In May a high-level meeting of Muslim and Jewish leaders in Europe was held to express their concern about the rise of the European anti-Muslim right. The meeting was organized by three Jewish groups, two of them American: Rabbi Marc Schneier’s Foundation For Ethnic Understanding, an important organization aimed at cementing ties between Jews and non-White groups, and its close ally, philanthropist Ronald Lauder’s World Jewish Congress. (See also John Graham’s “American Rabbi: Europe must accept immigration swamping.”) The European Jewish Congress was also involved in organizing the event, but no Muslim groups were involved. This was therefore a Jewish project from beginning to end.
Their formal statement is yet another attempt to justify the death of the West as a moral imperative. Europeans are urged to live up to their ideals:
We are troubled by the growth of racist and xenophobic movements. We believe that individuals and organizations espousing such malign and hateful ideologies represent a grave threat to the fundamental European values of pluralism, democracy, mutual respect and cooperation.
Such statements always remind me of Israel Zangwill’s statement during the 1920s immigration debate in America: “You must make a fight against this bill; tell them they are destroying American ideals. Most fortifications are of cardboard, and if you press against them, they give way” (see here, p. 266). Destroy them by appealing to their moral idealism.
Pluralism and democracy are wonderful, uniquely European inventions, and they are quite adaptive as institutions among Europeans. However, in the context of massive non-European immigration they are a prescription for cultural and eventual genetic suicide.
Incidentally, pluralism and democracy have no role in traditional Jewish society, thus, I suppose, absolving Jews of any need to live up to such ideals. This is exemplified by a remarkable account of a recent assault on a dissident Jew in the Hasidic community of New Square, New York. Israel Shahak has described the authoritarian, anti-democratic structure of traditional Jewish communities in Europe and has noted that such incidents of intolerance toward other Jews were common.
The statement completely avoids talking about what the multicultural future will mean for Europeans, noting only that the problem is “complex”:
We recognise that the issues of identity, integration, multiculturalism and immigration are complex ones which need to be addressed properly and in consultation with the minority communities in Europe.
Translation: We are not going to spell out what the future multicultural Europe will be like because any reasonable vision of the future would be rejected out of hand by thinking Europeans. Europeans should embrace this future without questioning the likely consequences to themselves and their traditional culture. Trust us, it will all work out.
The statement appeals to “Europeans of conscience” to “put a stop to any group that espouses racist or xenophobic ideologies long before they are in a position to gain legislative or other power.” As usual, the Holocaust is the moral trump card, described as an event that is “unique in history.”
While there certainly are Jews who strongly oppose the Muslim invasion of Europe (see, e.g., Phyllis Chesler’s comment on the statement), the strong support by the most important mainstream Jewish organizations for massive Muslim immigration even in the face of Muslim anti-Semitism indicates the extent to which they value the destruction of Europe and its culture. My view is that they the organized Jewish community, including the ADL, believes that Muslim anti-Jewish attitudes can ultimately be managed without causing a disaster for the Jewish community.
By bringing up the Holocaust and referring to “people of conscience,” the statement is clearly an attempt to guilt-trip the Europeans. One can imagine all the groveling that will ensue as the statement is circulated among European elites and in the media. It’s no accident that all of the intellectual and political movements discussed in The Culture of Critique involve moral indictments of the West. Moral indictments are a prominent theme in the writings of political radicals and those opposing biological perspectives on individual and group differences in IQ. A sense of moral superiority was also prevalent in the psychoanalytic movement, and the Frankfurt School developed a moral perspective in which social science was to be judged by moral criteria rather than truth.
Recently, former Dutch politician Frits Bolkestein brought up the topic of European guilt in a Wall Street Journal op-ed (“The Roots of Europe’s Cultural Masochism: How did we come to lose confidence in our own civilization?”). Bolkestein suggests that “Christian guilt” is at the root of our cultural malaise. His theory is that when Europeans were truly Christian, they could atone for their guilt, but now the guilt remains “unsublimated” in the contemporary climate of unbelief.
This is all a bit too psychoanalytic for me, and it doesn’t explain why Europeans are so prone to guilt in the first place. But it is certainly a good sign to see public discussions of the source of the European lack of cultural confidence.
Bolkestein writes as if European guilt naturally welled up because of its Christian past and the memory of the horrific events of the 20th century, including the Holocaust. But historical memory is not a passive process in which events are simply remembered accurately. If the history of the rise of the left in the media and the academic world tells us anything, it is that there are very specific campaigns designed to take advantage of this European tendency for guilt.
The statement by Jewish and Muslim leaders is a case in point. And it’s quite clear where a very large part of the guilt comes from. As indicated above, moral indictments of the West have been central to Jewish intellectual and political movements that have been dominant among intellectual and political elites. All of these movements were vitally concerned with anti-Semitism and a common thread has been the development of theories of anti-Semitism in which the behavior of Jews was irrelevant, leaving the entire burden of guilt for the history of European anti-Semitism on the Europeans. These movements predate WWII and all, except perhaps psychoanalysis, remain influential. But beginning with the desire to rationalize of Israel in the aftermath of the 1967 Six-Day War, the centerpiece of the Jewish assault on the moral legitimacy of the West has been the Holocaust. The centrality of the Holocaust is apparent in the statement by Jewish and Muslim leaders discussed here:
On this Europe Day we remember together the horrors that took place on this continent in the 1940s – a campaign of mass murder, unique in history, which resulted in the annihilation of one third of world Jewry in the Holocaust.
To attack massive non-European immigration is to support the Holocaust. Opposing immigration places oneself outside the moral ingroup created by the culture of the Holocaust.
My view is that moral universalism and guilt are aspects of individualism as an ethnic trait of Europeans (See here, p. 23ff). These traits are profoundly maladaptive in the modern world where they have been used as swords by the historic enemies of Europeans and their civilization. European individualist culture creates morally defined ingroups rather than ingroups based on kinship, with high levels of altruistic punishment against violators. The Puritan-Yankee culture that was so influential in shaping America is a prominent example, as in the movement to abolish slavery in the 19th century and the Civil Rights movement in the 20th century. These morally defined ingroups function to prevent defection in societies not based on biological relatedness. Guilt then functions as a negative emotion motivating people to adhere to group norms. The success of the culture of the Holocaust in manufacturing guilt is testimony to the continuing success of this strategy.
The strategy of Jewish intellectual movements for destroying Europeans and their culture has been to convince the Europeans of their own moral bankruptcy. Jewish intellectual movements have have presented Judaism as morally superior to European civilization and European civilization as morally bankrupt and the proper target of altruistic punishment. The consequence is that once Europeans are convinced of their own moral depravity, they will destroy their own people in a fit of altruistic punishment. Thus the intense effort among Jewish intellectuals to continue the ideology of the moral superiority of Judaism and its role as undeserving historical victim while at the same time continuing the onslaught on the moral legitimacy of the West.
A counter-strategy therefore is to convince Europeans that preserving themselves and their culture is profoundly moral. I suggest the following (see here for a discussion):
- It is likely that racial oppression and violence against Whites will occur when Whites are in a relatively powerless situation and at the mercy of people with festering historical grudges. The Jewish historical memory of the Holocaust is the centerpiece of Jewish grievance against the West. In America, Jewish historical memory about the 1924 immigration law and anti-Jewish attitudes, especially prior to World War II, are also very salient. The historical memory of Blacks in America is also very hostile (Rev. Jeremiah Wright comes to mind), and Mexicans and Asians (see also here) have their own axes to grind.
- It is immoral to create a situation in which White populations are trapped between affirmative action for low-intelligent groups (Blacks, Arabs, American Mestizos) and competition with hardworking, relatively intelligent Northeast Asians. For example, recently Blacks entering UCLA had SAT scores that were on average 300 points below White and Asian students. At the other end of the achievement curve, 46% of the undergraduates at the University of California’s flagship university, UC-Berkeley, are Asians despite the fact that Asians are only 12% of the state population.
- It is immoral to require Whites to contribute to public goods like education and healthcare that disproportionately benefit non-Whites. From an evolutionary perspective, such concerns reflect evolved preferences and willingness to help people who look like them and have similar cultural proclivities. A major political fault line in the U.S. now is between White Republicans who do not want to pay higher taxes in states like California with a very large non-taxpaying population of non-White immigrants with a very high need for costly services like education and health care.. (Of course, the mainstream media sees this as a massive moral failing on the part of California voters.)
- As noted by Robert Putnam, there are also other negative consequences of multiculturalism, including increased conflict, social isolation, and distrust of the political process. Civic mindedness and a strong concern about the society as a whole have been a hallmark of healthy Western societies but this will certainly decline with the rise of multiculturalism. Civic mindedness and public trust have been noted as unique features of Western culture, strikingly apparent in contrast to the culture of corruption and nepotism that commonly plagues non-Western societies. As I noted elsewhere, trust is really a way of emphasizing the importance of moral universalism as a trait of individualist societies. In collectivist, family-oriented societies, trust ends at the border of the family and kinship group.
To inflict Europeans with multiculturalism — especially when support for multiculturalism and support for their own demographic and political eclipse have never been supported by a majority of Europeans — is profoundly immoral. The interests and rights of Whites as a majority are no less morally legitimate than anyone else’s rights. We have to seek a world in which Whites attempting to atone for their personal transgressions seek moral legitimacy by working even harder on behalf of their own people.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
Thought provoking article. There is a lot to digest but this line sticks out:
A counter-strategy therefore is to convince Europeans that preserving themselves and their culture is profoundly moral.
I think that is absolutely the key. Most Whites around the world have been convinced that their own existence is somehow suspect. They have fallen by the line put forward by Jewish intellectuals that “White people are the cancer of history”.
One strategy might be to point out how many wonderful things are almost uniquely White. Things like concern for the environment, representative government, and modern science. Point out that while Asia and other countries may adopt some of these policies, it remains an open question whether any of it can flourish in non-White societies.
Do we have the right to deprive the world of all these things in an orgy of White self-sacrifice?
The United Church of Christ a/k/a the Congregationalist Church is the direct descendent of the Puritans.
In the 1930′s the UCC made up as much as 22% of American Protestants—today the UCC is about 3% or 4% of Protestants with maybe a little over a million members.
Your Aunt Martha who attends a UCC church in a rural area, and gives the UCC a nice check every week has no idea that the UCC is anti-White.
It’s pretty much the same with the White ethnic Roman Catholics—they have no idea that they are being destroyed by their own church.
Jews just want to be safe. They don’t want to be “holocausted” again. This means that the Anglo-Saxons must be annihilated and Western Civilization itself destroyed. All perfectly reasonable, and they can’t imagine why any “people of conscience” would object. There is, of course, one other way: un-do Western Civilization’s greatest mistake, and put the Jews back in the ghetto. Where they belong. And where they’ll be safe.
Of course, it was Germany and the German people, who were literally “holocausted”.
The so-called “Jewish Holocaust” was invented (or at least it now serves this purpose) to mask or draw an opaque curtain across the widespread, bestial scenes of rape, murder, and brutal destruction that was mercilessly exacted upon the German people (men, women, and children): the most creative, cultured, and gentle people in the whole of Europe.
In early 1945, even US Army captains straight out of West Point were ordering the execution of young German soldiers (bravely fighting to protect their homeland, mothers, and sisters) just because they put up a good fight and were more than a match for America’s vastly overrated, over-emotional, and often cowardly military.
The Webling Incident took place in the village of Webling on the outskirts of of the town of Dachau. American soldiers of the 222nd Regiment of the 42nd Rainbow Division executed soldiers of the German Home Guard after they had surrendered on April 29, 1945. The Home Guard consisted of young boys and old men who were forced into service in the last desperate days of the war to defend their cities and towns.
The annals of World War Two contain several other recorded incidents of American GIs running amok and killing unarmed and surrendered Germans.
How can ‘white’ Americans call themselves ‘white’ and still keep a straight face, when it was in fact American audiences who whooped and cheered when German POWs were gunned down by American soldiers in the Spielberg movie “Saving Private Ryan” ???????
Jews will never be properly dealt with until and after New York City (specifically Manhattan) has been defanged and castrated, and its pseudo-economic scam industry closed down permanently, with its current crop of leaders thrown in a reopened Alcatraz.
How can ‘white’ Americans call themselves ‘white’ and still keep a straight face, when it was in fact American audiences who whooped and cheered when German POWs were gunned down by American soldiers in the Spielberg movie “Saving Private Ryan” ?
Nice attempt at demoralization. Well I guess they call themselves White in the same way that Romans and Gauls still thought of themselves as White even thought they fought. Or the way Englishmen all thought of themselves as White after the English Civil War.
Black tribes fight each other all the time, do they still all think of themselves as Black? And your beloved Middle Eastern people fight each other constantly, but they think of themselves as Arabs and Muslims.
It seems to me doubtful that the Jews would want to destroy “Western civilization”. Their very existence depends on being able to function within that civilization. A parasite does not destroy its host, for it would destroy itself in the process.
Further, to whom would the Jews extend their usurious loans? To blacks, mestizos, mulattoes, zambos? They would have a hard collecting their money and their usurious monetary racket would probably collapse.
@ CompassionateFascist, 2:01 am.
["Jews back in the ghetto"]
That is the only reasonable “final solution” (worthy of a “compassionate” fascist I should say). You don’t let a serial criminal roam the streets,you lock him up,for good. It has by now been abundantly demonstrated that Jews cannot live among other peoples without trying to destroy them. Even in America that has been so good to them they are passionately engaged in its destruction.There is no excuse for their behaviour. An ETHNIC GHETTO for all of them is the only solution. Only that ghetto should not lie in Europe,the US or even Palestine but as far from the inhabitated world as possible.My idea is the southernmost end of Latin America on Tierra del Fuego. There they should have a territory with enough food (that they themselves grow),housing and medicines,but no luxury. And they should be forbidden to travel to or communicate with the outer world. It should not be an independent state but a permanent mandate of the UN. My proposal for a name of that mandate would be GHETTOSTAN. Let them live for all eternity in that Ghettostan and leave us “Goyim” alone.
Unfortunately, to the Jewish mind, for them to be safe, everyone else must be destroyed or made subordinate. Examine Jewish history and the Jewish cult, (it’s not a religion), and you will discover the roots of “anti-semitism.”
@ Uncle Sam wrote “It seems to me doubtful that the Jews would want to destroy ‘Western civilization’”.
First, note that many Jews are adamantly pro-white. Google “Jew Among You.”
Second, consider Africans-in-America.
Were it not for the White infrastructure, American blacks would digress back to grass huts, lip plates and bathing babies in cow urine. Nonetheless, blacks continue to rage against “White privilege.”
They are killing the goose that lays their golden eggs.
Most government programs now require a environmental impact statement. Perhaps a Racial Impact Statement should be added, comparing who benefits and who pays. It should be added to every budget item.
Meanwhile, back on planet Earth, anti-racism is just a code word for anti-white.
Nobody is flooding non-Arabs into all Arab nations and only into Arab nations and calling Arabs evil racists for opposing their dispossession.
Nobody is flooding non-blacks into black nations and only into black nations and calling blacks evil racists for opposing their dispossession.
This is happening in all white nations and ONLY in white nations.
There has never been a vote allowed on this issue in any white country. No one is allowed to talk about it, without being shouted down.
It is not suicide, it is genocide.
The dispossession of people in the modern world is limited to Whites. I don’t know of it happening in Asia, Africa or the Middle East.
The other side will fire back that Whites dispossessed Indigenous people in North America, Australia and Africa centuries ago. We need a way to neutralize that argument. The real target audience for our counterargument is not the Left or Jewish intellectuals, but Whites.
One effective comeback might be to point out that obviously the other side sees this as payback for past “sins” of Whites, so therefore it is meant to punish, which by definition means it isn’t good for Whites.
There is probably a better way to deal with it, but we have got to get Whites to even see that it is happening and also that the other side knows it is bad for us.
Thank God for White Rabbits and those wonderful BUGS Swarms!
Dr. MacDonald has usefully summed up what is known on the West Coast as The Anti-White Narrative. As an example of defamation campaigns, it is of the same type but of vastly larger historical significance than the similar anti-Philistine narrative from Old Testament days, and follow-up narratives to demonize the Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Spanish, Russian, and German peoples.
In addition to the suggestions offered by Dr. MacDonald, may we also consider starting any moral campaign by naming the campaign of defamation for exactly what it is. That would be a useful first step to asserting ourselves as an essentially moral peoples with a moral right to live and thrive.
“The other side will fire back that Whites dispossessed Indigenous people in North America, Australia and Africa centuries ago.”
Of course they will. They are anti-white and will do anything to justify the Genocide, they are taking part in. The problem they have is, there is no justification for Genocide.
So your comeback, is to repeat back what they are saying in terms that everyone listening can understand:
“So you admit to Genocide and you are justifying Genocide.”
Repetition is key. We aren’t dealing with intelligent or reasonable people, so we aren’t trying to convince them of anything. We are talking to the whites that are listening.
So your comeback, is to repeat back what they are saying in terms that everyone listening can understand:
“So you admit to Genocide and you are justifying Genocide.”
Yes, I think that is very effective. Make the point that they are justifying genocide (or at least displacement). Make it obvious to the public that this is their goal.
And Don’s point is excellent too. What we are dealing with here is a defamation campaign against Whites. And as far as the Jewish dimension is concerned, we are just the latest in a long running series of defamation campaigns. I do think most people instinctively realize that Jews must play some role in the endless conflicts they find themselves in.
WE THE DESTROYERS vs. WE THE PEOPLE
Three Jewish groups meet,one even called “Foundation for ETHNIC UNDERSTANDING “,to talk about relations between Muslims and Europeans, but no Muslim organisations are invited.And then they issue a statement like:
“…We recognise that the issues of identity,integration,multiculturalism and immigration are complex ones which need to be addressed IN CONSULTATION WITH THE MINORITY COMMUNITIES IN EUROPE…”
But where is the consultation of these “complex issues” with the MAJORITY COMMUNITIES in Europe?
So Jews talk with Jews about (troubling) relations between Muslims and Europeans,but no Muslims or Europeans are invited?This socalled “altruistic” concern seems to be – as always – nothing but Jewish ethnic self interest.But on closer inspection even that seems not to be the case.If Jews are so eager to promote non-White immigration into all White lands what is their self interest in this?Changing the West into a Third World garbage dump? Is that an environment Jews can live comfortably in?And what about Muslims who are on the whole far more anti-Semitic than Whites?Is having millions of Jew-hating Muslims around “good for Jews”?It makes no sense,unless we are prepared to suspect something far more sinister than (perhaps misguided) self-interest.It seems that the DESTRUCTION OF ALL EUROPEAN PEOPLES is the real objective here.Not only in Europe but also in America,Canada, Australia and New Zealand.In all those countries organized Jewry is hell bent on promoting non-White immigration.They even lobbied to have special “anti-hate” laws adopted in order to supress any resistence of the people to their own dispossession.This White Genocide Project seems for them even more important than their own economic wellbeing or even their existential security.
The Phrase of rabbi Marcus Eli Ravage comes to mind: “…We Jews are the destroyers…we will never be satisfied because we want..a world of our own…”
All inter-ethnic problems of the world are ultimately solvable on the principle of live-and-let-live,but there is no room for “destroyers”.
There is a clear distinction between “We the people “( meaning all the peoples of good will of the world) and “We the destroyers”.If they want a “world of their own” let them try to find that in Hell.
Some Jews do realize that the suicide of America and Europe will potentially destroy their own children’s future. There are people like Seymour Itzkoff who has written about the disaster of Europe opening the floodgates of immigration. But the number of Jews who can get past their emotional reactions (and bad intent) are a small minority.
If Jews could see that the dispossession of Whites would mean that the destruction of Europe and America, and that this in turn would be very bad for the Jews, Jewish attitudes might change – at least enough to make a difference.
One more thought on convincing Europeans that it is moral and necessary to save themselves and their culture: Point out that the culture they love (including liberalism) is unique to White people, and that if societies fail to remain White, the culture they love will be gone.
I think most Whites believe that other ethnicities will conform to Western. They tend to believe the “melting pot” theory and think that adding people from Asia, Africa and Mexico will be no different than adding Irishmen and Italians. Their confidence in that belief needs to be undermined.
They need to be reminded that even though Japan and China have adopted some of Western culture (mainly economics) they have not become that similar to European countries. They still do not embrace the individualism and the freedom of expression we value, for example.
Most people believe the “race does not matter” idea and that they blind themselves to the reality that most of what they love about life in America or Europe will be destroyed if Whites are replaced. We need to make them face that.
More importantly, they’ve adopted Western science, engineering, and medicine.
I’m not convinced of that. If individualism is defined as being allowed to dye your hair the color of an Easter egg or having access to a wide variety of pornography, then the Japanese are almost as “advanced” as us here in the West.
The only reason the Japanese aren’t facing annihilation like we are is because they haven’t had jews writing their history textbooks and immigration policies (and despite this, the Japanese are reproducing below replacement levels, just like Westerners).
China is on the fast track to becoming the world’s leading economy. The economies of the other Asian countries, like Japan and Korea, are also quite advanced. It would not surprise me at all if they overtake the White countries within a relatively short period of time (30 years).
As Igor Alexander above very astutely pointed out, Japan does not have any Jews in it to throw a monkey wrench into its development. The same thing could be said for the other members of the Yellow race. That is an extremely important factor to consider.
How can we compete angainst the Chinese and Japanese as long as we are stuck with affirmative action and its beneficiaries? They will overtake us unless tough minded white men regain control of the country – fat chance of that right now, but hopefully things will change.
Jews are upset that despite their collossal attempts to destroy white europeans, we are still around, getting the word out to our brethren about what is going on…….. (“hey now what’s that sound…everybody watch what’s going down”…) they are so desperate and blood thirsty that they are willing to risk their own to muslim antisemitism rather than postpone our demise!!!
If any jews are reading this….your people are insane, and they have much blood on their hands!
Only a cataclysmic disaster will wake up dumb-ass White people to what Jews are doing to destroy them.
Can the Jews not understand that they would be far better off in an all-White London than in a “Londonistan” infested by Paki and Somali gangs?Yet they keep going on this path to (self)destruction.Either they are paranoid psychopaths or destructive psychopaths,but psychopaths they are.
Yeah,a “light unto the Nations”.
Envy and jealousy also play a role. Just like the rest of the non-White world, they can’t help but compare themselves to us and find themselves lacking. It irks them to no end and causes them to lash out in a variety of ways, some more irrational than others.
A phosphorous light unto the nations.
They hate White Christians far more than they love anything else.
EuroMike – see the Light. Smell the Sulphur.
Can you blame Jews for hating Christian idiots like you living in their self-denial? The Christians expelled the Jews from London for 350 years when none of your ‘Paki’ lived in London.
Since it were the White Europen Christian Nazis who murdered ‘Six Million’ Jews during 1938-44, Why London blamed Holocaust on Arabs and dumped their religious garbage in Palestine? No wonder, India’s Krishna Menon and Iranian Ahmadinejad have asked the West to take their ‘garbage’ back so the Asian people can breathe some fresh air.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/western-mass-media-and-israel/
Paranoid sociopaths of the most destructive kind! You got it!
Jewish groups like ADL, WJC, AJC, CJC, etc. are known for using Western Muslim minorities as shield to counter the centuries-old Christian anti-Smitism. All these Jewish groups are part of Israel’s Hasbara (propaganda) Committe. Their rare stand against anti-Muslim propagated by the Zionazi facists is to fool both Muslims and the Christians. While these groups want Muslims to believe they care for Muslim rights in the West, they also fool the westerners that Muslims hate them more than the Jews do. In 2006, Abe Foxman, national director in his book had asked that Jesus’ all anti-Jewish quotes must be deleted from the New Testament because those quotes played a major role in the Holocaust.
The European Holocaust guilty conscience has long been rooted into White generations. Why else you think most of the European governments are run by anti-Muslim and pro-Israel facists? Germany has already paid $93 billion to Israel as Holocaust compensation money. The US taxpayers have contributed over $1.6 trillion to Israel since 1973 as part of ‘White Guilt’. Who, in his right mind, will blame Jews for maintaining such profitable industry?
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/02/07/holocausts-too-many-to-remember/
That would remove at least half of Jesus’ words from the New Testament. Christ is by far the most effectively “anti-Semitic” teacher in history, not against the Hebrew race but against the Talmudic religion and philosophy. The Neitzschean critique of traditional Christianity as Judaizing is 180 degrees backwards.
Edward – Jesus was not anti-Hebrew. He was himself from a Hebrew clan. He claimed to be a Messenger to Hebrew people (along with John the Baptist) to bring them back to the Moses Law (Torah). What’s is quoted to Jesus in the four Gospels, like Jewish myth of Holocaust’ – still has to be proved being ‘Word of God’. According to Dr. Robert Funk DDD, 80% of verses believed to be the sayings of Jesus – are lies fabricated by ‘interested people’ to serve their personal agenda.
Jewish Talmud was written over 100 years after the ‘dis-appearance’ of Jesus. It’s full of Hebrews’ hatred toward Jesus, Holy Mary and Christians at large.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2008/11/25/jewish-cartoons-mock-christians/
Dr. MacDonald delivers here another cogent,
timely analysis regarding the cynical attempt by organized Jews to press for a multuralculturalism in Europe they would never tolerate themselves and in Israel. He exposes them again as vicious hypocrites who manipulate ‘Holocaust guilt’ (as if all of Europe was to blame for Adolph Hitler) with a view to making the destruction of Europe “a moral imperative” while deflecting all examples of odious immoral Jewish behavior throughout history all the way up to Gaza & the treatment of black Jews & Arabs in Israel where all avenues to power—and, often enough, even a decent living—are undemocratically blocked.
I would only mention one caveat: To continually hammer away at “….biological perspectives on individual and group differences in IQ” is a provocative non-starter even for European whites. Such theories or facts will only guarantee more hate & more misunderstanding. Dr. E. Michael Jones’ analysis (Culture Wars magazine) is, I believe, more compelling, helpful & constructive in analysis, with many of the same ends in view, intersecting with Kevin MacDonald otherwise in not a few crucial areas.
Dr. MacDonald’s eugenical sociobiological theories get in the way of his otherwise trenchant analysis.
“Dr. MacDonald delivers here another cogent,
timely analysis regarding the cynical attempt by organized Jews to press for a multuralculturalism in Europe they would never tolerate themselves and in Israel. “
If the Jews are all so hot and bothered for multi-racialism, well let them try it first in Israel!
It could be so easy! Just pass the Right of Return and allow millions of Arabs to come over and add a whole bunch of ‘Diversity’.
Whites need to take their concern about moral universalism and project it onto Israel. It is very easy to pose as an anti-Zionist progressive these days (I do it all the time to the Jews at the University I work at, there is nothing they can do, I am speaking up for an oppressed minority, the Palestinians! haha!!! )
Fight fire with fire.
That may be so Mr Mallon. In a recent exchange elsewhere I introduced the IQ point. From that point on, the argument descended into a debate on the validity of isolating variables from statistical data and the use of concepts like race and intelligence. SJ Gould (on whom KMac has an amount to say) was brought in by my opponents and we all got nowhere, though I stood my ground.
All the same, though it is a difficult argument – and one has to stress the point that there are large differences from the average figures – it is also a powerful one in the cause of white identity and rights. I’m inclined to keep at it.
Although I don’t think IQ is THE reason we don’t want immigrants (to me it’s not even the main reason), it’s a good argument against roughly 90% of non-white immigrants coming into the countries of European peoples. So I think it’s handy.
When argueing against anti-racists, they will try to prove you’re a racist. Now I always start out by telling them Koreans are more intelligent then us. (If you take a look at demographics and economics in China, Korea, Japan, they are less dangerous in terms of immigration than India, Africa, and the Muslim countries. Of course there are purely utilitarian arguments against accepting large numbers of them either, but that’s not IQ.) I always try to stick to Koreans, whenever they start talking about how prejudice might cause the low performence of Blacks, I always point out that racism was no obstacle to Koreans, who are more intelligent then us.
So nobody can prove I’m a racist, because I always say first that Koreans are more intelligent than us Europeans. It’s also very easy, I use the relevant chapter from Richard Lynn’s Race And Intelligence (Koreans perform consistently better, Koreans in Korea, Koreans in the US, Korean children adopted by US White parents, etc.). After that, I make a small point regarding Africans, South Asians (including Arabs and Indians), Latin-Americans, etc., and there we are. They will call me names (racist!), but that makes them look stupid (“really? saying Koreans are BETTER than us is racism?”)
“. . . only guarantee more hate & more misunderstanding”?
HOW? Moreover, that is enemy terminology.
Excellent Excellent Article , thanks Kevin.Our people need to look deeper into the evolution of the Europeon Peoples through the Ice Ages to get a clearer picture of where we are coming from . I have just read ‘Erectus walks amongst us’-R Fuerle and recommend it for a clear succinct view of Evolution of humanity , focusing on the Ice Age Influences on our People.
I hope readers , particularly Americans , are considering their PAYPAL ACCOUNTS .The beginning of a long journey starts with the first step as they say.
Lets not forget the Jewish butchery and criminal mass murder carried out in the Soviet Union , the USSR , for 40 YEARS . I have never heard ONE apology for the 50 millions souls tortured to hell , the 10 of millions of families broken and destroyed , the untold misery created by these villains .Not one apology.NOT ONE! The psychotic ,psychopathic hypocrites live a lie and its our duty to dispel this LIE! Never let these phoney , righteous hypocrites forget it .
Agreed!
Many in the jewish community look at Muslim /Moorish spain as their ‘golden age’ . They have always been far more hostile to Christianity and the west than Islam- Neocon David horowitz and others also try peg Palestinian resistance to israel on contact with ‘the nazis’ – in a sense, blaming the west for any anti-Jewish muslim feeling.
When someone jewish sees a muslim family they feel ‘comfortable’ when they see a family of whites, particularly a blond couple with blond children, it fires some uneasiness that goes deep into their psych.
Some here ask ‘how can they be so blind’ or can’t they see the backlash that will come if muslims gain power in the west.
Remember that ‘smart’ doesn’t mean rational, remember that ‘smart’ people can be neurotic, in denial of reality, or so filled with hate and fear that they suspend reason.
A very cogent, insightful analysis.
Do you also notice the complete indifference to the skyrocketing rape and violence rates- attacks which whites are mostly suffering? I believe that deep down, many of them see it as justice served.
“We have to seek a world in which Whites attempting to atone for their personal transgressions seek moral legitimacy by working even harder on behalf of their own people.”
Yes.
Unfortunately the Catholic Church has renounced the core belief of the Crusades: that Crusading is a penitential act.
The potential is there in European genes, as centuries of crusading proved. I just don’t see a modern institution or pro-White wealthy elite ready to activate that potential.
I recognize that the Catholic Church is a universal institution, not a White one, and that those who sought personal redemption by going on armed pilgrimages for it were doing so ultimately in the service of Jesus as a universal redeemer and not for their own race, kinfolk, heritage and culture.
But they fought, in practice, for a Christendom that was White, and they were strengthened by societies in which kinship was treasured not marginalized, and to that extent the idea that “Whites attempting to atone for their personal transgressions seek moral legitimacy by working even harder on behalf of their own people” has already had its historic “proof of concept” testing. The verdict of centuries is that this can work. You need to dress White collective interests up very nicely for idealistic Whites. But if you do, they can and will seek personal redemption by fighting for the common good, turning their hyperactive guilt-proneness from a maladaptive weakness to a great strength.
Dr. Mac.
You might find the following co-incidentally interesting to your commentary.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/ME25Ad01.html
@ Omop, 10:29 am.
["Hitler hero worship on the Internet in China"]
An article in the Asia Times reports that on the internet in China Hitler is widely admired as a great hero. The article advises:
“…relevant Jewish organizations from the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the United States Holocaust Museum should engage with Chinese partners, such as the Shanghai Center for Jewish Studies and the Sino-Judaic Institute, to promote Holocaust education and awareness of modern genocide…”
If you know the history of Jewish false flag operations,you suspect that this whole business of “Hitler worship in China” is a fraud started by Jews themselves on the Internet to justify the introduction of Holocaust studies in China. Jews understand very well that Holocaust Guilt Tripping is their greatest psychological weapon in the West, generating sympathy, “reparations” in billions of dollars and political support for Israel. In China the Jews don’t have that leverage, therefore it has to be artificially created. Why the Jews are targetting China is clear enough. China is the new emerging economical superpower and the Jews – eternal parasites that they are – are looking for a new “host” after having plundered and ruined the West. But China has first to be psychologically “softened up”. Hence this “Hitler worship problem” that has to be “solved” with nationwide Holocaust education.
Poor Chinese if they fall for this trick!
The Army of Israeli Jews have just killed and wounded many unarmed civilians on the Golan Heights yet you look at the outrageous reporting of which the Sydney Morning Herald
http://www.smh.com.au/world/israel-blames-syria-for-deaths-of-golan-heights-protesters-20110606-1fpdc.html?skin=text-only
is but one typical example.
From the above report it is “clear” that the unarmed civilian dead and many wounded is no fault of the Israeli Jewish army.
The disgusting level of this Tribe disinformation propaganda article in using every unsubstantiated accusation in the book is so typical of their desperate tactics.
Even as murderers of unarmed civilians they attempt to portray themselves as innocent “victims” displaying not one iota of guilt for this crime yet only a few weeks ago the same controlled mass media were circulating their own rumours that civilians were in danger in Eastern Libya and that to stop civilians killings there must be intervention to prevent this and hence the sadly predictable escalation of a war of dispossession and removal on the secularist Ghaddaffi government. (Incidently by promoting Jihadist elements in the East.)
The actual behaviour of Israel is a shining example of the double standards employed by the Tribe and gives the lie to their claim of moral superiority but though it is crystal clear they can use their power they are testing it to the limit to either exclude from news coverage or slant and spin their criminality into “defensive” measures of which they cannot take responsibility.
This “forever the victim” stunt is wearing extremely thin and they know it which is why they will plug and spin their holocaust victimology even more fanatically and hysterically than ever to cover up their present day crimes.
In the face of unarmed civilians they use bullets to murder those people.
If there really is any moral universalism in the West then no matter how much Tribe apologists bury it or lie through their teeth those who claim to operate on the basis of moral universalism i.e. Leftists and liberals must start to feel more and more uncomfortable about supporting the murder of unarmed civilians just because those murderers are professional Holocaust wailers cynically using a previous suffering to promote a present intolerance towards anyone who dare protest peacefully. I think in shooting unarmed civilians they may have a problem is spinning their “terrorism” routine.
As the same mass media is promoting the “Arab Spring” when it suits their agenda they cannot, without fatally injuring their own propaganda, just blank out or justify mass killing and wounding by live ammunition just because the because the bullets are fired by the chosen and expect to get away with it without anyone noticing.
Whilst they may succeed in convincing those who want to be convinced for their own selfish reasons they will fail with anyone who has more than a goldfish memory and increasingly with those who will not see it as in their interests to keep on supporting or being silent about Jews as perpetrators and coming “off message” about the never ending narrative of the Jew as perpetual innocent victim.
They are getting too blatant because they are cocky and over-confident that they can get away with anything and there lies their weakness, but look out for using them using their usual tactics of intimidation and threats against those who have begun to feel uneasy about undermining their own claim to moral universalism by continuing to support or be silent about Israeli Jewish atrocities and the Tribal Diaspora’s blanket support for their fellow Zionist Jews.
The real Jew is exposed by the actions of the Israeli government and military. They will deal with White people the same way they deal with Palestinians if they ever gain the raw power to do so. And that raw power is what they are tirelessly working and scheming to acquire.
For those who are wondering why the parasite would
destroy its host, the answer is that they infect a new host.
One needs only to remember who opened up Chinese/American
relations and all the technology transfer, capital investment
and outsourcing that went with it.
Does the name Kissinger ring a bell. The avant-guarde
parasite to China.
Mike H
Mike H and Heather Blue pour vous and others.
“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races…and by the establishment of a world republic in which everywhere the Jews will exercise the privilege of citizenship.
In this New World Order the Children of Israel…will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition…” (Karl Marx in a letter to Baruch Levy, quoted in Review de Paris, June 1, 1928, p. 574)
Quite so. They hatched one plan for paradise and tried to execute it in Russia. After a few million bodies had piled up, and the society was obviously headed to oblivion, they pulled up stakes, thoroughly infected the US, and even had the nerve to goad the US against the Russian people for having the gall to salvage what they could of their society. Next stop will be China, after the US is a spent force, just as Russia was, and for the same reason.
I wrote this elsewhere, but I want to response to this article but I can’t think of anything better to say than what I said there.
If you read some of works of the great white thinkers you will detect a subconscious premonition of impending disaster. Oswald Spengler’s gloomy book “The Decline of the West” sets on my bookshelf. I read it a few years ago and found it somewhat over my head, but I certainly picked up on Spengler’s pessimism. (I need to read it again, I suppose.)
The existence of the white (or Caucasian) races is always under attack. I think we are the only human species that live under a freaky kind of curse. Why do alien races desire the extinction of the white race? Certainly, they hate easily; they even hate each other, but in a different way than they hate the White Race. White people have no acrimonious feelings for anybody, anywhere.
Apparently, non white races are united in their desire for the demise of the White Race. It is not just the Jews… all of them, the Blacks, Browns and Yellows have us under attack. They swarm over the west like the locusts of Biblical times. The Jews are the field marshals of this operation.
It’s like a curse bestowed on us by Providence. We are the only Race who must fight for survival as a race. Men have gone to war over territory, nations, supplies, the right to water-ways, trade routes, oil, but the White Race is the only race under siege as a race. Throughout history our enemies have been at a racial war with us. We go down only to rise up again, down, up, down, up….. It’s a constant struggle.
So far, we have out-lasted the death squads, but our future looks bleak this time. In the past, white survival probably looked just as bleak to our intuitive forebears. But those wars against our survival were confined by geography. The effort this time is global. Can we beat the odds yet again?
Our situation is certainly unique. No other group seems to live under this kind of threat to their existence. Is it any wonder we have ominous premonitions? The “end of time” is always dogging our heels. But you know, even if we are able to survive this particular onslaught our enemies will gather themselves together for another major assault in the future. The hatred for our Race will probably never go away.
There’s definitely a lot of presentiment on our part. We seem to have something in common with the Japanese, which is an underlying cultural obsession with suicide. Suicide rates are very high in Europe and Japan, and both peoples are neglecting to have children. But while Japan refuses to inundate their nation with hordes of sick and violent third worlders, Europeans welcome it. The Japanese commit suicide in a stoic and direct manner that at least preserves their culture. The Europeans, meanwhile, commit suicide by allowing others to kill them. The Japanese are dominant and self-possessed while the Europeans are weak and submissive to others, but the end result is the same: the end of two cultures.
Heather Blue – Spengler’s book MAN AND TECHNICS also discusses the link between Whites, technology, and Western civilization; give it a read sometime, it’s short and excellent: http://www.archive.org/details/ManTechnics-AContributionToAPhilosophyOfLife193253
Very interesting article. A little over generalized though. I am still not sure about this moral idealism and universalism and all that. Also the article does not seem to define what is meant by White here. Does he mean USA or Europe. Because things like pluralism or democracy was not something that was common in Europe. Pluralism as such also struggled in the America where we had certain ethnic communities with more rights than others. So I am not sure what all this means. The article seems to see democracy as something Western rather than modern.
Maybe.
But the problem with theories like these is you are going to have to defend it. As Rehmat has shown here, its not that easy to do. Anyways its irrelevant. Europe or America is not Jewish or Islamic. So who really cares what they think. Not being rude or anything but fair.
When they allow their native lands to be flooded by peoples of different cultures and ethnities by the million without complaining THEN they can talk. One wants an ethnocracy while the other a theocracy but here in the West they want a democracy? What kind of silliness is that?
E.g. mediavel parishes were quite democratic in most of Europe, at least in Western Europe for sure. And even before that, Germanic tribes, Italian and Greek city-states were maybe not paragons of modern democracy, but still something much closer to it than anything in the Levant or Egypt etc. Monogamy – a common feature of European societies even before the onset of Christianity – is also a very deeply democratic trait of any society, and it seems to have been quite unique to Europe. Most Roman emperors didn’t have as large a harem as similar lords in the East…
Exploitation Versus Trust: The Difference in the Jewish
and Gentile Worldviews
So double-dealing Judeofascists tried to enlist Muslims in a coalition to slowly eradicate non-Jewish right-wingers and traditional Christians in order to eventually eradicate Western civilization.
MacDonald: “no Muslim groups were involved”
It’s to the credit of these Muslims that they are unwilling to get in bed with the left-wing of the Judeofascist ideology. Having gone through the experience of having the right-wing of Judeofascism and its “secular,” “liberal” and neocon stooges attempting to wipe out Islamic civilization under the auspices of “democracy,” “progressivism,” and “humanitarianism” for the last ten years, they no doubt recognize that this is merely the anti-Western civilization equivalent of what the ringer they have been put through, and that anyone who gets in bed with the Judeofascist devil ultimately gets burned.
This just goes to show how much more civilized certain elements of Islamic civilization are than the many Whites in both the Establishment Right and the Establishment Left currently in bed with the Judeofascists either in the attempt to snuff Islamic civilization or in the attempt to snuff Western civilization, or both.
Didn’t these Jewish totalitarians foresee that the day would eventually come when the Christians and Muslims would see through their murderous double-dealing, and that they would pay a heavy price for their treachery?
Probably not, given that they are clearly sociopathic narcissists and psychopaths.
The question that will need to be answered by Christians and Muslims soon down the line is: what is to be done with the Judeofascists and their Left-Right, pseudo-secular, Zionist and Marxist snake collaborators?
“We don’t want them…let Islamic civilization take them!”
“No, we don’t want them…Western civilization should take them!”
Maybe we together can set up a snake refuge and autonomous oblast in Madagascar.
Bolkestein’s explanation hints at the truth. Christian-era European treatment of Jews is judged sinful by “Enlightenment” moral standards. The post-Christian regime installed through hostile conquest naturally sought to delegitimize its predecessor. Historical judgments are written by the victor.
The European suppression of Jews was morally justified according to the Christian requirement to defend against objective evil. This defense policy advanced both universal ideals and the interests of European gentiles.
Christian-era philosophers considered objective evil to be definable. “Enlightenment” philosophers responded by denying the possibility of objective evil and deploying a succession “non-judgmental” moral frameworks that favor the interests of Jews over Christians.
Histolorically, Semites of the Judaic and Islamic stripe have been working together against “Christians” (read, Indo-Europeans) for centuries. They coordinated together in taking and holding parts of Spain before Isabella reclaimed it. Muslims also gave Judaics shelter in their empires. Crusaders rightfully expelled both from lands they sought. As Spengler noted, both are “Magian” and are more like brothers than some of the naive might think. Arab-Judaic conflict is a recent aberration caused by political Judaic nationalism backed by the nominally Western powers.
“As Spengler noted, both are “Magian” and are more like brothers than some of the naive might think.”
Great point Jay. In DECLINE OF THE WEST Spengler says that White Westerners are “Faustian,” while Jews/Arabs are “Magian” as you note. He also says that Magian Jews/Arabs are kind of “fossils” of a previous era still surviving as a remnant bygone high culture in the Faustian West. He says that the clash between Faustians and the Magians is a cultural clash of being out of sync, that the Magian culture is older while the Faustian is younger…again, a problem of being out of sync with each other, like a generational gap. To make a generational comparison, if the Faustian West is a mature middle-aged man nearing retirement, the Magian Jews/Arabs are a decrepit old blind 100+ year old man nearing death. Though Spengler’s analysis has surely met many challenges in this age of globalization.
But since the Faustian West is in decline according to Spengler and others and now has such a global reach with so many hangers-on including the Jewish and Arab Magians (as well as Africans, Asians, immigrants of all kinds, etc etc), the downslide of the Faustian West means the downslide of all the others too — at least until another culture arises sometime in the future.
It is an interesting double standard: the Goyim are guilty of everything, but the Chosen people are never guilty of anything. Eternal victims on one side (the Holy People), eternal criminals on the other (the not quite humans on the other – the Goyim). Only simpletons buy this.
All part of the scam by the Zionists and their Left-Right Globalist partners to ride the “righteous victims,” the “holy Jews,” the “nation of priests” straight to the top of the New World Order.
That the Gentile half of the racket was dumb enough to think that these Jewish Zionist knaves were reliable and trustworthy partners just goes to show how defective the post WW II generation of “elites” truly is.
Jews have created wars and conflicts for whites to annihilate each other. Whites were a higher percentage, up to 30%, of the world’s population 150 years ago.
World War One and Two were fratricidal doozies the effect of which Whites are still feeling to this day.
It would be interesting if someday a demographer would project what the White Population would number today if WW1, WW 2, the Korean War, and Vietnam had never occurred. (Remember some French and Germans died in Vietnam in the 1950s before America became involved.)
To the best of my knowledge Whites today are about 8-9% of the Worlds Population. My hunch is that we would be about 20% if these Wars had never happened.
Also the population of colored countries wold be lower. More productive Whites use up more resources, so more Whites would mean less resources for Indians and Mexicans, so they could not afford to reproduce at the rates they do now.
Whites in America, Europe and Australia lose sight of how outnumbered they are in the world. And apparently our opponents want to keep that information hidden because it’s hard to find any hard data.
Whites can’t be more than 15% worldwide. Here are two sites I found. The first just gives population by region, the second makes some projections into the future. I think most Whites would be shocked to learn they are outnumbered by Africans alone (or close to it).
Does anyone any links that say anything? Preferably from “objective” sources.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/ethnicity/ethnic_5.htm
http://www.thenationalpolicyinstitute.org/2008/04/18/global-white-population-to-plummet-to-single-digitblack-population-to-double/
Sure, Squeaker, ‘you’ found ‘em. I posted that NPI article and the link weeks ago on the “Black Man’s Guilt” article at TOO. Credit where credit is due, right? You live on this site, but you didn’t see it. Oh, ok.
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/05/the-black-man%e2%80%99s-guilt/
Also, you never responded to my extensive commentary on the Kosher war on China I went to the trouble of providing. Why for?….
PS you forgot to tell us to stay away from Muslims and the 911 Israel connection. But keep researching, Sherlock!
For the record, Jason Speaked did spoke ’bout my Kosher plan for China comment. For the record.
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/05/during-1917-chapter-14-of-solzhenitsyns-200-years-together/
matthias I wasn’t trying to steal your credit. I never read that post. I found the information I got with a google search and then invited anyone else to add information. It’s great that you found that site before. All the glory is yours.
If there is something in particular I was supposed to respond to please let me know where it is.
The following is part one of a 1985 interview with Ex-KGB officer Uri Bezmenov. In this interview, Bezmenov outlines the systematic demoralization and indoctrination techniques utilized for decades against America. The interview is prophetic, describing effects we can see all around us today, and it speaks to the bleak future of our nation if left unchecked.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlkPkJInUmU
Excellent article and comments.
.
“the organized Jewish community, including the ADL, believes that Muslim anti-Jewish attitudes can ultimately be managed without causing a disaster for the Jewish community.”
I think so, although eventually they’ll realise they’ll have to sacrifice Israel to achieve this and then a lot of them will try and backpedal.
.
“It’s no accident that all of the intellectual and political movements discussed in The Culture of Critique involve moral indictments of the West.”
It’s like the West was an eco-system and they adapted to us.
.
“It seems to me doubtful that the Jews would want to destroy “Western civilization”. Their very existence depends on being able to function within that civilization. A parasite does not destroy its host, for it would destroy itself in the process.”
Clannish populations need a lot motivation to co-operate beyond the level of extended family. Jews developed two ways of achieving higher levels of co-operation than is standard for clannish peoples. One was having a tribal religion. The second was historical self-hypnosis.
War is the best way to create unity. Jews created a culture and a distorted history for themselves of constant threat and deadly persecution to condition themselves and their children into acting as if they are in a state of permanent war. This perma-war culture makes them insane.
Also, i don’t think they realise they’re adapted to us and they won’t have the same leverage with people who can’t be guilt-tripped i.e. pretty much everyone apart from white people.
.
“Whites were a higher percentage, up to 30%, of the world’s population 150 years ago.”
Whites were roughly 30% in the 1950s.
.
That was probably before the population explosions in China and India.
I think so, although eventually they’ll realise they’ll have to sacrifice Israel to achieve this and then a lot of them will try and backpedal.
Wandrin,
It seems possible that this process has already begun.
The group that seem to me the most committed to Israel, the Jewish Defense League, was reported by Haaretz in January of 2011 as having ties with Marine Le Pen:
Of course the JDL rightfully have a reputation as being more independent minded than most Jews, so it’s possible that where they’ve gone the other Jewish groups won’t be able to follow.
A Muslim/Jewish anti White alleigence is potetentially extremely damaging though I suspect that muslims are on to it. (I note the warnings in the Koran but also note that the Koran does note Muslim-Jewish alleigences that end in betrayal). The NAACP/Black/Jacob Schiff alleigence was very damaging. Many of the less directed White Nationalists dissipate themselves in pointless conflict with the gay/lesbian movement and even feminism. This co-option is now so succesfull that radical feminism has displaced liberal feminism (which might have created better work-childrearing integration) and has created so many fears in the homosexual community of White racial consciousness it is a slef propagating. At present some of the most effective compaigners for European rights are Marine LePen and Geert Wilders and prior to that Theo van Goh and Pym Furtyn (gays and a woman). For better or worse they have managed to avoid the stigma of the holocaust narrative by being pro-zionist.
Ironically it is fair to note that White Nationlists have extended genuine sympathy and respect to muslim predicament and have tried to unravel the holohype narrative used to give zionists a ‘free pass’. I am thinking of people like Brendon O’Connell who didn’t moderate himself in his anti-zionist stance and has ended up with a 3 year jail sentence.
If the homosexual and feminist movements were to stop allying themselves with the jews’ anti-white agenda, maybe I could find it in my heart to tolerate them to some degree. Of course, that’s not ever going to happen; homosexuals and feminists have it good under the current system and there is no way they are going to give up their privileges without a fight.
BTW, you are aware that the grandfather of the modern “gay rights” movement was none other than a jew named Magnus Hirschfeld, right? I’m told Hirschfeld was also the man who coined the term “racism.” Think long and hard on that fact before you go waving a rainbow flag on behalf of white nationalists at the next pride march.
It amazes me that there are people in this so-called movement who could be opposed to affirmative action and quotas for blacks but not be opposed to same for women, or who could support a movement whose explicit objectives include destroying the traditional definition of family and making criticism of homosexuals a prosecutable offense. (A stand-up comedian in Canada was recently fined about $15,000 by a “human rights tribunal” for hurting the feelings of a lesbian couple at one of his shows.)
Is destroying the traditional family at a time when we’re reproducing below replacement levels good for whites? Is having a nearly 7-to-3 female-to-male ratio for college enrollments good for our civilization, considering that civilization was created by white men?
Heterosexual white males are the lynchpin of Western civilization and anything which seeks to disempower and demoralize them — which includes feminism and the so-called “gay rights” movement — cannot be good for whites.
What do you mean by “co-option”? Who co-opted what? I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here.
Seems to me like these homosexuals are stuck between a rock and a hard place, since most of the violence directed against homosexuals in recent years has come from non-whites. Some day homosexuals will have to realize that they can’t keep having their cake and eating it too.
Marine Le Pen did poorly in the last election, I’d say precisely because she watered down what the Front National stood for in an attempt to make it appeal to moderates and the sensibilities of women. The result was a loss of votes to the jewish neocon Sarkozy. If anything, the Front National should be taking a harder line, not softening its image.
At any rate, your attempt to equate anti-feminism with hatred for women is weak. Critizing or disagreeing with feminism is not misogyny, despite what the feminists claim. I love women very much and believe feminism is an ideology which is hurting them.
I have heard that Pym Fortuyn had a predilection for sodomizing boys of North African descent. Why would I want such a man representing me? I wouldn’t even want him living next door to me.
At least Jörg Haider, if indeed he was a homosexual as has been alleged by some, had the decency to keep it in the closet.
@Igor,
By “co-option” I refer to a propgandistic technique that has been used against “Whites” very succesfully.
Consider the following sentence which I have made up but will be familiar to you: “People of colour, gays, minorities and women must unite to fight discrimination..”
This construction achieves two things: it explicity unites 4 or more groups (gays, minorities, people of colour and women in common fear of discriminattion and implicitly accuses all White males as the agressors against all without overtly naming them. It has been succesfull in turing many gays (not all eg Pym Furtuyn) against Whites and of course many women who have some fears of male violence and of helplessness interms of income and carear discrimination.
It’s a case of small legitimate fears being amplified and also a case of minor patholgies (such as violence against women, homosexual bashings) being used to pathologise the whole of white society. If it were not for the gender-ethno-marxists “we” might have solved these problems by ourselves and sooner. For instance liberal-feminists might have worked out how to harmonise succesfull motherhood and child rearing with a carear. It’s possible that gays might be helping our cause (as Pym Fortunyn did).
Please remember that many nationlists were once “liberals”, “leftists”, “feminists”, “gay-activists” before they had their awakening, we are all victims of a pathological culture. You can count me in that group and I suspect Prof Mcdonald as well.
It is not suprise that radical-gender feminism and ethno-marixism are almost indistinguishable.
The most diabolical aspect of co-option is that as gays and or women confront the “White male patriarchy” many react and this inflames things further.
Here, I am referring to “Anglo Saxon’s” initial comment to Dr. MacDonald’s excellent essay.
I am grateful that this comment was written. I believe it is important and necessary.
We who want to save The West want it to be saved because we recognize, respect and admire all that is good about it. This does not mean that we ignore the fact that The West has much to atone for, nor the fact that there is much in our past that should bring any self-respecting human being sadness.
However, we recognize, beyond all doubt, that this is not unique to The West: all countries and civilizations have much to feel bad about and learn from– that is, if they wish to evolve.
What we did to Germany during WW1, WW2, the period between those great conflicts, and the period after the last was awful. Not only that, the psychopaths responsible for the destruction of Germany are still, by and large, considered our heros. Patton is but one. While he is not quite on the same dismal level as Ilya Ehrenburg, he did explicitly encourage those thugs and cowards in his command to loot, rape and kill German civilians, and to shoot disarmed German soldiers. Frankly, I do not care if he had a conveniently belated realization that the Soviets were sadistic scum.
It is also very interesting to study the German occupations during WW2 (especially in Western European countries during the first three quarters of the war). When comparing their behavior to that of the Soviets and the US, those “evil Nazis” sure do seem remarkably civil and humane.
It is alarming and bizarre that we are trained to feel guilty about the exaggerated and outright false stories of what the Jewish people experienced, when we have much to examine in terms of what we actually did to our fellow Europeans.
Anyway, thank goodness for the likes of Kevin MacDonald.
Not only that, the psychopaths responsible for the destruction of Germany are still, by and large, considered our heros. Patton is but one. While he is not quite on the same dismal level as Ilya Ehrenburg, he did explicitly encourage those thugs and cowards in his command to loot, rape and kill German civilians, and to shoot disarmed German soldiers.
It is not accurate to characterize the Third Army (which Patton ran) as “thugs and cowards”. None of the Armies in the conflict were made up of “thugs and cowards”. The army that came closest to that description was the Soviet military.
The vast majority of warriors among the British, American, and German armies were men of high character and valor. I don’t think reexamining our role in WWI and WWII require defaming the great majority of warriors on either side.
The whole tragedy should be seen as a failure of political vision and leadership by people at the highest level by both the British and the Germans. The British mishandled events to be sure, but the German leadership, under Hitler, made monumental mistakes leading up to the war.
@Jason Speaks: The Soviet soldiers of WWII might have been thugs, but no cowards. Moreover, according to my grandparents, the first line fighting troops behaved well and were mostly interested in fighting, usually the later coming troops did all the nasty things. So even the thug thing might need some qualifications.
As I wrote elsewhere, while it is certainly stupid to think of the Germans as the primary villains of history or even of WWII, it is very easy to understand why many peoples (especially Slavs like Poles and Russians) hated them and fought against them. History is not a movie where there are Good Guys and Bad Guys, usually it’s way more complex than that.
re: Mark Hess said, “Patton is but one. While he is not quite on the same dismal level as Ilya Ehrenburg, he did explicitly encourage those thugs and cowards in his command to loot, rape and kill German civilians, and to shoot disarmed German soldiers. Frankly, I do not care if he had a conveniently belated realization that the Soviets were sadistic scum.”
While watching a WW2 documentary, I’ll never forget the testimony of an American GI in which he recalled how it was standard practice to shoot surrendering German soldiers in the field, and how surprised he was to not be shot when he was captured by the Germans. Though I don’t doubt that Patton was swept up by some of the Germanophobia of the time, his change in attitude after the fall of Berlin is significant. Reading the Patton Papers, one gets the impression that he was better than the type of character you describe. In his personal memoirs and letters he makes his principles pretty clear (all quoted from the Patton Papers):
“Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working. Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment is not intended for the individual but for the race… Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment, without due process of law.”
“I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POW’s to work as slaves in foreign lands (i.e. the Soviet Gulags), where many will be starved to death.”
“I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is ‘Liberty, then give me death.’ I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it.”
“Today we received a letter… in which we were told to give the Jews special accommodations. If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons, etc?… We are also turning over to the French several hundred thousand prisoners of war to be used as slave labor in France. It is amusing to recall that we fought the Revolution in defense of the rights of man and the Civil War to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles.”
“Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race, and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist. It’s said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it (instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed.”
“What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole.”
“There is a very apparent Semitic influence in the press. They are trying to do two things: first, implement communism, and second, see that all businessmen of German ancestry and non-Jewish antecedents are thrown out of their jobs. They have utterly lost the Anglo-Saxon conception of justice and feel that a man can be kicked out because somebody else says he is a Nazi. They were evidently quite shocked when I told them I would kick nobody out without the successful proof of guilt before a court of law.”
Fascinating remarks from Patton’s letters. I do think most people are open to the idea that Germany was treated harshly during and after the war. And I do think we need to explore the complexity of the conflict like Pat Buchanan and others have done (in fact, Niall Ferguson has done some limited reexamination of that period).
And the letters from Patton are fascinating and spot on. This business about putting so many people on trial for “war crimes” is generally about retribution – revenge that simply continues the cycle of hatred – a Jewish and/or Middle Eastern approach to conflict. This is why their conflicts go on for centuries.
Quote from Patton from above:
“I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic.
We have to remember the White sense of fair play when discussing Jewish influence with others. They are uneasy about morally or legally condemning an entire group of people en masse.
They believe each person should be judged by his individual behavior. Does this make discussion of ethnic traits and Jewish influence impossible? I don’t think so, but it means we must shape the message a certain way.
Until recently, White people were comfortable making judgments about different ethnic groups. They certainly viewed Africans has less intelligent and almost childlike. They felt the same way about the Native Americans. But in these cases, they did feel like they were morally condemning a group in some unjust manner, but that they were simply acknowledging traits common among a group of people – basically their biological traits.
I think a similar approach to Jews might be useful. People are quick to assume White Nationalists or White Advocates view Jews as “evil” and want to do terrible things to Jews and other races. Of course, this is not true and it’s an unfair accusation. But it is a burden we have to deal with and a myth we have to dispel before reaching a wider White audience.
This is why I think discussing Jewish traits and behaviors in a more reasoned and scientific tone will go further with White Americans and Europeans. We can even discuss traits we admire among Jews. But the point can then be made that there are identifiable Jewish traits that often bring them into conflict with the larger society.
Jason says, “We can even discuss traits we admire among Jews.”
My, my, Jason. Aren’t you nice.
Tell you what. You discuss traits YOU admire among Jews and leave the rest of us the hell alone. OK?
“Gabor
June 6, 2011 – 2:08 pm | Permalink
E.g. mediavel parishes were quite democratic in most of Europe, at least in Western Europe for sure. And even before that, Germanic tribes, Italian and Greek city-states were maybe not paragons of modern democracy, but still something much closer to it than anything in the Levant or Egypt etc. Monogamy – a common feature of European societies even before the onset of Christianity – is also a very deeply democratic trait of any society, and it seems to have been quite unique to Europe. Most Roman emperors didn’t have as large a harem as similar lords in the East ”
Interesting point. But I see that more a function of Christianity which differs from either Judaism or Islam which are very similar to each other. Hence the assimilation problem. One is more upfront about it than the other. Individualism is however an exclusive Western tradition. There are some who say that has to do with the break down of the extended family. We see in many thirld world societies a pattern where people from rural areas moving to the cities therefore breaking the traditional tribal connection. Maybe as time goes by these societies will be more urban and thus more individualistic.
Maybe
Another VERY important distinction is size. Jews are more in need of the diaspora community than the Muslims do. The Muslim immigrants in the West are not even 1% of the total Muslim population. Which explains why Muslims are lukewarm about any alliances with other minorites in the West. Their main concern is the Muslim nations, not the West. Thats where their loyalties are with. A very dangerous situation if the Muslims ever rise to the top in the West. But thats never going to happen. Their agenda is too exposed and the community of Islam is simply too big to hide. Something that Jews can do with ease. We all can see what Rehmat’s agenda is. Basically to convert Westerners to Islam or at least convince the West (or bully them) to support the Muslim Ummah. You know pressure Russia ove Chechniya, India over Kashmir and Israel over the Palestinains. That kind of a thing. The West acts like a proxy. Which as we all knew the Jews are doing to America. But for this agenda to work they have to use deception, act very cohesively and most of all be invisible. In fact prior to 2003 most Americans never even heard of an Israel lobby or AIPAC. And even less know anything about Judaism. Islam being a somewhat of a universal religion can not hide itself. It has many internal divisions that makes cohesiveness almost impossible.
But its not really relevant in the end since these two communities are the last to speak. The Emperor has no clothes. The most ethnocentric community on Earth and the most sectarian community are now lecturing the West about democracy.
How odd! Ain’t hypocrisy a bitch.
Europeans had functioning assemblies and councils (like the Roman Senate and Plebeian Assembly) well before Christianity, and I don’t think most or even any Eastern empires had anything like that. Certainly not on that level.
Present democratic legislative bodies in Europe are the direct descendants of medieval assemblies and councils, usually simply more and more members of them were elected instead of being hereditary, and larger and larger parts of the population got voting rights.
how is this for a coincidence:
Adam gadham. the “american alqaida”, born adam pearlman, has just called for muslims in the usa to buy guns and start shooting americans….how is that for direct jewish control of al qaida against whites?
As says Vincent Reynouard, the holocaust is the epicenter of the jewish propaganda (the “black box” of Ahmadinejad) about their supposedly moral superirity and the moral imperative for the europeans to disappear. If you don’t want to talk about the revisionnist studies you waste your time.
The Germans are guilt-tripped but they find ways to express pride in unusual ways according the Atlantic:
Why are so many Germans participating in Civil War reenactments—and siding with the South?
“On a warm spring morning about 50 miles north of Berlin, Union troops and their Confederate rivals prepare for battle.” That’s the attention-grabbing lede of a PRI story on the bizarre phenomenon of Germans reenacting the American Civil War. The reporter explains that many participants feel “a personal connection to the war,” and that everyone with whom she spoke took care to note that 200,000 Germans had taken part in the fight.
Read the story at The Atlantic for free:
Confederates on the Rhine
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/06/confederates-on-the-rhine/239724/
No, Jason. YOU read it for free in that radical Atlantic rag.
Double standards are a trait of Judaism and its moral particularism. Any European or American opposed to international Jewry influence in their homelands will be equated to a Nazi, whereas anyone opposed to a fully Jewish state in Israel will get the anti Semitic label, which is already happening (anti Israel already means anti Semitic with all of the huge negative impacts of the label).
Here is another clear double standard: Jews in the US like to complain about not being allowed to ‘country clubs’ (Steven Spielberg is an example), and yet WASPs are not welcomed in the ultra exclusive ‘Jewish clubs’ (since they -like all other Goyim – have no Jewish mother), and this is what happens both in US, but also in Israel too, a highly segregated country (see the youtube video of an American in Meah Shearim). One should not fail to see the high degree of hypocrisy of those complain of not being allowed to ‘country club’ since exclusivity and segregation are a trademark of their group, going far back in time, since when G-d signed a contract with them (a special deal), turning them into a Chosen People (Am Nivchai), a Treasured Nation (Am Segulah), to be set above all other nations in the world (Deuteronomy 28) and to milk the wealth of all other peoples (Isaiah 61). This is the strangest theology ever, a God chooses a people separating them from all other people’s in the world. An exclusive club of Choseness which no country club can ever compare to. One that may attribute full human status only to Jews (just get familiar with what fammous Rabbis have said on this issue).
edit
“of those who complain”
“separating them from all other peoples”
edit
“famous Rabbis”
edit
“of not being allowed to country clubs”
“it happens both in the US”
Jews chose their God who then chose them. Typical.
@Uncle Sam: “It seems to me doubtful that the Jews would want to destroy “Western civilization”. Their very existence depends on being able to function within that civilization. A parasite does not destroy its host, for it would destroy itself in the process.
Further, to whom would the Jews extend their usurious loans? To blacks, mestizos, mulattoes, zambos? They would have a hard collecting their money and their usurious monetary racket would probably collapse.”
Ever hear the story of the Scorpion and the Frog? Well, it’s like that. Jews simply can’t help themselves – they will destroy us because that is their nature. They will do so even if they destroy themselves in the process. But they think they are very clever, so they are certainly looking for new hosts to latch on to. That is the nature of the parasite.
The Jews won’t destroy themselves if they destroy us. Jews aren’t tied to the land the way westerners are; when the west falls they’ll simply move their operations to China or India. They’ll probably have an easier time there than they’ve had in the west due to the lack of historical antisemitism there.
@fender_strat: I think they’ll have a much harder time in India and China. While there’s no history of “anti-semitism” in either land, neither is there the asinine philo-semitism inculcated through christianity in the West nor the ability to be guilt-tripped because of “the holocaust.” India and China also have different philosophic traditions, which are less tractable to the Jews; and their elites, aware of the Jews’ destructive behaviour in the West. are smart enough not to let themselves be gulled into letting them into positions of power.
IOW, a civilization doesn’t last (proveably) 6,000 years and more without having learned a thing or to about dealing with invaders, even when they pretend to come as friends.
The Jews have a natural ability to figure out cultural weaknesses and exploit them to their benefit. It doesn’t matter where they go; every culture has a weakness that they can take advantage of. Their tactics change with the culture, but the result is always the same; the spiritual transformation of the host people. They destroyed Rome by converting Romans to Christianity, and they’ve destroyed the west through guilt and delegitimization. If they move to India or China they will figure out their weaknesses and start the cycle over.
Can I be wrong? Yes, possibly. Bertrand Russell pointed out that just because something has always happened in the past doesn’t mean it will continue on in the future. But at the present time there’s no reason to believe that Jews will be anything but successful in their nation-wrecking. There may be little or no philosemtisim in Asia, but if Jews managed to get to the top in the fiercely antisemitic Europe then there’s no stopping them in Asia.
One thing that Jews will have to do though is intermarry with the Chinese and Indians. Many Jews today already do this, which just proves that, despite the maniacal ravings of Rabbis and far-right Israelis, the Jews have never been a pure race, but an idea. The Jews of the future will be ethnically Asian, but the moniker ‘Jew’ will still exist, and psychologically and religiously speaking, they will still consider themselves the people of Israel the same way that the Ashkenazis, who are 50% European from a biological perspective, consider themselves “Jews.”
It would be bad for Jews if Western Civilization collapsed, whether the Jews know it or not.
While Jews (like every other group by definition) have managed to survive in many different situations, they haven’t always thrived, they haven’t always lived well. My impression is life wasn’t always so good for them in the Medieval period … or the Roman period … and many other epochs. Sometimes they did well, sometimes pretty bad.
So while they may find a way to survive if WC collapses, that doesn’t mean it would be desirable for them or of no particular consequence. I think the rabidly anti-White Jews don’t care, and the more moderately Leftist Jews don’t see truth.
Anyway, I think their undermining of WC is stupid and harmful to their own descendants.
1) It’s very likely that it was NOT Christianity which destroyed the Roman Empire. To the contrary, probably Christianity helped it survive for an additional century. (Or many centuries, if you take the Byzantine Empire into account.)
2) It was easy for the Jews to blend in in Europe, where on average they look at least somewhat European. Good luck for them trying to sell themselves as genuine Chinese or Indians… :DDD
3) The Chinese are more racially conscious than Europeans (although arguably not more than we used to be a hundred years ago – Beckham, Federer, Nadal, etc. are all great stars in China and in East- and Southeast-Asia in general), and are less inclined to universalistic ideologies (at least if they are harmful to their interests). Not to mention the Indians, who are extremely conscious of their group memberships. And the Middle East… historically they haven’t done well there.
Also, if history is any guide here, Western Civilization was the only place where Jews could thrive, in the Middle East they survived in large but ineffectual communities, in India they barely managed to survive and in China they simply assimilated, losing both their culture and genetic distinctiveness.
As of Africa… There are the Lemba (who didn’t thrive nearly as much as the Ashkenazis in Europe) and the Falassa (who were even worse off than the Lemba, in a Christian society, and seem to have been converts). So I would say no Western Civilization, no Jewish success. Possibly not even Jewish survival.
So how do we counter this guilt trip??? There are hundreds and hundred of websites that work toward the goal of exposing the tribe.. yet I see no evidence that the tide is turning..
I wonder … do all of those hundreds of other websites that you Facio (probably rightly) claim are working towards the goal of exposing “the tribe”, also have their very own “Jason Speaks” boring the hell out of everyone with their omnipresence, occasional hysteria, and perpetually infantile interjections?
;¬>
Facio Libre: “…how do we counter this guilt trip?” Here’s how. Learn to model the white voice in a white-centric way.
You focused on the big problem: “There are hundreds and hundred of websites that work toward the goal of exposing the tribe.. yet I see no evidence that the tide is turning.”
The tide won’t turn until we learn to express our concerns about ourselves in a white-centric way…we need to abandon judeo-centricity, and take up white-centricity. There are hundreds of examples of this, but here’s one very small example.
We were plagued with the problem of reading about “righteous gentiles” in our local papers. The first problem is that a few “righteous gentiles” are singled out this way as “a credit to the goyim race,” and the rest of the “gentiles” are labeled by implication “evil gentiles.” The second problem is that the diverse white American peoples do not need anyone condensing our identities, our chosen names, and our own diversities into the unwanted label “gentiles.” We can name ourselves.
So whenever “righteous gentiles” reared its ugly head, we emailed members of the media and whoever said it to criticize the use of the name for some of us as a matter of white resistance to supremacy, bullying, and hate for most of us. We didn’t analyze why Jews wanted to name us, we merely claimed the right to name ourselves. We haven’t seen that phrase on the West Coast for quite awhile.
Keep in mind that we spoke out in a white voice (“As one of the diverse white American peoples, I object to being named by someone in another demographic, etc., etc.”)
And we discussed the weird label in terms of our centricity, e.g., our claim to have the right to name ourselves, and our objection to both the “righteous” and the “gentile” labels.
At no time did we claim it was “offensive.” Nor did we knock Jews as Jews for this labeling. Lord knows that Jews have been calling us “gentiles” for 2000 years at least in the same way they have been telling rural-living Ukrainians for the last century that they are “peasants.” Yes, Jews are the naming species in a world that admits that the members of every demographic has the right to name itself.
This is only a tiny beginning step. But claiming your own name is a powerful liberating thing to do. And speaking about the wrongs of all sorts done to us (starting with naming) rather than analyzing what is wrong with Jews will win far more adherents, and liberation from their oppression.
An example of what I was talking about above appears in the San Francisco Chronicle today, page A1, headlined “Circumcision: Cartoon campaign prompts charges of anti-Semitism.” You can see it here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2011/06/07/MNI01JQ9D7.DTL
I suspect the campaign against MGM is a sincere effort by the city’s gay community, but it brought all the bullies out and exposed how they shut people up.
What this guy is doing could be replicated with campaigns against cruelty in killing animals, banning blood diamonds, or banning religious taxes on food instead of sitting around and writing lots of stuff about Jews. They’re vulnerable to charges of being bullies, supremacist, etc. It’s public activities that my bring white liberation like this campaign.
There are hundreds and hundred of websites that work toward the goal of exposing the tribe.. yet I see no evidence that the tide is turning
Part of the problem is the nature of some of those sites. Many of them strike the majority of Whites as low brow and borderline hateful. Most people simply dismiss them because of the shrill content.
That is one of the things that makes this website far superior. And the number of high quality sites is growing. They discuss everything from genetics to evolution to ethnic differences in traits. This is the way, IMO, to win over a larger number of Whites.
TIME wounds all heels, as they say, Facio Libre.
Oy, why are we soooooooooooooooo persecuted?
There is damn good reason Jews have been prosecuted by so many
Beautiful article. I agree that the concept of morality plays a central role in this struggle. As a response, I am very interested in the approaching of attacking morality all together and arguing that universal morality, as we think of it in the west, is a social construction of our own making and because it’s just a fabrication we need not take it so seriously. Post modernism and “social constructions” are tools of the left which they use against us. The marxists forced us to learn them in school, and now well use their own weapons against them to tear down their oppressive ivory tower of hate and lies.
Aren’t these jewish organizations and rabbi’s damning themselves? They push a genocidal plan on Europe contrary to UN resolution260, which jews where responsible for writing. Definition of Genocide:
(a) Killing members of the group
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
(c) DELIBERATELY INFLICTING ON THE GROUP CONDITIONS OF LIFE CALCULATED TO BRING ABOUT IT’S PHYSICAL DESTRUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
(e) forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
Wikipedia says this definition is the culmination of years of campainging by lawyer Raphael Lemkin. Yaur Auron writes “When Raphael Lemkin coined the word genocide in 1945 he cited the 1915 annihilation of Armenians as a seminal example of genocide.”
A very, very good article, Kevin. You have mapped the ‘Jewish strategy’ very well, indeed.
Judaism 101
Judaism teaches Jews to worship above all else, not God, but the Jewish people themselves. That’s why 90% of Jews are atheists and still remain being Jews. Get this into your thick skulls!! Judaism is not a Religion.. It’s a crime syndicate-sect! In twisted Jewish minds, Jews are walking Gods on this earth and all non-Jews, if they should be so lucky and be allowed to live, are here to serve them…. hence, the “Chosen People.” Some Jews believe that they were chosen by God to organize societies across the globe and rule over them.. the rest of the Judaics (the atheists), don’t necessarily believe that this was God’s doing, but don’t mind indulging and taking advantage of this position for their benefit nonetheless.. This explains the idiotic, racist boasting by a Jews claiming that all the best doctors, lawyers, accountants are Jews.. not because Jews are smarter than every other being on this planet.. this is because Jewish Freemasonry is in play.. So let Jews chew on this for a minute! There is a large numbers of Whites that know what’s up!!! It’s time to design strategies to reverse the tide and the ultimate goal of removing Jews from position of power.. If we succeed in removing Jews out of our lives all other things will fall into place.. Ron Paul and the Tea Party is a good start! We need to get around that movement and back every REAL Tea party candidate there is..
Why didn’t I learn about the Khazarian Empire and their Ashkenazim descendants in high school? Was their history really hidden by the Soviet Union?
Some contend, on this very website, that the Khazar theory is wrong:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2009/12/more-jewish-genetics-the-weak-khazar-hypothesis/
I wonder how many Europeans read this blog. Just by virtue of it being in English there are probably plenty of Europeans who can’t read it (although there is always Google translate and many Europeans speak English). I also wonder how many European equivalents there are. With many countries banning “anti-semitic” talk, probably not so many.
The terrible Whiteness of being.
Jason Speaks June 6, 2011 – 3:37 am | Permalink
“The dispossession of people in the modern world is limited to Whites. I don’t know of it happening in Asia, Africa or the Middle East. The other side will fire back that Whites dispossessed Indigenous people in North America, Australia and Africa centuries ago. We need a way to neutralize that argument. The real target audience for our counterargument is not the Left or Jewish intellectuals, but Whites.”
Of course one of the things accomplished by our enemies is to have started the World Repression & Genocide Calendar at the beginning of the Western ages of exploration and colonization. Push the timeline back and even “Native Americans” did not arrive in America first, as paleontologists now know. The Japanese were not the first people to live on their islands, and so on. In little curly streams, larger rivers and great waves, all sorts of peoples moved around the globe, the newcomers often pushing out and killing off the previous groups. Of course we are all well aware of the many Western sins, intended and unintended, like the introduction of outside diseases.
It is good to have answers for critics, particularly Whites, especially since these things are pathetic smokescreens when it comes to anti-White genocide. For example, the humongous slaughterings carried out by the Aztecs never seem to cause any guilt amongst Mexicans. Rather it’s: “Aztlan!” And how can our “taking the land away from the Indians” be one of the main justifications for flood-level non-White invasions into the U.S., since that only further inundates with outsiders today’s remaining Indians? (First “helped” by the Missionaries, now by the cultural Marxists, American Indians just can’t catch a break.) But, strangely, these same people also want to see Scandinavia swarmed over by non-Whites, but do not seem to be at all deterred by the fact that the Scandinavians have been in Scandinavia for a very long time.
Obviously, to our enemies, anti-White genocide needs no factual justification since it is delicious in itself.
- – -
Of course all the above is well known to most visitors at this site, but some fellow Whites, especially younger ones, might benefit from an occasional reminder.
Great ideas. Yes, the date and places are rather conveniently set to emphasize so-called White “crimes” while minimizing others. We do need to set the clock back and educate others that ethnic conflict is ancient. Africans, Asians, Caucasians and Native Americans have slaughtered each other for millennia.
And in modern times we have Mao and Pot Pot slaughtering millions of their own citizens (which doesn’t receive enough attention). We have genocide in Africa even today. So Whites need to understand that we are being singled out for defamation.
CLOCK-SETTING
There is a good short review of what is known as “clock-setting” which simply means the date chosen to start scoring good and bad historical points in so-called historical texts.
http://www.resistingdefamation.org/sub/g19.htm
By the way, while the voyages of discovery and settlement by Europeans took place during the past 520 years, at the same time, massive and centuries-long campaigns of invasion, genocide, and slave-taking of Europeans by Asian-based Turks and Mongols and African-based Arabs, Berbers, and Turks.
During that 520 year period, slave-taking went on by Asians and Africans all the way from Iceland, Ireland, and England to all the Slavic lands. This knowledge has been largely suppressed in American textbooks, so not many people know of it. It’s hard to argue or persuade with this information, but it’s good to know about it to clear one’s mind of any lingering doubts about our ancestors, histories, diversities, and cultures.
Excellent article on clocksetting, Don, thanks. In addition, the constant violence that went on between Native American tribes is neatly forgotten as well. In fact, there is tons of evidence that from South America to North America, indigenous people engaged in non-stop bloodletting for thousands of years.
This is not to defame Native Americans, but to point out this behavior was common to all humans.
How did the descendants of a small tribe from the Negev desert (with religious customs that put ‘B’ into bizarre) whose elders shuffled their way to Europe fleeing Roman swords, manage to gain such power over the Western populations that had the misfortune to extend shelter to these hairy-chested fanatics ?
How do you reach the summit of a food chain which allows you the luxury to write and then put into law legislation explicitly for the benefit of YOUR tribe in spite of constituting as little as ½ % to 2% of the population ?
How did the history of WWII in which 60 million souls had died gruesome deaths degenerate into a footnote in the L’Affaire Holocauste ? A half-cooked salad made up of British war propaganda and crude nonsense churned out by the kosher commissars @ the Main Political Directorate of the Red Army.
@ Jarvis Dingle-Daden [June 8, 2011 - 2:44 am] …
How ?????
In short …. The Rothschilds, with their bottomless pockets.
The successful marketing of the Holohoax brand took money, and lots of it.
This Rothschild (and International Banker) money was used to promote, entice, seduce, incite, blackmail, and bully widespread acceptance of the Holohoax myth.
The senior (usually by age) Rothschild male of any particular generation heads the Rothschild dynasty, and is also unofficially designated … “King of the Jews”.
Their representatives (i.e., agents) in the USA are the Rockefellers.
Xenophobic
The date is June 16, 793. You live in the learning community of Lindisfarne, England. Off the coast you see the ominous sight of Viking ships. Your natural reaction is to resist. But something in your mind has been “short circuited.” You are overwhelmed by guilt for allowing yourself to even consider the invading hordes of Vikings should be resisted. You feel shame and self-loathing. In time the community is wholly overrun and destroyed; its wealth taken by those who did not earn it.
The date is June 16, 2011. You live in America. Off the southern border you see an ominous sight; hordes of Hispanics illegally crossing the border. Your natural reaction is to resist. But something in your mind has been “short circuited.” You are overwhelmed by guilt for allowing yourself to even consider the invading hordes of Hispanics should be resisted. You feel shame and self-loathing. In time the nation is wholly overrun and destroyed; its wealth taken by those who did not earn it.
The funny thing about this thread is that surely most – if not all – of the grandfathers of the commentators were proud soldiers decorated for “fighting the racist Nazis”.
The Germans were the only white tribe (in modern history) having the brains to identify the danger of Jewish ethnic networking, as well as the courage and power to fight back.
At a time when French, British and Americans were far from seeing what was in store for them, the Germans tried to limit Jewish domination in key areas such as press, arts, banking, lawyers, and so on.
The German solution to the Jewish problem – prior to WWII – was “separation”: we are different, so let’s divorce. This was the only reasonable solution, approuved, BTW, by the Zionists, who could have drafted the Nuremberg laws.
So what Prof. Kevin MacDonald describes as Jewish ethnic networking, destroying his country, is not a result of Jewish intellectual superiority, but of White American stupidity, twice destroying Germany, unable to realize that Nazi Germany was not fighting against them, but for them.
Sylvie, touche, you have touched the third rail of the problem, the enigmatic Amerikinder!
So true, Sylvie. We Whites have been the pit bulldogs fighting and killing each other in fighting pits designed and constructed by the Jews.
Bullseye Sylvie! You have just accurately summed up 1933 to 1945. We need more like you.
The root of our problem (the global poison) lies in both London and New York City, and has done since the 1890s.
And as Junghans points out rather more politely than I shall here … our other major problem are legions of idiot Amerikans: slaves deluded with the insane belief they alone represent “fweedom and demonickracy”.
I think we all agree that the self chosen have been very successful in riddling white people with guilt .
I also think that this guilt agenda will back fire at some point in the future since there will come a time when white people begin to catch on up and then they it will be good again to be white and proud .
This back lash is just in it’s beginnings , but it is happening from what I see amongst white people in general .
The more the the pendulum swings one way the more it will return back , and they have pushed it to the max with the anti-white b.s.
The overwhelming Jewish Wall Street racketeering component in our recent economic debacle should have brought White people “into the streets”, but the control is such that hardly any have even been charged with the blatant fraud they committed against the American people.
Excellent article, Mr MacDonald.
I never believed that our proclivity towards individualism and our European values could overwrite our instincts for survival, but now I’m thinking that that’s entirely possible. I was assuming that most White people thought like I. And I thought personal survival is only truly likely if the group survives.
Anyway, now I realize how crucial these things are. And they explain perfectly why some White folks believe in us “all becoming one”. From their perspective, I think they think that following these ideals is a kind of natural human progression and eventually it will bring racial harmony and justice to the world. But, you know, I don’t think our elites are pushing immigration, outsourcing all our jobs and raping us financially for the noble cause of racial harmony. No. I think they are relegating Whites to a powerless position so that they can never be challenged, never be removed from power. And White Americans are the only block that can – if they unite – defeat their nwo plans, and save themselves in the process.
Jason says: “The other side will fire back that Whites dispossessed Indigenous people in North America, Australia and Africa centuries ago. We need a way to neutralize that argument.”
As it happens, natives are just another bunch of pampered parasites, like all other non-whites – sorry, “visible minorities” – in the white nations of the world. The most pampered of them all, actually. Let’s stop and ask ourselves exactly what IS a Canadian? Or an American, or an Australian, or an Argentine, or a German, or a Frenchman, or an Englishman, or an Italian, or a Swede?
It depends whether we’re talking about those nations as they have existed since the 16th and 17th centuries, in the case of the New World, and for untold centuries in the case of Europe, or whether we’re talking about the bloated, unrecognizable hybrids those nations have been turned into over the past 40 years. Since the late 1960′s, to be precise.
And here, a few myths need to be dispelled:
1) The “First Canadians” (or Americans, Australians, etc.) were NOT the Indians and Aboriginals that the Europeans encountered upon discovering those lands.
Those people were nomads who roamed continents about which they had no idea as to size, geography, natural resources, etc. The FIRST Canadians – or Americans, Australians, etc. – are the people who mapped those lands and gave them their names, laws, borders, institutions, governments, built their cities and towns, and created those nations.
This is why Indians can cross freely back and forth between the U.S. and Canada, since the border is the “white man’s line”. And it is. Just like all other borders, states, provinces, etc.
2) The countries of the New World are not “nations of immigrants”. The concept of “immigration” is an 18th century concept born out of the so-called “Enlightenment” (Les Lumières, die Aufklärung). That is to say, from the writings of the French philosophers – Voltaire, Montesquieu, Rousseau, Diderot etc. – who gave the 18th century its name and inspired both the French and, to a lesser extent, the American Revolution.
The countries of the New World were founded by PIONEERS. Subjects – not “citizens” – of the French, English, Dutch, Spanish and Portuguese Crowns, who built those countries from scratch and made them what they are. They didn’t “immigrate” to the New World. There was nothing to immigrate to.
Immigration as we know it only started in the second half of the 19th century. It was a direct consequence of the Industrial Revolution and 99% of that immigration came from Europe. Kindred folk of kindred religion, culture and race. Which is why they assimilated and why we now have pure, dyed-in-the-wool French-Canadians with Irish names like Johnson, Ryan, Mulroney, German names like Wagner, and Italian names like Bruchési.
We all know what an Iranian, or Japanese, or Korean, or Mexican is. But what if the U.S. were to “liberate” Iran and turn it into a mini U.S.A.? Complete with shopping malls, tweedledee-tweedledum political parties, a new President (Barakuda Obamama) and VP (Goldie Goldenberg), and millions of “Iranians” from Europe, Latin America, Black Africa, the Far East, etc.
How would we define “Iranian” then? I guess we’d have to separate the old, benighted, and obsolete “pre-Liberation” Iranians from the New! Improved! and enlightened “post-Liberation” Iranians. Wouldn’t we?
————————-
Facio Libre says: “There are hundreds and hundred of websites that work toward the goal of exposing the tribe.. yet I see no evidence that the tide is turning..”
The tide IS turning, even if you can’t see it. We are in the same position as the Bolsheviks were before the First World War. World War One was the catalyst that ushered in the 20th century. Without it no Communism, no Fascism, no National-Socialism, and no “Liberal Democracy”.
The changes needed will be produced the same way they have throughout History: as a result of a major catastrophe or series of catastrophes, natural, man-made, or both.
I refer those of you who can read French to Guillaume Faye’s excellent “La Convergence des Catastrophes” (written under the pseudonym of Guillaume Corvus). See also his recently translated “Why We Fight” (Pourquoi Nous Combattons).
If one study Muslim history from objective sources, he will find out that Muslims like Christians don’t have guilty conscience for their treatment of minorities living within their countries. A truth which many Jewish and Christian historians and even Israeli Presiden has admitted.
Contrary to that, Jewish communities were treated like cancer in European for centuries. This the very ‘Christian guilt’, which is being exploited by the Zionists under the WMDs, Anti-Smeitism and Holocaust. It got the Jews a colonial entity in Palestine and trillions of dollars from the western fools.
Under Muslim rule – for the first time since the Babylonian destruction of two Israelite kingdoms of Judea and Israel (586 BC) – the Yahud could model their lives after the Torah and do it legitimately, supported by the public laws of the state where they reside. It was the first time that a non-Israelite state put its executive power at the service of rabbanic court. For the first time, the state institutions took the responsibility to protect Israelite minority rights and declared to use all power at its diposal to do so – against both Muslims and non-Muslim citizens……
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/did-muslims-hate-the-jews/
The only way out of this is the lone political/cultural system that ever represented a threat to the Jewish plan for European/world destruction: National Socialism.
“Guilt-tripping the Europeans”
White people don’t feel any guilt about the Holocaust. They don’t care about that, and they wish the media wouldn’t dwell on the subject. I think the holocaust propaganda is mainly useful for the Jews, to help them nourish their grievances against white people. Also, it prevents us from learning our history and from reading right wing intellectuals of the 20th century. When people are told that National Socialism was all about killing 6 million Jews, they may believe it. Defamation works. But it doesn’t mean they feel any personal guilt over it.
“In May a high-level meeting of Muslim and Jewish leaders in Europe was held to express their concern about the rise of the European anti-Muslim right / … / no Muslim groups were involved. This was therefore a Jewish project from beginning to end.”
In fact, Islam-bashing is mainly a Jewish thing. White people don’t care about Islam, they are concerned about immigration. Jewish activists are specialized both in encouraging Muslim-bashing and in bringing White “islamophobes” to court.
“A counter-strategy therefore is to convince Europeans that preserving themselves and their culture is profoundly moral.”
As part of the counter-strategy, we must tell people about the Jewish problem and the philosophy of the Talmud. We must also denounce the hypocrisy of the pro-immigration lobby: they don’t want to live in Black neighborhoods. We need to explain that the so-called cultural enrichment amounts to quick race-replacement and that there is nothing inhumane in expelling non-whites back to their non-white nations.
“Translation: We are not going to spell out what the future multicultural Europe will be like because any reasonable vision of the future would be rejected out of hand by thinking Europeans.”
The Jews never spell out anything, especially not the meaning of the words they use. They just make quick accusations, and we are left with the work of explaining everything.
White people don’t feel any guilt about the Holocaust.
How exactly do you know that?
They don’t care about that, and they wish the media wouldn’t dwell on the subject.
Wishing the media wouldn’t dwell on a subject is entirely consistent with caring about that subject, and it’s also entirely consistent with feeling guilt over something.
I think the holocaust propaganda is mainly useful for the Jews, to help them nourish their grievances against white people.
“Useful for the Jews” in what way?
I do think Holocaust related media has made the average Jew more committed to an anti-European political orientation than he would’ve been otherwise.
Whether that makes Holocaust related media useful to the Jews as a group is far more questionable.
The intermarriage rate between Jews and Europeans is clearly much higher now than it was before the concentration camps in Germany and its occupied territories became a central preoccupation in the Jewish community.
Also there’s the issue that a desire for revenge against Europeans for the Holocaust arguably makes Jewish people much more likely to support policies which are not in the long term best interest of Jewry.
Values often come into conflict. The more committed a group of people are to one value (i.e. “Let’s do what’s bad for Europeans”) the relatively less committed they must be to another value (i.e. “Let’s do what’s good for Jews”).
When the values come into conflict, the value which has been downgraded in relative importance will suffer.
Also, it prevents us from learning our history and from reading right wing intellectuals of the 20th century.
White people did fine in the 19th Century while not being able to read right wing 20th Century intellectuals.
The actual problematical effect of Holocaust related media is that it’s used to make many Whites view a concern for the welfare of their race as something which naturally leads to the commission of mass murder and brutal wars which get millions of White people killed.
To reinforce this message the media tends to give major play to any case where a White could possibly be construed as having committed a racially motivated act of violence; while they hypocritically give far less attention to acts of violence committed by non-Whites against Whites which clearly had a racial motive (“Kill the Boer”, the Zebra Killings, etc).
This has utterly devastated the right wing in Europe and its Diaspora.
Just imagine the effect it would’ve had on the left if the media and school system hammered it into people that forms of left wing governance led to millions of people being murdered in the Soviet Union.
Just imagine if they assiduously promoted the idea that Europeans and especially Jews who show a concern for class interests are never to be trusted given what such people did to the Russians and Ukrainians.
The left would’ve been devastated and never would’ve been strong enough to transition from a movement at least conceptually based around class interests to a movement based around promoting the perceived self-interest of non-European groups.
But it doesn’t mean they feel any personal guilt over it.
As far as I know Kevin MacDonald hasn’t written about personal guilt in this context, he’s instead written about Europeans tending to feel a politically paralyzing sense of collective guilt.
It’s quite possible for a leftward leaning White to feel no sense of guilt on a personal level, while still thinking that Whites who think and act in a more collective fashion bear the collective guilt for this or that moral infraction committed by the ancestors and/or relatives of the Whites alive today.
That’s the main point of leftists, disproportionately of Jewish origin, presenting such a lopsided view of history where only the alleged moral infractions of Europeans are given significant consideration.
It’s to make it more psychologically unpleasant for Whites to care about the welfare of their race, and more pleasant for Whites to avoid caring about the welfare of their race.
On that last point, consider how much pleasure leftist Whites get from being able to look down on Whites who care about the welfare of their race.
It’s somewhat similar to the pleasure the Pharisee got in one of Jesus’ parables:
Reginald….
If by White guilt you mean Christian Whites – then you’re wrong. German Jews also played a major role in the mass murder of millions of Gypsies, Christians and Jews. There were approximately 150,000 German Jews in the Nazi Army.
Some Jewish scholars have called Holocaust as a new Jewish religion – but for Zionist leaders, Holocaust has become a WMD to shut-down criticism of Israel, Jews and Zionism. Professor Finkelstein in his book ‘The Holocaust Industry’ has claimed that Holocaust is $billions industry for the Jews.
@CompassionateFascist:
The biggest Holocaust of the 20th century was of European Christians by Bolshevik Jews in Russia and Eastern Europe rivaled, possibly, by the Communist butchery of fellow Chinese.