Driving Miss Ditzy: Review of “The Help”

James Edwards

Skeeter Phelan (Emma Stone), Minnie Jackson (Octavia Spencer) and Aibileen Clark (Viola Davis) in "The Help"

As we’ve noted many times before, the cultural Marxists never tire of fanning the dying embers of the “Civil Rights” movement (CRM) because it can always be relied upon to burst into flame, warming the hearts of a credulous American public. Whenever the Left encounters massive public skepticism regarding the benefits of homosexual marriage, open borders, global warming, Obama’s presidency, or whatever the liberal cause du jour may be, they can always depend on striking a sympathetic chord with mainstream conservatives and liberals alike by dusting off yet another reminiscence about the bad old days of segregation to remind us of how righteous liberals are.

Unpleasant memories like the French and Bolshevik Revolutions, Chairman Mao’s Cultural Revolution, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, the Vendee, and the gulags fade into nothingness when those evergreen images of police dogs and fire hoses flicker on the screen. If Tombstone, Arizona was the town too tough to die, the CRM is the radical egalitarian movement too good to be forsaken. Its memory must be kept front and center, and on life support forever, preserved in an environmentally controlled glass covered casket like Lenin’s corpse.

The Help is the movie industry’s latest contribution to this endless enterprise. Billed as this summer’s premier chick flick, The Help gives moviegoers a heaping helping of all of the bromides and stereotypes we’ve come to expect from a Hollywood production depicting the benighted South before the triumph of liberalism – stoic, long-suffering Blacks imbued with both homespun wisdom and impeccable moral rectitude. They never lose their tempers or lapse into profanity. They are the match to any and all circumstances they encounter, especially all impediments clumsily or maliciously thrown in their path by racist whites.


The film’s protagonist, a girl named Eugenia “Skeeter” Phelan, is the film’s White heroine, and as such, is inevitably at odds with her evil kin and society in general. Skeeter’s mother, the crass conservative that she is, even questions Skeeter about whether or not she’s a lesbian, which is the the film’s not-so-subtle attempt to build bridges between the CRM and “homosexual rights.” Race, gender and class envy are all thrown into this exotic southern gumbo, and liberalism triumphs, as expected by modern audiences. This is present day Hollywood’s version of the proverbial “happy ending”.

No Black character is portrayed with even a hint of negativity and we are all expected to howl with delight as the sassy maid (but not so sassy as to be unlikable) Minny prepares a pie made from her own fecal matter and serves it up to the haughty Junior Leaguer “Hilly”, who laps it up and asks for seconds. Southern White people are such fools, don’t you know!

All of the White men in the movie are mere stage props, except for the Senator’s son Stuart (modeled loosely on a true paragon, Mississippi Senator James Eastland’s gentlemanly son and Vanderbilt ‘65 grad Woods Eastland), who shows promise by acknowledging his inferiority and subservience to the feminist/liberal Skeeter as her suitor, but lapses back into idiocy when he scolds and dumps her when her “tell all” book hits the bookstores, branding her a traitor to both her race and her class. Never fear, though, the fair Skeeter’s act of betrayal has impressed those whose opinions really count – her Jewish editor/book publisher in New York City – an exemplar of liberal womanhood that would make Helen Reddy proud!

This is the most realistic portrayal of the film, a Jewish blue state liberal who rewards an ambitious Southerner for publicly selling out her own kind. Skeeter can now take her rightful place in the pantheon of CRM heroes by moving to New York City to pursue her feminist dream career as a writer, and shaking the benighted dust of flyover country off of her shoes once and for all. Good riddance to bad rubbish. All of this is woven into a background pastiche of CRM events like the Medgar Evers murder to show us just how brave and heroic both Skeeter and her coterie of Black maids are, and to remind us about why Hollywood bothered to make this movie in the first place.

What’s really going on here? The cultural Marxist left, as opposed to classical Marxists, believes that a successful revolution is best achieved through their tactic of choice, “the long march through the institutions.” Leftists, hiding their light under a bushel, infiltrate all societal institutions that set or influence cultural standards of morality and ethics. Once they achieve critical mass within any such institution, they take control, and replace the traditional values the institution previously espoused with a message of radical egalitarianism. Thus, the revolutionaries become the new establishment, and revolutionary leftist values become the new norm.

As Pat Buchanan wrote in his book, The Death of the West, the counter culture of the 1960s has become the dominant culture of today, and the dominant culture of the 50s and early 60s has become the dissident culture of today. The Help illustrates this perfectly. Jews, the most liberal segment of the population, took over the movie industry by the 1920s, and although it was held in check for a while as a result of pressure from religious and patriotic groups, it wasn’t long before Hollywood began its march to the left in tune with the rest of the Jewish community! Today the victory is complete. All eight major movie studios have a Jewish CEO (The Help is from Stephen Speilberg’s Dreamworks), and all are predictable exponents of liberal “message” movies. Left-wing psychological conditioning is, and for a long time has been, the secret agenda behind Hollywood movies.

As William Lind, director of the Center for Cultural Conservatism at the Free Congress Foundation and a past guest on our show, writes, “The entertainment industry…has wholly absorbed the ideology of cultural Marxism and preaches it endlessly not just in sermons but in parables: strong women beating up weak men, children wiser than their parents, corrupt clergymen thwarted by carping drifters, upper-class Blacks confronting the violence of lower-class Whites, manly homosexuals who lead normal lives. It is all fable, an inversion of reality, but the entertainment media make it seem real, more so than the world that lies beyond the front door.”

What is the purpose behind all of this? The young in particular lap this up like mother’s milk. Cultural Marxist dogma predicts that a constant drumbeat of such messages will induce a condition they call “cultural pessimism” among proponents of the old order, which in America would be conservative Whites, or more correctly, traditional White culture and society generally. Those marginalized by traditional American society — Blacks, other minorities, homosexuals, even women — would be mobilized into the new proletariat that would be directed, under cultural Marxist leadership, into overthrowing the old order. Dissent to this transformation would be regarded as mental illness, and recalcitrants would be subjected to having their outlooks “reconstructed” via the tender ministrations of “the therapeutic state”. People who persist in cleaving to the old ways are now those who ostracized and marginalized. People have picked up on this and liberalism is now quite fashionable. After all, who wants to be hated?

While attending this movie I noticed that the audience was an equal mixture of whites and Blacks, and both groups howled with equal delight as the white characters in the film were ritually humiliated and degraded. I wondered to myself what the response would have been if a white character had made feces pie and served it to an unwitting, credulous Black character? Somehow, I think the audience response would have been different.

White Americans have now incorporated self-hatred, induced by the entertainment industry to such an extent that they can be predictably relied upon to cheer at depictions of their own downfall and degradation. The Help has earned over $70 million during its first two weeks of release.

Reposted from James Edwards’ The Political Cesspool.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

90 Comments to "Driving Miss Ditzy: Review of “The Help”"

  1. Isabel's Gravatar Isabel
    September 17, 2011 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

    As a highly intelligent white woman who is sympathetic to the cause (or at least against anti-white racism) I occasionally end up on this site or on Steve Sailer’s blog where I am promptly repelled by the sexism and scientific ignorance I encounter. I start to picture a lot of whining anti-feminist MRAs, and believe me, crybabies are NOT sexy, let alone confidence-inspiring, as well as men who never seem to get out of the house (white women are all sluts, like on TV!) or have success with women. No wonder you imagine that the problem will be solved by taking control of women! Sorry, we are not going back to 1950’s. And the racism is completely unnecessary and a total turn-off. I mean, “sub-species”????? Someone MUST be the Master? Things were better when blacks knew their place??? Wow, have fun guys.

  2. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 3, 2011 - 10:44 pm | Permalink

    Whites have become slaves !

    Whites MUST support a huge welfare state that is supporting black disfunction and illegitimacy , and we can not even say a peep about it !
    Whites must support vast numbers of illegal and legal aliens to come and have babies and to milk the system and possibly to become criminals , and whites have no say in the matter , they must work harder to pay even higher taxes and at the same time to pay for being replaced by non-whites !

    That is slavery ! duh !

  3. MountainHome's Gravatar MountainHome
    September 3, 2011 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

    Evil, throughout history, never goes away. It just takes another shape or form with new faces. In the end, good always prevail, but at a horrible price. great article. Thanks.

  4. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    August 29, 2011 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

    @Jessica Arrington:

    Even with God as translator, humans must work out their individual differences among themselves through competition for the leadership role. Once these hierarchies are established people can proceed with life in relative harmony. so long as they don’t lapse back into self-worship

  5. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    August 29, 2011 - 7:02 am | Permalink

    @Jessica Arrington:

    When people forget to worship (acknowledge) God they start worshipping themselves. This is the problem. Always has been. Just ask any one who has studied religion or the Prophets.
    Your people are no better than my people just because of slavery any more than my people are better than yours. we’re all just people. That said. We can’t all live together as equals because equals repel…Somebody has to be the “master” and somebody has to be the “slave”. It is when the “Master” forgets that they are both creatures of God that leads him to abuse his slave. likewise, when the slave is thus abused, or when he forgets his master is also one of Gods creatures, he may rise up and kill the master. He may in fact, turn the table and make the master the slave and himself the master, (what goes around, comes back around) But in the eyes of God, nothing has changed, for they still don’t function or live as equals. TO GOD THEY WERE ALREADY EQUAL!
    So you can see where the false God of “equality” has led, and is leading, because most humans don’t see or understand the “mind” of God. Not saying that I do, but I know this, if Africans had never left Africa, there would still be “masters” and “slaves” both there and here…It is the only way humans can communicate without God to translate.

  6. Jessica Arrington's Gravatar Jessica Arrington
    August 28, 2011 - 6:38 pm | Permalink

    I am black and have studied African American history for decades. I was present at a feminist conference at Harvard, when the Nat’l Asso. of Black Women Historians organized their group rather be controlled by Bella Abzug and a crew of other feminists who attempted to lure black women scholars into their ranks in order to “legitimatize” their activities. That black women’s organization was the first group to come out against “The Help”, and gave a long list of reasons why the movie was a colossal piece of propaganda. Never, in black story-telling has any story been told of black servants serving feces to whites or anybody else, dooky stinks cooked or uncooked. This is a hollywood application, injected for its own purposes.
    The nasty remarks of many on this thread directed at the self-control depicted by the black characters, reveal incredible ignorance and rampant indifference to what happened to black people in America during the pre Civil Rights eras. I remember that for the most part, black people in general pre 1960’s were petrified of whites. In both the north and the south, black people routinely lost their lives for “mouthing off” to whites. Black mothers taught their sons, particularly how to “hold their tongues,” It was one of the things I was thinking about yesterday as I was watching a black political pundit. It occurred to me that there was a time in my lifetime when a black person would not talk directly to a white person without assuming a subservient demeanor. Just because whites now fear some black people who are crazy, and project that fear onto all black people, it does not mean that the centuries of horrible history perpetrated upon Africans did not occur. What all of us, both black and white, are now experiencing is the blow back from centuries of dehumanization, repressed anger, ignorance, isolation, and generation to generation mental illness. Inverted white rage at black people is a self-serving mechanism that absolves whites in the past of responsibility for the mess with which we are now contending. The answer is forgiveness. We must all forgive in the name of Jesus Christ.

  7. August 27, 2011 - 10:17 am | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee: I agree wholeheartedly. I would also add that the book “They Were White and They Were Slaves: The Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America” by Michael Hoffman discusses the true nature of slavery. This includes the fact that blacks could earn their freedom, take land, and own white slaves.
    Hoffman also takes on the Jews in other ways. I recall that at one time he called them a crime syndicate that masquerades as a religion.

  8. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    August 27, 2011 - 6:01 am | Permalink


    “young white men needo to stop listeneng to rap, stop worshipping sports……….
    I agree with everything you say. But in the end it is our pokitical leaders that should be held to account for their incompetence/treason in allowing this state of affairs to develop in the first place.
    Anyone, especially a politician, should know that if you take a good kid and drop nim/her in a drug/sex/violence culture the kid will sooner or later become part of it.
    Of course the buck stops 1st with the individual kid, then travels to the parent, and then to the politician, and finally to the false God of “democracy” which allows and encourages corruption of all kinds by selectively assuring that only the most narcissistic and sociopathic are elected.

  9. Robin's Gravatar Robin
    August 27, 2011 - 2:15 am | Permalink

    I have no problem, as a white woman, believing or saying that white women on the whole are quite naive and easily manipulated by media driven narratives and un-ambiguous conflicts between ‘white oppressors’ and ‘victimized fill in the blanks’ that are a staple of Hollywood.

    White men have also been steeped in an anti-white male stew for so long they have become either defeated slobs or browbeaten pussies that reflexively parrot the diversity raptures of their t.v. studio overlords.

    Young White males need to stop listening to rap, worshipping sports, playing video games, and get to the gym and to the classroom. They need to learn that it’s good and natural for them to carve out their own identities as white men and exercise their potential.

  10. Old Glory's Gravatar Old Glory
    August 26, 2011 - 9:41 pm | Permalink

    MTV and reality television is a moral compass for many of today’s young women (16-30)….

  11. August 26, 2011 - 8:31 pm | Permalink
  12. August 26, 2011 - 8:30 pm | Permalink

    In the following video there are two Black people, one in blue and one in red.

    The Black woman in BLUE, a very old woman, is closer to the days of slavery. Her personality shows the influence of Whites. Even though she actually didn’t grow up under slavery, she was raised by other Blacks who did or who were very close to that time in history. The woman in BLUE was also raised in an environment in which Whites dominated.

    The woman in RED (you’ll see her right away) grew up free from White domination and White influence, influenced primarily by her own people.

  13. Christian's Gravatar Christian
    August 26, 2011 - 8:28 pm | Permalink


    Your arguments for a racial communitarian ideology are based on communitarian arguments. Those arguments are in turn based on instrumentalism. I have not argued for destroying anything. What I have argued for is that citizenship and the right to marriage should not be based on race, but classical principles of citizenship and natural law.

    All peoples, including non-whites are humans and therefore rights and duties apply for them to. A dog is not a human so equal citizenship do not apply to a dog. A dog is also not a human so the law of marriage cannot be applied to them to. The difference between us is that I want to create state that is race neutral and where people are equal in front of the law. You want race to be imperative that describes what rights and duties you should have. Men and women are also different when it comes to biology.

    Why should the limit go by race? Should they have different kind laws apply to people of different gender? Most people would say no.

    The problem with your position is that it based on one idea “preserve and develop the race” and everything else is subordinate to that position. You argument is also based on what you see as a “racial reality” – were nihilistic racial positions is an “a priori” even if it comes in conflict with natural rights and even human dignity. Including killing your own.

    Your position is a modernist racialist position. My position is a true conservative position. It is a minority position for the moment because of all cultural relativism and the separatist ideology of multiculturalism.

    English is not my first langague.

  14. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    August 26, 2011 - 6:34 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    I can see it coming, Franklin, the next name: The Royal Americans.

  15. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    August 26, 2011 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:

    I think the reason for the change seen in blacks is that in the old days it was advantageous for blacks to meet white expectations so their behavior was far better. With the so-called civil rights movement they’ve regressed back toward their primitive culture because that is what other blacks reinforce. A disaster for all concerned.

  16. Rehmat's Gravatar Rehmat
    August 26, 2011 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    I wonder how the script-writer had come to resolve the situation in Jerusalem city’s Orthodox community section where women cannot drive or ride city tram in the same compartment with men.


  17. August 26, 2011 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

    — Silence has been part of our mistake; speaking corrects that mistake.

    — Submission to false word and thought taboos has been part of our calamity; breaking those taboos verbally is a vital to our good fortune.

    — Failing to teach others better paths of thought could be one of our failures. Teaching others over this fortunate teaching medium (the internet) is one of our great opportunities.

  18. thm's Gravatar thm
    August 26, 2011 - 4:44 pm | Permalink


    … I don’t really like to waste my time making comments in the Internet. Forgive these recent exceptions to that rule.

    That is to the readers of OO a regrettable loss because you are an interesting, insightful and compelling writer. But, since you seem to feel there is something more important for you to be doing than writing here, please tell us what that more important activity or activities might be.

  19. August 26, 2011 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

    “Julian, what you just described is what I call name-flight .It is the phenomenon of the continuous changing of the name for a certain people because every name given to them gets negative connotations. Thus after some time the new name gets the same negative connotations as the old one and a newer name has to be found and so on and so on.The cause of this curious phenomenon is not prejudice but the simple fact that the people in question is in itself problematic and remains so.

    Basically, yup. If a certain ethnic group was saddled with an official name like “Useless Stink” and that ethnic group developed its virtue, shined its character, and piled up truly numinous actions among their hostile host — pretty soon “Useless Stink” would become a term of laudation with an attractive nimbus.

    Shakespeare (some kind of White European Avatar, he was) said it: “A rose by any other name is still as sweet.”

    This seems dissonant with the Vedic idea that all letters and words have permanent essences, yet it has psychological truth. You can call a rose anything, but a rose is still a rose, and the word used for the rose will always take on associations from the rose.

    Your name or handle is not as important as what you are. Blacks should first learn to stop being complainers and nursing grudges — both real and hyped. It seems to me American Blacks fresh out of the humiliations and penances of slavery had a kind of saintly character (and discipline, work ethic) that you don’t see nowadays.

    Everything is dualistic. Nothing’s all bad or all good. But complaining, feeling sorry for yourself, endlessly wronged — is always ignoble in a larger philosophical context. Blacks should learn to specialize less in that, and specialize more in developing their character. I mean, isn’t that what MLK ostensibly conjured? That character should matter more than “color?” (Never mind race is more than color, but here’s a point.) Somehow blacks missed that in the end. Modern blacks are all about their color. They’re wronged because of their color. They should be favored because of their color. They should receive free stuff and free power (and jobs their not qualified for) not for their character, but just because they are a brown color. A few short years after the Big Talker talked, they have it completely backwards. Could be MLK had no virtuous essence to him indeed.

    Character and spirit outshine physical facts. Grudges and an assumption of entitlement are not quality “content” for the character.


  20. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 26, 2011 - 11:50 am | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:

    Julian,what you just described is what I call name-flight .It is the phenomenon of the continuous changing of the name for a certain people because every name given to them gets negative connotations. Thus after some time the new name gets the same negative connotations as the old one and a newer name has to be found and so on and so on.The cause of this curious phenomenon is not prejudice but the simple fact that the people in question is in itself problematic and remains so. But nobody dares to say that,hence the flightto ever newer and newer names.You can go from nigger to darkie to negro to Negro (with capital N as in the time of MLK) to colored people or people of color (NAACP) to Black (still acceptable) to the present African-American,the same negative connotations will stick to every new name.The possibilities BTW seem to be pretty well exhausted.What will be the substitute for “African”?Sub-Saharan perhaps?
    Hm: Sub-Saharan-American.

  21. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    August 26, 2011 - 8:06 am | Permalink

    “why should we preserve our race?, what is the point of doing that?”
    Good question. let me try to answer it with a question to you. What is the point of having families at all? Why not just “do what feels good”, have sex with whoever you happen to be with at the time? What better way to preserve and spread your genes?
    Speaking for myself, I believe in the God of Nature, it seems to work, maybe not very well considering all the wars in history, but until recent times those wars were relatively harmless, in the grand scheme of things, and may have served to cull out the weak and stupid, (Pre-industrial) if for no other reason than to kill off those who would rather kill than co-operate. Be it as it may, it WORKED! because it is NATURAL. Note that war is not the first choice of Nature, but rather usually comes about as the result of two different groups with roughly the same power (equality…equals repel) This is how marriage is being destroyed. Artificially (by the aid of un-natural, man-made, machines) making women equal to/with men. What happens is a leaderless union (un-natural) and the first disagreement that comes along must neccessarily cause either conflict or divorce. Which is where the real problem (child-abuse-neglect) begins. google Children of divorce.
    The degeneration of society begins with too many kids being raised without love (or too much of the wrong kind) the results are before you….crime, drugs, homosexualty, porn, poverty, over-crowded prisons, war, etc.
    But maybe this is all academic to you, maybe you personally have not been touched by this degenerate society, raised by loving, stable family as a first-born or only child, or perhaps you are just so damaged and dissillusioned by it you have surrendered. The fact is that family and racial loyalty is NATURAL. living in a genderless, leaderless, raceless overpopulated, spiritual prison is NOT!….jmo
    Equality does NOT work…It has killed or at least is killing the 5,000 year-old institution of marriage in the western hemisphere and wherever it takes hold.

  22. Exodus's Gravatar Exodus
    August 26, 2011 - 1:40 am | Permalink


    Your comments don’t make sense. It seems like you lack a fundamental understanding about what extinction is and why we want to avoid it. Is English not your first language?

    “I find the terms mongrel and Negro to be rather rude concepts. One can use better words to describe people of color. ”

    I find 30,000 rapes a year to be an act of war. Oh, White is a color too. Mongrel and Negro have clearly defined meanings. If you don’t like them, don’t use them.

    “I also know that race is a holistic concept.”

    Race is a biological reality. Here’s a recent discovery that humans differ racially in our genes by as much as 12%…so much for the leftist lies about you being more similar to a black in Africa than your White neighbor.


    “That also explains why you are against miscegenation. ”

    No, I think it’s safe to say you have missed the reason we are against that entirely.

    “My point about mixing with all people of the world was just an idea.”

    What is identity then? News flash: most people like their race just the way it is.

    “I thought it was pretty smart and funny idea, if we want to preserve genes forever.”

    How is it smart? You aren’t preserving anything, all you’re doing is haphazardly pouring everything into a bowl and damn the consequences. You want to destroy everything to create one thing? How is that smart? How will that preserve what is unique? How is that funny? Do you know the definitions of the words “smart”, “funny”, “preserve”? Your usage indicates you do not.

    “But why should we preserve our race?”

    Why should we breathe? Why shouldn’t every human on the planet commit suicide? That would be a smart and funny way to preserve context-free grammars.

    “Sure, some things may be morally self-evident, but I do not think preserving ones race should be one of those things.”

    I’m not sure how you could miss this. I guess I could counter with “I’m not sure that loving your parents is a virtue”. If you disagree, could you explain why?

    “Values are more important to preserve then any race”

    “Values” are intangible concepts, like ideas, that can’t actually be destroyed. I think you need to work on your English before you post here more. Not trying to be rude, but your comments are very light-headed and you are either a non-native speaker on using drugs.

    “If you want to marry someone of another ethnicity – such a marriage should be celebrated and be valued in the same way as any other marriage.”

    Why? Nobody in America thought this before the 1960s.

    What if you want to marry a dog? Is that ok? Surely that’s as valuable as any other marriage.

    “I think you Americans need to learn to live in a multiracial society.”

    I think the White stock of America should be allowed to choose what kind of society they should have, free from leftist hate-making and Jewish brainwashing.

    “I understand your dislike of the pre 1965 immigration law”

    No. You don’t.

    The last two sentences in your final paragraph are self-contradictory.


    William S. Sessions, Director, FBI

  23. August 26, 2011 - 12:34 am | Permalink

    “I find the terms mongrel and Negro to be rather rude concepts. One can use better words to describe people of color.”

    As to mongrel, yeah, that’s rude. (White men do much better transmitting racialism positively to White women if they avoid demeaning terms.) As to “negro,” when I grew up THAT was the “nice,” “proper,” and considerate term for them.

    It becomes a question of how long do you let yourself be yanked around by their continuing demands about what they be called. After my mom and dad taught me to call them by the elegantly French “negroes, trying to be Good White People, use the Proper term and not lesser terms like “darkies,” they then began saying that was a slur. Now they wanted to be called “black.”

    I think my mom and dad were a little flummoxed by that one. It didn’t seem nice. Sort of, you know, stark, undecorous, in-their-face. Would that really be nice? Would negroes like it if we called them “black”? It seemed very unlikely. Thus my mom and dad could never really get with that. “Black” didn’t seem nice like negro. Of course, the whole term was coined by negros who wanted to really GET IN OUR FACES about color, and the term was an expression of overweening pride in their darkness. “Hey, we’re not just DARK you honkies, we’re BLAAAACKKK, like you’re white. Hey, we’re the POLAR OPPOSITE of you. And we’re PROUD of our darkness.” It was self-chosen term loaded with attitude. My mother was terrorized. But we all went along with it.

    Next they’re saying that’s not nice any more. Then came along “people of color,” one that you just used as if it’s still o.k. (Is it still o.k.? I’m not even sure. Hasn’t it become sometimes a comic phrase?)

    Then we had to call them “African Americans.” Whites don’t get to be called “European Americans” though it would be a nice term, and we probably have more connection to Europe than the Blacks do to Africa. But there it is. I wonder how long that one will be acceptable. I notice that you, even though “African American” is the de facto correct term now, somehow avoided using it! I wonder why that was.

    Hmm. So after “African American” starts to sound like some kind of slur (which I think it already is, with people often saying it in a subtle mocking way) — what term will they demanding we use next? If they’d quit crying about everything, raise themselves up by their own silent, dignified toil — any term used for them would become a respectable term. Words take on the spirit of the thing they describe.

    Anyway, I was taught from childhood that “negro” was a respectful term, and like my mother and father, I find it more respectful and less crude than “black.” It also has a certain retro vibe that softens them up a bit, in my mind. I actually have more of an unpleasant association with Eldridge Cleaver and crew’s “black” than I do with “negro.” The older blacks I knew as a kid, who my mother described as “negro,” were much nicer and kinder sorts somehow than the “blacks” an “African Americans” of today.

    So “negro” is fine in my book. It’s what my mother used. And she was a nice person.

    Plus I’m tired of being yanked around.

  24. Christian's Gravatar Christian
    August 25, 2011 - 11:35 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    I find the terms mongrel and Negro to be rather rude concepts. One can use better words to describe people of color. I do understand the logic behind your position. You want to preserve people, not only their genes. I also know that race is a holistic concept.

    That also explains why you are against miscegenation. My point about mixing with all people of the world was just an idea. I thought it was pretty smart and funny idea, if we want to preserve genes forever.

    But why should we preserve our race? What is the point of doing that? Sure, some things may be morally self-evident, but I do not think preserving ones race should be one of those things. Values are more important to preserve then any race – one of those values should be the right to marry who you want. If you want to marry someone of another ethnicity – such a marriage should be celebrated and be valued in the same way as any other marriage.

    I believe that Americans believe that it is the character of a man that makes the man. I also believe they thought so even when racialism was a normalized concept of American policy.

    I kind of like that concept that the character of the man comes before race or class.

    I think you Americans need to learn to live in a multiracial society. I understand your dislike of the pre 1965 immigration law but even if those immigrants return home, you still end up in a multiracial society, which the largest minority will be African Americans – when the Hispanics is gone. I think you have to learn live with Native Americans, Eskimos and African Americans. That does not mean that you should accept the current situation.

    I think you commentators at Occidental Observer should listen to this video.

  25. john sumner's Gravatar john sumner
    August 25, 2011 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee: Julian, thank you for these thoughtful comments. There is a lot of truth in them, and they are very much appreciated.

  26. August 25, 2011 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

    “By the way, Sex and the City wasn’t Jewish created. It was based on a book about the exploits of some slut named Candace Bushnell.

    The actual television series, it’s production and broadcast, was a Jewish endeavor because the Jews decide just about everything in mass media now. I was referring to the well-known television series. If the television show (with a cast led by a Jewess by the way) was never produced from the endless nasty novels and scripts out there, nobody would have heard about it.

  27. August 25, 2011 - 8:41 pm | Permalink

    Most of them are dumb, gullible, and easily manipulated…

    Most White women are not dumb.

    “…like most women of any race. Our women aren’t special;

    Our women are special, and they are different than those of other races.

    …if they were they wouldn’t be flocking to black and Jewish men the way they do.

    It is an exaggeration to say they are “flocking” to these. However, it does look like we need to quick take the “cutting edge cool” and “hip” out of it before any more damage is done.

    …Before 30 they want alpha male (blacks),…

    This is an absurd statement. White-black mixing by White European women is still exceptional and on the fringes.

    …after 30 they want financially successful beta males (Jews)…

    Most White women do not want to marry Jews.

    …to raise their kids.

    Most women don’t want their husbands to do the bulk of child-raising.

    If white men want to regain control over their women then they need to dominate them and tell them what’s what…

    I think this is a simplistic prescription. I would prescribe a vaster program involving these:

    1) Moral and spiritual regeneration of White males

    2) Getting off the porn.

    3) Regeneration of male friendship and brotherhood.

    4) Better fathering which makes White sons confident with women. This is a slower prospect. Where that’s not done yet, good mentoring by men who can help others have the male authority you describe.

    5) More outspokenness and developing the message of “race-mixing’s really not that cool. (This will not be as hard as it seems. We just need to get doing it.) Plus a conscious, explicit value against it and for White marriage instead.

    6) Polemics deconstructing feminism, but more sophisticated than the approach you just took, and taking on board (into the development of that polemic) White women who are already anti-feminist.

    7) Manliness as you describe, but manliness that is calm and strong through being backed up by moral and spiritual regeneration (#1 above) and male fellowship for the naturally required Beatles Effect (#3 above). The solitary husband, disconnected from the strength and softening effects of communities such as church or other brotherhoods, will not succeed in a mere masculine domination of today’s women for very long. She needs a lot more going on (such as listed) in order to accept this and thrive with it. However, on the sheer intrapersonal level, yes, “male authority” is a very important thing for men to “have” and master. And this is the place where I agree with you.

    But there is much more needed than that. Successful marriage requires other buttresses and supports — a whole racial and and spiritual ecology — that we have been losing.

    At this fast-moving time, women most need:

    1) A de-coolification of race-mixing. This will easily raise nagging doubts.

    2) Seeing White males in agreement and various levels of real community.

    Those should be the priorities right now. For the interpersonal requirements you mention, men need mentoring for that, and they usually get that from their dad. It’s going to take longer to get a generation of strong men who never give up their male authority with their women, and even the best of those will need a supportive environment.

  28. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    August 25, 2011 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    To HP:
    Great comment. I’d never even heard of Edgar Steele till now. So your writing has achieved something, after all.

  29. john sumner's Gravatar john sumner
    August 25, 2011 - 8:25 pm | Permalink

    @Aprilia: Aprilia, I believe you are being disingenuous. Of course, I could be wrong.

    I responded to Bear’s comment because it is one of the very few I have yet to come across that expressed any kind of strong ambivalence about, let alone rejection of, the nasty and blatantly unreasonable and hateful views about females being voiced here. I was not responding to WG’s comment, let alone accusing him of anything.

    Even though I see quite clearly the harmful, irrational and ridiculous excesses of “feminism,” I do not exactly have an overflowing amount of sympathy for white males who complain about the supposed deformities of white women.

    I have lived for significant periods of time in three different overwhelmingly white and rural areas that were struggling economically. Of course, because of the lack of good opportunities, financial strain, and America’s abysmal educational system and social safety net, as well as its shameless “anti-culture” culture, there was much dysfunction and family breakdown to be seen.

    I can write you honestly, without any hesitation, that when those kind of breakdowns happened, almost inevitably, it was the mother or the oldest daughter to step up to the plate and take responsiblilty. While the men were getting drunk, impregnating other unfortunate women, getting fat, watching porn, following NASCAR, getting thrown in jail for violent offenses, or taking meth with their buddies so that they could beat the crap out of each other while listening to thug rap (I am not kidding– that was a pastime), the mother or eldest daughter would be trying her damnedest, holding a job, looking for work, going to school, making sure family members were fed, and so forth. There was absolutely nothing preventing the males from doing the same.

    I agree with you that we could use a little humility and shame. In my own experience, white American males are in more need of that than white American females.

  30. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    August 25, 2011 - 7:34 pm | Permalink


    You are right, but only to a degree. It is true that the average woman has a few less IQ points than men, but only a few. And what about the men (formerly in power), that allowed this to happen? and what about the males that grovel after the women you mention? The fact is MOST people are stupid. as some commedian once observed “The average person is stupid…but half of them are even stupider”
    Also; I don’t consider the professional prostitutes (in essence) you mention as real women, but rather a purely artificial creation of a degenerate society, a creature devoid of any feeling or loyalty to others, who would abandon their black children as soon as they went out of fashion and get a dog, bird, or whatever would get them more face time to maintain their sociopathic egos

  31. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 25, 2011 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

    @Henry Baxley:

    Oh, so it’s all an act? Come on. How many stupid white women buy into Jewish feminist nonsense? Nonsense that pits them against white men who have nothing but nobe intentions towards them? Most women are stupid, it’s that simple. It’s proven literally every minute of every day. Look at Heidi Klum miscegenating with a Congoid. Look at Kim Kardashian nailing every NBA purse snatcher she can come across. Look at all the actresses collecting African babies. Jewish propaganda is aimed explicitly at white women because they know how weak women- especially white women- are. It also helps that Jews themselves have very feminine mindsets (predilection towards subversion, deception, and coercion as opposed honesty, forthcoming, and direct confrontation), which makes them all the more potent against white women. Tell me I’m wrong.

  32. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    August 25, 2011 - 6:40 pm | Permalink


    LOL. So it would seem. The fact is they (real women) are genetically wired to APPEAR dumb, gullible, and easily manipulated…it seems to have worked well on you.

  33. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    August 25, 2011 - 6:27 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:
    Well put F. R. But you forgot to mention the… psychological…
    aspect of marrying or these days “hooking up” (having sex) with someone so different from your people as to be totally opposite, in color at least.
    Why would a person do that?? Given that the institution of marriage has historically been a contract between not just the two people involved directly, but their families, the (racial, religious) communitiy and God (Nature)
    I offer this explanation:
    Fifty years ago (most) white women that “went with” black men did it to rebel against a government (their fathers) that had abandoned them to “equality”….fyi. instinctually, women don’t want to be free, they want to be loved, possesed, and protected…
    Nowadays, unfortunatly they do it as a matter of course, because its both popular and accepted (legal)
    But make no mistake (most) of them still see it as a symbolic rejection of males in general who they (correctly) assume have rejected them, again symbolically. long story short, genetic treason has its roots in emotional, spiritual, psychological treason, and is an indirect…and direct… result of so called “equality”
    The fastest way to destroy a budding relationship is to tell a woman she is free to date other men because thats just what she will do…and who can blame her?
    Don’t get me wrong, I strongly support women having full power to choose and associate with any other WOMAN they choose! Govern themselves as they wish, etc. But when it comes to the world of men they should have power only over their sons. in this indirect way, they have ruled the world until “equality” came along and they traded the breast for the bottle, and nursing/nurturing was replaced with daycare, and they were forced/enticed by Big Brother to compete AGAINST men in the work place instead of WITH men in the home.

  34. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 25, 2011 - 6:10 pm | Permalink

    By the way, Sex and the City wasn’t Jewish created. It was based on a book about the exploits of some slut named Candace Bushnell.

  35. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 25, 2011 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    Some of you need to stop engaging in fantasies about the nature of white women. Most of them are dumb, gullible, and easily manipulated…like most women of any race. Our women aren’t special; if they were they wouldn’t be flocking to black and Jewish men the way they do. Before 30 they want alpha male (blacks), after 30 they want financially successful beta males (Jews) to raise their kids. If white men want to regain control over their women then they need to dominate them and tell them what’s what…and stop acting like Edward Cullen and all the other phony fairies Hollywood promotes.

  36. August 25, 2011 - 5:29 pm | Permalink


    “Only White male sluthood gave White women permission and example toward sluttery.”

  37. August 25, 2011 - 5:28 pm | Permalink

    “but that doesn’t mean that society shouldn’t do some things to keep them more under control than they are currently.

    That starts and ends with the men. Just as women in my town now ride skateboards and put African plugs into their earlobes (to destroy their beauty), women follow their men morally. Every White Snut will produce 100 White Sluts. Only White male sluthood have White women permission and example toward sluttery.

    Of course, whoring manuals like the Jewish-created Cosmo Magazine and the Jewish-created slutfest “Sex and the City” do their damage. Still, without the lynchpin of the male example, they could have no resistance to Jewish demoralization propaganda. Not a hope or prayer.

  38. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    August 25, 2011 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

    I agree, The history of the so called “civil rights” movement can not be separated from womens independace. Without which, it would have been impossible. I have traced their influence in racial matters all the way from the civil war to the present day.
    The best selling book “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” which was probably the first anti-white male book ever written. Was scribbled out by a closet lesbian preachers daughter who had never even visited the south. And so it continues, with bleeding heart women being instigated by hard-core, lesbians who serve as unwitting (and often witting) tools of Big Brother and the Jews.
    It’s really quite simple, once you are persuaded that “equality” of women is natural and healthy, you have both implicitly and explicitly endorsed racial equality for the same idiotic reasons. ie. “We’re all the same!” “We all put our pants on one leg at a time!” blah blah blah!

  39. Aprilia's Gravatar Aprilia
    August 25, 2011 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    @john sumner:

    Bear, thank you for the sanity. I do not like being told that our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives, friends, coworkers and girlfriends are naturally stupid, untrustworthy, anti-white and prone to losing control of their sexual urges.

    Bear was responding to a comment by WG, and WG’s comment did not contain such assertions:

    White women love this kind of movie. In fact White women are probably among its biggest audience.

    White women, in large part, are the problem.

    I’ve already had ‘discussions’ with the White women closest to me and they stubbornly plan to see this film. Even when I warned them about its ugly anti-White subtext.

    Obviously the comment contains generalizations, but made no claims as to the inherent qualities or sexual probity of White women.

    The comment did imply that White women are stupid to like movies like The Help so much, and it’s true in a real sense that they are at the very least sadly misguided to like a movie like that.

    A lot of White men also like the movie, but my strong impression is that it’s not nearly as often as White women like it.

    Maybe men are just more naturally territorial toward other races than women are, on average, and this stops even most of the all too brainwashed White American men of today from enjoying the perverse spectacle of watching a White person fed shit by a Black person.

    I wish for them a Germanic world, not one that resembles Somalia nor some Orthodox Rabbi’s sick fantasies, thank you very much.

    I have little reason to think WG supports either Islam or Judaism.

    I certainly hope you don’t have to support taking patriarchy that far to see that things have gone too far in an anti-patriarchal direction in America.

    European derived Women overwhelmingly are not depraved beasts with nearly uncontrollable sexual appetites, but that doesn’t mean that society shouldn’t do some things to keep them more under control than they are currently.

    What ever happened to shame?

    1950’s America didn’t have women stoned for adultery or anything like that, but there was still enough social stigma put on young ladies who comported themselves in ways dangerous to society and/or the next generation that women did a much better job of behaving than they do now.

    Also when divorce was shameful, women didn’t go all over the place divorcing their husbands like they do now (which of course has the effect of weakening marriage).

  40. August 25, 2011 - 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Realize the Jews have also arrogated for themselves the right to instruct Whites about their religions, and to tell them the history of their religious culture.

    Predictably, White European religious history and culture come out looking repellent, even absurd, and young Whites increasingly have absurd views about Christianity, mostly negative.

    If a cameraman on a boom had only glided over 1 percent of Christian churches each Sunday the past 100 years, filming the White peoples singing their hymns — young Whites would have a profound spiritual conflict and cognitive dissonance. Those pictures alone would finally give them proper information, completely upset their current Jew-fed ideas about what Christianity has been.

    (“Wow. Look. My White European people. They used to gather every week in one place and pay homage to a divine idea. Families. Grandmothers and grandfathers. They were a community. They look so happy. What a beautiful place. I can’t even recall singing one song with friends and all knowing the same lyrics. I wish I could have been there.”)

    Each people is the proper mastery of its own history and its own self-image. And truly, 99 percent of the content — of what Christian culture actually was, and antebellum Southern culture too — is absented from the narrative by our Jewish storytellers. Only negative is outlined and propounded.

    This is treachery, is unnatural, and they need to be thoroughly rebuked and reviled for their decades-spun attack.

  41. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 25, 2011 - 2:24 pm | Permalink


    Also race mixing is good for you white nationalists.You want to preserve your own race,well if you mix with others more people will have parts of your white genes and that would be smart way of protecting white genes in the future.

    I must say your idea of a mongrel Utopia strikes me as a very odd way of racial preservation!Perhaps you cannot understand basic logic,but what you essentially are saying is: the best way to preserve the White race is to destroy it!That is called a logical contradiction.Racial preservation is not about preservation of scatterd genes,it is about the preservation of individuals with a combination of certain unique genetic characteristics. Since individuals are mortal they must procreate with other individuals of the same genetic characteristics as themselves in order to preserve those characteristics in their progeny.This practized on a group level is racial preservation.Race mixing leads to the destruction of the unique combination of genetic characteristics which we call race.Race is a holistic concept.You might succeed in preserving the gene(s) for blue eyes by mixing a Nordic with a Negro but that blue eyed Mulatto is no more a Nordic (nor a Negro).Is that so difficult to understand?

  42. August 25, 2011 - 2:21 pm | Permalink

    Great post HP!

    On the subject of this movie, it all comes down to this:

    — It’s absurd to have an alien people that hates you act as your storyteller.

    — It’s absurd to let an alien people (who hate you) provide you with your self-image.

    — It’s absurd to let an alien people provide your understanding of your own past.

    The proper storytellers for any people are that people’s own sages, mystics, poets, priests, grandfathers/mothers, mothers/fathers, and that peoples assorted teachers. Not an alien people (such as the Jews) that hates you.

    We don’t provide to Jews their historical narrative or self-identity. Why should we allow them to usurp this position among us? So the problem is all rather obvious. Remove the Jews from any story-telling position in White nations, one way or another. Even if just by massive wakeup, massive boycott, and massive condemnation and vilification of their opportunistic and hateful utilization of their money-bought storyteller’s position among us. Soon Whites will wake up to this simple, obvious fact and recoil from their works with properly directed anger and disgust.

  43. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    August 25, 2011 - 2:10 pm | Permalink


    You understand nothing at all about genetics, do you. I suggest you study a bit and enlighten yourself with facts before you try to enlighten us with mythical nonsense. I’ll give you a clue: under most circumstances a genetically mixed organism is inferior.

  44. Whites Unite's Gravatar Whites Unite
    August 25, 2011 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

    I’ve said it before, and I will say it again:

    Cancell your cable subscription and stop going to the movies.

    Stop making these bastards rich.

  45. Christian's Gravatar Christian
    August 25, 2011 - 12:35 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    If I was a typical white liberal, why would I read articles from this site? I’m rather a conservative. I may not be a racial minded conservative, but a conservative with some grudges against the mainstream conservative community. I’m not positive to uncontrolled massive immigration or to illegal immigration. I do not like that western or specific European values and ideas are replaces with cultural relativism or multiculturalism. If Europe and America had a responsible policy for immigration and actually worked for assimilation of immigrants (including Jews) – we would not have this massive problems we have now. Assimilation means not only cultural but also genetically assimilation. What is important is that the immigrants cannot be so many so we assimilate in their culture, changing the meaning of being German, Swedish, Spanish or British.

    Think about this. For the moment is 13 percent of the American population black. If you had mixed with the African Americans from the beginning, many of them would be of mixed heritage. Some of you speak of IQ as something biological and important for building good societies. Well, if these Africans were mixed up with whites and Asians they would have higher IQ:s. Also race mixing is good for you white nationalists. You want to preserve your own race, well if you mix with others more people will have parts of your white genes and that would be smart way of protecting white genes in the future. By the way – I think mulatto kids are kind of sweet. ;)

  46. Christian's Gravatar Christian
    August 25, 2011 - 12:13 pm | Permalink


    I’m not a black woman.

  47. john sumner's Gravatar john sumner
    August 25, 2011 - 11:24 am | Permalink

    @Bear: Bear, thank you for the sanity. I do not like being told that our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives, friends, coworkers and girlfriends are naturally stupid, untrustworthy, anti-white and prone to losing control of their sexual urges. I wish for them a Germanic world, not one that resembles Somalia nor some Orthodox Rabbi’s sick fantasies, thank you very much.

  48. Henry Baxley's Gravatar Henry Baxley
    August 25, 2011 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    @Freedom Fighter:

    If only it were that simple. Unfortunately there are other things going on (along with) Jewish influence, like Mass Hysteria;
    Everyone goes along with what they THINK the majority is doing, feeling, etc. Thus, forming a mob. (Salem Witch Trials, etc.) Or Stokholm Syndrome;
    A captive and helpless person, or in this case a whole people, take on or adopt the point of view of those in power as an Ego-Defense Mechanism. Thus, if those in power (women, negros, and Jews) hate whites, (males especially) I better at least pretend to hate them too.
    Then there is the Hierarchal Imperitive;
    Equality doesn’t exist in nature, somebody is always in charge (boss) of somebody else…The instinctual need to know who is in charge is GREATER than the need to actually be in charge, this is why the minute that Blacks no longer KNEW their place…they took ours.
    The point is there is no such thing as equality, just relative states of power. White (working) men today are powerless, they were out-voted by the Jew-led idiot vote in the 20s to give their power to women, and then again in the sixties to give their power to blacks. So……..
    “How’s that Democracy workin for ya!”

  49. Bohemainh's Gravatar Bohemainh
    August 25, 2011 - 10:32 am | Permalink

    First, stop bitching about Jewish domination of movie production. Let’s make our own. Independent films, low budget; Disney started with some rather low tech films and equipt. compared what is available to us today?

    The magical negro theme, and feminist sister cool whitey it’s overplayed.

    Have a Great Day!

  50. Freedom Fighter's Gravatar Freedom Fighter
    August 25, 2011 - 9:14 am | Permalink

    ” While attending this movie I noticed that the audience was an equal mixture of whites and Blacks, and both groups howled with equal delight as the white characters in the film were ritually humiliated and degraded. I wondered to myself what the response would have been if a white character had made feces pie and served it to an unwitting, credulous Black character? Somehow, I think the audience response would have been different. ”

    This is a good paragraph , but I think the underlying driving paradigm is ‘the victum’ is sacrosanct . Maybe even the HolloWood conditioning is is creating a weird psyco transactional state where the Liberal white viewer assumes vicarious punishment as a guilt debt of brainwashing .Perhaps even wishing that they also could become victims and therefore ‘Sacrosanct’– The Illusion of Propaganda –As we see with the destruction of the ‘Evil Dictators’ in the MEast .
    How ever its twisted , Jewish HolloWood has created for themselves a open season on the European People . And this unfortunately is the NWO they are building–a world of endless ethnic conflict along the lines of 1984 or The Protocols .

  51. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    August 25, 2011 - 8:40 am | Permalink

    @Christian: Yeah, Christian, you live in Europe where multiculturism is celebrated – and your streets are increasingly on fire. Better wake up to reality!

  52. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    August 25, 2011 - 8:31 am | Permalink

    @Hengist: Yes, it tells you what a sick, vicious, obscene bunch of vengeful savages they really are.
    If we want to know what the RAW JEW Jew really is, we have to look no fartherthan their totally unfeeling and insensitive brutality to the Palestinians under their control. They glory not only in killing and maiming Palestinians but in beating and humiliating Palestinian men in the presence of their families. And this is precisely what they did as communists against the Ukranians, et al. in the USSR, and what they would do to Whites in the U.S. if, and when, they can get away with it.

  53. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    August 25, 2011 - 8:27 am | Permalink

    The power of white nationalism is that it forward looking and considers the larger picture. Environmentalism can be utilized by white nationalism to further its goals as many environmentalists are disillusioned with both the Republican and Democratic parties. If global warming is true, and the scientific consensus states that it is, then it is possible that refugees fleeing from flooded coasts and desertification will add to the growing multicultural problems in the United States. Mass immigration can be viewed as increasing emissions and suburban sprawl, and multiculturalism can be seen as divisive and leading an inability to protect our natural resources. One the other side of the coin since many environmental issues are international in scope they require international cooperation and governance. Unfortunately this can be viewed as an anathema to nationalism and sovereign rights. These are complex issues that deserve closer scrutiny.

  54. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 25, 2011 - 7:10 am | Permalink


    Christian is most likely a black woman…

    No,he rather sounds like a typical liberal with a preference for individualism.
    His give away for liberalism is:

    The problem is not really liberalism.The problem is such large amount of people with power do not defend liberalism.

    And his give away for individualism is:

    As long as individual freedoms are protected,I’m okay with cosmopolitanism.

    He sounds like a typical intellectual White liberal individualist( who doesn’t mind miscegenation),in short: he is the main problem!

  55. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    August 25, 2011 - 6:55 am | Permalink

    To D. Converse:
    Great comment.

  56. Tatt's Gravatar Tatt
    August 25, 2011 - 5:51 am | Permalink

    Christian is most likely a black woman…the giveaway is the “I have no problem with interracial marriage in a Christian setting” part.

    My apologies for being so mean, but truth is truth.

  57. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    August 25, 2011 - 4:25 am | Permalink

    You wrote:
    “I think the values celebrated in the book and the movie is good. The message is that you can create communities beyond race. Then you can of course discuss the validity of such arguments, both normatively and in terms of the social reality, but the fact remains – the values passed are not bad values. “

    You show an abillity to think independantly and analyse, which can be a bad thing from our point of view.

    Of course you are making a ‘value judgement’ that the values being passed on are not bad values. These ‘values’ however have been the prevailing hegemony for decades and yet the results are indeed very bad for Whites, so how can the values be good if they produce bad results? The reason they are bad for Whites is most certainly that the values not not grounded in biological racial realities but in agenda driven assumptions. (Alternative non biological explanations are pretty much exhausted by now, don’t you think?).

    The presence of a significant Black community does nothing but drain a White community of resources as it struggles to compensate cognitive inequality, and subjects it to heightened crime. I can’t think of a single good thing of note: even the music and dance is dubious and certainly excessive. I don’t have animous to Blacks but its clear that their predicament is incorrectly blamed upon Whites as a way to damage White society.

    The ‘propaganda’ in such films is subtle: it is not only negative in the form of way way too many incongenial White stereotypes but positive in promotion as heroic of a certain kind of “White”: who is or becomes some kind of righeous, libertarian/nihilist who has a certain charm, certain admirable characteristics in a racially self destructive philosemitically idealised kind of way.

    One of the most hideous examples being from “The Constant Gardener” Here is a Dr MacDonald review:


    “Although Tessa gets married to the White diplomat, her heart is in all things African. We see her flirting with an African doctor, openly consorting with him at a high-level cocktail party, then opting to have his baby in a hospital swarming with poor Africans, except for the White nurses and doctors. The birth of the baby happens as though it is part of the natural order of things—the husband is just fine with it, acting as if there’s nothing to notice, while the father of the baby looks on proudly. Tessa’s only thought is to help the poor African girl in the next room.”

    These are not positive affirming messages, we are being starved of such neccesary messages and they are being replaced by subversive ones.

    It is malevolence.

  58. HP's Gravatar HP
    August 25, 2011 - 2:34 am | Permalink

    Once again, I must agree with Mr. Lee. I was born in 1954 and raised on a tobacco farm in rural North Carolina, and those of you born from the 60s on have no real idea what life was like back then. For one thing, we didn’t fear for our lives every time we saw a few blacks hanging around together. There was a pervasive sense among whites that blacks were inferior, but I never perceived this as “hate,” just as a recognition of reality. We hardly ever locked our doors, left our tools stored in an open barn with little fear of having them stolen — it was a vastly more CIVILIZED world; in fact, compared to the era of my childhood, the world as it currently exists is anything but “civilized.”

    Lynchings are always brought up when somebody of my generation says something like this. I don’t think there was ever a lynching anywhere near where I lived, ever. And statistically, the percentage of blacks lynched in the Evil Days of White Southern Oppression is, like the percentage of white-on-black rape in modern America, practically nonexistent compared with current levels of violent black-on-white crime. I have read estimates based on FBI statistics of between 60 to 100 white women raped every day, on average, annually in modern America. THIS is an “improvement,” and “progress,” over the Evil Days of White Supremacism?

    And as a young man back in my 20s and 30s, I was all for the Negroes having their “rights,” in judging people “as individuals,” not by their race, etc.; on a personal level, I still do this — I have a black auto mechanic who’s the best mechanic I’ve ever had, and I surely don’t wish the man any harm because he is of a different sub-species of the human animal from me. But as a mater of public and social political policy in a bi- (or multi-) racial society, it is suicide. For it is all very nice on an individual level; but on a group level, your skin is your uniform, and you can’t take it off and declare yourself neutral. As Jeff Cooper used to say, “Don’t worry about which side you’ll be on in a race war, because the other side will let you know.”

    And there is too the overall recognition that, as a race, a sub-species, blacks are, on average, inferior to whites. If we hare to have this “multi-racial” society, one race MUST dominate. And it is a cold, sober but nonetheless true fact that, as a friend of mine once put it, “We could give the blacks everything we own, and make ourselves their slaves, and in ten years it would still be like the Central African Republic.”

    The 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Immigration Act were essentially the official notices of whites relinquishing their dominance over America, and the country has gone steadily downhill ever since — nor is it alone; Europe has suffered the same fate. That the Jews are the prime movers of this zeitgeist is indisputable; and for reasons I honestly don’t fathom, Jews regard white Southerners like myself as just above the Nazi Germans on their own sliding scale of humanity. I learned this from Jews themselves; and it perplexes me still, because growing up, all I ever knew or heard about the Jews was in connection with their being the people of the Bible. Yet Southern Jews seem to think of they’re surrounded by a group of potential goose-steppers who are inbred cretins to boot. (James Dickey’s “Deliverance” is another classic example of a Southern white author gaining recognition by writing a book that spits on his heritage.) And in its perverse way, it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy for the Jews. I once lived for more years than I care to admit with a Jewish graduate of Duke University who continuously expressed amazement at my intellect, despite the fact that I had been tested at age 12 at his alma mater and found to have a genius-level IQ, and had the papers to prove it. Whenever I quoted Shakespeare with that “redneck twang,” as he put it, it was as if I were an ape who suddenly began to discourse on quantum theory or something.

    That was when I learned two things: One, the Jews are THE most truly racist people in the world, next to which the most bigoted old-time Southern redneck is merely a piker; and it’s a large part of the “secret” of their success. And two, that poor old Edgar Steele was right: “Anti-Semitism is a disease; you catch it from Jews.”

    What has been done to Edgar Steele ought to shame every TRUE white man in existence. But whites have traded their ancient Aryan shame for a ruinous Semitic Christian “guilt,” so nothing shames them nowadays.

    Words won’t get us out of this, people. Religions and ideals and all the rest won’t, either. A FIGHT is coming, and a particularly bloody and brutal one for the very survival of our race and for the future of the human race itself; for without whites, there might as well be no future for the human species. Which is why I don’t really like to waste my time making comments in the Internet. Forgive these recent exceptions to that rule.

  59. August 25, 2011 - 2:03 am | Permalink

    “But this could also be, in part, backlash for Internet candor on the subject of Judaism.”

    I think you may be right. They are seeing it. All Jews have to be seeing it. While they have their power they are ratcheting up an anti-White message pretty damned fast now, aren’t they? Going for broke. Getting real in the face with it. They likely view it as a death struggle.

  60. August 25, 2011 - 1:19 am | Permalink

    “I enjoyed both the book and the movie. It’s no secret that blacks have historically been treated very badly by whites in the United States.”

    I would suggest you may be over-influenced by continuous one-sided propaganda going back prior to 1950 designed to make White treatment of Blacks look much worse than it was on the whole. You probably think Catholic priests are all perverts, and other such things.

    Most White slave owners, except maybe some of the worse Jewish slavemasters, were not uncharitable to their slaves. To be enslaved by Whites in America was sublime luck and high living compared to living out a short, brutal life as a slave of a competing tribe back in Africa. Slavery got started when Jewish and White travelers encountered Africans enslaved by other Africans and bought a few. The African slavemasters were far more inhuman and far less charitable and conscience-smitten than the cultured and Christian Whites of the South, you can have no doubt.

  61. Danning Converse's Gravatar Danning Converse
    August 25, 2011 - 1:08 am | Permalink

    Anything Jewish bespeaks tastelessness and vulgarity. It’s endemic, like penny-licking, sexless men, and brain fever.

    But isn’t one a glutton for punishment when he traffics these cinematic sideshows, knowing what to expect? Boycott them, and boot the JudeTubes out of your houses, too. You’re not talking Yiddish ’til you start talking purse.

    Rampant scorn of Whites reflects multiculturalism, no doubt. But this could also be, in part, backlash for Internet candor on the subject of Judaism. There’s been a flood of it – I’m happy to say – and it’s rising every day. This is a level of exposure they’ve never had to deal with before. Their secrets are out!

    In considering why Jews are as they are one might remember how radically different their upbringing is from that of Gentiles. Jews do not marry for love but rather as a business contract – that is to say, material betterment. Recreational sex is spurned. A child is born lovelessly, so to speak, and for this reason, we note, is often simply termed, “the kid.” Conceived without love, indoctrinated with hatred and hostility, programmed like robots, Jewish young are killers waiting to happen – clones of psychopaths who have been assembly-line produced for thousands of years. Not permitted to assimilate, strangers to love, tortured by diet, what’s to do but wank the mind? This is what we call brain fever, and why the world is in the shape it’s in.

    A Jew has nothing to teach anyone – except as a reverse template. This was the meaning of the Christ. He was the world’s first dedicated Jew-Knocker. Both in word and in action, Christ was the antithesis of all that we know as Jew.

    Some raise eyebrows at this, insisting, “Christ, himself, was a Jew.” But, no. The term “Jew” was coined by William Sheridan in 1775 for his play “The Rivals.” It is a reference to the Judeans, or folks from the Kingdom of Judah. Christ’s lineage was of the north, the Kingdom of Israel. His was the heritage of the Israelites, who never forsook the Torah, the Bible.

    After King Rehoboam came to power, the ten northern tribes seceded, c. 930 BC. They were unwilling to accept Rehoboam’s exorbitant taxation, and formed a separate kingdom called the Kingdom of Israel. King Rehoboam was left with the smaller, southern section, which became designated as the Kingdom of Judah, and included the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.

    With time, Judeans developed the Talmud, a lengthy series of Rabbinical comments, and prioritized this above the Torah. In contrast, the Kingdom of Israel remained loyal to the Torah. Their Kingdom was invaded by the Assyrians in 720 BC, and the Israelites were scattered to the four winds, fabled now as the “ten lost tribes.”

    In 586 BC the Kingdom of Judah fell to Babylonian forces, and its people were driven to Babylon in bondage. During this captivity the Talmud sprang into being. Anyone known today as a Jew has his origin in the Kingdom of Judah. He is a Talmudist.

    Biblically, we meet Christ at a point when Judeans have experienced a long history of misadventure. Following their captivity and return to Jerusalem in 538 BC, they were sacked again by Alexander the Great in 333 BC, and once again by the Seleucids in 198 BC, finally to be slipped without trauma under the protectorate of Rome in 19 BC.

    During Christ’s ministry it was the Judeans – the Talmudists – whom he denounced for hypocrisy, greed and self-righteousness. He derided them for davening on street corners. They still do it in Trenton, N.J. He derided them because he was not one of them. He was milk of the true faith – an Israelite. Christ’s entire ministry was a broadside against Jews. He swept away their five-hundred Rabbinical laws and replaced them with one simple commandment – the law of Love. The spume of their lies, theft, and butchery collapsed at the breath of his words. Such men no longer worshiped God; they postured before a clerical construct – the Rabbinate. These thinly veiled apostates worshiped the Talmud – and do to this day.

    Incidently, uring its long history, Jerusalem has been destroyed twice, besieged 23 times, attacked 52 times, and captured and recaptured 44 times. Good material for a script.

  62. Richard IV's Gravatar Richard IV
    August 24, 2011 - 11:40 pm | Permalink

    @Iranian for Aryans:

    I agree. When are we going to start making our own movies? It has never been easier to make movies and we have a lot of intellectuals that can string words together and script writing for these people would be a no brainer.

    The movies don’t have to be fancy, they just have to be well written and intelligent and they could be filmed using the Guerrilla filmmaking method – low budgets, skeleton crews, and simple props.

    I did a search on pro white movies and got zero results. So where is the pro white narrative?

  63. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    August 24, 2011 - 11:07 pm | Permalink

    This movie is one I’d avoid instinctively merely – boring topic. But it’s great to have regular dissections of the propaganda vehicles. I learn something tactical every time, even if I never attend a viewing.

  64. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    August 24, 2011 - 10:34 pm | Permalink

    Remember, part of the ‘wedge tactics’ of cultural Marxism is to split White men from White women by cultivating resentments. Minorities, homosexuals we can cope with. However the loss of women the White race can’t tollerate.

    We should NEVER be anything but respectfull and welcoming to women, to not do so is to fall for the trap. White Women have been misused as prime propaganda target, we need to win the back on to our side we can not do that by being reactive and angry thereby fullfilling the stereotype. White women are ultimatly more of a victim than White men. (An area that needs some research). My motto is anti woman is anti-white.

  65. Lookaroundu's Gravatar Lookaroundu
    August 24, 2011 - 10:12 pm | Permalink

    Whiteawake, you hit the nail on the head. If a majority, or even a sizable plurality of Europeans think as Christian does, it’s no wonder the place is going to hell in a handbasket. On another note, Hollywood’s movies and TV shows aren’t worth the time or money to see them. Like Pierre de Craon, Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ” was the last time I was in a theatre. Remember how the Jewish-leftist media treated Mel after he spoke the unwelcome truth during that famous traffic stop? Finally, as for fecal matter in food: is that kosher?

  66. icr's Gravatar icr
    August 24, 2011 - 9:08 pm | Permalink

    The problem is not really liberalism. The problem is such a large amount of people with power do not defend liberalism. Instead of taking a strong position of what is good and come in defense of individual rights and obligations, these multiculturalists promote the opposite ideology. An ideology in which ethnic minorities learn to hate the white majority and were rights and duties shall be based on what color or religion you have.

    This system you describe is a US import. Moldbug (Zionist, Jewish) explains:

    First, I believe anti-Americanism is best described as an epiphenomenon of Universalism. The single most significant fact about the world today is that sixty-two years ago it was conquered by a military alliance whose leader was the United States, and whose creed of battle was this nontheistic adaptation of New England mainline Protestantism. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the European ruling class holds essentially the same perspectives that were held at Harvard in 1945. The US Army did not shoot all the professors in Europe and replace them with Yankee carpetbaggers, but the prestige of conquest is such that it might as well have.

    It makes sense to view anti-Americanism as a postwar phenomenon, because it’s hard to find anything in Europe’s prewar political scene that corresponds to it. Before WWII, a European who found American influences pernicious was most likely a man of the Right, generally either an anti-Wilsonian aristocrat or a Bonapartist nationalist demagogue. After the war, and especially since the rise of the postwar-educated generation of 1968, European anti-Americanism has been overwhelmingly on the Left. Considering the animosity between these factions, it’s hard to find any continuity between them.

    For a book-length treatment see the book by conservative (Zionist, Jewish) Prof. Paul Gottfried:

  67. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    August 24, 2011 - 8:49 pm | Permalink

    In my opinion your self-description just described the core of the problem. Why are you here?

  68. Christian's Gravatar Christian
    August 24, 2011 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

    I enjoyed both the book and the movie. It’s no secret that blacks have historically been treated very badly by whites in the United States. I actually think the film provides a sympathetic image of white.

    The black housekeeper Minnie white employer (Celia Foote) was very kind to her and at the end of the film they become friends. Minnie is initially very suspicious of Celia’s friendship but towards the end they all end up like friends. Also, we find that Foots husband is very carrying and good person.

    The only white person described as unsympathetic in the film is Hilly Holbrook who has Aibileen Clark as a housekeeper. Clark is in turn a good friend and “nanny” to Holbrooks children. Hilly Holbrook is not very well liked. She is rather feared by her community. This cake filled with feces is actually sanctioned by Hilly Holbrooks mother, because has put her in a retirement home, not by Aibileen Clark.

    I think the values celebrated in the book and the movie is good. The message is that you can create communities beyond race. Then you can of course discuss the validity of such arguments, both normatively and in terms of the social reality, but the fact remains – the values passed are not bad values.

    What one should criticize is all these American sitcoms that are broadcasted all over the world. I find Sex and the City to be a rather nasty TV-series that celebrates materialism and shallow upper middle class ideas. In particular, I find everything with Ben Stiller, Adam Sandler, Sacha Baron Cohen, Jennifer Aniston, Jason Bateman etc in it to be rather terrible when it comes to promote good values.

    I also do not appreciate what Quentin Tarantino produced. In particular, I had a bad aftertaste of Inglorious Bastards, which praised the murder in dehumanized manner. I do not understand the goodness of murdering people, no matter what they may have possibly done. Machete was another movie I did not like. It gave a disgusting picture of both Mexicans and white Americans and celebrated violence and even incest.

    The Film “The Help” did not bother me just as the remake of “Guess Who” did not bother me at all. But then again, I do not find interracial marriage to be something bad under a Christian marriage.

    The problem is not really liberalism. The problem is such a large amount of people with power do not defend liberalism. Instead of taking a strong position of what is good and come in defense of individual rights and obligations, these multiculturalists promote the opposite ideology. An ideology in which ethnic minorities learn to hate the white majority and were rights and duties shall be based on what color or religion you have.

    If one is to uncover Hollywood, one should reveal their non-liberal side. That they do not care about black, white or for that matter, Jews as individuals, but they are fixated on identity politics.

    As long as individual freedoms are protected, I’m okay with cosmopolitanism – but instead cosmopolitanism is just another tool for create a fragmented society, a society which becomes more fragmented by the ideology of reinforced segregation.

    If you oppose it and argue for assimilation or for good common values you are called racist. Now those values may be implicitly white, in the terms that white Europeans created them, but why reject something that is good?

    But then again – I live in Europe, were multiculturalism, segregation and cultural relativism is celebrated and were Natural rights in terms of individual obligations and liberties is shunted. Not even pleadable humanism for animals is now something that is granted for in my country. Instead humanism is shunted as something racist that “hurts” the poor immigrants from the third world. Funny as it is, some of the identity political groups do not want to be represented by parts of the political elites, because they transform them into victims with savage claims.

  69. Hengist's Gravatar Hengist
    August 24, 2011 - 7:44 pm | Permalink

    Yet again, we are treated to jewish scatology: the eating of fecal matter, depicted as humour and righteous revenge. This tells us a lot about jewish psychology.

  70. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    August 24, 2011 - 6:40 pm | Permalink

    Grisham is high up on my most despised list, though I’ve never read one of his books. I did start one once but didn’t get more than 75 or so pages before the puke factor shut it down.

  71. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 24, 2011 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    HP wrote “; and there is no easier way for a Southern writer to gain acceptance in NY/CA film and literary circles than to write a book that spits on his or her racial and cultural heritage. ”

    Ever read John grisham’s first book, “A Time to Kill” It is about 2 evil White men rape a 10 year old black girl.
    There are so few White on black rapes in this country that the FBI statistics show 0 White on black rapes. Meanwhile, there are about 35 thousand black on White rapes every year.

    I read Grisham’s “The Firm” and saw the movie. Then I read his first book about the White on black child rape
    He claims he developed the story when he was a practiing attorney and sat in a courtroom where there was a hearing about a 10 year old girl who had been raped.

    So he made it a White on black rape which is almost non existent in this country. Naturally it was accepted. The book did not do well at all. It did however get him an agent and publisher. His second book “The Firm” took off and made him one of the most popular writers in the world.

    I read a book a day. I have not seen one of Grisham’s movies nor read one of his books since I read that lying anti White piece of anti White racist garbage “A Time To Kill”.

    There is not much we can do about our situation. The one thing we can do is boycott all antii White movies, books etc. I cancelled my All State insurance policies because they have a black spokes man abotu 80 times a day on every channel.

    I don’t go to any anti White movies or watch any TV show that has blacks in it. I don’t buy products that have blacks in their advertizing.

    Every restaurant in my city is staffed by illegal hispanics. I never go out to eat. If someone asks me to dinner I tell them to buy some steaks and we’ll have dinner at my house.

    I last entered a 7-11 30 years ago because the owners are all non White foreigners who get SBA loans and tax breaks that White American cannot get from our government.

    Virtually all supermarkets and smaller food stores in my city are staffed by hispanics. I have to eat so i buy food from hispanic staffed markets.

    If I could find a small market staffed by Whites I would buy my food there. Only problem is, most White small businessmen hire only hispanics.

  72. mari's Gravatar mari
    August 24, 2011 - 5:42 pm | Permalink

    I turn off the Tv every time ads for that movie come on. Didn’t they make a similiar movie starring Sissy spacek about 30 years ago with the same White woman siding with saintly blacks against evil White men story?

    Same old same old Any day now they will create another superman Saint Sidney Poiter type to bring enlightenment to the knuckle dragging Whites.

    By the way, do you know who supported Sidney and their 4 children after his career as Saint black man ended around 1970?

    His White wife Juanita. She was an interior designer. All the California entertainment people hired her as a way to support the family. She was ok at the job. Her great strength is that she protected the privacy of the stars who hired her. They did not want pictures of their bedrooms and kids play equipment in the tabloids.

    Sidney’s career went down the tubes after 1970 because he absolutely refused to take any role except sole male star. No second male lead roles for him. Another reason was what with the civil rights laws and affirmative action and goverment encouragement of black on White crime, Saint Sidney was no longer needed for propaganda purposes

    His White wife Joanna.

  73. Anon2's Gravatar Anon2
    August 24, 2011 - 5:22 pm | Permalink

    This film description reminds me not a little bit of the film, “Fried Green Tomatoes.” Same basic theme of white women and black people, including a good and wise black man, banding together to defend themselves and defeat evil white men in the South.

    There was even a scene where blacks, with the tacit understanding of the white women, cook an evil white man they have killed and serve it on a plate to another, unwitting, evil white man, who gobbles the “food” down hungrily. Kind of like the excrement scenario described from The Help.

  74. Robin's Gravatar Robin
    August 24, 2011 - 4:53 pm | Permalink

    Brilliantly written review on the truth. I only wish this type of intelligent, insightful viewpoint would reach a mainstream audience. It’s a shame that it has to be locked away in a tiny corner of the blogosphere.

  75. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 24, 2011 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

    @HP: With a single exception (going to see The Passion of the Christ during the past decade), I can say truthfully that what you say of yourself is true of me, too. I wish to heaven that more people would or could shake themselves free of their addiction to Jewish-produced filth.

  76. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    August 24, 2011 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

    @N44x: The first photo you link to is compelling evidence that our Tribal rulers no longer think they need to act covertly in slandering and oppressing those they hate and exploit. In short, how much more overt can their hatred get?

  77. N44x's Gravatar N44x
    August 24, 2011 - 4:06 pm | Permalink

    Here you can see Ms. Stone at the premiere of her film ‘Easy A’ with an ethnic slur conveniently poised above her head. (This isn’t doctored, other pics from the event may be seen here )

  78. HP's Gravatar HP
    August 24, 2011 - 1:53 pm | Permalink

    In fact, I wonder if that pie-baking busness is even IN the novel; it smacks too much of the Jewish obsession with feces to be the work of even the most degenerate Southerner. Of course, one would have to lower one’s self and actually read the book to find out; and I for one refuse to sink that low. But I’d almost be willing to bet that this was an addition of Spielberg and his “Dreamworks” Jews.

  79. HP's Gravatar HP
    August 24, 2011 - 1:40 pm | Permalink

    It should also be noted that the authoress of this piece of garbage, one Kathryn Stockett, was born in Mississippi in 1969, far too late for her know the TRUE nature of race relations in the South pre-Snivel Rights, as Mr. Lee has pointed out. It is claimed the book was rejected by 60 literary agents before being accepted by one. I find this hard to believe, since literary agencies, like the publishing industry itself, are overwhelmingly run by Jews; and there is no easier way for a Southern writer to gain acceptance in NY/CA film and literary circles than to write a book that spits on his or her racial and cultural heritage. Or, given the kind of “pie” served in this obviously sorry waste of celluloid, perhaps I should say sh*ts on that heritage.

    I must echo other commenters: WHY waste money reinforcing Hollywood garbage? I haven’t seen a movie in a theater in 20 years now, and there’s not enough Jewish fiat money in this world to get me back into one. You don’t need that damned HD TV, either.

  80. fender's Gravatar fender
    August 24, 2011 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

    It should be mentioned that this film was adapted from a novel written by an Anglo woman from the south.

  81. Nordic's Gravatar Nordic
    August 24, 2011 - 11:55 am | Permalink


    Females generally let the males fight it out, and side with the winner. That is why many, but not all, females are so vacuous on racial matters. Not all though. Also, they will go with the ‘culture’, as will most people. So if a decent % of people wake up, the rest will follow. With all the PC crap going on, its time the youth rebelled against it, but like RAP music, rebelling against ‘white’ might be the lowest common denominator.

  82. Whiteawake's Gravatar Whiteawake
    August 24, 2011 - 9:22 am | Permalink

    My first question has to be: Why would anyone give their money to see any piece of jew garbage in the first place? Surely no one would expect anything but anti-white crap .

    Second, is it really good policy to give these POS’s more publicity?

  83. WG's Gravatar WG
    August 24, 2011 - 7:48 am | Permalink

    White women love this kind of movie. In fact White women are probably among its biggest audience.

    White women, in large part, are the problem.

    I’ve already had ‘discussions’ with the White women closest to me and they stubbornly plan to see this film. Even when I warned them about its ugly anti-White subtext.

  84. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    August 24, 2011 - 5:52 am | Permalink

    Emma Stone is a very beautiful White woman.The name “Stone” of course rings some bells,it might be a translation of “Stein” which is a German-Jewish name. As appears from the Wikipedia article on her,her Swedish paternal grandfather had his name translated on arrival in the US and there are no allusions to any Jewish ancestry in the article,so I assume she is not “of the Tribe”.

    This use of Whites to attack Whites (which is essentially what this film is about) is a typical tactic of the Jews.They not only exploit us,they even use us to attack ourselves and even let us pay for our own destruction.Beautiful White women are used in anti-White propaganda,White politicians are used to ruin their own countries and finally taxes paid by Whites are used to finance programs aimed at their own destruction.Typically Jewish.

  85. hsc's Gravatar hsc
    August 24, 2011 - 5:51 am | Permalink

    These reviews are really invaluable, are perfect for sharing, and should become a regular feature of this site. That, and a relentless focus on the machinations of that other Jewish-dominated industry so lethal to white interests: Wall Street.

  86. August 24, 2011 - 3:53 am | Permalink

    What a well-written review!

    When will WNs band together and start producing their own movies?

  87. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    August 24, 2011 - 2:29 am | Permalink

    Reality can only be manipulated so much and for so long . There will come a time when hollywood’s depiction of reality will become obvious for the politically motivated distortion
    that it is .

    Everything comes back in to balance in time . Lies can get 99.9 % of the way to becoming reality but it is that impossible .1% that will come back to swing the pendulum back with a vengeance .

    In history , the jews always over play their hand .

  88. Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
    August 24, 2011 - 1:34 am | Permalink

    Go to the jewish areas of any large northern suburb and you will see black maids waiting for buses to take them back to the ghetto. I wonder who really had it worse.

  89. August 24, 2011 - 1:31 am | Permalink

    (Sorry, please delete duplicate above.)
    Northerners, liberals, and leftists like to believe, or pretend to believe, there was much more animosity between the Southern Blacks and Whites than their really was. That’s one lie underlying this Judenfilm and others.

    They have modern Whites, especially Northern Whites, convinced blacks lived in a state of constant resentment and animosity toward whites. Such is not the case. (The same people show dismay and incredulity if you quote blacks in Zimbabwe or South Africa telling reporters they liked it better under White rule.)

    Blacks and Whites in the South developed a greater ease and familiarity with one another than in the north. Once a daughter of mine visited Wilmington, North Carolina. She was about 17. She phoned me astounded at how different the blacks were. She reported, wide-eyed, how older black women spoke with her easily, conversed, often showing obvious warmth. She was unaccustomed to in northern states.

    She remarked that some older black women, out on the sidewalk or in some public place complimented her on her looks, called her “honey” — and even touched her in a matronly or motherly way! She had never seen such ease or familiarity from blacks in the north and probably hasn’t since.

    Blacks and Whites of the South lived very intimately together, after all, for a very long time. But our handlers and propagandists want to shape and define all history for us, and especially how Blacks experienced the South. (There’s always the conundrum of the many Blacks who eagerly fought in the Civil War, not wanting to see their White communities, the families they’d relied on and become intimate with, or Southern way of life destroyed any more than the Whites did.)

    I remember one news spot a few years ago about an old black man in some state like Georgia or Alabama campaigning for the position of sheriff. As a campaign device he rode on a horse to the homes of all the constituents of the county (mostly white), and spoke to them, campaigning. They elected him.

    I heard one fellow say: “Northern Whites love the idea of black/white equality, but don’t really love Blacks, or they’re not really comfortable with them. Southern Whites dislike the idea of black/white equality. But they are comfortable with blacks, and even like them.”

    The idea of a black putting fecal matter into the food of a White is pure Jewish fantasy along this line. Really pushing the envelop of false history. It is out-of-touch with the true nature of civilized Southern Whites, and the true nature of the general black attitude toward their superiors, which was more often characterized by gratitude and respect than devious mockery much less hatred. (Even during slavery. Most slavemasters were not brutes or lacking in charitable impulses toward their slaves).

    But I guess the fantasmagorical poop-in-the-food bit not only handily betokens the “implacable black resentment” Jews want to propound, but also marks the film handily with telltale Jewish humor.

    What disgusting filth they now pump out to the public. More false reality matrix. But the both the extremity of it plus the Jewish poop humor give it away for all educated Whites.

  90. Masculinity's Gravatar Masculinity
    August 24, 2011 - 1:15 am | Permalink

    Wait….the feces in Pie thing Was Actually in the Movie???? I thought the IMDB people were just joking……

    Oh… my… word…

    Thanks for the review!

Comments are closed.