The Jewish Social Network
A recent article in The Jewish Chronicle asks, How Jewish is Facebook?
The basic idea of Facebook, creating a simple and exclusive alternative to MySpace, isn’t Jewish. But the project was hijacked when the gullible Winklevoss twins entrusted Mark Zuckerberg and his accomplice, Eduardo Saverin, to help execute the project. (See also Kevin MacDonald’s review.) The movie adaptation of this true story is a fevered Jewish revenge fantasy against their hapless arch-enemies, the reviled WASP “insiders.” Both the book, by Ben Mezrich, and the screenplay, by Aaron Sorkin, wallow in defeating the earnest brothers, heaping these two iconic American Christians with humiliation after humiliation.
The schadenfreud reaches hysterical proportions in this scene where they narrowly lose a rowing competition…
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdDeui011iA
And what did these honest and trusting twins do to deserve this antipathy? Better yet, what did White America do to deserve this antipathy? How, when the President of Harvard himself is a powerful Jewish oligarch who laughed the twins out of his office, can Mezrich see himself, his people, or Zuckerberg as the sympathetic underdogs in this context? It’s simple: he’s Jewish and sympathizes with his own. To ask why he hates them is to make the same mistake the Winklevii made: grasping for a universal honor code in a tribal universe.
Mezrich explains why he hates them…
Mark and his friends were geeky, brilliant kids who had their faces pressed up against the glass,” explains Mezrich. “On the other side was the social scene they weren’t really a part of, and they created their own club, an exclusive, incredibly social place where they could be kings.
Hailing from a conservative Jewish family — his grandfather was a rabbi — Mezrich knows something about not fitting in at a prestigious university. Like Zuckerberg and Saverin, he attended Harvard, where he was a self-confessed “geeky kid”, and acknowledges that as a Jewish boy from Brooklyn who had not come from “a long line of people who had gone to Harvard”, there were opportunities that were not open to him.
“There are these groups where there is this old world aristocracy going on,” he says. “People like me — and Mark — couldn’t really be a part of that.”
The Social Network: A Sequel?
This is essentially a more explicit and direct reproduction of the catharsis Jews have been working out in seemingly every high school and college movie they’re involved in: the big dumb jocks are humiliated by the social outcasts. The bad guys are tall, athletic, and Nordish. The heroes are mousy, bookish, and clumsy. Women are little more than sexual trophies to be won when the White Christian objects of their ressentiment are destroyed.
Throughout the movie, Zuckerberg is depicted as some sort of super-genius, though there’s nothing ingenious about Facebook. The market vacuum that Rupert Murdoch created when he drove MySpace into the ground was going to be filled by something. While Zuckerberg’s a smart guy, he gets way too much credit for his creation. Unlike Napster, Wikipedia, Friendster, or hypertext, there was nothing innovative about what Facebook did. To quote another famous Jewish technologist, “even a turkey can fly in a high wind.”
That technologist was Eugene Kleiner, one of the “Traitorous Eight” who turned on the inventor of the semiconductor and founder of Silicon Valley, Dr. William Shockley. As is frequently the case, the White American with the brilliant idea is stampeded over by managerial elites who know how to run a business and know better than to let a few honor codes get in the way of a good income statement. And what of Dr. Shockley? Busted and bitter, he gave up on technology and rededicated himself to applying his gifts and the scientific method to the betterment of humanity.
William Shockley, White American Hero
As we White Advocates know all too well, you can’t take the social sciences seriously without breaking the regnant taboos, and so he did. Predictably, the Nobel Laureate became a “scientific racist”, despised by our academic overlords. He was the most hated scientist in America, dying alone and in disgrace, having allegedly been reduced to “harangu[ing] strangers on the inadequacy of the Negro race.” The “racist” origins of the Information Age and Shockley’s immense contributions to understanding race and intelligence have been disappeared, lost in the multicult memory hole.
Kleiner and Zuckerberg may have made off with all the money and won some of the early battles, but the future belongs to us. With the power of the Internet, a teenager brought down their entire music industry. One determined hacker sent the international diplomatic community into a panic. The Hollywood machine is threatened by the plummeting costs of production and the gradual loss of their monopoly over the American mind. Their news monopoly has been reduced to bankruptcy, competing with amateur bloggers to break stories that they used to stuff down the memory hole. The Occidental Observer and other excellent sites are serving as beacons, bringing a growing number of White Americans together with the naked truth, conceiving a new social network that will dwarf MySpace, Facebook, and the one trying to drive us apart.
Matt Parrott is the Executive Director of Hoosier Nation, Indiana’s leading traditional conservative advocacy group.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
Excellent!
Amazing.
Jewish businessmen started Hollywood by illegally using Thomas Edison’s patented film technologies. Jonas Salk took sole credit for the polio vaccine even though it was the product of an entire research team. Now Zuckerberg has made huge profits by stealing the idea for an academic-oriented social networking site.
Will the Jews ever change?
I especially like the myth of Salk’s magnanimity for not patenting the polio vaccine. He was doing research in the University of Pittsburgh’s facilities that was mostly funded by the March of Dimes!
Same deal with the Albert Einstein mythology!
Recommended reading >>> http://www.jewishracism.com/SaintEinstein.htm
by Christopher Jon Bjerknes
You mean Salk “borrowed” it from Enders, Weller & Robbins.
The schadenfreud reaches hysterical proportions in this scene where they narrowly lose a rowing competition…
Matt,
That scene may have as much to do with Sorkin being one of the lamest writers in history as with anything else.
Just look at this jawdroppingly unfunny and stupid sequence from his crapfest of a TV Show “Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9iTOcEHkoo
I thought it was interesting a quote from one of them: “The film is nonfiction. I think [the creators] David Fincher and Aaron Sorkin did a great job getting their facts right.”
I haven’t seen the movie, so I don’t really get what’s going on here.
Is it that the movie depicts Zuckerberg as being really amoral, but there’s some kind of vibe in it showing that the people who made the movie are behind him?
Anyway, there was a time when Jews were the underdog compared to the Ivy League Liberal Establishment (which was mostly WASP), but of course that time is past by now.
What’s happening a lot of times is Jews are living in the past.
Other times, though, they’re probably just pretending to live in the past because to help the public underestimate how powerful they average out to being.
Hey there Sam Davidson! Salk’s team was in fact handed the research info and results from other teams and scientists working on eradicating Polio. I believe it was the head of the March of Dimes at the time that did this (don’t have time to look it up at the moment). The excuse given was that Salk was known to be a fast worker, and he and his team could take the information and hopefully create a vaccine quickly. No doubt there’s more to it than that. When I was at UCLA two Jews stole credit for the work of a (gentile) doctor who proved that there is a physical difference in the brain among people with a certain mental illness as compared to normal people. Even though the theft was eventually proven, the jews had already received the glory and initial credit. They were never reprimanded publicly, and as someone else pointed out on the web regarding this incident, their community seemed to hold them in even higher regard once it was proven they were thieves. The doctor who made the discovery and did the work was given incidental mention in the papers.
As far as Zuckerberg goes, he is actually persona non grata amongst many big players in Silicon Valley. One of the true innovators working there stated that if one spent 2 minutes speaking with Zuckerberg, you could tell he was neither smart enough nor creative enough to have come up with the Facebook idea, never mind turning it into a giant. Jewish money got behind Zuckerberg, and as in so many other cases, an inferior and/or stolen product is pushed and promoted as the best, the end all. Because it is run by you-know-what.
Hollywood had been inserting mentions of Facebook in TV and film dialogue for a couple of years before “The Social Network”, and also pushing it on local and national news outlets, with stories designed to try and reel people in. 2010 was a big year for the tribe in attempting to rehabilitate Zuckerberg’s reputation. First the film, then he’s Time’s “Man Of The Year”, and tons of fluff and puff pieces on the “news”. As bad as it all is, at least their empire is in fact falling apart. Their current kingdom is crumbling and there’s not much they can do to save it. It’s going to get worse before it gets better. You can bet the tribe will openly bare its collective set of fangs as desperation sets in.
Jews have to make up stories that present themselves as outsiders because they are actually the ultimate insiders, especially at Ivy League schools and other prestigious institutions. I did read a piece that mentioned Zuckerberg must have had some connections to get into Harvard, as while being smart, he was no cream of the crop student, his SAT scores would not have gained admittance without some inside help. But that’s how it works for the majority of Jews at top schools these days. Only a small minority of them are actually qualified. Outsiders. Sure. Wonder how long it took the tribe to pull strings and edit Zuckerberg’s school records, to improve his grades and test scores? Not long you can be sure.
Check the wiki entries for Enders, Weller & Robbins. Those are the three gentiles that Salk robbed.
Some very interesting points. Jewish “dominance” in Crumbling, their markets/money system and methods are on LIFE SUPPORT. Despite their “2000 years” of Tribalism, they have constantly FAILED.
Despite all their mumbo jumbo about the “Holohoax” – They Killed over 30 million men, women and children, in the former Soviet union.
Not All by many of them, especially the elites, are a pathetic and evil people. If it was not for them we would have achieved much, more as a nation. We would NOT be so fractured as a nation. Europe will not becoming “Eurabia, and America will not become Amexica!
These folk, have started a chain of evens they simply CANNOT and WILL NOT be able to curtail and mange. Its like they let an avalance, loose, and it getting BIGGER and BIGGER, eventually it will hit something and fail.
The Jew/Especially the Estb (Now Zionist Jews) running scarred they are desperate, and that why I believe they are OPENLY being so anti-white. You’d actually be surprised, how many people know it ALL THE JEWS FAULT, this entire mess, and social destruction/financial and monetary melt down. Whites/Blacks and Hispanics know this.
They are destroying the ONE country they can really call home. WHY, oh WHY? Israel too is gradually dying, and is and will become a unsustainable nation. Do you guys reall ythis the rising powers of Brazil/Venz/Iran/China/Russia/India Etc… Will be Jewish Whores, like Europe and America? You must be kiding. Their days are numbered. NOTHING, and I say NOTHING lasts forever.
I can only hope, our people can pull through this and America/Europe and All Euro Nations get through this, “I call – Dark Ages” of Jewish Supremacy – But ultimately we let the Anti-Christ or Satan’s people to our nations!!
Thanks
“The film is nonfiction. I think [the creators] David Fincher and Aaron Sorkin did a great job getting their facts right.”
That quote was from Cameron Winklevoss:
http://www.popeater.com/2010/10/01/cameron-winklevoss-social-network/
I doubt the movie was that bad, even though it was writen by that Sorkin guy I don’t like, given this quote.
Reginald,
The Winklevosses don’t get the joke. They don’t see that the movie is pointing and laughing at them because it corroborates their assertion that they were hoodwinked out of the idea.
Okay, that explains it.
Parrott: “How, when the President of Harvard himself is a powerful Jewish oligarch who laughed the twins out of his office, can Mezrich see himself, his people, or Zuckerberg as the sympathetic underdogs in this context? It’s simple: he’s Jewish and sympathizes with his own. To ask why he hates them is to make the same mistake the Winklevii made: grasping for a universal honor code in a tribal universe.”
Diaspora Jewry plays the racist, self-serving, tribal game (even while hoodwinking the Western masses by successfully portraying itself as embracing universal humanist values) better than any tribe ever has and likely ever will; it’s got thousands of years of experience under its belt in this area. Indeed, Jewry’s tribalism is one of the reasons it hates non-racist Christianity so much (that, and Christian doctrine has successfully communicated Jewry for what it truly is to the masses).
Whites anxious about the future of their race need only embrace the traditional, “anti-Semitic” (actually, anti-Judeofascist) Christianity that is the touchstone of Western Civilization; the rest, in time, will take care of itself. How? Supremacist Jewry is the linchpin of the totalitarian, neo-Marxist, atheist-materialist war against Whites, Christians, Western Civilization and human freedom. Expose it for its true nature, and drive it out of Western Civilization into its own tribal, racist realm where it belongs (the Levant) and everything else falls into place.
Emulating ignoble, dishonorable, totalitarian and insanely racist and greedy Jewry to try to defeat it is exactly the wrong thing to do; it plays that game better than anyone.
I’m not claiming that we should abandon our honor codes, only that we should recognize that while they might be universal in an abstract or theological sense, they’re certainly not universally recognized or reciprocated.
That’s just it: Christianity imposes honor codes, and forces those who want to participate in Western Civilization to play honorably and not in an underhanded, back-stabbing, subversive, tribalistic manner, (which is the standard modus operandi of racist Jewry — yet another reason it hates Christianity).
I think what is engendering frustration and decline amongst Whites is that they are increasingly being forced by Zionist-occupied government and Jewish-invented ideological Marxism and its various offshoots (left-liberalism, neoconservatism/neoliberalism) to play with one hand tied behind their backs. Christianity, or more specifically, a return to private Christian moral authority across society accompanied with the elimination of Big Government and its anti-Christian totalitarianism, would level the playing field once and for all.
This is essentially a more explicit and direct reproduction of the catharsis Jews have been working out in seemingly every high school and college movie they’re involved in: the big dumb jocks are humiliated by the social outcasts.
I think this may be oversimplifying things.
The American love affair with the underdog goes far deeper than Jews siding with them because they were nerds in High School who got beat up by Jocks.
The Vietnam War showed a very strange development in the national character where the lauded heroes weren’t the people who did a good job of beating the other side, but rather the poor bastards who got captured.
High School Nerd = Victim = “Hero”
POW = Victim = “Hero”
John McCain and the Robert Carradine character from ‘Revenge of the Nerds’ are two sides of the same coin, and only one side of the coin had meaningful Jewish input.
What’s distinctly “Jewish” about it is the underlying ressentiment. The Winklevii didn’t actually do anything to become the antagonists, aside from possessing some vague “privilege” and being part of a social network that Jews are envious of. I’m not reaching, here. I’m tracking very closely to the explanations provided by the author.
In terms of specific movie The Social Network, I agree with you that it’s distinctly Jewish.
FTA: “Like Zuckerberg and Saverin, he[Mezrich] attended Harvard, where he was a self-confessed “geeky kid”, and acknowledges that as a Jewish boy from Brooklyn who had not come from “a long line of people who had gone to Harvard”, there were opportunities that were not open to him.”
Wow. He’s at Harvard yet can’t move beyond seeing himself as a victim instead of someone who’s made it? There are real advanteages to always seeing yourself as the victim. You can trample all over others, many of whom are innocent, while continuing to Hitler and the 3rd reich. You can be rude, vulgar and obnoxious and unbound to the same moral codes incumbent on all others since, after all, you’re nothing but a victim. You can steal on Wall Street, indifferent to the sufferings you’re inflicting on the innocent, since you’re a victim. You can shoot Palestinian women and chidlren, since, after all, you’re a victim.
This idea of victim-hood is powerful. It’s a concept that enables you to deceive yourself while screwing those around you. That is the core “religious” aspect for many of these non-religious Zionists in America. They don’t attend the synagogue on a weekly basis, but always believe they are the race that has suffered the most throughout history- It’s practically the unsung melody when you turn on the television.
This sense of ‘historical unfairness’ provides them with the feeling that they never made it to the top and always need to keep ascending, no matter who gets screwed along the way. It’s why they cant stop with their flailing Israel disaster- no one can tell them they are doing it all wrong, since they are the victim -and, of course smarter in general.
What about the fact that all the elite universities–the gatekeepers to economic and political advancement in our society– have been co-opted by Jews? Theoretically standardized tests were supposed to make university admission meritocratic, but I can tell you from first-first hand experience that acing them is no promise of admission to an elite university.
One has to wonder, if affirmative action is justifiable on the basis that it allows for equal access to elite schools, why isn’t a numerus clausus on Jewish admission?
How about Ayn Rand stealing the philosophy of Nietzsche?
“Behold, in the Kali Yuga, the Thundertoad shall belch forth hideous ichors which will give visions to those whom I love, and destroy those whom my soul abhors.”
There are some pretty substantial differences between Rand and Nietzsche. But anyway, I think she acknowledged Nietzsche’s influence.
This article makes no effort to analyze the book on which the film is based. But if we can assume that there are Jewish interests (or at least Jewishness) involved in the Facebook, the next question is this:
Why is The Occidental Observer still present on FB? Clearly, Facebook has become what it is only because a lot of people act by herd instinct. These people indirectly support FB and Zuckerberg by just being there.
It seems that to boycott Facebook would be to wear a hair shirt to make a tangential point. It would guarantee that we would reach fewer people. We would also be guaranteed that we would not make the slightest dent in Facebook’s viability or profitability.
The Facebook-effect of reaching out is overestimated. For most people, FB is just an extension of their real-life social network into cyberspace. FB is not a source of serious information. FB followers of TOO are less than 600 last time I checked.
Gentlemen … I personally suspect Facebook is a mega-fraud being orchestrated by shadowy organizations belonging to the Military / Industrial Complex, Eisenhower warned us about.
Official claims (now “confirmed” by Hollywood) that the jerk Zuckerberg is solely or largely responsible for Facebook are attempting to push my credulity and patience to unreasonable limits.
Here is a 4+ year old YouTube video that has been viewed over 1,290,000 times. It warns of the connections between Facebook and … (1) the CIA, (2) DARPA, and (3) the highly sinister, Information Awareness Office.
If you don’t yet know what DARPA and the Information Awareness Office are, then I recommend you research them in your own time. Someone called Peter Thiel also features in Facebook’s birth. Thiel is a member of the so-called “PayPal Mafia” … http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PayPal_Mafia
Peter Thiel got Facebook off the ground with a $500,000 early investment. Question is … why did he do this, and for whom did he do it?? Just to spice up the “conspiracy theory” a little, Thiel also happens to be yet another Ashkenazi Jew.
This YouTube video about Facebook (created in 2006) is very informative, despite the somewhat irritating voice of the young female narrator. Suffer that, and wait for the Org Chart that starts to feature at about 2:10 into the 4:10 minute video. It is essential viewing for those who really want to understand the true origins of Facebook:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B37wW9CGWyY
The Social Network: I simply liked the movie’s heartening message:
1) Jewish American princesses are wonderful, heroic women (even if they changed their name to Albright).
2) Asian girls are whores! Jewish men should avoid them.
3) Light-skinned and dark-skinned Jews should work together to crush WASP competitors and new aspiring minorities (Indians)
The idea may have belonged to the Winklevoss twins but I’m pretty sure Zuckerberg came up with the code. Let’s give credit where credit is due. Europeans and European-Americans shouldn’t engage in self-delusion the way the tribe does. Stare into the abyss long enough and it stares into you (you become what you despise).
Academia and the media routinely downplay and marginalize European scientific, literary, and artistic geniuses; when was the last time Hollywood made films about the lives of John Dalton, the founder of atomic theory, or Fyodor Dostoyevsky, or Stephen Hawking? Instead they’re too busy making movies about Allan Ginsburg and Freud.
The point is, if European-Americans ignore reality then they’ll be just as deluded as the tribe is. Intelligence and accomplishments should be accepted regardless of what race they belong to. Otherwise European-Americans run the risk of behaving like the tribe, or even worse, like the pseudo-intellectual frauds who claim that Africans created civilization.
While Zuckerberg’s a smart guy, he gets way too much credit for his creation.
I conceded that he’s a smart guy and I called it his creation. I stand behind the assertion that there’s nothing innovative about what he did. I’m certainly not claiming that Whites were the only innovators. Richard Stallman is the first example of a bonafide Jewish compsci pioneer that comes to mind. I’m sure there are others.
Fender – I wish Europeans would take a tip from the Tribe; give your energy, time, talents, and resources to advancing one’s own Race, and one’s own Race alone.
That “behaving that way makes you just like them” is just balderdash.
On the topic of Jewish self-deception:
One example was when Howard Stern interviewed Glenn Miller. Howard Stern disagreed with Glenn Miller when told that Jews play a powerful role in the United States. “Power? I don’t have any power!” The irony is that Howard Stern is a national celebrity, the subject of a major film, and hosts his own radio show. But he has no power, he assures us! The sad thing is that Stern probably believed his own words. Self-deception at its finest…
Al Gore made a movie and turned it into a fortune nearly as gargantuan as his girth by using the buzz it created as a basis of ‘environmental’ investment opportunities. It is a working template. Is this Social Network movie, grandly hyped, in part a replica of this? On one level it is a free PR campaign for a huge Initial Public Offering.
Exactly what is the raw financial income stream justifying the press evaluations on this product, easily reproducible and subject the vagaries of tomorrow’s fad, at over $50,000,000,000.00? An IPO is in the works. The Big Pay Out. The shearing of the sheep.
Does anyone else smell the biggest Jewish Pump And Dump ever? The value of this company is being wildly inflated and the usual Sacks O’ Gold suspects are lining up to offload the hot air for cold goy cash.
There is an awful lot of money in the targeted ads Facebook has on their site.
Obviously that money’s purely dependant on them keeping and/or expanding their massive market share, but the idea behind people buying into the stock is that Facebook is large enough that it sucks up the oxygen another social network would need to take off.
it would be smarter to buy gold or silver, but as stock purchases go Facebook makes as more sense as most.
Sam Davidson January 6, 2011 – 12:02 pm | Permalink Amazing.
Jewish businessmen started Hollywood by illegally using Thomas Edison’s patented film technologies. Jonas Salk took sole credit for the polio vaccine even though it was the product of an entire research team. Now Zuckerberg has made huge profits by stealing the idea for an academic-oriented social networking site.
Will the Jews ever change?
Will we?
Myspace was once the biggest thing around, and it too was deliberately designed by the ‘smartest guys in the room.’ I think that the big advantage that FB has is that it started with a fairly effective id verification method (you had to use your college email address), and so unlike myspace, where people made innumerable fake accounts, fb mirrored people’s real-life relationships.
It would be fairly difficult to duplicate. However, I think the FB-killer will be some sort of decentralized ‘blog’ network that will flourish because of people’s privacy concerns. There is plenty of free space on servers out there, all you need to do is develop a system that links emails to pages and maybe have some centralized rss feed.
Speaking of privacy, I thought this story from The Onion was funny:
Area Man Has No Idea How He Got On Hamas E-Mail List
http://www.theonion.com/articles/area-man-has-no-idea-how-he-got-on-hamas-email-lis,18721/
We should take every opportunity to tell our young folk about the Tribes true intentions. I was fired by a jew who found out I was Christian Identity he apperently hired me because of my last name and assumed I was one of there own , lol. Being an outspoken WN and pure CI advocate at the the time it was qucikly known I wasnt and it came as a surprise. But I put the weezel in his place as I walked out laughing.
Tomorrow Belongs to US: I hope so Matt Parrott. But it made me weep because that’s how much I don’t believe it right now
“The Hollywood machine is threatened by the plummeting costs of production and the gradual loss of their monopoly over the American mind.”
It’s good to see that optimistic spirit and I think it is justified. We now have more tools than ever to challenge the conventional wisdom. Establishing networks of White Advocates to talk, debate and strategize together will be very powerful.
…..but from TOO and other places I am beginning to see there are people who are willing to their bit and this is bringing me closer to the moment I will also stand up and do my bit. I don’t know whether it is too late now or not, but when the day comes I’m old and have grandchildren and all of this has played out and either we are finished or revived, I want to have a truthful answer when the question comes “what did you do to try to save us?”
On self-deception and Jews, here is an observation. There is a clip from the movie where Zuckerberg says something to the effect that the only reason the Winklevoss twins are suing him is because “for the first time in their lives, things are going their way”. This is seems to be typical of how Jews do in fact, delude themselves.
By reframing theft and dishonor as revenge against an oppressor or as some kind of “social justice”, they justify unethical and illegal activity. Note that Jews always establish the moral deficiency of their opponents. By attacking any moral or social legitimacy on the part of Whites, they open them up to all manner of attack. By portraying their opponents as “evil” in some sense, they are then free to use every dirty trick in the book against them.
In the above I meant to say:
Zuckerberg says something to the effect that the only reason the Winklevoss twins are suing him is because “for the first time in their lives, things are not going their way”
“By portraying their opponents as “evil” in some sense, they are then free to use every dirty trick in the book against them.”
And if you do call them on their illegal behaviour or at least point out how rude and obnoxious they are, they again play they “Oy, vey!” Hitler card, which is the ace they’ve played to great success.
I am reading my cousin’s psychology book, i guess its a textbook, “The Wisdom of the Ego” by George E. Vaillant, Harvard University Press, you would not believe the things in this book, Such as using evangelical preachers to demonstrate the different defense mechanisms of the ego. A young couple on their honeymoon discovered that the evangelist had had sex with both of them. So when he writes a book against teaching sex in the public schools its because his own sexuality is too horrible to acknowledge and that’s his ego’s defense.
Of course. Lets ignore the fact that gay sex is taught to our children and that takes away the right of Anglo Saxons and Christians to pass along our own values and traditions to our children. just make anyone who opposes the teaching of sex education out to be a sicko. That’s the jew M.O.
Its like the movie “Doubt” that is now on the Encore movie channel. The jew Merle Streep plays a nun and she badgers and badgers and relentlessly attacks the priest as a pedophile. His pleading with her does no good, she won’t stop and she takes great pride in destroying him.
Its never proven that the priest did anything wrong, that doesn’t matter, its just about making it look like he did, and the movie goer never learns the truth. That is exactly what jews do in real life. They just accuse and badger and relentlessly attack. The “culture of critique”.
The textbook is always alluding to Nazis to represent evil, it talks about ego defenses that could be used by a young virgin girl and making it sound like reluctance for such a girl to engage in sex is somehow sick.
I cannot believe how propagandized our nation is, the above article, hollywood movies and such textbooks make me absolutely despise jews and their shabbas goyim. I cannot even watch the “news” any more. If I even get a glimpse of Diane Sawyer I cross myself and quickly change the channel. I’m not even catholic.
The evil of jews is too great to express. Think of how many of our children they have killed in the middle east. Think about how many they killed in WW2 which was a White holocaust. What they have done to the West is literally incalculable.
We are so drowning in propaganda its amazing that anyone is still able to see some truth.
The textbook referred to studies done on Southerners during forced segregation. According to the textbook we’re all very very sick if we wish to not allow blacks and other races into our schools. It says nothing about Zionism however, that must be an indication of a very healthy ego and zionists are “mature” ego examples.
I hope the internet allows us to stop the jew. they are parasites and cancers. They live off of us, they can’t even build a country without using our money and our children’s blood. I hope they burn in hell, I’d just like to see them hang first.
Psychology as an academic discipline is a Jewish closed shop these days. Go through the references list at the end of the book and see if you can spot any non-Jewish names. If you can they’ll be a tiny minority. Remember ‘helping other Jews’ is the very basis of Jewish moral outlook. EVERYTHING a Jew does is shaped to some degree by this moral particularism. When you tune in to it the vast extent of Jewish nepotism you’ll begin to notice how very unmeritocratic Western societies have become. Watch an interview with a Jew on TV and count the number of references he/she makes to other Jews. All this self-promoting hype and anti-White, anti-Christian animus is enough to make you want to throw-up.
A website that allowed people to post examples like that found in “The Wisdom of the Ego” by George E. Vaillant might be a very good way to document the anti-White bias in academia and the media. Perhaps we could post the item with supporting links. That way we would have a handy reference to make our case and we could keep all their slander from going down the memory hole later.
Considering that jews make up nearly all the ivy presidents, control the boards, and nearly all the departments, and harvard, for example is less than 10% white christian male, its’ even more comical they try to hold onto this fantasy.
We have opened our doors, shared our power, they have done nothing but take, steal, and hold us in contempt. They will never, never change, but we better.
Jews are victims of their own inability to do anything except steal and weave lies to cover it. How Jews feel about themselves or us should be mean nothing to us. Our problem is we pay attention to Jewish utterances and are influenced by what they say. White people are the real victims. We are victims of Yiddish social engineering…mind games that they use like a mental crow bar to pry open cracks in white resistance and make entry easier for Zionist/Bolshevik Jews and their warrior mercenaries (pipe dreaming Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Islamic radicals) to feed off white culture.
The future does belong to us. We can no more help developing civilization than we can keep the rivers from flowing. It is inborn. Put us on the moon and we will build a civilization on the surface. That is our safety valve and our future, but only if we keep aline blood out of our veins. White women and those erstwhile white men who breed with aliens should understand that the white culture-civilization building gene cannot be passed on to non-whites. Nature ain’t set up that way. But until we tackle a specific target like the Jew’s “social engineering” network and wage a world wide war against its influence we are not going to get much done.
‘How Jews feel about themselves or us should be mean nothing to us.’
It’s true. We live in such a Jewified culture and our lives in the West have become ridiculouly Judeocentric. Obviously a lot of this can be tied to the Jewish antecendents of Christianity – but it has gone way beyond this today.
Jews have made it NATURAL that almost everyone should have a profound interest in their welfare, and be accutely concerned with what they think of us.
The Jews have cast themselves as the central characters in the drama of world history. We, however, don’t have to play the game and feed their tribal narcisisism.
“How Jews feel about themselves or us should be mean nothing to us. ”
No, but a well informed person needs to know what they think about us and how they feel about us, especially when they’re in disproportionate positions of power. I wish more westerners would learn about Judaism…learn about it even from phlio-semitic texts…they would be horrified and recognize that it is the oldest form of nazism.
….”There are these groups where there is this old world aristocracy going on,” he says. “People like me – and Mark – couldn’t really be a part of that.”….
Doesn’t anyone find this…strange? Like, how many have looked at —idk– some different culture and its institutions and said, ‘we could never be a part of that, but we have to get in?” It’s really raw envy. An analogy would be if Euros came to U.S. and moved into Indian tents, and started wearing Indian clothes only, and did law suits to get the “right” to be the Head of the Shamans or whatever, and put the Indian out on his butt, and slept in their teepee, and then insist only whites lead the peace pipe ceremony, and take away beaded shoes from Indians and give them to their own wives, and change eating habits to be totally Indian. That kind of thing.
Think how weirded out the Indians would have gotten. And then re-make all the Indians myths with white people, and erase cave drawings and put white people in the picture. Really think about this.
And has it ever occurred to anybody that MILLION of WASPs (real ones, not weird looking storybook people in argyle shirts, lmao), ARE SITTING RIGHT THERE the whole time? One understands we’re all slated for the chopping block, lol, but at the moment, some dreaded WASPS do still exist. They NEVER say it.
How many times have you really heard a WASP just slam you—as a WASP! Excuse me, I’m a wasp—then just let you have it!
Seriously— It’s the only racail-ethnic-religious reality literally DEFINED in dictionaries as a perjorative term. Get your mind around that! WASPS were born, lived and died under movie after movie with them portrayed this way, spoken about as if they are not there, etc.
Once I stopped somebody going on and on and on about “wasps” and just said, “protestantism is a religious perspective” (I could talk about that for hours)— The person was stunned. Truly, he was so encoded with “wasp” as a cutdown and synonymous with “elites” (we will continue to be “wasps” regardless of how poor we get, lmao, what an ass he was)— that he finally just shut up.
WASPs have that weird chair where they just listen to everything and everyone. Catholics say we’re heretics, jews that we’re not human. NEVER have I heard anyone say anything NICE about the wasps. Pat Buchanan is the closest (he’s Catholic). I think he actually has some decent feeling for those who are most likely children of the (real) founders and all that. He actually sounds WORRIED for the wasp—he’s the only one!
But the jews have come mostly, not with real revenge or resentment, but a seemingly secret sense (really deep down) that wasps really are better than them.
In fact, it is this that makes people question the holocaust. Hurt people, people for whom a nation donned uniforms and fought on their behalf (WWII) simply do not act in this manner after others have helped them. So, kids start to wonder. (If a nation died in a war to save you from camps… would you go on t.v. and gloat just a few years later about how you’ve managed to displace them and get rid of them —children of the founders, mind you— from the Supreme Court and all other places where they are slated to be erased from?). No one needs to see propaganda, or hear an “alternative” perspective, to begin to wonder about such behavior–just from the present on the pundits on t.v..
The saddest part is how many American jews never really got far from the ny/chicago, even FL kind of axis. Small town americans, often still traditional prots, are some of the best people in the world.
The Wasps enable(d) the Jews. Who cares if the latter devours them? They’ve been vectors for the tribe since Cromwell’s day, and when the Anglo-Saxon bunch and its hypocrisy, greed, and Europhobia go, so goes the entity that lives off of them. It’s actual a pleasure for some of us – Irish, Germans, Ukrainians, Persians, Croatians, Italians, Rumanians, etc… to see obese Brits and their overseas offshoots consign themselves to oblivion.
Twelve people talking to the ether electronically and Matt P – a genuinely good fellow, and intelligent to boot – claims that the world belongs to those twelve. Sorry, bro – just because one group will go down doesn’t mean yours is going to be the one there to fill the vacuum. Like the guy says above, let’s be honest about assessments. Your “group” is so far down the scale cladistically you have to identify yourself by the color of your skin. 800,00 Americans in America First, an organization whose only purpose was to avoid getting into war, and you think that today, 2011, things are so rosy that the whole future earth belongs to a few guys who clack at keyboards?
Tis the era of the merchant folk coming in full force – the Hindoo, the Chinaman, the rest. Your/our slide into slavery has been going on for a long time, and it’s not going to get better tomorrow. It doesn’t work like that.
There isn’t a single one of you who’s within a million miles of a lever on the means of production, and you’re not going to be allowed there either.
It wasn’t ONLY the WASPs who enabled the Jews. The French, Germans, Dutch, Poles and especially the Arabs and Turks did too.
The WASPs just happened to have a more efficient economic system than any of the others.
I’m not a WASP, and I’m very proud of my ethnicity, but in America, the only salvation is rally around the WASP culture—not as dominant and all-pervasive, they’ve lost that, but at least as a basic foundation upon which to build a consensus.
Go ahead. Cackle at the prospect of our demise and mock our desperate attempts to save ourselves from genocide, hun. I didn’t ask you to care if my people and I are devoured and I don’t care if the rest of the West gets a sick pleasure out of it. Your ressentiment parallels that of the Jews and it will poison your spirit, as it has, theirs.
I can’t right the mistakes my forefathers made, though I believe the record shows that they were often borne of naivete and no greater than the mistakes made when other nations struggled with this same affliction. It may be foolhardy of me to believe I have what it takes to find and pull “the lever”, to pull the sword from the stone. But I believe it’s foolish of you to write us off just yet. If we can redirect that same spirit of boundless optimism and curiosity that much of the Old World finds so obnoxious about us toward this problem, we might just redeem ourselves.
Not that you wouldn’t find new reasons to cough up poison and disease in our general direction.
Don’t take “hun” seriously, or “Serevus” or “der weiße Engel” or any of the fakers that spew anti-American, pro-Nazi sentiments. None one here is making anti-Germanic statements, but note that people like “Hun” or “Severus” or “der weiße Engel” – who may all be the same or related persons – insist on sewing dissension among Whites. In this case, they are trying to drive a wedge between Germans and Anglo Saxons (who are very similar genetically by the way). Why?
Because they are simply agent provocateurs trying to subvert White Advocacy. The endless stream of hate they have spewed against White people (British and American in this case) would not be the tone of people truly concerned with White culture.
They are a sham.
Don’t despair, Anne. The turn of the century wave of immigration from Southern/Eastern Europe was hard, but it didn’t end up as badly as you think.
I’ve spent most of my life with Greeks, Serbs, Poles, Bulgarians, Croats, and Italians. While it’s true that there is some disparagement of the WASPs, it isn’t inordinate, and there is something else–true admiration and an implicit understanding that much of the successes of these people was from internalizing WASP values.
While many of these people want to maintain their ethnic identity and culture, you wouldn’t believe the degree to which they’ve absorbed WASP culture. They might go to Catholic or Orthodox Church, but the celebrate Thanksgiving as if their own ancestors were at Plymouth Rock. They read Chaucer and Shakespeare as if it were their own literature. They study Alfred the Great and William the Conqueror. They are familiar with John Knox and John Wesley.
You have so much more to offer than the Jewish purveyors of “culture.”
Sure there are Nancy Pelosis of the world, but there are traitorous WASPs too.
As can be seen from the period before and after the War, moral and cultural consensus among the European peoples of America can happen– does anyone dare to try and restore it?
Thank you, Athanasius. Northern WASPs are not my favorite, but actually, the Central and Eastern non-jew Europeans have always been categorically welcoming. Anyway, the silent, unspoken lives of wasps is nothing anyone cares about—but we should probably make some samizdat on that, in case people ever get sick of crap movies s/a this one and Maury Povitch and shrink and court tribunal shows, and can’t speak Chinese. Just trying to address this “naming of oneself by so many others” that one goes through whenever watching msm.
There are some people here who post some stuff that I consider to be pretty crazy, BUT at the very least, European people are taking back the narrative of their history and culture (though in a small way… literature, academics, film must follow). Whoever controls the narrative, to some degree, controls thought.
Honestly, I consider white Eastern/Southern Europeans to have nearly the toughest time moving up in society in modern America. But there is one group I think has it tougher: White Scotch-Irish in the Lower Midwest and the South. They aren’t connected to any of the East Coast privilege, and yet in the eyes of every major university/law firm/medical residency, they are “privileged” white people.
If you are Scotch-Irish from some small town in Kentucky or southern Indiana, and you have above average intelligence, your chances of getting admitted to Northwestern or Cornell are MUCH lower than a far less intelligent black or Hispanic (to say nothing of our modern nomenklatura)–and yet, people will expect, demand really, that such a person ‘admit’ that they are really privileged and have all the advantages in life. It’s absurd.
@Hun, that’s pretty much my point. It’s like you believe some images produced in some hollywood movie. You take such relish in the hate and destruction of people, (so you say). Who? People working in mines in the U.S.? Who are suffering plant shut-downs in the mid-west and so on? They never gained anything.
Wrong, sister, I relish the destruction of people who have been instrumental in the destruction of my own people, and it has nothing to do with the tribe’s boring student films. The Wasp – from England, from Kwa, from Canada, from the Antipodes – was instrumental in tearing apart our world last century. Granted, this is the upperclass variety, the one that constantly shat on his kin beneath him, but that kin beneath him are a wretched lot as well. You make the mistake that Celine pointed out and always decried – you give some type of moral highground to some miner in W. Virginia or some factory worker in Michigan, when either is in all likelihood scum like everyone else, cramming his face, glugging his swill, rahrahing the big game and buying the jew narrative for most things but drawing the line when it comes to himself. These bottom of the barrel ones aren’t so great either, with their bumperstickers, their eagerness to kill Persians or Arabs or Germans, their consumerism, their borrowed cloud god. Nature takes care of false outlooks, it takes care of those who aren’t ruthless or intelligent enough to gain and keep power. For as long as these people believe any drop of the jewish mythos, from the torah ensconced in their wacky bibles to the modern tale of plucky zion surrounded by all-powerful enemies, they’ll elicit not an ounce of sympathy from me. Kwa has been filled with lower-case white morons for a long time, always eager to hate, always eager to kill whomever they’re told to kill. It’s time they go. And go they will. Actually, they’re for the most part gone already – a lumpenproletariat with no power at all, and thus we witness, and suffer, the inevitable sinking into the morass.
BTW, I like the picture you paint above about the Indians and the bizarreness of this whole scene we’re all witnessing daily. The weirdness of it begins to fade when biological consciousness and the corresponding evolutionary and ecological terms are applied though.
A subtle sleight of hand in the movie that many have missed is that they try to turn the dispute between the Winklevoss twins and Zuckerberg into solely an issue of character, while undermining the strength of the Winklevoss’ legal case, which is in reality quite strong.
jew tv has done all it can to try the case on tv and portray Zuckerberg as a genius. hero and boy wonder.
I rejected facebook for a very long time because some jew was getting rich off it. Now I enjoy talking up race on the Tennessee Titans facebook page. You’d be shocked, shocked at the number of friends I’ve made there. Yet none of these people ever actually say anything racial on the Titans site. They secretly support my comments tho. The main open response is to call me a racist and say football is not about race its about the game. I just soldier on.
Going back to Sunic’s comments about “staying academic”. I think the tea party people belong in the American3p and yet they are not even aware of it.
Perhaps this movement is too academic and not enough political. There are all these millions of Americans who need this party, yearn for it and yet nothing is happening to bring them in. The republicans will be able to hi jack the Tea Party movement with people like Sarah brain dead Palin.
I would ask the academics to hire a James Carville before its too late. If money is a problem then they should all come together and use their brains to see what Carville does for his clients and then try to figure out what they need to do.
I was banned from the forum at the old TOO site for something i said they didn’t like. Obviously I’m not educated or academic enough. But I have worked to get candidates’ names on the ballot in my state. The state coordinator in Nashville, phoned me to say that I was the most successful at getting names and asked if I would tell others across the state how I managed to do this because they were having problems.
I volunteered to collect names for the A3P in my state and this was after I was banned from posting here. Nobody ever replied to my email until about 6 months later. By that time I was pretty fed up. They are always posting stuff on here about low IQs, Southern people’s IQs are 15 points below those of Northern Whites, that sort of thing.
This may be very academic and there may be stats and studies etc etc etc. But this is not the way to run a party or a movement. It makes Southern people feel unwanted, unwelcome and undesirable. If we were otherwise made to feel welcome, everybody made to feel welcome, then factual information about IQ would be no problem but we’re not made to feel welcome. The tone, the overall effect is just not welcoming. I certainly do not believe in PC and the facts are what they are and I want to know the facts. But the way its been done on TOO is just not a good thing politically.
If they post intellectual articles, which I love even if I don’t always comprehend, I want to learn, I want to read this stuff. If some people get the articles, great, if others don’t, it doesn’t matter. Let them post here and feel welcome. People are here to socialize with other like-minded people and they will wonder off onto other topics and even personal topics. That should be ok rather than getting people kicked out.
Academics should transform themselves into politicos. Make people feel welcome. I may not be brilliant but I can collect names and get candidates on the ballot. I may not live in a desirable to-the-academics state like Massachusetts but I live in a state that is full of White people who are racially aware, unlike the brains in MA.
It’s actual a pleasure for some of us – Irish, Germans, Ukrainians, Persians, Croatians, Italians, Rumanians, etc
so ‘hun’ writes in English, probably from an Anglo-Saxon country, relishing in our ancient respect for free expression, free association.
Keep in mind also, hun, that we are one of the world’s great martial races, we are slow to anger, but when angered, our anger will not abate. Just look at the Indian Mutiny for a lesson in that.
And when Anglo-Saxons get angry enough, there will be no safe corner on earth for the corrupt Jewish elite who have abused our trust.
Anglo-Saxon elite through corruption, I grant you, but mainly naivity , offered to share power with Jews, whom guilt-tripped them “Why the jew quotas in harvard,” etc. Jews abused that trust and stabbed WASPs in the back, now they are turning our institutions on US – harvard, a school founded as a seminary, is a bastion of anti-christainity and Zionism. (Kevin MacDonald documents this quite well in several articles refuting the wave of recent books and articles justifying having 3 jews on the supreme court (articles like ‘its cuz we’re smarta’
Not that Hollyweird isn’t run by Jews who hate, hate, hate WASPs, but the Zuckerberg character in the movie seemed very unsympathetic (downright nasty and obnoxious, in fact) and the Winklevoss twins came across as fairly decent people.
Zuckerberg character in the movie seemed very unsympathetic (downright nasty and obnoxious, in fact) and the Winklevoss twins came across as fairly decent people.
from your Gentile point of view. but zuckerberg in the eyes of someone in the jewish commuity, is a hustling, sharp, hardworking guy, the wasps are snobbish, aloof, and dimwitted.
“…but zuckerberg in the eyes of someone in the jewish commuity, is a hustling, sharp, hardworking guy, the wasps are snobbish, aloof, and dimwitted.”
Even after centuries in civilization, they’re still desert peddlers, bowing and scrapping when they have to and happy to slice out your kidneys and sell them when you turn your back. At long last the goyim are starting to see this.
“Barbara January 7, 2011 – 8:43 am They are always posting stuff on here about low IQs, Southern people’s IQs are 15 points below those of Northern Whites, that sort of thing.
This may be very academic and there may be stats and studies etc etc etc. But this is not the way to run a party or a movement. It makes Southern people feel unwanted, unwelcome and undesirable. If we were otherwise made to feel welcome, everybody made to feel welcome, then factual information about IQ would be no problem but we’re not made to feel welcome. The tone, the overall effect is just not welcoming. I certainly do not believe in PC and the facts are what they are and I want to know the facts. But the way its been done on TOO is just not a good thing politically.”
This is, I suggest, at root, a logical and linguistic issue. When people refer to an IQ difference of 15 points they are usually referring to a GROUP average (a Standard Deviation is 15 points and one SD either side of the mean accounts for 2 x 34% of the entire population). One has to learn the language of statistics and probability, that’s all. When researchers and applied professionals talk of norms and an individual’ score s relative to peer norms, they are talking in a specialist language which can not be easily translated back into Natural Language (that is why the specialist languages of science are created, i.e to be able to say things which can not be clealry said in Natural Language). A lot of muddles are created through trying to say and write things about behaviour in Natural Languages, and the trouble arises because Natural Languages are not up to reliably handling ‘quantification’ (a technical logical term) issues. Technically, this is because Natural Languages are not ‘truth functional’, which means we are never really sure what we are saying in them, hence all the (often heated) argument. This is because these languages are ‘intensional’ and it’s worth spending some time trying to learn about the logical problems which intensional languages are prone to in order to appreciate why the more extensional alternatives have been created. Note, many psychologists fall foul of these problems too. More these days than say 40 years ago.
“from your Gentile point of view. but zuckerberg in the eyes of someone in the jewish commuity, is a hustling, sharp, hardworking guy, the wasps are snobbish, aloof, and dimwitted.”
Exactly right. I live in an area with many orthodox Jews. My WASP sensibilities do not go over well here. I am too polite and considerate. I do not have it in me to behave as belligerently as would be necessary to keep my place in line etc.
Svend, I hate to tell you this, but you may have to learn to be as brash as they are. Your decency and politeness only enables their immorality and vulgarity to triumph.
I wish I didn’t have to say that, but the most important thing, above all else, is the truth.
To fender_strat, if you understood writing code, you’d realize that it was one of the easier elements in creating Facebook. The real story, besides that of yet another Jew stealing someone’s ideas, is the Jewish money that jumped behind Facebook and has worked to exaggerate its real worth.
Exactly. A Pump And Dump IPO is being set up to out-Madoff any previous such scam. There is a synergy here between the Hollywood pump and the Sacks ‘O Gold dump. Hold tight your wallet when the ‘opportunity of a lifetime’ is rolled out.
“To ask why he hates them is to make the same mistake the Winklevii made: grasping for a universal honor code in a tribal universe.”
Now that is a line that is going to be remembered, Matt you are a wordsmith I will tell you that.
Very informative I had thought, until reading this article that the Jew invented the whole thing, I should have known better.
In the latest news from WikiLeaks, a newly-disclosed, classified, U.S. diplomatic cable from 2006 reveals that Coca-Cola and other companies complained that a key Israeli cargo crossing for goods entering Gaza was rife with corruption. The memo indicates that Israeli officials asked a Coca-Cola distributor to pay more than $3,000 to get a truckload of merchandise through the Karni Crossing. Other companies that complained about the corruption include Procter & Gamble, Caterpillar, Philip Morris, Westinghouse, Hewlett-Packard, Motorola, and Dell.
“Svend, I hate to tell you this, but you may have to learn to be as brash as they are. ”
I feel like a bad person when I’m impolite or pushy. I’ll not live here for much longer. On balance it has been a good experience as my eye are wide, wide open.
Off to Portland for me.
I used to feel like a bad person also when I was impolite or pushy, but I recognized that as a matter of survival, I had to put those feelings aside. Just as I would never kill an animal unless I needed to do it for food or not kill another man unless in self-defense, I recognize that in certain situations moral niceties must become secondary.
These are NOT nice people. (Has no one ever wondered why they’ve been eventually kicked out of every country they’ve squatted in? It wasn’t because they’re smart, rich or clever.) When they can behave with decency and manners, let manners be shown to them, but while they are loud, vulgar, rude, selfish and obnoxiously ego-centric, recognize them for what they are and deal with them in kind.
Plus, someone already said: It’s a mistake to look for universal principles in a tribal universe. They almost never look for universal principles, so why should you afford them the decency of doing so? It will be lost on them anyway.
David, the scientific language is a language that I don’t understand. Math is my most hated subject. I have a mug that says, “I’m an English major, you do the math”. I’m hopeless when it comes to that stuff.
I’m not sure what their point is in talking about those issues. But I do think that they need to be more politically smart in order to get more support.
Jason says:
“I think she acknowledged his (Nietzsche’s) influence.”
Oh, indeed? I have never seen such an acknowlegment.
Please tell me where I can find it.
And what are the “substantial differences” Rand had with Nietzsche? I think they were surface differences.
Not to mention, she plagiarized her book “Anthem” from Yevgeny Zamyatin’s “We.”
The person posting here as “hun” is yet another Jew on patrol, seeing if the current tack is the way to go to attempt to discourage whites. He/them post the same lines about WASPs, lower class whites and whatever on other sites. Ignore these types of posts. Or simply disallow them, delete them. Our racial enemies allow few if any dissenting viewpoints on their “Free Speech” sites. We should do the same. And claiming that to do so would lower us to their level is not accurate. We could never sink to their level. In anything.
Reginald January 6, 2011 – 12:51 pm | Permalink Matt,
What’s happening a lot of times is Jews are living in the past.
Other times, though, they’re probably just pretending to live in the past because to help the public underestimate how powerful they average out to being.”
What’s that Nietzsche said?
“Anyone who has spent a lifetime fighting an enemy has a real keen interest that their enemy – stays alive!”
He also said words to the effect that, even long after having been set free the slave insists that he can still hear the rattling of his chains.
I think this sums them up rather nicely.
And not just them.
What’s that Nietzsche said?
“Anyone who has spent a lifetime fighting an enemy has a real keen interest on making sure that their enemy – stays alive!”
“Hollywood machine is threatened by the plummeting costs of production”
I liked this article, a lot. But I didn’t get this line.
Shouldn’t it be “threatened by the rising cost of production”, and not plummeting?
Or am I missing something?
“Barbara January 7, 2011 – 4:20 pm I’m not sure what their point is in talking about those issues.”
It goes some way towards explaining why very small groups (e.g. in this case, just 2.0% of the US population and 0.5% of the UK population) *can* exert disproportionate social, political and economic influence. In the UK, the British Chinese comprise the same 0.5% proportion of the population, come top in our state schools, but do not have the same salience politically, socially or economically. Why not?
It raises some important questions about democratic freedom, fairness and Social Justice (see John Rawls’ Theory of Justice) and whether the liberal (libertarian) democracies (West and East) legislate and regulate justly and eugenically. If one accepts that cognitive diversity is largely genetic, one must ask if it’s just or in the collective interest, that those who are advantaged by their genetic inheritance are economically priviledged relative to those who are not. In the same vein, if one is born attractive, does one deserve prizes? If so, what has one done to deserve them?
These are difficult questions which (especially socialist) societies have long asked. Compare and contrast the People’s Republic of China’s Stalinist constitution with that of the US rights based constitution, and the EU’s 51 human rights articles (part of the post WWII European Project).
Libertarian societies appear to have fudged this issue, making out (contrary to the now abundantly available evidence from behavior genetics), that everyone is born equal, and that enironment and personal hard work determines how people turn out (and should be rewarded). In the recent past, young adults were led to believe that they should live by caveat emptor and let market forces (Natural Selection?) determine value. Look what has happened.
Most people do not understand the nature of meritocracy. Michael Young (who drafted the 1945 Labour Party manifesto which all but led to a Fabian/Stalinist Welfare State in the UK in the 50s through 70s where the means of production, exchange and communication were nationalised) created the term in 1958 to warn people of the dangers of meritocratic societies (a theme taken up by Richard Herrnstein in the early 70s through to his death in 1994 when ‘The Bell Curve’ was published, ironically with a Libertarian, Charles Murray). Just before he died, Michael Young wrote a damning criticism of Blair’s abuse of the term ‘meritocracy’. Blair’s New Labour government made much of ‘education, education, education’ (just as the Bush administration did of NCLB), but in the end, like mass immigration, and like so much libertarian policy, it’s just been grist to a dysgenic consumer mill (alas, few living under libertarian regimes fully appreciate how, and so readily vote for self-destructive policies which primarily serve those making money out of undiscerning consumers).
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2001/jun/29/comment
Here’s a more local illustration of the dire consequences which I suspect you will be familair with (see the video, feb 2007 note):
http://www.ets.org/perfect_storm
and here’s ETS’s best shot three years on (think genetics and US population projections for 2050):
http://www.ets.org/research/news/ets_report_progress_stalled_closing_black_white_achievement_gap
In conclusion, it’s primarily a matter of demographics and politics. Participants in discussions here (and this blog generally) might find it fruitful to consider what can be *positively* learned from studying the behaviour of this small, endogamous, networking, group.
Paradoxically, non violent anti-semitism can be good for Israeli Zionist immigration, and for group cohesion/solidarity in the USA.
I just went to FB and Liked TOO to make sure the CIA or NSA or Mossad know I follow it, but then I know they know that already.
Brattain and Bardeen deserve much of the credit for the invention of the transistor. Bardeen went on the win a 2nd Nobel prize, the only such individual, in the field of superconductors.
To be fair, some of Lilienfeld’s work anticipated the transistor (as did that of many others however).
Despite protestations by modern media, the fact is essentially all of modern science, math, and physics was invented by White European males.
Does this remind you of little Bernie Madoff? As Americans say:- Follow the money and find a ??? I leave the rest to you.
“Shouldn’t it be ‘threatened by the rising cost of production,’ and not plummeting?”
A lower cost of production means a lower barrier to entry into the industry. And that means more competition.
so what’s the point of talking about jew dirty tricks and their takeover of social websites if we don’t create our own social websites.
you can just complain so much about the actions of others. at some point you have to realize that you should do something. Where are White people and why are we not doing anything. Why don’t the Youth for Western Civilization create something like facebook? Or even better come up with an original brilliant idea. The best defense is a good offense.
that’s the problem i have with our leadership, they keep telling us all the bad things about what jews are doing that we already know. why don’t they DO SOMETHING rather than act like blacks and complain about what’s being done to us?
I defend the decision to write this article, as pieces like this have enormous leverage. They convert a movie made by our enemy into a propaganda video for us.
“We” have created a social networking site, New Saxon. Don Black was on the scene very early with Stormfront. Andrew Yeoman has done some creative guerrilla marketing work. Craig Langley has been creating epic poetry, Alex Kurtagic and Kyle Bristow have written novels.
Please be patient with us. It’s not like coming up with a brilliant idea and executing it flawlessly is easy.
I think there is great value in learning to critique movies and television, as well as other aspects of culture. We need to develop a language for discussing Jewish influence, a language that will be understood by a wider audience and allow us to stake claim to high moral and intellectual ground.
Too bad the jew controlled media doesn’t sell New Saxon like it has sold facebook.
I had never heard of New Saxon but now I’ve joined and I’m going to spread the word to all my facebook friends. Thanks for telling us about it.
Now, back to my original complaints about you guys. Under the social networking on THIS PAGE, facebook is listed but New Saxon is not. I am speechless.
Jason please don’t sit around trying to think of a language. We already have plain English so why not use it. At this point what exactly do we have to lose. Its time to call a spade a spade. Who cares if jews like it or they don’t, tell them to kiss your A$$.
I am attempting to log in at New Saxon but I’m being forced to wait for approval. You are kidding me. How the heck does someone decide who to approve and who not to approve i’d like to know.
if facebook is owned and controlled by jews, not even they care if stromfront is on there. they just want people to sell ads to.
this is what i’m talking about. unless people sound like academics they can be blocked from posting at your sites and now you’re actually checking people out before they’re allowed to use new saxon. good grief
Dear Barbara … you are raising many valid and accurate issues. You are surely right to be somewhat perplexed and frustrated. But meantime, please give these guys some slack.
It is a hostile world out there, and frankly I would definitely prefer if those operating and managing “New Saxon” continue to run stringent checks (approval process) on all those who ask to join.
Remember something that is very important … Facebook has historical connections to (1) the CIA, (2) DARPA, and (3) the highly sinister, Information Awareness Office … a fact I attempted to advertise when I posted that link to the YouTube video a few days ago (plse scroll up). Facebook started out with massive funding (kicked off with $500,000); the kind of funding that “New Saxon” is never likely to have in the foreseeable future. When you are that well funded you can afford to relax about who joins.
Facebook is a ring-fenced sub-section of the Internet. Its principle function is to build a database on that part of the world’s population who have made the mistake of joining, followed by acting as a worldwide marketing arm for Wall Street and the City of London. Another way of interpreting why it exists is to simply see it as just another expression of Huxley’s book, “Brave New World”.
Anglo Saxon, why are you, a person that praises the Third Reich and the Fascist Axis powers, a person that attacks the Allies every chance you get, complaining about government intrusion into our lives? The Axis powers you idolizes would never allow this level of dissent.
Barbara January 8, 2011 – 7:25 am “.. why don’t they DO SOMETHING rather than act like blacks and complain about what’s being done to us?”
Perhaps because they ‘lead’ in libertarian (anarchistic i.e deregulated) democracies, where most laws are drafted and enacted to limit the power of the state in favour of free-market consumerism (and ‘choice’) which determines values.
This is why the study of cognitive ability (and group statistics and demographics) are so important I suggest. It just requires high school level maths too. Male-brained people tend to take to this sort of analysis more than female-brained people do though. Our liberal-democratic societies are far more feminised than they used to be, and there are consequences. If one wants regulation, one has to look to systems of governance which are currently vilified by the liberal-democracies, and especially by the USA. This, I suspect, is why 1930s Germany keeps coming up in these blog comments. Why not look to China today as an alternative? It’s far more relevant to the current liberal-democratic economic situation too. Note China is governed largely by male technocrats who were trained in the sciences/technologies. Females play a minor role in high government in China. Why?
I don’t know the answers David. I guess its just frustrating to feel so helpless all the time when I would really like to make a quick march back thur our institutions and get rid of all the jews.
I am now using newsaxon and I recommend it to everyone if you’ve not tried it yet.
The only problems I have with the site are – they publish whatever private information you use to sign up – i thought, like facebook, i would be given a choice in what to make public!!! So be warned when you sign up!
Also, the colors are so dark and foreboding!!! Why? Those colors are depressing to me. Lighten up for crying out loud.
but you do get to create your own page and fix it as you like so you can make it light, thank god.
This brings us back to another time-honored problem, which is that of incompatible subcultures and the futility of everybody all “working together”. Would you really invite your 17 year old niece to set up an account at a place dominated by criminal gang subcultures, many of them actively associated with real life prison gangs?
The Jews have been victims of themselves since the genocidal and fratricidal Moses dragged them around the desert – eating mushrooms and complaining – for forty years and then settled them in the only region of the Middle East where there are no petroleum resources. Be sure your sins will find you out!
Barbara January 8, 2011 – 9:27 am “The only problems I have with the site are – they publish whatever private information you use to sign up – i thought, like facebook, i would be given a choice in what to make public!!! So be warned when you sign up!”
If you fancy a few hours of masochism, you might try reading some of the material at my website. Most of it iis quite old now, and is what was suitable as a public summary of work done on mundane behaviour profiling and management in the 80s and 90s within controlled environments. One small aspect of this was something called SASHA (Security and Sociometric Handling) which was used by security departments to identify Nth order social connections amongst potential trouble-makers.
A little knowlede of the Predicate Calculus and Relational Theory can go a long way in conjunction with appreciation of the natural limitations of all human cognition without the aid of scientific/computational support. Facebook etc appear to be Data Mining tools, so your caution is just wisdom at work. Most people will no doubt impulisvely rush in not knowing or caring what’s extractable by such systems (hence the recent Goldman-Sachs valuation of Facebook?). We live in an ever more deregulated, consumer society, people should think about that more perhaps?
Matt YOU are the one who told me about that site. I set up an account because I thought it was a recommended site by you. You named it as one of the accomplishments of White activists such as yourself.
““We” have created a social networking site, New Saxon. Don Black was on the scene very early with Stormfront. Andrew Yeoman has done some creative guerrilla marketing work. Craig Langley has been creating epic poetry, Alex Kurtagic and Kyle Bristow have written novels.”
David, where is your site? It seems like with everybody publishing their personal info it would be useless. SS has all the info on everybody anyway. The government’s computers know everything, not to mention the credit card companies.
Get this, my credit card company sent me a pin number – the very pin number I have for my bank card account.
I called the bank and they kept repeating “its a coincidence”. Yeah and next I’m going to hit the lottery no doubt.
They have my pin number for my bank account and there is nothing I can do about it. The bank asked if I wanted to change my pin number and I told them I didn’t want the bankcard company to have to go to the trouble of finding my new number.
My bad.
Barbara January 8, 2011 – 2:30 pm David, where is your site?”
Note that some contributors names are in brown and some are in black. Those in brown are links.
Here’s something else to think on, which I hope is helpful. In statements (i.e truth-functional sentences, i.e ones which can be said to be true or false), positions in arguments are marked by quantifiers (e.g. pronouns, ‘it’, ‘she’ etc). Quantifiers are logical connectives (there are 7 logical connectives, and these can be reduced to combinations of AND and NOT). These are important tools of reference and ‘memory’. There are two (logically related) quantifiers: ‘Some’ and ‘All’ (these are the existential and universal quantifier respectively). These are related, in that Some(x)=Not(All(x)) and All(x)=Not(Some(x)), where Some(x)=At_Least_One(x). This is mportant when referring to groups (classes) and their characteristics, be this rocks, people, dogs, fruit etc. When discussing groups (all scientific statements are relations between classes, at minum a pair of observations), some statements about classes (groups) will be true but trivially so, as the statement will come down to at_least_one(x) being true. A lot of ‘racism’ dissolves when one carefully thinks this through (see earlier comments). A lot of heat is generated by people trying to talk about matters in Natural Language(s) when basically, these languages are not fit for this purpose. This is why we have created artificial languages (the languages of science (physics, chemistry etc) and computing).
Matt, parties such as the a3p do not have to associate with undesirables but it seems to me you need their votes.
This elitist attitude will get you no where. Of course it may allow you to feel superior and be one of your ego’s coping mechanisms.
Its interesting that you focus attention on New Saxons but you ignore the fact that the Tea Party people are not interested in the a3p.
you should do something about your inability to take criticisms. I now view you as weak where before I may have respected you. you’re coping mechanisms are very immature. Not to mention petty and selfish.
I’m from a trailer park and grew up on food stamps and free school lunches. I have a general diploma from a small town high school and missing teeth. I don’t know what criticisms I failed to take or how I acted “elitist”. I don’t even remember the criticism about the italics and I never got upset.My reference was to criminals and prison gangs, not to people who are “beneath me” or less fancy than I.
There’s been a misunderstanding…
You must have gotten upset about the criticism regarding the italics on the site and now you feel safe to take that out on me. Go ahead. I can deal with it.
People can read the above posts and decide for themselves.
A Modest Proposal to Remove the Comments Section (well maybe not)
The articles and features on this site are great. Some of the comments are very good and normally I would say it was very constructive for people sincerely interested in White Advocacy to have a free flowing forum to discuss ideas and approaches to helping the cause. However, while I have no input or influence on this site, if it were mine, sadly, I would consider shutting down the public comments section. Why?
Because it is swamped with two types of very bad comments:
1. The disruptors who know they are trying to hurt White interests by tying it to Nazis, socialism, anti-Americanism and bizarre anti-technology rants.
2. People who may be creepy Hitler fetishists who have stumbled onto this site and think someone wants to listen to their psychotic breaks. They are also using this site to drive traffic to their pro-Hitler, anti-American sites.
When you consider the damage the above does to intelligent White Advocacy, then the comments section may not be worth it. It pains me to say so. I just know that a person stumbling onto this site may be fascinated by the articles, but if he reads half the comments, he will want to retch and this may poison his interest in White identity. Perhaps another alternative would be to automatically scrub posts that include certain names (Hitler) and terms, but that would probably prove too difficult in practice.
I am sure the comments section will remain, and perhaps it does more good than harm. But if it continues to degenerate into an America bashing, Founding Father hating, pro-Hitler cesspool, then I would understand why it had to be shut down. Perhaps regular contributors of articles could still post comments and we would still have the great articles!
Oh what a sweet little Jew-boy you are Jason! Always so full of ideas and wanting to share them with us.
Listen my little cross-dressing Pwincess, why don’t you sit down in front of you little pink keyboard and tell us something about yourself?
Anything will do. Perhaps you can begin by telling us from which State you write your missives? Oh yes, and also … which subject did you major in? Assuming, that is, you did major in something.
Now don’t keep us waiting! You are our favorite little poodle so we are always looking forward to seeing more of your Torah-Bora comments.
No one is falling for it Severus. Your are trying to conflate White Advocacy with Nazism, for the purpose of undermining White Advocacy. You know full well that making constant anti-American, anti-Anglo, anti-British hateful statements on a site in the ENGLISH language (and probably read almost exclusively by people from the countries you are bashing).
You and der weiße Engel and Anglo Saxon, et al, need to go find a new strategy. No one is falling for it.
They remind me of those leering, subversive yiddish comedians of early Hollywood, crashing WASP parties, harassing women and this was all suppose to be funny.
Jason, your modest proposal has a THIRD type of bad comment–those made by people who do not know what they are talking about, who toss off flip comments.
In other words, I am still awaiting your reply to my comment of Jan. 7 at 5:36 pm, wherein I asked you to provide support for your statement that Ayn Rand gave Nietzsche even a smidgin of credit for her philosophy, the most part of which she appropriated from him.
Still waiting, and my mind is open.
But the experts on Nietzsche, the Solomons, say the same thing that I said about Miss Rand.
Thundertoad, our discussion of how one philosopher influenced another, and whether I responded, is hardly going to drive people away, like praising Nazis would. Let me see if I can find the reference. I just know that Rand talked about her admiration for Nietzsche but ultimately went in a different direction. You cannot really equate the Randian viewpoint with that of Nietzsche. If you are, then you haven’t really understood them.
I smelt the movie as bs propaganda even before it came out. I wouldn’t even go watch at the dollar theatre in the ghetto.
I’m confused. Every Jew I see looks White and European to me. These Khazar Zids at Facebook are nothing more than Talmudic Zionist.
Kyle
And to whom did Nietzsche give credit for his philosophy?
Just wondering..
Perhaps from the same culture his math and language originated?
Interesting comment earlier re. living in Jewified culture.
Consider Dick Durbin, seen this morning, while arguing with Lamar Alexander on the impending legislative battles and defending the health care bill, make this comment: The only perfect law was passed by “Senator” Moses, who wrote it down on tablets and passed it down to us….
Such a comment, despite its asinine and kiss-ass import (surely the media-heads loved it), is symptomatic of something I have observed for over 20 years – the mainstream culture is slowly but surely being Jew-ized. Casual references to Jewish prophets, tens if not hundreds of Yiddish words creeping in (tchotchkies being the latest I have come across), and descriptions of America as a Judeo-Christian nation gaining currency beyond the sewage that phonies like Savage popularize.
It is as though the USA is Jew-S.A., and it is as though it is the sacred duty of Americans of all stripes to make the world safer for Jews…. Not sure if any of us can do much about this though.
The Goyim have themselves to blame because they are subconsciously restricted in their belief systems.
The Christian Goyim believing in the gobldy gook in the Bible & Creationism & Virgin births etc. etc. is regimented to believe almost anything without question.
The Jewish Torah & Scriptures have always encouraged Jews to take advantage of the trusting ( gullible) Goyim even convincing them to accept Jews as the Chosen people .
Until the Goyim can shake off the yolk of Religion they are doomed to be the slaves of their Jewish masters.
The Religion of the Goyim is programmed to be subservient to Jews , 50 % of whom are Atheists anyway.
Meanwhile Hollywood keeps pumping out “Fantazy Movies ” keeping the Goyim in a state of belief in the absurd.
@ Mathew …
Absolutely correct; I could not agree more!
I posted at length (with links) on this topic at TOO several days ago. If you care to read it, then please follow this link to an earlier Tom Sunic article and scroll down about a 1/4 way: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/01/feminism-and-women-on-the-right/
Or instead of scrolling, enter this string into your Browser Search facility (CNTRL-F) to quickly find on the article’s page: “January 2, 2011 – 3:38 am”
That makes perfect sense. After all the Enlightenment is what really blocked their path to power.
I don’t get why some of you are so obsessed with the Evangelicals.
I second MN’s opinion. We can’t recover the preeminence of America’s western heritage so long as we go around whining and wailing that we’re sinners and begging “God” for forgiveness. While it’s important to acknowledge one’s limits and weakenesses, it’s cultural and societal suicide to abase ourselves with imaginary transgressions…even as our non-shellfish eating brethren are instead extolling and encouraging each other that they’re the chosen ones.
Jews may seem 50% atheist but we must remember that, to a Jew, his Race is his Religion.
Why blame them? The most terrifying thing this is the millions of zombie WASPs who regularly and predictably finance Anti-WASP Hollywood dribble and even take their dates to ‘Meet the Fuckers’, watching foul-mouthed Jewish actors bad-mouth WASP society and Christian culture, and thereby enabling scheming Jewish financiers to cash in on bungling Jewish producers, inept Jewish directors and hack Jewish scripts.
There was a photo of the schmuck (zuckerschmuk) You could see only his reptile eyes! So no surprise for me. What the “morlocks’ are doing, we know, & wait,soon…………..
Jews usually just do things better. Some of them can be as God-less as the rest of society… but facebook is just way better than myspace…
If myspace would have been as good… it would still be around.
facebook targed educated students and Edu’s first… then it went to older people
myspace targeted high school teens and their teenbopper problems….. why would older people or educated people want to be on that scene?
I should have done the same thing 10 years ago when I was in college.
Quite.
No matter how you dice and splice it, Facebook is an incredible phenomenon. The details of its founding have and are being tested in court. Mark Zuckerberg like many successful people attracts great envy. Visionaries who are way ahead of the curve are not in the same ballpark as many others. Many people will try and copy his model but as all reasonable know, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. Jealousy is also a dangerous curse.
The german word “Schadenfreude” is missing the “e” in your article.
Best regards from old europe.
The american dream has gone to hell,the people that have brought this blessing to you since 1913 are those from the Synagogue of satan(Revelation 2:9,,3:9),read this book for free on internet to see what else they have in store for you,more blessing like 9/11,more war and total destruction of your country.
Read the book.
Who Is Esau-Edom..Who Is Esau-Edom.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19745589/Who-is-EsauEdom
i am an aussie anglo-celt – and i marvel that educated white people in your country (america) – have been judaised to such an extent that you even hate being white – you are guilt-ridden about what your ancestors did to the indians, negroes etc …this is all jewish brainwashing – i am a fellow anglo and i can tell you that my people builet australia to be one of the greatest countries to live in – after world war two – lots of jews tried to emigrate to oz – but the Government – as well as ex-servicemen actively resisted it – we didnt want to become a judaised-zog ridden country – run by self-chosen central-asian `jews`- thank Christ my ancestors had the foresight to see this – seemingly not your ancestors – even benjamin franklin warned against jewish emigration – NOW YOUR COUNTRY IS RUINED BY THESE VERMIN – wake up before its too late!!!
ps fuck you hasbara (zionist trolls) – reading this message – the anglo-saxon-nordic peoples are waking up and we are reclaiming our power!! why dont you jews fuck off to the outer reaches of the galaxy? – because i wouldnt want to be you in the coming years…..
Careful sunshine…
owen
January 10, 2011 – 10:19 am |
Your Australia is ruled by Jews as demonstrated by your own Rupert Murdoch who marched Australia full speed ahead into Iraq to do the bidding of Israel & its Jewish American 5th column.
, a
Like it or not, Israel is the Libertarian-Democracies’ front-line in the Middle-East. That’s how and why it was created in the first place. It thus gets a lot of leeway and support.
Solely as an exercise, just try seeing it from an Israeli point of view. It must account for some of their sometimes quite bizzare excessive stress response behaviours. No wonder they band together. They probably believe they are fighting for the Amercian Dream, i.e Libertarianism – anarchism. They won’t understand why any back home oppose this. They will see that as self-destructive. What is it which is self-destructive? Is it narcissism?
“And to whom did Nietzsche give credit . . .?”
The Solomons (Robert Solomon and wife, Kathleen Higgins Solomon, both PH. D.’s) list Socrates as #1, although Nietzsche had some problems with him. But also on the list of admired people are Jesus , Zoroaster, Goethe, Sophocles, Emerson, Spinoza, Kant, Schopenhauer, and Wagner.
In fact, F.N. had problems with just about everyone he admired, but of the people he did admire–he admired their integrity.
I feel the same way about Ayn Rand. Her novel, “The Fountainhead” is very good, if read as satire. But I have problems with her very first chapters, in which Howard Roarke tells why the Parthenon is not good architecture. But in fact, the Parthenon is a work of genius.
Ayn Rand had a lot of integrity . . . on paper.
Jews such as Jason also have trouble with Ayn Rand, but for different reasons. She portrayed her heroes as blondish-type Aryans, and Jews don’t particularly like that.
They do seem to like the community-disintegrating brand of capitalism that she espoused, though.
“Behold, in the Kali Yuga, the Thundertoad shall belch forth hideous ichors which will give visions to those whom I love, and destroy those whom my soul abhors.”
Jason Speaks January 10, 2011 – 11:03 am I just know that Rand talked about her admiration for Nietzsche but ultimately went in a different direction. You cannot really equate the Randian viewpoint with that of Nietzsche. If you are, then you haven’t really understood them.”
So long as people persist in naively (i.e non-self critically) ‘arguing’ (or ‘debating’) that one can or one can not demonstrate “understanding” etc with respect to such matters, very little will be gained other than very hot heads and bad feelings. because this (the domain of the intensional verbs of propositional attitude) is precisely where logic, truth and reasoning all break down and for known language/logic reasons (see Quine). That being so, perhaps we should all be wary of all of those who assert that they CAN behave fairly and rationally in such linguistic contexts? As I see it, all that happens is that individuals group together, i.e collude, validating each other for mutual (often economic) support (easier for small ethnic groups which are bright and feel unpopular?). This is truly the domain of (irrational) politics and it’s also why talk of a ‘knowledge based economy’ is largely vacuous too – as work will be shunted overseas where it is cheaper. The ‘knowledge economy’ cashes out as computer programming or some other tangible labour based, service, so, I say, beware, as there’s a cost to all of those living in ‘free’ Libertarian democracies inspired by the likes of Adam Smith, Ayn Rand, Alan Greenspan etc, and that cost is more competitive and abundant labour overseas, as domestic populations shrink, both physically, and as they are cognitively dumbed down (e.g. via female liberation lowering the birth rate amongst the more cognitively able and by higher immigration and birth rates amongst less cognitively able groups).
For me it is hard to tell if the explanation for the problems of the Liberal-Democracies can be fairly laid at any groups’ door (these problems also occurred in the 20s and 30s in the UK and Europe). Might it not just be that Liberal-Democracy itself is inherently and demographically flawed?
http://www.ets.org/perfect_storm
Dumbest article ever. While I have no comment on Jewish control of the media it is obvious that the writer has no understanding how innovation takes place. You don’t go and invent a car until someone has already come up with wheels engines and all the other parts. So just because someone already had an idea for a car but failed to build it or because you didn’t invent the parts for it, does building a working car make it any less of great innovation.
Products and scientific theories evolve. The person who can put all the parts together and unify them into a new and useful idea or product becomes the innovate.
Facebook didnt invent social networking, but neither did myspace or the Harvard Connect founders or even Friendster. Social networking is almost as old as the internet itself and was first used by researchers and academics to establish connections between people working on similar projects called USENET.
Now, I can also come up with an idea for a device that let’s people teleport across the galaxy, but until I actually have a product that works or people want to use I am hardly an innovator. Facebook is a product people want to use. Myspace is not.
The innovator is the person who comes up with the new idea. You can’t just make up your own definitions when the spirit moves you. Zuckerberg deserves credit for having the programming talent and business acumen to bring the product to fruition, and I gave him that credit. But that credit doesn’t extend to pretending that he’s an innovator.
The innovation regarding Facebook is applying gated community exclusivity to the model. The Winklevoss twins came up with that, and it’s understood by everybody except for you to be what set Facebook apart from the crowd of competitors. You can argue that new ideas aren’t all that big of a deal, or that somebody else would have thought of this particular one, but without it, Zuckerberg never would have pursued the project.
Now, I can also come up with an idea for a device that let’s people teleport across the galaxy, but until I actually have a product that works or people want to use I am hardly an innovator.
If you actually came up with the idea for the contraption, you would be an innovator. While implementation is important, billions of dollars go to patent holders, presumably because those patented ideas have innate value. Often, the innovators are several steps removed from implementation, but it’s not like a chemical researcher has to actually brew up, mass produce, and market his chemical to be the innovator.
Would he be hosed without those intermediaries? Absolutely. But that doesn’t make the intermediaries more important than the innovator, or even, *face palm*, the true innovators.
I never asserted that anybody involved in this innovated social networking and I didn’t deny that innovators rely on previous innovations, so you’re on your own with that tangent. I also never claimed that Facebook was unpopular or undeserving of popularity.
David Longley, wha’ chu talkin’ bout?
A Reply to David Longley:
Critiques of Randian Studies paradoxically focus on embodiment whether this is suchness as an embodied identity that has realist properties or the inscription of labouring bodies through a process of raceless capitalism. In my musings I consider the ways in which suchness may be best understood as a prosthetic that can situationally be attached/detached from objects that display a quantifiable objectivity, as per Ayn Rand and the Objectivist Institute . Paradoxically, this flexibility of objectivism increases the raceless capitalist’s powers of symbolic and material control over environments and the bodies of people of Semitic genetics. In earlier times I have considered prosthetic objectivism to be mostly associated with ruling class masculinities, or Ayn Randian-type lesbians . However, in certain contexts this ruling class discourse may become generalized. To examine how situationally this might be the case I examine capitalist and objectivist literature (‘For the New Intellectual’) that considers the racialized other to be embodied, mindless, Jews (‘jewzombies’) and surviving entrepreneurs to be disembodied, primal, heroic (almost Nordic) agents. Using popular culture, public information films and the recent preparedness information in the UK on ‘Islamic rape’ I show how people of colour are positioned as non-agentic, static and (most significantly) as immobile and riskily obscene bodies as opposed to the portrayal of ‘objectivist’ subjects in preparedness as mobile and able subjects whose genetic survival is at stake, along with the intrinsic freedom to copulate.
Well said owen 10:19 am
The Jew parasite have been kicked out of 79 countries in the past for what they’re doing on a global scale. Stealing the hard work of the “dumb goy”.
Time to kick the blood sucking leeches off the planet!
Such vitriol !
Jews are over-represented in many fields of human endeavour. Strange how a people and faith founded on traditions dating back 3500 years is still around. G-d is great !
Mar Samuel of the Academy of Sura stated in his interpretation of Jeremiah’s prophecies that we are commanded to “Seek the welfare of the nation you dwell in !’. i.e. The better the patriot the better the Jew.
What does that say about your “kick the jews out” theory ?
I thought Wilhelm Reich was the most hated scientist in America
Adam, Yuri Gorksenbach has interpreted Jeremiah’s prophecies in a different way.
He says that Jews are indeed commanded to seek the welfare of the nation they dwell in . . . “as an intelligent flea (assuming there were such a thing) might seek the welfare of its host–in order to further its own continuance and replication.”
Gorksenbach continues: “After all, what good is a dead dog to fleas? They cannot derive any benefit from it. It is in their best interest to seek the welfare of the dog, in order that they themselves might continue and replicate.
Indeed, it would be to their best interest to promote the welfare of the dog, although ONLY AT A SUBSISTENCE LEVEL.” (Emphasis mine)
“Furthermore, these ‘intelligent’ fleas must promote and establish their own in the seats of power.”
I think this explains how the Jews are “over-represented in many fields of human endeavor.”
Interesting, I’ve never heard of William Shockley, “the most hated scientist in America”. But, I would like to offer you my story (with over 50 documents) on:
http://www.universitytorontofraud.com
This story is prohibited to be reported in the media, but should be of interest to you.
Have a look at comment 5 in the link below which specifically covers NYC (the financial, and some might say, the cultural, centre of the USA.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2007/09/wednesday_19_september_2007.html
Then think of Miami, and Los Angeles (Hollywood). If an ethnic population is small nationally, but geographically concentrated in specific urban areas, and if said group assortively mates (endogamously), is it not likely that over-representation will occur in some behaviours, especially if gene and phenotype frequencies are lower in other out-groups in the same location? This may not be fair, and it would indeed highlight inequality (and maybe even a demographic/political strategy), but why would one expect otherwise, except to reject the Null Hypothesis? Would one not expect this to be especially likely in Libertarian USA where freedom of association and anti Big Government (anti-statism) is prized so highly?
I notice the “Thundertoad” gives credit (sorta) to those from whom HE has benefited.
Consciously, to a degree.
Subconsciously, certainly.
It is indeed Kali yuga, after all.
Here’s a follow-up empirical question, which may well be easily answerable on the basis of public domain data given that SAT and NAEP (The Nation’s Report Card) data is available down to the city level for some US cities. Given the demographics highlighted in the earlier post’s link, and given the mean ethnic group differences widely reported in the professional literature, would one not expect the mean White NYC SAT and NAEP scores for NYC to be higher than that of many other state capitals (ceteras paribus)?
Hopefully, this heuristic exercise might help some to start thinking more fairly and constructively about how these admittedly very difficult issues might be productively thought through. as historically, group (e.g. company) competition has been actively promoted by the Libertarian USA as ‘The American Way’. Clearly, some in the USA (and elsewhere), don’t like it when they see its modus operandi nakedly revealed. But do they have an alternative in mind, and if so, why is it not manifest?
Reply to Anglo Saxon
January 10, 2011 – 4:26 am
Please do NOT agree more & then proceed to direct me to a earlier Tom Sunic article and scroll down about a 1/4 way: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/01/feminism-and-women-on-the-right/
I read as far as this statement “Be it in European mythologies, be it European sagas, be it in real social and political life, White European women have always displayed an extraordinary amount of free will and bravery ”
What nonsense when you think of the Irish & other Catholic Women who to this day are the most indoctrinated Religious bigots ever.
The god or the “Church lady” types ruled by so many pedophile priests & ruling their households as an extension of the Christian gobldy gook particularly the Roman Catholic variety.
No IMHO the Christian ladies were & remain the most easily indoctrinated subservient people ever , believing in Virgin Births & worse that obviously Jewish & Athiests & sensible people can not help but find humor & horror glaringly evident.
Mathew I notice that website you link to is a communist anti-American site. Why would someone concerned with helping Whites support a Communist Leftwing site?
I agree in the main with everything in your comment but you have missed a point that only considerable spiritual training would enable you to see.The great strength (so we believe ) of white women from saga days etc has been perverted.It’s still there but now doing something repulsive (ie the insanity bigotry etc you descrbe) but it flows from that inner core of strength all the same, i believe.
Consciously, to a degree.
Subconsciouly, certainly.
Superconsciously, definitely.
…”He was the most hated scientist in America, dying alone and in disgrace, having allegedly been reduced to “harangu[ing] strangers on the inadequacy of the Negro race.”
Isn’t reprinting this unsourced, unflattering and probably untrue quote like kicking a man when he’s down? At the end of the documentary movie about German Jewish psyops soldiers trained at Fort Ritchie Maryland these two old Jews are filmed riding around in a car having a good laugh over the “Hitler had one testicle” meme they’d made up and fed to the media in occupied Germany.
Shockley was a Nobel Laureate and a gentleman. I doubt very much that he
harangued strangers about anything, least of all Negro inadequacy. I first learned about him and his ideas on race from a Playboy interview which was conducted with respect.
Isn’t that why the Jewish Establishment despise Wikipedia ; truth destroys lies , like light destroys germs.
“Dying alone and in disgrace, having allegedly been reduced to “harangu[ing] strangers on the inadequacy of the Negro race.”
An example of anti-white history, and a malicious lie about a deceased man of honour and merit.
Jason Speaks
January 11, 2011 – 6:55 pm
wha’ chu talkin’ bout?
Any jews who hate Shockley should boycott the fruits of his labor – which includes all modern electronics. They could then run their crooked banks with an abacus and their fingers for counting.
Adam, jews are overrepresented in some endeavors, and underrepresented in others. They are overrepresented in the endeavor of thieving and lying and bragging, and underrepresented in the endeavor of being good neighbors and citizens and of course fighting their own wars.
The first part may be explained by genes and their having migrated to live in a hospitable political-economic environment for higher rates of expression and reinforcement of the behaviours which you any many others find so repugnant.
Second, as to the wars, they probably reason (with some justification), that they are fighting for LIbertarianism. Especially in Israel. They are just part of that army against those who would thwart their freedom to do as you describe (caveat emptor).
Are you beginning to get it now?
One can be right, and wrong about some of this you know.
What matters surely, is what one can do about it practically all things considered? Are you aware of what you may be taking on, and how many of those around you are pulling the other way, not knowing what they do?
Again this is mean to be helpful. To focus, not undermine you.
Well the case of the two Winklevoss brothers has been thrown out for good by a judge named Alex Kosinski of the 9th circuit. Does anyone know if this judge is Jewish?
http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2011/04/litigationdailywinklevoss.html
Have you ever seen his appearance on the Dating Game? That should answer your question.
I just finished reading a ebook which might explain if Jews were really driven to steal Facebook.
The author explains Jews, use their analytic left brain more than their more creative right brains. So more of them went into media, Hollywood, banking, Wall Street and the new internet ways of collecting information on people. Any field which puts to use the more verbal left brain. Not as mechanics, or people who build with their hands.
While Germans, more right brained, head more into car production and building things. They use their right brains for spatial intelligence more.
Explaining the respect for German engineering.
He purposes that the old Jewish God is really a hidden supermind hidden within Mankind, using all the left brains in the world. Naturally favoring Jews. The new world order is an hidden agenda from this.
What we call Satan, is a rival supermind build out of all the right brains in in the world.
With both superminds fighting for control of the world.
Even Italian and black crime is explained by these ideas. And much more.
I got it for 2 dollars off Amazon – ‘God Stopping A Nuclear War’ .