The Battle of Jus Sanguinis (Right-of-Blood) River Campaign
Jus Sanguinis is a legal term that refers to Right of Blood citizenship, to preserve a nation’s cultural and ethnic homogeneity; as opposed to Jus Soli, which refers to Right of Soil citizenship. The Jus Sanguinis Campaign is a group of South Africans who have researched their genealogical history back to their original European progenitors; they are petitioning their relevant EU progenitor nations for redress.
On October 31 2010 the Jus Sanguinis Campaign submitted its “Boer Volkstaat or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return to Europe Petition and Briefing Paper” to the progenitor nations of Netherlands, France, Germany, United Kingdom, and Switzerland, and subsequently to the NATO Chiefs of Defence. 160 EU politicians, academics, legal experts and military officials were petitioned for:
[A] International Political and Legal Recognition for a Boer-Volkstaat in South Africa; or in the absence thereof;
[B] The enactment of Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation by the relevant Progenitor EU Nations to provide EU citizenship for African White Refugees.
On 5 January 2011 the office of the President of the Swiss Council of States requested that the Petition and Briefing Paper be submitted to the Swiss Parliament in hardcopy with original signatures. On 11 March 2011 hardcopy petitions were delivered to all five progenitor nations heads of state and the NATO Military Committee. The Swiss Petition is being investigated by the Swiss Parliament’s Committee of Legal Affairs. We are currently drawing up an application to the EU Court of Human Rights, which, if successful, will result in them ordering the other Progenitor nations to impartially investigate the petitions arguments and evidence and provide a written response to the petitioners.
Here follows a brief overview introduction to the arguments and evidence presented in the Petition and Briefing Paper.
White South African Refugees
On 27 August 2009 the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) granted Canadian Refugee Status to White South African Brandon Huntley. The IRB ruling found that Huntley “was a victim [of persecution] because of his race rather than a victim of criminality, who presented clear and convincing proof of state and security forces’ inability or unwillingness to protect him.” The ruling was made in accordance with the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) definition of a refugee:
A person who owing to a well founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who is, … owing to such fear, … unwilling to return to it.
Most Whites in South Africa Feel Persecuted
In early September 2009, four mainstream newspapers in South Africa did surveys on the Huntley issue, revealing that 74% of White citizens felt that they were being persecuted in South Africa for reasons of their race (Beeld: 83%; Die Burger: 62%; IOL: 65% and Rapport: 87%).
By 2009 over 600 South African Whites were refugees in foreign countries (170 in Germany, 111 in USA, 46 in Ireland, 33 in Canada, 24 in the UK, 18 in France and 15 in Australia), because they had a well founded fear of being persecuted in South Africa, for reasons of race, religion, nationality or membership of a particular social group or political opinion.
The South African goverment did not dispute any of the 600 refugee’s justifications for their refugee status with the relevant governments, limiting their challenge to the claims made by Brandon Huntley.
The ANC responded to the IRB’s ruling concerning Huntley by refusing to enquire into the details of his grievances. Instead they vilified Huntley for making the claim and showed overt hostility to him and the IRB by applying diplomatic pressure on the Canadian Government in an attempt to overturn the ruling.
The Jus Sanguinis Campaign submit that the South African government’s vitriolic response to the IRB’s ‘White refugee’ ruling is the final proof of the IRB’s ruling! The South African government completely ignored the racial basis of crime in South Africa. For example, Huntley claims that he was the victim of seven attempted robberies, including three stabbings, all at the hands of Blacks and during which he was called a “white dog” and “settler.”
Human Rights and Refugee Agencies Are often Hostile to White Refugees
The Canadian Government — petrified of the ANC’s ‘racism’ accusations — appealed the IRB decision before the Canadian Federal Court. On 24 November 2010 Judge James Russell confirmed Huntley’s persecution fears by the SA government. But, he questioned the legitimacy of Huntley’s ‘refugee’ status by claiming there was a lack of ‘objective evidence’ concerning ‘white refugees’ from ‘credible and trustworthy sources’ such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (para 59, 67). He referred Huntley back to the IRB for a new hearing.
Genocide Watch, run by Dr. Gregory Stanton, a former U.S. State Department official, recently stated their intentions to raise Boers from stage five (Polarization) to six (Preparation) of the eight stages of Genocide. Despite this, international anti-Apartheid agencies and UN human rights organisations effectively endorse the ANC’s persecution of White South Africans, because they refuse to enquire into any evidence submitted to them on the subject. Other bodies and individuals actively hostile to White South African refugees include: the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE); Prof. Dennis Alland, a former UNHCR Official and Member of ECRE and the European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA); and Prince Albert II of Monaco.
Jus Sanguinis argue that anti-Apartheid movement organisations who covered up reports of the ANC’s torture camps for its own ANC dissenters at places such as Camp Quatro, Angola (see below), are incapable of impartiality on issues that put the ANC in a bad light, and should not be considered credible sources on the issue of African White Refugees.
The Anti-Apartheid Movement: Most Successful Stalinist Popular Front
Paul Trewhela was a former journalist working for newspapers such as the Rand Daily Mail. He was a member of the ANC and SACP and is now an anti-Stalinist socialist historian of the ANC in exile. In Mutinies in the Liberation Armies: Inside Quadro (Searchlight South Africa 2(1): July 1990, 30-35), Trewhela describes the anti-Apartheid movement as “the most successful popular front lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.”
The first-hand testimony by former combatants of Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK) about the ANC prison regime … are an event in South African history. Never before has such concentrated factual evidence been presented about the inner nature of the ANC and its eminence grise, the South African Communist Party.
If people wish to understand the operation of the ANC/SACP, they must look here. This is the view behind the proscenium arch, behind the scenery, where the machinery that runs the whole show is revealed in its actual workings.
The ANC/SACP did a very good job in preventing public knowledge of its secret history from emerging. … Those who survived the Gulag system of the ANC/SACP did so knowing that to reveal what they had been through meant re-arrest, renewed tortures and in all probability, death. They had to sign a form committing them to silence..
This regime of terror, extending beyond the gates of the ANC/SACP ‘Buchenwald’ of Quadro, was a necessary element in the total practice of repression and deception which made the Anti-Apartheid Movement the most successful Popular Front lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.
In its 30 years’ existence, the AAM put international collaborative organisations of the period of the Spanish Civil War and of the Stalin-Roosevelt-Churchill alliance to shame. Extending to the press, the churches, the bourgeois political parties, the trade unions and the radical, even the ‘trotskyist’ left, the AAM has been an outstanding success for Stalinism… Vital to its success has been a practice of open and covert censorship now blown wide open… The ANC’s prisoners were its necessary sacrificial-victims.
Mwezi Twala was an ANC dissenter who was sent to the ANC’s re-education torture Camp Quatro, without ever being charged with any crime or given any trial. In his book Mbokodo: Inside MK: Mwezi Twala – A Soldier’s Story (see also here), he describes the exiled ANC’s use of political terror:
I became aware of these developments by word of mouth, but I was to discover later on, by personal experience, the terror of Quatro, to name but one death camp. People were removed from amongst us — taken to Quatro or Camp 13 — and disappeared forever without reason. Many of them were slaughtered by one means or another and their ultimate destination was a shallow grave. We heard rumours of execution by being buried alive, amongst many other techniques beyond civilized imagination. The purge created great fear amongst all of us, to the point where the smallest criticism, such as of badly prepared food, was seriously reconsidered by every individual, for one could never be certain that a ‘best friend’ would keep his mouth shut.
Our own security people became exceedingly arrogant, to the point where an innocent slip of the tongue or even a simple gesture could land you in a torture cell at Quatro. Security men of the lowest rank and intelligence — fourteen to eighteen year olds — became our masters, with the power of life or death in their hands. They acted on a mood with impunity. (pp. 49–50)
… Oliver Tambo visited Pango [Camp] at the height of the terror. The path from the entrance to the admin building was lined — like a scene from ‘Spartacus’ — with men, bloodied and filthy, hanging from trees. When his entourage arrived at admin, where I was officer on duty, Tambo’s chief of staff told us that there would be a meeting at ‘the stage’ (a clearing in the jungle… where we held meetings and discussions). Runners were sent out to notify everyone in the vicinity. On his way to the stage [Oliver Tambo] again passed the men tied to the trees. Being officer on duty, I could not attend the meeting, but my deputy went. After a while I saw guards come up from the stage, release the prisoners and take them to the meeting. There, my deputy told me, instead of objecting to their treatment, as I had hoped, Tambo berated them for their dissident behaviour and appeared to approve when Andrew Masondo declared that on the president’s next visit they would be in shallow graves behind the stage. The prisoners were returned to their trees … where the president [Oliver Tambo] passed the unfortunate men without a glance on his way out, and they hung there for another three months — followed by three months hard labour. (pp. 51–52)
As a result of his activism against the ANC’s political terror campaigns, Twala was sent to Camp Quatro:
The death rate grew to horrific proportions, some by suicide but mostly by murder. Others went insane under the constant stress or from everlasting pain. From time to time prisoners were removed from our cells and we forced ourselves to believe that they were being transferred: we preferred to look on the bright side because we could not handle the psychological devastation of facing probable reality. … No-one knows how many people were slaughtered at Quatro and the other camps, not even the ANC leaders. The use of MK names and Quatro names added to the confusion of keeping track of who was dead or alive: I heard one bizarre case where due to a confusion in code names a prisoner being tortured confessed to having murdered himself. Another confessed to murdering cadres who were subsequently found alive. Many of the guards (and prisoners) were young teenagers and were not particularly responsible people. The youngest prisoner at Quatro was a ten year old boy named Inzindlebe … [there] because he was an ‘enemy agent’. (p. 90)
It would be ideologically corrupt or naive to believe that international human rights organisations which censored and covered up the ANC’s appalling human rights record at Camp Quatro in Angola would expose the ANC’s persecution of White Europeans, even less so pro-Apartheid Boers.
The Anti-Apartheid Propaganda Lie of the ‘Crime of Apartheid’
Mwezi Twala concludes his description of the ANC torture camps by comparing the treatment he received from the ANC to the Apartheid government’s treatment of ANC rebels:
I meditated on the journey I had taken in order to be a soldier, to do my bit to free my people from the yoke of apartheid. All I had achieved was to be subjected to another kind of repression, imprisonment, and torture. If I had stayed in the Republic, fighting my own war against the Regime, I would have achieved far more in a week than I had over the past fifteen years in Angola, Mozambique and Zambia under the communist ANC leadership. Also in the event of being apprehended by the South African authorities, I would have faced a proper judicial trial and been sentenced to a prison term. (p. 100)
Prison would have consisted of a clean bed and blanket, and decent clothes would have been issued. Reasonable hot meals would have been provided. Clean hygienic cells with running water on tap, a civilized toilet facility and shower cubicles. Added to this would have been an acceptable prison work ethic and a small but welcome income, enough to allow me the luxury of buying cigarettes and toothpaste. I might have had the opportunity to study, as Nelson Mandela did, almost any subject, with access to the prison library. I would also have received medical care for injuries and illness, plus spiritual comfort from a prison chaplain of a denomination of my choice. In no way would I have been misused, beaten and tortured at the whim of a spiteful revenge-driven warden. (p.100)
Had the South African [Apartheid] goverment treated me half as badly as the ANC, it would have been deserved to some degree, as I had broken South African laws. In the case of the ANC, there was no such rationale. It was virtually impossible to find a detainee who had committed a clearly defined crime against the system, because there was no system. I concluded that the policies of the ANC leadership were based on personal ambition and fear. (p. 100)
In 1962 Liberia and Ethiopia brought charges against South Africa for allegedly practising the ‘crime of apartheid’ in South West Africa[1]. The South African government delivered a written presentation of 3000 pages, called 15 expert witnesses who testified that fifty countries practised a form of apartheid — separate development — between groups, classes or races. Forty of these were members of the UN at the time, including Ethiopia and Liberia. The petitioners refused to appear in person to testify and be cross examined, even though South Africa offered to pay all their expenses. The Apartheid Government was found not guilty of practicing the ‘crime of apartheid’ in Namibia.
It was specified in Article 22 of the Covenant that the “best method of giving practical effect to [the] principle” that the “well-being and development” of those peoples in former enemy colonies “not yet able to stand by themselves” . . . was that “the tutelage of such peoples should be entrusted to advanced nations . . . who are willing to accept it”.[2]
Despite this, ten years to the day of the ICJ ruling, the UN issued their Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid,[3] calling Apartheid a ‘crime against humanity’. No Apartheid official was ever convicted of the ‘crime of apartheid’; yet these international ‘human rights’ organisations continue to refer to Apartheid as a ‘crime against humanity’.
[1] 1964-01-10: ICJ: Ibid (www.icj-cij.org): Application Instituting Proceedings, 4 November 1960
[2] 1964-01-10: ICJ: Ibid (www.icj-cij.org): Summary of the Summary of the Judgment of 18 July 1966
[3] Dugard, John: Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid, Professor of International Law, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Leiden
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
Virtually every European country (except France) has some sort of jus sanguinis policy…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_sanguinis
…but I am not sure it can apply to South African Whites, because simply having “Dutch blood” or “German blood” is not enough to apply for citizenship, they also need to prove “German cultural affiliation”, etc.
It would be very good if someone could post ways in which private citizens in Canada (likewise in Britain and the US) could help the Boers, e.g. by helping with applications for immigration.
Why is it not obvious that we should help our own before being misled by “be kind to monkeys” legislation.
This case is a glaring example of a double standard that by now has been accepted almost universally,which says:
“Only Whites can be racist”.
And its flip-side:
“Whites can never be victims of racism”.
It is exactly people with these “values” who consider the slow genocide of the Boers now taking place in South Africa, hidden from the eyes of the world, as a kind of “just retribution” for the “crimes of Apartheid”.
And what were those “crimes”?Offering employement to idle Blacks,building hospitals and schools up to universities for them?Raising their standard of living so that it became the highest for Blacks on the continent?Of course not!Their greatest “crime” was the acknowledgement that RACIAL DIFFERENCES ARE REAL,and not only that but also that RACES LIKE TO LIVE AMONG THEIR OWN.Two simple realities that are unacceptable to a certain mind-set that imagines it can “remake” the world based on unnatural principles.
For those who still worship Mandela as a “saint” a look at a video where he sings “Kill all Boers” might be instructive.Equally instructive is the comparison of the primitive cruelty practised in the camps of the ANC with the humane discipline in the prison system of the “racist” Whites as described in this article.
The greatest crime of our age is not Apartheid, it is MULTI-CULTURALISM.
Apartheid SA had many similarities to (and an alliance with) Israel, it is difficult to condemn Israel and hold that Apartheid was not at fault. The meaningful opposition to Israel in the West is from Western liberals who hate them for being crypto-racial nationalists. I think white nationalists should avoid all SA comparisons and point to Israel. Not as a model but as an example of a country whose people are claiming their legitimate right; a right to continue to be that country’s people. Phrased in this way, those arguing for Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state would have difficulty denying to White countries a concomitant right to remain White.
Young (and not so young) Whites in SA should keep their heads down and sweat blood to acquire an advanced competence in some professional skill. When the time comes (as it surely will) those with marketable abilities will be able to gain entry to Western countries and make new lives for themselves.
Thank you, Someday, for correcting the glaring omission in the Article: that Apartheid South Africa’s closest ally — perhaps its ONLY ally — was the State of Israel.
Good to see that in some people truth is a higher value than hate.
Someday says:
The meaningful opposition to Israel in the West is from Western liberals who hate them for being crypto-racial nationalists.
I had never thought of it quite that way but it makes sense. Perhaps what they hate is any form of assertive ethno-nationalism, even if it is Israelis. Is this why Jane Fonda types take up the Palestinian cause, even though we know she is a an anti-Western Leftist? Almost all of the public figures who take up the cause of Palestine are generally anti-White – very odd.
Caleb,
Israel was the only ally of SA because it was the only country where there was no politically, economically and culturally powerful diaspora minority organizing boycotts and a campaign to break relations with SA. So Israel could get the benefits of trading with an outcast.
BTW I don’t oppose Israel’s existence, and couldn’t care less about the Palestinians. Also I hope the Jews in Israel will stay there and not come to Europe, it’s better for both them and us that way.
My criticism of Israel is mainly pointing out the hypocrisy that Jews support multiculturalism in Europe (and everywhere in the white countries), and support ethnonationalism in Israel. I also mention that Israel is not a very reliable ally, e.g. she’s selling US military technologies to China.
In the case of SA, South African Jews were interesting with their activity in anti-Apartheid movements.
Jason,
Many of the anti-Israel types in Europe are simply for the outgroup. In the case of Israel, they see Israelis as European whites disposessing a people of color. A number of Jews are also criticizing Israel, although they never go really far. (Like a full return of refugees and a one-state solution – which could be dubbed the South African solution.) I think for the majority of Jews the diaspora is more important than Israel. Israel can always be destroyed, but the diaspora never. And the diaspora needs multiculturalism. Some Jews are criticizing Israel as part of the multiculturalist package – they probably find it safer not to be Israeli nationalists when they are multiculturalists elsewhere.
All very well, but … the Afrikaners, the descendants of the Dutch, French and Germans, made a point of thumbing their nose at Europe. The word “Afrikaner” means “of Africa”, and most Afrikaners are proud of the fact that they are uniquely white African. In any event, Dutch rule at the Cape ended at the close of the 18th century and, second, Dutch settlement was facilitated by the Dutch East India Company, and not the Dutch government, so the link with the “fatherland” is very tenuous at this stage. The irony is that the people who have the most need to leave South Africa are the same people who least want to, because they don’t want to lose their identity. For example, they know that once they move to, say, New Zealand their children will grow up in a completely English-speaking environment.
Large numbers of English-speakers have retained their links with England – many kept their British passports after South African became a republic in 1961 and/or can claim British citizenship due to ancestry. Thus quite a few English-speaking whites have been able to get into Commonwealth countries like Australia and Canada quite easily even without having high levels of skill.
Well look at what became of the White Russians in Europe, professors became coal miners, women who had never worked became seamstresses (or nightclub hostesses). The life style in England or Canada for someone without marketable skills (or sufficient capital to set themselves up as farmers ect) is quite a bit different that in SA. Even if there are no expropriations, come the day, everyone will be selling up. They’ll get pennies for their property. Professional skills can’t be stolen from you, they are well worth sweating blood for.
All the more repelling that Anglo South Africans (including Jews who had Israel in any case) voted for the end to apartheid, with the majority of Afrikaners voting otherwise.
Afrikaners lost their country because of the rest of us, because of the boycott movement in other white countries. They never asked for help, but they couldn’t even get fair trade.
The Dutch and English were colonialists in South Africa. They killed millions of Black men, women and children during their occupation of South Africa and other African countries. The colonialists had very good relations with the Jews who funded European ‘crusades’ against South African natives – for greed and Jews were rewarded handsomely by the Afrikans by letting them monopolize diamond mining in South Africa. Today, Israel counts for world’s 60% diamond industry, most of which Israeli Jews mine in South Africa and a few other African nations.
Westerners were not whining when they were exploiting the African reserves, which they still do though via their puppet African rulers – but since the European lost their direct hold on African governments – they, Israeli Jews – in their self-denial start calling themselves ‘refugees’ or ‘holocaust survivors’.
Last year, one of White ‘refugee’ Tony Blair repeated old Afrikan lie. He said that the West is occupying Muslim countries to save the West from “Radical Islam”.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/zionists-myth-of-radical-islam/
There was NEVER large scale killings of San or Bantu native people by Whites in the whole 450 year period after the first arrival of Europeans. Millions? Not even many thousands. More total fabricated untruths from Rehmat.
During the period of Apartheid, South Africa produced more Black college graduates than the rest of Sub Saharan Africa combined. Apartheid South Africa created the highest standard of living for Blacks and also the best quality of health care than any other country in Africa, with the possible exception of Rhodesia. I’m not trying to justify Apartheid or to say it was good or bad but these are simple facts.
During the period of Apartheid, about 2,000 Blacks lost their life in the struggle to end Apartheid, many at the hands of the ANC who murdered people, often burning them alive with tires around them, they considered collaborators.
Since 1994 and majority rule in South Africa, about 40,000 White people have been murdered, about one percent of the White population.
Wisely or unwisely, the Whites of South Africa voted to end Apartheid, at a time when they were in a very strong position, with the strongest economy in Africa. They don’t deserve the demonization they are getting.
Rehmat, you don’t tolerate even true facts about Muslims in comments on your blog if they are at all critical of Muslims — you just delete posts. Yet you vilify Christian European ethnic people regularly on this blog. What is wrong with this picture?
And, yes, Rehmat, I AM an ethnic Jewish person, a fact you throw in my face over and over again — anything to avoid responding to facts.
The statistics in first paragraph of my reply is referring to the area of land that is today the country of South Africa — not to the rest of Africa.
Too bad we can’t edit posts for a period after uploading!
man ramit you must have a boring life for you to spew lies on every single story printed on occidental observer. it seems to me that you’d rather spout lies on a web site where at least one other person would agree with you’re propaganda. i mean why waste your time?
you muslims have conquered and murdered everybody you could for centuries, and then you try to criticize what whites have done. talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
pakistan and islam are so great that you fled them the first chance you got, into the white peoples homeland that you hate so much. that doesn’t make any sense.
and then you come to a white web site and constantly attack white people while proclaiming the greatness of islam. i’m starting to suspect that you aren’t really who you say you are, and are in fact here to make sure that whites and muslims stay at each others throats, to avoid the dreaded alliance of white nationalists and muslims that our leftist masters fear so much.
0/10
You are pathetic.
thm – Remember you pouted a similar Jewish lie about Jewish colonists in occupied Palestine. It was a land without people. Funny though – those anti-christ thugs did not notice those 700,000 native Muslim and Christian Palestinians who lived in Palestine before European Christians threw their Jewish garbageon Arab land.
Thm – I hate to blame you – because according to your Talmud – it’s kosher to lie to Goyim.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/01/04/israel-occupation-based-on-myths/
And Rehmat, it’s **halal** to kill Infidels, according to your Qu’ran.
Caleb – Not as much as it’s kosher for the Jews to kill Christians as they did in Russia and Ukraine under Jewish Lenin and Stalin – over 60 million of them.
It is amazing how history is amended to suit a communist party by propaganda and utter LIES to the outside world, to ensure them turning their backs on their own!. I think to few has done ACTUAL research to find the TRUTH!. For many years ANC, PAC and others has spread lies about THEIR land being taken, THEIR lives being taken and how badly they were treated!.
NONSENSE!!, UTTER RUBBISH!! Our ancestors came and settled in the CAPE in 1652 to secure a trade post for ships travelling from Holland to India, They discovered a tribe the “Khoisan” who were NOMADS..travelled after rains and Gracing for their (cattle, WHICH) by the way originally comes from INDIA! I still do not understand how the Khoisan had as many cattle as stated in history, as shiploads must have been brought to them into SA! These people (Khoisan) did Not claim any land. They traded with the Settlers. Settlers took them in and in some cases even MARRIED them! During the SAME period the Zulu(Nguni) infiltrated SA from the Congo and settled between Ulundi in Kwa Zulu Natal and the Tugela river. Only in 1770.. a 120 years LATER and 1200km from the Cape did the Trek Boers discover other black tribes who infiltrated SA the SAME year during the Bantu migration. During the same Bantu infiltration tribes were killing “each other” off!. Trek Boers were ATTACKED by these tribes and also by the Zulu (Nguni). Attacks by these tribes ie.. the GRUESOME Murders of Piet Retief and his men after trading 2000 cattle with Dingaan for a land treaty and Dingaan betraying them as well as ordering the KILLING of Piet Retief’s party, awaiting his return where 250 women & children was MURDERED is only but ONE of the incidents that lead to the Battle of Blood River! At dawn on 16 December 1838, the Zulus estimated numbers varied from between 10,000 to 30,000 attacked 451 Trek Boers. The rest you know!
During the British reign in SA THEY (The British) instituted APARTHEID here!! The British had in the interim found themselves plunged into the race war which the Zulus had started against the White Boers. In 1872, the White population of Natal was put at 17,500 – while the Zulu population was estimated at some 300,000. During the Apartheid era AFTER the British had pulled OUT of SA white SA fed, clothed built schools (Which was burnt down often) and supplied black people with jobs. Houses were built on Farms for farm workers. Most houses owned by whites had a servant quarter built on where there was toilet and shower facilities. If you look at a friend on face book’s profile that lives in Durban Natal SA and click on Durban you will be able to READ the History and SEE when and where the Zulu came from!
It is exactly the same with All incidents where blacks were killed!. The truth is NEVER told!. Why was there WAR in SA against the ANC?.. Again plse do research!! The ANC adopted violence against White SA by planting land mines, bombs wherein NOT only whites were killed but many of their own! THOUSANDS of people were killed! Their own were “Necklaced” (Tyre around the neck soaked in petrol and set alight) if they did NOT want to participate in causing chaos in SA. NO strikes were peaceful!.. Policeman were killed, cars stoned, people stoned, properties damaged and set alight!… Today 20 years AFTER Apartheid was abolished and BEE instituted where after MOST whites lost their jobs to make way for black empowerment this country and its people’s suffering is 100 000 times worse than during the apartheid era! More people (blacks) have died by the hands of their own in this period than in the 30 years of Apartheid. White farmers and urban whites are gruesomely murdered, raped and tortured daily! Corruption is in order of the day and selfish, self centred officials is enriching themselves instead. Their people are jobless, homeless and in severe poverty!.. Infrastructures are falling apart ie..Schools, hospitals. Electricity, water, taxes, food, petroleum prices are sky rocketing. Borders have been opened and thousands of foreigners are infiltrating an already overpopulated country! Yet NOTHING is DONE or even MENTIONED about our food suppliers (THE FARMERS) being exterminated every day!! I predict another SOMALIA very soon should this NOT be STOPPED!! As for the uninformed Illiterate who is using “propaganda” to enhance racial hate in SA which is meant to be “a Rainbow Nation”! , Go do you HOMEWORK!, READ and LEARN but PLEASE REFRAIN! from causing HATRED in a already unstable country!!! People are being KILLED because of you IGNORANCE!!
What?? I never said anything like that, about Palestine not being populated. You are coming up with a line spouted by some Zionists and attributing it to me. Does that mean I can find anything said by any Muslims ever and hold you accountable for it? That’s nuts, Rehmat. I am not a Zionist. I strongly believe that the US and all Christian heritage European ethnic countries should stop giving any financial or military aid to Israel, especially since organized Jews are relentlessly working to destroy the values, culture, ethnic identity and religion of such countries.
When the Europeans first moved to what is now South Africa about a 450 years ago, there were about 2 million native inhabitants, mostly San People and a few Bantus. There are now about 45 million Blacks in that territory, if you count the huge number of illegal immigrants that are pouring into the country since the ANC government does little to protect the integrity of its borders.
On the other hand, Rehmat, at the time of the partition of India, what is now Pakistan was 25 Percent Hindu. It is now 1 percent Hindu. The exodus was caused by the widespread terroristic murder campaign by Muslims against Hindu women, children and men, including sending trains full of dead Hindus into India. When I tried to get a discussion about this on your blog, on your article about Kashmir, you simply deleted my post instead of discussing it. Why? Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that to in any way either demonize Muslims or in any way justify the crimes against the Palestinians. Rather just to show that you want to demonize Christian heritage European ethnic people but refuse to even look at anything that might reflect badly on Muslims.
I respect Islam. In the last thousands of years, just about every ethnic group has done some terrible things. but to single out just the European ethnic people for criticism, which the Jewish supremacist Culture of Critique does, and whose bandwagon you have jumped on, Rehmat, is just bigoted hatred.
At the time that the Europeans f
Rehmat, neither Lenin (Russian) nor Stalin (Georgian) were Jewish and 60 million would have been the entire population of the Ukraine with at least 20 million left over.
What are they teaching you at the madrassa, besides how to look good on video while backpacking bombs on board the tube trains?
1) Lenin and Stalin were not Jewish but the ideology they put into practice was in large measure originated by Jewish thinkers. If an ideology promised paradise but it delivered hell on earth the originators of it bear a certain responsibility I think.
2)Trotsky was a leading figure in the early Soviet state. During Lenin’s illness and for a while after Stalin did not lead alone, Zinoviev and Kamanev were also influential So the decades of Stalin’s dictatorship ought not to obscure the facts of Jewish over-representation in the original Bolshevik leadership.
3) Jews were prominent among the Chekist torturers and their successors, they sent many millions (including almost all the former elite) to camps where most died of severe maltreatment, quite often people were just shot and dumped in pits. That some high ranking Jews were persecuted afterwards does not alter the fact of disproportionate Jewish participation in the worst crimes of the Soviet state. Jews replaced the former Russian elite ; the apparatchiks who kept the Soviet state going were disproportionately Jewish.
Someday,
Also, a very high proportion of Cheka/OGPU/GPU/NKVD/NKGB/MGB/MVD officers (especially the higher ranking ones) were Jewish. For example from 1930 (its creation) until 1938 the commander of the GULAG system was Jewish.
One must not forget that the early bolshevik leadership essentially consisted of Jews and philosemites, or one might use the term Jewified Gentiles. People who had many Jewish friends (inevitable in that environment), often had Jewish lovers/spouses, and praised the Jews abundantly (like Lunacharsky, Bukharin, Lenin, etc.) There was a huge campaign to eradicate antisemitism between 1927-1932, and one might be surprised to learn that it was initiated by Stalin. Stalin had ethnically conscious Jewish supporters, most prominent among them being Kaganovich, one of the maybe five most powerful people in the USSR in the 1930s.
The percentage of Jews on the GULAG was lower than their percentage of the total population as late as January 1, 1940. By the next year it increased a lot, but probably mainly because a lot of Jews (as well as Poles, Ukrainians, Balts, etc.) from the newly incorporated Polish territories were deported. I think (I don’t have the numbers in front of me to back me up) Jews were still underrepresented among these new deportees (as a proportion of the population of these new territories).
However, Rehmat’s number of 60 million is simply wrong, Soviet communism killed “only” 20 million, the huge majority of these before the end of the 1930s. And only a small fraction of these (much smaller than their actual proportion in the population) were Jews, whereas among the perpetrators they were out of all proportions…
Great article. What a breath of fresh air on the ANC and its murderous communist credo.
Caleb and Rehmat…FIGHT!
It’s unfortunate that the white SA plan for a separate Volkstaat (people’s state), when it was being contemplated at the end of apartheid, did not come to pass. Then as now, I am in favor of it. Failing that, the whites of SA and Rhodesia/Zimbabwe should have first consideration for entry to most or all European countries, Canada, Australia and any other civilized white, western-oriented state. Certainly they would be valuable assets: more racially, intellectually, and culturally adaptable (to name a few) to these places than most of the third world freeloaders who often seem to be put at the front of the line for free entry.
@ Lookaroundu
Third World immigrants should be banned anyway.These Boers from SA and also what is left of the White farmers in Zimbabwe should have priority. Whether it is in the USA,Canada or Australia,give them land for free and loans on easy terms to start a new life.If they cannot leave their hellholes due to financial problems (some indeed are extremely impoverized), pay for their flight.White solidarity in practice!I have heard of cases in Zimbabwe where White women have to resort to prostitution (with Blacks,mind you!) in order to survive.Send immediately planes to rescue these people!Good bye to universal altruism,time for tribalism now!
I do agree with “Boer Volkstaat or Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return to Europe Petition and Briefing Paper”. That’s what Helen Thomas (a Christian) and Gilad Atzmon (a Jew) had prescribed for the ‘Jewish Boer’ occupying Palestine.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/palestine-the-third-option/
@Rehmat
I do agree with the Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Pakistan for all PAKIS,now being a burden in all White countries with their gang-raping of our daughters , robbing our people on the streets or living on welfare and even being a nuisance on the Internet.Rehmat,please make use of this right!
I fully agree with the Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Pakistan for all PAKIS, the Middle East for all muzzies etc. Looks like you’ve been hoisted on your own petard… when are you leaving?….. :-)
@Rehmat
I do agree with the Jus Sanguinis Right of Return to Pakistan for all PAKIS,now being a burden in all White countries with their gang-raping of our daughters , robbing our people on the streets or living on welfare and even being a nuisance on the Internet.Rehmat,please make use of this right!
I bet many posters would contribute to a fund to send Rehmat home . He’s just that annoying . Hopefully , send him to a place where the internet is not in service due to the fact that sacred cows or camels chewed down all the telephone poles .
Look folks,I have said many times that universal altruism is the major weakness of the White man and pleaded for a return to “tribalism”.I will however make one last exception:let us set up a Human Rights Commission to secure the RIGHT OF RETURN to their countries of origin according to the Jus Sanguinis Principle for all non-Whites now residing in White countries.Let us be so altruistic to organize and finance it.Universal altruism,one last time!
However, Rehmat’s number of 60 million is simply wrong,
Rehmats numbers are always wrong . He has a jar of beads that go from ten million up to a gazillion and he reaches in and picks them randomly .
It’s a Islamic scientific method thing.
:-)
The Boers did not settle black land nor took it by force , apartheid was a rough attempt to restore South Africa to its 1902 borders, when Verwoerd was killed the international won and the country went to its inevitable ruin
Hallo all
I am a South african women, it is not as easy to stay and survive in SA. I believe that every one should have his space! But sorry to say, if you are white there is no place for you here! We are trying to get work in Canada, but if you do not have a visa they rarely help! We would love to take our daughters to a country that is safe and were they would have a equal chance and not judge because there white! they are born after the apartheid but still have know chance!
My kids have lost more friends to murder in their young lives that I ever did!
What would you do! Would you leave as well?
John here from the USA. I stand in solidarity with my white brothers in South Africa. Anything I can do to help, let me know…