George Bush: “The First Jewish President”

Michael Kinsley’s review of Bush’s memoir has this tidbit:

When Bush called for a new Palestinian leadership, Barbara Bush the elder (“Mother,” he invariably calls her) rang up to say, “How’s the first Jewish president doing?” Maybe I’m deficient in humor, but I don’t see why this is funny, as her son clearly believes it to be. I might even find it alarming if Bush didn’t crowd this book with ­maybe-you-had-to-be-there witticisms.

Philip Weiss writes that the comment is

a little window into the important mystery of how the realist [G. H. W] Bush absorbed the shocking reality of his neoconnized son — after all, a question of huge historical import. I.e by gentle ribbing, in the hope that it might eventually make a difference. Perhaps it even did; Bush didn’t attack Iran. Jeffrey Goldberg reported that he began to call Kristol and Krauthammer “the bomber boys” in the last years of his presidency. I’m a little surprised that Kinsley would have thought it alarming.


Actually, it’s easy to see why Kinsley would find it alarming: He finds any suggestion of Jewish influence anathema. (See below.)

Bush may have wised up, but the sad thing is that he was so gullible early in his presidency. Kinsley reports that after being elected governor of Texas,

God told him to run for president. “I felt a calling to run,” Bush writes. “I was concerned about the future of the country, and I had a clear vision of where to lead it. I wanted to cut taxes, raise standards in public schools, reform Social Security.” Bush never indicates where this laundry list of views came from. He had no political views he deems worthy of mention before the age of 40, but a few years later he has a complete set. You do have to wonder how deep they run.

Well, not exactly a complete set. None of the policies that Bush says he wanted to implement had anything to do with foreign policy (much less help out the really crucial issue of the future of White America). He was a babe in the woods and the neocons loved it so much that they made him into the first Jewish president. Jacob Heilbrunn has a nice account of Bush’s naivete:

The first time [Richard Perle] met Bush, he immediately sensed that he was different from his father. Two things were clear to Perle: one was that Bush didn’t know much about foreign policy and another was that he wasn’t too embarrassed to confess it. Like Wolfowitz, Perle admired Bush’s ability, as he saw it, to cut to the heart of the matter rather than become mesmerized by Washington policy talk. (p. 230)

The fact that Bush was a naif on foreign policy was seen as a plus by the neocons. “In August 1999 an excited Wolfowitz told me over lunch . . . that Bush had the ability to penetrate the dense fog of foreign policy expertise to ask a simple question. ‘Tell me what I need to know? [sic]’” (Heilbrunn, p. 230).
Although Heilbrunn states that we can never know for certain what was going on in Bush’s brain in the days and months after 9/11, his comment that Bush “moved further and further into the web that the neoconservatives had woven around him” (p. 235) seems reasonable. It’s pathetic to realize that someone can become president with such lack of experience or concern about foreign policy. I suspect that even the inexperienced Obama had more understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian situation if only because of his contacts among political radicals.

Bush may have wised up, as Weiss suggests. But by then  it was too late. Kinsley quotes Bush:

“The reality was that I had sent American troops into combat based in large part on intelligence that proved false.” A handsome admission, but it raises the question: So why were they still there, dying and killing, when he left office years later?

An even better question is why the intelligence was false. Neither Kinsley nor Bush would want to consider the evidence that neocons (Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, David Wurmser, Abraham Shulsky, Elliott Abrams, Michael Ledeen, Michael Rubin, David Schenker; see here, p. 48) at the  Office of Special Plans in the Department of Defense cooked the  intelligence on Iraq.

Best to keep that one under wraps.

Re Kinsley’s aversion to the idea of Jewish influence: Here he is on Jewish involvement in the financial crisis; he makes similar dumb arguments on the neocons and the Iraq war. Quick rejoinders: people are often unaware of how they are biased by their ethnocentrism, so it’s no surprise that Jewish neocons firmly believe that Israel and the U.S. have the same interests. Secondly, no one is saying that all Jews are neocons, but people are saying that Jews with a strong Jewish identity and commitment to Israel were extraordinarily influential in the Bush administration.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

65 Comments to "George Bush: “The First Jewish President”"

  1. dick shonairy's Gravatar dick shonairy
    December 24, 2010 - 8:37 pm | Permalink

    here is where we truly are:

    1)trillions in stolen money are now being used to construct massive underground cities, as well as underocean towns…possibly self sustaining space colonies…all under total secrecy by carefully selected elites.

    2)once they are finished and instituted, up and running, a brutal world war will be unleashed upon the earth. no one will survive outside of those secret underground cities.

    3) if they manage not to kill each other in their exclusive underground cities, after many many years, their elite descendants will have the planet all to themselves.

    4) does anyone recall that group of scientists and students from elite institutions who were selected to live in an experimental, self sutaining bubble, about 17 years ago?

  2. Optimistic Truther's Gravatar Optimistic Truther
    December 24, 2010 - 9:53 am | Permalink

    The Building What Campaign, is sponsored by over 100 families of victims of the 911 attacks, including Bob McIlvaine, who lost his son in the WTC and has been a tireless public voice for 911 Truth. Cosponsors include Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, a coalition of over 2000 licensed architects and engineers, and the NYC Coalition for Accountability, which has been lobbying for a NYC ballot measure calling for an investigation.

    Smears of “conspiracy theorist” and “Alex Jones” are not just asinine but extremely disrespectful of those who lost loved ones and are trying to get accountability.

    If it wasn’t for the “Jersey Girls” the four women who lost their husbands, we would never even have had a 911 Commission. Despite a hostile media and government, these four women were able to force the government to even investigate. Now that the 911 Commissioners themselves have said they were lied to and that there was a “cover up” the need for an investigation is clear.

    Talking about the Bush administration, the neo-conservatives, Zionists, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without understanding exactly what happened on 911 makes no sense.

  3. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    December 24, 2010 - 7:49 am | Permalink

    Jeff Maylor said: “Luke, I don’t think the invasion of Iraq was a good idea either – especially considering how we fought it. But repeating Leftwing talking points about how Bush and Cheney are some unique form of “war criminal” is bunk. But it’s nice to know Michael Moore is reading this blog.”

    Perhaps you could explain how describing Bush and Cheney as war criminals is tantamount to “repeating Leftwing talking points”, Mr. Maylor?

    And your comment about how you’re more upset with the methods employed in the deliberate destruction of an innocent foreign nation than you are with the fact the invasion was illegal under all international law provides me with further insight into the mind of the provocateur I suspect you are.

    Here’s a perfect opportunity for you to pedantically lecture us once again, providing you with the means of falling in love with the sound of your own voice one more time. Come on – Tell us how describing Bush and Cheney as war criminals makes us “Leftwing”. Draw it out…

    And by the way, Mr. Maylor, I would hope Everyone is reading this blog, not just those you approve of.

    …Michael Moore. Me…

  4. December 23, 2010 - 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Your readers misunderstand me. I understand Christianity to have a philosophical base which is at variance with Judaism. In the time of the Incarnation of Christ on earth ‘Judaism’ was known as the Tradition of the Elders… Christ’s words in the New Testament need to be read and compared with the Tradition of the Elders, I don’t think people would write of Judaeo-Christianity then. He was scathing of its leaders and their humbug and hypocrisy. I think your readers have clearly demonstrated the point I made.

    One would have to study the Creeds of the Christian Faith (especially the Athanasian Creed) and start from the foundations before being able to understand what is/was the traditional (Catholic (e.g., Universal)-Apostolic) Christian Faith.
    A good beginning would be to read Dorothy L. Sayers “Creed or Chaos” as she has laid a strong foundation for modern readers to grasp and upon which to build an understanding.

    I stand by my words: that which passes for ‘Christianity’ in America is mainly Liberal Judaism and not Christianity.

    By the way, there are many modern white pagans who earnestly believe white people should stick together. Tell me, what is the glue that will make them all stick together? Hitler was white and a modern pagan (blood and soil).

    • December 24, 2010 - 6:01 am | Permalink

      I fully agree. Christianity in the context of a homogeneous people such as existed in the preindustrial age..before mass transit allowed for the wholesale mixing of disparate peoples (Jews amoung them) was not such a bad idea. It served the purpose that all egotheistic religions serve, group awareness, identity, social coheision, and standards of/for behaviour. But the same tenants that served the white race well in the past, love your neighbor, etc. is suicide in 2010 when that neighbor is bent on your destruction

  5. December 23, 2010 - 8:47 pm | Permalink

    Jeff I respect your opinion, But I would call your attention to the fact that the entire white race has been all but destroyed in a mere fifty years. Things move at a different
    pace in the digital age fifteen years ago if you told me the left wing would be leading the criticism of zionism, I would have called you an idiot. But it has come to pass.
    IMO the only thing holding up the FALSE god of Christianity is the FALSE God of zionism…and a few bricks

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 23, 2010 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

      Henry, I would just say be very careful about what you have in place to replace Christianity if that day ever comes. It could just as easily get worse if we simply destroy Christianity. It’s not like people will automatically become good pagans. They may swerve toward Islam or Scientology – lol.

    • December 23, 2010 - 11:48 pm | Permalink


      The evidence indicates that White Christians leaving the religion are mostly turning into atheists, agnostics, and non-religious people.

      Almost none of them are turning into pagans, so of course I don’t see why pagans view Christianity’s loss as their gain.

      They may swerve toward Islam or Scientology – lol.

      Tony Blair’s sister-in-law just converted to Islam, so that might mean something.

      Also Auster recently went off on the tangent of saying Prince Charles might be a crypto-Muslim.

      It does seem more likely to me that a significant number of post-Christian Whites would convert to Islam, as opposed to reverting to Paganism.

      Islam has the advantage of there being a lot of people who actually believe it.

      Paganism just doesn’t have that going for it.

  6. December 23, 2010 - 7:51 pm | Permalink

    I think it is time for an accounting. Either you worship the Various false Gods of the Jews…Judeochristianity, equality, democracy, diversity, etc. or you acknowledge the eternal laws of Nature. Where do YOU stand?

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 23, 2010 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

      Interesting. But I think that changing the religion of a culture is something that normally requires many generations, especially one that is as entrenched as Christianity. In fact, this is a project that will develop over centuries. Right now, we just need to preserve as much of the White race, especially Western European types (but all Whites!) as possible.

  7. December 23, 2010 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

    As an observer looking on to the American scene I find it interesting that Americans don’t recognise the fact that they generally think in Liberal Judaic terms. This was recognised by Clifford Hugh Douglas and recorded in his writings possibly 80 years ago. He was referring to the fact that much that then passed for Christian philosophy was in fact philosophical Liberal Judaism – the philosophy of the ‘one way street’ stemming from the Old Testament concept of ‘the chosen’ and a Monarchial Jehovah.

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 23, 2010 - 7:42 pm | Permalink

      American culture was derived from Enlightenment ideals that were European in origin, ultimately stemming from the Renaissance (rebirth of ancient worldview) . It was the Jewish community that tried to update itself and conform to the new Enlightenment. America was not a “Jewish colony” as a few have asserted.

    • December 23, 2010 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

      Exactly! The refusal of white men to acknowledge Natural Law, choosing instead to worship Christianity (literally the bastard child of Judeism) has been and will continue to be his undoing. imo

    • ben tillman's Gravatar ben tillman
      December 24, 2010 - 12:21 am | Permalink


      Enlightenment ideals were of Jewish origin. They were a reaction to the Jewish presence and, since they were precisely the opposite of what Europeans should have adopted if they were to compete successfully with Jews, it should be obvious that the Enlightenment was yet another example of Jewish construction of culture.

    • Derek's Gravatar Derek
      December 24, 2010 - 2:28 am | Permalink

      ben tillman,

      That’s an interesting idea. I’ve never heard of the Enlightenment thought of that way. Do you have any sources or additional ideas regarding this thesis?

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 24, 2010 - 2:44 am | Permalink

      How can we say that the Renaissance was a response to Jewish influence? A love of Greece and Rome were not born of Jewish ideology. If anything, Greece and Rome are the antithesis of Judaism. The ideas expressed in the Enlightenment would not have been alien to the ancient Greeks. There is no evidence at all that Jews constructed the Renaissance, the Age of Reason or the Enlightenment. There were a few Jews who were involved but it was not a Jewish “plot”.

      If it were, we would have to give credit to Jews for the massive rise in the standard of living that has occurred since then.

    • January 5, 2011 - 11:39 pm | Permalink

      Betty, I think what you’re saying in general sounds intriguing. Do you have any specific reference for these writings on philosophical Liberal Judaism by Clifford Hugh Douglas? Does Dorothy L. Sayers specifically discuss this issue in her books, and if so, where and how?

  8. MattJ70's Gravatar MattJ70
    December 23, 2010 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

    What happen to Bush’s family ties to supporting Hitler? they never existed! Bush like the rest of american presidents since WW2 are al jew token puppets.

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 23, 2010 - 7:32 pm | Permalink

      I think American Presidents have been heavily influenced by the Israel Lobby and by Jews in general. However, I think it overstates it to call them “Jew tokens”. It also doesn’t help us understand the phenomenon.

    • December 23, 2010 - 11:32 pm | Permalink

      Bush like the rest of american presidents since WW2 are al jew token puppets.

      Eisenhower stood up to Zionists during the Suez Crises of 1956.

      Also, George H. W. Bush briefly stood up to Menachem Begin by opposing American loan guarantees to Israel as long as they continued settlement in the West Bank and Gaza, though later he caved.

    • Ilie's Gravatar Ilie
      December 24, 2010 - 1:16 am | Permalink

      Reginald: ”Eisenhower stood up to Zionists during the Suez Crises of 1956.”

      Yes, he did. And that after he instituted policies that resulted in premature deaths for millions of Germans.

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 24, 2010 - 2:40 am | Permalink

      Ilie, what policies did Eisenhower put in place that led to the premature death of millions of Germans? What policies in the 1950s were these? I have no idea what you are talking about.

    • Glen's Gravatar Glen
      December 24, 2010 - 7:32 am | Permalink

      Richard Nixon was at least aware of the traitorous nature of the international Jew:

  9. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    December 23, 2010 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    Naivete, or terminal stupidity and gullibility – it really makes no difference in the end. Both Bush and Cheney and most of the members of their administration – are guilty of being war criminals and mass murderers for the unnecessary deaths of not only all of our military soldiers who’ve been killed as result of their lies, but also guilty of the murders of over 1.6 million innocent Iraqis and no telling how many Afghanistan residents. Plus, when you factor in the very high probability of both being part of the conspiracy that became 9-11 – the ‘New Pearl Harbor event’ that the PNAC neo-cons opined that they needed, in order to launch their criminal wars of unprovoked (and nation-bankrupting) terrorist aggression against all of the enemies of Israel and which these criminals have also used to loot and plunder the natural resources of Iraqi – and now, these same criminals are lusting to repeat those crimes again, by conning the USA into attacking Iran for them – these guys are also guilty of high treason. Also, to make matters worse – Depleted Uranium is now spread all over Iraq and reports have appeared where traces of it are being detected in the food and water supplies of Britain and other European nations – and these guys authorized its use. Toss in violations of the Geneva Convention rules which prohibit torture and mistreatment of prisoners – and these guys would be convicted in record time, if we can ever drag their butts into a criminal court room where they belong. Oh, and I’m sure most of the other pro-white posters here are aware that since 9-11, the jewish neo-cons have also been shredding our Constitution and Bill of Rights – and are pretty clearly working to resurrect an updated version of their beloved USSR right here in North America.

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 23, 2010 - 7:35 pm | Permalink

      Luke, I don’t think the invasion of Iraq was a good idea either – especially considering how we fought it. But repeating Leftwing talking points about how Bush and Cheney are some unique form of “war criminal” is bunk. But it’s nice to know Michael Moore is reading this blog.

  10. Tom Brown's Gravatar Tom Brown
    December 23, 2010 - 9:30 am | Permalink

    Bush’s Knesset speech (May, 2008) is all you need, to see the Shabbat goy boy Bush grovelling before the Israelis. He did as he was bid, and the Jews rewarded him. Traitor, war criminal, murderer of Americans, confidence man (Texas Rangers baseball team) America richly deserves chaps like these.

  11. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    December 23, 2010 - 9:25 am | Permalink

    The thing that I find most annoying and appalling in Kinsley’s review is his professed admiration for Dubya’s “2 real achievements” – preventing an explosion of anti-Muslim sentiment, and his fight against AIDS in Africa. (I’m used to the complicity in Judaic subversion, vis a vis Dubya’s neo-connism. Judaic subversion is par for the course, and seemingly their raison d’etre)

    These 2 “achievements” are evidence of Bush’s treason. His DUTY, as POTUS was to protect The Citizenry of the USA. Muslims should have been expelled after 9/11/01 (were they really believed to have been the culprits of the attack) and Islam outlawed. Islam had no part in the creation of the USA, nd is in fact antethical to the beliefs and culture of the Foundering Stock. So by protecting attakers – Bush commits High Treason.

    Fighting AIDS in Afreaka? Why are MY resources being squandered elsewhere? Why aren’t Africans figthing AIDS in Afreaka?

    HIGH Treason #2.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      December 24, 2010 - 7:19 am | Permalink


      Only incurious fools continue to believe Muslims had anything to do with the terrors of 9/11. Even the FBI admits they have no evidence Osama Bin Laden and his mythical support group had anything whatsoever to do with the murderous attacks on the United States and its citizens.

      You, Ciaran, are the victimized result of the most comprehensive brainwashing and propagandization machine ever constructed. And we all know who pulls the strings behind that loosely-knit association of media, political, judicial and academic puppet personnel, don’t we?

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 24, 2010 - 7:34 am | Permalink

      Oh God. We’ve been through the whole 9-11 conspiracy thing. The guys who want to work on that project need to come with more than links to Alex Jones and a few other sketchy sites. And they need to calling everyone else names. Or insinuate that anyone who disagrees with their theories are in the pay of the federal gov’t. Or that they are gullible fools who believe whatever the gov’t tells them (that why they are on THIS site right?)

      Go do some real leg work and make a case that would stand up in court. AND … AND .. take the take to answer all the debunker stuff out there. Think critically.

  12. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    December 23, 2010 - 9:16 am | Permalink

    Tom – re: Dubya’s ancestral connection – why would the DNA of one alleged relative cancel out the thousands of others?

    What is it about Jew genetics, and White genetics, that makes it so easy for Whites to renounce everything Whites have done, and been, in favor of being a vicious ammoral sociopath?

  13. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    December 23, 2010 - 9:07 am | Permalink

    I am convinced the Jews are congenitically incapable of understanding their own malevolence. How the historical dislike cum resentment cum outrage cum hatred cum absolute loathing cum pitchforks cum slughter cum booting out of just about every place they’ve ever settled is pretty much the result of their own beliefs, and conduct towards their host populations. For all their vaunted “High IQ” – they don’t seem to be able to comprehend that they keep getting “persecuted” century after century. place after place, for the same reasons.

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 23, 2010 - 5:27 pm | Permalink

      Yes Ciaran, Jews are particularly prone to self-deception. Most humans are capable of it of course, but Jews definitely seem to have higher levels. The whole hysterical emotional reaction when they are forced to look at uncomfortable facts borders on being a bit unhinged. It must have been those Jews that argued the loudest and threw the biggest fits that had the most children.

    • ML's Gravatar ML
      December 26, 2010 - 5:27 pm | Permalink

      That’s a lot of “cum”, dude.

  14. salve judeii's Gravatar salve judeii
    December 23, 2010 - 4:18 am | Permalink

    As always, fascinating. Here is more food for thought:

    1) many roman emperors were married to jewish women.
    2) the top adviser to pharao was a jewish dream interpreter
    3) many of our christian white politicians are married to jewish women.
    4) countless high ranking members of the roman catholic church have been and continue to be jewish.
    5) the secret to jewish success is infiltration, as in kryptojewish infiltration
    6) Countless jews are white; they have the genome, and racially they have no use for us. none whatsoever.
    7) jews are supremely ambidextrous, as in left/right; we are nothing more than puppets in their hands.

    8)jews have survived intact for 5 thousand years, and today they are at the top of their game, and they actually flaunt their power in our faces while laughing all the way to the bank

    9) the human race is on the verge of destruction,and we are the next dinosaurs so who cares how powerful or intelligent the jews are?
    10) there is a God and it aint them (or us).

  15. Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
    December 22, 2010 - 7:29 pm | Permalink

    If the Bush’s supposedly have some distant Jewish ancestor, then why did Jeb go marry a Mexican? Also, W’s father, who should have been closer to the Jewish blood, was less pro-Israel than his son.

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      December 22, 2010 - 8:15 pm | Permalink

      Those are good questions. But, don’t answer what Dubya himself thought at the time or thinks now.

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 22, 2010 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

      Oh Dubya was fully sold on the neocon ideology for sure. I just suspect it was something done out of a mistaken conviction then allegiance to some Jewish bloodline. The neocons around Bush got his number: He liked simple black and white arguments without much “nuance” and they gave ’em to him. Also, I’m sure it appealed to his ego to see himself as a great warrior President that changed the world – and the neocons knew how to play on that was well.

    • RAH's Gravatar RAH
      December 23, 2010 - 12:04 am | Permalink

      What silliness. Bush thought he had a Jew in his family in the 1700s and so declared the war on Iraq? And why did he show no interest in attacking Iraq before 9/11? Did the attack activate the latent racial royalty?

      He’s just a moron. That’s it.

    • December 23, 2010 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

      Jews are not God, they don’t control everything and everyone in the world. There are social/psychological factors involved that work independantly of Jews….Like the laws of nature…..When something bad happens to a bunch of ignorant people it doesn’t take a Jew to point a finger at the one in the crowd who happens to look a little different.
      Hysteria can happen to a group of white, Aryan, gentile folk without any Jewish influence whatsoever.
      The Jews do not control Nature! they are merely human beings trying to look out for their own…A perfectly natural thing to do. And as Hitler said, and I paraphrase:
      If a people are not willing or able ( or too stupid) to struggle to live they don’t deserve to live
      If the Jews control everything that happens to gentiles, from what you eat for breakfast to who you elect for dog catcher what does that say about white people.
      If white people don’t start a little soul-searching and continue to blame The Jews for the sun going down we are finished.
      The Jews control far too much of our lives as it is. To ascribe an all-encompassing (and omnipotent) world conspiracy to Jews and their christian zionist agents is not only defeatist, but really borders on a kind of perverted devil worship. Folks, they are just people who, unlike most gentiles have not lost their identity, religion, culture etc….We should be so lucky!

  16. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    December 22, 2010 - 7:13 pm | Permalink

    FTA: “An even better question is why the intelligence was false. Neither Kinsley nor Bush would want to consider the evidence that neocons (Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, David Wurmser, Abraham Shulsky, Elliott Abrams, Michael Ledeen, Michael Rubin, David Schenker; see here, p. 48) at the Office of Special Plans in the Department of Defense cooked the intelligence on Iraq.”

    No honest observer can look objectively at the mendacious triumphalist policies of the neo-cons and not recognize that its breezy disregard for the truth is a product of Judaism. Instead of asking like other religions “Is it true?”, the central question of Judaism remains “Is it good for the Jews?”, with truth secondary.

    Ideas have consequences, and having people in this country in positions of high office whose primary concern is no longer with the truth but instead what’s in it for them and their coterie has led us and continues to lead us into disaster.

    The time to kick out these usurping foreigners is long past due.

  17. Optimistic Truther's Gravatar Optimistic Truther
    December 22, 2010 - 6:05 pm | Permalink

    “Anyone who thinks they did 9/11 is living in a fantasy world.”

    The attempts to distance Israel from the 9/11 attacks are as predictable as they are transparent. It’s been all but officially acknowledged that they at least knew about it in advance and made no attempt to stop it, and with the various tells like the Odigo messaging, the moving company in the WTC, and the Israelis caught filming the attacks from across the Hudson, it seems likely they were involved to one degree or another.

    This cat cannot be put back into the bag.

    The families of 9/11 victims want to raise awareness of the collapse of WTC Building 7:

  18. December 22, 2010 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    Anyone who has viewed the collapse of WTC 7 has to be an idiot to conclude its anything but a controlled demolition. If you follow the logic of who had to be in on it as I’ve done here…
    …then it’s clear that a group of ideological Zionists (most of them Jewish) had their hands in the operation, and even in stages of the attacks themselves. I suspect they facilitated and enabled the attacks in much the same way that the neocons did the brainwork behind the false evidence that framed Iraq. They put the pieces in place, wound up the operation, and sat back and watched it all come together.

    These are very sick people with very sick minds. They are programmed to believe anything and everything is justified so long as it is done “on behalf of the Jewish people.” They’ve been getting their chains jerked by this pharisaic matrix which itself is a wind-up operation for 2,000 years. One doesn’t have to be a Christian to recognize that 2,000 years of obsessive, relentless, neurotic, self-propagating, cult indoctrination is going to create some very disturbed minds.

  19. Optimistic Truther's Gravatar Optimistic Truther
    December 22, 2010 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

    The fact they didn’t proves that Israel does not have the capability for that kind of operation. Anyone who thinks they did 9/11 is living in a fantasy world.

    The attempts to distance Israel from the 9/11 attacks are as predictable as they are transparent. It’s been all but officially acknowledged that they at least knew about it in advance and made no attempt to stop it, and with the various tells like the Odigo messaging, the moving company in the WTC, and the Israelis caught filming the attacks from across the Hudson, it seems likely they were involved to one degree or another.

    This cat cannot be put back into the bag.

    The families of 9/11 victims want to raise awareness of the collapse of WTC Building 7:

  20. TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
    December 22, 2010 - 5:43 pm | Permalink

    Wikipedia says the Bush family is of primarily English and German descent.

    But I found this:

    Local historians in Wexford have discovered that George Bush is a descendant of Strongbow, the power-hungry warlord who led the Norman invasion of Ireland thus heralding 800 years of mutual misery.

    Richard de Clare, Earl of Pembroke – known as Strongbow for his arrow skills – is remembered as a *desperate, land-grabbing warlord* whose *calamitous foreign adventure led to the suffering of generations*. Shunned by Henry II, he offered his services as a mercenary in the 12th-century invasion of Wexford in exchange for power and land. When he eventually died of a festering ulcer in his foot, his enemies said it was the revenge of Irish saints whose shrines he had violated.

    *calamitous foreign adventure led to the suffering of generations*

    Somethings never change.

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      December 22, 2010 - 7:14 pm | Permalink

      If I recall correctly the Jews connected Bush to a Jew named Bush who was an officer in the American Revolution.

      I did a little cursory look up, and the Jewish genealogies from the 1890’s show a Bush family from the 18th century, and relate them to the Jewish Gratz & Etting families of Philadelphia and Baltimore.

      All of the original contemporary stuff about Bush published by Jews, or Jewish genealogy-historical sources seems to be down the memory hole.

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      December 22, 2010 - 7:21 pm | Permalink

      If Bush was, or if Bush wasn’t, really doesn’t matter. It’s what “Dubya” himself thought about his ancestry that is the more important.

      Some claim, Ben Franklin claimed, he was a descendent of the ancient Jews. Pretty thin stuff, but, the Old Testament is still a powerful book even today.

  21. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    December 22, 2010 - 5:06 pm | Permalink

    There are Jews in positions of influence who will shape policy to the advantage of Jewish interests, luckily Iraq has their fingerprints all over it. Saddam and Bin Laden played into their hands in an astonishing way. I don’t think Bush Jr wised up about Neocons it was more that the Iranian leaders didn’t make the same mistake. Bush Jr made himself very unpopular by his wars so I doubt that any future President will take Neocon advice at face value.

    Neocons were hurt by the failure to find Saddam’s nuke, so why didn’t they fake one?: It would have been simple to fake an Iraqi nuke and plant it. The fact they didn’t proves that Israel does not have the capability for that kind of operation. Anyone who thinks they did 9/11 is living in a fantasy world.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      December 24, 2010 - 7:06 am | Permalink

      “Anyone who thinks they (Israelis) did 9/11 is living in a fantasy world.”

      There are too many inconsistencies and holes in the “official story” of 911 to be believed and far too many connections to American and Israeli Jews that come to light when you study the known facts surrounding 9/11.

      To my way of thinking, it is those who dismiss Israeli involvement in the terrorist acts of 9/11 “who are living in a fantasy world”.

    • kirk's Gravatar kirk
      December 24, 2010 - 9:48 am | Permalink

      “It would have been simple to fake an Iraqi nuke and plant it”

      LOL. How does one “fake a nuke”? Who’s living in a fantasy world?
      How predictable is it that the tribe will try damage control even on this site? Every angle has to be covered, remember? The left, the right, the paleo right, the jew-aware right, the neo-nazis. Every angle.

      How difficult is it to plant 1-2 ‘benevolent’ commentators who gradually but steadily will try to steer the discussions to less ‘dangerous’ directions? To tell us what and how we should think and how to phrase it.
      Discuss jewish influence if you really have to -you stupid goys (it’s not that important, if you ask us)- but don’t do it this way, do it that way. Don’t say this, say that. It’s better…for you, not for us. We’re just selfless observers here…
      It’s for our own good, you see, leaving aside these ‘conspiracy theories’ is better for the white cause. They’re with us in this, after all parasites need some healthy hosts in order to survive, don’t they.

  22. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    December 22, 2010 - 4:12 pm | Permalink

    As I stated about a year ago here.

    I believe the 2000 Election was a quid prio quo between the Zionists and Bush/Cheney.

    The Zionist Jews that run Florida’s “contested” counties Palm Beach Broward and Miami Dade along with the radical Christian Zionist Florida Secretary of State Kathleen Harris decided the election for Bush/Cheney

    The deal was Bush was to take out Saddam as part of his deal. He waivered (probably at the advice of his dad) so the Israelis with Saudi and Egyptian help did the 9/11 false flag as a “reminder” of this deal

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 23, 2010 - 5:22 pm | Permalink

      Well that’s quite a story Paul, but then why didn’t most Jews vote for Gore over Bush? 80% of Jews went for Gore. Lieberman (Jewish) was Gore’s running mate, see. You just threw out a ton of conjecture and speculation. I don’t think that is how real real power is wielded. It’s a wee bit more subtle than that.

    • Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
      December 27, 2010 - 8:57 am | Permalink


      The conservative Zionist Jews voted for Bush hands down.

      The Zionist Jews in these Flrodia counties are the power Jews trust me on that.

      Old Joe Lieberman?

      Well he certainly did not go away did he?

      My scenario is certainly not something that could be dismissed as easy as you say.

  23. Bob Martin's Gravatar Bob Martin
    December 22, 2010 - 3:52 pm | Permalink

    The revelation that the neo-conservative intelligence about “Iraqi WMDs” was falsified should have been the kind of scandal that brings down a government, but the Republicans rallied around their President and simply went on to talk about other things. I’ve read that a poll of troops on the way to Iraq showed about half believing the Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks.

    Some needs to do a careful study of the post-9/11 propaganda including pre and post Iraq invasion. The best existing literature seems to be partisan Democrat/anti-Bush and from a liberal/leftist perspective (re PNAC, etc.) There was a lot of paleo-con anti-war writing of the 2001-2006 era but mostly geopolitical realist arguments as opposed to an analysis of the propaganda.

    Does anyone remember the “plastic and duct tape over the windows” to keep out biological attacks from Al Qaeda? Or the suggestion that Al Qaeda cells were in cities all around America, just waiting to strike? The whole brand name of “Al Qaeda” itself seems to look at a lot different after nearly a decade, and no Bin Laden.

    The silence from all corners of the political establishment on the propaganda, disinformation, and spin from 9/11 through the release of the Iraq War Study Group report (when the neo-conservatives seemed to have been reigned in) is astonishing.

  24. December 22, 2010 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

    KM: “no one is saying that all Jews are neocons, but people are saying that Jews with a strong Jewish identity and commitment to Israel were extraordinarily influential in the Bush administration.”

    I think nearly all Jews are Jewish supremacists, which is their right. Most Whites probably secretly harbor White supremacist attitudes, although I’m starting to wonder if they’ve finally been bashed (mostly by Jews in media, academics, government, etc.) for so long that this might no longer be the case. Another difference is that Jews inevitably seek to institutionalize their Jewish supremacist beliefs via their Jewish networks, and by establishing Jewish supremacist policy like Zionism. America has unquestionably become a Jewish supremacist nation both in terms of policy and in terms of the hugely disproportionate number of Jews at the highest levels of nearly any hierarchy.

    If a group of Whites were to pursue institutional supremacy at anything approaching a level of that of the Jews, they would be quickly targeted as a “hate group” and the full force of government would be turned upon them. But it’s okay for the Jews to pursue the most vicious and ruthless institutional racism de facto in America and de jure in Israel, and still declare themselves a vulnerable minority that deserves huge amounts of our money, praise, compassion, and promotion.

    • Jeff Maylor's Gravatar Jeff Maylor
      December 22, 2010 - 5:00 pm | Permalink

      KM: “no one is saying that all Jews are neocons, but people are saying that Jews with a strong Jewish identity and commitment to Israel were extraordinarily influential in the Bush administration.”

      Jews are highly ethnocentric although most would not call themselves neocons. Well obviously since we know that most Jews didn’t even vote for Bush. And there is a certain percentage of Jews that are non-political. If you’ve been around regular Jews, you realize it’s not a categorical thing in which every last Jew thinks the same way, but more like a population with very strong traits.

      But neither is it necessary. As KMD has pointed out, the real influence is among the politically active portion of the Jewish community, especially the leadership.

      My only concern is that we don’t make especially strong statements that can be disproven. Especially when they aren’t necessary.

  25. December 22, 2010 - 2:52 pm | Permalink

    That comment that KM attributes to Weiss was actually by Scott McConnell of The American Conservative magazine on Weiss’ blog.

    I think the neocons’ eyes got big when they realized what an empty vessel Bush was; I know they’re thinking the same thing about Sarah Palin. These people are wolves who devour the empty-headed goy that the rubes of both Left and Right cast before them, which makes any politician who isn’t Jew-wise is a threat to the country.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      December 23, 2010 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

      Right on, Chris!
      W was (is) an “empty vessel”, there for neocon taking. He probably couldn’t have found Iraq on a map until he ran for POTUS.

    • Floda's Gravatar Floda
      January 5, 2011 - 11:14 pm | Permalink

      Yes Cris

      Maybe they take every newly elected President since JFK into a special room deep in the White House in which an older CIA man and several heads of the US Military are present.

      He is politely asked to take a seat, a large screen appears and lights in room are dimmed. He is now shown REAL film of the JFK assassination.

      Near the end of the gruesome film clip thoughts run through his mind: “My God it was all true, all of it. Oswald was a patsy. Jack Ruby was also murdered. They DID murder JFK, my God, what have I let myself in for?’

      After the clip finished and lights in the room came back on the gray haired CIA man rose and looking earnestly at the ashen faced new POTUS, he said, “Any Questions, Mr President?’

  26. Lawrence of Appalachia's Gravatar Lawrence of Appalachia
    December 22, 2010 - 2:12 pm | Permalink

    This certainly explains (at least in part) why Bush did a 180 on his 2000 campaign promise to not persue a world-policeman role in FP.

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      December 22, 2010 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

      I gotta hunch that Bush may actually think he has an ancestral connection to the Jews.

  27. Ex-Pro White Activist's Gravatar Ex-Pro White Activist
    December 22, 2010 - 1:14 pm | Permalink

    had a Bush ancestor who was a Jew in 18th century New England.

    What’s the point? Did this ancestor enter the Bush family tree prior to 1750? Even candidates for S.S. membership only had to demonstrate an absence of Jewish ancestors back to 1750.

    And do you know all of your ancestors back to 1750?

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      December 22, 2010 - 2:57 pm | Permalink

      If recent stats on birth & marriage are to be believed, most people don’t even know both of their parents. ;)

      How about the poor bastard, who has sperm bank for a father, or an egg donor for a mother?

      What’s Bush’s excuse?

  28. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 22, 2010 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Maybe the old girl wasn’t kidding.

    Early in the Bush administration a number of Jewish genealogists were claiming that Bush, had a Bush ancestor who was a Jew in 18th century New England. That’s all down the memory hole now—unless someone saved it.

    • Jommy's Gravatar Jommy
      December 22, 2010 - 7:19 pm | Permalink

      Sephardic Jewish ancestry is very common in old New England families. The Tiffanys and Rockefellers both have Sephardic Jewish heritage.

Comments are closed.