Herman Cain: Tea Party Rock Star

Last year on the Fourth of July I went to a local Tea Party rally. As usual, the crowd was all White–a case study in implicit Whiteness. But one of the speakers stood out because she was Black–the only Black person in the crowd. Eager to show their anti-racist credentials, they applauded her enthusiastically. These middle-class White folks were open to opposing illegal immigration, but no speaker dared to comment on legal immigration.

Herman Cain

Reading today’s LA Times I couldn’t help noticing Jonah Goldberg’s comment that Herman Cain, the Black businessman and Republican presidential candidate is a “rock star” among the Tea Party crowd. I assume it’s the same logic. What could be better than having two Black major-party candidates square off in the 2012 presidential election? Could there be any doubt that White Americans are good people after all? So much for all that media talk that the Tea Partiers are nothing but a bunch of White racists.

Advertisement

A Southern friend of mine said that his White acquaintances supported Cain because of his stand on immigration. But when it comes to immigration, Cain is completely within the respectable conservative mainstream, opposing illegal immigration while proudly asserting that “Americans have embraced their role as the world’s premier ‘melting pot,’ welcoming immigrants from every corner of the planet. We readily learn about other cultures, customs and beliefs. We appreciate those who are willing to come to this country and make America a more vibrant and enriched place.”

So the real reason these Southern White conservatives support Cain is because he’s Black. A pathetic commentary on the  state of White America.

Incidentally, the purpose of Goldberg’s column is to promote Paul Ryan so that the 2012 election is a referendum on Ryan’s budget  plan. I can’t help thinking that this is an excellent way to divide White voters. Older people are a major Tea Party constituency but probably would be very doubtful about changes to Medicare or Social Security. (AARP opposes Ryan’s plan.) In the end, quite a few would vote for Obama when the Democrats scare the bejesus out of them by talking doom and gloom over Ryan’s ideas on the budget.

The sad reality is that whoever the Republican nominee is, the election won’t be fought out over the demographic future of the United States. That’s an issue that will be left undiscussed but lurking in the background even though it is doubtless a major source of the Tea Partiers’ anger. But at least the horrifying accusation of White racism won’t be heard either.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

91 Comments to "Herman Cain: Tea Party Rock Star"

  1. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    May 24, 2011 - 5:00 pm | Permalink

    Here’s a version of the same deranged principles from the USA weighing into British debates:
    http://blogs.ft.com/crookblog/2011/05/more-on-immigration/

  2. Liberte's Gravatar Liberte
    May 24, 2011 - 5:10 pm | Permalink

    How did the Tea party break from Ron Paul and “End the Fed”. Herman Cain says we don’t even need to audit the Fed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhen9QiYai8). This is just absurd. Beam me up.

    • John's Gravatar John
      May 25, 2011 - 3:34 am | Permalink

      The Tea Party movement has been completely co-opted. Once again, controlled dissent.

      That being said, there are still strains of promise within the Tea Party, I’m just not sure how effective they will at guiding the movement. The demographic crunch is coming faster and faster.

    • Hans's Gravatar Hans
      May 25, 2011 - 8:16 pm | Permalink

      The real answer is that there are two wings of the Tea Party: Ron Paul vs. Sarah Palin. Caribou Barbie’s manager is Bill Kristol. Caribou Barbie canceled a meeting with a pro-life group to meet with AIPAC. The Palin-Cain wing is ultimately run and controlled by the billionaire oil industry and globalist Koch Brothers while the Paul wing is supported by grass-roots donors and volunteers. I think you can connect the dots from there.

    • Hans's Gravatar Hans
      May 25, 2011 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

      To clarify, neocon slimeball Bill Kristol is Palin’s mentor and political guide. He is no manager of her in any explicit sense that most people can see, and therefore be wary of Palin and her Likudnik agenda.

  3. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    May 24, 2011 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Herman Cain is another detractor put in place at the head of the opposition by our ruling (Jewish/Free-masonic) elites.. His role is similar to that of Sarah Palin, and that is to derail the movement by highjacking it and rendering it ineffective from within.. Lets not be discouraged though.. Stick with the Tea Party people, and do your homework on the running candidates.. support those that speak for us no matter what..
    Look for those voices.. they are there!

    • Freedom Fighter's Gravatar Freedom Fighter
      May 27, 2011 - 6:40 am | Permalink

      That an interesting observation.A similar thing happened in Australia in the mid90′s when a Nationalist Party called OneNation took off . The JewsZionist and their Mason toadies came out swinging.The law was misused to drive the party to oblivion but with a similar division action driven into the party leadership.This was the last effort of European Australians to prevent this new cancerous ism–multiculturalism. The State Media makes claims that its dead but infact the Gov bureaucracy still promotes it. Though in some ways we are lucky because many of the immigrants in a big wave came from China and though there is a lot of resentment from the middle class due to the Resource competition they are hard working and dutiful so they are peaceful contributors .

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 2:23 pm | Permalink

      Agreed, but don’t overestimate Freemasonry. Whereas it may have once been a strong social/political force, it is essentially nothing but a ritualized social club for losers now.

  4. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    May 24, 2011 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    Cain is a fraud. I used to work in the same building with him. He didn’t build that pizza empire, somebody else did. (Willy Theisen.)

  5. fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
    May 24, 2011 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

    The Tea Party is a waste of time. The only thing that will work is a movement that is explicitly, unapologetically, and boldly pro-white European. The one and only concern of this party should be the welfare of European-Americans, regardless of religion, class, or political beliefs. In short, no ideological divisions.

    It will cause a storm of controversy and the media would attack them ceaselessly, but like they say, there’s no such thing as negative publicity. If whites- even white liberals- see a pro-white party getting endlessly pummelled by the media, I think it would raise alarms in their heads.

    It would also probably provoke public discourse nationwide, and there would be arguments as to what place whites will have in the future of this country, and others. The one thing that’s killing white interests is the lack of discussion about them as a group. White interests are seen as aspects of a fringe ideology. It needs to be brought front and center and become part of the mainstream the way black, Jewish, and Latino interests are.

    • Blue Devil's Gravatar Blue Devil
      May 24, 2011 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

      @Fender-Exactly. Nice point. It’s funny to see well-meaning white people come together yet simultaneously act so damn fearful and ashamed of their white ethnicity that they hide behind black puppets in order to subsidize their innate racism. This is the sick and twisted outcome of tribe rule. Cmon white people, we have the greatest culture on earth as weighted by the entire world’s wish to be here.
      In comparison, China is the new super-power yet Chinese Americans feel threatened at the rudeness and hostility they endure when travelling back to China. They scurry home to America to be with sophisticated, warm-loving white people. They purposely move to white communities while avoiding black and Mexican communities like the plague. They wish to emulate us and be around us. So how stupid do we look when we bow down on our knees and annoint another black man as if we’re too stupid to lead ourselves? We already did that suicide move in the last election. Isn’t that what electing Obama was all about, to collectively rid ourselves of allegations of racism? I’m dying over here people! Can Herman Cain represent the interests of white people as a black man? I suppose he may be able to conduct a level mimicry, but race complicates matters. The tribe has invested trillions in puppet stooges who lead their respective races into the tribe will. They do this so when shi$ hits the fan they blame themselves instead of the tribe. Conversely, if we vote in Herman Cain and he misrepresents us, then whites and blacks will forever be polarized, much more than they already are. But in the end, IF VOTING CHANGED ANYTHING IT WOULD BE OUTLAWED! LMAO So why am I wasting energy, Herman Cain will probably be elected or some other raging pawn on the bildeburg chess board. Now I know why they called it the garden of eden, ignorance is truly bliss. My friend told me a funny saying “Anyone seriously promoted as a presidential candidate in our American media should be tarred and feathered” Speaking to the teflon will of our ruling class and their soft-authoritarianism, where has Ron Paul been lately? Seems like all of a sudden Herman Cain took the rockstar spotlight as highlighted by Professor MacDonald. Might as well, this country’s headed for a nose dive so go ahead and elect another black guy so they can serve as the fall guy as we metaphorically shoot over Niagra Falls into the abyss.

    • John's Gravatar John
      May 25, 2011 - 3:35 am | Permalink

      It’s called the American Third Position. I’m assuming you’ve heard of this party? Right?

      http://www.american3p.org

    • Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
      May 25, 2011 - 10:13 am | Permalink

      John: “It’s called the American Third Position. I’m assuming you’ve heard of this party?”

      Seriously, every American who can join it should.

    • fender_strat's Gravatar fender_strat
      May 25, 2011 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

      I’m aware of the American Third Position, but what I was actually getting at was that either the Tea Party or the GOP needs to drop the BS and just become what they really want to be, which is a pro-European party.

      The GOP is scattered and confused because of America’s changing demographics. They don’t know how to react to it. There’s a lot of cognitive dissonance there; they want to retain their power but they are increasingly finding themselves catering to blacks and latinos in order to do it.

      They can’t maintain themselves in this manner. They can’t want to preserve American culture and simultaneously pander to the people who would bring about its destruction. No one knows what the GOP supports because the GOP doesn’t know who to support.

    • Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
      May 26, 2011 - 6:43 am | Permalink

      fender_strat: “I’m aware of the American Third Position, but what I was actually getting at was that either the Tea Party or the GOP needs to drop the BS and just become what they really want to be, which is a pro-European party.”

      The Republican Party should do that. But it’s not doing so. Following Numbers USA, the best candidate who could actually win the next presidential contest, Tim Pawlenty, only rates a C, and generally the others are very bad. Overall, the party seems to be set on a strategy of moving enthusiastically to Jews, Hispanics and Blacks, arguing (against all the evidence) that the ethnic voters it wants are natural conservatives, and hoping that its White supporters will keep supporting it because they will have nowhere else to go no matter how poorly the Republican Party reflects and supports their interests. The 2008 presidential election shows the utter failure of this strategy, as Jews supported the Democrat as strongly as ever despite the Jewish takeover of the Repubican party and despite the Republican candidate being an extreme pro-Israel hawk, and Hispanics voted for the Democrat despite the Republican candidate fighting harder for amnesty and Hispanic demographic interest in general than probably any other politician in either party. Yet the bad strategy has not been repudiated.

      The attitude of Republican strategists seems to be that fist they want the party to be multi-racial, even though in terns of its support it really isn’t, and they are not willing to take on the new Jewish pundit elite, exemplified by Jonah Goldberg, who among other things rejects any role for the Republican Party in defending White interests (and looks ready to call “racist!” if any Republican did move to support the ethnic interests of White supporters of the party), and finally the more the numbers drift to the detriment of Whites the more they seem to think that it’s too late, and there’s no choice but to chase the growing Hispanic vote and the elusive Jewish dollar, and hope that what has never worked starts working. Thus procrastination feeds on itself: the more the party puts off doing anything to protect White ethnic interests, the more the Whites decline, and the more the Whites decline, the more the party elite is reluctant to help those who are becoming losers.

    • Freedom Fighter's Gravatar Freedom Fighter
      May 27, 2011 - 7:03 am | Permalink

      In a way your right .The TeaParties haven’t realized that ‘there’ Gov has been co-opted by Zionist.They still have an illusion of just voting for some Candidate (puppet) that makes promises that he can’t keep. The KMD has the right idea of starting a party from scratch so that you can control its structure that still will be virtually impossible to stop the 5th .But still the thing is you need a party who’s candidates are close to the people , but that party has to be very motivated because any candidate who is going to take on the system needs proactive hard nosed supporters day in day giving direct support in Congress in Washington and who are prepared to get real nasty against the Zionist fanatics cause that’s where the attack will come from.

  6. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    May 24, 2011 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

    If you are only “implicitely white” then others who are “explicitely ANTI-white” will push you over.There is no way other than openly declaring yourself pro-White.Of course the whole world will then call you “racist”.But then you retort that you are no more “racist” than any other identity-based organization like the NAACP,La Raza or one of the many Jewish organizations. If they have a problem with a pro-White organization then why not with a pro -Black or pro-Hispanic or Jewish organization?If they object that those organizations represent MINORITIES that have been HISTORICALLY OPPRESSED by the white MAJORITY and that therefore they have the right to promote their interests based on identity while Whites don’t, then say that the right to promote one’s interests is a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT and therefore independent of historical circumstances.When they say that Whites DON’T NEED to promote their interests because the whole society is already organized that way (“white privilege”),then argue that that is no more true (affirmative action etc.),that Whites threathen to become a minority themselves and that they are globally a minority anyway and finally that they will decide for themselves what they need.In short: we are an identity-group and therefore have group-interests.period.

    • May 24, 2011 - 7:59 pm | Permalink

      The “historically oppressed by White people” argument is itself racist, because it ascribes the alleged sins of the fathers to contemporary Whites, and holds them accountable as a group for actions they themselves did not commit. Inherited, generational guilt is an extremely primitive, anti-Western concept. Very Old Testament. No wonder so many of these affirmative action and reverse discrimination programs were dreamed up by Jews. They’re akin to throwing children into the debtor’s prison for the bad debt of their parents. It reminds me of how, generations after the Holocaust, innocent Germans or still expected to pay and pay. It must all be part of the Jewish racket. Since that’s the case, maybe we should perpetually fine Jewry for the crucifixion of Jesus.

    • John's Gravatar John
      May 25, 2011 - 3:37 am | Permalink

      Franklin, can you try putting some spaces between your sentences, it’s annoying to read your posts otherwise, even if I agree with the content.

    • Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
      May 25, 2011 - 10:25 am | Permalink

      John: “Franklin, can you try putting some spaces between your sentences, it’s annoying to read your posts otherwise, even if I agree with the content.”

      Seconded, and please use paragraphs.

      As to your ideas, I think this is so right it’s not funny:

      Franklin Ryckaert: “If you are only “implicitely white” then others who are “explicitely ANTI-white” will push you over.”

      Over and over and over. Defending White interests while never articulating them or asserting the legitimacy of such a thing as a White interest is an overly complicated trick, and politics doesn’t reward these kinds of complex, timid, half-hearted approaches.

  7. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    May 24, 2011 - 7:47 pm | Permalink

    First of all, Tea Party is diversion created by the extremists within both Republican and Democrat parties to fool the American voters with the same rotten juice in a new bottle. All three political parties are controlled by the major foreign and local lobby groups.

    The concept of two Black candidates fighting each other is totally wrong. Both Barack Obama and Herman Cain may have Black skin but their loyalties to the upper-class Jewish and WASP minority is identical. The winner will be chosen by the Rothschild dynasty through AIPAC/Evangelists even before the first voter hit the booth. This was what happened during Bush/Kerry charade.

    Americans watch the US democratic election charade every four year without any hope of having a voice at the Capitol Hill.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/it-is-not-a-democracy-stupid/

    • Scotsman's Gravatar Scotsman
      May 24, 2011 - 11:06 pm | Permalink

      “Obama and Herman Cain may have Black skin but their loyalties to the upper-class Jewish and WASP minority is identica”

      You mean the WASP minority whos ancestors founded this country, and many of us share the honor of being descendant from? If only it were true.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      May 24, 2011 - 11:29 pm | Permalink

      Rehmat illustrates a point I have noticed before: Many Muslims have an intense hatred for WASPs. I remember a fairly nice Saudi guy in college made a comment about how “privileged WASPs like me didn’t have to worry about life”. He said it as a joke but I could tell he also meant it. Of course, I was not remotely “privileged”, I was middle class at best, and he knew that. But that is who he had the most venom for.

      So, WNist should be leery about taking up the Muslim cause too passionately (as a few do). It may make sense to work with them at times, but just remember, they ain’t fans of yours deep down.

    • bannister's Gravatar bannister
      May 25, 2011 - 9:36 am | Permalink

      Rehmat, you said – “First of all, Tea Party is diversion created by the extremists within both Republican and Democrat parties to fool the American voters with the same rotten juice in a new bottle.”

      No, that is not true. The Tea Party was NOT dreamed up by the power elite insiders. The Tea Party was a spontaneous uprising of mainstream Americans who finally got sick of BOTH parties. It was started on CNBC by financial analyst Rick Santelli who called for a “Tea Party” protest against Obama’s mortgage bailout. It snowballed from there and turned into a legitimate movement.

      It’s important to understand this. Why? Because it demonstrates that 1) there is a large group of dissatisfied Americans out there and 2) spontaneous uprisings DO happen and can take on a life of their own. The power elite know this and of course, they will desperately try to subvert or co-opt any movement in it’s early stages to neutralize the threat as quickly as possible.

      Yes, the Tea Party has been co-opted – TO AN EXTENT. But there are still good people there. And it was never a “white nationalist” movement to begin with so let’s not be disappointed that it didn’t become one. A large, anti-tax movement is a good start and I welcome it.

      If white nationalists are going to succeed, they must start THEIR OWN TEA PARTY and not just hope to catch the wave of another movement.

  8. Sir Tristram's Gravatar Sir Tristram
    May 24, 2011 - 7:58 pm | Permalink

    It’s just a sad, sad state of affairs.

    Almost all of the “tea-partiers” that I know are so close to being primed on the hammer of the race issue. But they just can’t face it. At the very end they turn and run into the arms of a black man to prove their deracination. Their critique of the government and liberalism is point on but they cannot seem to get around the narrowly defensive strategy of denying that there is any element of racial kinship in the “movement.” The success of a candidate like Herman Cain is the result. There’s this weird giddy, almost frenetic assertion: “Hey, we conservative whites have now got a black champ who can take out your black champ! Ha, so there! We’re gonna send him in and we’re going to pour all our funds into him, and you’re gonna see that we’re good guys, too!”

    So, we have, on one side, the Democrats, who are obviously against the Whites past any point of retrieval, and on the other, the Republicans, who are so rabid about Obama’s apparent “challenge” to Netanyahu that they are scrambling head over heels to prove that they are the Apartheid Jews’ best yes-men and that they can play the melting-pot game, too (This is really disgusting. btw, even though I don’t like Obama doesn’t it just rankle to have a foreign leader act like such an arrogant condescending jerk in the forum of OUR country?)

    Out of a country of some 300 plus million people, can we not muster at least a slice of the mainstream media attention towards something truthful and representative of middle White America?

    Is it just me or this some kind of nightmare?

    And if it’s not, then, I’m sorry to say it but we deserve all the bad government we get.

    • John's Gravatar John
      May 25, 2011 - 3:42 am | Permalink

      I really agree with you on this point that Whites are always on the cusp of confronting the race issue, but then quickly turn away. There is a lot of social conditioning that has gone into this. It’s almost like there is a moment of cognitive dissonance, in which their instincts are saying one thing, but all the socialization and endless media manipulation is saying another.

      I’m not sure how you counteract this. I consider myself a fairly logical and persuasive person, but people turn away just when it seems I’m on the cusp of convincing them.

    • Fynn's Gravatar Fynn
      May 25, 2011 - 8:11 pm | Permalink

      “Out of a country of some 300 plus million people, can we not muster at least a slice of the mainstream media attention towards something truthful and representative of middle White America?”

      We have to create our own media, and we have a chance to do that now with the internet. It’s the only hope.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 2:37 pm | Permalink

      Let’s face it. Most White people are literally afraid of the Jews. Until that fear is converted into open, defiant opposition to Jewish influence, things will remain the same.

  9. I's Gravatar I
    May 24, 2011 - 7:59 pm | Permalink

    The Tea Party is not a serious movement.

  10. Venona's Gravatar Venona
    May 24, 2011 - 8:42 pm | Permalink

    Jonah Goldberg is the poster child for the controlled media. Credentials as a conservative are zip, earns his media stripes working for the fellow tribesman Ben Wattenberg, writes an overhyped, incoherent book, becomes one of the leading “conservative” voices in the media.

    I believe Goldberg was one the leaders in the bash-the-French campaign leading up to the Iraq war. Yeah, the French are reason I’m seeing my country transformed into a third-world snake pit.

  11. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    May 24, 2011 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

    @KMac

    Ryan looks like Pugsly from the Munsters—he ain’t going nowhere.

    Not to rub it in, but, Irish Roman Catholic Ryans’ main supporter in Congress is southern fried Jewboy “Eric” Canter. Enough said.

    Check this out: http://goo.gl/fb/IRbd4

    I have no idea who wrote it—but—you might want to investigate.

  12. May 24, 2011 - 10:15 pm | Permalink

    Incidentally, the purpose of Goldberg’s column is to promote Paul Ryan so that the 2012 election is a referendum on Ryan’s budget plan.

    I’d guess the real reason Jonah Goldberg supports the Ryan plan is because he’d prefer old people pay to stave off U.S. bankruptcy than have the American auxiliary of the Israeli defense force see its budget cut.

    But of course he’s missing the big picture that Republicans advocating the Ryan plan, much less the Republican nominee being Paul Ryan, makes it much easier for Obama to win a second term.

    Obama is much less likely to attack Iran than a Republican victor in the 2012 election would be.

    You ever think of that, Jonah?

    It’s been fun to watch the guys on MSNBC gloat over how damaging the Ryan plan clearly is for the Republican Party. In fact, there was just a Republican female in a special election who went from pushing the Ryan plan to releasing a hilariously tortured statement calling people who pointed out she supports the Ryan plan liars and declaring that she’s “not married to it.”

    http://thinkprogress.org/2011/05/23/corwin-medicare-flip-flo

    In the end, quite a few would vote for Obama when the Democrats scare the bejesus out of them by talking doom and gloom over Ryan’s ideas on the budget.

    And of course Paul Ryan’s ideas on the budget are dangerous for old people, or at least for old people who were in the middle class when they worked.

    Just look how Jonah acknowledges that Ryan’s plan is built to target middle class people for especially drastic cuts in this passage from his LA Times Op-Ed:

    That’s because the Democrats don’t want to muddy their attacks on Ryan’s idea of “premium support,” whereby the poor get more generous vouchers than the middle class or the wealthy to pay for Medicare coverage. By the way, the concept of premium support has deep bipartisan roots, with endorsements from such Democrats as former Sen. John Breaux [who?] of Louisiana and former Rep. Dick Gephardt [a complete imbecile] of Missouri.

    So not only will middle class old people get their Medicare taken away and replaced with a voucher, they’ll be getting crappy little vouchers that are smaller than the vouchers given to poor people.

    • Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
      May 25, 2011 - 3:58 pm | Permalink

      On behalf of old white folks may I say that we are not only going to lose out on Medicare, which would be well worth it if our own children would benefit, but we will also leave behind a country full of folks who were let into this country on the grounds that they would help pay for medicare. Wrong again!

  13. May 24, 2011 - 10:43 pm | Permalink

    I can’t help thinking that this is an excellent way to divide White voters.

    Yes, but someone like Goldberg probably feels he has to support the Ryan plan because massive cuts to Medicare and/or Social Security are probably the only way the American Empire can be kept afloat for that much longer.

    Still, I tend to think the Ryan plan is so alienating to voters that there’s no chance of it being implemented anyway.

    So in that sense Jonah’s attitude is extremely irrational.

    A big part of why the Ryan plan isn’t popular is because it so clearly singles out old people, and especially middle class old people.

    If Ryan’s plan also called for similarly deep cuts in welfare programs for non-old people, maybe he’d have somewhat more of a chance of selling it.

    And of course there’s the underlying issue that old people are more likely to be White in America today.

    The electoral implications of this were found to very real by Donald Kinder and Cindy Kam, the authors of the book ‘Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion’:

    As expected, ethnocentric whites are more likely to push for cuts in food stamps, to favor reductions in spending on welfare, to oppose increasing benefits to women on welfare if they have additional children, and to favor strict time limits on public assistance. Partisanship, egalitarianism, and limited government also contribute to opinion on welfare, and in the expected way. But with controls on partisanship and principles (and on benefits and all the rest), the effects of ethnocentrism are statistically significant and sizable in every case.

    What’s more, not only is this effect not observable when it comes to social insurance programs, but you actually see the reverse. Ethnocentrism increases support:

    We are convinced that the positive effects of ethnocentrism on support for social insurance are real. We uncovered the same result—that ethnocentrism helps to build support for social insurance programs among white Americans—wherever we looked, and we looked in quite a few places. [...] When it comes to providing pensions and health care to the retired and elderly, ethnocentrism appears to be a force for liberalism, for a more generous welfare state.

    Which is just to say that we should expect to see this kind of doublethink about social welfare programs especially concentrated among ethnocentric white Americans.

    The whole book, I should say, is very interesting. And other sections detail the impact of ethnocentric attitudes on the part of non-whites on various matters, though interestingly this particular dissonance between means-tested programs and social insurance programs appears to be an exclusive peculiarity of white public opinion. Among non-whites, attitudes toward both kinds of programs are determined by partisanship and ideological variables.

    http://www.bullfax.com/?q=node-ethnocentrism-and-small-government-hypocrisy

    Of course the less ethnocentric whites in any state are going to be more likely to support Obama anyway, so obviously the key to Republican victory is to get the support of the relatively ethnocentric whites.

    So what does Ryan do?

    That’s right! He attacks like a laser the very “pensions and health care to the retired and elderly” that relatively ethnocentric whites are more likely to support that less ethnocentric whites.

    Those the gods would destroy they first make mad.

    • May 24, 2011 - 10:50 pm | Permalink

      *that relatively ethnocentric whites are more likely to support than less ethnocentric whites.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      May 24, 2011 - 11:01 pm | Permalink

      This seems true. Steve Sailer came to similar conclusion – Ryan shot himself in the foot. I do admire the courage and idealism, and these social programs will have to be scaled back someday, but older Whites are afraid of losing benefits. It probably would have been smarter to focus on welfare and Medicaid as you suggest, along with military spending. We can’t balance the budget on the backs of elderly White people.

    • J. Winthrop II's Gravatar J. Winthrop II
      May 27, 2011 - 6:55 am | Permalink

      Medicare has $75 trillion in unfunded liabilities. To fix that without cutting benefits Republicans would have to switch sides on tax increases. The Republican strategy since Bush lost in 1992, in large part because he cut a deal to raise taxes, is to let the Democrats own any tax increases regardless of how large the deficit is.

      This shows the limits of implicit whiteness in politics. There is no way for Republicans to reconcile their opposition to handouts to poor (black, hispanic) people with their support for handouts to retired (mostly white) persons.

      An explicitly pro-white party would have no problem setting priorities, but the Republican party is far from that.

  14. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 24, 2011 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

    This is a sign Whites have a long way to go before they embrace the truth. Their deepest fear is being called a ‘racist’. But the truth is, implicit Whiteness will not work, it must be explicit. And right now, Whites run in fear from that label. Maybe all we can do now is lay the foundation for a future renaissance. I know, not very encouraging. But there is honor in being the keeper of the flame. Our descendants will thank us.

    • Freedom Fighter's Gravatar Freedom Fighter
      May 27, 2011 - 8:59 am | Permalink

      Sorry Jason but White is the wrong label .It is European Americans please. White explicit will just bring on Jew attacks ,screaming I’m white and I’m NOT Trash ! Thankyou

  15. Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
    May 24, 2011 - 11:05 pm | Permalink

    It’s ironic that a bunch of Zionist Jew Supremacist liberal Democrats call the Tea Party “racist.”

    Conservatives are worthless. Just today Jew Republican Eric Cantor (the only Jew in the GOP and they make him the leader) said the government wouldn’t send aid to Missouri for the tornadoes. But this same Eric Cantor has just “protected” aid to Israel by moving it to the defense budget.

    Republican conservatives – including the grass roots Tea Party types – cannot kiss Jew ass fast enough. The entire GOP has come out openly for Netanyahu and against Obama’s tepid pressure on Israel over the illegal settlements.

    With “friends” like the GOP, White people don’t need enemies.

    • Freedom Fighter's Gravatar Freedom Fighter
      May 27, 2011 - 9:04 am | Permalink

      Yeah Rich , They all suffer from Stockholm Syndrome .They’ll change color in a minute and say ‘Heck , I don’t know what all that was about.Must’ve been something in the water. Haa Haww”

  16. Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
    May 24, 2011 - 11:24 pm | Permalink

    Really, if the jews are behind all this non white immigration, the joke is going to be on them. When we go down, there won’t be any white men to protect them – and God knows they cannot protect themselves without America. The non white masses of the world consider jews to be whitey, also.
    Those of you who indeed think the jews are so smart – how far does that smartness get them in South Africa? Probably gets them killed for looking white.
    Here is an inconvenient truth for you jews – you need the white man so pull your head out of your ass!

    • Rich Pearson's Gravatar Rich Pearson
      May 25, 2011 - 2:47 am | Permalink

      Scooter says:

      how far does that smartness get them in South Africa? Probably gets them killed for looking white.

      Are you kidding? They own all of the gold and diamond mines now. A present from their communist lackey Nelson Mandela. I hear the only “whiteys” on the South African currency post-apartheid are of the Communist Jews that helped take over South Africa.

      That’s how communism works – get the brown masses to take wealth away from Whitey and turn it over to the Jews.

      Jews aren’t stupid. Conservative Whites are stupid.

    • Scooter's Gravatar Scooter
      May 25, 2011 - 10:11 am | Permalink

      The way some people here talking about the jews being so damn smart makes me sometimes think they are jewish trolls playing a joke on us racist folk. There is definately a disproportionate amount of high achieving jews, and they stick together and help each other out, and since they all worship money and waste their lives chasing it, plenty of jewish families have accumulated it, and have bought there way into academia and politics. They are disproportiontely good at arguing and linguistics, and therefore have heavy influence in the media and Hollywood.
      But all that won’t help them when non white folks overwhelm the US and Europe – they will be white and get what is coming to all of us. So they need to wake up and support white nationalism, ironically, but they aren’t smart enough to see it, nor smart enough not to get their asses kicked out of every society in history.
      They are not smarter than us – they just worship money and its attendant power while we go about doing “good”. Hence we are vulnerable to their low cunning that undermines a society seeking higher rewards than filthy lucre.

  17. May 24, 2011 - 11:26 pm | Permalink

    Americans have embraced their role as the world’s premier ‘melting pot,’ welcoming immigrants from every corner of the planet. We readily learn about other cultures, customs and beliefs. -Herman Cain

    It should be noted that you don’t have to welcome immigrants from every corner of the planet in order to readily learn about other cultures, customs and beliefs.

    America didn’t start welcoming immigrants from every corner of the world until after 1965, and yet somehow the 19th Century thinker Henry Thoreau showed a great interest in the religion and culture of the Indian subcontinent.

    As for welcoming immigrants from every corner of the planet into the same melting pot, I guess this is one of those cases where someone acts like it’s more glorious to do something the harder it is.

    To paraphrase JFK’s speech on the space race:

    “We choose to make citizens of people from different continental races, cultures, and civilizations. We choose to put them all in a melting pot in spite of many of them having nothing in common either with each other or with the citizens already here, not because it is easy, but because it is hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.”

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      May 27, 2011 - 6:01 am | Permalink

      @ Reginald 11.26 pm.

      {“Welcoming immigrants from all over the world will enrich our culture”}

      This is the classical “enrichment”-argument: if you welcome people from all races or ethnicities,then that will “enrich” your culture.

      Most ( Third World) immigrants however are low educated and carry little culture in their baggage.You can learn more about exotic cultures from books than from such immigrants.

      The most ridiculous variant of this argument is the culinary one: if you accept exotic peoples as immigrants then that will enrich your country with all kinds of exotic restaurants.But you do not need millions and millions of Chinese immigrants to have some Chinese restaurants in your country,a few Chinese cooks would suffice.Heck,even a Chinese cookery-book would be enough!
      As for “high” culture,a few exotic professors would suffice.

      Clearly, the argument is false.

  18. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    May 25, 2011 - 12:02 am | Permalink

    LOL @ people who think any of this can be solved at the ballot box. Give me a break, people, honestly. You want to think about the 14 words becoming a reality? Think PLE. Everything else is just a waste of time.

    Tea Party? Pffff. I’m buying as many acres as I can and starting my own mini nation. The US will become many things before it’s done, none of them good, but your land will always be your land. Do you white Americans have it in you to kiss all your little toys goodbye and start a new life, off the grid, on a stretch of land that you own and control, with white neighbors whom you trust and help and who do the same for you?

    Now THAT’S implicit whiteness.

    • May 25, 2011 - 11:25 am | Permalink

      “but your land will always be your land”
      Tell that to the Rhodesians aka Zimbabwe Whites or the South African Boers or the Whites in Brazil whose farms are being invaded by people of color demanding the land…I tend to agree with you but let’s not paint too rosy a picture of the so-called Pioneer Little Europe.
      Frankly the average White is not very trustworthy in my experience and the idea that they will magically transform into NS types is unlikely to happen.

  19. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    May 25, 2011 - 12:38 am | Permalink

    Could that sack of Khazarian lard known as “Jonah Goldberg” wind up in positions of influence without some behind-the-scenes pulling of strings by his CIA asset of a mother ? The guy’s denser than a concrete road block.
    If I wanted to watch a flamboyant African man, all I’d have to do is tune in Murray Rothstein’s owned Black Entertainment Television. Assuming I won’t happen to catch another one of their On Wings of Eagles loops where good rabbi Eckstein urges (Black) viewers to make a cash donation to help ferry out of ex-USSR a family of Jews for subsequent re-settlement in Israel. On account of the latter – shudder – facing a persecution.
    The Murdoch media devote an obscene amount of airtime to former half-term governor Palin. Incidentally, her candidacy had been checked off as worthy of future exploration by the Vladimir Lenin of the zio-cons a.k.a. William Kristol long before her failed run as V.P. on the McCain ticket.
    As a side note, for a politician to earn the courting by the zio-cons, being the biggest toolbox appears as the main selling point.
    Concerning Herman Cain, what we’ve learned so far is that the man aches for Israel. So much so that following Obama’s Go-Back-to-1967-Border speech he’s released multiple pro-Israel statements. Now watch for how the media will be spinning him. That oughta help you connect the dots.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 2:50 pm | Permalink

      Regarding Rabbi Eckstein, does he hold ugly contests to get participants in his panhandling TV pleas? God! I’ve seen better loooking caricatures.

  20. tma_sierrahills's Gravatar tma_sierrahills
    May 25, 2011 - 12:58 am | Permalink

    Someone once figured that perched at the tippy-top of the hierarchy of the PC Pod People’s beloved noble demographic groups probably would be black lesbian single moms, which the GOP should really consider before they commit to Cain, since such a candidate would probably get so many liberal Democratic crossover votes that even Hollywood would go Red State.
    - – - -
    Border Enforcement + Immigration Moratorium = Job, Crime and Eco Sanity

  21. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    May 25, 2011 - 1:56 am | Permalink

    Tea Party folk jumping up and down with joy @ Herman Cain rally.

  22. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    May 25, 2011 - 1:57 am | Permalink

    watch?v=SqL3T4vYppU>

  23. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    May 25, 2011 - 2:04 am | Permalink

    There is something especially creepy about disgruntled blue collar whites kissing black butt .
    There is something very sick in these people . I would like a complete analysis of this philo-afro mental disorder .

    Can it be treated with high doses of radiation ? or perhaps some blunt trauma administered to their craniums ?
    These people need help !

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 2:54 pm | Permalink

      They’re just apeing what the White and Jewish elites tell them to do.

  24. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    May 25, 2011 - 2:37 am | Permalink

    @ Chris Moore , 7.59 pm.
    { The “historically oppressed by White people” argument is itself racist}
    Better call it primitive,because it goes back to the herd-mentality.Primitive people don’t see themselves primarily as individuals with individual responsibilities and therefore individual merit or guilt but essentially as MEMBERS OF A HERD.Whatever the herd does or has done collectively pertains to the individual.Guilt of SOME of the members of the herd pertains to ALL of the herd,and guilt of some of the herd in the PAST pertains to all of the herd in the PRESENT.In tribal cultures therefore you have the phenomenon of “blood-revenge”.If a member of tribe A kills a member of tribe B,then “justice” is done when any member of tribe B kills any member of tribe A in retaliation.It is the thinking of “herd-against-herd”. The absurdity of it all is well illustrated in the modern call for “reparations” for slavery.ALL present Whites should pay ALL Blacks for slavery that was abolished nearly one and a half century ago.Though it is true that nearly all Blacks in the USA are descendants of slaves,only a tiny minority of Whites are descendants of slave-holders.Most Whites in the USA are descendants of immigrants who not only came AFTER the abolishment of slavery but belong to entirely different European ethnic groups as those who held slaves,yet they are held responsible.It is as “logical” as holding the present generation of TIBETANS responsible for the JAPANESE attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941 with the “argument” that they both belong to the mongolian race…
    This is primitive herd-thinking.Jews of course are not primitive but they have inherited in their tribal culture some very primitive traits such as the idea of “inherited guilt”(and its corollary of inherited “right of revenge”).They use it as a weapon against others but of course it could also be used against themselves.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

      Good point. The American Public needs to realize that Jews are first, last and always motivated by PATHOLOGICAL REVENGE against their perceived oppressors – White People – going back 2000 years. Rely on it!

  25. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    May 25, 2011 - 2:37 am | Permalink

    [ What could be better than having two Black major-party candidates square off in the 2012 presidential election? ]

    Yeah , and you’ll notice this guy is more black than the obama .

    Maybe the two parties will be out-blacking each other .
    Like the next time around the democrats will have a witch doctor pygmy running and the repubs will then counter with a lip hooped cannibal .

    I wonder if pointing out that the other parties candidate is eating people will be considered to be racist ?
    We’ll just have to wait and see .

  26. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    May 25, 2011 - 6:15 am | Permalink

    Cain is just one more in the string of blacks who have learned to gain fame by “talking white” to people too ignorant to understand the fundamental issue is race, not policies. I doubt them or their black hero’s are even worth discussing.

    I’ve been wondering lately why we go to so much trouble trying to label ourselves as something other than just plain white, with unabashedly white interests. “White Nationalists” and such are just labels with a lot of negative baggage, and, I’ve come to believe, very counterproductive.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

      I agree. Just “WHITES” is a better label.

  27. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    May 25, 2011 - 7:57 am | Permalink

    I hope people understand that whenever something that is perceived by the establishment as a threat, it will be targeted for infiltration, subversion and destruction.. This is true for the Tea Party and it is also true for this very website.. There are a number of writes, contributing articles to this site, not going to name names, that I can say have questionable motives and affiliations.. that’s also true for the number of posters commenting articles here.. If we were to use the same measuring stick as it was used here for the TP, the life span of this site wouldn’t be that long either.. Every time whites will make attempts to organize they will be targeted for destruction.. IT’S A GIVEN.. It’s not going to be handed to you on a silver platter.. You will have to fight for it.

    My 2 cents..

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      May 25, 2011 - 11:59 am | Permalink

      Facio Libre is right on the money. We all should be in the constant high alert mode and scrutinize all writers and comment posters for subtle promotions of various facets of the enemy’s agenda.

      Tip: Number one on my list of clues to look for is when some member of the pro-white community starts promoting the idea of forming alliances with certain members of the enemy’s community and inviting them into our movement.

      That is how moles are inserted. Our motto need to be:

      No Moles, Just Right.

  28. anon's Gravatar anon
    May 25, 2011 - 8:01 am | Permalink
  29. Denys Picard's Gravatar Denys Picard
    May 25, 2011 - 8:24 am | Permalink

    I am kind of surprised that anybody could infer that the future election will be “fought”. the 5th of November 2008, it was already decided “Barack” would do eight years. Maybe he could be paroled out of Office.

    The Tea Party was a great spontaneous uproar which had genuine concerns and cause for about 2 weeks. And without putting in doubt the good faith of many of the followers, its leadership is unfocused and its agenda kidnapped by the media.

    The Tea party is now used to push agendas that are anti middle class but that both the democrats and the republicans do not want to stick to there image. As for the election, effectively it will be a divider of vote.

    So the only thing the 2012 promises to be is a more pornographic expense bonanza and brainwashing extravaganza for the populus.

  30. May 25, 2011 - 11:19 am | Permalink

    I happened upon his rally in Atlanta announcing his candidacy for President on C-SPAN. His remarks on Israel made BiBi seem like Alison Weir. The crowd loved it though. Judeo-Christians.
    AKA Anti-Christs.
    I have to agree, sadly, with the most perspicacious Fenria, no voting out of this mess, the Eskimos won’t have it.

    • Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
      May 27, 2011 - 2:53 pm | Permalink

      Wrong. They’re true Christians. Anti-Jewish Christians are an extremely tiny minority(<1% of all Christians) and are not real Christians in the first place.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 2, 2011 - 7:09 am | Permalink

      Z.O.G – Your ‘true Christians’ don’t mind when their fellow Christians are spit on their faces or copies of New Testament burned by Jews in Palestine. The problem ZOGs have with Muslims – is how could they cannot follow the Christian Evangelists.

      http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/religious-hatred-in-israel/

  31. May 25, 2011 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    FR: “The absurdity of it all is well illustrated in the modern call for “reparations” for slavery.ALL present Whites should pay ALL Blacks for slavery that was abolished nearly one and a half century ago.Though it is true that nearly all Blacks in the USA are descendants of slaves,only a tiny minority of Whites are descendants of slave-holders.”

    Similarly, by the modern Western intellectual zeitgeist, ALL Whites are to be perpetually held accountable for colonialism, and all Whites are to be perpetually held accountable for Nazism, even though a miniscule minority of Whites were responsible for implementing each, an even smaller minority of Whites benefited from each, and masses of Whites were the ones responsible for putting an end to each.

    Americans are now in a similar position worldwide where ALL Americans are being held accountable for starting wars in the Middle East even though it was a tiny cabal of Zionists and their congressional, war profiteering complex and media collaborators who were behind starting them (with lies), and who benefited from them. Averag Americans just picked up the expense tab and all the bad publicity.

    This is one reason I’m a libertarian and why I believe everyone should be. If a tribe of gangsters wants to engage in colonialism, let them pay for it themselves, take on the risk themselves, and pay the consequences if it goes awry themselves. They shouldn’t be allowed to get away with hiding behind the larger group after their black schemes go awry. This is classic, cunning-Jew behavior, and behavior engaged in by low-cunning, Jew-like Gentiles.

    Another example is how all Americans are picking up the tab for the miniscule minority of Wall Streeters who profitted form creating billions upon billions of dollars of corrupt financial instruments by way of bailouts, inflation and austerity measures.

    Trash like that pulls crap like that shouldn’t be allowed to be part of America, yet they’re actually running the place.

    • May 26, 2011 - 11:32 am | Permalink

      “You are ultimately willing support the expulsion of Jews from the West”

      Correction: Judeofascists who are guilty of treason, which will send a message to all would-be Judeofascists (and Islamists, and any other would-be tribal fascists, such as La Raza, or Nazis like yourself): don’t mess with America; don’t mess with Western civilization.

      “you would not be willing to compromise one jot or tittle of your ill-considered faith (i.e., libertardianism) in order to secure the genetic continuity of the White race.”

      Maintaining Western civilization will secure the genetic continuity of the White race, so long as its done in conjunction with throwing out the treasonous Judeofascists and other malign-intended, treasonous interlopers.

      I have no problem with any individual of any race that is willing to assimilate, and is unwilling to organize into a murderous or thieving gangster ethnic group. In fact, I actually prefer these over White Nazis and Communists who are treasonous to America, and treasonous to Western civilization, which makes them enemies of the White race and ultimately, every other.

  32. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    May 25, 2011 - 6:47 pm | Permalink

    This is a hopeful sign that Whites aren’t as naive as they appear. They see themselves as victims of racism according to this study.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1390205/Whites-suffer-racism-blacks-Study-shows-white-people-believe-discriminated-against.html

  33. Fynn's Gravatar Fynn
    May 25, 2011 - 9:44 pm | Permalink

    I watched the first Republican debate – or had it on – and would have been dumbfounded as to why the post-debate Tea Party focus group predominantly liked Herb Cain, if not for the fact that he is black. During the debate he said little and little of what had to say was interesting. But the PC reign of terror accounts for the lemmings putting their hands up for Herb Cain. These petrified people would no sooner vote against an African American in a focus group setting, than Russians would have voted against a communist in a focus group organized by Joe Stalin. If the “movement” can gain sufficiently in numbers and media presence, more and more whites will lose their fear and come our way. Ron Paul demonstrates well how many votes an honest man can get while working within the political and media establishment: about 5 or 10%.

  34. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    May 25, 2011 - 9:47 pm | Permalink

    This is what the REAL Tea Party is all about..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gmjhk2-ynLo&feature=player_embedded

  35. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    May 25, 2011 - 10:43 pm | Permalink

    “A pathetic commentary on the state of White America”, indeed, Kmac ! The befuddled Whites continue to churn about aimlessly, really clueless about racial reality, or, incredibly enough, in a flat-out state of race denial. They are terribly deracinated from centuries of ”proposition nation” tomfoolery, and by the effects of the mind altering parasites in more recent decades. The Tea Party crowd is very representative of how ideologically poisoned they really are. They are their own worst enemies.

    One would think that any self-respecting and purportedly intelligent people [Anglo-Whites] would eventually see sweet reason and start connecting the racial dots. Instead, they are more willfully ignorant than ever. It is flat ass crazy that they would still be slurping up the negrophilia garbage at this late stage of the dysgenic game. Most White people are good hearted, and well meaning, but my gawd are they ever clueless about the vital racial meaning of life.

  36. Captainchaos's Gravatar Captainchaos
    May 26, 2011 - 5:29 am | Permalink

    Dr. MacDonald, this Tea Party venture into black tokenism is yet more evidence of the White tendency to find emotional resonance with palpable symbols of moral abstractions, right? Right. Of course for the stupid the emphasis will be more on the “palpable symbol” of the moral abstraction than the “abstract” of the moral abstraction. How many of the Tea Partiers have IQs which exceed 130? (To pose the question as “How many Tea Partiers have IQs which exceed 140?” would be to set the bar impossibly high and thus be gratuitously insulting.) My guess, not many.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 3:16 pm | Permalink

      It is a question of cajones, not IQ.

  37. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    May 26, 2011 - 9:46 am | Permalink

    @Captainchaos

    Anyone with an IQ over 140 would know that this is what destruction of a movement looks like through infiltration and subversion.. Tea Party didn’t venture into black tokenism.. It’s being pushed towards it! There is a difference. Open your eyes!

  38. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    May 27, 2011 - 8:29 am | Permalink

    “This is a sign Whites have a long way to go before they embrace the truth. Their deepest fear is being called a ‘racist’. But the truth is, implicit Whiteness will not work, it must be explicit. And right now, Whites run in fear from that label.”

    Hence a white civil rights movement as the second step after weakening the psychological hold of the multicult.

    .
    ““White Nationalists” and such are just labels with a lot of negative baggage, and, I’ve come to believe, very counterproductive.”

    Inner party and outer party. If being WN in public is counter-productive then be WN in your head and be something else in public but work to make being WN in public easier by chipping away at the multicult.

    .
    “Tea Party didn’t venture into black tokenism.. It’s being pushed towards it!”

    Yeah but they *crave* it. Look at the reaction. Anyone who can say that level of cultic craving is the product of a fully and thoughtfully considered suicide urge and not the result of psychological conditioning is nuts. The Cain rally is blatantly Jonestown.

    .

  39. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    May 28, 2011 - 9:53 am | Permalink

    Whose interests the Tea Party serves – some idiots don’t want to know.

    Both Rep. Ron Paul and his son Sen. Rand Paul were hounded by AIPAC dogs when they said they want to cut USAID to Israel along with Egypt and Pakistan. Now, the two ‘anti-Semites’ are ganging on Ben-Obama for “begging” Israel to accept a “demilitarized” Palestinian state based on 1967 borders.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/washington-cannot-say-no-to-jewish-lobby/

    • Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
      May 28, 2011 - 11:00 am | Permalink

      “Both Rep. Ron Paul and his son Sen. Rand Paul were hounded by AIPAC dogs when they said they want to cut USAID to Israel along with Egypt and Pakistan. Now, the two ‘anti-Semites’ are ganging on Ben-Obama for “begging” Israel to accept a “demilitarized” Palestinian state based on 1967 borders.”

      Ron Paul will say the same about Iran as he is saying about Israel. Its actually a very good trick. He is basically saying we should not bother about what Israel does or Iran does but what we do. Its a good trick to not sound anti-Israel. He actually does not care about Israel and the Jews know that. They will never support him. He still wants to cut aid to Israel. Thats the bottom line.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 1, 2011 - 10:53 am | Permalink

      Bigmo – are you saying that Iran too receives $6-14 billion annual aid from Washington? Well if that’s true – AIPAC must be an Iranian lobby group, right!

      “The most important thing that I can convey about Iran in general – my most memorable reaction in retrospect – is this simple concept: Americans need to ignore anything and everything they hear about modern-day Iran, its leader, its culture, and its people from the mass media in America,” Michael Collins Piper, American author and correspondent for American Free Press, January 7, 2007.

      http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/islamic-republic-beyond-israeli-hasbara/

  40. Zenko Franu's Gravatar Zenko Franu
    May 29, 2011 - 8:48 am | Permalink

    The political circus is a minority Jewish dominated ring. Anything that happens inside the ring can only happen with the ring’s masters voice. The politics of America will not and can not change as long as these masters run the ring. Change can not come from within—third positions- tea party’s, Ross Perrots and other bland postures are simply bagatelles —. If a real, potential threat emerges from within the ring, it will be quashed before breakfast. Change can only come from without. The change we are infering is that a white re- conquista of the lands and the genes and biological force that have been taken away. A revolution is what it is needed, and the said revolution is not on sight, and when it comes it can never be from the inside; unless the inside rots away in which case the forces from without must be ready to step in and take over he debris.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

      I’m afraid you’re right, Zenko. They won’t go gently. They’ll have to be knocked out of the ring.

  41. May 29, 2011 - 10:56 am | Permalink

    Judeo Christians are the useful idiots of Jews.
    Real Christians are opposed to usury.
    Real Christians understand that Jesus opposed Jewry (the Pharisees).
    Real Christians understand that Matthew 10:34 means destroying Talmudic Phariseeism by putting the sword to it.
    Christian Zionists are race betrayers.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

      Christian Zionists are self-destructive idiots.

  42. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    May 29, 2011 - 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Shifting to publicly financed elections with a 21 day time window reserved for campaigning oughta help to take a lot of filth out of the pornographic circus the process has degenerated into. Attack ads will be made illegal. And Joe, I don’t want to hear stories about how your father-in-law Sol bumped his head against the guard tower in Majdanek either. (Ghosts of 2000 presidential campaign.)
    That would leave the ring runners with one weapon: old, dinosaur media whose readership and viewership have been in a free fall for more than decade now.
    Meanwhile enjoy the following:
    http://www.google.com/search?q=Tell+Obama%3A+You%27ve+Betrayed+Israel&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

  43. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 1, 2011 - 4:44 pm | Permalink

    Benji Netanyahu in his address to the joint Congress session gave his vote of confidence to the radicals in both Tea Party and the Republican Party.

    Kenneth G. Ramey writing in the Salem-News exposed these fanatic Zionists for distorting the Jewish Bible (OT) to serve their warmongering against Muslims and their blind support for the Zionist entity. Kenneth says that OT doesn’t give any prophecy about Jesus and Jesus being Jewish and Christmas is sold to the brainwashed Christians to collect billions of dollars some of which is used to settle illegal Jewish immigrants on lands stolen from Palestinian Muslims and Christians.

    “It is much too important, especially now, when politicians rely on what they hope will be a Christian base committed to the Republican Party (of God), a fictitious cognomen, a nickname, by which its leadership hopes to regain the Presidency by any and all means at it disposal, and our expense,” wrote Kenneth.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/bible-jesus-and-the-evildoers/

  44. Bobzilla's Gravatar Bobzilla
    June 1, 2011 - 8:53 pm | Permalink

    Unless A3P adopts a platform that supports Christianity it is doomed to fail. I am not talking about the Jonny-come-lately Christian Zionism. I am talking about the Christianity of our Forefathers in Europe. The Christianity that was the backbone of Western civilization for 2000 years. Christianity is the White race and the White race is Christianity.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      June 9, 2011 - 3:30 pm | Permalink

      Not anymore Bobzilla. The Fundamentalists and Evangelicals are Zionists, and the Catholics and Mainstream Protestants are purveyors of the quasi-atheistic Social Justice doctrine as religion. What’s left of Christianity?

  45. David's Gravatar David
    June 3, 2011 - 10:52 am | Permalink

    “The Tea Party was NOT dreamed up by the power elite insiders. The Tea Party was a spontaneous uprising of mainstream Americans who finally got sick of BOTH parties. It was started on CNBC by financial analyst Rick Santelli who called for a ‘Tea Party’ protest”

    You don’t even read what you write, do you?

    • bannister's Gravatar bannister
      June 4, 2011 - 11:56 am | Permalink

      Why do you say that? Are you saying that Rick Santelli is a “power elite insider” ?
      LOL

  46. Seal Beach's Gravatar Seal Beach
    June 24, 2011 - 8:50 am | Permalink

    Blacks role in American History is one subject America prefer not to address.
    Throughout America’s defining moments in history; blacks have always played an intricate role in shaping America’s morality or saving America from doom.
    In this case; I believe Mr. Cain is waking-up his fellow countrymen about the unabated perils to the nation if mass illegal immigration is left unchecked–even though African Americans are most affected by the influx of illegals.
    American Europeans seems to implicitly delegate these kind of issues for blacks to address to avoid the tag of being “politically incorrect!”
    So, in a sense of cultural opposite attraction; blacks and whites in America and America itself; really cannot survive without the other. No other nation in the world has reaped so much economic and moral fruit from blacks than America.
    Critical thinking is required when the masses start blaming blacks for personal failures later discovered after hysteria is played-out!

2 Trackbacks to "Herman Cain: Tea Party Rock Star"

  1. on June 1, 2011 at 4:55 pm
  2. on January 8, 2012 at 3:14 am

Comments are closed.