For some politically correct people, the riots in London of the last few days, which by now have spread to the rest of England, may come as a surprise. Actually, it is surprising the riots did not break out earlier, although a lot of news concerning ethnic violence is suppressed by the authorities and the media. A careful study of the newspapers and other different newsmedia shows us that the omens were there.
In 1995 the London Metropolitan Police Commissioner Paul Condon suggested that most robbers in London were Black. The 1990s were the high water mark of political correctness and multiculturalism and it is no surprise that Condon’s remarks were not met with concern, but with accusations of racism. In 1999, one year after Condon left, the Metropolitan Police was the subject of an inquiry — the Macpherson report — with the result that the Metropolitan Police was branded as ‘institutionally racist’. In other words: the police should chase anybody but Black criminals.

The police figures in 2000 showed that one quarter of people accussed of crime in Londen were Black, despite making up less than 10% of the population. It was noted by the police that Black children were six times more likely to be excluded from school and twice as likely to be unemployed as their White counterparts. Another point concerning Whites: the majority of the victims of Black crime were White. The police were also complaining they were hindered by anti-racist pressure: “This is the reality of crime as it is played out on the streets of London. Officers’ jobs have been made far more difficult than they needed to be. They are demoralised because what they have been accused of and the reality are two different things. Police are there to deal with crime; they are not interested in race.”
Despite the overwhelming evidence of Black crime as a result of immigration, it took a long time before voices in the media start to criticize the very root of the problem – multiculturalism. In 2009 Spectator-columnist Rod Liddle voiced a disgust about Black crime and its origin in Black culture, in his column “Benefits of a Multi-Cultural Britain”. It is about two ‘gangster-rappers’ who tried to kill a 15 years old pregnant girl. Liddle wrote: “It could be an anomaly, of course. But it isn’t. The overwhelming majority of street crime, knife crime, gun crime, robbery and crimes of sexual violence in London is carried out by young men from the African-Caribbean community. Of course, in return, we have rap music, goat curry and a far more vibrant and diverse understanding of cultures which were once alien to us. For which, many thanks.”
What followed was an accussation of racism. Diane Abbott, MP (Labour) for Hackney North, tried to play Black crime down by saying: “It is obviously statistically false to say that the ‘overwhelming majority’ of the crimes listed by Rod are committed by young Black men…” Happily, there were also voices in favor of Liddle, like Ed West from The Sunday Telegraph: “For many people going about their business in the city incidents of violent crime, aggression and disorder by groups of young Black men are depressingly common, and I would suggest anyone who doesn’t believe me walks around the city at four o’clock in the afternoon on a school day. It is not all one way, but there is considerably more Black-on-White crime in London and Britain generally than vice versa, and according to the Home Office the murder ratio is more than 2:1 in most years.”
If we have a closer look in the police statistics of 2010. The numbers of Blacks in London 12%, but they account for more than half of all street crimes and two third of gun crimes. Another shocking statistic is that Blacks make up one third of all sex offences. The crime rates among Black females are also disproportionately high. In other words: Blacks are more likely to be armed and dangerous than any other ethnic group. They are also more likely to target Whites. The widespread possession of guns among Blacks has led to the launch of Operation Trident by the Metropolitan Police in 2008. The shoot-out between the police and Mark Duggan at August 4, which has sparked the current riots, took place because the police wanted to arrest him as a part of Operation Trident.




Facing the Future as a Minority




(typos? – accussed, accussation)
The impunity of black criminals goes back many years, with the approval of then Home Secretary Jack Straw the MacPherson report called the police institutionally racist and many police simply decided they would ruin their career by arresting blacks. There was immediately a surge in mugging and sexual assaults. Eventually it dawned on the wider black black community that allowing black criminals to operate with impunity was leading to the black community being victimized hence Operation Trident is allowed to target blacks because it specifically deals with black on black crime. We will have a long wait for an operation to deal with black on white crime .
Nothing in this article is really surprising : The relative far greater number of Blacks in crime,the far greater number of Black-on-White crime than the reverse etc.It is the same with Blacks all over the world.The author of this article in the Spectator speaks frankly about it.But then he feels the need to make a remark that sounds very very political correct :
(bold by me) In return!So for all this crime and trouble you got some “cultural enrichement”,no?And what is that?Rap music! As if that stupid monotonous droning of aggressive texts is really a kind of music!What else?Goat curry! You really can’t make it up!Isn’t that worth all the trouble?But then having this trouble seems to be an enrichement in it self : “…and a far more vibrant and diverse understanding of cultures which were once alien to us.For which many thanks”.(bold by me) Mark the obligatory terms “vibrant” and “diverse” the two mantras of the Religion of Multiculturalism.
Well if the British authorities are really serious in solving the problem of Black crime for good,I have a proposal:
According to the statistics of 2001 (there are no more recent ones ,but you get the idea) there are following numbers of the Black groups in the UK:
Black Carribean : 565,876
Black African : 485,277
Black (other) : 97,585
together :1,148,738
Assuming that a Jumbo Jet can transport 333 persons and the flight vice versa can be completed in one day that would require 3,450 flights.If you want to finish the job in one year that would require 9,45 Jumbo Jets.Round that off upwards,then that is 10 Jumbo Jets only.Ten Jumbo Jets only! And in one year no more problemo.
Now that we are at it,we can make the flight back for those Black folks a “vibrant” experience too : allow them to rap all the time during the flight and let us serve them goatcurrytoo!Wouldn’t that be a fitting end to multicultural experience?
I cannot remember which article I read by MacDonald that stated that in psychological tests, whites had fear as an innate reaction when showed subliminal pictures of black people. I guess jews have known this for a long time. What appears missing in these observations concerning the current mob events is that they are part of a conscious strategy to psychologicly emasculate white men, and it is working. Feminist and homo groups have understood this also. So this whole black “sponteneous” problem is not just a black isolated problem only, it is all part of the larger persistent multicultural strategy. It persists so. And yes the police is being muzzled and is progessively turning anti-white male, especially that it is increasingly populated by blacks, feminists/lesbians, homos and jews. Feminist/lesbians, homos and blacks are all currentlly experiencing accelerated vertical mobility, and they therefore need to move some obstacles to their ambitions; and guess who is in the way?
In my ongoing, apparently lone campaign to get our message out I found a TIME mag site that I had a good battle with:
http://swampland.time.com/2011/08/12/what-you-missed-while-not-watching-the-iowa-gop-debate/
And started a couple threads in the ‘story ideas’ forum at Jon Stewart:
http://forums.thedailyshow.com/?page=ThreadView&thread_id=44198
And sent this comment to the PBS Ombudsman (Jewish, surprised?). You should do the same:
Probably 75% of your viewership is what we now call ‘wasps’ thanks to some liberal smear years ago. We are a commpassionate, gullible lot who have gone along with the liberal choice of programming that the mostly Jewish (let’s face it) leadership of PBS and the MSM have been giving us. What we would now like to see is something that celebrates ‘our’ MAJORITY history (basically American history not told by your usual cast who focuses on racism, antisemitism, etc.) without the 2% ethnic minority spin that is so pervasive that it’s almost normal.
We will post this request at spots online along with updates from you. Please know the ‘whole world is watching’ and we expect the same compassionate consideration you might give Democrat groups (minorities, Jews, Immigrants) you have been promoting for decades. An honest Ombudsman would understand and one that is now under online scrutiny should pretend that this is a letter from the ACLU or JDL. In other words ‘Give us back our Public Television or we will take it from you. We are the majority, and you’re all about Democracy, right?
————-
Let’s do something, shall we?
So what is it that triggers the ‘Your comment is awaiting moderation’ ? Posting links?
In WWII, for every German soldier killed by a partisan terrorist, the SS tactic would be to round up and execute several members of the civilian population they were trying to subdue. That’s downright brutal, especially since innocents of a country were being murdered by an army of invaders. In the current British case (as in larger Europe) however, there is an “army” of alien parasite races invading and infesting a European country. It is happening against the profound wishes of the indigenous population. If it comes to protecting your extended family and by extension your ancestral homeland, if it comes down to kill or be killed, what should be done? When those alien parasite races proceed with abandon to: rape, rob and murder your kin folk, to breed like rats, to pollute the culture, environment and not least the gene pool, all while a significant number of them are living off taxpayer funding, the SS solution doesn’t seem such a stretch after all.
In WWII, for every German soldier killed by a partisan terrorist, the SS tactic would be to round up and execute several members of the civilian population they were trying to subdue.
This is the tactic, in effect, that the United States applies to the people of the Middle East countries it invades, occupies, or bombs.
Downright brutal, it is.
And once again with all due respect:
Dr. M, what is the strategy behind the comment changes here? Does it help ad revenue to have to multi click? We understand if that’s it otherwise I don’t.
Good article, Mr Stuyvesant. The guy shot by the cops, Mark Duggan, which kicked off the riots, is your typical violent, drug-dealing maniac. And he seems to reflect what most Blacks aspire to be. And while the liberals will be crying over his eternal removal, me and most Brits are smiling :)
@Lookaroundu:
Where did you get this information about this brutal policy of the Germans during WW2? I am genuinely curious.
I post this here because it’s as good as any other for my message.
What if you all started posting with real names? Dr MacDonald does, albeit he is a tenured professor, but still. What would happen, do you think, if every commenter here posted with real name?
Also, don’t you find it curious that Dr MacDonald’s ‘Culture of Critique’ is available for free, as a pdf, if you know how to look, whereas other, more prominent books in unrelated areas are difficult to ‘score’ on the internet black-market?
@Anon2:
You do realize, as White Nationalists, we don’t support these interventionist, zionist tactics either, right? What’s happening in the ME at this time is the end result of neo cons taking control of US foreign policy and making decisions based solely on what they desire. The majority of US whites don’t support these wars or interventions, and if we could silence the media’s constant drum beating for wars benefiting Israel, the whites who have been fooled into supporting these wars would find that they had absolutely no reason to continue doing so.
@Anon2:
The tactic of reprisals against a whole town (eg by burning it down) began during the Franco-Prussian war. This is a war France started and was a bitter battle of survival for Prussia and the nascient unified Germany.
The French used irregular “francs trieurs” ie free-shooters or snipers that did not wear a uniform in the first half of that war. They would shoot Prussian soldiers behined the lines, some poor conscript unloading a freight waggon for instance and then made their escape by blending into the general population or would disappear into the forrest, perhaps pretending to be a hunter. It drove the Prussians crazy and probably paranoid. Needless to say fighting without a uniform is outside of the rules of war and no quarter was given to such men when caught. Punishing a whole village or town, by burning it, I believe was effective.
The Germans used the tactic again in WW1, but only towards the end of the war, well after the propaganda compaign that had already characterised German soldiers as brutish mass rapists, as impaling bablies on bayonets for sport and in rendering the bodies of fallen soldiers into soap.
The use of large numbers of “turco’s” often black Sudanese mercenaires by France probably entered the invasion nightmares of many Germans few of whom had ever seen Blacks before.
London riots (which killed three Muslims) vs Israeli tent protests.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/08/14/israeli-protests-by-the-%e2%80%98privileged-ones%e2%80%99/
I dunno. According to the Usual Suspects that write the comic books for the kids (and those that make the Hollywood movies, e.g., http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWhUh8RkRfg) the rioters are White and the cops are larger-than-life good guys.
Judge Joseph Dredd is a comics character whose strip in the British science fiction anthology 2000 AD is the magazine’s longest running (having been featured there since its second issue in 1977). Dredd is an American law enforcement officer in a violent city of the future where uniformed Judges combine the powers of police, judge, jury and executioner. Dredd and his fellow Judges are empowered to arrest, sentence and even execute criminals on the spot. He was created by writer John Wagner and artist Carlos Ezquerra, although editor Pat Mills also deserves some credit for his early development.
Judge Dredd is amongst the UK’s best known home-grown comic characters. So great is the character’s name recognition that his name is sometimes invoked over similar issues to those explored by the comic series, such as the police state, authoritarianism and the rule of law.[2] Judge Dredd was named the seventh greatest comic character by the British magazine Empire.[3] In 2011 IGN ranked him 35th in the “Top 100 comic books heroes”.[4]
@-JC:
Zionist Jews are known for using comicstrips and movies for the character-assassination of their adversaries. For example, Swiss-born Berlin resident, Jew director Dani Levi, who directed the comic movie “Mein Fuehrer: die wirklich wahrheit ueber Adolf Hitler (Mein Fuehrer: The Truly Truest Truth about Adolf Hitler)” released in 2007, which portrayed Hitler as a demoralized, drug addicted Adolf Hitler who plays with a toy battleship in the bathtub, dresses his dog in Nazi uniform and takes acting tips from a Jewish concentration camp inmate. The Zionist comic artists have been producing insulting cartoon about Jesus and the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Interestingly, Hennecke Kardel called Hitler – Founder of Israel. Antony C. Sutton in his book Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler exposes the collaboration between Nazis and the Jewish elites in the Wall Streel, Eli Eshed (Tarzan in The Holy Land)
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/berlin-jewish-comic-exhibition/