Anyone who wants to know how we got to the point of all this Diversity nonsense and multicultural madness, and where it came from, should watch this short film called The House I Live In. Starring Frank Sinatra, it came out in 1945, and was created “to oppose anti-Semitism and racial prejudice.” It was awarded both a Golden Globe and an Academy Award in 1946.
The plot’s pretty simple. Sinatra, playing himself, heads outside for a cigarette break in the middle of a recording session, where he happens upon a gang of about a dozen young boys chasing and cornering another kid, getting ready to pummel him. Sinatra intervenes, asking what the trouble is. The ruffians explain that they want to beat the kid up because they don’t like his religion. One tells Sinatra “he’s a dirty -” but Frank cuts him off before he can finish the sentence.
Frank then has a talk with the boys, and shows them how wrong they are. Does he tell them that, while religion is important, going around beating up people with a different religion is not appropriate behavior? Nah, Frank cuts right to the chase. He tells them:
“Look, fellas, religion makes no difference. Except maybe to a Nazi, or somebody that’s stupid.”
Christians like to complain about “modern day” Hollywood denigrating and downplaying Christianity, while insisting that back in the good old days Hollywood respected Christianity. But even back in 1945 Hollywood was giving Oscars to a movie that says that anyone who thinks Christianity is better than other religions is either a Nazi, or stupid.
Sinatra then goes on to explain that we’re all Americans, no matter what we believe, and “prejudice” and “intolerance” are wrong, because even though we all may not see eye to eye on religion, we’ve got to stick together to fight “the Japs.” And, yes, he says “Japs”, repeatedly. The kids then stare wide eyed as Frank breaks into an expurgated rendition of the title song.
The film is based on the song of the same name, The House I Live In. It’s all about America being a multiracial, multicultural Disneyland. But the songwriter was livid that the movie makers cut the verse that explicitly refers to blacks out of the movie. He even got tossed out of a theater for protesting the excision. But the people that made the movie knew that America wasn’t quite ready for a movie promoting that much Diversity just yet. No matter; they had plenty of time, and now they push not only racial integration, but miscegenation non-stop. And it goes without saying that if they were making the movie today, they would no doubt still leave in the line comparing evangelicals to Nazis for thinking religion is important, but they would take out the stuff about “Japs.”
Nowadays, of course, the message of the movie is considered mainstream. Who doesn’t love “tolerance” and “diversity” these days? But back then, the idea that race and religion were meaningless trivialities was only being pushed by radicals, Jews, and Communists. Forced racial integration was considered to be a Communist plot, largely because it was a Communist plot. And if you think I exaggerate, just consult some history books. Christians and conservatives of today love to pretend as if they’ve always stood for and promoted interracial marriage, integrated schools, integrated churches, Civil Rights laws, etc., and that Martin Luther King was the embodiment of Christian conservatism. But nothing could be further from the truth. Conservative evangelical churches in the era between WW 2 and the 1970s railed against racial integration, and opposed all efforts to mix the races. Probably not five white preachers out of a thousand would’ve conducted an interracial marriage in 1964. Conservatives and Christians weren’t “marching with Dr. King”; the non-blacks marching with MLK were Quakers, liberal apostate “Christians”, commies, beatniks, and, overwhelmingly, Jews. (One of the rare exceptions was Billy Graham, and he certainly didn’t take a prominent position in the Civil Rights crusade, because he knew it would kill his ministry. But he did invite King to pray at a New York City revival, and insisted on integrated seating at all his revival meetings. He was widely denounced by conservative Christians for these actions.) Again, just check the history books if you doubt that modern day shibboleths on race were considered far out, dangerous radicalism by Americans up until quite recently, and that the people pushing such things were generally Communists.
But if you don’t have time to read some history books, just watch the credits for this Academy Award winning movie. It’s like a Who’s Who of Hollywood Communism and radicalism. Sinatra was just their front man.
Let’s start with the man who wrote the lyrics to the song on which the movie is based. In the movie he’s credited as “Lewis Allan”, but don’t pay any attention to that. His real name was Abel Meeropol. He also wrote Strange Fruit, the song about lynching in the South which Billie Holiday made famous, and which TIME magazine called the most important song of the 20th century. Holiday claimed she wrote it in her autobiography, but that was a lie. And who was Abel Meeropol? Our good friend Max Blumenthal tells us that he was “a Jewish school teacher”, but there’s a bit more to it than that. Quite a bit more. Remember Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, the nice Jewish couple executed for giving our atomic secrets to the Soviet Union? Well, after they were executed, Abel Meeropol adopted their kids. Was that because he took pity on a couple orphans? Possibly. It might also have to do with the fact that the “Jewish school teacher” was an “ardent Communist” himself. Funny how Blumenthal forgot to mention that little fact…
OK, so we’ve seen that the lyricist for the song which inspired the movie was some strange fruit, indeed. What about others? Well, Earl Robinson wrote the music for the song. You remember Earl Robinson, right? He was one of the notorious Hollywood Ten, who were blacklisted for refusing to tell Congress whether or not they had ever been members of the Communist Party. Of course, every single one of the Hollywood Ten either was or had been a member of the Communist Party. Most still were. Robinson also wrote the music for other songs, like Ballad For Americans, an anthem all about how race and religion don’t matter. It was performed at the Communist Party national convention of 1940. (They also played it the GOP convention that year, which oughta tell you something.) Robinson also wrote Black and White, a celebration of the Brown vs. Board of Education travesty of jurisprudence. You’ve probably heard a watered down version of Black and White – Three Dog Night had a #1 hit with their less blatantly political form of the song in 1972.
OK, so the guy who wrote the words to the song that inspired the movie was an America hating Communist. And the guy who wrote the music was another Communist. Anyone else? Well, there’s also the guy who wrote the screenplay for the movie. His name was Albert Maltz, surprise, surprise, and he, too, “was a man on the rise both inside and outside of the Communist Party.”
Yes, The House I Live In, and its message, was a Communist production through and through. And make no mistake. The message of the movie wasn’t that people shouldn’t go around beating up Jews. We have no problem with that message; we oppose violence against anyone. But that wasn’t the message of the movie. The message was that religion and race are meaningless trivialities, and anyone who disagrees is either “a Nazi” or “stupid.”
In 1945, that was a radical Communist idea. Now, it’s a mainstream view parroted by nearly everyone.
Facing the Future as a Minority
“Forced racial integration was considered to be a Communist plot, largely because it was a Communist plot.”
:D! More please.
Yeah, that was a good plan.
I mean a “good line”.
I’m sure it was communists who were the driving force behind integration in the 20th century, but seriously, go back to the 1800s and you’d find that it was radical Christians like John Brown who were the loudest and most aggressive soldiers for liberty and equality. Meanwhile in Europe, philosophers like Schopenhauer and Nietzsche were condemning racism and anti-black sentiments in the US. We can’t lay all this on the tribe.
Certainly not. Subversion occurs in a wide variety of forms and has a wide variety of agents. The tribe is particularly strong in capitalistic environments and even though they were the instigators and financiers of the Bolshevik take over of Russia, their power declined relatively quick and a decade or two after the Great War, they were not particularly influential in Soviet.
fender_strat – international jewry have been involved in international politics since the 1800s. The Rothschilds agitated for the Civil War so they could tear America apart because they feared they would lose control of all the money they made if America became a rich and powerful, banker and competition.
@ fender
I doubt that Schopenhauer or Nietzsche ever actually saw a Black.
Depending on your age, your grandfather or great grand father probably never saw a Jew. There were not that many of them in the US prior to the early 1900′s. Few of those who were here, lived outside the big costal cities.
“The Rothschilds agitated for the Civil War so they could tear America apart because they feared they would lose control of all the money they made if America became a rich and powerful, banker and competition.”
Sadly, this is the truth. And Abraham Lincoln was assasinated by a Rothschild agent because he was going to restore the South.
…go back to the 1800s and you’d find that it was radical Christians like John Brown who were the loudest and most aggressive soldiers for liberty and equality.
And where did their “radical” Christianity come from? The Jewish population of the Netehrlands.
I think you guys are all reaching a bit. I see very little evidence that can connect the abolitionist movement to Jewish influence. The sad fact is that many elite Whites throughout history have shown a very strong desire to integrate Whites and other races, mostly out of this insane guilt complex Whites have and a strong sense of morality that seems to extend to other races. However, you see this with the elites throughout history at a much higher rate as they are generally at arm’s length from the problems that arise from living amongst other races.
Abraham Lincoln was going to restore the South? What do you even mean by that? You sound off your rocker.
Jews aligned themselves with communism mainly because it subverted American values at the time. You don’t seem many Jewish communists anymore (not nearly as many anyway) and you definitely don’t see it as much in Israel. Israel has swung away from a more communist influenced state to a capitalist state. You actually see most Jews now serving as cheerleaders for the “free market” because they are deeply embedded in the ruling elite now, and subversion of the system that they now mostly control would be against Jewish interests.
My god, this article was fantastic! TOO continues to go from triumph to triumph.
FYI I have an old 20/20 episode on VHS with Hugh Downs relating the life story of Billy Graham. I taped it because it claims Mr. Graham was actually born Billy Frank, a (you guessed it) little jew. You just know that somewhere right now some shadowy sheenies are still laughing about that one.
At our expense, of course.
Let us work together to stifle that laughter in their throats, shall we?
@ Matthias
Franklin was Graham’s middle name. “Billy Frank” Graham was old time Southern style for William Franklin Graham.
Tom, thanks for the update on Billy Franklin Graham and the source of the “Billy Frank” name, it helps keep us based in facts and sounding intelligent. It seemed strange to think Billy Graham was really a “secret Jew”, especially since he was recorded on tapes with Nixon, being very critical of Jews.
Anyone can made a mistake, I sure can, and I think it’s good when we correct these errors to elevate our game,so to speak.
I countldnt find anything to his name being Frank, his midde name is Frainklin. Where can I find that?
@ Neil
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Graham
@ Jason
Thanks.
Just like Frank Sinatra was an Italian Roman Catholic—the Catholics even put on two funeral services for him according to his bio:
On May 20, 1998 at the Roman Catholic Church of the Good Shepherd (Beverly Hills) in Beverly Hills, Sinatra’s funeral was held, with 400[60] mourners in attendance and hundreds of fans outside.[60] Gregory Peck,[60] Tony Bennett,[60] and Frank, Jr., addressed the mourners, among whom were Jill St. John, Tom Selleck,[60] Joey Bishop, Faye Dunaway,[60] Tony Curtis,[60] Liza Minnelli,[60] Kirk Douglas,[60] Robert Wagner,[60] Bob Dylan, Don Rickles,[60] Nancy Reagan,[60] Angie Dickinson, Sophia Loren,[60] Bob Newhart,[60] Mia Farrow,[60] and Jack Nicholson.[57][60] A private ceremony was held later that day at St. Theresa’s Catholic Church in Palm Springs. Sinatra was buried following the ceremony next to his parents in section B-8 of Desert Memorial Park in Cathedral City, a quiet cemetery on Ramon Road where Cathedral City meets Rancho Mirage and near his compound, located on Rancho Mirage’s tree-lined Frank Sinatra Drive.[57] His
“Frank” Sinatra wasn’t a Jew. LOL.
Thanks for the reply, Tom. I wasn’t very clear in my post. I myself never claimed Mr. Graham was of jewish heritage, Hugh Downs (remember him?) and the crew at 20/20 did. TTBOMK I have not heard the claim made or corroborated since, and this program was probably made two decades ago. If it’s a deliberate hebrew curveball, my point was that either way, true or not, they laugh up their sleeves. Sorry I did not make my point clearer. Cheers all.
And now the anti-White crowd has gone from promoting so-called diversity and tolerance, to openly expressing their true motivation: Hatred for Whites.
See this trailer for a documentary that was produced by MTV called “The Wild and Wonderful Whites of West Virginia”. In it they follow a family that happens to be named White and of course they are white. The trailer portrays them as low IQ morons to be sneered at. Welcome to the new world of tolerance, where poor whites can be laughed at for being poor.
By the way, this particular family may or may not have its issues, but can you imagine a movie that openly mocked a poor black family for being poor?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3ysuG2O0zw
Yeah, you totally have a point. I think, in my zeal to defend the honor of the editorial collective, I was more than a little unfair to you on the Rachel comments section. They made, in my opinion, a small mistake with that post, and I was trying to make sure it did not bring undue harm to the cause.
I certainly hope I did not drive you away. Your ideas are almost always good, and your insights are appreciated.
P.S. I still think Judaism is Satanic.
EIC, thanks, and no, of course you didn’t drive me away, not at all. You are a female, correct? Sometimes white women have an overdeveloped sense of guilt and responsibility – so don’t go thinking you are responsible! I come and go in intervals as time permits.
Aaah haa-haa-haa! You don’t say?
You have a very serious problem Jwason Squeaks. I shall define it for you: Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD)
Those who welcome your presence here are being far too polite and naive for their own good.
Regarding the mtv video of the Wild and Wonderful Whites, you have to have a pretty sick mind to make something like that.
An example of Jewish hatred of White Christians:
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Jewish Minnesota lawmaker is asking Senate leaders to allow only nondenominational prayers to open sessions, after feeling “highly uncomfortable” when a Baptist pastor repeatedly mentioned Jesus Christ and Christianity in one of the invocations.
Anglo-Saxon,
I do not think that Jason Squeaks is all that bad, especially since he dropped his “Ethnonationalism” alter ego.
He is obviously young, a work in progress, learning as he goes along.
His initial ignorance is slowly being chipped away in the learning process of being exposed to TOO.
Let him live and learn as he grows up.
I am not ethnonationalism, if that was another poster. And I am not new to these issues, I just have a different view from AS, to say the least. Note that I am honestly stating where I am coming from. But thanks for not calling me a Jew or inviting me to commit suicide.
“Does he tell them that, while religion is important, going around beating up people with a different religion is not appropriate behavior? Nah, Frank cuts right to the chase. He tells them:….”
Wrong. There’s a pre-amble of sorts putting it in the context of giving blood and saving someone else’s life.
To be sure, there’s a lot to what the rest of your essay is about, but, please, let’s not be obtuse and over-the-top; clever must be fought with clever.
James, I used to be a fan of noir films, those moody, shadowy motion pictures made from the early ‘40’s to late ’50’s that dealt with shady characters and raised the double entendre to an art form. Used to be, that is, until I became educated about the style. (Noir isn’t so much a genre as a style.)
At first glance (to today’s viewer), they seem to be either a campy trip down memory lane, or a grand tribute to a bygone urban America. To me, those movies seemed cool…the way life USED to be. And those cars…all those GREAT old cars.
The problem is, many films made during this era were the products of recent immigrants, people who had grand careers in cinema over in Europe until they were chased out by the Nazis. They were mostly jews who transposed European styles (German expressionism) on to the American film (with the help of their jewish comrades in the US who had taken over Hollywood 20 years earlier) and made the movie going public think that what they were seeing up there on the screen was the “real” America.
In truth, the producers and directors who made these films often knew very little about America, as they hadn’t really been here that long. They had read Raymond Chandler scripts and had seen Hollywood movies, but that was about it. Billy Wilder, Andre DeToque, and even the half jewish (but practicing Catholic) Fritz Lang were examples of these directors.
What I saw as “hard boiled” was really cynicism…a hyper-critical view of America, the country that had just saved these immigrant directors from extermination by the Nazis. Hollywood made these new arrivals rich, but they hated capitalism and set out to portray our culture in the most negative light possible. The thing is, to people my age, these movies seemed tame when compared to Hollywood of the ‘60’s, but they were really quite savage. The only thing that noir films from being more like movies of the late ‘60’s were the industry’s censorship boards.
They pretty much introduced nihilism to the silver screen…scenes with police officers murdered randomly and brutally by marauding bank robbers, young women hog tied and kidnapped by serial killers, movies dealing with rape or substance abuse. Things like this happened in 1940’s America, but they didn’t typify 1940’s America.
More accurate portrayals of the American attitude could be found in movies that were directed by people like Frank Capra and John Ford, who were also recent immigrants – movies about westward expansion or the importance of family. Capra and Ford also differed from Wilder (and others) in that they served in WW2 with distinction. (SOMEONE had to save jewish directors from the Nazis. )
Censors usually toned down most controversial issues in 1940’s and ‘50’s movies, with one exception – anti-semitism. Even anti-racism movies weren’t that easy to get past the censors, but anti-semitism flicks could preach at length.
See CROSSFIRE starring Robert Mitchum and Robert Young. It was directed by jewish immigrant director Edward Dmytryk, who tried to play martyr during the “red scare” by going to jail for contempt of court…until he decided he didn’t really like jail that much, so he ratted out his commie friends instead.
CROSSFIRE had the audacity to portray a brave American GI (Robert Ryan) who had just risked his life to help win the war as a raging anti-semite who murdered jews because they wouldn’t join the Army and help fight the Nazis. Needless to say, Dmytryk didn’t fight in WW2, either.
Excellent analysis. I must admit that I have seen quite a few noirs myself–believing them to be a tangible connection to a time that I find much better than the one in which we now live…but you are right on the money.
Great comment.
Jews have lifted many great ideas and inventions from others and after swarming into those fields uphold them as thier own.
Film and Cinema are no different.
The Germans created TV and let’s face it anyone who has seen the Nationlaist Socialist Films of the 30′s and 40′s as well as the German Newsreels can clearly see the more talented folks were German vis a vi TV Films
Great post. The Eastern Talmudic Jews swarmed into Hollywood in the 30′s thru 50′s and did exactly as you say
Yeah, just wanted to add that I really enjoyed reading that comment. Thanks.
Thanks everyone.
OK, an addendum. It’s spelled “DeToth”, and he may not have been jewish. Just substitue Otto Preminger in his place. Makes no difference to my argument, as this book by Vincent Brook will illustrate:
http://www.cjs.ucla.edu/index.php?option=com_events&task=view_detail&agid=166&year=2010&month=12&day=02&Itemid=53
Just a little correction. John Ford was not an immigrant. He was a first generation Irish-American who was born in Maine.
You’re right, Rod. He was born shortly after his parents had immigrated to the US. Technically not an immigrant, but closely tied to immigrant culture.
I would also add that the Sinatra film mirrors the infamous Soviet movie “Circus.” That movie portrays a white woman who is shunned by Americans b/c she gets knocked up by a black, and who then finds succor in the multicultural paradise of the USSR.
The movie climaxes with the baby being passed around by all the minorities of the USSR who sing in their native languages (emphasis on Yiddish, of course!) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31kSvUrBd6I
Little did we know that some day, the kids like that wouldn’t be running to the USSR, but rather running this country. Incidentally, even the actor who played the baby in this movie (and was in the Soviet navy) emigrated to the US!
“Gentlemen’s Agreement” (1946), starring Cary Grant, had the leading man posing as a Jew to expose the genteel anti-Semitism that was pervasive in American society, and yet somehow invisible to those who carried it. Much was made of Grant’s Jewish friend, who was of course an Army officer, combat vet, and all-around Regular Fella.
You’re right, Riley (except that Gregory Peck was leading man, wasn’t he?). Anyway, Gentlemen’s Agreement” was the understated beginning of what became the norm in anti-White Hollywood.
Many noir classics are irresistible masterpieces, and they are a legitimate and often profound exploration of the dark sides of the American dream… I wouldn’t be too squirmish about their “nihilism”. I don’t find them “hyper”-critical at all. Some of them introduced a harsh, urban realism that of course was predated by early 1930s Warner Bros. movies. And a vast part of American audiences always loved this kind of stuff as a popular , violence, crime etc.
Also ,some noir classics were made by directors like the All-American Howard Hawks or Anthony Mann…
John Ford and Capra – these are generally not realistic movies. They are more like myths about what is great about the American Dream. John Ford also did well in realism of course, for example “Grapes of Wrath”.
Methinks we would all do well to be VERY CAREFUL when watching any media that offers us a “depiction of what we are” via illustrated stories purported to be what we “were”.
That “we” does contain, and rely on a historical dimension, but in its actual existence, it happens NOW, and moves forward based on our ability to WILL now toward an ordering of ourselves that is the real home of ourselves.
Throw all that “Amerikan Dream” nonsense overboard! It’s not a “dream”, it’s an illusion, an illusion based on the death-memes of Universalism and Individualism. It is an illusion meant to disorder reality, and misdirect your efforts and loyalty toward the biggest illusion of all: “Amerika”.
We need images and narratives OUTSIDE that illusion, images and narratives that offer myths of what we are in a sense of where we are going, and what we are becoming … in the best sense. Those images and narratives cannot contain the poisonous idea of “Amerika”, because that is alien to what we are. “Amerika” is a label for a physical space under the control of a hostile alien troupe who is NOT US. As long as we identify with that which is controlled by hostile aliens, people who have no loyalty to us, of whatever “color”, we are in unhealthy thought-space.
I didn’t say Ford and Capra were realistic. I said they more accurately portrayed the American attitude.
In fact, I think it’s safe to say that depression and WW2 era America had probably had enough “realism” in everyday life, and didn‘t need movies to show them what reality was all about. Noir flicks were usually B films produced by lesser studios, like RKO. The most popular films of the day were, generally speaking, not noir. Musicals, comedies and westerns were the big releases. Ford won four Oscars, I believe (yes, one for Grapes of Wrath.)
You’re right, of course, not all noir directors were jewish. Carol Reed was the British director of THE THIRD MAN starring Orson Welles. This film also has a cynical view of the world, but that cynicism is largely directed towards the domineering presence of the Soviets/communists in Eastern Europe, not America (the story is set in Vienna.) It’s interesting to note that Reed ALSO served in WW2, an experience that had an influence on this movie.
Yes it’s true that Steinbeck and Faulkner (Intruder in the Dust – 1949) had a dim view of America, as did other assorted non-jews in the arts (Chandler, Hammett, Kerouac, etc.) This is what you’d expect in a free and open society. It‘s also true that jews produced many positive, up-beat movies. But jews were producing what America was buying. Hollywood was slowly introducing it’s audience to the idea of an evil America, quite subtly at first, with noir, then much more blatantly in the late 1960’s. I’m speaking, in general terms. When all is said and done, LARGELY jewish Hollywood put forth a lot of energy in portraying America (on screen) as a corrupt place, corrupt not only in practice, but in concept.
There’s no point in presenting individual examples to counter this idea. I know their were jews who didn’t go along with this notion of America, and non-jews who did, but the evidence (and results) shows a definite trend that can’t be argued away with isolated cases. Hollywood is jewish and Hollywood scorns America.
The jews portreyed the US as corrupt in a self fulfilling prophecy. If they had not done this there would be no way they could have stolen trillions from gov’t in the last few years. Many people have told me I am just jealous of jews when I tell them it was mostly jews stealing our money and ruining our country. I think this is a roundabout way of saying that they wish they could have been in on the scam.
The jew MSM has ruined our society.
“Crossfire” features a long speech against anti-discrimination without mentioning the Blacks with a single word… instead the Irish Catholics are being brought up. As in the short “The House I live in” here is also a tendency to simplify Jewishness as a religion, and not an ethnicity as well…
“the country that had just saved these immigrant directors from extermination by the Nazis.”
Wow ok. Try learning a little history.
Anyways it’s obviously retarded of any country to accept jewish immigrants and then not expect these same jews to openly betray the country. That is ignoring the horrific bullshit they push always, the truly evil actions they commit.
Look at britain, look at the USA now, look at germany, and so on. Jews will always conspire to betray and then move on to the next nation.
No one is interested in researching real history. Why would they? Everyone “knows” it was “extermination” because . . .
The jew-owned History Channel said it was “extermination”
The jew-owned history books said it was “extermination”
The myriad novels produced by the jew-owned publishing industry said it was “extermination”
The jew-owned Hollywood movies said it was “extermination”
The jew-owned newspapers/magazines said it was “extermination”
The jew-owned Nuremberg kangaroo court said it was “extermination”
(If you say publicly today that you are skeptical of it being “extermination” the jew-owned courts will send you to the Gulag for 5 years minimum. We all are aware that facts MUST be protected with long prison sentences. Facts must never, ever be doubted or investigated.)
The jew-owned “education” system said it was “extermination”
And last but not least, all the jew-owned politicians said it was “extermination”
etc., etc., etc., etc., ad nauseum.
So, you think jews would lie to further their group interests?
Wow. What a novel idea.
Maybe those who have pointed out the jews are the masters of the Big Lie are on to something.
“”the country that had just saved these immigrant directors from extermination by the Nazis.”"
“Wow ok. Try learning a little history.”
Yep. If someone can’t even get that right, you’ve got to question the rest of their narrative.
Suicide or murder?
Would the US be integrated today without the Jewish lobby (suicide) or is it integrated due to the Jewish lobby (murder).
Emanuel Celler Act.
“…the act resulted in new immigration from non-European nations which changed the ethnic make-up of the United States.”
Brown vs Board (“The American Civil Liberties Union was a friend-of-the-court participant in the historic Brown case. We picked up that mantle in later years, first in Topeka, Kansas, on behalf of the children of Linda Brown (one of the named plaintiffs in the original Supreme Court case), and then later in places like California and Connecticut.)”
Sheff vs O’Neill
“The American Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), the Center for Children’s Advocacy and cooperating attorneys struck an agreement today with the state of Connecticut to implement compliance with a longstanding order from the state Supreme Court to desegregate Hartford public schools.”
These are just a few examples of the power of the Jewish lobby to dominate politics and restrain the public majority, thus resulting in massive third-world immigration and integration upon the white majority against their will.
What’s the verdict?
Your Honor, we the jury find the Jewish lobby guilty of Murder in the first degree. The crimes were premeditated and committed with extreme prejudice and malice.
This shows once again that Hollywood isn’t about entertainment,run by businessmen who “happen to be” Jewish (thanks,Abe Foxman),it is CALCULATED DESTRUCTIVE SOCIAL ENGENEERING,just as the media who also “happen to be” owned by Jews.There is no centrally planned conspiracy à la Protocols of the Elders of Zion here.Jews don’t need such an artificially incentive,they do it spontaneously.Intense tribal loyalty coupled with a deep rooted paranoia and hatred for the gentile world is enough.The trouble is not the depth of their depravity-we know that already-the trouble is that their actions are so influential.These people have an uncanny sense for what “works” best in a given society.In America that is clearly the film.They can ruin whole nations and now in our modern age they have gone global. Remember that verse in the Bible where “Jahwe” blesses Abraham: …”and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed…”(Gen.12,3).This “blessing” has become a horrible curse for us all.
In Berlin the main film museum is named after ” Billy Wilder” . He was the German Jewish emigree who worked for uS psychops after wW2 and did the Dachau horrom film with lampshades made of human skin and shrunken heads etc. His actions led to the hanging of many innocent Germans by the US authorities after show trials. Now he is revered by the German film industry! Nothing changes.
James Edwards
It is one minute before midnight-demographically-for White Americans in America. It is getting kind of silly at this point in time to phrase the race-replacement issue in such anemic and safe language. Diversity and multiculturalism=race-replacement of White Americans. So, you should be using the more accurate term race-replacement instead.
This is such a bunch a crap, the blood is the differance in all peoples. DNA is the key that determines one’s potential for success. The average of america has been lower to the point we are today where every perversion is elevated to sainthood, normal, traditional people are mocked, the world is upside down.
A 13 year old girl in my extended family just told her grandmother that a black boy is calling her. Her grandmother told her she didn’t have to talk to him, she said she is afraid not to??? The grandmother is afraid to tell her son, the girl’s father.
On the cable show “I Shouldn’t be Alive”, a White woman with a twelve year old daughter at home, stopped at a convenience store late at night to get gasoline, a black boy stood at the pumps, he asked her if she would give him a lift – - being White guilted, she repressed her natural instinct for survival, she would have probably told a strange White boy, no way, but not wanting to be called racist she agreed to give him a lift and you know the rest, raped beaten blah blah blah.
This has been done to us by the jew brain. These people are sick, they are destroying civilization so they can have their jew world order, destroy us and make all the money they can in the process.
Think of what they have done to the White race thur their propaganda movies, their media and textbook industry. Think of what they have done to us psychologically. Even today they kill our children in the middle east.
Over the centuries they never concluded that they were making themselves into a pariah and they should change their habits. They perfected their methods instead. They are evil, its in their DNA, its in their genes, its wired into their brains, they are sick.
For generations now, the Hidden Hand in the western governments has been systemically destroying democracy in third world countries. None of the evil things have been done by White people.
By the time most of the White race wakes up to the fact, our military will be diverse so that they will happily kill us and we will have no defense and no way to fight back.
“being White guilted, she repressed her natural instinct for survival, she would have probably told a strange White boy, no way, but not wanting to be called racist she agreed to give him a lift and you know the rest, raped beaten blah blah blah.”
Yeah and, very few White boys would have raped her (even though the “jew-brain” has minimalized the importance of female purity to the point where some actually would.) This is because they care about the honor of their people (or they used to.) Black boys used to get lynched for doing that sort of thing. White boys did, too, even though they did and still do it much less frequently.
“ically destroying democracy in third world countries.”
Democracy is a joke. We don’t need a democracy. We need a strong, genius leader who will defend our interests. Not Obama.
Watch this video and look at this woman’s face. She happily works to make Europe diverse. If this isn’t the face of a sick race then I don’t know what is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9DBmP86vAM
What a video! And of course, that sinister bee-otch is Swedish taxpayer subsidized in her new little shtetl! Why, Europe won’t survive without tons and tons of new Turd World immigrants!
You’re right Babs Lerner, but so much more the reason for Israel to import them! Well?!
“Uh. Err… Ahem. Umm.”
. As HR pointedly stated it in an issue Olast year:
Whether they are leftists or rightists, Marxists or liberals, believers or atheists, Zionists or “perfectly assimilated,” the Jews are always the most fervent supporters of the multicultural society, planetary miscegenation, and global Empire. When all other identities disappear, only the Jewish people will remain, recognized by all as the “chosen people” of God.
Of couse. Read the Old Testament. To a Jew before any white is an Englishman, a Frenchman, a German or a Russian, he is just one of the goyim, one of a large class of people and knowing their national distinctions, beyond their not being fellow Jews, is trivial.
Frank Sinatra like so many Jews was not so upset and angered by Hitler and his policies that he would go fight the Germans. That difficult and life-taking task was left for the goyim. Once again Hollywood triumphs.
I never heard that Sinatra was jewish. To be fair to the man, he did perform for the troops in WW2 – my dad saw him.
Lancashire – Sinatra wasn’t a Jew. He was a BIG money-maker for the Self-Chosen – and he’s do whatver they wanted. He was too busy chasing tail to go to war. (I wish ALL White men had done that, instead, FYI. )
I LOVE Sinatra, as an artist. He was a BRILLIANT singer. One of the very best, EVER. I know he was a sleazy little worm, as a person. This is not an un-common occurence, alas.
ha god’s chosen people? We’ll see what god does for them when the White man turns on them. Praise god I can’t wait for that time.
Brainwashing is warfare. The urge to protect ourselves and the legacy of our ancestors is as natural as a mother holding a child to her breast. Diversity is certain death for Europeans. Our genetics cannot brook the full frontal assault of either Jewish or black or oriental genes. Touting diversity was a way to eliminate us and our will to our destiny from the world stage to clear the way for Jewish designs. It is militaristic, sabotage, etc. –all the things warfare is — just with a little more deception and subtlelty than outward violence. Diversity is murder. There was NOTHING good about WW2 NOTHING — to anyone with a brain who has studied all their lives and really, truly wanted to see the truth about these things. I used to be a stupid “diversity” dupe also for many years…. To want your people to survive to reach their destiny is not hate. I do not hate anyone. I just hate the dissolution of my people. Ironically, Jews and their dupes have turned the world into a death camp for US.
I hope I don’t live to see the day when our society is as mongrelized as Brazil or Colombia.
Hi Every-one! Here’s what Frank fought so hard for:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9reO2Kisrg&feature=player_embedded
Beautiful, isn’t It?
OK, she looks like she escaped from one of those politically incorrect Warner Brothers cartoons of the 1930′s. I’m guessing that’s the point, and her intent.
The thing is, as an updated version of one of those cartoons, I guess it is mildly…amusing, maybe? Sort of?
It’s what black filmmaker Spike Lee calls “coonery buffoonery.” He seems to have finally figured out that a lot of unsympathetic whites are getting a pretty good laugh out of this kind of stuff, despite all of it’s aggressive posturing.
SHE SHOWED ME A PICTURE ALL I COULD DO WAS STARE AT THAT FREAK IN HIS SANDALS WITH HIS LONG PRETTY HAIR THEY MUST THINK THAT IM STUPID OR I DONT HAVE A CLUE ILL BET HES A COMMIE OR EVEN WORSE YET A JEW
She Left Me for Jesus by Hayes Carll
Nice work, Mr. Edwards. Suffice to say that I wish you rather than Mr. Webb had done the explication de texte for Camp of the Saints.
“Remember kids, anybody who supports Israel or Lubavitch supremacists over real American values is either a Nazi or a dope.” “So don’t listen to any Jewish propaganda. Don’t let em make a sucker outta you.”
Especially pertinent when it seems today we’re about to get into another Joe Lieberman/John McCain jew war in Libya. The next one just might be here. How much more can we take?
The culture war fought by media heavily influenced if not controlled by a Jewish syndicate is just one facet of “diversity”, “multiculturalism”, and “political correctness”….the other is the LEGAL origin. Certainly the culture war precedes the legal war, for without the one, the other is very unlikely to follow.
Certainly the beginning was the Civil Rights legislation of the 1960′s. This was the beginning of the legal battle for control of culture. And we’ve all heard of Brown vs. Board of Education, Roe vs. Wade, and other legal battles. But these pale in comparison to the fundamental legal basis of politically correct ideology. All of these others are governmental enforcements, usually by way of judicial activist judges.
Beginning in the 1980′s and early 1990′s however, were the CIVIL law suits and bringing to bear the might and power of the trial lawyers and EEOC. The first big cases dealt with “sexual harassment”. And these cases involved women who were literally told “have sex with me or you are fired”. This slowly morphed into even casual complements being construed as “sexual harassment”. It began with the gender wars.
Then came “racial harassment” and “hostile work environment” lawsuits… This was the REAL motivation behind all of these lawsuits…to reach a point where racial sensitivity can be litigated. It ends with the racial cold war.
We all remember this wave of sexual/racial harassment lawsuits and the silencing effect it had on speech, expression, and behavior. Many of the complaints (especially the racial ones) were frivolous…but the EEOC and trial lawyers didn’t care. Their goal was sheer volume…to turn the battle into a financial choice for companies and businesses…a cost which employees pay by losing their jobs if they “violate” the edicts of political correctness.
Corporate America had to make a financial choice, fight these silly slap suits or institute “diversity training” and other forms of indoctrination and politically correct enforcement. Corporations began to fire employees who exhibited politically incorrect behavior. “Racially/sexual insensitivity” became grounds for quick dismissal. This fear of losing one’s job bled over into the culture at large. Where folks would easily say the obvious, now cower in fear for “saying the wrong thing.” This fear does NOT emanate from cultural mores, but from literal fear of finding oneself on the “blacklist of political incorrectness” which permanently destroys one’s career.
The natural progression from civil suit to corporate enforcement of politically correct indoctrination to a new politically correct reverse-McCarthyism (to borrow a misused term) is all clearly delineated over the last 30 years. And it was definitely by design.
We see how ridiculous this corporate political correctness has become with companies like Target and Wal-Mart their employees from saying the word “Christmas”…and the “war on Christmas” we have now each year (although, it seems to have subsided some in recent years).
THAT is the origin of modern “diversity”….but certainly the culture war that preceded it is as well. I think to defeat it though, we must FIRST dismantle the LEGAL framework built up by the priests of political correctness…..and THEN begin the culture war anew. The tide IS turning, but can’t be turned completely unless we tackle these legal fronts first.
One organization I donate money to is FIRE…they fight legal battles against college campuses to eliminate college speech codes. If you folks think its bad out in the civilian world, college campuses are like little gulags run by leftwing tyrants enforcing literal speech codes!
I just wonder if Frank Sinatra had studied Jewish Talmud. If he had he would have known from where the roots of anti-Semitism are.
Senator Terri Bonoff told the Minnesota Republican majority leader that “feel uncomfortable” when she hears Jesus and Christianity being mention during opening session prayers.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/defamation-the-movie/
“Senator Terri Bonoff told the Minnesota Republican majority leader that “feel uncomfortable” when she hears Jesus and Christianity being mention during opening session prayers.”
Then she needs to immigrate to Israel. (Didn’t “God” create Israel to isolate the rest of the world from the chosenites?) Let her go back to where she belongs.
.” It seemed strange to think Billy Graham was really a “secret Jew”, especially since he was recorded on tapes with Nixon, being very critical of Jews.”
‘kay, that’s weird, since Billy Graham was one of the first Christian Zionists who promoted the idea that it was God’s will for Christians to support Israel.
Hm. Maybe Billy was just acting as an agent provocateur with so he could report back what Nixon might say in private.? Naaaaah. Everybody knows that Jews and their shabbos goys never conspire.
Perhaps Billy Graham was hoodwinking that gullible guy Nixon. But Graham’s support of Israel was already well known. And Nixon supported Israel too. That didn’t seem to stop either one of them from being very critical of Jews in the media.
As some have speculated, Graham and Nixon were as interested in using Israel to commandeer Jewish support as vise versa.
Billy Graham was one of the first pastors to normalize integrated services. He complained to Nixon that the Jews were banning Christianity in Israel, and suggested that the Jews were going to cause anti-semitism with their actions. My read is he was a dupe that got burned, and then went along to get along.
Considering all the things that Nixon did, Graham was most embarrassed by Nixon’s use of “salty language.”
@Tom:
please see my reply to you in the first dozen posts or so. Thanks.
“Forced racial integration was considered to be a Communist plot, largely because it was a Communist plot.”
As a European, I think of communism as a workers’ movement. It’s funny to think that in the USA, communism largely remained an intellectual, Jewish movement. In France, I suppose communism became less Jewish as it became a mass movement. Support for immigration would not have been popular with the workers, and I don’t suppose immigration was openly encouraged by the direction of the French Communist Party.
It’s educational indeed to go back and see how far back the re-education program for White people was formulated by Hollywood and the tribe. The “Seven Faces of Dr. Lao” (1964) featuring Tony Randall has it all:
– The foreigner (a Chinaman) who is oppressed and abused by Whites
– The foreigner is wiser than all the White people and also has special powers
– There was a scene of two White fellows beating up on a Noble Indian fellow for no reason. He was saved by Dr. Lao.
– Most of the White people are corrupt, vain, ridiculous, shallow, or drunks. The exception is the hero and his love interest, who was a beautiful White woman. Back then they were still reliably giving Whites a White hero in movies, but the script was full of instructions about the evil of White society anyway.
– A “greedy Whiteman” who was trying to rip off the town. Our country is full of White men who became businessmen, then wealthy, then benefactors to their communities. I used to live in Ojai, California where there was a wonderful park and other beautiful and important city structures built and donated by the wealthy Mr. Libby, and all of our town histories are loaded with these kind of men. But “Dr. Lao” featured the “evil rich White man” stereotype. (Sort of like Utne Reader is presently trashing Donald Trump as a rich man the people need to take down, because he has a Gentile image. Rarely are the real rich — the Jews — spotlighted in our media.)
The movie ends with Dr. Lao (Tony Randall) intoning wise words as he rides into the sunset. The really creepy thing was he was directing all his “wisdom” at the young White boy in the film, who was dismayed about how bad Dr. Lao had it around his own people and thought Dr. Lao was just swell.
Oh, and this one had an appeal to the animal side of White women. In one scene Dr. Lao, who has the power of shape-shifting and was holding an otherworldly magic show and carnival for the people, takes the form of pan and does a seductive dance around the White woman playing his pan pipes. The woman gets the sweats and it’s obvious that he’s releasing the “passion nature” of an “uptight overly-moral white woman.” At least we got to have a White sort of Pan in 1963. But the message that moral rectitude is just unnatural repression and that women should inflame their passions was being placed. At least in this film it served a storyline of getting the woman to warm up to the White hero a bit. But that was then.
It was basically the whole formula, inchoate, which later became cliche. When I saw what it was about I used it to instruct my children, who had watched it with me, about the Jewish propaganda program for White people.
Brilliant post, Julian Lee! Bravo.
“But the message that moral rectitude is just unnatural repression and that women should inflame their passions was being placed.”
This reminds me that it’s impossible to fully understand the sex-obsession of Freud and early psychology without recognizing their Talmudic roots.
For the last 150 years it has been capitalism, especially American capitalism, rooted deeply in American Protestantism, that has been leading the charge for racial integration–not communism. It hasn’t been Marxists, Hollywood “liberals,” or even “the Jews”. They’ve all been working within the CAPITALIST system, according to its logic and its nature.
Please explain to us how it was logical for the capitalists to encourage non-whites to take over industrial areas, destroy the infrastructure, and drive out businesses. Their consumer base was destroyed by white-flight and the cost of operation is driven up by non-white criminality.
Billy Graham, his son Franklin and the rest of TV evangelists are nothing but Jesus’ goats selling Scofield Bible’s narration of Jesus’s second-coming. Their support for the Zionist entity is two-edged sword – to make way for the return of Jesus and convert/likk Jews while sucking tens of millions of dollars from the Jews.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/11/27/save-a-jew-save-yourself/
>Now he is revered by the German film industry!
Yes, but not for his Buchenwald (not Dachau) propaganda, of which few people ever heard of, let alone know about his participation, but for his classic movies, many of them masterpieces. What is wrong about that?
And anyway, the Film Museum in Berlin is not called “Billy Wilder’s”. Only the bar next to it, and that name was chosen mainly to attract tourists.
I remember reading that in the days of the “rat pack” Frank Sinatra had a spat with Sammy Davis Jr and publicly called him a “dirty nigger bastard”. Actors are basically prostitutes who will play a role for money even if they don’t believe in the subject matter of the film, tv show or play. This attitude of Sinatra is proof of that.
“Actors are basically prostitutes who will play a role for money even if they don’t believe in the subject matter of the film, tv show or play.”
Just like politicians.
Is it any wonder we’re in such sad shape when we have nothing but cowards, turncoats and two-bit oppurtunists “leading” us?
It has become literally laughable how often Academy Awards are given to films with a certain message
HERE is a short clip from Ricky Gervaise’s “Extras” comedy. An actress played by “Kate Winslet talks about playing in a holocaust movie guarantees her Oscar! and It really did!”
“This is the first year in at least half a century that not a single Oscar or Golden Globe entry has focused on the horrors of the Shoah.”
This statement immediately followed:
“Equally ignored, with one peripheral exception, are films on World War II and the Nazi regime.”
IGNORED? only the jewish could consider themselves “ignored” by having merely half a century of films dedicated to their holocaust.
Israeli leaders have called Jews around the world to immigrate to occupied Palestine with the exception of the US, which in fact is home to half of world’s Jewish population (12.7 million). Why? Because the American Jews push the Gentile Americans to fight Israeli wars and die for the Jews. Plus, American Jews help Israel to suck billions of dollars out of American taxpayers each year – while over 52 million Americans cannot aford proper education or basic medicare.
Every American politician knows those facts but is scared to admit that because he’she is scared to end up like JFK, RFK or Helen Thomas, who would have told Senator Terri what she told the Jewish settlers in Palestine: “Go back to your European homelands”.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/helen-thomas-steps-on-lobbys-toes-again/
While Jews were and are the driving force behind Communism and all of the other anti-White movements, they are never the seminal force. White men are.
Whites are the true creative force in the world. As an example 98% of patents are filed by White men. Jews have little to no creative ability, what they do have is recognition. They are true opportunists.
They monitor the milieu and when an idea that they recognize as “good for the Jews” appears, they use their control over the flow of capital to fund it and their control over the mass media to popularize it.
About that “Circus” movie:
I’ve seen it as a small child from Central European country under Soviet hegemony. Weell – as I was basically left by my parents with the impression that people are equal and moreso in a civilized country like America and seeing a black face in my coty was a very rare event, I also reacted by a slight incomprehension to the “mulatto” revelation of the Hitler-styled circus director. Somehow I took it for an entirely personal affair of that young lady and when the hero did not seem to have problems with it, then it was probably OK.
However, in the library of my parents, there were various books about Africa and the strange customs of its inhabitants (e.g., the mass killings at the tribal leader’s funerals) so I would be probably quite surprised if the little mulatto would have been half real African, that’s for sure.
I notice, though, that the movie was dubbed and therefore there were no yiddish verses in the lullaby.
Good Article!
The thing about Jewish influence in the media is that they actually founded and created these industries. They started off buying up the small theatres then started distributing movies, growing into Paramount, Universal Studios, 20th
century Fox, Metro Goldwyn Mayor, Columbia, Warner brothers. It’s a similar story in radio and television.
The Encyclopedia Judaica has a”smoking gun” article concerning this, it says: “Thus, all the large Hollywood companies, with the exception of United Artists, were founded and controlled by Jews.” That article can be found on p.446 under the title “Motion Pictures”. And by all accounts, they still own/control most of it today.
And the reason they call anyone an anti-Semite for stating the obvious about Jewish media control, is because Jews DO have a hidden agenda, and films like the one above is another good piece of definate evidence.
TT
There’s also a book by Neal Gabler called “An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood.” Not only did the Jews single-handedly create Hollywood, but they did so by stealing the technology from Thomas Edison and his own motion picture company. The reason why the film companies moved to California was to escape the reach of Edison. A few years later Edison’s motion picture trust was dismantled by the courts for violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act… thus paving the way for the Jewish media monopoly that followed.
Communism in Hollywood is a vast subject, obviously. But the influence goes beyond preaching racial equality and miscegenation. The Sexual Revolution of the 1960′s was set off by a Jewish Communist film director. Everyone remembers the late ’50′s film smash, “Pillow Talk” with Doris Day and Rock Hudson. It was directed by a New York Jewish Communist, Michael Gordon. Gordon went on to make “Boys Night Out” with Kim Novak and James Garner in 1962 and “Texas Across The River” in 1966 with Dean Martin, Joey Bishop and Rosemary Forsythe.
“Good, clean ” had a radical backgroubd even then.
Another TV show that demonstrates a version of this theme is Bonanza. It’s amazing to think of this Cowboy show being used to promote Cultural Marxism, but it was. Over and over again we see stories of poor Indians, Mexicans and Chinese, being cruelly oppressed by bigoted Whites. I have been amazed at how moralistic and preachy it is on these anti-White issues, upon second viewing.
There is also a lot of moralizing about how we need to give criminals a second chance and how the ‘dangerous crowd of townspeople’ need to be constantly held back from exercising their instincts for self-preservation. All Frankfurt School stuff.
Absolutely. Just saw a poor Mexican being oppressed by the despicable White man on an episode of Bonanza. It was truly over the top.
For what it’s worth, ol’ cowpoke Lorne Greene was a Jew.
So was ol’ Michael Landon (Little Joe) and I am sure most of the writers and producers were Jewish. People just watched the show thinking it was a nice plot, never realizing that over and over again, the White Man is portrayed as bad, and the minority is good.
I’ve been watching some TV Land recently. One bright spot, is how totally wonderful life appears to be on “I dream of Jeanie”. It was like the pinnacle of White society here in America, complete with safe neighborhoods, attractive White women, and dazzling science and technology. Were we really like that once? Fun little shows like that will be an eternal reminder of what we have lost.
Yet more “wisdom” of a like nature from Hollywood:
http://turnabout.ath.cx:8000/node/2889#comments
I’d just like to mention Ol’ Blue Eyes momma was an abortionist.
That’s noir, eh?
Cobalt: On “I Dream of Jeannie”, which was one of my favorite shows in it’s day – might I point out that Larry Hagman, a jew, was being groveled to, served by, and genuflected to – by Barbara Eden, who was the beautiful and gorgeous white female Jeannie? So, you see – even there, we were being ‘treated’ to a jewish Hollywood fantasy – whereby the lowly white female gentiles are subservient to their jewish ‘masters’. Like you, my level of observation and ability to ‘see’ and ‘recognize’ the subliminal subversive messages and themes in the older TV shows and Hollywood movies has reached a high degree of sophistication – since my eyes have been opened to the ‘jewish issue’. And, once your eyes are open – it is downright amazing how much of this anti-white garbage will literally slap you in the face.
Personally, I cannot remember a time in my life where I wasn’t racially aware – but, I still often marvel at why I was unable to pick up on this poison when I was initially exposed to it.
No longer do I suffer from this particular strain of naivete, however.
Hollywood like the Wall Street – is a Jewish domain. However, everyone who dared to say that in public – was called ‘anti-Semite’ by the ‘Jewish mafia’.
Once I listed TEN truths – if you believe either of them – it would add your name to the non-ending list of ‘Anti-Semitic’ people.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/youre-anti-semite-if-you-believe-that/
I just finished a shower which was induced by all the insane and irreverant and decidedly innaccurate and hateful comments I have just read. It makes me fearful for the continuation of an America dedicated to love.
I recently watched the 1950′s Rosalind Russell ‘Aunty Mame’ on TCM. It is nothing but anti “uptight protestant WASP” propaganda.
When the nephew Patrick grows up he gets engaged to an upper middle class country club type protestant girl. The engagement is broken when Patrick, with Aunty Mame’s help realized hat his fiancee’s family is anti-semitic.
I switched channels as soon as the anti protestant preaching started. I’ll never watch the movie again.
Read the lists of lawyers on the anti White side of every anti White lawsuit from Brown vs. Topeka to the latest affirmative action rulings. 90 percent or more of the attorneys on the anti White side have obvious Jewish names.
Jews now rule this disfunctional multiracial mess in which the best and the brightest are forbidden by Jewish affirmative action laws from college admission and employment.
Jews are in triumph now, and for a few decades more. But in 30 years or so the asians, hispanics and africans the Jews used to destroy the goyim will destroy the Jews because the Jews are White.
Jewish history is the history of parasites and predators who over hunt and overgraze thus destroying the habitat.
Then they complain when they have to move on!