Ann Coulter: The Republican demise is all Teddy Kennedy’s fault

Ann Coulter’s column, “America nears a demographic tipping point,” has some good, if unoriginal points. Yes, we are nearing the point where pretty much all the White people will have to unite behind a candidate to win a presidential election. Even young Whites voted for Romney, with only 41% voting for Obama. This despite being brainwashed by the school system and MTV. American politics is clearly becoming ever more racialized.

And yes, the Latinos are never going to vote for a conservative candidate given their family patterns:

More than half of all babies born to Hispanic women today are illegitimate. As Heather MacDonald has shown, the birthrate of Hispanic women is twice that of the rest of the population, and their unwed birthrate is one and a half times that of blacks. That’s a lot of government dependents coming down the pike. No amount of “reaching out” to the Hispanic community, effective “messaging” or Reagan’s “optimism” is going to turn Mexico’s underclass into Republicans.


So what is the cause of the impending collapse of the Republican Party—and White America? Why it’s Teddy Kennedy, of course.

The youth vote is a snapshot of elections to come if nothing is done to reverse the deluge of unskilled immigrants pouring into the country as a result of Ted Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act. Eighty-five percent of legal immigrants since 1968 have come from the Third World. A majority of them are in need of government assistance.

This is typical analysis of the immigration disaster one gets from mainstream conservatives. Coulter acts as if, despite all the best efforts of Republicans over the years, immigration happened anyway. And if it hadn’t been for that evil liberal Teddy Kennedy, all would be well with the Republic.

The fact is that the real force behind the 40-year campaign to overturn the 1924 Immigration Restriction law was the organized Jewish community, not the freshman senator from Massachusetts.  And it couldn’t be further from the truth that Republicans aren’t equally to blame. Republican presidents,  including the sainted Ronald Reagan, have been complicit in the immigration disaster. Reagan agreed to the huge immigration amnesty of 1986 and did nothing to curb the real problem, legal immigration. Those chickens have come home to roost.

Not that they weren’t warned. I just came across a wonderful article by Peter Brimelow and Edwin Rubenstein, “Electing a new people,” that appeared as the cover article in National Review in 1997. But conservatives ignored it: “was greeted with a resounding silence. No argument with our assumptions. Nothing.” So the Republicans got Bush elected in 2000, but 0f course he did nothing on legal immigration and even pushed for another amnesty.

Coulter then switches gears to another soft target, blaming it on big business and completely exonerating Romney:

Romney was the first Republican presidential candidate in a long time not conspiring with the elites to make America a dumping ground for the world’s welfare cases. Conservatives who denounced Romney as a “RINO” were the ones doing the bidding of the real establishment: business, which wants cheap labor and couldn’t care less if America ceases to be the land of opportunity that everyone wanted to immigrate to in the first place.

Let’s see. I don’t recall Romney making a peep about legal immigration. And he definitely softened his stand on illegal immigration once he got past the primary hurdle. I have no doubt at all that he would have been pretty much like Obama if he had actually gotten elected.

Like Coulter, he would be terrified to be called a racist by taking on legal immigration. And she would be even more horrified to mention that the organized Jewish community is a big part of the problem. The level of legal immigration by itself (>1 million annually) will doom any hope that a conservative Republican can win. The reality is that unless conservatives man up and become willing to take on legal and illegal immigration, they have no hope for victory in a national election in the long run.

It’s true that the business community is an enemy. But the business community was not a factor in enacting the 1965 law. It was controlled by the American majority until long after the 1965 immigration disaster and there is no reason why it can’t be controlled again. The majority of White Americans don’t want this displacement non-White immigration. If they began to assert themselves on this issue, they could still turn it around.

But mainstream conservatives like Coulter aren’t even willing to mention that ethnic politics may have something to do with the problem. And a result of being guided by conservatives like Coulter, a very large percentage of White voters will continue to vote for candidates that will not further their interests. When people like Coulter are looking for someone to blame for the failure of conservatism and the Republican Party, they should look in the mirror.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

198 Comments to "Ann Coulter: The Republican demise is all Teddy Kennedy’s fault"

  1. KPRyan's Gravatar KPRyan
    December 31, 2012 - 4:32 pm | Permalink

    The business community may not have had a hand in the 1965 law, but they certainly had their say in NAFTA and that treaty was the final tipping point in not only the destruction of the middle class but in literally forcing many from South of the Border to illegally enter the USA.

  2. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 23, 2012 - 10:03 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: Yes, he did make his fortune in banking first.@D. K.: Well, I was closer than Mari…LOL…..

  3. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 23, 2012 - 5:55 pm | Permalink


    Joe Kennedy, Sr., made his original fortune as the youngest bank president in America, before either the onset of Prohibition or his ventures in Hollywood.

  4. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 23, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink


    We Baby Boomers are considered to be the native-born Americans who were born between 1946 and 1964, inclusive, Bobby, rather than 1945 and 1963.

  5. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 23, 2012 - 4:30 pm | Permalink

    @mari: “America’s emoployers absolutely do not want skilled white immigrants from Europe, anymore than they want skilled white native Americans..”

    Mari, this has been so utterly evident for myself for eons now. I’m lucky I always got into a job because I have always had a ton of friends to fall back on. Other people aren’t as lucky. Having said that, Mari, I honestly believe that the majority of Eurpopean-Americans STILL DON’T GET THIS POINT. THEY SIMPLY DON’T GET IT!! They don’t understand that regardless of the training their kids have, they are going to be excluded from job opportunities that used to be open to their parents, or somewhat open, AS A GENERAL POLICY. There are dozens of, by rules, regulations, restrictions, and tons of devious ways they enforce this and I’ve noticed that these kids and their ignorant parents, or at least so many of them, still don’t understand this. One would think it would be as plain as the nose on their faces, but apparently isn’t. This surreal fantasy existence, this willfull ignorance, will be paid for by very painfull and rude awakenings coming down the road at these folks and their kids like a tornado. It will mow a cyclonic path through every dream some young European-American college kids, and their parents ever had about the prevailing system and their place in it. STUPID IS AS…………….

  6. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 23, 2012 - 4:16 pm | Permalink

    @mari: mari, excellent post, but the age of the children of the greatest generation, the “boomers”, has usually been stated as being those born between, 1945-1963. (between 40 at the youngest, and 65, at the oldest.)

  7. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 23, 2012 - 12:18 am | Permalink

    @mari: mari, in many ways I fee for people like you. Knowledge has a downside, when one is living in the middle of enormous ignorance. It

  8. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 23, 2012 - 12:15 am | Permalink

    @mari: I particularly remember how I read that Joe Kennedy, setting his sites on Hollywood as a money making opportunity, said that “I can outwitt those rag merchants(the term he used for the Eastern Euroepan Jews that ran Hollywood) any tim of the week.” Oh yeah, whatever he may have been, he was one driven son of a b—-.

  9. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 23, 2012 - 12:12 am | Permalink

    @mari: mari, brilliant and completely true analyses of the history of who actually built the U.S. up as a modern nation, and the struggles that took place in that time.

  10. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 22, 2012 - 5:35 pm | Permalink


    “Libya that killed Khadafy’s child,” She wasn’t Khadafy’s child. She wasn’t dead, she was a 5 year old sized doll specially made for the occasion and spread all over the anti Reagan jew media. She is now a Doctor working in Syria.

  11. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 22, 2012 - 5:23 pm | Permalink

    It is a fantasy that America during colonial times and at its founding was an english anglo saxon.protestant nation.
    During colonial times the country was 20 percent or 1/5 african. How the country managed to survive with so many africans I don’t know. Of course they did not control the nation’s cities and many states as they do now.

    At the time Washington was president and the constitution, 1790’s, the country was just 3/6 british, not english. 1/6 was black. The rest were mostly germans, dutch and french, some canadien immigrants to New England, some refugees from the French revolution, some who drifted east from Louisianna.

    The most important thing to realize about that 3/6 or 1/2 british group is that not all were english. Many were scots and irish who were antagonistic to the english because they were deported criminals and rebels, resentful indentured servants, and descendants of the clearances of Ireland and Scotland during the 17th and 18th century.

    So even the “british” were not exactly from the same ethnic group. But 1840 the good protestant british owners of the New England textile mills had replaced the young british protestant native women workers with irish immigants.

    The coal miners of early 19th century Pennsylvania seemed to have hired not local Americans. They imported first irish and then other europeans to work the mines. The railroads seem to have been built exclusively by irish and chinese immigrants.

    The story of America folks, is that of class warfare between to employeers and employees. The employeers always, always refused to hire their own people right there and sent off to europe to import strangers. The new englanders were importing hordes of irish catholics even before Catholicism was decriminalized by the new england states.

    As far as I know, the only employeers who hired local americans rather than importing workers were the southern mining, timber and factory owners who hired native American locals.

    Chicago was almost totally an immigrant city right from 1840 on. The motto of the factory owners was “no americans need apply.”

    Believe me, if native americans did not have a history of trade unionism, populism a protestant native american movement
    etc, the employeers would hire us and there would be no affirmaive action laws.

    Employers don’t want us because we are aware of the minimum wage, overtime pay laws, workmen’s compensation
    etc, etc. We even go to social security occasionally to check if our employer is actually sending the money deducted from out paychecks to social security. Immigrants don’t do that.
    When we get hurt at work we report the injury to workmen’s comp. When immigrants get hurt at work they go to the county hospital ER and refuse to tell where they got hurt.

    So the cost of the medical care is borne not by the employers workmen’s comp insurance company but by medicaid and other tax payer funds.

    Jews love immigrants for the damage they do to the country.
    Employers love immigrants for the profit they make from them.

    And it has been going on since the 1630’s when the southern planters and New england craftsmen figured out that the White indentured servants would insisted on leaving after the 10 or 7 year indenture was up but the blacks would not leave and allow themsleves to become slaves.

    Interesting feature of early (17 century) labor was that the White indentured servants were never kept on as employees.
    The employeers just went down to the docks and bought more starving desperate wretches. This is in contrast to European labor practices at the time whereby the employers often kept the indentured servants as well paid craftsmen after the indenture was up.

  12. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 22, 2012 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    I realized that Tom was a jewish mole during that thread he hijacked into a discussion of Oliver Cromwell. It became obvious by Tom’s comments about Cromwell’s persecution of the Church of England (episcopal in America) that Tom the jew pretending to be a protestant historian did not know the difference between the CofE (episcopal) and the Roman Catholic Church.

    Go back to your AIPAC ADL SPLC training seminars Tom

  13. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 22, 2012 - 4:55 pm | Permalink

    Most biographers of old Joe Kennedy emphasis his bootlegging and stock market crimes. Few mention that during the 1920’s he was the most successful movie producer in Hollywood and his studio, RKO was the most profitable. Joe kennedy invented the movie western which bacame the standard pot boiler money maker for movies and then TV for decades. You cannot believe how much jews still hate old Joe for besting them at their own game, movies back in the early days. It is also why jews hate the man who invented the feature film, D.W. Griffiths and took away all his awards a few years ago.

    Joe learned about jews from his stock market crimes and his battles with them in Hollywood in the 1920’s. Eleanor Roosevlet, commie that she was had some things to say about the jews whose money supported the democrats.

  14. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 22, 2012 - 4:32 pm | Permalink


    The WW2 greatest generation retired 30 years ago. The generation that is now retiring is their children, the baby boom generation. The children of the baby boomers, now aged 60 to 40 have been viciously discriminated against is employment since 1972. There are more than one hundred million White grandchildren of the baby boomers who could
    take over all the STEM and other jobs requiring high IQ. But our judges have ruled and our feminazi and minority EEOC FEPCs and numerous local and non profit gestapo groups see to it that the no Whites need apply laws are ferociously enforced.


    Get that through your head. America’s employers want indian and asians for STEM jobs and hispanics, africans and anything but White for anything else.

  15. JP's Gravatar JP
    December 21, 2012 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

    1) Demographics have already destroyed the country. There’s no going back. 2) White people will be extinct before they ever wake up and realize they should be defending their territory 3) Ted Kennedy was the force behind the 1965 Immigration Act. Coulter is way behind the times even talking about it, but a lot of people, including myself, have been demonizing Ted Kennedy for being the one to push this on our country. And rightly so.

  16. mari's Gravatar mari
    December 21, 2012 - 3:13 pm | Permalink


    I wake up at 5/am some mornings and turn on fox news. I watch for just 2 reasons. First it has substantialluy fewer ads interrupting the program than other news channels. I hate that 3 minutes of “news” and 2 minutes of ads. Second, at least Fox manages to tell a news story in a coherent linear fashion without a lot of giggling and dilly dally. Sometimes the other news channels never do get to the end of the story. So I watch fox. And what do I see advertizing on fox every early am?

    2 protestant churches. One pastor with a thick southern accent sitting surrounded by a pack of “adorable” african toddlers. Whenever I see those kids on TV all I think about is
    what they will be doing in 12 years. Anyway, the pastor wants us to adopt these kids so they can get more affirmative action jobs or at least send money to the protestant pastor
    to give them food.

    The next ad is some american protestant group sending $25.00 food packages to Israel. In each package is a letter telling the grateful reciepeint that the package is from American protestants. You should see the actors, ancient bubushkas all crone like and bent over double with scarves and shabby clothes like russians after a few years of Lenin.

    TEd Kennedy had nothing to do with the 1965 Immigration bill tom. That was Emmanuel Cellar and Jacobit Javits. It was a jewish thing from 1925 on when the first immigration limitation laws were passed.

    From 1910 when the jews founded the NAACP and especially 1920 when jew Trotsky told Jew Lenin about the american blacks, jews used black protestants as their storm troopers.

    The hispanics h ve been brought here more by american businesses by the jew, catholic, protestant, secular, hindu and especially asians who use them in their sweatshops and restaurants than catholics as a group plan. There is also the fact that while the popular perception of hispancis is a casual sometimes catholic, more and more of them belong to various protestant fervent evangilical churches who in their obssession with the OT are of course fervent supporters of israel.

    The jews love non christian asians, arab muslims and any and all immigrants who are not White americans. Noel Ignatiev, the jew professor at harvard who preaches under the protection of Harvard that all Whites should be exterminated
    for some reason hates the Irish catholics even more than you do.

  17. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    December 19, 2012 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

    @Kevin Hein: I agree that Ann Coulter makes remarks that you and I do not get the opportunity to say on the MSM. Still, I’ve often thought it was a chicken cowardice of both Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh to keep talking about Republicans and Democrats, Liberals and Conservatives rather than AIPAC, the controlled Jewish media and the Mexican invasion.

  18. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 17, 2012 - 4:03 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: If your comment weren’t a bit too long for comfortable memorization, I’d suggest giving it mantra status. In other words, well said.

    When the chips are down, the Left will never allow mere facts, even facts pointing at the destruction of the Left’s own members, to trump its contempt for those it deems politically (hence, morally) incorrect.

  19. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 15, 2012 - 1:43 am | Permalink

    @arthurdecco: Perhaps your’e right. It’s true, I was mainly focused on old Teddy, but do your really think that the rest of the Kennedy family that followed Bobby and John, had much left over for European-Americans? I’ve never seen any evidence of it. My post was a little misleading, because I always admired John Kennedy, despite all the rumors of debauchery etc. He was a man who towered, as a leader, over clowns like William (Jefferson-that’s a joke) Clinton.

  20. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    December 14, 2012 - 11:13 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: “Hands down win for the two families most corrosive for white Americans—- the Bushes and the Kennedys. ”

    By equating the two families you have demonstrated your complete ignorance of what John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy stood up to and for, Bobby.

    The fact is their youngest brother was not the brightest bulb in the pack, but for you to compare the elder Kennedy’s to the Bush cabal is just more of the meanderings of a propagandized and deliberately mislead-all-too-trusting consumer of dishonest “news”.

  21. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 14, 2012 - 9:41 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:


  22. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 14, 2012 - 3:00 pm | Permalink


    “I had a fairly well nationally known Irish Catholic journalist & historian admit to me that the Irish, despite their complaints, had been treated very good in the United States! And that there was NO real historical evidence of any acts of violence against the Irish Catholics or their property! (It took the gentleman about a week to 10 days to make this admisssion to me).”

    So, sleep deprivation and waterboarding really do work?!?

  23. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 14, 2012 - 11:06 am | Permalink


    I’m glad to see that David Duke, whose career I have followed since the early 1970’s, is saying nice things about the Irish Catholics in Ireland. LOL.

  24. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 14, 2012 - 11:00 am | Permalink


    Boo-hoo-hoo. LOL.

    I had a fairly well nationally known Irish Catholic journalist & historian admit to me that the Irish, despite their complaints, had been treated very good in the United States! And that there was NO real historical evidence of any acts of violence against the Irish Catholics or their property! (It took the gentleman about a week to 10 days to make this admisssion to me).

  25. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    December 12, 2012 - 11:32 pm | Permalink

    Go to Ann C’s website. Read what she posted about the INSANE
    vendetta launched against Amanda Knox.
    She says [innocent] AK is the ‘new Mumia Jamal’…
    ergo Ann is nuts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  26. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 12, 2012 - 7:38 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott:

    Your comment reminded me of a video I saw a while back.

    It exposes biased reporting against boys/men.

    I figure that video is part of the men’s rights movement. In the past, I used to put that term in quotation marks, and I’m not sure why. I’ll try to avoid doing that from now on, because it can sound disrespectful, and I do think they are doing some good, important things.

    However, from what I remember about the short time I spent on some men’s rights websites, there is a lot of genuine hatred toward women and a lot of the comments seem irrational and mostly used as a way to vent. That’s understandable; a lot of guys have bad (maybe traumatic) experiences with women. There are some women (and men) who do really bad things. So it’s easy to fall into an “all women (or men) are evil” perspective.

    For me, I know that’s not true. My mom is one of the best people I know. She’s always thinking of others. And my dad is an old-fashioned good person, naturally good.

    Anyway, your comment about Ann’s remark reminded me of that video.

  27. ATBOTL's Gravatar ATBOTL
    December 12, 2012 - 5:23 pm | Permalink


    Am I the only who is sick of this troll?

  28. Seattle's Gravatar Seattle
    December 12, 2012 - 4:20 pm | Permalink

    Dear Kevin MacDonald,
    I’m still waiting on your response to Ron Unz’s piece over at TAC. Correct me if I’m wrong, but does it not seem to bolster your view of Jewish overrepresentation? It’s clear most (all?) of the sundry commentators on the issue have focused (exclusively) on the ‘discrimination’ enacted upon Asian-Americans, rather than the far more controversial conclusion of undue Jewish overrepresentation that is really the core of the piece. You should spit out an few words on the matter, if you’re so inclined.

    @to that other commentator
    “Let’s face the facts, the Irish Roman
    Catholics in particular have had it in for
    White Protestant America since they got here—for no damn good reason”
    Yes, they have, and for good damn reason, the same good damn reason that this site exists. You destroyed their culture and made them paupers in their own country and prevented their development as a nation and a people. And they didn’t like that. They always liked being Americans though, but they didn’t like being slovenly Anglophiles, so in that sense they were most certainly hostile to the silliest of WASPish delusions. Anyway, in the process they became Americans, or at least helped create a truly pan-European American identity, one your sniveling, degenerate, Fraserite- royalist bollocks has nothing to proffer. Go back and supplicate to Windsor and see how you fare…

  29. Lancashire lad's Gravatar Lancashire lad
    December 12, 2012 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

    I hope you haven’t missed this:
    “Mr Bush said, ‘America is a nation of immigrants. Immigration can help us build a better tomorrow.’ He said that he hoped that the US would consider the future of immigration ‘with a benevolent spirit.'”

  30. Pat's Gravatar Pat
    December 12, 2012 - 11:30 am | Permalink

    Looking beneath the why of the “them vs us” campaigns might be productive to winning friends and influencing people – as never a given in politics.

    Putting even the right person up for the wrong reason is nearly as bad as putting the wrong person up for the right reason. If the GOP is guilty of this, raise your hand.

  31. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 11, 2012 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    How about this as a headline Ann Coulter,

    America’s Demise is all the fault of Republican “chicken sh_t politicians, that have allowed the left to have their way for 100 years.

  32. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 11, 2012 - 10:46 pm | Permalink

    @Richard: Some leftists are aware of what illegal immigration does to the environment Richard, but I have concluded that the leftist mindset, is such, that anything suggested by white people involving “immigration issues”, race, social programs, is deemed worthless. The left will be the agent that leads us into totalitarian hell, not the right, as disgusting as the right can be. There has been more spying on citizens in the last four years, than at anytime in this countries history. We know this from the very brave whistleblowers that have come forward.

  33. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 11, 2012 - 8:44 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    …the vast body of illegals here continues to procreate native-born American citizens…


    That’s definitely an important aspect of the situation. “Important” might not be a strong enough word.

    And as Bobby rightfully points out, these new citizens will have a major impact on the environment — which is something many self-identified progressives seem unable or unwilling to understand or admit.

    I used to visit a popular liberal news site and they would occassionally have articles about the environment and global warming. And pretty much none of the commenters would bring up the issue of immigration (or overpopulation in general.) It sort of amazed me, and seriously depressed me.

    One time I wrote a comment mentioning overpopulation and it got a relatively positive response. So I think a large percentage of liberals (ones that genuinely care about the environment) are aware that illegal (and legal) immigration affects the environment in important ways.

  34. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 11, 2012 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: @Bobby:
    Gentlemen, you have both highlighted the essentials which must be discussed if we hope to prevail. Like you, I hate no one. Time spent in NY in my youth taught me to respect Cubans and fear Puerto Ricans. When I was first aware of Mexicans, I was impressed by their devotion to family and their work ethic. I confess, I held hope that they would demonstrate to blacks that racism was not the problem. I did not count on their children immediately demanding all of the benefits of all American victims.

    The leftist who drive you mad are the natural product of liberalism as our new religion. The other is the success Maxrist have in teaching our young to self-identify by class rather than race or even nation. The “educated” have been taught to see themselves as part of a cosmopolitan elite. International travel is now required. everyone knows some fine person who becomes the exemplar of their group. Who would refuse to welcome the pre-presidential Barack Obama to dinner?

    Diversity is a lot like spice in cooking. In the proper doses it delights, overdone and it renders the food uneatable. We must refuse the hate label. We have a right to be who we are. We have as much right to our own habitat as any endangered sub-species.

  35. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 11, 2012 - 6:22 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: My experiences have basically paralleled yours. I have a Mexican relative also, my cousins wife, the one of the neatest and nicest persons I’ve ever met, honestly. He could not have done better. But as in the cases you mention, her parents and even grandparents had been in the U.S. since the early twenties,etc.

    As for what the Washington state area was like, I already knew, being informed here in California, by a good friend of mine that moved from California up to Washington state with his wife, and became the Post Master of a small town.

    Your last paragraph is totally on the mark, as to the dynamics of what illegal immigration has morphed into today. The left, in my opinion is either made up of insane, deluded, revanchist, or simply misinformed Americans. I can’t tell you on how many leftist forums, I’m always reading about how we need to , clean up the environment, force the government to stop these crazy wars so we can focus on domestic rights of Americans and quality of life issues, and on and on the drone. I called in to one leftist radio show, and asked how these goals will be accomplished when the so-called progressive left will accuse anyone of being a Nazi, or racist,etc., who talks of limiting legal immigration, and eliminating illegal immigration,etc. As if these things have nothing at all to do with “quality of life issues,” the environment, job and wage depression, ruination of traditional American culture and further balkinization,etc. All the “progressive’ host answered me with, was that he thought I was close minded and I needed to expand my prespective. I thanked him for his time. He knew what I was thinking of him,etc. Actually I was lucky to even get on the show, because most leftist radio programs, never, ever give callers with other views a chance to debate them. The left has not room for debate, because they “know” they are right,etc.

  36. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 11, 2012 - 5:30 pm | Permalink


    As I have said, elsewhere, I was a week shy of nine when the 1965 Hart-Celler Act was signed by L.B.J. I have personal recollections back to when I was two years old, and political recollections back to when I was just shy of four (the first Kennedy-Nixon debate); yet, I have absolutely no recollection whatsoever of either that 1965 milestone itself or its short- to mid-term consequences. I really do not recall its ever being discussed until I was already a middle-aged man!?!

    I grew up among a lot of Mexican-Americans– one of my many sisters even married one, for her first husband– but they were essentially as American as I and the other Whites of my blue-collar hometown were. That’s how their parents wanted them to be, just as my grandparents had wanted my mother and her siblings to be, as first-generation Americans. I realized that my many Mexican-American friends were ethnically different from me, but they did not act appreciably different, let alone have the current attitude of anti-White and anti-American grievance that even third-generation Mexican-Americans have today, in spades.

    As a young lawyer, I was occasionally active in Democratic Party politics, at the local level. I was very aware of what was going on politically, at both the national and international levels, back in 1986. I remember the Chernoble disaster, the bombing of Libya that killed Khadafy’s child, the Antonin Scalia nomination, the fall-out from Iran-Contra, the drug overdose of the Celtic’s top draft pick, Lenny Bias, etc.; yet, I have no recollection at all of the 1986 amnesty that President Reagan signed that year!?! If I had been asked to rank-order America’s many problems, mass immigration would have been far down the list, back then.

    By the turn of the century, Mexicans seemed to be everywhere, riding bicycles to and from their jobs, because they were unlicensed, and probably could not afford to own and operate a car, regardless. The fast-food restaurants that used to be filled with White or Black help were suddenly full of Mexicans. The lawns that used to be cut by lone high-school and college kids were now full of Mexican work crews, speaking Spanish. Construction crews that used to be overwhelmingly White were suddenly almost all-Mexican, speaking Spanish. What has taken place in this country, in just two generations, but especially during this past one, since NAFTA was passed, in Bill Clinton’s first term, is simply breathtaking. Perhaps because I was located up in Seattle for so long, where the Hispanics were few and far between, I simply did not see the real gravitas of the situation until it was very far advanced. Even L.A., where I lived after Seattle, seems like a totally different city, now, from the one that I first visited, thirty years ago, or even the one that I lived in, many years later still.

    It has become so in-your-face, with the Establishment pushing immigration and multiculturalism everywhere, all the time, that I cannot grasp how any White American cannot see where this train is headed. What is it about Latin America that any White person, even a bona fide liberal, should want (what is still left of) America to emulate?!? It is simply inexplicable….

  37. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 11, 2012 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: The attitude, or should I say non-attitude, of millions of Americans on both the legal and illegal immigration problem in this country utterly astounds me. It just blows me away when I consider it at quiet times. The amount of resources, the usurpation of American taxpayers social benefits that goes to these foreign nationals here without permission, the shear arrogance and the entitled attitude shown in the way they tromp around in the big cities of the U.S.. many of them still beautifull, the immense crime they commit taken as a whole, AND the rather meek and tepid reaction of most Americans to all of it, BLOWS ME AWAY. It says more about American citizens than it does about the illegal foreign nationals. They know what they want!!

  38. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 11, 2012 - 3:00 am | Permalink


    The official estimate, Richard, is eleven million illegals. Activists against open borders have widely varying estimates, but most of them tend to see twelve million as the (current) floor, and twenty million as the (current) ceiling. Even without “comprehensive immigration reform”– i.e., another amnesty, plus increased legal immigration of both high- and low-skilled workers– the vast body of illegals here continues to procreate native-born American citizens, and they will continue to do so, unless and until they are sent packing!

  39. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 10, 2012 - 10:46 pm | Permalink


    You put into words what a lot of people are feeling — it can be intense.

    Switching gears a little bit…

    You mentioned the “twelve to twenty million illegals” in this country. And I’m wondering if we should trust the people who give us those estimates.

    How do we know it’s not twice that much?

  40. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 10, 2012 - 3:29 pm | Permalink

    @Brian: Agreed Brian. In fact, that’s how pre-Hollywoodized white men did act.

  41. Brian's Gravatar Brian
    December 10, 2012 - 1:04 pm | Permalink

    What we need are 10 million white men around the world who act and behave like Ariel Sharon and Benjamin Netanyahu. Anne Coulter and her ilk are not worth preserving.

  42. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    December 10, 2012 - 3:24 am | Permalink

    I mostly agree with you. I did not mean to diminish the suffering of the Slavic people during WWII. I wish Hitler had been cleverer in the treatment of the Slavs.
    I still believe that Germany and Russia united can stop the Wall Street and City banksters. That is the reason the USA and England are always trying to put a wedge between them.

  43. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 10, 2012 - 12:53 am | Permalink

    @Kevin Hein: I could say that I disagree with you, Mr. Hein, but in truth my reaction to your stalwart defense of Coulter is that I simply do not recognize the woman you are describing.

    The Ann Coulter I have observed on and off for almost twenty years is not a figure characterized by special insight into present-day politics, culture, or social stresses. Even less is she a force to be reckoned with in the resistance to the Jewish-led war against white Christians and post-Christians and the remnants of their civilization. She is a book whose cover tells the reader all he needs to know about what is contained within.

    Coulter invariably communicates the sense that she cares more about her (rapidly fading) looks than about anything that comes from her mouth or pen. And what does the latter commodity amount to? Nothing with rhetorical appeal beyond the momentary laugh or sneer, nothing with insight that doesn’t seem borrowed from an infinitely more interesting original, nothing with a moral sense beyond the values of the Establishment. Yet really, is any of this surprising? Were she a woman of substance, would she have retained a position in the public eye as long as she has?

    She had a few moments of notoriety after the 9/11 false-flag operation, when some acclaimed her and others denounced her for some idiotic comments about forced conversion of Muslims to Christianity. I still don’t comprehend why she became a heroic figure to some people, whose standards of heroism must have been seriously compromised. Besides, how could such foolish remarks have been offensive to Jews, who have been falsely accusing Christians of doing such things for almost 2,000 years and so must have been cheering for her in private? Indeed, in calling for a war against the Muslim world, which storefront nation at the eastern end of the Mediterranean was she, consciously or otherwise, doing the dirty work for?

    Ultimately, what Gertrude Stein famously said of Oakland might just as easily be said of Ms. Coulter: when you get there, there’s no there there. Also as with Oakland, why would anyone who has any loyalty to white people want to go to Coulter? Surely not for the architecture!

  44. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 9, 2012 - 11:03 pm | Permalink

    @Kevin Hein: Time will tell Kevin. My own prediction is that the left hasn’t yet begun any serious attacks against her, but they will. They will begin the same marginalization process they did with Palin, who was too easy a target. So far, unlike Palin, Coulter doesn’t believe in apolgies to the left. But as I said time will tell.

  45. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 9, 2012 - 9:58 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    With that said, not asking anyone to compromise on core beliefs etc.

    Good. Speaking for myself, it wouldn’t happen if you did. Not for less than six figures, anyway. In sterling. In cash.

  46. Kevin Hein's Gravatar Kevin Hein
    December 9, 2012 - 9:45 pm | Permalink

    Ann Coulter is actually incredibly valuable for us.

    You may think that she is useless or misleading because she doesn’t talk explicitly about white interests, but you fail to realize what she does do that is incredibly valuable.

    Her derogatory remarks and outlandish comments are little by little making political correctness impotent.

    And I think that is what her main goal is.

    She is one of the only people, aside from Pat Buchanan, who is making a splash in the mainstream by repeatedly introducing ostracized thoughts and standing by them until the “evilness” of them wears off for people.

    She is attacking political correctness by using effective propaganda techniques of her own, and it is working.

    Without her, PC would have more power over certain issues like immigration.

    I don’t think MacDonald sees how she is wearing away the power of PC.

    Maybe she isn’t explicitly laying out a plan to save the country for whites, but you have to still give her credit. You can only do one thing at a time. Little by little.

    The Frankfurt School didn’t create PC in the first place by just coming out and being like “We need to fight for Jewish interests, don’t say these things, and ostracize people who do.”

    No. It happened very gradually and subtly.

    Coulter is more effective at killing political correctness than most people.

  47. Whites Unite's Gravatar Whites Unite
    December 9, 2012 - 9:16 pm | Permalink

    MacDonald is the one honest man in America.

    As Coulter is well aware, it wasn’t called the “Hart / Kennedy Act”.

  48. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 9, 2012 - 8:47 pm | Permalink

    I fear that it is just barely possible to keep politicians within reason with a free press. As it is today……

  49. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    December 9, 2012 - 8:15 pm | Permalink


    I have no illusions concerning the initegrity of America’s leadership. In truth, they are among the most cowardly, calculating and self-serving people alive today.

    Can any country survive when it suffers from leadership as cowardly as we are now saddled with? They couldn’t in previous ages and I doubt ours can today. Add to that the historically novel demoralization we’re now going through because we can now see, in ways not available to previous ages, what knaves and useless fools lead us.

    In short, this will not end well.

  50. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 9, 2012 - 7:00 pm | Permalink

    @Felix: I don’t know why more are brought aboard exactly, but I do know this without a doubt, that neither the Senate, Congress, or White House is continuing this mass immigration out of any sense of morality or human values, as the left might preach. Their is no sense of “human values’ or morality in our Congress and Senate today. If there were, they wouldn’t be carrying on these insane actions in the middle east, that kill innocent people on both sides.

  51. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    December 9, 2012 - 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Staunching the flood of immigrants into this country should be of interest to American blacks and asians as well as whites. When we’re facing austerity and a fiscal cliff, why bring more people aboard many of whom we know will be a drain on our dwindling resources?

  52. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    December 9, 2012 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

    At a time when the American public is being told it must embrace austerity, to offer amnesty to illegal aliens, (I won’t even discuss legal immigration at this point), is outright criminal, irresponsible and bordering on treason and should have otherwise low-abiding citizens marching on Washington with pitchforks and burning torches.

    If we don’t have the money to provide American veterans with the healthcare they need, if we don’t have the money to provide seniors with the social security that they paid into, why in the hell should the American public be expected to pay for the housing, healthcare, food and education of people who snuck into this country like the thieves they are?

    Why, in a time of high unemployment and social chaos, should we even consider amnestying people who are stealing construction jobs that Americans would be glad to do?

    I live in major US citizen and see the needs of American citizens go wanting even as some non-English speaking Chalupa, Jorge and Lupita and their children pay for groceries with EBT cards provided courtesty of the state. Where is the justice?

    Controling the border is NOT an act of heartlessness. Expelling illegals. It’s an act of common sense and a responsible response to a problem the a**holes in Washington have refused to address for generations.

    In 1986 three million illegals were amnestied. Today we’re being asked to grant amnesty to twelve to twenty million illegals. What will the number be in 2040, Forty-eight to eighty million? I am glad I am old enough not to have to live to see that day.

  53. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 9, 2012 - 2:49 pm | Permalink

    @Bigmo: Bigmo, I hope so. So far, most European-Americans don’t seem to even be bothered much by the fact that their Congress, RIGHT NOW, is importing 100,000 people a MONTH!!, INTO THE U.S., each and every month and in this economy!!

  54. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    December 9, 2012 - 11:50 am | Permalink

    Someone brought up the N. Ireland debate as an example of deniminational conflict: it seema neither side there has any sort of ethnonationalist inclination either, which makes the fratricide even worse. Sinn Fein is an old school Marxist joke that is only nationalistic in opposing things like the EU and the Orangists are EDL type proposition nationalists (often staunchly philosemitic as well). The whole situation is an unfortunate example of the worst aspects of the pointless inter-European conflicts of the past century.

  55. December 9, 2012 - 10:31 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce: She also periodically makes statements that are outright crazy. I heard her say on the Jim Bohannon Show that Saddam Hussein’s government had raped “over a million” Iraqi women! When I got on and asked where she got that, she had no good answer. After she was off the show, Bohannon said that he’d only had her on as “entertainment”! She’s totally reckless and not really somebody that you want on your side.

  56. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    December 9, 2012 - 6:13 am | Permalink

    The cat is coming out of the bag. The focus now has shifted to 1965 immigration act. More people will look at that. The Jewish role is slowly coming out. I think 2016 will to Conservatives be what 9-11 was to the Liberals. An awakening. The liberals found out about the Neocons and AIPAC and all that only after 9-11 and the Iraq war. Thats when it came out. 2016 will be the republican conservative awakening about Jews and white displacement.

  57. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 9, 2012 - 2:20 am | Permalink

    @Alfred: Thanks for the LOOK article. It’s a keeper.

  58. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    December 9, 2012 - 1:50 am | Permalink

    I also am ordering Jack’s War and recommend everyone else
    spread the word about this book , go ahead and cough up
    a few bucks for a real copy so you can pass it around after
    You read it, the excerpts themselves are food for thought,
    Don’t think very highly of the Ethno Women who prefer
    Black Men

  59. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 9, 2012 - 12:34 am | Permalink

    @Luke: The Church of Rome used to encourage Jews to decamp from Rome and pay reparations. Many of the Jews fled Rome to end up on the Adriatic Coast. This family line is typical. I believe the name has morphed to Selgin in the US.

  60. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 9, 2012 - 12:18 am | Permalink

    @Luke: Hat tip for Judas Goat, which is incidentally downloadable.

  61. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 9, 2012 - 12:14 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I replied to this request of yours six hours ago, but the reply is still in moderation. Please keep an eye peeled.

  62. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    December 8, 2012 - 11:39 pm | Permalink


    I associate with that comment , it is appropriate and necessary
    to acknowledge those who are superior in their competencies ,
    It is not all about who can just B.S. the most.

  63. Taras's Gravatar Taras
    December 8, 2012 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

    @Dark Henry: Add to that the tens of millions of Slavs murdered by the Nazis, who nearly killed my grandfather with them. The Germans were not unfortunately the innocent party of WW-II, they regarded Slavs and Jews alike as one and the same, filth to be exterminted. That was a big mistake, many soldiers in Eastern Europe actually upon being captured by the Germans told their captors they wanted to fight for THEM, not the Bolseheviks. Had they seen the Poles, Ukrainians and other Slavs for what they were, a huge ready made fighting force, they could teamed up and crushed the Soviets, then turned on the U.S. and Britain next if they chose. Germans have made military, technological, cultureal and genetic controbutions to the peoples of Eastern Europe. Indeed the greatest Tsar of all time, Katerina the Great, was German born. She did more for the average Russian than any other Tsar. When Hitler invaded Poland and Ukraine, girls gave German soliders flowers and the people welcomed them as conquering heroes because they mistakenly though there were coming as liberators. Sadly, that was not the case, because Hitler came as a destroyer, just like the Talmudic Bolsheviks came as destroyers too. I agree the way the German people were treated by both the Soviets and the Western powers was evil and genocidal. But let’s make no mistake, there were no good guys in WW-II, that war made monsters out of millions who were forced to fight, and kill for their own survival. There was no good reason then and there is no good reason now for Germans and Slavs to be enemies, both in fact have common enemies.

  64. Taras's Gravatar Taras
    December 8, 2012 - 10:56 pm | Permalink

    @John the Second:

    I frankly have always been suspicious of the Catholic Church for many reasons, and what you have said only confirmed I am not alone in the suspicions I have harbored for years. I frankly do not trust churches in the U.S., except the Ukrainan or Russian Orthodox chuches. Even there, they have been under constant assault from the Talmudic Tribe, and nearly wiped out in their own native lands too. The statements they have issued however give me reason to belive they are not under Tribal control, and they have the balls to call a spade a spade.

  65. Taras's Gravatar Taras
    December 8, 2012 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

    That is why I personally detest both of them. Neither one is dog poop in my back yard.

  66. December 8, 2012 - 10:35 pm | Permalink

    This Coulter piece was good enough for the uninitiated and we’re glad it’s out there. Give her a break. She (and Buchanan) is the most implicitly white pundit out there, and she’s right about Ted Kennedy’s involvement with immigration. And until we own the media lock stock and barrel the Jewish involvement with immigration will continue to be a dead end.

  67. December 8, 2012 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    @Richard: Please share the book Jack’s War with your friends that are thinking the same way. And by the way, you are not unworthy, actually you’re WAY ahead of the crowd.

  68. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    December 8, 2012 - 7:11 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Good show Richard! You and Pierre are two of the sharpest minds on TOO and instances where you put your heads together more gently (instead of butting) could be really interesting. With that said, not asking anyone to compromise on core beliefs etc.

  69. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 8, 2012 - 7:11 pm | Permalink


    I know I often use separate comments to clarify parts of my other comments. And I hope others don’t mind too much.

    Sometimes my inner perfectionist nudges me to make sure to do my best to clarify things so that there aren’t any unnecessary misunderstandings. I care about… things. Even if it might appear somewhat self-absorbed to constantly revisit my comments and clarify them. I hope not, but it’s possible.

    Anyway, I want to clarify something above:

    “I really did feel unworthy to be here (on T.O.O.). And to a lesser extent, I still feel that way.”

    The reason I added “and to a lesser extent” is because… nobody here has made me feel unwelcome. And some people have told me that my comments are useful. That’s why I don’t really feel unworthy to visit/comment on this site.

    But in the background of my mind, there’s still some feeling of unworthiness. And that’s not necessarily a bad thing. I’m not an egalitarian, and it feels right to acknowledge that a lot of people are superior to me in different ways.

  70. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 8, 2012 - 6:49 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Mea maxima culpa. One thing and another got in the way then—and then I forgot. Rather than induce very well founded objections that the longish comment I’d need to make was entirely off-topic and irrelevant tot he thread, I will write to you privately as soon as I can to make amends.

    In temporary and partial lieu of a proper answer, please have a look at both of these linked documents (from July 2007) when your time permits. The one is the papal letter (termed juridically a motu proprio), issued with the binding force of ecclesiastical law, called Summorum pontificum. The other is a letter of instruction to all the bishops of the Latin Rite Church, wherein is described in some detail what the Pope claims he meant to say in the motu proprio. They are short enough to require in sum only about twenty minutes of your time. My proper answer will take these as the foundation for my characterization of BXVI as a Hegelian down to the marrow.

  71. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 8, 2012 - 6:46 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce: Your restraint is noted with thanks. I look forward to mirroring it in days to come.

  72. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 8, 2012 - 5:05 pm | Permalink


    Your comment reminded me of something I was thinking about a couple days ago.

    I was remebering myself two or three years ago, when I was starting to think more and more about race. And I was sort of wanting to seek out some pro-White websites. The only thing I knew (or thought I knew) about pro-White sites is the negative version given by the media. Once in a while, in the past, I would see a news story that mentioned “racist” or “white supremacist” websites and they would show a blurry or censored computer screen which appeared to depict some kind of almost-scary-looking website with a black background and intimidating blood-red font. That kind of stuff. That’s the image they want people to have when they think of pro-White (or “white supremacist”) sites.

    (Maybe those sites did and still do exist…)

    They want people (Whites and non-Whites) to think of shaved heads and tattoos and beer bottles and threatening messages, etc.

    (Of course I don’t think that people with shaved heads or tattoos are necessarily bad — there are probably lots of relatively good, intelligent men who have a shaved head and/or tattoos. I want to emphasize that. But a lot of people do associate those things with… something negative.)

    And that’s the image that most people have. They don’t know that a site like the The Occidental Observer exists. They don’t realize that people with advanced degrees write pro-White articles. I didn’t, and I’m pretty sure that 99% of White Americans don’t know that, either. Maybe I’m wrong about that.

    They aren’t aware that there is a large amount of intelligent pro-White sites and discussions and… people. All of it is out there (here) waiting for them to come and read and be inspired and help in some way.

    I was so relieved to find this site. It was like a heavy burden had lifted off my shoulders. I was especially comforted by the fact that many (maybe most) of the commenters here have better educations than I do.

    I really did feel unworthy to be here. And to a lesser extent, I still feel that way.

  73. Mike's Gravatar Mike
    December 8, 2012 - 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Macdonald says: “What has she said opposing legal immigration? The post links to an article on Jewish issues showing she is not willing to go there at all.”

    That link says: “How about we do this:… have no more immigration — I haven’t finished. You’re not going to, neither of you are going to like this part. No more immigration, legal or otherwise, of low-wage workers.”
    Read more:

    When she says “Eighty-five percent of legal immigrants since 1968 have come from the Third World. A majority of them are in need of government assistance” in the column you say doesn’t say anything about legal immigration, you can assume she is wanting to reduce it.

    Here she is in 2007:

    Here’s VDARE listing to many of her immigration columns
    “In 1960, whites were 90 percent of the country. The Census Bureau recently estimated that whites already account for less than two-thirds of the population and will be a minority by 2050. Other estimates put that day much sooner.

    One may assume the new majority will not be such compassionate overlords as the white majority has been. If this sort of drastic change were legally imposed on any group other than white Americans, it would be called genocide. Yet whites are called racists merely for mentioning the fact that current immigration law is intentionally designed to reduce their percentage in the population.”

    Yes, she did not mention

    What else has she done?

    Defend the Council of Conservative Citizens
    Write a afterward to Joe Sobran’s Book
    Frequently link to, cite, and tweet to VDARE
    Write about racial differences in intelligence

    Next to Pat Buchanan, please cite one conservative with 1/10 of her visibility who has done this?

  74. December 8, 2012 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Excellent deconstruction. Coulter, like Limbaugh, is just fine up to a point, but needs elaboration like this. This is linked and commented on here:

  75. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    December 8, 2012 - 3:30 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas:

    “Some of you can’t seem to think clearly. Coulter, Malkin, O’Reilly…all good. Yes, they are not able to out the Jew. But they come VERY close.”

    Is shiksa Michelle Malkin merely waiting for her kosher husband, Jesse Dylan Malkin, to give her the green light to unmask the worldwide conspiracy into which he was born? Perhaps Ann Coulter has come closer to outing it– that is, when she was not literally in bed with one of its high-profile conspirators, like the former president of the New York City Council, Andrew Stein (ne Finkelstein)!?! “‘Tis a puzzlement!”

  76. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    December 8, 2012 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Another good thought provoking article by Kevin. American politics, (in the non-South, at any rate) is finally, at long last becoming racialized. Racial polarization is, of course, absolutely necessary for White genetic survival. Bearing that fact in mind, in the main stream media, which is obviously Jewish dominated, it is hard to tell what the real beliefs of the well paid “conservative” Shabazz Goyim (like Coulter) might actually be, as they shill the basic Neocon message. That being so, it is sometimes also hard to tell whether they are only muddying the waters, as scripted, or if they are sometimes intentionally sowing seeds of doubt. Do some of them really have a secret ideological agenda, or are they merely window dressing for the bemusement of well meaning White patriots and political junkies? A Jewish controlled pressure relief valve, so to speak.

    The fact that the dark, multi racial tide is starting to obviously overwhelm Whites, and as they become more cognizant of the fact, implicit and/or explicit racial polarization will be the likely result. That’s how it has finally entered current politics, even though it was not the real intention of the liberal race-mixers at all. The big caveat is, can WN’s secure a leadership role in this new racial paradigm, or will this development be neutralized and derailed by Jewry and their Neocon collaborators?

    It looks rather hopeless at present, but historic change can happen rapidly, if there is a well organized opposition prepared for the White reaction. As for the average, clueless White on the street, he or she may have a racial or ideological ‘epiphany’ when it dawns on them that they have been lied to, but only a good dose of racial reality and hard polarization will ever truly awaken them. Emotion and self-interest will ultimately motivate them when the mental shackles are finally broken. The great question is: are there going to be enough White advocates ready to lead them from their current foolish delusions and intellectual bondage?

  77. sanjay's Gravatar sanjay
    December 8, 2012 - 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Its tragic that so many fellow white intellectuals are naive.

    We cannot save everyone from their naivety, but at the same time we must let go of old divisions, catholic and protestant, and become a cohesive force.

    There are two types of critics,

    1) the ones who offer constructive criticism to strengthen us and make us better

    2) then there are those who only want to create schisms in white community. These infiltrators, these rats are poisoning White confidence.

    We must guard against the infiltrators and deceivers. We as Whites should all hone our BS meter.

  78. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    December 8, 2012 - 12:57 pm | Permalink

    ‘So working/middle class white men stay home instead of voiting for yet another pro-amnesty, pro-tax-cuts-for-the-rich Republican and the moral of the story is…that the GOP needs to give every Hispanic man a blowjob.’

    You can be my thunder buddy.

  79. Gregor's Gravatar Gregor
    December 8, 2012 - 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Dr. MacDonald had an excellent radio interview on Friday Dec 7, on Charles Giuliani’s Truth Hertz show on the Oracle Broadcast Network.

    It is available at … the December 7 archive file.

    The interview begins just before the end of the first hour, and continues to the end of the show. Dr. MacDonald got some very interesting points out, and Giuliani allowed him a lot of space to develop his ideas.

  80. December 8, 2012 - 12:15 pm | Permalink

    @John the Second: I love this comment, it hits the nail right on the proverbial head. I think, on occasion, that we need the disaster that is coming. We need to rewrite & remake everything. We need a new unity, a new way of looking at the world. If the things that we had made in the past, constitutions, laws, nations and all the rest had been properly constructed we would not be in this mess now. There comes a point where EVERYTHING must be torn down and made anew. I think that we are there. There are three points that will be critical to our success in this future – REASON, LOGIC AND EUGENICS.
    Read, Jack’s War

  81. December 8, 2012 - 11:57 am | Permalink

    @buckle: This is why I say that the real issue is RACIAL LOYALTY. We can go on killing one another over extraneous issues until doomsday. Or we can work toward a better future. There are only two camps, pro-white or pro-white-genocide.
    Jack’s War

  82. James H's Gravatar James H
    December 8, 2012 - 11:47 am | Permalink

    This video explains in a short 15 mins the problem to ADD American’s.

    And the Walls came Tumbling Down: How the Jews opened America’s borders.

  83. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    December 8, 2012 - 11:43 am | Permalink

    @C. C. Conrad: Can you turn “Jack’s War” into a URL link? Then we can click straight to your website, publishers, Amazon page, etc., or perhaps some review pages.

    Just follow the Comment Formatting instructions listed just above the TOO Commenting box.

  84. December 8, 2012 - 11:42 am | Permalink

    @Dark Henry: You’ve got that right.
    Jack’s War

  85. December 8, 2012 - 11:31 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Charity starts at home.
    Jack’s War

  86. December 8, 2012 - 11:04 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: Like I say, there are only two categories, pro-white and pro-white-genocide.
    Jack’s War

  87. December 8, 2012 - 10:58 am | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: “I have to agree completely that as soon as someone SEES the truth, that they’ve been played, the disconnect from the anti-white propaganda is immediate.”

    This is exactly why I wrote – Jack’s War – in the way that I did. The character “Jack” goes through his own, rather painful, awakening and hopefully the person reading the book has his or her own awakening as they read. I only hope that some of our people will buy & distribute this book among the public.

  88. December 8, 2012 - 10:33 am | Permalink

    @Adeimantus: The question is fundamental: is a person for White Racial Loyalty and Solidarity, or against it? Is the person committed?

    I personally don’t care one whit if a person considers himself a Buddhist, Christian, Catholic, Protestant, Atheist, Agnostic, or other. I ask only: Where does he stand on the Race Question?

    I agree.

  89. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    December 8, 2012 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    The great fault line in the WN movement is the Catholic v Protestant debate which continues unabated in Northern Ireland (they are rioting again as I write). It’s a surprise Professor MacDonald does not address the issue or at least acknowledge it. It I were a member of the tribe I would look to exploit this division which makes me very suspicious of some of the posters here …

    I am struck by how gracious and polite David Duke now is about Catholics and even boasts they voted for him in Louisiana.

  90. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    December 8, 2012 - 10:12 am | Permalink

    I can’t allow this to pass; “The GOP’s goal is to keep the world safe for the tribe’s interests.” Are you smoking crack? Wall St. put Obama into the white house not once but twice. Bill Clinton dismantled Glass-Steagal and also debuted globalism and destroyed our manufacturing base. Clinton was whole hog NWO and his mentor, Quigley, was an academic EXPERT on the Jews and the Jew money power. You have to face the fact that both “sides” are owned and operated by the hive. Ron Paul is just about the only one who kept his hands clean, and he paid dearly for not playing ball.

  91. December 8, 2012 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    The power elite wanted desegregation and non-white immigration, and that is why it happened and it had nothing to do with what the Catholics wanted. The white Catholics were not interested in blacks or asians or mexicans or jews. They have become so since 1965, under power elite persuasion.

    Kennedy was blamed for being a liberal, not for being a Catholic. Everyone knew he was a bad seed.

    Anyway, it was called the Hart-Celler Act, not the Ted Kennedy Act. Celler was a big shot and at least partially Jewish. Anybody who writes about the 1965 Immigration Act and doesn’t mention that Celler was responsible is shucking and jiving for those ubiquitous Jews.

    I believe Ted Kennedy said at the time the Act would result in a non-white majority. Why is he never quoted directly?

    Now, in England they were actually lied to by the politicians who told the Brits they would not have to worry about non-white immigration, because the non-whites in the Empire would not want to move to England.

  92. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 8, 2012 - 9:50 am | Permalink


    “The Mormon church has its own YouTube channel with many videos featuring non-White and mixed-race couples. They are clearly going out of their way to say, “Look at us, we aren’t a racist church…”

    After giving it more thought, I’m not sure the second sentence in my quote above is very true.

    The number of mixed-race couples featured in their videos might not be more than the national average. And I don’t want to be unfair toward the Mormon church. For some reason(s) I have a good feeling about them or their past.

    I think the reason why I wrote my original comment is because the Mormon church spent money to have YouTube feature some of their mixed-race couples prominently in the “related videos” sidebar. (YouTube accepts money to give some videos a special placement. And for a while the Mormon church advertised some of their videos that way on YouTube. And those particular videos happened to disproportionately feature mixed-race couples.)

  93. December 8, 2012 - 9:47 am | Permalink

    Jones and the pathetic Pike apparently don’t obey the Lord they so loudly profess:
    Here is Jesus the Christ speaking to the jews:
    “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
    –John 8:44

  94. December 8, 2012 - 9:39 am | Permalink

    I knew a jewess last name of Coulter, has this Coulter been vetted?

    Dr MacDonald has proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it wasn’t Ted Kennedy or Gerald Ford who is responsible for the abomination known as the Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965, it was The Hive.

    As a Catholic Sedevacantist I fully appreciate the evil that the current church is accused of and actors in, however let us not forget that the church TODAY is NOT the true church but a garish burlesque of the Holy Roman Catholic Church and this is how it happened:
    How the Jews Changed Catholic Thinking
    By Joseph Roddy, Look Senior Editor.
    LOOK Magazine, January 25, 1966, Volume 30, No. 2.

  95. John the Second's Gravatar John the Second
    December 8, 2012 - 9:37 am | Permalink

    “The Church is Europe and Europe is the Church” – Hillaire Beloc

    Folks, that was the “Catholic” view for centuries on end, lasting into the 1960’s. There was no “Let’s get the WASP’s by joining with the Jews” philosophy inculturated in the Church what-so-ever. As Professor MacDonald made quite clear in The Culture of Critique, it was a Catholic Senator from Arizona in 1952 who wrote and got passed new restrictive immigration laws that sent Jewry into a tizzy.

    Being not much younger that K.M. myself, I too remember a pleasantly different America than exists today, including a long stint in Catholic schools which ironically ended at the conclusion of Vatican II. While learning at the yardstick of a succession of Sister Mary Diesel Locomotive’s, not once was there mentioned any promotion of immigration in the classroom, legal or otherwise. Further, not once did I hear a priest speak of such from the pulpit until well the late 1970’s.

    Back in the 1950’s a former card-carrying communist by the name of Bella Dodd willingly testified before the House Committee on Un-American Activities. She was a recently converted Catholic. During her testimony she revealed that the COMINTERN (Communist International) and the CPUSA (Communist Party – U.S.A.) had sent directives to their revolutionary members in the West (particularly in the U.S.) to infiltrate the churches and in particular the Catholic Church. The methodology to be employed was not to sit around playing Bingo with the laity, but, rather, to enroll in the seminaries and convents to destroy the institution from within.

    Not unlike in Spain during the Inquisition, many Jews and their Fellow Travelers became a modern version of the “Conversos” and did indeed work their way into the priesthood and then rose through the ranks in the Catholic hierarchy, sowing the tares amongst the wheat. The actual fruits of their efforts became evident to a few astute observers leading up to and during Vatican II, but were not recognized by a larger segment until well after the “reforms” had been implemented. The AntiChrists had sunk their teeth deeply into the neck of the Church behind closed doors, thus few were even aware an attack had occurred.

    WASPS. The sainted WASP’s and the damned Catholics.


    Where, may I ask, were these wonderful WASP’s in 1965?

    Did they stand up against L.B.J. and his “Great Society”, Jewry and the hardly fearsome “Freshman Senator” from Massachusetts who already had the distinction of the drowning death of Mary Jo Kopechne as a rather noticeable liability? Why no, they did not. Matter-of-factly, without the WASP’s there would have been no “Great Society” socialist legislation pushed by the WASP (Disciples of Christ) L.B.J., nor the immigration act. The WASP’s did next to nothing to stop any of it because it was also them.

    Engage in a little intellectual honesty for a change and look up the voting record in the House and Senate back in 1965 and toss in a little bio work on these elected representatives and guess what ye shall find?

    A huge majority of WASP’S!

    Regarding the immigration act, U.S. Jewry wrote the legislation, found a completely compromised “Catholic” to push it in the Senate and a dolt in the House, but did you bother to study the co-sponsors? Most of them were (GASP!) WASP’S!!!

    “Blame the Catholics!” comes the cry when in truth the protestant faiths were compromised by Jewish infiltration far before Rome was. Read how they became Martin Luther’s “Best Friend Forever” (when he truly needed one, for the 95 Thesis was pretty well spot-on) until he smelled lots of rats. Was in not the not-so-sainted Calvin who somehow twisted scripture to argue that usury was not just “Kosher” but “Christian”, even though its use had been universally outlawed in Catholic Christendom for over 1500 years before his dissent? Was it not a WASP “King” and titular head of The Church of England in Great Britain who allowed Rothschild to establish the usurious Bank of England and its cancer in Anglo territory?

    Was it not the morally compromised WASP Woodrow Wilson who presented the country with the Federal Reserve, WWI (for the benefit of the Jewish banks, Zionism and the slaughter of European Christians) as well as presenting to WASP America the idea of global governance via The League of Nations? Was it not the WASP F.D.R. who stated “Some of my best friends are communists” while he was being pit bulled by Father Coughlin? Was it not the WASP Harry Truman who “recognized” the Ashkenazi migrants to Palestine as a “State” even prior to the scheduled U.N. vote on the question of statehood?


    Given the facts, a “Traditional Catholic” could easily argue that the WASPS joined with the Revolutionary Jew centuries back to destroy Western Civilization and make a damn good argument of the proposition. One could cite the joined actions of the WASP-Jew alliance of merely the last one hundred years and etch the guilt of those participants in stone if one so desired.

    Pointing fingers … and here we go again.

    How about this proposition instead – We Are All Guilty Of Doing Nothing When It Mattered, Both Protestant And Catholic Alike.

    It doesn’t matter which generation – “Greatest”, “Silent” “Boomers”, X, Y, Z and start over again. “We” were busy trying to make a living, raise families and the like while the revolutionaries did what they do while we were otherwise occupied – destroy things.

    As long as we engage in internecine warfare we are going to continue to lose and lose badly. WASPS and Caucasian Catholics have one hell of a lot in common – they screw up constantly as the historical record makes indisputably clear. There are WASPS so liberal you would think they were from some Eastern European Ghetto and the same can be said for some Catholics. No group gets to wear a halo here, for the sins of all are many The guilt is universal, so engage in some proper self-reflection and grow the hell up.

    Collectively we’ve things to do. There’s a war going on in case you failed to notice.

  96. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    December 8, 2012 - 8:31 am | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: The list of celebs you cited have spent their apprenticeship years in the mainstream media, being careful to toe the line, and meanwhile they’ve been collecting those big bribery paychecks from their jewish masters.

    Now, assuming that at least a few of these celebs are secretly jew-wise – and itching to speak out, but are aware that their mainstream careers are over if they dare to do so – what would a smart and determined dissident do?

    Simple answer. Bank as much of that jew money as they could, work as hard as they can to secure their financial future by establishing a jew-proof nest egg – and then, when their ducks were in a row – speak out and name the jew.

    They’d be promptly fired from the rapidly shrinking mainstream media, sure – but, with their financial futures secured – they could then shift their talents to the alternative media on the web, which is growing – and continue to speak and write the truth. They won’t get the kind of income they were getting when they were on the jew payroll, but they will be rewarded by the sense that they are no longer a stooge for the jews.

    Think about this. People who post regularly to TOO and other pro-White websites do so in our free time and none of us expect or receive any financial compensation for our efforts to speak the truth and to help educate our fellow White European kinsmen and women. We do this because we love our race and our people and because we care about what kind of future our white children will have.

    I can’t speak for anyone besides myself, but I get a good feeling inside my soul for the minor contributions that I sometimes make to our cause. The possibility, therefore, exists that a few of these celebs might also be satisfied and motivated by something other than cold hard cash – especially when that cash carries with it the stench of White race treason.

  97. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    December 8, 2012 - 8:13 am | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: I have a feeling that Teddy was given an offer that he couldn’t refuse.

    After the deaths of JFK and RFK, I suspect he was approached and offered a deal that went something like this; “Do you want to join your brothers, or are you willing to act as our gentile front man for the White genocide program that we intend to implement here in America?”

    By the way, at the end of today, Ted Kennedy will have gone
    3 years, 3 months, 13 days without taking a drink of booze.

    That is, I believe, his new record for sobriety.

  98. Fatboy's Gravatar Fatboy
    December 8, 2012 - 8:07 am | Permalink

    @Fatboy: my point was that the students couldnt give a hoot–they dont seem to grasp what is happening, or worse–they dont care. There were no comments about that in the half time show, apparently.

  99. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    December 8, 2012 - 8:05 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Good observation. I’ve also read Final Judgment and its a fantastic book, the best Piper has ever written – although Judas Goats would be a close second.

    I tend to believe that the hostility that Joe Kennedy felt towards jews was not really based on any real ethnic or racial awareness on Joe’s part. I suspect it was instead based on the competition between bootleggers and old Joe had gotten screwed over by his crooked, dirty dealing, double-crossing jewish bootlegger rivals and that’s probably how Joe Kennedy came to develop a dislike for the tribe.

    There are millions of reasons to dislike jews, and not all of them are 100 percent related to race.

  100. Fatboy's Gravatar Fatboy
    December 8, 2012 - 8:05 am | Permalink

    Unfortunately, I dont think its true that most white americans dont want replacement level immigration”. They are quite oblivious, hypnotized with football and reality tv shows, as they are. They are not even able to conceptualize that there is an alternative way. A nearby professional school, which I keep tabs on, has gone from 1% to 10% black in just ten years! And even more positions have been lost to asian minorities and other groups.

  101. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    December 8, 2012 - 7:56 am | Permalink

    @Sanjay: Brother Sanjay? Are you familiar with E. Michael Jones, editor of Culture Wars Magazine and also an infrequent guest on various web radio podcasts? He’s a very interesting fellow to listen to, but he is definitely not a ‘White Nationalist’ by our definition.

    Jones is a traditional Catholic, which usually means that one sees the Vatican II deal that the Catholic Church leadership cut with the jews as a huge and probably fatal mistake – since it marked the beginning of the jewish infiltration of the Catholic Church, and today, they pretty much own it and call all the shots.

    At any rate, there is an interview that E. Michael Jones did where he discussed the late Sam Francis and he pretty much lays out what he thinks the Catholic position is on ‘race’. I encourage you to listen to this interview and it can be downloaded here:

    Sam Francis, Race, and Religion, an interview with E. Michael Jones (May 2007)

    Incidentally, not to spoil the podcast listening – but, Jones tends to believe that jews can be redeemed, if only we can somehow sprinkle a sufficient amount of holy water on their evil and demonic heads. Ted Pike also seems to believe this nonsense and it never ceases to amaze me how, after 2,000 years of non-stop failures to tame & defang these evil and destructive creatures that we still have prominent religious leaders barking this same impossible-to-achieve tune.

  102. December 8, 2012 - 7:29 am | Permalink


    You are right. Ted Kennedy was Catholic in Name Only (CINO).

    Jews have always used high profile gentile frontmen to conceal their hostility.

  103. Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
    December 8, 2012 - 7:13 am | Permalink

    If Catholics had power they would have risen up when JFK was murdered in Dallas. They didn’t. One thing you have to give blacks credit for, they will riot and confront despite the peril to their own lives. However, they are hemmed into ghettos they create and their power is limited to street violence. Catholic power seems to be limited to cronyism in local government. Maybe the Catholic strategy is to swarm the U.S. with immigrants, or maybe it is the Protestants who bring them in to work, cheap. Jewish power is based on internationalism and banking, and the GOP’s number one goal is to keep the world safe for the Tribe’s interests. Or are their interests hopelessly emeshed?

  104. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    December 8, 2012 - 6:58 am | Permalink

    May the “allies” FDR, Churchill et al. rot in hell for ever.

  105. Dark Henry's Gravatar Dark Henry
    December 8, 2012 - 6:55 am | Permalink

    @Anglo Saxon:
    That would explain why the SOB let 1 million+ German POW die of cold and starvation in concentration camps after the war had ended. That, together with the fire bombing of Dresden, Hamburg and other German cities, and the millions murdered during the ethnic cleansing of Silesia, East Prussia, and other former German lands, was the real holocaust.

  106. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    December 8, 2012 - 6:24 am | Permalink

    Yes, it was a Catholic country, England, which dragged the USA into the war …

    Kennedy Sr. was one of the few voices of sanity and was sacked as Ambassador to the UK as a result. Being an Irishman he instinctively distrusted the ‘Allies’ as did Devalera, Salazar and, of course, Franco. All these devout ‘protestants’ saw WWII as bad for their own people. Devalera incidentally, after early morning Mass, signed the book of condolences in the German embassy in Dublin on hearing of AH’s death

  107. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    December 8, 2012 - 4:54 am | Permalink

    @George Herouvis: It was never a secret!

    Eisenhower was labelled a “Swedish-Jew” when he was a Cadet at West Point: having passed the entry exam in 1911.

    Read this

  108. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 8, 2012 - 4:30 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: wouldn’t. “would”!

  109. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 8, 2012 - 4:29 am | Permalink

    @Jim G: The Good Samaritan is good because he gave from his own purse to help a foreigner. He did not send the bill to the Hebrew Peoples’ Mutual, nor did he advocate all Samaritans become wards of the Jews. If he’d pitched his own family out of house to make way for the Samaritan, he probably wouldn’t have been woven into a different parable.

    But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.
    1 Timothy 5:8 NKJV

  110. George Herouvis's Gravatar George Herouvis
    December 8, 2012 - 4:17 am | Permalink

    Eisenhower was a secret jew…so it has been said.

  111. Jim G's Gravatar Jim G
    December 8, 2012 - 2:58 am | Permalink

    @Tom: Tom the only thing the Catholic Church in America has been good at is running BINGO. The Church in politics is a joke. Best example is abortion. The Church’s official policy on abortion is that it is killing an innocent human being; a monstrous evil and a mortal sin that will take the unrepentant sinner to eternity in hell.

    (Although you would have to give any cleric today the third degree before he would admit to the existence of hell and that damnation is the works for the likes of Teddy [of course we do not know for sure if Teddy and his dad are down there]).

    The Church can’t even reign in so-called Catholic politicians that support abortion. Norte Dame University even gave president Obama an honorary degree. Had the Church any power over its followers regarding contraception America would be filled with millions more Irish, German, Polish, Italian White citizens.

    Rather than dumping on Catholics here at TOO it would be more productive if you show that the Cardinals and Bishops that preach in favor of non-White immigration are preaching heresies. Christ commanded his followers to do the exact opposite that some Catholics higher ups are preaching. (Matt 28: 18) And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth. 19 Going therefore, teach all nations: baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost.

    Christ did not say bring the different people of all different nations to home your nation. Christ affirmed that that were different nations and different people. So Tom making war on Catholics and Christians is counter productive. It is something that the Jews would do. You’re not Jewish so why do their bidding?

  112. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 8, 2012 - 2:30 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Isn’t it amazing? This is what human beings are all about. Never mind how someone made their money, just worship or admire them because they have a lot of money. This is truly a system so toxic to human beings, that if they are ever freed from it, they will realize in the future the kind of bondage they have really been victims of. I’m making no moral judgements here. I realize we all do what we BELIEVE is best for ourselves, our friends and families.

  113. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 8, 2012 - 2:19 am | Permalink

    @Marcus: Joe Kennedy moved in the same circles as Meyer Lansky in his bootlegging days before a bitter falling-out, with the former having to beg the Goodfellas to save him from a Jewish hit. Or this is what Piper Collins maintains in Final Judgment (p. 93):

  114. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    December 8, 2012 - 1:58 am | Permalink

    @Kyle Bush:

    Have you ever watched this video Kyle? If not, then download it if you can, and share!

    Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs – Updated 2010

  115. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 8, 2012 - 1:58 am | Permalink

    @Marcus: That’s true about Joe Kennedy. He was by no means anti-white.

  116. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 8, 2012 - 1:56 am | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: No Mary, if they drop the J word their income is toast. Why continue to make up excuses for O’Reilly’s, Coulter’s, Malkin’s, Hannity’s or any other of these media millionaires LACK OF INTEGRITY. I’ve said it before, I give Obama’s pastor of twenty years, The Black Panthers, Luis Farrakan, or anyone else that comes out and simply states what they think of whites, MUCH MORE CREDIT THAN I DO THE ABOVE MENTIONED PHONIES. PERIOD.

  117. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 8, 2012 - 1:45 am | Permalink

    @Mary Thomas: i agree with you whole post, except the part about the Catholics. Like Tom, you seem to target and easily identify the Catholics as being the chief facilitators of illegal aliens. WRONG!! Tens of Thousands of protestants who run small to medium sized businesses, seem to have as their guiding rule, ” we accept all denominations but prefer 10$ and 20$’s. In other words, thousands of good Presbyters, Episcopalians, Lutherans, etc.etc., employ illegal aliens because they work “cheap”. I see it in California all the time and everywhere. The heads of big businesses even Multi-nationals, are mostly good old Protestants, not Catholics,and they, have embraced multiculturalism, and have an anti-white, affirmative action, hiring bias. The only reason Catholics get picked on is because they are more open, more organized and therefore more identifiable in what they are doing. But Protestants are doing it on a bigger level and no one mentions it. That’s why I’m mentioning it now. Protestants never, just like Catholics, seem to be bothered by the war on Christmas, the constant attempt to ban Christian culture, Christmas trees, or any Christian values that they supposedly believe in. Just recently, some troublemakers decided to remove the Christmas tree from an old folks home. NO PROTESTANTS WERE THERE TO PROTEST THE ONE THING THAT GAVE THESE OLD FOLKS SOME JOY AT THIS TIME OF YEAR, AS THEY THEMSELVES LAMENTED.

  118. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 8, 2012 - 1:44 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Blogs ago you made some extempore remark about Benedict XVI’s Hegelianism which went right over my head. Would you mind expanding a little on that? Thanks.

  119. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    December 8, 2012 - 1:33 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: The Lateran Treaty was modified in 1984. The Vatican, along with five other confessions (Judaism included – UCEI) is a beneficiary of part of the proceeds of personal income tax (8/1000); the State itself is a beneficiary, funds devolved to it are supposed to be for humanitarian ends (eg. Italian peacekeeping in Iraq!).

    Opting out of the contribution not an option. The Jehovah’s Witnesses and Buddhists are on the waiting-list for inclusion as qualifying faiths.

  120. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    December 8, 2012 - 1:09 am | Permalink

    RE: The Kennedys, it should be noted that papa Joe Kennedy, despite being an unscrupulous schemer, did make a valiant, futile effort to influence opinion in Washington against intervening in th European conflagration (US neutrality was a sham at this point). This was a time when the interventionist press was launching extreme smear campaigns against “isolationists,” eg Lindbergh.

  121. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    December 8, 2012 - 12:48 am | Permalink

    I have to agree completely that as soon as someone SEES the truth, that they’ve been played, the disconnect from the anti-white propaganda is immediate. For me, research on the bailouts did it. I discovered the elites are beyond the rule of law. I can’t live with that.
    But sadly, yes, the Catholics are idiot fools, vote liberal, defend illegals, etc.
    It’s amazing to me that people who claim to believe in God can vote for the side that kills babies! I have a Catholic friend, God love him, he can’t argue with me on any of the issues because he is sooooooooooooo wrong on every one.
    Ted Kennedy was just a dumb goy, had the brain of a peanut, and I’m sure he really didn’t understand the impact that legislation would have. We need to OVERTURN that awful legislation, and very SOON. The Jews knew what they were doing alright, and sat up night after night planning our demise. It’s sickening. We should never have fought our brothers in Germany to save the scum that now has us on our knees.

  122. December 8, 2012 - 12:15 am | Permalink

    @Steve: Our people have been here before. Europe was over run by Khan, the Huns, the Mohammedans & we always won. The question is, will we retain the lesson this time or continue to cut each other to pieces over petty nationalism & other foolish ideas? We need three things now more than ever – REASON, LOGIC AND EUGENICS. Read Wilderness Empire and you’ll see what it takes to get us going. We are still fighting the Quakers.

  123. December 8, 2012 - 12:08 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: No I didn’t see that C-Span program but I have gotten used to the court historians and their penchant for white washing scum. The number one traitor & criminal was FDR and we all know how that communist is praised.
    Jack’s War

  124. Aquilax's Gravatar Aquilax
    December 7, 2012 - 11:08 pm | Permalink


    I’d hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the future looks grim for Whites. As I see it, the only way to counter the threat of Jewish global domination is for Whites to become as equally ethnocentric as the Jews themselves, but don’t hold your breath.

    Jewish strength lies in their ability to pool their resources together and create powerful groups such as the ADL, SPLC, ACLU, AIPAC, AJC, etc. Can Whites pool together to create similar PACs to match their Jewish counterparts? I think not. Not by a long shot. Even in the face of blatant Jewish control of the Federal Reserve, media, and our politicians, Whites are powerless to organize and unite in the face of the Jewish machinations of political correctness and mass media brainwashing.

    The only thing we need whites to do, is to become desensitized to the propaganda of the hostile elite.

    Usually, words like “racism” or “antisemite” create some sort of inner feeling where a person feels nervosity increasing inside his body. It’s the same type of nervosity and worry (let’s regroup that under “fear”) that paralyzed people who became dominated under an oppressive regime. We simply have to teach people to become immunized against this sort of intimidation, because it is intimidation.

    One way would be to show people that they are getting manipulated and dispossessed, because people who had trust in something and suddenly realized they got screwed all the time lose almost instantly all respect for the person/organization/political system that they used to trust. Just because the anti-white propaganda has been working for 50 years, doesn’t mean it will take an equivalent amount of time for one to disconnect from it, it can be instantaneous (like a long lasting couple that suddenly breaks up when one partner realizes he has been betrayed).

  125. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    December 7, 2012 - 11:07 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    It’s been a very long time since I’ve even watched broadcast television.

    The thing about this sentence is that, no matter who says it and whatever the reason for saying it, it’s always great to hear.

    You know how much I hate to agree with you, but that is a sentiment I can wholeheartedly endorse.

  126. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    December 7, 2012 - 11:00 pm | Permalink

    There is little point in trying to judge Ann Coulter as such. She is a TV personality, first and foremost. We can safely assume that ALL current TV personalities are self-serving careerists at best.

    At best.

    What’s interesting is the increasingly explicit racialization of American politics. We have now had several major public figures discuss White voters and how they are starting to vote as a block. They are openly discussing the role that race plays in politics and how immigration is hurting us. That’s the important thing..

    We will see many conservative talking heads start to discuss Whites as Whites, for the first time in their lives. Don’t get too hung up on pointing out that they are inconsistent or impure or just being opportunistic. Of course they are opportunists! We are not really looking for leaders among the mainstream media. We want our issues and messages to be given more airtime, that’s all.

    I understand everyone is paranoid of being conned again, but the best way to avoid that is not to get too hung up on finding wonderful leaders to follow. Stay true to principles and our people.

    If you can make use of a hack, do so.

  127. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 7, 2012 - 10:44 pm | Permalink


    All you gotta do is count the immigration votes in the US Senate. LOL. It ain’t brain surgery. The Catholics & Jews vote as a unit. The sad thing is the Catholics even vote against their own interest, and in the Jews interest on many Jew agenda items.

    I wasn’t going to bring this up, but, I had a Southern journalist send me a link to a story, that didn’t make national news for some reason, relating to the treatment of a Catholic Bishop who filed a lawsuit agains Obamacare that was thrown out of Federal Court by a “Conservative” Irish Roman Catholic Federal Judge, who is a close pal of a former Conservative Roman Catholic Governor, and, a Conservative Italian Roman Catholic former US Senator Santorum. The Catholic Bishop I believe is a Croatian(?) or other former Yugoslav and he took it hat in hand from thesae Conservative Catholics.

  128. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 7, 2012 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

    Ann Coulter changes her tune & tone a little bit saying, “America Nears El Tipping Pointo”:

  129. Mary Thomas's Gravatar Mary Thomas
    December 7, 2012 - 10:23 pm | Permalink

    Some of you can’t seem to think clearly. Coulter, Malkin, O’Reilly…all good. Yes, they are not able to out the Jew. But they come VERY close. Look at Bill and the war on Christmas. These people are not stupid. If they drop the J word they’re toast. Pat Buchanan said too much and got canned. Same for Napolitano and Beck. Dobbs too. The Jews simply are not going to allow anyone to speak out. They own and run the media, so I’m not sure what we can do, short of blowing them up. I still maintain that they really have not thought this through. As we devolve into a black/brown third world nation, the rule of law will break down (as seen in all black and brown nations) and the Jews themselves will no longer be safe.

  130. Kyle Bush's Gravatar Kyle Bush
    December 7, 2012 - 9:35 pm | Permalink

    Another interesting phenomenon on the topic of immigration from the third world is the ridiculous population boom that has happened.

    Since WWII the world population has gone from some 2 billion to 7 billion.

    This growth is exponential and is happening mostly in the third world.

    The BBC had an interesting documentary on the matter: “How Many People Can Live On Planet Earth.”

    Apparently, the United States is already beyond the population capacity where it could support its population on just its own resources.

    And the world itself is headed there really fast. Exponentially fast.

    Meanwhile, the populations of most of Europe are actually declining.

    Absolutely ridiculous!

  131. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 7, 2012 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

    To what purpose?

  132. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 7, 2012 - 8:55 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: No concern of mine Pierre. Tom does indeed get carried away with this weird notion of Catholic power. It’s only keeping him from seeing what’s really going on. In fact, unlike some people think, I would consider the Catholics as being rather powerless in the U.S., and in reality one of the least influential groups. Even in Europe, young people have long ago refused to pay the Catholic tax, imposed on them in places like Austria, Italy,etc. They are losing parishioners by the thousands every year. Sounds like a real power group to me. LOL…

  133. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 7, 2012 - 8:40 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: I apologize if it seemed that I was trying to associate you with my own marked distaste for the guy. I wasn’t. Things get messy enough around here without me or anyone else picking fights for others.

    That said, I do heartily endorse your last two sentences.

  134. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 7, 2012 - 8:35 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Pierre, I have nothing personal against Tom. Or should I take that back. It is personal in the sense that as a fellow nationalist, I would simply like Tom, for his own sake, to see the other side of this issue. I’ve already acknowledged all of the shenanigans of the Catholic Church that I don’t agree with , and have even expressed my concerns with one of the priests I know. But Tom believes that the Catholics are some kind of all prevading power in the U.S. This is nonsense.

  135. thunk's Gravatar thunk
    December 7, 2012 - 8:31 pm | Permalink

    Here’s a letter I just sent to Kwame Kenyatta, Detroit City Council member. As Detroilet’s bankruptcy and taxpayer bailout beome imminent, I encourage all OO readers to Google “Detroit City Council,” pick a council person of your choice, and send a similar letter.

    Dear Mr. Kenyatta,

    I am a graduate student doing a project on urban America. In my research, I have learned the stark truth that, contrary to poltical correctness, the success of a city is highly dependent on its racial make-up. Specifically, I have determined that every urban center with a majority black population has basically resulted in abysmal failure. Your city, in particular, has proven that a majority-black population/leadership is seemingly incapable of sustaining Western Civilization in terms of prosperity and civil order. Detroit, which has been under black control for decades, has proven that blacks are seemingly incapable of providing for their common welfare, let alone maintaining the infrastructure they inherited from white predecessors. With Detroit’s demise, it becomes quite evident what monolithic black control brings. Now, as Detroit’s bankruptcy becomes imminent, the white taxpayer, again, is forced to bear the cost of propping up another failed black community.

    Your disgusted perpetual taxpaying rescuer,
    Joseph Hinton”

  136. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 7, 2012 - 8:18 pm | Permalink


    It’s been a very long time since I’ve even watched broadcast television.

    The thing about this sentence is that, no matter who says it and whatever the reason for saying it, it’s always great to hear. Put plainly, divorce from the tube is a sure sign that the web of indoctrination has been broken. If someone were to say to me that he’d given up on television to devote more time to amassing belly button lint, I’d know that I was dealing with a guy who was worth having a few drinks with. When the reasons are of a somewhat higher order, I’d consider it well worth my time to pay for the drinks!

  137. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 7, 2012 - 8:03 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Wise and kind words no doubt – which do nothing to relieve this sad case of envy. Thanks anyway.

  138. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    December 7, 2012 - 7:50 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: You’re right. It’s been a very long time since I’ve even watched broadcast television. I do remember that these were lay persons who were discussing American politics, and, therefore, their authority to speak on behalf of Catholics was highly questionable, come to think of it.

    My music teacher, when I was a child, was a devout Catholic, and she had absolutely no use for the Washington Kennedys — in fact she called them “trash.” Yet she was not anti-Irish or anti-Catholic (obviously). She had lived in Detroit during the race riots and had witnessed firsthand what serious racial problems were like.. She was personally the victim of Negro crime. She was devoted to her own faith, but she never spoke disparagingly of the sincerely held beliefs of others.

    I agree with you that Ted Kennedy was a Catholic only in name and not in truth — and I say this only because of his all-too-open, bold defiance of Catholic teaching.

  139. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 7, 2012 - 7:48 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    “… Reeve’s reserve …”; corrigendum: “… Reeves’s reserve …”.

  140. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    December 7, 2012 - 7:40 pm | Permalink

    Ann Coulter is the poster girl for white Christian conservatives:

    1. She’s a GOP party hack.

    2. She is subservient to Jewish media power and tries to out Zionist the Jews, acting as an attack dog going after opposition to the Zionist wars of the post-911 era.

    3. She’s comically hypocritical and dishonest.

    4. She couldn’t care less about the interest of White people, and would be perfectly happy in a non-White country as long as it was Republican, Christian, and conservative.

    Much like the religious trolls on pro-White forums, she only becomes concerned with White people when it looks like her particular fairy tale “team ideology” about Jesus, Washington, and Ronald Reagan is in jeopardy.

    She’s a WASP like Justice Stevens, perfectly willing to allow her own people to fade away as long as their ideals and principles are preserved, which of course guarantees that neither will be. Worse than useless, her function is to derail any pro-White sentiment that may compete with Team GOP.

  141. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 7, 2012 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: There is a price for everything, of course. The time you spent raising a handful of sons, not to mention learning how to make a killer marinara sauce (☺), has no counterpart in my own life. Thus, I was able to use a portion of that time to acquaint myself with the writing of great rhetoricians past and present and to try to apply and emulate a few lessons learned. The Lord will judge which of us made better use of the time allotted, but to allude once again to poker, I’d be a fool to bet on the outcome considering that my hand consists of a pair of threes.

  142. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    December 7, 2012 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

    I agree with Adeimantus, it would be great to have “Cultural Insurrections” in a Kindle format. I have already downloaded “A People That Shall Dwell Alone”.

  143. Steve's Gravatar Steve
    December 7, 2012 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

    I’d hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the future looks grim for Whites. As I see it, the only way to counter the threat of Jewish global domination is for Whites to become as equally ethnocentric as the Jews themselves, but don’t hold your breath.

    Jewish strength lies in their ability to pool their resources together and create powerful groups such as the ADL, SPLC, ACLU, AIPAC, AJC, etc. Can Whites pool together to create similar PACs to match their Jewish counterparts? I think not. Not by a long shot. Even in the face of blatant Jewish control of the Federal Reserve, media, and our politicians, Whites are powerless to organize and unite in the face of the Jewish machinations of political correctness and mass media brainwashing.

  144. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    December 7, 2012 - 7:14 pm | Permalink

    Thanks to Dr. MacDonald for the article. And thanks to the commenters for including their thoughts.


    “Even the Mormons are trying hard to diversify with Polynesian, mestizo, and even black missions.”

    The Mormon church has its own YouTube channel with many videos featuring non-White and mixed-race couples. They are clearly going out of their way to say, “Look at us, we aren’t a racist church…” I don’t know much about the church, but I think they used to have a reputation for being sort of “racist”. They were probably a great church in the past, helping to protect and guide many beautiful White families.


    I was thinking about similar things earlier today, but you expressed them better than I can. (Your comments seem to always stand out in a good way.)

    I was thinking about how I have watched sports games in the past in which neither team was one I really cared about… but that didn’t stop me from picking a side to cheer for. (I didn’t actually cheer out loud.)

    (I’m not a big sports fan, but once in a while I’ll watch part of a game.)

    You’re right — even if we don’t particularly like either side of a sports game (or political battle) we still naturally feel compelled to… take a side anyway.

  145. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 7, 2012 - 7:13 pm | Permalink

    @C. C. Conrad: By any chance did you see this program when it appeared on C-SPAN thirteen years ago? Reeves appeared about a quarter of the way into its third hour, after court historian Robert Dallek had pontificated for more than two hours on every imaginable aspect of Kennedy’s greatness, all of them fictional, of course. I remember watching Reeves with some disappointment, because he seemed to speak in far more gentlemanly terms about Kennedy’s vices than simple justice required of him. In retrospect, Reeve’s reserve probably carried more weight than a plainer statement of the evidence, as truthful as it might be, would have.

    Most of the call-in questions for Reeves were polite and unargumentative, but for the next several days, callers to Brian Lamb’s morning show, Washington Journal, excoriated the network for allowing anyone to speak critically of the sainted Kennedy. Commenters here at TOO who think that mere facts will open the eyes of white men and women need to splash the cold water of Kennedyolatry on their face lest hope degenerate into Pollyannaism.

  146. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 7, 2012 - 7:05 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:
    I defy you to produce one comment that thm has made which is anti-white.

  147. December 7, 2012 - 7:04 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus: Exactly. One can pray to their pet rock for all I care as long as they defend their race.
    Jack’s War

  148. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 7, 2012 - 7:03 pm | Permalink

    do we need more people? I confess to feeling crowded if I can see the smoke from my nearest neighbor’s chimney. If it is merely to pay for social security and medicare, I am willing to sign up for nothing but pain relief after my three-score and ten. That is, if the sacrifice benefits my grandchildren and not their replacements.

  149. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    December 7, 2012 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

    @thm: @thm

    Anyone who reads your posts here knows your primary interest in posting on TOO is not in preserving and protecting ethnic European peoples’ interests but in bashing Roman Catholics. It is true that some of the White Catholic leadership, like the White Protestant leadership, has sold out — but that doesn’t speak for all Catholics or Protestants. I don’t believe White people can really afford such a divisive and corrosive outlook as you promote.

    thm, anyone who reads your posts here knows your primary interest in posting on TOO is not in preserving and protecting ethnic European’s peoples’ interests but in promoting the semitic, non-White religion of Catholicism.

    I don’t believe White people can really afford such a divisive and corrosive outlook as you promote.

  150. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 7, 2012 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

    Well said!

  151. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    December 7, 2012 - 6:56 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Hot damn, I wish I could do that!

  152. Andrew's Gravatar Andrew
    December 7, 2012 - 6:50 pm | Permalink

    Ann Coulter appears to be primarily motivated by her Republican affiliation. I would guess that ever since she has been a toddler, she has been heavily influenced by her parents’ political allegiance, probably primarily her fathers’ Republicanism. This tribal/team cheering instinct is a powerful force in motivating human behavior, humans (particularly males) instinctively love to belong to an in-group and feel that sense of belonging to that group and competing against rivals. We see this in the sports world, where untold billions of dollars are spent by fans world-wide, as they invest vast amounts of their time analyzing, discussing and watching their sports team. In the past, all of this interest, effort and allegiance was devoted to the family/clan/nation as part of the spectrum of human survival initiatives (now its squandered on meaningless games).

    Ann Coulter is a woman, and women are primarily rule-followers, designed to adhere to customs and traditions. It is to be expected that she will cleave to her Republican identity, a part of her identity that she has invested perhaps 35 years or more to, in spite of the unpalatable lemons her party/team/in-group continues to produce as national candidates. She does deserve credit for addressing issues of race and immigration, and facing down very heavy fire from a sea of opposition, such as the nasty harridan bitches on The View. Nevertheless, Dr. MacDonald is correct in pointing out that even though she is making progress, she still falls far short in her punditry and analysis of the true forces behind White dispossession in America. Our people need better.

  153. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    December 7, 2012 - 6:44 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think any European country is in a position to export immigrant workers at this point. The one region that does (due to lack of local opportunities) Eastern Europe, has anemic demographics, and the exodus has led to depopulation of rural areas, not relief of overpopulation stress. It’s funny how in the early 20th century the Germans were worried about how the Slav population was growing so much faster than their own and now they are both in a demographic winter.

  154. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    December 7, 2012 - 6:31 pm | Permalink

    @C. C. Conrad: Yes, I too am for this approach. The question is fundamental: is a person for White Racial Loyalty and Solidarity, or against it? Is the person committed?

    I personally don’t care one whit if a person considers himself a Buddhist, Christian, Catholic, Protestant, Atheist, Agnostic, or other. I ask only: Where does he stand on the Race Question?

    Same with politics. I don’t care whether a person calls himself a “conservative” or a “liberal” or a “libertarian,” etc. Where does he stand on the race issue? What is his honest position on this issue? Will he fight for White Survival? Is it really and truly of heartfelt importance to him?

  155. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 7, 2012 - 6:18 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: Bravo. I wrote much the same thing (at far greater length, predictably) in a moderation-mired comment that will eventually appear just above yours.

    The present Pope of my Church has set records for the number of times he has set a reverential foot inside synagogues and temples. Never once, alas, has he gone there to warn the idolaters of their imminent damnation lest they repent and embrace the Cross! His predecessor “worshiped” with Buddhists and animists. Is it any wonder, then, that the clerics who follow their lead should join hands with their Protestant brethren in doing the will of the Jews, which is to turn this nation and the other nations of the West over to savages and layabouts, who will swarm ineffectually around the barriers separating them and us from the Tribe’s gated community of world domination?

  156. December 7, 2012 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

    I think that we could all deal with this much better if we just divide everybody into two groups – 1) pro-white and, 2) pro-white-genocide. Then we don’t need to debate over what church did what or petty nationalism.
    Jack’s War

  157. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 7, 2012 - 6:05 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus: I have no quarrel, sir, with your second paragraph in the linked comment, nor with your judicious comments later in this thread. I do, however, think that this sentence,

    I’ve heard them [Catholic Church authorities] speak in glowing terms of such immigration on their cable television network.

    is fundamentally mistaken. People who appear on cable television shows are, first and last, television personalities—no more and no less. Everything said in such a venue needs to be given its appropriate and proportionate weight. I suggest that helium is a good element with which to concoct a very fitting metaphor.

    As has been the case for the past two thousand years, priestly, pastoral, or episcopal utterances originating anywhere other than the pulpit—or when in written form, an official residence or seat—deserve precisely as much respect and obeisance as any advice I may give suggesting that there is wisdom to going all-in when you’re holding a pair of threes in a hand of draw poker.

  158. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 7, 2012 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    I repeat, once again, the Republican Party, and anyone that claims to be associated with it and invested in it, like Ann Coulter,etc. is UTTERLY USELESS TO THE FUTURE OF EUROPEAN-AMERICANS IN THIS COUNTRY. The Republican elite is never, ever, going to change in such a way that finally shifts the weight of their concerns towards their overwhelmingly European-Americans constituency. So, therefore, they are as useless to European-Americans as useless can possibly be. In fact, they are downright DANGEROUS TO EUROPEAN-AMERICANS future prospects in this country. How many times do they have to prove this to some of the dumbkohfs that continue to vote for them? Look at them. Right as of this moment, the Republican elite is spending their energies on “how to be more receptive to “hispanics”,etc. If Martians became citizens, they’d be spending their time ruminating on how to better serve the interests of Martians!!

  159. December 7, 2012 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    @Alexander: @Alexander: “Secondly, as a nation we need legal immigrants. Desirable, skilled immigrants, white Europeans who can replace the dying white World War 11 generation.” IF by desirable you mean WHITE okay, otherwise you are FOS!

  160. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 7, 2012 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    @Alexander: No we don’t “need” legal immigrants. We need traitors like Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Apple computer company, etc.etc. to step up and build tech schools with their enormous fortunes and start giving back to the people that essentially made them so enormously rich, European-Americans. We need a ten year moratorium on ALL IMMIGRATION. PERIOD!!

  161. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 7, 2012 - 5:51 pm | Permalink

    @Tom: Tom, you are becoming repetetive in your false belief. I mentioned before, how millions of Americans don’t even go to church and how millions upon millions of good Presbytarians, Episcopalians, Lutherans, etc.etc. have been hiring illegal aliens by the millions. If anything they are the main facilitators of illegal immigration today. Sure once the illegal aliens are anchored here because of these greedy protestant groups, they go to the Catholic Church and take from it more than ever giving back. Just because Protestants aren’t as organized as the Catholics has nothing to do with their greedy and corrosive business practices. I hear it all the time from these greedy presbytars, Oh I’ll just hire me some illegal Mexicans for half the price,etc. The same thing goes for defending Christmas against attacks by Jewish groups. Cowardly Protestants are NO WHERE TO BE FOUND. Give me a break.

  162. December 7, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    @Mike: If she wasn’t running around with blacks I would.
    Jack’s War

  163. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    December 7, 2012 - 5:47 pm | Permalink

    @Alexander: How notable that you ally yourself with Tom, who has a dozen times or more been proved a bigot and flat-out liar. As with him, so for you, too, it seems, no fact, however plain, is worthy of acknowledgment, let alone consideration, unless it meets certain pre-rational standards of moral correctness. Those standards amount in practice to two things: hating Catholics and lying about them.

    For a Traditionalist Catholic, like me, your attitude and Tom’s underlines the satanic irony of the Second Vatican Council, wherein the traitorous elements within the hierarchy remade its doctrine and its liturgy—first and foremost the Mass—in accord with the dictates of six mainline Protestant ministers who were invited along to perform that very task! If Paul VI, Annibale Bugnini, Joseph Ratzinger, et alii, were fool enough to expect gratitude from the likes of you and Tom for their perfidy to the Faith that Thomas More, John Fisher, Edmund Campion, and an uncountable number of other English and Continental martyrs gave their life for rather than apostatize, as your forbears did, they were fools indeed.

    The literature on Teddy Kennedy is now so vast that only bigots and idiots and residents of New England (to the extent that this last category may be deemed separable from the first two) can now claim that he was ever prepared to ponder any topic not directly related to one or another of his corporeal appetites. Indeed, one may legitimately wonder whether his interest in political power had any foundation other than its usefulness in feeding and, however briefly, slaking those appetites. Yet for you, Tom, and countless others, this admittedly bestial man serves a purpose even more outsized than himself: as an instrument of Rabelaisian caricature, a club with which to beat people and ideas you are too slothful or too ill informed to confront head on. For Ann Coulter, as for Rush Limbaugh and countless other Republican apologists über alles, Kennedy was, as Joseph Sobran wrote of Chappaquiddick, the gift that keeps on giving. No explanation, no supporting evidence, is ever required once the magical name is mentioned. When even Kevin MacDonald has the temerity to step forward and reduce Teddy’s role to its proper level of insignificance, your anger knows no bounds; you lash out sans reason, embarrassment, or any other mark of the civilized man.

    Parenthetically, it’s almost a wonder that the trashy Latin American novelists (whose third-rate books have been highly acclaimed by the Jewish literary establishment for the past thirty years) never used magical Teddy as a real maravilloso character in one of their tedious fictions. Perhaps they didn’t read enough of the Tribally owned newspapers from which you glean your “truths” to see his greatness.

    Finally, face the fact that at the end of the day, Teddy Kennedy was no more Catholic than you are. Indeed, in publically turning his back on the doctrine and discipline of the Church, he formally became what you are: a Protestant. Stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.

  164. December 7, 2012 - 5:45 pm | Permalink

    @russ hook: The whole Kennedy family was a bunch of sex perverts, read – A Question of Character A life of JFK – by Thomas C. Reeves.

  165. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 7, 2012 - 5:41 pm | Permalink

    @Bobby: P.S., My Lord I left out the number three familiy most corrosive towards white Amerians — the European-American family, which enabled the other two. I like to state the whole picture, painfull as it is.

  166. December 7, 2012 - 5:41 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay: Pat Buchanan is not exactly the great white hope. He chose a black as his running mate when he ran for office.
    Jack’s War

  167. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    December 7, 2012 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

    Hands down win for the two families most corrosive for white Americans—- the Bushes and the Kennedys.

  168. December 7, 2012 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    “Ann Coulter: The Republican demise is all Teddy Kennedy’s fault.
    If one wants to know what’s wrong with the (R) party they need look no further than the “look at my black boy friend” Ann Coulter type of “I hate my race” white female.

  169. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    December 7, 2012 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Liberalism — by which I mean the sacred belief that race differences are insignificant and that White people do not have legitimate ethnic interests — is the real culprit here. It is believed in by many persons — especially Whites — of otherwise widely differing persuasions regarding all the other issues of morality and politics.

  170. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    December 7, 2012 - 5:10 pm | Permalink

    @Marcus: “Let’s not pretend that any particular religious subgroup of whites is more responsible for the current situation than any other.”

    I entirely agree, sir! Sorry if my comments seemed to say otherwise.

  171. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    December 7, 2012 - 5:07 pm | Permalink

    There can be no doubt that the Roman Catholic “hierarchy” would be all too pleased to have a predominantly Catholic population in the US, and if importing non-White Catholics would achieve that end, they’ll gladly do it.

    To be fair, the White Southern Baptists are just as racially self-hating as they can be.

    Modern Christianity is a force that is actively working against the long-term survival of White humanity. There can be no doubt that, for most modern Christians, creed lays race-considerations in the dust. Among mainstream Christianity today, there simply is no official concern for the European stock that once was the heart and soul of Christendom. In fact, in not a few Christian circles, encouraging miscegenation is seen as a strong sign and evidence of “Chirstian” virtue.

  172. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 7, 2012 - 5:02 pm | Permalink

    Dr. Macdonald:

    Anne Coulter is a glowing proxy for our cause. Here is how: She is goodlooking, white, fearless, a lawyer with a conviction in her beliefs, and loves controversy. She has authored half a dozen books. In short, she epitomizes white racial success and is ideal to promote white ideals.

    Secondly, as a nation we need legal immigrants. Desirable, skilled immigrants, white Europeans who can replace the dying white World War 11 generation.

    We have few alternatives, and must embrace the likes of Ann Coulter and harness her attributes to our own ends.

  173. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    December 7, 2012 - 5:01 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus, I live across the street from a “mega church” whose walls bear giant posters of happy mixed race couples and their young Joakim Noah offspring. Also, for all the bashing of Catholics who sympathize with mestizo immigrants, there is an extremely energetic Evangelical/Pentecostal proselytization effort aimed at Latinos both here and in their native countries (I think Guatemala is around 50% Pentecostal now). Let’s not pretend that any particular religious subgroup of whites is more responsible for the current situation than any other. Even the Mormons are trying hard to diversify with Polynesian, mestizo, and even black missions.

  174. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    December 7, 2012 - 4:49 pm | Permalink


    Where in the article does Coulter make the point that Kennedy was motivated by his Irish Catholicism?

  175. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    December 7, 2012 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    Coulter says that Christians are morally superior to Jews because they openly and unself-consciously accept mixed-race marriages in their churches (whereas Jews do not):

    Ann Coulter – Jews Need to Be Perfected

  176. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 7, 2012 - 4:30 pm | Permalink


    I wish to associate myself with Tom’s comments.

  177. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    December 7, 2012 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

    @Tom, What about Eisenhower (first to use military to force integration), LBJ, Earl Warren, Geoge McGovern, Dean Rusk, Carter, Reagan, the Bushes, Clinton, etc.? The majority of gentile supporters of non-Euro immigration and “civil rights” were certainly Protestants, though there were a handful of notable Catholics.

  178. Alexander's Gravatar Alexander
    December 7, 2012 - 4:08 pm | Permalink


    Dr.: Macdonald:
    You were raised Roman catholic so I understand your sympathies for a catholic like Ted Kennedy. Joe kennedy his father, a bootlegger, womanizer are traits which many americans find distateful. It was therefore, unsettling for a protestant nation to elect an irish-catholic as president in 1960 as you will remember. But as Anne eludes to, a way to get back at protestant exclusiveness, for sure.

    Ann Coulter’s point is that kennedy, was motivated by his catholicism(which you avoid mentioning) in promoting immigration against a predominantly WASP nation. Jews naturally benefit but only unwittingly and like Catholics, harbour ill feelings towards protestants even today.

    Ann coulter is a positive force in promoting white identity, values and interests. She deserves to be coddled, not admonished.

    • Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
      December 7, 2012 - 4:27 pm | Permalink

      Ann Coulter BRAGS about how Protestants — the “megachurches,” for example, are ever so happy to embrace miscegenation — and she scolds the Jews for not living up to this superior “Christian” standard.

  179. omop's Gravatar omop
    December 7, 2012 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

    How about this proposal for a non demise of the USA. No moe Repub, Rems, Tea party, Coffee party or coke.

    Lets have political parties along the lines explicitly called for in the Census of population;-white, black,[african american], asian, mexican, mestido etc., etc., BUT DEFINITELY INCLUDING THE CHOSEN PEOPLE OF GOD TOO.

    Then we can all eat chinese, mexican, italian, french, indian, greek, kosher as well as fast foods without feeling demised as pundit Ann.

  180. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    December 7, 2012 - 3:42 pm | Permalink

    @Tom: The American Roman Catholic Church simply loves the prospect of filling the U.S. with as many Mexican and other Latin American immigrants as possible. I’ve heard them speak in glowing terms of such immigration on their cable television network.

    I don’t believe that many individual American Catholics agree with their church authorities on this matter, however. Some of the strongest pro-White persons I’ve ever known have been devout Roman Catholics.

  181. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    December 7, 2012 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Kr. MacDonald,

    Would it be possible, since Cultural Insurretions is currently out-of-print, to have it published as a Kindle book on Amazon?

  182. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    December 7, 2012 - 3:29 pm | Permalink

    To be fair someone like Coulter could only speak up the one time before being dispatched from the mainstream.
    But the misdirection she uses (e.g. Ted Kennedy) is a real betrayal. She could leave the reason unstated. She could even demand study of the causes, events, interest groups, whatever, underlying the 1965 act. Something like that would go a long way to waking more people up, and wouldn’t get her immediately thrown out. She’d be on the hitlist for sure, but she’d be able to get a lot more like that out before they got her.
    But for misdirecting people she’s a traitor because she actually hurts us, and actually helps the neo-neocon movement which is just getting off the ground.

  183. Mike's Gravatar Mike
    December 7, 2012 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

    1) Ann coulter is the most popular conservative columnist the country
    2) She makes an extremely implicitly racial point about the demographics of this country and the GOP that anyone with a 3 digit IQ can put the pieces together on


    everyone hard right blog I can find does nothing but complain about how she won’t mention legal immigration (even though she mentions legal immigration in her piece and has called for moratoriums in the past e.g. ) and she doesn’t talk about Jews (in which case she would immediately cease being the most popular columnist).

    Give credit where it’s due. This was a great column on an important subject that will be exposed to people who are not usually exposed to our ideas.

  184. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    December 7, 2012 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Catholic politicians did not bring immigrants into the UK. Nor into France or Germany.

  185. Hans's Gravatar Hans
    December 7, 2012 - 1:50 pm | Permalink

    LOL. Rancid Ann, who laughably called Romney the most conservative candidate in the 2012 GOP primary field, will never expose the Jews. She’s owned by them just like Pig Limbaugh and Punk Hannity.

  186. m's Gravatar m
    December 7, 2012 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    It is getting to the point that whatever remnant of white cohesion is left within any Christian denomination is so small, that it is almost not worth mentioning, anymore. It is certainly not worth arguing over. No one believes that the Catholic church is not pro white-dispossession. But aside from a few fringe movements, what Christian church isn’t, these days?

    As far at TK? I would not attribute Ted Kennedy’s motives to a conscious attempt to undermine whites. I doubt he ever thought it through that far, but was for the most part happy to remain an obnoxious, drunken womanizer. My impression is also that his support of legislation turned on whether there was an opportunity in it for him, or one of his friends/advisors/contributers.

    On the other hand, in his own shallow mind he probably convinced himself that he was being both kind and helpful to the downtrodden. A true saint of a man, and a legend in his own mind.

    Ted Kennedy was an unwitting example of Wilmot Roberton’s “Gracchite” classification of dispossessors. A useful tool in the right hands, as long those hands could continue to supply him with booze and women. Actually, a pretty cheap trade-off for what they in turn gained.

    This is not to say that he would not have still done what he did even if he’d been convinced that it would lead to white dispossession. He was an opportunist. But to attribute anything theoretical to him, or anything intellectual, as if he were acting on his own plan, would be to miss the deeper meaning, which of course Ann always does. Her statement that Romney was not on-board with making America “a dumping ground” for “the world’s welfare cases” shows that she has little depth of understanding. She still remains a mainstream Republican hack.

  187. russ hook's Gravatar russ hook
    December 7, 2012 - 1:25 pm | Permalink

    @thm: Ted Kennedy was a sadistic pedophile according to Brice Taylor’s book. Google it. Also “Tranceformation of America.”

  188. thm's Gravatar thm
    December 7, 2012 - 12:55 pm | Permalink


    Anyone who reads your posts here knows your primary interest in posting on TOO is not in preserving and protecting ethnic European peoples’ interests but in bashing Roman Catholics. It is true that some of the White Catholic leadership, like the White Protestant leadership, has sold out — but that doesn’t speak for all Catholics or Protestants. I don’t believe White people can really afford such a divisive and corrosive outlook as you promote.

  189. December 7, 2012 - 12:52 pm | Permalink

    Pat Buchanan, Kevin MacDonald, and countless other Catholics are leaders in WN movement.

    Do you have any detailed book or work to back it up.

  190. thm's Gravatar thm
    December 7, 2012 - 12:42 pm | Permalink

    Meanwhile Israel, I’m sure everyone here will be pleased to learn, has solved their illegal immigration problem. Israel is celebrating that, by the recent measures they have taken, including building walls and fences, aggressively watching their borders, creating an 11,000 person capacity detention center for illegal aliens etc., they can now boast “We Have Stopped Non-Jewish Immigration to Israel.”

    Read about it here in Israeli newspaper Arutz Sheva:

    PM: Illegal Immigration, Human Trafficking Things of the Past

  191. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    December 7, 2012 - 12:28 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think anyone can question that a long range political goal of organized Jewery was the destruction of US immigration laws. By the same token, the Jewish politicians could never have accomplished their immigration goals without their Roman Catholic allies who were also somewhat contained by immigration restriction too.

    Ted Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Philip Hart and numerous other Roman Catholic politicians pushed along with the Jews to overturn restrictive American immigration law.

    Let’s face the facts, the Irish Roman
    Catholics in particular have had it in for
    White Protestant America since they got here—for no damn good reason. A lot of the Italians haven’t been much better either. One only needs look to Nancy Pelosi, or the Governor Cuomo.

    The Jews may well be the brains behind the sellout & invasion, but, the Roman Catholics are their army.

Comments are closed.