Our Rachel

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon




For Patrick Willis, a true lover of Palestine, who decided to take a Rachel poem of mine and turn it into a moving new video: In Memory of Rachel Corrie.



It is hoped that the essay presented below will serve as an introduction to this widely acclaimed video as well as a tribute to Rachel on the 8th anniversary of her death on March 16.

She was called “St. Pancake” by her killers soon after her death. It was a term of derision for a young woman determined to make a martyr of herself. She had gotten herself pancaked. Flattened. Crushed beneath the blades of a bulldozer while giving succor to terrorists.

In the words of Zionist professor Steven Plaut, Rachel is “a sort of Mother Teresa for the radical left and apologists of Islamofascism. She is a martyr-saint for the pro-terror lobby.”

16 March will mark the 8th anniversary of Rachel’s death. It’s a good time to remember her and ask ourselves what she died for. Are the Palestinians any nearer to achieving their dreams of an independent state? Are those who killed Rachel in a stronger or weaker position than they were eight years ago?

Advertisement

There are two versions to every major news story that comes out of Israel: the Zionist version and the non-Zionist one. These narratives never agree. They are mutually incompatible. One is the “right” version, the kosher and politically correct one advanced by organized Jewry and its hasbara agents in the mainstream media. The other is the “wrong” version, the one touted by “anti-Semites” and “conspiracy theorists”.

Rachel seen through Zionist eyes

According to the Zionist worldview, Rachel Corrie was

a clueless flag-burning undergraduate from Evergreen State College in Washington. Urged on by her radical professors, she decided to join the missions organized by the International Solidarity Movement (ISM). She and her comrades were sent off to the “occupied territories” to assist Palestinian terrorist groups. (See here)

Having arrived in Gaza in January, 2003, age 23, the budding terrorist had immediately been given a crash course by the ISM in how to be a thorn in the flesh to Israel. She lived among the Palestinians in Gaza, eating their food and imbibing their false values and skewed views of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Needlessly concerned about the “illegal occupation” of Palestine in the disputed territories of Judea and Samaria, all one hundred per cent Jewish by divine mandate, this dangerous fanatic seemed to be unaware that the Arabs had been squatters on Jewish land since the 13th century; and that this land, Greater Israel, stretched from the Nile to the Euphrates.

Here is Zionist pundit Denis Prager, telling us how unspeakably evil and misguided Rachel was:

Rachel Corrie chose to side with a society that breeds some of the cruelest murderers of innocent people in the world. [Emphasis in original]. Rachel Corrie gave her life trying to protect people whose declared aim is to annihilate another country. She was one of the many fools our colleges annually produce.

We are told repeatedly that Rachel was idealistic—as if that matters. Virtually every person who commits great evil—the Nazi, the communist, the Islamic terrorist—is idealistic.

We are told ad nauseam that Rachel Corrie was a “peace activist.” So let it be said once and for all that most of these people are moral frauds. Why? Because “peace activists” routinely protest only against peaceful countries. [They] only target peace-loving Israel and America.

Rachel Corrie and the millions marching to protect Saddam Hussein’s Iraq have never uttered a peep against Palestinian terror, Iraqi totalitarianism or North Korean gulags. Instead, they focus their animosity at the countries that confront these evils—the United States and Israel.

Grieve for Rachel Corrie’s parents, but spare us the hagiography. Rachel Corrie died fighting for the International Solidarity Movement, a Palestinian group dedicated—in its own words—to “armed struggle” against Israel. She ended up being a useful idiot for, and one more victim of, Palestinian terror. (See here)

On 16 March 2003, this useful idiot went too far. For two hours, she kept interfering with the work of an Israeli  bulldozer trying to demolish a Palestinian doctor’s home; a doctor with terrorist sympathies whose house had tunnels built under it, through which food, medical supplies and arms were being smuggled to give aid and sustenance to “filthy Arabs”—one million of whom, as we are reliably informed by respected rabbis, “are not worth a Jewish fingernail”.

She kept on getting in the way of the good Jewish driver, taunting him through a bullhorn and skipping from mound to mound of earth in her hateful fluorescent orange jacket, making it impossible for him to kill her and pretend he hadn’t seen her.

She was certainly asking for it.

Here is Steven Plaut again, Associate Professor of Business Studies at Haifa University, offering his condolences to Rachel’s parents after the tragic death of their daughter:

Welcome to Haifa, Mr and Mrs Corrie….Your daughter was in a war zone as a belligerent, on behalf of a movement of Arab fascists seeking to destroy Israel and murder as many Jews as possible. Your daughter died while interfering with an anti-terror operation carried out by soldiers in a land in which she had no business being at all….The Jews have been battling Arab fascism and genocidal terrorism for a hundred years, before, during, and after the Nazi Holocaust of six million Jews. Your daughter was helping those who perpetrate Nazi-like atrocities against randomly selected Jews….Your daughter has become a symbol for dangerous foolhardiness. She essentially committed suicide as an empty gesture to assist murderers and terrorists. (See here)

“Martyr, idiot, dedicated, deluded. Why did this American college student crushed by an Israeli bulldozer put her life on the line? And did it matter?” —Joshua Hammer, caption to a picture of Rachel in The Death of Rachel Corrie. (Mother Jones, 9/2003: http://motherjones.com/politics/2003/09/death-rachel-corrie

Rachel seen through non-Zionist eyes

Let’s cut to the chase now. Having described the politically correct version of Rachel’s death, the one insisted on by organized Jewry and the mainstream media, let’s consider the politically incorrect version now, if only in the interests of balance.

Here is Alison Weir, a well-respected authority on Palestine. Having read scores of different accounts of Rachel’s death, including every single eyewitness report, this is Weir’s beautifully succinct summation:

On March 16th, 2003, an Israeli soldier driving a bulldozer two-stories high crushed to death 23-year-old Rachel Corrie, an American nonviolent human rights protester. According to numerous witnesses and photographic documentation, she was killed intentionally.

Rachel and a handful of others practicing Gandhian nonviolence in the Gaza Strip had been pleading with Israeli soldiers for two hours not to destroy a Palestinian family home. Suddenly, the Israeli bulldozer operator began driving his giant bulldozer toward the home, Rachel sitting in the bulldozer’s path. Witnesses report that she then stood up on the mound of debris and dirt pushed by the bulldozer blade and looked straight at the operator through the window. He continued, and she was pulled underneath the tractor, its blade crushing her. He then backed up, running over her again, burying her deeper into the dirt. (My emphasis, see here).

Weir concludes her account of Rachel’s death:

Her friends ran to her screaming. They dug her out of the dirt. One told me that Rachel’s eyes were open; her last words were, “My back is broken.” (See here)

The day after Rachel’s death there was a memorial service for her in Gaza. Many Palestinians attended this service, the men’s faces etched with silent grief, the women’s eyes streaming tears. Here was a lovely American girl in the full flower of her youth who had died for Palestine.

Not to be excluded, the Israelis decided to attend Rachel’s memorial service too. To mock and gloat. The same bulldozer that had killed her was sent in to disrupt the ceremony. And this it did.

“The bulldozer that killed her drove slowly, exultantly past…” (Alison Weir)

Rachel’s Death: Its larger significance

Let’s now attempt to set the tragedy of Rachel Corrie within a wider context.

Clearly the death of this iconic figure was a public relations disaster for Israel. The effect of decades of Holocaust propaganda must have unravelled in a single instant. You bastards, you killed our Rachel! This must have been the thought uppermost in the minds of millions of Americans on hearing the tragic news of Rachel’s death. The ability to squeeze tears from non-Jewish eyes for Jewish suffering must have suffered a serious setback at this point. Why should we mourn your dead at Auschwitz when you killed our beautiful Rachel?

I confess, bad Christian that I am, that unkind thoughts such as these assailed me on the day I first heard that Rachel’s life had been snuffed out in the Holy Land. To put it mildly, the manner of her death did not increase my respect for Israel or enhance my capacity for shedding tears for Anne Frank.

I found myself buying a candle for Rachel and lighting it before a side altar in the Benedictine abbey near my home, offering up this prayer: “Lord Jesus Christ, protector of the weak, let Israel come to a speedy and peaceful end and the Jews be sent on their travels again—back to the countries where they belong!”

I shouldn’t have said that. But this is how I felt. And now that I’ve confessed it, I feel better.

Consider now these significant facts:

Rachel was killed on March 16, 2003, exactly four days before the beginning of the Iraq War. Ariel Sharon, already guilty of war crimes (Sabra and Shatila massacres, 1982) was Prime Minister of Israel at that time. He it was who had said, shortly after 9-11, that Israel could more or less do what it wanted with impunity. “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it!” he had famously boasted on Israel radio.

America said nothing on that occasion. It swallowed the insult.

Sharon must have known, on the day of Rachel’s death, that the Americans were getting geared up for their attack on Iraq four days later. They would have other more important things on their minds than the death of an obscure peace activist in Gaza. Sharon was on a roll. There is little doubt that the killing of Rachel received the green light from the Butcher of Sabra and Shatila himself.

Having spent two hours trying to demolish a house with Rachel constantly getting in his way, the bulldozer driver must have phoned for instructions from headquarters. Admittedly, this is pure speculation. The directive must have come back—so I imagine—“Kill her!” A salutary lesson needed to be set. The ISM peace activists had to be taught a stern lesson that Israel was not to be trifled with. If you throw yourself in front of a bulldozer, you can expect to get run over.

There is additional support for the hypothesis that Rachel’s death was a state-sanctioned act of premeditated murder. What “additional support”? Well, the fact that the same policy of reckless disregard for the lives of ISM peace activists was to continue unchecked in the immediate aftermath of Rachel’s death.

On April 5, a mere three weeks after Rachel’s death, peace activist Brian Avery was shot in the face by IDF forces and severely disfigured. Six days after that, on April 11, it was another peace activist’s turn. British ISM volunteer Tom Hurndall was shot in the head by an IDF soldier and left clinically brain dead, dying nine months later.

Many similar incidents followed, demonstrating that the bad publicity resulting from Rachel’s death had done nothing to galvanize Israel into taking remedial steps to improve its image.

I need mention only a few names: Tristan Anderson (American), Emily Henochowicz (Jewish-American), Tove Johansson (Swedish), Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mairead Maguire (Irish). I leave it to the reader’s imagination to picture the horrific injuries often sustained by Israel’s many victims: blindness, brain damage, disfigurement, mutilation, paraplegia, pain.

Tove Johansson, Swedish human rights activist, whose face was badly disfigured by an Israeli settler. Her crime? Helping Palestinian children get safely to school. About a hundred settlers gathered to jeer and spit at her and other peace activists with the chant: “We killed Jesus! We’ll kill you too!”

Facts and Figures

The number of foreigners killed and injured in Israel are a mere miniscule fraction of the number of Palestinians put through the mad mangle. More than 45,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel within the last ten years. Countless more have been injured.

Consider these horrific statistics: between four and five Palestinian children have been killed on average every week for the last ten years by Israeli forces, more than one every second day. (Based on figures found here).

Despite the fact that Israel has violated 65 UN resolutions, the US government continues to give this parasitic pariah state $8.2 million per day. Total “direct” aid to Israel has been conservatively estimated at $140 billion. It is interesting to note that, when indirect aid is added to this enormous sum, the total cost to the American taxpayer is a staggering $3 trillion — the identical amount, by the way, that Rabbi Dov Zakheim managed to “lose” or “misplace” when he was Chief Financial Officer at the Pentagon a few years ago.

If you’re wondering what $3 trillion looks like, imagine a stack of $100 bills piled up to 340 times the altitude of Mt Everest—or a money tower of $100 bills 3037 miles tall. (Based on figures found here and here).

Conflicting Stories: Who is lying?

As I mentioned earlier, there are always two sides to any question involving the state of Israel. There is the non-Zionist (or anti-Zionist) narrative which is usually harsh and condemnatory, accusing Israel of bad behaviour, and there is the Zionist narrative which is invariably self-exculpatory and seeks to present Israel as spotlessly innocent. We have seen this drama enacted repeatedly. There is little new here.

There was the USS Liberty incident in 1967, for example. (Here is a survivor’s detailed eyewitness account). On that occasion, a United States Navy research ship, USS Liberty, moving through international waters, was attacked by the Israeli Air force and Israeli Navy torpedo boats. Thirty-four American crew members were killed and 170 injured. There is more than enough evidence to show that this was a false flag act of terrorism committed by Israel against America.

As one might have expected, the Israelis claimed it was all a tragic accident, and the US government was happy to give them the benefit of the doubt.

Only last summer, there was the Gaza flotilla incident in which Israeli paratroopers attacked six ships in international waters on their way to Gaza on a humanitarian mission. Nine peace activists, mostly Turkish, were killed, and about fifty injured. On this occasion, turning logic on its head, the Israelis claimed they had been acting in self-defense when their own unprovoked violence had produced the inevitable resistance. (See here)

As usual, two conflicting accounts: the Israeli version and the world’s version.

Perhaps the most striking example of these polarities of viewpoint can be seen in the case of the Gaza War that took place in the winter of 2008-9 (‘Operation Cast Lead’). This led to massive disproportionate casualties on the Palestinian side, amounting to a massacre—a ratio of over 100 to 1 killed—together with the almost complete destruction of Gaza’s infrastructure; and it was concluded later, after an international  investigation led by Judge Richard Goldstone, himself a Zionist Jew, that Israel had been guilty of serious war crimes.

Despite these findings by a panel of world-renowned legal experts, Israel was to be let off the hook completely. It investigated itself and found that its behavior had been irreproachable. The AIPAC-enthralled American government reached a similar conclusion. Many neoconservatives went even further and suggested that the only “criminal” here was Judge Goldstone himself, an incorrigible anti-Semite and Hamas sympathizer!

What Israel says, our media repeat. What Israel demands, our government gives. What Israel wants, its well-greased lobby delivers. — Alison Weir, We Won’t Forget Rachel Corrie

So much for truth and justice in an Alice in Wonderland world turned upside down.

We won’t forget

Poor Rachel! What did you die for? Who is there to mourn you now except the Palestinians and those who love Palestine?

We shall not forget you, Rachel. We shall carry you in our hearts like a hidden flame. In your lovely innocence and idealism, you will remain to us always the perfect symbol of our people—and a reminder of what awaits us all in the days of tribulation to come.

Amnesty International condemned the killing of Rachel in the most emphatic terms. She is our role model, our icon, our symbol of sacrifice. Neither Israel nor its American backer paid the slightest attention.

Christian Bustany, Amnesty International’s US representative, lamented the fact that our dear Rachel, the flower of our race, had been so callously killed and nothing done about it.

As Rachel Corrie was an American citizen, the US government has a particular responsibility to ensure thorough, proper and impartial investigation of her death. US-made bulldozers have been ‘weaponized’. Their transfer to Israel must be suspended.

The killer bulldozers are still shipped out to Israel in vast numbers, courtesy of the American taxpayer, demolishing houses every day, uprooting olive trees, and running amok amid a terrified people.

The day after Rachel’s death, Israeli forces killed nine Palestinians, including three children.

It was business as usual.

Young Rachel…looking forward to life

Rachel’s last words: “My back is broken.”

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic, age 32, with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a published poet and translator whose verse can be sampled here. “Lasha Darkmoon” is a pen name.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

454 Comments to "Our Rachel"

  1. Bernie's Gravatar Bernie
    April 15, 2011 - 3:41 pm | Permalink

    I just read that the Palestinians killed another white person who went over there to advocate for them (but who could not be bothered to advocate for his own people).

    I put him in the same boat as “Our Rachel.” A poor, misguided white leftist who died in the service of other people.

    Just wondering what those who honor Rachel think of this. Is the Italian guy a hero too?

  2. flavia's Gravatar flavia
    March 27, 2011 - 11:30 pm | Permalink

    I’ll definitely be raising hoards of little Evola’s in my house. Home schooled. It is nonsensical for a woman to think she can attain more satisfaction being some middle manager business administrator than she can from ensuring that her genetic kin are as well taken care of and prepared for this world as possible. Even decades of Jewish propaganda on this matter has not convinced all women to eschew the family.

    To the whites that do not want to have a family- good! We need to get rid of those with the gene of self destruction. Good riddance. Be gone. Adopt a little black kid for ease of self identification if you can, pathetic cuckold.

    The great thing about people like Rachel Corrie is that they are sensitive to pain and injustice. For a very long time the injustice perpetrated on whites has not been so blatant, now it is. It is only natural for us to notice injustice wherever we may see it, even in our own country and within our own race. Universalism doesn’t mean complete blindness towards the in-group.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 28, 2011 - 11:59 am | Permalink

      A compromse should perhaps be made between the non-altruistic philosophy of Kevin MacDonald and the altruism which is the bedrock of Christianity.

      Even KMac, who claims to be an atheist, was born a Catholic and is imbued with many Christian values. You could say he remains very sympathetic to Christianity for other people! :) He sees it as a socially cohesive force that helps to preserve the family unit — which it does.

  3. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 23, 2011 - 11:34 am | Permalink

    For you modern women who think that all women always thought like you a challenge (in the form of a quote I found on James Edward’s site):

    “Indeed, I have the most affectionate and jealous regard for every right that inheres in my dower of American womanhood. I claim and enjoy the right to be as cultured, as learned, as useful, and—if you please—as ornamental in society and at home as my individual limitations will permit. I have no wrongs, no grievances, no crying need to usurp lines of work that will break down the barriers God has set between men and women. I am not in rebellion against legal statutes, nor the canons of well-established decency and refinement in feminine usage, and, finally, I am so inordinately proud of being a well-born Southern woman, with a full complement of honorable great-grandfathers and blue-blooded, stainless great-grandmothers that I have neither pretext nor inclination to revolt against mankind.”

    Augusta Jane Edwards, “A Speckled Bird”

    Rebellion is the proper word for your behavior.

    • March 23, 2011 - 8:17 pm | Permalink

      Dave,

      That was absolutely brilliant.

      A word to White Men.

      Your uxorious behavior is equally responsible for our destruction.

      Contrary to what Judeo-feminists have taught for the last 50 years, men (well, White men anyway) are not “natural rapists.” Our fault is that we are natural milquetoasts. We tend to dote on our women too much. That is our achilles heel.

      We must become better men, take back power from our women – who have been “empowered” by our enemies (and have used that power to betray us) – and re-implement a masculine polity.

  4. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 23, 2011 - 10:13 am | Permalink

    Where the rubber hits the road: It was to be expected that the discussion came to this point – whether white women will decide to have more babies so that our race survives.

    The response in these threads – even from those women purportedly on our side – is an effective “I don’t want to have kids and you can’t make me”. Sorry, demographics is destiny as they say. White women are in a unique position – men can’t have babies on their own. It doesn’t matter how particular women feel about feminism – if all white women limit their fertility they’re all contributing to our demise anyways – so they are our WORST enemies. Don’t listen to what they say watch what they do – those women limiting their fertility all act as if their attitude was “apres moi le deluge”. You know what happened to the “ancien regime”.

    Some comments on the passing scene: There was a news story today about how a PETA demonstration caused traffic accidents in LA. What were the circumstances? A bunch of foolish white women were convinced to shower nude in a busy intersection and that was the distraction that caused the accidents. I suspect PETA is just one of many scams intended to supply foolish white people with a substitute morality and to distract them from their primary responsibilities in life. Even thought these scams are clearly morally less significant than other life issues we are suckers for them – particularly women! These young women had absolutely no understanding of how ethnic outsiders have grasped white female sexuality and used it to their own advantages, e.g., in pornography to demoralize the white race and in sexual promiscuity to attack the family. If they had even a cursory understanding of these issues they could not allow themselves to be PIMPED in this manner!

    There was also the story of the young white coed at UCLA who made a youtube video about rude asians and received death threats. Who was pilloried here? The white coed or the Asians issuing death threats? The apparently jewish chancellor at UCLA went after the white coed of course! They don’t like you white women – you have just been useful idiots to them for the last century! Now with white demographic decline their real attitude will manifest itself. Because of white demographic decline and declining white enrollment at UCLA all the non-white minorities thought they could get away with this behavior and they have! Decisions have consequences! White people can’t maintain hegemony without demography! All you white people who think that minorities will treat you fairly when they are in the ascendancy are insane! The US attorney general has already taken public positions that he will not enforce the law in a color-blind manner!

    In case you didn’t pick up on the implication, regarding issues that really count, there isn’t much difference between the white women showering nude for PETA and women like Rachel Corrie.

    Now the cultural marxists are rolling out the “white privilege” meme. Note this new meme does not draw a distinction between sexes – the implication is “all white people – including women – are privileged and should be discriminated against”. Unless white women change their priorities you too well experience second-class citizenship – if not outright annihilation!

  5. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    March 23, 2011 - 7:19 am | Permalink

    Lasha Darkmoon, to the Zionist trolls who had swarmed onto this site posing as White Nationalists:

    I’d sooner meet Jack the Ripper in a dark alley than any of you guys.

    JACK THE RIPPER IDENTIFIED AS A POLISH JEW
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article687489.ece

  6. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    March 22, 2011 - 5:30 pm | Permalink

    which reminds me of the putative Christian slogan, Salvation is thru the Jews, or something like that.

    Study the jews and become a racialist.

  7. Joe Webb's Gravatar Joe Webb
    March 22, 2011 - 5:28 pm | Permalink

    yes, Rachel was a universalist and a woman ….but if she had lived a while longer around the jews, she would have probably joined us.

    The Jews saved me. It was they who gave me instruction, albeit unwittingly. J

  8. March 22, 2011 - 4:52 pm | Permalink

    Lasha,

    You keep chanting the same mantra. I just don’t buy it. When women are in the public sphere, they present obstacles that men must negotiate in order to deal effectively with Jewish Power. We have proven singularly unable to negotiate those obstacles. The Jews understand this. They deliberately put you in the way. They are effectively using women, as a group, as a shield. You must stand down.

    You ask yourself, “Are women better off after ninety years of feminism and female liberation?” And you answer with an emphatic NO.

    But you don’t ask yourself, “are men better off?” How about children? The answers, to both questions, are an equally emphatic NO.

    The Jews see “feminism” as the act of getting White women to delay, limit, or reject child-bearing in favor of injecting themselves into the public sphere. To them that is exactly what “feminism” is. That is the behavior they are encouraging. If that behavior has rendered all of us – men, women, and children – less better off, then why on earth would we want to encourage it?

    My definition (and theirs) isn’t “strict,” it is very broad. Your definition of “feminism” is too narrow to be useful. You seem to think that a “feminist” is only someone who hates men, favors killing their unborn children, and/or is a lesbian. While women like that are certainly “feminists,” there is much more to “feminism” than that. Christina Hoff Summers is against all of those things but she still classifies herself as a “feminist.” She calls herself an “Equity Feminist.” All she really wants is the right for women to delay, limit, and/or reject child-bearing and the right of women to inject themselves into the public sphere. Summers is a Jew and she understands that as long as women are allowed to do those two things White Civilization cannot adhere.

    I want to reiterate, some miniscule number of women may need to (for whatever reason) do those two things. And they should be allowed to. But no sane society would ever encourage women, en masse, to do those things.

    Chris,

    I think if you re-read my posts you will see that they are very subtle, indeed. In fact, they may be too subtle, folks seem to be missing the point.

    But thank you for your kind words regarding our efforts here in New England to restore the rights of people of European descent.

    Barkingmad,

    I think in a healthier society most women would feel truly liberated to, after the kids are grown-up and moved out, dedicate their “golden years” to their home and their still-working husband.

    However, as I’ve repeatedly said, I wouldn’t artificially forbid women from doing what they choose. I just think it is a really bad idea to encourage them to do things that, at least when done en masse by them, are extremely harmful to society.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 22, 2011 - 5:58 pm | Permalink

      Whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about. I just hate divorce because I don’t want to end up poor and lonely and without a family :( Feminists love divorce.

      I think that women should be able to work. But they should not be taking the ability of men to take care of women who are raising the next generation away from them. And that is what is happening now. Men should be able to aquire resources, which they can then use to spend on women who will raise children. And the men who are best at obtaining these resources should get to have the most children.

  9. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    March 22, 2011 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Maybe a Kinder, Küche, Kirche life & attitude are justifiable for younger women. But women’s contributions after menopause and the children have gone cannot be limited (by any thinking being) to catering to an ablebodied husband and dusting the furniture.

  10. March 22, 2011 - 1:11 pm | Permalink

    I think Russ needs to develop more subtlety and nuance regarding his views on women. He’s right that organized Jewish saboteurs have used feminism to pit men against women, but that doesn’t grant license for male chauvinism. In fact, this little dust up between Lasha and Russ is exactly the kind of outcome they are aiming for.

    That said, Russ is clearly on the front lines of the struggle, and not just in cyberspace, but the boots on the ground struggle.

    I just read his The Art of Suppression, which is essential reading as a case study in exactly how racist organized Jewry engages in anti-White racism and cultural sabotage, employing various apparatus’ to go about it.

    I recommend everyone here read it closely. It is an account that has high resonance. In fact, I point it out to the editors as something they may be interested in.

  11. iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
    March 22, 2011 - 11:19 am | Permalink

    Lasha,

    I posted a couple of comments and I kind of regret giving my opinion about Rachel when I didn’t know how much she meant to you and Kevin. It was really insensitive of me. I’m sorry if I upset you. It wasn’t intentional. And just so you know, I never ever belittled her actions or amused at her death, publicly or privately – that’s not me… I would feel sorry for anyone or anything that died the way Rachel did. Even tho I gave my opinion, I still thought she was a brave and principled person. I guess her self-sacrifice for something she believed in is admirable.

    Now I’ve thought about it more, I think Rachel was driven, not by outside influence, but by her inner nature of helping those who need help. And that’s not a bad thing. I’m sure the people of Palestine regreted her loss, intensely.

    I remember seeing this little girl, just after her house was blown up by Jewish terrorists, and there’s this little kid, crying, holding her half destroyed toys. A little luxury taking from her. I know how I felt seeing that. So I can understand why Rachel decided to go and help them.

    TT (old username: TicTac)

  12. Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
    March 22, 2011 - 8:58 am | Permalink

    @ Russ

    Here is an anti-feminist post of mine for which I have received a lot of hate mail from feminists. How can anyone call me a “feminist” after reading this?!?

    http://www.darkmoon.me/2011/are-women-equal-to-men/

  13. Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
    March 22, 2011 - 8:14 am | Permalink

    I am not a feminist — I am an anti-feminist!

    @ Russ

    Your definition of “feminist”, dear Russ, is so extreme that I doubt if one in a million would accept it!

    Thus according to you, EVERY female undergraduate at a university or college of further education is (like Rachel Corrie) a “feminist” by definition — because she is delaying childbirth.

    She ought to be at home, cooking and cleaning and having babies. Higher education is a male sphere and women should butt out.

    All nuns are “feminists”, you assert, because they have opted out of childbirth.

    I am a “feminist” by virtue of the fact that I write articles for the internet. I have had the impudence to enter the public domian — the “external sphere” as you put it — a sphere which, in your opinion, is sacrosanct to men.

    According to your strict definition of “feminist”, any woman who meddles in politics or public affairs (or is an activist for human rights causes like Rachel Corrie) is a “feminist” because

    (a) she is forgetting her intrinsic role as child-bearer and home-maker, and

    (b) “getting in the way of men” and generally being an obstacle to progress.

    Mother Teresa is a feminist. Rachel Corrie is a feminist. The Queen of England is a feminist. Even the Virgin Mary is a feminist for meddling in human affars and setting a bad example by remaining a virgin. :)

    * * * * *

    These extreme ideas of yours, dear Russ, would find few takers nowadays. In fact, you will be the first to admit they are not particularly original.

    These old-fashioned ideas happen to be an exact replica of the German Emperor Wilhelm II’s philosophy of Kinder, Küche, Kirche, or the 3 K’s, a slogan usually translated as “children, kitchen, church”.

    In Emperor Wilhelm’s opinion, these were the ONLY THREE ACTIVITIES with which women should concern themselves: children, kitchen work, and church-going.

    In short, domestic work should be woman’s sole occupation, all other human activities being left to men.

    You are relique from the past, Russ. I had no idea such extreme reactionaries still existed. Wow, I’m learning!

    Please don’t take offense. I am with you 100 percent in your distaste for the excesses of feminism. I am, I repeat, an anti-feminist by all normal definitions. I have been invited to write articles for two anti-feminist websites. Most feminists hold me in abhorrence. And I am the first to admit that feminism, as we know it today, is a Jewish plot: a divide-and-rule strategy that has had catastrophic consequences for both sexes.

    I ask myself, “Are women better off after ninety years of feminism and female liberation?” And the answer is an emphatic NO.

    Women are infinitely worse off. And so are men. So why on earth would I wish to be a “feminist”?

    • Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
      March 22, 2011 - 8:43 am | Permalink

      @ Russ

      I actually hold ideas that no true feminist would hold and would attack me for espousing: for example, the idea that men should always have priority in the job market over women when there is a job shortage.

      This used to be the case in Tasmania until recently. I was all for it. If a man and a woman applied for the same job and both were deemed equally competent, then the man should automatically get the job. (There are a number or reasons for this, but I won’t go into that here).

      In an ideal world, Russ, in a Utopian world, there would be no job shortages and women would allow men to be the main breadwinners. Women who think their careers are more important than childrearing are, in my opinion, sadly misguided.

      Ever see that movie, The Devil Wears Prada? Now THAT is pure Hollywood propaganda for the very worst excesses of feminism.

      These pushy women, obsessed with their jobs and careers to the exclusion of all else, are what organized Jewry would like all women to be: men in skirts.

  14. Mick's Gravatar Mick
    March 22, 2011 - 5:36 am | Permalink

    If any of my sisters, daughters, nieces or god-daughters were to “block” some outsider male from advancing because I or any male relative thought he was unfit, well praise the Lord, and bring on a better fellow. My genes still get ahead.
    In NY a few years ago we had a group of friends who were stopped by a negro with a firearm. Late, in the Village, they had been imbibing of adult beverages. One young lady, in full “I am woman here me roar” guise proclaimed:”What are you gonna do, shoot us?”
    He shot her.
    Can we compare this to Rachel?
    I would argue NO.
    Corrie was facing an “official” — perhaps using Western rights that don’t exist elsewhere — in full light of day. She was not irrational.
    Both these women were murdered.
    Men of the West, the negro is in prison, fully condemned for his crime. How about the jew?

  15. March 21, 2011 - 12:09 am | Permalink

    “Liberalism” is a code word for White Genocide.

    “Feminism” is a sect of “liberalism,” therefore “feminism” is a component of White Genocide and is anti-White. Any one who engages in it, is a party to White Genocide and is anti-White, whether they understand that or not.

    “Feminism” was organized by Jews, to separate White women from White men, in an effort to get them to think and act in ways that will bring about White Genocide. It encourages two specific behaviors in women that accomplish genocide:

    1. It encourages them to put-off, limit, and/or reject child-bearing which reduces the White fertility rate, and

    2. It encourages them to move out of the domestic sphere and into the “external sphere” of work and war. This displaces men from jobs, as well as causing massive psychological damage to men by forcing them “to accept” this completely manufactured displacement by their females. This engenders genocide by lowering the earnings power of men and by making them submissive in the face of attacks on their people and society. Attacks which include invasion (i.e. racial-flooding).

    Rachel Corrie rejected the domestic sphere and willfully injected herself into the external sphere, in a pathetic attempt at manhood, by trying to perform the role of a man as a “war leader.” This makes her a “feminist,” which in turn makes her anti-White, and a party to White Genocide.

    Why would anyone want to lionize someone like that. As I said in one of my earlier posts, she represents everything wrong with today’s Judeo-feminist indoctrinated, White female and she should not, under any circumstances, be represented to White people – particularly impressionable, young, White females – as a role model (or, God forbid, a martyr).

    The attempt to lionize this women is wrong.

    If those trying to canonize her were legitimate and really believed that White efforts in Palestine against the Jew were legitimate then why haven’t you chosen one of the several White men involved in the ISM who have been killed by Israelis?

    By choosing to elevate a female over (at least equally qualified) men, you are continuing the same long-standing assault that the Cultural Marxists have been making against White men.

    You are not the good guys and neither is your standard bearer, Rachel Corrie.

    • Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
      March 21, 2011 - 7:26 am | Permalink

      @ Russ

      In Defense of Rachel Corrie

      I reject these arguments.

      Just because Rachel Corrie engaged in political activity in the “external sphere”, instead of staying home and having babies, does NOT make an anti-White “feminist” out of her— any more than Mother Teresa was an anti-White feminist for pursuing a non-domestic role and choosing to remain celibate.

      (Are nuns all “feminists” because they don’t have babies?)

      I myself am no feminist. Far from it. I accept all your arguments against feminism and regard this movement as little more than a Jewish conspiracy to drive a wedge between man and woman, weakening each of the sexes and leading to a breakdown in the family structure.

      So why should I, a pronounced anti-feminist (who has recently been invited to contribute an article to Henry Makow’s anti-feminist site), wish to “lionize” Rachel Corrie if she were the “feminist” you say she is?

      Your disparagement of Corrie as a “feminist” might have had some validity if it had been based on fact rather than on inference. Can you produce a single pro-feminist quote from Corrie? Can you supply concrete evidence to show that she was against the family unit and preferred a career to having babies? That she was pro-abortion, or anti-man, or had lesbian tendencies?

      No, you cannot; for no such evidence exists.

      * * * * *

      Do you honestly expect anyone to believe that because a young college student in her gap year at university goes out to a foreign country and engages in temporary political activity, that this somehow makes her “anti-family” and “pro-feminist”?

      What makes you think Rachel wouldn’t have settled down and got married and have had lots of babies if she had been allowed to return to America — in one piece — after her short stint in the Middle East working for the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) as a voluntary peace activist?

      You are probably unaware of the fact that Rachel’s political activity in Gaza was rubber-stamped by her university as part of her academic work. It was a type of “course work” and would have gone on her CV when job-hunting in the future.

      It had nothing whatever to do with feminism.

      What Rachel did was no more a foray into “feminism” than it would be for an American foreign-language student to spend a gap year in France or Germany improving his/her language skills.

      I’m afraid your logic is askew, dear Russ, and I must reject your arguments as basically unsound. However, I do respect you and regard you as a highly intelligent person. I just think you’re wrong on this particular issue, that’s all.

      I am also 100 percent behind you in your condemnation of feminism as a subversive movement invented by organized Jewry: yes, as a Jewish conspiracy.

    • March 22, 2011 - 12:29 am | Permalink

      Lasha,

      I understand your identification with Corrie. You’re a lot like her (you hold “higher degrees,” you have moved into the external sphere – writing poetry and publishing at TOO – and I assume you have not married or had children). Of course, you believe her actions and lifestyle were legitimate and it’s no wonder you’d like to see her honored. But I profoundly disagree with that goal. As I said before, I think she represents everything wrong with today’s White female and I don’t want young White women encouraged to follow in her footsteps.

      It isn’t a matter of whether women, like you (and Corrie), are capable. You are. (In fact, your article on Jews in the art world, and Elizabeth Whitcombe’s article on the influence of the Frankfurt School on contemporary music, are two of my favorite pieces at TOO.) The problem is that when you are in the public sphere you are obstacles to men (for far too many reasons to go in to here). You are in the way of men and prevent us from being able to accomplish what we need to accomplish. The Jews understand this, it’s why they organized “feminism” in precisely the way they did. They wanted to turn you into obstacles that would block and prevent White male achievement – in every field.

      But to answer some of your questions:

      Just because Rachel Corrie engaged in political activity in the “external sphere”, instead of staying home and having babies, does NOT make an anti-White “feminist” out of her— any more than Mother Teresa was an anti-White feminist for pursuing a non-domestic role and choosing to remain celibate.

      By my definition above, yes, it does. (Mother Theresa was certainly a feminist. See the next question for more on that.)

      (Are nuns all “feminists”? . . .)

      Yes. One of the hallmarks of advanced societies is how they deal with the miniscule number (less than 1%) of women among them who are instinctively feminist. Convents were Christian societies’ answer to the problem.

      I myself am no feminist.

      But you are.

      Your disparagement of Corrie as a “feminist” might have had some validity if it had been based on fact rather than on inference. Can you produce a single pro-feminist quote from Corrie? Can you supply concrete evidence to show that she was against the family unit and preferred a career to having babies? That she was pro-abortion, or anti-man, or had lesbian tendencies?

      Corrie is a feminist by my definition. Any woman that delays, artificially limits, or rejects child-bearing is a feminist. Also, any women, that injects herself into the public sphere of men, is a feminist.

      Do you honestly expect anyone to believe that because a young college student in her gap year at university goes out to a foreign country and engages in temporary political activity, that this somehow makes her “anti-family” and “pro-feminist”?

      I don’t know if I would label her “anti-family” but it absolutely does make her a feminist. By the definition above, any female who goes to college, and thus delays child-bearing, and injects herself into the public sphere is a feminist.

      What makes you think Rachel wouldn’t have settled down and got married and have had lots of babies if she had been allowed to return to America — in one piece — after her short stint in the Middle East working for the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) as a voluntary peace activist?

      Maybe she would have. But that doesn’t excuse her behavior and I certainly don’t want her held-up to other impressionable, young women (or men for that matter) as a role-model or a hero.

      ———————————

      My responses to the rest of your post will be more of the same. So I won’t continue in that vein.

      I would just like to clarify my point. I believe (as I noted above) that a small number of women are, for whatever reason (and there are many reasons), feminist. I have no desire to forbid these women the option of foregoing child-bearing or entering the “public sphere,” as I’ve labeled it. I simply don’t want society holding this up as a standard which women, in general, should aim for. It harms all of us.

  16. Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
    March 20, 2011 - 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Let me end on a lighthearted note. No matter what bad things are said about the Jews, it cannot be denied they have a highy developed sense of humor — one of their most captivating characteristics. And they always have the last word.

    Here’s a good example.

    In 1924, the poet William Norman Ewer wrote this famous anti-Semitic quatrain you will frequently find scrawled on washroom walls:

    How odd
    Of God
    To choose
    The Jews.

    He was at once made to look a fool by philosemite Cecil Browne who replied:

    But not so odd
    As those who choose
    A Jewish God,
    But spurn the Jews.

    A Jew, Leo Rostein, was to provide the clincher. And he did it beautifully:

    Not odd
    Of God:
    Goyim
    Annoy ‘im.

    • Jim's Gravatar Jim
      March 21, 2011 - 9:59 pm | Permalink

      But is it God
      that chose the jews
      who play the odds
      until they lose?

    • Jim's Gravatar Jim
      March 21, 2011 - 10:29 pm | Permalink

      (“STACK the odds” would be a better line)

  17. Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
    March 20, 2011 - 7:27 pm | Permalink

    This thread has now runs its course, so I would like to thank all those who contributed to it and helped to make it so entertaining and stimulating to read.

    The number of posts attacking Rachel Corrie came as real surprise to me. I had always assumed that most of Kevin MacDonald’s supporters were anti-Zionists who would therefore be sympathetic to Rachel Corrie. The sheer volume of anti-Rachel posts forces me to conclude that the bulk of these posters, far from being Kevin MacDonald’s dearest supporters, are in the fact his deadliest enemies.

    In attacking me personally for writing this article in commemoration of a young American woman who died in a noble cause — for yes, the Palestinian cause is as noble as it can get — these Rachel bashers are in fact questioning my editor’s judgement for accepting my article in the first place; they are telling him in no uncertain terms that they would rather read articles vilifying Rachel Corrie.

    It’s hate they want, not love. Commemoration leaves them cold. It’s desecration they desire.

    White Nationalists? I don’t think so! I won’t waste my time speculating what they are.

  18. DianaBlaze's Gravatar DianaBlaze
    March 20, 2011 - 5:59 pm | Permalink

    @anonyma

    I didn’t realize there were stylistic differences because I stopped reading his posts after a while but it is an interesting observation.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 20, 2011 - 6:47 pm | Permalink

      ‘Jason Speaks’ has contributed over 100 long posts to this thread alone. (You can easily check this out). Well over 10,000 words. They are all well written in the style of a retired Jewish college professor with lots of time on his hands.

      It only becomes apparent that this character is part of a TEAM of Jews when you examine the same writer’s posts from 2-3 weeks ago. He is then a pretty uneducated character who makes several spelling mistakes which the professorial type would never make. He can’t even spell OUTING (he spells it OUTTING, not once but twice). He gets ITS and IT’S mixed up repeatedly. And he spells NICKELS as “nickles”.

      Obviously this ignoramus has to be a totally different “Jason Speaks” to the professorial type who is the current ‘Jason Speaks’ and writes correct English always.

      As I said earlier, we have TEAMS of Jews working as a unit on this site. The poster “Someday” is another only too obvious troll, as he is constantly lending support to ‘Jason Speaks’.

      These guys all have on thing in common:they profess to be devout White Nationalists while bending over backwards to say nice things about Zionism and sing the praises of Israel. And of course they have spent this entire thread spewing their spitte all over Rachel Corrie.

      They really must be desperate to descend on this website in such huge numbers and on this particular thread — over 420 posts so far, not counting all the deleted ones.

      One has to feel sorry for them.

    • Dave's Gravatar Dave
      March 20, 2011 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

      @Chris Moore: Since you won’t debate me about what rhetorical approaches work best I’ll debate you about the accuracy of your historical/political analysis. You said this:

      “What is fascism in general terms? A top down, hierarchical structure with a patriarchal, particularistic, “pure blooded,” race running things, and everyone else at their mercy or enslaved by them, essentially existing at their pleasure.”

      Your analysis of fascism is incomplete. Fascistic movements were NATIONAL movements contained within nation-states. That is why there were SEPARATE fascistic movements in Germany, Italy, Spain and even the UK. NS German territorial acquisitions up to and including the partition of Poland are not a counter-example since these moves merely sought to place all German peoples and historically German lands under German rule.

      Bolshevik communism was a jewish inspired INTERNATIONAL movement that sought to subjugate the entire world. By calling a jewish supremacist movement like bolshevik communism “judeo-fascistic” you are (intentionally? unintentionally?) giving people the WRONG impression that jewish supremacists running bolshevik communism only had NATIONAL ambitions. That impression is so wrong it is laughable.

      As I have stated before, Jewish supremacism is a better term to describe, e.g., “bolshevik communism” than judeo-fascism because in its very formulation it reflects the INTERNATIONAL scope of jewish ambitions. Using “judeo-fascism” instead of “jewish supremacism” obscures the scope jewish ambitions since you are using a term that describes NATIONAL movements to describe an INTERNATIONAL movement. Jewish supremacists are not fascists because they do not have ambitions limited to their own nation. If only they were fascists! We could let them have Tasmania and be done with them!

    • March 20, 2011 - 11:04 pm | Permalink

      I think your points are fair and worth debating, and agree that “judeo-supremaicsm” or “jewish supremacism” are also useful terms and should be used liberally as well.

      On behalf of the term “Judeofascism,” I would counter that the plan is to set up Jewish Zionist fascist cells in multiple countries that are then united into an international web run out of Jerusalem.

      I think a strong argument can be made that the Nazis had similar intentions to unite fascist movements, and planned to dominate Europe and beyond from Berlin.

      Maybe I’m narrow minded, but other than sheer ambition, I honestly can’t see why anyone would want to waste political energy and capital trying to rehabilitate the term “fascism” when it can be usefully and effectively wielded against Jewish fascists in Israel and beyond.

      The fact that so many leftists are against the term proves that they see it as a liability as well due to Judeofascism’s historical and contemporary influence over their own ideology (although the term judeo-supremacism” leaves them vulnerable as well for the same reason). To me, Judeofascism is more effective, though, because it implies a coherent, organized political ideology, whereas Judeo-supremacism implies mere bigotry, or loosely organized bigotry.

  19. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 20, 2011 - 9:40 am | Permalink

    That should be “austrian corporal” not “austrian “colonel”.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      March 20, 2011 - 9:19 pm | Permalink

      I prefer Corporal Frankenburger, his jew grandpa’s name, Miss Maria Schicklegruber bore Adolf’s father (Alois) after being impregnated by the jew Frankenberger outside of wedlock.

  20. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 20, 2011 - 2:54 am | Permalink

    @Chris Moore: Think like a rhetoritician and not a pedant. I’m sorry to say that if you can’t see that “fascism” and allusions to national socialism should be avoided when discussing legitimate white interests then you are beyond hope. Read your last post. It needlessly reminds people of the excesses of national socialism, damns patriarchy by associating it with fascism, and even mentions that darned austrian colonel. You used “fascism” like seven or eight times and “bolshevism” once even though bolsheviks had a higher body count! That’s the DEFINITION of obscurantism. Of course, if you’re really a troll, I understand why you want to inject “fascism” into every discussion of legitimate white interests and use it with abundance!

    • March 20, 2011 - 2:23 pm | Permalink

      Uh, Dave, sorry to inform you, but Hitler is indelibly connected with fascism, and will always be. Perhaps it was his Jewish blood coming out.

      And Bolshevism is merely Judeofascism with layers and layers of window dressing.

      It’s the controlled opposition neo-fascists, along with the controlled opposition leftists, who are sidetracking White people into dead-end alleys. They’re the “trolls” of humanity. And a lot of them don’t even know it.

  21. March 19, 2011 - 9:13 pm | Permalink

    Dave: “[Jews are] racial realists/hbd aficionados for Israel, and multiculturalists/radical egalitarians for everyone else”

    (Hopefully without being accused of compulsiveness): What is fascism in general terms? A top down, hierarchical structure with a patriarchal, particularistic, “pure blooded,” race running things, and everyone else at their mercy or enslaved by them, essentially existing at their pleasure.

    Isn’t this exactly what Jewry has in mind for humanity long term?

    Personally, I’m utterly convinced that fascist-like formulations are simply following Jewry down the rat-hole, because I’m convinced that Jews are indeed the original fascists, and all of their intrigue and intellectual efforts have been geared toward that end, whether the wind-up Jews implementing Talmudic doctrine via ideologies like Bolshevism even realized it or not.

    Think about this, too. If someone smart wanted to implement fascism, how would they go about it: by ranting and raving like Hitler and getting opponents all worked up, or by slowly raising the temperature of the pot until their opponents were cooked without even knowing it?

    This is exactly how supremacist Jewry is going about it.

    The alternative that I would propose would require a tract unto itself, but something along the lines of the Greeks + a more pluralistic Holy Roman Empire.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 19, 2011 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

      “Jews are the original fascists.”

      I certainly think there is credence to the idea. For instance, the Talmud suggests that Jews will inherit a millenial rule of the Messiah. Hitler believed in a millenial reich. And Churchill says in one of his speeches something like, “if the British empire lasts a thousand years, I hope we will remember this [Battle of Britain] as our finest hour.”

    • March 20, 2011 - 12:43 am | Permalink

      Yes, and neither Hitler nor the British Empire lasted very much longer because they were both dealing with an even more serpentine opponent.

      The masses have an interest in collaborating against fascists and fascism. Once they recognize Talmudic Jews as the ultimate fascists, it won’t take long to isolate them permanently.

    • visitor's Gravatar visitor
      March 20, 2011 - 1:18 am | Permalink

      to chris moore:
      coming from a libertarian mindset, too, i totally disavow national socialism or any socialism. part of the problem with this model is “regulatory capture”, where special interest groups co-opt the state and are thereby empowered.

      regulation is always the friend of big business, big banking and finance, and big labour in hobbling smaller, nimbler competitors. no prize for guessing who controls the former.

      and anyone who thinks contemporary america is laissez faire, should consult the federal register. in 2007, i believe it amounted to some 73,000 pages. now it’s electronic and so harder to size, but it has bulked up significantly.
      http://bookstore.gpo.gov/

      who thrives in a regulatory bracken of complicated laws, strictures, and loopholes? isn’t that just what talmudic training is all about?

  22. DianaBlaze's Gravatar DianaBlaze
    March 19, 2011 - 5:00 pm | Permalink

    Jason would have you hate Rachel Corrie because she befriended brown people. But we have always done that in one form or another. White missionaries traveled to the most godforsaken corners of the earth and saved peoples souls and fed their bodies and educated their young.

    Jason would have you believe that you most avoid their 4000 year old conflict. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict dates from this century and the Jewish theft of Palestine but Jason doesn’t want you to know this fact.

    Jason would have you believe that we just need to leave the people in the Middle East alone to sort out their own problems as though that might be possible with a Zionist directed foreign policy agenda running the American ship of state into the ground.

    Jason is horrified that white people might be put in service to the Arabs or so he says, or is he afraid that the truth about the Middle East will finally be discovered by the Americans who serve Jewish interests and not their own.

    And though we didn’t need Ariela Sharon to tell us who controls America, it sure didn’t do any harm. The point is that he made it not where. And by the way, Gaddifi’s son is dating an Israeli!

    We’re all on the same side as far as the Jewish lobby Jason tells us. I don’t think so. There are plenty of Jews who are anti-Zionist at this juncture. I believe because Israel is turning into an embarrassment, and more importantly, leads the way to revelations of the unseemly past of this people. As a matter of fact ISM I is lead by a Jew. Other than get 20 other Palestinians killed at village protest it has accomplished very little.

    Peaceniks in the Middle East are generally of a left wing stripe but all white. And that is the point. Silly emotionalism may be exactly what the white movement needs. As one wag put it, the Palestinians won’t get their freedom until the Americans get theirs. Our Middle East policy has made us hated even among other white nations!

    Notice how Jason always minimizes Jewish culpability. So what he tells us if the Secretary of War in the Confederacy was Jewish. So what is Henry Kissinger is Jewish so what is Hilary Clinton learned Yiddish as a child. So what is Rahm Emanuel’s father was in the Irgun Stern. So what already!

    Just remember Rachel Corrie is your enemy. Don’t forget the left is your enemy. And don’t mince words when criticizing other races. Why is Jason so preoccupied with Rachel’s leftist politics and not willing to point out that the left is a Jewish contrivance.

    Despite being a painfully politically correct American kid, Rachel had a beauty of the soul and spirit that Jason, the ugly little troll can’t stand. Notice how he caricatures MacDonald’s work. Notice how he makes the white movement look petty and mean-spirited. Notice how we’re put on the defensive when defending one of our own. Notice how much time we waste talking about him. Notice all the games.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 19, 2011 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

      I don’t ‘hate’ Rachel, non one really does, we just can’t put her on a pedestal with other White women we have known and admired. And I do hate much of the politics she attached herself to (fighting against “white privilege” and Cultural Marxism).

      And I’ve already made suggestions for how the issue of Rachel’s death could be more effectively used to encourage Americans to stop providing aid to Israel. The key at this point in time is to drive a wedge between Christian Americans and Zionists. That is the answer. Rachel’s beliefs and associations are a non-starter for White Conservative Christians, that is a fact. And that’s the group that needs to reconsider its reflexive Zionism.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 19, 2011 - 6:21 pm | Permalink

      Yeah, I agree. I supported Jason Speaks before because I thought, even if he is a Jew, he might still have something important to contribute. And God-willing, we might even be able to teach him that we are not evil. But he is just here to spread FUD and be completely close-minded. He just thinks we are blind Jew haters, despite all of the evidence to the contrary. I find that ethnocentric and irritating.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 19, 2011 - 8:21 pm | Permalink

      @ DianaBlaze

      Rachel had a beauty of the soul and spirit that Jason, the ugly little troll, can’t stand. Notice how he caricatures MacDonald’s work. Notice how he makes the white movement look petty and mean-spirited.

      Join the Hate Jason Club, Diana! So you’ve spotted “the ugly litle troll”, it seems. Just remember two facts about “Jason Speaks”, Diana.

      (1) He has contributed more than 100 posts to this tread, so he is obviously a full-time operative working for organized Jewry — since everything he says either belittles Rachel or puts in a good word for Israel.

      As you have so rightly pointed out, he recommends that Whites should concentrate 100 percent on White Nationalism in America and leave the Palestinians for the Israelis to deal with. Israel will do all us Whites a favor, he suggests, by genociding these brown-skinned people on our behalf and thus make the world a whiter place!

      This is his bizarre logic.

      (2) “Jason Speaks” is not ONE person, Diana. Different Jews are posting under the same name. I proved this above by stylistic analysis. I showed that a previous “Jason Speaks”, writing 2 weeks ago, wrote very poor Engish with lots of spelling mistakes, whereas the present “Jason Speaks” makes no mistakes and is obviously an educated man (or woman).

      This is not just one troll, Diana. This is a collective effort. A group of Zionist trolls working as a unit.

  23. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 19, 2011 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

    @Chris Moore: In fact, the easiest and most encompassing argument to make is not that some jews are “judeo-fascists” but just to casually observe that some jews are both zionists AND cultural marxists/multiculturalists WITHOUT ANY COGNITIVE DISSONANCE. How can that be? They’re racial realists/hbd aficionados for Israel, and multiculturalists/radical egalitarians for everyone else (how nice of them). “Hypocritical racial chauvinists” covers the implicit lack of empathy in holding such contradictory positions quite nicely (you mean whites can’t have their own country like Israelis and everyone else in the world?). You don’t need “judeo-fascist” to make this argument. In fact, your focus on “judeo” makes it seem like you have a problem with the jews in general. I know I don’t, its just that I don’t like some of their radical revolutionary movements which have been bad for my people.

  24. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 19, 2011 - 3:55 pm | Permalink

    @Chris: I have a point, and you’re being compulsive. The first things I learned about cultural marxism and the Frankfurt school were that cultural marxism was a response to white male european hostility towards orthodox economic marxism and in cultural marxism’s first incarnation (post ww 1 Hungary) it sought to degrade white gentile sexuality with a radical scheme of sexual “education” (some things haven’t changed). When white male europeans didn’t want to play ball in the “destruction of western civilization” (what did the ethnic outsiders expect? – white males to reject their own culture?) – the marxists sought those with grievances to recruit – minorities and women. And white males have been the target ever since. By using “judeo-fascist” you’re really not using the most accurate terminology nor are you doing your part to educate your own people. If you persist in such obscurantism you may cause people to question your motives.

  25. March 19, 2011 - 2:14 pm | Permalink

    Dave: “When people are pointed in the right direction, learn about who birthed marxism, communism, cultural marxism and the Frankfurt school and why they did it the veil should be lifted from their eyes. Your formulation engages in some (unintentional) obscurantism because it doesn’t immediately point the reader in the right direction.”

    Look at it from the opposite angle, though. People mistakenly widely associate organized Jewry with liberalism, compassion, refined sensitivity — the opposite of fascism — yet it turns out that organized Jewry is a fascist formulation. That immediately discredits all of the Jewish ideologies and intellectual movements above as masks and fronts for evil crypto-fascism, and implicates large factions of Jewry themselves as being guilty of what they have been loudly condemning in others for decades.

    That connection, that realization, that eureka moment will wipe out the credibility of supremacist organized Jewry faster than a tsunami.

  26. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 19, 2011 - 12:41 pm | Permalink

    @Chris Moore: In fact, the point you’re trying to make in your formulation has to do with the fetish for hierarchy some people have – “supremacist” makes the point better than “fascist”.

  27. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 19, 2011 - 12:25 pm | Permalink

    @Chris Moore: Using the words I suggested points the casual observer right back to where they need to go to be disavowed of the view that communism was an altruistic “brotherhood-of-man” operation. When people are pointed in the right direction, learn about who birthed marxism, communism, cultural marxism and the Frankfurt school and why they did it the veil should be lifted from their eyes. Your formulation engages in some (unintentional) obscurantism because it doesn’t immediately point the reader in the right direction. If you use the words I suggested the curious are pointed in exactly the right direction.

  28. March 19, 2011 - 12:03 pm | Permalink

    I’ve stated this before here clearly: I’m not a White nationalist. If I had to put myself into a category, it would probably be something like a libertarian-populist-Christian-messianic.

    The reason I am here is because it is the pre-eminent site on the Jewish question, which I have been studying, thinking and writing about for years.

    Am I an advocate of Whites? I’m White myself, so I better be. But that doesn’t go hand-in-hand with fascism, as some people insist it does (including the ADL). White’s flourished and prospered most under the Christendom of Western Civilization, not under the fascism of Nazi Germany.

    This site is “Occidental Observer,” and due to proprietor MacDonald’s specialty, it maintains a special emphasis on the Jewish question. As far as I know, it’s not a White nationalist party apparatus, despite MacDonald’s association with A3P. It attracts plenty of White nationalists though. Fine. I have no problem with that. Thankfully, it’s still a free country.

    One other point: What’s bad for the devil is good for humanity (Whites included); similarly, what’s bad for the misanthropic Judeofascists is good for humanity and Whites and Christians ESPECIALLY.

    Why? Even though their toll in the Arab and Islamic world is rising, Judeofascists have more White and Christian blood on their hands than any other race by a huge factor, and show no signs as having reformed their ways. All they have done is switched their masks from Bolshevik to neocon, neoliberal, and Zionist.

    When a serial killer changes into a different wig, does his essence change?

  29. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 19, 2011 - 11:28 am | Permalink

    @Chris Moore: “judeo-fascism” is a poor choice of words. “Fascism” was an organic white development sponsored by white men who perceived bolshevik communism as the racist threat that it was. White men who joined fascist movements did it for self-preservation reasons. This is not “bunk”, “a racist lie”, “paranoid rantings of a lunatic” – it is well documented that one of the first things the bolsheviks did when they came to power is purge the Russian elite of Russians. So when Germans, Italians and Spaniards joined fascist movements they did so because they thought their personal existence, way-of-life and culture were at threat. The problem with fascism is that in some guises it became overly concerned with racial matters and morphed into racial idolatry, so it is subject to criticism. Nonetheless, your formulation in some way sullies a movement that started for legitimate reasons and had some legitimate goals (e.g., the avoidance of ethnic and cultural genocide). I prefer words like “marxist”, “cultural marxist” “”bolshevism”, “bolshevik”, “commissar”, and “hypocritical ethnic chauvinist”.

    • March 19, 2011 - 11:57 am | Permalink

      Dave: “The problem with fascism is that in some guises it became overly concerned with racial matters and morphed into racial idolatry…”

      That’s because it is patterned on Judeofascism. How so? You said it yourself: “it is well documented that one of the first things the bolsheviks did when they came to power is purge the Russian elite of Russians. So when Germans, Italians and Spaniards joined fascist movements they did so because they thought their personal existence, way-of-life and culture were at threat.”

      In other words, Christian and White fascists began organizing in the West along the same lines as Judeofascist Bolsheviks had organized the new Soviet.

      Contrast with Christianity, which was originally not an emulation of Judeofascism, but a break from it, a rejection of its essence.

  30. Petronius's Gravatar Petronius
    March 19, 2011 - 10:58 am | Permalink

    ““Facts are stubborn things”, you say. Well then, how do you account for the “stubborn” fact that the Israelis did NOT treat Rachel Corrie with the care they profess to treat all White non-Jews?”

    Now, that is really easy: the question here was about Rachel’s BELIEFS about Israeli policies (and moreso about “white privilege), not about their actual REALITY. That was one of her big fatal fallacies. Another proof how naive and deluded she was about real life politics.

    In any case, her statement was not so far from the truth, if you reframe it a bit: for diplomatic and “image” reasons Israelis certainly have an interest not to harm Western (“white* as Rachel says ) people or any other bystanders during violent actions and conflicts. In Rachel’s case they failed: to say it with a famous line of Napoleon, from a Zionist perspective her killing was more than a crime – it was a mistake. To make up for this loss in the propaganda war, pro-Zionist media had a lot of work to do to cover this up. (But don’t worry, Lasha won’t give up, and she’ll shamelessly go deep down the schmaltz and emotional manipulation alley to give everybody their pretty blonde martyr, a strategy that will never work anyway.)

    Finally: the stubborn stupidity of some people here amazes me, and I guess it fits, that these are usually the same who scream “Zionist swarm invasion” as soon as dissent with their reasoning rises its ugly head…

  31. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    March 19, 2011 - 7:16 am | Permalink

    TROLL FACTORY

    I have noticed a significant pattern develp at least THREE times recently. When “Jason Speaks” make a post — not always, but sometimes — we suddenly get an epidemic of ITALICS!

    Every single post in in italics!

    What are you doing, Jason Speaks, to screw up this website?

    * * * * *

    I happen to know that “Jason Speaks”, who has contributed over ONE HUNDRED POSTS to this website in the last three days — check if you want — is not a a single individual. He is part of a TROLL FACTORY.

    More than one individual is posting under the name “Jason Speaks”. They take it in turns to use this generic name. It’s a group of Jews doing this.

    I have irrefutable evidence of this.

    The current “Jason Speaks” is probably a retired Jewish professor. He writes very well and doesn’t makes any spelling mistakes. A previous “Jason Speaks” however, writing 2 weeks ago, makes many spelling mistakes and grammatical errors which the current professorial “Jason Speaks” would never make.

    The bad-speller “Jason Speaks”, for example, spells the word OUTING as “outting” (twice), NICKELS as “nickles”, and ITS as “it’s”. And several other such howlers.

    These guys can’t be the same person.

    I repeat, we have a group of Jews at work here. A troll factory.

  32. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 19, 2011 - 6:46 am | Permalink

    I firmly believe that the United States would not be in debt if it were not for the Jews. Did you know that interest on the national debt is a significant portion of our federal budget? Historically, who has charged interest?

    http://www.rense.com/general41/trill.htm

    Here is a site showing research (meaning more than one scientist put his reputation at stake) that Israel alone, discounting all the trouble Jews have caused domestically, has cost the American public 3 trillion dollars. And if we remember, in 2003, that was essentially the entire national debt. It is a lot of money. The 3 trillion figure is in 2002 dollars.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 19, 2011 - 7:13 am | Permalink

      “When the federal government runs a deficit, the Treasury borrows money from the public by selling securities in the capital markets,” the CBO says. “That debt is purchased by various buyers, including foreign investors, mutual funds, state and local governments, commercial banks, insurance companies and individuals. Of those groups, foreign investors (governments, businesses and individuals) currently own 45 percent of all federal debt issued to the public — or nearly $2.1 trillion of the roughly $4.6 trillion that is now outstanding.”

      And just WHO are these foreign and domestic investors? Is it wrong for me to ask who owns the tax money that I have to give if it is NOT me, and NOT even Americans? Additionally, taxes have to keep rising if we are actually going to pay off all this debt. What if the interest ever becomes the whole federal revenue? In that case, ALL the tax money goes to mysterious “investors”.

      And I think we all know what that means. We could very well become a nation of slaves. And to WHOM exactly? To which individuals? To which specific groups? We don’t even know!

      In that year, 350billion dollars went to interest on a debt of 2.7trillion. This was also the early 2000’s.

  33. March 18, 2011 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

    Nice try, Jason Speaks.

    The Talmud isn’t an “old wives tale.” Neither is the Cabala. They are fascist Jewish religious documents that inspire fascist Jewish religious doctrine and serve as an operating manual for the tribe, which the tribe has followed faithfully.

    The proof is in the pudding, the evidence is increasingly clear in Israel, in Jewish religious leadership’s own words and instructions that ‘racism originated in the Torah,’ in the political and social destruction that follows supremacist Jewry around like a shadow wherever it goes.

    All your desperate spin and red herrings to create doubt and throw people off of the scent (how many posts have you made on this thread alone?) are yet more proof of the extent to which Jewry will go to cover its homicidal tracks.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 19, 2011 - 3:58 am | Permalink

      Part of the philosophical difference between the two camps here at TOO revolves around the issue of “racism”. Note that Chris Moore, as well as many others, decry racism and believe it to be of Jewish origins. They are willing to embrace the sacrifice of Whites to help Arabs, as long as it hurts Israelis. Needless to say, many of us take a different view that can be called “race realism”. This needs to be explored further. This whole disagreement has been good. What I am noting is that people on the other side are not so much pro-White, as they are anti-Jewish, and see themselves in a kind of Holy War against Israel and Jews worldwide. “White Nationalism” is interesting to them only so far as it can be used to attack Jews.

      More on this later, but it may have to wait for the effect of tonight’s happy hour to wear off.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 19, 2011 - 6:15 am | Permalink

      You know, Chris, I am starting to think that even if Jason Speaks is not a Jew, he does not have a firm enough understanding of the situation. He thinks we are just a bunch of Jew haters. But we are no more so Jew haters than the Palestinians. They want a Free Palestine, we want a free Western Civilization. But if you asked a Palestinian what he thought about Jews, you might get a response that suggested he did not like them very much. Either Jason truly does not understand how organized Jewery has operated as a major factor bringing calamity upon our people, or he is a Jew.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 19, 2011 - 6:43 am | Permalink

      “Racism” existed thousand of years before there was a discernible group that could be called Jews. Tribalism, racism, ethnocentrism, and various other related concepts existed in the deepest of human history. In fact, it existed before human beings were fully evolved as modern human beings.

      No religion “created” racism, they merely manifested it and often codified it. Tribal cohesion and tribal warfare is a common inheritance of every single human being alive today, on every single continent.

      The Japanese long believed they were a superior people. And so did the Chinese. They didn’t get it from the anyone else, it is a natural human behavior. And so did every other group of humans. There are hunter-gather tribes in existence today who believe that they are the only true human beings on earth.

      You are implying that race consciousness is a bad thing and that we should blame the Jews for it.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 19, 2011 - 6:52 am | Permalink

      And you cannot be taking the word of a bunch of dumb-dumb Rabbis as authorities on the origin of racism. They are a bunch of silly puffed up goofballs who think their childlike understanding of the world has some legitimacy. Kind of like people that listen to Alex Jones or Rense.

      Now, I think it’s good to point that these Rabbis endorse racism, in order to undercut the unearned moral authority Jews have earned and use to hurt the West.

      But the “conspiracy” isn’t being run by a bunch of goofy Rabbis somewhere. It’s not a matter of Jews acting under the direction of Rabbis or following the Talmud.

      Why are you even here, I don’t get it? This is not a low-rent Alex Jones/Jeff Rense site.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 19, 2011 - 6:53 am | Permalink

      “You are implying that race consciousness is a bad thing and that we should blame the Jews for it.”

      No, I am implying that racism in general is bad. It was bad when we killed the Amerindians. It is bad now that the Jews are killing the Palestinians. And I am certainly not only implying but generally stating that ANY official doctrine of racism, including national socialism but not including mere patriotism or nationhood, is evil. A people can demand their right to exist. They cannot demand that some other people cannot exist.

      Many Jews, to this day, have no problems harming non-Jews economically because of their racist past and, of course, their racist present. Meanwhile, our religion teaches us to be fair to everyone. So go tell that to your boss, Jason.

  34. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    March 18, 2011 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    Only among whites do you find the kind of empathetic universalism that leads people to take up the cause of ethnic outsiders (or even animals). Like I’ve said before, it’s a noble characteristic but is the very opposite of what’s needed to prevent whites from sharing the fate of the Palestinians.

    Are people like Rachel Corrie ever going to be capable of seeing whites as deserving ?

  35. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    March 18, 2011 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

    It is true, Lasha, that so many here hate poor Rachel. I am really twisting about on this issue. I see her as an unusually courageous person who spent all her courage on the wrong cause. 10 years from now, what Palestinian will even remember her name or what she did? I love her, but she did wrong. She is like the suicide bombers – but at least their memories will be revered by their people.

    I am so sorry to have to say these things. And you don’t have to be frightened of meeting me in a dark back lane. I’m a woman and I wouldn’t harm you just because we disagree.

    • Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
      March 18, 2011 - 5:11 pm | Permalink

      @ Barkingmad

      Nor would I harm you. I think we would agree on so many points that our few disagreements would hardly matter.

      What people forget is that Rachel never set out to be a martyr or do anything spectacularly heroic. I don’t know how old you are, but she could have been your daughter or sister. Misguided perhaps (in your eyes) for risking her life in a dangerous land. But make allowance for her. She was only 23.

      She had all the fire of youth in her and her life lay ahead. Her death was most unexpected. It wasn’t as if she was a reckless hothead rushing to meet her doom. She expected the bulldozer driver to stop.

      Whatever the case may be, is there any reason to HATE Rachel with such a bitter, twisted hatred as some of the posters here clearly exhibit?

      This hatred is not the hatred one might expect from White Nationalists for one of their own deluded sisters. It is the hatred of Jews who sense in the Corrie affair a major débâcle. A public relations disaster that wipes out the effect of several decades of Holocaust propaganda.

      Believe me, I’ve known people who have said to me with tears in their eyes. “Those bastards killed our Rachel! Why should we shed tears for Anne Frank? Let them mourn their own dead.”

      Honestly, I meet people in all walks of life who are so disgusted with Israel that it has made them openly anti-Semitic. Which is regrettable. Because one shouldn’t judge all Jews by the crimes committed by some of the worst of them.

      Israel’s constant crimes — the Gaza War above all in recent memory — have made the worm turn for almost everyone I know. They no longer emote when they hear about Jewish suffering. They don’t give a damn. They refuse to set foot in a Holocaust museum. The word “Auschwitz” does nothing for them. Anne Frank leaves them cold. And if ever there’s a Holocaust movie on TV, they switch channels at once. They just don’t want to know.

      I’m afraid the Jews will have go back to Charm School and learn better how to behave if they want us to love them.

  36. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    March 18, 2011 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been to Israel, floated in the Dead Sea, stayed at their stinky hotels, went to bethlehem, sea of galilee, etc. I know how blacks must have felt in the South in the old days. You can tell they are annoyed by you, consider themselves superior. I’ve since told everyone in my church who will listen not to go. Rent the video, save the trouble. There were so many checkpoints to go through I thought I was in ww2, or apartheid South Africa. Your own guide (who is also paid and tipped, though not by me) takes bribes from the overpriced places they take you. (The other store owners complained to him about it, they wanted in on it – we had our own tranlator) You are there to be fleeced.
    However, I agree we don’t need to hate them. We don’t need to love them, either. Cut’em off from the tit. No aid for Israel.

  37. Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
    March 18, 2011 - 2:35 pm | Permalink

    “born agin’ redneck” writes:

    I would bet that Rachel Corrie was probably one of these ardent anti-white, white self-loathing, white guilt ridden types of liberals… I sure don’t trust ANYONE who takes up Rachel as a cause.

    In that case, you must put no trust in Kevin MacDonald who is a sincere admirer of Rachel Corrie and was 100 percent behind my article.

    He still has the Rachel video up and running as I write — In Memory of Rachel Corrie — a video banned by YouTube owing to a concerted campaign by organized Jewry which had complained about its alleged “shocking and disgusting content.”

    Tell Kevin MacDonald to remove this video if you find it so “shocking and disgusting”!

    Would Kevin MacDonald publish this article of mine—not a single word changed—and would he show that pro-Rachel video if he was not himself a sincere admirer of Rachel Corrie and all she stood for? All those who are vilifying Rachel and spitting on her memory, subjecting me personally to cowardly ad hominem attacks, are also questioning my editor’s judgement.

    They are questioning his judgement (1) for publishing my article and promoting a pro-Rachel video; (2) for being “misguided” enough to be 100 percent in favor of Rachel rather than 100 percent against her — like the rest of you Zionist trolls and phoney White Nationalists who have descended on this website suddenly like a pack of mad wolves!

    And how do we know you are genuine White Nationalists? Forsooth, because you SAY you are! We are expected to take your word on trust.

    Not good enough, my friends.

    I’d sooner trust Jack the Ripper in a dark alley than I would trust any of you!

    If you don’t like my article and wish to see me blacklisted and banned from publication on this site, please feel free to write to my editor and complain about me. I am sure he will give you a fair hearing.

    However, I suggest you provide him first with solid proof of your credentials: that you are what you say you are — genuine White Nationalists — and not what you seem to be: fanatical Jewish followers of Ze’ev Jabotinski, Baruch Goldstein, Jonathan Pollard, and war criminal Ariel Sharon! — he who openly boasted:

    WE, THE JEWISH PEOPLE, CONTROL AMERICA — AND THE AMERICANS KNOW IT!”

    I have no wish to say any more except to beg my few supporters and the many noble-hearted people who cherish Rachel’s memory, to continue to fight the good fight against our real enemy: the implacable enemy with his ancient grudges who seeks to enslave us all and destroy the lives of our children.

    I need not identify this deadly Enemy by name: you already know who he is.

    Xanadu
    (Lasha Darkmoon)

    • Mick's Gravatar Mick
      March 21, 2011 - 1:16 am | Permalink

      Jack the Ripper was a jew.
      Some imp told me he draws bulldozers in the ashes of Hades with his knife.

    • History is Bunk's Gravatar History is Bunk
      March 23, 2011 - 11:18 am | Permalink

      “… I sure don’t trust ANYONE who takes up Rachel as a cause.”

      Spoken like a true jew troll.

  38. March 18, 2011 - 2:25 pm | Permalink

    What Kevin MacDonald labels in academic jargon “Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy,” I label Judeofascism or “the Judeofacist racket.”

    It has essentially existed as a racket ever since the Jews were dispersed for the last time by the Romans from the “Promised Land” during Christ’s epoch.

    It was during their various dispersions and exiles, including the Babylonian, that the Talmud originated (originally as oral instructions) as a kind of survival guide on how the Jewish people could be bribed, coerced, browbeaten, manipulated, and rewarded to stick together, and operate as a cohesive racket among “the nations.”

    Talmudic Judaism is the longest running and most highly evolved racket in history, and Judeofascist successes in racketeering and subjugation, including leftist racketeering, bankster and economic racketeering, and Zionist racketeering, all flow from the Talmudic Master Plan and religious tip of the pyramid, which is essentially a fascist formulation. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, forgery or not, isn’t a bad metaphor for the Talmudic/Cabala Master Plan.

    For good primers on the Talmud and Cabala (another post-Old Testament Judeofascist operating guide) see the scholarship of the Rev Ted Pike http://www.truthtellers.org/ or Michael Hoffman, reviewed here:
    http://www.rense.com/general84/mhof.htm

    Just as Judeo-Christian Zionists don’t want “the Jews” criticized and discredited because it undermines their own childlike, arrested development religo-ideology, fascist factions of White nationalism don’t want the Judeofascist Zionists criticized and discredited because doing so undermines their own fascist ideology.

    Fascism and Judeo-Christian Zionism are both used to co-opt, pigeonhole, control and marginalize Judeofascism’s cohesive group competitors, just as Marxism (Communism) is used to control and manipulate the non-cohesive “nations” on a mass scale, sometimes mass-murderously (eg Jewish Bolshevism).

    The Roman Empire and later Christianity essentially kept the Judeofascist rackets “down and out” for centuries. The Renaissance was the beginning of the unleashing of the Judeofasicst whirlwind, which has been fine-tuned and perfected as an ideology of subjugation and control over the centuries.

    Are these people literally Satanists? Even if they are technically not, they might as well be. Their intended end result is the same, with them (psychopaths and sociopaths that they are) ruling the world out of Jerusalem.

    • Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
      March 18, 2011 - 4:22 pm | Permalink

      Fascinating. I agree with everything you say. The word “Judeofascist” is a strong word and one should use it as much as possible when dealing with one’s Enemy — especially as he has no scruples in playing the Anti-Semitic card.

      An even stronger word, however, is “Judeonazi”. This makes the enemy cringe.

      Unfortunately, the word is not really fair on the Nazis.

    • March 18, 2011 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

      Chris Moore
      March 18, 2011 – 2:25 pm

      Are these people literally Satanists?

      I think Luciferians is more accurate.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 18, 2011 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

      Chris Moore says:

      What Kevin MacDonald labels in academic jargon “Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy,” I label Judeofascism or “the Judeofacist racket.”

      and later …

      Are these people literally Satanists? Even if they are technically not, they might as well be. Their intended end result is the same, with them (psychopaths and sociopaths that they are) ruling the world out of Jerusalem.

      When you say that you have another term for what MacDonald has described as a ‘group evolutionary strategy’, you suggest some kind of equivalency between your thoughts on the issue and his. There really is none. MacDonald has presented a scientific theory based on evidence and logic, using basic concepts from science like evolutionary psychology and social identity theory.

      What you are presenting is a collection of old wives tales and folk superstitions. Now a serious social scientist can take those crude tales and use them to build a more serious explanation, but there is really no correlation between people who speculate as to whether “Jews are Satanic”, and the work MacDonald and other scientific researchers have done on Jewish history.

    • March 19, 2011 - 12:07 am | Permalink

      There are theological analyses, there are scientific analyses, and there are combinations thereof.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 19, 2011 - 4:10 am | Permalink

      Well you can call it a “theological” explanation if you wish, but we aren’t talking about Jesuit level discussion with the theories you are promoting. I had no idea Jeff Rense type thinking was behind so much of this. This is a key to a lot of our disagreement. I would encourage the more scientifically minded readers to go check out Rense.com, especially it’s paranormal and Luciferian explanation of world events. This may explain why mutual agreement is probably impossible.

  39. Sardonicus's Gravatar Sardonicus
    March 18, 2011 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    @ Jason Speaks

    The Jews in Israel make deals based on what they think will help Israel, and that seems to be more important to Israelis than hurting White people, from what I can see. In fact, Whites, according to Rachel Corrie, are treated pretty well in Israel.

    Can you produce any documentarty evidence to prove that Rachel said “Whites are treated pretty well in Israel”?

    No, you cannot. Because Rachel said no such thing! And you are making it up.

    Rachel would have known from her own stay in Israel that Whites, especially Christians, were treated like shit in Israel. That they were spat upon by settler Jews.

    Wasn’t Swedish activist, Tove Johannson, mentioned in Darkmoon’s article with a picture showing her bleeding face, set upon by Jewish settlers who permanently disfigured her?

    Have you seen that picture of her face? Scroll upwards and you will see it!

    And isn’t there documentary evidence (provided in the article) to show that that 100 of these bloodthirsty Jewish settler fanatics gathered to chant: WE KILLED JESUS! WE’LL KILL YOU TOO!

    So much for “Whites being treated well in Israel”!

    Why don’t you just give up, you tiresome troll?

    I notice you question the authenticity of every source and quotation (e.g. the Sharon quote saying “We, the Jewish people, control America! ), but never once do you provide any documentary evidence for any of YOUR statements!

    So come on, do please provide us with documentary proof that Rachel said “Whites are treated well in Israel.”

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 18, 2011 - 4:53 pm | Permalink

      The proof that Rachel believed Whites were treated pretty well in Israel is in Rachel’s emails to her parents. Here are a couple of quotes and I will provide the link to those emails:

      So when I sound crazy, or if the Israeli military should break with their racist tendency not to injure white people …

      We could probably make it through if we made serious use of our international white person privilege…

      She felt that the Israeli army was “racist” for NOT injuring White people. Please let that link in. She thought they were racist for NOT hurting White people. She also indicated that as a White person, she had some kind of privilege while there in Israel. Facts are stubborn things.

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/mar/18/usa.israel

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      March 18, 2011 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

      Excellent quote from Jason Speaks. The most idealistic whites (like Corrie) see their own people as “privileged” – never as deserving.

    • Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
      March 18, 2011 - 9:46 pm | Permalink

      “Facts are stubborn things”, you say. Well then, how do you account for the “stubborn” fact that the Israelis did NOT treat Rachel Corrie with the care they profess to treat all White non-Jews?

      How do you account for the “stubborn fact” that they killed her mercilessly under the blades of a bulldozer, in spite of all their fine words?

      How do you account for the “stubborn fact” that that they have killed serveral other WHITE people, peace activists from all over the world, for whom you say they have a special loving tenderness and regard as noble-souled Jews?

      Swedish activist Tove Johannson was a White person. Was she treated with tender loving care by the “most moral army in the world”? Wasn’t she disfigured by a “nice” Israeli settler?

      Aren’t White Christians SPAT UPON in the Holy Land by nice noble Jews?

      Who was it who chanted: “WE KILLED CHRIST? WE’LL KILL YOU TOO?

      Nice noble Jews who love White people and treat them in a privileged way?

      Listen, you tiresome troll, there’s no way you can justify the war crimes, cruelties, and human rights abuses committed by your people in Israel.

      Don’t even try.

  40. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    March 18, 2011 - 12:50 pm | Permalink

    Corrie seems pretty lucid and intelligent here

  41. Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
    March 18, 2011 - 12:24 pm | Permalink

    Russ
    March 18, 2011 – 3:34 am | Permalink

    “They [the Jewish bankers] like the idea of Israel so they empower it. They like feminism so they empower feminist twits like Corrie.

    Another Rachel-basher.

    Tell me, sir, do you have any evidence that Rachel was a “feminist twit?

    I challenge you to come up with a single Rachel quotation in which Rachel reveals she is a hateful feminist.

    • Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
      March 18, 2011 - 12:34 pm | Permalink

      Russ
      March 17, 2011 – 11:15 pm | Permalink

      To ‘Sardonicus’
      :
      “You’re only half-right, because Jews are only half the problem. The other half is weak, braiwashed Whites, including feminists like Corrie and the pathetic “men” that enable them.”

      Here you are again, knocking Rachel for being a brainwashed feminist. Where’s the proof?

      Come, give me a single quote from Corrie showing her as a “brainwashed feminist”.

      You can’t do it!

    • March 18, 2011 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

      My last response to you was inexplicably deleted. So I’ll try again.

      You’re missing the point. Rachel’s entire existence showed her to be a brainwashed feminist. The very fact that she was half-a-world away fighting for some alien nation shows she was a brainwashed feminist.

      She should have been at home. She should have found a proud White man to settle down with and have his babies. This is what we need our women to do. We definitely do not need them pretending to be the goddess saviors of the universe. Whether or not exposing Jewish hypocrisy by shining a light on the Jews atrocities in Palestine is useful to us or not (I believe it does play a role in regaining control over our lands and futures) is moot. It isn’t her role to do it – it is the proper role of White men, not 23 year-old twits.

      Lionizing her damages White interests by encouraging other young White females to act out fantasies rather than honor their obligations to be wives, mothers, and homemakers.

      Our people are literally dying. We are disappearing because we are not reproducing. The main reason we are not reproducing is that feminism is encouraging our women to do stupid things – like getting crushed by a bulldozer, half-a-world away, in a foolhardy attempt to protect an alien people that hate her – instead of getting married and starting families.

    • Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
      March 18, 2011 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

      @ Russ

      I asked you to produce documentary evidence in the form of a clear statement by Rachel Corrie demonstrating that she was a “feminist twit.”

      Like, for example: “I think women are equally intelligent as men and should be paid as much. Or: “I think having a career is far more important than having a family.”

      You were unable to provide any such evidence because your only concern appears to be cheap abuse and vilification of Rachel Corrie.

      Don’t make abusive statements that you cannot support with concrete evidence.

      Saying, “Oh, Corrie MUST have been a “feminist twit” otherwise she would have stayed behind in America and fought for the White race instead of going out to Israel and getting killed” is a pretty pathetic argument. It may prove that Rachel was misguided, even reckless. What it does NOT do is show hat Rachel was a “FEMINIST twit.”

      You make an inference and the inference you make is totally invalid. It’s a bit like saying, “Hank MUST be the killer because, you know, Hank gave me a really filthy look!”

      This kind of low-quality logic cuts no ice with anyone of intelligence.

    • March 18, 2011 - 10:00 pm | Permalink

      Butterfly,

      You seem to have an overly emotional attachment to Corrie as a symbol. It is effecting your judgment.

  42. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    March 18, 2011 - 11:55 am | Permalink

    Jason said “But there are positions between absolutely hating Jews and mindlessly loving Jews”

    But Jason, unless we are able to look in the eye what Jewish culture has done to us in the West, and what it wants for us, there is no point in putting the massive energy that it will take, into walking ourselves up into a revival capable of resistence.
    I supported you before but the things you say make it seem like you just don’t understand the nature of Jewish culture at all. You keep talking about religion is if it’s only about religion. It’s not, it’s about an ethno-cultural group who convincingly promote the end of racial identity for everyone else while intensely promoting its continuation within its own ranks. That hypocrisy and our stupidity has brought us within sight of own demise. That’s hundreds or thousands of years of our ancesters creating a distinctive reality for us, all destroyed in 4 or 5 generations.
    If you can’t see that reality, you may be in the wrong place. There are currently vaguely white nationalist movements that imagine they can be in league with the Jews. I mean, oh wouldn’t that be lovely if it was possible. But it isn’t possible, because they hate us. Don’t you get it. It’s not us hating them

  43. I's Gravatar I
    March 18, 2011 - 3:07 am | Permalink

    Liberals are not attacking Jewish Power. Israel is not Jewish Power – the banks are. Israel is at best a totem.

    Now you’re just being dumb. “The Israel Lobby” is a pretty damn good proxy for Jewish power in the US. Obviously if you can criticize Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians, then you can criticize the American support for Israel that makes that treatment possible, and then you can criticize the Israel lobby that compels the US to furnish that support.

    It’s basically a loophole in the taboo structure. You can’t criticize Jewish power, but you can criticize “The Israel Lobby” which is very approximately equivalent to Jewish power. You’re just calling it something else. You can talk about Jewish control of media, Jewish economic power, Jewish manipulation of the government, etc. without identifying it as such, but everyone knows what is going on. You can dissect and analyze “The Israel Lobby” and find ways to undermine it, and that is exactly what the left is starting to do.

    I guess it’s actually probably better that White nationalists do not understand this because if they did they would probably just bumble in and find a way to screw it all up.

    • March 18, 2011 - 3:34 am | Permalink

      Again your wrong. The Jewish Banksters are Jewish power. Anything they like they “empower” (their term). They like the idea of Israel so they empower it. They like feminism so they empower feminist twits like Corrie. They like “liberalism” so they empower it.

      You already made my point for me when you correctly stated that, “You can’t criticize Jewish power, but you can criticize “The Israel Lobby.'” If the Israel Lobby was the real power, you wouldn’t be allowed to criticize it.

    • I's Gravatar I
      March 18, 2011 - 3:40 am | Permalink

      So you’re saying any criticism of Jews other than criticism of “the banks” is worthless? E.g. Kevin MacDonald’s books, which go into depth about Jews but do not discuss the banks, are a total distraction? Should we conclude that MacDonald was just trying to attack Whites?

      Maybe you could give me an example of what you consider valid criticism of Jewish power to be, and an example of what you think a smart strategy for attacking it is. That would help.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 18, 2011 - 3:44 am | Permalink

      I agree. I don’t think Jason really understands.

      http://www.youtube.com/user/bigfatso0007

      Is this the Israel you want on your side? And what did happen to the whites in South Africa, anyway?

      Atah metachat degle shahor.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 18, 2011 - 4:05 am | Permalink

      South Africa was destroyed, but it wasn’t Israel that did it. In fact, Israel lent support to South Africa (of course, in exchange for minerals as well as trading information about nuclear technology).

      It was the Left that destroyed South Africa, with respect, including people like Rachel Corrie. And yes there was a significant component of Western Jews as well. But even the Crown wanted to oppose South Africa so that the British Commonwealth could appear pure to the world. Jews drove the issue in the West, along with the Soviet Union which wanted to destabilize South Africa.

      As to the video, moving pictures no doubt, but ever since I was shown endless reels of Jewish bodies in order to propagandize me about the holocaust, I have realized you can’t go by images alone. In any conflict, all sides can produced grisly pictures. Hiroshima didn’t look too snazzy after the atomic treatment, but I wouldn’t base all my feelings about the war with Japan on those images alone.

      Unless a person is Palestinian, the motive for outrage is a dislike for Jews or “White imperialism by Israelis”, not a love of Arabs. So, I just can’t play along and do the crocodile tear thing. What about the 500,000 dead in Darfur? Do their deaths not matter since it wasn’t Israelis pulling the trigger?

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 18, 2011 - 4:19 am | Permalink

      “And yes there was a significant component of Western Jews as well… Jews drove the issue in the West…”

      I’ll take this to mean you totally agree with me.

      “As to the video, moving pictures no doubt, but ever since I was shown endless reels of Jewish bodies in order to propagandize me about the holocaust, I have realized you can’t go by images alone.”

      The difference is that the Halocaust images were embellishments, propaganda, and sometimes wholly fabrications that no one was allowed to challenge.

      “Unless a person is Palestinian, the motive for outrage is a dislike for Jews”

      Yes, exactly. And it is a solidly founded motivation.

      “What about the 500,000 dead in Darfur? ”

      Black people are violent. What does this have to do with anything? Are you trying to say we should care about them, too? Finally, we agree. And a lot of people do care about that who don’t realize their own futures are at stake. First, we need to take care of ourselves.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 18, 2011 - 5:08 am | Permalink

      Israel’s reputation is insignificant. The reputation of Talmudism as a religion, philosophy, mindset, or unconscious force needs to be attacked. If you are unable to see why, then I sincerely question your motives.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 18, 2011 - 5:14 am | Permalink

      Why the endless questioning of my motives? Anyway, what is Talmudism? I’ve heard that term used a lot and I don’t really know what it is, since I don’t have a big interest in religion. I associate it loosely with Judaism and therefore Jews, but I don’t even think of Judaism as much of a religion. Jews seem unable to explain if they even believe in heaven or not. It seems like an ancient collection of boring empty rituals.

      So what does it mean?

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 18, 2011 - 5:19 am | Permalink

      *sigh*

      Well, this explains a lot. How can you understand the Jews unless you understand how they evolved and what it means, even, to be a Jew, or to express Yiddishkeit?

      Their origins as a people and the beliefs that gave birth to their unique racial identity (as well as still being believed in by many orthodox Jews today) can teach you a lot about why people keep thinking you are a Jew. I am beginning to believe you simply have a fundamental ignorance of this particular people and why, for instance, they would be so unwilling to leave peacably in another people’s land.

      Go read the Culture of Critique.

      But for right now, you can start by looking up “Talmud Truth” on revisionist history. You won’t fully understand after that, but it’s a start.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 18, 2011 - 5:35 am | Permalink

      I’ve read the Culture of Critique, or most of it, and it focuses on Boasian anthropology, political radicalism, psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt School, and The New York Intellectuals. None of that particularly religious, in the normal sense of the word. Are you sure you have read it?

      It isn’t about the Talmud or religion as such, as much as how an ethnic group managed to survive cohesively over several thousand years, often coming in conflict with the larger society due to it’s actions. Judaism is a tribal religion that thinks of it’s people as special … like most tribal religions.

      But if you think Hollywood producers and New York Bankers are consulting the Talmud to make decisions, I don’t know where you get that. Most of MacDonald’s work focuses on genetic traits and behaviors.

      So you aren’t telling me anything special about the Talmud. As far as I know, MacDonald doesn’t claim it promote evil or satan or anything like that. Not even sure MacDonald believes in those concepts.

      And by the way, the only thing gist I have picked up on as to what you guys mean by “Talmudic” is the relentless use of logic and argumentation. But that’s not a Jewish monopoly. The Jesuits, among many others excel at it.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 18, 2011 - 5:43 am | Permalink

      Ok.

      And now I think you are a hopeless case. I think you should just steer clear of Jewish issues on this site. You will find that no one here agrees with you. Admittedly, Jews are not European man’s only concern. But they sure as heck are more than their fair share of our troubles.

      Defending the Jews against this claim is both insane and retarded. Simply, you are dead wrong. Or you really are the Jew everyone else thinks you are.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 18, 2011 - 6:14 am | Permalink

      The Tamud is the written form of their group evolutionary strategy. It could be argued that any religion that creates a biological barrier as well as advocating a philosophy is an evolutionary strategy. In that sense, Christianity may even be an evolutionary strategy as well. For example, Arian-Christian Germanic tribes along the Roman border did not integrate until they converted to Catholicism.

      MacDonald is a scholar. I am not.

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      March 18, 2011 - 10:24 am | Permalink

      “I” says

      I guess it’s actually probably better that White nationalists do not understand this because if they did they would probably just bumble in and find a way to screw it all up.

      The Zionism issue splits the principled (if misguided) left from their Jewish core. It seems obvious this is a fault line to be exploited. We simply don’t have the time to explain it to the White Nationalists. Let them continue doing, well, whatever it is that these “White Nationalists” actually do; seemingly, set limits on how we fight Jewish power.

    • March 18, 2011 - 3:19 pm | Permalink

      I
      March 18, 2011 – 3:40 am | Permalink

      So you’re saying any criticism of Jews other than criticism of “the banks” is worthless?

      No sir. I’m not saying that at all. My point is that we should not be lionizing feminist twits like Rachel Corrie. By doing so we damage White interests. White women (and men too) need to be weened off “feminism.” Encouraging our women to act like this – and by extension forcing White “males” to take a back seat to them in order to support their false attempts at being diva/goddesses – is destroying White civilization.

      Whether anyone likes it or not, the basic reality is that if White women don’t make the sacrifice of being responsible wives, mothers, and homemakers, producing sizable families, then all is lost. When we encourage female narcissism (which is essentially what feminism does), we are encouraging the death of our people.

    • March 18, 2011 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

      Jason Speaks
      March 18, 2011 – 4:05 am

      South Africa was destroyed, but it wasn’t Israel that did it. . . . It was the Left that destroyed South Africa . . .

      You’re right. But remember “the Left” is wholly a Jewish construct.

  44. March 18, 2011 - 12:57 am | Permalink

    @Scooter who wrote:

    You can’t seriously believe that if we asked the jews to leave, and they did, that we could control the negro and mexican problem, do you?

    Yes. Absolutely. Once Whites regain control of our nation’s institutions the racial-flooding problem will disappear almost immediately.

    Solving the racial-flooding problem is simple. Just restore the rule of law and enforce the laws on the books. Non-Whites will immediately stop coming in, both because there will be no incentives for them to come and because we will physically prevent them from doing so. Illegals will self-deport, virtually over-night, when they realize there will be no more social welfare flowing to them and arrests will be imminent.

    We can then take our time working with the (legal) non-White communities presently here in determining what the best course of action is to restore our country to it’s natural all-White (or at least overwhelmingly White) former self.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 18, 2011 - 1:23 am | Permalink

      Here, here!

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 18, 2011 - 1:30 am | Permalink

      Interesting way of putting it and I think I agree. We would still have to deal with the Mexican and Black problem, but without Jewish intelligence and media savvy, Blacks and Mexicans would be dealt with easily. The head of the NAACP was always Jewish until the 1960s and that tells you something.

      But, we would still have to deal with other groups, I agree with Scooter on that. We would still have problems, but the opposition we dealt with would be weaker. Our next biggest problem would be liberal Whites – and there are plenty of them. We would still have the Robert Wright type of White Gentile Liberal who happens to be anti-White, pro-mass immigration and a bit of an Israel critic.

      That’s why in the final analysis, I think our focus has to be primarily on being pro-White, not anti-Jewish, anti-Black, anti-Asian or whatever. If we can’t make the case for ourselves and our survival, then some opportunistic disease will get us, whether it is White Liberal or Jewish NeoCon.

    • March 18, 2011 - 2:17 am | Permalink

      Jason, I’m inclined to agree with you, to a point, vis-a-vis the importance of being pro-White. This is how I see it:

      There are two primary components to warfare (even cultural warfare), defense and offense. Armor is the tool used for defense and arms the tools used for offense.

      Being pro-White is a form of armor. Being Jew-wise is a means of being well-armed.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 18, 2011 - 2:36 am | Permalink

      “For her who had learned the stern lesson of honor, we should not grieve that she found sweeter the opal gates of death.”

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      March 18, 2011 - 8:55 am | Permalink

      I definately agree with the pro white sentiments. Concerning self deportation, when I vacationed in Mexico several years ago and had a cab driver who spoke good english, I engaged him in conversation. He had been a construction worker in Chicago! Secretly delighted he had exercised his right of return, I asked him why he came back. The work ran out, and living in America wasn’t so easy!
      Two possible solutions:
      1. Get tough on employers sanctions.
      2. Expose employers to the govt./media for hiring illegals.

    • Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
      March 18, 2011 - 12:08 pm | Permalink

      Good show!

  45. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 17, 2011 - 11:39 pm | Permalink

    Hagiography only works if the facts support it. Rachel Corrie was not involved in advocating for whites, nor did her writings show any concern for the plight of white people. Those are the facts. That’s why the attempt at hagiography failed. The focus group of this blog shows that not even allies buy her as martyr. The only credible way she works is as dupe. “Not even the Jews believe in multiculturalism – if you try to force it on them they’ll run you over with a bulldozer like Rachel Corrie!”

    @Sardonicus: You can’t blame the immigration act and the jews for all our problems. If white women weren’t aborting their babies en masse across the west we wouldn’t be in the situation we are in. Likewise, if white women started having 4 kids or more the supposed doomsday scenario would disappear in a matter of years. This is the simplest solution. It doesn’t require a lot of handwringing by intellectuals, the composition of catchy anthems, the designing of flags, uniforms, and armbands, etc. Such a solution is also resistant to attacks by the enemy – calling pregnant white women “nazis” just isn’t the same as calling a young white male a “skinhead”. Also, if white women don’t start having more white babies were doomed anyways and all of this is just a waste of time.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 17, 2011 - 11:52 pm | Permalink

      I think it is best to be responsible at the same time. Encouraging a 16 year old girl to go out and have unsafe sex with her boyfriend to “save her race” might not be warranted. It would be better if she could become educated, marry a successful White man, and then contribute to the effort by both having a lot of children and also being able to take good care of them.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      March 18, 2011 - 2:45 am | Permalink

      Why do the facts need to support a martyrdom of Rachel Corrie? I you’ve learned ANYTHING from you Jews, you should have learned that control of the narrative beats out the facts every time. Just ask Draza Mihailovic, General Wrangel, Franco, Antonescu, or any other figure whose meaning in history has been completely distorted.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 18, 2011 - 3:02 am | Permalink

      Yes, we can ignore the facts and simply try and create our own Anne Frank, so to speak. But the other side has a luxury we don’t; enormous power in the media and academia. When you have an ocean of money, an ocean of willing accomplices and control of so much media machinery, you can get by without having all your facts straight.

      Who here thinks we are in that position? I don’t. So, the standards will necessarily be higher for us, that is life for the moment. If you are looking for a martyr to drive a wedge between Christians and Jews with regard to Zionism, here is some advice:

      Make sure the victim/martyr is an ardent Christian Conservative. If you had a real life Christ worshiping girl that had been killed by the Israelis in some fashion (especially while she spreading the good Word), then you would have something. However, the Israelis aren’t likely to hand you an easy plum like that anytime soon. But that’s the kind of thing you need.

    • Petronius's Gravatar Petronius
      March 18, 2011 - 10:25 am | Permalink

      I can’t force myself either to voluntarily disregard the facts about Corrie and swallow Lasha’s embarrassing crocodile tear jerking rhapsodies. There is something incredibly stupid, something femininely stupid about all this martyrification business.

      Too much focus on Jew/Zionist hate tends to make people plain crazy and lose all grounds of reality.

  46. March 17, 2011 - 11:26 pm | Permalink

    Highlighting organized Jewish pathology and sociopathy in Israel clues people in on organized Jewish pathology and sociopathy in America.

    Why is that so hard for some people to understand?

    And yes, ALL Jewish Zionists should go live there, which would solve our Judeofascist issue, and would get rid of the Israel lobby, which would help solve the Palestinans’ Judeofascist issue by diminishing the funding of Zionist expansionism and diminishing the US’ blank check political and diplomatic support of all things Israel.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 17, 2011 - 11:37 pm | Permalink

      OK fine, but I wouldn’t limit it to only Jewish Zionists returning to Israel. Some of our worst enemies among Jewish intellectuals and activists aren’t strong Zionists – some of them could care less about Israel. I think this is the part of the difference I have with people who take a deeply religious view of the problem. I would not frame it as a battle with “Satanic Jews worldwide”. That may be close to your position, but it’s not mine.

    • March 18, 2011 - 1:41 am | Permalink

      J.S.: “Some of our worst enemies among Jewish intellectuals and activists aren’t strong Zionists – some of them could care less about Israel.”

      Yes, but they are financed and championed by wealthy Jewish-American Zionists and Jewish Zionist groups like the ADL, and enabled by Jewish Zionist politicians.

      Additionally, they can be made to labor under the Jewish Zionist albatross if they are engaged in anything that smacks of Judeofascist racketeering — including Jewish Bolshevism or cultural Marxism.

      Individual Jews are not a major threat on their own; it’s the Judeofascist rackets, including left-wing ones, that cause the problems, similar to issues a lot of people have not necessarily with indivudual Muslims, but with Islamists and sharia, or not with individual liberals, but with left-wing rackets.

  47. Sardonicus's Gravatar Sardonicus
    March 17, 2011 - 9:10 pm | Permalink

    @ Jason Speaks

    Jews and Israel are not my primary concern. White Civilization is.

    If you were a genuine White Nationalist, which you are not, Jews and Israel would be your primary concern — for the simple reason that organized Jewry and Zionism are the main threats to the White civilization you profess to love so much.

    Here it is in black and white. See if you can refute these arguments put forward by Lasha Darkmoon:

    All genuine White Nationalists should, in my opinion, be passionate anti-Zionists like Rachel. And they should, therefore, be ardent Rachel supporters.

    Why should all White Nationalists be anti-Zionist by definition?

    Let me tell you why.

    Because if it were not for organized Jewry, the standard bearers of Zionism, there would be no need for secession. If we have lost our homelands to multiculturalism, both in America and Europe, it is because of the Jews. The Jews, and the Jews alone, are the architects of our misery. Even before the introduction of the deadly 1965 Immigration Act in America, which opened the floodgates, it was the Jews above all who had been agitating for unlimited Third World immigration — for Operation Swamp the Goyim.

    Yes, we all know that “organzed Jewry is largely to blame for the multicultural nightmare that now confronts us — and which is the motivating force behind White Nationalism.”

    And so, Jason Speaks, if you were a genuine White Nationalist, JEWS and ZIONISM would be your “primary concern”.

    They would be your primary concern for the simple reason that they are the main threat to White Nationalism as well as its motivating force.

    Whites would not even be talking about a White haven in the North West Pacific if their country — AMERICA — had not been stolen from under their noses by organized Jewry.

    If this country has now become a multicultural zoo — a dystopia in which Whites are to become a beleaguered minority by 2050 — we have only the Jews to thank.

    You can’t argue your way out of that. It’s irrefutable.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 17, 2011 - 10:36 pm | Permalink

      I’ll have to develop a fuller answer later, but I think many of us see it differently.

      My main objection is that I think you on the other side are lumping together Zionism, Jews, Cultural Marxism, Israel, New York bankers, Israelis, Bagal shop owners, etc., together in a way that isn’t quite correct, which seems to be summed up in the regular use of the term “organized Jewry”. The strong ethno-centrism of Jews is unquestioned. But I’m not sure that defeating Israelis in one of their 4,000 year old battles with some Arab group, actually advances White interests. Can you show me how helping the Palestinians win a few feet of land helps stop Cultural Marxism or put an end to the massive invasion of the US and Europe by Third World people?

      And I still don’t know what would be bad about all Jews returning to Israel, from out perspective. Seems like it would be pretty darn good. Now, as someone pointed out, they wouldn’t do it because they live better here. But from our perspective as Whites, I can’t see any downside. Wouldn’t you like it all the Jews in Hollywood decided to go live in Israel and vacate the US and Europe?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 17, 2011 - 11:13 pm | Permalink

      By the way, Sardonicus, are you quite sure that Jews living Israel care as much about undermining White Civilization as our cosmopolitan Jews living in the US and Europe?

      I’m reminded that Israel maintained a long and mutually supportive relationship with South Africa. Now, it is true that “organized Jewry” in the West agitated against South Africa, as did all the communists and race-deniers. But from what I understand, Israel was actually faithful in its relationship with South Africa. Now, they were obviously acting out of self-interest, but nonetheless they did work with South Africa after other countries turned their back on them. I’m sure it was to get vital materials, not out of a desire to help Whites. But they didn’t put hurting Whites above their own self-interest (as some “White Nationalists” seem willing to do just to hurt Israel).

      The Jews in Israel make deals based on what they think will help Israel, and that seems to be more important to Israelis than hurting White people, from what I can see. In fact, Whites, according to Rachel Corrie, are treated pretty well in Israel.

      By the way, full disclosure, I am not sure I am a “White Nationalist”, I have never used that term, I just say White Advocate, because the concept WN is not well defined to me. I have reservations because I am for a White Republic, with individual rights and the rule of law, not any kind of fascist or socialist state.

    • March 17, 2011 - 11:15 pm | Permalink

      Sardonicus
      March 17, 2011 – 9:10 pm

      “If you were a genuine White Nationalist, which you are not, Jews and Israel would be your primary concern — for the simple reason that organized Jewry and Zionism are the main threats to the White civilization you profess to love so much.

      You’re only half-right, because Jews are only half the problem. The other half is weak, braiwashed Whites, including feminists like Corrie and the pathetic “men” that enable them.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      March 17, 2011 - 11:38 pm | Permalink

      Personally, I find most jews irritating. But hating them doesn’t qualifiy as the end all of white nationalism, imho. You can’t seriously believe that if we asked the jews to leave, and they did, that we could control the negro and mexican problem, do you? Also, many a jew is marrying himself out of existence.
      http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/WillYourGrandchildrenBeJews/
      Jews might be ugly parasites and irritatingly make alot of money, and have a sordid past, etc -but when they are gone by their own hand – their black and brown spawn will swamp us like a tsunami.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 18, 2011 - 12:00 am | Permalink

      ” I have reservations because I am for a White Republic, with individual rights and the rule of law, not any kind of fascist or socialist state.”

      I am for a representative government of any kind. If my government consists of an autocrat who shares my interests, this is better than a government that consists of a parliament that does not. Although, parliament is a superior form of government when it also happens to be representative in certain respects. For instance, it is less vulnerable to impulsivity. However, that comes at the expense of being able to do things quickly.

  48. March 17, 2011 - 8:27 pm | Permalink

    Dave: “How can you sanely support an agenda that is targeted against you and your own people and not for some altruistic, brotherhood-of-man reason but for the selfish advantage of another group of people? That’s the poison of cultural marxism.”

    And Judeo-Christian Zionism, and White nationalist Zionism, and neo-conservatism…

    The “brilliance” of the Judeofascist is enlisting and co-opting non-Jews to do the bidding of the Judeofascists against the target group’s own personal interests. Sometimes this can be accomplished through intellectual movements or religious concepts, sometimes it is by infiltrating and co-opting a target group’s government and economic system, corrupting them, and then leveraging those institutions on Judeofascism’s behalf, and against the interests of the majority.

    But again, this is key: Rachel Corrie died fighting against the Judeofascists. Does it matter that she was probably motivated by cultural Marxism? Only if she’s martyred as “Rachel Corrie, the heroic Marxist who died fighting the Zionists.” But that’s not how Lasha Darkmoon is martyring her. She’s martyring her as yet another White person murdered by Judeofascists.

    Additional, if the entire Left can be “played” against the Judeofascists and starts directing its ire at organized Jewry instead of Whites, Christians and Western Civilization, that’s a good thing.

    Divide and conquer, the same game the Jews play. Lasha Darkmoon is several steps ahead of you fellas.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 17, 2011 - 8:51 pm | Permalink

      If you are saying this is a ploy by Darkmoon, for propaganda purposes, then on that level it might be useful. We should show the hypocrisy of Jewish support for Israel while the same Jews attack American Pioneers as “imperialists” who “exterminated” Native Americans. If it can be useful on that level, then it may be plausible.

      But then the propaganda needs to be reframed. It should focus on the cruelty and indifference of the IDF and any facts that can show they knew what they were doing when they ran over her, as well as their subsequent treatment of the issue.

      But it cannot focus on how glorious and saintly Rachel is, because Rachel is a huge turn-off to people on our side. Everything about her reminds of us of the kind of Leftist Multiculturalist we can’t stand, and the fact that she would burn an American flag but not an Israeli, won’t win over most Whites. So, the smart thing is to cast her as a bit misguided, not saintly, but a victim nonetheless of the IDF, and a symbol of how Israel treats those that oppose it.

      Focusing on how Rachel is the new Mother Theresa, as some of suggested, gets in the way of the storyline.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 17, 2011 - 11:46 pm | Permalink

      @ Jason Speaks

      I actually sort of agree with that last post. But you have to admit, Rachel does make a good martyr against a group of people who, as a general political mind, want to completely genocide us. And that those same people brainwashed her makes it even sadder.

      I recognize that you do not hate all Jews. Neither do I. But the fact is that the Jewish body is trying to destroy our race. Maybe not Norman Finkelstein, but the generalized Jewish community must be painted as an enemy.

  49. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    March 17, 2011 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

    Poppping back here for a moment, I must admit I was initially quite shocked and dismayed at the derogatory comments about Corrie. But then I realized I’ve seen this vocabularly about Rachel before….in the mainstream center right of American politics. The Republicans who sympathized with the Tea Party movement. Previously the white people who hadn’t yet faced up to the terrible reality facing us. Still vociferously pro-Jewish, but shadows there in the back of their minds. Some dawning horror in the back of their eye.
    Lasha I think the explanation is actually positive. I think some of those Republicans are taking their first steps home. Sure, there are still a lot of memes banging around in their heads they can’t let go of. Lot’s of genocidal hateful enemies they had sincerely thought were dear friends and allies. It can take time to face up to things. But the important thing is THEY ARE HERE.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 17, 2011 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

      No one that comes to this site is vociferously pro-Jewish (unless as a troll). If they were, they wouldn’t stay but 2 seconds. Respectfully, those who oppose making Rachel a martyr for White Nationalism are simply perplexed by the illogic of it all. Perhaps we don’t hate Jews with an all-consuming passion, we may not find them the source of every last evil in the world, nor believe they were born evil, but we are quite aware of negative impact of Jewish influence on our culture. I’m talking about regular visitors to this site.

      But there are positions between absolutely hating Jews and mindlessly loving Jews, it’s not either/or. Jews and Israel are not my primary concern. White Civilization is.

      The people that Rachel associated with, the various leftwing organizations, hate the IDF the way leftists still hate Pioneers in American history. They see a group of White people oppressing brown people. That’s all.

  50. Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
    March 17, 2011 - 7:32 pm | Permalink

    Rachel lovers, don’t both to read any more!

    Don’t bother to post any more!

    The entire Comments column here has now been taken over by Zionist Jews and Christian Zionists!

    They have descended on this website suddenly like swarms of locusts, sensing a threat to organized Jewry in Rachel Corrie — Rachel who must, at all costs, be belittled, mocked, vilified, denigrated, sneered at, spat upon, and treated like a lump of shit.

    There is not a single White Nationalist in sight.

    There are only Jews and their camp followers here — the brain-dead Christian Zionists.

    Everyone else has departed.

  51. Mister White's Gravatar Mister White
    March 17, 2011 - 7:05 pm | Permalink

    No true pro-White would ever vilify and trash a DEAD White girl like Rachel Corrie for the mere fact she was a “liberal”. No true pro-white would ever do such a thing.And I think most of the comment posters on this thread who’ve discredited the dead white girl Rachel Corrie are using divide and rule tactics .These infiltrators clearly want Whites i.e.White liberals and White conservatives,to hate each other.To want nothing to do with each other. These malevolent, self serving infiltrators
    want whites totally divided and disunited. A message to the more “conservative” pro-whites out there : Take the blinders off! Think more racially not ideologically and you will see things a whole lot clearer.

    • March 17, 2011 - 11:05 pm | Permalink

      No, Mr. White. No true WN would ever canonize a woman who spent her entire (albeit short) adult life steeped in hatred and contempt for her men. It’s cowardly feminists, like you, masquerading as honorable defenders of White femininity that are acting as the divisive force here.

      Women like Corrie who believe that they are entitled to travel the world championing the causes of the brown races are a the Jews greatest weapon against the White race.

  52. March 17, 2011 - 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Dave and Lew said all I wanted to say, only better. So I’ll just add, Rachel Corrie represented everything wrong with today’s White female. She was an arrogant, self-absorbed twit, stoned on “feminism,” who swallowed all of the Judeo-feminist lies about the role of women in society. Women, like her, actually believe that they represent the female divine and are going to save the brown masses while concurrently redeeming us “evil White males.”

    Jews, through feminism, have turned White women into the ultimate “Fifth Column.” Any White man who doesn’t understand that, either isn’t thinking, or, as the saying goes, he’s thinking with the wrong head.

  53. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 17, 2011 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

    @EIC: I’m not arguing that Rachel Corrie was a white hater or even a jew hater. She was just helping the downtrodden. Sadly, however, she was still a dupe of cultural marxists unaware that cultural marxism itself is a racist tool directed at her own people. None of those teaching cultural marxism I’m sure touch upon the fact that it was cooked up to further the agenda of one group of people at the expense of another group of people.

    If she had been made aware of that at a truly profound level of consciousness as opposed to just a mere fact, she probably would have changed her behavior. How can you sanely support an agenda that is targeted against you and your own people and not for some altruistic, brotherhood-of-man reason but for the selfish advantage of another group of people? That’s the poison of cultural marxism. It has a woman like Rachel Corrie convinced that she has to choose death to demonstrate that she is not a “racist”. In another tragedy a woman did not resist a rape at the hands of a man of another race because she didn’t want to be called a “racist”. That’s the real tragedy here. This ideology is designed to make us lower our guard and takes advantage of our best instincts.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      March 19, 2011 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

      Dave:

      Your posts are so excellent you should be paid to post here.

  54. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    March 17, 2011 - 1:21 pm | Permalink

    Rachael Corrie was a self-hating, anti-White White, and of her own free will she gave up her life fighting for non-White Semites. The fact that she was murdered by Jews doesn’t change this reality.

    Still, this incident does show what Jews have in mind for all of us. From the Jewish point of view, we are all Rachael Corries who deserve to be crushed under the bulldozer’s blade.

    We killed Jesus, and we’ll kill you too.

  55. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 17, 2011 - 12:05 pm | Permalink

    @Lasha: It is noted that you did not take on the arguments posited by those dissenting from your “hagiography” of Rachel Corrie. That is because you know you don’t have a leg to stand on. Since she was an attractive white woman, she is above reproach, and the motivations for her actions cannot be considered. Sorry. Part of the malaise facing white peoples is white men stopped standing up to white women a long time ago. I call a spade a spade regardless of the sex who authored it.

    The facts of her death would lead one to believe that she was a naive youth involved in some cultural-marxist-inspired wild goose chase. Review of her writings confirms that suspicion. Since the more extreme cultural marxists want to genocide the white race, any white who gives one of their relatives a chance to murder him/her is merely playing into their hands. That is the definition of a “fool”. In their fantasies radical cultural marxists want to KILL US. That is the reality of Rachel Corrie’s fate. She unwittingly obliged them. Due to the ignorance/indifference of her guardians, she was allowed to get involved in some misadventure purpose-built to trip up gullible white youth. She was allowed to follow the pied piper to her death.

    It is only a happenstance of fate that her death came at the hands of the Israelis. Ordinarily, cultural marxist agitating is directed at white gentile societies. Had she gotten involved in cultural marxist activities at some earlier or later time when palestinians were not the cause of the day her activities in all likelihood would have been directed at white gentiles. As some others have mentioned, at earlier times she may have been agitating against apartheid. At a later time, she may have been attacking the white men in Wisconsin who are trying to put Wisconsin’s finances in order.

    If white women want to contribute to the cause, they should stop aborting their babies and start reproducing above replacement level. That simple act would be beyond attack by our enemies. Let’s see if they have the nerve to call white motherhood “racist” or “selfish” or some other self-serving buzz word. When the white sexes are working together toward a shared future we are a formidable people.

  56. Chonodomarius's Gravatar Chonodomarius
    March 17, 2011 - 10:54 am | Permalink

    Miss Lasha, Fighting for the noble Aryan race is shameful? Would it be okay with you if they had said “Indo-European”? If it had been Louis Farakan instead of Corrie would you fell the same? How about Obama? The problem is many Americans falsely view the Palestinian-Israeli conflict as white colonials vs brown aboriginals, even Raspail makes this mistake. Corrie was a typical self-hating white girl, yet she was an American citizen and murdered by a government the U.S. supports. We know what the response would be if she had been a Jewish activist. I don’t like whats being done to the Palestinians either, but go to an anti-war rally and speak the truth about Israel and the same Palestinians and peace activists like Corrie will turn on you like mad dogs.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 17, 2011 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

      The argument is made a lot that Corrie was a white-hater. I disagree with that. I think she certainly believed that she had “privilege,” even to such an exaggerated extent that it got her killed. But at the same time, I believe she was protesting the IDF because they were JEWS, and not simply because they were white.

      Someone please find me evidence to the contrary, since it is the foundation for most of the anti-Rachel arguments being made.

  57. Lasha Darkmoon's Gravatar Lasha Darkmoon
    March 17, 2011 - 8:46 am | Permalink

    White Nationalists: separating the wheat from the chaff

    I am finding it difficult to distinguish between Zionist trolls who wish to silence me — and who have been bombarding me with hate mail at my private email address — and so-called “White Nationalists” who for some reason don’t think very highly of Rachel Corrie.

    I had always assumed until now that all genuine White Nationalists, like Kevin MacDonald for example, would hold Rachel Corrie in respect and honor — and indeed Kevin MacDonald does have a very soft spot for Rachel; he strongly disapproves of those on this site who have sought to sully Rachel’s memory by belittling and sneering at her.

    After all, Rachel was a passionate anti-Zionist. She was 100 percent against the atrocities and human rights violations associated with this parasitic pariah state which should never have been founded in the first place.

    She would have been appalled, as all high-principled people are, at the war crimes committed by Israel in its 22-day Gaza War of 2009-10 (‘Operation Cast Lead’).

    All genuine White Nationalists should, in my opinion, be passionate anti-Zionists like Rachel. And they should, therefore, be ardent Rachel supporters.

    Why should all White Nationalists be anti-Zionist by definition?

    Let me tell you why.

    Because if it were not for organized Jewry, the standard bearers of Zionism, there would be no need for secession. If we have lost our homelands to multiculturalism, both in America and Europe, it is because of the Jews. The Jews, and the Jews alone, are the architects of our misery. Even before the introduction of the deadly 1965 Immigration Act in America, which opened the floodgates, it was the Jews above all who had been agitating for unlimited Third World immigration — for Operation Swamp the Goyim.

    Kevin MacDonald has written about all this at great length, providing meticulous documentation to show how organzed Jewry is largely to blame for the multicultural nightmare that now confronts us — and which is the motivating force behind White Nationalism.

    Whites would not even be talking about a White haven in the North West Pacific if their country — AMERICA — had not been stolen from under their noses by organized Jewry.

    If this country has now become a multicultural zoo — a dystopia in which Whites are to become a beleaguered minority by 2050 — we have only the Jews to thank.

    For a White Nationalist to be FOR organized Jewry and PRO-Zionist is therefore an absurdity — an oxymoron — a contradiction in terms. It is like handing your deadliest enemy a dagger to stab you in the back with.

    I note that this forum is swarming with professed White Nationalists who appear to be ardent supporters of Israel.

    They despise the Palestinians and they mock Rachel Corrie for dying for brown-skinned “Ayrabs” and “wogs” — I quote an actual poster on this blog.

    Rachel should have stayed behind in America, they insist, and fought for the noble Aryan race — and let all the “wogs” in the Middle East wipe themselves out!

    Shameful.

    This is not the right attitude. These posters sound more like neo-Nazi skinheads than decent human beings. They are not the kind of recruits any true White Nationalist leader would wish to have. They bring discredit upon him and his movement.

    In fact, the more I think of it, it is most unlikely that any of these professed White Nationalists are White Nationalists at all.

    They sound more like Jewish infiltrators.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 17, 2011 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

      “All White Nationalists be anti-Zionist by definition”

      The reverse of that statement does not hold true. All anti-Zionists are not White Nationalists. That is the point. As far as I can see, there is a significant body of anti-Zionists who also happen to be quite hostile to “White Privilege” and Western Civilization. Now, by no means are ALL of them that way. For example, Pat Buchanan is anti-Zionist and obviously he is a fan of White people. But then you have Jane Fonda, and she is the furthest thing from a White Nationalist. So, indeed, we do have to separate the wheat from the chaff, and not reflexively throw in with anyone that seems to be attacking Israel, no matter what the other facts of their lives and beliefs are. There are people who are anti-Zionist AND despise White people as well. So, these particular subsets are not our allies. They would be the chaff.

      The principle that the “enemy of my enemy is my friend” has a long history in the Middle East, and I don’t look at it with admiration. It may be true that you have to cooperate with a snake when fighting another snake in at times, but you would be wise to remember it is still a snake.

    • iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
      March 18, 2011 - 8:25 pm | Permalink

      I don’t think that’s fair. I don’t think she should’ve been in a war zone fighting for non-Whites. Not that I hate non-Whites, I just think what’s the point? One protestor isn’t going to change the situation. What’s with this if you critisize her you are no true Aryan stuff? That’s not right. Offering an opinion on the her situation isn’t wrong. It’s the same Amy Biel syndrome stuff that was shown on TOO a couple of months back. We never got slapped down for critisizing her. Show some consistency, TOO.

      TT

  58. Petronius's Gravatar Petronius
    March 17, 2011 - 8:03 am | Permalink

    Seriously, all the people here stubbornly calling “Jason speaks” a “Jew”, because he is about to destroy their illusions about Rachel Corrie, are plain scary. What is all this insanity good for?

    All you need to do is OPEN YOUR EYES to REALITY and READ Rachel’s emails to her mother. Point.

  59. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    March 16, 2011 - 11:28 pm | Permalink

    It’s sad to see a clash of ideas and viewpoints degenerate into a clash of personalities and egos.

    Maybe the next thread will be better.

    • Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
      March 17, 2011 - 6:53 am | Permalink

      It’s been an interesting discussion. We certainly live in interesting times.

  60. iboTTs's Gravatar iboTTs
    March 16, 2011 - 10:30 pm | Permalink

    If Rachel was liberal-left then she probably wouldn’t like us all that much. But that’s expected. The fact that she gave her life for Palestinians makes me think she was culturally brainwashed. And the fact that Jews killed her, and show no empathy towards her death whatsoever, isn’t the least bit surprising.

    I wish she had never died, and obviously I’m sorry for her, but she’s no White martyre. She’s really a misguided victim of the multicult and ZoG-ish education.

    TT

  61. March 16, 2011 - 10:09 pm | Permalink

    I just left the following comments, on this subject over at ANUnews.net and thought I’d copy and paste them here:

    Liberal twits like Rachel Corrie don’t fight against Jewish interests for the right reasons. They think of the Jews as “uber-Whites” and, consequently, see themselves as champions of the brown masses in their fight against “evil Whitey.” They are truly sickening.

    This is just going to “empower” more stupid college girls (of both sexes) to think that by standing against “the man” they are going to some how “change” things.

    Whenever I read stuff like this I’m reminded of the quote attributed to that demented Jew, Saul Alinsky, who supposedly wrote, “it is easy to get people to do the right thing, but impossible to get them to do it for the right reasons.”

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 10:35 pm | Permalink

      Yeah, I questioned this article as well. I think I have made some good arguments in its defense, and I definitely think it is important to have heroes. But to be honest, it would have been a lot easier to agree with an icon who wasn’t so self-confused. Just saying.

    • I's Gravatar I
      March 16, 2011 - 11:11 pm | Permalink

      Liberal twits like Rachel Corrie don’t fight against Jewish interests for the right reasons.

      Huh? Is there a *wrong* reason to fight against Jewish power?

      Here’s what I find funny. When liberals do something right – and it is indisputable that there is a substantial and growing resistance to Jewish power among the White left – this is dismissed and attacked because “it’s not for the right reasons”. As I noted above, I do not agree with this – I think anti-Zionist White liberals are motivated by strong instinctive racialism – but even if this is not true, who cares?

      Yet when conservatives do something wrong – and the vast majority of self-identified conservatives are VERY pro-Jewish power and pro-Israel – hey, man, it’s cool, because they’re still “conservative” and they have good intentions.

      I call bullshit on this whole frame. Israel is the Jews’ main weakness right now, and the White liberals are hammering away at it. Using the Palestinians against the Jews is brilliant, just as Jews used blacks and other non-Whites against us. Fundamentally, what I care about it is that it is working. I do not see White nationalists doing much that is working, other than spreading information on the web, which is certainly important. And conservatives, for the most part, side with Jews and against their own people.

      Frankly, I question the motives of people who see White liberals successfully undermining Jewish power and condemn them. You see something that is working, and want it to stop? I really do not see myself as being on the same side as these people.

    • March 17, 2011 - 12:44 am | Permalink

      “Huh? Is there a *wrong* reason to fight against Jewish power?”

      The problem is they’re not truly fighting against Jewish Power. “Liberals” and Nationalists are almost identical in our view of how power works. Both camps believe they are fighting the good fight against a small group of elites that rule the world. The difference is in how we identify that group. “Liberals” believe that group is constituted of Rich White Men. Nationalists know that it is made-up of Rich Jewish Men.

      Of course, “Liberals” believe as they do because the Rich Jewish Men, that run the world, deliberately condition them to believe it, in an effort to scapegoat us. So, when they are fighting Jews as merely members of the class “Whitey” they are really helping the Jews by misdirection. The reason the Left’s half-century plus long “revolution” against “the Man” has not only failed but actually helped the Jewish plutocrats, is because it is designed to misdirect their attack at White men – the only group that can actually stop the Jews’ plan for world domination.

    • March 17, 2011 - 12:51 am | Permalink

      However, I do agree that if the “Liberals” can be used to advance our cause by harming Jewish interests, we should use them that way. But we should never think they are our friends. Remember the most powerful “White Liberals” are all Jews.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 17, 2011 - 12:55 am | Permalink

      “Remember the most powerful ‘White Liberals’ are all Jews.”

      That is almost certainly true.

    • I's Gravatar I
      March 17, 2011 - 2:56 am | Permalink

      The problem is they’re not truly fighting against Jewish Power… “Liberals” believe that group is constituted of Rich White Men. Nationalists know that it is made-up of Rich Jewish Men.

      Yet, increasingly we see liberals attacking Jewish power. So you’re saying that the liberals are intending to attack Whites, but instead they’ve misidentified Jews as Whites and are attacking them by mistake? Frankly I don’t think that makes a lot of sense. Given the extent to which White liberals are exposing and undermining Jewish power, I think you need a lot of evidence to support such an argument and I don’t see any, quite frankly.

      So, when they are fighting Jews as merely members of the class “Whitey” they are really helping the Jews by misdirection.

      Okay, so Rachel Corrie was helping Jews. I guess all the White liberals saw what happened to Rachel Corrie and said “boy, White people are sure awful for crushing her with that bulldozer”, right? And I suppose John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt were helping Jews by publishing The Israel Lobby. And I suppose that, say, Greg Felton was helping Jews by writing a book called The Host and the Parasite about Israel and the US. I suppose all the boycotts and divestments of Israeli products are just the liberals’ way of helping Jews and attacking Whitey. Etc. Do I need to continue? I do not think your way of looking at the situation makes sense.

      But we should never think they are our friends.

      I see no reason why this should necessarily be so. Good article on this topic here.

      Remember the most powerful “White Liberals” are all Jews.

      That’s definitely true. But there is a growing rift between Jewish liberals and White liberals. By contrast the Jewish control over conservatives is very strong and appears to be increasing.

    • March 17, 2011 - 8:31 am | Permalink

      Liberals are not attacking Jewish Power. Israel is not Jewish Power – the banks are. Israel is at best a totem.

      Liberal twits like Rachel Corrie are merely a distraction and probably only serve to strengthen Zionism rather than weaken it. Further, Zionism is not the only Jewish “-ism” that needs to be combated. “Left”-leaning Jews aren’t very fond of Zionism, for a couple of reasons. The big one being that Zionism has a religious/mystical component to it that requires all Jews inhabit “Eretz Israel.” Most of the wealthy, “progressive” Jews on the “Left” are too soft and have no intention of ever living in that God-forsaken desert surrounded by enemies. Plus, these Jews believe the diaspora is necessary for control of the Goyim.

  62. Praxis's Gravatar Praxis
    March 16, 2011 - 9:23 pm | Permalink

    Please use caution in throwing the pejorative “jew” around. Every white nationalist of my acquaintance has been labeled “jew” or “jewish troll” more often than can be counted. It has gotten so bad, in fact, that I don’t believe one has truly earned his wings as a white nationalist until he has been universally condemned as a jew by Netters.

    Jason Squeaks is probably nothing more than a Rush Limbaugh –type with lightweight racialist inclinations. His anti-socialist, pro-capitalist philosophy is a combination of Ayn Rand and the John Birch Society. Yes, much of what he writes is laughable and can be predicted with accuracy. He has lots of time on his hands and yes, behaves as a gatekeeper of sorts. He may well be one of the gatekeepers! Official or unofficial is irrelevant. It’s quite apparent that at least one or more of Kmac’s moderators likes him. Perhaps Jason is a moderator! Do moderators self-identify as moderators at TOO? I don’t know. What I do know is I’ve been prevented from responding to Jason’s Limbaughism on several occasions. And civil posts of mine that Jason didn’t like simply vanished after his disdainful, Limbaugh-like responses. Coincidental? A little more than that, I think.

    Still, I don’t think he’s a jew. I think a late 40ish/early 50ish pensioner of some means typing from home is closer to the truth. Or perhaps he is an academic/teacher/instructor/staff employee admirer of Kmac with too much time on his hands this term.

    Don’t overreact to Jason Squeaks, is my advice. Fwiw, life is full of irritants.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

      Yes, finally, some sense. All that witch hunting has gotten out of control. On the plus side, I doubt it would be easy for a Jew to sneak in! LOL

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      March 17, 2011 - 1:31 am | Permalink

      Praxis says

      Jason Squeaks is probably nothing more than a Rush Limbaugh –type with lightweight racialist inclinations. His anti-socialist, pro-capitalist philosophy is a combination of Ayn Rand and the John Birch Society.

      So, Jason Speaks is not a Jew, but a Philo-Semitic Rush Limbaugh Ditto-head that spends all day every day spamming Kevin MacDonald’s blog telling us to go easy on the Jews, support Israel, and never stray outside of Kosher Conservatism.

      Would it matter either way? I’ve never called him a Jew, I just don’t buy his schtick. Whether he’s an idiot that believes it, or a Jew infiltrator – who cares? What difference does it make?

      He’s either a Jew Troll or a Jew Dupe – who cares?

      Thank God for Kevin MacDonald and having a place we don’t have to cater to these people. MacDonald’s article “Working with Jews – or not” says it all. Why should I have to listen to a bunch of racist, bigoted, Jewish Zion-Nazis or even give the Apartheid Regime of Jew Bigotry in Zionist Occupied Palestine the time of day?

      What, some organ-stealing, kidney trafficking JEW ISRAELI is going to give us moral lectures? The followers of the racist, bigoted Talmud?

      Perhaps Conservative Republican so-called “Christian” Zionists want to cater to the Synagogue of Satan – why should I? I’m a WASP. I don’t buy their crap at all.

      Rachel Corrie was a sympathetic White women who was murdered by a bunch of Jew Nazis. Screw them.

  63. Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
    March 16, 2011 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    I posted a link to this article on a “Christian” Face Book group page called “Christians Against The New World Order”…only most of the people who post there actually PROMOTE the NWO agenda. One such person is Samuel Benitez who had this to say about the article:

    “What ticks me off about this Link is the way they are using her pictures and her childhood memories to promote an agenda, they should at least show some respect for this Girl´s memory and not use her post-death image right next to her Childhood picture, i find that rather twisted, and i would be outraged if she were a family member and saw her like this, in that type of website.

    Note: “that type of website…”

    Interesting. Darkmoon is here being accused of breaking some unwritten law by posting two pics in juxtaposition: Rachel as a young girl and Rachel as dead woman.

    So unfair! She shouldn’t do this! Getting a cheap emotional effect!

    Who sez? A Jew! Or a shabbat goy.

    These guys even tell you what pics you need to post in order not to wind them up by making an extremely effective and emotively charged pont!

  64. Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
    March 16, 2011 - 8:16 pm | Permalink

    Elite Institution coward, how can you really know what is in the Jewish hearts? Why do you want to sentence all Jews to genocide or oblivion and deny them the right to exist for something that their ancestors may or may not have done?

  65. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    March 16, 2011 - 8:01 pm | Permalink

    My maidservant friend was of course wrong to generalize. Just because you receve ill-treatmeant from a particular Jew doesn’t mean that all Jews are bad.

    I received this email only today from a Jewish friend asking her if she would like to pray and burn candles for a Jewish family murdered in Israel. I guess my friend agreed. She likes praying and she’s into candles big time.

    I quote this email in its entirety because I find its language quaint and charming. Quintessentially Jewish. (I hope my friend doesn’t mind me quoting it).

    Subject: Mivtzah Neshek in the zchus of the Fogel family who were murdered R”L

    [We] are asking all of us to join women all over the world in lighting shabbos candles in zchus of the neshamos of the kedoshim from the Fogel family murdered in Israel, R”L.

    In less then 28 hours the word spread so fast that over 10,000 women (and some men who live on their own!) have committed to light shabbos candles this coming shabbos, parashas Zachor and erev Purim!!

    Lets storm the heavens and beg HaKodosh Boruch Hu that in zchus of our achdus in lighting shabbos candles and in encouraging women throughout the world to join in bench licht this week, we will have the geulah!!

    Please see Facebook link below and add as many people as you can.

    Lets us all together spread the light of Yidishkeeit to all corners of the world. So far, the reponse has been incredible! People have added people on this facebook event and the numbers of people comminting themselves to light candles literaly grow by the minute!! Please help me reach as many women as possible by asking your ladies to take part in this and if you are on facebook, to join the group.

    A freilechen Purim and only bessuros tovos to all!

    Real cute…I wonder if that’s Hebrew or Yiddish?

    • Rod Mckenzie's Gravatar Rod Mckenzie
      March 16, 2011 - 9:05 pm | Permalink

      I find this ethnic argot bout as quaint as a barbed wire fence surrounding an abandoned industrial waste site in New Jersey. Please keep your friend’s “quaint” emails for your own enjoyment in the privacy of your own hard drive?

    • March 16, 2011 - 10:03 pm | Permalink

      Shabbos candles to draw in potential shobbos goy slaves — how quaint indeed.

      Thank you for sharing a prime example of organized Jewry’s slithery, manipulative, ingratiating ways.

      Why, Satan’s serpant could learn a thing or two from these people himself!

  66. Chonodomarius's Gravatar Chonodomarius
    March 16, 2011 - 7:42 pm | Permalink

    I remember girls like this from college, rainbow berets and Free South Africa t-shirts. I always enjoyed the look of consternation on their faces when I called them hypocrites for not caring about Palestinians. Since they got their way in South Africa, it seems some of them aren’t hypocrites. Now they can justly call me hypocrite for not caring about apartheid in South Africa while pretending to care about it in Palestine. I don’t. I hate Israel because of its belligerent actions against my country. I hate it because it envolves me in its fanatical goal of making good a 2,000 year old land claim. I hate it because it has nuclear warheads aimed at Europe, which I do care about. As for Biehl and Corrie, though they were race traitors, they were still white women. The Congoids and Yids that killed them should be taught a lesson.

  67. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    March 16, 2011 - 7:37 pm | Permalink

    @ Jason Speaks

    Ironically, I don’t have any Jewish friends at the moment, although about 6 years ago I had a Jewish coworker. He was not demonic. I met him and his wife at a happy hour once and they were quite nice. She liked me and sent brownies for me at work the following week.

    Lucky you. To have met a couple of nice Jews. You have all the luck.

    My best friend, desperate to find work in this economoc downturn, recently signed on with a domestic agency and they sent her out to to work for a Jewish family as a live-in maidservant.

    She lasted a month.

    They expected her to eat dogfood. The couple’s elder son tried to grope her in the kitchen as she was bending over to get some cookies out of the oven. And when she left at the end of the month, they docked her wages because she hadn’t given a month’s notice.

    Once bitten, twice shy. She’s now an anti-Semite.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      March 16, 2011 - 10:42 pm | Permalink

      Anonyma:

      I have great news for your friend. You cannot dock someone’s wages for failure to give notice. If she had a month’s salary quoted to her, it is due. She should talk to the Dept. of Labor. Additionally, she was sexually assaulted. That is unacceptable, and she should contact the EEOC and initiate a case. Why let them get away with it? She could win a nice judgement and donate some of the money to this website, as a final punishment to the jews who harmed her.

  68. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    March 16, 2011 - 6:27 pm | Permalink

    It’s amusing, it was suggested I might be a borderline sociopath because I wasn’t for making Rachel Corrie a saint. It was also suggested that I must not be able to value other peoples, due to my failure to embrace Palestinians as a new holy people.

    This brings something interesting to mind. How much interaction with other people do we do? In my case, quite a bit. I have Asian friends for example, and as recently as year ago sent a flowers to my Asian friend’s wife when they had a baby. Most of the non-White people I know stem from work. On a daily basis I may lunch with Asians, Whites, Hispanics, Indians, or Pakistanis. Most of the people at work are still White and so are most of my friends and lunch-mates, but nonetheless, I have significant interaction with other ethnicities. And like people anywhere, some are nice, a few mean, and most pretty average.

    Ironically, I don’t have any Jewish friends at the moment, although about 6 years ago I had a Jewish coworker. He was not demonic. I met him and his wife at a happy hour once and they were quite nice. She liked me and sent brownies for me at work the following week. She also talked about their recent trip to Germany and how much she liked the German people, and how nice they were, almost in a protective manner. The irony is, I didn’t know they were Jewish at that point. I found out later. He was not religious in any serious sense.

    I have another Jewish coworker, who is from NYC and he has that New York attitude and can be a bear to work with (which thankfully isn’t often). But he jokes around at other times. I do note that all the Jews I have known were liberal on social issues. The Jewish guy I mentioned before was afraid to get a gun for home defense, even though his wife wanted one – he was afraid it would “just make things worse” if a criminal broke in. LOL

    And, of course, anyone that has an IT department deals with tons of Indians and Pakistanis.

    So my beliefs are not born out of negative personal encounters, they are born out of a concern that White Civilization survives and thrives. It is also born form the reality that more homogeneous societies function better.

    • Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
      March 16, 2011 - 7:31 pm | Permalink

      Jason Speaks,
      I believe you and I don’t think you should allow yourself to be influenced at all by others who are throwing accusations. In the end it doesn’t matter what other people think, just so long as you know what the truth is for yourself. Also bear in mind, if those who accuse you could see inside your head, they wouldn’t be accusing you….so it’s not really that they are against you personally, it’s just that they aren’t able to tell.
      Success in ensuring white civilization does survive will have to involve a lot of people with a lot of very different ideas, being able to come together around that singular uniting focus. I believe you that you are there. I could be wrong of course. But in the end we don’t have to trust eachother’s motives as long as we can look at what is being said and calculate, on balance, the effect of that person’s words is good for the whites.

    • March 16, 2011 - 7:46 pm | Permalink

      So despite the massive body of irrefutable evidence of organized Jewry’s malign influence and intentions written and assembled by Dr. Kevin MacDonald, much of it on this very site, you have formed your opinion of organized Jewry based on a couple of Jewish casual acquaintances.

      Brilliant.

      And gee, you sure did expend a lot of energy on their behalf…why, you’re a regular Oskar Schindler.

      You go, girl!

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

      *Sigh*
      Chris, as I made clear to anyone, I do not base by wider political beliefs on a few personal interactions. That was my point. Despite having fairly positive interactions with most non-Whites, I understand that White culture is under threat and needs protection.

      And the key role that Jewish intellectuals, financiers and activists have played in undermining White Civilization is without doubt.

      But I don’t agree with people like you on key points. I am not opposed to the Enlightenment. I like the Scientific Revolution. I don’t hate every last Jew walking the face of the earth.

      I am more concerned with leftist Jews in the US and Europe, then the ones in Israel. And I would include NeoCons in that group, because most of them are actually pretty Leftwing, except for the hawkish stance on Israel.

      Sure Israel does everything it can to manipulate us. So do the Saudis, so does almost every other nation on earth. But it’s the Jewish powerhouses inside the West that promote Cultural Marxism that I find most dangerous.

      Guys like you are off on some weird pseudo-religious trip to smash every last Jew and cry crocodile tears for Palestinians you could care less about it.

      No thanks.

    • March 16, 2011 - 9:22 pm | Permalink

      Way to put words in my mouth — yet another Zionist tactic.

      It doesn’t matter if you’re a Jew or not, because you’ve been so thoroughly Judaized. You’re so narcissistic, you just don’t see it, which is one of the manifestations of the process.

      To say that the Enlightenment was co-opted, manipulated, and exploited by the Judefascists and their pseudo-Christian and anti-Christian White-sociopath collaborators is not to say that it is utterly irredeemable, unsalvageable, and without merit, but rather that it has been abused and poorly implemented, and the disastrous outcome for Western Civilization and other civilizations as a result of consequential colonialism, communism, zionism, and neo-fascist globalism speak for themselves.

      Your attitude is emblematic of how the corrupt, Judaized Establishment can no longer see the forest for the trees.

      We are entering a new epoch, and your kind will necessarily be marginalized and ultimately shoved into the gutters.

      Or, alternatively, you can emigrate to Israel where you’ll feel right at home.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

      Yeah, I should probably apologize for that sociopath thing. That was dirty.

  69. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    March 16, 2011 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    Let the Zionist trolls remain

    “I” says:

    How has “Jason Speaks” not been banned already? This guy was an obviously insincere Jewish troll from day one, yet he is still allowed to flood every thread with his garbage. What’s the deal?

    I’ve asked myself that question too. Is there an explanation?

    Why is “Jason Speaks” given free rein to disrupt this site and introduce innumerable distractions, all the while defending Zionist atrocities and pretending he is a White Nationalist into the bargain!

    If the editors of this site want to continue to allow EVERY comment thread to be derailed by this prick, I guess that’s their business, but they are showing an appalling lack of judgment. Lots of people have worked hard contributing to this site in terms of both content and web design, and then you let this Jewish creep come in here and piss on all of it.

    This poster (“I”) speaks for me. He speaks for countless others on this site. We have a problem here.

    …you don’t even have the guts to boot an extremely disruptive troll off your website.

    Strong words.

    Though I sympathize with this poster’s viewpoint, I think I understand the Moderator’s modus operandi. He doesn’t want to censor offensive statements made by these Zionist trolls — because the more offensive they are, the more quotable they become as WMDs to use against them at some future date.

    Here are two verbatim quotes about Rachel which will delight the hearts of our resident Zionist trolls:

    Do I think Saint Pancake got what she deserved? More pancake jokes, please!…. That reminds me, I’m out of maple syrup…. Keep the pancake jokes coming!
    — Verbatim quote from a Zionist website

    And how about this one? Even “Jason Speaks” will find it hard to do better!

    I know someone who worked for Caterpillar. By the way, CAT revenues and profits are up!….I’m gonna piss on her grave!

    (I’m not making these quotes up. Jews said these things about Rachel. They really hate her. Don’t worry, I’ll provide a link to the quotes later)

    The Jews on this site posing as White Nationalists — who can be likened to wolves in sheep’s clothing — attack Rachel ceaselessly in post after post.

    By their posts ye shall know them!

    * * * * *

    Remember Rachel was fighting against Zionism. What could be nobler? Zionism is an unspeakable evil. An ideology based on genocide, ethnic cleansing, land-grabbing for a Greater Israel, and millenarian mumbojumbo to keep the low-IQ Christian Zionists happy.

    Remember the day today: 16 March. The 8th anniversary of Rachel’s death under an Israeli bulldozer.

    Those who tell you that you shouldn’t waste your pity on Rachel would of course prefer you to pray for the souls of Jonathan Pollard, Baruch Goldstein, and war criminal Ariel Sharon!

    I remember a quote from Lasha Darkmoon. It rings in my head like a clanging bell. I can’t forget it.

    You bastards, you killed our Rachel!… Why should we mourn your dead at Auschwitz when you killed our beautiful Rachel?

    She apologized for thinking like that. She said such unkind thoughts were probably quite common. I think she’s right.

    When I think of what the Jews did to Rachel, I have no tears left for Anne Frank.

    • Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
      March 16, 2011 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

      Anonyma, first of all I pressed the wrong button before replying to and accidently reported your post. I hope the moderator will realize my mistake.
      Of course, people should feel outrage by the way Corrie was posthumously treated. It was a disgrace, particularly in regard of the way so many of our own people joined in.
      Also, who would want to see any people such as the Palestinians being abused for decades at a time, obviously caught in a hopeless trap by Israel, a country that rules over them, but doesn’t want them, but does want the ground they are standing on. It’s a tragedy.
      But on the other hand the world is full of tragic peoples and terrible misfortunes. For me, what really matters about terrible Israeli abuses over many years, is that so deep was the sleep/avoidance of so many of us in the West, that in order to be able to wake up, it probably took many years of the drip drip effects of witness the abhorant other side of Jewish culture. It probably woke me up. It probably played a part in waking you up.
      So it’s a godsend. I feel bad for the Palestinians about saying this but I hope the situation continues as it is because so deeply asleep are so many of our people that this drip drip effect out of Israel, and from reading the callous remarks of diaspora jews, is probably the central reason why so many are now waking up. Millions of people across the West right now, may still be smiling agreeably when a zionist pours contempt on the Palestinians or glibly justifies another abuse, or tells bare faced lies about Israeli intentions, but in their minds those people are thinking “what are you?”

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

      Don’t worry, I won’t be posting as much in the future. I like most of the articles on the site and still think it is very valuable, but there is a core of posters to this group I don’t like.

      On the one hand you have the Rambo wannabes that spin their post-apocalyptic fantasies, replete with ethnic slurs and chest-thumping. That’s a drag and gets us nowhere.

      On the other hand you have people who hate Israel with an all-consuming passion, literally more than they care about White people. They quote the Bible and suggest a dark “satanic” conspiracy is literally to blame. They thrill to every defeat Israel encounters and cry crocodile tears for the Palestinians

      There also seems to be a sliver that wants to put Whites in the service of Arabs and Muslims, to help fight Arab wars against Zionism and it bleeds over into an embrace of radical Left ideologies.

      No thanks to all of that.

      I would note for the education of the normal readers (probably most are normal people), I am not Jewish and have the most totally White ancestors you can imagine, going back to England, with a little Scottish and German thrown in. But note how any failure to embrace the radical Left pro-Palestinian movement gets one branded a “puppet of the Zionists”. These people lack almost any subtlety of thought.

      If White Advocacy is to move forward, it will have to find a way to distance itself from these people, who really aren’t all that pro-White in the first place. They are just using White Advocacy as a vehicle for other things.

    • dc's Gravatar dc
      March 16, 2011 - 11:38 pm | Permalink

      It’s not that you’re a jew Jason, it’s that you’re unpleasant, self-satisfied, stupid, and disruptive. You interfere in the conversation of your betters and reduce everything to sloganeering. You don’t see this of course, but you should understand that it is the judgment of the vast majority here.

      You and people like you have tried to mock and denigrate Rachel for no good reason. Misguided? maybe. But never as much of a race defiler and traitor as you, if you are in fact white.

  70. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    March 16, 2011 - 6:20 pm | Permalink

    I’ve got to be honest about this and say that I am not particularly motivated by the plight of the Palestinians so much as the fact that the way Israel treats the Palestinians and the way the Diaspora provides cover/justification for that, is helping millions more of my people to realize things about Jewish culture that they would otherwise probably never have been able to do. Probably including myself.
    That this has happened may be the single only reason there is any hope at all at this moment for European descendent folk to avoid the genocide that is being heaped upon them.
    So please, let’s call this for it is. A godsend.

  71. March 16, 2011 - 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Western Civilization has been in steep decline ever since the “Enlightenment,” when it no longer became taboo to collaborate with organized Jewry.

    At that point, organized Jewry and latently Jewish White money worshippers and power mad psychopaths and sociopaths began clawing their way to the top along with Jewry, which resulted in colonialism. This culminated in guys like Hitler, Stalin, Churchill and FDR, who did untold damage to the White race.

    Western Civilization has been trying to regurgitate the Jewish gangsters for thousands of years, but they are well organized, and their unscrupulous, greedy White collaborators have a lot of power as well, particularly in modern times. Indeed, contemporary American society is organized to reward Judeofascists and their unscrupulous White sociopath collaborators, and punish the morally refined authentic Christians and humanists.

    This, yet again, will be to the ultimate detriment of ALL American Whites.

    The good news is that Europe, with its bedrock of Christianity, is again increasingly critical of the Jewish gangsters, and “anti-Semitism” (anti-Judeofascism) is again breaking out all over, and has ALWAYS has been percolating just under the surface .

    The bad news is that this is why the unscrupulous, Judaized American Whites and their Judeofacist partners are trying to “break” European anti-Semitism by engineering open borders globalism and Middle East wars, which sends hundreds of thousands of Arab refugees flooding into Europe.

    Any White who collaborates with the Jewish gangsters, far and away the definitive, most toxic enemy of Western Civilization, is the mortal enemy not only of the White race, but the entirety of mankind.

  72. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    March 16, 2011 - 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Tehran has named a road in Rachel Corrie’s honor – and I called her: “Rachel Corrie: ‘Mother Teresa for Islamists”

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/rachel-corrie-mother-teresa-for-islamists/

  73. March 16, 2011 - 12:45 pm | Permalink

    Killing is senseless and useless. We can not see the bigger picture. We have a limited view. There is beginning a global civil war…the haves against the have nots. It is rumbling now, and may gain momentum. Rachel is a martyr for the cause. She stood up for those who couldn’t speak, and couldn’t stand. She knew what she was doing. The eternal life of our soul is what is important, as are the moral decisions we make every day. This was Rachel’s path, her “dharma”. You don’t stand in front of a moving ISRAELI, heartless tank and not know that there is a big possibility that the tank WILL NOT STOP. Rachel was willing to give her life to the cause and become a martyr, and will be remembered as such. The repercussions are great. The poetry and video posted by Patrick to Lasha’s poetry is exquisite, eloquent, powerful, and an art form which has a strength to oen eyes, make people aware, and wake some up. I compare this art to Goya’s series on the atrocities of war. Hits you viscerally on all fronts. Maybe Patrick and Lasha could consider making it into a film and showing it at film festivals. With love and appreciation for all you do to expose the atrocities of war. Jill

  74. Alaric's Gravatar Alaric
    March 16, 2011 - 12:29 pm | Permalink

    Rachel ‘s mind was corrupted by liberal-marxism. She stood on a mount protesting against a racial assasin in defence of Palestinians. She would have stood before Capitol hill championing the black cause against her own race. She would have stood at the forefront of Christian Zionists screaming her head off for the survival of Israel against imaginary Fascist/Nazi/ ” dark forces” . She would have stood for every marxist-leftist-liberal-multicultural-cause, except of that of her own kind.

    • omop's Gravatar omop
      March 16, 2011 - 1:47 pm | Permalink

      Your damnation of Rachel’s mind is indicative of “your” treating her for her foibles or your selective telpathetic conclusions.

      You might want to inform the forum as to your qualifications of tagging her with :- ” Rachel ‘s mind was corrupted”.

  75. Alaric's Gravatar Alaric
    March 16, 2011 - 11:40 am | Permalink

    This is a non-sequitur. There will never be a shortage of decent ingroup leaders. It is a matter of distinguishing the psicopath from the normal persons. There should not be a need to search for a ” morally strong outsider- or different ethnic group”. After all look at our pathetic situation now, being ruled by psicopaths of the ingroups combined with ultra psycopaths of a different ethnic group.

  76. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    March 16, 2011 - 10:48 am | Permalink

    (elite institution coward) Your reference to psychopaths brings up a good point. Should we favor a white psychopath over a morally strong individual of another race? Could the white psychopath can do far more damage to his in-group then an non-psychopathic ethnic outsider.

  77. Petronius's Gravatar Petronius
    March 16, 2011 - 10:43 am | Permalink

    Give me a break. I am supposed to take this kind of talk serious?

    “Our dear Rachel, the flower of our race …. We shall not forget you, Rachel. We shall carry you in our hearts like a hidden flame. In your lovely innocence and idealism…”

    OK, congratulations, now you finally got your own Anne Frank icon to idolize and pray to… a dream come true no doubt. I find this just as appaling and questionable as the original “pretty victimized girl” tearjerker cult. Am I the only one who feels that this forced saccharine eye-wetting, neatly illustrated with a close up Rachel’s corpse for more effect, is not only in extremely bad taste, but just plain misguided? To a level that borders on sheer idiocy?

    Rachel’s emails to her mother prove without doubt that her motives where very different from what Lasha auto-hypnotizes herself (and us) to believe. Please people, don’t get blinded by the beautiful blue eyes and the pretty face and your emotional need for a white martyr or your anger against Israel and Zionism, but recognize this. It is there for everyone to read.

    Rachel is not only the victim of an Israeli bulldozer but also of leftist White guilt brainwashing, of hypermoralist reasoning, and of a culture/society that doesn’t offer young people or a meaning they can dedicate and sacrifice their lifes to. Their thirst for idealism is left unquenched. This is why many of them embrace the poison of cultural marxism and naive activism like this. In the long run, it was rather Leftism that brought her to her death by corrupting her mind likes this.

    I am willing to pay respect to anyone who sacrifices his life for his beliefs. Rachel is a thousand times more worth than Jane Fonda, and certainly not as obnoxious, but excuse me: her naivety, or lets say: plain stupidity in political matters easily amounts to Jane Fonda’s level. All this makes her death even more of a sad and tragic waste. She was courageous, no doubt, but I would rather have seen her being courageous for her own people than playing the martyrs for others to feel like a good anti-racist white girl. (You will not find me shedding a single tear for Arab/Muslim/Palestinian concerns, -justified as they partly may be -, who have their share of atrocities as well. ) At least her death helped expose Zionist hypocrisy, and that is something.

    So please cut this unhealthy emotional need for artificial idols and be reasonable. Come back to earth. We don’t need that kind of bullshit. And I don’t think Rachel has deserved this kind of kitsching up either.

  78. namavadhuta's Gravatar namavadhuta
    March 16, 2011 - 10:13 am | Permalink

    History is Bunk wrote:
    ” How many “Light Unto The Nations” jews around the world are speaking out about Rachel’s murder at the hands of the international terrorist State of apartheid Israel? The jews-only terrorist State represents them all; surely their consciences are troubled? (sarcasm alert) ”

    Note the reference to “apartheid”. I think most concerned people here, white nationalists in particular, understand the implications of that word in the context of where it came from, South Africa.

  79. Chris's Gravatar Chris
    March 16, 2011 - 4:36 am | Permalink

    The White race is on its own. I know from personal experience the deep seeded hatred the Arabs hold for us.
    The hatred is due to many factors.
    israel being the flash point. The wars are zionists. In the ME they know this.
    In the states, well, its oil or what ever the hell they label it, WMD ect.

    The Arabs are a conspiracy minded volk. They see jews running our foreign policy(which they do).

    They actually get it.I guess its the lack of wealth and main stream media over there.

    Maybe when it hits home we can start to wake up here.

  80. Chris's Gravatar Chris
    March 16, 2011 - 2:56 am | Permalink

    Nice try, Jason speaks(hebrew).
    Your now trying to label me as anti-White?
    Good luck on that, kid.
    Its very obvious what your doing here.
    As I said, you’ve been exposed on this post. Your viciuos attack on Corrie has not gone un-noticed.

    Your “spin” is very telling.
    But please keep it up. Continue your slander.
    Your contempt for the White race is becoming more obvious by your every post. Of course this is your blind spot.
    In your mind, your controlling the post.
    To everyone else, your Jew is showing.

    Your showing your true colors. And this is a good thing.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 3:03 am | Permalink

      This is the fourth time you have hurled an incorrect ethnic slur at me. And I did not say you are anti-White by the way, but I am trying to get you to THINK about your positions for a minute. I am attempting to get you to think about how your beliefs and actions undermine Whites. And I guess I thought you were at least honestly pro-White in the past. I don’t know anymore. This is pointless.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 3:19 am | Permalink

      I think the major problem with Jason is that he cannot understand why White people are compassionate. It is not that he is a Jew. He just lacks empathy. That might be how it was impossible to brainwash him. How do you guilt trip somone if they don’t care?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 3:25 am | Permalink

      I care EIC. If I didn’t care, I wouldn’t argue the point at all. It is unfair of you to accuse those you disagree with of being sociopaths. Really.

      I just told you who I care about. I gave numerous examples. I do not care for those that hurt them.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 3:28 am | Permalink

      Sociopathy is a spectrum disorder. It is not an accusation. It is a sincere belief.

      When you were reading the article, did you have an emotional response? I think almost everyone who read this felt sympathy for Rachel.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 3:33 am | Permalink

      Yes EIC, as I explained many, many times, I thought her life was tragic. I explained that. I also felt disappointment when I learned more about the beliefs she had accepted. Then I felt real outrage when I discovered she considered herself a warrior against “white privilege” . In other words, I am capable of feeling and thinking. I don’t think it is appropriate to stay fixated on our initial emotional reaction.

      That’s why Man is the rational animal, not the reactive emotional animal.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 3:37 am | Permalink

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdjg6ms04BE

      Do you hate these twins, just because they are Asian? How can you hate these twins, Jason?

      See, that will make people dislike you, even other white people. Why? While we are trying to preserve the integrity of our land, our cultural and geneological self-determination, we are also not monsters. We also love those two little girls.

      I do prefer they stay in China.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 3:50 am | Permalink

      No, of course not EIC, why would I hate those Asian twins. But I would not advise a White girl, out of self-hatred for Whites, to go get involved in some intra-Asian war.

  81. Chris's Gravatar Chris
    March 16, 2011 - 1:52 am | Permalink

    She was a kid, Jason. A Kid.
    A young White girl who was snuffed out.

    I guess its trivial to you. You sit behind your keyboard and judge her. Clearly you are a coward, she was not.
    Jason, have you ever done anything to confront zionism, aside from eating dortios and typing on your computer?

    Have you ever been in an armed conflict against people that really want to kill you. In real life?

    I think you are a nieve individual in terms of real life situations. If I were to compare you to Corrie, well, its pretty obvious who is worth a damn.

    And its not some troll.
    In your whole life, Jason, you will not achieve what she has.
    You will just type away in your basement. Nobody will even notice you.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 2:24 am | Permalink

      Read my post above. How dare you judge me in that manner. I am trying to keep soft-headed people from embracing self-sacrifice. I am trying to keep weepy emotionalism from overwhelming our ability to think straight. We should not embrace the idiocy of the black community as our standard of behavior.

      In the black ghetto, they allow their kids to indulge in the most pathological self-destructive behavior, and then howl in indignation when the inevitable happens. When their poor child loses his life to drugs or the police, who do they blame? Well of course, it’s The Man. And they all gather round and lionize the black youth as a great new hero to be worshiped.

      And then the other kids learn how to get street cred and compassion by this model. And the cycle repeats endlessly and stupidly. What is needed is sober thinking and tough love, not mindless indulgence.

      But you’d rather insult me. I’m the bad guy because I don’t join the Cult of Rachel. Sorry. Very few rate that level of adoration. That’s not heartlessness. It’s having a real heart for the real victims of Cultural Marxism. Not the pampered college girls and boys that get to flit all over the world fighting “white privilege”, but the white working man whose wages have stagnated for 40 years. The white family that has almost been destroyed. And the white children who live in fear of abuse and ridicule, because of the world people like Rachel Corrie built.

      Sorry, I love the right things too much to fall for a false idol.

  82. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 16, 2011 - 1:37 am | Permalink

    You guys are almost there.

    Cultural marxism is an ideology cooked up to destroy white western civilization and to bring low its people. The people who cooked it up couldn’t accomplish this on their own. They need white quislings and an army of non-whites to dispossess us.

    Middle easterners have been happy to oblige cultural marxists and have moved to the west in an effort to destroy western civilization and islamify Europe. Had Rachel Corrie known who cooked up cultural marxism, and that it was intended to destroy white western civilization MAYBE she might have chosen a different path. Maybe she might have realized that the attack on Israel was an unintended consequence of cultural marxism (it was supposed to benefit Jews and not harm them), and that it was foolish to let the relatives of those who cooked it up have an opportunity to kill her. Maybe she might have realized that muslim palestinians may appear as attractive victims, but that other muslims are dead set on the destruction of white western christendom (or whatever remains of it) and wouldn’t have been so eager to render them aid. That’s if she was sane.

    However, many white people are not sane. They know the goal of cultural marxism is to destroy western civilization but choose to adhere to it anyways, because it appeals to their sense of personal grievance (e.g., women often buy into it because they are currently benefiting from it and are resentful against men of their own race). They can’t foresee a possible future where competing races not tainted by cultural marxism and emboldened by apparent white weakness attempt to genocide us.

    That’s why sane cultures never let ethnic out-groupers educate their youth. Once that seed is planted, it might be impossible to deprogram the victimized. Rachel Corrie is a cautionary tale of what trouble a young person can get herself into when no one is monitoring what she is being taught at college.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 1:41 am | Permalink

      Yes, I think you are spot on, Dave.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 1:48 am | Permalink

      Thanks Dave, you put everything into words perfectly, I totally agree. EIC, how can you agree with Dave but disagree with me?

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 1:50 am | Permalink

      He’s not Rachel bashing.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 2:06 am | Permalink

      Ok, so this is all about protecting Rachel’s image no matter what. If you look back I did not ‘bash’ her for a long time. I expressed regret at her loss of life and felt that she was used. However, I also felt that she had been a willing dupe and should have known better. But as you all gushed over her, elevating her above Mother Mary, I found it offensive. She is very representative of the kind of White woman that betrays us routinely. She is the White liberal girl in college that denigrates anyone that dares defend Whites.

      I am expected to support her no matter how she spit on my people (which is what the charge of “white privilege is). I am to always put her on a pedestal and absolve her of any responsibility, no matter how much she embraces Cultural Marxism. Well no, I think the failure of other Whites to SHUN people like Rachel is at the heart of our problem.

      We indulge them, pat them on the head, say they didn’t really mean it, couldn’t really help it, all the while watching as they take the lead in deconstructing White Civilization.

      Sorry, I can’t go there. And instead of a rational response, I am simply accused of being a “Zionist” because I think it is bad to idolize White girls who give their lives for Arabs.

      I grew up across the street from some White liberals who practiced universal self-sacrifice of Whites to help Others. And their lives became a mess. Did I think it was tragic? Yes. Did I feel sorry for them? No.

      The time for pity is over.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      March 16, 2011 - 1:11 pm | Permalink

      Our man Dave makes great points. People just cannot see what the non whites have in store for us if they succeed. Death, rape, plunder, torture – and they will all feel justified, because we white men are responsible for everything bad in their warped minds. Why the jews still use them to undermine white society really shows their own stupidity, because they will be tortured first by the Arabs. Just like the jews bumbled and killed the misguided Rachel, who was fighting ineffectively for the arabs against the white man’s culture. As Dave said, she just wanted something to believe in for her life. The jewish press has so degraded the accomplishments of the white man, she didn’t believe in us, either. I think her story should be out there, as part of the story of the zionists.
      So lets say the jews come to us, saying, “You know, you guys are right. Helps us mend our ways. We will convert to Christianity, pay our tithes, and give back our ill gotten gains, abandon israel if you will let us live peacefully in the USA. We could give them Mississippi in exchange, rename it israel, no voting rights in the US, of course. Ban them from PR and news organizations, banking, investments, and of course, the Pacific Northwest redoubt.
      Do they have an incentive to do anything different? Do we leave them a face saving way out of their mess? What would you do if you were a damn jew? Commit suicide – no, you would keep going the way you are, because everyone hates you, anyway. Let’s come up with a plan to get those bastards out of their mess and ours, which doesn’t involve death and destruction.
      My plan is conversion to Christianity, what is yours?

  83. JJT's Gravatar JJT
    March 16, 2011 - 1:36 am | Permalink

    Universalism is a problem when a small group use it as a weapon against those who believe in it. We must depart from universalism to preserve ourselves. This does not in any way diminish RC’s bravery and dedication.

  84. March 16, 2011 - 1:31 am | Permalink

    On March 16th, let us not only remember the life of Rachel Corrie but let us also remember the possibilities of our own life. On March 16th, let us remember that Rachel Corrie at the age of 23 was full of life, a life that can continue to live through us.

    Peace.
    Michael Santomauro
    ReporterNotebook@gmail.com

  85. Chris's Gravatar Chris
    March 16, 2011 - 12:45 am | Permalink

    Jason speaks,
    Why do bash her so much. She was confronting zionist Israel. I commend her for that, reguardless of her motives. She saw injustice and spoke out.

    • JJT's Gravatar JJT
      March 16, 2011 - 1:11 am | Permalink

      Because he is a Jew. He is unable to see the beauty in her selfless universalism. They are only able to see weakness, not beauty.

      We can be sure that if Rachel had made it home, she would have regarded the daily frauds in the WSJ in a different light.

      We all come to the same please, though we take different paths.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 1:18 am | Permalink

      Ok, so have any of you even read any of the material on this site? Are you not aware that the writers, including MacDonald (who may adore Rachel too), has been critical of selfless universalism? That very concept has been at the heart of White self-destruction. Have you even read any of the articles here? It is selfless universalism that is so maladaptive.

      And I am not a Jew. Are you an Arab?

  86. March 15, 2011 - 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Jason Speaks: “I submit we have been deliberately and knowingly mislead by many of the posters on this thread. If any of the posters unknowingly put the Cultural Marxist Rachel Corrie on a pedestal, then now is the time to say so. If you fail to acknowledge your mistake, then you were in on the con from the beginning.”

    It’s not a mistake to point up that Rachel Corrie was yet another in a long line of White people murdered by Judeofasicsts, from White Christian victims of Judeofascist-Bolshevik instigated Communism through the Whites killed fighting in WWII which was precipitated by Communist murder and aggression through the Whites killed fighting the Iraq war which was instigated by the Israel lobby, Judeofascist Zionists and Judeofascist neocons and their collaborators…

    Rachel Corrie attended Evergreen State College, which is a long time hotbed of leftism to this very day. Yes, Rachel Corrie was brainwashed by political and cultural Marxism, which also can be laid at the feet of what J. Edgar Hoover called subversive and hostile American “Red fascism,” but we all really know exactly who he was talking about, don’t we?

    Indeed, Kevin MacDonald has documented the extent to which subversive Jewry has used leftism and factions within the U.S. government itself to overthrow the interests of White and Christian America.

    Do you understand the common, virulent, White-hating and Christian-hating Judeofascist thread that ties Jewish Bolsheviks, Jewish Communists, Jewish cultural Marxists, Jewish neoliberals, Jewish neocons and Jewish Zionists together?

    Are you willing to acknowledge your own mistake of failing to acknowledge that Rachel Corrie was doubly victimized by the Judeofascists: first when their diaspora Marxist incarnation/ideology brainwashed her, and secondly when their Israeli Judeofascist Zionist incarnation/ideology murdered her?

    Why do you show such lack of compassion for Whites victimized by Judeofascists? It’s almost as if you don’t want Judeofascists to be held accountable for their crimes against humanity; it’s almost as if YOU have been in on the Judeofascist con from the beginning.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 10:05 pm | Permalink

      Did Rachel Corrie possess any free will? I cannot accept that she bears no responsibly for her bad philosophy. It is true she was victimized by the bad leftism she absorbed. And yes, most of the promoters, are Jews, in fact almost all of the ringleaders of Cultural Marxism are Jewish.

      But she had embraced it willingly, a hard Left Marxist view of the world. This wasn’t some airhead tripping through college that picked up a few liberal ideas. She was full scale Marxist. She had obviously refused to look at anything other than the that viewpoint. That is not admirable.

      But, even if we say she was unable to think for herself, the key thing is that WE DON’T ENCOURAGE OUR DAUGHTERS TO DO THE SAME THING OR HOLD HER UP AS AN EXAMPLE.

      Sheesh. You can say, here is a tragic example, not to be emulated. You can say it’s the story of a poor girl that went wrong, like those old 50s shows about how good girls get their lives ruined when they go bad. It says it’s tragic but it doesn’t hold her up as a role model. Bad idea that.

      But in your zeal to attack Israel at all costs, you go too far. Would you sacrifice every White person in America just to throw sand in some Israeli’s face? I don’t care about these Semetic battles, and guess what, if you go back over the centuries, the Arabs and the Jews BOTH have a lot of blood on their hands.

    • March 15, 2011 - 10:07 pm | Permalink

      P.S.: Rachel Corrie compensated for her mistake (and then some) of allowing herself to be brainwashed by Judeofacist Marxists by confronting the Judeofascist Moloch on its own (occupied) territory. It’s impossible to know what was going through her mind in the months and days before she was murdered, but most likely it was something along the lines of: “I have been misled and lied to about the true nature of organized Jewry by both the Left and the Right. I have been deceived. I am utterly lost.”

    • March 15, 2011 - 10:14 pm | Permalink

      JS: “in your zeal to attack Israel at all costs, you go too far. Would you sacrifice every White person in America just to throw sand in some Israeli’s face? I don’t care about these Semetic battles…”

      You may not care about these Semetic battles, but the Judeofascists have made damn sure that as an American, you are complicit in their actions, so these Semetic battles care about you.

      But I actually agree with you on one point: Israel is the place to contain the Judeofascist Moloch once and for all so it can’t implicate or endanger America or Western Civilization ever again.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

      Chris, if she had felt like she had been mislead by Marxists, then she would have gotten the heck out of there. But we don’t have to guess too much about what was going through her mind less than two weeks before her death. We have emails.

      She states pretty clearly that she is carrying on the fight against “white privilege” and something called heterosexism. If she had some sudden change of heart, and felt deceived by both sides, why would she keep participating in this event?

      I love Christians, but a few have a tendency to tell themselves happy fairy tales.

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      March 15, 2011 - 10:45 pm | Permalink

      Chris Moore says:

      what J. Edgar Hoover called subversive and hostile American “Red fascism,” but we all really know exactly who he was talking about, don’t we?

      The authentic Pro-White voices are like those crying out in the wilderness, only heard by other PRO-WHITE White people. “Red” Jew Commu-Fascists and Jew Apologists like our current trolls are like those who are tone-deaf, or color-blind. They simply cannot see how transparent their ostensible camoflage is to WHITE people.

      Because “conservative” “liberal” “left” “right” etc. – WE are not JEWS, and JEWS are not US.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bee_Orchid

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

      Rachel had never read something like Duke’s MY AWAKENING. And if she had, it was a carefully crafted procedure carried out in some advanced philosophy class in just such a way that the only thoughts Rachel had about the book were those that criticized it.

      You have to understand that while she had discovered the Zionist power structure, the majority of her brainwashing remained intact, and she acted within the confines of that artifical system of beliefs. People who fully break their brainwashing can sometimes go off the deep end. Look at Charlie Sheen. “I have a disease. Bullshit! I cured it with my brain.” He also talks about Levine trying to use him as an “exit strategy.” He says he has “tiger’s blood” and “adonis DNA”. And he wants Levine to know that he has healed faster than [Levine’s] “unevolved mind can understand.”

      To me, these are the ravings of someone who has had his entire system of beliefs shattered. And his subconscious has gone on the super defensive mode. Unfortunately, breaking his brainwashing made him go insane. Now, sadly, he’s just trying to keep hold of his children.

      Mel Gibson experienced a similar turmoil.

      So as you can see, it is not easy to break one’s brainwashing, even if someone is struggling in earnest to do so. It requires time, intelligence, and great psychological fortitude.

      Rachel was getting there. And she DID have a heart of gold.

  87. Zenko Franu's Gravatar Zenko Franu
    March 15, 2011 - 9:50 pm | Permalink

    Rachel is now dead. It is patently clear that she was misguided, poisoned by the xenomania and whitephobia that predominates in academia and institutions of education and learning; marxist leaning, degenerated by the Franfurt school catechism; liberal syphilis, antiwhite canker ,hatred for one’s own kind and passionate xenomania. Rachel was a product of our own decadent and decaying civilization. The products of contemporary academia and universities are of inferior educational and cultural qualities. She was one of the thousands and thousands craneum cleansed students produced by the assembly line of our educational system. She sacrificed herself needlessly, she could and would have been more useful alive, to keep on fighting for her cause—irrespective of whether one agrees or not– had she kept her passions under check and comprehend that her horn blaring at a murderous monster was a hoot against thunder. It is not a fair and balanced challenge to throw stones, and slings , and standing fast against armor and heavy steel. Rachel was of our own semblance , but ideologically she was on a different level.The irony of it is that she failed to recognize an enemy. She failed to realize that she was alone ( where were others like her to stand next to her a blare a horn at the advancing truck?) in a hopeless situtation and tempting fate. Does anyone believe that standing in front of an onrushing train can make the train stop or avoid being struck by it ? On that precise moment, on those precise seconds she was not thinking. She was a lover of humanity, there are no enemies for these kind of lovers, they are unable to distinguish, they only know of circumstancial situtations which need to be negotiated. Unfortunately it was a dreadful moment for her, precisely because she failed to acknowledge an enemy . Rachel will be remembered by the Palestinians, and be their marty and heroine. It is amazing that no one speaks about the murderer or the race of the murderer. The criminal is a heroe to his own people. He may still be driving trucks , demolishing anything that stands between him and his objective.

  88. Balthasar's Gravatar Balthasar
    March 15, 2011 - 9:46 pm | Permalink

    We, the Whites, embrace the Palestinian cause because this is what we are. We are idealistic and fight or at least sympathize with the weak, the terrorized. Yes, the Palestinians are strangers to us. Most of us would not want to have them as our neighbors. But so what? Does that make it all right to terrorize them, to murder them? Helping the Palestinians may not directly help the “white cause”. But so what? We do it because this is what we are. There is nothing special in the white color of the skin. The white cause to me are like-minded people. I would take Desmond Tutu over Jason Speaks any day because the latter I suspect is a racist Jew with whom I share nothing except the color of my skin.

    And to those who think we should compromise with what we are lest the white race disappears. The white race is not in danger. There are plenty of us. Breeding more trailer trash is not what is needed. Behaving like “white people” is.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 9:53 pm | Permalink

      Then why aren’t we, the White, the idealistic, going en masse to Darfur to stop the injustices there? Why aren’t we, the White, the idealistic, going to help stop the brutal treatment of Guatemalans by Mexico? Why aren’t we, the White, the idealistic, going to every toilet on Earth to fight “oppressors”?

      Are you endorsing the NeoCon line that we must forever fight tyrants all over the world, anytime we see an injustice? Does every White kid born in Kentucky have a lien on his life, to be collected whenever some liberal dogooder decides it’s time for him to be sacrificed for some alien tribe?

      It is exactly this kind of misguided “idealism” that has brought us to our current state.

  89. March 15, 2011 - 9:38 pm | Permalink

    While one cannot help but strongly admire Corrie’s courage and idealism, I suspect that her stances on other political and cultural issues would place her solidly in the Left.

    I cannot help but wonder what a nationalist this white woman would have made if she had gained some exposure to William Pierce, David Duke, and Jared Taylor during her teenage years. Instead, she seems to have grown into a Left Coast, Berkeley-style liberal, albeit one with inspirational passion. Instead of traveling halfway across the world to struggle on behalf of the brown Palestinians, she should have shown the same concern and sympathy with her own race.

  90. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    March 15, 2011 - 9:26 pm | Permalink

    It is a blessing to have people like Dr. Lasha Darkmoon. Her work “In Memory of Rachel Corrie” is the perfect antidote to those of us who have been exposed to years of the media idolization and guilt over Anne Frank. Possessing artistic intuition, Dr. Lasha Darkmoon knows how to create icons with the power to inspire and motivate. Let’s take advantage of it. We can see the death of Rachel Corrie as the demise of an naïve, ignorant leftist, as the media would us remember her, or we can see her death as the murder of someone with the courage to stand up to a great injustice.

  91. I's Gravatar I
    March 15, 2011 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

    How has “Jason Speaks” not been banned already? This guy was an obviously insincere Jewish troll from day one, yet he is still allowed to flood every thread with his garbage. What’s the deal?

    If the editors of this site want to continue to allow EVERY comment thread to be derailed by this prick, I guess that’s their business, but they are showing an appalling lack of judgment. Lots of people have worked hard contributing to this site in terms of both content and web design, and then you let this Jewish creep come in here and piss on all of it. This site has kind of become a microcosm of the United States in that regard. Anyone else noticed that?

    Oh, and I love all the tough guy talk about how you’re going to form a militia and secede from the United States, yet you don’t even have the guts to boot an extremely disruptive troll off your website. Yeah, that’s really convincing!

    Well, anyway, I’m just a reader and occasional commenter, but I certainly hope the more talented writers start migrating to places like Counter Currents or elsewhere where this kind of crap isn’t permitted, which they presumably will.

  92. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    March 15, 2011 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    There seems to be little interest in simply double checking the accuracy in this article of a key claim.

    This is the quote from the article Dr. Darkmoon wrote:

    He it was who had said, shortly after 9-11, that Israel could more or less do what it wanted with impunity. “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it!” he had famously boasted on Israel radio.

    America said nothing on that occasion. It swallowed the insult.

    This makes it sound like Ariel Sharon made this comment on Israeli radio and yet the link provided by the author contradicts that claim. This will make the article suspect to anyone that reads it. Shouldn’t that be addressed before it is widely disseminated? Can’t we simply state that is was reported that he said it in private, not that he went on the radio and made a statement that obviously no politician would ever make in public?

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/10/Sharon3.html

      Here’s a source from a renowned historian for that quote.

      Jason, your previous post, in which you declared, “we have been punked,” was an assault not on the content of this blog but on the administrative effort that went into its production. As White Nationalists, it makes sense for us to occassionally or even often disagree with something posted here. And we are entitled to our opinion. But purposefully undermining the credibility of the magazine’s staff should be the job of the ADL.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 15, 2011 - 8:53 pm | Permalink

      Can’t we simply state that is was reported that he said it in private, not that he went on the radio and made a statement that obviously no politician would ever make in public?

      You’re making things up. The Ariel Sharon comment is beyond dispute. Even Chomsky and Gild Atzmon quote it. I”ve never heard the quote questioned except by Zionist trolls.

      See here:

      http://www.mediamonitors.net/khodr49.html

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/10/Sharon3.html

      http://www.intifada-palestine.com/2009/05/ariel-sharon-we-the-jewish-people-control-america-and-the-americans-know-it/

      http://www.washington-report.org/html/newsitem_s.htm

      The quote is even mentioned in Wikiquotes. NOT in “Unsourced”, as you falsely informed us all yesterday, but in “SOURCED”.

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Ariel_Sharon

      http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Ariel_Sharon

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

      Uh huh, I think I now know exactly where you are coming from EIC. Very disappointing. You are agitating for more Whites to lose their lives for the sake of Arabs. Sad.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 9:06 pm | Permalink

      Did you even read your own link, EIC? I’ve already read that one. It again makes NO CLAIM that Sharon made that statement ON THE RADIO, as if he were addressing the Israeli public.

      The article, which is pro-Palestinian, does not back up the article’s claim. And assuming you are legit, you need to learn that in the real world, you first subject your material to some scrutiny, some proofreading. You don’t want glaring errors in it.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 9:21 pm | Permalink

      Ok. Look, Jason.

      I am not agitating for more White people to die for Arabs. In the first place, I sincerely doubt Rachel herself intended to die for Arabs. She thought she was an unvulnerable white person.

      Second, I did read that link. Either you aren’t smart enough to comprehend it, or you are intentionally distorting the truth. In either case, you should really lay off the posting for awhile.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

      EIC you have appeared honest, so let me try this one more time. Let me try and be clear.

      I am not disputing that there was a report that Sharon made that comment to his cabinet in private. I am disputing that he made that comment on public radio

      All the links report that he made that comment, assuming he made it, to another cabinet member, not to the Israeli public on the radio.

      That is the distinction I am drawing and it is not insignificant. If an Israeli Prime Minister went on the public air and said “Jews control the US”. that would be absolutely huge. And doesn’t the article written by Darkmoon imply that?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 9:44 pm | Permalink

      Apparently the confusion or miscommunication revolves around the issue of “Israeli radio”. Yes the article says that it was “reported by Israeli radio”. But Darkmoon doesn’t write that is was reported by Israeli radio, she writes that Sharon actually SAID it on Israeli public, boldly stating it to the entire world.

      That part is not accurate and is misleading. Darkmoon says that Sharon boasted and said this on the radio. That would be insane for the Israelis to do.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 11:27 pm | Permalink

      Ok, but I think you are quibbling over a minute detail. What does it matter whether he stated it “to the public” on the radio or to his advisors. He was boasting about it, and the public overheard.

      In fact, all you have done is show that Sharon is a coward.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 11:51 pm | Permalink

      I don’t doubt Sharon is a coward and a monster. I’m not defending him. I was pointing out that the article written by Darkmoon had a factual error in it, that would tend to distract from it’s effectiveness. If it’s going to be disseminated, and in some sense represent this site, then we ought to point out any errors in it.

      I am reminded of when Secretary of State, James Baker was quoted as saying “F the Jews”, back in the early 90s, in response to how Israel or the Jews would be upset over some action the Administration had taken or not taken. This was a second hand report that was put in some newspaper, who knows if it’s true.

      But here is a big difference between him saying that in private meetings, and him saying that on Meet the Press. And in the same way, what Shaon says in private isn’t all that shocking, but if he said it to the public, it would be an earthquake.

      If you support a candidate and he is about to make a big speech that has an error that the opposition can seize on, shouldn’t you tell him?

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 12:00 am | Permalink

      He it was who had said, shortly after 9-11, that Israel could more or less do what it wanted with impunity. “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it!” he had famously boasted on Israel radio.

      TO

      “He it was who had said, shortly after 9-11, that Israel could more or less do what it wanted with impunity. ‘We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it!’ he had famously boasted, as was recorded on Israel radio.”

      Emphasizing the importance of this kind of minutia is how Lipstadt destroyed David Irving. But I suppose you do have a legitimate point.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 1:04 am | Permalink

      *Sigh* You still don’t get it EIC. He was never recorded saying it on Israeli radio. He was REPORTED to have said it by someone who war reporting on Israeli Radio.

      It’s like the difference between Obama saying something on CBS or them physically recording him saying it VERSUS a report by someone on CBS that there is a rumor he said something.

      It’s not minutia. Let’s be serious. If it had been recorded, we would have a link to the sound file. It was hearsay being reported by someone, not a recording of Sharon himself speaking.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 1:10 am | Permalink

      No, I get it. And I think you are going to cast doubt on that he ever said it. He clearly did.

      What was Israel radio’s incentive for making that up? To convince the Jewish people that they control America? Why? They already know it.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 1:11 am | Permalink

      And look, maybe you all get that Sharon didn’t go on the radio and say this, nor was he recorded saying it. The article by Darkmoon sure seemed to imply that to me, but maybe you don’t get that implication.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 1:17 am | Permalink

      Are you a Jewish lawyer now? Who cares where he said it or to whom? He said it.

      Let’s play a matching game. Match these quotes with their authors:

      1) “I love toy cars.”
      2) “Do I look fat in this dress.”
      3) “I control America.”

      a) A toddler
      b) A young woman
      c) Ariel Sharon

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 16, 2011 - 1:28 am | Permalink

      EIC, would there be a difference between a rumor that Obama once said he is a Kenyan versus an actual tape of Obama saying he is a Kenyan?

      Is this Arab avoidance on your part?

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 16, 2011 - 1:36 am | Permalink

      That situation is completely different. Israel has, in the past, made similar statements. Obama has never said he is from Kenya to anyone but people who already know it. And they haven’t slipped up either.

      http://www.rense.com/general91/nnet.htm

      Look, Netanyahu joins the bandwagon.

  93. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    March 15, 2011 - 7:31 pm | Permalink

    Have we been punked by Arabs?

    Thanks Wayne for the site showing Rachel’s emails. OMG. I will provide the links below, but here are some samples of the sneering contempt she exhibited toward Whites, in her own words in emails to her mom:

    On trying to by checkpoints:

    “We could probably make it through if we made serious use of our international white person privilege …”

    Later on she writes:

    “So when I sound crazy, or if the Israeli military should break with their racist tendency not to injure white people

    Or this juicy tidbit:

    “I look forward to all of us who are new at this developing better skills for working in democratic structures and healing our own racism and classism and sexism and heterosexism and ageism and ableism and becoming more effective

    Oh yeah, Rachel is a real hero to White people. She couldn’t stand us and she especially despised Western Civilization. She was a Cultural Marxist! She spoke the language of international communism.

    I submit we have been deliberately and knowingly mislead by many of the posters on this thread. If any of the posters unknowingly put the Cultural Marxist Rachel Corrie on a pedestal, then now is the time to say so. If you fail to acknowledge your mistake, then you were in on the con from the beginning.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/mar/18/israel1

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/mar/18/usa.israel

  94. Wayne's Gravatar Wayne
    March 15, 2011 - 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Jason speaks:

    Just Google “rachel corrie” and you will see the memorial site. You can read her last e-mails from there.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 7:21 pm | Permalink

      I think a common theme on this post has been to poo-poo Rachel because she died in a way that did not help White Advocacy. However, I think everyone is missing the point. Rachel’s behavior was based on false premises. She had been taught lies, and no one here could have undone the brainwashing she underwent. This is true.

      But Rachel still acted as a White person even under the false assumptions that had been implanted in her mind. And somehow, she was even still able to notice who the true bad guys were in the Middle East situation. Kudos to her for that, at least.

      It can be hard for someone who is lied to continuously to overcome that conditioning. Recovering cult victims undergo a lot of self-questioning and psychological suffering. Rachel clearly partially broke her brainwashing, and she was fully a White American.

      For her actions specifically, we should have a sense of bittersweet sympathy.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 7:34 pm | Permalink

      Wayne, thank you for the heads up, those emails tell the whole story. My full response is waiting moderation. We have been punked straight up. This is a con.

      Rachel was a Cultural Marxist who despised White people, as detailed in her emails to her mother. It is worse than I could have imagined.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

      I don’t think she “despised” white people. But from the letters, it is clear that she thought she had “international white person privilege”. To some extent, she was actually right. If she were a Palestinian doing what she was doing, the IDF would have just shot her with a tank.

      In retrospect, it is quite clear that her education had indoctrinated her with an inflated since of her “privilege” as a white person. That particular lie actually got her killed. But as far as I can tell, her e-mail is fairly accurate about the situation in occupied Gaza versus the comparative luxury to be found in an upper-middle-class American family.

      She was a Cultural Relativist, to be sure. Her brainwashing had been extensive. Notice in her first letter where she states, “But anyway, there are eight-year-olds here much more aware of the workings of the global power structure than I was just a few years ago.” This indicates a feeling of humilation and shock that comes with the realization of having been deceived.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 8:55 pm | Permalink

      But the reason there is “luxury” in middle class America is because of the hard work and sacrifice that White people have made. Now let’s look to reasons for Arab poverty.

      Before oil (that Americans and British found, developed and to this day pump for them), they were always dirt poor. This is primarily because they low IQs and horrible work ethics. They have some oil wealth which is spent on corrupt despots buying White women on the international slave market.

      The general population will be relatively poor a hundred years from now. That’s not the fault of the West or anyone else. In fact, whatever wealth they have is the result of White people finding oil and then being nice enough not to outright take it, like anyone else would.

      This is also the reason I am not too concerned with Arabs developing any serious weapons – lack of brainpower.

      By the way, why don’t the Arab princes that cry so much over the Palestinians, take a fraction of the money they spend on whoremongering and slave trading and set the Palestinians up in style somewhere?

      And I am still waiting on my Thank You from Arabs, for providing them the only source of wealth they have ever had: Oil. Any other nation would have simply claimed it as their own property.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 9:00 pm | Permalink

      And no one is denying that.

      I have an idea. Since it is quickly becoming obvious to me that you don’t have anything else intelligent to say about this post, why don’t you go find something better to do? For example, I have to go study.

  95. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    March 15, 2011 - 6:10 pm | Permalink

    Rod Mckenzie – Could you enlighten us all why you did not include Jews in your list of the people for whom White race should not die? Do you believe that Jews are White and not Asiatic Khazarian or North African Berbers. In fact, since the US Civil War, almost every western war had been for the Jews.

    But then every White american cannot have the gutts of Helen Thomas, right!

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/06/10/helen-thomas-tell-them-to-get-the-hell-out-of-palestine/

  96. omop's Gravatar omop
    March 15, 2011 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    Jason Speaks can write another 6000 words or more hasbaric bs but the facts are tha RC was “murdered” by Israelis and his bs cannot match KM’s pontifications:

    “The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of OTHER races…and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the Children of Israel…will furnish ALL the leaders without encountering opposition…” (Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574)

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 7:10 pm | Permalink

      omop, I don’t know what your issue with me is. Why the animosity toward me? I am pointing out, as have many others, that it is not wise to encourage White women to die for non-Whites. Why would that bother a White nationalist or White advocate?

      It might bother an Arab or Muslim that wanted to use Whites as cannon fodder, but not a White person.

    • omop's Gravatar omop
      March 15, 2011 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

      A typical coy-selective amnesiac response. The cannon fodder (Rachel C) did not die for a non-white. She was massacred by a Jew driving a buldozer. But then your response is quite indicative of those who always claim innocence as they kill and murder others.

  97. Frank Toliver's Gravatar Frank Toliver
    March 15, 2011 - 5:16 pm | Permalink

    I would suggest limiting a user’s posts to 3 max on any one story. These types of ongoing interpersonal battles which go off topic are better fitted for a forum rather than a blog, and tend to turn both new visitors and fans off from the site.

  98. Rod Mckenzie's Gravatar Rod Mckenzie
    March 15, 2011 - 5:03 pm | Permalink

    While I give moral support to the Palestinians in their struggle against Zionism. I can’t say anything in support of these young White people who risk their lives for non Whites. Whether it’s support for the Palestinians, Tibetans, Eskimos or whatever the flavor of the week is. Our own race is in a precarious state and we need dedicated people like these to support our own cause. Now, while the Rachel Corrie’s might be sharing the same struggle with us inasmuch as it is against the Zionists. Don’t think for one minute these people would in any way support our cause, the cause of the White Race! The Rachel Corrie’s of the world would think nothing of sleeping with black men and having their children, if it was expedient for them. I have seen their type over and over again! They see the world through the eyes of the radical leftist, in terms of the exploiters and the exploited. It just so happens that Israel has become so arrogant that they have become the exploiters in the eyes of the leftists. Fifty years ago with movies like Exodus, they had the leftists as their greatest supporters and now they have become the proverbial Nazis themselves in the eyes of their former allies. The killing of Rachel Corrie was a tragedy in itself, but we should not be deluded into thinking that she was dying for our greater cause, which she most definitely wasn’t.

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      March 15, 2011 - 6:13 pm | Permalink

      The Rachel Corrie’s of the world would think nothing of sleeping with black men and having their children

      If that’s the case, surely you have evidence that Rachael Corrie had a black boyfriend, or a black child? Surely her boyfriends were not White, according to you?

      The defamation of Rachael Corrie by those ostensibly our allies is quite astonishing.

  99. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    March 15, 2011 - 5:01 pm | Permalink

    Why do Leftists embrace Palestinians?

    I have no clue. But clearly there are a bunch of “anti-fascists” that can’t stand Israel, that is a fact. These people are not pro-White, not in the slightest. I don’t pretend to understand the minds of Jane Fonda types.

    But we should be wary of having our cause hijacked by people who apparently could care less about White people. If we begin to uphold the sacrifice of White women on an altar to serve Arab and Muslim causes, then exactly what are we doing?

    As I have said repeatedly and no one refutes, Rachel was a fan of MLK and Ghandi, both anti-White activists. She identified with non-Whites over Whites, she wrote letters complaining of White privilege and she embraced other Leftwing causes. If I have said something inaccurate, please inform me.

    Who are we fooling here?

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      March 17, 2011 - 3:39 pm | Permalink

      Ourselves.

  100. Palestinian's Gravatar Palestinian
    March 15, 2011 - 4:35 pm | Permalink

    People, please give her a break! You can never read her mind and claim, for certainty, that had she been alive, she would have been anti-white! How do you know that? If there is a blame, it is on you for not reaching out to her back in her college days and educating her about her own people’s cause! The blame goes on you and you only!

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 4:50 pm | Permalink

      You act as if we are subjecting her to abuse, but that is absurd. We are discussing the pro-Palestinian cause and how it relates to White people. We are also discussing why White women sometimes turn against their own people and sacrifice themselves for non-Whites, which other races seldom do. That is all perfectly legitimate.

      Being anti-Israel is not the same as being pro-White. You can see all the strange leftist communist groups that hate Israel to prove that. In fact, wouldn’t it be better, for us as Whites, if Israel remained as a nation and we encouraged every Jew in America to go live there?

      I have genetic interests, see. Those are with White people. I also have an interest in maintaining the best culture that Man ever built, Western Civilization. Jewish Leftists and other Jews, along with many other people, are attacking what I love. But my focus is on what I love and wish to preserve, not getting knocks in on Israel.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      March 15, 2011 - 5:20 pm | Permalink

      In fact, wouldn’t it be better, for us as Whites, if Israel remained as a nation and we encouraged every Jew in America to go live there?

      I disagree with that idea, the last thing most Jews want is to live in a Jewish state, case in point: there is a net migration of hundreds of thousands from Israeli into the the US ( far more Israelis live in the US than the ADL know or want to know). Most Jews live in white countries because they love it here, they would fight to the death to avoid going to Israel.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 5:53 pm | Permalink

      You are right, there is no way they would voluntarily return to Israel. Now how do we get Jews to understand they are undermining the very societies they thrive in?

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      March 15, 2011 - 6:09 pm | Permalink

      Jason Speaks says:

      Now how do we get Jews to understand they are undermining the very societies they thrive in?

      That’s a good point Jason Speaks. I nominate YOU. You should go to Jewish websites and try to convince them they are undermining the societies they thrive in. Instead of constantly telling White people they are too “anti-semitic” too “liberal” too “pro-Palestinian” and too “anti-Israel.”

      Your efforts are wasted here – you should go to Jewcy and post comment after comment there. With your deep concern for the Jewish people, it seems a natural fit.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      March 17, 2011 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

      Jason Speaks, There is self deception about what they are doing but I doubt it would make a difference even if they were fully conscious of it. Jews have no choice but to undermine the very societies they thrive in – if their priority is ‘Never Again’.

  101. March 15, 2011 - 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Communist hippie chicks, the savior of the nation that gave us George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis? Sorry, that just doesn’t work and will not work.

    Some people just want to be the slaves of the other Semetic race. Sorry, Americans are the friends of liberty anywhere, but guardians of our own. I will no more pay the Danegeld for Isreal than I will for Palestine.

    Just a case of Aliens v. Predators, Crips v. Bloods, Trotskyites v. Stalinists.

    Please wake up and think of the interests of America, not a deracinated America hating fool, just like Lori Berenson, the communist terrorist obsessed with third worlders,

  102. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 15, 2011 - 2:17 pm | Permalink

    @Chris Moore: We’re approximately on the same side here. The elephant in the room no one has mentioned is the 3k victims on 9/11 which were either victims of willful negligence or the unimaginable – a false flag operation perpetrated by our own government. Where are the Rachel Corries of the world calling for justice for these victims?

    I must correct you here:

    “Christian martyrs were subjected to martyrdom because the refused to deny their faith. What “good” might they have done if they had denied their faith and simply walked away? That’s what too many “Christians” do today, which is why the Judeofascist Moloch is emerging victorious.”

    As long as they can escape martyrdom without denying their faith, Christians are called upon to do so. The fact that Christians were “subjected to” martyrdom means that they could not simply “walk away”- they either had to deny Christ or suffer death.

    Rachel Corrie was not presented with such a situation – no IDF officer asked her to forswear her allegiance to the Palestinian people (?) or face death. Instead, she effectively chose a ritual suicide which is decidely not Christian. What’s the moral difference between a woman who is beset by the apparent meaningless of life and seeks to sanctify it by “death-by-IDF bulldozer in a showy political cause” and a man who is dispossessed of his family in a blameless divorce and seeks “death-by-cop after lengthy police chase”? They have one thing in common – they both make good nightly news fare.

    • March 15, 2011 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

      My point was thate she died confronting the Judeofascist Moloch, perhaps and even likely motivated by the remnants of Christian instinct; and additionally that, unfortunately, the Christian instinct which compels confrontation of the Judeofascist Moloch has been so long repressed, suppressed and castigated as “anti-Semitism” by so many contemporary, self-described Christians that for them to declare themselves such is to spit in the face of true Christianity — particularly from the many (majority?) who have stooped so low as to even collaborate with the Judeofascist Moloch, spiritually, materially, or otherwise.

      What we have in so much of contemporary Christianity today is what Jesus described as disgusting hypocrites and showboaters who “love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men….”

      Whatever her motives, Corrie had more guts and Christian instincts in her little finger than these hyporcirtes will ever have in their entire bodies.

    • March 15, 2011 - 4:14 pm | Permalink

      Let me put it this way: I believe the divinely inspired purpose of the Christian faith is to confront and defy evil (Satan) on earth. If Satan possesses Judeofascist Jewry, as he apparently has since Jesus’ era, per Christ’s own remonstrations, then one’s Christian obligation is to confront Judeofascism.

      Self-described Christians who fail in this duty, whatever the outcome, are cowards, hypocrites and liars.

      And those that take their cynicism to the next level and actually collaborate with the Judeofascists become complicit in Satanism.

      If a majority of Christians now fall into one of these two categories, they either lose the right to call themselves Christians, or Christianity (or more correctly, Judeo-Christian Zionist Christianity or Judeophile liberal Zionist Christianity) — like corrupted Judaism — becomes a metaphor for evil, and a medium or facilitator of Satanism.

      Superstitious nonsense? If Jesus were alive today saying the things he said 2,000 years ago, he would be crucified as an anti-Semite (indeed, isn’t that essentially WHY he was crucified — for defying “the keepers of the Jewish faith”?). So anyone who wants to say that Jesus was wrong to be an “anti-Semite” should stop calling themselves Christians, because they’re nothing but parasites on the deepest convictions of Christianity, and the accomplishments of Christendom and the Christian faith.

  103. March 15, 2011 - 2:08 pm | Permalink

    Dave, are you say that today’s Jewish Zionists aren’t heirs to the Judeofascist Pharisees because a lot of them don’t have Semitic blood?

    They are indeed ALL heirs to the Judeofascist Pharisees because they are morally and spiritually corrupt to the point of profound evil — what the “superstitious” traditional Christians might categorize as being “possessed” or under the spiritual control of Satan.

    Additionally, Jewry is well known to have had its fingerprints all over European colonialism, which never did benefit the European masses, but rather benefited the elites who collaborated with Jewry just as the self-serving American elites are collaborating with Jewry today. As then and today, all colonialism accomplished was a vast wealth transfer to the corrupt elites at the expense of a lot of European blood.

    Do I believe the lot of these elites were and are under the spiritual control of Satan?

    Given their murderous, noxious behavior, it’s certainly hard to argue otherwise.

  104. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 15, 2011 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

    @history is bunk: In fact, the semitic peoples of the middle east are treating Israel like what it actually is – the latest European colonial project in the middle east (after Alexander, the Byzantines, the crusaders, the Brits) – the semitic peoples of the middle east aren’t happy that their former British colonial masters have been replaced by European-sourced jewry.

  105. Wasp's Gravatar Wasp
    March 15, 2011 - 1:29 pm | Permalink

    I don’t understand this attempt to make a martyr out of Ms. Corrie. She was a far left liberal activist who had absolutely no love for the White Nationalist movement. Sure, her death was tragic but she was sadly just another victim of the West’s devotion to fanatical altruism.

    Really, this whole article comes off as just a cheap attack piece on Israel and further reinforces the stereotype that most of us are blindly antisemitic.

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      March 15, 2011 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

      Really, this whole article comes off as just a cheap attack piece on Israel and further reinforces the stereotype that most of us are blindly antisemitic.

      That’s funny, because your post comes across as a cheap attack on Rachel Corrie, and further reinforces the stereotype that “conservatives” are blindly philo-semitic.

      The Palestinian cause should be embraced by a pro-White movement, because the Palestinian’s enemies are our enemies. That doesn’t make the Palestinians our friends exactly, but it makes us allies of convienience.

      As we can see from the Zionist hysterics in this thread, Jew Israelis don’t want to talk about Rachel Corrie – because Zionism shows the hypocrisy (er, chutpah) of the entire Jew ideology. Nationalism for Jews, destruction for all gentile nations.

      “Conservatives” wish to cut a deal with our historical enemies – just as they did under the Bush administration – how did that work out? You ever find the WMDs the Israelis told us Saddam had? Did you catch Osama yet?

      Conservatives have failed. Step aside, your are increasingly irrelevant.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

      I don’t understand the desire to make her a martyr for our cause either (since she wouldn’t have even had lunch with people like us), but it seems to have touched a real emotional nerve with a few here. God bless her, but what she did had nothing to do with White Advocacy. I am afraid some people are not so much pro-White as they are preoccupied with hating Israel. I get the impression they would kill every last White person on earth if it hurt Israel just a little.

      Which by the way brings up an interesting point. Why are these people more angry at Israel than the Leftist Jews inside the United States? That is our real problem. Jews and Arabs have fought each other for centuries, who cares? I care about the West. These people seem to be off on some holy war. Note the endless Bible quotes.

      And I would like someone to please address what appears to be a factual error in the article. These articles should be factual.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 7:00 pm | Permalink

      @ Jason

      Yeah, I have a reason we should care. 20% of AMERICAN foreign aid goes to fund these atrocities. That’s about 8 million dollars/day. In my opinion, our foreign aid is grossly over-funded, a vestige of the Cold War era.

      What if we had control over our own government so we could stop immigration? And even better, we could use the 3 billion dollars that we DIRECTLY give to Israel every year to help fund this effort.

      I am not blindly anti-semitic, but I believe that Jews are one of the main reasons we cannot defend our borders.

  106. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 15, 2011 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    When I’m looking for heroines one comes to mind from Roman antiquity – the Roman matron who when accosted by a foolish friend wishing to brag about new jewelry she had been given pointed out to the fields where her two strapping sons were working – she said there is my precious jewelry – my family heirlooms – my repaid debt to my forbears. When was the last time you heard a white western woman speak about her male kinsmen like that?

  107. Zenko Franu's Gravatar Zenko Franu
    March 15, 2011 - 1:17 pm | Permalink

    It was an unnecessary tragic death. It was a brutal murder of a beautiful girl in the flower of her youth. We wish she had sacrificed her life for the cause of her own people. She may have been misguided , but her strength of character and tenacity in adversity can only be admired. She must have realized she was ” dancing with a murderer” when leaping from mound to mound. What is needed is the caliber and valor of a girl/s like Rachel to stand up and fight to ” the death” against the invasion and ocupation of white homelands by afro-asian hordes. Very much like Amie Biehl, who died in South Africa, needlessly, foolishy, stupidly, in the hands of the murderous black mob; where she could have been fighting for a her own race..

  108. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 15, 2011 - 12:47 pm | Permalink

    @Chris Moore: Sorry, her free will decision to sacrifice herself is not commendable, but dubious at best. Dubious at best, because in all likelihood she was an unwitting dupe of cultural marxists. You absolve her completely of all responsibility to guard and value the precious gift of life she was given, and place no value on the good that she might have done had she simply walked out of the way of the bulldozer. Christian martyrs did not seek out martyrdom – but instead were subjected to it (much like Jesus himself). St. Thomas Moore avoided martyrdom at every turn and was only executed after the crown suborned perjury. Sorry, St Thomas Moore is my guide on how we approach these questions, not Rachel Corrie.

    • Dave's Gravatar Dave
      March 15, 2011 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

      @history is bunk: why are you snickering – If you are making the point that the Israelis are primarily semitic you should look up the demography of Israel – 80% of Israelis are ashkenazim.

    • March 15, 2011 - 1:40 pm | Permalink

      Dave: “in all likelihood [Rachel Corrie] was an unwitting dupe of cultural marxists.”

      Just as those White-American soldiers killed in the Iraq war were the unwitting dupes of Zionists, be they Jewish Zionists, Judeo-Christian Zionists or Judeophile liberal Zionists.

      But that doesn’t mean they can’t be grieved and avenged as yet more victims of the Judeofascist Moloch.

      Dave: “[what good] she might have done had she simply walked out of the way of the bulldozer. Christian martyrs did not seek out martyrdom – but instead were subjected to it (much like Jesus himself).”

      Christian martyrs were subjected to martyrdom because the refused to deny their faith. What “good” might they have done if they had denied their faith and simply walked away? That’s what too many “Christians” do today, which is why the Judeofascist Moloch is emerging victorious.

      No wonder Rachel Corrie and a lot of other truly compassionate anti-Zionist lefties like her apparently apparently had no respect for Christianity (even if they fell prey to the Judeofascist Moloch’s Marxist guise): Judeo-Christian Zionists and Judeophile liberal Christians are moral cowards, frauds, and two-faced cynics.

      Those who truly believe in the Kingdom of Heaven aren’t afraid to confront the Judeofascist Moloch; indeed, it’s their very purpose. To shrink from the Judeofascist Moloch is to walk away from true Christianity.

      Why do the others bother calling themselves “Christians” if they are going to shrink and run from the Judeofascist Moloch, or worse still, collaborate with it?

      Like the Judaism of Jesus’ era, “Christianity” itself has become so fraudulent, corrupted, and compromised by the masquerading, Judaized liberals and conservatives who hold themselves up as Christians that I doubt Jesus Himself would identify with it today.

      Either it needs to be reclaimed from the frauds and usurpers by any and all means, or abandoned, as Jesus Himself abandoned the irredeemably corrupted Jews once it became clear that the Judeofascist Pharisees had usurped Judaism, and still own it to this day.

  109. European's Gravatar European
    March 15, 2011 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

    Jason Speaks
    March 14, 2011 – 11:02 pm | Permalink
    Wayne, if you have a link to the website where Rachel expresses guilt over her “white privilege” it would be interesting to read. I would really like to understand the psychology of people like her. I think if we could get a handle on this unlimited altruism and self sacrifice for others – and find a way to correct it – we would make huge gains.

    For who Jason? Jews ofcourse.
    Wouldnt you just love to know, so you can argue and manipulate whites and propose errors in their thinking. Another “CRUEL” attempt in saying: There is nothing good in Whites or in Rachels altruism. Lets fix that!
    YOU ARE DISGUSTING! No humane discourse possible with you.
    Ofcourse you stand above everyone in Histories past, who have sacrificed their life … the desperate voice and giving the last breath to a cause. We were all foolish at one time @ 23, and I would not encourage my kids to go off to have themselfs killed at 23. But she nevertheless deserves and needs to be remembered honorably for her courage, her spirit to help, her sense of justice/injustice and caring enough to want to make a difference.
    Jason, I doubt that you have done anything meaningful in your life, but spread discourse, and subtly undermine the white peoples psychological make-up. Whites are hospitable, but this does not mean we welcome your tsunami.

  110. March 15, 2011 - 12:27 pm | Permalink

    The true pointless and poisonous sacrificialists are those who want America to sacrifice its own people in wars for Israel.

    The “White nationalist” Zionist trolls who are attempting to get conservative American Whites to identify with the plight of the Judeofascist Zionist Israelis are merely the updated version of the Judeo-Christian Zionists like G.W. Bush who, along with his Jewish neocon brain trust, lied America into war and sacrificed thousands of Whites to their Judeofascist Moloch.

    Whites like Rachel Corrie who make a free will, individual decision to sacrifice themselves to a cause they believe in are infinitely morally superior to White Judeo Christian Zionists and White nationalist Zionists who are attempting to hoodwink thousands of White Americans into fighting, dying and sacrificing themselves to Israel on a mass scale.

    Like chameleons, Judeofascist and their collaborators always change their faces and politics to best mix in with the political environment they seek to utilize on their own, self-serving behalf.

    Judeofascists are Zionist fascists in Israel and (historically) Red fascists in America. Today in America, sometimes they’re both, but increasingly trying to pass themselves off as “conservatives” and “patriots” in order to get America to fight Israel’s wars.

    For example, David Horowitz.

    Over his career, neocon agitprop David Horowitz transitioned from Red fascist to Zionist fascist, but his Judeofascist essence has remained the same

    • History is Bunk's Gravatar History is Bunk
      March 15, 2011 - 12:43 pm | Permalink

      We sacrificed millions of our own people in the jews’ wars of 1914 and 1939.

      Looks like we never learn from our mistakes.

  111. Dave's Gravatar Dave
    March 15, 2011 - 11:08 am | Permalink

    This article and most of the comments praising Rachel Corrie are hopelessly naive.

    The ethnic outsiders know we have an unhealthy tendency to place our women on pedestals, particularly our attractive women. If an attractive young woman wakes up out of her media-induced narcissistic and solipsistic trance just for a moment, men and women will flock to her as if she is some kind of goddess. Note, this article is not about the two male protesters who were shot in the head – in these instances there is no question about intention on the part of the IDF. Instead, this article is about a foolish girl who danced on the precipice and finally fell into the abyss. As a tool for assassination, a bulldozer is a very bad instrument. Obviously male sacrifice is not valued as much as female sacrifice.

    Even the author is want to worship St. Rachel:

    “We shall not forget you, Rachel. We shall carry you in our hearts like a hidden flame. In your lovely innocence and idealism, you will remain to us always the perfect symbol of our people—and a reminder of what awaits us all in the days of tribulation to come.”

    In contrast to the author, I’m jealous with such sentiments and reserve them for the Almighty alone. “Perfect symbol”?

    The fact that she let herself be run over just shows how little she valued her life. The Christ-authored standard here is that of the good samaritan. Jesus did not ask that we foolishly and sinfully throw away our lives. In the parable of the good samaritan, we are asked to render assistance to those beset by robbers – not to suffer robbery itself. To show solidarity with the Palestinians she need merely render material aid and comfort, she did not have to suffer death. If she had judiciously avoided death, she could have done even more good for the Palestinian people. The only difference is that her smaller acts wouldn’t have garnered her world-wide attention!

    Those praising her for her idealism are playing into the hands of our enemies! They want our women to continue going on foolish crusades to aid other peoples. The last thing they want these young women to do is to take an interest in their own kind and maybe have, like, for example 2.5 kids! The ethnic outsiders WANT you to praise her for her idealism and willingness to get involved in a fool’s errand!

    Regarding her motivation, she was just a victim of cultural marxism. The Palestinian cause falls into the white west bad – brown east/south good meme that cultural marxists have been peddling for a century. The only irony here is that cultural marxism has boomeranged back against the very people who birthed it! Note that in contrast to other white people, the Israelis recognize cultural marxism for the existential threat that it is and are willing to squash anyone attacking them with this ideology. I’m sorry to say this, but the Israelis are the model of how to respond to those peddling cultural marxism, not a bad example to be avoided.

    Regarding the Palestinians themselves, their Muslim brothers have been willing to be tools of the cultural marxists in the west by immigrating to Europe. So I have mixed feelings about them. Given current realities, had Rachel Corrie avoided death and later visited Europe, she might have been raped by Muslims in France or Sweden!

    • History is Bunk's Gravatar History is Bunk
      March 15, 2011 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

      “Note that in contrast to other white people, the Israelis . . .”

      White semites?

      LOL

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 2:41 pm | Permalink

      Wow, very impressive post by Dave above. The point about cultural Marxism is salient. For reasons that aren’t clear to me, the Left has embraced the Palestinian cause. It may be that in their mind the Israelis are more “White” and the Palestinians more “brown”, as was stated. But why have people like Jane Fonda been so attracted to this cause?

      Jane Fonda is a communist who was an anti-American traitor during Vietnam, going so far as to pose with the North Vietnamese . Why on earth would she and other Leftist throw in with Palestinians? They are not anti-Jewish, nor are they generally anti-Israeli, so it is baffling.

      I don’t have an explanation, except that people can be motivated by things other than their genetic interests. Obviously this has been true for White liberals for generations.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      March 15, 2011 - 3:50 pm | Permalink

      One thing is very clear, people like Rachel may be criticizing Jews but it is a mistake to think their motivations are in any way pro white. They’re white and criticizing Jews but they’re the very opposite of white nationalists.

      White nationalist support for the Palestinian cause would be counter productive anyway; that is why the Israel Lobby try to conflate the white liberal- left campaign for Palestinian rights with historical anti-Semitism.

  112. maaldweb's Gravatar maaldweb
    March 15, 2011 - 9:48 am | Permalink

    I have no sympathy for “peace and human rights activists” of any kind. The same people in Europe and US are usually pro-immigration, pro-feminist, anti-fascist, anti-racist, anti-white, anti-european etc.
    I am not here to support the genocidal and insane jews, who are the sole responsible for the destruction of western civilisation. But don’t ask me to feel sorry for some fringe liberal hippies.

  113. Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
    March 15, 2011 - 9:23 am | Permalink

    Magic Kingdom

    Rated 5.0 out of 5.0

    @ Fr Sandy

    For a moment I thought I was listening to the late Richard Burton! I don’t suppose Patrick W is a relative?

    I know Patrick Willis. He is a consummate actor and performance artist known for his poetry recitations. He has worked with Lasha Darkmoon on other poems of hers apart from In Memory of Rachel Corrie.

    “MAGIC KINGDOM” is one of their best collaborations, the words being provided by Darkmoon. There is something otherworldly about this poetry. It has been described as “weird” or “exotica fantastica”.

    Magic Kingdom
    – 4 min – 19 Feb 2011 – Uploaded by Snordelhans
    Heretic Productions present: Lasha Darkmoon: http://www.darkmoon.me … Poetry love hate desire loss disgust sickness stains madness care …
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23HmHP8o_Yk

    Sorry if this link doesn’t work.

    If it doesn’t work, just google: Lasha Darkmoon, Magic Kingdom, YouTube and you will get it.

    There’s another Darkmoon poetry video (YouTube again) called The Monkey on your back. I don’t think this has been done very well. The pauses between lines are too long.

    Still, as you say, the reader Patrick Willis could be a stand-in for Richard Burton.

  114. Barbara's Gravatar Barbara
    March 15, 2011 - 9:14 am | Permalink

    I don’t think any of you understand how much trouble we are in. A black four star general went on tv demanding that the military become more diverse.

    Our recruits are being trained in house to house urban combat. They will take our guns and use the multi cultural military against us. When things get so bad that all White people wish to oppose what they are doing we will be defenseless to fight back.

    That’s why books such as The Turner Diaries are stigmatized because it speaks of what our lives will be like. The writer was not very good but he tried to warn us.

    You don’t get it. We are Rachel Corrie.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 9:27 am | Permalink

      The American people are very well armed and there will be no moves to change that for quite a long time. Nothing that changes that can get through the House and Senate for many years, because Republicans are too beholden to the NRA, and the Repubs will probably pick up the Senate in 2012.

      Eventually it will be a problem, but not until at least the end of this decade.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 15, 2011 - 9:52 am | Permalink

      @ Barbara

      You don’t get it. We are Rachel.

      Beautfully put. Very perceptive and on the nail. You’ve said in seven words what Xanadu (Lasha Darkmoon) tried to say above at far greater length and in different words:

      Rachel died for Palestine. She died for a noble cause. Little do her detractors know that she died for America too.

      Not for the Zionized America we see today! Not for the multicultural zoo that America has morphed into under the iron rule of her New Masters. No, Rachel died for the Eternal America in the heart of all true Americans — the ideal America, the America that could have been had it not been subverted by Freud and the Frankfurt School and the latter-day standard bearers for Zion.

      God bless Rachel! May she live in our hearts forever, a symbol of our long struggle and a role model for young women.

      If she had lived, she would have made someone a marvelous wife. She would have been a perfect mother.

      If ever I have a daughter like Rachel, I will count myself lucky.

      Yes. If Rachel had lived, I’m sure she would have joined our movement. The fact that she died for the Palestinian cause hardly makes her a hard-left, anti-White terrrorist! — as the hateful Zionist trolls on this site are only too anxious to suggest.

      Rachel was a heroine. To quote Lasha Darkmoon again:

      We shall not forget you, Rachel. We shall carry you in our hearts like a hidden flame. In your lovely innocence and idealism, you will remain to us always the perfect symbol of our people—and a reminder of what awaits us all in the days of tribulation to come.

      Note that — “the days of tribulation to come”. Darkmoon is referring to American dystopia she sees ahead of us, the nightmare future looming for White folk in the multicultural menagerie the Jews have built for us.

      As you say, Barbara: “WE ARE RACHEL”.

  115. the Avatar's Gravatar the Avatar
    March 15, 2011 - 8:22 am | Permalink

    In answering him and to twist his tail, all i had to do was mention how good it is that there are Arab revolutions taking place, the obvious negative changes to the baby killers in Palestine and how those Iranian ships nicely cruised by the Suez canal just a few days ago. beautiful. he didn’t like that. i also mentioned how sure i am that the day the Jews finally pack it up and leave my dear Palestine … – thats if the prophecy is not fulfilled and they instead stay there buried next to my grandparents whom they slaughtered in forty eight – … they will arrogantly look around, throw their haughty heads up and just say “We left because it was just too hot up there, who would wanna leave next to the primitive Arabs anyway” … hehehe – ma hada bi´darilhun, il iahud -

  116. the Avatar's Gravatar the Avatar
    March 15, 2011 - 8:03 am | Permalink

    I had an argument with a yeshiva man at another forum the other day…
    the thread was about a chain of supermarkets ( Olympia food co op) removing Jewish occupiers goods from it shelves.
    the thread name was:
    “Olympia Food Co-op Removes Israeli Goods from Shelves” . he had said : ” But the people supporting this move do not desire a just peace and Rachel Corrie died while trying to protest tunnels used to bring weapons into Gaza. These kinds of actions seem to be carried out in a knee jerk kind of way without thinking about the larger geopolitical and historical aspects of the conflict taken into account. I certainly hope my grocer or union or any other company I frequent do not do this or I would have to find a different place to buy my food or other service.”
    HEHEHE, WHAT CAN I SAY?

  117. TMJ's Gravatar TMJ
    March 15, 2011 - 5:34 am | Permalink

    “She was working with children who drew two pictures, one of the American flag, and one of the Israeli flag, for burning. Rachel said that she could not bring herself to burn the picture of the Israeli flag with the Star of David on it, but under such circumstances, in protest over a drive towards war and her government’s foreign policy that was responsible for much of the devastation that she was witness to in Gaza, she felt it OK to burn the picture of her own flag.”

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 17, 2011 - 6:32 pm | Permalink

      I missed your post earlier and this is important. It is sad to see how self-destructive Rachel’s thinking had become. Let me repost what you said and and the link. Thanks.

      “She was working with children who drew two pictures, one of the American flag, and one of the Israeli flag, for burning. Rachel said that she could not bring herself to burn the picture of the Israeli flag with the Star of David on it, but under such circumstances, in protest over a drive towards war and her government’s foreign policy that was responsible for much of the devastation that she was witness to in Gaza, she felt it OK to burn the picture of her own flag

      She felt it was OK to burn the US flag but could not burn the Israeli flag with the Star of David on it.

      http://www.rachelcorrie.org/ism.htm

  118. Fr. Sandy's Gravatar Fr. Sandy
    March 15, 2011 - 3:17 am | Permalink

    For a moment I thought I was listening to the late Richard Burton! I don’t suppose Patrick W is a relative?

  119. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    March 15, 2011 - 12:16 am | Permalink

    I am sure Rachel knew that Americans at large has been brainwashed by the Jewish-controlled media so much that they think and act like robots when it comes to the “Chosen People”.

    I also wonder why she gave her life against the interests of Zionist entity – when more than 50% of country’s Senators feel being honored to be invited to a foreign lobby’s (Israel) annual conference. the same lobby which blocked USAID$100 million to Lebanon while approved additional USAID$20 billion to a country which has proven to work against the national interests of the US.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/04/02/us-doesnt-need-enemies-when-it-has-israel-as-friend/

  120. wayne's Gravatar wayne
    March 14, 2011 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

    On her website there is a series of emails she wrote to her parents prior to her tragic death. In reading them she came across to me as a young woman searching for meaning. She seemed to harbor a lot of guilt for her “white privilidge” and her comfortable upbringing.
    A previous poster asked why we didn’t see Chinese or any other race sacricing themselves. ANSWER: because they do not have this guilt-their women are busy raising strong and numerous ethnic babies!

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 11:02 pm | Permalink

      Wayne, if you have a link to the website where Rachel expresses guilt over her “white privilege” it would be interesting to read. I would really like to understand the psychology of people like her. I think if we could get a handle on this unlimited altruism and self sacrifice for others – and find a way to correct it – we would make huge gains.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 11:31 pm | Permalink

      Corrie was misguided. She was doing what she thought was best because others had made her feel it was the right thing to do. To her it was unlimited altruism coming from a people with unlimited strength. She was probably fully unaware of the current situation in America. If you are told again and again that there is no such thing as race, you do not even see that there might be a problem here. So wanting to help others makes more sense.

  121. Bernie's Gravatar Bernie
    March 14, 2011 - 9:54 pm | Permalink

    “Some of you just dont get it… Rachel Corrie was one of those rare human beings who could put aside race, colour, religion, class etc and see a situation for what it is. ”

    Here’s one white guy who wishes – just once – someone “would put aside race and religion” and speak out for oppressed whites be it in the U.S., Europe, South Africa or anywhere else for that matter.

  122. Wayne's Gravatar Wayne
    March 14, 2011 - 9:08 pm | Permalink

    Hate to see such a beautiful woman die so young. She should have found a good husband and had many white kids, THAT would be doing something for our situation. But it sounds like she was a self-hating bolsevik, so that would never happen. Also, noticed the picture of the Nordic woman was was injured as well. Are all the white women leaving their family and kin to die for the turd world? Where are the men? Where are thier parents for God’s sake!

  123. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    March 14, 2011 - 8:23 pm | Permalink

    Excuse the digression, but two senators calling for us to intervene in Libya. Guess which two.http://www.voanews.com/english/news/usa/Two-US-Senators-Urge

  124. Eddie's Gravatar Eddie
    March 14, 2011 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

    Some of you just dont get it… Rachel Corrie was one of those rare human beings who could put aside race, colour, religion, class etc and see a situation for what it is. I hope she’s never forgotten.

    By the way, the pro-Zionist view of the events surrounding Rachel’s death show all the classic ‘symptoms’ of Israeli propganda… you know, make the victims the aggressors and the Israelis the defenders, demonize the Palestinans and their supporters and label them all as terrorist, and above all use logic that defies all the known facts and common sense.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 9:12 pm | Permalink

      Eddie, God bless her, but putting aside race and religion is hardly rare in America. It’s the norm. It’s the norm in most of Europe too now.

      Unfortunately.

  125. Walter L's Gravatar Walter L
    March 14, 2011 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    Anonyma, people just scroll by Jason.

    “What they should NOT do is to come across as overweening, fascist, White Supremacist bully boys, sneering and snarling at every other race under the sun.”

    Such creatures are almost non-existent. The reason that you think there are such horrible creatures in threatening members is that they have been created by a very clever anti-white group.

    I will not name the group but they are very powerful in the mainstream media.

    Look at the members of the “overweening, fascist, White Supremacist bully boys” organizations. They cannot get good jobs with their shaved heads and tattooed bodies, unless it is in the NBA. They have no money. Yet they do have money.

    What group of people has a lot of money and knows how to conduct an advertising campaign to destroy a product? Normal white people do not make themselves look ugly and then go out and tell people that it’s great to be white.

    But there is an anti-white group that is clever at deception. One of them could, Saul Alinsky style, easily find a looser white guy and hire him cheaply, $50,000 a year, to look like an idiot and say, “Jews are bad, Hitler was good to kill the Jews, Fascism is good, N-word people are bad, on and on”.

    It makes perfect sense. The loser white guy can’t go public; his cohorts will kill him, and if they don’t the IRS will.

    Two minor points:
    One, you do know that FDR was an early admirer of Fascism and Mussolini.

    Two, the “old-fashioned KKK ‘nigger-lynching’ racists” is another big PC myth. Most blacks lynched were criminals just as were most whites lynched. Why help the Jews along by further propagating their anti-white myths that Fascism and black lynching were great evils. The great evil is the anti-white racism that is going on in Europe and America.

  126. visitor's Gravatar visitor
    March 14, 2011 - 7:40 pm | Permalink
    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 7:55 pm | Permalink
    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

      Now how about that link from Atzlan? Jewish groups are playing a dangerous game by letting in so many different ethnic groups, groups that may not like Jews at all, as that article suggests.

      Of course, they will all naturally line up against Whites, but it remains a risky strategy indeed for Jews.

  127. Bernie's Gravatar Bernie
    March 14, 2011 - 5:52 pm | Permalink

    “Some people just hate Jews so much, they will forgive anything in someone else who hates Jews.”

    Bingo.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

      It is not merely that we hate Jews, and in fact, most of us do not hate ALL Jews. It is that we love Rachel Corrie.

    • Felix's Gravatar Felix
      March 15, 2011 - 6:51 pm | Permalink

      To the contrary I do NOT hate Jews but in fact have respect for them. However, as a rule, I do not trust them, knowing that they’ll look always out for the interest of themselves and their own first, even if it means behaving sociopathically or underhandedly and even as they demand that others show to them the consideartion that they seldom ever reciprocate. In short, I realize that they work to create societal conditions that enable them to prosper yet often at the expense of the host population among which they live.

  128. March 14, 2011 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Rachel Corrie resonates with a lot of anti-Judaic Whites because she is yet another example of a White person murdered by Judeofascists. There were tens of millions of Whites murdered by the Judeofascist Bolsheviks in the Soviet sphere whose blood has yet to be redeemed.

    Perhaps Rachel Corrie and a lot of other White anti-Zionist lefties who have been taken in by leftism was in search of the compassion of authentic traditional Christianity that the Judeofascists and their collaborators have systematically suppressed and tried to snuff in order to replace it with pseudo-compassionate and pseudo-humanist Communism, and pseudo-Christian Judeo-Christian Zionism.

    I think what a lot of macho, atheistic, piss and vinegar White nationalists fail to appreciate and understand is that half of all White people are women, most women respond to compassion, Christianity is compassionate, therefore they are alienating half their potential base by pissing on Christianity, and they have virtually no other tools designed to appeal to women other than intimidation, and trying to engender fear of other races.

    No wonder they so often fall flat on their faces, and will continue to until they get right with Christianity.

    • Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
      March 14, 2011 - 6:51 pm | Permalink

      @ Chris Moore

      The good things you say about Christianity resonate with me. Though Christianity as a religion may be moribund, even in its death throes, traditional Christian values continue to offer the best hope for Euro-American man.

      The new religion touted for Whitelandia, however, appears to be neo-paganism. I for one would not be happy living under neo-pagan skies.

      To my mind, neo-paganism is a fancy word for hedonism and sexual promiscuity. This is only one step away from the values promoted bty Freud and the Frankfurt School.

      Jews would flock to Whitelandia once they heard that all the gorgeous blonde shiksas there were into neopaganism, i.e., free love.

  129. Bernie's Gravatar Bernie
    March 14, 2011 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    If she was 23 in the 1980’s, “Our Rachel” would have been in South Africa, protesting against the evil white devils who surely exploited the poor, innocent, black peace-lovers.

    Amy Biehl = Rachel Corrie.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 12:28 am | Permalink

      I had forgotten about the Amy Biehl situation, thanks. She was murdered by thugs she was helping in South Africa. The most shocking part? Her parents ended up forgiving and embracing the black murderers of their child:

      Biehl’s family supported release of the killers, and her father shook the murderers’ hands, stating that

      “ The most important vehicle of reconciliation is open and honest dialogue…we are here to reconcile a human life which was taken without an opportunity for dialogue. When we are finished with this process we must move forward with linked arms”

      This is sickness. Her parents were deeply leftist activists who fought against “white privilege”. And they carried it to it’s logical extreme, literally embracing the murderers of their daughter.

      This, I submit, is a form of mental illness.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 12:45 am | Permalink

      Yeah, I agree. Just about the only reconciliation I would have wanted would have been a reconciliation of those black mens’ souls with Hell. There is such a thing as moral insanity.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zell_Kravinsky

      This man’s story is an example. It is even worse because he donated a large sum of his money to a university.

  130. I's Gravatar I
    March 14, 2011 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    All the anti-Rachel Corrie comments here are sickening and only reinforce my belief that the left is the only side that really counts, and will be the side that does most of the heavy lifting in getting Whites out of the mess we are currently in, while the right mostly sits around and bitches about the people who are actually accomplishing something.

    “She wasn’t fighting for her race!” Well, yes she absolutely was, whether she was consciously aware of it or not. The #1 problem faced by her race is domination by a hostile Jewish elite, and she took those bastards head on, delivering a major blow right to their major weak spot: public perceptions of the Israel/Palestine conflict, which are destroying the Jews’ carefully constructed image of themselves powerless and morally righteous victims.

    The White left has been taking the Jews to the woodshed over the last five years on this topic. People are increasingly seeing the Jews for what they are, and this is almost entirely due to the activity of the left. The same weapons the Jews created to destroy us are now being turned on them and it’s an absolutely beautiful sight.

    The people who would invalidate everything the left is accomplishing because they are not overtly racialist are completely stupid. If they came out and started rambling about secession and killing muds, like some of you are inclined to do, they would never get anywhere. And while I don’t doubt that on a *conscious* level, most of these anti-Zionists leftists hold multiculturalist beliefs, we must remember that the human mind is a very complex thing. The fact that their ACTIONS are unmistakably pro-White suggests to me that somewhere in the unconscious part of their minds, they have figured out that their race is in danger, that this danger is due to Jewish domination, and that Jewish power can be undermined via the Palestinian issue. And they have been sufficiently motivated to go and do something about it. Remember that racialism, like the sex drive and the desire to breathe air, is an instinct and cannot be entirely controlled or eliminated by consciously held beliefs.

    So, yes, Rachel Corrie was fighting for her race and deserves our respect. Frankly, to me, one Rachel Corrie is worth more than 10,000 morons playing Rambo in the woods of the Pacific Northwest, waiting for the system to collapse so you can emerge with your AK-47s and kill all the muds and liberals, or whatever the hell. I don’t see a lot of value in that kind of activity regardless of what kind of “pro-White” views you espouse.

    • Jim's Gravatar Jim
      March 14, 2011 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

      “So, yes, Rachel Corrie was fighting for her race and deserves our respect. ”

      She’s worthy of our respect, not hero worship. If I know the left, respect is something she definitely woud NOT have had for any of us.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 15, 2011 - 12:16 am | Permalink

      Yes, I also think that the “Left” is unnessarily villified. I am a Leftist. I mean, I am a college student, so it is more or less a requirement. But White Nationalism is not an inherantly non-Liberal viewpoint. In fact, I think it would be a HUGE and positive change for our country if we would defend our cultural and ethnic interests. I firmly believe that the world can be improved, but Progressivism cannot be founded on a LIE. That there is no such thing as race is certainly a lie.

      The left is by and large a cesspool of pandering. But then again, often so is the right. Need I mention President Bush?

  131. Mister White's Gravatar Mister White
    March 14, 2011 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Take a look at some of the comments Jason Speaks has made regarding the DEAD White girl, Rachel Corrie :

    Jason Speaks
    March 13, 2011 – 11:15 pm
    ” She seems very much like the type of hippy girl that provoked US troops to fire on them at Kent State. As I have said, she meets the profile of someone who couldn’t stand most White people, and you damn well know it…Opposing the state of Israel, even destroying the state of Israel, isn’t going to do that much to help Whites in Europe or the US. Good god,…”

    Jason Speaks
    March 13, 2011 – 6:18 pm
    “…she reminds me of the kind of 60s student that would protest American military men returning from Vietnam.”

    Jason Speaks
    March 13, 2011 – 6:55 pm
    “…the woman was a left winger who almost certainly hated White Advocates.”

    Jason Speaks
    March 13, 2011 – 7:57 pm
    “…If an American girl flew over there and stood up against one side or the other, and ended up getting herself killed, I would think, “wow, that is sad”. But honestly, I would also be thinking, “WTF was wrong with you, girl?” I know it sounds heartless, but it’s the truth. Maybe it’s seeing her wear that peace symbol, but she reminds me of white girls I see all the time who are eager to denounce White people and Western Civilization. In other words, a Portland girl.”

    Jason Speaks
    March 13, 2011
    I’m afraid her profile is tragically leftist and anti-White.

    Jason Speaks
    March 13, 2011 – 11:15 pm
    ” She seems very much like the type of hippy girl that provoked US troops to fire on them at Kent State. As I have said, she meets the profile of someone who couldn’t stand most White people, and you damn well know it…Opposing the state of Israel, even destroying the state of Israel, isn’t going to do that much to help Whites in Europe or the US. Good god,…”

    Jason Speaks
    March 13, 2011 – 10:57 pm
    “…she didn’t care anything about White people in general. She appears to be a typical Leftwing Portland hippy girl.”

    Now compare those disgusting comments by Jason Speaks with the disgusting things Jewish extremists have written about the DEAD White girl Rachel Corrie – articles linked in LD’s article:

    Welcome to Haifa, Mr. and Mrs. Corrie
    Steven Plaut
    Posted Mar 03 2010
    “Rachel Corrie, you may recall, was a clueless American-flag-burning undergraduate from Evergreen State College…”

    Welcome to Haifa, Mr. and Mrs. Corrie
    Steven Plaut
    Posted Mar 03 2010
    “Not content with mourning their daughter’s tragic death, which resulted from her own foolhardiness, the Corries have devoted themselves to demonizing Israel and supporting Israel’s enemies.”

    Who Killed Rachel Corrie?
    Dennis Prager- Saturday 22nd Nov 2003
    “…anyone with a conscience must regard Rachel Corrie’s activities with contempt.”

    Who Killed Rachel Corrie?
    Dennis Prager- Saturday 22nd Nov 2003
    “We are told repeatedly that Rachel was idealistic—as if that matters. Virtually every person who commits great evil—the Nazi, the communist, the Islamic terrorist—is idealistic.”

    Who Killed Rachel Corrie?
    Dennis Prager- Saturday 22nd Nov 2003 “She was one of the many fools our colleges annually produce. Evergreen State College is reputed to excel in such production.”

    It’s all so SICKENING,and this should tell us all we need to know about Jason Speaks.Also,take a look at the numerous comments Jason Speaks has posted in this thread defending former Israeli PM Ariel Sharon.

    Anyway,EXCELLENT article Dr. Lasha Darkmoon!

  132. March 14, 2011 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

    She was the typical self-hating white leftist. Those people serve no purpose in saving Western Civilization. Unforetuneately there are too many here willing to fight for Palestinians but not for their own people. She wasted her life and talking about here is a waste of our precious time in our lives and the lives of our civilization, our liberties, and our nation.

    Rachel Corrie would never have fought to defend America, fight illegal immigration, stop gay marriage, or end third world legal immigration. So why are we talking about her at all?

    So people just hate Jews so much, they will forgive anything in someone else who hates Jews. It is said Stalin hated Jews, but that does not make him an ally in the preservation of the rights of whites or the survival of Amerca, or the survival of Western Civilization. The same with Rachel Corrie.

    She is nothing in our fight for our heritage. Nor is there anything for us in the fight between the Arabs and the Jews. So Isreal disappears, that does nothing to stop Janet Napolitano, Jesse Jackson, Barak Obama, Tom Harkin, or 20 million illegal aliens. Hell, Angela Davis is anti-Zionist, but she is no ally and is an enemy.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 14, 2011 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

      @ Federale

      Unforetuneately (sic) there are too many here willing to fight for Palestinians but not for their own people.

      Another fool who can’t even spell a simple word. Even his name is an orthographic abomination!

      Incidentally, Rachel Corrie, who was willing to fight for the Palestinians, never said she was unwilling to fight “for her own people.”

      She was perfectly willing to fight for her own people, though I doubt she would be willing to fight and die for a creep like you.

      I certainly wouldn’t wish to do so!

  133. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    March 14, 2011 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

    The Zionist regime is very allergic to the name Rachel Corrie.

    Last year, Israeli soldiers boarded the Malaysia-funded Irish vessel MV Rachel Corrie carrying humanitarian aid for the 1.5 million beseiged Gazzah citizen and forced it to sail to Israeli port of Ashdod instead. According to Israeli military statement: “there was no violence or injuries among the soldiers or crew”. Israel is expected to expel the eleven activists and eight crew but hold the cargo to find the Iraqi WMDs found missing in Iraq after US invasion in 2003.

    Israel’s top con-man, Benjamin Netanyahu, tried to use the incident for the ‘humane nature’ of the Israel Occupation Force (IOF) by saying: “We saw today the difference between a ship of peaceful activists, with whom we don’t agree but respect their rights to a different opinion from ours, and a ship of hate organized by violent Turkish terror extremists – waiting for our soldiers on the deck with axes and knives”.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/06/07/jewish-vengeance-israel-vs-turkey/

  134. European's Gravatar European
    March 14, 2011 - 1:41 pm | Permalink

    @ Jason,

    your last post to me felt like I was being slapped around by a man, including Rachel, and then tells me afterwards, you know I love you, (you know that… is a typical for you), empathy or emotions toward another human being irritates you? If you can’t feel that anymore, I suggest a dose of good counsel. Appearantly you can’t face your self, or hate yourself.

  135. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    March 14, 2011 - 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Jason Speaks says:

    I’m sorry, but when I reread what Denis Prager wrote, a lot of it is true. Aren’t almost all “peace activists” frauds, and don’t we all know that? [No, we don’t!!!] Are we really about to throw in with Jane Fonda and other communist supporters of the Palestinians?

    After reading the above comment, who can doubt any longer that “Jason Speaks” is a Zionist troll?

    Denis Prager, quoted extensively by Lasha Darkmoon in her article with obvious disapproval, happens to be as extreme and fanatical a Zionist Jew as you can possibly get! — and lo and behold, “Jason Speaks” agrees with him wholeheartedly!

    Especially with Prager’s silly view that “most peace activists are frauds”!

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      March 14, 2011 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

      I’m very happy to see the new comments rules, and I hope they’re strictly enforced_even against me if I cross the line. As it’s sometimes been this site has not been a valuable resource, but more a pathetic demonstration of our weakness. Infiltrators are a fact of life. When they succeed in turning something like this into a street brawl they’ve won. That’s the bottom line.

  136. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    March 14, 2011 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Only when Whites suffer the same fate as the Palestinians will people like Rachel Corrie sympathize with white nationalism.

    • Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
      March 14, 2011 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

      Have you any proof that Rachel Corrie did NOT sympathize with White nationalism?

      Why do you have the audacity to suggest she was against something she made no recorded comment on? Isn’t that sneaky? Isn’t that the way you trolls work?

      Rachel was 23 when she died and had probably never given a thought to White Nationalism. It hadn’t crossed her mind.

      Maybe she would have been an ardent White Nationalist if she had lived longer.

      Has that never occurred to you?

  137. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    March 14, 2011 - 11:58 am | Permalink

    I know, Rev. John Hagee will disagree with me that Jews hate Christianity – but in fact the Zionist Jews hate their fellow non-Zionist Jews too.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/anti-semitic-roots-of-zionism/

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 2:02 pm | Permalink

      Jews have always been opposed to Christianity. Need I remind everyone of the piece of “conceptual art,” Piss Christ, which sold for $15,000 to a museum owned by a Jew? It depicts a platic figurine of Jesus submerged in a Jew’s urine.

      And if Jews do not think they can bring a converted Jew back to the darkside, they will definately be hostile. Dr. Norman Finkelstein is an example.

  138. JJT's Gravatar JJT
    March 14, 2011 - 11:26 am | Permalink

    The Jews show up and derail discussion.

    TOO needs a system of user registration. 3 strikes and you’re out (IP banned too).

    Jasonspeaks is obviously a Jew.

  139. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    March 14, 2011 - 11:21 am | Permalink

    The Eastern European Jew is so arrogant now it defies description. He knows he has parasited his way into the USA which is the reason for his brazen arrogance angainst all of humanity.

    They are using their postion of power in the USA to get whatever it is they want. For them all that counts is money Israel and the USA as long it is a place they can use.

    The key to stopping all this madness is to confront Jewish power full bore head on in the USA otherwise the world will be aflame for a thousand years with Talmudic hatred revegene and insanity.

    It all boils down to that.

  140. Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
    March 14, 2011 - 10:21 am | Permalink

    I attended a play in Manhattan a few years ago about Rachel Corrie. The play had been *censored* for a few years, as the Jew Power in New York City used it considerable muscle to ban public performances of it. It was eventually allowed to be performed at some small community theater. Jewish behavior is predictable, while posing as “liberal” free speech advocates, they resort to threats, official censorship, and even violence, any time someone dares to even mention Jews in a less than worshipful tone. One might recall an angry Jew destroying an art installation about Israeli violence in Europe a few years ago (ironic?)

    Corrie appeared to be a very typical idealist White women – her murderers cold blooded, racist, bigoted Jews. That Jews would come here, pose as “white advocates” and attack Corrie says everything one needs to know about them.

    It’s vitally important that Whites revisit the Bush era – from 911 to the financial crisis – and unpack the lies and deceit that most of America seemed to buy. The vilification campaign against Rachel Corrie showed these Jewish “liberals” and “leftists” to be unbelievable hypocrites. I’m sure they are quite proud of themselves however, since to a Jew, hypocrisy is the highest virtue – “chutzpuh.”

    • Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
      March 14, 2011 - 11:24 am | Permalink

      The Jews know full well antisemetism is rising in the USA over all their BS games.

      That is why they are arming themselves in militia camps in NY and Arizona. This is going to get real ugly in the next 5-10 years.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 14, 2011 - 5:09 pm | Permalink

      @ Rich Pearson

      Well spoken, dear brother. At least there is no chance that you would ever be mistaken for a troll! Every word you say is true.

  141. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    March 14, 2011 - 10:07 am | Permalink

    Jason:

    I think some of your attackers just aren’t very bright. I’ve read many of your comments and you make quite a bit of sense. Even if you were a “paid jewish troll” as some moron said, your excellent comments are helping us out here.
    As for Anglo-Saxon, half the time I think he is a nutcase, and other times he makes sense. Perhaps he needs to revise his medication.
    Some people are just contrary types who love to argue and feel most alive with a little opposition, and probably get ignored in the real world.
    Keep up the good work Jason.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 4:38 pm | Permalink

      Thanks Scooter. I know I am provocative at times, but it seems to me that we are hear to sharpen our arguments and challenge each other, among other things. There are many interesting posters on this site, including yourself, and it gets everyone intellectually stimulated. And I’m not paid nor am I working for Zionists – LOL.

      I don’t know what the story is with a couple of the posters on here, but we’ve had people deliberately create fake, superficially pro-White personas in the past, who went on to say ridiculous things no White Advocate would support (like the strange Der Dweeb and Seve*s who promoted some bizarre theories). I have no clue what they hope to accomplish, other than to distract everyone.

    • Madame Butterfly's Gravatar Madame Butterfly
      March 18, 2011 - 9:58 pm | Permalink

      @ Jason Speaks

      I don’t know what the story is with a couple of the posters on here, but we’ve had people deliberately create fake, superficially pro-White personas in the past, who went on to say ridiculous things no White Advocate would support…

      Talking about yourself, are you? And your fellow Zionist trolls? If ever anyone assumed a fake White persona, it is you!

      All you do is sing here is sing the praises of Israel and spew your vomit all over Rachel Corrie. And you make out this is how all White Nationalists behave?

      You behave like the worst kind of Jew, sir. The most contemptble kind of Jew.

      How come you’ve made over ONE HUNDRED POSTS SO FAR?

      Who pays you?

  142. March 14, 2011 - 9:59 am | Permalink

    Beautifully done Lasha! It’s interesting to see the stream of invective and vitriol that makes those commenting sympathetic associates of those who murdered Rachel. They all have her blood on their hands. The most wonderful thing that can happen in this world is the coming destruction of Israel. It will bring an aftermath of fresh air and clarity that we have lacked for too long. The abomination will have its day.

    Once again, fantastic work, which is what you do.

    • Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
      March 14, 2011 - 11:52 am | Permalink

      Dear Les, many thanks for these kind words. You know only too well that you are my mentor in most things. I am acquainted with your writings…and I have heard your sublime poetry read by the silver-tongued Patrick Willis.

      Yes, I regret all this unnecessary Rachel-bashing. I can’t believe it’s going on. Nor can I understand how so many people who regard the Jews as their mortal enemies should be so callously indifferent to the systematic genocide of the Palestinian people.

      Rachel died for Palestinne. She died for a noble cause. Little do her detractors know that she died for America too.

      Not for the Zionized America we see today! Not for the multicultural zoo that America has morphed into under the iron rule of her New Masters. No, Rachel died for the Eternal America in the heart of all true Americans — the ideal America, the America that could have been had it not been subverted by Freud and the Frankfurt School and the latter-day standard bearers for Zion.

      God bless Rachel! May she live in our hearts forever, a symbol of our long struggle and a role model for young women.

      If she had lived, she would have made someone a marvelous wife. She would have been a perfect mother.

      If ever I have a daughter like Rachel, I will count myself lucky.

      Xanadu
      (Lasha Darkmoon)

    • European's Gravatar European
      March 14, 2011 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

      @ Les Visible,

      that is exactly what happend after WWII in Germany. Although demolished, and millions died, there was a breath of fresh air and free thinking. I grew up with no cultural race conflicts, hostilities, or take over agendas. It is somewhat sad to think, that this is what it will take again?. When will people learn? Jews primarily!.

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      March 14, 2011 - 2:25 pm | Permalink

      Not being religious myself I couldn’t care less about any religion on it’s own merits. But what I do care fervently about is the freedom of a people to choose. When I listen to our great leaders trying to justify our involvement in middle east wars, and what they claim to be out to accomplish, it’s perfectly clear these wars are not only for the jews, but against the Moslem religion. Thus our wars are promoting Communism. They are only different in degree from the anti-religious effort here, and someday all religions here will be subjected to the same treatment.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 5:11 pm | Permalink

      With all due respect, I just don’t get it with regard to Rachel. Are the Palestinians white? Are we sticking up for White people here? Because, God bless them, they don’t seem White as far as I can tell. Now, that doesn’t mean they aren’t entitled to respect and I do wish them well. And I think pointing out the cruelty and hypocrisy of Israel is good.

      But are we required to support everyone the Israelis happen to be at war with, to the point of death? If the Israelis start attacking water buffalo, do I have to suddenly gush with love for water buffalo? I’m just not a big fan of any of these Semitic people. I wish the Egyptians well too, but with an IQ of 87, they probably won’t be setting up a republic anytime soon. These are hard facts.

      People have said they would be proud if Rachel was their daughter, but I’d like you to please reflect on that. Would you really encourage your daughter to go risk her life to help Africans? Or Arabs? Or Asians? Especially if the group in question was relatively low IQ, and had no history of freedom.

      I run into SWPL types whose daughters are off on some mission to save the world from “White imperialism “, either by building villages in Africa or fighting against “corporate greed”, and I honestly recoil. It doesn’t impress me at all. I think it’s tragic. I don’t think anyone should want their daughter to do that.

      There is a certain subset of Leftist that is opposed to certain actions of Israel, with regard to Palestine. Jane Fonda comes to mind, she has been on this point for over 30 years. I can’t say I really understand it, but we all know Jane Fonda isn’t pro-White or anti-Jewish. Something else motivates it.

      So, I would urge caution when you say things like “I would be proud if this was my daughter”. Your children might just take you seriously. And you want your daughter to live a long full life proudly defending White Civilization, not dying young to support Africans or Arabs or Inuits.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      March 14, 2011 - 5:23 pm | Permalink

      She epitomized the best, the unique, characteristics of the white race. Unfortunately that propensity to empathize and cooperate with others also extends to ethnic outsiders.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

      The only thing I wonder about, Someday, is if this trait of unlimited altruism, complete self-sacrifice and endless sympathy is really the “best” of our race? Stay with me here.

      If a trait has become distorted and is leading to the destruction of your own genetic interests, then can we still say it is “good”? The attraction to sugar is a good thing, but if it is so exaggerated that a person literally kills themselves stuffing their face with candy bars, it is no longer good.

      It seems to me that all traits and behaviors have to be looked at in these terms. It’s great if a person is friendly, but if they suffer from William’s syndrome, and are totally absolutely naive with regard to dangerous strangers, then it is no longer a good thing.

      Something has happened, especially to our White women, to make them rather mindlessly altruistic, in a way that is doing real damage to themselves and other Whites.

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      March 14, 2011 - 6:39 pm | Permalink

      I think the answer has to start with acknowledging that we Whites have this inherent tendency to be universalistic. Pointing out that only people who have ever really empathized with ‘ the other’ are White disconcerts (white) egalitarians. They like to flatter themselves that they have overcome their instinctive ‘dark side’.

      think that whites are uniquely vicious

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 6:51 pm | Permalink

      Now that makes sense to me, thanks. Yes, letting other Whites know that they aren’t overcoming their “dark side” at all, but in fact acting in line with an instinct we all feel, and only Whites feel, will make them stop and think.

      I am reminded of those poor women that try and raise monkeys as human children, only to suffer the inevitable consequences. You also see them on shows like the Dog Whisperer, where people spoil their dogs to a bizarre extent, dressing them as human and letting them bite everyone because they can’t stand to discipline them.

      This concept of super stimulus may explain a lot. Here is a short summation on wiki. I wonder if expressing empathy and acting altruistically feel so good that they have become a kind of addiction?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernormal_Stimuli

    • Someday's Gravatar Someday
      March 15, 2011 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

      The Supernormal Stimuli link talks about “the entertainment industry’s hijacking of our social instincts”. There is not much doubt about that- or who is doing it.

      Re. Williams syndrome Children who form no racial stereotypes found

      . In 2009 UCLA biologist Robert Wayne led a study comparing the wolf and dog genomes. The finding that made headlines was that dogs originated from gray wolves not in East Asia, as other researchers had argued, but in the Middle East. Less noticed by the press was a brief aside in which Wayne and his colleagues identified a particular short DNA sequence, located near a gene called WBSCR17, that was very different in the two species. That region of the genome, they suggested, could be a potential target for “genes that are important in the early domestication of dogs.” In humans, the researchers went on to note, WBSCR17 is at least partly responsible for a rare genetic disorder called Williams-Beuren syndrome. Williams-Beuren is characterized by elfin features, a shortened nose bridge, and “exceptional gregariousness”—its sufferers are often overly friendly and trusting of strangers.

  143. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    March 14, 2011 - 9:45 am | Permalink

    Jason Speaks, stop arguing. I think you’re right pretty much across the board, and I know it’s hard not to defend yourself when you are attacked. But this thread is about the death of someone who showed great courage. Not in our cause, but still.

    There’ll be other times to defend your good name (unfortunately). Not in the thread for comments on Dr. Lasha Darkmoon’s remembrance of Rachel Corrie’s death.

    Everybody else, please let this go too. Don’t take silent respect for the dead as an admission of guilt.

  144. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 14, 2011 - 8:00 am | Permalink

    I think the population of people who post on this site are, albeit justifiably, more paranoid than average. I am not sure any of the questioned posters above is Jewish. Honestly, the only time I thought the site might be getting hacked was when all those hateful comments started popping up. I thought it might have been a strategy to self-destruct the authenticity of this material. But then again, it also could have just been a lot of hateful white people. David Duke is not a violent racist, but I am sure there really are people like those he is painted to be.

    No, I think some of us have differing opinions, but I do not see clear and convincing evidence that any of the above posters is a crypto-troll. It’s a little far-fetched. Correct me if I missed something, please.

    • Opinion of Jason Speaks's Gravatar Opinion of Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 9:16 am | Permalink

      Jason Speaks wanted some input, here it is:

      YES you are a Jewish troll. Say “L’Chai” to Mark Potok and Mo’ Money Dees for us!

      You, and all of the people just like you, will reap what you sow, whether here on Earth or otherwise. I hope your thirty shekels are enough to quell your conscience but I’m guessing the Talmud (that you say Jews don’t follow bc they don’t read it, LOL, instead of the obvious fact that it permeates Jewish identity, nice try there Jew troll) lets you live in a permanent state of false superiority.

      Go away! We don’t need anymore Jewish White Nationalists! We all know how that works, e.g. the Jews that tried to subvert AmRen.

      Want another example? Lawrence Auster, who never fails to (a) point out biological and social differences unless they (b) reflect poorly on the behavior of Jews.

      They’re called GATEKEEPERS. Jason Speaks isn’t smart or influential enough to be a gatekeeper, no, he’s just a scrawny little troll, probably under the age of 30, paid to clack away on his keyboard at a website dedicated to exposing people like him so that Whites can have a healthy identity and enjoy existence here on Earth without being genocided by other Jews like him! LEAVE, the power of Christ compels you!

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      March 14, 2011 - 9:50 am | Permalink

      As a long time reader and infrequent commenter, I say kudos to Anonyma and others who have pointed out the behavior of certain posters, aka Jason Speaks and Someday. Just the volume of posts alone says something – Jason Speaks tries to dominate each and every thread. He’s also constantly trying to gatekeep and setting limits on speech – exactly the behavior that MacDonald has described on numerous occasion; Jews trying to mark certain discussions as “out of bounds.”

      If I remember correctly, Jason Speaks (as his previous handle) and Someday showed up the day of the first 911 thread – both demanding that discussion of Israeli involvement in the 911 attacks be out of bounds.

      Like Soviet Commissars of old, they declared anyone mentioning this truth to be “crazy” and otherwise “fringe.”

      Zionists have been pretty open about their “trolling” of online forums that criticize Israel and Jews; there’s a specific office in Israel dealing with Internet Hasbara, and the story of Megaphone is infamous in online circles.

      This is Kevin MacDonald’s blog – since he is the most effective voice out there talking about Jewish power – this forum is going to be a target of every tactic imaginable. Expect it.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 14, 2011 - 9:55 am | Permalink

      @ (elite institution coward)

      I do not see clear and convincing evidence that any of the above posters is a crypto-troll. It’s a little far-fetched. Correct me if I missed something, please.

      I do not see any clear and convincing evidence that (elite institution coward) is not a sock puppet of Jason Speaks or himself an independent crypto-troll.

      I note that these “two” characters speak to each other in a never-ending dialogue, like Siamese twins joined at the hip, posting 75 percent of the total number of comments on this site.

      I don’t think it is too far-fetched to surmise that none but full-time Zionist operatives would have so much free time at their disposal.

      Even the literary style of these “two” hasbara agents is strikingly similar. I can’t say for sure at this point they are the same person, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they are.

      How come you “two” guys have so much endless leisure to post here, hour after hour? Don’t you have jobs to do? Or is THIS your job — to be full-time hasbara agents for the ADL?

  145. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    March 14, 2011 - 7:16 am | Permalink

    I would like someone else’s input into what is up with Anglo Saxon and Anonyma. They occasionally post things that make sense from a White Advocates viewpoint, but then suddenly launch into arguments that will only divide us (like anti-American rants).

    They are also both very are that Der Engel was a fake and obviously so was Sever*s, but they seem very afraid to discuss the issue. That doesn’t sound like someone who supports this site. I believe both have campaigned to have the freak Longlly reinstated as a poster. So what are these guys?

    Are they trolls like Der Engel, or are they truly blockheaded hotheads that can’t think straight?

    • European's Gravatar European
      March 14, 2011 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

      @ Jasons S,
      Your comment:
      *but then suddenly launch into arguments that will only divide us (like anti-American rants)*

      You said that about me too, when I came across this site by sheer accident in january after my first post. You could not stand another opinion or view-point, so you accused me of being devisive. A white person would never have seen my view this way, or make this statement white among whites, but you did. From then on all my posts were waiting moderation. Jason, you are not a genuine, natural White male. A Generic Imposter perhaps. I do not wish to hate you as a Jew, but I do hate your *intentions* to destroy me, how ever so subtly, a whitey of all whites, and ALL those of my Race. Rachel was my Sister! And may you NOT succeed in draging her thru your slime.

  146. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    March 14, 2011 - 6:52 am | Permalink

    Who are the Zionist trolls trying to sabotage this website?

    Jason Speaks says:

    I think we need to explore the difference between those that value White and Western Civilization and those that simply hate Jews. There is a difference.

    To this, Anglo Saxon replies:

    But you ARE a Jew, Jason Squeaks. And once again you post (for the Nth time) for the sole purpose of belittling the comment of someone else; while adding some more bile in order to steer discussion along a ‘Jew’ friendly line.

    This gets interesting.

    Is ‘Jason Speaks’, the self-professed White Nationalist who questions the authenticity of the Ariel Sharon quote (“We, the Jewish people, control America—and the Americans know it!”) and who never loses an opportunity to deflect serious criticism from the Jews, a Jew himself?

    It would appear that quite a few intellgent posters here have now reached this conclusion: that far from being just a Jew, a Zionist troll, “Jason Speaks” is an employee of the ADL who is paid to post here on a full-time basis.

    Almost every second post on this thread, you will notice, is made by this loquacious individual. He cannot afford to let ANY anti-Zionist sentiment go unchallenged.

    Every serious criticism of Israel or Jewry must be countered AT ONCE.

    Here is Concerned Observer of Comments
    March 14, 2011 – 2:21 am :

    Jason Squeaks…this hasbara troll…Notice how many posts this Jewish troll has used to clog up this otherwise intelligent discussion.

    Also notice his obviously Jewish nature. This is a learning moment for those who have read KMac’s classic “CULTURE OF CRITIQUE.” Can you see the Culture of Critique going on, right now, on a WN blog?

    [What we have here is] multiple Jewish/Zionist hasbaRATS sock-puppeting with each other, hijacking threads, sowing dissent, and YES, practicing the Culture of Critique.

    Learn from your racial enemies!!!! Know how to spot it.

    I repeat:

    Notice how many posts this Jewish troll has used to clog up this otherwise intelligent discussion.

    I have counted.

    There have been 77 comments so far. “Jason Speaks” has contributed 27 of these comments. Far more than ONE IN THREE! I

    Note this significant fact too.

    Dr Lasha Darkmoon’s exceptionally well-researched and moving article contains roughly 3000 words. Jason Speaks’ “comments” now amount to over 6000 words! More than double the original article.

    This is no ordinary commenter posting on a casual basis. It’s a full-time job for “Jason Speaks”. In all probability, a well-paid job.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 14, 2011 - 6:57 am | Permalink

      The numerous sock puppets here are part of the scam.

      The poster known as Someday is either a sock puppet or an independent operative.

      About this there can be little doubt, as Anglo-Saxon has been astute enough to notice on a previous occasion.

      Who am I?

      I am monitoring this site on a full-time basis for Kevin MacDonald, as a favor to him, but without his knowledge. Sniffing out Zionist trolls is my one and only role here.

      I can announce with absolute certainty that this site is now under constant attack by organized Jewry.

      How many trolls there are here, and how any sock puppets, it is impossible to say. But one thing can now be said with 100 percent certainty: the poster known as Jason Speaks is a Jew masquerading as a White Nationalist.

      Don’t trust him one inch.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 7:07 am | Permalink

      No, you dumb-dumb Anonyma, I am trying to get you guys to pick up you game. If I can punch holes in bad arguments on the fly, just how do you think they will stand up against serious opponents? If I can find flaws that quickly, then it isn’t going to fly with mainstream people.

      It isn’t my job to cheerlead for any anti-Jewish or pro-White remark, no matter how ineffective it is. This is a place to subject our arguments to some scrutiny BEFORE they are thrown out to the general public.

      And by the way, you know full well I took on Der Dweeb, Sever*s and some other pranksters who were trying to destroy this site. Why didn’t you ever challenge those obvious trolls? You still won’t even address the issue. Didn’t you even campaign to keep that freak Longlly posting? WTF are you thinking? I THINK you are on our side, but this doesn’t sound right on your part. Please explain.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 7:12 am | Permalink

      Anonyma says:

      “I am monitoring this site on a full-time basis for Kevin MacDonald, as a favor to him, but without his knowledge.”

      WTF does that even mean? Without MacDonald’s knowledge? You have had a grudge against me, just like Der Engel did, just like Sever*s did. You are following the same pattern as the very worst anti-White trolls we have had. You still fail to speak out on them. In fact, you always covered for them. Why?

      I thought you were serious, but apparently not. How many people does Searchlight Magazine have working against us?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 7:23 am | Permalink

      Anonyma, you never once did a word count on Longlly, even though he was so disruptive that MacDonald had him banned. I don’t remember any criticism of him at all from you. But now you claim to be “working on MacDonald’s behalf, but without his knowledge”. I was one of the most vocal opponents of Der Engel, Sever*s, and Longlly and you know it. All of him have been outed and either banned or forced to leave.

      Yet you offer me no thanks. You offer no work of acknowledgment like a true White Advocate would. Not even a sense of solidarity against obvious saboteurs. Why not?

    • History is Bunk's Gravatar History is Bunk
      March 14, 2011 - 10:24 am | Permalink

      Anonyma,

      I always scroll straight past anything posted under the names of “jew speaks” and its tag team partners “$plc institution coward” and “some dag.” It does not take long to work out they are jew trolls, for those who visit here often.

      If for some odd reason I wanted to infect my mind with gutter trash jew spew I would go out and buy a talmudvision propaganda tube to replace the one consigned to its rightful home in the trash dumpster long ago; I certainly won’t knowingly read any of their verbal vomit here at TOO.

      Maybe newcomers just have to spend enough time here to be able to sort the wheat from the trash, as the rest of us have.

  147. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    March 14, 2011 - 5:07 am | Permalink

    I’m sorry, but when I reread what Denis Prager wrote, a lot of it is true. Aren’t almost all “peace activists” frauds, and don’t we all know that? Are really about to throw in with Jane Fonda and other communist supporters of the Palestinians? This strikes me as bizarre. It’s like thinking Jimmy Carter is our friend because he criticizes Israel – newsflash: Carter is no friend to us or even to the United States.

    Maybe the supporters of her on this site are more clever and cynical than I realize. Maybe they see a good propaganda vehicle. If that is the game, then so be it. But let’s not believe our own BS.

  148. Sanchez's Gravatar Sanchez
    March 14, 2011 - 4:59 am | Permalink

    Like an advance posse, Amerika sent out wicked little Israel to test its weapons and world tolerance for state organized depravity. Amerika by underwriting this Third World military super power has given the apartheid, supremacist entity a free hand as the IOF and Mossad scout and scalp in the wasteland of government sponsored international terror much in the same way that white “settlers” who squatted America used renegade tribes to open the frontier in their “conquest” of the “homeland” as the West was “won” through the holocaust of the Native American population. Israel has blazed a trail of anarchy across the last 63 years of world history “conquering new territory” as it rampages through Palestine and is loathed like no other state for its spate of provocative extra-judicial killings, systematic genocide, expulsion of refugees, land grabbing, amassing of nuclear and other WMDs; a rap sheet of crime that no single nation other than the US comes even close to.

    Allowed to “fly” amok with its high tech Amerikan weaponry, razing ghettos in the name of peace, murdering in the name of security; this Orwellian state knows no moral boundaries any more than geographic borders. And protected by its weapons purveyor through an unbroken, delinquent chain of UN vetoes by recalcitrant US governments, this illegitimate rogue entity is the greatest single threat to world peace facing all of us today. This is the true face of terror, organized, righteous and extreme, and it is as at home in the Al Jolson Obama’s White House as it is in Tel Aviv. Israel and the US have more in common than their radical supremacist Zionists howling for Arab blood and cheap oil.

    How can Palestine be free of the scourge of racist, colonial interlopers who view the rest of humanity as mere sheep and pigs if the entire United States has itself been occupied by an alien race that has infested the body politic, media with its “culture” of hatred and death and the vast majority of the US people don’t even understand how diseased their vaunted “democracy” has become?

    However, as long as there are still people of Rachel’s caliber and with her understanding and love then there is surely hope that the US will finally bleed the poison from its soul and recover the moral high-ground that it has for for so long abandoned as it wallowed in the filth of Zion.

    “Anti-Semitic talk is not about Jews at all: it is the dominant ideology of Pax Americana. A Cuban who talks about anti-Semitism paves the road for the triumphal return of Meyer Lansky’s heirs to his island.” Israel Shamir

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      March 14, 2011 - 11:43 am | Permalink

      Sanchez- fabulous post. I’ll quibble with one essential element though – Wilson sold us to the Hebes in 1913, and FDR finalized the contract in 1933. Amerika is a Jewish Nation – not an American Nation. My country died befroe I was born. I’m the vassal slave to the International Jew.

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      March 15, 2011 - 8:19 am | Permalink

      @ Ciaran

      I’m the vassal slave to the International Jew.

      Yep, you’re my slave! Don’t you forget it! :)

  149. visitor's Gravatar visitor
    March 14, 2011 - 4:35 am | Permalink

    maybe this’ll work. any technical support here?

  150. visitor's Gravatar visitor
    March 14, 2011 - 4:34 am | Permalink

    enough of these italics. anyone know how to restore the font?

  151. visitor's Gravatar visitor
    March 14, 2011 - 4:29 am | Permalink

    i don’t know enough about rachel corrie to judge her or her motivations. likewise, i know nothing about the personal orientation of the protester cat-and-mousing with the tiananmen square tank. but both bulldozer-girl and tank-guy showed to the world the truly ugly face of the regimes they opposed. these sort of non-violent sacrifices are enormously challenging to the legitimacy of same. quang duc’s gesture in south vietnam was similarly shocking and effective in shaping us public opinion.

    i salute corrie’s courage and idealism.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 4:57 am | Permalink

      One difference I see is that the Chinese student in front of the tank was fighting for … Chinese freedom. On the other hand, we have a White girl sacrificing herself for non-White, non-Christian, non-Western people. That’s a difference.

      She spoke glowingly of Martin Luther King and Ghandi (both figures that opposed Whites) and wished to follow their example.

      It’s not hard to figure out where she was politically. She was a Portland girl, who loved MLK. She had participated in a televised mock trial of Bush for war crimes. She was an environmentalist. I’m sorry, but it’s pretty obvious where she was coming from. She was a hard Leftist.

  152. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 14, 2011 - 3:52 am | Permalink

    “Surely, a more rational solution could have been found.”

    Yes, I agree. I think if more people had thought like this, Western Civilization would be in much better shape. Take a glance at Patrick Buchannan’s THE UNNECESSARY WAR if you get the chance. It is about how we essentially needlessly killed 60-70 million of our people in the two Great Wars. I won’t get into how the Jews goaded us on. But ultimately I suppose, it was not their hands that pulled the trigger.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 3:57 am | Permalink

      Oh yes, I have read (most) of his book and it is excellent. Those two wars cost the West dearly and they may yet prove to have been fatal blows.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 4:07 am | Permalink

      They will not be fatal blows. People like Kevin MacDonald and “Lasha Darkmoon” are going to make sure that we do not stop existing.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      March 14, 2011 - 10:40 am | Permalink

      Elite Coward – yes it was their hands that pulled the trigger, of the Brother Wars, in the 20th century.

  153. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 14, 2011 - 3:30 am | Permalink

    “So is providing a pretext for the federal government to attack you.”

    On this, we fully agree.

    “EIC, perhaps you can give us insight into this way of viewing the world. With respect, you seem more sympathetic to Palestinians living a world away, then you are to White Southerners in your own country. ”

    I am not in fact more sympathetic to them. But their children are being slaughtered after they are born. Ours are being slaughtered before they are born.

    “You seem to have accepted the view that we did the Indians wrong and that we may be owed some kind of payback. ”

    A “payback” would be just as wrong as what happened in the first place. I do not believe that vengence is owed to us by their descendants.

    ” You seem to believe that it is noble that 600,000 Whites died over the issue of slavery.”

    It was certainly noble. You don’t hear stories about any other people dying in mass to free a different race of people, do you? And as for the act of sacrifice, one should not donate so much blood that he can no longer live. Or ever give again for that matter.

    I am pointing out that we do in fact have a reason to be proud of ourselves. This has been stolen from us. We have our faults, but we have also done and continue to do great things.

    Everyone remembers Richard Nixon for Watergate. But he did great things for the American people. He had an unfortunate anti-semitism problem, however.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 3:38 am | Permalink

      EIC, I am confused on a point. You said that Jews worship the Devil in an earlier post. And now you point to Nixon’s ‘unfortunate’ anti-semitism problem, reproachfully. Something doesn’t compute.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 3:45 am | Permalink

      And on the other point, I think we have to ask ourselves what is “noble”. Was the wholesale slaughter of hundreds of thousands of men truly noble? Did it feel noble to the young soldier who died on a cold winter day, somewhere in Tennessee? Did his mother rejoice on hearing of his “noble sacrifice”?

      In other words, wasn’t it quite hateful to butcher hundreds of thousands of Whites, who spoke the same language and worshiped the same God, for the sake of a relatively low IQ group of people with whom they shared very little?

      I think we need to examine our concept of what is noble. Just because we cause great harm to ourselves doesn’t make it noble. Surely, a more rational solution could have been found.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 3:48 am | Permalink

      “EIC, I am confused on a point. You said that Jews worship the Devil in an earlier post. And now you point to Nixon’s ‘unfortunate’ anti-semitism problem, reproachfully. Something doesn’t compute.”

      Ah, yes. Pardon my sarcasm.

  154. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    March 14, 2011 - 3:06 am | Permalink

    EIC, perhaps you can give us insight into this way of viewing the world. With respect, you seem more sympathetic to Palestinians living a world away, then you are to White Southerners in your own country. You seem to have accepted the view that we did the Indians wrong and that we may be owed some kind of payback. You seem to believe that it is noble that 600,000 Whites died over the issue of slavery.

    Is the idea of sacrificing yourself and other Whites to an “ideal” seductive in some sense? Does it make you feel Christlike?

  155. Concerned Observer of Comments's Gravatar Concerned Observer of Comments
    March 14, 2011 - 2:27 am | Permalink

    Notice the trickiness: Jason Speaks is ascribing Talmudism to supernatural belief. Know your enemy! The Talmud is man’s law, and an incredibly ethnocentric and supremacist one at that, with little to do with supernatural. The only worship involved is the worship of themselves, the Jews, so they can feel they have a right to rule over the Goyim. Jason Speaks is cleverly trying to conflate the Talmud with the Torah (Old Testament). When he says Jews don’t care about the Talmud or don’t READ it, don’t be fooled. They don’t NEED to read it. The ideas of supremacy and devalue-ing the lives of the “goyim” is passed down from elites to rabbis to every Jew, whether or not they have actually studied the Talmud! This is obvious to most but maybe not the uninitiated so I felt I needed to point this out. (You don’t need to read the Talmud to be imbued with the evil sense of Jewish superiority and the self-righteousness it takes to try to enslave and take advantage of everyone else. It’s an essential part of Jewish identity (religious or not!!!) and you get it from being “Jewish” not reading the Talmud.)

  156. Concerned Observer of Comments's Gravatar Concerned Observer of Comments
    March 14, 2011 - 2:21 am | Permalink

    Jason Squeaks: “Most Jews could care less about the Talmud.”

    Ladies and gentlemen, here is just ONE mistake this hasbara troll has let out recently. Notice how many posts this Jewish troll has used to clog up this otherwise intelligence discussion. Also notice his obviously Jewish nature. This is a learning moment for those who have read KMac’s classic “CULTURE OF CRITIQUE.” Can you see the Culture of Critique going on, right now, on a WN blog?

    I’m finding myself wishing for the thumbs-down mechanism again…but the problem with that was the same as we have here: multiple Jewish/Zionist hasbaRATS sock-puppeting with each other, hijacking threads, sowing dissent, and YES, practicing the Culture of Critique.

    Learn from your racial enemies!!!! Know how to spot it.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      March 14, 2011 - 10:36 am | Permalink

      I caught that. The dismissal of the Talmud. “Oy! It’s nothingk!”.

      Th Talmud is not a “supernatural” tome. It’s a collection of Law” folk-lore, and rabbinical “what to do”. It revolves around “How to Screw the Goy”. Individual Jews may be wholly oblivious to the diktats of the Talmud, but the ideologies and practices of Jewish life have been wholly permeated and suffused by the contents there-in.

      A local Jew I know recently commented that “Judaism is all about the Talmud”. Direct quote.

    • March 14, 2011 - 2:29 pm | Permalink

      Notice, too, how Jason is obsessive-compulsive about controlling the discussion and direction of this thread.

      Obsessive-compulsive control freakery: yet another very Jewish characteristic.

      Either the guy is a Jewish Zionist troll, a partial Jew whose Jewish side sub-consciously emerges when his blood comes under criticism, or a latently Jewish Judaized goy who is a White nationalist version of the brain dead Judeo-Christian Zionists.

      I’ve also noticed how he is hell-bent (literally) on ridiculing traditional Christianity’s healthy, sometimes necessarily superstitious, inherent contempt and distaste for predatory Jewry.

      Whatever the case, he and his kind will always sneak out after dark and let the Judeofascists in the back gate at first opportunity.

      Routing the Judeofascist enemy within is job #1; Western civilization and Christianity will take care of the rest.

      Jason and crypto-Jew “White nationalists” like him seem to recognize this, and seek to sabotage its prospects.

  157. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 14, 2011 - 1:20 am | Permalink

    You said that White agitators killed themselves in the Civil War. But who were we really fighting?

    http://www.jewishmag.com/110mag/civilwar/civilwar.htm

    Yes, that’s right. The Confederate Secretary of War was a Jew, as were many Confederate officers. Who would be attracted to African slavery the most?

    That webpage also mentions the role of the Union officers in the Indian Wars. So you can see, our history has not been perfect. And it is my belief that Mexican immigration today is punishment for the atrocity of the Indian Wars. But we can still live. We just need to remember who we are.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 1:29 am | Permalink

      Yes there was a Jew that served in the cabinet by the name of Judah P. Benjamin. So what? He is what I would call a “good Jew”. It was the North that instigated the war that killed 600,000 White people. The South just wanted to be left alone.

      And as far as the “poor blacks” that were enslaved, well they were slaves to start with in Africa. Secondly, they have very low IQs and are to this day childlike, so is it really so bizarre that they would find themselves in slavery back in a time when slavery was common worldwide?. Thirdly, how would they have ever found the Christianity you cherish if they hadn’t been brought here?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 1:34 am | Permalink

      And what do you mean that the Mexican invasion is a “punishment” for what “we did” to the Indians? That makes no sense. Races and ethnic groups have clashed and fought each other over land for thousands of years. How do you think the Apache gained their territory? By killing the Indians that were there before them. Native Americans were not some group that had a common bond, they actually fought and killed each other savagely for thousands of years. We will never know how many Indian genocides took place before the White Man arrived.

      And just how did you arrive at this belief that “God is punishing us” for our treatment of these “noble” Indians? Did God contact you? I mean this way of thinking gets us nowhere.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 1:42 am | Permalink

      I mean it was Karma.

      But you are right. The past does not justify crimes in the present. I am not justifying the situation. I am citing its origin. Obviously we have a right not to be displaced from our land as great as the right the Indians had before us.

      History is as you have said it was. And it was a cycle of evils. Let’s not let it happen again, especially not to us.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 2:14 am | Permalink

      http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/sumter.htm

      Technically, the South fired the first shot of the Civil War. But let’s not get picky, right?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 3:00 am | Permalink

      Yes that happened at Fort Sumter, although it was a small act in the scheme of things and this was after the South had given notice to the North that they were seceding from the Union. They then asked the North to remove it’s army from the installation. The North refused. The South wasn’t going to invade and occupy the North and the North knew that. So they could have reached an agreement. Instead the North chose full scale invasion, the burning of cities, the destruction of a culture and the suspension of the Constitution. Basically they did to the South what they would not dream of doing to any country today.

      But it does prove the point that letting hotheads rule the day (on both the Southern and Northern side) is a bad idea. So is providing a pretext for the federal government to attack you.

  158. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 14, 2011 - 1:03 am | Permalink

    Here is why we need to exist. Little Rachel stood in the way of a big evil as it sought to do harm to another human being. She died for another, Non-White, just as Christ, a Non-Human, died for us. Jews hate her for that. They hate that someone would dare do what is right.

    Jews hate White people because at every turn, we serve Christ. And Jews are Christ-haters.

    And how have they decided to destroy us? They want to destroy us by convincing us that we serve Christ so little that we do not deserve to exist. The hypocrisy is one that only those who laugh at God can stomach.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 1:09 am | Permalink

      OK, so your philosophy comes from a deeply religious viewpoint. Again, I just want to point out to others that there really are posters who believe Jews worship the Devil. I don’t, but there you are.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 1:24 am | Permalink

      The White people are a deeply religious people. It is only very recently that so many forgot their God. Again, tricks!

      I am fully knowledgable about Darwin’s theory of evolution. I also know that God invented it, as well as creating mankind.

  159. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 14, 2011 - 12:57 am | Permalink

    I am not pulling your leg. Do you know why White people are disappearing? It is not because they do not have the power to exist. It is because they lack the will. And they lack the will because they have no hope for a future in themselves.

    Our birthrates are falling because women are DECIDING not to have and love children. Our people are DECIDING to inter-marry. And why? They do not trust the teachers who tell them it is ok to be who you are and to be proud of who you are.

    Instead, they listen to the Children of the Devil. Well, here’s the truth: Jesus Christ was a Jew. But Jesus Christ was an anti-semite.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 1:07 am | Permalink

      I totally agree with the first two paragraphs. But the last one is totally unprovable. On that last paragraph I think you are pulling our leg.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 1:36 am | Permalink

      Take it religiously, take it figuratively. It doesn’t matter. There is less difference between reality and a metaphor than is obvious. Reality is what remains when everything you believe is a lie. But all your beliefs are metaphors.

  160. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 14, 2011 - 12:20 am | Permalink

    They may believe this in their mind. But in their heart, they worship the Devil. The precepts of the Talmud live barbarously in in their hearts.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 12:23 am | Permalink

      I’ve liked your posts before, but now you must be pulling our leg. Now, by the way, some have attacked me for disregarding those that claim Jews worship Satan. They have said I was protesting a claim no one ever made. Well please see above.

  161. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 14, 2011 - 12:13 am | Permalink

    The Roman emperor Tiberus removed the Jews from their land and destroyed their Temple because God’s Chosen People forsook God, and so they were no longer his people. He no longer protected them. They killed Christ, and they were punished.

    To survive, they made a deal with the Devil. All who follow the Talmud forfeit their souls. The White Christian people chose God, and they were grafted in to the family of God. Christ bought whatever Jews who would believe in him, and he bought the Gentiles as well. But as you can see, God invested a lot more heavily in us ;)

    The major problem is not that our women refuse to have children and raise the next generation or that they choose spouses of another race. The problem is that these decisions ARE LIES. Our women are tricked into selling their bodies to a future they are not allowed to envision. They are deceived into not loving their family or their brothers.

    The White race would never choose not to exist if it weren’t lied to.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 12:19 am | Permalink

      Most Jews could care less about the Talmud. That is especially true for American Jews, and it is really really true for Jews that have money and influence. They don’t take religion seriously for the most part.

      You think Alan Greenspan, or Bernake, or Zuckerman, or Norman Lear, or the boys at Goldman Sachs even believe in a supernatural realm?

  162. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 14, 2011 - 12:04 am | Permalink

    But if you deny what you are in order to save your skin, then what have you saved but it’s color? The heart is gone. You become yet another race of Jews.

    If 600,000 White Americans would die to end African slavery, then how many would and even OUGHT TO live to preserve the same goodwill? White people are a good and decent people who deserve to live. All the slanted history you have been taught about your own past, focusing on the bad and never the good, has been a clever deception meant to destroy you by convincing you that you don’t DESERVE to exist!

    In reality, the great evil steams from the Israeli Wehrmacht, and the Jewish mind lords whose prophesize enslavement and destruction for all the races of men. It is not the White Christian people.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 12:15 am | Permalink

      Yes I totally agree that White people deserve to live and thrive. But who has stood in our way? Well quite often it is the leftwing idealistic hippy student type.

      I don’t think the Civil War was a good idea and it was more or less brought on by “idealistic” Whites – not Jews.

      Look, I understand her death may be useful as a propaganda tool, but in that case I think we should focus on the cruelty of the Israelis and especially the hypocrisy of the Jewish media in not giving it the same coverage others get. But trying to convince me she was a saint is a lost cause.

      I would bet you $1,000 that if she could, she would have had you arrested for hate speech.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 14, 2011 - 12:23 am | Permalink

      I would welcome her having me arrested for hate speech. I would like it known to the world that I HATE the evil that has brought calamity to the future of our people, of our heroes, of our holidays and memories.

  163. (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
    March 13, 2011 - 11:39 pm | Permalink

    In regards to the numerous comments abounding about Rachel not being a White Nationalist, we must keep in mind that Rachel represents the best of what it means to be White. Here was a woman who saw something wrong with the world, and she gave up her life trying to fix it. It brings back lines from the Battle Hymn of the Republic:

    Christ has died to make men HOLY / let us die to make men free

    600,000 of your ancestors died with the rhythm of that song stamped in their minds, in a war that ended African slavery. Clearly, these are issues White people care about.

    Now, the Jewish perversion comes in the form of convincing our people, including people like Rachel, that it is a sin to love her own people. It is certainly a sin to mistreat or exploit another race. We can all feel the truth of that vividly in the Palestinian crisis. However, it is NO SIN to love your own people and to want them to survive.

    To convince someone otherwise and to silence the teachers who would preserve the truth is psychological genocide.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 11:57 pm | Permalink

      I cannot say she is the BEST of what it means to be White. She sacrificed her life to help non-Whites, who lived a world away, while most likely being hostile to everything you believe in.

      Now, to be fair to her, idealism is a largely a White impulse, and she appears to have had that in some form. But blind romantic idealism is something that has caused us a great deal of trouble as well.

      Her idealism reminds me of that New England style idealism that has been discussed before. In fact, isn’t this very similar to the mindset of the White Abolitionists that agitated for a war that killed over 600,000 White people?

      No thanks.

    • born agin' redneck's Gravatar born agin' redneck
      March 15, 2011 - 12:08 pm | Permalink

      600,000 of your ancestors died with the rhythm of that song stamped in their minds, in a war that ended African slavery. Clearly, these are issues White people care about.

      These are the issues whites use to lord it over other whites.

      Because they don’t have anything better to do.

      As the danger to whites increases, Rachel will fade to absolute irrelevance.

      As will the jewish holocaust.

  164. giovanni's Gravatar giovanni
    March 13, 2011 - 10:32 pm | Permalink

    Rachel Corrie was an anti-israeli activist and a very effective one even before being murdered and becoming a symbol of Israeli cruelty. She sacrificed herself for a cause, as many young idealists have done and the cause is fighting Israel, not the jews in general or being pro-white

    But fighting Israel is the only acceptable way to fight jewish power in our world and the only people that are allowed to di it are leftist pro-palestinians

    If you think the jewish power is the main issue for whites/europeans, then Rachel Corrie was fighting for you. Because you and your fellow white nationalist/racialist etc… ARE NOT DOING A THING about it, except writing anonimously comments on marginal websites
    It is kind of stupid and narrrow minded to show contempt for someone not only eroic in the way young white idealist people sometimes are, but that has fought against your enemy while you were doing nothing

    Challenging the people Rachel was fighting is dangerous, until you find a way to do it in your “right racialist way” do not spit on those that from a different perspective are actually doing and paying a price

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 10:57 pm | Permalink

      New flash: Rachel Corrie didn’t give a fig about Jewish power in the sense you mean it. And she didn’t care anything about White people in general. She appears to be a typical Leftwing Portland hippy girl. Jesus, wake up.

    • born agin' redneck's Gravatar born agin' redneck
      March 15, 2011 - 12:02 pm | Permalink

      If you think the jewish power is the main issue for whites/europeans, then Rachel Corrie was fighting for you.

      It’s not and she wasn’t.

  165. European's Gravatar European
    March 13, 2011 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

    @ Jason
    She was a strong environmentalist, but I don’t see any evidence she was motivated by “Christian love”. Is that supported by anything? Did she talk about Christianity? It wouldn’t change my mind, Christians do loopy self-sacrificial things all the time, but was that even her motivation?

    Does it matter what her key motivation was. Besides there are Christians who never speak about belief, but live by their concience. She believed in something at 23, she did not hang around in bars, became pregnant at 18 etc. she stood up for injustice. She saw the Palestiniens as human beings, the physicians home served as a medical aid facility etc.
    “Justice” ? You as a Jew should know this principal better than anyone else on this blog. But all you can see in her is “HATE that she might have had toward whites, and any other negative …. You sound so jewish, to put another white persons deeds in a negative. And Whites are picking up on yours. If you read Mac Kevins Book, in the very beginning he writes about the openess to strangers that white nordic people have, unlike that of the jewish nature, suspicious, mistrust, negative etc. (and don’t give me the story of Ruth) Why are you here on this blog, when your “natural” does not reflect white man’s nature. It comes thru more then you think. To learn, and perhaps someday you can pass for one? But suit yourself.

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      March 13, 2011 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

      If this were a jew site and the girl had been jewish killed by a white, do you think there would have been all these negative comments about her, even if she was Lizzie Bordenstein? I doubt it. What you’d have seen would have been a united, unanimous front of outrage for maximum propaganda benefit. Every subject which comes up here is the starting gun for a brawl. And that is one of the main reason we very well may lose all.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 11:15 pm | Permalink

      European, I am not a Jew, and you should know that. You are throwing around a bunch of ugly accusation based on nothing. You wanna know where I am coming from? Fine.

      I am for White Culture and White Civilization. I am for freedom and individual rights within the context of an intelligent group of Whites who can handle it (meaning I am not sure Africans, Arabs and Hispanics truly can). When I see Man walk on the moon, I am seeing the epitome of White Civilization.

      I think many Jews are the biggest obstacle we have. Jews are a very tribal and often hostile group of people, and also have a fairly high verbal IQ, which makes them more dangerous. I wish it were not so, but those are the facts. I think they act stupidly in undermining White societies, but nonetheless, they are. We have to bring this out to the public. The simple widespread knowledge of this would severely limit their power.

      Now, my motivation is to save a civilization I love, not to get invovled in some Semetic conflict. Personally, the Arabs and the Jews can fight each other forever as far as I am concerned. I think it is good to point out to the world how the holier-than-thou Israelis have treated the Palestinians, and get Americans to question our knee jerk support for Israel. But, I was not born yesterday when it comes to these Portland area activists.

      She seems very much like the type of hippy girl that provoked US troops to fire on them at Kent State. As I have said, she meets the profile of someone who couldn’t stand most White people, and you damn well know it. Do we have to act like naive children here? None of you will answer the question as to why Rachel wasn’t funneling her “idealism” to help Whites protect their country.

      Look, I am grown man, I can’t indulge silly fantasies of “martyrs”. Please. Opposing the state of Israel, even destroying the state of Israel, isn’t going to do that much to help Whites in Europe or the US. Good god, the West has faced onslaughts from Jewish/Bolsheviks long before there was a state of Israel.

      Hello? Russian Revolution? Communists forces in Germany? Communist party USA? The Frankfurt School? All long before Israel existed. Hell, we would all be better off if all the Jews went to live in Israel and left us alone, so why should I be so hot to oppose that country?

      This silly emotionalism is annoying. You aren’t thinking.

  166. Fr. Sandy's Gravatar Fr. Sandy
    March 13, 2011 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

    One of the attractions of this blog is the interesting questions raised. Ever since I first saw the video of the Jewish driven bulldozer backing up to make sure that the woman was indeed murdered I have been of mixed emotions. Rachael certainly brought out the stereotyped image of the Jew amongst the Israeli settlers but as I am concerned about the survival of my people which seems as hopeless as that of the Palestinians I am not certain that the effort was worth her sacrifice. At the back of my mind is the nagging feeling that she is one of those women that would neither have my children nor speak up for the brutalized children that Matt Parrot brings to us via his Hoosier Nation. The study of Jewish solidarity and imperialism is certainly interesting but our main interest should be our social decline and our falling birthrate. I am afraid that while I certainly admire Rachael for her bravery and her idealism I suspect that her contribution to white survival was rather low.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 9:25 pm | Permalink

      I suppose I would ask this: Did Rachel see any injustices towards Whites, right here in the US? Was there nothing in her own backyard that roused her sense of idealism?

      Did she have any sympathy for the out-of-work blue collar white male, who was barely getting by in a dilapidated trailer somewhere. Especially if he loved country music, guns and volunteered to help the Minutemen protect the border with Mexico.

      In fact, why wasn’t Rachel down on the border, helping to highlight the injustice of the Mexican invasion of the United States? If it was travel she wanted, why not go Europe and protest the Islamization of London? Granted most of us don’t do any of that, but if a person was so moved by idealism as to risk her life, why not fight for those causes?

      I’m afraid her profile is tragically leftist and anti-White. I agree with those that say trying to create some coalition of leftists, Whtie nationalists, and anti-zionists is a lost cause.

      But, her case can be highlighted for propaganda purposes, than go for it. But I think we have to have all our facts right to be effective.

    • vanilli's Gravatar vanilli
      March 15, 2011 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

      “the nagging feeling that she is one of those women that would neither have my children…”

      Why does anyone have to have YOUR children? And any critique of those white guys who breed with “submissive” Asians?

  167. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    March 13, 2011 - 8:23 pm | Permalink

    Strictly speaking it doesn’t much matter whether Sharon actually said it or not; it’s what we all know to be true.

    Another thing I believe personally to be true is that anyone who obviously comes here to quarrel is the enemy of all, regardless of their racial beliefs. Getting along and forwarding our cause doesn’t require mindless agreement. But it does require a minimum of civilized politeness and an intent to get along.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 9:30 pm | Permalink

      The issue of whether Sharon actually made that statement matters, if we are taking the point out for public debate. If we are trying to persuade others as to the power of the Israel Lobby, and we throw out a bunch of quotes that can be proven to be false, we lose credibility.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 15, 2011 - 3:12 pm | Permalink

      @ Jason Speaks

      “If we throw out a bunch of quotes that can be proven to be false, we lose credibility.”

      So why don’t you prove them false?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

      I did point out the specific statement in the article that appears incorrect. Let me do it again. This is the quote from the article Dr. Darkmoon wrote:

      He it was who had said, shortly after 9-11, that Israel could more or less do what it wanted with impunity. “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it!” he had famously boasted on Israel radio.

      She was talking about Ariel Sharon. She claims he made that boast on the radio. My concern is that that claim appears incorrect and is contradicted by the link she herself provides. Sharon did not literally go on the radio and make that boast to the Israeli public. The sources she referenced do not make such a claim. They state that Sharon made it in a private cabinet meeting.

      Big difference. If we make such a bold claim, that is then contradicted by the very links we provide, that is a problem. I am not accusing her of being dishonest, I am saying she has a significant error in her article.

  168. NBG's Gravatar NBG
    March 13, 2011 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

    “Our” Rachel? No one but a dribbling tard would buy the suggestion she died for White people. This is crude propaganda that vilifies the jews in the hope of creating a broad anti-jew coalition (Arabs/Palestinians, the anti-racist-and-jew left, and White nationalists) that will never happen. Rachel’s death signifies the same thing as a gang-raped nun doing the lord’s work in Africa. Eaten by a shark because you didn’t fear it enough.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 13, 2011 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

      This is a White Nationalist site. I had no idea it had suddenly morphed into a HATE-RACHEL SITE.

    • Floda's Gravatar Floda
      March 15, 2011 - 9:52 pm | Permalink

      Crude propaganda? Surely you cannot be serious? For an example of crude propaganda go back to Lasha Darkmoon’s article and see the spin in the Zionist view of Rachel’s death at the beginning of her essay.

      There are many comments here on Rachel’s naivety, probably well founded, but as one contributor wrote, ‘I don’t see any Asian or Africans protesters aiding the Palestinian cause in Israel’. Right or wrong, that seems to be a characteristic of our people. It’s decency, the exact opposite can only be said of our most terrible enemy and perhaps that decency is our weakness which has brought us to this point in history. However the Jew has been removed from EVERY place he has ever settled. Most recently Germany. He knows this and uses his media weapon to make us forget it.

      History will repeat, let’s not kid ourselves, the Jews are universally despised as a people, not only for war mongering false flag attacks (think 911, the USS Liberty, Oklahoma etc etc.) their murderous actions in Gaza, but that they star in ALL financial swindles which this time have brought down the World economy.

      When finally America awakes, there will be the mother of all pogroms.

  169. B.B.'s Gravatar B.B.
    March 13, 2011 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

    Ariel Sharon, already guilty of war crimes (Sabra and Shatila massacres, 1982) was Prime Minister of Israel at that time. He it was who had said, shortly after 9-11, that Israel could more or less do what it wanted with impunity. “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it!” he had famously boasted on Israel radio.

    That quote, in all likelihood is a fabrication from the Islamic Association for Palestine .

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 8:01 pm | Permalink

      Yes, we have to stay close to the facts. We are all on the same side with regard to the Jewish Lobby and the tremendous power it has, but if we make claims about it that can be easily disproven, it doesn’t help.

  170. European's Gravatar European
    March 13, 2011 - 7:33 pm | Permalink

    @ Jason S,

    She was only 23 years old. My youngest is 22, they don’t hate anything yet. (but injustice when they see it) I dont’nt know who her teachers were, but perhaps she was Christian and wanted to do something good or help to right a wrong done.
    I hear you there is plenty that can be done here in the US, but who controlls the US? At 23 you don’t have that kind of money or power to make a dent into the US political landscape. Go to Africa, India, or anywhere else, with very little you can make a difference. Americans, Jews, many different folks exploit one another here. Think about why our kids go off to another country. Do we teach them their kind matters here, do we instill healthy values, or are they overrun in our schools with foreigner for whom they’ve been asked to scrifice? (multiculturism, always the other, bend over backwards, Holocaust Culture etc.)
    She was 23, she should not have died.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

      I understand it might make sense to use her as a propaganda vehicle to demonstrate Israeli and Jewish hypocrisy on a number of issues. If such a case can be useful, then fine.

      But on a personal level I can’t get swept away in admiration of her. I don’t think her actions were very prudent. I would feel the same way about an American girl going to protest the genocide in Darfur, where over 400,000 have died. If an American girl flew over there and stood up against one side or the other, and ended up getting herself killed, I would think, “wow, that is sad”. But honestly, I would also be thinking, “WTF was wrong with you, girl?”

      I know it sounds heartless, but it’s the truth. Maybe it’s seeing her wear that peace symbol, but she reminds me of white girls I see all the time who are eager to denounce White people and Western Civilization. In other words, a Portland girl.

      She was a strong environmentalist, but I don’t see any evidence she was motivated by “Christian love”. Is that supported by anything? Did she talk about Christianity? It wouldn’t change my mind, Christians do loopy self-sacrificial things all the time, but was that even her motivation?

  171. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    March 13, 2011 - 7:33 pm | Permalink

    Does anyone know if the guy who drove the bulldozer even got in trouble for killing her?

    • Floda's Gravatar Floda
      March 15, 2011 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

      The gang of unspeakable child murdering shysters who run the international bolthole for Jewish swindlers, murderers, pedophiles and criminals World wide, probably gave the bulldozer driver a ‘chutzpah medal’, for not only running over sweet Rachel, but backing up and running it over her again, just to be sure!

      Below is a quote from a rather famous, but often misunderstood, 1930’s to 1940′ German Political figure long before Israel was created in the book he wrote while in Prison in 1924:

      “It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of actually living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: A haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.”

      No matter what one thinks of him today, those were prophetic words indeed.

  172. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    March 13, 2011 - 7:19 pm | Permalink

    OK, since we are getting into this, one thing I quibble about in the article: Sharon supposedly stands up like a villain in a Bond movie and says ““We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it!” on Israeli radio.

    First off, he didn’t say that on Israeli radio. According to the article – he is reported to have said that in a heated cabinet meeting with Perez. Now maybe he does go around talking like Dr. Evil, holding a cat and boasting of his world domination, I have no idea. But I think the source should be considered. Check out other articles on this website. Among others are articles that defend Gaddifi! That’s not too promising.

    The Israel Lobby is real and has enormous power, and I applaud people like Trafficant for speaking out about it. But I don’t want to throw in with pro-Gaddifi newspapers.

  173. Liberte's Gravatar Liberte
    March 13, 2011 - 7:09 pm | Permalink

    To those who would look at Rachel as a race traitor; don’t be absurd. WPWW comes in many different forms. It doesn’t always manifest in racial awareness. But that doesn’t take away from the heroics of her actions.

    How many Chinese activists do you see there? Japanese? African? How many Arabs do you see protesting against the Arab criminals who rape and steal from our family in Europe? Few or none.

    Sure, she wasn’t fighting for Europeans – but she is absolutely a positive demonstration of why the European gene must be preserved.

  174. Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
    March 13, 2011 - 6:42 pm | Permalink

    The Zionist trolls and the shabbat goys are already out in full force, I see, belittling the death of Rachel and sneering at her for taking an interest in the Palestinians!

    Palestinians are Ayrabs, right? They have brown skins! Thy read Qur’ans! They’re terrorists!

    Above all, they’re not White!

    Oh, poor Rachel! Why did you waste your life in such an ignoble cause? Dying for dirty brown folk when you could have stayed behind in America and — and done what?

    Blather on endlessly about your White Utopia!

    At east Rachel DID something! All you guys do is TALK!

    From morning to night, it’s QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK!!!

    Ignoble scum!

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

      Really Anonyma? Most people expressed regret at the loss of her life, but we also pointed out the woman was a left winger who almost certainly hated White Advocates.

      And I must say, that although expressing regret at her loss is the nice thing to do, I am sure she would have had us all locked up in prison for “hate speech”. Do you doubt that?

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 13, 2011 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

      Jason,

      Rachel was a good girl. She had a heart of gold. An idealist. Give her a break. Be generous.

    • Jim's Gravatar Jim
      March 13, 2011 - 7:11 pm | Permalink

      I agree with Jason. White advocates championing this woman reeks of the pro-illegal immigration lobby championing Gabrielle Giffords – she’s nothing more than a convenient sympathetic vehicle.

      I’m sorry she died, and her death illustrates the true nature of israel, but she and most of us are worlds apart.

  175. March 13, 2011 - 6:23 pm | Permalink

    So why is a white nationalist site care one fig about a race traitor who worships wogs? We have no interest in the intra-Semitic fight between Muslim Arabs and the Jews.

    • Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
      March 13, 2011 - 6:52 pm | Permalink

      To my mind what is so pertinent here is the attitude of the jews toward what they’d done. It is much the same attitude of jews and blacks here concerning the tens of thousands of white women who have been raped and murdered by blacks. I can’t help but feel anyone who still has a shred of sympathy for either has a serious problem with reality.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 13, 2011 - 6:59 pm | Permalink

      So why is a white nationalist site care one fig about a race traitor who worships wogs?

      You obviously don’t bother with fine distinctions between racism and racialism. I am learning to my cost that those who profess to be “racialists” are often no more than old-fashioned KKK “nigger-lynching” racists.

      Whites are entitled to a life and culture of their own and they certainly need to fight their own corner.

      What they should NOT do is to come across as overweening, fascist, White Supremacist bully boys, sneering and snarling at every other race under the sun.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      March 13, 2011 - 10:52 pm | Permalink

      Becuse her death is instructiv.e Her death reveals the way Jews deal with “uppity” Goy.

  176. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    March 13, 2011 - 6:08 pm | Permalink

    I intend no disrespect to the Corrie family, and agree that the death of Rachel was a tragedy – but, where I and the vast majority of sympathetic white do-gooders part company is when we see our racial brothers and sisters getting themselves killed for reasons that have zero to do with helping OUR race survive. In fact, I would bet that Rachel Corrie was probably one of these ardent anti-white, white self-loathing, white guilt ridden types of liberals who devote their entire lives doing everything possible to help non-whites, but who would – if asked – flat refuse to lift one finger to help their own race of people.

    Again, no disrespect intended to the grieving Corrie family – but, had Rachel been a white nationalist – I would bet she’d still be alive today.

    Advice to white liberals: You need to get off this kick you’re on about saving every race of people on the planet from the jews and change your priorities to protecting and fighting for your own racial survival.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 6:18 pm | Permalink

      Yes I would agree. Her loss is a tragedy, but she reminds me of the kind of 60s student that would protest American military men returning from Vietnam. I doubt she would like any of us at all! She probably hated White Advocates of any kind – do you any of you doubt that?

      This is where I disagree with MacDonald. I have seen him say positive things about Jimmy Carter. I can only assume this is because Carter criticizes Israel. But Carter was a horrible president and he is a sanctimonious jerk to this day. I’m not even sure Carter liked the United States.

      So, the Israelis actions were wrong, but let’s not imagine that any of these left wing protesters are on our side. And for the most part, I don’t care about Israel. I would like us to stop supporting them with aid and military support, but beyond that, I am happy to let the Middle Eastern folks sort our their own problems.

    • (elite institution coward)'s Gravatar (elite institution coward)
      March 13, 2011 - 11:20 pm | Permalink

      It is through our honest good intentions that the Fallen Children of Israel think they can destroy Christendom. The Jews can make no moral claim to exist. They sacrified their souls just to hang on, just like the monster who feeds on blood. It would have been better not to kill Christ. This has always been true, and Jews have always cursed it.

      Good job, TOO. You have learned how to speak to your people. I was waiting for this.

    • born agin' redneck's Gravatar born agin' redneck
      March 15, 2011 - 11:34 am | Permalink

      In fact, I would bet that Rachel Corrie was probably one of these ardent anti-white, white self-loathing, white guilt ridden types of liberals who devote their entire lives doing everything possible to help non-whites, but who would – if asked – flat refuse to lift one finger to help their own race of people.

      You make sense Luke.

      And I sure don’t trust ANYONE who takes up Rachel as a cause.

      Not in this way.

      Dr. MacDonald: Be careful.

      Whites are not strong enough yet to keep our enemies closer.

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      March 15, 2011 - 9:53 pm | Permalink

      “born agin’ redneck” writes:

      I would bet that Rachel Corrie was probably one of these ardent anti-white, white self-loathing, white guilt ridden types of liberals… I sure don’t trust ANYONE who takes up Rachel as a cause.

      Dr. MacDonald: Be careful.

      This is “Concern Trolling” Exhibit “A”

      As a life long Pro-White White Person, but very new to this supposed “pro-White” movement, blogs like this often seem to be majority “old timers” who are not familiar with the internet, internet culture, blogging/forum etiquette, and “trolling” – rhetorical strategies to create an illusion of “consensus” and the like. The internet is the first time regular (White) people have had access to the same mass media the Jews in America have had since they stole Thomas Edison’s camera technology, and wormed their way into the early radio companies.

      I fear that the “conservative” “old fashioned” Whites – even if they are pro-White – are hopelessly out manuvered. Every public conversation dealing with the Jew Mafia is going to be attacked … by Jews, who support the Jew Mafia.

      Some conservative recently wrote about Jon Stewart Liebowitz and how Mark Sanchez was fired for daring to say the obvious – Jews run the media. One Jew Liberal was complaining about attacks on “Jon Stewart’s faith.”

      Does anyone believe that Jon Stewart Liebowitz is religious, or believes anything in the “Jew religion”? Yet he still holds himself out to be a “Jew” – what does that mean exactly?

      Conservative, liberal, left, or right – Jews will go to any conversation online, and defend the Jews – or at the least, deflect criticism from them. It hardly matters if they call themselves “conservatives” or “liberals” – they are Jews, they support Jews, they defend Jews – while they eat pork sandwiches.

      So what is a “Jew”? It’s just some Ashkenazi who wants in on the Jew Mafia. What is a “Jew supporter of Israel?” Just an ethnic Ashkenazi that wants a place to run off to when they get caught committing crimes.

      Pork eating Jews complaining about “discrimination” against their “religion?”

      If Whites were healthy, these people would simply be laughed at. Wait, what does the Bible say?

      And thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a byword, among all nations whither the LORD shall lead thee. Deuteronomy 28:37

      Hey Jews, we’re all concerned about you.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 15, 2011 - 10:14 pm | Permalink

      I agree totally. There is something very fish about this Rachel worship and this attempt to put White Advocates in service to Arabs. Why would anyone want Whites involved in Semitic battles that go back 4,000 years! To advocate that we spend precious time helping the Palestinians makes as much sense as saying we should keep sending Israel aid.

      We don’t need to support either! Let them sort their own problems out. Are you people so naive as to think that Palestinians would treat you any better than a Jew? You just look at the dog that happens to be down the moment and think, “aww poor abused puppy”, but you fail to realize both are pitbulls that switch positions eternally in their battles.

      It is monstrous to tell our daughters to give up their lives for Arabs,

  177. Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
    March 13, 2011 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    The video, In Memory of Rachael Corrie, was posted on YouTube a few weeks ago. It collected many enthusiastic comments but also became the center of a concerted campaign to get it removed. As a result of intense agitation by the enemies of fee speech, the video has now been banned.

    I learnt this only a few hours ago from Kevin MacDonald.

    The video had been removed, he told me, due to its “shocking and disgusting content.”

    Fortunately, I had a copy — and so you now enjoy the dubious advantage of being able to see a banned YouTube video.

    Readers are invited to send in their comments, positive as well as negative. Is the video so shocking and disgusting that it ought to be removed from this site? Or should people be allowed to view it without fear of contamination?

    I will let readers decide.

    Xanadu
    (Lasha Darkmoon)

    • Miriam K's Gravatar Miriam K
      March 13, 2011 - 6:26 pm | Permalink

      Let me be the first to vote. The video is certainly shocking and disgusting, but it is precisely for that reason that it should not be removed from this site.

      I am more shocked and disgusted that the video should be banned than I am by the video itself.

      Why, pray tell, was this video banned?

      It is not the video itself that is shocking and disgusting, it is the crimes highlighted in the video: the wanton slaughter and mutilation of little childen, the spitting in the faces of Christians, the bulldozing of people’s houses with the women and children still in them:

      How the settlers spit on Christians
      In the land where Jesus died—
      And how those who do the spitting
      Have the world upon their side.

      How they bulldoze people’s houses
      Till the roofs crash on their heads
      And the women lie all broken
      With their babies in their beds.

      Yes, such shocking and despicable things should not be tolerated in “the Middle East’s only democracy”!

      I know for a fact that Israeli soldiers deliberately go out of their way to break the bones of Palestinian children.

      The manufacturers of wheelchairs and prosthetic limbs do a thriving trade in Israel. How they must love Israel!

    • Protocols of Albion's Gravatar Protocols of Albion
      March 13, 2011 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

      Lasha, where is the link (?) to that video? Maybe my eyes are failing and I’m looking right at it, but, I can’t find it in the article or your comment.

      Help!

    • Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
      March 13, 2011 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

      @ Protocols of Albion

      You will find the link in the first paragraph in italics.

      For Patrick Willis, a true lover of Palestine, who decided to take a Rachel poem of mine and turn it into a moving new video: In Memory of Rachel Corrie. It is hoped that the essay presented below will serve as an introduction to this widely acclaimed video as well as a tribute to Rachel on the 8th anniversary of her death on March 16.

      Click on “In Memory of Rachael Corrie“. You’ll have to scroll back up to the first paragraph.

    • TicTac's Gravatar TicTac
      March 14, 2011 - 8:00 pm | Permalink

      The real reason for banning the video is because it portrays the Jews negatively. If it only attracted a few hundred viewers, they can handle that. But when it reaches thousands of people, then the Jewish gate keepers go on the offensive, pulling the offending material. That’s not surprising for an elite minority who are paranoid of exposure. At least it’s obvious who’s in control.

      TT

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      March 14, 2011 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

      @Xanadu/Lasha

      Do you know if Rachel Corrie was of Lebanese/Syrian ancestry?

      I do know that Corrie, by many other spellings, is Lebanese/Syrian in origin.

    • Xanadu's Gravatar Xanadu
      March 15, 2011 - 8:11 am | Permalink

      @ Tom

      I don’t know the answer to your question, but she certainly doesn’t look Lebanese or Syrian.

  178. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    March 13, 2011 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Pity the poor victimized jews who were “forced” to commit an atrocity. There is one thing “God’s Chosen People” can never be rightfully accused of: Having a conscience.

    • History is Bunk's Gravatar History is Bunk
      March 13, 2011 - 10:36 pm | Permalink

      Good point, Whiteawake.

      How many “Light Unto The Nations” jews around the world are speaking out about Rachel’s murder at the hands of the international terrorist State of apartheid Israel? The jews-only terrorist State represents them all; surely their consciences are troubled? (sarcasm alert)

      How many of them are expressing outrage at the cold blooded murder of a young American peace worker? Far less than the number of jews who agitated to get the Rachel Corrie video censored off the jew-owned “Free Speech Ain’t Us” YouTube, would be my opinion.

      If the jews actually do ever have a real holocaust against them (unlike their fake “6 million” claims during World War I AND World War II.” [Didn’t know they tried to fly the “6 million” scam during World War I? Do some research.]), they will have brought it on themselves, just as their expulsion from dozens and dozens of countries throughout history were in reaction against their destructive group tactics against nations which host them; however, this time it is the entire Western world they are working to destroy.

      Thanks for the essay, Lasha. Very emotive.

    • Ciaran's Gravatar Ciaran
      March 13, 2011 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

      Their God is Lucifer.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 13, 2011 - 10:54 pm | Permalink

      Oh I don’t think their God is Lucifer. I don’t even think most of them take religion seriously. We are talking about traits they have, just like any other breed of creature in a sense.

      I think we need to explore the difference between those that value White and Western Civilization and those that simply hate Jews. There is a difference.

    • Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
      March 14, 2011 - 4:22 am | Permalink

      But you ARE a Jew, Jason Squeaks. And once again you post (for the Nth time) for the sole purpose of belittling the comment of someone else; while adding some more bile in order to steer discussion along a ‘Jew’ friendly line.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      March 14, 2011 - 4:41 am | Permalink

      *Sigh* It’s Anglo Saxon

      And now the friend of Der WeinerSchnitzel and Sever*s pipes in. You know full well I am not Jewish and anyone who reads what I have written knows that. Funny that accusation was the first thing Der Dweeb accused anyone of, and it turns out it was a technique. All the trolls change names so often I forget who is who. But I am guessing you are one of our friends from Searchlight Magazine or some other Communist group.

      Tell us Anglo Saxon, why were you always so supportive of Der Dweeb, Serer*us and Longgly, all known disruptors. When everyone was fed up with Longlly , you were begging to have him reinstated.

    • Anonyma's Gravatar Anonyma
      March 14, 2011 - 4:39 pm | Permalink

      @ Jason Speaks

      You know full well I am not Jewish and anyone who reads what I have written knows that.

      I don’t. I agree with Anglo Saxon 100 percent. Almost everything you say on this site betrays your Zionist Jew character.

      You’re just not smart enough to hide it.

      Anyone would think you were a more devout White Nationalist than Kevin MacDonald himself. Next you’ll be giving KMac tips on how to how to be a better White Nationalist, doubtless offering to ghost his articles for him.

      You know who you remind me of? — The Devil, whispering in God’s ear how he should rule the world.

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      March 14, 2011 - 10:13 pm | Permalink

      @ Jason

      I think the thing that you are forgetting is that the Jews are a religious cult with a “marriage taboo”. Over the centuries the inbreeding among the Jews, and the cultish aspect of the “religion” has created a perfect human storm.

      I know you are stressing the genetic aspect of Jewish behavior, but, that genetic element would not be in play if it were not for the religious cult of the Jews. It is kind of a chicken-egg arguement that everyone is getting fired up about. LOL.

    • DianaBlaze's Gravatar DianaBlaze
      March 20, 2011 - 9:28 am | Permalink

      Just thought I’d post this up near the top so the casual eye can take a closer look at the democratic state of Israel.

      http://www.holylandunveiled.com/
      http://palestineremembered.com/
      http://www.jamiiforums.com/jamii-photos/72797-palestinian-mothers.html
      http://www.ifamericansknew.org/

Comments are closed.