The governing philosophies that rule the legal system are: (a) “legal realism” by which is meant that the judge decides whom he wants to prevail (or who “should” prevail as the legal theorists would claim, not wanting to let the cat out of the bag that the judge is not a philosopher king and is likely to rule for his former law partner or for the utility companies); and (b) “critical legal studies” which is an basically a Marxist theory that mirrors “legal realism” but is even nastier because the criteria by which the judge is supposed to decide who should prevail is based on which litigant belongs to the “victim class” and which one belongs to the “oppressor class.”
These two philosophies work very well upon a foundation of the “common law system” which we in Anglo-Saxon countries “enjoy” as opposed to the code system most European countries use.
When I was in law school, the professors would tout the benefits of the common law system especially its “flexibility.”
What has happened is that on most issues there are contradictory so-called “precedents” from which the judge can choose much like an artist chooses which color to use from his palette.
I followed the cases of several White dissidents who were prosecuted in trumped up claims that they incited someone else to commit a crime. (The SPLC’s Morris Dees specializes in such cases and such claims.)
Some decades ago a White businessman won a lawsuit against the NAACP arising out of a boycott of White-owned stores in a small town in Mississippi. The local Blacks had ignored the NAACP’s calls for the boycott. Enraged by the failure of the brothers and sisters to obey instructions, the NAACP sent the brother of Medger Evans to speak in the local Black churches.
In his sermons Evans warned the local Blacks that the NAACP was going to be taking down the names of Blacks who shopped with White merchants and that they were “going to break your necks.”
Sure enough the houses of Blacks who didn’t obey were burned down.
This was the case of Claiburn Hardware vs. NAACP.
The U.S. Supreme Court indignantly overturned the judgment against the NAACP and said that the 1st Amendment protected such speech. In order for speech to constitute an incitement and to give rise to liability the speech had to be a direct and immediate incitement.
This “precedent” has been cited by attorneys defending White activists over and over again. Never has any Judge cited it or relied on it. Instead, the Judges have chosen other precedents and have allowed Dees to get judgments against White activists whose statements really did not threaten any violence at all. Dees and his witnesses were allowed to deconstruct the text of the statements and to explain to the jury that when a White racist tells an audience “we are non-violent” and things like this, that such statements are “code” for “go out and commit crimes.”
The fact that not one court has ever cited Claiborne Hardware vs. NAACP in cases brought against White activists even if only to distinguish it shows just how fixed the system is.
The icing on the cake is a little known “rule of court” in the federal courts which allows the Judges to make a ruling and include in the ruling a holding that the decision will not be precedent on any other case and to order that the decision never be published!
This was done in the Georgia case of Carver vs. State so the federal courts could uphold a kangaroo court conviction of a Klansman in which — among numerous other outrages in the conduct of the trial — the trial judge denied the defendant the right to subpoena evidence in violation of Mapp vs. Ohio and the Fourth Amendment.
Almost no lay Americans are aware of this unspeakable star chamber rule and the vast majority of lawyers don’t know about it either.
There was a proposal a few years ago to change this rule and the federal judges vehemently opposed taking their “discretion” away from them.
The American justice system is held in awe by its victims who haven’t got a clue about how it works. Its filth and corruption are made all the worse by its hypocrisy.
Obviously, there are many judges who are fine men and women and do follow the law.
But they are very much in the minority.
As Montesquieu said there is no crueler tyranny than one in which the forms of the law and justice are maintained without the reality.
Thorborne Richardson is an attorney.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
Yes, the law is wonderful. Sometimes the judge says two and two are four; other times he can make it whatever he wants. Where is the judicial overview? Look how the courts and lawyers have pettifogged and roadblocked the issue of the President’s birth certificate and whether he is qualified to sit in that office. I’m sure it will be settled when he is safely out of office.
Shouldn’t that be “the brother of Medgar Evers”, not “Evans”. If I recall correctly, of course!
Matt Hale was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison…
See also A
Better Future
The only solicitation that occurred was on the part of the mole who repeatedly accosted Matt over a period of over 2 years.
I would frame that as a blatant instance of double jeopardy.
Yes, Dr Pierce always nailed it.
He was never shy about reality, and it wasn’t about talking our parasites into going away. they will need more assertive persuasion.
A good article. Though the American legal system has it’s merits, it’s deficiencies persist.
Think about it. How many people at any given trial have a vested interest in arriving at, or uncovering, the truth? The WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth?
Not the attorneys (sorry Thorborne) – they’re interested in presenting only their client’s version of the truth and will suppress all other versions when legal (or not.) Not their clients – they’re interested only in prevailing over their opponents (usually for vengeance or financial gain.) Certainly not the judges – when they’re not disallowing evidence or obsessing on precedent, their using their position of legal omnipotence to bring about social change and become the next Thurgood Marshall and be remembered in the hallowed halls of justice for the next thousand years. Not paid expert witnesses because, well…they’re paid. Not plea bargained witnesses because they fit the constitutional definition of bribed witnesses.
So who does that leave? The jury? Yeah…unless it’s the O.J. trial. So I guess that REALLY just leaves the court stenographer. And maybe the janitor.
Most people in any given courtroom are concerned a good deal with the law and not much with the truth. I don’t know what the good alternative to/variant of Anglo-Saxon law is, but it must be out there somewhere.
I was recently a witness in the racketeering trial of a building contractor. there was no court stenographer. An entire day of testimony was wiped out because the recording system was hyper sensitive to a live cell phone in the room.
I guess that just leaves the janitor.
The whole persecution of Idaho attorney Edgar Steele by the Federal government should be enough to scare the hell out of any lawyer who takes on an unpopular client!
You’re right, Tom. I even thought the guy was probably guilty at first, and that it was just overly zealous WN’s who claimed his innocence. Your link to Cyndi Steele’s press conference (on a previous post) was an eye opener, though. It makes absolutely NO SENSE for him to kill his mother-in-law and wife. And the FBI let his wife drive around with a bomb under her car for several weeks.
If the jewish power structure can fire Rick Sanchez within hours of making jewish-critical comments, what do you THINK they’re going to do to a guy who defended the Aryan Nations??? (not to mention his wife)
Not many of these guys, these black robes. And they can’t sway the laws of physics.
I don’t know what the good alternative to/variant of Anglo-Saxon law is, but it must be out there somewhere.
No document or law can make a just, upright, honest people from a venal people. The arrow of causation points in the other direction.
Don’t forget the worst problem of all: the idiotic bribe-happy legislators, who (on all levels) reportedly generate around 200,000 pages of new and highly arbitrary regulations per year. It is impossible for any citizen to know all of them or avoid breaking some, and thus impossible to prevent some little hook-nosed prosecutor from leveling his bony finger in one’s direction, crying “Arrest that violator!”, and sending in the SWAT team of armed lickspittles for the roundup.
There are no doubt some decent people within the system, but they turn out to be few and far between. Most of the players have no reason to live other than chasing money, power, and fame while making the lives of others a living hell by ingesting them into the legal system, fleecing them, and throwing them away (unless the would-be victim has a get-out-of-jail-free card marked with a big J and various other symbols of privilege).
But aside from their obvious widespread corruption, perhaps the greatest problem with judges is their lack of intellectual qualifications for the job. Go through a randomly-chosen stack of case law, and you’ll find more mistakes of logic and jurisprudence than you can count. Morons who can’t locate their own rear ends are actually making law all by themselves, and we’re eating the consequences and paying them handsomely for their trouble.
“It is impossible for any citizen to know all of them or avoid breaking some…” [in reference to regulations]
This is a tactic used not only by government but by many employers, public or private, as well – create a plethora of rules and regulations that make it difficult for ordinary people to function without being a violater in one small way or another. This is intended to be overlooked most of the time, but as soon as the powers that be want to burn someone for illegitimate reasons, they’ve got legitimate ammunition to get them with.
I don’t know the specifics of David Duke’s prison time for tax problems, but I DO know that amiable hippy/hillbilly Willie Nelson owed $32,000,000 in taxes/penalties and didn’t spend a day in prison.
Yes, the Jews and their catamites really had it in for poor David. It’s greatly to his credit that after the ordeal was over, he came back even stronger and more dedicated than before.
You’re quite right – they can do the same to anybody, and that’s the whole point. However, I wouldn’t call it “legitimate” even though the word means “according to the law”. The assumption has always been that the law is just, whereas justice is no longer of any concern at all to those who write, enforce, and defend it. Instead, a noisome gaggle of shameless parasites are making the rules to suit themselves and their paymasters, and sanctimoniously pretending to “dispense justice” while doing the exact opposite. It’s really quite sickening.
Euro
“Morons who can’t locate their own rear ends…”
I remember reading about one moron who was able to find his FRONT END and played with it under his robes during court proceedings.
Court proceedings are a sham, the lawyers have already agreed to the verdict BEFORE you even walk in.
The system’s not sick, it’s already dead.
I’m not sure of the exact chronology, but I have a feeling that David Duke’s prison sentence was a specific retribution against him for his having published Holocaust revision materials in his autobiography.
That was a very, very interesting article. I’ve always wondered about the law and how it works. I wonder: Can Mr. Richardson recommend any books that tell about how law really works, what law schools teach, etc. (like a “for dummies” sort of overview) that would not mislead me? Something really nitty gritty?
For 38 years I have been trying to make a difference in human rights for TI’s in Amerika. Look, any rational being who has been confronted with judges who refuse to admit evidence that is clearly relevant, just to prevent a party from making a proper record, is perpetuating the fraud.
In fact, the shift has been away from jurisprudence to a kind of modern crony system. What fuels this good ole’ boy system is fraud. Before the term “Targeted Individual” was coined, the concepts were known and felt by those around me. The problem is that there is no organization to help because people are afraid and silenced by these murderers, like Aaron Russeau, the movie producer of Freedom to Fascism who was killed by induced cancer.
We may be doing ground breaking work in my newest case, but all of it is uphill. In the past, I represented David R. Hinkson, inventor, who developed a multi-million dollar dietary suppliment formula for minerals with a company he called WaterOz. He was targeted because of his stance on income taxes and because his products were becoming very popular and was a threat to big pharma. David is now serving a 43 year prison sentence in SuperMax for his “crimes” of being a patriot and supporter of and believer in the US Constitution.
Today, I represent the wife of Edgar Steele, First Amendment lawyer from North Idaho, is a TI, in jail and isolated in solitary confinement. There is a no contact order so his wife cannot speak to him, to increase the isolation. He was about to discover and expose the link that is used by the Sovic money interests that steal thousands from older Americans who are drawn into the Russian Bride scam. Along with human trafficing (the knowledge of which cost Sen. Nancy Schafer, former Georgia State Senator and her husband their lives, you see she committed suicide by shooting herself in the back of the head twice) the Slovic block of mafia have perfected the art of the slave trade to a new techno level. (Have you seen the movie Taken?)
Anyway, as soon as Ed, author of one book, Defensive Racism, said the word, there is a book in this bride scam business, he went from merely on the watch list, to being set up with a pipe bomb placed under his wife’s car by the handyman and then blamed as if he was the mastermind in a plot to kill his wife and mother-in-law. Below are some links to explain his present dilemna.
What I am looking for is the opportunity to start a dialogue that could lead to a cohesion among TI’s. I have found that only one person, such as myself, who has been the subject of targeting (that’s another story), can truly appreciate the harm, danger and risk involved. If we could somehow bring together these people, we might have a chance to bring about greater exposure of the conspiracy, which, in turn, will cause the conspirators to back off.
I believe, as you have demonstrated, that Exposure is the Only Cure for Corruption, just as Vigilence is the Price of Freedom.
I am naive enough to believe that something can yet be done to de-rail the abuses and stupid enough to believe that I can help individuals find relief.
In the case of Cyndi Steele, whose bold statement before a federal judge yesterday is attached, whom I represent pro bono, I believe she truly is in danger from the accomplices of Larry Fairfax, the handyman turned pipe bomber. Notice that among the cast of co-conspirators, we have Jim Maher (neighbor of Cyndi and Ed Steele) the brother of Bill Maher, world famous comedian and a retired Idaho State District Court judge who is still sitting on the bench as a temp. Maher has been given a complete “get out of jail free card” by the US prosecutor because of his political connections, although he was involved in key decision making. This is racketeering but the government will not charge it.
In order to target Ed Steele, Fairfax says he was hired by Ed Steele, to murder his wife. She says not so, husband not capable because of four surgeries in the six months prior to his arrest and that the tapes with her husband’s voice saying words that sound like he was plotting to kill her, was just a pre-recorded re-mix of statements he had made and are on the internet. But she says, Ed had to be silenced and she recognizes that she, as his wife, and their children, are all expendible. Rationally, she’s afraid for her life.
Since Fairfax is as “dumb as a box of rocks” and wouldn’t know how to make a bomb if he had to, those who support Ed Steele believe that there is some big money and politically connected people pushing his prosecution.
If you are interested, please read and view some of the attached material as mentioned below. Notice the contrast between what Cyndi is saying and what the news media will publicly acknowledge. However, we are carefully feeding the information to the media and little by little, the story is being told.
Ed has a national following and we think that we can reach out and get their support if some of us who are awakened can find a pathway for better exposure. One has to hit just the right chords with just the right timing to gain attention by the right people. Its a game and we need many supporters who would be willing to help. I see part of the solution is demanding a congressional investigation right before the election of the failure of the FBI to properly investigate and warn the public and Mrs. Steele of a weapon of mass destruction attached to her car as she drove through communities of three states. The question is, why isn’t congress demanding an investigation of the FBI for allowing a woman to drive around three states with a lethan pipe bomb on her car for almost three weeks?
Wesley W. Hoyt, former prosecuting attorney