Finding examples of Jewish hypocrisy and double standards about ethnic interests is not exactly big news (see Jewish attitudes in Israel versus the Diaspora). The entire Jewish political spectrum in the Diaspora in the West energetically pursues policies intended to displace White people and their culture, while at the same time promoting the interests of Israel as an ethnostate. There are differences in emphasis of course. The neocons are mainly focused on heavy-handed, overt promotion of Israel and less strident about White displacement. They sometimes get off message on immigration when there are larger fish to fry. As Peter Brimelow wrote about Bill Kristol, “Kristol will return to immigration enthusiasm once he has helped persuade Bush to attack Iran.” New president. Same message.
On the other hand, the mainstream Jewish community (more than 80% of Jews voted for Obama) is more openly dedicated to White displacement and sometimes engages in a bit of hand-wringing on some of Israel’s more egregious bouts of aggression and racialism while nevertheless managing not to rock to the boat when it comes to total fealty of the US to the religious and ethnonationalist right that dominates Israeli politics.
Despite their banality, egregious examples of hypocrisy and double standards are nevertheless worth commenting on. And in the case of Mark Leibler, it shows that these patterns are not confined to the US. (Here’s an article pointing out the same pattern in Australian MP Michael Danby.)
Leibler lives in Australia where he co-chair of a panel dedicated to “end the exclusion” of Australia’s indigenous peoples from the constitution. His motivation? Another banality: Leibler “cited the effects of the Holocaust on his family as a driving force in his work.” Leibler is much concerned with “racism”:
“Racism doesn’t just belong in another place or time. It casts a shadow here in Australia because it is still part of our nation’s constitution.”
The panel the previous day released a report, ordered by the prime minister, into changing the constitution to recognize that Australia was first occupied by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
“It was racism and its off-shoot Nazism that caused my parents to flee Belgium in 1939,” Leibler wrote. “It was racism that saw my maternal grandparents murdered in Auschwitz.
“My family has never forgotten our debt to Australia. We owe our freedom, prosperity and the very lives of our children and grandchildren to this country. For me, one way I can help repay this debt is by working to change our constitution for the better.”
Indigenous people were “invisible” as far as the Constitution is concerned, he continued. “No mention of their heritage and cultures; no mention of their place as the first inhabitants of this country and as the world’s oldest continuing cultures.”
The fact that the Anglo-Celts who forged the nation and still constitute its ethnic identity, legal system, language, and culture are not mentioned in the Constitution is of no concern to Leibler.
Despite his deep concern for the Australian Aborigines, Leibler is remarkably unconcerned about the ethnic cleansing and apartheid being perpetrated on indigenous Palestinians by his co-ethnics in Israel. As described by Mondoweiss contributor Nima Shirazi, Leibler has
deep and powerful connections to Israel. Indeed, half of his “extended bio‘ [PDF] is dedicated to celebrating his Zionist credentials:
Mark is also Deputy Chairman of the National Australia Bank Yachad Scholarship Fund, which enables Australian scholars of diverse backgrounds – including indigenous scholars – to study in Israel and to return with ideas and experiences of advantage to Australia. His 2006 essay ‘Crossing the Wilderness: Jews and Reconciliation’, published in New Under Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, examined the parallels between the Jewish and Indigenous Australian experience and considered the importance of land to both cultures.
Mark is deeply involved in Jewish affairs, occupying senior leadership roles in several Australian and international Jewish bodies. In Australia, he holds the positions of National Chairman of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council, Life Chairman of the United Israel Appeal of Australia and Governor of the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce. He is also a Patron of the Victorian Chapter of the Australian Friends of Tel Aviv University. Mark served for ten years as President of the Zionist Federation of Australia and for six years as the President of the United Israel Appeal of Australia. Internationally, Mark recently completed his term as Chairman of the World Board of Trustees of Keren Hayesod – United Israel Appeal, serves on the executive of the Jewish Agency for Israel, and holds office as a Governor of both Tel Aviv University and the University of Haifa in Israel.
Shirazi has a nice paragraph from racial Zionist Vladimir Jabotinsky on the indigenous people of Palestine.
[Jabotinsky] wrote that “there has never been an indigenous inhabitant anywhere or at any time who has ever accepted the settlement of others in his country. Any native people…views their country as their national home, of which they will always be the complete masters. They will not voluntarily allow, not only a new master, but even a new partner. And so it is for the Arabs” who had a “birth right to Palestine.” Jabotinsky asserted that, even if “the Arabs of Baghdad and Mecca” acquiesced to Zionist intentions, “Palestine would still remain for the Palestinians not a borderland, but their birthplace, the center and basis of their own national existence. Therefore it would be necessary to carry on colonization against the will of the Palestinian Arabs, which is the same condition that exists now.” He nevertheless concluded that “Zionism is moral and just…There is no other morality.”
All peoples view it as natural to retain hegemony in their native land. The only exceptions are White people. Even indigenous Whites in Europe whose ancestors have been there for 20,000 years feel a moral imperative to be displaced by other peoples.
We shouldn’t be surprised by Leibler’s hypocrisy—or that Jewish intellectual and media influence has been directed at displacing Whites in their homelands just as it is directed at displacing Palestinians in Israel. Leibler doubtless doesn’t see any problem. If asked about it, he would probably paint Israel as a light unto the nations, a nation with a uniquely moral vision beset by vicious anti-Semites. But as we cynical evolutionists are fond of saying, the best deceivers are those who believe their own lies.
Facing the Future as a Minority
A quotable ending Dr. Mc…. ‘the best deceivers are those who believe their own lies.”
A must read and view:- http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2012/01/28/israeli-satire-show-latma-tv-represents-africans-as-dancing-banana-eating-baboons/
Great paragraph. It is truly a canard that more than a relative handful of left and liberal Jews are anti-Israel or anti-Zionist. Even Noam Chomsky has repeatedly make lying excuses for neocons/Israel Lobby when it comes to responsibility for the Iraq War.
Australia really needs some kind of Anglo-nationalism.
Unlike the US, Australia still has an English-descended majority.
And there is no need for American-style “white nationalism”, as other European groups in Australia (Italians, Greeks, Croats etc.) tend to keep to themselves.
“My family has never forgotten our debt to Australia. We owe our freedom, prosperity and the very lives of our children and grandchildren to this country.”
Treachorous lying vermin.
The only way their supernatural level of hypocrisy aka “chutzpah” is even conceivable is if their moral balance is 100% Jew, 0% everyone else. Plague-rats.
“Findings examples of Jewish hypocrisy on attitudes and double standards about ethnic interests is not exactly big news.”
It has to be hammered home though. They have no moral balance in the sense white people understand it. None. The bigger the betrayal the cleverer they think they are. Vile race.
What is it that makes Whites view their displacement as necessary? The Arabs in Palestine are not so easily deceived!
I believe that it is because the Arabs have retained their CULTURE, whereas Whites worldwide have all but abandoned theirs for that of “African Americans.”
My view has long been that the people, biologically speaking, who produce a given culture are an integral and necessary part of that culture — the culture that they produce, which is to some considerable degree unique to them. Therefore Whites, having lost their own cultural heritage, have an inadequate sense of a real and pressing need to defend their ethnic and national interests.
Mark Leibler is no more interested in the indigenous people of Australia than he is in the indigenous people of Palestine. What he is interested in is delegitimizing Australia’s White culture.
@omop:
That site led me to this video, which is funny and accurate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amQtXtkys6Q&feature=player_embedded
This was from an Israeli TV show. They’re basically poking fun at how insanely stupid and cowardly Europeans are. Europeans should not get angry at this, they should learn from it and realize that the Israelis are right.
Why do you only focus on the hypocrites? Why not pay attention to people like Michael Savage, David Horowitz, Lord Glasman, Dan Stein, Mickey Kaus etc who do NOT support immigration to white countries? It really is pathetic to think about your life Kevin. Twenty years you have spent focused on the Jewish people. You’ve been shunned by all your colleagues and probably have no social life other than people than David Duke. A sixty five year old keyboard commando fading into the twilight.
@fender:
Brilliant find! Too bad we didn’t make it. Its a winner!
@Adeimantus:
I think that for Americans we cannot overlook the general acceptance of responsibility for the acts we genuinely did commit.
I know no Americans who feel any real guilt over the fate of the Indians. It was battle and we did what we had to, but we do feel real regret that we did not handle it better. They were our opponents, but we had real respect for, and have adopted much of, the best of Native Americans. We are sad to be responsible for the disintegration of any human culture. To visit a reservation in America today is to be ashamed that a once proud, unique, culture and people were unable to maintain cultural integrity. Blond and kinky haired “Indians’ selling things made in China does no one honor.
We also accept some ancestral responsibility for the horrors that our nation has faced due to race relations. For many reasons having to do with our own weaknesses we were unable to convince our fellow Americans that what they were proposing in The Civil Rights Act was madness. Many could not persuade their own children for decades.
Sadly, many were all too pleased to have the great migration out of the south and into Detroit.
@ fender.
Since you seem to have a good sense of humor you will love this.
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2011/04/23/mocking-jesus-on-israeli-tv-צליבת-ישו-the-crucifixion-of-yeshu/
“The neocons are … less strident about White displacement.” Is it really merely a choice between the NY Times type of displacement versus the Wall Street Journal type of displacement?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11J42boQ7Ms Gay Asylum Seekers welcome in the UK | Protest 15 July 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ON7UVHGKy4 LGBT rights to be included in Immigration Reform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FK15lXHEW9o Nadler promotes LGBT Immigration Rights
Male homosexuals in Moslem countries are persecuted; therefore, their human rights allow them refugee status in Western countries, and then family reunification allows totally open immigration from Moslem countries. How did brainwashing ever become this successful? Jews, cultural Marxists, billionaires, lawyers? Ignorance of history, biology, reality?
1) Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny.
2) The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.
3) Early and provident fear is the mother of safety.
4) The tyranny of a multitude is a multiplied tyranny.
5) All who have ever written on government are unanimous, that among a people generally corrupt, liberty cannot long exist.
6) The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedients, and by parts.
7) People will not look forward to posterity, who never look backward to their ancestors.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Edmund_Burke
White racist democracy – good idea; freedom and equality for all races and creeds – bad idea.
White solidarity – necessary idea, but how can it be achieved? Tell the truth about what Jews and non-whites are really like – thus generating enough fear to motivate Whites.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofhpTIqx9Jg Easy Bake Anne (ramzpaul)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GQIptKdqNg Jewish Woman Tells Us Why Many Jews Don’t Live in Israel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA7Ymki71fM Jews admit to destroying white race
I live in Australia and thanks for being aware of what happens in my country. I just heard this guy being interviewed on the 2UE radio station and it was just waffle. David Oldfield interviewed Mark and although I didn’t listen to the whole interview, David thought it was just political correctness. You are right Kevin, white people are not mentioned in the Australian constitution. Of course, those who do the most are the most ignored or hated –– Does anyone know who Tim Berners-Lee or Dennis Ritchie is? But everyone knows who Steve Jobs is!
Thanks Kevin. All the best.
@Alice Teller: I think you are right. White Guilt is at the root of the American decline. Thank you.
How is this guilt to be cured?
@Adeimantus:
This is something I have great difficulty expressing. Yes, it is guilt, but it is also exhaustion. It takes great strength and endurance to live in even a bi-racial society and maintain some decent standards of life. If others will not or cannot exert self-discipline, then you either accept it or become an oppressor. I think that Jews succeed so often, not because they are so powerful, but because they never quit till it gets ugly. I think we just got tired. We had enough on our hands in the south with the race issue, and then there was the new assault from the Jews. I can only hope that living the reality of the alternative will reawaken us.
The destruction of the Aboriginal people lies solely with the lying left , who this shithead Liebler has manage to create a job for himself promoting . More harm was done to the Abo’s been 1975 and 2000 that in the previous 200 years by putting the on welfare and booze and allowing them to vote for who ever supplied the most of either and the lying left celebrating every ‘win’ . These left wingers have been trying to clean their conscience ever since by maintaining this charade (by inventing and falsifying history) of righteous indignantcy –Group think (delusion ) in its purest form .
Fortunately their are a few honest Blackfellas who spot the rat in the rig — The policy of divide and rule to further Jewish interests and security or do I mean domination .
It is the booze and left wing none-sense social policy that has excluded Aborigonals from modern Australia .
It has to be consider to be a great misfortune if you fall into minority status (by race or economics ) and get help from ‘The Jews’ .
The reality is the Aboriginals (who are for the most part like the rest are stuck to their TV ) are having to take up where they were dumped off in 1975 but with very few of these people now in a educational/psychological and even physical state to contribute anything but victimhood which leftwing parasites quickly spot as a place in the sun for themselves . It is not only the lying left that have created this state of affairs but is also the lying left who continuously obstructed a solution for the last 10 years . Its a bit like the Holyhoax : once the believers admit the Zionist were deeply involved in the catastrophe of the WW2 , then the fable crumbles . The same psychology is involved with production , promotion and perpetration of aboriginal victimhood . Once again leftwing psychology and its twisted bastard philosophical contradictions is allowed to run rampant unchecked for decades because it favours histories most precious victims.
Along with the USSR , this is may other pet fury .
@Alice Teller: The best way I could describe it would be that I don’t want blacks to be lynched merely for being black, but I don’t want them as my boss, either. Unfortunately, the ball got rolling to give blacks some protection as human beings and it became a downhill snowball devouring everything in its path. If you oppose things as having gone too far, they accuse you of wanting to lynch, of being a hater. I guess if they don’t allow for a middle ground, they get to keep the hustle going.
Concerning the article and Palestine, did anyone catch the article in Hareetz, or elsewhere on the internet, where a new Israeli law was passed in the last two weeks that a Palestinian cannot become an Israeli citizen even if they marry an Israeli citizen? How would the Southern Poverty Law center (run by two obnoxious jews) react if Mexicans could not become US citizens even if they married US citizen?
@matthew:
Well, because it is those hypocrites among the Jews who predominate and are trying to destroy their host countries. This is happening in all White countries (talk about stereotypical behaviour). As for “non-hypocritical” Jews such as Michael Savage, David Horowitz etc., they don’t act out of “patriotism”. Jews feel no loyalty to their host-countries, they feel loyalty only to themselves, always asking “what is good for the Jews”. Jews of this type think that preserving the US is “better for the Jews”, better for the Diaspora and better for Israel (in terms of financial, political and military aid and fighting wars for Israel). They don’t care for the US as such. That is why they so vehemently attack Ron Paul, because he is not “good for Israel”, even calling him an anti-Semite! (how revealing).
The socalled “disagreement” between hypocritical and non-hypocritical Jews is like a quarrel between two shepherds, one of whom wants to slaughter the sheep right now, the other of whom wants to keep them somewhat longer in order to milk and shear them (but still slaughter them later on). Neither of them acts out of “love for the sheep”.We the “sheep” have seen through this and cannot be cheated any longer even by a million of “Matthews”.
@matthew: Dr. McDonald is doing good work here, Matthew. He is enlightening everyone about Jewish actions which are not normally easy to find. He is getting facts out into the open for everyone to see. Are you afraid of the truth?
matthew
“Why do you only focus on the hypocrites?”
The majority of Jews are either actively engaged in or tacitly support the genocide of white people.
KMac: white Boston Brahmins the dying race:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfR4DLXYpCw&feature=player_embedded
Mod:
Convert the video to just a link. I didn’t mean to embed a video!!
Arrgg!!
@Matthew, who wrote:
“Why do you only focus on the hypocrites? Why not pay attention to people like Michael Savage, David Horowitz, Lord Glasman, Dan Stein, Mickey Kaus etc who do NOT support immigration to white countries?”
The Mossad, Israel’s spy agency, has as its motto, “By way of deception thou shalt do war”.
When Michael Savage, David Horowitz, Lord Glasman, Dan Stein, Mickey Kaus, and other Jews say they are against non-white immigration (or Affirmative Action, or queer rights, or any other program designed to disrupt White society) they are engaging in this ancient Jewish war tactic—deception.
When we see some Jews taking one side of an issue, and other Jews taking an opposing view on the same issue, we are witnessing their attempt to deceive White society. Michael Savage and the others know very well that there will be no halting of non-white immigration into America and so they know they are free to scream long and hard about it without disrupting the Jewish plan for America and the Whitelands.
By way of deception thou shalt do war.
Dr. William L. Pierce wrote a sizable article about this very issue in February 1992.
http://nationalvanguard.org/2010/09/by-way-of-deception-thou-shalt-do-war/
I haven’t seen the question of royalty/aristocracy discussed in the US WN movement. Was independence from the UK a good idea in hindsight? Appreciated, the same problems of dispossession are faced by the UK as well as the nations that did not go down the independence route (Canada, Aus, NZ).
But the US independence weakened UK royalty also in the UK. The perception that George III mishandled the American grievances and forced Britain into what was regarded at home as effectively a civil war, led to reforms that prevented royalty meddling in political affairs ever again.
The reforms may have gone too far, effectively rendering the role of the aristocracy mute. But was it really mute? Perhaps not…their role was to epitomize the best of the race in terms of genetics, intelligence and all the other traits. They were highly integrated into the concept of people, served in the military, led troops into war and so on. They also quite likely carried an ancestral knowledge of interlopers in our midst and – because of the emphasis on purety of bloodline – kept those interlopers both out of their ranks, and out of luck when it came to taking over the nation/s.
Not sure what any of this means, but isn’t it the case that once we get financial/media/political power back, our movement will begin to shift toward the mainstream in society, and it will become both feasible and needful that we begin to exhibit an internal architecture along lines of concentric circles with more more more protected peoples in the middle and less core less protected but more aggressive more protective groups in the other circles?
I mean, this will have to happen, because ultimately the WN community will have to take on a form capable of replacing the currently hierarchy in society.
So…will it not be that we will need back royalty and aristocracy? Whether that will be taking back the royalty that is already available or allowing new aristocracy to emerge from the ranks…some sort of equivalent solution will have to emerge, so as to make sure “we don’t get fooled again”.
@matthew:
Matthew – the other responses to you all make good points, however I believe you also make potentially good points, or that there are good points to be made from your line of thinking.
The vast majority of Jews – IMHO – have never thought through the issues such that they have come to a conclusion “we must destroy white society”. This is actually implied by KM himself at the end of his piece when he says the best decievers are they who believe their own lies.
This knowledge has long since been absorbed by the Jewish hierarchy and used – as it should be – to its maximum potential. Which is – of course – to literally educate Jews to believe in whatever particular ‘angle’ is most beneficial in that particular time, place, society, era, etc.
The truth is – as you say – this does raise issues as to how the Jewish people should be regarded at the individual level, and even at the level of groups in specific locales.
However, I wouldn’t agree that this matter should be approached from the direction of assuming that we have some sort of higher duty to be ‘fair’ about this. We don’t…in its entirety the Jewish people are being horrifically destructive to us. That makes the Jewish people an enemy of the White people.
However, from the direction of strategy, for example how we might help and support the Jewish People to become more internally incoherent and fractious, certainly issues are raised.
All of that said, there is one slightly more universalist nugget of hope to gleaned from your insights. The jewish people are made into our enemy by the actions and malign intent of just a minority in their ranks, and by their religion Judaism which inherently seeks both hatred of gentiles, and domination over them. But excepting all that, as people, as individuals, Jews could be friends.
One way that the Jewish could keep their religion yet not be a threat to us, would be if we found a solution that made the tactics that come out of their religion, ineffective. If that happened then relations could be normalized.
But as things stand, the Jewish people in its entirely are seeking our genocide. And you have to accept the implications of what that means. Not just for us, But for you too.
In the meantime Caroline Glick’s latest article openly calling for Jewish Americans to put Jewish interests above America’s.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=255334
Sorry for offtopic, but somebody might be interested .
The Four Jewish Races of Israel and The high Achievements of Jews
“”…..Richard Lynn is Emeritus Professor of Psychology at the University of Ulster and currently probably Britain’s foremost academic having the courage to write on race differences in IQ and achievement. His latest book, “The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement” is an analysis of the Jews’ success world -wide using much the same methodology as in other work of his such as ‘IQ and the Wealth of Nations’. …..”"
“”…..Lynn is pessimistic about the Jewish-nationalist effort, noting that 500,000 Israelis have arranged US passports for themselves, fearing the worst.
Today’s Israelis may have their American passports ready; but they will find distinctly inhospitable the Sharia West (not to mention its Black and Hispanic minorities) which they have been so keen and self-deluded as to create…..”"
“”…The Jews – especially the wordsmith Ashkenazis of the Wittgenstinian type – were lately the victims of the Russians, French, Poles and Germans and found refuge in the English-speaking world****; but, in their madly cultivated multiculturalism, they will next be the victims of themselves…..”"
http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/tim-haydon/1581-the-four-jewish-races-of-israel-and-the-high-achievements-of-jews
@fender:
Didn’t make me angry or see anything to learn from it, save the confirmation of KM’s comment that when it comes to ethnic power politics there is no morality or principle other than “whatever works”.
White women being raped by Muslims? Maybe, but it isn’t Muslim criminal networks abducting thousands of White women a year and shipping them into a life of sexual slavery featuring being chained to a post and raped thirty times a day.
Muslim’s to blame for Multi-culti? Hardly. They benefit from it, but it isn’t organized Muslimly promoting multi-culti that got the flood gates opened in the first place, nor organized muslimy organizations that demonize any white person for daring to say that just maybe whites have their own interests and distinctiveness, and just maybe that on its own is reason enough not to want multi-culty.
@Mickey Meadows:
I like the idea of a royalty/aristocratic class. It’s said George Washington was approached and asked if he would like to be king. I guess it took him by surprise, but he declined. I’ve always liked the idea of being a ‘subject of the realm’, and as we see today what the Founding Fathers’ vision has come to, leaving the door open to whoever wants to take control, and the joke this country has become, I’m all in favor of your proposal.
May I suggest a Catholic King and Queen? Some years back (the Catholics would know the name of the king I’m speaking of), I read an article of the king deciding to step down from his throne because, as he said, the times have changed and he could no longer be effective as a king, the forces were too great against it. There was a picture of him and his wife. A finer royal couple I’ve never seen in my life. The epitome of Virtue, Principles, Decency and Morality. Offer him the Throne, or another Catholic royal. The king that stepped down was, I imagine, a Traditional Catholic. I imagine all Catholic kings would be, anyway.
I would not go for the shady UK royalty and would steer clear of them altogether.
@Bluerose:
UK royaltyand probably all current royalty no longer carries or understands the sort of knowledge that would be necessary to fulfill the true purpose of a royalty (plus larger enclosing aristocracy).
Catholic sounds good to me if it could be sold to the Protestants and all the other denominations. One advantage of a Catholic system would be the pan-national centricity. But again, as with current royalty, the Catholic hierarchy no longer seems to carry the sort of knowledge that would be necessary for the system to also protect the genetic interests of the people.
@Vlad Writes: Extremely well stated point, Brother Vlad. I concur 100 percent. Not desiring to be ruled by blacks or other non-whites does NOT equate to wanting to ‘lynch’ them. In fact, I can find sympathies for blacks and other non-whites who do not wish to be ruled over by Whites. This is as much their legitimate right as it is ours.
This is why a White Ethnostate is Priority #1 for our people. And, such a state must be White only. That means, and the gang over at the Political Cesspool needs to listen up, no non-whites and most especially no jews, not even those who are sent into our ranks and told to pretend to be friendly to our cause.
@Adeimantus: Dr. Pierce used to often make references to what he thought might be a miracle cure for most of the psychologically suicidal ailments of the White race.
I believe he called it The Oak Table Leg treatment.
@Mickey Meadows:
Thanks for the link to that article in the Jerusalem Post. There is one comment on that article by a Jew, a certain Adam Glick, that gives such a revealing glimpse into the extreme arrogance of the Jewish mentality that I can’t resist to quote from it. Here we go: (bold by me)
Need I say more?
@Franklin Ryckaert:
The amazing part is how the he thinks he’s the voice of moderation.
Suzy Freeman-Greene: Australian TV is hideously white and blonde!
[snip]
MORE than 2 million Australians were born in Asia and our Indian-born population has more than trebled in a decade, but mainstream television, other than SBS, rarely reflects this fact.
The ABC provides stellar news coverage, from News Breakfast to Lateline. But as journalist Margaret Simons recently observed: ”Anyone watching ABC’s main news and current events shows could be forgiven for thinking that Australia was still a nation composed of blond or red-headed, blue-eyed Anglo Celts.”
Andrew Jakubowicz, professor of sociology at Sydney’s University of Technology. ”There is a crisis of recognition of diversity in Australian public culture which gnaws at the heart of the country,” he has written. ”It is racism at its most systematic, unselfconscious and destructive.” (And yes, I’m aware of the irony of myself – an Anglo-Celtic journalist – lamenting TV’s lack of diversity.
White Australia has faded into history. Surely it’s time for commercial TV executives to look at the world around them.
http://www.theage.com.au/national/toowhite-tv-must-tune-in-to-the-real-team-australia-20111125-1nz8l.html#ixzz1eipaXryK
Andrew Jakubowicz, “Anglo-Celtic”?!? lol
His bio: http://andrewjakubowicz.com/about/
@Luke: Brother Luke, we need to find and support black men like Marcus Garvey, who in the 1920′s predicted a “glorious black future” that would be similiar to the “glorious black past” if American blacks would move back to Africa. Talk about win-win! They would get to enjoy their wonderful, engaging, and colorful tribal culture that we are baffled by, and we could pursue our culture that bores them, and they wouldn’t have the “horrible racism” they suffer from here in America.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Funny that somebody with surname “Glick” thinks he is related to Abraham and consider himeself “chosen”. It could be true through maternal line but me thinks that many of the present day “Jews” have little relation to those in the Old Testament. If Christ Himself called real racial Jews like the pharises of his time “sons of the Devil” and “race of vipers”, among other things, what is the appropiate name for the Glicks of this world that not only are as hypocrites and arrogant as Anas and Caifas, but also jumped in Jewry boat centuries afterward by means of Kazharia and even later mixtures…
However it is a mistake to consider Jewry to be a monolithic entity. We need a good set of articles at TOO explaining the intra-jewish disputes (askenazi vs sephardy/semite, atheist vs reformed vs conservative vs (ultra) orthodox, zionist, vs non-zionist, liberal vs neocon, diaspora vs israelies, etc), their origins and how they affect the current situation.
“We are a nation of a different category altogether. We are distinct, separate, and above all other nations…The entire planet earth is our homeland.”
Judaism is Nazism. It always has been.
My! My! My!
Let a few Jews in your country and they will poison the minds of the host people. Let a Jew on a school board and he will poison the minds of the school board members. Let a Jew in University and he will poison the minds of the students. Let any Jew become head of a national organization – like the Center for Disease Control – and he will ruin the healthy policies of hospitals and health clinics. Let a Jew in any important institution and he will fill it with his poison. . The Jew will smear individuals and ruin reputations and bring suffering. While Jews prattles “equality, rights and fairness” they distributes ruin pain and misery.
The Jews poison our minds against each other and against civilization. Why shouldn’t they take advantage of that when we give them the equipment? Not only do we allow these vipers to attain positions of power in white nations, we give them the benefit of western technology.
Everything we invented, developed and created came from the will to live. Remove Jews from the control of western invention and technology and we will have disabled their ability to inject their poison.
@anon:
A better way is to call it supremacism but then of the most inflated and arrogant sort. David Duke’s critical book about the Jews is not for nothing called Jewish Supremacism.
@Franklin Ryckaert:
Pretty laughable quote, actually. If there’s anything the tribe isn’t, it’s sober and objective. Like Voltaire said, they are “born with raging fanaticism in their hearts.”
This is precisely why they can’t lead humanity forward, as they believe they can: their psychology won’t let them. Leadership requires the building up of strength, but the Jews always do the opposite. They are levellers.
Whenever European strength manifested itself (Rome, Russia, England, America) the tribe was there to bring it down to suit their interests. The tribe never builds, they only level. This is a cycle that’s going to go on and on.
Matthew
All those fake conservative jews only pretend to be proEuropean so that dumb fake christian whites can die for israHell.
jews only care about themselves. David Horowitz was supporting ghetto black nationalists until they started criticizing Horowitx’ homeland israHell.
Hatred is the blood if the jewelry. He ceases to be a jew when he stops hating nonjews
@Mickey Meadows:
I am not sure we are ready for royalty, but I do think it is vital to think of ways to restore an organic, hierarchical, relation on the community level. One of the great losses of egalitarianism is that we have abandoned any but a taxpayer’s obligation to our neighbor. It is not so long ago that in most communities the best and brightest felt some sense of obligation. This was not usually paid for. The minister, doctor, judge, school teacher, were were respected, usually with very good reason.
@matthew:
Dr Kevin MacDonald is a full professor, the author of scholarly books, articles, the editor of a scholarly journal, one of the founders of a political party, a researcher who has documented the evolutionary strategy of Jewish ethnic survival through the ages.
He is a courageous man who has been threatened, vilified, had people show up at his classes to try to intimidate him, yet undaunted and at great personal cost has continued to stand up for his convictions and the defense of Christian heritage European ethnic people. Many men and women will draw inspiration from his life and example for generations to come.
Your slandering Dr Kevin MacDonald as a keyboard warrior says nothing about him but a lot about you, Matthew.
n.b.: Leibler has lived in Israel for quite a while now.
http://wordfromjerusalem.com/?page_id=2
@Mickey Meadows: You may be interested in this:
http://www.4shared.com/office/BWXPqd3T/Democracy-The_God_That_Failed_.htm
A comparative study of monarchy versus democracy. Whilst not championing either, the conclusion is that the former is more conducive to liberty and civilization than the latter.
@thm: Well said . KMac is truly one of the Saviours of OUR PEOPLE , giving an intellectual understanding to the self-deceptive systematic attack that Talmudists & Zionists have obviously planned for a long time . There are useful idiots on both sides of the fence with this hypocrite Leibler is but one example.
Their policy is always to divide , it is probably the most obvious tactic of any attacking strategy . In USSR the rulers were divided against the ruled . In the multicultural West one race is used to attack another (by claiming discrimination) . With Jews always claiming that all they want is Justice for all .
Its the same old canard of Justice or Equality being used to incite one group against another . Women against men , black against white , rich against poor , the decadent against the straight , the police against the people , cultured against the simple ,the worker against the professional and the professional against the worker .By engaging in this never ending game of dividing , any natural specialisation in civilisation can be set against each other and the two sides exploited .The TV has been a devil send in this game .
The con of multiculturalism has opened up an endless Vista for this evil behaviour , though at this point in time what we are seeing is the control being imposed by legalism and surveillance . Having destroyed the natural self ordering of ethnic blocks where the rulers and the ruled feel kinship , OUR PEOPLE are being forced into a slave state , where the rulers hate the ruled because they fear them because they are exploiting them because someone controls the capacity to print and direct the money .
Imagine if this wicked philosophy or strategy managed to get control of all of humanity . They would do just as they did in the USSR and start murdering people whole-sale under the thinest pretence . When Victims Rule , that will rule with barbaric intolerance . They rule with fear & hatred to any that won’t abase themselves . This is exactly what we are seeing in the West now as the Jews are demanding that all must go doggy to their every whim , connected to “intolerance” and its every widening classiification that drives the legalism & SS or you will be considered ‘anti-semitic’ and therefore ‘fair game’ , the veiled threat .
It is the Talmudists that have promoted and are whipping up this behaviour because who else could have planned this ? The Holyhoax and its never ending victims that can be driven against humanity .
Why isn’t the media condemning her like Emma West?
Crazy Jewess Launches Racist Tirade Against Gentiles [TRANSCRIBED] – YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Z88bjQukaHM#t=0m13s
Jewish Zionist Millionaire, Moises Sacal Smeke, Beating and Humiliating a Mexican Teen Valet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0Glf7bAnFg&feature=uploademail
The realities on the ground in contemporary Israel are such that any ‘unauthorized’ non-Jew who inadvertently steps onto JEW ONLY road and/or crosses the perimeter of JEW ONLY neighborhood scattered throughout the occupied West Bank, stands good chance of catching a bullet to the head either from Israeli military patrols or one of the multiple crazed ex-Brooklinetes of Khazarian sort who’d ‘heard Zion calling’ and chose to respond.
While the latter’s diaspora dwelling co-ethnics in every country this side of Iran made it their business to appoint themselves to the job of monitoring the moral health of their non-Jew (read: white Christian) hosts. By pitching the joys of diversity, tolerance, spirit of Kumbaya and other lullabies from the playbook of cultural marxism.
But in the interim acting as an auxiliary support team for the Israeli state propaganda machine.
Maintaining a virtual death grip on the means of news dissemination in these host countries helped Team Yitzhak not just to suppress reports documenting the ethno-fascist core of Israel; such stories weren’t permitted to pop on the news radar to begin with.
The biggest hypocrites are the dumb white puppets like the Republican presidential candidates. I wonder from the speeches I see them, especially Romney, make – are all White Gentile American clowns?
The main point or Romney’s speech was relocating the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. In no other country in the world would the electorate be so stupid as to think this is even an issue. There are about ten million other issues that are more important.
How about providing jobs after a recession? (Not that the preppy multi-millionaire humanoid has ever met a poor person)
How about health?… education?… being provoked to war against Iran?
Among the millionth most important are whethter to locate the embassy in Shanghai or beijing? (The next superpower)
One’s historical and linguistic ties with Europe, especially Britain and Ireland?
But the main topic of debate is where one’s embassy is located in a tiny Middle Eastern country with few natural resources. Are you serious? Are you absolutely bloody serious?
@Free Thinker:
Their policy is always to divide , it is probably the most obvious tactic of any attacking strategy . In USSR the rulers were divided against the ruled . In the multicultural West one race is used to attack another (by claiming discrimination) . With Jews always claiming that all they want is Justice for all .
Its the same old canard of Justice or Equality being used to incite one group against another . Women against men , black against white , rich against poor , the decadent against the straight , the police against the people , cultured against the simple ,the worker against the professional and the professional against the worker .By engaging in this never ending game of dividing , any natural specialisation in civilisation can be set against each other and the two sides exploited .The TV has been a devil send in this game .
The con of multiculturalism has opened up an endless Vista for this evil behaviour , though at this point in time what we are seeing is the control being imposed by legalism and surveillance . Having destroyed the natural self ordering of ethnic blocks where the rulers and the ruled feel kinship , OUR PEOPLE are being forced into a slave state , where the rulers hate the ruled because they fear them because they are exploiting them because someone controls the capacity to print and direct the money .
Imagine if this wicked philosophy or strategy managed to get control of all of humanity . They would do just as they did in the USSR and start murdering people whole-sale under the thinest pretence . When Victims Rule , that will rule with barbaric intolerance . They rule with fear & hatred to any that won’t abase themselves.
Brilliant. I love your comment, Free Thinker.
The last line makes sense to me. I’ve seen this happen on the small/individual scale. It’s important to be cautious about any individual or group who has built their entire identity around victimhood, or at least what they believe to be their victimhood.
In some way, we’re all victims, of course. But I’ve observed some individuals who exploit the power of victimhood, and they are vicious people. It’s like they have a split personality — an inner victim and an inner victimizer.
They demand “tolerance” (undeserved acceptance) or else. It’s seriously unfortunate the way western culture has bought into the false virtues of “tolerance” and “equality”. So much unnecessary suffering and chaos, because of two nonsensical ideals, two wolves in sheep clothing.
@Richard:
I want to add:
I think some of the people who promote “tolerance” and “equality” and “diversity” probably have (what they believe are) good intentions. I do not necessarily think that all of them realize how empty and seriously harmful that kind of flowery rhetoric really is.
Have a good Tuesday.
@Richard:
Both you and Jason have alluded to the damage this has done. I don’t think there is enough discussion about the real ways these fads have done harm to real people. You are right, Richard, most people mean well. The vast majority of the folks who earn such scorn on these pages are ordinary, decent sorts, who are living their lives and do what they have been taught was right. Our job is to help them understand why these views are not right, by pointing out the damage they do.
Thanks, Richard. You keep me honest.
Can anyone shed some light on Eric Cantor’s call regarding insider trading not only Congressmen but aids as well. Is he trying to head off an investigation?
@Alice Teller:
I appreciate the kind words. It’s always nice to say hi.
I don’t think there is enough discussion about the real ways these fads have done harm to real people.
That’s a good point.
In an article I found on Faith and Heritage, the author quotes a man named Richard Weaver as saying, “Ideas have consequences.” And that’s something I’ve been thinking about for months. Not that particular quote, but the heart of it. You’re right: real people are being harmed every day because of ideas like “tolerance” and “diversity” and “equality”, and sometimes it might be difficult to attribute the negative effects to those false virtues.
And I think it is bigger than just racial issues. They affect every area of life. The end result is disorder and suffering.
So, this Liebler assumes himself to be a native of “Israel”; aboriginal?
With so many Whites legitimizing Israel-firsters, who can blame him?
This is off topic, but can someone recommend some good translations of Nietzsche? Or good books on his thinking? Walter Kaufmann’s is everywhere but he is Jewish and I’ve heard his translations softened the real Nietzsche. Thanks
@Jason Speaks:
H.L. Mencken’s The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a great summary of Nietzsche’s ideas. Mencken was the first person to bring Nietzsche into the American consciousness, and at a time when race realism was pretty mainstream (which comes into play often enough to actually warrant a modern intro warning us to ignore Mencken’s racial comments, of course).
The book also has value because of Mencken’s commentary; basically what you have is a brilliant American commenting on a brilliant German; two great minds in one. Sometimes Mencken even puts things better than Nietzsche does. Mencken could have expanded on a few chapters but overall the book is excellent and of great value to both Mencken and Nietzsche fans.
However it’d probably be more interesting and fun just to dive into Nietzsche’s writings themselves. Nietzsche is one of the few philosophers who’s fun to read because he writes in a brief, efficient, aphoristic style. Beyond Good and Evil is a good place to start, as it’s basically Thus Spoke Zarathustra in a standard philosophical format (TSZ is written in a poetic, Biblical tone and is not a good place to start, despite its popularity). After BGAE it’s pretty much up to you, though I found Birth of Tragedy extremely difficult.
As for translations, R.J. Hollingdale is outstanding. Anything by him is good, and I’m pretty sure he translated all of Nietzsche’s works. HL Mencken himself did a translation of Antichrist which is said to be fantastic, as is Clancy Martin’s version of TSZ. Yes, Kauffman is known to have really messed with Nietzsche, even the intro to Clancy’s version of TSZ says this. The Faber/Lehmann version of Human, All Too Human is good, and Shaun Whiteside’s translation of The Birth of Tragedy I found to be extremely obscure, but that may be because TBOT was Nietzche’s first book, and may be tougher to “get” than the others.
Leibler is of course attempting to undermine and delegitimizing Australia’s White cultural heritage (short-lived though that is!) but I don’t think he’s being hypocritical or that he is deceiving himself. He is, rather, engaged in a cynical attempt – co-ordinated by his handlers in Tel Aviv – to impress upon the gullible guilt-ridden minds of White Australians the idea that aborigines were the original owners of the land of Australia just as Jews were (according to fanatical biblical interpretation) the original ‘owners’ of the Land of Israel. It’s all about conflating the two narratives to erode opposition to the Jewish claims. I’d be very surprised to learn of any of Leibler’s family ‘marrying out’ – certainly not into the aboriginal community. No offence to the aboriginies!
@fender: Thank you very much, I will look for those. A commentary by Mencken sounds fascinating. I will look for the R.J. Hollingdale translation as well. I have read bits of Nietzsche in the past and always found it invigorating to say the least.
@fender: Ironically, while I fundamentally disagree with Nietzsche on many issues, I found Birth of Tragedy to be extremely insightful. The guy was a genius as far as philology goes. It’s not even that I agree with all his interpretations, but the creativity and originality he showed really brought me back to the classical playwrights with fresh eyes.
@Mickey Meadows:
I don’t exactly remember whether it was in one of their articles or on their website that I read Vdare is a Jewish website and blog. I just always remembered that bit of information afterwards. And as to a writer who mentioned he was formerly affiliated with the Frankfurt Institute (or the Institute of Social Research), this was recent — a year or two ago. I wish I had kept that article. I’m pretty sure that piece of information was in an article. In fact I wish I had kept both bits of information, but didn’t think it would come in handy. I found out about Vdare via the AmRen, looking over their links, and signed up long ago just wanting to now more about WN ideas and things about illegal immigration, and race differences, etc.
I too enjoy the Vdare articles, and in fact just got their latest email with subject line “Mitt Romney: Self-Deportation” AND Hispandering” with their list of featured articles, usually always interesting. But since I’ve learned the things I have along the way about the Jews, I’ve been a little wary of Vdare, sort of.
Anyway, I know what I read (article or website) about it’s being Jewish-run, and thought I’d mention it.
Ooops — so sorry. That post about Vdare should have gone to the A3P article ! I’ll cut and paste it there right now. Sorry about that!
And for Jason Speaks (not Mickey Meadows). I *would* screw up!
Hi Kevin, readers, good piece.
KMac and DDuke continue to be the premier sources for exposing Zionist/Jewish anti white activity.
A similar article by Nationalist Alternative on the same thing — Constitutional Change: Liberalism, Liebler’s List and the coming Police State
http://www.natalt.org/2012/01/27/constitutional-change-liberalism-liebler%e2%80%99s-list-and-the-coming-police-state-2/
Do not forget his hypocrite brother Isi Liebler famous for
Melbourne – Jewish leader Isi Leibler, a staunch defender of Australian multiculturalism, says the policy has no place in Israel.
“This is a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country for the Jews,” he told a Jerusalem newspaper.
Mr. Leibler has previously said that multiculturalism in Australia was something that “we are all proud being part and parcel of…
Mr. Leibler said post-Zionists were pushing a universalist agenda in schools aimed at eliminating Jewish nationalism and creating a multicultural state. “
Australian readers interested in getting involved with Nationalist Alternative contact natalt@ymail.com
@Free Thinker: The same fate has befallen many native Hawiians, and the left is entirely responsible. How stupid must it be to think you are somehow giving people dignity, uplifting their spirit,etc, the things the left claims they want for people, when they are taking away all of these positive qualities by putting them on the dole. I fully agree with those people that have pointed out rightly, how much capitalism has negatively impacted the fate of caucasians, but the left and their “programs” have done infinetly more damage.
Hello all!
My question is how many Israelis have dual US/I citizenship?
How many Israelis are in USA?
THERE ARE SO MANY IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA..YUK.
@Bobby:
I fully agree with those people that have pointed out rightly, how much capitalism has negatively impacted the fate of caucasians, but the left and their “programs” have done infinetly more damage.
I think that is an important point, Bobby. Thankfully I’ve seen similar comments by other people under other articles; that’s because this site attracts relatively sane people, free thinkers who do not listen to so-called conservatives like Rush Limbaugh or liberals like Keith Olbermann. Unfortunately both of those White men are anti-White, whether they realize it or not.
The Irish have their own version of Mark Leibler. Their Jew MP, Alan Shatter (he’s the only known Jew in parliament), has been the primary force in promoting non-white immigration into Ireland for several years now.
He recently launched a scathing attack on the Irish for their history of neutrality, saying they should have done more to rescue Jews during WW2:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2092138/Irish-minister-admits-time-Jews-fleeing-Nazis-denied-visas-1930s-morally-bankrupt-regime.html#ixzz1lCdGna4z
‘WE SHOULD no longer be in denial that, in the context of the Holocaust, Irish neutrality was a principle of moral bankruptcy.”
So said Minister for Justice Alan Shatter at the opening of a moving and illuminating exhibition on the Shoah in Europe in his department last week, in the run-up to Holocaust Memorial Day yesterday.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2012/0130/1224310943066.html
[Other controversies]
He has been criticized as being a pro-Israel propagandist:
During the 2009 Gaza War, Sinn Féin TD Aengus Ó’Snodaigh claimed that Shatter and the Israeli ambassador to Ireland had exposed the Oireachtas committee on Foreign Affairs to “propaganda, twisted logic and half truths”. Ó’Snodaigh also said that Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister, would have been proud of it.[4] In February 2009, during a sitting of the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs concerning the Gaza conflict, Shatter clashed verbally with Professor Ilan Pappé, Professor of History at the University of Exeter, accusing Pappé of biased scholarship and historical inaccuracies.[5]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Shatter
————————————-
“Minister has ‘undue influence’ over policy regarding Palestine”
SEANAD REPORT: TERRY LEYDEN (FF) said he believed that there was an undue influence by Minister for Justice Alan Shatter on Government policy concerning recognition of a Palestinian state.
He also claimed that US president Barack Obama was a tool of Israel and that the stand taken by the US at the United Nations this week would mark the beginning of the end of his presidency.
He hoped that the 40 million Irish-Americans would remember Mr Obama’s UN statement when the next election came round. There was a massive Jewish vote in the US. “They influence government policy.”
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2011/0923/1224304575876.html
————————————-
“Israel lobby dictates who may run for Ireland’s president”
…Shatter is a committed Zionist. Whereas the Irish government was generally more balanced in commenting about the Freedom Flotilla II than many of its EU counterparts over the past few months, Shatter was openly hostile to the effort, declaring it was “something of a mystery” to him why anyone could feel the need for a “political protest” against the Gaza blockade. Worryingly, Shatter has been put in charge of the department of defense by Ireland’s relatively new prime minister Enda Kenny; that department has awarded contracts to Israeli weapons firms in the not-so-distant past.
http://electronicintifada.net/blog/david/israel-lobby-dictates-who-may-run-irelands-president
@Richard: Absolutely agree. Rush Limbaugh is a big joke,(except for his four hundred multimillion dollar contract), and Keith Olberman is simply a leftist clown. As the longshoreman philosopher, Eric Hoffer pointed out, if a new system like a dictatorship for instance, ever seized power in the U.S. and started locking up citizens,etc. Limbaugh and Olberman,(those loyal to the former system, as Hoffer would say) would turn on Americans and start broadcasting the new systems propaganda. It never ceases to amaze me, how many Americans believe they can learn something from Main Stream Media idiots like O-Reilly, Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, or on the left, Olberman, Maher, Maddow, etc. Sites like this, is where people learn new things, even if they don’t agree with some of the views here. The MSM IS THE GOVERNMENT MEDIA, no different than the old Soviet News Agency TASS–interesting if you like stories about cats trapped on top of trees, or the latest news involving Huntington Beach “skinheads”. The last is a private joke, made up by a friend of mine, when he became incredulous over how often the Los Angeles Times and the ABC TV stations kept repeating a story about 3 white youths that beat up some old guy. It turned out that he wasn’t that hurt, certainly not killed, as he probably would have been had he encountered one of Los Angeles’ “non-skinhead” gangs. White skinheads are an epidemic in California, just ask the Los Angeles Times or the Main Stream News Media.
@Vlad Writes:
Personally, I trace the greatest damage to the women’s movement. I sometimes wonder what would have happened if we had adhered to the old custom of giving priority, among job applicants, to a married man with children. This was applied to both races in the past.
Sadly, the best Black History Moment of Black History Month hits the news only two days into the festival. How will they top this?
http://www.ajc.com/news/dekalb/new-birth-ceremony-with-1328502.html
Don’t you just get all jittery when the Diversity’s weakness for justifying all your prejudices goes on full display right before your very own eyes?
This story is a humdinger- right in the afro ATL on the second day of Black History Month.
The Jews are outraged that a negro voodoo priest masquerading as a Christian wrapped himself it the Torah and got proclaimed a King by a fake rabbi.
But don’t Jewish agitprop orgs tell us they “fight anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry, defend democratic ideals and protect civil rights for all,” and that they “fight hate, teach tolerance, and seek justice,” or, as the Bremen Jewish Heritage and Holocaust Museum in da ATL says it, “celebrating Jewish culture, embracing diversity, and promoting social justice”?
Then why the outrage over “Reverend” Eddie Long’s new worship habits? Maybe he’s just catching up with the Jews’ forcing Interfaith services into “Christian” churches. Shouldn’t the Jews welcome his vibrant and enriching contribution to Jewish worship practices?
The outrage is because Jews deeply resent negro appropriation of their forms and symbols. If anyone feels superior to the negroes, it must be the Jews.
Jews intentionally ruined Christian churches through the struggle for racial integration, and they won’t let it happen to themselves. They’ll stay pure and let everybody else mongrelize. They worry about how Eddie Long is tarnishing their exclusive brand.
“The Anti-Defamation League was founded in 1913 “to stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all.’ ” Stopping the defamation of Jews by condemning a negro king takes precedence over giving the negro fair treatment and declaring him the great new leader of the Interfaith movement between voodoo and Judaism.
But more telling is the claim by the fake rabbi (but not a fake Jew) that he was “restoring” Eddie Long. That’s the old Abrahamic claim that Jews bring justice and judgment to the world, so that through the Jews, Christians become restored Christians through the hands of Jews.
“My message was about restoring a man and to encourage his walk in the Lord,” Messer said. “It was not to make Bishop Eddie L. Long a king.”
Why would a “Christian” go to a Jew for anything?
Obviously, this a all show business and marketing for the disgraced negro voodoo priest Eddie Long, whose legal troubles have filled da ATL news of late and crowded out the really important negro crime and corruption stories.
“The connection of the Torah scroll to the Holocaust and then to Eddie Long is incomprehensible to me,” said David P. Gushee, a professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University. Gushee is a scholar of the Holocaust and has visited Auschwitz several times.
“What was the point? Was it to signal that Eddie Long was suffering persecution like the Jews at Auschwitz?” Gushee asked.
Negroes can never be allowed to climb higher than their allotted rung on the victimhood ladder than the Jews will allow. Mentioning Auschwitz in connection with negro suffering is verboten- that’s more tolerance of equal suffering than is permissible. Jews must always maintain their morally superior position in the victimhood hierarchy. They are highly vigilant against encroachments. The ADL regularly blasts anyone who uses the word “Holocaust” outside of approved contexts.
“In his statement Thursday, Ralph Messer said Sunday’s presentation ‘was simply a way of bringing honor to a man who had given his life to the Lord and had given so much to his church, the Atlanta metro area and throughout the world.’ ”
Wrapping a negro in a Torah may have lifted the negro, but it definitely disgraced the Torah!
“You can’t attack [Long],” Messer said Sunday. “He’s sealed. Wherever he turns, the power of God is there. … It’s not him, it’s the king in him.”
That statement defies comment.
“A lot of things could have been done to shore that up, but this particularly bizarre ritual was deeply disturbing,” Gushee said. “One problem with Messianic Judaism, in which leaders attempt to fuse Jewish and Christian traditions and symbols, is that it can easily stray into profound insensitivity.”
Sounds like Interfaith is only permissible within the limits drawn by Jews. When things progress too far along logic lines of inevitability, the Jews call it “insensitivity”.
But not once did they accuse Long of “anti-Semitism”. That career-destroying hate charge is reserved only for White Humanity.
@Bobby: Spot-on ! The MSM has become a Jiant entertainment and propaganda machine taking the place of religion .
I spotted what I think was a cunning piece of propaganda the other day on PBS . The ‘journalist’ visiting Florida to report on the Romney/Grinch auctions , was saying to us the audience : “You know I never seen it so personal ,dirty and nasty ” and she reiterated a couple of times . But all they showed were the usual dirty laundry campaign and the couple of over groomed , over fed satisfied hogs , then it suddenly occurred to me that perhaps her instructions were to Make Believe to the audience that the candidates were really nasty and vengeful , So that the we the audience could live out or feel that they were doing what we felt we’d like to do .(visceral brainwashing ) . In realty the ‘candidates’ know its all a charade , they have their millions $ and not a worry in the world , as long as they tow the line , the gravy train will keep rolling on . And their wives will have something to talk about with ‘friends’ .
Most of these personalities are driven by vanity , so time in the limelight is what they love and what they hope to get at the end of the ride .
Note : ‘ ‘ marks points of insincerity .
@Free Thinker:
Politics as Kabuki Dance? All we can hope for is for them to act out our feelings? Newt snarling to punish the bad Wall St insider? Great insight.
@Alice Teller:
And the only one up there even trying to tell the truth, Ron Paul, is relegated to the role of the crazy old uncle we usually keep in the attic.
@Free Thinker: Democrats vs. Republicans, we are to believe according to Limbaugh and company, or Olberman and company, are engaged in violent confrontations on ideology,etc. but you’ll find them on the golf course together, in restuarants, and at social gatherings eating, drinking and making merry. It IS all a charade. One simple example that it is a charade. If they are working for the “American People”and are concerned about “JOBS”, why do both parties think nothing at all of allowing over one million people to enter the U.S. “LEGALLY”–EVERY SINGLE YEAR IN A CLEARLY COLLAPSING ECONOMY? These career polticians, are cynical people in the extreme. They don’t have any principles or plans for the improvement of the nation, and certainly not for the average American citizen.
@Qwert: I know I am shouldn’t be, but I am just amazed, every instance of a Jewish politician that i have seen, no matter what country, it’s the same story – force open the borders and turn on the spigot of immigration on full, chastise the host country as anti-semetic, and push for a pro-zionist, pro-Israel policy.
The selfishness and hypocrisy is astounding.
@me:
Same here. That tribe never ceases to amaze and horrify me. Imagine what they could accomplish if they actually wanted to do something good.
@Qwert:
Well they do do something good: they advance their race at the expense of others. We should be doing the same.
The main difference between Europeans and Jews is psychological; the Jews are a people who are deeply resentful and vengeful, as their religion is a slave morality. Jews attain power through levelling, destruction, and the lowering of standards.
Thus the Jewish dream of global control can never be realized; the their domination always goes hand-in-hand with destruction, both of the people under their jackboot, and themselves. The Jews are psychologically incapable of leadership, only oppression. Leadership requires the opposite of the Jewish mind; namely, the European mind.
Europeans are builders and creators. Wherever Europeans go they invariably improve the conditions of the native populace. This is due to the inherent goodwill and altruism of the European, which, ironically, is now being used against him.
@fender: No we should not. We should leave them alone. We can’t say ‘the jewish elite is horrible for doing this’, then do it ourselves.
Kevin Mac, you should have a field day with this..
Blaming the Jews—Again
If you were an anti-Semite dedicated to spreading your hatred of Jews, what charges exactly would you make in 21st century America?
There are two charges you would make. First, the rich Jews control our government. Second, those Jews are trying to push America into war so your sons will have to fight for Israel.
http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/02/controlling-bounds-of-public-discourse.html
Elliiot Abrams of course, wants war with Iran.. and a commenter points out:
Isn’t Elliot Abrams the guy who advocates open borders for the US but opposes mixed marriages for Jews? That was a hypothetical question. He IS that guy
@me:
“No we should not. We should leave them alone.”
We can’t, because they won’t leave us alone.
” We can’t say ‘the jewish elite is horrible for doing this’, then do it ourselves. ”
But we shouldn’t say they’re horrible for doing that. They aren’t horrible for doing that. What they do is in keeping with the laws of reality and evolution. We should do what they’re doing because we need to out-compete them.
@me:
Thanks, great link. I agree that I do not want to win if it means turning into Jews. Not only is it an very unappealing option, but how will we ever win over those who are most able to help, the white rich? If they have to put up with all the unpleasant aspects of dealing with Jews and the only difference will be that the new bosses are the strong men of NS – what is is it for them – less money? We will win by returning to our own best characteristics, and stop giving all minorities, including the Jews a free pass. If the playing ground is not corrupted by Jewish bribes and back handed dealings we will win every time. Right now, we should demand, in the street in need be, the our government enforce immigration laws and clean up the financial sector by throwing some people in jail.
@Alice Teller:
“I agree that I do not want to win if it means turning into Jews.”
Well then have fun being their servants.
You can’t condemn Jews for using strategies that work and then think that we can beat them by ignoring those very same strategies.
Sure I can. I don’t like Jews, nor the society that they have influenced. That does not mean that I must emulate them. We can win in our own way, and that begins by demanding equal requirements for all. They only win under the current situation because we give them undue trust and consideration. I agree that it works for them in the short run, but when we change they will have do. In part we let them get away with so much in the same way that spoiled children can dominate a household full of adults. it is sometimes easier to give in then put up with the fuss they make.
We mustn’t get lost in the illusion that they are all wise and all intelligent and least of all – all powerful. It is a massive con job, but it is still a con. They are often clever, but mostly they have chutzpah. As more truth comes out, things will change. That is why Jews like Friedman are singing a different song these days – they know they cannot control their less intelligent co-religious. Especially in Israel.
@Alice Teller: Besides which, their thousands of years of evolutionary path – as per KM – cannot be just synthesized, even if one did want to become the Jew (I don’t, either).
@Alice Teller: P.S.: Block has a interesting paper on why Jews vote left en masse. It’s obviously coloured by his ethnicity, but still worthwhile.
http://goo.gl/1HP0R
@Trenchant:
Just to play devil’s advocate, Couldn’t we produce a subset if we really wanted too? I am not very good with numbers, but if we assume that all human qualities exist on a continuum, and we have more intelligent individual’s than they, Could we find those with the necessary personality traits among us? I don’t want to, I’m just wondering.
@Trenchant:
Very interesting article, thanks for the link. The only thing I would add is their intense desire to dominate, everywhere, everything, everyone, and their downright pleasure in ugly scenes. More than The Ordeal of Civility, they seems to find them invigorating.
You are so kind about posting books. Is it possible to download them to a kindle?
@Trenchant:
All we need is geopraphic and genetic isolation. As long as we keep aliens out, we can succeed in any environment with any type of government or economy. But we need to be operating under the understanding that we’re Europeans, we have our own identity, and culture, and we want to keep non-Europeans out of our affairs. Basically what we need is our own Israel.
@fender:
Fender you are more or less amoral. Most people are not. Particularly our people. If you are such a genetic and evolutionary fatalist then one can argue that nature is just taking its course. At the very least you must acknowledge that we are different, we have different physical (thank goodness!) and mental characteristics.
When I said ‘leave them alone’ I meant we should not exploit other peoples. We should let them be in their own nations. That does not conflict with the idea of challenging and expelling people who are essentially trying to wipe us out.
Fender i appreciate your frankness, but I find your post-christian, post modern amorality disturbing.
@me:
I’m not a post-Christian amoralist, I’m a pre-Christian moralist. My values are based on the values of Greece and Rome, before Judaic thought took over in the form of Christianity.
Also, you need to realize that every argument used against Whites is a moral argument. The tribe’s arguments are not that Whites have a culture, history, and interests of their own (these are facts), their arguments are that Whites are uniquely evil, exploitive, and racist (these are moral attacks). The tribe wields morality as a weapon because they know that Whites are fond of moral arguments due to their inborn altruism.
In order to defeat the tribe’s arguments you need to defeat the morality that says that everyone is equal, and that the “evil” ones need to atone for their sins. These are slave values. Whites need to go back to their original pre-Christian aristocratic values if they have any hope of surviving.
@fender:
Is it possible that much of our apparent disagreement is due to a lack of precise definitions? Jews pervert Classical virtues as well as Christian virtues. We held aristocratic virtues for far longer than egalitarian ones.
The pagan virtues of Prudence, Justice, Temperance and Fortitude are not those the Jews practice, merely words they twist to suit themselves.
@Alice Teller:
The Straussians perverted Socrates and Plato to support their neocon agenda. I don’t think they were too keen on the pre-Socratic Greeks.
Of course when Jews teach European history it’s always in a way that ignores the racial aspect of it…unless of course that racial aspect is entirely negative.
It’s hard to pervert classical, aristocratic values though, because they’re absolute. The building up of strength, the nobility of bloodlines, and the Culture of Beauty are all pretty much what modern Jews and dumb liberal Whites would consider “fascist.”
@fender:
so infanticide ‘s ok? selling your children into slavery? .. wasn’t Rome, long before it was christian the first universalist multicultural empire, And long before it was Christian rome was weak, effeminate, decadent and ripe for destruction.
I don’t want to get into the tiresome discussion again, but in my eyes anyone who wants to toss out the last 2000 years of western civilization – its religion, theology and art (a relfection of its beliefs- from Gothic cathedrals to the Renaissance masters, ) is just as much an enemy and just as destructive as any marxist. It’s the naturalistic/Rousseau fallacy – if we can just through out what’s holding us down and return to our savage selves we’ll enter utopia on earth.
It is inaccurate and disingenuous to refer to Christianity as Judaic. That is like calling Luther catholic. Lets say a form of government arises in Hungry, its called communism. By your reasoning, the 54 uprising was ‘judaic/communistic’ . If anything Christianity strengthened the resolve of, say the Spanish during the Reconquista, or the Knight of St. John at Malta.
Then fight the lies, expose the truth show that are the wicked ones. Why do you think they want to maintain such a stranglehold on public discourse.?
You contradict yourself> if whites have inborn altruism, then they won’t act like the Jewish elite do.
@Alice Teller: alice, if the laws of our nation were merely enforced,particularly national security (even pre-9/11) and financial prudence, it would have the appearance of an anti-semitic /NS roundup. Just like the uprising in Hungry in 54 and the polish one in the 18th century.
@me:
I cannot claim familiarity with the details of Eastern European history, I see your point. Although, it must be admitted that they have so many gentile collaborators that it would be a mixed crowd.
I would be very happy if we could just reclaim and enforce the constitution as a wonderful start. Lacking that, even the laws on the books – right now- would be a huge beginning.
Have you seen the painting of Obama trashing the constitution?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KGlBHyVeYU
@Alice Teller:
In Poland they were exclusively the tax collecting class (the arenda system) much like ‘privitization’ today, they simply promised lazy,corrupt lords (and sadly corrupt church offiicials) x amount of money and they could keep the rest – do to this they ruthelessly exploited the peasants. I believe that Kevin MacDonald has even wrote the the Arenda system, as it was called, effectively wiped out any hopes of a middle class in east europe and plunged the region into a back water – much like they are trying to do here.
When the peasants revolted in the 18th century it had all the appearances of ‘antisemitic’ incident (and groups like the ADL still look at it that way) because all the oppressors were Jewish.
i have not seen that painting. I will take a look.
@Alice Teller: just watched it.. it’s kind of funny that he has Lincoln and Bush (GW) seemingly horrified – bush was a huge spender and constitution abuser – as was lincoln….. but I see the point.
@me:
Sadly, the decline has been ongoing for a long time now. I am, never the less, heartened by some scenes from the Republican race. The are often the only large, all white crowds in modern life. Surely we can make something of the gathering alone?
If any real attention is paid to Obama’s recent assault on freedom of conscious via the Catholic Church, we may be able to gain back some white, Catholic groups from the Democrats. I expect nothing from the politicians themselves, but I take hope from anything that brings us together.
What are they going to do – force people to be republicans?
@fender: “In order to defeat the tribe’s arguments you need to defeat the morality that says that everyone is equal, and that the “evil” ones need to atone for their sins”
I don’t consider rejecting egalitarianism a moral argument, rather a scientific one. I also don’t believe different means inferior, either. To me, the highly trusting part is both boon and bane, and becoming aware of this uniqueness is the cure to self-oppression.
@Alice Teller: for some reason the catholic church seems to be a particular target for the left- I think that’s a reflection of Jewish hatred and fear of it. IT has no rational basis and the irrational assaults will continue.
Off hand does anyone know if Obama applied the same heavy handed policy to say , orthodox jewish groups or muslims?
or is it like the recent child molesting case in brooklyn (where rabbis made a public call to kill any jew who rats on them) – completely ignored by the the NYT times, instead of a two week front page feature everytime a catholic case emerges.
@me:
I think that Jews have an unerring instinct for who poses the most danger to their agenda. The Catholic Church is the ancient enemy.
I have differences with the Church, but one undeniable fact is that if we had all followed the Church’s teaching on reproduction and the sacramental nature of marriage we would not be heading for minority status. We would all have lots of babies.
The left has been determined to reduce the marital bond to no more than the homosexual joining. Two separate entities, each with their own, independent lives who come together in lust. No obligation to each other, society or the future.
@me:
“wasn’t Rome, long before it was christian the first universalist multicultural empire,”
No, and don’t listen to anyone who says that. They just want to try and come up with a historical precedent for multiculturalism where none exists.
When the Romans conquered other peoples they did it to spread Roman law, Roman culture, and the Roman religion. Other peoples were absorbed into Rome; Rome did not adapt to their cultures.
“in my eyes anyone who wants to toss out the last 2000 years of western civilization – its religion, theology and art (a relfection of its beliefs- from Gothic cathedrals to the Renaissance masters, ) is just as much an enemy and just as destructive as any marxist.”
All that needs to be tossed out is the slave moral code and the quest for univeral equality. I’m not trying to do away with anything else, least of all the music and art.
“It’s the naturalistic/Rousseau fallacy – if we can just through out what’s holding us down and return to our savage selves we’ll enter utopia on earth. ”
Rousseau is exactly who I oppose. Society does not corrupt man, man corrupts society. Rousseau, like all the others who preached “freedom” and “liberty,” had his ideals backwards.
“You contradict yourself> if whites have inborn altruism, then they won’t act like the Jewish elite do.”
People can change. Look at the Swedes: they used to be the most virile and merciless warriors in the west, and now they’re the most feminized and cowardly people in the west.
@fender:
Would you expand on what you call the slave morality? To accept ourselves as equal before God merely acknowledges that as God’s creatures we are so far beneath him, that only he can judge us based on our gifts and how we used them. Equality before the law has been trashed. Our problem in America is that some are more equal than others. Affirmative action is for legal corruption that says we must elevate some who are demonstrably less qualified.
Am I the only person in America that connects our current situation of decline on all levels, to the Civil Rights Act, which demanded that qualifications be ignored?
@Alice Teller:
The master-slave dichotomy was invented by Hegel and then expanded upon by Nietzsche. The basic argument is that there are two types of morality: aristocratic and slave.
The morality of the aristocrats is this: the good are strong, powerful, courageous, and commandeering. They are the ones who determine right and wrong and exert their will and influence over others. Aristocrats see only themselves as the measure of all things.
The morality of the slave is this: the good are the weak, powerless, sickly, and wretched. The evil are the aristocrats, because they are powerful. Slave moralists are people of ressentiment (French word); they resent the power and nobility of the strong and always seek to subvert and corrupt it using their moral arguments.
Nietzsche- who was otherwise not at all antisemetic-correctly saw the Jews as the world’s foremost slave moralists. Taking what we know of Jewish psychology and their historical hatred of European aristrocracies, arts, cultures, etc. we see that this is right. The Jews are a people of great ressentiment– everything they do is a reaction to us, to bring us down, and to make us small and weak.
What does this have to do with Christianity? It was Christianity- originally a Jewish belief system- that inverted the values of Europe. The good were no longer the proud, noble conquerors, the good were the oppressed and the wretched. Christianity then evolved into liberalism and finally socialism, all of which carry the same paradigm: devote all your energies to lifting up the weak and helpless.
This was ultimately what WWII was about: master morality vs. slave morality. On one hand you had master morality, personified in Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany and their devotion to power and beauty, vs communist Russia and capitalist Europe, spiritually deadened servants to the ideas of equality and justice.
@fender:
and roman citizenship, Saul of Tarsus even had it. thus it was ‘multicultral’ as all empires are.
this is laughable. Rome completely transformed itself absorbing greek culture – most all of what we have roman ‘art’ is simply copies of greek statues. they did introduce the arch and a variation of the capital, but other than that their architecture is nearly indistinguishable from Greek. , to which many roman republicans cried decadence! – and were correct. and many religions, like the cult of isis, which was widespread Rome, the roman religion was just acknowledgement of state power people weren’t even allowed in the temples.
then it is not inborn.
it is not an accident that the most radically egalitarian movements were also vehemently anti-christian – the French republic and Bolshivik Russian and more recently the modern anti-Christian multiculti/cultural marxism.
yet you and others keep blaming the church and chrisitans. That is just silly. Were the Russian orthodox the reason for Communism?
@Alice Teller: i agree whole heartedly with your comments about the catholic church and acknowledging equality before God. I have come to admire the steadfastness of Catholics and the church.
.
@fender:
and the most atheistic and secular. hmmm
the moral code you’d like to ‘go back to’ says its ok to leave a baby to die of exposure if you don’t want it, and there’s nothing wrong with watching two men fight to the death for sport.
Now on the latter you might say ‘we’re weak’ or something similar, and I would only reply that the knights of Malta were among the fiercest and most tenacious warriors in not only western history, but human history.
@me:
There was no such ideology as multiculturalism back then. That would have been completely alien to the Romans, who modeled themselves specifically on their precedents, the Greeks. Again, when the Romans conquered other people they were absored INTO Roman society; in today’s multicultural nations, other people come in and force their ways ONTO the indigenous people. It’s actually the complete opposite. Yes, different peoples lived under Roman rule, but only because they were conquered. They were not invited in as immigrants.
Our altruism is indeed inborn but like everything else, it can be brought to extremes through intense psychological conditioning. It can be exagerrated to the point of becoming suicidal, which is what is happening now. We are not fully genetically determined; there is always room for nurture as well as nature.
The Bolshevik movement was not egalitarian, it was Jewish genocide. You should know that by now. Only the useful White idiots believed it was egalitarian because it was marketed as such, and they supported it because its tenets agreed with their ideas of “justice” and “social conscience,” as defined by liberalism, and prior to that, Christianity.
Atheism and secularism actually have nothing to do with what I’m talking about. I’m not promoting atheism, I’m promoting a moral code that focuses on the building up of strength, not the tearing down of strength. Nor am I blaming Christianity for our failures, I am simply saying that it was a precedent for much of our current psychology. And um, I’m not condoning baby-killing; I’m not sure where you got that.
Christianity had its uses, and yes it has produced some great warriors, but you have to understand that that happened contrary to what it teaches. In fact the biggest problem that libtards and atheists have about Christianity was it was often “war-like” when it should have been peaceful.
Today you won’t find any Churches who are talking about the tribal problem we have, nor will you find any major Christian organizations that promote race realism. This is because Christianity is about personal salvation, not race. Almost every major Church supports the chosenites and their dreams of global SPECTRE-like conquest.
By the way, this is OT, but WND is pushing Iran fear hoax. They are allowing comments, a lot on Jews – please join!
http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/ayatollah-kill-all-jews-annihilate-israel/
@fender:
I am not saying you were. But in saying you want to toss out Christian morality, and return to a pagan ethos there is nothing in that moral code that holds human life sacred. Thus, infanticide was common (still is in pagan non-abramic faith countries, and not surprisingly – being considered again in the most secular post christian european countries like holland) as were fight to the death blood sports and a host of other things incompatible with basic human decency.
Cultural marxism, bolshism, etc all were radically egalitarian in word, and they were (and are) viciously anti-Christian – my point is you can ‘t blame radical egalitarianism on Christianity or weakening of our moral character, As Alice Teller points, if we were to just follow the catholic church’s teachings on abortion, marriage and sex we’d be wouldnt’ be dying as a peoples.
You said “Rome did not adapt to their cultures” this simply is not true roman republicans complained of the cultural poision/influence of the Greeks (bringing among other things homosexuality) and as i mentioned they extened citizensship to non-romans which is very different from a nation-state. As i said, all empires are multicultural.
@Alice Teller: Well I’m more way-out there than that, believing that the only way the Jews are able to control is through the State, and that the real cult of these times is the State. I mean, think about all those phony PhD’s awarded to Jewish “intellectuals” by rigging the accreditation (detailed in “Minority Rule”) – would there have been demand for said academics without the massive funding from the GI Bill? Of course not!
This is where I part company with the NS brigade (and only moral grounds, too). I believe only anarchism or at least radical decentralization, can restore the Jewish/Gentile power balance, so mightily skewed to the former as it is now. Pace Hobbes, anarchism is not disorder, just a lack of monopoly order. It’s also not a panacea for all ills.
Quote from articles last sentence: “the best deceivers are those who believe their own lies.”
Don’t agree, here.
I think the best deceivers are those who DON’T believe their own lies”.
For example, Jews are master deceivers, they promote the lie of cultural Marxism in Western countries, but practice a double standard in Israel.
The Jew constantly preaches the lie that races are all equal, but deep down (Talmudic thinking) they think they are superior).
Quote from articles last sentence: “the best deceivers are those who believe their own lies.”
Beg to differ, here.
I think: “the best deceivers are those who DON’T believe their own lies”.
For example, Jews are master deceivers, they promote the lie of cultural Marxism in Western countries, but practice a double standard in Israel.
The Jew constantly preaches the lie that races are all equal, but deep down (Talmudic thinking) they think they are superior).
@fender:
Thanks, that was helpful. I do not speak or read German, and I confess to finding translations of Hegel indecipherable. Perhaps because of this I have avoided Nietzsche. I do have the H.L.Mencken book you recommended on my wishlist.
Based on your comments, may I suggest that the problem here is not Christianity vs Classical Paganism, but a lack of balance, the golden mean? The Church has traditionally played an essentially feminine role, attempting to curb and balance our more brutal natures.
I hate the cult of the victim as well. It seems to me, with the feminist movement as my main interest, that it is not the feminine impulse that has brought us to our ruin, but the Jewish contortion of traditional values. We are out of balance in so many ways, in part, because our cultural voices are dominated by a people who have never found balance. To read Jewish feminists is to enter a world in which hatred and contempt for their own parents is paramount.
@me:
Here is another version, direct from the artist, which allows you to hover over each president with a description of their adherence to the constitution. I think he tries to be fair. And, needless to say, all criticism has been blamed, not on Obama’s actions, but on racism.
http://www.mcnaughtonart.com/artwork/view_zoom/?artpiece_id=379
@Trenchant:
I can certainly agree that radical decentralization is called for. I think that we do not pay enough attention to the damage the Talmudic mind has done to our legal system. If there are any lawyers among us, a discussion of the effects that the Jewish mind has done to American jurisprudence, beginning with the initial refusal to have large numbers of Jews in the Ivy league or white-shoe law firms, down to the present would be very enlightening.
Certainly, a good beginning would be to chuck the entire IRS code and replace it with something very simple.
@me:
No, I don’t want a return to pagan religion, I want a return to a pre-Christian moral paradigm, but only as *part* of a greater belief system that puts our race and culture first.
@Alice Teller:
Hegel is indeed indecipherable, which is why his master-slave dialectic is pretty much the only thing that people really understand about his ideas.
Is the problem Christianity? Not really. The problem is the lack of racial consciousness among Whites. Whites can be successful as Christians, as atheists, or as pagans, but they need a racial consciousness that connects them. Our DNA is what needs to be preserved.
The problem is that Christianity has ironically turned into what it should have been all along- a peaceful, universal, egalitarian ideology. Virtually all Churches support Israel, third world immigration, and everything else that is harmful to Whites.
The Christianity that we need- the conquering Christianity- died a long time ago…and that Christianity only worked because it really didn’t adhere to its own ideals. That’s the truly ironic thing about it.
What we need is a belief system where our race and our religion are one and the same. Christianity is not up to the task.
@Alice Teller: Destroying the temple puts the Pharisees out of a job. They’re still going to be with us forever, but it’s the leverage through politics and law their best weapon, and that can only be applied when there exists concentration of powers. Political leverage and radical decentralization are opposing forces.
@Trenchant:
Now we must find a way to sell it to the public. Thanks for the link on immigration. I have not had time to view it all, but I believe that this is the issue that would most unite Americans, black and white and challenge the elite’s claim to represent the popular voice or will.
We need not begin by persuading people that it has all been a Jewish plot. The people, certainly outside of big cities, understand this as a simple case of good manners. When we were having a party, we were glad to have you, but there is trouble now and it would be best if you just went home.
That does not even address the anger at violence and job loss.
@fender:
“Our DNA is what needs to be preserved.”
But why?
We are not going to “do away” with the State. We are not doing to “do away” with a national currency. We are not going to “do away” with public laws. This is the silliest waste of time. Why are there 1,000 post debates on pros and cons of a anarchic-libertarian “society”? This is nothing more than a fever dream.
@fender:
..we’re going in circles here…
that paradigm includes infanticide , and to the death blood sports for pleasure, secondly, Christian era nations certainly did not put their own nation and people second., in face I would argue that a POST Christian ethos did. They didn’t grovel and wring their hands and apologize to muslims and wish for ‘dialogues’ in fact the Christian kingdoms of Aaragon and Castile tenaciously fought to drive the muslims from what is now spain. They de-multiculturalized, if you will.
@Trenchant:
For our own sake. What do you mean why?
@Jason Speaks:
Sorry Jason, I didn’t mean to feed the beast. You are quite right that neither extreme will be implemented, barring a total collapse, but facisism and libertarianism do represent the range of alternatives. The current system has failed us. If we are ever to do anything other than whine about the problem, we must find the right approach and direction.
I think Ron Paul is a great start, and I have hopes for the movement he has begun.
I think that we all suffer from the reformist plague of perfectionism and a demand for a purity. If we can find any flaw, we reject all. And that dog won’t hunt.
@Alice Teller: I wasn’t directing it at you at all. And people are free to say what they want, it’s just that we get literally thousands of posts stating that all copyright laws, all patents, all public laws should be repealed, stuff that has zero chance in the real world. I think discussion of the Fed for example is fine, but the believe that this is the Holy Grail of saving the White race is incorrect.
@Jason Speaks: There is no Holy Grail, and the State is prone to be monopolized by the Tribe. And yes, the State in some form will probably be around for a long time, but that’s irrelevant to the question as to whether it’s a boon or a bane. Crime has been around a long time, and will always be so, but that’s no excuse to rest on our laurels.
@Trenchant: You are correct that just because something has always been around is no reason to accept it. And your knowledge of Austrian economics is impressive, I hope it makes more inroads in the public mind. However, it is a matter of avoiding inadvertent red herrings with regard to topic of White survival.
For example, one issue which tends to become a distraction (not on purpose and I have indulged it myself) is the preoccupation that a worldwide civilizational collapse will present us with a great opportunity in the next few years. There is almost no evidence for that, yet I fear people get distracted from real projects in hopes that a war-to-end-all-wars is about to erupt. And even arguing over the topic may be a distraction.
@fender:
I mean, it’s a normative statement in conflict with what I understand as your partiality towards biological determinism.
It was sickening to see the republican presidential “candidates” slobber all over themselves in their total and unconditional support of israel. Each “candidate” tried to outdo the others in equivocating their support of israel. It sure sounds like TREASON to me. Since when does our Congress do what is good for israel and NOT what is good for America? Our Congress should have to register with the State Department as “agents of a foreign government” along with AIPAC, ADL, ACLU, $PLC and CAIR. Since our government is infected with dual nationality israelis (who have hijacked our “foreign policy”), it looks like israel is already our 51st state. Our politicians are more interested in the well-being of israel than of our own country. israel is NOT our “friend”. Remember the USS Liberty . . .
I used to chuckle upon hearing white “supremacist” groups discuss “ZOG” . . . it turns out that they were right . . . what we have worldwide is “jewish supremacism”. We can stop it by forming our own “cartels” and opting out of the jewish-run financial systems, avoiding the so-called “entertainment” and “mainstream media” conglomerates which are today’s version of “bread and circuses”. The political end will be much more difficult as suitable candidates for public office would have to counter the considerable “support” that AIPAC and ADL provide to our adversaries . . . I look forward to hearing from those like-minded people to help develop ways to counter our present “jewish supremacist” situation. We need to “take back” our country.
“ZOG” is “zionist occupation government . . .
Boy was that interesting. It’s easier to “see what they do” in another country than here in the USA, since here it’s too close to home. Cunning, gall, chutzpah, wiliness. I don’t know the right word for “whatever this is.”
@Mark Leibler: “My family has never forgotten our debt to Australia. We owe our freedom, prosperity and the very lives of our children and grandchildren to this country”!
• Ironically, usurped Aussie nation has been symbolised as a freethinking, egalitarian society. Thriving democracy downunder, where gutsy newcomers are given a fair go, because Aussies backed the underdog and cherished mateship values. Where most people didn’t care what one’s religion or race was, unless one happen to be unaffiliated or independent Jew, morally differing from zionist canon.
Encompassing scores of Israeli refuseniks who renounced bloody slaughter and made Australia home, only to face thought-police impaired internet communication! Primed by the ALP doctrine of the enforced internet filter in public libraries as a prototype to the multi-billion-dollar broadband conquest at the colossal cost to the fleeced taxpayers (who awaited in vain for the vital healthcare delivery).
Where none ever was able to run for political office, persevere as an outspoken journalist or run a noteworthy internet forum, unless subscribed to the taboo for discussion ethos.
Where clannish inhabitants in insular communes were indoctrinated as supposedly being descendants of the wandering tribe, who find no solace outside the native land, their ancestors were expelled from. Hence they followed zionist teachings as perpetual wanderers in a quest of aliyah to eretz Israel.
Apparently with the blessing of staunch Labor icons (akin to the belligerent Michael Danby MP). Hell-bent to surpass their political counterparts precedent. Whatever it takes to demonstrate their binding allegiance with the vicious zionist junta!
@Qwert:
thanks..’they’ the joo subversives are global.
as the stupid bumperstickers here in soviet monika say
1…coexist [with islams star almost eatinh the 'o']
2…think globally act locally
saw both on 1 car recently..the jews do think globally..
@knowthyenemy:
If you dont know of emma lazrus check her story.
What she promoted here and wanted there
is this ‘thing’ with jews genetic?