weiner also introduced a bill that would make it no longer a felony to knowingly transmit HIV. The bill applies not only to failing to disclose your HIV status to sexual partners but to blood donations as well.

The liberal obsession over warping and ultimately abolishing gender is now manifesting itself among children. The Left justifies their attack on gender as an effort to end stereotypes, to break down barriers, and shatter the mythical glass ceiling that holds women down. The Guardian ran a piece titled, “Are gendered toys harming childhood development? The article claims that the gendering of toys, through marketing and coloring, is what determines if children choose to play them or not. This is exemplified by a quote from a University of Kentucky professor: “Gender preferences for toys only show up after children learn about their gender. Babies show no preference.”

The Boston Globe ran a similar piece titled, “The problem with separate toys for girls and boys,” where they claim that marketing and gendering of toys promote the idea that boys and girls are “fundamentally and markedly different from one another.” Perhaps because they are?

A Harvard psychologist is quoted; “The resulting rigidly stereotyped gender roles are unhealthy for both males and females, who are actually more alike than different.”

The articles are clearly pushing a particular narrative, that there is little if any meaningful biological difference between XX and XY genotypes. Further, they claim that gender roles are molded through force via the prevailing social structure. There are some interesting studies that fly directly in the face of these claims.

Research with monkeys, who were obviously never socialized in our horribly gendered and sexist Western society, show a sex preference for particular toys as well. Male monkeys prefer to play with balls and trucks, while female monkeys prefer to play with dolls.

Another study  investigated the link between toy preferences and biology in young children. All of the children that participated in the study were under 18 months old. After 18 months is where an understanding of gender differentiation occurs. The researchers found that children as young as 9 months, the youngest in the study, had a significant preference for toys that were “stereotypical” of their gender. Boys preferred toy balls and cars, while girls preferred toy cooking pots and dolls.

Another area of research supporting biologically based sex differences is congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), a recessive genetic disorder that hinders normal hormone production. As the name suggests, CAH is present from birth. The disorder impairs cortisol synthesis, which in turn leads to abnormal levels of androgens, or sex hormones being produced. Not only can CAH cause variations in physical sex characteristics, there are significant psychological and behavioral variations found as well. Studies of females with CAH show they exhibit higher levels of aggression, heightened interest in sports, and more masculine qualities overall, compared to a control group of females without CAH. Moreover, among people without any sort of hormone disorder, there is a great deal of biodiversity in terms of hormone levels. Males exhibit a testosterone of range of 240–950 ng/dl, while females range from 8-60 ng/dl, and this natural variation in hormone levels is manifested in physical and psychological traits (e.g., the very muscular Serena Williams). Depression (higher in women), aggression, competitiveness, and body composition are among a myriad of traits affected.

In a neuroscience class I had last year, CAH and Klinefelter syndrome (in which there are a variety of abnormalities resulting from an XXY genotype) were studied. You could see horror on the face of every women’s studies and critical theory major in the hall. Watching them trying to work through the dissonance between “gender is a social construct” and “congenital hormones affect behavior”, was wonderful.

Along with assailing gender norms, the left has been promoting transgenderism. Gender Dysphoria, as it is officially named per the latest Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, is exceedingly rare. Or at least it was. New data suggests that the number of Americans that identify as transgender doubled, from .3% to .6%, in the past five years, with an estimated 1.4 million adults now identifying as transgender.

Is this any surprise? The media has sensationalized the disorder, from the first transgender woman to run for office in Virginia, to the Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner obsession. Since 2012, UK’s National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children has received twice the number of calls as previously, from children as young as 11 expressing issues relating to Gender Dysphoria — unhappiness with their biological sex. Canada has passed a law that will allow child protection agencies to remove children from their parents’ home if the parents do not support their chosen gender identity.

*    *   *

These concepts are hardly new. Magnus Hirschfeld, a Jewish doctor who practiced in Berlin, is considered a father of the transgender movement (see Andrew Joyce’s “The Assault on Gender and the Family: Jewish Sexology and the Legacy of the Frankfurt School, Part Two”). “Called the Einstein of sex”, Hirschfeld and his colleagues offered early sex-change operations and hormone therapy as early as 1919. While Hirschfeld’s Institute of Sexual Research was thriving during the decadent Weimar era, he was exiled from Germany when the National Socialists came to power.

But despite its faddishness, not all is well in transgenderland. People who identify as transgender have an incredibly high rate of suicide and attempted suicide. According to a study by Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 30% of transgender people had attempted suicide, 58% had at least one other psychiatric diagnosis, and 63% report having a history of being bullied.

And, as magazine covers depict transgender children as the new norm, the American College of Pediatricians released a statement describing the harm the transgender movement does to children, citing issues such as the dangers of hormone blockers and rising rates of suicide for those who have undergone sex change operations. The American College of Pediatricians concludes their statement by asserting that subjecting a child to “a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex,” is very clearly abuse. Their statement deserves wide dissemination.

3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V)….

4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty- blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child.

5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.

6. Pre-pubertal children diagnosed with gender dysphoria may be given puberty blockers as young as eleven, and will require cross-sex hormones in later adolescence to continue impersonating the opposite sex. These children will never be able to conceive any genetically related children even via articifial reproductive technology. In addition, cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to cardiac disease, high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke, diabetes, and cancer.

7. Rates of suicide are nearly twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBTQ – affirming countries. What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?

8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to “gender clinics” where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.

Canada has passed a law mandating authorities to remove children from their parents if the parents object to the child undergoing sexual transformation. This is criminal given the irreversible effects on reproduction, particularly given that the vast majority would eventually accept their biological sex after going through puberty. Oregon has passed a law that 15-year-olds can get a state-subsidized sex change operation without consent of parents. Insane.

We have created a society that says it is sexist to play with “gendered” toys, that your biological sex does not bear any relationship to behavior, that encourages and praises psychiatric conditions, and will take your children away if you don’t play along accordingly. The Left is actually looking at us, with straight faces, and telling us that gender and all its roles are figments of our imagination — “social constructs,” despite the fact that over 6,500 genes in humans express differently depending on biological sex. They are engaging in gaslighting on a massive scale.

Creating a society where neither men nor women act like, well, men or women, is going to have incredibly degenerative effects on the family unit and the health of society as a whole. More children are identifying as transgender because society promotes this sort of madness. People legitimately struggling with gender dysphoria need psychiatric help, not a society that makes a spectacle about which bathroom to use. A stable family unit that helps and cares for one another is perhaps the greatest antidote to state power. When we create a society that can destroy a family by taking children away from their parents and denounces boys for wanting to act like boys, we are welcoming the decay.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

39 Comments to "Gender Bender: Feminist Ideology Goes Off the Deep End"

  1. Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
    August 30, 2017 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    The caption of the link,”To avoid perpetuating gender stereotypes, I gave my daughter a mix of dolls and toy cars to play with. This is what happened.”

    https://imgur.com/gallery/AT2Ak

    HAHA

  2. George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
    August 30, 2017 - 9:51 am | Permalink

    Feminism, trangenderism and socialism are based on 19th Century biology which believed in the inheritance of acquired characteristics. This is what Charles Darwin assumed when he developed his famous theory. The work which became the study of genetics by Gregor Mendelson came much later. Socialism, then, has attached itself to the notion that a powerful entity, such as a totalitarian government, can engineer a new species of human, without the troubling characteristics which seem to have plagued mankind from the beginning, aggression, greed and sex differences. Also, in this theory, society constructs reality which makes biological differences irrelevant.

  3. conradcgaarder's Gravatar conradcgaarder
    August 30, 2017 - 9:53 am | Permalink

    What would happen if Oregon made illegal the marketing of toys “for boys” or “for girls.” Might a toy maker in violation of such a law find the success of its appeal dependent upon how many Hebrews (or Shebrews) are on the Supreme Court.

  4. JRM's Gravatar JRM
    August 30, 2017 - 10:28 am | Permalink

    This kind of cultural insanity is what happens when White men turn over the reins of power to women and Jews. Both groups tend to foster hysterics. This was well-known around the year 1900. The idea that Jews and women (of any ethnicity) would actually be running the show in one hundred years would have shocked our grandfathers. But here we are.

    There is a nice juicy irony at work here though, for those who like to savor such things: those who suspect the “Climate Change” agenda of being less than truthful are labelled as “Science Deniers”, while those who believe gender is more a social construct than a result of biological determinism claim to be on the side of “the Science is settled”.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      August 31, 2017 - 5:41 am | Permalink

      JRM,

      “This kind of cultural insanity is what happens when White men turn over the reins”

      Then it’s time European males take back the reins by creating a definition of our reproductive lives not dependent on Abraham.

      • August 31, 2017 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

        Bravo. Short, succinct and oh so true.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        September 1, 2017 - 4:56 am | Permalink

        @ Michal Adkins

        The “Old Testament” is pretty “sexist” as today are many Orthodox families, though even then “Shebrews” can be “pushy” (as in the “New Testament” too – Matthew 20.21).

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      September 1, 2017 - 5:07 am | Permalink

      @ JRM

      Your “hysterics” observation recalls Otto Weininger’s “Sex & Character” (1903) and Jean-Martin Charcot before him.

  5. Sally's Gravatar Sally
    August 30, 2017 - 10:59 am | Permalink

    This article refuses to acknowledge that transsexuals are not trying to change gender roles, but physical sexual characteristics. There exist people who identify as transgender or some as ‘queer’ but not all of those desire a differently-sexed body.

    Feminism originally said that gender roles didn’t align with sexual parts, but now they’re saying they do in fact correlate. It’s a complete 180.

    Fighting transsexualism as opposed to trying to nail down some supposed inherent gender role would take skeptics a lot farther. Why is there such a resistance to this more fruitful tack?

    Also, monkeys aren’t human beings. And girls and women are extremely aggressive, including physically; since human beings don’t have psychologies separable from their physical being, the old adage that ‘girls are psychologically more aggressive’ is just contradictory and absurd. Females tend to cloak their aggressions and drive to dominate through ‘care,’ as opposed to the more typically male mode of direct one-ups-manship and overt physical shows of force. The notion that testosterone makes males more aggressive or imbues them with more competitive drive just clashes with common sense. Lots of hormonally normal men are far less aggressive than lots of hormonally normal women are.

    So this notion that gender roles are somehow intrinsic to sex parts is not only the very crux of transsexualism, it defies direct observation.

    Besides obvious physical characteristics like body proportions, etc. and the ‘roles’ that sometimes stem directly from them (men clearly surpass women in almost anything that requires upper body strength, at least as a group) what traits can be attributed to ‘masculinity’ or ‘femininity’ in human beings?

    Almost nothing extreme, from what I’ve seen over the course of more than four decades of life. Which does not imply that there aren’t some differences, just that they seem at best mild and often not the kinds convention assumes.

    • Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
      August 30, 2017 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

      “trying to nail down some supposed inherent gender role…” My goodness, read some history or literature; classic gender roles are displayed even in some places in the modern world. “Also, monkeys are not human beings.” They are gendered animals, like humans, which is the point. “And girls and women are extremely aggressive, including physically…” Hate to mingle with your crowd; females are certainly not “extremely” aggressive compared to males. “Females tend to cloak their aggressions…” Like, using psychology? “The notion that testosterone makes males more aggressive or imbues them with more competitive drive just clashes with common sense.” No it doesn’t, even though the science shows the situation is more complex than once thought. Testosterone levels by race correspond to aggression levels of the different races. “Lots of hormonally normal men are far less aggressive than lots of hormonally normal women are.” The use of “lots” as a quantitative measure renders this statement useless. Is “lots” of men ten? A thousand? Eighty percent?

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        September 1, 2017 - 4:49 am | Permalink

        @ Karl Nemmersdorf

        Females use talk and tears. Men use barks and blows. These are generalized “stereotypes” as there is a wide spectrum within the biological categories.

    • Jude's Gravatar Jude
      August 31, 2017 - 8:55 am | Permalink

      “Girls and women are extremely aggressive, including physically.”

      “Extremely aggressive” relative to whom? Men? I’d like to see the hard evidence for that assertion. My own entirely unscientific observation of life indcates that the more physically masculine the woman is the more aggressive she will tend to be – not necessarily in the sense of starting fights but in the sense of having a dominant personality. This isn’t to say all feminine women are living saints – merely that when they are nasty, they tend to be nasty in a less overtly dominant way.

      The truth is that neither men nor women are obviously aggressive most of the time. However it’s also obvious that engaging in very strenuous aggressive physical activity or indeed aggressively competitive activity of any kind has a physically masculinising effect on both men and women.

    • HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
      September 1, 2017 - 5:27 pm | Permalink

      The may be instances of female aggression in the establishment of dominance hierarchies but they are very limited in scope relative to those of males, say the dominance of the conversation among women at a party; where are all the female Napoleons of history ?

  6. Pat Kittle's Gravatar Pat Kittle
    August 30, 2017 - 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Piano moving is a notoriously sexist occupation.

    Have you ever seen a womyn piano mover?

    Where is the outrage??
    >:-(

    • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
      August 31, 2017 - 6:12 am | Permalink

      I have been concerned that from 70 to 90 % of the teachers in grammar and high schools are women. Such exploitation! Shouldn’t the Civil Rights Division intervene and fire most of them to make up for all the discrimination in the past?

  7. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    August 30, 2017 - 4:28 pm | Permalink

    There used to be tom boys and sissies in every playground, men who dressed as women in privacy, and women who were referred to as manly. There have always been women who love women, coyly referred to as spinsters, and of course the confirmed bachelor. Cities of a decent size had clubs and bars that catered to those of a different persuasion. Everyone with any degree of sophistication knew about them. Most people had a live and let live attitude towards them, a good thing, live and let live. Now, like relations between the races and the sexes, polarization and hatred are dividing us in the guise of love and tolerance. The word ‘satanic’ can be applied to negation and reversal of the natural order, satan is the counterfeit, the great liar. So, what is being played out here is satanic.

    • James's Gravatar James
      August 30, 2017 - 7:26 pm | Permalink

      That’s right. And for all of those years, they were seldom bothered by anybody, like you said, live and let live. What we are seeing now from the Left is dangerous to children and downright evil.

  8. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    August 30, 2017 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    The Emperor’s nude so we know he’s a guy, Serena Williams wears a frock…

  9. August 30, 2017 - 7:13 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t there a logical difficulty here? Like the Jewish idea that ‘race doesn’t exist’ – how can there be ‘racism’ if that’s true? —- If ‘genders’ are completely fluid, what sense does it make to talk of sexual stereotypes at all? It’s just more Jewish BS derived from Jewish printing of paper money, allowing Jews to fund endless unemployable tribals in pointless tasks, but which Jews have evolved to like.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      August 31, 2017 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

      @ Rerevisionist

      You are absolutely correct about the illogical semantics of “race” and “gender” in the present intimidation process.

      The “anti-racist” propaganda by Jews escalated for obvious reasons after WW2, notably at first in UNESCO documents dominated by Ashley Montagu, Marie Jahoda and Otto Klineberg; and later contributors have included Leon Kamin, Steven Rose, Richard Lewontin, &c &c. Their influence still dominates the so-called “social sciences” and the biassed “science” media.

      A few Jews have taken a different position; see e.g. Mitchell B. Hart (ed), “Jews and Race” (2011), Stanley M. Garn, “Human Races” (1971), Michael Levin, “Why Race Matters” (2016), &c.

  10. SFC Steven M Barry USA RET's Gravatar SFC Steven M Barry USA RET
    August 30, 2017 - 9:30 pm | Permalink

    “People should be free to do, say, and be, whatever they want.”

    No. They shouldn’t.

    That nonsense is how we got to where we are now.

    S//

    • James's Gravatar James
      August 31, 2017 - 6:12 am | Permalink

      I think there is a difference between individual liberty – as the US founding fathers intended, to the freedom to damage society as a whole, as we see now.

  11. Sandy's Gravatar Sandy
    August 30, 2017 - 11:33 pm | Permalink

    I’m retiring after almost 30 years as a care aide changing adult diapers. There are only two genders but in the loonie bin you can be whatever you want to believe and all the so called professionals and managerial workers will go along with you because they are only there for the length of their shift and at the end of the day they can’t be bothered arguing. They go along with assisted suicide too.

  12. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    August 31, 2017 - 4:20 am | Permalink

    There are various “feminisms” and they have had their own critics like Fay Weldon, Germaine Greer and Camille Paglia – “that’s wyomin for yer”.

    But the transgender development is perhaps its most dangerous outcome, poisoning not only university life but social legislation; in Britain it has the support of institutions from the “Tory” government to police uniforms. On BBC TV we have just had programs on “brain [re]training” 7-years olds to stamp out emergent gender awareness, which nature provides through genes and hormones for successful mating and family protection, on the pretext that this stands in the way of equal career opportunities.

    The open or concealed objective is to destroy at the earliest opportunity successful heterosexual reproduction and the normal two-parent family. The biggest victims are white children and students. The worst casualty is the white birth-rate and the next bad is the happy family unit.

  13. James's Gravatar James
    August 31, 2017 - 5:09 pm | Permalink

    I would love to get off this planet. The people are going mad en mass. It is very sad to see the destruction of the Republic of the United States of America as well as the destruction of the family and the acceptance of the fallacy that a human being can choose their gender. It’s laughable and tragic all at the same time. However if you look at the poisoning of the food with glyphosphate and diacamba as well as the water pollution with flouride and multiestrogens well the picture is not pretty. I guarantee that these poisons are lowering the human IQ substantially. The future is not bright for humanity. As they say if I knew then what I know now, I wouldnt of had my 2 kids. They are fine, normal kids but I shudder to think of what they are dealing with and are going to have to deal with in terms of the insanity pervading the people all around them. As for myself I have lived for 50 years on this planet and my grandmother lived to be 104.
    I shudder again to think of what humanity will look like in 54 more years, if the people of the USA do not stand up for common sense, logic and truth. Im doing my part daily and taking a huge amount of flak for it. I consider the flak battle scars and worth it, because if we dont speak up this madness will never end! Join me in speaking up and saying no to the insanity we all see unfolding.

    • Karl Nemmersdorf's Gravatar Karl Nemmersdorf
      September 1, 2017 - 5:10 pm | Permalink

      You should have had more than two kids so that the next generation could have a better chance of success. It is useless pessimism to say that you don’t want to have children because the world is so bad. Who is going to make the world better, then?

      • Mari's Gravatar Mari
        September 6, 2017 - 9:22 am | Permalink

        Karl,

        How many White children did you have and raise? American Whites are still reproducing ourselves, 2 kids per couple. What’s the average European rate? 1.5 children per White couple while your taxes support 3 to 5 children per non White couple?

        • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
          September 6, 2017 - 9:52 am | Permalink

          The rate of 2 kids per couple looks high to me. But, it is far from enough. Four seems more reasonable. My experience in politics suggests that conservatives are having few kids and a large faction are too old for anymore. And the ones they do have do not produce many grandkids.

  14. August 31, 2017 - 6:45 pm | Permalink

    As magazine covers depict transgender children as the new norm, the American College of Pediatricians released a statement describing the harm the transgender movement does to children, citing issues such as the dangers of hormone blockers and rising rates of suicide for those who have undergone sex change operations. The American College of Pediatricians concludes their statement by asserting that subjecting a child to “a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex,” is very clearly abuse. Their statement deserves wide dissemination.

    Perfect it’z! So vas ist yur problem goy? You goyim should shut up your mouth. It’s all part of our long range plan to genocide you white people off the face of the earth and so far the plan is working perfectly – wouldn’t you say? We got you running away on all fronts now and there aint’ nuthin’ you can do ’cause we got all the money, all the media, all the classrooms, all the judges, all the courts and all the homeland security working for us while all you got is a bunch of brainless sheep that listen to everything we tell them on our Talmudvision. More than half your own herd is helping us kill you off ’cause that’s the way we’ve programmed you.

    About the only thing you might do is pick up the gun. But you are far too disorganized to actually commit any unified action against us. We solved that problem by throwing our legal monkey wrench into all your organizational efforts. But that really doesn’t matter anyway because we will soon revoke your Second Amendment privilege now granted by the state we control. Should that fail there are other issues you have to face, like where you gonna’ buy yur ammunition? Do you think we haven’t been carefully restricting ammunition sales? Think you will have enough to fight our police and military forces arrayed against you?

    What would you do anyway if you got the upper hand? Reason with us? Run us out of town? Then what? Do you think we would just slink quietly away? We might, but we’d just invade again and murder you all anyways, like we did with our Bolshevist vengeance murder campaign against the Russian people, not too mention what we did to Germany for Hitler’s double-crossing us. So even if you get away from us this time, you won’t ever have the resolve to do what is necessary to end our pernicious depredations upon you. A real “final solution” unlike the phony one we made up and pinned on the Germans.

    So sit back and die quietly instead of kicking about like there’s a problem. As far as we’re concerned there is no problem at all with your extinction. We Jews think its just fine.

    All the worst,
    Maury Rothstein

    • Don Gates's Gravatar Don Gates
      September 1, 2017 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

      A great description of the problem. Well written.

  15. Elizabeth's Gravatar Elizabeth
    August 31, 2017 - 10:13 pm | Permalink

    The appeal of Feminism for our enemies was the effective way in which it lowered the white birth rate, the rest is window dressing.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      September 1, 2017 - 7:35 am | Permalink

      Elizabeth,

      And now we see the results (58 million abortions in the U.S. since 1973). One has to ask how a forward moving nation was pulled back into the stone-age?

    • HK Wills's Gravatar HK Wills
      September 1, 2017 - 5:12 pm | Permalink

      That and a doubling of the divorce rate since 1960, and the lowest marriage rate since the 1860’s.

  16. Floda's Gravatar Floda
    August 31, 2017 - 10:34 pm | Permalink

    Someone should remind the Jews that it is exactly this kind of manipulation which is behind the indisputable FACT that over many centuries they were expelled from every place they ever settled. The last time it was post Weimar Germany, there they were behind every kind of debauchery and financial malfeasance imaginable. I was born in Germany and I have a sense that sooner or later, but eventually the pendulum will swing the other way, just as it did when Uncle Adolf arrived in Berlin.

  17. Forever guilty's Gravatar Forever guilty
    September 1, 2017 - 4:03 am | Permalink

    Well explanation could be very simple and common sense. Jews historically lived in the compact ghettos in European cities. What does that mean, there were a lot inbreeding in Jewish population. That imply that there was ( is ) much higher number of genetically disorders : psychological, hormonal etc.

    So Jewish population should have a much higher percentage of persons with hormonal dysfunctions. And Homosexuals are basically persons with hormonal pathologies.

    So these sick creatures need sexual partners. So they are trying to “soften up” and bend overall population to their sick ways.

  18. Jesse's Gravatar Jesse
    September 1, 2017 - 11:54 pm | Permalink

    Those who say there is no deference between boys and girls must not have ever raised both boys and girls. For it is nonsense to say there is no difference between boys and girls. But someone has a satanic agenda.

  19. Laurence Almand's Gravatar Laurence Almand
    September 6, 2017 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Read the good book FEMINISM AND FREEDOM to see how the malicious feminists are trying to subvert our society to their anti-male agenda.

  20. pterodactyl's Gravatar pterodactyl
    September 8, 2017 - 2:27 am | Permalink

    The story below of the banned sign sums up what is happening in the West generally. There was a ‘sexist’ poster saying that girls like dressing up etc and boys like getting dirty etc at a garden centre where the public were the customers (see link below).

    ONE – yes ONE person complained (a teacher, of course), and guess what the outcome was – the signs were removed.

    This shows how the majority willingly submit and bow down to the far-left minority, even when the minority is ONE. Why do the people do this?

    The majority are in fact submitting to a loud and aggressive minority within the population. They do the same in every other field – education, the legal system TV – they let the loud left dominate. Therefore the downfall of the West is caused because the majority submit rather than stand up to those who try and bully them (and succeed).

    Perhaps we are destined for this to remain the attitude of the whites for the time being. However, one day in the future when all the corruption, socialism, Islam, white-hate etc all finally reap what we sow, when this time comes and the people are no longer rich and pampered (as they still are now) and instead we are third world and short of food once again, perhaps then the survival mode of the people will be activated, as opposed to the ‘submission’ mode we are now in. And if the people ever switch to this mode, and a new right-wing elite take over, then if/when that happens, how long will it take to sort out our enemy within? (And we know who they are). Actually, a very short time. The only thing to stop the new elite correcting all the nonsense would be other hostile countries interfering.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/845744/sexism-argument-garsons-garden-centre-titchfield-hampshire-posters-complaint-grandmother

    • George Kocan's Gravatar George Kocan
      September 8, 2017 - 7:47 am | Permalink

      The grandmother was shocked–shocked by reality. How to change reality? Censorship, always reliable as socialist teachers well know. What is the whole purpose of modern schools except the indoctrination of students in an unnatural ideology which can only be sustained by suppressing competing views and supporting facts? Socialists know they cannot win without censorship.

Comments are closed.