We should all he outraged that Pat Buchanan has been fired by MSNBC. As he notes (“The New Blacklisting“; VDARE.com), his firing came after “after an incessant clamor from the left” resulting from the release of his book, Suicide of a Superpower. The problem is that Buchanan doesn’t accept the dogma that our multiracial/multicultural future is going to be just a wonderful place to live. As quoted by one of the clamorers, Media Matters, Buchanan describes the America of 2041 this way:
America’s gonna look very much like California right now. And what does that mean?
California is bankrupt. It’s bond rating is the lowest of any place. Los Angeles, half the people there don’t speak English as — in their own homes — 5 million people. And you’ve got all the problems of crimes. You’ve got a black-brown war among the underclass, as one sheriff described it, in the prisons and in the gangs. And people are leaving California. And it’s the old tax consumers are coming in.
Now, these are not bad or evil people. Even the ones who are illegal. They’re coming to work, many of them. They’re coming for a better life. But the truth is they are bankrupting the state of California because of that divide you mentioned between taxpayers and tax consumers. And what happens when all of America is like that, when every American city is like LA?
What’s so great about being on the left is that you don’t have to rebut your enemies’ ideas. Truth and the interests of Whites are irrelevant when up against the interests and moral claims of non-Whites. Here Buchanan is committing the cardinal sin of the new dispensation: Implying that there are real differences between peoples and that a very large percentage of the newcomers are not particularly talented and are prone to sucking up government services. And apart from the economic consequences of the Third World invasion, I think it’s going to be way worse for Whites when they become a minority because they will be increasingly victimized by the coalition of the left that hates them so much now. Not to mention the findings of all the research that multicultural societies are prone to conflict, political alienation, and lack of willingness to contribute to public goods like government-sponsored healthcare.
The leftist idea that all this can be decided on moral grounds and that people like Buchanan must be silenced in the mainstream media implies that the future of White America should not be discussed openly and honestly. Facts and an honest discussion of the legitimate interests of Whites are irrelevant. The greatest question in the history of the republic—whether Whites should willingly become a minority—will be decided by elites in the media and their favorite activist organizations representing peoples who obviously see their interests coinciding with making Whites a minority as soon as possible. Those who oppose this agenda will find themselves out of work, excluded from positions of influence, and generally confronted with very diminished opportunities in life.
The really surprising thing is that Buchanan wasn’t fired a long time ago given that he has been on the wrong side of the ADL for over 2o years. Buchanan has consistently called attention to the power of the Israel Lobby and its promotion of wars on behalf of Israel since the first war with Iraq in 1991. He also went against the Holocaust Industry by daring to defend John Demjanjuk in the mainstream media. In the VDARE article, he quotes Abe Foxman complaining that Buchanan ”bemoans the destruction of white Christian America.” As Buchanan says, why shouldn’t he complain about it? He’s a Christian. And he’s White. Watch Foxman go into a rage at the thought that Israel doesn’t have a right to do everything it can to remain a Jewish state. And need I state the obvious—that Jewish money funds the left?
I remember well when Buchanan appeared as a regular columnist in major American newspapers. He used to have a regular column in the LATimes—inconceivable now. It’s been a steady slide from the mainstream. His fall from grace is really an indication of the power of the enemies of White America. They are in charge now, and if we don’t change that soon, the catastrophe will be upon us.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
The funny thing about the left is that they have no idea that they will be the first victim of their multicultural utopia. In Iran the left already made the mistake to side up with the islamists against the Shah. Here in the West, their individualistic and hedonistic lifestyle is abhorred by the immigrant-cultures.
Last friday I had a coffee with my leftist colleagues who were bemoaning that after the Arab Spring they can’t go on a holiday to Tunisia or Egypt anymore. I thought: this is just the beginning. Wait until they get out of their ghettos here in Western Europe. And they will, and they will impose their will upon us, not by words but by violence.
The first to post. Imagine that. And I’m at a loss for words after reading the vdare article.
Defy them, and they will go after the network where you work, the newspapers that carry your column, the conventions that invite you to speak. If all else fails, they go after the advertisers.
I know these blacklisters. They operate behind closed doors, with phone calls, mailed threats and off-the-record meetings. They work in the dark
Everything points to we are living in a Totalitarian state.
They then demand that the heretic recant, grovel, apologize, and pledge to go forth and sin no more.
It seems time all this craziness needs to stop, including the Left’s goal of transforming society. There’s enough out there now that has exposed the Left, via magazines, books, the internet. Not really TV yet. I was going to say Michael Savage has a radio program with a huge following, and he talks against immigration, homosexuality, right to own guns, etc., so if he can do it, why can’t someone like Buchanan. But then I realized Savage is also a Zionist, so he gets to stay on the air.
McCarthy saw Commies in the woodwork, and apparently he was right all along. So this is what it’s like living under a Totalitarian regime….hard to compute this.
It’s amazing that PB hung in there as long as he did. I enjoyed his journalese but his books were poorly written and researched by interns using secondary sources. He adhered to a morally conservative view but this no longer has traction even with a mature readership. Surely, he should have jumped ship to the Paulites before now. He will be missed.
Terms such as the left , the right, THEY are taking over Europe, America becoming mongoloid nation are not as clear as stating in my simple way the following:-
a] Siding in silencing criticsim of any individual who happens to be jewish as antisemitism but encouraging damning muslims is that like freedom of speech american style?
b] approving and promoting gay marriages is american democracy in action.
c] critiquing same sex marriages is basically un-american.
c] its American to promote groupings such as ADL, NCAA, but its un-american to promote groups that desire to be none of the above.
d] ad infinitum.
e] Time to establish an out in front orgnization equal to the others well established groups asap.
We White Americans need to take notice. If Pat Buchanan was fired for telling the truth about White America’s plight, what is going to happen to us when we are a minority in our own country? We better start taking consistent action on behalf of our race or we will wind up oppressed like we’ve never been before in this country.
If the elite tries to silence you for bemoaning the destruction of your country, then that is a sure indication that the destruction of your country is the agenda of that elite.
“… the enemies of White America … are in charge now, and if we don’t change that soon, the catastrophe will be upon us.”
In the 2008 presidential election, 78% of Jews voted for Barack Obama …
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews
Are the liberals worse for Whites than the neocons, if we can judge by the way Jews vote?
“Liberals are seeking to escape the consequences of their own liberalism. … liberalism, an all-encompassing belief system that prohibits any rationality other than its own insane rationality, forces people to be irrational in order to fend off liberalism’s insane consequences.” — Lawrence Auster
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/005864.html The Unprincipled Exception Defined
“This is a global community — we need to keep engaged for the sake of freedom … We need to embrace other cultures and other races … You will not object to your genocide.” — ramzpaul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omKe6K77Boo They Live – Judge Napolitano’s Freedom Watch
http://www.ramzpaul.com
What are plans for dealing with the following problems?
1) demographic implosion of Whites
2) demographic explosion of non-whites (except for East Asians)
3) anti-White ideology now ruling
4) open borders
If cultural Marxist Christianity is not replaced soon, then are the White European races going the way of the Visigoths?
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/021671.html Are whites brain-dead, or are they toiling under the Reign of Fear?
What’s so “great” about the left’s ideas is that they don’t actually interfere in any way with neoliberal exploitation. Not only do they not interfere with it, they help provide left cover for the neolibs’ ruthless and exterminationist exploitation of our people.
The catastrophe is certainly building right before our very eyes, unfortunately the vast majority of media mesmerized Whites remain willfully ignorant of their ugly, looming fate. This is essentially the misbegotten story of delusional Anglo-White America itself. A credulous people who have recklessly blundered in making war on their own kind, who worship false ‘equality’ gods, who follow suicidal political pied pipers, who believe in the most inane fantasies and delusions, who live in a land of ideological make-believe, who shamelessly genuflect to their denigrators, and who have lived in a pretentious state of race denial for way too long.
When the racial & socioeconomic disaster breaks over them, they will be dumbstruck. I can’t honestly say that many of them don’t deserve it, but the racial debacle will also sweep away many of us, as well as a host of clueless and innocent White people. An ethnic tragedy of immense proportions is in the making, unless fate intervenes.
As to the catastrophe, George Soros sees it coming. He said so somewhere. And so would I if I were he. Just look at Greece.
I would contend that the more acute threat are the moderate to high IQ Asians (and to a lesser extent mestizos) that are being imported to man the bureaucracy and lesser technocratic posts. THAT is the power to make us completely disposable.
The masses of Mestizos are problematic, but utterly manageable, even in a democracy, so long as we at least have the bureaucracy and technology and business positions that open the door to economic control.
Some very powerful Jews in the country have been after PJB for 20 years. In this case, Jews used their age-old method. They didn’t refute his ideas or try to; they just demonized him and went to his employer and got him fired. As someone just noted, it’s amazing PBJ stayed visible in the mainstream for as long as he did.
Side Note:
How long until that guy Tom shows up and calls PJB a Catholic blowhard?
The day Pat Buchanan chose a black woman as his vice-presidential running mate is the day I realized he was running scared and willing to make peace with a multi-racialized America.
But I asked: Have we sunk so low that men ostensibly on “our side”, (Buchanan, David Duke, others) who now admit that a multi-racialized America is okay by them, just so long as our fellow brown-black citizens promise not to brutalize us?
What depths of despair, what canyons of disgust, what bottomless chasms of moral surrender will we endure before we drop the Buchanans and the Dukes and the Merlin-Millers-For-President delusions and stop doing all the silly, worthless things we’ve been doing?
WK – http://tinyurl.com/86mzh9c
http://tinyurl.com/86mzh9c
I doubt Pat Buchanan was making much of a difference anyway, as right as he is. But seeing as how he no longer has to tow any kind of PC line, can he at least come forth fully as a White nationalist or separatist, a la Jared Taylor? And can he finally be fully honest about the semite problem?
@Lew: I think part of what kept Patrick Buchanan on life support for so long was that he had a certain utility for the left. He fit the picture they wanted to paint of a reactionary, bigoted old guard rightest. I refer to his homophobia and Christian fundamentalist stances, which are off-putting to many academic types, thus immunizing these against those views of his which make good sense. The psychology is that pro-white, resistance to the Israel lobby, anti-gay rights, religious intolerance are a package deal. Contrast how quickly Joe Sobran was nipped in the bud by the neocons–he was dangerous because he divested Buchanan’s rational views from those opinions of his that marginalized him as far as most educated elites were concerned. For my part, while I don’t like everything about PJB, he was certainly the smelling salt that awoke me from my liberal stupor, and led me to great forums such as this one!
@Ward Kendall:
Ward – I respect you because you’ve got real accomplishments in trying to wake people up (your book, but maybe there’s more).
But people like Buchanan and Duke have woke up so many people. Duke gets thouands of views on his videos…he’s a great speaker and looks good too…very good for us. Duke definitely played a part for me…and I came from the mainstream only recently.
You ask why do these people take various stances on multiculturalsim and/or avoid saying certain things and so on.
But surely you must see that they are seeking a formula that works best. Buchanan has been much less forthright than Duke, but Buchanan has probably said enough that, for a hell of a lot of people, they then start on a personal journey.
I see you talk a lot about what other people are doing wrong, but what are your basic ideas? Or is your contribution that of pointing out what won’t work, in which case, nothing wrong with that, someone has to do it, but then again it looks like a crowded role from where I’m standing.
@Dirk:
The Muzzies already are in places like Norway, Sweden and Germany. They’re going after Jews and the dhimmi natives. It’s bad enough in Sweden the Jews are leaving.
Even in the U.S. thanks to the Democratic party, ADL and ACLU, Muslims have been making significant inroads into shutting down criticism of their violent religion and their tendency to use terrorism against non-believers.
@Junghans:
Where does this idea that whites deserve it come from? Whites have been manipulated with powerful psychological devices over decades. There is no sense that as a people they deserve to get what’s coming to them if they let it happen. Apart from the traitors they are asleep.
The communistic bastards on the left are destroying this nation domestically. I’ve believed that for years. The Republican Neo-Cons, are destroying it internationally. Neither of them gives a rats ass as to what the others policies are, BECAUSE BOTH OF THEM ARE THE SAME. I’ve lived in California for most of my life. I grew up going to the great beaches, I hung around downtown Los Angeles occasionally. It still had back then, old and interesting restuarants that were fun to eat at, and the food was good. In those days, illegal aliens could easily be recognized from most other hispanics, becaue they walked around with their heads down and tried not to be too noticeable, because they knew quite well they had no right to even be in the state. Both parties are responsible for their being here illegaly, but the democrat party has done every possible thing to facilitate their staying here, as they even gave taxpayer money and services to them illegaly. The Democrats have spent forty years ruining California, and they are still doing it.
Every single thing Pat B. stated in the excerpt from his book is 100% true. In fact, it’s as verifiable as a scientific proposition would be. If Pats statements are that true and certain, and yet he still got fired, the only rational conclusion is that, truth is no longer allowed in the United States of America, and we are now not much different than the typical communist, or fascist dictatorship. In fact, because it’s a media outlet that fired him, it’s especially devious, because the media is pretending to be the vehicle that’s “enlightening” Americans. You know, you have the “right to now” bullshit. Apparently “you” only have the right to know what is “CERTIFIED” by some so-called guardians of “morality”,etc. As for my thoughts, I haven’t the slightest doubt, political correctness is going to be the end of this country, because Americans who care, aren’t going to “take it” forever.
@Ward Kendall: Ward, I thought picking his running mate was simply a practical political decision–in Pats mind.
If Dr. MacDonald had made a statement that there is a coalition of people in this nation that “hates whites so much now,” even 25 years ago, I would have looked askance at him. Not now. Now I’m aware of it everywhere, even though I’ve always been one who took the ancient advice, “Be slow to believe.”
I’ve been thinking about Edgar Steele who is being held incommunicado in a Federal Prison in California.
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/?p=733
Steele graduated from the University of Washington, then went into the Coast Guard for 4 years, then got an MBA from UC Berkeley, and then a Law degree from UCLA. Here is Steele’s biography: http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/bio.htm
Pat Buchanan may have problems? His latest book that got him in trouble with MSNBC is a best seller from what I can see. Plus, Pat is worth tons of cash—look at his old Presidential campaign finance statements for proof, Pat has a model portfolio. Buchanan has the money & connections to fight back if he wants too.
Pat could always take up Edgar Steele’s case in retirement. Even if Steele were guilty, he does not deserve to be locked up incommunicado in a maximum security Federal Prison in southern California!
We will see what Paddy O’ does, my guess is bluster willl be about it.
Natural Polarization is the answer.. A Natural Polarization Party. It does an end run around both the left and right wing-nuts and poses the problem as it really is. An epic struggle for control between the male and female gender.
Both the left and the right are having a FALSE DEBATE, Its not about “equality” as the left would like you to believe. Nor is it about “Christian values” (whatever those are) Its not even about “freedom” which both sides claim as their motivation….Its about which idiology is better suited to shepard posterity, ie. our children through what appears to be an ever more oppressive future.
Natural Polarization calms the fears of both men and women by SHARED control according to the laws of nature…women run the home and everything in it and men run everything else.
Note; The absolute power over the home is (indirectly) influencing every decision made by men by virtue of women being more valued than men…(once you get rid of religious superstition..stoning, beheading etc. and “democratic” mob rule…war, “freedom”, “equality” etc.)
Natural Polarization is the answer.
The question is, what will the catastrophe look like? How many years away are we talking? I can certainly believe something negative will arrive, but I can’t see Soviet style death squads roaming the street, for a variety of reasons. This is still a very different country from Russia, in that people do bristle at too much invasion in to their personal lives (I think they still do – admittedly they let our opponents limit speech and thinking in pretty severe ways).
And I don’t believe in the total collapse of all civilization theories, at least for the next 50 years. But, countries that have had large Jewish populations often have very dramatic social and political events. What, realistically could we except inside the US?
I can see more limits on free speech, more invasion into privacy, and school education that demonizes Whites more than ever.
Memo to Whites:
Interests supersede all other stuff. Conservatism, bill of rights, constitution, etc etc etc. Nothing really matters if White interests are crushed.
The American Right is a false right. Evola was correct in this diagnosis. Patriotards will wrap themselves in the flag whilst selling their daughters to the mulatto hordes.
Of course, left vs right should be irrelevant to the racially conscious White. To paraphrase Greg Johnson, “we need to make White racial consciousness hegemonic up and down the political spectrum.” He was right. America used to have racialist socialists (Jack London), feminists (Margaret Sanger), and labor leaders (Daniel Kearney).
Buchanan is speaking to the wrong crowd. Kwanswervatism is a state of mind first and a political ideology second. Kwanservatives lose because they won’t do a damn thing that’s in their best own interest. Speak to the postmodern intellectuals who shape discourse. Speak to the. disenfranchised White youth. Ward Kendall is right although I often loathe his personal attacks on William Pierce. Choosing a negress as a running mate was foolish. Stunts like that only alienate your (already small) base. Things like that make Itz Pat look foolish and cheap.
On the other hand, Itz Pat has voiced our concerns in a palatable way to the masses. For that I’ll give him some credit. Our cause needs many tiers. There need to be thousands of Itz Pat. Soft and demure, wishy washy, but at least framing the debate in a meaningful way. Next a layer of David Dukes, a little more hardcore but not radical by any means. Up the ladder will feature scholars like Prof. MacDonald, Michael O’Meara, James O’Meara, and Jonathan Bowden. At the top we have the radicals.
We can learn from the “left” here on this one. Rather than attacking our more boisterous thinkers we can rationalize them. For gods’ sake they made Chairman Mao an acceptable role model! Our radicals look like Buddhist monks by comparison.
So to wrap it up, don’t fawn over kwanservates. Don’t be wishy washy like Itz Pat. Speak the whole plain truth at all times. Never spit on other racial activists to gain credibility. And finally, look for fresh folks in different places than CPAC. Try the environmentalist scene and the honest postmodernists.
@Lew: Three hours, thirteen minutes. Oh, well; all good things come to an end.
If I were Jewish I would take PB seriously. Would I really want to live in a Balkanised USA? What chance have I of controlling the MSM if the majority audience is black or hispanic? Does a non-white future hold more fears for me than the present menage?
They might be slower but blacks and hispanics might be asking themselves the same questions …
@buckle:
Many generations from now, if the country is largely Hispanic and black, Jews will have less interest in it, because it won’t be a nice host to live in any more. But while I agree that very long term balkination is possible, I can’t see it happening in the next 50+ years, in other than a strictly cultural sense, i.e. no fighting in the street, just growing separation.
It still seems like Brazil is the most likely model for a future US.
Brazil is a hundred times more healthy than the rotting corpse that is the US
please, can someone point me in the direction of the pro european/white advocacy groups?
i ask who cares what enemies think of white people. white people must demonise their enemies using enemy tactics and lobby for their own interests using legal and pressure lobby groups.
i hope these organisations already exist i keep on asking but no one is able to point me in their direction.
@Henry Baxley:
Just curious, in what way is Brazil more healthy in your opinion? On every metric I can think of it is a far less desirable place to live.
Less divorce, less crime, better climate, fewer Jews, etc.
@Henry Baxley:
Well, are you particularly interested in White issues as such? We may be become Brazil, but that means a much lower standard of living for most Whites, more crime, and destruction of our own White culture. And of course, massive miscegenation. And I believe Jews have the whip hand in Brazil as surely as anywhere.
The sum total of the left’s argument:
It doesn’t matter if you’re speaking truths or that the facts are on your side, we’re simply not going to allow you to talk about those subjects, that’s all, and if you DO try to talk about those subjects, we’re going to dismiss you as evil and call you childish names.
Debating the left is like arguing with a four year old.
Yipes. “Homophobia” is an aggressive, manufactured propaganda-word created by a militant gay activist for the gay agenda and a bludgeon to intelligence. Aversion to homosexuality is not a mental illness, and nobody has “phobias” toward gays, but a range of human feelings, most of them natural. The word is newspeak.
This is very good thinking and I agree. I just wanted to call it out. We need to think these ways NOW.
@blue rose:
Michael Savage’s true name is Paul Wiener. He is a Jew.
Not only are Whites supposed to accept their displacement, they are expected to pay for it. In California, Gov. Jerry Brown wants to raise taxes while implementing his scheme to provide college scholarships to illegal aliens. Any resistance by Whites to footing the bill for immigration — going back to Proposition 13 in 1978 — is met by angry accusations of racism from the multiculturalists.
Jason Speaks;
I am interested in the health of the family. The nuclear family is the garden from which the future grows. is that a white issue?
@Jason Speaks: “And I don’t believe in the total collapse of all civilization theories, at least for the next 50 years.”
I understand this to be just a subjective opinion, but where does the 50 years come into it? What’s the logic behind the number?
@Henry Baxley:
Only in the sense that things like clean water are a white issue, but no, there a million things that are good for human beings in general, but don’t have anything to do with the current struggle white people find themselves in.
I bristle at praising Brazil because it is a race mixing model that is hailed by our elites. We need to deconstruct the myth of Brazil. There there are millions of people living in abject poverty in Santa Paula in that pattern repeats itself over much of Brazil. It is not a model to follow.
@Trenchant:
Oh, 50 years it is just a way of putting it beyond now or the immediate future. I sincerely doubt that there will be anything like the total collapse of civilization for many generations, if ever. I could’ve just as easily said 200 years, but there is a small chance that in three or four generations something could reach the breaking point – but I really doubt it. There is no good evidence for something that catastrophic.
@Julian Lee: I chose that word for succinctness, but I was referring to his overall anti-gay demagoguery and particularly his anti-evolution stance. I believe these opinions are off-putting to an educated audience, such as those in academia. As a result, his audience fails to heed his critical message about white preservation and foreign policy. My point is that the only visible spokesman that the MSM allows on these topics also happens to carry this intellectual baggage, which is so obnoxious to educated elites who have the ability to shape policy. Occasional persons, such as we at this website, I guess, have the ability to see past the distractors to the truly critical issues, but the vast majority of humanity is impressed by superficial factors.
@Poetryman: What I mean to say is that having PJB around gave the illusion of an open debate, but at the same time allowed the media to shape the debate significantly by coloring negatively those positions to which it was opposed. But better to have some voice than none, which kept PJB from pushing the envelope too far for many years. Now he has done so.
@Poetryman: Good point. Organized Jewry is expert at such divide-and-conquer tactics. “Left” and “Right” are mind-killing ersatz meaningless categories. Self (inclusive of tribe, nation, civilization, race) and Other, as the Jews understand instinctively, is the only effective foundation for political strategy and action. Behind the scenes, Jewish political engineers cognitively gerrymander the media, educational system, and political system, so that each generation views their choice as pulling the lever for “Right” or “Left,” never suspecting that by framing things in this limited way, they have already been set on the path to the slaughterhouse.
On another note, Paul Craig Roberts has an interesting piece on Pat Buchanan and Judge Napolitano’s firings: here.
Pat had a good run, just like Joe Sobran. We have the internet–as long as it lasts–to further disseminate the
facts on the ground, the most pertinent being the inadvisability of publicly being white. The next time you go into Atlanta or DC, watch out for the DHS and
be sure to not bring any gold, weapons or whiteness with you. “You be tight, but don’t be white, bro.”
@Mickey Meadows: If a dedicated and determined white race realist were to dig deep enough in the history of White European people, particularly here in America – I think in most cases that involved Whites doing something really extraordinarily evil and distasteful, one would be surprised to discover how often they will find the presence of jewish fingerprints. And, jewish financial backing.
Certainly, due to the traditional tactic that jews have used throughout their unsavory, nation-wrecking, nation-subverting, nation-plundering history – there will emerge a significant number of White Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, or Germanic stooges. Race traitors who decided to throw in their lot with the jews who were behind the curtain, to exploit, plunder, and to help the jews in the execution of their evil – but, in the end, this ‘front man’ tactic has always been useful to the jews because the faces out front are the ones who are usually assigned the blame for the evil deeds.
If one notices, there is a very disturbing and quite dangerous trend that has been unfolding here in the USA since 9-11-01. We are seeing jews stepping out from behind their curtain, and more and more jews are openly being installed into most of the most high profile and visible power and choke-point positions. Fewer gentile stooges are being used as front men or women.
If anyone fails to see why this trend should alarm White European people in America, then its time for a brief video recap of what happened after the 1917 jewish Bolshevik Communist takeover of Russia. Based on a book by Juri Lina titled: “Under the Sign of the Scorpion”, here is a must watch video that’s less than 7 minutes long:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lZj1emEb1-g
Tip: I wouldn’t miss attending the next Gun Show in your area. Bring 3 forms of ID and a wad of cash. The Second Amendment is the last obstacle between White Americans and what happened to the 66 plus million dead White Russians.
Let’s not let a repeat occur here in North America, okay?
@mark: Controlled Opposition. Disinfo and Misdirection Agent for the self chosen ones.
It embarrasses me to no end, every time some White guy will tell me how much he likes the Savage Weiner and how they think Savage is on our side.
Whites have no hope of winning this battle with that sort of shallow, uncomprehending stupidity.
The people who control the mass media are on a quest for ideological purity and will tolerate only a controlled opposition. Quite frankly I’m shocked PJB lasted as long as he did. Buffoons like Glenn Beck and Michael Savage have said things far more incendiary than PJB, but the they are given free reign because their message is muddled and unlikely to generate any sort of mass awakening.
Several years ago I heard PJB on NPR discussing the immigration debacle. He would be asked a question, would hit it out of the park, and then would be rudely cut-off. This continued for six or seven questions until the interview was terminated. Only the most brainwashed white person could have listened to that interview and not believed that Buchanan was right.
I disagree. Family IS the issue we all should concern ourselves with because it is the destruction of the family that led to multiculturalism and so-called equality in the first place.
While it is true that other factors are involved in the death of marriage, multiculti being one, The true enemy of marriage and family is democracy, (read mob rule organized and controlled by a malevolent elite)
If people had any inkling as to the importance of motherhood to child developement and hence the fate of society, they would dump this “equality” crap in a heartbeat. Therefore that is where we should focus our energy. Not what is good for the economy, national security, “moral values”, or even white people. If the family is strong the race will be strong. And so will practically everything else. imo
The litmus test of any movement, social system, political party, religion, or government should be one thing, and one thing only….Is it good for children?
@buckle: We are not fighting an enemy who thinks rationally or logically, Brother Buckle. This enemy is literally consumed – from head to toe – with a raw, venomous, vociferous, boiling hot caldron of radioactive hatred for White European people. I believe that they hate Whites more than they love their own people or children, which can be shown by their insane lust to destroy the greatest civilization ever created in world history – one created by the genius and talents of White men and women, and one which has provided them with their greatest parasitic nourishment in world history.
Thus, we can forget about any efforts to appeal to their common sense or to their own sense of survival.
There is only one way to save our people from being handed the same fate that this tribe handed to over 66 million Russians.
And, talking or voting are not part of that solution. We may wish they were, but they just aren’t part of the equation.
@Bobby: I believe Buchanan deliberately jumped on a hand grenade by selecting Foster because he was sent to help the establishment GOP destroy the Reform Party. Remember, for third parties to survive – and thrive – they absolutely must be able to tap into those matching funds spigots. To qualify for that, they must get at least 10 percent of the vote.
Had Buchanan picked a well known, unabashedly pro-Southern, meaning, pro-White – white man for his VP, I would bet his percentage would have been as high as 15 percent. Instead, he succeeded in getting about 1% and he killed the best third party to come along since the George Wallace days.
BTW: I am frequently ashamed by some of the indications that I see coming from my fellow White Southerners that strongly suggest to me that far too many White Southerners are borderline brain dead stupid, when it comes to being able to recognize a RINO and a Neo-Con anti-White lying globalist, open borders loving, war mongering for Israel, sleazy politician. But, I am beginning to get the impression that the South is finally beginning to slowly wise up with regards to this despicably evil Bush Family of globalist traitors.
Thus, had Buchanan made a wiser choice for VP – I doubt the whole South would have voted for Bush.
The posters who asked why Buchanan was allowed to stay on TV as long as he did? That’s your answer. It was his payback for helping to destroy the Reform Party.
@Henry Baxley: Family is the #1 issue with me.
@Dr. Faust: Thanks for the link. I like Paul Craig Roberts, but I think sometimes he misses. I feel that Buchanan was fired more for the race issues, but then again we cannot underestimate the ability of these subtle Mandarins to turn one purpose to another.
Pat Buchanan has a problem in that not only do the multiculturalists hate him, but he has also made many in the moneyed elite angry with his opposition to some trade agreements. That leaves him kind of unprotected.
Pat Buchanan is sort of unique that way. He’s managed to be pro-White for decades without the mainstream really being able to demonize him convincingly. This post is linked to and commented on here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com
And there are more posts on his firing further down on the same site.
Buchanan’s shots at our mortal jew enemies & their non-White foot soldiers – until now carefully calibrated to ensure his continued lucrative employment in the “mainstream” media – must be landed with full force from now on. If he wants to survive the oblivion the jews are trying to consign him to, he’s got to establish a strong, regular online presence, like Duke on You Tube, and write a book about the shadowy machinations the cowards of organized jewry employ to destroy anyone who opposes their planned White genocide.
He’s got nothing to lose now, so it’s time to sh-t, or get off the pot.
@N.B. Forrest: My money is on Patty fading into oblivion. He’s spent far too many years keeping his head below the edge of the fox hole, and old habits are hard to break.
Besides, someone – I think it might have been J. Michael Hill from the League of the South – once remarked that these ‘establishment conservatives’ have a #1 overriding fear that motivates them to always remain gutless cowards. That fear is losing their invitations to respectable Country Club Republicrat cocktail parties.
This is a demonstration of how the so-called ‘Right’ has been emasculated and neutered. The left defines the boundaries of the debate; the enemy defines the acceptable limits of discussion and discourse, and discussion of White European ethnic interests is, to the left, which means to the jews – not to be allowed.
It’s up to Whites to grab the jews by their horns and change that restriction.
@Luke: Thanks Luke, I never considered those reasons and they don sound convincing. As for the “braindeadedness,(maybe it’s a word) of white Southerns for the past 40 years, I couldn’t agree more.
@Bobby: Sorry, folks, I promise to check my spelling from now on.
Pessimist and the likes of John Hagee, et al. You’ll enjoy this free speech by individuals living off of $3/4 billion provided by American taxpayers:-
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/vandals-scrawl-graffiti-on-jerusalem-baptist-church/#more-35869
Farnham O’Reilly:
I am ready to work with any one who puts family above all. Also, if I had children I would be in the northwest, probably Idaho or Montana. But thanks to my own foolishness in marrying a divorced woman who had already had a tubaligation, I have remained childless.
@Luke:
Luke – IMHO you’re a good thinker…and thanks for the video which I watched. All those names and faces.
I don’t know what to say about the perils coming up. Only that the future is not set.
Luke, it is hard to believe what the Jews did to Russia after 1917 as caused by anything but a wish to totally destroy the country. I agree with Sholitsyn that it may never recover. Just the effects of 4 generations of malnutrition alone causes problems.
By 1890 Russia was the 4th largest industrial nation in the world, right behind USA, England and Germany. It has many climates. It has fabulous wealth in everything from grain and lumber to oil and gold. Geographically it stretches from sub tropical to artic and from the Baltic to the Pacific.
Geographically it has the same advantages the USA has.
Its vast population in 1917 meant that there would be enough near geniuses to compete with the English, Germans, Italians Americans etc.
But as soon as they took over the Jews just set about destroying Russia and its people. With all Russia had going for it in 1917, the destruction did not just happen because of communism. It had to be deliberate.
Jews destroyed Poland as well. The reason Poland was divided between Russia, Austria and Prussia was because the tax collection was in the hands of Jews. Contractor Jews, not goverment employee Jews. They kept so much of the taxes for themselves that by the time the division came, Poland had no army nor diplomatic service.
What goverment there was ws supported by the private income of the royal and ducal families while the Jews kept most of the tax revenues for themselves.
Affirmative action in America was created by Jewish attorneys. It was motivated by more than simple hatred of the goyim. Affirmative action keeps Whites out of jobs and most importantly keeps White genius, innovation and work ethic out of the workplace.
Jews could not bring about a 1917 Russian style revolution in America. But what better way to destroy a nation than making it illegal for the best and brightest to
be admitted to the best colleges and most important jobs?
Instead our technology and science is turned over to asians and indians who can copy but cannot invent. Our civil service was turned over to illiterate, innumerate slothful blacks. Our public school systems in state after state are dominated by low IQ blacks and browns.
America does not have 3 equal branches of goverment. The judiciary is now and has been supreme since 1804.
That judiciary is ruled by Jewish organizations like SPLC, ACLU, ADL and their numerous legal fronts.
The judiciary has made it illegal to hire the best qualified White man and mandated hiring the least qualified black woman. The judiciary has encouraged, enabled and abetted murders, rapes, robberies and terrorizing of the Whites by the blacks for 70 years. The judiciary made decision after decision that allowed black terrorists to drive law abiding Whites out of our greatest cities.
With its double blast of school busing and encouragement of black on White crime the judiciary has destroyed city after city. Whites flee and create civilized suburbs. Then the judiciary at the behest of ADL SPLC NAACP lawsuits orders municipalities to erect sec 8 housing and bring in black and brown criminals to destroy suburbs and even small rural towns.
When the orders for mass executions of Whites come, the orders will come from the judiciary at the behest of an ADL SPLC ACLU NOW lawsuit.
I can’t see much hope
@Luke:
Had Pat been crazy enough to pick Duke as his running mate (who else could you be referring to?) that would have been the end of his journalism career right then and there.
@Jason Speaks: I tend to agree about Brazil being our future, except for one thing we should seriously consider copying from them. They have only a self defense force, and do not fight foreign wars. It is cheaper by far when the other guys keep the peace and don’t charge you for it.
Otherwise, they are a great example of our future. Massive ghettos, fearsome national police, but also a plane manufacturer, they manufacture cars, sugar ethanol, jewish billionaires, massively tolerant liberalism, poverty so vast, millions of people dig through trash heaps, lots of indigenous people complaining about mistreatment, mulattos, danger everywhere you go, justice for sale, rampant prostition and drug use, conspicuous consumerism. The place sucks, just like the United States sucks.
@mari:
mari – good points but sometimes the hope comes precisely because the situation is so near-impossible. This is because when possible solutions are heavily constrained, it becomes possible to see the solution just by thinking of those constraints. The solution of course looks impossible, but at least…there it is.
1. Billionaires
2. Lawsuits
3. Powerful/Wealthy quasi-religious organizations
4…..that move from lobbying to politics direct
5. Buying it back
6. Free states within states.
5. …that expand
7. Deals with the rest of the world, to welcome home their brethren.
Things along those sort of lines.
Impossible? The early stuff is the hardest….but gets easier and easier until it becomes inevitability.
I would feel like it was hopeless…but there is just one reason why I don’t.
We are the European People.
@Luke:
Recheck you history. It was Ross Perot (in collusion with the Transcendental Mediation cult ) who destroyed the Reform party in 2000.
Pat picked Foster after he was turned down by Hoffa Jr. and James Trafficant. Symbolism aside, wasn’t/isn’t Foster more pro-white
than either of THEM? I think the two white guys were asked because of their positions on trade.
@icr:
Buchanan’s been at it since the mid-sixties—I’m sure he has lists of of thousands of credible, attractive, educated & wealthy White men to pick a vice-presidental candidate from. White men more qualified than himself.
If you haven’t looked around, Paddy O’s new “controversial” suicide book has flown off of the shelves. It is now available in paperback too.
Pat’s crying all the way to the bank!
@Mickey Meadows:
Well said! I would add that our major task is to remind as many of our folk as possible that we do not have to endure this. A tough job, but surely not impossible.
The metapolitical project ( which in this case is about changing the discourse to bring into being a new pro-white elite) will take generations. By the time it comes to fruition (*if* it does) most of us here will be dead.
Do you think the NSDAP and the Communists and the IRA turned up their noses at electoral politics?
I’m sick of writing about referenda and PR so I’ll give it a rest.
@Tom:
How’s the weather in Tel Aviv?
@icr: I wouldn’t know? How’s it look up your ass right now? LOL.
@Jason Speaks: So this is just your guessing, I mean, like all the Panglossian experts one would see via MSM who missed the financial meltdown until it exploded in 2007?
Geometric progressions on both sides of national balance sheets are not easy predict, but the debt side is more tractable than the asset side. Social science predictions are no more than trend extrapolations. Driving in the rear-vision mirror has been know to harm telegraph poles.
@White Jazz Musician: Great name, you’d be the exception that proves the rule, I guess? ☺
@Bobby: Of course I meant to say “Brainlessness” of White Southerners”, because brainless they surely are, by willfully not seeing how the Southern Baptist preachers are screwing them, IN MY OPINION.
@Poetryman: I imagine you’ve already read this Sobran classic:
http://www.sobran.com/reluctant.shtml
@Ward Kendall:
LOL!! Ward, Ward. There you go bothering people with uncongenial facts. The myth of Pat Puke-cannon as some sort of unyielding, consistent, principled defender of White interests just never ceases to perplex me. And here at TOO where the creme of the White crop should know better. Very depressing.
And–LOL! The shock!–he was fired from MSNBC, the preeminent lefty network on any cable band save Al Gore’s Current TV.
And while we’re bringing up unpleasant facts, let’s not forget Pat’s long opposition to all these Middle Eastern wars for Israel, that is, until they get going. Then he’s all in favor of them because bombing brown people gets his Crusader juices flowing. Totally worthless schizo.
@Trenchant: No, thankee kindly.
@Mickey Meadows: It makes no difference whether it’s hopeless or not, only with the benefit of hindsight will this be revealed. It must be resisted regardless, on principle.
@mari: great post, but Mickey Meadows is right to temper your pessimism.
Go here: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sean-hannity-takes-pat-buchanan-to-task-over-controversial-remarks-about-the-end-of-white-america/
And leave a comment if you want to fight the anti-Whites and not just argue amongst yourselves about who is “right” ….
I can’t help having a bit of a soft spot for Buchanan. In some ways, I cut my political teeth as a teen by watching Crossfire back in the 80′s, and more importantly reading his column in my local paper. He was certainly a skilled debater and gifted writer, and while my own path soon led to the diversion of libertarianism, there is no question that Buchanan influenced me, and all things considered, for the better.
I particularly appreciated that his columns were laced with historical and literary allusions. As a teen in the pre-internet age, these references were invaluable to me and an important part of my education. It really set him apart from other columnists, as he captured the magesty of civilization in a seamless flow. Whatever one may think of Buchanan, he saw the world through rich historical eyes. For me, that was probably his greatest contribution.
Whatever punches he may have pulled, he was one of the few in the 80′s mainstream press that offered any substance at all. As time marched on, he became not merely one of the few, but the only. Now there are none.
With our “precious” freedom of the press, there is today not a single commentator in the mainstream that will advocate for whites at all. Not one.
Mainstream conservatism is unabashedly hostile to us and our worldview.
Of course, it’s possible that Buchanan will get another gig, and presumably he’ll continue his column for a time. The internet ensures that if he wants a voice, he can have at least a bit of one. But he’s no longer the vigorous firebrand of years gone by. He’s an old man now, and any comeback would simply amount to a swan song. Even if that happens, it would not alter the symbolic importance of what has transpired.
The real story, as Buchanan himself has more or less said, is not that he changed, but that America changed. Just a few decades ago, he probably represented the Silent Majority. I remember, as a kid in the 70′s and 80′s, when ALL white adults were politically incorrect, to put it mildly. This in a fairly prosperous, well educated and all white suburb.
But now, that world is gone. The people have been trained well, and even if they disagree with the PC orthodoxy, they know to keep it to themselves. And the all white suburbs of yore are now multiracial. Miscegenation is common, and white children few.
It’s a world in which Buchanan is irrelevant.
Now, at best, he represents a Silent Minority that shrinks by the day. I remember watching some of the Reform Party convention on C-Span back in 2000. The average age of the conventioneers appeared to be past 75. They were in pitiful condition: lots of wheelcheers and canes. If I hadn’t known better, I might have thought that I was viewing an event not merely at a retirement community, but a nursing home. It was sad, these representatives of an America that no longer existed. I couldn’t watch more than a few minutes of it at one sitting; what I saw genuinely disturbed me. What I saw when I went outside disturbed me even more.
Meanwhile, the non-whites continued to flood in, and leftist/jewish cultural levers continued to spew their poison.
It was obvious to me then that, whatever sentimental attachment that I might have had to it, Buchanan’s America was over. It had, at the very least, one foot in the grave. There was no longer any energy to it, or any real gravitas. Just the weary regret of old men who simply can’t believe that what is so obvious to them is not also obvious to everyone else. Old men with decent instincts, but who had absolutely no idea as to the nature and power of the forces arrayed against them, much less how to beat those forces. Old men who, I suspect in more than a few cases, returned from the convention to a home darkened by their mulatto grandchildren. All very, very sad. I suspect that a huge percentage of that 2000 crowd is now dead, along with their world.
The race blind mainstream conservatism that has displaced Buchanan’s more authentic flavor will itself suffer the same fate. Demographics are destiny, and the Jewish stranglehold on our key societal institutions remains unchecked.
Not to put too fine a point on it: it’s over.
To be a bit more precise, it’s over for traditional America, for Buchanan’s America. But it’s not over for us, in fact it’s only beginning.
We can still move forward, if we are able to let go of what is truly and well lost. Sad though it may be, America is one of those things.
White nationalism is all that is left, the only worldview that is capable of accurately identifying the existential crisis that we face, and the only worldview that offers a way forward…however long the odds. For all our faults and foibles, we if anything skew young, but at the very least have strong representation in all age groups. We have truth on our side, but more importantly, energy and the potential for real fanaticism. At the very least we are obsessives, and I mean that as a compliment.
There has been an ongoing debate within white nationalism between the “vanguardists” and the “mainstreamers.” I’ve always thought it was largely a false debate, but false or not, it is becoming moot. We aren’t welcome in the mainstream, and we’re not going to be welcome. There will be no long march through the institutions, as those doors are shut to us.
We’ve got to face the fact that we will not be allowed to reach the majority of the white population with our message. This, while tragic, is not fatal. Revolutionary ideas and movements are made by minorities, and we certainly can reach the more motivated, obsessive and fanatical of our people. Those are the people who, if we are to have a land of our own, will be instrumental in bringing it about. Only they, the “vanguard,” can get the ball rolling, and once they do, then the millions of our people who retain healthy racial instincts (and large numbers do) can enter into the equation. But we have to work with the tools and capabilities available to us, which means vanguardism by default. It is not a bad thing for that to become crystal clear to us. It’s a good thing.
So, despite my soft spot for Buchanan, his firing is probably a net positive. There should be no illusion that the system is anything other than hostile to us, and his firing helps drive that point home.
The focus, energy, obsession and fanaticism need to be directed toward one and only one goal: the coming White Republic. All else is mere diversion or dead end.
As Buchanan himself has more or less said, it’s not that he changed, but rather that America changed. There was in fact a culture war…and his side lost. The culture moves inexorably to the left. Once mainstream conservatism abandoned the defense of whites as a people, this march to the left was inevitable. A new people require a new narrative, new heroes, and a new worldview.
For what it’s worth, the last paragraph in my post above was supposed to be edited out.
@Henry Baxley: What you said isn’t really true. Promiscuity is rampant in Brazil. The antibodies for HSV-2 are present in 44% of the population as compared to 16% of the United States. As a side note: Israel is one of the few places that has a strain of HSV1 that commonly affects the genital region causing 66% of those infections. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_herpes_simplex
Crime rates depend on your location. Northern Brazil is the black area and crime is rampant. Southern Brazil contains the pardo and white areas which have lower crime rates, but still are unsafe. Brazilians are happy to get the hell out of Brazil and come to America. I have many Brazilian friends, I know.
Trainspotter,
Your above post deserves, once more, to be picked up by Greg and pasted at CC as another of your insightful comments.
@Trainspotter:
The last part fit in very nicely. I think you summed up the entire existential point of view brilliantly. As Farnham O’Reilly opening line in his opening line of “What Will Work, Part Thirteen (Installment I)”
As beautifully nostalgic our cherished past may seem, we cannot go back.
Though I wonder at even the possibility of a White homeland. Whoever plotted out interracial marriages so that the future of mankind is peopled by ‘little greys’ — truly diabolical, yet who will be their Overlords in that future day, and will the ‘little greys’ come to find the Utopia they think will be — or will they find instead an Idiocracy, where the ‘little greys’ exist for the amusement of their Overlords?
Que Sera Sera
The future belongs to the young little greys. I wonder how it will be in this future Funland?
@Hans: You are right. Listen to good old Patty talk about how the Iraq war was unnecessary but how great the surge was.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Srwk5WwroXY&feature=related
@Trainspotter: Great comment. I ask this as a curious libertarian, what do you mean by “diversion”?
Cairock; My info came from Nationmaster and wikipedia, I have never been to Brazil. Are you saying the U.S. has less divorce than Brazil? please give a source.
@cainrock: Yes, I believe someone posted on here that a White Brazilian got a chance to go to Australia and he literally cried at being able to walk the streets safely. He couldn’t do that in Brazil. I think everyone knows Brazil is in pretty bad shape.
@Trainspotter: That’s a beautiful comment, Trainspotter. You bring up a curious point about the age of white nationalists. I would like to take a survey of the ages of people who read this site.
@Trainspotter: Another curious point you raise: I wonder if white nationalism, if it ever becomes any sort of reality, will only result in the salvation and population expansion of the most ethnocentric kernel of western Europeans, in effect, creating a sort of convergent evolution with Judaism. That would be an ironic turn of history, would it not?
I am 67….Good luck on getting anyone else to respond
Pat Buchanan: 300 nukes in Israel yet Iran a threat?
RT media
HYPERLINK
Bobby: ” Ward, I thought picking his running mate was simply a practical political decision–in Pats mind.”
The implication in your statement is that a white vice-presidential candidate would have been impractical.
In my view, it is never “practical” for white advocates to attempt to pull the wool over anyone’s eyes, simply because such attempts are all too evident. In Buchanan’s case, he made a feeble and very transparent effort to deflect public attacks that he was “a racist” by choosing a black running mate. It was a cowardly and foolish move on his part. The Left knew it and WN’s knew it.
Consider: What if Buchanan had chosen a Jewish vice-presidential running mate instead? Or a Mexican? Or a homosexual? All of these tactics would have failed because EVERYBODY knows it’s insincere.
Likewise, the American Third Position’s choice of a presidential candidate, sans any political experience, had no more significance than a cheap card trick. Then consider his VP running mate – a woman almost 80 years old!
I mean, what were they thinking?
http://tinyurl.com/86mzh9c
Mickey: “I see you talk a lot about what other people are doing wrong, but what are your basic ideas? Or is your contribution that of pointing out what won’t work, in which case, nothing wrong with that, someone has to do it, but then again it looks like a crowded role from where I’m standing.
You’ve certainly heard the old saying about “shooting the messenger”? That being, of course, the messenger of bad news. For years, shooting the messenger has been a common pastime over on Stormfront, whose members must perpetually adhere to a Stepford Wife mentality in their undeviating praise of white nationalism. Otherwise, they will be cybernetically executed by a high-powered ‘Account Disabled’ to the forehead.
Try making even the mildest criticism of David Duke on Stormfront (backed up with incontrovertible facts) and see how quickly a murderator (er, moderator) takes a bead on you. As a result, Truth has been the first casualty in the white advocacy movement (WAM). Duke, like others, are seen as “doing no wrong – ever”. Instead, they have been elevated to cult demagogues. That is why much of WN has the taint of a religion about it – and a bad religion at that.
My main issue with Duke is not that he’s a photogenic, articulate, well-reasoned spokesman for our Cause, but that he’s publicly confessed he’s willing the work within the parameters of a “multi-racilized America” provided no one race (including whites) is “given more rights than another”.
Translated: Duke has publicly admitted that he sees America’s future as a multi-racialized nation and that all he wants is for whites to “be treated fairly” within this multi-racial melting pot.
Well, that may be what Duke and his worshippers are willing to settle for, but I want nothing less than the ultimate eviction of America’s illegal aliens, including those granted amnesty in previous years. That, and more!
As for outlining what I believe should be done, I did just that about 10 years ago, and posted the report on various forums, including Stormfront. The murderators (er, moderators) were so open-minded that they deleted that report and then fired a high-powered “Account Disabled” right between my eyes.
I would be willing to outline my viewpoints on this site, but without the permission of those who run it, my hands are tied.
In the meantime, my comments are just opinions, and I well know that there are those who will not agree with them.
HYPERLINK
@Ward Kendall: Ward, great comeback to my thought on Buchanans choice. I considered you answers in the light of how the left in this nation operates. I considered their subterfuge on hundreds of issues, and I considered again, what Dr. Macdonald said about how utterly hatefull the left is towards white Americans. Your right, nothing, NOT ONE CONCESSION should ever be given in the political arena to the “progressives”.
There is no evidence collapse and economic chaos are likely to occur any time soon.
In fact, there is evidence the opposite is true.
@Lew:
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/02/two-charts-that-terrify-republicans.php
@Luke
Either Bucky will make a final break with “respectability” (the jew-defined limit on White opinion) or he’ll just do what he’s done for decades in hopes of getting another tv gig at Fox or somewhere. If he chooses the latter, he’ll just be running in place as far as furthering the cause of White survival.
He’s an old man now, surely with enough financial security to speak the unvarnished truth. The jews already hate his guts and openly seek his ruin. Why NOT kick ‘em where it hurts?
@Trainspotter: Well said, America is a dead duck for the white man. So no more BS 4th of July parades, no more saluting the flag, no more support of foreign wars, no more singing the national anthem. Personally, I see no reason that we should prop up this system. Learn to live cheaply (small house and older car) and save your money (after you have paid off the house) so when the jew, or black affirmative action or Hispanic boss gets pushy with you, you can tell him to do the job without you. Since many of us keep the system running, they need to employ us on our terms or keep the lights on without us! (Or keep their trains running, water flowing, planes, and cars working)
P.S. If you do pay off your house, invest in your own business or another white man’s business. Mutual fund investments just make jews rich. If you must own stock, research the companies directly and buy stock through a discount broker with no monthly fees and low trading commisions. They will make a little on the trade, but it is a bearable amount.
@Henry Baxley: Good grief, you’re old, Mr. Baxley! Sixty-seven?!? Wow. I won’t be 67 for . . . months. I wonder whether I still have time to accomplish something before I too am frog-marched to Trainspotter’s heap of superannuated white garbage. Or am I there already and just too brain-dead to grasp the fact? Either way, perhaps you’ll be good enough to keep a spot warm for me.
@Trenchant: Being, as I am, mere yards from Trainspotterish oblivion, you’ll understand, I trust, why I am rather less enthused about his comment than you are, my friend. Nonetheless, I do take the point of your applause.
Now that I have already twice broken my pledge of silence till Lent ends—that the Shrove Tuesday sands have not quite run out is my lame excuse—I really need to begin taking it seriously. À bientôt, Trenchant.
@Ward Kendall:
I am very open to the idea of America being returned to its previous demographic makeup (and then some), but from what I can see this is a nearly impossible task. I say nearly because if there was widespread support for such an action among whites and the strong willpower to do it, I don’t doubt it could be accomplished.
Without seeing your plan it is impossible to judge. But since there are something like 100+ million nonwhite people inside the United States, I can’t imagine whites forcibly relocating them in the current environment. Although, I do see the forceful return of illegal aliens as much more likely (that is to say palatable) in the near future, if whites truly demanded it.
All our possible future plans are contingent on winning over a significant portion of the whites to what has hitherto been considered unthinkable (at least in the last 50 years). It seems to me, that whatever plans we have for the future depend on how many whites we can reach.
@Trainspotter:
Mainstream conservatism is unabashedly hostile to us and our worldview.
This is sadly true. Much of their race denial is insincere (at least it was in the beginning); however I believe many conservatives have fallen prey to believing their own propaganda. They were so eager to present the image of colorblindness that they deluded themselves into being “anti-racists”. This is especially true among the so-called establishment conservatives.
One thing that might grow pro-white numbers is disillusionment among conservatives. If they could face the fact that they will never win again in the US, they might start to look around. They tend to be honest folk who believe in our institutions. Getting them to face their reality, such as the fact that they will never again wield significant political power in the current environment might break them free of old ways of thinking. In this way pessimism may be a friend.
@Lew: Yeah, right. When Forbes runs a DJIA@15000 line, it’s time to relax. Good times we missed you, great to have you back. LOL.
http://goo.gl/Zzssn
Jason: “I am very open to the idea of America being returned to its previous demographic makeup (and then some), but from what I can see this is a nearly impossible task.”
For the sake of analysis, let’s say you’re right – that restoring America to a state of 90% whiteness (or better) is “nearly impossible”. If so, should we in the white advocacy movement:
1 – Fully and publicly acknowledge the near impossibility of saving our Race and quietly make peace with ourselves?
2 – Inwardly acknowledge the near impossibility of saving our Race but pretend “we’ve got a good chance to win” so that our families, our friends, our children, and our enemies will see us go down fighting – even though we actually know we’re doomed?
3 – Re-examine our tactics and strategies over the past half century, as well as those of our leaders (whomever they may be) to see and to understand why they have not worked – instead of assuming that David Duke and Paul Fromm and Don Black and Richard Butler and William Pierce ever really had a workable blueprint to salvage and restore America as a white nation?
Did they?
Really, was such a plan ever laid out for the rest of us to examine? In the case of Pierce, was it ever anything more than a couple of ramshackle buildings tucked away in some isolated part of West Virginia’s backwoods and Kevin Alfred Strom bleating over the radio?
Because that’s all we’re left with, Jason: Either we openly acknowledge that we’ve lost and gone home for good, or two, we admit we’ve lost (but only to ourselves) and then put on a great big act for the old folks and the kiddies and all the Snidely Whiplash Jews as we continue to huff and puff about “all the things we’re gonna do!” or three, we actually sit down and conduct our own Wannsee Conference, one that we’ll use to meet and develop a genuine blueprint of action – something Pierce, Duke, Fromm, and the all the rest have never done.
You see, Jason – we’ve being trying to send men to the moon without an Apollo Project to guide us. No wonder we’ve failed. No wonder we continue to fail. And that’s our final fate unless we gather the moral courage to acknowledge the complete and utter failure of our leaders.
HYPERLINK
HYPERLINK
@Ward Kendall:
Yes I see what you mean. I suppose the answer from the other side would be that in the long run the entire continent of America cannot be returned to a whites only area. Therefore, the only possible answers are:
1. Whites regain full rights in the United States him (end affirmative action, allow free association including all white neighborhoods, etc.). In this scenario whites are preserved within a multiracial US. I suppose this is basically the Duke plan.
2. At some point in the future, perhaps 100 years from now, the US literally fragments into various nations based on ethnicity. At that point some “white homeland” will occur naturally.
The second point is so far off in the future and so tenuous that it requires little discussion at the present time there is no point in planning for it.
My impression is that the Duke plan might be plausible as a kind of stop gap measure until more whites are on board. However, from a political standpoint any assertion of rights for American whites may be a nonstarter given the increasingly anti-white nature of this country and its elites.
But this leaves us with no good alternatives, other than trying to awaken as many whites as we can to their impending doom.
Question: Given that virtually all American whites run from the issue of race, how can we hope to garner enough support for something as major removing all nonwhites? Doesn’t this require years, if not decades of remedial work with American whites to get them to a point where they would even consider such a thing?
@Pierre de Craon: On ageism, it doesn’t behoove me to be doing any stone-throwing – my house is substantially glass.
@Ward Kendall:
Well said Ward…this is top thinking IMHO.
Without attempting to justify right here, I would just add that as you say, within the right sort of strategic framework it is possible to make things as they were. If we forget for a moment, all the steps (mostly not yet clearly understood) that would be necessary in order that the ground be prepared (in terms of structure, control, economic control, wealth, political/media power etc in order that this next step was possible, the way ‘making it like it was’ would look on the ground would something along the lines of gated communities that bought up, and grew and grew, took on their own security, won court rulings or paid a corrupt and bankrupt state handsomely, for partial and the total independence…and then grew some more.
It is possible. Not saying it isn’t nearly-impossible. But then look at how we broke those German codes in WWII or used Radar or other miracles that won a war (that should never have been fought).
It is nearly-impossible that’s for sure. But as I say before. I would be totally defeatist in the face of this. Totally. But there is just one thing that stops me from being so, and that is that we are the European People.
@Lew: Looks like the crude market is reading Darkmoon.
http://goo.gl/zGTGV
@Ward Kendall:
By the way, I don’t mean that it is logistically impossible to remove nonwhites, or even near-impossible. I think we have the intelligence and the resources to execute such a plan. My concern is that we are decades away from convincing enough white Americans that this is a good plan. And big numbers would be needed to counter all the other white Americans who would stand against us.
It’s a question of will. What are the historical precedents for it? I’m not being Debbie-Downer; it’s just that this is the crucial issue to me.
@Ward Kendall:
Sorry for the multiple posts, but I wanted to state the obvious: of course white advocacy needs to review the tactics and strategies it has used over the last 50 years. This is just common sense for any type of political or marketing strategy.
If we had been trying to sell some cola for the last 50 years and could barely get 1% of the population to buy it, we would need to admit there was something wrong with either the product itself or how we were selling it – or both.
Pat Buchanan, as the lone representative for traditional, white America finally gets purged from a major media outlet by the usual suspects. I’m surprised the ADL and other organized Jews along with their gentile leftist lackeys waited this long to deliver the coup de grace. Indeed, it’s the understatement of the year to say the country has moved left as that’s putting things a bit mildly.
I’ve been critical of Pat over the years for his word parsing style but his presence still helped point people in the general direction of white nationalism if they were so inclined. His demise should serve as a warning that the anti-whites seek total victory and complete domination over us. So the soft headed among us should quickly disabuse themselves of the notion that we can still curry favor with or seek quarter from them. It’s best to steel ourselves for a long, hard struggle.
Media Matters- just another cog in the Soros machine.
@Jason Speaks:
Jason – In terms of removing non-whites what I believe is that we should not be aiming for this in the near future, and that our intentions/motivations regarding this should aspire to universal and honourable values – whether or not we are the only people doing so.
We need to look to the accomplishments of our ancesters for inspiration. There is a trackrecord in our history of solving often ancient and intractable blights suffered by all human civilizations, not by trying things all civilizations have tried and been failed by, but by creating whole new conceptual paradigms that completely transformed the landscape of human possibility, with the effect of not just solving the original problem but relegating it to the status of just another legacy problem among many others all completely swept away.
In a sense this point is very similar to the points you so passionately make about not repeating old and discredited WN strategies. Imagine that point writ large…wherein the WN grievances and objectives become just an instance of a more generic problem facing all human societies…and within the West…not just White but all ethnic/cultural groups. Imagine that we aim to contribute a solution there at that higher level, whereby the objectives of WN’s are all met, but as just one instance of problems solved for other peoples too.
Would aiming for a ‘big solution’…one that shifted the whole paradigm….be harder or easier than accomplishing exclusively WN needs? The intuitive answer may not be the right answer, when all is considered.
One issue – for example – is in terms of tensions between the White and Jewish peoples. Is the idea of staging some sort of fightback that harms the Jewish people really a good solution to this problem? Hasn’t that been done many times before, only to accomplish yet another cycle of hurt for both peoples?
What if it was possible, instead, to create a whole new conceptual paradigm whereby just one of the effects was simply to neutralise the ancient and deeply ingrained hostile strategies used against us, such that they no longer worked, and would never work again. In a situation like that, the Jewish people would simply no longer be our enemy. Over time the two peoples would normalize and learn to live in peace. Even if they hated us and wanted our downfall…it would not matter….many peoples want the downfall of our people, and of other peoples, but unless they have the means to accomplish it, it does not really matter and need not get in the way of friendship.
It sounds crazy…impossible….but isn’t our current situation anyway impossible? In fact I think the teachings of KM, at the highest level of insight, are that it isn’t impossible at all, simply because the Jewish people do not change their strategies…they use the same approaches as they have done for hundreds of years.
Another consideration is just that I don’t think Europeans find it very inspiring to be driven by negatives and grievances. They are OK for a quick war, but just not of a temperment for sustained century after century of bile and hatred. We are builders not levelers.
@Mickey Meadows:
What if it was possible, instead, to create a whole new conceptual paradigm whereby just one of the effects was simply to neutralise the ancient and deeply ingrained hostile strategies used against us, such that they no longer worked, and would never work again.
That does sound very good. I wonder if the new research showing homogeneous societies function better than ones with ethnic diversity could be helpful. I also wonder if the success of Japan and China – to very homogeneous societies – will change opinions about the value of diversity.
Pat Buchanan is a stalwart who has fought the good fight and has never wavered. And his run is not over yet!
I just listened to an interview of Tom and John Metzger done by Christopher Hitchens back in 1991. They held up fairly well and John did well for a kid of 23. However, one problem were the predictions of imminent race war. Tom also predicted that the cities were about to fall apart and that very soon people would have to choose sides in street battle.
None of that happened. And we could have traveled back another 30 years to the 1960 and heard the exact same predictions. I’m not trying to be a meanie weenie, or to “demoralize” anyone, I’m simply pointing out that predictions of imminent bloody streetfighting along with cities in ruins never actually come true, nor have they rallied white people in the past, and I believe they ultimately undermine our credibility.
Please don’t misunderstand me because I’m not cheerleading for the “team”. Just trying to improve our performance.
A warning from Britain:
“Twenty percent of the British school population is white…”
[ http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/a_warning_from_britain.html ]
@Dirk: Being kind of tired and not reading too clearly, I thought “Wait until they get out of their ghettos here in Western Europe. And they will, and they will impose their will upon us, not by words but by violence” referred to the Leftists! But that is what the Left did in the last century (Russia, China, Cambodia, etc.) One can however in fact imagine the Leftist elite coming out of their bubble (or self-imposed ghettos separting them from the hoipolloi) to firmly deal with the now minority whites (Russia, China, Cambodia, etc.) once and for all….
@Mickey Meadows: Agree completely!
Jason: “By the way, I don’t mean that it is logistically impossible to remove nonwhites, or even near-impossible. I think we have the intelligence and the resources to execute such a plan. My concern is that we are decades away from convincing enough white Americans that this is a good plan. And big numbers would be needed to counter all the other white Americans who would stand against us. It’s a question of will. What are the historical precedents for it?”
For those capable of holding panoramic concepts within their minds, the issue of rounding up, containment in processing centers, and then controlled repatriation of millions of Hispanics back over our Southwestern borders is within our technological reach. As someone once said, “If millions of Mexicans managed to ooze over our borders without any help to begin with, then they can be made to ooze right back again by simply applying the necessary pressure points.”
We’re more than “decades away” when one assesses the present state of the white advocacy movement. Not a single leader has outlined a blueprint for the removal of America’s frothing swarms of Third Worlders. Though not a “leader” myself, I have formulated in detail what actions the WN movement should take to begin the process for building and managing a white nationalist state, from its physical infrastructure to its system of government to its economic system.
Unfortunately, proceeding with such a blueprint requires capitalization, something that David Duke can get for his extended European vacation tours but more difficult to come by when it involves financing something that ultimately requires hiring personnel and establishing a command center.
People like you, Jason. I think you have the right attitude and the proper balance of intelligence and investigative curiosity.
Anyway, it doesn’t have to be “decades”, if the right blueprint is created and enacted upon.
Click Here:
HYPERLINK
Jason: “Sorry for the multiple posts, but I wanted to state the obvious: of course white advocacy needs to review the tactics and strategies it has used over the last 50 years. This is just common sense for any type of political or marketing strategy.”
You know it’s common sense and I know it’s common sense, but much of the WN body politic does not appear to. Year after year, they stumble around, dumbfounded and befuddled as to why we’re losing and why America is growing browner with each passing day. Few of them ever seem to ask: “Are we doing something wrong?”
One major problem is that our “leaders” are not men of action, but men of words. Even when generously financed by contributors’ donations, such donations usually fund expensive jet travel to exotic European cities and resorts, rather than going towards actual on-the-ground activism. Our movement mainly consists of the “eat, meet, and retreat” commandos, and has for as far back as anyone can remember.
Click Here:
HYPERLINK
If we had been trying to sell some cola for the last 50 years and could barely get 1% of the population to buy it, we would need to admit there was something wrong with either the product itself or how we were selling it – or both.
@Ward Kendall:
One major problem is that our “leaders” are not men of action, but men of words. Even when generously financed by contributors’ donations, such donations usually fund expensive jet travel to exotic European cities and resorts, rather than going towards actual on-the-ground activism.
I’ve wondered about things like that. How does a person know his money is being used for the reasons that he hopes it will be used? I honestly don’t know. I’m ignorant in this area.
Is there a way to prove that donations are being spent wisely? I’m not really talking about T.O.O. but just so-called non-profit organizations in general. Or any site that asks for donations… how does a person know his money is being utilized responsibly and ethically and actually helping the cause he wants to help?
Most people in America are not wealthy and must make some kind of sacrifice in order to give some of their money to a political or social cause.
I think it’s very important to find a way to help potential donors know that their money is being used responsibly. Maybe that is already being done. Again, I’m in the dark on this issue. I don’t know much about it. Maybe someone else will clarify how it works.
(I have no reason to believe that anyone at T.O.O. has ever misused their donations.)
Richard: “I’ve wondered about things like that. How does a person know his money is being used for the reasons that he hopes it will be used? I honestly don’t know.”
Richard, as I’m sure you and others have read in the news from time to time, various charities, non-profit political agencies, and sometimes just sole individuals running a “Save the Turtle” website end up in the crosshairs of law enforcement. In fact, it’s happened more than once to individuals, groups, and organizations collecting donations on behalf of the white nationalist movement. Occasionally, WN’s themselves have been sentenced to prison.
So, how do WN contributors know if their donations are being used properly?
1 – Because the individual, group, or organization simply tells you so. No actual proof is offered, no accounting is given, except for an occasional “Thanks guys! We just bought that new spiffy office printer we so desparately needed!”*
*But what you’re usually not told:
>That the WN operation took in over a $1000 from its recent donations appeal and yet bought only a $300 printer. Afterwards, the remaining $700 collected is never mentioned again or accounted for, but simply gets rolled up into a tight wad of cash and then shoved straight down into the pocket of the WN “leader”, to do with as he pleases. When the wad thins out (down at the local bar, in the nearby casino, impressing some babe) out goes another call for more donations “To Save the White Race!”
The truth is, virtually no WN individual, group, or organization ever tells its contributors exactly how much money it rakes in or what it spends it on. Anyone who dares to ask is usually denounced as a “Jew” and banned from the white nationalist website for doing so.
Like gays in the military, there’s a system-wide “Don’t Ask – Don’t Tell” policy among white nationalists when it comes to money. They’re as tight-lipped as Jews about it, maybe more so.
The alleged reason for this policy?
> “Can’t have the FBI, the CIA, the ATF, the JDL, the ADL, the SPLC, the Mossad, MI6, the LGBT, Starfleet Command, Kaos, Spectre, and Bill White knowing how much money we’ve got, now can we!”
The real reason?
> WN individuals, groups, and organizations don’t want YOU knowing how much in donations they’ve raked in from contributors because then they might have to account for every dollar they’ve spent and then you might learn that:
1 – They wasted your money.
2 – Or, they’ve simply got nothing to show in the way of accomplishments or deeds for that money. Therefore, by keeping contributors in the dark, no uncomfortable questions get asked and the cash flow doesn’t get interrupted.
Moral of the story?
Simple: Failure to have financial transparency in the White Nationalist movement is yet another major reason why we are failing. For without fiscal accountability, there can be no way to judge either the direction of our progress, or the effectiveness of our leaders.
Click Here:
HYPERLINK
@Ward Kendall:
Ward, you really need to get a blog of your own, so we can read your comments more often, they are really that valuable. You consistently have great posts and you have a deep knowledge of the history of white nationalism and the problems it’s faced. And you have some great ideas for going forward (at least from what I’ve heard – apparently you aren’t allowed to post them all?). I’m not alone in saying that if you got your own blog it, I’d be checking it out regularly. And it would attract a better crowd. I’m thinking over what you wrote and will respond later (assuming I’m allowed to post later).
I was honestly unaware of the pathologies that run through so many white nationalists. But I’m learning on my own hide. I will just say this: A movement that demonizes any attempt at improvement is pretty much a waste of time.
Someone needs to start a new blog which is presented and moderated in such a way so as to attract normal white Americans. We need a way for normal, sane, productive white folks to meet and share ideas. I’m afraid the prospects around here have turned rather bleak.
@Jason Speaks:
Jason – don’t be disheartened. The problems are not unique to WN…it is fairly typical human nature. It takes extraordinary effort and perserverence to influence.
@Ward Kendall:
Ward, I would suggest the big problem regarding finances is that the WN movement is totally starved of money. Wouldn’t it be better to radically increase access to funds, before worrying about financial transparency? Radical increases would tend to drive reforms anyway.
Good, so you’ll all be at the South Africa Project Rallies on Monday the 27th? Look forward to seeing you all there. Click on my name to learn more.
All this talk of removing non-whites seems off point. Put it this way… a choice of 2 countries. One is 50% white, 50% non-white, 0% chosen. The other is 95% white, 4% non-white, 1% chosen. I think the choice is crystal clear.
Other cultures/ethnics may struggle to a adapt but they don’t start out with malicious intent. Look for the group handing out the poisons, restrict them, and you’ll find everyone else will just grow in a healthier direction.
@Lombard:
This is an interesting point. However, as I’m sure you will agree, the long term goal should be a nation that is all white, without either browns or Jews. The evidence is clear that Jews undermine the white societies they live in; no further explanation is needed for those who have studied the issue.
And having a society that is 50% white and 50% nonwhite runs the risk of miscegenation. Over the generations there is the mixing at the margins that eventually erodes white homogeneity. Of course, without Jewish influence, whites would most likely take care of any nonwhites in their midst, unless the ratios were 10 to 1 or greater against them.
So for me, the ideal policy would be the establishment of an all-white nation with the removal of nonwhites and Jews. As a beginning step, simply insisting that all illegal aliens go home might be a good first step in reducing the number of browns and getting up the nerve of white people. Once white folks realize that all illegal aliens and/or brown people are not sacred objects, but can safely be repatriated, they might realize they can successfully reassert the right to their own country.
I don’t know what the prospects are for a future white America, but the more browns that come here, the more difficult any future reassertion of white people becomes.
@Trainspotter: My compliments on your excellent post on Pat Buchanan’s sacking, it was much appreciated. If 10% of our people understood the problem as clearly as you do we wouldn’t have a problem.
Note that the president of MSNBC, Phil Griffin, has a Jewish wife, Kory Apton, who is the daughter of “Holocaust survivors”.
Pat Buchanan has made a lucrative career out of not naming the Jew.
Screw Pat Buchanan.
The powerful Israel lobby group, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) censored Pat Buchanan for the last two decades. In October 2011 – Abraham Foxman, national director ADL wrote a letter to Phil Griffin, president of MSNBC, urging the network to stop giving Buchanan “legitimacy and credibility” by providing a platform for him as analyst – as “he continues to openly express anti-Semitic, racist and anti-immigration views“.
Even under suspension, Buchanan could not shut his mouth. In November 2011 article he called GOP a war party, praised Rep. Ron Paul and claimed that Tehran is not pursuing nuclear bomb – and that an US or Israeli attack on Iran will be disastrous for both the US and its allies in the region.
Pat Buchanan (born 1938) was GOP presidential contender in 1992, 1996 – and contested 2000 election on Reform Party ticket. As a White House official during Ronald Reagan presidency, Buchanan was blasted by Jewish groups for advising the President to visit German military cementery at Bitburg (1985). “The only one defending the trip was Pat Buchanan, saying, we cannot give the perception of President being subjected to Jewish pressure,” said Elie Wiesel.
Pat Buchanan is not friend of Muslims. He is a Catholic White nationalist Islamophobe. In 2010, Jewish groups praised Pat Buchanan for blasting Jewish billionaire Mayor of New York city, Michael Bloomberg, for his support for the construction of the Muslim Community Center a few blocks away from the so-called ‘Ground Zero’. Pat wrote on his personal website: “The issue here is the appaling insensitivity, if not calculated insult, of erecting a mosque, two blocks from a World Trade Center, where 3,000 Americans (in reality 2,864 including 35 Muslims and no Jew) were massacred by Islamic fanatics whose Muslim religion was integral to their identity and mission“.
Interestingly, in a 2010 interview, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, who claims Jewish family roots, said that Israel was behind the 9/11 terrorism.
The ADL in its latest report issued on February 28 – has called Pat Buchanan, “Uunrepentant Bigot, Racist and Anti-Semite“.
“Now that he has lost his position as a paid commentator at MSNBC, Pat Buchanan is trying to portray himself as an innocent victim of a campaign to discredit him,” said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director. ”But if one looks at his long record of racism and anti-Semitism, it becomes clear that Buchanan is really the victim of his own, cumulative bigotry. Thanks in large part to the Internet and his many books and columns, Buchanan’s bigoted views are no longer hidden from view,” wrote Abraham Foxman, national director ADL.
ADL has selected some of the following Buchanan’s statements in the past to prove its point.
“Israel and its Fifth Column in this city seek to stampede us into war with Iran. Bush should rebuff them, and the American people should tell their congressmen: You vote for 362, we don’t vote for you” – in column ‘A Phony Crisis – and a Real One’, July 15, 2008.
“If you want to know ethnicity and power in the United States Senate, 13 members of the Senate are Jewish folks who are from 2 percent of the population. That is where real power is at….” The McLaughlin Group, February 2, 2007.
“Neocons say we attack them because they are Jewish. We do not. We attack them because their warmongering threatens our country, even as it finds a reliable echo in Ariel Sharon.” – ‘Neo-Conned! Just War Principles: A Condemnation of War in Iraq’, 2005.
“Who would benefit from a war of civilizations between the West and Islam? Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel, Sharon, Likud.” – ‘Neo-Conned! Just War Principles: A Condemnation of War in Iraq’, 2005.
“Israel is in an existential crisis. It can wall itself off and annex what it wants on the West Bank, and leave Palestinians in tiny truncated, nonviable bantustans that will become the spawning pools of terror. Or it can give the Palestinians what Oslo, Camp David, Taba and the ‘roadmap’ promised; a homeland, a nation and a state of their own. Israel is free to choose. But American needs a Middle East policy made in the USA, not in Tel Aviv, or at AIPAC or AEI.” – ‘Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency’, 2004.
Well, Buchanan, my friend, even though you banned me on your website for defending the construction of Muslim Community Center near WTC – I must say you do sound like a Jew hater under the Hate Law!!
Rehmat Your comment is interesting. But, absolutely nothing the ADL says now or has ever said since it was founded to defend a Jewish factory owner who raped and murdered one of his 12 year old $1.25 per hour wage slaves is true. The prosecutor, Judge and jury have been branded as anti semitic ever since.
What is so anti semitic about investigating, prosecuting and convicting the rapist murderer of a 12 year old?
Leo Frank did rape and murder Mary Phagan. James Taylor did not rape and murder Mary Phagan. There was absolutely clear unmistakeable physical evidence.
Mary had shoulder length reddish blonde wavy hair on her had and light brown, not black hair between her legs.
There were only 2 possible suspects, a black man and Leo Frank. Between Mary’s legs they found black caucasian, not african hair left by the rapist. On her head, chest, shoulders and clothes they found dark brown straight caucasian hair, not kinky african hair.
The hair tonic on the hair was tested. it was the same brand used by Leo Frank. It was a standard brand, just a bit of circumstantial evidence. They didn’t have advanced forensic science in those days, but they did have microsopes, magnifying glasses and eyes to see the difference between the brown caucasian hair the rapist left all over Mary and the black african hair of the person the Jews have falsely accused for the last 100 years.
The black co worker did not rape Mary Phagan as the ADL has claimed for the last 100 years.
Founded on a lie 100 years and has lied ever since, that’s the ADL.
Leo Frank waS widely known as a sexual harasser of the 10 to 16 year old girls who worked in his factory. The first thing a new girl was told by the other girls was, “never be alone with Mr. Frank.”
That is why the ADL was formed, to defend the rapist murderer of a 12 year old factory girl.
Knowing why the ADL was formed, why should we believe anything ADL says? Had Alan Dershowitz been around at the time I’m sure he would have defended Leo Frank and written a book a year about it for the next 30 years.
“The truth shall set you free.”
Rehmat, you wrote that this is anti-semitic.”“Israel and its Fifth Column in this city seek to stampede us into war with Iran. ”
it is absolutely true. I have read that in Jewish publications for the last few years. Such an Israel firster as you must read the same Jewish publications I do.
You know very well that all they have done for the past 15 years is advocate war with Iran (a war fought by White American combat troops on the American taxpayers dime with American tanks and weaponry, just like the way the Jews “won” the 1973 war when every American tank in Europe was airlifted to Israel and thousands of American troops fought in Israel against the Egyptians.)
I read the local Jewish Journal every week and sometimes other Jewish publications. Can’t help it, they are everywhere in my neighborhood, library, at work, lobby of the condo, every coffee shop and in front of every business.
For years all the Jewish publications have done is beat the drums for a war with Iran, fought by the Americans.
Correction. Mary Phagan did not make $1.25 per hour. She made $1.25 per week, the standard slave labor wage for a child factory hand in those days in Georgia.
The muslim community center will never be. As I understand it, the muslims rented the building with an option to buy. They owe several years rent and the property owner does not want to sell to such deadbeats who can’t pay the rent let alone get a mortgage.
You are very typical Rehmat, Always side with the enemy of the country you live in. If in Russia spy for the Americans. If in America spy for the Russians. Persecute the muslims in the middle east and unite with them against the goyim in America.
Whether you realize it or not, Rehmat, your double dealing goes back at least 5,000 years.
I just spoke with a guy who owns a small exterminator company. He has been doing it for 30 years. He says that business is booming because the mexican immigrants are bringing mexican roaches with them to Los Angeles and S. California.
Also today looked at the front page of the Los Angeles Slimes Spanish language paper, LA Opinion. Right on the left side there is a lengthy article about how evil HUD Section 8 apartments that hispanic immigrants live in are not quite up to par.
Deplorable living conditions!!! Air conditioning does not work. Not enough landline phone extension plugs. Old shabby carpets. Some of these apartments don’t even have dishwashers. Horrors.
Not mentioned of course that back in mexico and guatamela they lived in the jungles without running water, electricity or paved roads.
Bigger and better cockroaches, just another marvelous benefit of diversity.
Dats “free” speech by the chosen few.
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2012/03/10/lol-israel-is-only-mideast-state-safe-for-christians-envoy-to-u-s-says/#more-36937