The death of Daniel Bell is another one of those moments when you get a glimpse of how the world works. Writing in Slate, Jacob Weisberg recalls his fond memories of the great man. It’s a totally Jewish reminiscence. As a student, Weisberg wrote a letter to Bell. Bell responded, inviting Weisberg “for a ”nosh’” — “over lox and bagels” as we later find out.
In other words, Bell and Weisberg made a Jewish connection right off the bat. Indeed, Bell lived his intellectual life in pretty much an entirely Jewish milieu. The article mentions Dwight MacDonald, Irving Howe, Alfred Kazin, Clement Greenberg, William Phillips, and Irving Kristol. Only MacDonald was not Jewish, and he stood out like a sore thumb. One writer labeled him “a distinguished goy among the Partisanskies”–a reference to Partisan Review, the flagship journal of the New York Intellectuals. A New York Times article on Bell’s death, written by Michael Kaufman, also mentions (in addition to Kristol, Howe, and Kazin) David Brooks, Seymour Martin Lipset, Nathan Glazer and another solitary distinguished goy, Daniel Patrick Moynihan. When Bell held forth at his Harvard soirees with what Weisberg calls his “yiddishkeit wisecrackings,” he could be quite confident that pretty much everyone would be on page.
An important theme of Jewish intellectual movements is the guru phenomenon, where Jewish intellectuals are surrounded by adoring acolytes like charismatic rabbis in traditional Jewish society. Weisberg was enthralled by his mentor’s brilliance as he held forth at his residence in Cambridge not far from where he taught at Harvard:
I doubt I’ve since heard conversation of that quality—ranging across political literature, the sociology of intellectuals, and the history of various left-wing splits, all spiced with Yiddishkeit wisecracking. Bell was at once a stunningly original mind, an ironic observer of the scene around him, and a genial gossip. To call his memory prodigious would do him an injustice. …
If I were to revisit the subject of the New York intellectuals today, I’d make the case that Bell, who died this week at the age of 91, was not only the greatest mind in the group but one of the genuinely important American thinkers of the 20th century.
Yes, Bell is right up there with Einstein, Freud, and Boas in the Jewish pantheon of 20th-century intellectuals–adored and promoted by co-ethnics with prominent positions in the media or academic world.
The quote from Bell that always stuck in my mind is this:
“I was born in galut [exile] and I accept—now gladly, though once in pain—the double burden and the double pleasure of my self-consciousness, the outward life of an American and the inward secret of the Jew. I walk with this sign as a frontlet between my eyes, and it is as visible to some secret others as their sign is to me.” Bell concludes that “one realizes that one does not stand alone, that the past is still present, and that there are responsibilities of participation even when the community of which one is a part is a community woven by the thinning strands of memory.” (Bell 1961, 477, 478).
On the surface, Bell seems like a White American, right down to his inconspicuous and not-at-all Jewish last name (changed from Bolotsky when he was 13). (Here’s another Daniel Bell, a swimmer from New Zealand.)
But he relates to others primarily on the basis of whether they are Jews. A letter from Jacob Weisberg is treated very differently than one from someone with a goyische last name, and it’s only natural that they nosh over lox and bagels.
On the other hand, when interacting with a non-Jew, Bell poses as a secular intellectual, someone who’s “just like you” –someone who is dispassionately grappling with sociological questions. But all the while, he is aware that he is part of a historical community to which he bears a responsibility. This responsibility subtly informs his writing, with the result that the New York Intellectuals generally accepted the entire assault on the traditional people and culture of America, particularly non-White immigration and the proposition nation idea. This despite the fact that many of them came to define conservatism as the neocons displaced earlier conservative thinkers.
It’s a story that’s repeated over and over again, as much now as it was when Daniel Bell made his mark in the American intellectual community.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
That’s an interesting story about how that subset of the Jewish hive networks and promotes their ethnic agenda, Kevin. I’m sure that their mutual admiration organizations also shmoozed all over each other, while granting each other honors and awards for community “Yiddishkeit”, and services rendered. How “Jewish” !
Interesting also how his prognostications about de-industrialization and re-stratification were made true by people like him who ensure that there won’t be any meritocracy in academia and that the only people who work on Wall Street have no loyalty to this country.
Re: “Bell seems like a White American,” sure, he’d be welcome at the AmRen Conference.
Jews give each other prizes and an excellent example of that is the Oscars and entertainment awards, just like some much of the awards for literature or medical research, they are a pathetic, albeit DEADLY bunch.
How about Ilana Mercer, who obviously keeps close tabs on you Dr M, gee who wrote about the Puritan mindset and the destruction of Whites last year could it have been initials KM???
Peter recently added DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL to his blog links.
Peter looks BRIMMING with joy as the jewess clutches him:
http://www.vdare.com/mercer/110126_south_africa.htm
January 26, 2011
Why Do White Protestant Societies Wither? South Africa As A Case Study
[Adapted from her address to the 3rd Annual Meeting of the HL Mencken Club, October 23 2010.]
http://www.vdare.com/images/012611_mercer.jpg
VDARE.Com Editor Peter Brimelow with Ilana Mercer at 2010 H.L. Mencken Club conference
By Ilana Mercer
Peter Brimelow has a single-minded focus on reducing immigration. He will work with anyone who agrees with him on that point. Let’s face it, he’s right. Post 1965 immigration has wrecked America, and will soon annihilate what’s left if it is not stopped. He also publishes KMac: this is how I became aware of Kevin’s theories. So please cut Mr. Brimelow some slack.
Having said that, Ilana Mercer’s piece was ridiculous. She blamed the English speaking world for destroying South Africa but failed to mention that it was Jews in America and England who led the anti-apartheid movement – and Jews in South Africa who led the communist party and cheered the destruction of white rule.
The Debbie Schlussel link is puzzling, though. She is a nasty Jewish supremacist who gloated when the “anti-semitic” Jew Robert Novak died, and has some ridiculous story on her blog about Pat Buchanan making a crude anti-Jewish joke when she met him. It’s obviously a lie. I’ve met Buchanan and he’s a very classy decent guy and a gentleman – her story is absurd.
If he’s willing to do “anything” to reduce immigration he should probably start by revamping the layout of his site. It looks like it was created in ’98. All he needs is some floating .gifs and we’re pretty much talking geocities material here.
I’m sure people have pointed this out to him. It’s called WordPress. Any moron can put together a nice looking site at this point. Jesus.
@ John …
It is the CONTENT that matters my friend, not how ‘pretty’ it looks … or whether it goes “whiz-bang” or not. Maybe you’ve been playing with your X-Box for too many hours? Now you ain’t satisfied until you get given multi-hued VR on every page.
Wrong, content is not all that matters. If you are a businessman, and show up to a meeting wearing bermuda shorts and a tophat, you will not taken seriously. I’m being a bit hyperbolic here, but looking the part is important in society, and a professional layout on a website is the first step towards being taken seriously. While appearance does not seem to matter to you, it does for a lot of people. Do you know what publishers do to get a quick boost in sales for books? They design a hip new cover, and it works. It’s the same content, but they just packaged it in a new way, simple as that.
John, I like the look of the site, it is pretty conservative but then so are business suits.
One minor point, I did not like the amount of light red text on ‘Deja Vu All Over Again: AmRen 2011 Under Attack’.
“Your comment is awaiting moderation.”
I’ve been commenting for quite some time on TOO what is up with this?
Ok so let me repost:
Jews give each other prizes and an excellent example of that is the Oscars and entertainment awards, just like some much of the awards for literature or medical research, they are a pathetic, albeit DEADLY bunch.
How about Ilana Mercer, who obviously keeps close tabs on you Dr M, gee who wrote about the Puritan mindset and the destruction of Whites last year could it have been initials KM???
Peter recently added DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL to his blog links.
Peter looks BRIMMING with joy as the jewess clutches him:
http://www.vdare.com/mercer/110126_south_africa.htm
January 26, 2011
Why Do White Protestant Societies Wither? South Africa As A Case Study
[Adapted from her address to the 3rd Annual Meeting of the HL Mencken Club, October 23 2010.]
http://www.vdare.com/images/012611_mercer.jpg
VDARE.Com Editor Peter Brimelow with Ilana Mercer at 2010 H.L. Mencken Club conference
By Ilana Mercer
Peter recently added DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL to his blog links.
That’s unfortunate. She’s quite the mad dog neocon if I recall correctly.
I remember Daniel Bell when, invited by Octavio Paz, he visited Mexico City in 1990 and appeared on Mexican TV celebrating the fall of the Soviet Union with Czesław Miłosz, Hugh Thomas, Hugh Trevor Ropper, Leszek Kolakowski, Ágnes Heller, Cornelius Castoriadis, Hugh Trevor-Roper, Jean-François Revel, Michael Ignatieff and Mario Vargas Llosa.
When Bell’s turn to speak in a round table arrived, the first thing he talked about was his Jewish ancestry. His tone was pretty haughty and then he started to talk so fast as to impress the other hosts.
Back then I had no idea about the Jewish Problem. Now I understand Bell’s haughty dismissal of Pat Buchanan as a macho beer drinker in Paz’s magazine. (Octavio Paz never got a clue of the JP in spite of the fact that, unlike “Latin” America intellectuals, for decades he exposed Stalin’s [Jewish] executioners.)
I think an interesting study would involve testing Jewish individuals for levels of oxytocin in their bloodstream. This study seems to point to oxytocin’s effect of increasing love and affection for in-groups and more aggression towards out-groups.
Speaking of chemicals that seem to effect our behavior/cognitive abilities, etc, I think this article might also explain the feminization of males, and I’m not talking about “societal conditioning” but actual metabolic and physical changes that are taking place due to incredibly rapid changes in our environment. When you see a lack of anger at the U.S. populace and this overall sense of defeatism, evidence of decreases in testosterone in the male population should serve at the very least as a subject of intense debate.
John: KMac has an excellent article on oxytocin here: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/07/kevin-macdonald-hormonal-regulation-of-ingroup-altruism/ .
Please don’t hesitate to scour the archives at TOO.
Thumbs up: Oxytocin, vasopressin, POMC/ACTH/alpha MSH/Beta-LPH/Beta-Endorphin etc, all part of the HPA/LC-Gonad-Axis.
Dr. MacDonald –
You might be interested in the latest Abe Foxman book – love to hear your thoughts on it in a column: “Jews and Money”
http://www.amazon.com/Jews-Money-Stereotype-Abraham-Foxman/dp/0230623859
Hey Matthias, thanks for the link, KMac’s analysis of the same study in relation to whites is really interesting. I really do think that white people feel very little sympathy for one another because the ingroup sentiment here in America is rapidly eroding as all the institutions that whites used to dominate are become more “diverse.” When you saw police departments, businesses, government agencies, and other institutions get their first minorities, the whites who composed those institutions were initially hostile, but as time went on and more minorities came on board, whites lost all sense of identity as an ethnicity. In order to survive in that new environment, they would have to learn to work with these people or essentially, get fired. What whites fail to realize is that their short-term gain has translated into long-term misery, and almost all of them do not even know why. That’s where the media comes in, to point them to all the “problems” whether it be a Democrat or a Republican, effectively disregarding the real elephant in the room.
I still think it would be interesting to see where Jewish individuals fall on the oxytocin spectrum. But then again, it might not be so much what levels of oxytocin you have but more about how you define what your ingroup is going to be. Once that ingroup is defined, you will fight for it. You see this with idiots who will literally fight someone else who roots for another sports team. They have defined their completely twisted reality around this group of professional athletes making millions of dollars who have absolutely no investment in the fans blindly rooting for them (those players and their fellow fans are now their ingroup).
I think that if someone did a study, they would find that initially, sports fans and ethnic ingroups largely overlapped. I can’t help but suspect that many of the people rooting for Bronko Nagurski in the 1930′s in Chicago were actually Poles who enjoyed seeing a co-ethnic running over people who didn’t otherwise respect them. Italian New Yorkers rooted for DiMaggio… and so on. But now, somehow the link has been broken, and you have chubby white kids (be than Polish, Italian, or WASPs) wearing over-sized LeBron James jerseys and rooting for him as if they had something in common with him.
Athanasius,
Someone a while back, I think at castefootball.us, had a piece along those lines. The ethnic makeup of teams was not a function of “genetics” but the ethnic makeup of the ticket buying public. When the Dogers were in Brooklyn, Jews were great baseball players; then, when they moved to LA, suddenly the Jewish players disappeared and Hispanics were ‘discovered’ [I remember all the hoo-haw about Cubans]. The wild card, though, was Whites; apparently, they had no loyalty, and would watch anyone.
So, the economic incentive was to get rid of the White players, and pack the teams with blacks and hispanics; you’d gain those smaller audiences, but not lose any of the larger White audience.
I suspect the rest of our ‘culture’ works the same way. When MTV started, it was White hair-metal a la Beavis & Butthead] and banning Cher; now it’s all gangstas. Why? Because blacks have their own networks and shows, but will watch ‘mainstream’ networks if filled with blacks; the White audience is simply taken for granted. Thus, expanding market = more, ultimately all, blacks.
?
Indeed.
However, as obvious at it may initially seem (especially in the wake of 9/11), I once again urge readers here follow up the figures provided in links to the demographics of NYC, and to carefully consider the IQ of the three major groups which make up its population, with a thought or two to brain-gender and genetics.
Thripshaw,
You failed to mention the support the old South Africa got from Israel. Or was it another Jewish conspiracy?
MacDonald: [Bell] relates to others primarily on the basis of whether they are Jews…On the other hand, when interacting with a non-Jew, Bell poses as a secular intellectual, someone who’s “just like you” –someone who is dispassionately grappling with sociological questions.”
This is perhaps one of the most nauseating characteristics of diaspora Jewish intellectual networks. They pose in public as if they are earnestly and objectively searching for answers and justice, meanwhile nearly every pronouncement, finding or conclusion is calculated through the sub textual lens of “Is it good for the Jews?” — which is nearly always their true bottom line.
Gentile liberals, meanwhile, blunder along with nary a thought about is It good for the Whites, or Is it good for the Christians, or Is it good for average Americans and their families, and then stand there with mouths agape when it turns out Jewry was calculating its own interests all along, and “somehow” ends up running so many elite institutions for its own benefit and at the expense of the entire society. They then shake their heads and say something congratulatory like “Wow, you’ve got to those Jews, they sure are clever.”
Conservative Christian Zionists have a corollary, shaking their heads and saying “Wow, look at God’s chosen people go.”
In both cases, I think the congratulatory reaction is pride and ego-driven, with each side not wanting to admit to itself that its comprised of nothing but intellectual rubes who’ve been hoodwinked by Jewry yet again.
When are these idiots going to learn? Or perhaps the corrupt statist-liberal-capitalist system has acclimated them to accept society’s enslavement to Jewry. But gee, it sure would have been nice if they’d checked with younger generations before selling them into slave bondage to the Jews and then acting like it was all inevitable anyway.
What utter fools and cowards.
Tell us that salespersons in general don’t do the same in our dysgenic Libertarian cultures. Tell us that estate agents, financial advisors, dentists, in fact, just about any group with something to hawk these days doesn’t ingratiate themselves as a ‘friend’ and walk happily away having made a fast buck or so.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, many here have just found a convenient (albeit often guilty) scapegoat. The problem however, is an integral, and ubiquitous part of the American Dream which has degenerated into a global nightmare of narcissistic, self-destructive insincerity, deceit and self-delusion. Ironically, like many others, you’re content to keep peddling this as your right, whilst blaming your more ‘successful’ competitors for doing the same. My prediction: this your economy will continue deteriorating so long as a critical mass of people such as yourself continue behaving as you do. :-(
Longley: “The problem however, is an integral, and ubiquitous part of the American Dream which has degenerated into a global nightmare of narcissistic, self-destructive insincerity, deceit and self-delusion.”
I agree that the current U.S. statist-liberal-capitalist system (which you keep insisting is libertarian) is hopelessly decadent, corrupt, and degenerate. Yet you keep throwing up red-herring as to why this is so.
Let me ask you something. Have you been to The Zog’s web site in which he documents the overwhelming organized Jewish infiltration and co-opting of the U.S. Establishment?
I’ve posted a nice summary on my website of his findings (written by a third party) titled “Self-serving, self-promoting Jewish network has positioned itself to dominate or sway all manner of the most elite institutions in corrupted America,” and I can tell you The Zog’s evidence is incontrovertible.
http://www.judeofascism.com/2011/01/self-serving-self-promoting-jewish.html
Yet you continue on with the theme of “the poor Jews are being scapegoated. The libertarians are all to blame.”
I’ll tell you what. If you can find a web site that documents libertarian penetration of the most elite institutions in America at even 10% of the level that The Zog has documented organized Jewry’s decades long penetration of the American Establishment, I’ll start to consider the possibility that you are not a Zionist shill. But you won’t, because you are.
I’ve suggested to you before that you read the Chinese Constitution for contrast . Is Hu and the rest of the Chinese leadership Jewish? Look at the efforts to promote regime change across the world by the USA since WWII (Korean war, Vietnam war, Iraq war). What was all that in pursuit of, socalism/communitarianism/statism or…. Libertarianism?
Have a look at Charles Murray’s recent books, eg. this and this, and take a look at how Irwin Stelzer figured in these (he often pops up in the UK stating the merits of deregulation). Look into Greenspan, Rubin and Summers, or just look back at what Reagan and Thatcher did to the USA/UK beginning in 1979/80. Were they communitarians? You have a lot to learn about modern politics. You have to look at what’s happening here in contrast to communitarian states which are threatened by the USA/EU.
I don’t expect you or others to have seen it all this way before. That is why I am posting it.
Mr. Longley,
Who cares what is in the Chinese constitution? There is no power of judicial review in the PRC, and consequently the country isn’t governed by law, but by fiat of local party bosses.
Talk about a red herring.
1.300,000,000 Chinese, other members of the SCO, those looking to join it, and the US government given how much money it now owes China.
Are you representative of US citzens do you think?
Rather than strategy of evade and mock, how about dealing with the substance of my post.
There is no primacy of the rule of law in China, so why does their constitution matter?
I think it’s fair to say contemporary America has devolved into a kind of heir to the British Empire, with similarly nakedly base motives.
I think its also fair to say in some ways it’s an accidental Empire that earned its mantle by winning WWII and later the Cold War, and became THE global superpower by means of design, attrition and momentum.
Indeed, we might have remained a somewhat benign superpower as we were in the ashes of WWII indefinitely and even dismantled enough of the Empire to keep America solvent after the Cold War had we listened to guys like Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan. Instead, insatiable, supremacist Jewry was allowed to get its hooks in up and down the Establishment, and look at us now.
Getting deceived and hoodwinked into the Iraq war and war against Islam by our corrupt elites (not to mention the likelihood that 9/11 was an inside job) are exactly the kinds of black ops and political machinations and intrigue that follow Jewry around like a bad odor. They are a people in permanent revolution against the Christian order, against Gentile order, against any kind of non-Jewish moral order.
As far as China goes, Longley, it amazes me that you hold up a continuous political rule with a history of murdering tens of millions of its own citizens as some sort of ideal, and one that today routinely uses political prisoners as slave labor. Talk about wanting to take us out of the frying pan and into the fire…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Book_of_Communism#Estimated_number_of_victims
Not coincidentally, certain insane neoliberal sociopaths like George Soros and Thoms Friedman also view China as a model for America to follow. Something about these people just loves the idea of using an all powerful state to subdue and subjugate humanity in its entirety. It makes one wonder if they’re in some kind of totalitarian pact with the devil.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/world-mainmenu-26/north-america-mainmenu-36/5226-george-soros-touts-china-as-leader-of-new-world-order
Heads-up: There is no substance.
Learn to take constructive criticism, and see if you can bear to let yourself be educated by those who know better than you instead of being driven by your false prejudices. Most people don’t do this very well because it hurts (see links elsewhere for an explanation), and whilst taking knocks is part of growing up (or having narcissism knocked out of one is just part of the genetic maturation process), a lot of people seem to desperately avoid this, much to their own, and all around them’s cost.
[If you look around at the site you'll find their Constitution and may note that it's a democracy, just not a Liberal-Democracy]. So was the USSR and Eastern Europe. Look at the birth-rates for Eastern Europe and Russia since the end of their system. The critical difference between the birth-rates in China vs. the Liberal-Democracies is that the former’s are eugenic and planned, whilst those of the Libertarian Liberal-Democracies are dysgenic and biologically unfit, and people such as yourself are wittingly or unwittingly rallying to the cause of self-destruction.
I assure you, I’m quite familiar with China. If anything, their reproductive policies are dysgenic. For starters, the ‘one child policy’ isn’t evenly applied, because as I said, China isn’t a country where the rule of law prevails.
In theory though, ethnic minorities can have unlimited children, peasants in the country can have two, and (presumably) more intelligent urban dwellers can only have one.
In practice, party members and government workers DO only have one child (b/c they will get fired if they have more), rich factory owners have multiple wives in multiple cities, poor urban workers who have too many children will have their house bulldozed or an induced abortion if they can’t pay the fine….
Longley,
why don’t you take a look at the birthrate of Western Civilization under the Christian moral order vs. the birth rate of Western Civilization under the post-Christian, statist-liberal-capitalist/Jewish centered New World Order (of which Communism was the first explicitly anti-Christian, so called “secular,” big push).
Okay, Bell, a Jew, liked the company of other intellectual Jews. Is this news? And hasn’t MacDonald touched on this subject a zillion times already?
But were Bell’s fame and repution purely the invention of Jewish networking? Did he really contribute NOTHING to the intellectual and cultural debate in from the 50s to 70s? If Jewishness is all that counts or of paramount importance, why doesn’t Weisberg write pieces on the passing of others Jews who died on the day Bell died? Say, of a Jewish plumber, accoutant, or high school teacher?
Jews may ‘stick together’, but Bell was admired because of his set of beliefs and ideas. Whether one agrees with them or not, it’s shameful that MacDonald doesn’t touch on them at all and ONLY emphasizes the Jewish aspect of Bell. He’s beginning to sound like David Duke.
People who read OO accept it as a given that Jews ‘stick together’. But sticking together alone doesn’t produce great wealth or power. Black street gangs stick together but I don’t see them running Hollywood or Wall Street. Italian-Americans and mafia have long stuck together but they are much less powerful than Jews.
It’s almost as if MacDonald is so filled with envy and resentment over the fact that Jews are more intellectually accomplished than his own people that he has to besmirch EVERYTHING about Jewish intellectuals and culture as nothing more than ‘social networking’.
MacDonald is only practicing a Culture of Whining.
Andrea,
If you were sitting on our side of the fence, you would see it from our perspective. We have to constantly bend over backwards and take your insults, your whining and whining, about your sensibilities, your accusations of hate, anti-semitism, berating, belittle-ing, all the while your are stepping and trappeling all over our sensibilities, accomplishments and feelings. Get real, the jewish culture is constantly whining, setting up monuments of grievances, museums etc. all over the world to remind us of who’s past? It IS NOT mine, nor is it yours. You can not live in the present, see or appreciate life today for what it is, so you have to draw and dig into the past to give your life meaning today. You can’t live in peace anywhere in the world, so you create unrest and war where ever you go. You are whining us to death. So we whine and wonder what are we to do about your kind, who never ends whining. I, maybe we, are torn between wanting to put you in your place, to get real, or move up to the 21 century and leave your 2000 year agenda where it belongs, meaning back 2000 years. We would not need to discuss Jews or Jewish intrests today, if you would not have infiltrated or forced your way into my/or our life. You fought your way from the self-imposed ghettos, to preserve your jewishness, and forced yourself into the European Culture, Schools and Universities. You did not create Europe, you helped to destroy it and it’s people. I get tired of hearing your whims, and whines, and I vomit everytime I am forced to swallow your agendas as legitimate. I ask you for some self-evaluation and the whining your in-culture exibits. Sorry, but it induces nausea in me. Please respect my sensibilities and my health. Unless it gives you pleasure to be on your on-going path of distruction. It will catch up with you sooner or later again. ….Pride comes before the fall!. What goes up-must come down. Thank God for some Laws that you can not control. Peace be with those who have learned to live in the present.
An awful lot of people haven’t sufficiently followed through the gravity and implications for the USA and other Liberal-Democracies of what The Bell Curve reported. What’s published in the book was all pretty much said and acted upon long beforehand by British Fabian communitarians at the end of the C19th and in the first few decades of the C20th (which was picked up on the Continent, and especially in Germany), and led to the British Welfare State (see the Beveridge Report) in 1945 (although see Young’s follow up on how it was faring in East London communities (F&KIEL)). Fabianism (which is quite subtle) probably also accounts for the successful Stalinist changes in the USSR after 1928 in my view, as well as the China which we see today. People here need to take a far closer look at all of of that, and not just blindly embrace the Libertarian propaganda which was designed to vilify the above and thus sustain the domestic free-market/anarchistic status quo.
No doubt this will get the same thumbs down much as The Bell Curve did after it was published in 1994. The sad thing is, most people don’t understand why there was the backlash. Blanchard’s review is quite good on that, Blanchard is a Behavioural Geneticist, well known for his work on Twin Studies and behaviour.
For the record, the UK PROBE Project was being written up in 1993. This was in effect an effort at the other end of the Gaussian curve, i.e an effort to benevolently effectively manage the underclass through apposite allocation under controlled conditions. Predictably, this was received by Libertarians much as ‘The Bell Curve’ was. If interested, here are some internal (anonymous to protect their identity) peer reviews by applied (i.e government) professionals written in 1993 about 7 years after the launch of the applied, operational project. It was made public on USENET in 1995/6:
https://groups.google.com/group/comp.ai.philosophy/msg/cacb328eaa38b627?hl=en
Ilana Mercer is a hardcore Zionist supremacist as I discovered in a brief exchange I had with her in 2005.
She also condemned the eminent South African Jewish
Judge, Richard Goldstone, for his critical report on Israel’s
invasion of Gaza. She wrote that Goldstone was not active in opposing apartheid, looks like she’s trying to have it both ways on that subject.
I dislike one-barrel crackpots so I avoid Brimelow, et al.
Probably agree more than not with him but I don’t like avoidance of the Israel issue when AIPAC runs Congress
and we finance Israel to the tune of hundreds of billions
of dollars over the years. AmRen is ridiculous in their censorship of this issue. Anything that Mercer and all the
libertarian-Objectivist clones have ever said was said over half a century ago by Ayn Rand in Atlas Shrugged. We need
Bush League Ayn Rand wannabes to lecture us on anything
when the original is readily available in print.
Hey John , regarding this website , I have to disagree. I find “Attractive” sites are annoying and time wasting , pictures and one-liners don’t substitute for content (but they are often designed to ). I have just had a rootle around at ‘The Atlantic’ and I won’t be going back [though I'm not American] and their might be some good stuff there.Perhaps webmasters should get on the ball and offer a site with a few layout combination.I prefer my news in B&W .
As a aside , in the MSM a bold face lie is harder to propagate if done with a straight face–it must be emoted.
What the OCC could do with is a cartoonist and some pithy humor. sorry I can’t do stick man.
Perhaps a RIP page for those whites who have been destroyed by ethnic attacks.The fallen should not be forgotten.
You are missing my point and kind of putting words in my mouth. You seem to be implying that the only two sites available in the world are “attractive” sites and “informative” sites. Obviously, a site can be both. I too would rather have a site be informative but that does not mean it cannot be packaged in a presentable manner. I actually do not think just plain black and white layout is that bad, and is actually considered to be aesthetically pleasing to most, especially when reading text heavy articles. If Vdare’s website was a B&W layout, I would consider it a vast improvement. Remember, this movement is not about appealing to what a small minority, but reaching an optimal audience. Honestly, someone new coming to one of these websites might just laugh and turn away for something as simple as the site looking stupid.
I’m not talking about flash videos and ridiculous bells and whistles–just a nice clean layout.
Point us to some examples. The term “a nice clean layout” means different things to different people.
And if you really and genuinely want to see a ‘superior’ website layout [I would personally describe the present layout as "nice and clean"] then you would surely purchase a TOO Subscription so that this website’s proprietor, Prof. MacDonald, has the cash to pay the Website Designer who has all the requisite credentials.
What say you now, John?
This website is a perfectly fine example of a “nice and clean” layout. I actually give kudos to Prof. MacDonald for ditching the old wordpress site and putting this up.
TOO’s layout has a simple elegance. It doesn’t distract you from the principle point of it’s existance.
To Chis Moore ,
my take on the Liberal psychology is more straight forward . Basically self indulgent , they like to feel good about everything/everyone because it ‘feels good’ and underneath(not admitting it) ,primordially they are frightened and fear makes us feel bad , and the person who has fear at the base of their psychology sees themselves as a victim , so they identify with victims THUS the caveat ‘The victim cannot be the perpetrator’ , this is why liberals and many working class people (who also feel sorry for themselves) can’t work it out– it doesn’t compute-the victum can’t be the perpetrator. World Jewish establishment has got them by them by the nose and the MSM encourages the population to consider everyone who ‘disadvantaged’ a victim–a victim of society.Its the old Commie view that if we can just get social the conditions wright them every one will be happy.
And on a similar line anyone who won’t accept Jews as victims and their demands as their natural requirements and defense becomes their enemy.This I imagine is the subtext when the top of Jewish pyramid twist European Royalties arm and got them to introduce ‘Multiculturalism’ through the Freemason network. Not to go along with these powerful Jews would have had them destroyed through media etc.Though this multiculturalism offer would have been dressed up as serving the ‘Supreme Being’ (were all on the same team) and expanding markets (good for making us rich)-the subtext would have been there–We are Victims and if you don’t help us defend ourselves against your people then how can we not consider you to also be the enemy.
Very very ironic : If you destroy your own people then we can trust you ! They will be thrown to oblivion when the time is right.
In my last sentence above I meant to say we do NOT need Bush League Ayn Rands………….
Sorry about my typo.
That piece by Ilana Mercer is too much. It’s the same old crap that’s been peddled by other Jews like Paul Gottfried – saying that Whites have “withered” or “committed suicide.” Wrong. Without the Jews there would have been no anti-apartheid movement in South Africa and no forced integration in the U.S.
More info: http://eternalforms.angelfire.com/jews1.html
2+2 = …?
To William W January 30, 2011 – 10:34 pm
A couple of questions for you and Chris Moore.
1) What is likely to happen if one sets up a political system whereby the able people in society get the opportunity (by tests like SATs) wherever they live, and whatever colour their skin, to go to universities where they mix with others like themselves and go on to work in cities where most of the money/action is? What happens back home?
2) What happens when that’s supplemented with the above average females doing the same? What happens to the birth-rate and progeny back home?
The problem is that most people here (and elsewhere) don’t think things through far enough. Another, what happens if most of the NYC Whites are Jewish (i.e not Hispanic or Black or WASPs/Catholics). Who will they mix with if people assortively mate? Who will disproportionately hold the reins of power (in NYC) and Wall Street/Madison Avenue etc if said group is blessed with a higher mean IQ through selective/assortive breeding (eugenics) than the other two big groups? If one them wants them turfed out of power, what does that say about the system which let it happen? What about the rest of the cognitive elite? Does the US want to eat the very children its equalitarian, meritocratic, revolution once revered, and how do you think the rest of the world feels when it sees the USA wanting to export this Libertarianism poison to them? See the Western birth-rates?
Chris Moore writes
I’ve posted a nice summary on my website of his findings (written by a third party) titled “Self-serving, self-promoting Jewish network has positioned itself to dominate or sway all manner of the most elite institutions in corrupted America,” and I can tell you The Zog’s evidence is incontrovertible.
http://www.judeofascism.com/2011/01/self-serving-self-promoting-jewish.html
I’m going to be a little strong in my words in an attempt to try to get through to you. I went to the site. You put together all these statistics. And you complain about how long it takes to load the pictures (yes, it does). So I looked into the stats you give for the Treasury Department, for example.
Where, where, where! do you or the site
http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-the-treasury-department/
get the information that the various people who pictures are there are Jewish. Where? Tell me. Please. Where’s the beef, as the TV ads used to say. Please. I would like to pursue this. Let’s discuss this. There is no information there at all as to why the person is said to be Jewish. Each of the (admittedly big beautiful close-up) pictures has under it a little line of the person’s title and that they are Jewish. How do you know they are Jewish? Science requires that you have to give some information as to how you know. Otherwise, I’m sorry, you can’t go around saying specific individuals are Jewish. I don’t mean to be negative, but if you could get some specific information on this, the data could be phrased so that a much larger audience will believe it. As it is, not even I believe your statements very much.
First, The Zog isn’t my site. It’s a site I’ve been pointing people to as a resource for documenting the massive organized Jewish infiltration into the U.S. Establishment. But your critique is fair enough. I agree that the ZOG needs to do a better job of fleshing out the Jewish background of those he claims to be Jewish.
Perhaps those who have linked evidence supporting or disputing his contentions on this can email or comment him for inclusion/negation on his site.
I’m only familiar with The Zog from Occidental Observer, but in the past he has painstakingly and mostly accurately documented the Jewish background of those on his lists with his links. My hunch is further research will prove his lists to be mostly accurate.
True, perhaps my claiming his evidence is “incontrovertible” was a stretch — at least at this point. But his work is a good start, and a good indication.
I’m not a racialist, so I don’t really care about the DNA aspect of the question, though. In fact, I increasingly beleive Jewishness is a state of mind. But I agree that a good indicator if someone is suffering from a Jewish state of mind is Jewish DNA, but having Jewish DNA is not decisive, IMO.
Hence it’s the genetics of behaviour which fundamentally matters, which is what you would have learned by now if you’d followed up on the links I’ve provided in support of my comments over recent weeks instead of arguing. I use links to corroborate what I have to say, that does not mean that what I have to say is just sourced on those links.
Over recent decades the number of professional journals has dramatically proliferated, so much so in fact that academics can no longer keep abreast of their own fields, and certainly most libraries can no longer afford to purchase all the journals, not even the online ones. The further explosion of personal publication via the Internet in the 90s dramatically changed the nature of public-ation, eroding the old peer review system, so, you and others here would be wise to be careful about what and who you read, and carefully consider, ceteras paribus whether some of what you are being told here may be more worthy of more careful attention given the evidence-base and logic provided than you might initially give it (seeking out, or attributing, credit itself, can, like possessing ‘ideas’, be a self-destructive narcissistic poison, I hasten to add).
Allow me to elaborate: I don’t believe that DNA is destiny, but I do believe it plays a huge role in our political attitudes, and I do believe that environment can even change DNA and how people consequently view the world politically. I believe the political DNA of many Whites has been Judaized by the toxic Judeophile American political, cultural and social environment. I believe the Jewish Bolsheviks tried to use the authoritarian state to Judaize the Russian people, and succeeded for a time.
I believe if left free of toxic statist social engineering, man’s organic (natural/default) state in a neutral environment like that of the relative peace and prosperity attained by Western Civilization is generally Christian in outlook, hence “anti-Semitic” (anti-Judeofascist, anti-psychopathically tribal). This is why Jewry requires a pseudo-secular, coercive state either like Communism or like FDR socialism (which utilized the public schools and Big Government to displace the Christian moral order) to do its bidding.
In short, it’s taken extraordinary statist-Left, statist-Liberal, and State Capitalist measures for Jewry and its collaborators to bash the Christianity out of modern Western man, and they’ve largely succeeded — for now.
I’m hopeful that Western man can regain his environmental, organic, natural Christian outlook by purging the Judeofascists and their collaborators, including Judaized Whites, or re-formatting society by removing the state and allowing Christianity to naturally re-grow, which will marginalize and/or de-Judaize them, or if they prefer, pay their emigration fare to Israel, where the Gentiles amongst them can go to work as donkeys for the Zionists, which deep down seems to be what they crave.
Are you a Lysenkoist too?
Tell us how it does that exactly as DNA is in one’s gonads. Genes can be, and demonstrably are, selected by the environment over generations through our behaviours (phenotypes) being selected and reinforced by their consequences, but that is not what you appear to be asserting. If you can find it, dig out Skinner’s ‘On Having Poem’ (a clever and amusing critique of Chomsky’s errors). There used to be a 60m audio of it on the web, but it appears to have been pulled in recent times. The text was published in Cumulative Record which will probably be online. See also his The Phylogeny and Ontogeny of Behavior especially the open peer discussed in his canonical papers article by Harnad and Catania in their 1980s book/BBS article. I’ve had to pick up a few otherwise able colleagues on a serious misunderstanding about radical behaviourism here, and some are only too eager to peddle that misunderstanding, usually Libertarians.
What you assert above, like much else that you write, appears to be creative writing, i.e political rhetoric. I suspect you may not see this. I suspect you do not have had a Higher Education in science? That is no big deal in itself, as one can always redress that by listening to, and learning from, those who have. Or do you think that everyone is free to hold true whatever they like? There is a cost to that, i.e bad behaviour. That’s what anarchists have been peddling to several generations, and I say beware, as alas, caveat emptor is not enough, people need protection – see US economy.
New York Times interveiw of Abby Joseph Cohen:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Abby-Joseph-Cohen-The-Solomon-nytimes-2583206707.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=4&asset=&ccode=
Tom: If the point of this linked story was to give evidence of a false-flag operation—the representative of one ethnically networked racket (the Times) trying to undermine awareness of the reality of ethnic networking by pretending to have a go at the representative of another ethnically networked racket (Goldman Sachs) —its mission has been successfully accomplished.
Thank you.
Uh, maybe that’s because ethnic networking is all that Jewish “accomplishments” and “culture” really are?
Ooh, a Jew accusing a gentile of “whining”. That’s pretty funny. But of course, you don’t see why, because you’re a Jew and thus are incapable of introspection.
“ceteris paribus” (among other…ahem….less than perspicacious choices)
Acting as if other things are equal is just what scientists do when testing hypotheses. Sadly, many students in the social sciences (and sadly some of the non social sciences) have not understood this, and wrongly seem to think it metaphysically true. In fact, the Null Hypothesis is literally nearly always false as it’s a function of sample size. What matters is statistical power and control over variables.
If, on the other hand, you’re merely looking for typos and spelling mistakes in order to devalue what’s written, you’re clearly concerned more with style over substance, i.e. something which, as I’ve been at pains to point out with respect to brain-gender and politics/demographics, we’re drowing in across the Liberal-Democracies.
Most of the people on the streets in Egypt are men you will note.
Chris Moore writes
But your critique is fair enough. I agree that the ZOG needs to do a better job of fleshing out the Jewish background of those he claims to be Jewish.
My critique/criticism is more than fair, it is absolutely true. The ZOG site simple states this person and that person and that person are Jewish, and it gives no info at all on why the claim is being made that the person is Jewish. Do you have any idea how insane that sounds to the outside world?
What constitutes evidence that the most of the rest of the world would take as reasonable evidence that a person is Jewish? The answer isn’t DNA. One answer might be some notice of say some meeting of Jewish people, and the person’s name is among those at the meeting. Or there might be a notice of a gathering honoring Jewish woman in politics, and the person’s name is listed among those being honored. Or someone is a member of Jews for such and such. MacDonald uses a certain criteria, something about the person self-identifying as Jewish.
In fact, working out criteria, maybe even different kinds of criteria, and grouping the criteria into some kind of catetories developed over time, and having some big file or someting that lists the name, and then a link to the evidence that the person is Jewish. And a criteria doesn’t have to be from God. For instance, maybe just a middle name, or a very different name at birth (although a little more than that is needed), but that is why maybe some categorizing of the kind of evidence for a person being Jewish. Jewishness existed before knowledge of DNA. It is a group thing.
A while back there was a huge online book “When victims rule” – I think that was the name of the book. That would have lots of examples of this. I remember checking out some stuff from it, and lots of books teh author will indicate that he or she is Jewish, and indicate other people who are Jewish – this could count as valid evidence that lots of people would take that such and such is Jewish. (Here’s another idea: what do the Israelies use to tell if a person is Jewish can get Israelie citizenship.)
Once such a file is put together, then others can start to make more solid logical statements about people who are “Jewish”. And it could produce valuable logical information that lots of people would be influenced by, that’s lots of people could start to explore general statements about Jewish people. (One thing I am interested in is how can I find out who in Congress is Jewish. Because then I can start to explore voting patterns.)
Good. That’s the idea. You’re grappling with the difficult problem of logically quantifying in (see the existential and universal quantifiers Some(x)=Not(all(x)) and All(x)=Not(Some(x)) where Some(x)=At_Least_One(x) and reference in truth functional (computational) statements). This is all about classes and class membership. Unless one can clearly specify how one is ascribing class membership, how does one count? If one can’t count, what is one actually referring to, and what is one analysing in terms of functional relations? How can one agree or disagree? his is why the languages of the sciences strive to be extensional and leave intensional (mentalistic) language behind. Excusing oneself for de facto using intensional Natural Language as a modus vivendi just because one doesn’t know any better doesn’t get one out of the problem. So, just because most people don’t know what they are talking about or reading/writing here (remember, ~91% of the population has an IQ below 120, and decades ago, that would have been the cut off for university entrance) being popular shouldn’t get one the thumbs up just because one is in the majority of ignorami, and similarly, those who try to educate those in error should not get the opposite. See? The latter is typical Libertarian anti-elitism, paradoxically working to dumb down the population. Conclusion: OOC operates a Libertarian website.
When Victims Rule
No, but would it matter if I was?
The point that’s being missed by you and most others is that the driver is Libertarianism which is the right wing anarchistic American Dream. Watch the video, study the data, and look across the other Liberal-Democracies exported by the USA and the EU.
Herrnstein may have got it – see his 1990 article on Rational Choice Theory. I’m not sure Murray at the AEI does.
Do you understand now?
I quickly realized that DL haa an autism spectrum disorder, there really is no point in responding to him.
David, I think if you were aware of your difficulties in interacting with other humans you could, with a great deal of effort, become more effective in promoting your ideas. ( Maybe taking them where they will be welcomed). So ask yourself -do I have have:-
*gaze-monitoring deficits
* apparent deafness/insensitivity to voices
* deficit in sense of personal agency/episodic memory *literalness/inability to deceive
I think you have already demonstrated:-
* deficits in interpreting others’ intentions
* deficits in appreciating shared-attention/groups
* theory of mind deficit
* pathological single-mindedness
Further reading:
THE IMPRINTED BRAIN THEORY
.
Abe Fauxman, thank you very much for that PDF version of WVR. I noticed that the the Jewish Tribal Review website along with the HTML version of the WVR book has disappeared. I was afraid that I wasn’t going to be able to find it again.
Are you in sales? The PR (‘spin’), advertising business? Ever been tempted to hawk sub-prime mortgages, credit cards etc to the unwary for commission etc? ;-)
I’m not the one who is spamming this site with getting on for 20 comments on this post alone.
Ignoring you makes no difference, it seems there is an endless supply of TOO newbies who you can inviegle into responding to your self serving screeds to give the impression that you are participating in discussion. (rather than spamming which is what you are doing).
The trouble is you are hurting the site by cluttering up the threads with your spamming while wasting other peoples time. Furthermore you create a bad impression of TOO in the minds of those newbies who come here and are naive enough to try and read your endless spamming.
I am not going to read you or anyone responding to you, I will not reply to any comments you make in the future.
“Someday February 1, 2011 – 12:51 pm The trouble is you are hurting the site by cluttering up the threads with your spamming while wasting other peoples time. Furthermore you create a bad impression of TOO in the minds of those newbies who come here and are naive enough to try and read your endless spamming.”
Narcissitic rage. Note how you resort to abuse when you don’t get your own way? Note how you pride appearance/image before substance? Note how you grandiosely assert that you will punish others by not reading what they write, or devaluing what they have to say? These are typical behaviours of pathological narcissists (it’s a devlopmental, arrested development disorder). You also appear not to want others to read some of what’s being posted to this blog. Why is that do you think? This is behaviour which others might like to ponder too. What happens when this is writ large?
“In other words, Bell and Weisberg made a Jewish connection right off the bat.”
“Jew Radar” I remember reading this story , written by a Jew, about how he can spot another Jew amongst the crowd. He called it Jew radar.
“Secret Agent”
This secret agent stuff is good advice. White advocates should play the game, make their fortunes, then drop the bomb. Kinda satisfying, playing the Gentile dumbo, pleasing the Jewish lords, only for you to turn on them – from a financially secure position.
Here you go from 2003 without any wish to offend.
Well – if someone had read David Brooks’ January 12, 2010 Op-Ed column ”The Tel Aviv Cluster’ in the New York Times – he would know how smart Jews are.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/01/21/jewish-or-israeli-achievements/
Some excerpts from a seemingly rare, honest Jew, one Phillip Weiss, on the truth about Jewish networking responding to a typically boastful piece by David Brooks:
Meritocracy and Jewish kinship networks
By Philip Weiss | January 13, 2010
“But I’d like to inject a realistic note here. How much of Jewish achievement reflects the fact that Jews look out for one another? When I had to get a partner on this website to keep it going, I was most comfortable getting another Jew. Years ago when I was at the Harvard Crimson newspaper, my Irish-Catholic friend Mary Ridge informed me that it was a “Jewish club”–we selected for our own kind; and the Crimson produced a lot of professional journalism talent. I have gotten most of my journalism work from Jewish bosses.
Jews have kinship networks as strong as other people’s, maybe more strong. All that Hollywood talent– producers are always aware of who is a Jew, and I am sure they feel more comfortable hiring Jews. Landsman. My parents liked the idea of my marrying a Jew because Jews are gemutlich, as my mom always says– family, kin. We know all the social cues, can finish one another’s sentences, etc.
And look at the New York Times, where Brooks works. Is it an expression of Jewish genius that most of the political columnists are Jewish? Tom Friedman, Nick Kristof, Paul Krugman, Frank Rich, David Brooks et al. Or does it maybe reflect the fact that a Jewish family has majority ownership of the newspaper and that most of the big editors have been Jewish and at some level, unconscious or otherwise, they favor Jews?
So I think some of the amazing record of Jewish achievement reflects discrimination; and Jews are powerful enough in this society that we ought to be conscious of that. Brooks has often praised the late sociologist E. Digby Baltzell, and Baltzell said as much about the last establishment; he said that WASPs favor other WASPs, and that it was hurting the American establishment.”
http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/meritocracy-and-jewish-kinship-networks/
Here too is a terrific, very revealing comment from that most heartening thread from that post of awakened Anglos:
“Phillip, I tend to agree with both you and David Brooks. There is a lot of truth to David’s argument, but I’m afraid your argument is equally true. I worked in business development at Fox and I have a Jewish sounding last name as did the head of the legal dept. at the time. We both spilled the beans at the Christmas party that neither of us was Jewish and couldn’t help but feel maybe we had done something wrong. The President of the division, our boss, was Jewish. We were both gone in 6 months time. Coincidence? I would like to think so.”
Comment by Steve | January 14, 2010 | Reply
Good extracts they are too, but even though these are widely stated observations (e.g. who runs Hollywood, and even Wall Street) this has long been the American Way surely? There is nothing in US law or Constitution (to the best of my knowledge, please feel free to correct me), which explicitly, legally, proscribes such nepotism for jobs in the Private Sector. In fact, Civil Liberties (and elsewhere, Human Rights legislation) subtly facilitate this.
This is what many well intentioned people don’t seem to have seen in our ‘free’, ‘individualistic’ democratic societies. They are so busy romantically campaigning for freedom from the state (where there might have been some means of controlling nepotism given Public Sector bodies should be observant of potential exploitation for selective group interests given they are funded by the collective, i.e by the entire population’s taxes for the entire population) that they don’t appear to have seen how they’ve been advantaging small, tightly knit, endogamous, allegedly oppressed, groups in this way.
The increasing attacks on statism or Big Government (especially since the 70s), will have facilitated Private Sector ‘family’ business practices, which I agree, are indeed venal.
But legal…..
One doesn’t get this, or is it see this as clearly in the larger Gentile community, basically because it is so much bigger. It looks iike it’s just meritocracy at work, but there is a major problem with meritocracy itself, which was pointed out by Young when he coined the term back in the late 50s. He pointed out the problems again in 1994 when he reviewed The Bell Curve, and again in 2001 when he criticised Blair for abusing the term.
If you have not seen this problem, it’s worth digging out the links I’ve provided, as it may surprise you where it all leads. It’s not to Libertarianism.
It’s the same old crap that’s been peddled by other Jews like Paul Gottfried – saying that Whites have “withered” or “committed suicide.” – Sam Davidson
Peter Brimelow, much as I admire him, has made a strategic mistake of allowing Jews into Vdare as writers and immigration reform crusaders. He was fired from his job as Chief Editor of the “National Review” for identifying organized Jewry in “Alien Nation” as the forces behind the 1965 Immigration Reform Act. Jews, with the rare exception of heroic individuals like Brother Nathanael Kapner, and the Jewish patriot extraordinaire who preceded him, Benjamin Freedman – who likewise renounced Judaism, will never act in the interests of whites because they privately believe in the “never again!” lies of their mostly entirely embellished “holocaust” and the absurd notion of “this is what happens when whites’ rule.”
Nicholas Styx, as passionately and eloquently as he writes about suppressed black-on-white crimes is intellectually dishonest because as much as he rails against the total censorship of the staggering numbers of such crimes, he will NEVER identify that those doing the cover-ups are ALL Jewish-owned, and that it is in fact (See “Coloring the News: How Crusading for Diversity Destroyed American Journalism”) explicit policy by the Jews’ News to avoid casting “minorities” in unflattering reports.
Jews’ are subversive by nature, and allowing them anywhere near our efforts to advance white interests is immediately compromised and rendered ineffective by our foolishly thinking they are anything but self-aggrandizers who seek to stifle the truth as to what ails us once they are in the fold. It is a devastating miscalculation. How is this working out so far for you, Mr. Brimelow, on the immigration reform front? Break free of the Jewish matrix, Peter. Kick them out from our media, and tell the whole, God-awful, unfettered truth. It is intellectually liberating if nothing else.