Japan vs. America

Edmund Connelly


Hiroshima, 64 years after the bomb

It seems more and more Americans are taking a sour view of the way things are going for the country — and rightly so. “By all accounts,” our editor Kevin MacDonald writes, “particularist anger is welling up in White Americans — especially among the middle and working class — outraged at the changes they see.”

Curmudgeon James Howard Kunstler has been repeating his mantra about an America in decline: “The failure of leadership extends through government to the news media to business to the universities to the courts. All authorities are suspect. All are dishonest and cowardly.”

How can one deny that the “nation” is not in free fall? It really strikes me that it’s only a matter of time before one of the critical pillars of collective life collapses and brings the whole rotten structure down around us. I mean, isn’t it obvious that the promised multicultural utopia has degenerated into a dystopian nightmare formed from what used to be our country?

Advertisement

Pat Buchanan’s been making the same point as well. “In communist countries in the Cold War, all understood that the government did not represent the people. The state was at war with the nation. That idea is taking root in America — the idea that our government no longer seeks to represent us.”

That’s probably putting it mildly. Paul Craig Roberts writes more ominously about America’s likely future: “The Roman Empire lasted for centuries. The American one collapsed overnight. Rome’s corruption became the strength of her enemies, and the Western Empire was overrun. America’s collapse occurred when government ceased to represent the people and became the instrument of a private oligarchy. Decisions were made in behalf of short-term profits for the few at the expense of unmanageable liabilities for the many. Overwhelmed by liabilities, the government collapsed.”

Robertson adds, “On July 12, Niall Ferguson, an historian of empire, warned that the American empire could collapse suddenly from weakness brought on by its massive debts and that such a collapse could be closer than we think.”

Today’s column, though, is not about the state of America. It is, rather, about a leading competitor, one that has gotten right so many of the things America has gotten wrong for half a century. That country is Japan.

Over three years ago, Jared Taylor published a cover story in his American Renaissance magazine called “In Praise of Homogeneity: The Japanese know how to run a country.” It began:

I have just returned from several weeks in Japan, and am again struck by the forceful example that country offers of the advantages of homogeneity. As the years go by, Japan’s steady record of successes stands in ever-greater contrast to America’s failures, and to its inability to think seriously about the kind of country it is becoming…. [T]he Japanese have a much better chance than we do of surviving into the next century as a coherent, prosperous nation with a culture and civilization it can unmistakably call its own.

Taylor liberally used photographs to show how clean and prosperous Japan had become. For instance, even manhole covers were artistically designed. Of course he mentions the enviable conventional wisdom about Japan, that “there is essentially no place at no time that is or feels unsafe.”

Manhole cover in Takamatsu City on rural Shikoku Island.

As an opponent of the open borders, non-White immigration that has prevailed in America for decades, Taylor makes the contrast with Japan’s. “We are told over and over that immigration is an inevitable consequence of world travel, of a shrinking globe, and that without big doses of foreigners a country cannot be truly international or participate in the global economy. Again, Japan proves this is nonsense.”

To drive home his point, he imagines what a fresh-eyed American tourist would see. “Still, what probably first strikes a visitor from America is the sense that Japan is simply more advanced than the US. There are many things that contribute to this impression, but some of the most important are that everything seems to work, everything is clean, everything is orderly, everything spruce and tidy.”

Having been the beneficiaries of a rising currency for decades, millions of Japanese have been able to travel, work and study abroad. Thus, they have gained the ability to begin assessing their own country’s status in the world. As Taylor wrote, “Many Japanese realize that, in many respects, they have a better country than we do. They envy us our continent-sized country and our raw materials, but they no longer see us as a model for much of anything.”

Jared Taylor

Mr. Taylor, who grew up in Japan until he was sixteen, knows what he’s talking about when it comes to Japan. Fluent in Japanese (and French), he continues to work on projects related to Japan. Back in the mid-1980s, when Japan was just heading toward the center of the American business radar scope, he published a book called Shadows of the Rising Sun: A Critical View of the Japanese Miracle. A man with such a perspective is a good source, especially since he is fully a race realist.

Having read his AMREN story, I was therefore even more impressed last year when I viewed an Internet page that pointed out the irony that America, the country that won the war in the Pacific, was now far below its  adversary, Japan. To make the point, it contrasted Hiroshima and Nagasaki with Detroit 64 years after the war’s end:

We all know that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed in August 1945 after explosion of atomic bombs. However we know little about the progress made by the people of that land during the past 64 years.


DETROIT — 64 YEARS AFTER HIROSHIMA: Welcome to Detroit …next 2 Exits – Drugs- Ammo


The wave of Japan-o-philia began with Harvard professor Ezra Vogel’s bestseller Japan as Number One. In support of the book, influential postwar ambassador to Japan, Edwin Reischauer, wrote that, “Japan today has a more smoothly functioning society and an economy that is running rings around ours.”

An odd thing happened after that, however. With all the praise heaped on Japan for its “economic miracle” of the time, it was inevitable that contrarians would emerge to challenge that view.

For instance, trade negotiator Clyde Prestowitz’s Trading Places: How We Are Giving Our Future to Japan and How to Reclaim It. There was also The Enigma of Japanese Power by Dutchman Karel Van Wolferen. Unlike Vogel, the authors here argued that yes, Japan was economically successful, but it was a threat to America.

This argument was surprisingly advanced by a writer for The Atlantic Monthly, James Fallows. Originally, he was the chief speechwriter for liberal Democrat President Jimmy Carter, but he became critical of Japan upon being posted there by The Atlantic in the late 1980s. To this day, it remains rare for a White American liberal to be so hard on a nation of non-Whites. This was particularly true of his highly readable essay “Containing Japan.”

Japan’s prosperity continued, causing many observers to claim it was more a bubble than real wealth. Sure enough, from 1991–93 Japan experienced a humiliating bursting of its “bubble economy and beginning of its “lost decade.”

But was the Japanese downfall real? A friend of mine living in Japan claimed things were just fine — Japan’s economy was humming along like before and that its factories were constantly moving up the economic food chain. “Look, I’m living in Japan. They used to live in rabbit hutches but now have soaring concrete condominiums and park their luxury European cars in basement garages.” In the mid-‘90s he sent us Blindside: Why Japan is Still on Track to Overtake the U.S. by the Year 2000. Written by feisty Irishman Eamonn Fingleton, it actually amused me because I liked his over-the-top prose.

By the late 1990s, my friend had bought a house near Osaka, Japan’s number two city and actually seemed to prefer life in Japan to that in America. Increasingly, he hated the coarse pop culture in America, especially rap and hip hop. And whenever he’d come through L.A. or New York, he’d be appalled at the cities of Babel they had become, what with Jamaican cab drivers and Iranian shoe store managers and the proliferating numbers of convenience stores run by Indians (the ones from India). This was not, he continually harped, the America he had grown up in.

His life in Japan was now better in most ways than it was for family members back home. In his view, the big difference between Japan and the US was that the Japanese government was structured to work toward the greater good of Japan and its people, even at this late stage of capitalism. This was true throughout most of Asia. Japan was still conscious of nationality (race really, since 98% of residents in Japan are pure Japanese). Because of government policy, businessmen could not line their own pockets short term at the expense of the long term good of the country.

America — but really most of the Anglosphere — was different. Everything was geared toward immediate profits and big bonuses for offshoring manufacturing rather than for long term viability — individualism run rampant. This lack of concern for national interest extends even to critical areas of our foreign policy — designed by people with a passionate attachment to a foreign country.

As for the argument that with its aging population and plummeting birthrate, Japan has no choice but to allow massive immigration, the Japanese disagree.  You see, the “must have immigration” argument applies only to White nations. Japan, China, Korea, and Taiwan are having none of it, yet they are prospering. This came up in responses to a Steve Sailor VDARE column by a reader from Japan:

I commend Steve Sailer for yet another on-target laser beam concerning America’s death-by-immigration and the bipartisan roots of this self-made disaster.

An irreversible disaster too, for this is the one lunacy that can never be expiated—except through untold misery, nation breakup, violence, and not infrequently, civil war.

One of Sailer’s most important contributions is to highlight the prominent role that American Jews have had in this dissolution.

It’s a brave thing for Steve to do, for it exposes him not merely to a barrage of “nativism” and “racism” projectiles but also to the concussions of “anti-Semitic hate” grenades lobbed from the well-fortified trenches of the Treason Lobby (links in original).

The letter writer, using the pen name Takuan Seiyo, admits that Jews played a prominent role not only in our disastrous immigration policy but also in our disastrous civil rights legislation and “the dysfunctional minoritarian tyranny that has resulted from it.” Funny then that he would attack Kevin MacDonald as an anti-Semite when they’re making similar arguments. (MacDonald responded here.)

I was reminded of all this when I read an article recently by new TOO writer Christian Miller. This time he was writing on Greg Johnson’s Counter-Currents site and he used the case of Japan to argue that only White countries were being targeted by genocide through immigration:

Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world. It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline. There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce. The elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system. The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate. Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent. Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor. Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan. There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans. Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration. Japan is not the target. Japan is free to remain Japanese. It is only White nations that are targeted for White genocide.

That’s a good point. Let’s face it, immigration is not inevitable, especially in the case of America. We had plenty of Whites (nearly 90%, as Miller writes), so what we really needed was a pro-natal policy rather than an “invade the world, invite the (non-white) world” policy.

But we are ruled by a hostile elite that knows exactly what it wants to do to us. Will we ever truly resist?

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

204 Comments to "Japan vs. America"

  1. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    February 20, 2011 - 11:17 am | Permalink

    Taylor. He’s right about Japan, of source – but why does he associate with so many Jews? His events are crawling with Jews. Even Chabad Jews. You know – the Jews tht think it’s OK to kill a Gentile, if a Jew needs an organ transplant? I mean, at the last “conference” – he completely screwed over his faithful followers. One would have assumed that one had stumbled into a Bnai Brith meeting. Taylor has also snubbed Kevin MacDonald for years.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 20, 2011 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

      Maybe Jared Taylor actually thinks the self image of whites is the real problem.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      February 22, 2011 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

      Agreed, Cirian. I attended one of the AMREN conferences and the much-touted “mystery” guest speaker who was to pull everything together at the end turned out to be some kind of black-garbed rabbi.I had guessed it would be Pat Buchanan. What an outrage!

  2. Ex-Pro White Activist's Gravatar Ex-Pro White Activist
    February 20, 2011 - 11:34 am | Permalink

    We had plenty of Whites (nearly 90%, as Miller writes), so what we really needed was a pro-natal policy rather than an “invade the world, invite the (non-white) world” policy.

    When was this? It sounds like early 1933 during FDR’s first term.

    I think the “USSR vs. USA” is undoubtedly a more instructive analogy.

    Surely I can’t be the only one feeling a wave of nostalgia at watching the Muslim uprisings against corrupt secular dictatorships? It all has such a 1989 Eastern Europe look and feel to it. Corrupt dictatorships aligned with an alien imperial power, armored vehicles of standard design parked on corners and in plazas to intimidate protesters, huge teeming mobs of outraged and deprived people…

    Ooops! Those are US designed M1s and M113s in the background, not T-62s and BTR 60s!

    http://www.aei.org/issue/25991

    This is useful “Collapse” reading. “The Soviet Collapse: Grain and Oil” by Yegor Gaidar. The USA is pretty well on the opposite side of the Grain & Oil equation. Apart from that much else is easily recognized.

    • Thripshaw's Gravatar Thripshaw
      February 21, 2011 - 4:03 pm | Permalink

      The 1970 census showed 89% white, 9$ black, and less than 1% each for American Indian, Hispanic and Asian. (Asians numbered about 400,000 in the ’70 census.) Remember, this census was taken 5 years after the disastrous 1965 immigration bill was passed.

    • T. Threat's Gravatar T. Threat
      February 26, 2011 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

      Thripshaw, the Immigration Bill passed in 1965, but didn’t take effect until 1968. Then Jewish lawyers lobbied for the Asians, Africans, Latinos to up the numbers, create daisy-chain immigration schemes of epic proportion and more. On the side these Jews made sure that ALL Jews are considered refugees, and have no barriers if they want to move to the US. George Soros could move here with no problems.

  3. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    February 20, 2011 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

    I’ve personally had the best of business dealings with the Japanese. I wish I could say the same of the Jews. LOL.

    The Japanese are straight line thinkers. Set a goal, and get there with the least possible effort. Team planning with everyone on the same page. Getting from A to Z without going through every other letter of the alphabet. That sums up the Japanese.

    The Japanese do have their quirks & kinks, but, so do we.

    To me, Taylor is more of a cheap race hustler than anything else. The Japanese may be a good influence on him. LOL.

  4. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    February 20, 2011 - 12:44 pm | Permalink

    FYI: That’s not Hiroshima in the top picture, it’s Yokohama. The huge ferris wheel is Cosmo Clock 21 and the weird-looking building is part of Minato Mirai.

  5. PeteR's Gravatar PeteR
    February 20, 2011 - 12:49 pm | Permalink

    fender_strat is right. Those are pics of Yokohama.

  6. February 20, 2011 - 1:04 pm | Permalink

    The letter writer, using the pen name Takuan Seiyo, admits that Jews played a prominent role not only in our disastrous immigration policy but also in our disastrous civil rights legislation and “the dysfunctional minoritarian tyranny that has resulted from it.” Funny then that he would attack Kevin MacDonald as an anti-Semite when they’re making similar arguments.

    “Takuan Seiyo” is the misleading pen-name of a pro-Western poseur who claims to be half-Slav and half-jew. When push comes to shove Seiyo cares more for jews than he does for Whites.

    If you’re curious why Seiyo attacked MacDonald, consult the exchange at Chechar’s A lightning in the middle of the night! The exchange continued with Chechar’s Tanstaafl on Auster and culminated with Tanstaafl et al on Takuan Seiyo.

    At the time of his Lightning post Chechar was just becoming conscious of jewish influence. He had previously developed a rapport with Takuan and others at Gates of Vienna, a “counter-jihad” blog whose comentariat is dominated by jews, crypto-jews, and deracinated, jew-blind, pro-Israel “whites”. Takuan and others didn’t like Chechar’s change, and in the process of making their disapproval clear they laid bare the jew-first premises behind most if not all of the “counter-jihad” movement.

    Pro-Western jews like Seiyo, or like pro-”white” Eugene Girin (whom Seiyo links in the quoted comment to Sailer), or like pro-Western/pro-”white” Lawrence Auster, are dissembling and dissimulating. They want Whites to stand up strong, but only in order to better defend jews. They detest Whites like MacDonald for educating and motivating us to stand up strong in opposition to jewish aggression against us.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 20, 2011 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

      Well said. That Jew mongrel Takuan is a nasty piece of work, when he’s questioned on the destructive actions of Jews, againt host nations.

  7. JasonW's Gravatar JasonW
    February 20, 2011 - 1:37 pm | Permalink

    While we all admire Paul Craig Roberts for the work he has done for America, he does have the demise of the Roman Empire wrong. He says, “The Roman Empire lasted for centuries….Rome’s corruption became the strength of her enemies, and the Western Empire was overrun.”

    Let’s not forget that the over-praised Roman Empire was a slave-based economy and a vast military dictatorship, and that those who did the over-running were our ancestors for the most part whose beneficiaries we are. Had the Roman Empire maintained its hegemony over Europe, our histories, our cultures, and our customs would conform to the Roman imperial model, not largely to the conquering noble Germanic, Slavic, and Celtic nations.

    In short, the over-runners were really liberators and history-makers, not barbarian destroyers of a worthy project.

    Of course, this does not change the argument that vast genetic lines were killed in the wars of the 20th Century when the best and brightest of our peoples were murdered in compliance with various spurious divisive propaganda campaigns. The white survivors who came back from the 20th Century wars didn’t know what was going on, and brought that ignorance back with them to our fathers and mothers, triggering our home front losses ever since.

    ==========

    “Funny then that he would attack Kevin MacDonald as an anti-Semite when they’re making similar arguments.”

    Anti-Semite is just another name or label given to those who lack a Jewish basis for analyzing Jewish behavior. It is not really different from the labels goy, gentile, and shiksa. But both Steve Sailer and Takuan Seiyo are, by reputation, part Jewish and thus have more ethnic validity to speak of Jewish conduct. Part of the reason for the harvest of name-calling is the feeling that an outsider has no right to name, label, define, or describe Jews.

    I subscribe to the exact same rule when non-white individuals seek to name, label, define, or describe white Americans, and I feel that we need to hurl the most vigorous invective in the direction of the person doing so. I believe that we need to cool our passions at the slur “anti-Semite” and get over it, and polish our invective toward those who slander and name us. It is all part of normal tribal behavior. The white tribe just needs to get as mean with their name-callers as they get with us, that’s all.

    • Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
      February 21, 2011 - 7:27 am | Permalink

      If our enemies attack us in any way, dub them anti-white.

      Pro Whites that aren’t already doing this, or refuse to do so, are simply not in the game.

    • JasonW's Gravatar JasonW
      February 21, 2011 - 11:12 am | Permalink

      Agree with Richard IV completely. We even published a way to respond to hate speech at ResistingDefamation.org after seeing the need. And put a “vicious” in front of that “anti-white.” Just stay focused on the person leveling the hateful accusations, not on his or her demographic group.

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      February 21, 2011 - 9:59 pm | Permalink

      I agree with your proposal,but part of the problem is:there is not such a thing as a “white tribe” and it would be very very difficult to create one.The causes of modern white man’s problems are not the lack of talent but the absence of an adequate ideology and a total lack of tribal behaviour.There has been only one country in recent history that showed white tribal behaviour for a short period of time (only 12 years) with remarkable success,but thàt country was mercilessly crushed by hostile powers ,never to be allowed to show such behaviour again.You know which country I mean.

    • T.I. Likeitis's Gravatar T.I. Likeitis
      February 26, 2011 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

      JasonW, Sailer claims to be part Jewish as an attempt to avoid criticism. He’s adopted, and is making guesses, and part of this is by his ‘looks’, so he says. I live near Sailer and have seen him person many times, he wouldn’t no me of course. In person, he doesn’t look Jewish. That doesn’t mean anything many times, but once again, he’s just another of those big talkers who claims to be part Jewish to try and cut off criticism. Seiyo is a windbag who has never written or uttered an original thought.

  8. Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
    February 20, 2011 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Interesting article demonstrating the strength of ethnic homogeneous societies. BUT: the article seems to downplay Japan’s economic and demographic problems:

    “Japan’s prosperity continued, causing many observers to claim it was more a bubble than real wealth. Sure enough, from 1991–93 Japan experienced a humiliating bursting of its “bubble economy and beginning of its “lost decade.”

    In fact, “the lost decade” continued into the 2000s in terms of demographic and economic recession (stagflation). Also, heterogeneous China (not Japan) is the threatening rising star in the east. Japan is losing ground, at least in economic terms.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 20, 2011 - 3:12 pm | Permalink

      I think it’s debatable whether China is homogeneous. The number 92% is bandied about as the percentage of Han in the country. Many of those people are sinicized separate ethnic groups… on the other hand, many of the 8% have little ethnic consciousness at all.

      I would say that much of China’s success has come about from a sense of collective Han identity… Though this Han identity may be fragile, as it is a result of the 2000-year imperial project.

    • Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
      February 20, 2011 - 3:29 pm | Permalink

      You’re right: That’s why I wrote that China is heterogeneous… Many people seem to forget that the Japanese hegemony in eastern Asia is a modern phenomenon. If/when the Chinese tiger returns in full strength, everything will return to “normal” from a long-term perspective. Whether multiethnic China is as stable as homogeneous Japan is, of course, another question.

    • Geiseric's Gravatar Geiseric
      February 20, 2011 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

      From The Economist (http://www.economist.com/node/17492790 ):

      “In 1995, just before the economy started to lose steam, the working-age population hit its high point, at 87m. Since then it has fallen sharply. If current trends continue, in 20 years’ time it will have dropped by 20m, according to the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. By 2050 it will have fallen below 50m, forming an almost perfect bell curve in one century. Among rich nations, only Germany will suffer a similar fall.”

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 20, 2011 - 6:40 pm | Permalink

      Sigh, there’s Longley, downvoting me.

      All I meant was that China could go either way. E.g., Cantonese people clearly come from a different racial stock than the Han (despite the fact that Cantonese is closer to ancient Chinese than modern Mandarin), and there are two counter-currents. One is for Chinese nationalism, and the other is Cantonese nationalism.

      This also goes for Wu speakers, Sichuanese, Fujianese, and even Shaanxi people. The central government has so far been able to hold all of these people who have varying degrees of Han genetic ancestry together, but the right forces could also tear China apart.

    • February 20, 2011 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

      ” Athanasius February 20, 2011 – 6:40 pm

      “Sigh, there’s Longley, downvoting me.”

      Have you still learned nothing about the folly of inventing one’s own private (psychological) irrealities and arguing about their truth or falsehood?

      Until you and others do see the folly of all that intensional nonsense, you will be wasting your time on all of this rubbish about ‘Jews’ etc.

      It’s subtle, but it’s devastating once you see it. It’s worth the time too.

      Some really very silly people posting here think that truth will go away if they abuse people telling them what they don’t like to hear. It’s known as shooting the messenger. The frequency of such behaviour here suggests that this entire subject area isn’t frequented by the brightest of Americans. Why might that be, and the fact that it isn’t deprive more people of important feedback on their behaviour? That is how meritocracy doesn’t work (or has paradoxically adverse/pernicious consequences). it sorts into divided communities, and you even see people here facilitating just that! They are facilitating class/group conflict! It is not between Jews and non Jew, but between your own cognitive elite and the rest. It’s why you get brain-drains, smart-flight, and the decay of communities. Kevin MacDonald etc may actually be facilitating exactly what The Bell Curve and Michael Young etc specifically tried to warn against. Can you not see the modus operandi? Can you see how such behaviour is self-destructive?

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 20, 2011 - 7:28 pm | Permalink

      Can you tell me how that response relates to anything I’ve written int his thread? I was (semi-)joking because you seem to get angry anytime I portray the ethnic dynamics in China in anything less than a positive light.

  9. February 20, 2011 - 2:12 pm | Permalink

    @ “Takuan and others didn’t like Chechar’s change, and in the process of making their disapproval clear they laid bare the jew-first premises behind most if not all of the “counter-jihad” movement.”

    And not only did they become very upset with me, but after I wrapped my head on the JQ the administrator of Gates of Vienna, a white Christian, stopped short of publishing any more of my “Quetzalcoatl” chapters in his blogsite. Consequently I had to publish them in my own blog: a little taste of the flavor in the blogosphere of what happens when, in MSM, one dares to name the Jew.

    To my mind, Takuan is like Auster: very dangerous intellectuals since they pose as Occidental defenders when in fact they prioritize Jewish interests above all. Beware of half-Jews, especially the half-Jew pundit who sincerely claims to be in our side. Their taqiya is so subtle that they can bamboozle us far more insidiously than any sophisticated Muslim can. In fact, for a time, when I corresponded with Auster and Seiyo these pair bamboozled me.

    I do recommend OO readers the collected exchanges about Takuan Seiyo in the entry that Tan linked above: “Tanstaafl et al on Takuan Seiyo”.

    • February 20, 2011 - 3:40 pm | Permalink

      ” Chechar February 20, 2011 – 2:12 pm

      “Beware of half-Jews, especially the half-Jew pundit who sincerely claims to be in our side. Their taqiya is so subtle that they can bamboozle us far more insidiously than any sophisticated Muslim can. In fact, for a time, when I corresponded with Auster and Seiyo these pair bamboozled me.”

      Beware of narcissists. Period.

      A lot of what goes on is just one bunch of narcissists competing against another. That’s the essence of Libertarianism/anarchism.

      Most won’t be doing it for nothing (and certainly not the benefit of others) either. There will be ‘supply’ of one form or another.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 20, 2011 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

      It IS the Jews. John 8:39-44

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 20, 2011 - 7:42 pm | Permalink

      That Gates of Vienna douche is a singlularly emblemic example of the pathetic. self-negating Shabbos Goy tool. I hope his organs wind up in an Tel Aviv market.

  10. anne's Gravatar anne
    February 20, 2011 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

    This will be unpopular and yes, I’ve read Dr. MacDonald, but how is the immigration act (of 1965) only Jewish? It was the HART-CELLER Act and they are Catholic, (although one was half Jewish), and the Kennedy’s (like Teddy) who had so much play in all this was Catholic. This is a forbidden remark, it does seem, in “white” nationalism.

    A great problem comes out of it, also. If ever mentioned, one is “divisive,” but in reality, many will not join since they simply see the issue of being whether to “chose sides” between jews or catholics, with many 3rd parties being neither and not really caring. Hart-Celler, Kennedys were in fact not jews. Just saying. And this kind of overlook is too large not to be noticed by many.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 20, 2011 - 5:41 pm | Permalink

      I think you are right to point out it not only Jews that have fought for open immigration. We’ve all known Whites that seemed to love opening up the borders. I once worked with a lady that cheered with people from Haiti were shown on TV sneaking into the US.

      So, I think it is mainly that Jewish leaders have provided most of the energy, intelligence, and money to push this agenda. But people like Kennedy should be remembered for the damage they did.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 20, 2011 - 6:36 pm | Permalink

      Also, there are plenty of Jews whose names aren’t on the bill who did a lot to get it passed, such as Javits. And Celler was a Catholic? As far as I know, he identified as Jewish.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 20, 2011 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

      Nah – the Immigration Disaster Act was strictly Kosher.

    • Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
      February 21, 2011 - 7:37 am | Permalink

      History is a fun hobby, but you still have to play the game in front of you.

      We already know that 2% of the USA is anti-white. But we also have at least 50% of whites, that are anti-white/pro white genocide and think themselves virtuous for thinking that way.

      So its time we took the fight to the white anti-whites. Call them anti-white and pro white genocide! Push them out of their comfort zones!

    • Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
      February 21, 2011 - 8:20 am | Permalink

      My feeling is that the repeal was standard operating procedure: Jews lead revolutions but its always the goyim who are the public face.
      I’d like to hear Kevin MacDonald speak to your query.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 21, 2011 - 9:19 am | Permalink

      Teddy went Stockholm Syndrome. After getting loads of help covering up the manslaughter of poor MaryJo – and possibly little Teddy. He also witnessed what the Tribe did to his brother Johnny.

      I never counted Teddy as “White”, Ann.

    • JasonW's Gravatar JasonW
      February 21, 2011 - 11:26 am | Permalink

      Congressman Emanuel Celler was Jewish.

      Internet reference texts on US Senator Philip Aloysius Hart do not state his religion or ethnicity, except that he attended a Catholic high school.

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      February 22, 2011 - 8:02 am | Permalink

      @ Anne

      The Jews couldn’t get anything through Congress without the help of the Roman Catholics. The Roman Catholics are in denial on this issue.

      Hart, of Hart-Celler, was a Roman Catholic!

      As Dr. MacDonald has pointed out the Jews are the prime mover, but, it is obvious that the Roman Catholics have been the pivot.

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      February 22, 2011 - 8:09 am | Permalink

      @ Anne

      Hart is buried in a Roman Catholic Cemetery in Michigan.

  11. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    February 20, 2011 - 4:06 pm | Permalink

    Agree 100% on Japan as a much better model. I think my country would be like that if we hadn’t taken in all those millions of jewish refugees but because we did we’re now pretty much guaranteed a civil war instead.

    It’s wrong to think Japan isn’t targeted for destruction too though. It is. They just don’t have a big enough foothold there yet. If you hang out in marxist or globalist circles / forums from time to time you’ll see they’re already talking about it.

    For now it’s useful to say it is white countries and only white countries but in the long run their paranoia will lead them to try and destroy the East Asians too.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 20, 2011 - 6:50 pm | Permalink

      Longley I have twice provided you with the data proving the size of government did not go down under Reagan. This information is freely available from many sources. You seem to be totally dishonest.

      Again, the last 40+ years has not seen a rollback in the size and scope of government in the US. It has seen a massive increase in government, especially non-military government spending and control. Before 1930 US gov’t spending was less than 10% of GDP, usually a lot less. After FDR it increased to approximately 20% (excluding WWII). After 1950 it steadily rose from 20 to the current 40 percent. So the period of less cohesion, less cooperation, less compassion, actually coincided with the dramatic upticks in federal spending and controls.

      Regulatory control has varied. There have been mild rollbacks in some areas (airline) but massive increases in regulation in other areas (Americans with Disabilities Act, Affirmative Action, Environmental regulations, etc.) If you could educate yourself as to the basic facts, it would make the discussion more fruitful.

      And if you did, maybe you could publish in your field.

    • PeteR's Gravatar PeteR
      February 20, 2011 - 7:04 pm | Permalink

      Wasn’t there some gathering of Jewish neocons last year to discuss long-term strategies for the Jewish diaspora and in which east Asia was discussed as a potential new site for metastasis?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 20, 2011 - 7:14 pm | Permalink

      Peter, here are a couple of interesting articles from Steve Sailer’s site about how Jews are thinking about the rise of China and India and related issues:

      http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/07/china-v-india-which-will-be-good-for.html

      http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/07/foundation.html

    • February 21, 2011 - 1:54 am | Permalink

      PeteR:”Wasn’t there some gathering of Jewish neocons last year to discuss long-term strategies for the Jewish diaspora and in which east Asia was discussed as a potential new site for metastasis?”

      Yes, there was. It was discussed at some length a while back elsewhere in the comments section in these pages. The Jewish assault on Asia has begun, and they are sparing no expense or effort in their concerted, global attack. Click on my name above to take you there then scroll down to the post under my name. Why Prof KMac chose not to weigh in on the monolithic JPPPI and its insidious yet brazen machinations is quite frankly a mystery to me. PS Metastasis? How apt!

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 21, 2011 - 2:13 am | Permalink

      You don’t know the half of it. Language programs across China are full of young Israelis (and American, British, French, even Polish Jews–what are the chances? aren’t there supposedly only 40k Jews in Poland?). And unlike the other Americans who just come to drink and get laid, they actually learn Chinese. I pride myself on my Mandarin speaking ability, but I’ve met Israelis who practically sound like native speakers. The stories I could tell.

      Needless to say, knowing Chinese isn’t that helpful when competing against Jews for a spot in a top school or for a job.

    • Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
      February 21, 2011 - 7:49 am | Permalink

      So the reds are planning new genocides? As usual they are leaving a paper trail any investigator can follow. I can’t wait till the lawsuits against these monsters and their descendants, get underway.

  12. February 20, 2011 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

    “That’s a good point. Let’s face it, immigration is not inevitable, especially in the case of America. We had plenty of Whites (nearly 90%, as Miller writes), so what we really needed was a pro-natal policy rather than an “invade the world, invite the (non-white) world” policy”

    It was/is inevitable, as it was/is in the EU. Many do not seem to understand how Western Libertarian Democracies operate, or more accurately, can’t operate. How would the alternative ever be effectively legislated never mind enforced in any Libertarian-Democracy?

    Even ‘authoritarian’ city-state Singapore failed in its pro-natalist/eugenic policies, and in the EU it would probably be illegal under the FCHR.

    China is constantly criticised by the West/UNESCO for allegedly breaching Human Rights via its pro-natalist (eugenics) 1990s legislation.

    Most people don’t see how they are being destroyed by their own anarchism (freedom).

  13. February 20, 2011 - 5:03 pm | Permalink

    A coincidence? In the last couple of weeks I’ve noticed some links (and even some posts making certain points) are not very welcome here. Is there a bias in terms of what is acceptable?

    Why has there been immigration? Was it not to compensate for the low birth-rates?

    Why does highlighting the dire demographic/economic (all but genocidal) consequences of spreading the USA’s model of Libertarian (Equalitarian) Democracy to post war client states (from Germany to Japan) get the silent treatment?

    Is it anathema to those who blame immigration for their economic and social woes?

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      February 20, 2011 - 5:56 pm | Permalink

      This may not be new to anyone else, but I only learned not too many years ago that during FDR’s war, Japan sank three times of much of our shipping as we did of theirs; apparently only our immense producing capacity saved us. I’ve been wondering ever since what part genetic mixing played in that. Have we been weakened to the point we couldn’t win another war, since our manufacture base is gone?

    • Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
      February 21, 2011 - 9:02 am | Permalink

      One POSSIBLE reason for immigration is white population decline (its all economic), the other is that that is was a Jewish endeavor to 1. get more Jews into the U.S. 2. to weaken the cohesiveness of the white majority.
      I have a question for you David. Throughout the Western World, for the last 60 years, there have been many groups of “rights” seekers – females, gays, atheists, minorities, environmentalists. Why has it all happened so recently? How was the country able to carry on the status quo for 150 years without the rights-seekers having any power? Does it fit with your libertarian anarchist theme?

    • February 21, 2011 - 10:15 am | Permalink

      Brahms February 21, 2011 – 9:02 am

      “I have a question for you David. Throughout the Western World, for the last 60 years, there have been many groups of “rights” seekers – females, gays, atheists, minorities, environmentalists. Why has it all happened so recently?”

      Questions, questions, but you never seem to learn from the answers do you? Now you ask for dumbed down versions of matters instead of wising up? Why? I have explained all this many times since early January. You just have not grasped it, even though it has been stated very clearly many times in many ways. Is your incomprehension down to lack of respect or perhaps ability. What were your SAT scores? You say you are in the field of medicine. Doing what? Can all matters be explained to just anyone? Are we all equals? If not, would you be offended to be told that you were not everyone’s equal? Can you be anything you want? That is the Amercian Dream. But if Intelligence and Personality is largely genetic, and protection from damage?

      To answer your question, it has been to increase the number of workers and consumers, i.e borrowers-in-debt. Debt increases the money-supply and for those in the Private Financial Service Sector (and retail), it increases their commissions and profits. hence the property boom. Hence female liberations (more impulsive disposable incomes, higher mortgages etc not under male control).

      At the same time this anarchism has made regulation to protect such naive consumers (many go childless chasing their empty, narcissistic, dreams) much harder as de-regulation=anarchism) which aids those doing well from Financial Services etc. The financial elite.

      Disproportionately more Jewish people have done well out of living this (rather perverse given the outcome for most) American Dream (which actually genetically dumbs down the population through Differnetial Fertility, i.e skewed birth rates by IQ), but it is not just Jewish people, there are many WHITE Gentiles doing this too. There are only about 6 million Jews in the USA, just 2% of the population, but see NYC demography, which is where I began in January.

      Now the American Dream is looking rather jaded because Libertarianism truly is a slash and burn predatory system which depends on the genetics of behaviour remaining opaque and the equalitarian myth being kept alive via rhetoric and anti-science, whilst statism (regulation) is vilified as tyrannical. It is Libertarians who have peddled political correctness, not ‘liberals’. The USA and EU does not have left-wingers, it has anarchists who used to call themselves Trotskyites (Libertarians really). They were ant-statist too. They hated Stalinism. You can see their efforts to censor and censure even here in this blog. They may not call themselves such, but that doesn’t matter, it’s what they do that counts. You have been playing your own part in this behaviour.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 21, 2011 - 10:31 am | Permalink

      I would point out that Trotsky didn’t have use for Kropotkin either.

    • February 21, 2011 - 11:11 am | Permalink

      Athanasius February 21, 2011 – 10:31 am

      “I would point out that Trotsky didn’t have use for Kropotkin either.”

      Did you look up the Hansard link to Churchill on the German use of anarchists in WWI and the 1917 “revolution”? Did you note that the allies did much the same via Balfour at the same time? Anarchists are used to topple regimes and/or keep regulators at bay. They come in many guises. Human Rights NGOs for example.

      Females make good anarchists. They are not builders. Hence their low frequency in Chinese, former Soviet, and Islamic governance and engineering in general. In fact, if you want governance, as a rule, keep females out. If you want to build and sustain, regulate etc, as a rule, keep females and the feminine-brained out.

      This has been history (except in the self-destructive Libertarian-Democracies).

      These are the facts.

    • February 21, 2011 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

      Thanks David -for not answering my question. You did give me the dumbed down anarchist economic theory – but that was nothing new and not what I wanted. Let me make it very simple – assuming that it is anarchists and not liberals who push things like hate crime laws, feminism, immigration, atheism, noble savage ideal, “equality”- who is informing the change agent’s philosophy? Where did it originate? Is it some organic philosophy that just popped into people’s heads in 1960?

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      February 21, 2011 - 8:39 pm | Permalink

      You’re buried under a landslide of fear and loathing, as demonstrated by the multitude of “Thumbs Down” votes your comments have received, Mr. Longley.

      Stating the obvious truth looks like a traitorous act against the state these days, doesn’t it?.

      Take comfort. Being right has its own rewards.

  14. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    February 20, 2011 - 5:10 pm | Permalink

    China is constantly criticised by the West/UNESCO for allegedly breaching Human Rights via its pro-natalist (eugenics) 1990s legislation.

    China the first mature Fascist state according to Leddeen) has not got anything which can be called a eugenics policy.
    Has China come to the end of history. China’s one-child policy doesn’t apply to Muslim ethnic minorities or Africans by the way.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 21, 2011 - 12:35 am | Permalink

      I wouldn’t worry about lack of ethnic consciousness among the Chinese. I’ve been called “ghost man” and “overseas devil” more times than I can count there.

      I’ve also been to “chocolate city” as mentioned in that article. Most Chinese are terrified of it, but it persists because of the number of Africans who go to the Canton Trade Fair.

      This is perhaps a representative example of the Chinese view of Africans: http://www.chinasmack.com/2009/stories/shanghai-black-girl-lou-jing-racist-chinese-netizens.html

      just read the comments.

    • February 21, 2011 - 9:11 am | Permalink

      “China the first mature Fascist state according to Leddeen”

      Naturally.

      Ledeen’s a Libertarian. He will have lots of supporters in the USA, Israel and EU. Not in China, Russia etc though.

  15. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 20, 2011 - 6:14 pm | Permalink

    There is a school of thought that Japan was “targeted for destruction” by western banks in the 90′s. It has not fully recovered from the experience. China is next and the “West” (as in the banks) is demanding a floated currency so they can trade it. The consequences are inevitable …

    • Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
      February 20, 2011 - 10:05 pm | Permalink

      Interesting thought.

  16. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    February 20, 2011 - 6:26 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks February 20, 2011 – 5:24 pm

    Perhaps David Longley is arguing that ‘libertarianism’ facilitates abortion and contraception. These have in turn led to the demographic crisis inflicting the West.

    This raises philosophical questions about the nature of freedom and how it is exercised? I am not convinced however, that this blog nor even the blog format itself is a suitable vehicle for such a debate.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 20, 2011 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

      Well it seems that abortion and contraception are available under many forms of government, from ‘libertarian’ countries to outright socialist ones. Russia has the same issue for example.

      Nor is it clear that geometric expansion of the population is always a good thing anyway. The main problem is mass open immigration.

    • February 20, 2011 - 6:48 pm | Permalink

      “Perhaps David Longley is arguing that ‘libertarianism’ facilitates abortion and contraception. “

      I’m drawing attention (repeatedly) to the demographics. Look up the TFRs of the Libertarian-Democracies.

      It doesn’t matter what anyone thinks is causing this. It did not happen in the former USSR or Warsaw Pact until Libertarian-Democracy was imposed upon them by the USA. This does not happen in Islamic nations who are resisting the USA’s imposition of this anarchism, just as Iraq did.

      Arguing about what may account for it does not have any impact on whether or not the TFRs are all below replacement, nor the consequences for the economies, nor whether many have tried to compensate via immigration. These are just facts. The arguments are all irrelevant (as I have explained before). Just like the use of ad hominem etc (and abuse, other personal references etc), are all just distractions i.e Irrelevancies.

      Those doing that here either want to distract others, or are too poorly educated to see what they are doing. It’s probably a combination.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 21, 2011 - 2:34 am | Permalink

      How do you square the fact that many Racialist Eugenicists support contraception and abortion?

      Margaret Sanger immediately comes to mind.

      Lothrop Stoddard was one of the Founding Directors of the American Birth Control League!

      Blacks have abortion rate 3x that of Whites. Hispanics have abortion rates 2x that of Whites.

      How many White lives have been saved because Black fetuses, that would have matured into gangster rap gang banger murders, were mercifully aborted and flushed down the sink?

      The problem is not enough Whites, the problem is too many Browns!

    • Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
      February 21, 2011 - 9:11 am | Permalink

      David, the former Soviet Union was invaded by Jewish oligarchs – the economic system you are describing may simply be result of Jewish control of economic and government policies. Who are the new rich in Russia? Perhaps libertarianism (anti-nationalism) allows Jews access?

  17. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 20, 2011 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

    I talked to someone who had recently been on vacation in Japan. He marveled at how clean and high tech their public rest areas were. He went on a tour of the country side and he said their roadside rest areas were nothing like ours. He also went through Singapore and was shocked at how futuristic is was.

    We used to have this same safety and cleanliness here in the US. You could actually trust people and hitchhiking wasn’t the manifestation of a death wish that it is now. Of course, this was before our massive immigration, cultural revolution of the 60s, and the huge Great Society Big Government programs.

    How much more will White Americans take?

    • February 20, 2011 - 7:10 pm | Permalink

      If your behaviour is typical. It is hopeless.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 20, 2011 - 7:29 pm | Permalink

      How is any discussion possible with a man like Longley, so profoundly ignorant of recent history, as to think the size of government in the US has declined in the last 40 years? That a literate individual would be unaware of the Great Society Programs, the expansion of government through Civil Rights legislation, the EPA, Affirmative Action, the Americans with Disabilities Act, to just mention a few, is astounding.

      To think that he doesn’t even consult a simple data set that shows the massive increases in government spending over the last few decades … this is not the sign of a first or even second rate intellect.

      I don’t think we have to wonder why he isn’t getting published or isn’t writing any books. Apparently, the best he could do over the last 20 years has been to inanely cut and paste the same verbiage over and over to various internet sites.

  18. MS's Gravatar MS
    February 20, 2011 - 7:37 pm | Permalink
  19. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    February 20, 2011 - 7:47 pm | Permalink

    Longley – if White ever do manage to survive – all we, or any other Nation need ever do is to keep Jews out. Juden Verboten!

    No Jews.

    It’s really that simple.

    So go away.

    • dc's Gravatar dc
      February 20, 2011 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

      You might include Jason.

  20. Rod Mckenzie's Gravatar Rod Mckenzie
    February 20, 2011 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

    If the pictures are of Yohohama it makes the case even more than Hiroshima. Yokohama was devastated in the 1922 earthquake and again in WW2. Look at it now!

  21. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 20, 2011 - 9:13 pm | Permalink

    Longley, for the first time I have thumbs downed your posts. Jason Speaks totally annihilated you and all you can do is post the same tired worn out crap which boils down to this: (paraphrasing here) You ignorant anarchists/libertarians are too stupid to see your own folly and too dumb to listen to or understand me. (end paraphrase)
    You can’t refute what he sez and no one will publish your garbage because you are a loser. GTFO

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      February 20, 2011 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

      Longley

      I have no idea whether your posts belong in some sort of high-tech journal or whether you belong in an insane asylum. At this end stage of my life I have neither the mental faculties or motivation to delve deeply into any highly technical field, and my assessment is that few others do either.
      What I do have however is both the background and faculties to understand that you are a very negative factor here. You say your information can’t be simplified. Fine. Then why post it here?
      If I’ve understood you correctly you don’t care about the white race; you just hate libertarians. Then why post here?
      One of the major problems we’ve always had is our rugged individualism and love of freedom; we can’t seem to get together enough to even defend ourselves and that trait certainly shows here on this site. Whatever your intentions are, you certainly keep everyone at each others throat.
      I’m not joining any “jump on Longley” group; this is all I’m going to say; let your conscience be your guide. To everyone else, please, stop all the infighting and let’s get down to some serious discussion on saving ourselves. If we get wiped out while we’re fighting each other it won’t matter who said what. Please, if you don’t like something just post your own idea of something better.

    • February 21, 2011 - 10:21 am | Permalink

      Whiteawake February 20, 2011 – 10:51 pm

      “Longley

      I have no idea whether your posts belong in some sort of high-tech journal or whether you belong in an insane asylum. At this end stage of my life I have neither the mental faculties or motivation to delve deeply into any highly technical field, and my assessment is that few others do either.

      What I do have however is both the background and faculties to understand that you are a very negative factor here. You say your information can’t be simplified. Fine. Then why post it here?”

      Perhaps for all those people who are NOT like you.

      Do you think that everyone else is like you? Is everyone equal? If you find others who behave like you, how many do you count before you infer that’s everyone?
      What about those who don’t express themselves like you? Do you just ignore them? What if you are in an ignorant minority?

  22. PeteR's Gravatar PeteR
    February 20, 2011 - 10:01 pm | Permalink

    At the end of the war, Yokohama did in fact look a lot like Hiroshima.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/41311545@N05/5387568874/in/photostream/

  23. dc's Gravatar dc
    February 21, 2011 - 3:17 am | Permalink

    Oh my!
    Are we done discussing jew films and sharing fond memories of how they informed our childhoods?
    Careful Kevin, Jason Squawks may report this as, ssshhh …. , a…s….

  24. February 21, 2011 - 7:51 am | Permalink

    In time, watch the behaviour change.

  25. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    February 21, 2011 - 9:24 am | Permalink

    David Longley – this article details Jared Taylor’s hommage to Japan. Instead of derailing threads on the OO site – why don’t you go seek out Jew Among the Gullible Goy, on the AmRe site, and play with him. He’s Chabad. He could probably get your dreck published. The Tribe own and control lots of media sources. I’ve seen the garbage of countless no-talent Jews, all over the Media. I’m sure there’s a place for you.

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      February 21, 2011 - 10:14 am | Permalink

      Japan, whether by genes or culture, has always prospered because of it’s willingness to change directions and act collectively. As a rugged and diehard individualist that’s not at all palatable to me. But nevertheless I can take a lesson from them and the American Indians, who in some ways were so individualistic they could rarely put together an effective fighting force. Despite their great bravery and ferocity-and initial advantage in numbers_the actual resistance they managed to mount to our take-over was pathetically small. Just as ours has been to non-whites. Most of us here are repulsed by the idea of anything collective. But in any kind of fight history is perfectly clear: collectives are necessary.

    • February 21, 2011 - 10:32 am | Permalink

      Ciaran February 21, 2011 – 9:24 am

      “David Longley – this article details Jared Taylor’s hommage to Japan. Instead of derailing threads on the OO site – why don’t you go seek out Jew Among the Gullible Goy, on the AmRe site, and play with him. He’s Chabad. He could probably get your dreck published. The Tribe own and control lots of media sources. I’ve seen the garbage of countless no-talent Jews, all over the Media. I’m sure there’s a place for you”

      More questions, but do you really want to learn, or do you just want to self-adoringly rub shoulders with people like yourself? I have posted material on Japan several times in recent weeks. Why has this article popped up on this blog just now? This has happened several times now. Perhaps behaviour is being shaped? Who knows?

      Not much learning seems to happening though.

      Nobody forces you or nayone else to comment or to read what I write, but perhaps you can’t help yourself getting excited?

      Japan was a Post WWII client state of the USA just like Germany and the Tiger Economies. Japan now has a dismal TFR just like Germany. The EU was a post-war Libertarian project to thwart the spread of regulation, aka the USSR. Now the problem is the PRC/SCO/BRIC and the Arab/N African states.

      Are you taking this all in?

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 21, 2011 - 11:03 am | Permalink

      When women are given freedom from societal expectations the TNF goes down. There are many examples of low TNF in the ancient world.

      what we really needed was a pro-natal policy

      Look at what is happening across the Arab world, that’s what happens when there are a lot of young people in a society. High fertility is a social time bomb.

    • February 21, 2011 - 11:34 am | Permalink

      Someday February 21, 2011 – 11:03 am

      “Look at what is happening across the Arab world, that’s what happens when there are a lot of young people in a society.”

      This anarchistic behaviour is (probably) being fomented/incited by Libertarian forces in the West.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      February 21, 2011 - 1:38 pm | Permalink

      Nonsense, the Western governments (and Israel) are aghast at prospect of the Arab countries getting popular governments. It is entirely predictable that countries with high fertility and a youth bulge were going to experience political turmoil and revolution. That is why Gunnar Heinsohn was able to predict it.

    • February 21, 2011 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

      What is TNF?

  26. kirk's Gravatar kirk
    February 21, 2011 - 11:12 am | Permalink

    I don’t think Japan is completely off the hook on immigration. From time to time you ‘ll see in the usual outlets (NYT, Newsweek etc.) articles on how Japan or S.Korea should really, really open their borders and allow some third world immigration, accept “diversity” and so on. They don’t explicitly call them “racists” yet but the message is there; you must accept the balkanisation of your country or else…well, who knows.

    As for the question “why on earth would a beltway jew (in case you wondered who are the typical writers of such articles) care about the demographics of the Far East”, that’s a little trickier. Preparing the ground for the next big flight? There is of course the race barrier which negates crypsis, but… I guess they also didn’t look quite as white as they look today 12 centuries ago. Carefull crossbreeding can work wonders:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_Marom
    Trust the tribe to survive no matter what.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 21, 2011 - 12:35 pm | Permalink

      @ kirk …
      During the past 5 years or so, there has been a massive influx of young (late twenties, early thirties) Black African males into Southeast Asia generally. They claim they are there for ‘business’. Yes, and I flew on a winged pig yesterday.

      They can be readily seen in Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand. Others have reported the same for certain regions of China. One would have to assume the same phenomenon is being repeated elsewhere, in Vietnam and the like. While anyone who knows the region is well aware the Philippines has long been a basket case in this regard.

      So, the migrant pressures on Japan and Korea will certainly increase. The 64,000 dollar question is whether the Chinese and Asians generally will start to reject the sugary sweet, One-World Zeitgeist that has been pouring out of New York City, Washington, and Los Angeles all these years?

      Some of the Pop fashions prevalent in Japan in recent years are surely indicative of a national psychosis amongst the under 35s. The demure Japanese women of our fantasy (e.g., Western men’s first choice for a wife) are almost extinct.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 21, 2011 - 11:49 pm | Permalink

      ‘The demure Japanese women of our fantasy (e.g., Western men’s first choice for a wife) are almost extinct.’

      Absolutely not!

      Personally find Asian Females to have frankly alien visage. They are akin to ‘grey aliens’ literally to my mind.

      This notion that White Guys everywhere want an Asian Wife is flat out wrong.

      (I personally would prefer an Alyssa Milano clone :-))

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 22, 2011 - 2:07 am | Permalink

      @ Tenrek Odine … February 21, 2011

      The demure Japanese women of our fantasy (e.g., Western men’s first choice for a wife) are almost extinct.

      I was being metaphorical.

      You were being a typically overemotional American male.

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 22, 2011 - 7:30 am | Permalink

      ‘You were being a typically overemotional American male.’

      As if that were a bad thing…

      “The doom of a nation can be averted only by a storm of flowing passion, but only those who are passionate themselves can arouse passion in others.” – Adolf Hitler

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 22, 2011 - 11:30 am | Permalink

      @ Tenrek Odine …

      Yes, I concede you have posted a noble response containing a very illustrative quote.

      Instead of “overemotional” perhaps I should have used the more accurate term … overly sensitive to criticism?

      This is precisely how you have been ‘seen’ by those in Europe for well over a century.

      Your national crabbiness and/or moodiness does make it difficult to communicate with you folk sometimes. As evidenced in some of the responses that have been posted here at TOO these past several days.

  27. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    February 21, 2011 - 12:24 pm | Permalink

    @ Brahms … February 21, 2011
    I was asked a similar question a short time back, but was verbally abused after I took the trouble.

    Just a few days ago, another commenter, who goes by the moniker, “Scooter”, threw out an open request whose text was quite similar to yours, and I responded kindly to him. Within 2 days, Scooter then reveals the flaws in his own personality by starting to get all stroppy and contrary with me.

    All the evidence suggests there are a few too many ‘femo-males’ and neurotics posting comments here at TOO … at least at this point of time. Perhaps there is something bad in the water they are drinking?

    So, how should I respond to your request? How sincere is it? Okay, I will respond in the abstract, and leave the donkey work to you. Perhaps I am growing tired of trying to make the wantonly blind see the light? Horses and water come to mind.

    David Longley (due to his past work experiences, professional contacts, analyses, and studies) knows something of great value. On these issues, the knowledge he has is very rare, in part, because many of his recommendations are counter-intuitive. They are incisive, and enlightening, and liberating. They go against the grain of our contemporary, dumbed-down culture.

    He has also been commenting frequently probably in the hope of serving up some of the more complex concepts, or controversial opinions, in bite-size portions. Therefore, his line of reasoning, once you put away your private and silly prejudices, is not that difficult to comprehend.

    Perhaps you underestimate yourself dear Brahms?

    It is essential you make yourself familiar with some of the jargon David employs. This is normal. I could write at length on Optics, Computer Networking, or Neural Networks, but it wouldn’t make much sense to you unless you understood the jargon I would necessarily have to employ. So, get yourself past the jargon hurdle first! This will require an effort on your part.

    What you have to realize and accept is that both the United States and Britain have been turned into highly ‘feminized’ societies. In the case of the USA, one could argue it has been highly feminine all along (the metropolitan areas especially) but if I attempted to explain why I believe that, then I would really open up a Pandora’s Box. Just concede that the only country in the entire Universe capable of producing the likes of Hillary Clinton, Albright, Pelosi, and the MLF nutter from Alaska, is the USA! No other geographic entity can come close in this regard, except perhaps Canada. It is one reason why you are taught to celebrate that ugly Freemason statue (the female with the torch) that stands in the approaches to NY city harbour. The people who conspired to produce and erect that monstrosity knew something about America you (probably) would ardently refuse to accept even if your life depended on it.

    Just take David’s contributions one step at a time. Go back and read some of his earlier stuff. Take some notes. Don’t get involved in ad hominem.

    If you don’t know them already, identify the subversive trouble makers (the rabid ‘troll’ accusers, the hysterics, and probable agents of Zion). Recognize that their only useful purpose has been to confirm a great deal of what David Longley has been trying get across (the basic concepts) to a rather stubborn, churlish, and ungrateful TOO audience. Demonstrable proof on tap!

    What David has said about the Female mind and its instantiation (through meek emulation, or miseducation, or subtle conditioning) into the brains of too many males, resulting in a rapid regression of Western Culture, is 101% correct. I knew this was the case before I had ever heard of “David Longley”, but it was more of a gut feeling, an intuition, rather than knowledge derived from empirical evidence. David has helped me understand, to a much greater depth, what I hitherto was unable to measure … only ‘sense’ with my instincts. As a result, a whole heap of new pieces of the global jigsaw have fallen into place for me.

    People who are fundamentally hostile to David Longley are suffering from a bad dose of cognitive dissonance. With the passage of time, many will recover, and they will eventually begin to see the light. Then (I predict) the more decent amongst those will be wanting to post public apologies to David Longley. At least, this would be IMHO a most just and pleasant outcome.

    • I's Gravatar I
      February 21, 2011 - 3:21 pm | Permalink

      David Longley needs to get a site of his own, or write a long article for TOO, or something. He also needs to make it clear exactly what his point is. Writing all these intentionally vague, off-topic comments is just annoying. Frankly, I think he’s just a bullshitter trying to impress people and sound like a genius by throwing out a lot of fancy jargon. If he had something interesting to say, he would just come right out with it.

    • February 21, 2011 - 8:29 pm | Permalink

      Thanks for the reply. As far as I can tell, there are some pretty smart people on this site, smart enough to at least understand this thesis of Longley’s. Why is it so hard to give a brief (or long) explanation? I’ve read every link he’s given and I’m not putting all the pieces together. A feminized brain – possible, but where’s the evidence? What caused it? Who caused it? I know there is some pro-female bias in school which is affecting boys. The theory seems to be saying – feminized society leads to low fertility, leads to immigration for economic reasons; but what about anarchists and libertarians, are they the result of feminized brains as well? I suppose feminized brains push the victim culture maybe – and “equality”. In any case, he needs to give some evidence – you and he both waste too much space telling us you’re right without showing us.
      BTW – I highly doubt anyone here is downgrading you or Longley to keep the truth from getting out – that’s really far fetched.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 22, 2011 - 2:45 am | Permalink

      @ Brahms …
      Maybe you are just not up to the challenge of understanding? Perhaps it is beyond your capabilities? Or perhaps you just need more time to let it all sink in? Suggest you dwell on certain issues for a while.

      The theory seems to be saying – feminized society leads to low fertility, leads to immigration for economic reasons.

      Surely a child would understand and accept this umbilical relationship? No?!? What is the alternative? Build a “Chinese Wall” all along the entire perimeter of every nominally “White” country?? India’s population has increased by 300% since just 1947!!!

      ++++++++++++++

      but what about anarchists and libertarians, are they the result of feminized brains as well? I suppose feminized brains push the victim culture maybe – and “equality”. In any case, he needs to give some evidence.

      He doesn’t need to do any such thing. It is YOU who should go out and research the evidence yourself!

      Ever heard of the term Zeitgeist? If not, please look it up.

      You are getting confused. Anarchists and libertarians are not the exclusive result of feminized brains, although they could be in part. Their existence is certainly fed by and sustained by a preponderance of feminized brains who have all been awarded political power (via the vote, and via opinion polls, and other expressions of choice).

      The female is child-like and resists discipline, as children are wont to do. But if equal political power is given to women then Anarchism and Libertarianism do become advanced by default.

      Consider that Both Bill Clinton and Barry Soweto would NEVER have become Presidents of the United States without attracting a disproportionately White Female vote. Can’t blame the ‘Jew’ here as they are only that magical 2% of all ‘white’ females, so you will have to revert to David’s thesis to explain how that voting pattern came about. A thesis that puts at least equal blame on the millions of non-Jewish White women (and their weak and meek menfolk) for worshipping personal freedom at the expense of social responsibility and emotional maturity!

      ++++++++++++++

      If you need me to explain more, then consider paying me; then I will happily spend endless time spelling it all out for you.

      Otherwise, please don’t be so arrogant as to expect me to devote hours of my day to explaining things that in the final analysis, you have probably already determined to reject, no matter how well it is presented to you.

      Oh, and by the way …

      BTW – I highly doubt anyone here is downgrading you or Longley to keep the truth from getting out – that’s really far fetched.

      I can’t speak for David, but I do expect, he would take the same view I do. Neither of us comment here at TOO to attract and collect (what we Brits call) Brownie Points. Such silly behaviour is for feminized and narcissistic minds.

      David Longley is receiving heavy “downgrades” because he has stimulated cognitive dissonance in many of you, and in most others he has touched a very raw nerve.

      Except for the two regulars who follow me around this site, I rarely get downgraded here at TOO. This hissy-fit pairing are prime examples of the feminine-gone-wrong brain at work. My downgrades on this particular issue are entirely because I am happily providing public support to David Longley. I support because I am entirely satisfied his motives are pure and not subversive, and because his arguments have been cogent.

      Other than that, I couldn’t give a stuff about my downgrades. TOO is not my only audience. Over an 18 month period, I have already attracted one of the highest reader “Recommend” scores at a leading UK Newspaper.

    • February 22, 2011 - 7:01 am | Permalink

      Brahms February 21, 2011 – 8:29 pm

      “Thanks for the reply. As far as I can tell, there are some pretty smart people on this site, smart enough to at least understand this thesis of Longley’s. Why is it so hard to give a brief (or long) explanation? I’ve read every link he’s given and I’m not putting all the pieces together. A feminized brain – possible, but where’s the evidence? What caused it?”

      You write “I’ve read every link he’s given and I’m not putting all the pieces together.”

      So what can explain your also having written “A feminized brain – possible, but where’s the evidence? What caused it?”

      CYP21?

      Might it be that reading is an intensional idiom of propositional attitude. A psychological verb?

      What is reading ability taken as a short-form test of? What does PISA, SAT, WAIS, NAEP etc test?

    • Brahms's Gravatar Brahms
      February 22, 2011 - 4:14 pm | Permalink

      I see, I’m not smart enough understand – right. I’m supposed to take on the reputation of AngloSaxon and Longley that the feminized male brain is real deal; or I’m supposed to research it myself. That’s might be how it works with your group of lackeys over in England but over here, you’ll need to prove your thesis.
      Longley mentions CYP21 – I’m a physician not a molecular biologist, what is CYP21? What is the significance of CYP21? Getting the picture?
      I love it when the English pull the superiority complex, having lived in London for a year, its comical.

  28. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 21, 2011 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Much of what you guys say about our feminized society is quite true. That doesn’t mean the other BS is, though, concerning liberty and freedom. I agree like minded whites should cooperate but we should enbrace rather than discard the freedoms that made us a great nation. I don’t care for many things in the USA but too much freedom is not our problem.

    • February 21, 2011 - 1:19 pm | Permalink

      It wasn’t freedom which made the USA great, it was hard work. Industry. For that, one needs skills, abilities.

      Look at this today. Watch the video at least twice. Look at the NAEP data referred to above. The Libertarian economies have moved towards the Service Sector shunting indtrry/manufacturing abroad.

      The Service Sector is female type work. What are men to do? Hence the crime rate. Do you know how women try to treat offenders? They try and get them to think and behave like them! That’s how self-centred they are.

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      February 21, 2011 - 1:33 pm | Permalink

      Yes, if government hadn’t already have become so dictatorial even in the 50′s, so that school segregation was ended at gunpoint by an overly powerful government, we’d be having none of the racial problems we’re having now. As it was it could only have been avoided by another civil war which we would certainly have lost.
      As for freedom the last hundred years has been a ceaseless roll of freedoms lost, to the point that almost anything we do is taxed, licensed, permitted, or otherwise regulated. While blacks and homosexuals have gained a few freedoms, mostly at our expense, even they have suffered a huge net loss in freedom. It’s most always missed in discussions of anarchy and such that a free people can and will take care of most problems before they reach catastrophic proportions. The answer to the problems of government is always more restriction of freedom and more confiscation of private property. The answer to the problems of freedom is most always more freedom.

    • February 21, 2011 - 2:12 pm | Permalink

      Michael Hardesty February 21, 2011 – 1:19 pm

      “Just read all of David Longley’s wordsalads here and he has yet to make one intelligible argument.”

      Argument is what people who don’t understand science or this still waste their time doing. These are mainly people who chose to do feminised subjects like the humanities and social-sciences at college. These are our Libertarians’ hordes of anarchists/subversives. The free-markets’ arrested-developed foot-soldiers and/or ‘useful idiots’. See the mean SATs scores by subject at the College Board. They never meet any real scientists so they remain comfortable in their delusion until their economy starts to crumble around them. Even then they stamp their feet like spoiled children. That is the nature of narcissistic entitlement. They demand that reality complies with how they narcissistically think, not the other way around like grown ups and real scientists. They don’t meet many grown-ups on their courses, as their teachers behave much the same way.

    • Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
      February 21, 2011 - 2:49 pm | Permalink

      It’s just misdirection. To say that feminization is a problem gets you nowhere. If it’s true why did it happen and where did it come from? The West wasn’t feminized before the culture of critique and radical feminism. So where did the culture of critique and radical feminism come from?

      Same answer as always.

      Focusing on an intermediate step is misdirection. Sometimes it’s deliberate attempt at division. Sometimes it’s just a stray nutcase.

  29. Michael Hardesty's Gravatar Michael Hardesty
    February 21, 2011 - 1:19 pm | Permalink

    Just read all of David Longley’s wordsalads here and he has yet to make one intelligible argument.
    Read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and The Ethics Of Liberty by Murray Rothbard. Jason is correct in writing that the trend of the last century or more has been anything but libertarian. If there were no New Deal-Great Society social safety net here in place, there would be no mass immigration. You would either have to own property here
    or get vouched for by someone who does or sign a declaration that you will not be a public charge. 90% of US crime is committed by native Blacks. I’m sorry they were brought here and if I could undo it I would but no one can.
    Their massive crime and sociopathology is staggering and they should be paying us reparations for not living in the hellhole of Africa where they are killing each other by the millions and sold each other into slavery to Arabs and then Europeans. The Jewish influence is intellectually and culturally profound & largely negative (with notable exceptions) but I don’t worry about getting robbed or murdered by Jews. Jews are dying out. Blacks are taking advantage of legal abortion much more than they used
    and we have to oppose fundamentalist fetus fetishists at every turn. If men could get pregnant abortion would have been one of the Sacraments. I loathe feminists but I’m in favor of tax paid abortions. The life abortion saves may be yours.
    Ignore Longley in the future.

    • February 21, 2011 - 1:29 pm | Permalink

      “Michael Hardesty
      February 21, 2011 – 1:19 pm | Permalink
      Just read all of David Longley’s wordsalads here and he has yet to make one intelligible argument.
      Read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and The Ethics Of Liberty by Murray Rothbard.”

      These were anarchists. Libertarians. These were people which the likes of Greenspan, Rubin and Summers etc looked to if not championed. These people (e.g. the Austrian and Chicago School ‘economists’) falsely assumed the Rationality Assumption (cf/ Herrnstein 1990) and promoted equalitarianism. These people all but destroyed the USA as a consequence in late 2007/8. Now the US people are paying with their Public Services to bail out those (mainly in NYC) who did it. The same is happening in Europe. Meanwhile the birth-rates continue to fall bar immigration, as they do in Japan, the rest of SE Asia, and Russia. Everywhere which embraces Libertarianism or had it thrust upon them.

      These are the facts. Germany saw this in the 1930s, so did the USSR. This is why they resisted the USA etc.

  30. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    February 21, 2011 - 1:59 pm | Permalink

    Longley:

    The common factor in all of this is not libertarianism, it’s Judaism. If you were a truly scientific thinker you’d know the difference between a constant and a variable. Judaism is the constant, libertarianism is a variable.

    The tribe uses whatever politics or economics it needs to to achieve its ends. Jews are anarchists, Marxists, communists, neocons, atheists, authoritarians, and libertarians. They get people in all movements so they always come out on top regardless of which movement wins or loses.

    When Stalin purged the Trotskyites and Old Bolsheviks from the USSR the Jews in New York and Hollywood were still behind Stalin 100%. Remember the Rosenbergs, the two spies that were executed for nuclear espionage?

    This is why Jews can be both free market neocons who push for wars in the middle east and populist democrats who favor tough economic regulations and a soft approach to the Arab world.

    Obsessing on one aspect of Judaism (promotion of libertarianism) is foolish. You make the same mistake the goy have always made: associating Jews with only one political, economic, or social movement. Jews are a part of ALL movements. Pro-war, anti-war, pro-capitalism, anti-capitalism.

    The one constant is Judaism and the promotion of its members. Whether the future will be in the hands of a multitude of private bankers or some sort of centralized global bank, Jews want to make sure they are on top, regardless of the economic philosophy.

    • February 21, 2011 - 2:26 pm | Permalink

      fender_strat February 21, 2011 – 1:59 pm

      “The common factor in all of this is not libertarianism, it’s Judaism.”

      No it is not. The Libertarian/anarchistic system is having the same effects in Japan and the other Tiger Economies (and RUssia etc). It is Libertarianism not Judaism which is killing off populations.

      “When Stalin purged the Trotskyites and Old Bolsheviks from the USSR the Jews in New York and Hollywood were still behind Stalin 100%. Remember the Rosenbergs, the two spies that were executed for nuclear espionage?”

      Most jews shifted to support Trotsky and anarchism once the party was purged in the 30s. There are all sorts of useful idiots. Read about Polecats and Rats in VENONA. To suggest that most Jews supported post 30s Stalinist USSR is ridiculous given the facts. The Cold War was fought against statism. See the Von Mises site and how the Austrian School depicted serfdom. see George Raisman on Nazis and Stalinism. What was the Cold War all about? It opposed statism (a large Public Sector) and regulation in favour of free markets and Privatisation. Wall Street and the stock-markets of London etc.

      You just want to blame Jews. There are not enough of them where it matters.

      The problem is the economic system. That is shown by the same problems happening to demographics wherever it operates. Even for secular Jews. See their TFRs vs Orthodox. See also other relations between TFR, IQ, SES and religiosity…. You have not been paying attention. Not all has been spelled out…

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      February 21, 2011 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

      Amen Fender

    • Tenrek Odine's Gravatar Tenrek Odine
      February 21, 2011 - 11:57 pm | Permalink

      “The truth was inescapable. In not one single case could I find any prominent, powerful and influential Jewish personage who identified himself or herself with any cause complementary to the interests of the British Nation… Quite the contrary, every cause inimical to these things seemed to have Jewish participation and backing. Looking back to the political arguments I had had earlier, it now occurred to me, as it had not done at the time, that the most vociferous and aggressive opponents of all I believed in had been Jews.” — John Tyndall

  31. Nightowl's Gravatar Nightowl
    February 21, 2011 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

    That’s a chain E-mail that has been going around for years–unfortunately the clown who produced it didn’t bother to do his homework and used pictures of a Tokyo Suburb not realizing it wasn’t Hiroshima. I just saw a National Geographic special on the Hiroshima incident and the computer animation of the city indicated it was landlocked with a river in the center, not on a bay.

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      February 21, 2011 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

      Jews control nearly all of the major media which hugely affects the way people think; they also control most of the large accumulations of wealth, and, along with blacks, occupy a very large number of high positions in government. With those things they don’t need anything else.

  32. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    February 21, 2011 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Longley – re your last post – cuo bono?

    ” free markets and Privatisation. Wall Street and the stock-markets of London etc.”

    The Yids play both sides. Von Mises was a Hebe. Fender’s right – it’s all about Die Jude.

    • February 22, 2011 - 8:23 am | Permalink

      Ciaran February 21, 2011 – 3:02 pm
      “Longley – re your last post – cuo bono?”</blockquote.

      Cui Bono – Those whose behaviours are being selected to live the American Dream.

      Those who play the Libertarian system.

      Your and others’ (scotomatic) selectivity blinds you to the bigger picture/problem.

      Behaviour Geneticists (as opposed to non-scientist Social and/or Evolutionary Psychologists) appreciate the problem of logically quantifying in with respect to classes. They eschew intensional heeding Quine and Skinner.

      I suggest you try doing as you are told instead of questioning me or instructing.

      Did you listen to the 1hr Skinner audio on the role of Natural Selection in behaviour and its management as I advised? It appears not.

  33. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    February 21, 2011 - 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Longley if libertarianism is to blame then why are China’s demographic problems even worse than Japan’s? China has a huge public sector, yet after 2019 it’s expected to have one of the biggest demographic downward spirals ever. And many of Eastern Europe’s demographic problems can be traced directly back to the communist era.

    If the Cold War was fought against statism then I’d say we lost that war. How big has our public sector grown as opposed to the private sector? How many new government agencies have been created since the Berlin wall came down? Who is pushing for open borders and multiculturalism? Certainly not the majority of private citizens.

    I don’t doubt that intelligence level and econcomics play a factor in all this. I agree with you that libertarianism is the wrong approach and that we have a naracissistic culture of selfishness. But who promotes this lifestyle of radical individualism? Jewish media and academic elites, and that’s because that’s the philosophy that “won” out over communsim. If communism had won then they’d be supporting that….which goes back to my original point about how Jews put their people in all movements so they can’t possibly lose.

    • February 21, 2011 - 3:32 pm | Permalink

      fender_strat February 21, 2011 – 3:06 pm

      “Longley if libertarianism is to blame then why are China’s demographic problems even worse than Japan’s? “

      It isn’t. China’s is managed. It is eugenic. Look at its economy and mean IQ. Japan’s, like the rest of the Libertarian economies, is differential and dysgenic.

      I have been through all this elsewhere over the last 6 weeks or so. This is getting tiresome.

      It is now being made painfully clear to me that most people posting here are really not very bright (or respectful). Nor do they know the important data which is known by Governments. Nor will they be informed. Most people would not bother. Do you now see why? Do you see why so many silly people believe the silly things they do? They don’t listen, and they even end up chasing away those who might educate them.

      What promotes dysgenesis is Differential Fertility – low, skewed birth-rates. Liberation of smarter females.

      It is not just (male) Jewish people who often suffer from feminized-brains and arrested development. Some of them may serve as a good epidemiological model of sexual dimorphism which is atypical, but they are not alone (see NCAH).

      Like many you describe what you do not know and call that reality becaue you hold it true. You would do better to learn. Go and look at the changes to curricula even in science and maths in recent generations. Note how they have been feminized.

  34. February 21, 2011 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Look at the instability in N Africa. Who benefits? Crude Oil is today over $105 a barrel, the highest since the financial crisis in 2008. Approximately 95% of Libya’s exports are its hydrocarbons. Who ends up paying for the turmoil/anarchism? It’s those in the US and EU who have to pay the hiked fuel prices. Who profits from this fomented ‘uncertainty’? The free-markets (and oil companies) love turmoil. Regulated nations prevent this. People can plan in regulated nations not where one has Permanent Revolution which is primarily good for market volatility and trading.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 21, 2011 - 4:56 pm | Permalink

      This is another ahistorical post by Longley. There has been tremendous turmoil in both regulated and nonregulated markets, not only in “libertarian-anarachist” systems. You can go back over the last 500 years of data and find huge swings in commodity prices under free markets, monarchies, and dictatorships. In fact, some of the worst imbalances and shocks often occur in “planned” economies as Von Hayek demonstrated.

      In fact, it is silly to talk about the oil market today as a “free market” in the first place, as anyone in the business will tell you. It is a worldwide enterprise that exists in totalitarian nations, theocracies, dictatorships, mixed economies and somewhat free markets, but it can hardly be considered a “free market”.

      Longley is a one-trick pony that always says the same thing no matter what the situation is. I would encourage him to clean up his act, get more rigorous in his thinking and then maybe he can write some academic papers – you know, publish like a real professional in his field.

      If that task is too daunting, maybe he can spend some time over on the MTV forums.

  35. Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
    February 21, 2011 - 3:14 pm | Permalink

    Here ya go Davie

  36. February 21, 2011 - 3:28 pm | Permalink

    @ Perhaps David Longley is arguing that “libertarianism” facilitates abortion and contraception. These have in turn led to the demographic crisis inflicting the West.
    This raises philosophical questions about the nature of freedom and how it is exercised? I am not convinced however, that this blog nor even the blog format itself is a suitable vehicle for such a debate.

    @ I don’t care for many things in the USA but too much freedom is not our problem.

    @ David Longley… knows something of great value. The knowledge he has is very rare, in part, because many of his recommendations are counter-intuitive..] What David has said about the Female mind and its instantiation (through meek emulation, or miseducation, or subtle conditioning) into the brains of too many males, resulting in a rapid regression of Western Culture, is 101% correct.

    * * *

    Speaking about Takuan Seiyo in this thread, in The Brussels Journal he wrote a long philosophical essay, “Empire of Yin”, about why western civilization have become so emasculated.

    Feminism and especially male emasculation are certainly major weapons of mass destruction used against the West. And yes: the Germans of the 1930s saw the danger that this Judaized empire of yin represented for the Teutonic soul (this is not Seiyo speaking: it’s me). That’s why in NS Germany abortion was allowed only for non-whites at the same time of promoting successful campaigns for the Aryan family to breed. In a normal white society, the average woman should be expected, compelled in fact, to breed: breed and breed like our ancestors did. Only the eunuchs cannot understand this.

    Excessive liberty (licentiousness), including the so-called “women’s rights”, is the epiphenomenon of a society that has castrated the males. If white women were submitted back to the mores of my grandmas, Western civilization would be (obviously) saved. But only a fascist state would be capable of reversing both feminism and the continuing cultural and psychical emasculation of men, which reminds me a passage of the book by Francis Parker Yockey, an American sympathizer of European fascism.

    Excerpts of Imperium, starting on page 130:

    /quote:

    The great symbol of this in the Western Civilization is everything suggested by the name Hollywood.

    The message of Hollywood is the total significance of sexual love as an end in itself—the erotic without consequences. The sexual love of two grains of sand, two rootless individuals, not the primeval sexual love looking to the continuity of Life, the family of many children.

    One child is permitted, as being a more complicated toy than a dog, perhaps even two, one boy and one girl—but the family of many children is a subject for humor to this decadent outlook.

    The instinct of decadence takes many forms in this realm: dissolution of Marriage by divorce laws, attempts to discard, through repeal or non-enforcement, the laws against abortion, preaching in the form of novel, drama, journalism, the identification of “happiness” with sexual love, holding it up as the great value, before which all honor, duty, patriotism, consecration of Life to a higher aim, must give way.

    An erotomania is abroad through our civilization, not indeed like the sexual obsession of the 13th century which was at least racially affirmative, in that it increased the Western Peoples, but always a purely rootless erotic-without-consequences.

    This spiritual disease is the suicide of the race. The weakening of the will—Nietzsche called it “paralysis of will”—another symptom of dying out of racial instincts, leads to a total deterioration of public life in the afflicted races.

    Government ceases… No effort! That would be too hard. Keep the pleasures going, the panem et circenses. Never mind the necessities of life, we are willing to renounce them as long as we have the pleasures.

    This weakening of the will leads to voluntary abandonment of empires conquered with the blood of millions over ten generations. It leads to abysmal hatred of whoever and whatever represents sternness, creation, the Future…

    Mediocrity rises over the horizon of a dying race as its last great ideal; total mediocrity, renunciation of all greatness and distinction of any kind whatever; also mediocrity of the racial blood-stream—anyone can come in now, not only on our terms, for there are no more terms, and there are no racial differences, everything is one, dull, eventless, mediocre.

    The weakening of the will is not hard put to find an ideology which rationalizes it as “progress,” everything desirable, the aim of all previous history. The democracy-liberalism complex lies to hand, and it acquires in such times the meaning of Death—of race, nation and Culture. There are no human differences, everyone is equal, men are women, women are men, “the individual” is everything, Life is a long holiday whose main problem is devising new and more stupid pleasures, there is no God, no State, off with the head of anyone who says there is a mission, who wishes to resurrect Authority.

    /end of quotation

    Francis Parker Yockey wrote his book in 1948. He dedicated it “To the Hero of the Second World War”. He was imprisoned and soon after died at jail.

    Off with Yockey’s head…

    • Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
      February 21, 2011 - 6:02 pm | Permalink

      With regard to Yockey’s remarks about Hollywood’s promotion of the Erotic and Romantic Love as ..I was about to say the Highest Good…the fulfillment of narcissistic Self-Obsession, let me add that women, that is most women, in the West today are caught in a Trap.

      The Natural Condition of Women is to be , if not barefoot, then pregnant. Children transfer her Natural Impulses from the Erotic (and man-catching) to the Realm of Children and babies and attendant social affiliations.

      (Also, there is a Biological White dynamic of what KM has called Expressive Individualism which both sexes possess because of our evolutionary history. This ends in political LIberalism as well. So, Whites are the most vulnerable to Loner strategies. )

      Today, the Farm is gone. Farming supported large families because of the economics of the Farm. Also, the small shop/cottage industry is almost gone, and families are thus not supported by economic structures/conditions. Children actually cost a lot of money and cannot be considered as “necessary” for the Farm, or for Old Age support.

      The Trap for women is worse than for men. Men have their Work, which their brains are designed for…much more than women. Women do not think. Just look at the magazine racks which reflect the nature of womens’ vs. mens’ brains. A woman therefore without man’s natural inclination toward the objective world of work, if, not married and busy with children and family, becomes more “neurotic.”

      Look at the food commercials: almost 100% targeting women, beauty ads, and so on. This is for Woman Nurturer, Baby Maker, Attractor-of-Men, meal-maker. Also, Fashion for both home and Person. Beauty again. There is nothing wrong with this. (You may have noticed the latest degradation for women on TV ads: vibrators, of course delivered by a clutch of gals gathered around the kitchen table. Then there are the Size Matters ads for Male Enhancement. This marks the same degradation of men, only , interestingly, men don’t need social support like the ladies in the ad, to send for their penis-pep in the plain brown-wrapper.) All of this represents Eros Wandering Childless as opposed to Eros Building of LIfe.

      Where is the contemporary woman to find fulfillment? Work is always unsatisfying , even creative work, if her natural Being (children, etc.) is denied. I have personally witnessed this often.

      So the above Trap is the Erotic leading not to Family and babies, but to Errant Eros. This leads to more disaster for women than for men because men always have Work. However, do not think that men are spared the consequences of a wandering and useless Eros-without-Aim.

      Both sexes are harmed. So, it is LIberalism’s Inidvidualism, loss of Farming and its family -fostering nature, the Anomie of the City, and especially the Modern and Jewish weapons of porn, Hollywood (almost the same thing), and the inevitable Mass Culture of TV, etc.

      Eros has been denied its natural life-cycle. All of the above, plus contraception…Contra Conception…, has resulted in a kind of reprise of Plato’s (Symposium?) myth of the sexes as originally One. We were originally content with our unified asexual nature, but we became too powerful as such…we were capable of challenging the Gods. This threat to the Gods resulted in their dividing us into the two sexes, so as not to challenge Their Power.

      Marriage is supposed to Make of Two, One. That is the Christian Idea, and also the alleged Romantic Idea of Early Hollywood as well. Today, Hollywood relegates children to non-R rated. The earlier medieval romantic love was actually a Classic statement of a sexual and civilizational standard that, among other things, resulted in , guess what?: Children.

      the last few comments have been very good.

      Joe

    • February 21, 2011 - 9:51 pm | Permalink

      Chechar and Joe Webb – superb.

  37. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    February 21, 2011 - 3:30 pm | Permalink

    Longley, like so many people you are focused entirely on the ideology and not who’s behind it. Yes, the free markets profit from chaos. And who is the free market comprised of? A hugely disproportionate number of Jews. Same as how a hugely disproportionate number of American communists were/are Jews. Same as how 77% of Jews vote democrat while the neoconservative movement was also mostly Jewish. What part of this don’t you get?

    Judaism incorporates all aspects of society into its GES: economics, politics, science, everything. Judaism is all-encompassing; wherever there is a potential for growth or acquistion of power, you will find Jews there regardless of what it is.

    Jews are the ultimate utilitarians. If it benefits them, they support it, and the best way to know what benefits them is to have a stake in every political and economic movement. Jews reduce everything to the bottom line, and the bottom line is their survival at all costs. Everything else is a variable, a means to an end.

    • February 21, 2011 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

      “Jews are the ultimate utilitarians. If it benefits them, they support it, and the best way to know what benefits them is to have a stake in every political and economic movement. Jews reduce everything to the bottom line, and the bottom line is their survival at all costs.”

      Jewish people as a whole are just an over-represented group in the self-centred cogntive elite which followed the Amercian Dream of how to get on. They have thus benefited disproportionately from The US American Dream which is at root Libertarian anarchism.

      You are attacking your own cognitive elite and singling out its most salient and cohesive group. It is both a statistical fact and an artefact. Look up my link to the NYC demographics which I have repeatedly provided since January. What do you learn?

      The most Jewish Jews are Orthodox and Ultra Orthodox. Look at their TFRs, their mean IQ (if you can find it) and SES. These people isolate themseleves a bit like the Amish. These were the poor Jews in Europe. TFR and SES is negatively correlated.

      There is far too little discrimination here. This is irrational, bigoted and offensive, to the point of stupidity.

      You are attacking America itself, and not seeing it. You are just going to destroy yourselves if you continue behaving this way.

  38. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    February 21, 2011 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Well of course I am singling out a cognitive elite; when things are going wrong do you put the blame on those with power or those without? Ideologies only go as far as they are promoted, and promotion is found in the universities, news media, print media, and film industry. All are Jewish-controlled, and no Jews are calling for increased white birth rates and ethnic cohesion among whites.

    Jews have disproportionately benefitted from American libertarianism but they also disproportionately benefitted from Soviet communism, including during the Stalin years. It was no coincidence that Stalin was one of the first world leaders to recognize Israel, and it was no coincidence that he gave them their own autonomous oblast in Russia.

    If you are so interested in economics then go to an economic discussion forum. This is a site about European and European-American interests, and it often focuses on negative Jewish influence in the west. You don’t seem to be interested in this, so why are you here?

    • February 21, 2011 - 6:49 pm | Permalink

      fender_strat February 21, 2011 – 4:37 pm

      “Well of course I am singling out a cognitive elite; when things are going wrong do you put the blame on those with power or those without?

      Ideologies only go as far as they are promoted, and promotion is found in the universities, news media, print media, and film industry. All are Jewish-controlled, and no Jews are calling for increased white birth rates and ethnic cohesion among whites.”

      So, let’s get his clear:-

      98% of the Libertarian ‘land of the free’ (where everyone is allegedly equal) is allegedly controlled by just 2% of its population, which happens to be Jewish, and you can’t do anything about it either.

      That doesn’t seem to be a very good advert for the USA’s free and meritocratic system as a model for the rest of the world, does it?

      No wonder nations like Palestine, Iraq, Iran, N Africa, the Middle East, China, Russia etc etc are so reluctant to embrace it as the paragon of democracy.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 21, 2011 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

      Good point Fender strat ….. have we gotten confirmation that his guy really is Longely? He basically trots out the same anti-freedom, anti-American line that Anglo Saxon, Der Weenerschnitzel and the other trolls endlessly repeat.

    • February 21, 2011 - 10:05 pm | Permalink

      Yes, 2% of the population does control virtually all means of information dissemination. The evidence is there and I’ll post a link if you like; they admit it. It speaks very poorly of the country, I agree. However, everything that you claim to be wrong with this country mirrors the messages coming from Jewish media and politics – they control the medium that dictates popular thought.

  39. dan neil's Gravatar dan neil
    February 21, 2011 - 6:07 pm | Permalink

    Yes resist we do but not with enough force and anger.
    We can all hear the voice saying.
    “IM AS MAD AS HELL AND IM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE”…. But off to bestbuy we go and shopping on amazon,, der da der , der da der.. No policy enacted made this nation no ink no flag.. THE BLOOD OF OUR YOUNG FORFATHERS, THE PRESIDENTS WHO FROZE IN THE VALLEY FORGE… WE ARE WEAK IN COMPARISSON PATHETIC.
    Maye be we no longer deserve this land or our freedoms.

  40. Ignore Trolls and Advance White Interests's Gravatar Ignore Trolls and Advance White Interests
    February 21, 2011 - 6:29 pm | Permalink

    1. Any effort spent on Longley forgoes effort spent on advancing White interests.

    2. Longley blames libertarians and absolves Judaism and the Culture of Critique. Why is he on this blog?

    3. DO NOT RESPOND to Longley’s trolling. Just down-vote if you wish, and don’t waste anymore effort on what is obviously:

    (a) Jewish troll
    (b) Jewish apologist
    (c) misguided fool wasting all our efforts

    • February 22, 2011 - 1:25 am | Permalink

      And Longley is far from the only one. OO desperately needs to call a non-Kosher Orkin Man.

      The comments here are filled with trolls making sure Whites must fight a strong current to have productive dialogues.

      Watch for patterns of disinformation, distraction, disruption, demoralization and manipulation.

      Some examples are trying to control the limits of our discourse (e.g. not discussing certain topics because they’re “not respectable”) or mute criticism of Jewish supremacism.

      Actually the raw truth can be our most powerful weapon because if the system gets caught red-handed in a hideous big lie like 911 or the Holohoax it can bring what’s left of its credibility crashing down. Just because they get away with all these big lies now doesn’t mean they always will.

      This board needs a better system to identify trolls and enable genuine Whites to reduce their deleterious effect.

      Some ways to do this while preserving open discussion:
      - create a troll button
      - enable better tools for readers to browse the comments of a particular commenter
      - enable “rating groups” where the user can choose a set of trusted commenters whose collective ratings guide the assessment of trolls (designed to avoid subversion of simpler ratings systems). this data could be read for both individual comments and for commenters as a whole
      - enable “troll sets” where the user can choose his own list of trolls whose writings he wishes to always ignore (perhaps excepting exceptionally popular posts)
      - can also enable social networking features, e.g. allowing users to make things like their trolls sets and ratings for specific comments public
      - mini-notes on comments to enable known commenters to make small notes and ratings that are aggregated below or on the side of the comment
      - commenter metrics to keep track of how things like activity level to see who’s sucking all the oxygen out of the board
      - add a conversation feature where a topic is to be explored
      - add a private discussion area
      - add secure area to the web site and use secure email
      - even when the posts are ignored, they would could have a small bar with the name of the suppressed comment and a bit of data in case the user wishes to read it, thus preserving free speech

      It’s important to recognize that trolls are not real people acting in good faith to contribute to the discussion. They are operatives whose purpose is to greatly reduce the probability of us having useful discussions and demoralize most from bothering to read or contribute since it’s annoying and tedious to sift through all the dreck. Even if there are some good discussions, their distribution is reduced because fewer people read it.

      Some of these dirtbags are probably getting a nice little envelope of shekels for their efforts as they stab our people in the back.

      Some of our best commenters are staying away. Mission Accomplished for the enemies of our people.

  41. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 21, 2011 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    re the next- to- last post of Mr. Longley’s, and his “Libertarian Anarchism” perseveration, which is legit up to a point, I wonder what L.’ proposal is to correct this civilizational mistake, short of his Change! admonishment?

    I still do not understand Mr. Longley’s general point of view, and I do not have the time/inclination to read all that he has written over the last few months to try to put together the pieces of his puzzle. Please Mr. Longley , I may be intellectually lazy buy maybe not. I have this thing about an intellectual or political position admitting of a relatively simple, not simplistic, formulation. It may require much ink to defend, but its exposition should not be that difficult, in summary. I asked for that at the end of the thread on the Australian guy’s jail problems a few days ago.

    Briefly, I asked for your views on racial factors, and I also challenged your claim that jails provide a good microcosm of human systems in general…that you overlook high-functioners who usually avoid jail, and I also wondered if you were not long on psychologism and short on History. This is not ad hominem as I have found your writing interesting but perhaps a bit johnny-one-note…as in your tendency to come from the point of view of your professional experience and at least some genetic science. Nothing wrong with this but it could be incomplete, something that I am sure you have considered/ To put it very simply, a jail full of nigras, rag-heads, injuns,.and white trash, is not an adequate model of white society.

    Also, you seem to be stuck on intellectual movements, and Ideas in general, as opposed to recognizing, for example, the current hyper-rejection of “Jew- York- City” by the American electorate in an election a couple months ago…. also, the profound changes in attitude in both Europe and the U.S. generally with regard to just about everything. Granted that Libertarianism and Expressive Individualism are marked features of White consciousness generally, there is a secular and uninstructed Middle America which is NOT libertarian. It sees its interests collectively as the racial polarization proceeds at a good clip in the U.S. with the Republicans become almost totally White, and the Dems a mere aggregation of radically dissimilar freaks: Jews, Blacks, Mexers, , Asians, Queers, and White Race Traitors.

    LIbertarianism does not afflict just about everybody, except for a few pointy-headed greying intellectuals. Do American Whites want to retain some independence of the State? Of course, and that is Good.

    The State should intervene in the economy to assure it works for the country’s people, and then provide the obvious civil and police protections.
    It should stay out of the home, schools, and so on. If left alone, and the thrall of nigger-jew-love broken, Whites will be all right . Maybe they will even start loving themselves enough to have children. Joe

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 22, 2011 - 4:47 am | Permalink

      Just my opinion, but I don’t think using ethnic slurs promotes our cause, especially if you are a featured writer for TOO. It fits the caricature the other side wants to paint of us. They know how to defeat the so called “Hollywood Nazi” -the guy who comes across as bigoted. They know how to handle Archie Bunker.

      They have no clue how to handle MacDonald and others like him. Shouldn’t we claim the intellectual high ground?

    • February 22, 2011 - 6:43 am | Permalink

      Joe Webb February 21, 2011 – 6:56 pm

      “I still do not understand Mr. Longley’s general point of view, and I do not have the time/inclination to read all that he has written over the last few months to try to put together the pieces of his puzzle.”

      The above largely explains why you don’t understand. That, plus the all too dim insight that you won’t put the time and effort into finding out. Just ask yourself how much time and research I may have put into writing those earlier comments in the first place? What one sees sees is phenomenal, insightless, entitlement. Elswhere, how many bloggers riun blogs to court narcissistic supply, or sell advertising? How many want articles which then allow them to sell something or to secure donations/subscriptions etc?

      Did you ever look into the NYC data or listen to the 1hr Skinner audio? I didn’t see any discussion on that or anything else substantive that I have said apart form outright rejections that Libertarian-Democracy is the problem. How about the exchange in the first Social Psychology thread? Did you understand the thrust of that, or that in the points made in the ‘Mind Wars’ thread? The points made there were major issues which make much of what many people post here non sequiturs, yet they continue, effectively insisting that sine=adjacent/hypotenuse and 2+2=5 just because that’s familiar to them, i.e that’s their prejudice.

      As with most blogs, many people here appear to just want a few minutes of excitement, not hard work. Posters like me spoil their fun as I require them to do some work. That seems to be the USA and its system writ large these days.

      Girls just want to have fun?

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      February 22, 2011 - 12:03 pm | Permalink

      One of the problems that David Longley has is that he uses the ‘web log’ format in a manner for which it was not designed. It’s as if he is writing an academic paper complete with footnotes and referrals as a result his posts contain more of these than the original headline article. Reading through David Longley’s comments however and also of those who have taken the trouble to read and respond to them, he raises one salient point: how can individuals with libertarianism as their ‘credo’ develop a group evolutionary strategy? The original GES (if it existed at all in the USA) was always assumed but never explicitly defined within constitution and David Longley (tortuously at times) is raising our awareness of this issue.

      Confronted by groups with a more effective GES (who have used libertarianism for their own ends) the limits of the libertarian model seem to have been reached. To the British mindset of David Longley and myself, who have looked with envy and admiration at the USA throughout our adult lives, we (perhaps?) see this problem in different terms. Living in a country with a Royal Family who nickname themselves “The Firm”, (curiously and without any self-irony, football hooligans use the same soubriquet to define themselves), we have a constitution which provides for a GES. The two are indivisible. Our King is a GES – “the King is dead, long live the King!” Our issues manifest themselves differently and bloggers here did a good job in deconstructing David Cameron’s recent speech on the failure of multiculturalism, pointing out its limitations and contradictions.

      These (occidental) observations do not however, resolve the issues at stake here either for the USA, the UK or the West in general. The issue thus remains, how can the West develop a GES in a peaceable manner? For what it is worth, I am of the view that the Irish diaspora (of which I suspect “Kevin” “MacDonald” is part!) offers a possible model. Both through their monastic elites in the medieval period and their non-elites post-famine in the 19th century. That is for another contribution when Japan is not the subject.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 22, 2011 - 12:18 pm | Permalink

      The original GES (if it existed at all in the USA) was always assumed but never explicitly defined within [the] constitution and David Longley (tortuously at times) is raising our awareness of this issue.

      Exactly right!

      Personally, I strongly believe an identifiable GES has NEVER existed in the USA … substituted instead by the eponymous “American Dream”.

      Ergo, because the USA assumed leadership of the Western (de facto “White”) world in 1945 — or more accurately, in August 1941, when the Atlantic Charter was signed — then this is why and how we are in the mess we find ourselves in today!!

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 22, 2011 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

      Anglo-Saxon,

      Surely you don’t blame the USA for the multicultural disaster in your own country?

      Believe me, i don’t think that the USA should be absolved from blame, but I think that finger pointing is not very productive. Surely there are enough treacherous elites to go around in the USA, UK, France, Germany, and Russia…

      Better to identify the problems specifically and determine how to counter them.

      100 years ago, the British Empire was in a position to ensure the dominance of the West for the next millennium…

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 23, 2011 - 12:12 am | Permalink

      @ Athanasius … February 22, 2011
      You are still wedded to black & white, either/or world views. It is a Western fault. Learn to think in shades of grey (gray). A lot more will make sense to you if you do.

      For example, I heavily criticize (and rightly) the role the United States of America has played in infantilizing and feminizing the Western male’s behaviour and outlook, and you interpret that as meaning I totally blame the USA for the multicultural disaster in my own country (UK).

      The world does not work like that, and I think you know this.

      To write a full reply to your relatively short comment would take me over an hour. Time I don’t have to spend for such a limited audience.

      Firstly, as an American (I will presume), you should not take my comments (on this subject) too personally. Some of the finest people I have met on my travels, have been Americans. I am actually on your side. Clearly, what a couple of clearly insane commenters here keep hysterically claiming to the contrary is simply an illustration of the sickness that pervades your culture; if indeed one can call jazz, blues, West-side Story, and hip-hop a culture. But, what shocks and frustrates so many Brits is the pollyannaish world-view that so many Americans like to cling to. You know … all that Apple Pie and Picket Fences stuff.

      The USA played THE major role in fomenting the multicultural disaster in the UK (and South Africa, and Australia, et al) because of the dominance (both ‘cultural’ and in terms of money power) of the American Media Machine. All the source of the money used to fund such efforts, such as the infamous Ford Foundation, were 100% American. Yes, I know that your media is dominated by Jews, but even before the Jews became as dominant as they are today, Americans were screwing with, and antipathetic to, British culture and its self-identity. You have to go back to the 1960s and 1970s to really see the “in your face” evidence for this. In fact, the evidence can be found in every decade since the early 1800s.

      The other important point I wish people like you would learn and understand, is that the United States is NOT a valid country. Your countries are actually the individual States! The UNITED STATES is a legal abstraction with Corporate status. The idiot who sits in your White House isn’t the President of a nation … rather, he is the Chairman of a Board of Directors. If you could take the time to research the legal status of the USA Corporation on the Internet, you will see that I am correct.

      Therefore, it is difficult to debate with the average American on blogs such as this, because (typically) you have no idea what you belong to, who is leading you, and who you are paying taxes to, etc. When Brits attack the USA, then 7 or 8 times out of 10 they are attacking the SYSTEM and not the people living in it (i.e., the naive fools who stand with hand on heart and sing the Star Spangled Banner. Did you know you gave the Straight Arm Salute until about 1935?).

      Yes, absolutely. 100 years ago, the British Empire certainly looked like it could ensure Western dominance for the next millennia. But, unfortunately, we had that fratricidal genocide called the First World War. I acknowledge that Germany, France, and Imperial Russia suffered far higher casualties, and I am sorry for their deaths. But, Britain did lose 658,700 of its finest young men (killed in action). Furthermore, we lost 359,150 unaccounted for (probably this means “blown to pieces”). And another 2,032,150 were wounded or maimed for life. These statistics exclude all the mental damage done. No nation, particularly a relatively small one such as the United Kingdom, can sustain such casualties yet continue to maintain a Global Empire. So, our world (the Western World) began to unravel as long ago as 1914.

      I am a solutions oriented person. But, my professional background and training also impels me to identify and quantify the problems first. You cannot tailor workable solutions until you have properly analyzed and identified what the problems and afflictions actually are. I am sure you would identify with this strategy.

      I am convinced there will never be a Renaissance of “Ethnic European Man” until the leadership of the movement is returned to its rightful place: back to Europe. You Euro-Americans will then have to follow our lead because, as Professor MacDonald has repeatedly stated: we cannot unite around abstractions. And abstractions is all that you guys in the USA have to offer us. I don’t really know what you mean by “Freedom”. If I challenged you to define what you meant, I think you’d have great difficulty making sense. Whereas, in Europe, we are simply trying to defend the ancient lands of our ancestors from invaders.

      The only alternative for you guys is to pursue Secession and create a new, Whites Only Nation built upon the riches and expanses of Washington State, Oregon, Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Doing this would earn you Oceans of respect. Only after taking this brave step could you begin to call the shots.

      Until then, don’t tell a European how he should defend his soil unless you are prepared to show proper respect, or are prepared to emigrate back to Europe and join the battle on European soil.

  42. February 21, 2011 - 8:43 pm | Permalink

    @ “A feminized brain – possible, but where’s the evidence? What caused it? Who caused it?”

    The One Ring, led often by the Sauron-Jew (bur not always) caused it. You should know, since that article was originally posted here at OO.

    • February 21, 2011 - 10:35 pm | Permalink

      I look forward to the read. “You should know, since that article was originally posted here at OO.” Yes, how stupid of me.

    • February 21, 2011 - 11:17 pm | Permalink

      Well, that essay was fascinating but said nothing about the feminized brain, nor gave any evidence for it, nor gave any mechanism. Why did you link it?

  43. February 21, 2011 - 10:43 pm | Permalink

    @ “I look forward to the read.”

    Well… Actually David’s anarchist-libertarian worldview is not the same as blaming corporate capitalism for our current problems. Michael Colhaze’s essay just seemed brilliant to me from the stylistic viewpoint.

    • February 21, 2011 - 11:20 pm | Permalink

      So you have no insight into this feminized brain stuff and link to articles that also have nothing to add. I won’t hold it against you since it was a nice piece. Still odd.

  44. February 22, 2011 - 12:07 am | Permalink

    @ “Still odd.”

    It is odd. Yes. But I am still struggling with so many theories about the basic etiology of Western malaise and still a little confused. Some of these theories seem to intersect with the others, including the JQ. At any event, following Hegelian historical dialectics, the “empire of yin” will switch to a violent revolutionary yang once the Muslims start to behave in Europe as they’re behaving this very day in the Middle East. White men still can recover his courage to fight back with weapons in his hand. Big showtime for our people might be coming…

    Following the LOTR metaphor, to my mind Islam is a kind of Gollum that, though our enemy, still has to play its role in awakening us to destroy the Ring.

  45. Dedalus's Gravatar Dedalus
    February 22, 2011 - 1:18 am | Permalink

    This is not the first time MacDonald has confused America, or Amerika, with “Individualism” as if individuality is bad.
    I haven’t heard anyone give me a very good, and positive, definition of individuality.
    And yet Nietzsche, arguably the greatest Western Philosopher ever, said that the Wests crowning acheivement was the Sovereign Individual. And of course he was right!

    Can’t Mr. MacDonald, and not just Mr. MacDonald see the difference between individuals and spolied, selfish egomaniacs? Caust this is what he’s really talking about.

    It’s just not right to confuse one with the other.

    What is best in Western man deserves better.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 22, 2011 - 1:53 am | Permalink

      I don’t think individualism is a bad thing, and I don’t think Dr. MacDonald does either. However, it may be that only Whites, especially Whites from Western Europe are all that individualistic. Certainly Asian culture doesn’t have it, nor does the Middle East or Africa. And highly individualistic people may be slow to see threats from groups that are hyper-ethnocentric.

      I think of individualism as a political, cultural and psychological issue.

      Politically it means recognizing the rights of adult individuals as well as their responsibilities – property rights, minimal welfare state, freedom of speech, etc.

      Culturally, for me it means a recognition of the individual’s value, a willingness to entertain new ideas, not being a slave to tradition.

      Psychologically, it means self-reliance, self-responsibility, a kind of independence in the face of reality. Thinking for oneself.

      That’s pretty brief, but that’s my view. And none of that excludes cooperation among people, nor should it minimize the high value of families and communities.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 22, 2011 - 1:57 am | Permalink

      And I agree that there is definitely a difference between spoiled narcissism and true rugged individualism. Americans of the 19th century were individualists but they were not pampered adolescents. Getting rid of most of the welfare state might rid our population of those negative characteristics.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 22, 2011 - 3:22 am | Permalink

      @ Dedalus …

      And yet Nietzsche, arguably the greatest Western Philosopher ever, said that the Wests crowning acheivement was the Sovereign Individual. And of course he was right!

      When a cohesive population sharing the same cultural roots becomes infected by a parasite, then the functional unity apparent before that infection took place becomes severely disrupted.

      But, who do we blame for this parasitical infection?

      The Parasite … which is only doing what parasites are programmed to do … or the Host … who has allowed himself to become infected?

      Steps could have been taken long ago to clean ourselves of this parasite, but we failed to take them.

      The one country that did attempt (and bravely) to show the cheapest way to a parasite free life, was bombed to oblivion by the fathers and grandfathers of those who are today writing here, wringing their hands over what to do.

      Furthermore, it was the American people who supplied the rope with which those parasite killers who had survived the cowardly carpet bombing, fire-bombing, and Soviet butchery, were hanged, and without a proper trial.

      Indeed, it was Americans more than most who threw themselves at the task of extinguishing from the face of the planet all copies of the (successful) formula for ridding any population of its Parasites, and returning society to optimum health.

      So, who really is at fault?

      Or, are you not yet man enough to accept where you, and we, went wrong? Preferring instead to look for scapegoats. To blame abstractions or anybody else who happen not to look or think like you.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 22, 2011 - 3:29 am | Permalink

      And now another example of Anglo Saxon promoting his anti-American, Marxist, Howard Zinn/Chomsky inspired view of the world. Note how the troll, like Severis (are they the same person?) seeks to sew dissension among Whites. He is terrified of Whites across the world uniting in a kind of racial consciousness, so he tries to turn it into some lame Marxist anti-American fight.

      Germans, English, White Americans, Irish, Italians, White Australians ….anyone all of European descent, will not fall prey to silly Saul Alinsky tactics to divide us.

  46. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 22, 2011 - 3:19 am | Permalink

    This is Steve Sailer’s take on Japan, pretty interesting. The gist of it seems to be that the last decade or so has been bad for financiers, but not so much for the Japanese people who seem to be doing OK.

    http://isteve.blogspot.com/2011/02/japan.html

  47. February 22, 2011 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    David,

    Is there a single article (or alternatively a few specific posts here in OO) where your theory is neatly presented?

    • February 22, 2011 - 4:09 pm | Permalink

      Why don’t you look back to comments from early January and find out?

    • February 22, 2011 - 4:47 pm | Permalink

      He can’t present his theory in any type of logical format. What he can do is give bits and pieces mixed with various genetic jargon and then imply your low IQ if you can’t put it all together. Sane people don’t communicate ideas like that.

  48. Ryan K's Gravatar Ryan K
    February 22, 2011 - 9:13 am | Permalink

    Athanasius Said:
    February 21, 2011 – 2:13 am | Permalink
    You don’t know the half of it. Language programs across China are full of young Israelis (and American, British, French, even Polish Jews–what are the chances?

    I have often thought that part of the Anti-Japanese hysteria whipped up all over the world in the late 1980′s was Jewish driven , particularly by Israeli colonists who often act as the attack spearhead after a couple of years in Military service. All things Japanese at that time became fashionable .But I guess that the Japanese weren’t too keen to be ripped off and shafted be a scream vindictive Semite . So the Jews did to the Japanese what they did to the Russians or Germans or European peoples generally , that is they smear them as racists and whip up hatred against them.
    It is a sad truth for the USA that if the American gov had listened to Japanese criticisms about their society in the late 80′s many of the problem today wouldn’t exist BUT of course the tightening of society was the last thing the parasites wanted. When a society tightens is becomes less easy to manipulate and the death stake of multiculturalism hadn’t been driven in deep enough. European people hadn’t been weaken enough to resist what is virtually a Jews takeover of the West . Our leaders have become Zombie like repeating ridiculous hypocritical twisted ideas , with the great confidence that it makes sense-not.
    I have a feeling the the European peoples are starting to wake up and realize the Jews particularly Zionists have been waging a clandestine ethnic war against us for what, 120 years ??
    Why should we be surprised that Jews are madly studying Chinese , just as they did Japanese in the 80′s .Philosophically the Chinese and Jews will hate each other AND the European peoples have to be careful the Jews don’t use us to attack them as they did with the Japanese.

  49. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 22, 2011 - 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Longley, The question here is this: either I am too lazy to dig out all your stuff, or you are too lazy to summarize it in one paragraph. Since you claim to have a strong and unassailable position, it must be such that you can summarize it briefly. Not only myself, but many others would benefit form reading it.

    You continue to basically insult me and others for failing to scramble around and put your puzzle together. Speaking of narcissism, that would seem to fit your attitude here.

    You also still refuse to state your position on Race.

    Your position on refusing to simply state your position in a couple of paragraphs is amusing. Who is the libertarian hyper-anarchistic one now?

    By the way, the issue of a Feminized Brain is not clear to me. Culture produces a feminized brain for males. Also, economics produces a feminized brain inasmuch as almost everybody has a job to lose and thus they keep smiling rather than fighting. Finally, Whites’ promiscuous altruism tends to feminize men. However, the Fighting Male Brain ticks away implicitly and it is beginning to go explicit.

    Joe

    • February 22, 2011 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

      Joe Webb February 22, 2011 – 12:41 pm

      “Mr. Longley, The question here is this: either I am too lazy to dig out all your stuff, or you are too lazy to summarize it in one paragraph.”

      No. I have written it before I see no need to again.

      “Since you claim to have a strong and unassailable position, it must be such that you can summarize it briefly.”

      I do not think it wise to repeat it all again and again. When I have done so, some people complain. Note how you ask me to do what others complain I have already done? Why? This is what peole do in blogs. They do not go back. Many are here for the natter or cage-fight. I am not.

      “Not only myself, but many others would benefit from reading it.”

      Then go back to January and start reading. Simple. Others will have done so, why not you? Not everyone comments.

      “You continue to basically insult me and others for failing to scramble around and put your puzzle together.”

      I am educating you. You will only learn if you work and do as you are told.

      “Speaking of narcissism, that would seem to fit your attitude here.”

      No, narcissists expect others to do everything for them. They are princes and princesses. You will not work.

      “You also still refuse to state your position on Race.”

      False.

      “Your position on refusing to simply state your position in a couple of paragraphs is amusing. Who is the libertarian hyper-anarchistic one now?”

      Non Sequitur.

      “By the way, the issue of a Feminized Brain is not clear to me.”

      Much is not clear to you. Did you go and do any reading on the genetics and physiology of this as instructed? We all begin female.

      “Culture produces a feminized brain for males. Also, economics produces a feminized brain inasmuch as almost everybody has a job to lose and thus they keep smiling rather than fighting. Finally, Whites’ promiscuous altruism tends to feminize men. However, the Fighting Male Brain ticks away implicitly and it is beginning to go explicit.”

      Gobbledegook. This is about aggregation of genes and physical development/behaviour at the population level. You would have learned that if you had read the comments and links.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 22, 2011 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

      The following has been extracted from an article just recently posted online by Henry Makow (published earlier by the Wall Street Journal: see Erin Patrice O’Brien)
      http://www.henrymakow.com/flipside_of_feminism_men_dont.html

      QUOTING BEGINS:
      American men have been struggling with finding an acceptable adult identity since at least the mid-19th century. We often hear about the miseries of women confined to the domestic sphere once men began to work in offices and factories away from home. But it seems that men didn’t much like the arrangement either. They balked at the stuffy propriety of the bourgeois parlor, as they did later at the banal activities of the suburban living room. They turned to hobbies and adventures, like hunting and fishing. At midcentury, fathers who at first had refused to put down the money to buy those newfangled televisions changed their minds when the networks began broadcasting boxing matches and baseball games. The arrival of Playboy in the 1950s seemed like the ultimate protest against male domestication; think of the refusal implied by the magazine’s title alone.

      In his disregard for domestic life, the playboy was prologue for today’s pre-adult male. Unlike the playboy with his jazz and art-filled pad, however, our boy rebel is a creature of the animal house. In the 1990s, Maxim, the rude, lewd and hugely popular “lad” magazine arrived from England. Its philosophy and tone were so juvenile, so entirely undomesticated, that it made Playboy look like Camus.

      At the same time, young men were tuning in to cable channels like Comedy Central, the Cartoon Network and Spike, whose shows reflected the adolescent male preferences of its targeted male audiences. They watched movies with overgrown boy actors like Steve Carell, Luke and Owen Wilson, Jim Carrey, Adam Sandler, Will Farrell and Seth Rogen, cheering their awesome car crashes, fart jokes, breast and crotch shots, beer pong competitions and other frat-boy pranks. Americans had always struck foreigners as youthful, even childlike, in their energy and optimism. But this was too much.

      What explains this puerile shallowness? I see it as an expression of our cultural uncertainty about the social role of men. It’s been an almost universal rule of civilization that girls became women simply by reaching physical maturity, but boys had to pass a test. They needed to demonstrate courage, physical prowess or mastery of the necessary skills. The goal was to prove their competence as protectors and providers. Today, however, with women moving ahead in our advanced economy, husbands and fathers are now optional, and the qualities of character men once needed to play their roles–fortitude, stoicism, courage, fidelity–are obsolete, even a little embarrassing.

      Today’s pre-adult male is like an actor in a drama in which he only knows what he shouldn’t say. He has to compete in a fierce job market, but he can’t act too bossy or self-confident. He should be sensitive but not paternalistic, smart but not cocky. To deepen his predicament, because he is single, his advisers and confidants are generally undomesticated guys just like him.
      QUOTING ENDS.

      As I have said. The American ‘Male’ is a problem for the “White Race”. They struggle to “man up”. They are inherently infantile, and have exported this behaviour pattern to all other white nations (e.g., Britain, Europe, and Australia) in the name of Globalization.

      The White Race will never recover until its falsely installed American ‘Leadership’ is replaced by a European one.

      How many grown American males have you seen breaking into tears on television, as they emotionally thank their Mummy Wives for everything. Now think of a single American female who has returned the compliment!

      You can’t, because it has yet to happen. The American Woman is the real ‘man’ of America.

      Hey … don’t you take this too personally now guys. Remember … I didn’t author the original article. We are meant to be talking in broad generalities here. Identifying the real sources of problems. Try to think Bell Curves and Statistical Distributions!

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 22, 2011 - 4:13 pm | Permalink

      The above is a completely false interpretation by the troll Anglo Saxon. The problems the White race face really confront all Whites in Europe, Australia, America, New Zealand, South Africa, and so forth.

      AS endlessly tries to sew dissension between American Whites and European Whites as a way to derail White Advocacy. Pay no attention to him.

    • February 22, 2011 - 10:22 pm | Permalink

      AS -so are American men juvenile or are their brains feminized? Or is this all BS?

    • Matthias's Gravatar Matthias
      February 23, 2011 - 2:40 am | Permalink

      In nature, feminization of the host by the parasite is not uncommon:

      “LaPage also says, “Parasites may cause biological changes such as species which cause changes in the host’s reproductive glands, parasitic castration, such as the parasitic crustacean Sacculina, which destroys the reproductive organs of the host, the short-tailed spider cram, Inacus mauritanicus, which is attacked by Sacculina neglecta.

      The effects of Sacculina cause seventy percent of male crabs to acquire some of the secondary sexual characteristics of the female. The abdomen of these males becomes broad, they may acquire, in addition to their male copulating styles, appendages modified to bear eggs, and their nippers become smaller at the same time.”

      It is inevitable that the enormous effect which the parasite has upon the host would result in some biological alterations such as the effect of Sacculina upon Inacus mauritanicus.

      We have seen in America during the past quarter of a century, coincident with the great power attained by the Jews in every walk of life, startling modifications in the appearances and habits of American males, as well as a vast increase in the public practice of male homosexuality.

      American males have taken on some of the secondary sexual characteristics of the female, and they have shown amazing declines in such primary male characteristics as energy, aggressiveness, and physical strength.

      The traditional roles of the sexes have also undergone sweeping changes, due principally to Jewish agitation for “sexual equity.”

      This campaign has not resulted in sexual equality, since this equality could only be attained by eradicating all physical differences between males and females. However, it has resulted in a decline of masculine traits in the American male, as well as psychological confusion as to his role.”

      Eustace Mullins, THE BIOLOGICAL JEW

  50. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    February 22, 2011 - 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Part of Japan’s success may be attributed to a few politicians who won’t wait until their country is a lost cause before they address the problems of multi-ethnicity agenda or illegal immigration. One such man is Shintaro Ishihara, the mayor of Tokyo.

    From a left wing blog (in condemnation of Ishihara):

    “Ishihara has made several other derogatory statements about non-Japanese. For instance, in a highly publicized statement at the Tokyo International Anime Fair on March 25, 2006, he said: ‘I hate Mickey Mouse. He has nothing like the unique sensibility that Japan has. The Japanese are inherently skilled at visual expression and detailed work.’ On February 20, 2006, Ishihara also said: ‘Roppongi is now virtually a foreign neighborhood. Africans — I don’t mean African-Americans — who don’t speak English are there doing who knows what. This is leading to new forms of crime such as car theft. We should be letting in people who are intelligent.’ “

    • February 22, 2011 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

      “This is leading to new forms of crime such as car theft.”

      This is great, blacks do like to steal cars.

  51. Michael Hardesty's Gravatar Michael Hardesty
    February 22, 2011 - 4:44 pm | Permalink

    B.F. Skinner was a totalitarian Communist-Socialist-Collectivist-Big Brother Determinist who was totally debunked by Noam Chomsky, of all people !, in Noam’s devastating review of Skinner’s Beyond Dignity and Freedom in The New York Review Of Books in 1971 or 1972. Ayn Rand also debunked in a 1972 number of the Ayn Rand Letter.
    The University Of Maryland has been petitioned to remove his name from the psychology building. Read Thomas Szasz, don’t waste your time on a twentieth rate nonintellect like Skinner or the troll called David Longley, just reading this poseur gives one a headache, the man has a very bad odor about him and I avoid unsanitary things.

  52. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 22, 2011 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Jason:

    I think he makes a decent point here. It especially resonated with me concerning frat boy behaviour. I did all that stuff back in college, but when I got out I needed to continue to grow and assume greater responsibilities. I’m sure you have also done the same thing. Our families depend on us to be strong for them. I don’t think we can sustain our country and then rebound if we let women do the fighting for us. Leadership in the home and in the country is a man’s job. We should sacrifice the joys of sitting on the couch and watching negroes play sports while we eat fattening foods, and interact and grow our white families. Well done A-S.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      February 22, 2011 - 7:29 pm | Permalink

      AS may have made a point that has some validity on it’s own, but he himself isn’t to be trusted in my opinion. Sever*s and others used to occasionally say something true, as part of their propaganda, but they themselves hated White Advocacy and were seeking to subvert it.

      Did you remember Der Weisse Angel? He would post these long rants that were pro-Nazi and anti-technology. Sometimes he would say something that anyone could agree with, but he was literally here to subvert this blog. His name literally meant ‘The White Angel’ and which as the nicname of Josef Mengele. So his game was to encourage us to act like Nazis and/or embrace weird anti-technology views in order to make us look bad. I suspect some of these guys want to leave a trail of hateful remarks on this site so that the $PLC can refer to it later.

      It turned out Der Weisse Angel was actually a reincarnation of Adam from long ago. So when I see these guys that encourage known trolls and constantly sew dissension among pro-White groups, I am suspicious.

  53. February 22, 2011 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

    @ David, Is there a single article (or alternatively a few specific posts here in OO) where your theory is neatly presented?

    @ Why don’t you look back to comments from early January and find out?

    I started as a sympathizer of some of what you said in your posts but such a preposterous response makes me harbor now serious doubts about your honesty and intellectual integrity.

    It goes without saying that one’s pet theory has to be presented neatly and concisely, in falsifiable form if possible, in a book or a scholarly paper. For instance, my own research on the whys of extreme cultural self-loathing among some specific westerners is explained in my online book. It is a theory about childhood trauma I discovered in obscure journals to be sure. But precisely because it’s so sui generis and arcane I’d never dare to fragment it through dozens of posts in different threads from “early January”, to use your words, and then ask the readers to do the digging!

    Talking of narcissism…

    • February 22, 2011 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

      “It goes without saying that one’s pet theory has to be presented neatly and concisely, in falsifiable form if possible, in a book or a scholarly paper. For instance, my own research on the whys of extreme cultural self-loathing among some specific westerners is explained in my online book. It is a theory about childhood trauma I discovered in obscure journals to be sure.”

      I couldn’t care less how ‘sympathetic’ you are!

      I’m not offering you a theory. I’ve been describing what has been empirically happening, still is happening, and will continue to happen. If you don’t pay attention that will be your loss. I’m not an amateur at this like you.

      Note: this is what Applied Behaviour Analysts do. If you or anyone else wants to know what I have had to say to date, you should go and read it. That’s the simple advice. Why should I have to repeat it?

      Don’t bother trying to explain your behaviour as it will be irrational. The past posts are all available (providing they have not been censored) and are all in the here and now just as any new post would be. What would any new post contribute? Your sense of entitlement is overwhelming.

      Given the subject matter which you refer to as your ‘theory’ I guarantee it will not be testable. It is couched in the arcane language of intension. Social ‘science’ is pseudo-science for precisely that reason. I have explained all this.

      You clearly haven’t a clue.

  54. Michael Hardesty's Gravatar Michael Hardesty
    February 22, 2011 - 7:17 pm | Permalink

    What’s happening with my comment above ? Notice a couple since then including more Longley.

    • February 23, 2011 - 11:06 am | Permalink

      Your post comprises factual falsehoods (as those who have been reading what I have posted will now know). Your post serves as grist to my mill. You won’t see how.

  55. Ryan K's Gravatar Ryan K
    February 22, 2011 - 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Edmund Connelly ,Thanks for the fantastic article .This sort of Journalism puts the most of the MSM to shame (if they had a sense of any) .
    The comparisons between Japan and Singapore and the West are so stark , that the Western media generally ignores it .Or in Singapore’s case ridicules .
    One of the Great achievements of the Japanese in the 20th century was preventing Jewish colonization .They understood what happens when a parasite is allowed to settle and dig in on an organism–soon the plant or animal becomes sick. One of the cleaver ways the Jap got the Jew of his back was to allow the Jews to arbitrage Japanese savings ; once the pigs got their snouts into the trough they lost all interest in vilifying Japan–Wow we love the Japs they let us rob them! We might call this tribute but the Japanese new that in the long run it would eat the heart out of the US but stoking the useless thieving banker culture.but what could they do? American ideals we in the dust , the country had submitted to the Yoke of Jewish Left wing philosophy with that massive dose of illogical hypocrisy that goes with it. But what could the Japanese do? It was them or us. The Japanese still exist as a unified ORIGINAL people with an original culture and an original future . If the Jew had had his way, Japan would have become a criminalized violent and confused society –But as WE know it would have been good for Jews and therefore a Great place to live!
    Check out what the Loving Left have done to the Aust Aborigonal http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/destroyed-in-alice/story-fn59niix-1226008040782 . But these Left-wing Mongrels never look back because of course they are cosseted by Jewish Philosophical nonsense –The Victim cannot be the perpetrator , And the do gooder is good–not a guilty conscience or a left-wing social climber or ofcouse a self-interested ethic attack Jew.
    The crimes of these people are vast . But the bullshit train cannot be allowed to stop because if it does people might stop and have a look where they have come from an it might occur to the managerial class that things infact haven’t improved but that it is an illusion of hype and endless , much of it silly, novelty .
    Thus the Fascist Left have to move to there next thing , legislating to put women in management position and the new cry ” Is that institution too White?” .And what after that?? The list could and will be endless .The Western World is heading right into a Communist Dictatorship V2 .
    This criminal philosophy being imposed from the top has to be fraught with all our strength. Our Zombie leaders done know if they are Arther or Mather anymore , they babble shit , because the philosophical ground has been cut away from under them. Their lawyer minds go into robotic overdrive reeling out the rote that they think their Jewish/Mason media masters want them to spew.
    By obsessively projecting women into status positions the system is baiting men to be dishonest and betray the countries and ideas for short term survival. With divorce as easy a the push of a button and woman being attracted to high status men AND men in western society no longer give any status as the part of a tribe (except if your Jewish or some other sanctified minority) , Men are doing what ever it takes–Total corruption and destruction of Western Civilization is a real possibility . Any one who thinks these Left Wing wankers are building a happy society are idiots or fools. The mass media thinks they can just chime out some loving platitudes and everyone will ‘Just be Good’ .Have a look at that “The Australian” newspaper article about what is really going on .The left-wing Jewish driven Philosophy doesn’t have a cure because they haven’t admitted that it is their bullshit ideas that are the problem. The idea of Autonomous man frightens them to hatred and they attack those who promote a belief in Real Democracy. The only democracy most of these bag of lairs are interested in is CEO Democracy which is another name for Communist/Socialist Democracy , where we the people are offer two possible candidates (and lots of other no-hopers) , who say and think the same thing ; its just about management , as the Overlords see it.But that management will become an Octupus to keep the weird stressed out world what they consider ‘Normal’ ! And thus it becomes like Communism . I could rave on (Haa) , What about obesity ? The social and scientist have all the answers and none of the cures because their underlying philosophy is incorrect , and who do we thank for that ?

    A Chinese sage said ” When intellectuals meddle in Government they cause chaos ” and this my friend is where we have come from.

    It is a real problem for the European peoples when our rulers think : you Brit , you Yank , You Aussie are no better than so fellow living in a slum in Africa And you should be given no more writes on Earth than they are and that it is only luck that has you living in this 1st world country and it has NOTHING to do with the many , many trials of your ancestors that developed the beliefs of your community and system that all of the third world want to move to (but not adopt!) . NO IT IS NOT THAT ! We decide who is lucky and why and we betray you because you are just animals and animals can live anywhere in any system.Except of course that is if your Jewish. Such good people.

  56. Ryan K's Gravatar Ryan K
    February 22, 2011 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

    There was an error with paragraph order so I have reposed this .Thank Edmund , great stuff.

    Edmund Connelly ,Thanks for the fantastic article .This sort of Journalism puts the most of the MSM to shame (if they had a sense of any) .
    The comparisons between Japan and Singapore and the West are so stark , that the Western media generally ignores it .Or in Singapore’s case ridicules .
    One of the Great achievements of the Japanese in the 20th century was preventing Jewish colonization .They understood what happens when a parasite is allowed to settle and dig in on an organism–soon the plant or animal becomes sick. One of the cleaver ways the Jap got the Jew of his back was to allow the Jews to arbitrage Japanese savings ; once the pigs got their snouts into the trough they lost all interest in vilifying Japan–Wow we love the Japs they let us rob them! We might call this tribute but the Japanese new that in the long run it would eat the heart out of the US but stoking the useless thieving banker culture.but what could they do? American ideals we in the dust , the country had submitted to the Yoke of Jewish Left wing philosophy with that massive dose of illogical hypocrisy that goes with it. But what could the Japanese do? It was them or us. The Japanese still exist as a unified ORIGINAL people with an original culture and an original future . If the Jew had had his way, Japan would have become a criminalized violent and confused society –But as WE know it would have been good for Jews and therefore a Great place to live!
    Check out what the Loving Left have done to the Aust Aborigonal http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/destroyed-in-alice/story-fn59niix-1226008040782 . But these Left-wing Mongrels never look back because of course they are cosseted by Jewish Philosophical nonsense –The Victim cannot be the perpetrator , And the do gooder is good–not a guilty conscience or a left-wing social climber or ofcouse a self-interested ethic attack Jew.
    The crimes of these people are vast . But the bullshit train cannot be allowed to stop because if it does people might stop and have a look where they have come from an it might occur to the managerial class that things infact haven’t improved but that it is an illusion of hype and endless , much of it silly, novelty .
    Thus the Fascist Left have to move to there next thing , legislating to put women in management position and the new cry ” Is that institution too White?” .And what after that?? The list could and will be endless .The Western World is heading right into a Communist Dictatorship V2 .
    This criminal philosophy being imposed from the top has to be fraught with all our strength. Our Zombie leaders done know if they are Arther or Mather anymore , they babble shit , because the philosophical ground has been cut away from under them. Their lawyer minds go into robotic overdrive reeling out the rote that they think their Jewish/Mason media masters want them to spew.
    By obsessively projecting women into status positions the system is baiting men to be dishonest and betray the countries and ideas for short term survival. With divorce as easy a the push of a button and woman being attracted to high status men AND men in western society no longer give any status as the part of a tribe (except if your Jewish or some other sanctified minority) , Men are doing what ever it takes–Total corruption and destruction of Western Civilization is a real possibility . Any one who thinks these Left Wing wankers are building a happy society are idiots or fools. The mass media thinks they can just chime out some loving platitudes and everyone will ‘Just be Good’ .Have a look at that “The Australian” newspaper article about what is really going on .The left-wing Jewish driven Philosophy doesn’t have a cure because they haven’t admitted that it is their bullshit ideas that are the problem. The idea of Autonomous man frightens them to hatred and they attack those who promote a belief in Real Democracy. The only democracy most of these bag of lairs are interested in is CEO Democracy which is another name for Communist/Socialist Democracy , where we the people are offer two possible candidates (and lots of other no-hopers) , who say and think the same thing ; its just about management , as the Overlords see it.But that management will become an Octupus to keep the weird stressed out world what they consider ‘Normal’ ! And thus it becomes like Communism . I could rave on (Haa) , What about obesity ? The social and scientist have all the answers and none of the cures because their underlying philosophy is incorrect , and who do we thank for that ?

    It is a real problem for the European peoples when our rulers think : you Brit , you Yank , You Aussie are no better than so fellow living in a slum in Africa And you should be given no more writes on Earth than they are and that it is only luck that has you living in this 1st world country and it has NOTHING to do with the many , many trials of your ancestors that developed the beliefs of your community and system that all of the third world want to move to (but not adopt!) . NO IT IS NOT THAT ! We decide who is lucky and why and we betray you because you are just animals and animals can live anywhere in any system.Except of course that is if your Jewish. Such good people.

    A Chinese sage said ” When intellectuals meddle in Government they cause chaos ” and this my friend is where we have come from.

  57. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 22, 2011 - 11:04 pm | Permalink

    I see that Mr. Longley is very upset at our holding his feet to the fire with regard to his refusal to articulate a coherent, short, abstract perhaps, of his position. It is possible that he cannot do so because it is not coherent because it does not take evolutionary psychology, history, race, Jews, and other factors into consideration. HIs mantra of liibertarian anarchic individualism is getting a bit stale and too bad because Whites do have a problem in that regard.

    However, I have yet to see a suggestion by Mr. Longley as to how to correct this problem except for his perseveration of ‘go back and read everything I have written” with his usual accompanying insults. Personally, I think I have been pretty patient with him and so now simply say; it would so nice if you were not here. Joe

  58. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 22, 2011 - 11:14 pm | Permalink

    correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t Nial Ferguson a neocon, and isn’t Paul Craig Roberts about three quarters around the bend with his concentration camps awaiting us all and sundry absurd/unproven factoids?

    Also, the argument of what Japan IS going to do about its very low birthrate…has not been addressed. I suppose it is better to shrink down as one people, especially if one has the defense umbrella of the U.S., although why would China be interested in Japan when the empty Siberia and shrinking population of Russia is just the duck sitting. Right, nukes. But..
    Joe

  59. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 22, 2011 - 11:46 pm | Permalink

    reading Richard Fuerle’s Erectus Walks Among Us, I especially liked his discussion of Neanderthals loaning Cro-Magnon some of their genes so that a few percent of our White genes bear the stamp of our Neanderthal Big-Brothers.
    Fuerle points out that extreme sports are the exclusive domain of Whites (something I have posted on … several times) and attributes the special fighting- spirit and courage of Whites today to the genetic contribution of Neanderthal. Neanderthal , he says, hunted up-close and personal with large heavy spears, while Cro-Magnon threw spears from farther away (bow and arrow when?). He further argues the large and heavy stature of Neanderthal helps explain their hunting technique as opposed to the more gracile Cro-Magnons.

    It is interesting that this Manliness of Whites, Longley notwithstanding, stands in sharp contrast to Asians and Africans as well. The former will fight when well organized only. Blacks will fight only when disorganized. Organization is too abstract for them, and emotion is the only rule.

    White men are feminized per Longley…right. Football, extreme sports, tendencies to assault and battery (take away assault and battery and white crime stats fall dramatically), motorcycles, fast cars, and so on.

    It is true that White males in the professions and academe have been feminized for cultural reasons and Fear…jews, white promiscuous altruism, Christianity, liberalism and communism. If Longley was correct…I gather he claims that something like fluoride has been sapping our vital juices, or maybe plastic bags which have some connection with estrogens…if Longley was correct, working class and lower middle-class White males would also demonstrate a feminized brain. That is absurd if you have any acquaintance with these guys…gyms, bars, drag races, hunting and fishing, guns, etc. Longley must be nuts or simply, like the carpenter who fixes his car with a hammer and saw, has only one tool-kit at his side.

    When White men have had enough, as they are absolutely demonstrating right now with regard to immigration, they are going to go berzerk on liberals, nigras, mexers, and Jew-York-City. Which gets us back to fascism. Is fascism feminized Mr. Longley? Because that is where we are headed, hopefully avoiding the fuhrerprinzip and instead going back to Northern European Kingship, elected kingship with constitutional law, not fuhrerlaw.

    Speaking of feminized brains, the tendency to emotionalism as opposed to calm is part of the female psyche. Mr. Longley seems near to hysteria. Reminds me of my mother (but I forgive her).

    Joe

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 23, 2011 - 1:39 am | Permalink

      @ Joe …
      Kindly scroll down and digest my comment addressed to Chechar about David Longley. Don’t shoot the messenger my friend!! You are bigger than that. I know you are. So, please man up to your full stature and be magnanimous.

  60. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 23, 2011 - 12:31 am | Permalink

    Anglo Saxon:

    We wouldn’t have to secede if our states were legally countries! Believe me, the thought that my own state could secede would please me to no end but unfortunately, you are completely wrong. We are stuck in the US. I wish you Europeans would save us, but by all means stop immigration of non whites before it is too late. With 90% of your population still white, you have no idea how good you have it.
    You are also fortunate that the minorities you do have are mostly asian. You cannot fathom how unpleasant a group of negroes can be, and how much of a drag on society they can be. If you want to find out, we could send you 30 million of them – your Olympic basketball team would probably win the gold medal.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 23, 2011 - 1:13 am | Permalink

      Dear Scooter,
      I once lived and worked in Jamaica for about 15 months. Having often found myself the only White Man within large groups of natives I think I know all about negroes! It wasn’t too bad, and the girls hit on me strong, but I do know what you mean. I was threatened four times and intimidated often.

      I will concede blacks within America are meaner and more intimidating. I well remember entering the USA via JFK, New York. I was not impressed at all by the imperious and rude way in which I and my fellow passengers were (mis-) treated … chiefly by US Blacks wearing dark blue immigration uniforms.

      I am doing all I can to (indirectly and imperfectly) help you guys in the USA. I write and post in other guises elsewhere.

      Have a good day, and stay calm. As for me, I am going out on my peddle bike today.

  61. February 23, 2011 - 1:09 am | Permalink

    Anglo-Saxon,

    I agree with much of what you say about Amurrica. Have you read O’Meara’s Toward the White Republic? On page 94 he says: “Our people will survive only if white men learn again, in struggle, to stand […] free from everything associated with the monstrous Leviathan that the United States has become”.

    I confess I’ve just re-watched Pride and Prejudice for the Nth time. There’s no question about it. Mores must be forcefully reverted back to the Austen world, where women were kept in the place where they belonged. As I said above, only the feminized western “males” cannot get it. Women belong to us; not to them. They’re Nature’s most precious gift.

    And yes: like you I would prefer Europe to lead the West. But first Britain must be punished for Winston Churchill’s astronomical blunder. Perhaps only after she becomes visually like the deracinated UK in the film Children of Men will Britons revive?

    As to secession at the other side of the Atlantic, again you are absolutely right. I favor the Northwest idea. But some intuition I’ve never fully understood tells me that revolution in Europe won’t be as nasty as it will be in the Amurrican Leviathan ruled by die Juden. This continent will turn truly hellish after showtime starts.

    I wish I could join the battle on European soil. Unfortunately, with the exception of Covington (in America) I don’t see any other lone voice seriously calling for arms in the western world. Feel free to contact me thru my blog’s email if you know otherwise.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 23, 2011 - 1:24 am | Permalink

      Dear Chechar …
      I and others like me want Churchill’s statue in Parliament Square … one that I have myself stood before, long before I knew of his true history … taken down and smashed. I want all Churchillian symbolism destroyed and a national apology issued to the German People.

      Everytime I meet or communicate with a German national I feel an urge to issue a pathetic apology for belonging to such a foolish and easily deceived people. I think, when I die I shall request to have my ashes spread somewhere in Germany. Sounds dramatic, but I am seriously thinking about it. The only issue is overcoming the practicalities of how it could be done.

      Meanwhile, thank you for your kind invite to contact you, Chechar. Right now, I am busy working on a manuscript. Sometimes I get annoyed with myself for spending so much time commenting online. I hope and expect to have more free time to exchange on a personal level, later in this year. Stay well. May the air you breath fill you with strength and vitality!

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      February 23, 2011 - 1:34 am | Permalink

      @ Chechar …

      P.S. Please go easy on David Longley. His methods may be a little eccentric and barn-storming, but his heart is in the right place. He and I are about the same age so this means we went through a similar schooling system in Britain (before it was wrecked by the Social ‘Engineers’) so I do have the ability to “read between his lines” so to speak. He knows better than us the cultural errors White America has made. He is trying to show us the big picture. In fact, he has already succeeded in my view.

      Please don’t hold him to impossible standards that nobody else here could come close to. For example, asking him to post a single summary of his theory isn’t going to work as his modus operandi is to reply in order to expose the flaws in other people’s thinking and assumptions. There is absolutely no need to abuse him. He should be hailed. Longley is NOT our enemy and is certainly not, in any shape or form, a disinformation ‘agent’ working for Israel or Zionism, as some others (not you) have claimed.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      February 23, 2011 - 10:31 am | Permalink

      Longley,

      What if what one values is one’s own culture, tradition, relatives, history, and yes phenotype?

      What then?

    • February 23, 2011 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

      Athanasius February 23, 2011 – 10:31 am

      “Longley,

      What if what one values is one’s own culture, tradition, relatives, history, and yes phenotype?

      What then?”

      What if one only values oneself?

      That is precisely now Axis II Cluster B identity disordered people behave.

      What’s more, to the best of our knowledge, they are untreatable. They suffer from a (genetic?) developmental disorder.

      The probem is that they do not know who THEY are.
      Read up on this, and read up on co-dependency.

  62. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    February 23, 2011 - 2:04 am | Permalink

    Actually, this may be my favorite Anglo Saxon post from not long ago:

    “Leave your own borders and you get so frightened, your first and sometimes only response is to compensate by getting overly aggressive. That is one reason (presumably) why you believe you must cover this planet with US military bases, in the same way you covered the interior of a nascent USA with Forts to attack the noble Red Indians (whom you then more or less wiped out).”

    So he hates the US and takes the side of the “Red Indians” over that of Whites. This is not a White Advocate in my book. This is just a Leftist that hates the United States. He is recycling old nonsense from Howard Zinn and Chomsky.

    • February 23, 2011 - 10:13 am | Permalink

      Jason Speaks February 23, 2011 – 2:04 am

      “So he hates the US and takes the side of the “Red Indians” over that of Whites. This is not a White Advocate in my book. This is just a Leftist that hates the United States.”

      My emphasis. But note the reference to imagined, irrelevant, intensional non-truth functional psychological states, which nobody can affirm or deny.

      Such dramatic affectation/rhetoric is endemic today. if it isn’t hate of one group, it’s hate of another, but its all emotional fabriction, fomenting conflict, heckling.

      Despite repeated efforts to explain why the fallacy of the ad hominem is a fallacy, i.e that it is irrelevant material, it persists. Whether it is just tactical nefarious rhetoric to distract and foment conflict, or prima facie evidence of failure to grasp what is relevant, is moot. Either way it makes rational exhange all but impossible. That is how anarchists behave. It is good for market volatility – it makes governance/regulation all but impossible,

  63. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    February 23, 2011 - 8:25 am | Permalink

    Jason:

    I guess he is also unaware that the “Noble Red Indians” are more properly called “Native Americans”! They nobly scalped and murdered and raided, even though they never believed in ownership of land. The treaties they made with the US govt. now allow hugely profitable gambing reservations and a near autonomy from US laws. Since they just love the land, hunting and fishing and running the buffalo off cliffs, you would think they are quite pleased with the 100 years of peace now that they don’t kill each other on a regular basis.
    We vastly improved the life of “Native Amercans” and developed a great country with our shared homeland. Of course, we all know who has ruined it.

  64. Michael Hardesty's Gravatar Michael Hardesty
    February 23, 2011 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

    There was a sad sack named Longley
    Who was always in his comments Wrongly
    He needs to go away and beat his Bongly

    • February 23, 2011 - 7:31 pm | Permalink

      Michael Hardesty February 23, 2011 – 1:30 pm

      There was a sad sack named Longley
      Who was always in his comments Wrongly
      He needs to go away and beat his Bongly”

      Oh dear. It’s truly pandemic. ;-)

  65. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 23, 2011 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

    regarding the difficulty of stating one’s general position, I disagree. I could state my position in one paragraph. I use that boiled down paragraph all the time when talking to people and I do not have to come up with 28 points. I am almost always successful in talking to folks. How do I know it is successful? Because folks ask questions, keep talking about their own experience and we leave on good terms.

    Socrates tears down and others build up. Also, since we are all politicians as well as White Nationalists with our intellectual views, we recognize the absolute necessity for friendliness, something remarkably lacking in Mr. Longley. Longley is short, very short on both persuasivenss and friendliness.

    He is also apparently lacking in the ability to write a coherent paragraph or two describing the science behind whatever his views happen to be which are still not stated. Jews, race, WN, evolutionary psychology as opposed (if opposed) to his perhaps lab-rat and genetic determinism, his totalizing tendencies….all are apparent. ” Wrecker” occurs to me.

    I am completely willing to hear someone out but all I hear from Longley is insults and “instructions” to do what he says. He is a good example of the problematic nature of the Fuhrerprinzip. Joe

    • February 23, 2011 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

      “we recognize the absolute necessity for friendliness, something remarkably lacking in Mr. Longley. Longley is short, very short on both persuasivenss and friendliness”

      No. This tells me that you are far too easily taken in by populist rhetoric which just poaches and distorts work from science in order to sell narratives as merchanidise and/or to court narcissistic supply. It’s how gangs operate. You appear to have little or no formal training in science. You may think that insulting, but it appears to be the case form how you post. Your criteria for accepting or rejecting what you are told makes you one of a lost generation which sadly treats knowledge and qualifications as bling. You simply don’t know how to assess truth and falsehood, and you do not appreciate the dangers of nefarious rhetoric.

  66. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 23, 2011 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Mr Longley, your last piece is rhetoric of the first order. You are a wrecker. I was once told by one of my many Jewish ex-friends that I had the most developed B-S detector that he had ever seen.

    Your constant refusal to answer my queries as to your view of Jews , Race, etc. lead me to conclude that you are a spy or a wrecker, or a Jew. Joe
    Joe

    • February 23, 2011 - 4:02 pm | Permalink

      What I am endeavouring to wreck is your (and others’) false view9s) of the world. That’s called education (or, if you like, therapy).

      All you have to do is look at the facts out there in the world – i.e follow up links instead of your own, fabricated, false psychology. This requires an allocentric worldview – not your egocentric one.

  67. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    February 23, 2011 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    I think this will be the end of my bother with Mr. Longley. He describes my psychology views as “false” without knowing or enquiring as to what they are. Longley is thus a claimed psychic as well as his other asserted qualifications.

    Joe

    • February 23, 2011 - 7:26 pm | Permalink

      No. I, and others observe what is written by you. That is how you show your ‘psychology’. It is your verbal behaviour. You do not understand Behaviour Analysis.

      You are unable to grasp that I have been telling you is factually about the world, as you are demonstrably unaware of some of your own behaviours. That is what ‘self-centred’ refers to. You are unable to see what you are doing (and not doing) and its consequences. You ask what has been said, but you do not go and look. Why?

      Is much of the rest of the USA like you? You’re lost in an imaginary intensional world of your own creation (although much of it has been shaped by others), and you are so wrapped up in it that you do don’t look at what physically happens. You won’t be helped either. Isntead of learning from Behaviour Analysis, you say it isn’t so, because you can’t see what you are being shown!

      Go back to the Social Psychology exchange I had with Kevin, and see what you learn from his errors.

      I’ve been at this a lot longer than you realise, and I’ve had to deal with this sort of behaviour often. It is very common. Don’t forget, I used to teach and manage applied professionals. On the oter hand, you could just keep parading what you don’t know, and hope that nobody comments…

  68. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    February 24, 2011 - 4:39 am | Permalink

    “And now another example of Anglo Saxon promoting his anti-American, Marxist, Howard Zinn/Chomsky inspired view of the world.”

    Agreed. He’s more subtle than some but that’s all.

    “The one country that did attempt (and bravely) to show the cheapest way to a parasite free life, was bombed to oblivion by the fathers and grandfathers of those who are today writing here, wringing their hands over what to do. ”

    Clever bit of divide and rule.

    And btw 100s of countries have expelled jews.

    • February 24, 2011 - 11:00 am | Permalink

      The next, largely Gentile, country to run ‘Socialism in One Country’, which tried to make employment in the Public Sector dominate the economy whilst making private sector profiting at the expense of the vulnerable a crime against the people, was branded an ‘Evil Empire’ by the USA – in large part because it removed people’s freedom to run business in this way…

      Go figure (as you say over there). Ask some people what it was like growing up in East Germany after the war. To many it looked much like Germany under the National Socialists.

      We are a strange species.

  69. Sean's Gravatar Sean
    April 14, 2011 - 9:06 am | Permalink

    So how can we fix immigration? How can we reduce it from 800k a year back down to something manageable like 200k a year? How can we get white people to realize that living in fear of non-white gangmembers is not a utopian ideal?

5 Trackbacks to "Japan vs. America"

  1. on February 21, 2011 at 9:17 pm
  2. on February 22, 2011 at 10:32 am
  3. on March 18, 2011 at 10:12 am
  4. on March 27, 2011 at 2:05 am
  5. on March 27, 2011 at 2:06 am

Comments are closed.