Hollywood and the Left, Again

It’s virtually a cliche that Hollywood is the embodiment of cultural Marxism and exclusion of conservatives (see “Navigating Hollywood: Conservatives and Christians Need Not Apply“). Now a new book, Primetime Propaganda: The true Hollywood story of how the left took over your TV, promises to provide a great deal of detail and juicy anecdotes on Hollywood and the Left.

In the following video clip, Leonard Goldberg notes that liberalism in the TV industry is “100 percent dominant, and anyone who denies it is kidding, or not telling the truth.” When asked if politics are a barrier to entry, Goldberg says, “Absolutely.”

There’s the familiar sense of moral and intellectual superiority:

Friends co-creator Marta Kauffman says that when she cast Candace Gingrich-Jones, half-sister of Republican former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, as the minister of a lesbian wedding, “There was a bit of ‘fuck you’ in it to the right wing.”

Kauffman also acknowledges she “put together a staff of mostly liberal people,” which is another major point of Shapiro’s book: that conservatives aren’t welcome in Hollywood.

Maybe that’s because they’re “idiots” and have “medieval minds.” At least that’s what Soapand Golden Girls creator Susan Harris thinks of TV’s conservative critics.

However, the ranks of dumb right-wingers has dwindled, according to Harris, whose video has her saying: “At least, you know, we put Obama in office[!!], and so people, I think, are getting – have gotten – a little bit smarter.”

Ah yes, a sure sign of intelligence is voting for Hollywood’s preferred candidate. And now that Obama is president, we are all the wiser for it.


Hollywood discriminates against conservatives and is proud of it:

Nicholas Meyer being asked point-blank whether conservatives are discriminated against in Hollywood. “Well, I hope so,” he answers. Meyer also admits his political agenda for The Day After, a  TV movie he directed for ABC that was seen by 100 million people when it aired in 1983.

“My private, grandiose notion was that this movie would unseat Ronald Reagan when he ran for re-election,” Meyer says

Note: 100 million viewers–a vast audience when compared to the comparatively  minuscule numbers that read sites like this.

Not surprisingly, producers acknowledge promoting the homosexual agenda and drug use. Particularly chilling is “president of MTV Networks Entertainment Group Doug Herzog talking about his network having “superpowers” when it comes to its influence over young people.” Even a passing familiarity with MTV shows its agenda of promoting multiculturalism, miscegenation of White girls with super cool Black males, drug use, and recreational sexuality.

Another obvious truth is that Jews run Hollywood. (See, for example, Edmund Connelly’s “Rick Sanchez on Jewish Media Power“). Virtually all the names mentioned in the linked article are Jewish, including the author, Ben Shapiro. Interestingly, Shapiro is a conservative who managed to get all these frank admissions by flagrantly calling attention to his liberal credentials: Being Jewish and sporting a Harvard Law hat was enough to get their confidence.

“Most of them didn’t Google me. If they had, they would have realized where I am politically,” he said. “I played on their stereotypes. When I showed up for the interviews, I wore my Harvard Law baseball cap — my name is Ben Shapiro and I attended Harvard, so there’s a 98.7 percent chance I’m a liberal. Except I happen not to be.”

I suppose we should be thankful for small things like getting a yet another picture of Hollywood and the left. Nothing new here–the topic has been well covered even in the academic literature (see, e.g., here, here, p. 48ff and Edmund Connelly’s work (here, here, here, and here). But it shows once again the critical importance of media control in the media age. We don’t have it; they do. That’s why they’re winning.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

127 Comments to "Hollywood and the Left, Again"

  1. Nax's Gravatar Nax
    June 19, 2011 - 8:33 am | Permalink

    Hollywood left wingers promote Jewish domestic policy i.e. breakdown of the traditional family and social order.
    Hollywood right wingers promote Jewish foreign policy i.e. military conflict with Arab and Muslim societies.

  2. June 12, 2011 - 6:21 pm | Permalink

    From the Jewish Weekly, The Forward, has an interesting article related to this topic:



    A remarkable number of the people responsible for these films happen to be Jewish. The extent to which their religion plays a role in their interest in filmmaking and social justice varies as much as the subjects and styles of their movies.

    Jews creating accessible, meaningful art is neither a new trend nor a random coincidence, according to Caroline Libresco, a senior programmer at the Sundance Film Festival. In our interview, she said, “I don’t think it’s an accident that progressive Jews want to make a difference. Social change documentaries are an expression of tikkun olam.” Libresco has worked in documentary films for 15 years and is herself Jewish. She also said, “There has always been a strong wave of Jewish activist documentarians.”

    Michael Santomauro

  3. Tom Brown's Gravatar Tom Brown
    June 7, 2011 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

    Folks, as long as the Jewish “federal” reserve ponzi money printing machine–they get it first–continues, Americuns will not care who runs academia, the MSM, Wall St., Corporate America, federal, and state governments, ORRRR Hollywood!!! But when the ponzi crashes, you will see J bombs galore. Let’s have a respectful moment of silence for our courageous Helen Thomas, and Rick Sanchez!!!

  4. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    June 7, 2011 - 11:47 am | Permalink

    If we had just one major network that was pro-Euro , I am sure that it would be shocking as to the sudden and radical success that white nationalism would enjoy .

  5. Edison Carter's Gravatar Edison Carter
    June 7, 2011 - 3:23 am | Permalink

    A relatively small fraction of the White wealthy segments of Western society deciding to put up a media struggle might also reap disproportionate rewards.

    We need a professional quality White Video News website.

    A pro-white version of CNN. Someplace that whites can go to hear the truth that the Jewish media isn’t covering, or is covering up.

    There’s no way to get into the government licensed and regulated television broadcast industry so we need to go around them using the internet. Video webcasting is the solution.

    To start it could be nothing more than a daily (or if resources were very tight a weekly) newscast from a white nationalist perspective. Just a half hour a day of quality programming. The bare minimum standard for this would be the same that’s required of a local TV station. The show must go on. Every day that webcast goes out on time. Every webcast meets basic quality standards.

    Fox News uses a tactic that we can copy. They have the best looking anchorwomen. This is important. People believe what good looking women say. That’s a large part of the Sarah Palin phenomenon. This also creates the image of success and authority, the group with beautiful women is a group with status, with power.

    Behind the scenes all that’s required is professionalism and high standards. In front of the camera you need to look good. Obviously everyone involved in should be white, especially the anchorwomen.

    To work this would have to be so good that a viewer looking at a clip of it on youtube could mistake it for a cable news program. That means good looking anchorwomen (I can’t repeat that often enough), professional delivery, multiple camera angles, smooth camera movement, a good looking set (no sitting in front of a green screen), well designed graphics and titles, fast paced live editing, and an intelligent script to read off the teleprompter.

    For content there must be a focus on white issues. Not implicit white issues, explicit ones. The stuff that Rush Limbaugh can’t talk about we should be pounding at every opportunity. Ending legal immigration. Ending all guest worker programs. Protecting our manufacturing base with tariffs. Exposing the jewish role in the financial swindles. Exposing the jewish role in promoting war.

    Eventually we should have a 24 hour video webcast.

    Dr. William Pierce accomplished a great deal with a weekly half hour broadcast on shortwave radio and uploaded to websites. If we could start with a weekly newscast, a broadcast quality production, we could reach far more people in 2011 than Pierce did in 2002.

    • Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
      June 13, 2011 - 5:16 am | Permalink

      Sounds like a sure-fire plan, Edison–for pulling in hot chicks!

  6. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    June 6, 2011 - 11:27 pm | Permalink

    “In Russia, I think the communist rule endured long after most people had become cynical about it.”

    Yes, once trust has broken down the elite have to use brute force methods. Breaking trust is only the first step.

    “I think the Jews’ control of entertainment is a symptom of what has gone wrong rather than the cause (although it’s exacerbating a critical situation). 100 million may watch their product but very few take it seriously; hardly anyone is converted from conservative to liberal or by watching TV.”



    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      June 6, 2011 - 11:32 pm | Permalink

      Yeah, how many children watch “Friends” or “Will and Grace” and begin to perceive the people portrayed in that show as normal and the values promoted as normative.

      Our traditions are mocked, our religion is derided, are aesthetics are sullied.

  7. Anti-Surrealist's Gravatar Anti-Surrealist
    June 6, 2011 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

    All the Europeon peoples have to do is CLOSE RANKS against our enemies.

    It doesn’t need to be nasty , just turn away from their properganda machine and refuse the notion of Jewish victimhood.We know they utterly believe their own properganda so leave them to their own properganda .

    Never forget what the Jewish establishement did in the USSR :50 million dead, I’m not interested in arguing about numbers , lets give the gas chamber stories a rest and talk about YOUR crimes against humanity.

  8. Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
    June 6, 2011 - 6:26 pm | Permalink

    Weiner Admits it was his weiner and then this:

    “Weiner (D-N.Y.) is Jewish and one of the most ardent supporters of Israel in Congress. In a May interview, the politician said he was raised Jewish and told Moment Magazine, “We weren’t a very religious household, but we had a very strong sense of our Judaism.”—Weiner Used Jewish Sexual Stereotype To Facebook Sexting Partner


    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 6, 2011 - 7:22 pm | Permalink

      When I see people like Weiner meltdown over something so infantile and narcissistic, it makes me think we are not fighting wizards, we are fighting aggressive little rats that scurry when light is shined on them.

  9. Wattylersrevolt's Gravatar Wattylersrevolt
    June 6, 2011 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    I can see the pattern here. Conservatism=Republican Party war crimes=the good kind of war crimes. This is the conservatism of Goldberg and Silver and some of the commenters here. Mao murdered a lot of his fellow Chinese..how many is a guess at best…Hitler was really a good guy after all. The Vietnam War was good war. Why is anybody shocked that race-replacement is occuring so fast.

    So how exactly was Ron Silver and how is Goldberg a conservative. Did and do they oppose race-replacement? My strongest suspicion is the that they were Fox News-Bernard Goldberg conservative.

    My Fox News conservative cousin’s son will be off to Camp Pendleton in two weeks where he will blindly implement the foreign policy of the Democratic Secretary of State Hilary Clinton.

    Conservative Native Born White Americans are insane.

    Kevin, why accept it at face value that Goldberg and Silver are conservatives? Because they voted for Reagan and Bush and Bush?

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 7, 2011 - 6:29 pm | Permalink

      WTR: But KM hasn’t accepted, at face or any other value, the contention that Goldberg and Silver are conservatives! That is merely the implicit or explicit contention of the people mentioned in the blog post itself. I hope that you don’t believe that each and every article and blog entry needs to be prefaced with an “it ain’t me, babe” disclaimer, as if this site were a radio station broadcasting an ad for [ahem] male enhancement? KM doesn’t treat his readers like children, nor should we expect him to.

      Whatever my own gripes about this or that article posted at TOO, neither KM nor any other regular writer, with the sole exception of the odd comment by Joe Webb, has ever adopted a stance that differs markedly from Joe Sobran’s long-ago characterization of the Republicans as the right wing of the unitary War Party. And it needs to be forthrightly added in fairness to a fine writer that even Joe Webb has in effect stated that the Republican sympathies he has here and there voiced are mostly products of nostalgia.

      Indeed, compared with, say, VDare (which I choose because of the near-perfect alignment of its central goal—marked restriction of immigration, especially non-Caucasian and non-Christian immigration—with those of TOO), this site is characterized by the absence of the subversive figures (Michelle Malkin, Brenda Walker, et al.) whose overt or covert support for Tribal control through the deceptive mechanics of the faux-confrontational structures of “democracy” compels readers to check bylines carefully and sift everything posted with an eye to the possible misdirection of Occidental energies toward institutions (yes, you, Fox News), figures (Palin, Bachmann, Gingrich, et al. ad infinitum), or movements (take your pick) that serve as instruments of Managed Opposition.

      While TOO writers sometimes disagree with one another (usually very politely and often productively) and TOO commenters very, very frequently disagree (not always politely and often unproductively), none of the former are moles, and whenever moles appear among the latter, they are quickly exposed and driven off—sometimes, unsurprisingly, in terms not coincident with the highest standards of Western Christian gentility.

      In short, since TOO remains a hazard-free playground, we ought not expect that it be complexity-free as well.

  10. Tor's Gravatar Tor
    June 6, 2011 - 11:56 am | Permalink

    Just listened to an old Fresh Air on NPR with Jon Stewart. Stewart stated that he feels like an “outsider (in America)…diaspora is in my wheelhouse.”

  11. me's Gravatar me
    June 6, 2011 - 10:16 am | Permalink

    Creative people in all fields tend to be tolerant and politically liberal. Show me an artist who’s also a country club Republican.
    the politicization of creative fields is a recent trend – the same with universities and clergy – prior to the ascendancy of cultural marxism, many artists, writers and musicians were ‘conservative’ or ‘right wing’.

  12. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 6, 2011 - 6:07 am | Permalink

    As far as as a person I am not quite sure as he played a role in the atomic bomb, probably intending it to be used against Germany. He is also said to have become more ethno-centric as he grew older or rather more honest about himself.

  13. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 6, 2011 - 6:05 am | Permalink

    Yeah I know about the one about God and the dice. He couldn’t accept quantum physics. But he also couldn’t accept the expanding universe even though his theories pointed to that. He fudged his equation to make it fit. Later it was found that indeed the universe is expanding. So his initial theory was correct. he did not want to accept the expansion of the universe because of its philosophical implication. Intelligent design since an expanding universe means that the universe has to be pin point exact in everything for it not to collapse on itself.

    Actually it was Edwin Hubble who made the ultimate discovery about the sixe and expansion of the universe.

    But Einstein was brilliant especially about light.

  14. Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
    June 5, 2011 - 8:27 pm | Permalink

    HuffPost: Kanye West’s Threesome with Corpses

    After a rough leak months ago, Kanye West’s official video for his single, “Monster,” has finally hit the web for real, and for better or worse, it was certainly worth the wait to see.

    Hip hop’s leading star is joined by the game’s other leading lights in Jay-Z, Nicki Minaj and Rick Ross in a spooky, off-the-wall and semi-graphic video that, by its own admission, touches on the racy and controversial.

    With an introductory disclaimer that reads, “The following content is in no way to be interpreted as misogynistic or negative towards any groups of people. It is an art piece and it shall be taken as such,” the video launches into women hanging by nooses, Kanye setting up a threesome with corpses, Jay-Z raps over dead women and evil Nicki Minaj busts out the S&M gear to torture her good self.”


  15. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 5, 2011 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Franklin Ryckaert ,

    True, but its a top down elitist thing. Very fragile. Temporary thing. Never lasted and easily disposed of. Its the most unsuccessful strategy ever pursued. They know that but they think by opening the borders they think Whites will be too disintegrated to offer a common unified resisitance. Hence nothing will happen, or so they think. If you read Dueteronomy 28 you would know what always follows.

    What is it that Einstein said? Insanity is doing the same things over again and expecting different results. Or something like that.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 6, 2011 - 4:42 am | Permalink

      Alas, the insanity quip was not Einstein’s. Sources that attribute it to him are mistaken. (I don’t know who actually said it, and I’m not certain anyone knows for sure.) In addition, it’s not really his style, which tended to be more grandiose and usually self-serving.

      A far more typical wisecrack of Einstein’s is the famous one about quantum mechanics: “He [i.e., God] does not throw dice.” This was the best riposte he could muster to the brilliant theory of Werner Heisenberg, whose imaginative capacity far exceeded Einstein’s.

  16. Edmund Connelly's Gravatar Edmund Connelly
    June 5, 2011 - 4:38 pm | Permalink

    Since this is pertinent, I’d like to try to post links to my writing on Hollywood and its Jewish identity. All of this appeared in the print version of The Occidental Quarterly. I apologize if I’ve failed to make these links live.

    Understanding Hollywood, Part I: Hollywood’s Jewish Identity Vol. 8, No.1 (Spring 2008)

    Understanding Hollywood, Part II: Deconstructing Chrisianity Vol. 9, No.1 (Spring 2009)

    Understanding Hollywood, Part 3: Racial Role Reversals Vol. 9, No.1 (Summer 2009)

    The Jews of Prime Time Vol. 6, No.3 (Fall 2006)
    Editor’s note: These links have now been provided in the original blog.

  17. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 5, 2011 - 3:30 pm | Permalink

    Steven Spielberg came up with an idea to build up a video library filled with “testimonies” of gas chamber, glove and lampshade survivors in which they relay personal experiences in the Nazi-occupied Europe.
    In this one, Irene Zisblatt shares how she personally was ordered into the gas chamber by the ubiquitous Dr. Mengele. Luckily for her, the camp guard was unable to shove little Irene in as the chamber was jam-packed by then. All the while SS men were preparing to drop Zyklon B in.
    In this testimony, Irene barely escapes Ilse Koch who that day was shopping for material for lampshades.
    Lastly, Irene tells us how she was forced to hide family jewels in her mouth. Then swallow them, then shyt them out, then rinse the stones off in her concentration camp soup. In order to repeat the whole thing all over again.

    • I Cut's Gravatar I Cut
      June 11, 2011 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

      Well Jarvis, they are known as an extremely scatological bunch, in addition to being recognized as congenital liars. It seems as if they are driven to lie even when they don’t have to.

  18. June 5, 2011 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

    I used this book as a stepping off point for some reflections on the myth of Jewish “humor” on my blog last month:


    As I mentioned there, it’s important to realize that Shapiro is not so much a “conservative” as a Neo-Con. Which is to say, his agenda is not really ours. For example, contrast his account of Rachel Corrie’s death:

    “Rachel Corrie, the radical proterrorist Palestinian sympathizer killed by standing in front of a bulldozer in the Gaza Strip trying to defend a terrorist invested area.”

    with Dr. Darkmoon’s article on this very site:


  19. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 5, 2011 - 3:09 pm | Permalink

    It’s interesting to learn from an Israeli think tank that Israeli lies propagated through Zionist-owned mainstream media, books, cartoons, Hollywood, powerful Israel lobbying groups and over 100,000 idiots operating phoney Muslim and Christian websites and spamming the internet discussion forums – has failed to hide the true evil nature of the Zionist regime. On September 30, 2009 – Canadian author and blogger, Greg Felton, wrote in an article titled Israeli propagandists shoot themselves in the foot as they shout off their mouths:

    “If you have ever visited a blog or on-line discussion group on the Middle East you have doubtless had the misfortune to run into them. They are known by the language they use: depraved sexual insults, bile, bigotry, threats, disinformation and character assassination. That’s right: I’m talking about “hasbarats,” zionist trolls who infect the Internet with hasbara, pro-Israel propaganda. Of course, mainstream media hasbarats have been around for decades, as have “hasbaratchiks,” fifth-columns in foreign governments who subvert national policies to serve Israel. The Internet, though, is the latest, some might say the greatest, propaganda playground, and Israel cannot cope with factual, passionate, well-documented stories that expose its war crimes and unrepentant criminality.


  20. Dedalus's Gravatar Dedalus
    June 5, 2011 - 2:28 pm | Permalink

    I would have written the last sentence like this,
    We don’t have it; they do. That’s why they’re “winning.”

    This only seems permanent and indesctrubable because we have had to live through its rise to the top of the power it now has. But the fact is, that when you look past the hype what you see is what they have really created, an unsustainable world of darkness and confusion.
    The key word is unsustainable.
    The fact is, they can only sustain the dark world they’ve made for so long.
    They have concealed this dark world by using money, rhetoric, propaganda, name-calling, intimidation, threat, punishment, etc.
    It can’t possibly last. And it won’t.

  21. Ex-Pro White Activist's Gravatar Ex-Pro White Activist
    June 5, 2011 - 2:26 pm | Permalink

    “it shows once again the critical importance of media control in the media age. We don’t have it; they do. That’s why they’re winning.”

    And there isn’t going to be any significant media to control for “our side” either. The prime reason is “we” are neither competent or motivated enough. It’s not because the evil grinch Jew takes it away from us.

    The tiny white media that does exist is technically retromingent. There is a vast literature content in pdf that is broadly “free” and public domain. And none of it that I can find has been converted into Kindle mobi or other eBook reader format for dissemination by the 3g networks. The pathetically laughable part of this is the conversion software is freeware.

    Deskoop and laptop PCs are already a dying dinosaurs. Kindles and tablet computers like Ipad2 and Androids are where it’s at for youth and for existing “elites” (a reputed recruiting target for some). But it’s not where any pro-white media is at. This is stuck in the late 90s. 1990s in some cases, 1890s in others.

    Ditto for recent works under copyright and being sold through Amazon and various boutique literary websites.

    If these various folks only want to market high priced print editions to a restricted market, so be it. I think it would be consistent to roll out large print editions like Reader’s Digest and religious publishers do. They also aim into the well heeled elderly demographic and do fairly well for themselves.

  22. Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
    June 5, 2011 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

    I wish we did have medieval minds because we then wouldn’t hesitate to slaughter those amongst us who have caused us so much damage.

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 6, 2011 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

      What an ignorant person, eh!

      The European with “medieval minds” had expelled Jewish communities from every European country. However, now the same Jews are not controlling but pissing of Christians with “medieval minds”.

      “I am sorry, gentlemen, but I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious to see the success of Zionism; I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents,” – Harry Truman’s response to US diplomates, who advised him not to recognize State of Israel, November 10, 1945.

      “We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world – no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small group of dominant people,” – President Woodrow Wilson.


    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      June 6, 2011 - 11:20 pm | Permalink

      I’m not sure what you’re getting at, Rehmat, with a bunch of non sequiturs.

  23. June 5, 2011 - 12:42 pm | Permalink

    Yes, apart from the issue of who or what destroyed Christianity, it’s obvious that centralization is the Jews’ best friend, and the upper hierarchy of the Church was always in bed with the Jews. Maybe that’s why Judaism is decentralized; they know better.

    • June 5, 2011 - 2:13 pm | Permalink

      Correction: Judaism WAS decentralized. It is now highly centralized around Israel and Zionism which, mark my words, will be the ultimate downfall for Diaspora syndicalist/supremacist Jewry, because it can no longer operate in the shadows, nor pass itself off as “humanitarian.”

  24. June 5, 2011 - 9:41 am | Permalink

    @ Bear,

    I think Reagan was the last president with a libertarian streak (“Government IS the problem”) but the neocons have essentially taken over the GOP, at least at the major policy formulating national level, since.

    Libertarian Ron Paul has been marginalized by the neoconned, Establishment GOP for years, which is the real “controlled opposition.” His libertarianism is far more in tune with Reagan’s instinctive libertarianism, minus the pimping of the military industrial complex, which in retrospect was Reagan’s biggest mistake.

    I agree, the open-borders, globalist, and “anything goes” strain of libertarianism, is no good. One of my theories of libertarianism is that Jewry uses government and its power as the primary means of suppressing opposition to Zionism, re-engineering society, networking its way to the top and instituting their own legacy role, like at the Fed, therefore the smaller and more decentralized the government, the less damage they can do, and the more likely some organic moral authority will re-assert itself vs. the false moral authority of ideological Zionism/Big Government.

  25. Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
    June 5, 2011 - 9:37 am | Permalink

    There is little question that they who control the information flow of a people (MEDIAting current events & interpretations of history) & economics control a nation.

    But Americans bought into the lie by choice, i.e., by falling for a culture of contraception & abortion; thus culling our own herd an creating a culture of decadence & death. Those WASPS who despise Catholicism ought to think long an hard on that. None of us can say we were not warned. The Pope saved Western civilization from the ravaging hoards an miscreants more than once in history. Today, after the annexing (stealing) of the papal States, he is impotent to do so. He is reduced to trying to prevent even more horror, lest the Vatican be razed to the ground an made into a museum —or parking lot.

    Yes, thank the Jew but not just them, also thank Luther, Calvin, Henry VIII, Voltaire, Rockefeller, Roe v. Wade and
    the rest.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      June 5, 2011 - 10:27 am | Permalink

      Paul VI (a liberal Pope if ever there was one) warned in 1968 about the disasters which are contraception and abortion.

      WASPs have to confront the reality that the enlightenment project is now over. Even the great Dolly Parton can understand that.

  26. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 5, 2011 - 8:44 am | Permalink

    Who has the greatest numbers of secret agents in America?


    • Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
      June 5, 2011 - 9:02 am | Permalink

      Re the negativity in the comments I agree with Farnham and a few others. How often have we heard about the hold the jewish have over the media? Yes it is true, yes it is grim. So what can you do within your lifetime to make a difference? If there’s no immediate solution then what can you be doing to change that for the next generation? If you can’t think of a single other thing, the answer is BE SUCCESSFUL AND WEALTHY and then BE READY AND AVAILABLE.
      You see…you have something you can do and it’s exactly the same as what your families want you to do anyway, and what you want to do for yourself anyway. You need to get off your arse and get successful. THEN worry about the next stage.

    • Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
      June 6, 2011 - 2:37 am | Permalink

      If they’re “secret” how is it you know about them?
      Only a Mossad plant could write such crazy posts.

  27. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    June 5, 2011 - 7:32 am | Permalink

    Even a nice gal like Dolly doesn’t stand a chance and no wonder when one sees the type of posters on OO. I have read one female WASP regular whose “strategy” consists of not only wiping out Jonah Goldberg and Leroy Brown but Ramon Ramirez and Slugger O’Toole also. Slugger, in particular, is a source of animus especially given that his grandmother is Sicilian!

    The bottom line is that Dolly and the WASPs (even with Dolly’s money) possess no GES.

    • Don's Gravatar Don
      June 5, 2011 - 10:33 am | Permalink

      If you like to use the slur “WASP,” you’ll love to see Chris Matthews use it to attack Mitt Romney, calling Romney “WASPy,” along with attacking Romney for using “European” and calling Republicans “nativist.”


    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      June 5, 2011 - 12:07 pm | Permalink

      Romney is a dead end and Matthews is therefore offering an assist. Where’s the problem? The enlightenment is finished and so is the reformation which spurned it. Matthews’s achilles heel is his intellectually corrupt version of the Catholicism but how do you propose to call him on it? With intellectually corrupt protestantism?

    • Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
      June 9, 2011 - 12:21 pm | Permalink

      “Debauched”, Pierre?
      You really should get out more, mix with people. Just charge up the ol’ mobility scooter and GO. And b.t.w. the most notorious user of the casting couch was that son of the Nebraska plains Darryl F. Zanuck.

      Marilyn Monroe posed nude for a calendar photo. Does that make her even more a “promoter” of obscenity than the nineteen year old Hedy Lamarr? Then there was Henry Miller, D.H. Lawrence–their works classed as obscene and decidedly not Jewish.

      I never cared for Howard Stern. Imus was who I used to listen to but I tuned out not when he did the women’s basketball team thing but before that, when he broadcast an ugly racial attack on, of all people, journalist and TV host Gwen Ifill of PBS — a thoroughly inoffensive figure who did a lot to bring “Washington Week” back to prominence.

      Anyway, Ath, you forgot Minsky’s Burlesque–closed down under the Comstock Laws.

  28. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 5, 2011 - 6:32 am | Permalink


    Thats true. After all Liberalism was never a Jewish invention, they just support it when they are a minority. Muslims are kind of doing the same whenever they are a minority.

    When they are a majority then that is something else.

    • June 5, 2011 - 10:12 am | Permalink

      Once in power the Jews switch over to Neo-conservatism to conserve ZOG. Open borders (ostensibly for cheap workers for Corporations, in reality for race replacement), endless wars, and transforming authentic nationalism to de-racinated civic nationalism. This damned-able present system is what they want to keep around.

      They are trying to conserve (note the root word) something, however it is not a Conservatism that Ed Burke, Joe de Maistre, and especially Revilo P. Oliver would recognize.

    • Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
      June 8, 2011 - 11:19 pm | Permalink

      Pierre, I’m putting you up for this year’s Pedant and Bore award.
      My point, which I tried to make in ten lines or less, was that Hollywood is liberal because it is creative not because it is Jewish.
      As for deeply reactionary political views you could not find any better examples than the studio moguls: Goldwyn, Jack Warner, Harry Cohn, William Fox. It was the Fatty Arbuckles, the Chaplins, the Jean Harlows — gentiles all –that gave Hollywood a name for immorality or political undesirability.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      June 8, 2011 - 11:34 pm | Permalink

      Alla Nazimova, Hedy Lamarr, Lenny Bruce, Howard Stern… You can’t deny that Jews have been the vanguard of obscenity promotion.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 9, 2011 - 12:35 am | Permalink

      Thank you for the award, Caleb. I accept, whether or not it comes with a statuette. Better men than you have told me I was scheissvoll.

      I understand now why you seem to be missing my point. You think Hollywood is creative. I on the other hand am certain that it isn’t. You think that the old studio moguls were “deeply reactionary.” I’d like to hear the views of the parents and other loved ones of the hundreds of girls (and boys) they pressured and debauched even before I ask for your definition of the words in quotes above. There is a gulf between us, and I fear it is unbridgeable.

  29. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 5, 2011 - 6:30 am | Permalink

    “When country singer Dolly Parton told Vogue magazine a couple of months ago that her idea for a TV series about a country singer who becomes a gospel singer was turned down by Hollywood, she said that “everyone’s afraid to touch anything that religious because most of the people out here are Jewish, and it’s a frightening thing for them to promote Christianity.” Truer words were never spoken.

    But the ADL’s chief troublemaker, Abe Foxman, immediately flew into one of his by-now tiresome furies and fired off a letter (which he made available to the news media, of course) to Dolly, scolding her for her innocent, honest comment. Foxman charged that Ms. Parton was invoking “the old antisemitic stereotype of Jewish control of Hollywood and hostility toward Christianity.” He did not, however, directly contradict her or deny that Hollywood is controlled by his fellow Jews.

    Being the nice person she is and knowing on which side her bread is buttered, Dolly dutifully and publicly apologized. She wrote to Foxman, “I regret that my words could have conjured up an impression of Jewish ‘control’ of Hollywood.” Ever the arrogant, whining bully, Foxman accepted Ms. Parton’s atonement, informing the media that is was a “refreshing capitulation.” And the Hollywood lie lives on. ”

    Need I say more?

    • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
      June 5, 2011 - 11:19 am | Permalink

      @ Bigmo, june 5, 6:30 am.

      [Dolly Parton criticizes the Jews,then apologizes]

      Whenever somebody speakes a truth about the Jews,sly fox Abe Foxman appears and decries it as an “old canard” (his habitual term).He demands that you deny the obvious: no Jews do not control Hollywood,no Jews do not control the Banks,no AIPAC does not control Congress etc. etc.
      This “facts-are-fiction”-confession is always demanded.Even more disgusting is the insistence on a cringing public apology.

      Whites seem not to understand that it is exactly this “ritual humiliation” that keeps their slavery intact.We have been “colonized” by the Jews and we know it not.We have accepted Jewish refugees and immigrants as our fellow citizens,but as soon as they landed they started to take over our society in all its key positions of power and influence.Not only have the Jews colonized us economically,politically and culturally but above all psychologically.Colonies are ruled by a foreign minority not only by militairy power but ultimately by psychological intimidation.Once this intimidation is rejected,the subject people is on the road to freedom.As long as we remain intimidated,deny obvious facts and apologize we will never be free.

      The film industry is one of the main weapons of the Jews to manipulate us psychologically.In the typical fashion of the Jewish “dual-strategy” they boycott anything that might strengthen us, while promoting anything that weakens and corrupts us.

      Whites should leave an industry that works for their destruction and start one of their own.When famous people like Mel Gibson or Dolly Parton would join,that would be a great advertisement.An even better advertisement would be when the Jews would loudly decry them.That would give them instant “martyr status” and popularity.( we saw how this worked with Mel Gibson’s film The Passion of Christ).

      Whites should show some CHUTZPAH.Jews have it in abundance and see how far that has brought them.Let’s try to imitate and then surpass them.We have that potential.

    • Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
      June 6, 2011 - 1:28 am | Permalink

      Athanasius, if you want to count foreign artists, I would point out that during his most creative period, the 1920’s and 30’s, Salvador Dali was either an anarchist or a communist, depending how he felt on any particular day. His later move rightward was pure opportunism. He wanted to get in good with the victorious Franco regime. Speaking of Spain, how about Luis Bunuel (communist), Pablo Picasso (lifelong communist), Federico Garcia Llorca (communist and homosexual)?
      When the colonels took power in Greece, that country’s two greatest artists Melina Mercouri and Mikis Theodorakis became political exiles.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      June 6, 2011 - 8:31 pm | Permalink

      Well, I’m not sure how helpful it is to speculate what Salvador Dali, an internationally adored artist, had to gain by kissing up to Franco.

      I guess if you are going to define conservatism so narrowly for the purpose of making your point, there are indeed few conservatives. Tchaikovsky was a nationalistic, patriotic, and religious–and gay. So was he conservative or liberal?

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 8, 2011 - 7:54 pm | Permalink

      I’d go a step and more beyond Athanasius and ask why anyone, Caleb, need examine the politics, however you want to define the term, of any of the people you mention. If your point is a limited one—say, that Picasso, Dali, García Lorca, and Buñuel are oversold by the Establishment because of their politics (except that I think that Dali is now undersold, for the wrong reasons, after being oversold, for different wrong reasons, for fifty years)—there’s matter for discussion there, and believe me, I could discuss your ear off till you begged for mercy (mea maxima culpa). If, however, your point is simply to reinforce what you wrote above about “creative people in all fields [tending] to be tolerant and politically liberal,” my respectfully meant reply would have to be that both the charge and the specification exhibit grievous formal and material errors, errors rooted in fallacious, Tribally generated and inculcated ideas of what “artists” and “creativity” are and how posterity should understand them.

      Since Athanasius has mentioned Tchaikovsky, let us take that composer as exhibit A for the case that the West treated its artists’ more undesirable private traits with laudable discretion before the Tribe murdered the coachman and grabbed the reins. Many people, myself among them, came to adulthood knowing zilch of Tchaikovsky’s homosexuality, and many more lived full lives and died without knowing that for something like a decade, Tchaikovsky had a homosexual liaison with his own nephew, Bob Davidov, thirty-one years his junior. Having this information at hand—much less having your nose rubbed in it—makes none but the degenerate heart beat more rapidly (in a good rapid way, that is) and hinders rather than helps one’s engagement with the music specifically in terms of the beauty the music embodies or expresses.

      Finally, may I say to Athanasius that his range of choice in artists in answer to Caleb’s post higher up is piquantly eccentric, so much so as to border on the antic (I think a Brit might write “pawky”). Could my honorable friend simply be stirring the pot in hopes of getting something—preferably something interesting or unexpected or funny or naughty—to rise to the surface? I grant that Curry and Benton would be at home in much the same pot—say what you will about that John Brown extravaganza in Topeka, but once seen it ain’t never gonna be forgot (the unbelievably ugly bust of JFK as leper or late-stage syphilitic in the lobby of the Kennedy Center is the only thing I’ve ever seen that produces a comparably dyspeptic effect)—but in tossing in Repin, who is a faux-realist (I mean that as a compliment) of a transcendentally higher order, I can’t help suspecting Athanasius of being impish—not that there’s any intrinsic harm in impishness. Every good boy deserves fun, and few if any TOO commenters are gooder than A.

      As for Dali, no way I’m going there!

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      June 8, 2011 - 9:49 pm | Permalink

      I think that Benton, though not a WN should be considered a prophet for us. I strongly suspect that his criticisms of the “limp wristed” in NYC who controlled the art world wasn’t only a condemnation of homosexuals.

      But Benton had a brilliant idea. He wanted to make Kansas City the Athens of the Midwest–and he nearly succeeded. Of course I can’t entirely blame his ultimate failure in that regard on his expulsion from the art institute there, but despite his theoretically ‘liberal’ (in so far as he was a New Deal supporter) credentials (to say nothing of his art), he was shunned. Still, his basic premise was sound–we too need to consider alternate poles of power.

      I’d also point out that with respect to social mores, Benton was extremely conservative. And I don’t think anyone could accuse him of being a pansy.

      I’d love to explain my feelings about Repin’s work, but I’m rather hesitant to reveal too much about myself

    • Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
      June 8, 2011 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

      Abe Foxman is America’s Superman. He is one who authored Hate Law. No American celebrity, Jewish or Christian, can challenge him. Rev. Ted Pike have called “Global Thought Police”. He is protected by the powerful Judeo-Christian Bilderberg Group.

      “Various far-right extremists and conspiracy theorists, however, charge that the (Bilderberg) group is a shadowy force seeking to control world events, exerting allegedly dominating powers of international influence to promote a “new world order” under their control. The extremists claim that Presidential candidates of both major U.S. political parties are controlled by the Bilderberg group; among those often mentioned in such conspiracy-oriented propaganda are David Rockefeller, the Clintons and Henry Kissinger,” says Abe Foxman.


    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 9, 2011 - 12:59 am | Permalink

      I hear you, Athanasius. Knowing nothing—I mean literally nothing—of the biographical details of any of these guys’ lives save for birth, death, and floruit dates, I based my comment solely upon their work, about which I do know a thing or two.

      Had I better understood more of your referents, I am sure I would have been less inclined to think you were trying to get a rise out of others. Having myself yielded seldom times on several sites to the temptation to make mischief for its own sake, however, I could hardly blame another for doing the same.

      Keep your innermost feelings private, by all means! TOO is a fine place, certainly, but spilling one’s guts here is even less appropriate than doing it with a bartender.

  30. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    June 5, 2011 - 2:03 am | Permalink

    It’s not just Hollywood. Creative people in all fields tend to be tolerant and politically liberal. Show me an artist who’s also a country club Republican. For that, name me anyone who has earned his millions in the knowledge industries who favors the Stupid Party’s platform of tax cuts for billionaires, tax breaks for polluters and guns for everyone.

    Hollywood supports globalization. Why not? For them globalization works. Over half the profits from movie and television production come from foreign distribution. It is also a considerable earner of foreign exchange for the USA.

    • C. Deschanel's Gravatar C. Deschanel
      June 5, 2011 - 1:54 pm | Permalink

      A good number of creative people, non jews, have to pretend to hold leftist views in order to keep their jobs, sell their work, etc.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      June 5, 2011 - 2:00 pm | Permalink

      Thomas Hart Benton, Salvador Dali, Ilya Repin, John Steuart Curry.

    • Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
      June 5, 2011 - 2:01 pm | Permalink

      …None of those guys were ‘country club Republicans,’ but they were all pretty conservative in the sense that most people here appreciate the word.

  31. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    June 5, 2011 - 1:32 am | Permalink
  32. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    June 5, 2011 - 1:31 am | Permalink
  33. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    June 5, 2011 - 1:31 am | Permalink
  34. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    June 5, 2011 - 1:20 am | Permalink

    Ben Shapiro is a rabid neo-con Jew. Go read his ridiculous political statements on his website. Stereotypical neo-con Jew garbage.

  35. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    June 5, 2011 - 12:13 am | Permalink

    I don’t buy this stupid “conservative” propaganda about Hollywood being “liberal.” Hollywood is Jewish first, capitalist second, and “liberal” when it accords with the first two.

    • I's Gravatar I
      June 5, 2011 - 9:25 am | Permalink

      Exactly. Highly ethnocentric Jews like Ben Shapiro wouldn’t be promoting this idea of a “liberal” media if it harmed Jewish interests. Get a clue, folks. I was really surprised to see a book like this getting such a positive review here.

  36. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    June 4, 2011 - 11:42 pm | Permalink

    “Friends co-creator Marta Kauffman (…) cast Candace Gingrich-Jones (…) as the minister of a lesbian wedding”

    The Friends episodes with the most heavy Jewish propaganda were the least funny.

    “100 million viewers–a vast audience when compared to the comparatively minuscule numbers that read sites like this.”

    I hope the internet is having an influence on smart people who have an interest in politics.

    “We don’t have it; they do. That’s why they’re winning.”

    This can be said both about government and the media. The media have not been able to persuade white people that race replacement is good for them. But the government doesn’t care what people think. It has the power.

    Control of the media is useful to practice censorship, to silence the natural elites, to prevent us from getting organized… but the media don’t really have the power to convince most people that the earth is flat, or that immigration is good for us.

    G.Wellington: “Which came first: Jewish media control / The jewish federal reserve ??? “

    I suppose the cultural institutions were conquered a little earlier than the political institutions. Controlling the media makes it easier to conquer the government. But controlling government also makes it easier to conquer the media. I think Jewish activists have become powerful in politics thanks to their money, their ethnic networking, their adeptness at mastering the cogs and wheels of the political machinery, their taste for revolution… It isn’t simply a question of controlling the media.

    Wandrin: “The rulers of the Soviet Union had total media control but no-one believed a word the media said so it didn’t matter.”

    People probably believed some of the propaganda. Anyway, the crucial factor seems to be freedom of speech. Even if everyone knows about the general masquerade, no rebellion will happen as long as we are afraid or unable to speak publicly. In Russia, I think the communist rule endured long after most people had become cynical about it. In fact, most Russians probably were cynical about communist rule from the beginning. But the regime only collapsed after Gorbachev introduced some glasnost.

    The Soviet leaders had no reason to continue the communist experiment. I think the problem for us in the West is that the Judeo-leftist system is blocking any reform or rebellion. Unlike Gorbachev, our phony Jewish elites do not see themselves as part of the people.

  37. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 4, 2011 - 9:13 pm | Permalink

    On April 26, 2008 – Israeli president Shimon Peres, and defence minister Ehud Barak alongwith 300 other mourners gathered in Tel Aviv’s London Park to pay tribute to the fallen member of Jewish terrorist militant group Haganah, Yossi Harel – for commanding the refugee ship Exodus 1947. In real life, Yossi Harel commanded four Haganah-owned vessels, transporting 24,000 illegal Jews from Europe to make Aliya to British mandated Palestine as part of World Zionist movement agenda to populate Palestine with foreign Jews for establishing a Zionist state in the future. One of these four vessels was the ‘Exodus 1947″, a refurbished excursion liner, with American Jewish crew and captained by Isaac ‘Ike’ Ahronovitch 23, an Israeli Jew who had served in British merchant marine……

    In 1960, a propaganda movie ‘Exodus’ based on 1958 novel Exodus was filmed in Cyprus and Israel. Hollywood actor Paul Newman played the leading role in the movie. The movie was the brain-child of Israeli PR man, Edward Gottleib. The movie project European Jew settlers as brave while the natives as brutal and some of them linked (Mufti of Palestine’s followers) to Nazis – while ignoring the fact that close to 150,000 German Jews were part of Nazi Army…


  38. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    June 4, 2011 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    Most observations that need to be made about the topic of this post have already been made by Professor MacDonald or one or more commenters. The only really notable point omitted—a point that underlines the untrustworthiness of Ben Shapiro’s motives and the dishonesty of his self-labeling—is the absurd idea that anyone could call Ron Silver either a victim or a conservative. He was a supremacist Jew, a bloodthirsty Israel-firster, a man who switched parties only to support the evil wars—fought only for Israel’s and Diaspora Jews’ interests—of George W. Bush and his advisers, every last one of whom was either Jewish or, like Cheney, Frank Gaffney, or Thomas P. M. Barnett, in the Tribe’s pay.

    I took Silver’s appearance at the Republicans’ 2004 nominating convention as proof positive of the treason of the Republican Party, of its unmistakable betrayal of all white Americans, especially but by no means exclusively those who are Christian. Is there someone out there who thinks it can be read any other way?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

      No that is pretty much it. All Jewish “NeoCons” are really Leftists who migrated over to so-called “conservative” positions in order to protect Israel. It is only their concern for defending Israel that made them strong on national security.

      The Republicans get like 20% of the Jewish vote about probably about the same amount of money. So Republicans push Israel issues as a way of peeling off a few Jewish voters. The whole thing is pointless.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      June 7, 2011 - 6:22 am | Permalink

      Yes, absolutely pointless. Depressing, too, especially when elections roll around. The Tribe’s candidate wins 98 percent of the time, even when he hasn’t demonstrated the slightest interest in any issue of genuine concern to local, state, or national voters. (Of course, in most races, all the candidates are the Tribe’s candidates.) Though democracy is a fraud that stinks to high heaven, Americans seem to have had their olfactory nerves disabled at the same time they had their testes clipped. Who doesn’t love a two-for-the-price-of-one deal?

      Solipsism and mass egotism have been the Tribe’s undoing throughout recorded history. Such will undoubtedly be the case again. Yet with Jews controlling the levers of power of this, the most invasive security state in human history, and with a seeming majority of the white Christian population almost worshipful of the costumed thugs of our overlords’ police forces and armed security agencies—men and women many of whom would as soon shoot or tase a mere civilian as look at him—I am near despair. As bad as things are now, I fear that they will be much worse in twenty, thirty, and fifty years, barring a miracle. Maybe Spielberg or another Hollywood genius can arrange one for us! Perhaps a Vulcan spaceship landing on the White House lawn. Better still would be one that accidentally vaporizes Georgetown, Jerusalem, or the Upper West Side of Manhattan.

      Dream on, Pierre!

      Yet no amount of puerile posting by the subset of kill-’em-all commenters here at TOO and at less civilized sites is likely to accomplish anything worth a damn, of course. If blood is to be shed, it won’t be because our thoroughly modern Remington Raiders (to revive a Vietnam-era locution) dropped their mouses and picked up their Glocks. It will be something else that gets things rolling, something unexpected, probably something unimaginably frightful. Having carried arms in one war, I pray to God to be spared another. More harm than good will come of it (it was ever thus). I’ve met very few aging vets who feel much different. Besides, as the Kristols and Foxmans and Peretzes have taught us, bloodthirstiness is an appetite that can be kept fresh and lively only by getting other people to spill the blood.

      Please pardon the glumness. It’s been a bad day.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 7, 2011 - 8:11 am | Permalink


      No need to apologize for the glumness. How can one survey the cultural landscape and not have moments of dread. Hope all is well. And as they say, where there is life, there is hope.

      Just curious, are you a professional writer? Your vocabulary and writing style suggest a lot of polish and sophistication. You seem to naturally use metaphors, which I’ve always been ham-handed with. May I ask what your background in this area is? Or get any suggestions on what to read so as to improve my own writing?


    • Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
      June 7, 2011 - 10:23 am | Permalink

      “Bllodthirsty”, Pierre, **mon vieux**?
      Have you been watching the news reports from Syria, Yemen, Bahrain?
      We’re pretty safe over here, or think we are until there’s a 9/11. Could you make nice with al-Assad for a neighbor?

  39. observerx's Gravatar observerx
    June 4, 2011 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Steven Spielberg said it, explicitly. “I had learned film was power”. He also said he discovered the camera to be “a tool and a weapon”.

    I got it at this link (Spielberg interviewed):

  40. observerx's Gravatar observerx
    June 4, 2011 - 6:02 pm | Permalink

    “I had learned that film was power” (Steven Spielberg)

    The camera means power, it is a tool and a weapon, according to the very own words used by Mr. Spielberg.

    The whole Steven Spielberg quotewhere he clarifies what the thrill of filming is about:

    ““I could use my sisters as actors in my films, I could trash them in any way I felt like,” he explained with boyish delight. “Kill them over and over, and it was all in the interest of telling a good story. And then I could show my little 8mm films to my parents and get them to react. It was how I originally found my position in the family. I discovered something I could do, and people would be interested in it and me. I knew after my third or fourth little 8mm epic that this was going to be a career, not just a hobby. I had learned that film was power.” I asked Spielberg what he specifically meant by power. “Well,” he explained, “I remember in high school there was a bully who used to give me a hard time and, with his very limited vocabulary, made anti-Semitic slurs. I was always a Jew with a hyphenate to him. I remember asking if he’d star in one of my films. I converted him to being my friend, even though I don’t think I was ever his friend, because I never quite forgot the taunting and how intimidated I was around him. Even when he was in one of my movies, I was afraid of him. But I was able to bring him over to a place where I felt safer: in front of my camera. I didn’t use words. I used a camera, and I discovered what a tool and a weapon, what an instrument of self-inspection and self-expression it is.”

    • observerx's Gravatar observerx
      June 4, 2011 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

      I meant… “The whole Steven Spielberg quote where he clarifies what the thrill of filming is about”

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 6:52 pm | Permalink

      Fascinating quote. Where is it from? Film really is about power. And to be fair, it’s not just Jews who realize it, a lot of people do. I think most Whites are a bit naive about it, though.

  41. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    June 4, 2011 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    I think the Jews’ control of entertainment is a symptom of what has gone wrong rather than the cause (although it’s exacerbating a critical situation). 100 million may watch their product but very few take it seriously; hardly anyone is converted from conservative to liberal or by watching TV.

    Deep down the White masses know TV is a lot of nonsense but they go with it as an escape from reality . That’s the central problem, Whites prefer Jewish fairy tales to the world as it is.

  42. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 4, 2011 - 5:51 pm | Permalink

    Benny Shapiro oughta follow up his groundbreaking study that Hollywood is ‘entirely liberal’ with a sequel: River Runs Down the Hill.
    The only difference between the Kumbaya Jews of Hollywood and their zio-con co-coreligionists is that the latter would like to see the remaining Pals shipped off to Jordan.
    Whereas the die-hard kibbutzniks among Hollywood Jewish crowd simply choose to pretend the Pals don’t exist.
    That town suffers no shortage of dedicated zio-cons, mind you. Just because they lurk in the background (kosher money bags who finance much of the Hollywood pap), doesn’t imply they aren’t there.
    Television networks sell as much as $60 billion worth of on-air commercials year to year. The power to switch off the Judaic brain fryer whose task is to pour into your living room mindless idiocy, cultural marxism and zionist agitprop – lies within you.
    On a semi-related note, the relentlessly “brilliant” Jewish money men of Hollywood despite their inherent “brilliance” @ managing cash flows have now been reduced to having to court South and East Asian investors.

  43. Tony L's Gravatar Tony L
    June 4, 2011 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

    No use trying to minimize it. Control of Hollywood is a powerful weapon. It allows the Marxists to control how the crowd FEELs about various people and events. For example: who is more pure than Eisenhower in American history? But now consider that there is good evidence that 1,400,000 German POWs died AFTER the war. (See Other Losses by James Bacque) It makes one FEEL different upon seeing “Ike” in old films. Unfortunately there are many examples in history like this. Control over Hollywood is largely control over the common man’s perceptions. Only those who understand how movies and TV are made have any hope of becoming recognizing fictional presentations.

    • Tony L's Gravatar Tony L
      June 4, 2011 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

      Correction: The last line should read:
      Only those who understand how movies and TV are made have any hope of recognizing the fictional nature of these presentations.

  44. Wandrin's Gravatar Wandrin
    June 4, 2011 - 3:40 pm | Permalink

    “…but it shows once again the critical importance of media control in the media age. We don’t have it; they do. That’s why they’re winning.”


    “Put that way, it sounds pretty hopeless.”


    The rulers of the Soviet Union had total media control but no-one believed a word the media said so it didn’t matter.

  45. Whites Unite's Gravatar Whites Unite
    June 4, 2011 - 1:35 pm | Permalink

    500,000 Tea Party activists show up at a rally and wave signs:

    Left responds with a bored shrug.

    500,000 Tea Party activists simultaneously cancell their cable subscriptions and stop going to the movies:

    There will be sheer and utter panic on the Left.

    The first, and I mean the absolute first step, is to simply stop financing your enemies.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 5:07 pm | Permalink

      I do think “the Right” or other “implicitly White” groups should use their financial power more. Most of the Tea Party doesn’t want to go a month without cable, but if they even threatened it in a serious manner, it would get attention.

      Even if they, as subscribers,started mass emailing producers of Leftist junk on TV it would get attention.

      Same thing is true of people who graduate from colleges. They need to stop going to games and sending donations to a schools that promote Cultural Marxism.

    • buckle's Gravatar buckle
      June 4, 2011 - 5:59 pm | Permalink

      How are 500,000 going to organise thesmelves if 50 posters on OO are constantly bickering with one and other? I should know, I’m one of the latter.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 6:47 pm | Permalink

      We’re all guilty, but strangely enough, I think people who are the most interested in ideas, argue the most. When you get out to the larger audience, they tend to want a simpler message they can all get behind.

      Jews bicker constantly among themselves but they do manage to put up a united front.

    • Kievsky's Gravatar Kievsky
      June 5, 2011 - 7:42 am | Permalink

      @Whites Unite,

      I think people won’t cancel their cable, but they’ll have to cut it from their budget, because the banksters grossly mismanaged the economy. Watch — they’ll make cable TV a lot cheaper or free if the proles can’t afford it. However, if they do this, they’ll go after gov’t subsidies.

      We do live in a neo-Soviet state, if you look at this country from an economic point of view. Every time a corporation wants to do something that isn’t profitable, it just goes to the government well and steals our money to do it.

      So much of American society has become “phoney make-work” that it is going to become physically impossible to sustain, unless we can continue to import the products of Asian and South American slaves.

      With better management, teh globalization could have lasted a lot longer. However, they wanted to have it ALL NOW. They couldn’t be bothered with energy efficiency or conservation.

      The mass brainwashing machine, military machine and social services machine are rolling along on Quantitative Easing money. They know it’s going to fail, but they aren’t doing anything to warn us or help us prepare for when it does fail. The view of TPTB is that “it can’t fail.” Yet it must and it will fail.

      And it will be an uncontrolled fail, rather than a controlled fail. Free fall instead of parachute descent.

  46. Kievsky's Gravatar Kievsky
    June 4, 2011 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

    The kid took “Who Rules America,” renamed the subjects of WRA from “Jews” to “liberals,” and made it into a documentary.

    Many will say “he’s a Jew trying to deflect criticism from Jews,” but the fact is you see the names of the “liberals” and they are all strangely similar. Very few Irish or Italian names there. People aren’t stupid.

    I think the kid’s motive is to get some quick fame using some obvious truths and putting them through his Jewish filter. He is putting his personal interests and greed ahead of his tribal interests. That’s my kind of Jew! LOL!

    • June 4, 2011 - 12:58 pm | Permalink

      Perhaps. And perhaps he’s simply trying to control the debate. “It’s okay to criticize them as being conspiring, monopolistic, hegemonic, blacklisting liberals. But by no means identify them as conspiring, monopolistic, hegemonic, blacklisting Jews — even though any fool can see that that’s what they are!”

      It’s called triangulation, wherein the parameters of debate on either side are strictly defined to exclude the possibility of naming the Jewish racket, and Jewry has mastered the method. All those who step outside the prefab parameters are easily marginalized further by declaring them anti-Semites.

      The only hope of ever breaking the paradigm is by forcing Jewry and its bootlickers to overplay the anti-Semitism card until it loses its sting, which at this point has to be getting close to a fait accompli. It seems to me more and more people are rolling their eyes when Jewry drags it out for the umpteenth time to ward off the truth.

    • June 5, 2011 - 9:44 am | Permalink

      “He is putting his personal interests and greed ahead of his tribal interests. That’s my kind of Jew! LOL!”

      Paraphrasing P.T. Barnum: “There is a Madoff born every minute!”

      Hopefully this trend continues!

  47. Venona's Gravatar Venona
    June 4, 2011 - 11:45 am | Permalink

    I’ve known for many years who run the TV industry. What is interesting is that it is nearly always a member of the tribe who point out the “liberal agenda” of the Hollywood/TV moguls.

  48. Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
    June 4, 2011 - 11:43 am | Permalink

    Chris writes, “For example, the glorification of Black gang culture on MTV seemed to parallel the rise of Black athletes into dominant roles in professional football and basketball — which itself was market driven.”

    MTV glorifies the worst stereotypes of Blacks, and yet these Blacks, perhaps drawn by money, do not seem to see how demeaningly they are being framed. It is sad for Blacks & vicious on the part of the media tycoons who love to exploit Black women shaking their “booty” for the cameras. And
    politicians, who also profit from this, do not care either. We are not just being dumbed own, the whole culture is being raunched by unbelievable greed & abject wickedness.

    • June 4, 2011 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

      Good point. Hollywood Jewry took a potentially positive depiction of Blacks that they might have built upon to improve their culture, and steered it in scurrilous, gang-banger-glorifying direction, making money for themselves hand-over-fist the entire way. And then they have the chutzpah to credit themselves as being allies of Black Americans.

      That kind of calculated cynicism goes way beyond disingenuous, and crosses over into metaphysical evil.

  49. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    June 4, 2011 - 11:14 am | Permalink

    Shapiro is no conservative. He’s a rabid warmongering Zionist neocon (i.e. a leftist). He loves wars for Israel as long as he doesn’t have to fight. He even got married in Israel. He’s completely untrustworthy.

    • June 4, 2011 - 11:43 am | Permalink


      “If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it.”
      — Gal Beckerman, The Jewish Daily Forward (January 6, 2006)


    • Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
      June 5, 2011 - 1:25 am | Permalink

      Yep, Shaprio is a neo-con Jew piece of garbage.

  50. June 4, 2011 - 11:01 am | Permalink

    Another point that needs to be considered: How much of Hollywood’s cultural pollution is agenda-driven, and how much is a consequence of greed-driven, unbridled Capitalism?

    For example, the glorification of Black gang culture on MTV seemed to parallel the rise of Black athletes into dominant roles in professional football and basketball — which itself was market driven.

    One notorious characteristic of Jewry is its insatiable greed. Many Jews will literally do anything for money, and then justify their dirty deeds by creating some moral rationale to camouflage their crassness, for example “helping Blacks” by spreading rap (when in fact they were mostly looking to make money).

    In addition to Christian well-poisoning, it’s possible that a twin motive for Jewry’s cultural pollution is as base as naked greed.

    Because of its eagerness to destroy Christendom, it’s possible that Jewry merely does first what degenerate money-worshippers (more than a few of them of Anglo background, and some of whom disguise themselves as Christians and advocates of Western civilization) were destined to do under a crass system of unbridled Capitalism anyway.

    Interestingly, these kinds snakes seem to be gravitationally attracted to supporting Jewry no matter how low or cunning-Left it goes. I suspect they see something of themselves in the crass, soulless Jewish predators.

    • Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
      June 4, 2011 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

      I don’t think the Jews can be blamed for destroying Christendom. They are certainly kicking it while it is down but I place the blame at the feet of Martin Luther, Henry the 8th and the other kings and nobles of Europe that participated in the land grab that was the reformation. The Jews are organized and stick together as MacDonald has amply shown but they can’t be blamed for our own stupidity.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 4:55 pm | Permalink

      Alexander, Martin Luther was active in the early 1500s, about 500 years ago. Shouldn’t we look to more recent causes? Since Luther’s time White European civilization flowered to unprecedented levels, conquered most of the world and landed on the moon. It has only been in the 20th century that we saw so much self-destruction on the part of White Europeans.

    • Tom's Gravatar Tom
      June 4, 2011 - 10:42 pm | Permalink

      “Alexander” hasn’t read Martin Luther on the Jews. LOL.

      I’m sure Pope Pelosi, Pope Casey or Pope Biden would agree with “Alexander”.

    • Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
      June 5, 2011 - 3:27 am | Permalink

      I have read Luther on the Jews and Luther on killing all the European peasants and Luther on a variety of other subjects. And as for Luther living 500 years ago so what? The unprecedented levels you mention are pointed all downwards. Have you never seen a field going to seed?

    • Bear's Gravatar Bear
      June 5, 2011 - 7:16 am | Permalink

      I think you make a relevant point. It is likely that a Jew in a position to make an influential decision will likely make a decision that is at best indifferent to the well being of Europeans and at worst subversive. Indifferance is a form of contempt. Hence we have the acceptabillity even a promotion of a sort of abstract libertarianism as a kind of controlled impotent opposition. Libertarianism might reject elements of ethno-marxism and income redistribution from coloured to Whites and so many Whites espouse it in the hope it will proect them (Ann Randism, Globalism, Open Borders and free movement of goods and people) but it is in principle puerily oblvious to ethnic interests and does not acknowledge that maintaineance of group interests is essential for the well bering individuals within that group eg Whites. Hence it ultimatly serves the interersts of subversion.

  51. June 4, 2011 - 10:48 am | Permalink


    Which came first:

    Jewish media control


    The jewish federal reserve



  52. Thomas Mallon's Gravatar Thomas Mallon
    June 4, 2011 - 10:37 am | Permalink

    Prof. MacDonald writes, “…it shows once again the critical importance of media control in the media age. We don’t have it; they do. That’s why they’re winning.”

    I don’t think we should concede they “are winning”. No fatalism should be allowed. Life is like a chess game. They’ve got the Queen, yes, but good chess players, esp when it is hard, are smart, very patient, coy, & extremely dangerous on the board, scanning for their opponents weaknesses, hubris & for opportunities, baffling combinations.

  53. icr's Gravatar icr
    June 4, 2011 - 10:16 am | Permalink

    “…but it shows once again the critical importance of media control in the media age. We don’t have it; they do. That’s why they’re winning.”

    Put that way, it sounds pretty hopeless.

    OTOH, people are not entirely as stupid and sheeplike as their public behavior might lead one to assume. This is clear from the success of right-wing populist parties like the “True Finns.” Low-threshold PR obviously allows the unbrainwashed minority to inflict some hurtful bruises on the “hegemonic discourse.” Too bad there’s not much chance of it being adopted anywhere in the US.

    • Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
      June 4, 2011 - 1:10 pm | Permalink

      “… it shows once again the critical importance of media control in the media age. We don’t have it; they do. That’s why they’re winning.”


      But that doesn’t mean we’d need the same advantage in reverse to be winning.

      Think of mass media control as air power in land war.

      For a long time our enemies have enjoyed air supremacy, the most favorable state, where one side’s air completely dominates the other side’s air, which cannot effectively interfere if it even exists. In this situation the visible battlefield may be empty because any ground forces on the weaker side that show themselves to contest anything are volunteering for the victim role in a “highway of death” scenario.

      Air(wave) parity, with White gentile and Jewish media forces having equal effect is far out of our reach.

      But even a reduction of Jewish mass media domination to “air superiority” with White gentile voices being able to practice some “air denial” would make a great difference. At that point, armies can act though they suffer harassment from the air, and at that point in a political struggle activists can do a lot more without being hopelessly demonized by hostile domination of the airwaves.

      You couldn’t say that the Palestinians enjoy a level media environment, but they have enough friendly media that they can organize and press steadily for boycotts, sanctions and disinvesment, and they do.

      So the effect of wealthy, loyal Arabs and Muslims who fund friendly media for their people is much greater than the direct media pressure itself. It’s the media, plus the popular and activist energy unleashed by creating a contested zone, even if it’s biased in one direction, as opposed to a completely uncontested Zionist official media environment.

      A relatively small fraction of the White wealthy segments of Western society deciding to put up a media struggle might also reap disproportionate rewards.

  54. June 4, 2011 - 10:16 am | Permalink

    So liberal Hollywood, enthrall to Jewry, believes conservatives have “medieval minds” (which I suppose is their shorthand for Christian minds).

    Ironic, isn’t it? The most “medieval” of the Christians in terms of lack of enlightenment, intelligence and sophistication are the Judeo-Christian Zionists, and they, too, are enthrall to Jewry.

    So what is the status of the pre-medieval minds of leftists and Zionists enthrall to Old Testament Jewry, and existing under its thumb, like fungus? Moldy?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

      Hollywood hates Christian Zionists quite a bit. They almost universally despise neoconservaties.

    • June 4, 2011 - 7:18 pm | Permalink

      No doubt Hollywood thinks it hates Judeo-Christian Zionists like GW Bush; but it’s probably more a case of being too much alike than anything else (both Jew-worshipping, money-hungry psychopaths, only working from different ends). But Hollywood hates neoconservatives, their fellow Jews? How can that be when the neolibs and neocons are mere degrees of separation, Wall Street Jewish bankers ran the economic hierarchy in the Clinton, Bush an Obama administrations, the neocons were joined in their efforts to lie America into the Iraq war by their fellow Jewish Zionist Fifth Column members on the Left, and a straight line can be drawn connecting Bill Clinton with Al Gore with Joe Lieberman with John McCain?

      The myth that Right-Establishment (neocon) Republicans are that much different than Left-Establishment (neolib) Dems is exactly that: a myth. And it’s designed to convince the rubes that we live in a true democracy. (But yes, some of those blinkered rubes are Jewish and in Hollywood, and live in a state of false conciousness along with so many others.)

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 8:06 pm | Permalink

      Yeah I agree that NeoCons and the Left are not much different (NeoCons are usually Leftists who realized the US needs a strong military to help Israel). But if you are a public Neocon in Hollywood, your career is pretty much over. Most people in Hollywood, Jewish or not, are pretty emotional creatures.

      Beyond that, lots of Jews hate each other. They usually put up a united front, but it doesn’t mean they can’t fight bitterly among themselves. I’m not arguing they don’t support each other, obviously they do, but they can be vicious to each other as well. Jews sue Jews all the time, in fact, that is one of the problems the Israeli economy has – the complete lack of trust.

      Look at the universal scorn DSK is receiving, often from Jews in the media. Or long ago, Roy Cohn, the Jewish guy that was an aide to McCarthy during the communist investigations in the 50s … the Jews hated that guy. And they all seem to be making fun of Anthony Wiener quite a bit.

      Several Jewish commentators on TV had a field day mocking the Hasidic group that refused to run a photo of Hillary Clinton in their newspaper because she is a woman. They referred to them as backward.


      Beyond that, there is actually some mockery of Jews in the media when it involves super Zionist types. The Onion does it sometimes. This fake story is funny:

      Israel Bombs Anti-Semitism out of Lebanon:

      Or this one:
      Government Official Who Makes Perfectly Valid, Well-Reasoned Point Against Israel Forced To Resign

      So yes, they are an ethnic group that is very cohesive and has that rather backward Middle Eastern clannishness, but when they don’t feel threatened, they seem to like taking shots at each other.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      June 4, 2011 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

      Jason Speaks: “Hollywood hates Christian Zionists quite a bit. They almost universally despise neoconservaties.”

      That must be why Hollywood continues to turn out movies that support Neoconservatism’s goals and aspirations – because they “despise” them.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 8:44 pm | Permalink

      Arthurdecco, which movies are you reffing to? I mean movies that support NeoConservative views in particular? It seems like most of the movies I see trash GWB and the idea of America running an empire. I’m serious about this, which movies promote NeoCon views?

      Avatar, the most hyped movie in recent years, was intended as a critique of so-called NeoConservative views. Most of the war movies made about Iraq in recent years have been highly critical of the war and shown the horror of war – and usually shown the US has evil.

      If you mean goals and aspirations in such a general sense it may be hard to prove one way or the other. Hollywood has liked war movies, for example, sense the beginning. Arabs have been used as the “bad guy” at times in the past, although usually it is White Nationalists these days.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 9:15 pm | Permalink

      Oh, and by advancing NeoConservative goals, I mean something more specific than the general Holocaust movie of the week. That stuff is everywhere, but that is very much accepted by the Left. I mean what are the movies that promote the themes NeoCons that differentiate them from the Left.

      For example, movies glorifying Cheney or Rumsfeld.

    • C. Lock's Gravatar C. Lock
      June 4, 2011 - 9:41 pm | Permalink

      Hollywood does help out the neocohens, just not openly. We’ve seen enough movies showing our fighting forces in the Middle East battling ‘the enemy’ and other films with the usual Muslim baddy to see what’s up.

    • dc's Gravatar dc
      June 5, 2011 - 5:34 am | Permalink

      “enthrall” eh? Don’t use words you don’t understand, or at the least first consult a passing 10 year-old.

    • June 5, 2011 - 8:00 am | Permalink

      “I’m serious about this, which movies promote NeoCon views?”

      1.) ‘Team America World Police’ is a masterful piece of Neo-conish propaganda created to appeal to young tweens who in a few years time could be recruited/ drafted for service in overseas ZOG wars in Iraq.

      2.) ‘An American Carol’ features a trip to an ‘alternate universe':

      ” Shaken but still unmoved, Malone is visited by the angel of death (Trace Adkins), who takes him to a future Los Angeles which has been taken over by radical Islamists. Victoria’s Secret has switched to selling burqas and the Hollywood Sign now reads Allahu akbar.[7] Later, he is taken to the ruins of his hometown in Michigan, which has been destroyed by a nuclear bomb planted by Al Qaeda. In a makeshift morgue, Malone learns that he will be killed in this attack, leaving nothing behind but his trademark hat and “big ass”. Malone pleads for his life with the Angel, promising to change.

      Later, Malone arrives at an anti-Fourth of July protest rally and publicly renounces his former views. “


      3.) ‘The Kingdom’ is a really disgusting piece of filth, probably the worst of the bunch, that features a Black Male and White Female teaming up to fight the Jews Arab enemies.

      A Black Male and White Female team? Yuck this must have fulfilled some very sick yiddish fantasies.

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 5, 2011 - 8:31 am | Permalink


      Good picks. Team America had a slightly NeoCon feel to it, although I would says it’s ridiculous comedy and use of puppets made it less than effective. It was also mocking Americanism half the time.

      I never saw American Carol but I got the gist of it from trailers. Nor did I see Kingdom. But I would argue that is not many movies against the dozens on the other side. Avatar, Star Wars, and tons of other big budget movies took shots at NeoCons. Jarhead, Hurt Locker, Redacted, etc.

      It seems to me we had more pro-war, pro-American movies back in the 80s.

  55. So Cal herc's Gravatar So Cal herc
    June 4, 2011 - 9:39 am | Permalink

    Let’s picket the studio. Worked for blacks a couple times in hollywoods stained history.

  56. observerx's Gravatar observerx
    June 4, 2011 - 9:06 am | Permalink

    I think Hollywood is a prime example of Jewish networking at its finest. It is not a coincidence that all of the major companies are owned by Jews (and have always been), I can’t see them all being owned by Mormons or Jehovah Witnesses as a matter of “coincidence”, as some people like to explain the Jewish monopoly of Hollywood. Henry Ford did say he was not willing to open the capital of his company because the Jews would take it over from him. Well, it has happened to the Walt Disney company… High intelligence and a clannish could be an explanation for this pattern of Jewish group behaviour, which is known since antiquity.

    “Now these Jews are already gotten into all cities; and it is hard to find a place in the habitable earth that hath not admitted this tribe of men, and is not possessed by them”.

    “She that was great among the nations, and princess among the provinces: Rabbah said in R. Johanan’s name: Wherever they went, they became princes of their masters”.
    Sanhedrin 104a

    Most people simply are unaware of how ethnocentric Judaism is.

    • observerx's Gravatar observerx
      June 4, 2011 - 10:38 am | Permalink

      High intelligence and a clannish mentality I meant.

  57. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    June 4, 2011 - 6:37 am | Permalink

    When it comes to Hollywood – there is no ‘Left’ or ‘Right’. Hollywood’s main genda had been to pollute Christian societies, rrligiously, morally and politically. Hollywood has played a major role in brainwashing American and the Western by supporting Jewish myth of Holocaust (over 70 movies so far), demonization of Christianity, non-Whites and Arabs.

    Hollywood is predominantly Jewish and played a propaganda tool for CIA and the powerful Jewish Lobby. The ‘War on Terror’ (read ‘War on Islam’) has been the most favorite Hollywood topic since the 9/11 inside job.

    But to say publically that “Hollywood is Jewish” – will get one the title of “Anti-Semite”.


    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      June 4, 2011 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

      Rehmat said, “When it comes to Hollywood – there is no ‘Left’ or ‘Right’. Hollywood’s main genda had been to pollute Christian societies, religiously, morally and politically.”

      Rehmat, you’ve finally said something I can agree with unreservedly.

      And what’s with this left and right anyway? False constructs, both.

      I’d like to see people who look like me and who grew up like me, who may be down on their luck, looked after by our public institutions until they’re able to get themselves back on their feet. Does that make me a lefty?

      But I am also vehemently opposed to our governments allowing thirdworlders to come to my country with their extended families so that they can abuse the social programs put in place to protect the threatened or unfortunate members of the society that welcomed them, leaving less for those who paid into them.

      Does that make me a right-wing troglodyte?

      These identifiers like “Left” and “Right” aren’t helpful nor are they accurate. I’m left on some issues and right on others – like many other people are. These words are weapons aimed at social cohesion and good sense – they’re certainly not words that can be used to describe anyone other than the cartoon cut out characters preferred by our media mavens and the various other types of information gatherers who are too lazy to do the heavy lifting needed when trying to accurately describe the varied preferences and prejudices of the people who share my opinions and of those who don’t.

      Let’s lose this “Left/Right” nonsense and start thinking about what brings us together instead of worrying about what separates us.

      John Lennon, who many here would probably describe as a “lefty” famously said, “If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. “

      What’s so “lefty” about thinking thoughts like that?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 4, 2011 - 9:04 pm | Permalink

      Here is John Lennon on Dick Cavett show saying that White people need to give things to Native American or the Red Man will ally with Blacks and kill Whites. He said it approvingly … encouragingly. He also states that he regrets criticizing Chairman Mao in his song Revolution. I think his Leftwing views do matter. He is also an example of a person who wants to undermine White society who is, himself, White.

    • arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
      June 5, 2011 - 12:27 am | Permalink

      I really hate to say this so unequivocally, Squeaky, because I’m not naturally so “in your face”. I normally like to build consensus and I encourage flexibility in almost all the discussions I involve myself in but you’ve forced my hand with your latest post featuring your (I’m SURE!) Googled simplistic/dishonest opinions of John Lennon’s politics and HIS opinions of the society that raised him.

      My comments on your thoughts?

      You’re an intellectual gnat, stuffed full of cheap, lazy, easily-gotten opinions, softened science and propagandized fear, who, for some unexplained reason, thinks his willfully ignorant opinion of Everything is valuable.

      And I can’t see much hope of a change in that…

      John Lennon had a lot of good, published ideas, Squeaky – when do you figure we’ll be able to start reading yours?

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 5, 2011 - 12:38 am | Permalink

      Arthurdecco, I don’t know what the purpose of your insults are, I’ll ignore them.

      Anyway, You saw the video of John Lennon. He was sympathizer with all kinds of Leftist nonsense. He got taken in by Eastern Mysticism as well. Like a lot of musicians, he wasn’t the most logical thinker.

      You are reacting to criticism of John Lennon as if he was your lover. I’m not denying he wrote some snappy tunes. But his political and social thought was antithetical to almost everything TOO stands for. He explicitly called for Blacks and Red Indians to rise up against Whites. He sympathized with Chairman Mao. He wanted to overthrow the ruling White Establishment. He glamorized the use of drugs among White youths and gave cover to largely Jewish radicals of the 60s.

      He wasn’t your boyfriend. He was just a singer. He was generally anti-White and definitely anti-Western. Don’t deify him.

    • June 5, 2011 - 6:54 am | Permalink

      “He also states that he regrets criticizing Chairman Mao in his song Revolution.”


      Remember Chairman Mao racked up more kills then Uncle Adolf! (Wikipedia states an estimated 70 million)

      It is clear the real homicidal maniacs reside on the Left-end of the political spectrum.

      Also remember that racial miscegenation destroyed the Beatles! It was mostly Yokos fault!

    • Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
      June 5, 2011 - 7:45 am | Permalink

      It is clear the real homicidal maniacs reside on the Left-end of the political spectrum.

      It’s really true. Almost all the great mass killers of the last century were from the Left. And yes, Yoko broke the Beatles up … part of an Asian conspiracy?

    • June 5, 2011 - 10:15 am | Permalink

      “And yes, Yoko broke the Beatles up … part of an Asian conspiracy?”


      Just the sad results of racial miscegenation. Usually nothing good comes out of such unions.

Comments are closed.