Kouchner’s Rage: Portrait of a Warmonger and Immigrationist

Guillaume Durocher


 

koushner-kosovo

Kouchner laughs when questioned about reports of organ trafficking under his watch in Kosovo.

Bernard Kouchner is a senior French politician and has for decades been a common face in the media, typically promoting this or that “humanitarian intervention” in some part of the world. He served as France’s foreign minister between 2007 and 2010.

I was tremendously struck by a passage in Paul-Éric Blanrue’s book on Sarkozy and the Jews[1] in which he mentions Kouchner’s hysterical reaction to one of his friends mentioning “the Jewish lobby.” Numerous senior figures, including President François Mitterrand and Prime Minister Raymond Barre, have noted that the lobby is a major player in French political and cultural life.[2] Blanrue’s book more generally uses Sarkozy’s career to explore the secular trend in France of the steady replacement of vestigial Gaullist elites, still vaguely committed to French independence, by neoconservative and globalist elites.

Jacques Séguéla, a wealthy French advertising man, recounts that he was on a cruise with Kouchner and his wife Christine Ockrent (then the head of France’s international state media, including Radio France International and TV station France24):

I incidentally mentioned, I no longer remember in what context, without any racist intent, the expression “Jewish lobby.” What had I said? Bernard jumped up at once and locked himself in his cabin. Christine [Ockrent, wife, DG of France Monde, TV5 Monde, France 24, RFI], went in as a scout, she came back bearing a Kouchnerian diktat: “I will leave this anti-Semitic boat first thing in the morning!” I didn’t sleep the entire night. At the crack of dawn, I broke into apologies without really knowing what had been my sin.[3]

This episode, I believe, will resonate strongly with many people who have had to interact with strongly-identified Jews whenever their perceived core interests are stake. Kouchner displays astounding emotional intensity and a sense that he is entitled to engage in unrestricted emotional blackmail against a friend for the smallest unintentional slight. But what is more terrifying, for a Jew, than the sight of goyim pointing out that Jews have a disproportional influence, or even form a “lobby,” in goyishe lands?

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Kouchner, born in 1939, is the son of a Jewish father and Protestant mother. Like the part-Jewish Emmanuel Todd,[4] he strongly identifies as a Jew, saying: “to be a half-Jew is to be twice Jewish.”[5]

Kouchner has built his entire career on the discrediting of the notion of national sovereignty and the principle of Western elites’ “right of intervention” (droit d’ingérence) anywhere on the globe, citing humanitarian or democratic pretexts. He has specialized and been very skillful in exploiting the mass media, using images of starving children or massacred civilians, to emotionally manipulate public opinion to accept imperialist wars.

Kouchner’s first escapade abroad was as a physician in Biafra during the 1968 famine caused by the Nigerian Civil War. In 1971 he founded Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) and became known in international media as the “French doctor.” He later rose in the ranks of the French Socialist Party, often serving in the government.

As a senior French politician, Kouchner has exploited virtually every opportunity to agitate for war against European and Arab nationalists, citing his theory of droit d’ingérence. In 1991, as a member of the French government, he pushed for violating Iraq’s sovereignty to help Kurdish secessionists and called for the West to push beyond the liberation of Kuwait to topple President Saddam Hussein in Baghdad.

Throughout the 1990s, he was part of the clique of overwhelmingly Jewish “intellectuals” in France (Bernard-Henri Lévy, André Glucksmann . . .) who never saw a war they didn’t like and enjoyed strangely systematic media access to promote these wars. There is a famous photo of him hauling rice into famine-wracked and war-torn Somalia.

In 1999, following the NATO bombing of Serbia in violation of international law, Kouchner was appointed as the United Nations High Representative in Kosovo, effectively governor of the new ethnically-Albanian mafia state in that province. Kosovo was run by the former terrorists of the Kosovo Liberation Army and Kouchner had the dishonor of presiding over astounding corruption and criminality. Beside the oppression of the Serbs of Kosovo, Kouchner’s Albanians allegedly engaged in a gruesome trade of organ trafficking taken from combatants and civilians. Whereas senior United Nations and Council of Europe officials have backed the claims, Kouchner dismissed the matter on Serbian television with a hearty cackle and obscenities.[6]

In 2003, the “humanitarian” Kouchner backed President George W. Bush’s illegal invasion of Iraq, which led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands and the displacement of almost 5 million people.

In 2007, freshly-elected French President Nicolas Sarkozy appointed Kouchner to be his foreign minister, despite the fact that the former is a nominal conservative and the latter was a card-carrying Socialist. This move made sense insofar as this distinction is spurious, and both men are dedicated to the same globalist program of neoliberalism, foreign wars, and indefinite displacement-level African/Islamic immigration. There is no left-right distinction in politics any more; the only valid distinction is between globalists and nationalists. In this respect Sarkozy and Kouchner were perfectly compatible as globalists.

Foreign Minister Kouchner ended Jacques Chirac’s previous policy of timid independence relative to the United States, reintegrating France into NATO. He also moved to have France adopt the Lisbon Treaty reinforcing the European Union, despite the French public rejecting a very similar “Constitutional Treaty” in 2005 by referendum. Thus Kouchner was among the gravediggers of President Charles de Gaulle’s previous work of limited French independence, a balanced Middle Eastern policy, and at least verbal opposition to American imperialism.

In 2010, the Jerusalem Post named Kouchner the fifteenth most-powerful Jew in the world, noting that he is “[a]t the forefront of the international struggle against Iran’s nuclear program.”[7]

Since leaving office in 2010, Kouchner has also agitated for war in Libya,[8] which has led to the destruction of the stable anti-Zionist regime there and its replacement with permanent tribal civil war. And of course he advocated war to depose President Bashar al-Assad in Syria,[9] which has fueled the rise of the Islamic State. In each case, Kouchner has advocated policies which have led to the deaths of thousands of innocent people while at the same time advancing the interests of Israel by rendering the Arab states politically fragmented and militarily impotent.

Kouchner has also asserted that whereas Iran must be deprived of nuclear weapons, the world has “a duty to protect [Israel].”[10] Israel, let it be recalled, is an explicitly racist state with a Jews-only immigration policy. Indeed, Israel has been violating international law and ethnically cleansing the native Palestinians for half a century. Israel has also engaged in periodic wars of aggression. Yet Kouchner has curiously never applied his theory of droit d’ingérence to Israel and in fact in the past has taken the lead in cracking down on excessively pro-Palestinian elements in the French Socialist Party.

Kouchner however is very critical of France, saying that “France is a racist country” and claiming that President Sarkozy “was detested also because he was the son of a Hungarian and the grandson of a Jew.”[11] And while asserting that the entire world has a duty to support Israel with its Jews-only immigration policy, Kouchner has demanded that both France and Europe respond to the current migrant crisis by taking in more African/Islamic settlers.[12] These migrants, incidentally, are coming to Europe in part precisely because of the murderous wars Kouchner has agitated for in the Arab World. For Kouchner, it’s a win-win situation.

Bernard Kouchner’s entire life and career have been dedicated to promoting the interests and claims of universal jurisdiction of the American Empire and its European satellites. He has, objectively and consistently, agitated to destroy independent European and Arab nations, while simultaneously promoting the perceived interests of Jews and in particular the Jewish ethno-state of Israel. Hypocrisy is his right, I suppose.

But it begs the question: Why was he able to serve as foreign minister of France?**

Why is he even a French citizen?

** The short answer to this question is obviously and at least in part the strength of “the-lobby-that-doesn’t-exist” meme in elite French circles. Kouchner’s president, Sarkozy, has made unbelievably Judeocentric statements over the years, presumably to pander to Jewish elites and fully cognizant that such statements will not hurt him with French voters, including most recently that “Israel’s right to security [. . .] is the struggle of my life” and that humanity has “contracted towards the Jewish people a debt which cannot be extinguished.” See Guillaume Durocher, “Paul-Éric Blanrue and the Jews: From Celebration to Censorship,” The Occidental Observer, September 24, 2015.


 

[1]Paul-Éric Blanrue, Sarkozy, Israël et les Juifs (Embourg, Belgium: Oser Dire, 2009).

[2]Guillaume Durocher, “‘The Lobby-That-Doesn’t-Exist’: Politicians and Pundits on Jewish Influence in France,” The Occidental Observer, October 1, 2015. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/10/%EF%BB%BF-the-lobby-that-doesnt-exist-politicians-and-pundits-on-jewish-influence-in-france/

[3]Blanrue, Sarkozy, 108.

[4]Guillaume Durocher, “Emmanuel Todd’s Conceit,” The Occidental Observer, November 12, 2015. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/11/emmanuel-todds-conceit/

[5]Ibid.

[6]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMOtjnpDG78

[7]Steve Linde, “The World’s 50 Most Influential Jews,” The Jerusalem Post, May 21, 2010. http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-Features/Worlds-50-most-influential-Jews

[8]Bernard Kouchner, “Libya: The morality of intervention,” The Guardian, March 11, 24. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/mar/24/libya-morality-intervention-united-europe

[9]“Syrie: Kouchner et Glucksmann pour une intervention militaire,” L’Express, October 22, 2012. http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/monde/proche-moyen-orient/syrie-kouchner-et-glucksmann-pour-une-intervention-militaire_1177635.html

[10]“Bernard Kouchner : ‘Le monde doit protéger Israël,’” Courrier international, February 2, 2013. http://www.courrierinternational.com/article/2013/02/15/bernard-kouchner-le-monde-doit-proteger-israel

[11]“French loathed Sarkozy because of his Jewish origins, says former FM,” The Times of Israel, October 15, 2014. http://www.timesofisrael.com/french-loathed-sarkozy-because-of-his-jewish-origins-says-former-fm/

[12]“Bernard Kouchner : ‘La France n’accueil pas assez de migants,” Fdesouche, September 9, 2015. http://www.fdesouche.com/642209-bernard-kouchner-la-france-naccueille-pas-assez-de-migrants “Kouchner: ‘L’Europe ne fait pas assez pour l’immigration,’” Le Soir, November 7, 2014. http://www.lesoir.be/702013/article/actualite/union-europeenne/2014-11-07/kouchner-l-europe-ne-fait-pas-assez-pour-l-immigration-video

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

45 Comments to "Kouchner’s Rage: Portrait of a Warmonger and Immigrationist"

  1. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    February 5, 2016 - 11:13 am | Permalink

    These days I am torn between doing what I can to stop the rot, sewage overflow, and general degeneration of the West and Whites from getting worse (though it seems to do so as time goes on, without letup), VERSUS doing nothing and even hoping for an apocalyptic collapse that will finally awaken the sheep, those of diverted attention, and the young and any productive insentient soul.

    Once your house burns down, criminals are free to prey on you and yours without penalty, and all your wealth is confiscated, you then have nothing to lose, and retribution, revenge, and inflicted pain and death on the people who caused and allowed these catastrophes will be your prime endeavor.

    Which is better? Are we past the point of no return?

  2. Armor's Gravatar Armor
    February 1, 2016 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    “Kouchner’s Rage: Portrait of a Warmonger and Immigrationist”

    By ZOG’s logic:

    – Calling Kouchner a Jewish warmonger is antisemitic!
    By bringing attention to the jewishness of the warmongers, you encourage people to think that all Jews are the same. And that is terribly unfair to innocent Jews.

    – On the other hand, Jewish warmongering is not supposed to be xenophobic or goy-phobic.

    Personally, I can’t think of a worse way to unfairly lump all people together than by bombing a foreign country. By going to war against a foreign country, you seem to be saying that you see the whole country as your enemy. And you know it is unavoidable that many innocent lives will be lost.

    But in ZOG’s eyes, calling attention to the Jewishness of the Jewish warmongers is much worse than any collateral damage caused by the bombs!

  3. Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
    February 1, 2016 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Kouchner, according to Wikipedia, “was born in Avignon, to a Jewish father and a Protestant mother”:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Kouchner

    Of course, like with so many status-seeking mamzers in the “Western” world, it is totally overlooked and forgotten that this disqualifies him from being halakhically “Jewish” — but hey, who really cares about that .. can’t let something as silly as rabbinical law get in the way of evil, personal ambition, right??

    So much for “Jews” being a “race”.

    • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
      February 1, 2016 - 4:14 pm | Permalink

      Quick question for Monsieur Durocher:

      On this note, are there ANY politicians – or those in the social ‘elites’ – left in France that is of actual French (Gaulish and/or Frankish – and Catholic) stock and descent..?!?

      • FranksandBeans's Gravatar FranksandBeans
        February 6, 2016 - 8:49 pm | Permalink

        Even if there are 100% Gaulish or Frankish, those politicians have sold their souls to the Jews. So just as well they are 100% because they do what the Jew puppet master tells them to do.

  4. Miche Kunis's Gravatar Miche Kunis
    February 1, 2016 - 11:14 am | Permalink

    Will you get a load of this?

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/99-44100ths-pure-conventional-wisdom-from-foreign-policy-the-end-of-an-era-for-white-males/

    “Quite simply: It now seems to be common sense that no society can thrive if it fails to tap the intellectual, economic, creative, and spiritual resources of its entire population.”

    “Finally, thanks to the mobility revolution of the past century, flows of refugees and migrants of all kinds have shifted the demographics of societies and—protests and unease aside—they have proved essential to fighting the demographic trends, such as aging, that have put many advanced societies at risk.”

    So… in order for society to THRIVE, all women along with all men must work, work, and work in the New Economy. But that means fewer women get married and have kids.

    And so they can’t survive as a people…

    And that means the thriving society has to take in tons of migrants from non-thriving societies that are not so economically maximized.

    What does this mean? If ALL societies want to THRIVE, they must become like the West where women would rather work than be mothers.
    But then, ALL societies would begin to age and fail to produce enough kids. Then, all of humanity would die off.

    So, in order for a thriving economy to survive, they must rely on non-thriving societies. In that case, it would be bad if all societies were thriving since they would all face birth dearths and wouldn’t be able to take in surplus people from other nations.

    Btw, Jews keep saying that European nations(and Japan) need to rely on immigrants in order to survive. But survive as what and as whom?
    If Japanese population goes from 100 million to 50 million, it is still Japan. But if Japan fills the lost 50 million with 50 million Hindus or Africans, it is no longer Japan.
    A nation is more than numbers. Japan is not defined by the number of 100 million. Japan is defined by JAPANESE whether they be 1o million, 20 million, 50 million, or 100 million.

    What kind of an idiot defines nationhood by numbers? Suppose a massive earthquake kills half the Japanese. So, is Japan no longer Japan since it no longer has, say, 100 million? Will Japan be Japan once again only if brings over 50 million Turks? Hey, it’s Japan again since it’s up to 100 million!!

    What kind of logic is that?

    Now, if the West is facing declining numbers, the obvious solution should be more men should be fathers, and more women should be mothers. White people should emotionally grow up, get married, and have kids instead of acting like perpetual kids addicted to videogames or TV shows.

    But Rothkopft says NOOOOOOOO. Why, the economy would fail unless all women worked like ants. It is the only way to THRIVE.
    But choosing to THRIVE, the nation cannot SURVIVE.
    Solution? Bring in tons of people from nations that don’t thrive.

    Isn’t there a middle-ground between the Thrive mode and Survive mode?
    According to Rothkopft, apparently not. The West must fully go into thrive mode, and women must work and work and work. If that undermines the survive mode of the people? Bring in tons of people from the Third World and face racial-cultural displacement, but then, don’t worry about such things since a nation should only be defined by numbers(population figures), GDP, and libertarian ‘right’ to consume like a pig.

    By the way, what kind of an idiot believes that bringing in tons of Third Worlders will do wonders for the economy? How many people really think that boatloads of ‘refugees’ from Africa will do wonders for the European economy? How is Sweden faring so far with all those Somali morons?

    Of course, Rothkopf is not an idiot. He is a weasel. The idiots are white people are smart but not smart enough to see through the vile lies of scum like this.
    He just wants to weaken the unity of white European nations.

    Jewish message to white nations: “You will not survive unless your nations become non-white.”

    Okay, I have a message for Israel. Israel will not survive unless it becomes majority non-Jewish. If identity doesn’t matter, what does it matter if Israel is majority Jewish or non-Jewish?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYKyp1e_jYc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ9n0hibSS4

    Meanwhile, this is the kind of Zionist actions fully supported by American Jews:

  5. Dave Bowman's Gravatar Dave Bowman
    January 31, 2016 - 5:28 am | Permalink

    Being English, I’m no expert on French politics, but my current affairs knowedge was, I thought, very up-to-date. Even so, I’d only ever heard of this guy vaguely before – always in thoroughly negative and appallingly immoral terms. They hide in the shadows even when they are international “personalities”. Now I read the full truth, courtesy of TOO. Naturally, his Wiki page for public consumption contains not a jot of any of this.

    I’m not given to abuse but the truth is, having read this patiently – and painfully, – I am seething inside right now. What does it take to make people look at this smug, arrogant, lying, corrupt, utterly hypocritical, shamelessly self-promoting Jew bastard and put him permanently far, far away from public office of any kind ? While these worthless scumbags are looked up to in ANY way as some kind of international social or political “role model”, their is no hope of change at a deeper level. I now believe that, sometimes, full, open, public, ruthless character assassination via the hard facts on wide distribution could be a major step in opening eyes and removing these parasites from our midst.

    Thank you, so much, Monsieur Durocher, for this appalling – but vital – reading.

  6. Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
    January 30, 2016 - 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Quite probably dead. Very probably arrested not as French Jews ( that was not permitted by the Vichy government) but as ” resistants” , i.e. Communists.

  7. peter's Gravatar peter
    January 30, 2016 - 11:13 am | Permalink

    It states in his biography that his grandparents on his father’s side were deported to Auschwitz. Is there any more information on their fate ?

  8. January 30, 2016 - 4:45 am | Permalink

    Ahah – “1971 he founded Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders)” —
    .
    I’d heard before this outfit is phoney, or at least in part phoney. What a surprise! Bombs Without Frontiers sounds more accurate.

  9. January 29, 2016 - 11:45 pm | Permalink

    This story is really dispiriting. Among European nations after WWII, France tried to steer an independent course from the US. Now, it’s just a cuck-nation of globalism, of a world empire that might be called Kosheria or Koshmir.

    In contrast to France and Germany, Russia has been targeted for destruction. But…

    In some ways, the West’s attempt to isolate Russia has been a good thing for Russia despite the hardships.

    Suppose Russia is welcomed by the West. Then, Russia might be open to Western-style policies, lower its nationalist guard, and adopt western ways that are proving to be so suicidal.

    It’s been said that it was a great thing that Western European nations buried the hatchet after WWII and made peace. But, all that peace had a negative side-effect.

    Too much peace and brotherliness among European nations made all the nations overly trusting in unity and cooperation. It robbed them of their suspicions. A people that are no longer suspicious lose their survival instinct. (Corleones in THE GODFATHER had to always be suspicious and never ever trusting. To trust is to lower your guard. Trust culture is good within a nation/culture, but it should never be applied to outsiders. Corleone’s share all the secrets in the family but never with outsiders.)
    It’s like dogs raised to love and trust one another lose the keen instinct for survival.
    A wild dog or wolf is more wary, aggressive, and less cooperative, but it has powerful in self-preservation instincts. It sees everything as a potential danger. It takes no chances.
    But if you raise a bunch of dogs together and make them all be friendly-trusting-complacent, sure they get along together and that’s all very nice. But the dogs become like deer in headlight. They don’t know how to react to danger or respond to threat. They think everyone and everything is their friend. They lose all sense of danger and threat. They project their sense of safety and security on the entire world.

    And we see this in EU today.

    When Europe was more divided, competitive, and mutually suspicious, it’s true that this sometimes led to terrible wars among Europeans. But on the other hand, each nation had very powerful survival instincts. Since they feared and suspected nearby nations, why would they trust the rest of the world? Such distrust among European nations led to wars but also passion for pride and survival.

    But after WWII, all the Western European nations got along famously. They became like tamed dogs. They were nice and friendly. And cuddly.
    It was good that Europeans were no longer killing Europeans. But with all that peace and prosperity, Europeans became less like fierce attack dogs and more like cucky-wucky neutered tamed dogs.
    They went from dogs that barked and growled at strangers to dogs that were no longer afraid of strangers. Since they were protected by master USA and since they all got along happily with the other dogs, they no longer barked at strangers. They assumed that strangers are just as nice as they themselves all are with one another.

    So, instead of ‘Beware of Dog’, European dogs hold up signs ‘WELCOME TO OUR PLAYGROUND’ as millions of invaders trample into Europe.

    Both Old Europe and new EU are double-edged swords.

    Old Europe was made up of mutually suspicious, even hostile, nations. The bad side of this was was and a lot of dead people in sometimes stupid and petty wars.
    But the good side of this was that EVERY NATION has powerful survival instincts. If Poles don’t trust Germans, they are not gonna trust Africans or Muslims. If Germans don’t trust the French, they are not gonna trust the rest of the world.

    The good side of New EU is that all nations get along together and live in peace and trust one another, mostly anyway.
    But, the bad side of this is that Europeans, in having come to live with one another peacefully, have lost their killer/survival instinct and have come presume the entire world could get along just as peacefully as post-WWII Europeans do. (Europe as St. Bernard to the world.) And such naivete assumes that EU is just a part of the world and the world is just one big EU.

    So, maybe it’s a good thing that Russia is on hostile footing with the West. Sure, there is an economic price to pay, but it makes Russians suspicious and boosts their survival instinct. And that’s better to have.

    No nation trust trust the global world order dominated by the likes of Soros.

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 31, 2016 - 11:44 am | Permalink

      If a German can easily live in peace in America with his French or British neighbor, why can’t European countries live in peace with one another? Should we all live in each others’ houses here to make sure that we don’t end up fighting?

  10. noname's Gravatar noname
    January 29, 2016 - 11:03 am | Permalink

    I’ve just had an unpleasant experience on a Russian-Jewish site. The article that had been published there states that Europeans shouldn’t be impatient to the immigrants, and should instead ask forgiveness for all the awful things that have been done to them in the past. Like slave trade, Opium Wars etc.

    So, I spent some time and posted a comment, providing information like the fact that the slave trade was not initiated but stopped by the Europeans, as early as 1820, although slave markets in Africa still existed even in the XX century, etc. The result: comment deleted, I am banned by IP and called a “cockroach”.

  11. January 28, 2016 - 9:03 pm | Permalink

    For clarification, it cannot be repeated often enough when discussions focus on the Jewish problem – Martin Heidegger’s succinct statement, which by some is deemed to be an antisemitic statement, to which I reply: How can truth-telling be antisemitic or hateful?
    >>The Jews, with their marked gift for calculating, live, already for the longest time, according to the principle of race, which is why they are resisting its consistent application with utmost violence.<<

    • Guest's Gravatar Guest
      January 29, 2016 - 11:45 pm | Permalink

      Reply to Fredrick Toeben @ 9:03pm on January 28: “How can truth-telling be anti-semitic or hateful”?, you asked. The answer is that in Judaism exists the concept of lashan hora (‘evil speech’) wherein any statement, even if it is factual and truthful, may be deemed ‘evil’, ‘blasphemous’ or dangerous to the Jewish community, particularly if it reveals or explains Jewish beliefs or actions. Thus, ‘truth’ is never an objective reality, but a subjective one tied to ethnic needs and preservation of their own people. To preserve one’s own people is moral in itself but this is used ultimately to silence objective truth and that will, in itself, destroy the moral nature of any people.

      • January 30, 2016 - 6:05 pm | Permalink

        Thank you for this – it clarifies many things of which I was but vaguely aware.

      • John's Gravatar John
        January 31, 2016 - 11:36 am | Permalink

        “in Judaism exists the concept of lashan hora (‘evil speech’) wherein any statement, even if it is factual and truthful, may be deemed ‘evil’, ‘blasphemous’ or dangerous to the Jewish community”

        Thanks for that. That explains a lot about how the Jews operate as opposed to the Christian belief that “The truth will set you free”.

        John 3:19-21New International Version (NIV)

        19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.

  12. Indian guy's Gravatar Indian guy
    January 28, 2016 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Thank you, Mr. Durocher, for this article.

    …to be a half-Jew is to be twice Jewish.

    This certainly rings a bell in my mind.

    Immediately after Narendra Modi was elected PM of India, one Anish Kapoor wrote in none other than The Guardian, “India is being ruled by a Hindu Taliban”. [1]

    At that time I found this quite funny – as I do other works of hyper-paranoid anti-Hindu Hindus – as Modi is as much a “Hindu nationalist” as Reagan was a “White nationalist”.

    But a little research later it became clear that I was not dealing with a Hindu here. [2]

    Anish Kapoor is half-Jew, on his mother’s side. And the Jewess in question is of the Sephardic/Mizrahi strain.

    Incidentally the guy has created sculptures for the Israel Museum in Tel Aviv. [3]

    Not to mention, spent 2 year in an Israeli kibbutz. [4]

    The Jewish Chronicle article that mentions this also says, that this bastard (pun intended) is “the biggest name in art” in an example of that shamelessly Jewish ethnic self-promotion that Prof. MacDonald and others have written about countless times at TOO.

    Also, this Jew has designed “Holocaust Memorial” candles which are to be lit on that special day all over UK. [5]

    So obviously, he’s a self-identified ethnocentric Jew who doesn’t see any problem with Jewish territorial ethno-national in historic Palestine.

    Yet, strangely when he comes across anything even remotely connected to Goyish nationalism, he shudders and shakes, and goes straight for abusive histrionics in a true a la Juif style.

    That this particular variety of nationalism has never pogrommed him, is a matter of no consequence to this SOB. He simply hates even semi-aware Goyim.

    Thankfully, I am not the only Indian who sees through this Jew. [6]

    Nor is the Indian government taking this nonsense, at least for the time being. [7]

    Moral of the story?

    Just one drop Jewish blood, regardless of its strain and the race of the Goyish blood in them, and you are a “twice Jew”.

    [1], http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/12/india-hindu-taliban-narendra-modi

    [2], https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anish_Kapoor#Early_life

    [3], http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-03-08/israel-museum-kapoor-work-turns-jerusalem-upside-down-update1-

    [4], http://www.thejc.com/arts/arts-interviews/interview-anish-kapoor-biggest-name-art

    [5], http://www.thejc.com/arts/arts-interviews/interview-anish-kapoor-biggest-name-art

    [6], http://www.hinduhumanrights.info/anish-kapoor-behind-the-mask/

    [7], http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/artist-anish-kapoor-who-criticized-pm-modi-dropped-by-rajasthan-government-1245100

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 28, 2016 - 4:42 pm | Permalink

      I am not the only Indian who sees through this Jew

      Of course, his real name is GLASS- another name-changer. . .

    • January 29, 2016 - 3:33 am | Permalink

      @Indian Guy – I’d be grateful for an outline of Jews in India:
      — East India Co; was it Jewish?
      — Gems etc: did Jews pillage, while simple Brits provided military muscle?
      — Was e.g. Bengal pillaged; and e.g. cotton industry ruined there, by mutilations?
      — Was there some sort of central bank?
      — What did people like Clive ‘of India’ do?
      — What did the ‘moghuls’ do?
      — India of course is large: were the principalities, countries, regions etc divided-and-ruled?
      — Did the British-style exam system and civil service serve some subtle purpose– Etc – there are so many questions which people in Britain, with ‘their’ empire at one time, ought to know!
      –[If you have a sound revisionist overview, including WW1 and WW2 and post-1945, I could host it on my big-lies site.]

      • Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
        January 29, 2016 - 10:34 am | Permalink

        For a wealth of information on Jewish penetration of India, go to :

        https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/

        Search there for example : Tata, Sassoon and the opium trade. The Indian owner of that website also thinks that Rajiv Gandhi was murdered by the Mossad.

      • Indian guy's Gravatar Indian guy
        January 29, 2016 - 10:40 am | Permalink

        Ok. Rerevisionist. I’ll do some research on this. And although this may take some time, as soon as I finish, I’ll send the info to you at your site.

      • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
        January 29, 2016 - 1:15 pm | Permalink

        Two prominent jews, Al Baghdadi and Sassoon, there were undoubtedly many others, controlled the growth of opium poppies and refining of the resin to opium in 19th century British India. It was done on a vast scale. Of course the opium was destined for China to achieve the degradation of its population. When the Chinese government objected, Britain conducted 2 Opium Wars at the behest of its jewish masters.

      • FranksandBeans's Gravatar FranksandBeans
        February 6, 2016 - 8:58 pm | Permalink

        Rerevisionist, Don’t forget that Queen Victoria’s PM, Benjamin Disraeli was Jewish and his policies helped gain a foothold in India and South Africa. So there were Jewish influences in India during Queen Vic’s time as well. Also, Edwina Mountbatten was part Jewish as well. I guess there is some fodder for you to look at for your website.

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      January 30, 2016 - 2:54 pm | Permalink

      Anish Kapoor, that pseudo-artist who created ‘ The Queen’ Vagina” , which was exposed in Versailles garden ? ( and happily vandalised ?). What a baffoon !
      I don’t know who is worse, he or Damien Hirsch !

    • Alieu's Gravatar Alieu
      January 30, 2016 - 11:36 pm | Permalink

      Really interesting post. I didn’t know they had the same problem in India. Just goes to show that Jewish hostility towards any national identity by the people they live among is universal and not limited to Europeans or people of European descent. They bring this hostility with them everywhere they go and then blame the resulting conflict on the other group. Yet another example.

      • Indian guy's Gravatar Indian guy
        January 31, 2016 - 6:35 pm | Permalink

        Herve Ryssen has a very interesting post where he claims exactly that: that Jews intend to destroy the identities of others while keeping their own identity intact.

        Here’s the link: http://www.toqonline.com/blog/the-psychopathology-of-judaism-2/

        Nationalism is simply drawing the lines between one’s own kind and others and then keeping those lines intact.

        Given Jewry’s status as an ethno-nation as well as a socio-economic class, the prospect of being seen a group of racially alien exploiters has been their worst nightmare.

        Add to this the historical precedent of nationalists having been their worst enemies.

        Black nationalists, for example, clearly saw that the Jew was the lord of their ghettos, and they made no attempt to keep quiet about it.

        The greatest enemies of the State of Israel has not been head-chopping sex-slave-trading suicide-bombing Muslim fanatics from the dark ages BUT Western-educated modern-minded secular Arab nationalists/Ba’athists.

        There’s an excellent article at Counter Currents at a Black nationalist’s realization of the Jewish question.

        http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/01/harold-cruses-the-crisis-of-the-negro-intellectual/

        Having said that, some kinds of national identities have been worse for the Jews than others.

        The Western Man is the paradigmatic example, and for good reasons.

        So, while they despise ALL national identities, they reserve a special hatred for Euro-White folks.

        • FranksandBeans's Gravatar FranksandBeans
          February 6, 2016 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

          Indian guy, I have known personally that Jews love the Hindu race because they claim that Hindus never persecuted them when they were in India unlike the EVIL western Christian nations. That is why I see many stamps and collaborations made between jews and Hindus. I guess that is just a ploy to gain a foothold in India. In America, many companies owned by Jews and their goys hire Hindus on the cheap H1B visas to get the work done at a low cost and to displace the white Americans from their rightful jobs. So Jews are using Hindus in many devious ways just to get back at the white people.

  13. WunderHund's Gravatar WunderHund
    January 28, 2016 - 11:30 am | Permalink

    As an aside….. that antisemic boat was the USS Liberty.

  14. Ezra Pound's Ghost's Gravatar Ezra Pound's Ghost
    January 28, 2016 - 11:09 am | Permalink

    In little more than 4 years, Jews have turned me from a libertarian-disposed, race-ignorant guy into a militant “anti-Semite” and fascist – and not a hint of humor is intended here.

    • Peter J's Gravatar Peter J
      January 28, 2016 - 4:32 pm | Permalink

      I exactly agree

    • John's Gravatar John
      January 29, 2016 - 10:04 am | Permalink

      Lol. You sound exactly like me and this guy too.

      Search for: “Tuesday, 20 March 2012
      Shatter Watch: Treacherous nation-wrecking scumbag”

      A few years ago, I woke up pissed off and decided to try to figure out where these idiot leftists come from (what kind of families) and as soon as I did that I discovered one Jew after another. The thing is, I understand why they do what they do (trying to weaken and destroy their biggest rival so that they can rule) but I still cannot comprehend the goy, European leftists’ thinking.

      I also read some of the protocols today and the Jews admit that liberalism weakens,

  15. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    January 28, 2016 - 9:38 am | Permalink

    “There is no left-right distinction in politics any more; the only valid distinction is between globalists and nationalists.”

    This has been my mantra for years. It is applicable in every White country. Even then, politicians have to be scrutinized on a sliding scale, as none are really pure nationalists. I think of Ron Paul as an example. Nationalist in many ways, but solidly buys into the Mises-Jewish version of global-Jewish economics.
    White countries will never be free from manipulation, until the principals of Byzantium, regarding the tribe’s influence, are implemented.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 28, 2016 - 11:24 am | Permalink

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        January 29, 2016 - 9:12 am | Permalink

        Oops. Thanks for the correction. I had edited that sentence before posting from “principal tenets”.

        • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
          January 30, 2016 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

          Pronciples of Byzantium? Please clarify, thank you.

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          January 30, 2016 - 3:51 pm | Permalink

          @Rosa
          It has been said that the success of the Byzantine Empire was achieved by seeking alliances only when necessary, and changing alliances when it suited the needs of the Empire.
          That was achieved in large part by keeping Jews out of positions in banking/financial matters, government, and education, to eliminate their influence.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      January 29, 2016 - 6:04 am | Permalink

      You are so correct. Over the past year, I have posted to several web sites referencing Jewish interests diverging from nationalistic and nativistic ones. I have tried to be objective and reference based, proffering fact and evidence over polemic. The result: I am banned as a commentator (blocked) from Frontpage Mag, WND, CNS, and now by PJMedia. Roger Simon took unusual offense at my pointing out the very same observations found here at TOO. And some other lame, lying, deceptive falsifiers of Jewish history and current agitprop.

      Furthermore, at two hospitals in the Fort Lauderdale area-one public and one private-TOO is blocked by their WiFi, for being a “Hate Site”. I wish I had the money to challenge this in open court. I have little doubt that this is the handiwork of the Hostile Elite and better than even odds of the SPLC’s involvement. Ft. Lauderdale is sickeningly and increasingly dominated by Jewish Leftism

      • John's Gravatar John
        January 29, 2016 - 11:02 am | Permalink

        I have been “banned” from too many sites to count over the years because of my wrongthink. Hell, I’m blocked from posting on Quora until tomorrow (not including my new account that I signed up with the day they blocked me … again). VPNs are your friend.

  16. Aeneas's Gravatar Aeneas
    January 28, 2016 - 9:09 am | Permalink

    This one of the things that wakened me up to the Jewish Question, how emotional the Jews are when their interests are at stakes.

  17. Harvey's Gravatar Harvey
    January 28, 2016 - 5:58 am | Permalink

    I think it were Napoleon that fumbled the Jewish percontination. Though these chilling accounts of Bernard Kouchner demonstrate the compounding burden of his error. It was the American rock ensemble, MC5’s Rob Tyner (Derminier) who said in cousinly tribal fashion; “Brothers and Sisters, I want to tell you something, I hear a lot of talk, by a lot of honkies sittin’ on a lot of money, tellin’ me they’re high society. Well I’ll let you know something, if you ask me, this is the high society, this is the high society!”

Comments are closed.