National Review’s Failed Conservatism of Values, Ideas, and Principles

Kevin MacDonald


The National Review assault on Donald Trump brings up the issue of basing one’s political views on values, ideas, and principles. The problem is simply that these abstractions may or may not reflect fundamental interests, and the Trump candidacy is bringing this to the fore. The NR commentary is essentially a brief for the priority of principles, ideas, and values over interests. NR editor Rich Lowry sums up the theme:

If you truly are conservative, you believe in ideas and in principles, … It’s not just attitudes. It’s not just who you dislike. It’s limited government. It’s the Constitution. It’s liberty. Those are the things that truly make this country special. And they are basically afterthoughts to Donald Trump. He almost never talks about them.

For Lowry, the contrast is between ideas and principles versus not liking someone (?!). Concerns about “limited government” and respect for the Constitution are the main themes running through the comments. Trump just hasn’t been mouthing adherence to either of them, and his critics point to instances, mainly in the past, where he has strayed from these abstractions. (Yes, the Constitution is an abstraction, because as Joe Sobran said (and quoted by Gregory Hood), “the Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.” It follows from this, and it is certainly true, that the Constitution does not pose any serious threat to the eclipse of White America.)

In all of this, there is no mention of fundamental interests that might  be compromised by adhering to the principles they espouse. As I noted in a recent article on the response to Trump, “Conservatism Inc. may argue that Trump is not a ‘conservative.’ But the reality is that Trump voters are focusing on his big issues—immigration first and foremost. Unless we win the immigration battle, none of the other battles can possibly be won.”

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Immigration, more than any other issue, reflects fundamental interests in the ethnic composition of the United States. As an obvious example, limited government is not going to repatriate millions of illegal immigrants, or keep them out in the future. It is an enduring Utopian ideal that limited, constitutional government and individual freedom can survive importing millions of people from radically different cultures—cultures with no history of limited, constitutional government or individual freedom, and often with hatred toward the peoples and cultures of the West. Only the most reality-detached ideologue could believe that it’s all going to work out and something resembling traditional American institutions will be around in a few decades time if current trends continue. As Jared Taylor points out, “Do they really believe that Mexicans and Haitians and Guatemalans and Vietnamese and Bangladeshis and Chinese are ever going to be made to care about the Second Amendment or Madisonian democracy or limited government?”

This mindset among NR conservatives reflects a common defect among liberal Protestants that surfaced originally in the nineteenth century — the idea that the very different people crowding the shores of the U.S. would become “just like us.” These immigrants would eventually become good Protestants. What we are seeing now is how important segments of non-White immigrants, most obviously Muslims, are in fact unassimilable. They are never going to “become like us” and be concerned about the principles and values so near and dear to conservatives. It was the realization that so many of the post-1890 immigrants were infected with radical political beliefs that finally made Americans realize that immigrants don’t automatically turn into patriotic Americans. This realization was an important impetus for the 1924 immigration law.

It’s obvious that importing millions of non-Whites has resulted in increasing pressures directed squarely at some of the sacred principles conservatives claim to value, in particular pressure for controls on speech and thought resulting from the need to knuckle under to aggressive minorities that don’t take criticism kindly, no matter how factually based. This is especially the case in universities and the media, where violators of multicultural decorum are routinely harassed and fired. But intellectual rationales for curtailing speech critical of the multicultural ideal are already common in the legal community in the U.S., while in Europe, police-state controls on thought and  behavior intended to buttress the the multicultural revolution are firmly ensconced. For Germany reeling under the migrant onslaught, the first priority is to manage nativist anger, not restricting migration or repatriating migrants. And throughout the Western world, there is increased surveillance because of terrorism threats resulting ultimately from immigration.

Although the San Bernardino shootings and the long list of terrorist incidents prior to that certainly focus the public’s attention one of the costs of massive unselected immigration, the far greater problem is that massive immigration leads to a loss of a sense of national identity as bound up with a particular people and culture. There is an elite consensus that citizenship  is simply a matter of accepting basic principles of democracy and individual freedom — the “proposition nation” concept of citizenship — rather than protecting the interests of a particular people. The ideology of the proposition nation is now a consensus among political and intellectual elites throughout the West, and certainly “conservatives” are no exception.

We have to understand that this way of thinking is the result of the counter-cultural revolution of the 1960s, the intellectual basis for which is discussed in The Culture of Critique. In CofC I discuss a paper by Roger Smith, who shows that until the triumph of the cultural pluralist model with the countercultural revolution of the 1960s, there were three competing models of American identity: the “liberal” individualist legacy of the Enlightenment based on “natural rights”; the “republican” ideal of a cohesive, socially homogeneous society; and the “ethnocultural” strand emphasizing the importance of Anglo-Saxon ethnicity in the development and preservation of American cultural forms.[1]  These three strands are compatible with each other, but only if the US had retained its traditional homogeneous White underpinnings. Recall that the Immigration Restriction Act of 1924, with its built-in sense of White identity politics (i.e., biasing immigration to people from Northwest Europe), was essentially upheld over presidential veto not that long ago, in 1952. Yet these principled conservatives act as if their ideals have always been the guiding principles of the Republic. Fundamentally, they have plugged into the leftist zeitgeist in order to make themselves palatable to the powers that be — or, in the case of the rather large percentage of Jewish neocons among the NR essayists, they have simply passed off their leftist impulses and ethnic interests in a non-White America as the true conservatism.

The problem is that these self-described conservatives have thrown out all of this except the Enlightenment ideals. By denigrating and religiously avoiding the traditional ethnocultural strand of American identity as well as the republican ideal of a cohesive and socially homogeneous society, these “conservatives” have wholeheartedly gone along with this revolution. It is a revolution that amounts to the suicide of the West. In the end, it is anything but conservative.

The outcome of the present policies is utterly predictable decline in social cohesion, with far-ranging costs in terms of increased conflict and crime, and a lessened willingness and ability to contribute to public goods such as welfare and health care. It’s well known that ethnic diversity is correlated with a host of undesirable outcomes. People in ethnically diverse societies invest less in social capital, they cooperate less, are less prone to engage in volunteer work, and there is less trust among citizens.

Given all that, how can any rational person suppose that a set of principles, ideas, and values that result in all of these costs to the White population of the U.S. could be anything other than a suicide wish in the present political context? Immigration is the bedrock issue. Nothing else matters. The lack of concern about immigration in favor of principles and  values is a deadly flaw in conservatism as promoted by Lowry et al. If the NR conservatives would have their way, immigration would not even be an issue in the campaign. If nothing else, we all have to thank Donald Trump for putting it front and center in the public consciousness.

Several of the comments reflect a concern that, far from being a small-government conservative, Trump represents a kind of veiled fascism:

  • In a comment that assumes that Trump wants absolute power, Yuval Levin: “American conservatism is an inherently skeptical political outlook. It assumes that no one can be fully trusted with public power and that self-government in a free society demands that we reject the siren song of politics-as-management.”
  • William Kristol: “Isn’t Trumpism a two-bit Caesarism of a kind that American conservatives have always disdained?”
  • Ben Domenech: Trump advocates “a rejection of our Madisonian inheritance and an embrace of Barack Obama’s authoritarianism.” (Elsewhere Domenech writes that Trump “would throw the Constitution and the rule of law to the winds in pursuit of an aggressive promise of unilateral change – and [his supporters] are fine with that.”)
  • R. R. Reno: Trump “presents himself as a Strong Man who promises to knock heads and make things right again. In this, he has a lot more in common with South American populist demagogues than with our tradition of political leaders.”
  • David Boaz: “Trump’s greatest offenses against American tradition and our founding principles are his nativism and his promise of one-man rule. … He’s effectively vowing to be an American Mussolini, concentrating power in the Trump White House and governing by fiat.”
  • David McIntosh: Trump’s policy ideas are “the ramblings of a liberal wannabe strongman who will use and abuse the power of the federal government to impose his ideas on the country.”

There is essentially zero evidence for any of this. But underneath such sentiments is a guilty conscience—the realization that establishment conservatives have done nothing to stem the actions of our hostile elite in running roughshod over the interests of White America in maintaining its political and demographic hegemony. Indeed, in many ways, despite their rhetoric, they are a major part of our hostile elite. Several of the essayists acknowledge that there are very real grievances underlying the anger so many White Americans feel, including the failure of Republicans to do anything to stem the anger and frustration of its base (see especially Domenech and Reno). But their prescription is that these extremely frustrated, angry (White) voters reject Trump and pledge allegiance to principles of individual freedom, limited government, the free market, etc., and hope for the best, even though they can’t explain how these principles would do anything to assuage their deeper concerns. Indeed, these principles are sometimes used as a rationale for the immigration onslaught, as with David McIntosh of the very pro-immigration, philosophically libertarian, free trade-obsessed Club for Growth.

It’s like they are saying, “Okay, we haven’t done anything to help you out and we can’t explain how subscribing to principles of freedom and limited government would really address your concerns over how immigration has transformed the U.S. But please don’t vote for the only person who is even discussing these concerns.”

Nobody’s listening, apart from the Beltway conservatives who are plugged into the Conservatism, Inc. gravy train.

If we are in fact seeing the beginning of a politics of more-or-less explicit White identity,  the irrelevant cuckservatives at the dying NR must receive a great deal of the credit. And for that we can be thankful.


[1] Smith, R. M. (1988). The “American creed” and American identity: The limits of liberal citizenship in the United States. Western Political Science Quarterly 41:225–252.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

87 Comments to "National Review’s Failed Conservatism of Values, Ideas, and Principles"

  1. Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
    February 2, 2016 - 1:32 am | Permalink

    They keep talking about fascism but we already live in a fascist state. Unfortunately the only rods that bind us are Jewish interest.

    I too worry about the media that Trump gets just like Bob. I guess most of us are just hoping that this time is different. That maybe they feel that he can’t be shut out because of his wealth. Let’s hope we’re not Charlie Brown and Lucy is holding the ball.

  2. LKM's Gravatar LKM
    January 29, 2016 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

    The definite non-white nationalist Tucker Carlson penned the following regarding Trump vs. establishment conservatives:

    http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/donald-trump-is-shocking-vulgar-and-right-213572?o=1

    Most of it is not at all relevant to this site and its ideas, but the following passage however jumped out at me as something that could easily have been written (albeit less opaquely) on this site:

    Republican primary voters…seem to know a lot about Trump, more than the people who run their party. They know that he isn’t a conventional ideological conservative. They seem relieved. They can see that he’s emotionally incontinent. They find it exciting.

    Washington Republicans look on at this in horror, their suspicions confirmed. Beneath the thin topsoil of rural conservatism, they see the seeds of proto-fascism beginning to sprout. …Republicans in the states aren’t dangerous. They’ve just evaluated the alternatives and decided those are worse.

    In other words, the people who usually run the Republican Party don’t actually think like rank and file Republicans. They think like liberal Jews brought up on a diet of imagined anti-Semitism. In fact the scenario follows the sentiments expressed by Jewish author Philip Roth in his alternate-history novel The Plot Against America.

  3. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    January 29, 2016 - 12:43 pm | Permalink

    We keep hearing about ‘populism’, ‘populism’, and ‘populism’.

    What is populism? Being responsive to the people?

    There is a need for populism. People are sometimes right and need to be heard.

    I think populism becomes a problem if we were to assume that the People always know best. They don’t. The masses or the mobs can be wrong. Very wrong.

    Elitism? It has value because the best educated and most intelligent sometimes do know what they’re talking about. They should be the leaders and managers of society. But elitism is a problem if we assume the elites always know best. They don’t. They sometimes favor theory over practice. Also, many of them gained status by serving the powerful and well-connected. So, elites never act on pure ideal but often serve The Power. Look how Colin Powell made a fool of himself at the UN to argue for Iraq War. Look how all those think tanks on left and right serve the likes of Koch Bros and Soros. Elites may be better educated but they too were made and favored by power. So, they serve the power above any ideal.

    Also, populism and elitism are not always opposite. Because the people tend to be rather ignorant, they can easily be manipulated by the elites.

    So, populism is, more often than not, a tool of elitism.

    So, the elites don’t mind populism as long as THEY can to call the shots… like stirring up populist fears after 9/11 to support the invasion of Iraq. Clinton often played the populist: I feel Your Pain(when not your ass).

    And National Review never complained about Talk Radio populism as long it stuck to GOP speaking points. And what is FOX News but a populist channel that panders to lowbrow tastes? Why is Megan Kelly on the show? She looks like a beauty queen.

    But with Trump, populism has become un-moored. And that’s what the elites don’t like.

    Also, why isn’t Sanders called a populist? Isn’t he pandering to class angst and resentment? I guess he has the support of a ‘better kind of people’, the upper-middle class ‘progressives’.

    Populism generally refers to white social conservative types who are low middle class or working class or poor.

    But the Alt Right needs to be wary of populism because people can easily be swayed and manipulated.

    Consider Frank Capra’s MEET JOHN DOE. We see populism at its best — simple Americans coming together — , but this good quality can so easily be manipulated since goodness is earnest, sincere, and naive. The good can be taken for fools.

    https://youtu.be/flmdGgUtkCU?t=49m45s

    And consider all the sucker masses in FACE IN THE CROWD.

    But one saving grace about Trump populists is that they tend to be irreverent. They are not following Trump out of sincere and naive faith in his character. They know he’s a sinner and a showman. They are not like Obama zombies who wept and peed in their pants as if he’s the second coming of messiah.

    No, Trump supporters are a new kind of irreverent, cynical, and cocky populists who like Trump because he’s a chaos candidate who is shaking things up.

    They’ve stuck with Trump not so much out of sincere faith/trust in him because they are onto the game that the elites want to derail him because they want total control of the narrative.

    And this is what drives the elites crazy. If Trump supporters believed in Donald’s pristine goodness, then the bubble could easily be pricked by the elites by exposing his scandalous personal history.

    But Trump supporters know that history and don’t care since politics have lost all innocence after Clinton, Bush II, and Obama.

    Besides, it’s funny that the Lib elites would accuse Trump of vulgarity. They defended Clinton’s antics in the White House.

    And what was more gauche and sickening that Obama’s sham new messiah act? It was pure Hollywood. Vulgar, politics turned into Oprah show. And look how Michelle makes rap videos and slams basketballs and spends 100 million on vacation trips. Vulgar and trashy.

    The elites overlooked all of that, but they are offended by Trump’s style?

    Also, don’t the Liberal elites control Hollywood, Pop Music, and TV? What kind of culture have they been feeding to the people? Gangster rap and Lena Dunham. And shows like Simpsons and Family Guy. They encouraged vulgarity among the masses. They got rich doing it. But they know bitch about vulgarity? Please.

    If Libs are so sophisticated, why do they get their news from comedy shows like Jon Stewart and Bill Maher? Why did they make Michael Moore the most famous documentarian in the world? And why is the vulgar ugly spectacle of ‘gay pride’ parades their idea of morality and spirituality?

    A sophisticated Liberal is someone who laughs at Sarah Palin but just adores Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner.

  4. Sgt Trumpinator's Gravatar Sgt Trumpinator
    January 29, 2016 - 9:41 am | Permalink

    “Most of my audience has a bipolar feeling about Fox News,” Steve Deace, the conservative Iowa radio host who is backing Ted Cruz, said during an interview with CNN. “They view it as the most reliable place to go for news coverage, but they have grown increasingly untrusting of it when it comes to analysis.”
    http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/01/28/internecine-politics-fox-news-debate-executives-daughter-is-marco-rubio-press-secretary/
    The tweet was also transmitted before everyone began finding out about the ambush set-up to target Donald Trump with an inquisition from Muslim Activists, Illegal Alien amnesty activists, and put CAIR front and center in the debate format. Bill Sammon calls this attack questioning approach, “Murderboarding“.

    In addition, this revelation also explains why Corporate Fox News, driven by owner Rupert Murdoch, has been a staunch Rubio advocate and even went so far as to attempt to assist Rubio with secret meetings to organize Fox broadcasts for the Gang-of-Eight legislative priorities.
    http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/01/29/donald-trump-brilliantly-diminishes-ted-cruz-by-putting-him-on-full-display-with-video/#more-111620

  5. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    January 28, 2016 - 11:27 pm | Permalink

    (Mod. Note: This is not a comment, it’s a long article, and should be submitted to the editor as such. This time it will be approved, but with a warning: future long posts like this, by you or others, will end up in the trash. Please keep comments tp a reasonable length and focused on the topic of the article.)

    What the Right must do is lead an ethno-moral movement. Ethno-politics isn’t enough. And there is a golden opportunity because so many middle class whites and working class whites and poor whites have become culturally corrupted, demoralized, and de-spiritualized. Look at the rising death toll among less privileged whites: http://www.unz.com/isteve/the-white-death-death-rates-up-among-25-34-year-old-whites-too/

    So many whites are lost. Not just economically but culturally and morally. After all, times were bad during the Great Depression, but whites still had morals and pride and honor. Today, they have nothing but tattoos on their ass and cuss-words on their lips. Their idea of culture is rap, dumb movies, porn, piercing, ugly goth music, obscene comedy, etc.
    Even when faced with hardship, people can still maintain sanity and sanctity with moral pride and honor. Consider the black mother in RAISIN IN THE SUN. She don’t have much but she has pride because she is a family woman and believes in God.

    But morality doesn’t exist in America. Not among blacks, whites, or browns. Morality is seen as old-fashioned. Of course, there is IMPLICIT MORALITY among the affluent elites. After all, plenty of affluent Jews, white Libs, and Asians still practice the moral life of diligence, budget-consciousness, marriage, fidelity, family, and raising kids right BUT, they are not explicit about it. They practice it quietly because morality is supposed to be square, unhip, conservative, and reactionary.
    Morality exists in America to the extent that privileged classes still silently practice it. Most elites do NOT act like Lena Dunham or rappers. They act more like Amy Chua and her Jewish husband. They mutter ‘liberal’ platitudes, but they practice ‘conservative virtues’ of fidelity, family, commitment, and discipline for kids. You don’t send your kids to Harvard by allowing them to watch TV all day and waste time perfecting the ‘art’ of the ‘twerk’.

    For the elites with intelligence and sophistication, morality doesn’t have to be spelled out for them to realize that it is an essential element in life. But for the less intelligent, moral virtues must be spelled out more explicitly. But our society is no longer explicitly moral. If anything, it is explicitly immoral with stuff like Miley Cyrus and Nikki Minaj as the face of culture and public behavior.
    There is PC and SJW as a new value system and morality, but they don’t really work as morality because they judge people according to group-identity. Morality is about individual conscience, sense of obligation, and personal responsibility. PC undermines morality because it says some people are good simply because of identity while others are bad simply because of identity. So, blacks are good cuz they are a ‘victim group’. They can burn down cities, rape, murder, and rob, but we must love them and try to rationalize their behavior since they have inherited moral superiority from the legacy of slavery. In contrast, white gentiles are bad no matter how good they are as individuals. Since they inherited the ‘original sin’ of ‘white guilt’, even their goodness is just a product of ill-begotten privilege. So, even bad blacks are good, and even good whites are bad. PC morality is like that, and it’s a sham. It means black individuals don’t have to try to be good since they are good by virtue of blackness. And white must always try to be extra-good by cucking out to others because they were born with ‘original sin’. PC infects whites with compulsive-obsessive disorder of having to cleanse itself all the time. Whites are like Lady MacBeth who can never clean the blood on their hands.

    This mentality exists in US, Canada, Australia, and Europe. Why do Germans do nothing about the masses of invaders? Since whites were born ‘evil’, they must try to be super-duper good, even to the point of endangering their own existence.
    But, of course, the invaders are good simply by the virtue of being non-white. True morality cannot work like this.

    True morality is about individual conscience, self-control, responsibility, and sense of obligation to others. And this sense of obligation must be mutual. Golden Rule means ALL sides have to be good to the other. If one side violates the Golden Rule, it has reneged its right to exist among decent men. Of course, even PC-pushing Libs understand this on some level. To some extent, affluent white/Jewish Libs promote PC explicitly to hide what they are doing implicitly. After all, many urban whites and Jews got sick of bad black behavior. So, they used Bill Clinton the New Democrat to get tough with Law and Order and lock up tons of black males, and that lowered crime rates. But since such might be deemed ‘racist’, Jewish/white Libs masked their actions with lots of PC noises. It’s like Bloomberg aggressively used STOP AND FRISK to control the Negroes, but then spouted all the PC cliches about need for more ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’. (Of course, diversity via immigration helps white/Jewish elites cuz immigrants serve as buffers between themselves and dangerous blacks.)

    Anyway, white folks are hurting. One reason is globalization and the shipping of factories overseas. Also, mechanization and rise of the internet have destroyed many manual jobs. Just consider the newspaper. Before the internet, it was a giant operation with tons of papers, trucks, and personnel. With the internet, media outlets can trim down and don’t have to rely on getting bulks to paper to every door. And since people shop online, so many shopping malls are hurting and closing.

    So, there are many new challenges in the new economy. To meet such challenges, white folks need to be alert, disciplined, focused, adaptive, creative, and etc. And indeed some whites have been like that, and they’ve benefited from globalism and live with affluence in NY, SF, Chicago, LA, MIami, Houston, and etc. But many have not. They’ve fallen behind and are falling deeper and some are even dying young addicted to alcohol, drugs, ugly behavior, etc.
    To an extent, it’s a matter of IQ. Smarter whites are gonna be more adaptive and creative. The less intelligent whites are gonna feel lost. They are less educated, less creative, less adaptive. Being less smart, they are more vulnerable to cultural garbage and opiates on TV. The Jerry Springer crowd. Smart people are less in need of explicit morality since they can always use wit and talent to make it in life. But less intelligent people are more in need of morality as bedrock of behavior since their minds are less nimble. It’s like, if you know how to swim, you don’t need a life jacket. If you don’t know how to swim, you need a life jacket or something to hold onto. That is morality. (It would be nice if smart and rich whites cared about less fortunate whites and offered them leadership and guidance, but the very idea of whites helping and leading leads is ‘racist’ according to PC. Powerful blacks may help powerless blacks, and rich Jews may aid middle class Jews. But rich whites better not care about other whites, no matter how much they are hurting. Rich whites are to drop any idea of white identity or unity.)

    Less privileged white folks are dying in dangerous numbers(like Russians in the 90s). They need help and guidance. And this is a golden opportunity for Alt Right.
    Alt Right accuses Conservatism Inc of focusing on abstract principles. Alt Right claims to be for something more solid like identity. So far so good. But thus far, identity has been an abstract idea on the Alt Right because mere identity doesn’t mean much. Identity has to be empowered, and morality must play a big role in that. Nothing will come of spreading mere white identity among poor and working class whites. It has to be supported by morality. So, Alt Right must also be Alt Morality. And it has a golden opportunity because there is a huge vacuum in the white soul among the middle class, working class, and the poor. They are crying out not only for identity but morality. And Alt Right can fuse identity and morality.
    Now, I’m sure there’s value to Nietzsche, Schmitt, and Heidegger, but seriously, that stuff means nothing to most white people. What matters is morality. Alt Rightism must be a humanism. It must reach out to white folks, even the least intelligent and poor among them, and tell them Alt Right cares and is about them, not only about the fantasy figures of ubermensch-ism.
    Why is SEVEN SAMURAI an inspirin film? It’s because the samurai of superior ability and courage decide to help out a poor village of farmers. Even the master swordsman in the film figures that it’s not good enough to be the best or superior. Superiority in skill must serve a purpose. Defending farmers from bandits is a worthy purpose.
    it’s all good and fun for Alt Right to dabble in theories of ubermensch and make fash jokes to be alt-hipster and ‘cool’., but that’s not gonna mean much to the demoralized whites who need morality.

    Also, morality can be and must be combined with identity. There are two components to morality: horizontal and vertical. Morality cannot simply be a matter of ‘my country, right or wrong’. The golden rule means all sides must stick to certain basic principles. So, morality isn’t about an individual only doing what is good for him or about a group only doing what is good for the group. That is just egotism or ultra-tribalism.
    There must be mutually agreed-upon principles, and indeed, such is the foundation of world peace. Nations respecting one another and acting according to the same rules.
    Nationalism is good for world order cuz each nation defends itself and respects the right of other nations to defend themselves. Such is the basis for internationalism. Globalism is bad for the world since super-rich elites and darkie masses don’t have to play by the rules. Elites will toy with the entire world to get richer, and darkie masses think they have the right to just barge into richer nations while refusing to fix up their own nations. Morality must be mutualist upon agreed-upon rules. In this sense, morality is anti-tribal.

    But there is also a vertical aspect to morality. Human culture isn’t only about getting along with others who exist in the world. It is about memory and destiny. it is about what we owe to our ancestors and descendants. That too is a moral obligation. After all, why do nations preserve their art treasures? It’s not just about monetary value. It is because heritage defines what a people are. Jews owe it to their ancestors to keep Jewish identity and heritage alive. After all, if their ancestors hadn’t struggled to survive and keep lit the torch of Jewish identity, modern Jews wouldn’t even exist. So, current Jews are obligated to remember and honor their ancestors and history. Moral obligation is horizontal(spatial in the here and now) and vertical(temporal in the then and to be).
    Horizontal morality and vertical morality are at odds, and nationalism is the best means of integrating the two.
    This way, every nation will have core identity and themes of identity, heritage, and culture. But every nation shall horizontally respect other nations’ right to their own vertical morality. Also, minorities will be tolerated on the promise that they accept their positions as minorities than try to become future majorities; a new majority means the change in the very character of that nation. After all, if Israel becomes majority Arab, it is no longer a Jewish state.

    So, white folks need to be instilled with morality that is horizontal and vertical. Yes, there is a need for whites to recognize the rights of non-whites, but whites also have a vertical moral duty to keep alive their own identity, heritage, history, and etc. Whites have a duty to their ancestors. That is a morality. Do Chinese have an obligation to keep alive Chinese territory, identity, and culture? Yes. Do Greeks have an obligation to preserve Greek history, culture, art, and identity? Yes. If they don’t, who will?

    Cucks of National Review only go for horizontal morality(except when it comes to Jews and Israel), and this is crazy. All races and cultures have a moral duty to their ancestors and forebears. Without their struggles, sacrifices, suffering, and victories, today’s folks wouldn’t be here in terms of identity and culture. Just as Greeks are forever indebted to the 300 Spartans who laid down their lives and to the Greek patriots who struggled to liberated Greece from the Turks, all whites are indebted to their ancestors who gave so much in courage and sacrifice to create white civilizations. Of course, no people have been angels. Whites, like all others, should also acknowledge that their success and survival sometimes came at the expense of others. Even so, the primary duty of a people is to their own ancestors. After all, Turks did a lot of bad stuff, and Jews also did a lot of bad stuff. But Turks are into preservation of Turkdom, and Jews are into preservation and pride of Jewdom. Whites should be the same way.

    Identity is a form of vertical morality. A culture is nothing without memory, and whites need to remember their past.
    Of course, the clever and nasty Jews have gained control of history. Jews want whites to forget about their past glories and only remember about past ‘guilt’. Also, Jews want whites to forget that whites also suffered in great numbers at the hands of Mongols, Muslims, Jewish collaborators, Jewish slavers, Jewish communists, Jewish finance capitalist swindlers, Jewish pimps, Jewish gangsters, Jewish drug pushers, Jewish gambling moguls, etc.

    Alt Right will never go beyond an internet phenom unless it touches upon reality. And by reality, I don’t just mean conferences of ‘quality’ well-educated people like at the NPI conference. Sure, the intelligent need to lead and guide. But it must connect with the people, especially those who are lost and confused.
    And a silver platter of opportunity has been offered to the Alt Right by the White Death phenom. Whites are morally sick and they are physically dying. Rich educated whites got theirs in NY, SF, Chicago, and etc, but rest of the whites are facing hard times. GOP turns a blind eye to White Death. Elite Democrats laugh at white misery and say “You hicks deserve it, haha, and we’re gonna use section 8 and immigration to send more blacks and browns to your communities.” No one stands up to do something about White Death. Charles Murray has written about the decline of the Other White American in COMING APART, but he too is lacking in any meaningful proposal.
    Alt Right must connect with such people just like Jesus and early Christians connected with the poor and wretched. Remember Bolsheviks came to power by reaching out to the people with themes of ‘land, peace, bread’. And Mao went to the countryside and built up a peasant army. And National Socialists connected with lower middle class Germans, working class Germans, and poor Germans. They understood the appeal of socialism. And Jews gained power by uniting Jews everywhere. Capitalist Jews united with socialist Jews. Cosmopolitan Jews connected with Nationalist-Zionist Jews. Rich Jews began to care about poor Jews. Jews used capitalism to make money, nationalism to build a world-wide bond of all Jews, and socialism so that rich Jews would provide guidance and help for less fortunate Jews.

    Of course, White America is not suffering like the poor in Jesus’ time. Due to welfare, even the poor in America can become fat and need not worry about hunger.
    But they are morally, spiritually, and culturally famished. It is a great moral famine. Many don’t have fathers. Many have trashy single mothers. Their idea of culture comes from TV and junk music. Culturally, they are without memory of the glorious history of the West and white race. Morally, they are always condemned for ‘racism’ in schools and Jew-controlled media. Sports culture demoralizes white males because black males dominate. Asians outdo them in schools, and then affirmative action does the rest to hurt poor whites.
    They have full stomachs but empty souls. They need to be healed ‘spiritually’. And Nietzsche and Heidegger aint gonna do it. Whatever value such thinkers may have for elite Alt Rightists, the people need something more accessible.

    White Death phenom offer the Right to gain tremendous moral advantage.
    The Right in America has long suffered moral deficit because of the prevailing PC of ‘white guilt’. Even though Alt Right rejects PC formulations, the powers-that-be still effectively condemn it with accusations of ‘racism’ and blah blah blah.
    The Right has a golden opportunity to regain the moral advantage by taking up the issue of White Death, a tragedy that the likes of Tim Wise and David Siorata savor with hideous glee.
    What is the cause of White Death? Globalist economic policies, to be sure. But there is more. The souls of so many Americans have been rotted by Jewish-controlled media and culture that promote ‘gay marriage’ and tranny nonsense as the ‘new morality’. White kids have been degraded with trashy like SEX AND CITY, JERRY SPRINGER, HOWARD STERN, MAURY POVICH, LADY GAGA, MILEY CYRUS, WHORE CULTURE, SLUT CULTURE, DRUG CULTURE, TRASH CULTURE, MAINSTREAM-IZATION OF PORN, ELEVATION OF ‘TWERKING’ AS AMERICAN DANCE, and etc. Also, the Jew-run Lib Media have hidden the narrative of black on white crime/violence and how this is the product of racial differences, i.e blacks are naturally stronger, tougher, and more aggressive than whites, therefore whites need safe spaces away from black thugs.

    Alt Right can go on the moral offensive in DEFENSE of white Americans who are suffering from broken moral compasses resulting from LIBERAL JEWISH-HOMO-NEGRO control of culture that promotes sluttony, whore-behavior, thug pride, decadence, degeneracy, and etc. When Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner and homo-daddy-Campbell Soup commercials are what passes for today’s morality, it’s no wonder so many people are morally lost and confused.

    Now, look at any map. Each state has tons of small towns. Also suburbs are beginning to hurt because Libs are gentrifying cities and sending the blacks to suburbs and small towns. Cities demographically Europeanize but, at the same time, they preach ‘diversity’ and use it as excuse to dump urban blacks in non-urban areas.
    Alt Right needs to create a connective link among the many small towns. Surely even the smallest towns have at least one reasonably smart young white who is willing to spreads the message. This network of villages, towns, small cities, and suburbs in ‘flyover country’ can serve to mount a counter-offensive against the Narrative pushed by NY and LA.
    And by bringing young white people together in theme, purpose, rage, and righteousness from all those places, it can begin a network of counter-power and counter-narrative. Alt Right can document and expose how so many white lives have been destroyed by the decadent degeneracy of Liberalism that pervades media and entertainment that are controlled by Lib Jews, homos, and Negroes. Alt Right must play the role of the samurai in SEVEN SAMURAI. White folks are the farmers. Jews, homos, and Negroes who’ve corrupted culture are the bandits. Americans may own their TVs, but owning a TV means your eyes, ears, and souls are owned by those who control what comes on the air. A handful of Jews, homos, Libs, and token Negroes control all of media and entertainment, and they are filled with degeneracy, and this has done real harm to the masses. Of course, Libs will say entertainment doesn’t affect human behavior, but if so, why do they fear a film like THE BIRTH OF A NATION or JEW SUSS(by Harlan) so much? if movies have no impact on human behavior, who cares if films are ‘racist’ or ‘antisemitic’? The fact is entertainment has a huge effect on human behavior. They are advertisements for certain attitudes, styles, outlooks, and values.

    Alt Right needs to build an nation-wide organization whereby each state puts forth a representative on a rotating basis. Each state should develop links among the various small towns and suburbs and even parts of cities disaffected with elites. Alt Right will gain more definition if it begins to have structure. It’s like political conventions have delegates from the many states. They are not just a jumble of people. They are from different parts but united in identity, memory, and destiny. It’s like the scene in TRIUMPH OF THE WILL when various men declare whence they came:

    If indeed we are living in a managerial age(as Burham said), Alt Right must come up with a way to organize and manage a movement that connects all relevant people together. Organization and management are the key. Why did the British rule India for so long? Partly, it was due to guns and ships. But it was also because the Brits were well-organized and well-managed. In contrast, the Indians were divided and disorganized. 100 people who are organized have more power than 10,000 people who are not. Why is it that a small pride of lions can gain dominance over 1000s of wildebeests. If all those wildebeests were to unite and fight together, lions wouldn’t have a chance. But they don’t know how to organize. In contrast, a pride of lions are well-organized and work as a team. In the US, there are far fewer Jews in NY and LA than there are white conservatives all across America. So, why do Jews rule? Jews in NY are very well-organized and they manage their affairs very well. So are Jews in Hollywood. Why did Jews gain so much of the Russian economy in the 90s? They understood the power of organization and management. Russian masses did not. There was far more of them, but they lacked unity and coordination. There is so much latent potential in White America, but there is no organization and management of white identity and destiny. All those white communities all across America can play a role. But they are all islands separated from one another. They are like dots in a connect-the-dots book that have yet to be connected. Alt Right needs to create a new system whereby all those dots will connect and work in unison. It is possible due to the internet. Alt Right followers and representatives in various towns should be encouraged to form meetings, get together, and create Soviet-like structures. The only reason why Bolsheviks won was because they were better organized and more powerfully managed. Non-elite White Americans are like Russians in the 90s. So many of them but so demoralize and depressed because they feel isolated. Putin revived Russia by trying to unite Russians politically and revive them morally. Whether he has succeeded or not is up to historians. It’s too early to tell. But he did improve Russia from the 90s when Yeltsin was the very worst organizer and manager of Russian gentiles. In contrast, the very well-organized Jews who were less than 1% of the population swallowed up 50% of the economy in a few yrs. What organization and management can do!! If Jews who are 2% of US can achieve so much by superior management and organization, think of the potential if whites were thus organized and managed across all 50 states. The power is there. It is latent. It depends on who connects with the people, connects the dots, and then forms a movement that seeks to organize and manage the white masses in a cultural, moral, and political movement.

    Though Nazism became evil due to Hitler’s nutty race theories and war mongering, there was much about it that was moral and good. And when we compare what National Socialism did for the average German(worker, farmer, father, mother, or child) with what American Liberalism(of late) has done to the white masses, National Socialism comes across as much better. Surely, a healthy sense of identity, unity, community, heritage, order, and discipline is better for a people than the cult of egotism, narcissism, indulgence, excess, ugliness, decadence, degeneracy, infantilism, and filth that encourages whites to have wanton sex outside marriage, use drugs, pierce their bodies, get demented tattoos, talk like rappers, listen to filth music(whether rap or forms of metal). Liberalism has promoted Jerry Springerism for ‘white trash’ and Maury Povichism for ‘black culture’. That is how the Jewish elites see white masses and black masses. Non-elite gentiles are like pigs to be fed slop at the trough. Jews know that morality(and I mean true morality) is empowering to average people, the masses. Morality is about self-control, and self-control means independence from those who want to control you.
    Jews worked financiers for a long time, and they capitalized on the immorality of others. After all, moral and responsible noblemen took good care of their finances and didn’t fall into debt. But an immoral and stupid nobleman blew his money on having a good time and then borrowed money from Jews to have more good time. Eventually, his debts piled up, and he had to give up his property to the Jew. Jews see whites in the same way. A moral America will be responsible in their behavior. It will be filled with people who are resistant to temptations of the opiate-pushers who control the media. Jews want to demoralize us so that we will lose self-control and act/spend like tards. And when we are out of money? We have to fork over all our belongings to the money-lenders and then depend on Jews for more and more loans. Of course, there is no risk to the Jews since they own the government and can always expected bail-outs like after the 2008 crash. Jews see gentile morality as an obstacle to total control over them. It’s like the British Jew David Sassoon sold opium to the Chinese to weaken their resistance and immunity to imperialist power. Loss of morality feels liberating and fun in the short term. I mean it’s great to go to Las Vegas and spend money and have a good time. But eventually, you lose your nest egg, and the Jew has everything. Jews want us to act like Julie Haggerty in LOST IN AMERICA:

    American Liberalism tells white Americans to lose all self-control and indulge themselves in sex, drugs, and hedonism. Libertarianism is about nothing but legalization of pot and even prostitution. What happens when white people are maxed out and no longer own anything? Then, the Jewish message to white American women is this: “You can still become a stripper or porno performer and have sex with black men in videos directed by Jewish men.” THAT is the moral message of Liberal Jewish America to people they deem as ‘white trash’. And the message to white males? “You are racist and better apologize forever and celebrate the fact that blacks are kicking your ass and white girls are having babies with black men.” Yes, THAT is the ‘moral’ message for white males from the Jews.

    Given such foulness that passes for the New Morality, Alt Right has a great opportunity and opening to connect with the hurting white masses. But, Alt Right mustn’t merely pander to whites and treat them as poor noble ‘victims’, which is the logic of Black Lives Matter that pretends blacks are utterly blameless. No, Alt Right must judge the ‘white trash’ for their failures and stupidities. But it must also show that white people have been willfully corrupted, vulgarized, and degraded by a Jewish-controlled media that sees white people not as people but as sheeple, pigs, and animals to control, tame, and exploit. Jews think there is NOTHING WRONG with your daughter ending up like Miley Cyrus or some groupie whore who puts out to thug rappers with tattoos and bling. THAT is the Jewish vision for white America. Total ‘whiggerization’.

    Alt Right must offer new morality, true morality.
    Of course, there is already a moral movement in White America. It is called Evangelical Christianity. So, why has it failed?
    Because it is run by dummies, saps, and opportunists. Also, it is in guilt-mode and/or forgiving-mode. It is mostly about ‘we white folks must atone for racism’ or ‘we must forgive and love those who hate us’. Christianity in the past used to be robust, confident, judgmental, and on the offensive. It had pride and power as the faith of Christian Soldiers. Today, it is the faith of Christian wusses, cucks, saps, and pansies. So, it gets no respect. No one feels empowered by Christianity. Today’s Christians feel they must apologize to Jews, Negroes, and even homos.. They feel they must forgive and love even those who spit in their faces. They feel they must worship Israel, Israel, and Israel that has NOTHING to do with white survival or well-being. And adopt black African babies.

    True morality must be founded on nature and health. Body serves as a useful analogy for the soul.
    What is good for the body? Real food with protein, vitamins, fiber, and all such nutrients. While we can have cakes and junk food once in awhile. that is not real food for healthy life.
    Same goes for morality and culture. There is junk culture and it can be fun once in awhile, but making junk culture the center of one’s culture is like living on candy, cakes, and sodapop. Junk-centered diet will ruin the body, and junk-centered culture will ruin the soul. And cultural depravity and deficiency will lead to moral downfall.

    Morality is about right and wrong, and therefore, it is ‘square’ and not very fun. It is uncool. It is like telling kids to eat the spinach.
    But morality is necessary. To make morality compelling and powerful, it must be combined with powerful storytelling. That way, morality is made exciting and romantic. Take SEVEN SAMURAI. It is filled with action and violence and tension, but it’s about good men trying to do the right thing. All stories have a moral component. So, the control of storytelling is the control of the drama of morality, the passion of morality, the thrill of morality.
    Griffith’s BIRTH OF A NATION is about the moralization of white pride, white defense, white unity, and white survival.
    The New BIRTH OF A NATION about Nat Turner moralizes the Negroes and their pogroms against whites.
    Both stories are moral, but the story-telling favors different sides and groups.
    So, control of storytelling is about control of morality as a passion.
    After all, Jews survived for so long because they controlled their own storytelling via the Bible. Bible is a morality tale, but its morality is exciting because it tells a STORY about Jews using all sorts of means and methods to win over other races with the help of God.

    Morality alone can be pretty dull and boring. This is why people usually don’t go to church. People want morality as story than sermon.
    Stories move. Sermons stand still. Movies and plays are where moral tales dominate in our world. Greeks understood this when they invented drama. Art and stories may morality move. Morality on legs is exciting. We don’t want to hear a sermon about how decent folks ought to take care of helpless folks. It’d be Zzzzzzzz. But we want to see SEVEN SAMURAI and MAGNIFICENT SEVEN over and over because morality has been made exciting.

    So, Alt Right must try to form a new kind of morality via storytelling. Tell stories of white suffering at the hands of Jews and blacks. And then tell stories about how whites can unite, resist, fight, and win. Morality must be storified. Too much of conservative morality is in the form of sermon in churches and talk radio. For true believers, it may be good enough. But for young folks, it is booooooring. They want stories that make morality come alive and justified.

    There is the SEVEN SAMURAI option that is about good vs bad. This is possible when we are on firm ground that belongs to us. We can fight in terms of us versus them. In SEVEN SAMURAI, the samurai and farmers defend firm ground from bandits who attack.
    But, what about cases where the bad has taken over everything? Then, you need the sly and subversive YOJIMBO option. In that film, the hero enters a town that is totally dominated by the bad. The good have no power. In order to fight the bad, the hero has to be
    bad-bad. He has to slyly play the game of the other side but to undermine it from the inside.

    Anyway, Alt Right must be a humanism. It must reach out to white folks who are hurting. Thus, it will gain moral credence as the movement that cares about people who’ve been neglected and mocked by the elites. It can gain even more moral advantage by accusing the elites of having promoted the kinds of policies and images that degraded white America. Alt Right needs to point out that Jewish Liberalism wants to turn all white girls into Miley Cyruses. Jews don’t want poor whites to be moral and regain self-control. Jews know that true morality is empowering even for the poor. Jews want to degrade whites. Of course, dumb ‘white trash’ kids are fooled into thinking they are empowered by acting badass in imitation of rappers, tattoo-freaks, thugs, and watching dumb professional wrestling. But it’s all just idiocy and indulgence. Real power comes from self-control, channeling of one’s energy toward constructive ends, knowledge, a sense of priorities, a sense of roots and identity.
    This goes for blacks as well. Imagine one Negro who knows about black identity, black history, black heritage, and black culture. Suppose there’s another Negro who only knows rap, twerking, TV shows, hollywood movies, and comic books.
    Which Negro will be more empowered and have better compass in life?
    Surely, Jews have nothing against the Negro having identity and culture. So, why do Jews say whites are not deserving of identity and culture? The Jew might say that blacks are deserving of identity and culture because they were oppressed.
    But if a people are deserving of identity and culture ONLY if they’d been oppressed by whites, that means all the black Africans who were not enslaved by whites have no right to preserve their identity and culture. ONLY blacks who have been oppressed are deserving of identity and culture. Such would be the case if we follow the Jewish Liberal logic. It is nonsense, of course.

    All people deserve to be empowered, and identity, culture, and morality are the key.

    Morality is useful because it is something that can empower any person. Creativity is a tool of just a few. So is intelligence.
    Most people lack genius, artistic talent, beauty, musical talent, originality, wit, etc.
    But they can be still moral. Morality gives them compass in life. They gain a sense of direction, priorities, and control over their destructive beastlier impulses. Also, morality can unite a people together. Horizontal morality can unite all of us in outrage against the powerful. Surely, all races can unite in moral outrage at the corrupt dealings of a politician. Just because a politician is white doesn’t mean that whites should defend him. Just because he is black doesn’t mean blacks should defend him. Just because he’s brown doesn’t mean browns should defend him. Just because he’s Jewish doesn’t mean that Jews should defend him.
    Horizontal morality demands that all good people come together to condemn a corrupt politician. Such unity of outrage is power.
    Granted, the real world is far more complex. ALL POLITICIANS are corrupt, and usually when a politician is investigated for corruption, there is a political motive behind it. Indeed, even those accusing the politician are very likely corrupt. Also, too many groups tend to ignore the rules of horizontal morality and protect their own. So, even though Marion Barry was a piece of turd, blacks defended him just because he’s black. And Jews are usually silent about Jewish corruption. Bernie Madoff was able to steal so much over so many yrs because other Jews looked out for him. Jews turned on him when he lost THEIR money. With such tribalism, the ideal of horizontal morality is dead in America. Look how Jews are showering Jonathan Pollard with all sorts of prizes. And browns think illegals should be forgiven and even rewarded because browns like to side with browns. With such degradation of horizontal morality, whites need to wary of the morality-of-diversity. True morality only works with mutual adherence to the golden rule. Almost no one plays by that rule in the US anymore. Certainly not the Jews, blacks, browns, homos, etc. So, why should whites? Even so, whites should still condemn corruption among their kind cuz tolerating such behavior will hurt the white community. Look at blacks. They close ranks with corrupt black politicians and leaders, and their community has turned into shit. Whites need to circle the wagons at times, but they should not tolerate stinkweed whites with no integrity.

    The Right should be about Morality, Manners, and Myth. Morality favors the good over the bad, the healthy over the unhealthy, the sane over the insane. Morality must be founded on truth and nature. The problem of the Bible is it is founded on dream of lost Eden. In truth, humans are highly evolved animals. We are intelligent beasts. Our understanding of life and values must begin with the fact of our animal nature. It should not be denied. The problem of religions like Buddhism and Christianity is that they reject the animal side of man as sinful or wicked and seek pure union with the holy spirit. As such, they come to regard much that is healthy and natural as ‘sinful’. And in Confucian philosophy, the life of the heart and mind is so favored over the power of the body that physical labor and activity came to be seen as vulgar and lowly. So, Chinese culture and civilization turned overly effeminate and refined. It lacked manly vigor and robustness of spirit. (Noted in the recent film WOLF TOTEM.) But then, mankind won’t achieve much if it just embraces animalism. Black Africans were very close to nature and, as such, they were wild and funky. But they acted like apes and monkey and created no kind of civilization as they were too busy shaking their ass and chucking spears at hippos. Mankind is a part of nature but it must be more than nature. (Mankind is like a garden. Made from stuff of nature — trees, flowers, rocks, water, grass, etc — but managed and organized by a higher design and integrated with man-made sculptures and structures. Garden is both natural and artificial. Pure nature is just wilderness. Wilderness is awesome, but it is too rough-and-tumble for human behavior. Artifice without nature offers ideal control, but it is inorganic and dead.) It was the Greeks, more than any other people, who found the balance. Greeks emphasized the power and beauty of the body. But they also emphasized the life of the mind. And through arts and drama, they also expressed the power of passion and psyche. And their gods reminded Greeks of the essence of all facets of life, from the need for order(Apollo) to need for revelry(Dionysus). But not all gods were the same or equally important. Civilization cannot put Dionysus over Apollo. There has to be room for Dionysus but not at the center. And the Greek Way revamped and revised must serve as the New Way for white Americans.

    The problem of American culture is it is now made up of extremes. Some religious communities are too excessively into sanctimony and spirit. As such, they ignore all the ‘pagan’, ‘idolatrous’, and ‘sensual’ facets of life that make life exciting and interesting. So few Evangelicals contribute to creativity since everything about them is morality and spirituality.
    But there is another kind of extremism and excessive tendency. We see it in wanton sensualism of pop culture, much of it based on black jungle ape lusts. It is unfettered and unrestrained surrender to total animalism. It’s dance turned into fuc*-movements, music turned into orgasmic moans, rhythm turned into hump-motions, lyrics turned into demand for sex. It sees humanity as meat without the myth.

    Both ultra-spiritualism and ultra-sensualism are examples of life out of balance.
    And then you have ultra-intellectualism of the radical geek community. These nebbishers know life only through books, theories, and discourse, as if all of life is just some mind-game.

    What is necessary is the balance of spirit, body, and mind. And the first people who came close to perfecting this ideal were the Ancient Greeks before they lost their way.

    White folks need morality to distinguish right from wrong. But they also need myth because it fills life with vision, poetry, and imagination. And they need manners since life isn’t only about ethics and imagination but form and order. People without manners are barbarians. Excessive manners can be stifling and overly inhibiting, like among the Japanese. But the loss of manners in so much of American society had led to all kinds of degradation. It isn’t enough to know right from wrong. One must have a sense of form and dignity.
    But among so many millennials. the art of manners no longer exist. Too many are slovenly, vulgar, and messy, especially in the less privileged communities. They talk like people burping or breaking wind. They think blurting out whatever nonsense that pops in their head is ‘authentic’ and ‘real’.
    People need to know that social aesthetics has a way of either encouraging good behavior or bad behavior. A culture saturated with tattoos, ugly talk, trashy vulgarity, and bad manners will also make for bad thoughts and worse imagination. Just look at the British working class. Their loss of manners and form has led to rise in barbarism and ugliness of soul and thought. Once people act like barbarians, they think like barbarians or don’t think at all.

    This is why education theory is fundamentally flawed in the West. The main emphasis is on what-to-teach when, in fact, the important issue is whom-to-teach. Before education focuses on what to put in the mind, it has to shape, form, and construct a mindset that is conducive to accepting what is taught. Take the black community. The problem is that so many blacks are unprepared and unwilling to sit still and open their minds to higher knowledge with respect, reverence, and curiosity. They’ve been raised by single mothers and never developed no manners but cussing and jiving. Their idea of culture is trash TV shows and trashy music. Their bodies have never been disciplined to act properly in school. Their minds are unfocused and care only about jungle-jive stimuli. Their emotions are all about fighting and fuc*ing. So, with such mindset, the black mind is unwilling to open up to knowledge, ideas, truth, and beauty.
    So, the issue of what-to-teach is useless with blacks. Blacks, as whom-to-teach, are worthless. They haven’t the attitude, manners, outlook, dignity, respect, and concern to be willing to learn. So, you can give them new computers, new books, new this, new that, and etc. All they care about is jiving and shucking and fuc*ing. Some will say it’s because black IQ is lower and blacks are naturally aggressive. Yes, that is true too. But just like even lions and tigers can be tamed to do tricks, blacks can be tamed to learn better. But no one is willing to do so. Before you teach lions and tigers to do tricks, you must first change their attitude and mindset in regard to the trainer. They must be made to respect and even fear the trainer. They must learn to control themselves and listen to instruction. Then and only then can tricks to taught to them. Same with dogs. Unless you gain control of the dog’s manner, attitude, and behavior, you cannot teach it tricks. When it comes to blacks, educators focus on what-to-teach but overlook the fact that blacks must first be changed in manners, attitude, and behavior first. But then, of course, the idea that blacks need to be disciplined and taught manners will strike many people as ‘racist’. Why, it would suggest too many blacks are acting like animals. Besides, we have a culture that pretty much glamorizes bad black behavior in rap and sports and etc. Bad Black Behavior is supposed to ‘authentic’, ‘revolutionary’, ‘liberating’, and ‘inspirational’. But how can people with attitude like Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, or 50 cents be taught anything? When Liberal media are promoting bad black behavior as cool, why should young blacks act any different?

    Of course, white kids, even ‘white trash’, are not as bad as blacks. But there’s been a lot of vulgarization, debasement, and infantilization of white behavior. We see it among elite whites too. Just consider the daughter of Brian Williams who got a ‘rimjob’ on a TV show. Of course, most elite kids don’t act like that, at least not openly, but everyone is afraid to condemn such behavior because doing so might make one seem ‘square’ and ‘old-fashioned’. As for the lower-class whites, their attitudes and manners are informed by Jerry Springer, Howard Stern, Family Guy, and endless trash that dominates pop culture. They don’t act as bad as blacks, but too many whites constitute a degraded population immersed in the culture of ugly, trash, idiocy, and dementedness. We have white males who remain stuck at emotional age of 13. We have white women who act like slutty teenyboppers. Even white women in their 30s dress like teenage sluts. We hear all these stories of white female teachers having sex with students. When people lose their manners, inhibitions, and morals, the power of nature directs them to act like beasks. Students become like animals, and teachers become like students.

    Now, the power of nature must not be denied. We are animals, and our energy derive from natural power in us. But unless these energies are molded and shaped into something higher, people will no better than apes. Indeed, how kids dance today without shame is much like how apes act in the zoo. Apes feel no shame about having sex in front of people. And animalized and Africanized whites are acting like jungle apes on the dance floor. And so much talk among millennials is filled with animal filth and obscenity. Kids act and talk like possessed Regan in THE EXORCIST.

    Alt Right must exorcise the white race of its filth-possession by Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Jews see white people as sheep. Negro culture has turned into garbage. And homo have elevated decadence and degeneracy into new religions.
    Of course, there have been great things that came from Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Jews contributed lots of great literature, music, and arts to humanity. Lots of black music in the past were truly great and fantastic. And homos have played a significant role in the history of arts and culture, especially in the West beginning with the Greeks. But of late, Jews-Negroes-homos have grown culturally corrupt, excessive, arrogant, vile, and hideous. We don’t need Lena Dunham, 50 cents, and John Waters.

    We need to stand for morality, manners, and myth. The other side stands for mush, muck, and meat. The Lib idea of values is just sappy New Age gobbledygook. Their idea of behavior is obscenity and filth, the kind of you see in GIRLS. And they see humanity as just pieces of meat.

    Anyway, a great opportujity has appeared for the Alt Right. The phenom of White Death means that so many whites are hurting. And it’s not just about economics but about ethics and aesthetics of behavior in white communities all across America. And NO ONE cares for these people. Jews don’t care. If anything, Jews mock them and laugh at them. Jews want federal agents to go kill ‘white trash with guns’. Jews see the daughters of white men as prospective strippers and porn performers for Jewish vice-industries. And blacks don’t care for these whites. Black boys just want to beat up white boys and wanna make moves on white girls.
    Worse, the cuck elites of the GOP don’t care about the non-elite whites. They are too busy pontificating about ‘abstract principles'(to win favors from the likes of Sheldon Adelson) to care about their poorer racial brethren. Whites like Lowry would rather win the favors of rich Neocohens than identify with less fortunate whites who are in need of leadership, guidance, and proper criticism.

    Pat Buchanan did speak of these Americans in 1992, but his prescription was only economic and moral.

    Reject ‘free trade’ and keep the jobs here. And hope for a religious revival. Opposing ‘free trade’ is all very good. And religion can be good too. But, they are not enough. The economic proposition implies that these ‘dumb whites’ aren’t good for anything but low-skill factory work; they can never improve themselves. And the religious proposition implies that these ‘simple-minded whites’ would do best to shut their minds and just stick to dogmatic catechisms of God and country. Buchanan’s prescriptionism is a Forrest-Gumpism. Buchanan really liked that movie, but if that is the essence of conservatism, it is a dead end. Conservatism is fine, but white people need to think in terms of ‘what more can I do?’ and ‘what more is possible?’ While most white people are not capable of doing something something great or superior, they should still strive in mind and heart for something higher than food on the table and Bible-told-me-so.

    Even non-intelligent and non-special white people have some degree of myth and creativity and poetics and imagination in them. Even if they can’t create art, they can be led to appreciate art, culture, and history, even if only on the middlebrow level. And if they create a home environment rich in culture, then there is the chance that one of their children might have the gift and then do something remarkable with it since he’d been raised in an environment that encourages the life of the mind(reason, logic, and facts), health of the body(through eating real food and exercise), and possibility of myth and imagination(through appreciation of poetics, music, and art).

    Alt Right needs to develop a canon that will serve to unify all whites with the same cultural references.
    Jews did this by creating the Bible. Prior to its creation, there were many sources and texts of Jewishness. This meant that different tribes had different stories and versions. So, Jewish scholars came together and created a canonic version of Jewishism. It became the Torah. And this version came to be the one that ALL Jews had to read and learn. Since all Jews shared in the reading of the same text, they grew strong in bond.

    There are tons of Western texts going back to ancient times. Most whites haven’t read any of them, and even the more intellectual whites have read totally different texts and focused on different cultures and periods.
    So, whites are not united in common reference. Some whites know something about Greeks but nothing about Russians. Some know about vikings but nothing about Romans. and etc.
    But imagine if a white canon could be constructed. A canon read and shared by ALL white people.
    It could be around 500 pgs and it would be made up of excepts(from great texts in religion, philosophy, literature, poems, etc) with necessary annotation and thread of narrative. Of course, such compilations and anthologies already exist, but none of them are meant to unite a people. They are just handbooks for college classes, mostly.
    What Alt Right should do is create a version that is to be read by ALL whites. This way, all whites will have a common reference. And since they will be introduced to various great works via excerpts, the book will serve as gateway to discovery of more about western history and culture.

    Alt Right should also come up with an image canon. A collection of 500 essential images that define the West. Again, such books exist, indeed too many of them. The Alt Right version would be different in that it will be meant to serve as the canon for ALL whites. There will be a greater sense of unity among whites if they share in the same canon. Imagine if all whites on the Right read the same canon and shared in the same image canon. There would be a sense of unity and share reference. Imagine a white guy in Peoria Illinois, white girl in Branson Mo, white guy in Little Rock Ark, white guy in Anchorage Alaska, white guy in Alamo Tx, white girl in Poughkeepsie Ny, white guy in Santa Clara Ca, and etc and etc all connected by the same canon of literature and having seen the same canon of sacred images.

    And Alt Right could also choose 500 essential music of classical, folk, and pop that best define the white race and white spirit.
    Again, the main value of such a thing would be unity of shared images.

    Shared references is the source of power. Imagine if every Jewish community or tribe had its own version of the Bible. Jews would have fallen apart since the idea of common reference would have been missing. Among the Chinese, the bonding force was same written language and Confucian texts. Various Chinese regions spoke different dialects and didn’t understand one another. But all Chinese shared same written language and immersion in Confucian texts. Among Arabs, it was the shared reference of Arabic as used in the Koran.

    Alt Right is big tent, but it needs to create a culture of shared references so that all white rightists will, at the bare minimum, share the same references in literature, history, images, and music. Of course, such canon cannot cover everything, but in making every white person aware of the defining peaks of Western culture and history, it will have a powerful bonding effect.
    It will have the power of the German Bible that came to define German culture upon printing by Gutenberg.
    Alt Right needs its own Gutenberg Bible. The tent needs to be big with people with different ideas but all members need to share in some common canonical texts, images, and music.

    It’s like movie culture. While each person has his likes or dislikes and personal list of movie he might have seen that others may not have, all cinephiles need to have seen the essential cinema of Welles, Kubrick, Kurosawa, Ozu, Truffaut, Ford, Peckinpah, and etc.
    There can be no common film discussion among cinephiles unless they share in the references.

    The creation of this canon can truly be a collective effort with recommendations made by various Alt Rightists with knowledge of Greek literature, Roman literature, Germanic mythology, Slavic folklore, German philosophy. A kind of wiki-Alt-right effort. it can be made into book form and also exist online. Each excerpt can be accompanied by summary, appraisal, and commentary by an Alt-Rightist who knows something about the subject.

    As Alt Rightists have different interests, they can make recommendations for the canon based on their personal knowledge. So, an Alt Rightist who knows a lot about the Middle Ages can recommend certain texts from that era. Or someone who is an expert on Russia can suggest certain Russian poems. The book cannot be too big since its main purpose is to bind people with common reference.
    It’s like Robert Christgau presented his canon of essential Rock:
    http://www.robertchristgau.com/xg/bk-cg80/rocklib.php

    And just like there’s the Talmud that accompanies the canonical Torah, there can be Alt-right ‘Talmudic’ thoughts on the Alt Right Canon as additional commentary, criticism, and analysis.

    As most of great literature and great art are now in the public domain, there’s need to worry about copyright. It’s just a matter of doing it.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 29, 2016 - 12:33 pm | Permalink

      They think blurting out whatever nonsense that pops in their head is ‘authentic’ and ‘real’.

      I posted recently on “how to turn yourself into a liberal.” [Modified version here]

      1) Drink two or three stiff cocktails

      2) Place a bag over your head

      3) Start talking

      4) Record the output

      5) Transcribe

      6) Submit for publication [or self-publish]

      Almost looks like you have done that [in conservative version].

      There are good points, but they are drowned out by tangential information.

      Differentiate the essential from the non-essential. Symptoms were discussed with repetition- the actual causes should be subject to the most emphasis.

      You also throw out arbitrary assertions as if they are unassailable.

      I simply had to stop reading. These posts involve monumental self-indulgence which you don’t seem to understand.

      If you cannot edit, perhaps you should get an editor. I suggest you do that, and get your own blog.

  6. Brent G's Gravatar Brent G
    January 28, 2016 - 11:46 am | Permalink

    I wouldn’t worry too much about the Kosher Review and nutjobs like Andrew C. McCarthy.

    They can’t stop Trump. He has really fired up the GOP base and the witch can forget it. Trump is winning, no doubt about it. He will be the next president barring all else.

  7. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    January 28, 2016 - 2:43 am | Permalink

    The pakis like your Mexicans know the establishment is anti-white and pro everyone else.

    Its a recipe for hostilies.

    All it will take is for the system to implode is the police or squaddies refusing to turn on their own kind.

  8. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    January 28, 2016 - 2:30 am | Permalink

    We just have a vile establishment controlled by the same Jews who run America.

    In fact knowing what a real Englishman or Scot can do to the imported “invaders” raping and pillaging the realm, left unhindered, the ruling class is constantly resorting to ever extreme measures to keep the restless natives in check.

  9. T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
    January 27, 2016 - 8:40 pm | Permalink

    New Animation on FOX “BORDERTOWN” from Seth MacFarlane

    It’s about Mexifornia!

    More information episodes etc.
    https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=bordertown+episodes

  10. January 27, 2016 - 6:28 pm | Permalink

    “As Jared Taylor points out, ‘Do they really believe that Mexicans and Haitians and Guatemalans and Vietnamese and Bangladeshis and Chinese are ever going to be made to care about the Second Amendment or Madisonian democracy or limited government?'”

    Wrong question to ask. After all, let’s suppose all such people can be turned into wonderful Constitutionalists and good citizens. Should US then allow all such people to keep coming?

    No, because whether such people are good or bad, too many of them will no longer make America what it is.

    Suppose 50 million Hindus go to Japan and suppose each of them is nice and law-abiding. Should Japan accept them? But if Japan did that, Japan would no longer be Japan. It would be Japan-India.

  11. January 27, 2016 - 6:20 pm | Permalink

    The point of conservatism is to conserve something, right?

    So, every people will have different conservatisms.

    Japanese conservatives want to conserve Japan.

    Jewish Zionist conservatives want to conserve Jewish nationhood.

    Kenyan conservatives want to conserve Kenyan culture and nation.

    Turkish conservatives want to conserve Turkish nation and race.

    Greek conservatives want to conserve Greece.

    No two conservatism will be the same.

    If YOU are conservative, you want to conserve your family history, legacy, and property.

    IF I am a conservative, I want to conserve my family history, legacy, and property.

    Now, there is a common theme in all forms of conservatism. It is about conservation. But conserving what? It depends on what you are and what culture you belong to.
    Surely, a Iranian conservative and Israeli conservative want to conserve different things. The role of Iranian conservative is to conserve Iranian culture and nationhood. The role of Israeli conservative is to conserve Israeli culture and nationhood. Both are about conserving but about conserving different things.

    So, surely white conservatives have different sense of roots, culture, and history than do black conservatives, Jewish conservatives, Asian conservatives, Muslim conservatives, and etc. (To the extent that most non-whites on the ‘Left’ want to conserve their own identity and culture, they are really closet-conservatives or rightists.)
    And all these conservatives can respect one another. White conservatives can respect the desire of Jewish conservatives, black conservatives, Asian conservatives, and etc to conserve their own identities, cultures, and histories.
    So, why can’t they respect the wish of white conservatives to conserve their European identity, culture, and history?

    A white conservative never tells a Jewish conservative to abandon Jewish identity and culture in favor of some mindless abstraction. If anything, a white conservative encourages non-white conservatives to keep their identities and cultures.

    To conserve, you gotta have something to conserve.

    Now, NR says what should be conserved in America is the idea of freedom and liberty. But true white conservatives want to use their freedom and liberty to conserve their identity and culture. After all, Jewish conservative use freedom and liberty to conserve Jewish identity and culture.

    Freedom and liberty are not enough. They are used to do things. And what should white conservatives do with their freedom? It makes no sense to be free just to be free.
    No, people use freedom to do something real and specific.

    Also, how can freedom exist without power? People without power have no freedom. Since Jews, blacks, and non-whites are seeking power for themselves and since they are hellbent on using their power to take freedom away from whites, whites must seek power as whites and for whites.

    The way NR explains it, American Conservatism should conserve the formula for losing one’s identity, legacy, culture, history, and power. Whites should forgo white identity, white history, white culture, and white power. What they should conserve is the notion that whites need to just meld with the rest of humanity.

    What kind of conservatism is that? Conserve the formula of one’s own racial, cultural, and historical erasure?

    By the way, if such a formula is so good for whites, why don’t NR tell Jews to give up on Jewishness and Israel, just become one with goyim, and just champion abstract principles?
    And forget about the Holocaust too since it only promotes tribalism by making Jews think in terms of us versus them(who killed us).

    Now, there was a hopeful time when many Americans, Liberals and Conservatives, wished that all Americans would give up on hyphens and just be good Americans. And all these Americans would be bound by principles of liberty and freedom guaranteed by democracy.
    But if we define Americanism that way, isn’t any democracy just another ‘America’? After all, US isn’t the only democracy. Mexico is a democracy with a constitution much like that of the US. Same with Japan, a democracy with constitution. So, are all democracies ‘American’ since Americanism is about democracy and freedom? That makes no sense. Since Israel is a democracy and Turkey is a democracy, are they just ‘America’ too?

    At any rate, the hope of a colorblind America without hyphenization was lost. It’s true that blacks, Hispanics, and others played the race card and identity politics. But then, so did the Jews, especially Neocons in the GOP who are passionate Jew-firsters and Israeli patriots. Identity politics don’t only exist only on the ‘left’ and among blacks. It is big among Jews, and indeed Neocons used the GOP as a flagship of aggressive pro-Zionism.

    Furthermore, the only reason GOP became the party of the South was because it pandered to Neo-Confederate passions. GOP’s appeal was always implicitly white.

    But there’s another thing about race and identity. Even if all groups in America conscientiously tried to reject and repress all thoughts of race and ethnicity, we would notice racial differences anyway.

    Since Ashkenazi Jews are smarter, we would notice that they are vastly over-represented in finance, media, high-tech, elite government, law, academia, and etc. Since blacks are stronger and more aggressive, we would notice that they dominate sports and crime. Since Mexicans tend to be mediocre and docile, they will serve as line order cooks and lettuce pickers. Since Asians are studious, diligent, and conformist, they will be the loyal dogs of their Jewish masters.

    In the end, we can’t escape from race even if we wanted to. We would still have an America where Jews are elites, Mexicans are busboys, and blacks are thugs.

    Indeed, even in interracist relationships, we see the same patterns. Black men take white women cuz black men are tougher than white men. White men and black men take Asian women cuz they are bigger and tougher than Asian men.
    So, interracism isn’t about going beyond race. it is going outside race for racial reasons. It is because people notice racial differences. It’s because you find the other race to be superior and want to surrender to it and be a part of it. Why do so many white women become groupies of black athletes and rappers. Women are turned on by toughness.

  12. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 27, 2016 - 5:35 pm | Permalink

    The first thought I had to watching the Britain First video was how deeply betrayed the English people have been, by the “traitors within”. The easy arrogance and violence of the Muslim reaction to them, says it all. They know they have been given the A. O K in England… It really wasn’t much different, from the reaction seen in the U.S., over and over, by the Hispanic power groups during their Gran Marches, involving illegal immigration–one of total entitlement. PEACE

  13. AJP Way's Gravatar AJP Way
    January 27, 2016 - 5:31 pm | Permalink

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2016/01/27/cuckservatives-the-race-obsessed-left-created-the-alt-right/

    David French:

    “If anyone besides the members of the alt-right is responsible for the latest iteration of whiteness-obsessed fanaticism, is it the conservative movement that is consistently calling for a colorblind politics and culture — echoing Martin Luther King’s call to look to the content of one’s character over the color of one’s skin? Or is it the progressive movement that pushes explicitly race-based organizations such as La Raza or Black Lives Matter while specifically scorning whites, Western civilization, and so-called white privilege?”

    Conservative Inc. is for colorblind politics and culture? Really?
    If Conservative Inc is for judging individuals by ‘content of character’, why does it support Israel in a wholesale manner? Why does it favor ONE nation over all others based on its flag? Don’t Neocons lecture us all the time that US was a bad bad nation when it used to favor certain races for immigration. If that was wrong, why should US favor certain nations over others when US has immigrants from all over the world? Isn’t American foreign policy discriminatory and supremacist in favor of Jews, Zionists, and Israel?

    Why does Conservative Inc favors Jews over Palestinians? Why not judge Jews and Palestinians not as peoples or nations but only as individuals? When has Conservatism Inc ever have done that?

    How come Israel can violate all international laws and have 200 nukes while Iran got hit with sanctions for so long for nukes it didn’t even have?

    So much for colorblindness. Jews have money, and Conservative Inc has always judged people and issues on the color of money.

    Besides, if color doesn’t matter, why does Conservative Inc agree with Democrats that “diversity is our strength”? I mean if all peoples and groups are interchangeable individuals and if ‘race is just a myth’, why do we need diversity when all groups are or should be the one and the same, only to be judged as individuals?

    Another thing. If there are individual differences, why can’t there be group differences? If individual differences do exist, couldn’t it be that certain groups may have more of certain kinds of individuals than other groups? Might not there more more high IQ individuals among Jews and more high-muscle individuals among blacks? If all individuals were the same, there couldn’t be group differences. But if individuals can be different, then groups can have different shares of certain individuals. If there are tall people, medium people, and short people as individuals, then it’s possible that group A could have more tall individuals than group B. Thus, group differences could be real.
    —————-

    French: “They’re a motley group of white nationalists and wanna-be fascists.”

    If what we stand for is ‘fascist’ — racial identity, nationalism, historical consciousness, territorial integrity, and cultural pride — , then Israel is certainly fascist because it strongly supports all such themes.

    French supports Jewish fascism of Zionism but not European fascism of national pride and racial survival. That needs to be changed.

    If he doesn’t see color and don’t regard any people as his people, then why does he favor Israeli Jews who ethnically cleansed the Palestinians and still occupy Palestinian land? Would he ever think of adopting and raising a Palestinian child?
    So much for color-blindness. He chose a black child because it’s fashionable to be associated with blackness since ‘black is so cool’ and since being pro-black wins your ‘anti-racist’ points.

  14. Shillelagh's Gravatar Shillelagh
    January 27, 2016 - 10:22 am | Permalink

    “. . . Irish harlots like Megan Kelly, O’Reilly and Hannity . . . .”

    Harlots, yes, but how are they “Irish”?

    • wiggins's Gravatar wiggins
      January 30, 2016 - 12:09 am | Permalink

      They’re as Oirish as Ronnie Raygun…

  15. royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
    January 27, 2016 - 7:52 am | Permalink

    Here is a news conference by Trump:

    I told you so…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHHiJXXx9Cg

    I just hope that he really does keep his word and do what he says!

    God give Trump strength and help him maintain it!

  16. royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
    January 27, 2016 - 7:34 am | Permalink

    And I thought the British were (and have called them as much several times) a bunch of cowardly sheep!

    My sincerest apologies!

    Here we have a group of Real Christians who put their Blood where their Spirit is,

    Youtube has typically disabled comments on this video…, what a losing site Youtube really is…, so much for free speech!

    Copy and distribute this as widely as possible before Youtube does the Jew thing and deletes/bans it entirely.
    This behaviour should now be copied by all Real Christians and implemented not only in Islamic neighbourhoods but in Jewish ones as well.

  17. January 27, 2016 - 5:48 am | Permalink

    Jim Rizoli Interviews Fred Leuchter: His Story, His Way — TRANSCRIPT

    https://katana17.wordpress.com/2016/01/25/jim-rizoli-interviews-fred-leuchter-his-story-his-way-transcript/

    FL: At that point, the judges called us into chambers. Now we’re in chambers. They ordered coffee and cakes. In our meeting, I’m eating cakes and drinking coffee with the judges. [Jim laughing] You can see where their sympathies lay, okay.”

    • January 29, 2016 - 4:22 am | Permalink

      I was amused to see Fred’s comments on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But I doubt any roving physicist would be allowed to investigate.

  18. ikat's Gravatar ikat
    January 27, 2016 - 3:01 am | Permalink

    I really would appreciate it, if somebody could explain to a non US citizen in simple terms the importance of IOWA (mainly agricultural) for the nomination of the presidential candidate. Ther Inet was not really enlightening. Thank you.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 27, 2016 - 4:15 pm | Permalink

      I Googled, it took a few seconds to find out.

      The Iowa Caucus is noteworthy for the amount of media attention they receive during U.S. presidential election years. Since 1972, the Iowa caucuses have been the first major electoral event of the nominating process for President of the United States

      I might ask why you didn’t Google on it. I’ll be glad to look up stuff for others- only five bucks a pop.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        January 27, 2016 - 5:26 pm | Permalink

        veni vidi googli

        I came
        I saw
        I googled

  19. January 27, 2016 - 1:45 am | Permalink

    The “principled conservatism” promoted by National Review is a plutocratic ideology.

    “Principled conservatism” has the problem that the Republican Party’s strongest base of support, in the former Confederacy, has no interest in this ideology except as a supposed proschema for the indirect pursuit of White interests. That is the legacy of Nixon’s “southern strategy,” and this has always been understood. How to make Southern Whites continue hoping that the GOP will be marginally less disastrous for the White race than the other party has been an obvious consideration in Republican propaganda. Think of George H. W. Bush’s Willy Horton ad.

    In 2012 I wrote “A Party of Plutocrats Has No Future” pointing out that “principled conservatism” not only failed to serve White interests but was the main reason why the White candidate in 2012 lost. Trump has offered what is clearly a more hopeful approach from the perspective of White interests (and the interests of native U.S. citizens generally).

    The rapid marginalization of National Review as the emblem of plutocratic ideology is a gratifying confirmation that the title of my essay was correct.

  20. John S's Gravatar John S
    January 27, 2016 - 12:59 am | Permalink

    We have a large public that is very ignorant about public affairs and very susceptible to simplistic slogans by candidates who appear out of nowhere, have no track record, but mouth appealing slogans.

    ― Zbigniew Brzeziński, The Grand Chessboard, 1997

    If Trump is the carrot dangling in front of our faces, then the stick represents Brzeziński and his elite friends who are steering Whites to their imminent downfall. I suggest you purchase one of Brzeziński’s books so that you will have a better understanding as to why Trump is leading in the polls.

  21. Gus Fisher's Gravatar Gus Fisher
    January 27, 2016 - 12:21 am | Permalink

    Jews are the problem not Third Worlders upholding principles of Madisonian or Jeffersonian democracy.

    They have corrupted the political system because they are not like us and our North European ancestors who founded this great republic that they have destroyed.

    This is what Jared Taylor doesn’t get.

    So-called conservatism is dead unless you mean Fox and Irish harlots like Megan Kelly, O’Reilly and Hannity – the Trinity of Useful Idiots for the Jews.

  22. Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
    January 26, 2016 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

    Jared Taylor triangulates against “Mexicans and Haitians and Guatemalans and Vietnamese and Bangladeshis and Chinese” who will not ever adopt White norms precisely to distract from ‘fundamental interests’.

    Jews are who subverted these norms.

    • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
      January 27, 2016 - 4:52 am | Permalink

      IMO, Jared Taylor is at best a milk-toast, quasi-politically-correct-straw-man. For decades he has pontificated eloquently about anything BUT the Jews. IMO, talking (/writing) about him is an arguably much less effective way of spending ones energy than referencing almost anyone else who is supposedly representing our (White) interests.

      Unlike Taylor, our beloved, if I may affectionately call him thus, “K-Mac”, has been the principle White leader creating a new linguistic framework allowing not only main stream America, almost certainly including Trump who probably reads or knows about TOO [and if there is a remote chance that he does not, then he should be getting free copies of everything Hr. Prof. Dkrt. K. MacDonald has written], to clearly understand the psychological mechanisms the Jews employ to destroy the White people on the planet.

  23. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    January 26, 2016 - 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump abruptly announced here Tuesday that he would not participate in Thursday’s scheduled debate, escalating his off-and-on feud with the Fox News Channel and throwing the GOP campaign into turmoil.

    Donald Trump knows exactly what he is doing!
    I’ll bet Trump has an excellent grasp on a whole lot
    in numerous directions!
    Donald already has a few strategies for
    dealing with Diebold Vote fraud.

    • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
      January 27, 2016 - 5:06 am | Permalink

      With the ratings bonanza ($$$) that the Lame Stream Meida is getting whenever Trump is on the ticket, not only is it no wonder that they are running around in circles like chickens without heads, but it’s a wonder that Trump has not started a media empire of his own not unlike Ted Turner’s once owned (now Jew hostilely taken over) CNN.
      Trump TV Network [T.T.V.N.], Trump Times, Trump Broadcasting Network [T.B.N.] (radio), Trump Business News [T.B.N.], etc…, – all operating live from Trump Tower Central Head Quarters.
      That would really send the god-forsaken filthy Jews into a decapitated funky chicken dance of the most satisfactory proportions.

      • Rick's Gravatar Rick
        January 27, 2016 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

        I sent a suggestion to the Donald Trump campaign for

        Trump Broadcasting Network [T.B.N.] (radio),
        Great Idea
        He could pick up a few AM Radio stations
        ( AM for greater range ) and have airtime
        for the Campaign and others that are like minded.

  24. January 26, 2016 - 6:42 pm | Permalink

    Buckley was overrated and did a lot of damage.
    http://davidduke.com/so-called-conservative-passes-away-but-legacy-of-ugly-deeds-survives/
    Buckley acknowledged on Jan. 25, 1952 when he wrote in Commonweal, a liberal journal, that he was willing to support what he called “Big Government” for “the duration [of the Cold War]” because—he said—only “a totalitarian bureaucracy within our shores” could ensure total victory over the communist menace.
    The new conservatism was not new at all. In fact, Buckley’s “contribution” to conservatism was introduction of a host of longtime Trotskyite (Marxist) communists as voices for “modern conservative thought.”

    Foremost among them, James Burnham, only 20 years earlier, had been Jewish Bolshevik Leon Trotsky’s “chief spokesman” in American “intellectual” circles. Then, during World War II, Burnham worked for the Zionist- and Trotskyite-infested Office of Strategic Services, forerunner of the CIA, which later recruited Buckley while he was at Yale.

  25. January 26, 2016 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    Indeed, in many ways, despite their rhetoric, they are a major part of our hostile elite.(Dr. MacDonald)

    Of course they are. The left and right in America are part of a system that serves the globalist elites. This is how it works.

    The globalist elites have a “home game” and an “away game.” The home game (in the West) is political correctness, White genocide, and degeneracy of all sorts. The away game (in the non-West) is war, neo-liberal privatization, and coup d’etats. The main job of the left in America is to carry out the home game while the right pretends to oppose them. The main job of the right is to carry out the away game while the left pretends to oppose them.

    The Cucks at NR are just as guilty as liberals are.

  26. January 26, 2016 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    Well the Davos Hostile Elite Crowd definitely don’t care
    for the Trumpinator which for me I read as an endorsement
    or a valuable trait. If they don’t like him that’s one more
    not insignificant reason to go ahead and vote in the
    Primary for him. Diebold be Damned and vote anyway.

    It was at that conference that a figure with significant ties to Fox News’ own bottom line let it be known his intention to make certain Donald Trump will never win the White House. His name is Martin Sorrell, a British citizen and head of WPP, quite possibly the single most influential and prominent marketing firm in the world with decades-old ties to the most elite of the elite. Here is what Mr. Sorrell had to say regarding Donald Trump just days ago:

    “It doesn’t matter who the Republicans put up…Hillary will win.”

    The controversial GOP candidate has also taken on the issue of H1-B labor replacing American workers – which pairs with the outsourcing issue – which could rattle the nerves of firms like IBM and Microsoft.

    Also sounding off from the world of Davos was Professor Niall Ferguson, a recurring Bilderberg attendee who wrote authorized biographies on the Rothschild banking dynasty and on Henry Kissinger, who predicted a prime time fail of Trump once the votes are cast. Bloomberg reports:

    “If you bother to read some of the serious analysis of Trump’s support, you realize that it’s a very fragile thing and highly unlikely to deliver what he needs in the crucial first phase of the primaries… By the time we get to March-April, it’s all over. I think there’s going to be a wonderful catharsis, I’m really looking forward to it: Trump’s humiliation. Bring it on.”

    So this election is THE FINAL TEST of whether or not we can
    successfully express our WILL at the Diebold Ballot Box
    or not. If we are denied our interests by the Hostile elite
    in such an open Manner then we will know that we
    have crossed the Rubicon toward something else
    and the ground that this all walks on shall shift?

    Why not forward this article to any contacts you have
    in Iowa and New Hampshire for starters.

    VOTE FRAUD UNDERWAY – WHAT CANDIDATES MUST DO
    newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd558.htm

  27. Atticus Ford's Gravatar Atticus Ford
    January 26, 2016 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

    One wonders by reading what Lowry writes, does he really believe in what he is saying? He seems to be a man that has been “educated” to a certain degree. I am sure that he has access to a dictionary and a simple perusal would explain that the ideologies that he and his magazine espouse are not conservative in any sense of the word. My belief is that Lowry knows full well what he is doing and is just running NR as controlled opposition for Jewish interests. It probably started at least 50 years ago when Buckley realized that being a true conservative was a very lonely game in the 1960’s and that he preferred to be one of the “Respectible Intelligencia” of New York society. He kept NR as a respectable conservative facade for many years after but he himself had probably sold out in the 1960’s to Jewish organizations where he would be allowed to push conservative ideas as long as they didn’t threaten Zionist interests.

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      January 26, 2016 - 7:24 pm | Permalink

      What is ‘conservatism’? Self-professing conservatives can’t agree even within a generation.

      Buckley was a grinning chat-show clown without principle or people (the second matters more).

  28. FKA Max's Gravatar FKA Max
    January 26, 2016 - 2:44 pm | Permalink

    This is somewhat off-topic, and some or most might consider it pseudo-scientific and overly metaphysical, but I feel I need to share the following information, especially with some of Donald Trump’s skeptics and critics here in the comments.

    The topic I would like to talk about is astrology, and how Donald Trump’s astrology/birth horoscope corresponds with and relates to the astrology/birth horoscope of the United States of America ( July 4, 1776). Very favorably actually.

    Here a good astrological analysis, that comes to the ( IMO correct) conclusion, that Donald Trump and the USA match very well astrologically, and that Donald Trump is/has an overwhelmingly positive influence on the United States:
    Donald Trump / USA Astrology Synastry
    Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3CzQCAPKkg
    Published on Aug 25, 2015
    Astrology analysis of USA and Donald Trump birth chart synastry

    Here Donald Trump’s personal horoscope:
    Astrology for Donald Trump
    Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j0AeaSoxN4
    Published on Aug 22, 2015
    Astrology analysis for Donald Trump and his presidential run

    Nancy Reagan consulted with astrologer Joan Quigley on a regular basis during President Reagan’s presidential term:

    Virtually every major move and decision the Reagans made during my time as White House Chief of Staff was cleared in advance with a woman in San Francisco [Quigley] who drew up horoscopes to make certain that the planets were in a favorable alignment for the enterprise.[3][1]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_Quigley#Relationship_with_Nancy_Reagan

    Founding Father Benjamin Franklin was also an avid astrologer:

    Franklin’s quote in full: “Courteous Reader, Astrology is one of the most ancient Sciences, had in high Esteem of old, by the Wise and Great. Formerly, no Prince would make War or Peace, nor any General fight a Battle, in short, no important Affair was taken without first consulting an Astrologer, who examined the Aspects and Configurations of the heavenly bodies, and mark’d the lucky hour. Now the noble Art (more Shame to the Age we live in!) is dwindled into contempt; the Great neglect us, Empires make Leagues, and Parliaments Laws, without advising with us; and scarce any other Use is made of our learned Labors, than to find the best time cutting Corns, or gelding Pigs, – this Mischief we owe in a great Measure to ourselves: The ignorant Herd of Mankind: had they not been encourag’d to it by some of us, would never have dared to deprecate our sacred Dictates; but Urania has been betray’d by her own Sons: those whom she had favored with the greatest skill in her divine art, the most eminent astronomers among the Moderns, the Newtons, Helleys, and Whistons have wantonly condem’d and abus’d her, contrary to the Light of their own Consciouses.” —- Originally in the 1751 preface to the Poor Richard’s Almanack written by Franklin under the pen name, Richard Saunders. First published late in 1732, Poor Richard’s Almanack is probably Franklin’s best-known publication. Richard Saunders’ humorous sayings and advice filled the pages of the almanacik’s twenty-six editions.

    http://www.astrology.co.uk/news/USA.htm#fay

    Here some more references to Benjamin Franklin’s astrological activity:

    There is one skeptics’ Internet site that acknowledge that there was “astrology content” in Poor Richards Almanak, but the site claims that this does not prove Benjamin Franklin was an astrologer, citing that the Washington Post publishes a horoscope column, and this does not mean the Post’s editors believe in horoscopes.

    Our response is: That is a dumb analogy. The Washington Post editors did not write their Horoscope column but Benjamin Franklin himself wrote all the astrology material in Poor Richard’s Almanak. In fact, Poor Richard’s Almanak is predominately astrological material and even provided an Ephemeris and Aspectarian for each year, informing its readers of the astrological position of each planet and the planetary alignments for each day of the year. Ben actually calculated these positions in advance by himself, which proves he was an extraordinarily skilled astrologer and mathematician.

    http://www.magiastrology.com/proof_franklin_was_astrologer.htm

    His astrological method and why he chose the 4th of July 1776 to sign the Declaration of Independence:

    When Benjamin Franklin picked a date for America’s Founding Fathers to sign the Declaration of Independence, he made sure the day was a fabulous astrological day. He was not going to settle for a day when only two planets were going to form a planetary eclipse. He chose July 4, 1776, because on that day, FIVE planets came together in the sky to form a FIVE PLANET PLANETARY ECLIPSE.

    http://www.magiastrology.com/ben_franklin_astrology.htm

    I have intuitively felt from the start, that Donald Trump is authentic and the ”real deal”, his conduct so far backs this up IMO, and the astrology does, too. I have studied and researched astrology for many years, and I found it to be a reliable and helpful tool in decision-making and explaining and interpreting world events.
    Considering how much credence some of the most important Founding Fathers have given to this divinatory art form, I think it might be helpful to pay attention to what the planets have to say about this most crucial of times for the United States of America.

  29. T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
    January 26, 2016 - 1:45 pm | Permalink

    >>>It was at that conference [Davos] that a figure with significant ties to Fox News’ own bottom line let it be known his intention to make certain Donald Trump will never win the White House. His name is Martin Sorrell, a British citizen and head of WPP, quite possibly the single most influential and prominent marketing firm in the world with decades-old ties to the most elite of the elite. Here is what Mr. Sorrell had to say regarding Donald Trump just days ago:

    “It doesn’t matter who the Republicans put up…Hillary will win.”

    WPP and its myriad of affiliates, represents up to HALF of all Fox News ad revenue. WPP’s clients include such corporate giants as Ford, Glaxo Smith, IBM, Microsoft, Nestle, Walmart, Unilever, etc. – clients who in turn represent tens of millions of dollars in monthly ad revenue that keep the lights of Fox News on and pays the salaries of on-air personalities like Megyn Kelly.

    So when someone like Martin Sorrell [jew] signals it doesn’t matter who the Republicans nominate because Hillary Clinton is going to be the next President of the United States regardless, it is a prediction/threat that should be taken very seriously.<<< http://tinyurl.com/hl29h6d

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 26, 2016 - 6:12 pm | Permalink

      Trump will skip the Thursday Fox debate- http://tinyurl.com/hkcfr2o

    • Nick Dean's Gravatar Nick Dean
      January 26, 2016 - 7:34 pm | Permalink

      Between Rep/Dem candidates who were interchangeable like Bush and Kerry, the media could manage to make them both seem roughly equally likely winners – and in fact help fix the vote for Bush, the reason for which only became obvious later following 9/11.

      It’s possible that Trump snuck up on them, driving a patriotic swell that will be difficult to cover-up by massaging vote numbers.

      The MSM will certainly trouble to do so absent some scandal, and Hillary looks more vulnerable than Trump to a scandal right now. Even if they start dumping on Trump, has he ever knowingly broken the laws on state secrets?

      • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
        January 27, 2016 - 5:24 am | Permalink

        Dumping on Trump is like dumping sh!t onto a helicopter propeller. It ends up hitting ever one except the intended target!

  30. January 26, 2016 - 9:14 am | Permalink

    Here is an interesting thought from a website called occidentaldissent.com

    “Who is subscribing to the National Review? A bunch of rich old White men over half of whom are in the seventies and tend to live inside the Beltway. Out of touch?

    Male – 81.4%
    Median Age – 66 years old
    Ages 15-54 – 18% of subscribers
    Household Net Worth over $1 million dollars – 34.4%
    Household Net Worth over $250,000 – 78.6%

    Probably a quarter of National Review subscribers are senile. No wonder they are always carrying on about the Gipper. It is still 1984 for much of their audience.

    Note: I strongly suspect that a large percentage of National Review subscribers are either already dead or will be by the 2016 election.”

    Anyone thinking a Donald the Christ or Adolf Trumpler is going to save them will find themselves sadly disillusioned. The Jews learned there lesson about leadership for the goyim long ago.

    I cannot help but wonder if the disillusioned Trumpeters will be as “disappointed” as the Perot party people after he abandoned them on a bizarrely flimsy excuse that was actually a comment on how gullible they were to follow him in the first place.

    I have come to the conclusion that one of the main differences between the Jews success and the gulliable goyim’s failure is simply one of memory. The Jews have a memory that stretches back to the very beginnings of their race. They even remember vast numbers of events that never happened and use them for their holiday celebrations and guilt induction.

    In short, Jews seem to remember everything – even things that never happened. By contrast, the goyim remember nothing. They don’t know who they are, where they came from, or what happened in the last election. They are far too busy with their cell phones to examine where they are going as a people.

    I only wish I could join them with my head in the sand and vote for the Donolf Trumpler with the same confidence. – but I jest haint that gulliable.

    As for the National Review and the conservative movement, the following might provide some insight on those subjects:

    Excerpt from: “From Ivory Tower To Privy Wall”

    “In the middle group are the Birch-type blind men who produce millions and millions of dollars worth of wasted propaganda; wasted because it is not designed to do the job they really want and need done, but is instead what they like to hear. These people have never yet stopped to reflect that in order to win they need not just the thinkers — the right-wingers, the bourgeois, rich folks, and the rest of the elite minority – but the vast masses of the people who support demagogues like Johnson, FDR, and Kennedy. Goldwater’s catastrophe was the result of producing propaganda and campaigns designed to win thinkers instead of masses. The result was that twenty-seven million Goldwater thinkers were swamped at the polls by some forty-three million Johnson wishers and hopers, who can never, never, never be reached by “conservative” logic, facts, and boring, sissy tea parties.

    “The worst waste of money I have ever seen in the whole field of propaganda was the special Sunday supplement the Birch Society put out not so long ago in newspapers all over America. It cost as much as a quarter of a million dollars in some cities. Had it been designed to appeal to the mass, the “average man,” the man who votes with his heart instead of his head, it could have been worth the millions it took to publish. But it was foolishly aimed at a relatively tiny minority. On the front cover, in full color, it showed a typical Birch Society meeting, in the home of a man obviously wealthy – in the kind of living room which would make the average, working-class, overalled American uncomfortable. The Birchers were sitting around sipping tea with their pinkies daintily extended, and the whole atmosphere was foreign, ridiculous, and even painful to the man in overalls — to America’s millions of “ordinary Joes.” There might have been some sense in printing that piece in Fortune. But to spend money to put that advertisement (which could reach only the rich and the sophisticated) in a mass medium, at the cost of a mass medium, was the kind of thoughtlessness which keeps the right wing powerless, eternally defeated, and discouraged.” – George Lincoln Rockwell (circa 1966)

    Get that? “boring, sissy tea parties” – Rockwell, a man out of time.

    http://www.americannaziparty.com/rockwell/materials/articles/tower.php

    • William Boggle's Gravatar William Boggle
      January 26, 2016 - 5:59 pm | Permalink

      I wouldn’t put down NR’s readership because they are old or rich. They are merely sheltered from the realities of life so to coin a British expression they have an I’m all right Jack attitude. White people who are competing with minorities for $7.00 per hour jobs at Wal Mart and forced to live in black hell-holes like Ferguson or East St. Louis, will have a more realistic attitude about the realities of life in America. They are more inclined to vote for Trump based on his addressing the issues that they face every day. They could care less about the purity of his “conservative” credentials unlike the ivory tower faux intellectuals like Lowry.

      • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
        January 27, 2016 - 2:09 pm | Permalink

        Justin Trudeau should be relocated to Brampton, Vancouver or Toronto, minus the cachet of his name, with only his BA. in English Literature to open doors. While sweeping floors in Macdonalds or stacking shelves at Walmart his high-minded ideals on immigration would definitely take a turn.

  31. Mr Darcy's Gravatar Mr Darcy
    January 26, 2016 - 8:43 am | Permalink

    Francis Parker Yockey explains–and predicts–everything that is now happening in his book “Imperium” published in 1948. It’s available from Invictus Books online for 20 bucks.

    If only Trump were like Mussolini! If only he would rule as a sort of monarch! Yockey explained that, “good or bad, the kings are coming.” He expected us to see what he calls “the resurgence of authority and religion.” That democracy is moribund; that is was always doomed to death through dictatorship. The question is what sort of dictator—monarch—shall we have? One who hates us and wants to destroy us, or one who will take the necessary action—whatever that might be—to save us?

    As another commenter points out on this thread, things in America today are worse than they were in Weimar Germany’s final days, and they must lead to the same conclusion. But will the police state be an atheist-Marxist one, or one that preserves and exalts the traditional historic American Nation?

    For it IS going to happen–whether as the result of this election cycle or a later one. The time is ripe for it. And since the Clintons’ first administration–and through every subsequent administration–rule by decree (coyly called “Executive Orders”) has been the order of the day. People keep saying that “Trump won’t be able to carry out his promises because Congress won’t go along with him,” etc. Ridiculous. Congress is toothless and spineless. They surrendered to “Mussolini” long ago. The stage is set. I continue to have some misgivings about the Donald, but what is our alternative, really?

    • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
      January 27, 2016 - 5:41 am | Permalink

      The first thing Donolf Trumpler should do after building the wall along the Rio Grand and deporting all the criminals is invade Canada.

      After that he can set up labour camps all over the “Jew-minion of Kafkada” and confine the politicians, bankers, oligopolists, but most specifically reserve a special intensive learning camp for the Jews and nationalize all their ill gotten resource based companies to be run for the benefit of the country.

  32. Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
    January 26, 2016 - 7:19 am | Permalink

    “This mindset among NR conservatives reflects a common defect among liberal Protestants that surfaced originally in the nineteenth century…”
    Is there some evidence that it was only liberal Protestants that were afflicted with this defect? Even if that were true, I suggest that those Whites who are not Protestant and from places other than North-Western Europe ought to be grateful. I know from my now long deceased American relatives that their parents and grandparents were horrified when Catholic Slavs, Italians and horror of horrors Austrians started arriving in large numbers.
    @Bob
    Trump has been very clear about stopping illegal immigration, and has said the wall will have a big beautiful door in it. That is certainly no guarantee that 3rd world immigration will stop. In fact, about 3 years ago he complained that bright US educated children of friends couldn’t emigrate. I have a difficult time believing he has a plethora of non-White friends.
    Having said that, there have been whispers that Trump was impressed with the late Barbara Jordan, a Democrat Chair for immigration reform, who pointed out the severe negative effects that 3rd world type immigration has on the working poor, and Blacks in particular.
    Either way, stopping illegal immigration by sealing the southern border and changing the criteria for whom you wish to admit, sends a strong message to the hostile elite.

  33. Jacob's Gravatar Jacob
    January 26, 2016 - 3:57 am | Permalink

    “Trump represents a kind of veiled fascism:” he throws out protesters, and his policies are full of holes: http://www.cafeconlecherepublicans.com/donald-trumps-immigration-myths/
    And off course he spits on the constitution:http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwioptTvtMfKAhVGs4MKHcJvChgQFggdMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fopenborders.info%2Fblog%2Fthe-constitution-citizenism-and-the-natural-right-of-migration%2F&usg=AFQjCNEf1yqBJMtgpB0-PNvfMVytdH-9sQ
    http://openborders.info/blog/immigration-and-the-us-constitution/
    So white identity is being argued against American identity. For shame.
    “This mindset among NR conservatives reflects a common defect among liberal Protestants that surfaced originally in the nineteenth century — the idea that the very different people crowding the shores of the U.S. would become “just like us.” These immigrants would eventually become good Protestants. What we are seeing now is how important segments of non-White immigrants, most obviously Muslims, are in fact unassimilable. They are never going to “become like us” and be concerned about the principles and values so near and dear to conservatives. It was the realization that so many of the post-1890 immigrants were infected with radical political beliefs that finally made Americans realize that immigrants don’t automatically turn into patriotic Americans. This realization was an important impetus for the 1924 immigration law.” Wrong: http://thinkprogress.org/immigration/2015/09/24/3704612/report-immigration-assimilation/

  34. L. Austine Waddell's Gravatar L. Austine Waddell
    January 26, 2016 - 1:54 am | Permalink

    Jews had the mainstream Right defanged, declawed, and neutered a long time ago. Now it has come back to bite them in the ass. Big time.

    • Aeneas's Gravatar Aeneas
      January 26, 2016 - 8:56 am | Permalink

      Pretty much this, NeoCohens are dead in the water.

  35. Andrew's Gravatar Andrew
    January 25, 2016 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

    Great article. I am inclined to believe that most of what was written against Trump is insincere cuckery at the behest of the Critiquery.

  36. Darian Diachok's Gravatar Darian Diachok
    January 25, 2016 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    I used to block out time to read NR cover to cover. Then my favorite writers were fired, and the “escalate-war-in-the-Middle East” drumbeat took over with the timeless cover, “Unpatriotic Conservatives.” Ever since neocons hijacked it, NR fell from its perch as one of the country’s most cultivated sources of cultural and political enlightenment — to be sold basically into white slavery, with the marching orders: keep publishing that stuff on principles and whatever the hell else it is that makes people read your rag, but WE set the agenda!

    That formula doesn’t work over the long haul. Who wants to be manipulated? I check NR articles from time to time to pick up on any new ways neocons try to manipulate conservatives. For years now, it’s good for little else. RIP NR!

  37. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    January 25, 2016 - 5:52 pm | Permalink

    I’ve come around to some extent on the Trump candidacy. I still think this is an attempt to crush the anti-immigration movement in the same way that they used Obama to destroy the anti-war movement, but to the extent that he keeps our issues front and center supporting Trump makes some sense on the tactical level.

    However; we should not fall into the same trap as the anti-war left. We should support Trump with our eyes open and with no illusions about who he is or what he is going to do if elected. The anti-war left was effectively sidelined while they patiently waited for “their man”, Obama, to put an end to the wars and banker bailouts. They continued to sit on their hands as he expanded the wars and continued the banker bailouts…and when they realized the magnitude of his betrayal of them, they were so demoralized that they simply collapsed as a political movement.

    If Trump is elected (something I still see as unlikely, a Sanders presidency seems much more likely IMHO), he will almost certainly abandon his promises regarding immigration. At most he will simply expand legal immigration sufficiently to ensure the Jewish demographic agenda advances unimpeded.

    We shouldn’t pause after a Trump ascendancy to the White House, but instead continue to amplify the pressure and keep the immigration and demographic issues front and center to the extent that we can. We should assume from the start that we will be betrayed so that this betrayal will not demoralize us. On the contrary, being prepared for it we might find that this betrayal energizes our movement. The anti-war left invested so heavily in the Obama myth that they could not oppose his policies after his election…and this naïve belief destroyed their movement. Let’s not allow the same thing to happen to us. The stakes are too high and time has grown too short.

    • White EthnoState's Gravatar White EthnoState
      January 25, 2016 - 7:36 pm | Permalink

      Great comment. Trump is a back stabber whereas NReview is much more honest about its Anti-white agenda.

      • unadorned's Gravatar unadorned
        January 26, 2016 - 5:25 am | Permalink

        What are you talking about? There is nothing honest about NR. They pretend to be anti-immigration by throwing a bone to a Mark Krikorian article, but it’s a red herring to keep the rubes from knowing that they want to displace them with millions of browns and blacks. The rest they want to die in the ME for Israel. It’s sickening that they call themselves conservatives.

        As for Trump how the hell do you know he’s a “back stabber”. Such stupidity in one sentence.

    • Floda's Gravatar Floda
      January 25, 2016 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

      Bob,

      I think you are completely wrong on Trump, he is not the sort to make grandiose promises and then deny having made them. I suggest that is what the bought and paid for flyweights running against him would do.

      No, I see Trump as the real McCoy. America is in deep trouble and a man of Trump’s age and intelligence has known this for a very long time. I see America in a similar (but far worse) situation as was Germany during the Weimar period post WW1.

      Then a determined very able man came along in 1933 who inside 5 years virtually eliminated unemployment and most importantly had Germany issue its own currency at no debt to the people. By contrast America, Britain and much of the rest of the World languished in the great depression for years. He was hugely popular drawing Rock star crowds of many thousands wherever he went.

      Of course he had to be destroyed. They had to find a way of stopping him before the sleepwalking masses would wake up and see how their barbarous overlords in Government and Finance had utterly deceived and impoverished them. I believe the rise of Trump and the enthusiastic crowds who greet him wherever he goes remind our Jewish friends of uncle Adolf.

      They’re nervous, I think with good reason.

      • Bob's Gravatar Bob
        January 26, 2016 - 10:04 am | Permalink

        @Floda
        Let’s hope you are correct and that I am mistaken. But the parallels with the Obama candidacy are just too obvious to ignore. The kind of “faith” you express in Trump is dangerous, IMO. It exposes us to the same kind of moral collapse that destroyed the anti-war movement.

        The inherent political power of the people resides not in their votes at the ballot box, but in their ability and willingness to take direct action against the political class. Pitchforks and rope are the real currency of the political power of the masses and we should never forget this.

        We should be behind Trump not with our “faith” but with our pitchforks firmly pressed against his backside pushing him forward and a length of rope close at hand should it be needed.

      • Robert Firth's Gravatar Robert Firth
        January 27, 2016 - 1:55 am | Permalink

        Germany was not the only country to have a visionary leader. An American entered the US Senate in 1932 with similar ideas: setting the country to rights, destroying the baleful power of the elites, and trusting the common people.

        Until 10 September 1935. We all know who did it and why, even if this has been erased from official history. I greatly fear the same elites will do the same to Donald Trump.

      • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
        January 27, 2016 - 5:58 am | Permalink

        I agree.

        Trump is a legal-beagle. He is obsessed with dotting every “i” and crossing every “t”. He does not couch his description of the press, and individual distortion artists using the typical PC language like “untruth” and “mis-represent”, preferring instead to simply call them “liars”!

        He knows he can do this because, if the liars try to sue him for his absolutely and totally correct labels, he knows he will win in court.

        I get the feeling that, as decisively as he wields the “liar label”, he would be equally repulsed at the thought of being called a liar by anyone.
        I get the feeling that he takes his personal honour very seriously.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      January 26, 2016 - 5:56 am | Permalink

      Bob,

      There seems to be a story line in the United States and United Kingdom. Trump represents Cameron* and Sanders represents Corbyn.

      *Although only lip service is paid to the Conservative Party’s platform, it’s easy to see most issues were stolen from the British National Party.

      • January 26, 2016 - 9:10 am | Permalink

        Within the American political tradition, Trump will probably be like Teddy Roosevelt, willing to disturb and over-turn members of his own class more than any other candidate. He will be unpredictable, but not in the covert way that Nixon liked to surprise the nation until he was surprised himself.

        National Review is condemned for that crowd’s willingness to ignore the need to have educated young diverse white American college students in rebutting, deflecting, and mocking the anti-white narrative as presented in our formerly great institutions of learning. They cast away tens of thousands of young minds who could have been bulwarks against mental and physical corruption in the coming years.

        A fun thing to note about NR’s tatty faux take down is that the leading name was Beck who has since endorsed Sanders.

    • Mick's Gravatar Mick
      January 27, 2016 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

      The big difference between Trump and Obama in 2007-2008 is that Trump has independent wealth. It was obvious that Obama was not anti-war given his strong backing by the establishment. He also endorsed the Afghan war in 2008 and said he would escalate it, a campaign pledge he followed through on. Lefty anti-war types, were stupid anti-whites who thought being black made Obama peaceful and moral. Another difference is that Trump and immigration restriction advocates are taking on the entire political/media/educational establishment. This takes a strong commitment that will not easily collapse. Opposing the Iraq war in 2007-2008 was a politically correct position. The neocons had accomplished their goal of destroying Iraq, and were fine with their goy front men Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld being blamed, trashed, and kicked to the curb.

      • Bob's Gravatar Bob
        January 28, 2016 - 1:21 pm | Permalink

        @ Mick
        One thing that I have noticed about Jews, when they come across a “winning formula” they continue to implement it until it fails to work any longer. Controlling all sides of any conflict or debate is a long standing Jewish practice that has served them well. I believe most people who visit TOO would agree with this statement.

        Given this, we can say with a reasonable degree of certainty that the Jews have THEIR candidate on all sides of any political contest or struggle and that the Jewish controlled media will do their part to advance the Jewish controlled candidates. We can also say, with the same degree of certainty, that the Jewish controlled media will be hostile to any individuals/groups who have not been captured by Jewish power. Now if the media is hostile toward you they do one of two things. The first, and most preferable from the Jewish perspective, is to simply ignore you and deprive you of media coverage. If the first is not possible, or not working…the second option is to give that particular individual/group very negative coverage. If you accept these things to be accurate, what does that say about the Trump candidacy?

        AS for the risk of a moral collapse of the anti-immigration movement, I guess we just have to disagree. I see the anti-immigration movement as being very fragile and the pro-white identity movement as being even more so.

  38. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    January 25, 2016 - 5:28 pm | Permalink

    But underneath such sentiments is a guilty conscience–the realization that establishment conservatives have done nothing to stem the actions of our hostile elite in running roughshod over the interests of white America in maintaining its political and demographic hegemony.

    In my opinion this is the most important line in the entire article. Any European-American, even those with a very liberal attitude should dwell on all of it’s ramifications. I couldn’t even begin to cover them all if given two days…PEACE.

  39. another reader's Gravatar another reader
    January 25, 2016 - 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Rich Lowry:

    It’s not just attitudes. It’s not just who you dislike. It’s limited government. It’s the Constitution. It’s liberty.

    But Lowry et al don’t really care about any of these things, do they? If they cared about limited government they would be against the welfare/warfare Leviathan in Washington DC. If they cared about the Constitution they would support free speech and they wouldn’t have purged “thought criminals” like Jared Taylor. If they cared about liberty they would support freedom of association and would be against forced racial integration.

    They care about these values only when it suits their (((masters))).

    • Luke's Gravatar Luke
      January 26, 2016 - 5:08 am | Permalink

      Reflecting back on the firing of Pat Buchanan from MSNBC, after he dared to write a book (Suicide of the West) that asked the all-important question ‘Can the West (America) even survive absent a White majority population?’ – wasn’t it this Rich Lowry character who arrogantly stated that such questions as that will not be permitted within the realm of publicly acceptable discourse in America?

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      January 26, 2016 - 6:44 am | Permalink

      If they cared about the Constitution, Obama, McCain, and Romney would not have been on a ballot for the Presidential Election.

  40. celt darnell's Gravatar celt darnell
    January 25, 2016 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

    Well, there are, of course, a million things wrong with the National Review’s attack on Trump that have been well dissected here and elsewhere, but what I find most intriguing is their constant comparison of Trump’s view of the presidency to Barack Obama’s. According to them, Trump shares Obama’s views (which are like Mussolini’s, Latin American strongmens’, African dictators, etc.)

    Well, NR and a whole host of other cuckservatives have been pointing to Obama’s manifest violations of the Constitution throughout these past eight years.

    And, having taken control of both Houses of Congress, they did precisely what about Obama’s lawlessness?

    Oh yes: absolutely nothing.

    It’s impossible to take these people seriously.

    • Doug's Gravatar Doug
      January 26, 2016 - 9:57 am | Permalink

      Always the philosopher, Bill Buckley, in his waning years, gave up on conservatism in favor of BS sessions on TV with “intellectuals”. His firing of the inestimable Joe Sobran and strained article about Pat Buchanan’s alleged probable antisemitism were just the prelude to his conversion to becoming just another running dog of the Jewish-controlled media.

    • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
      January 27, 2016 - 6:15 am | Permalink

      They should be taken very seriously!…, listed, and slated for round-up and insertion into “Arbeit Macht Frei” re-education camps that focus on ditch digging in latrines, hand plowing fields & spreading “organic” fertilizer and, on writing critically examined essays on methods of improving the White gene pool.
      Failures in any of the aforementioned tasks should be met with internment in post WW2 like starvation camps similar to the ones that German soldiers were thrown into and starved to death.

  41. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    January 25, 2016 - 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Trump’s rhetoric is indeed attractive. But without some Ron Paulish objective to crimp its largesse, the State will ensure whites continue to pay for their own displacement. (As a mental exercise, which would protect the border more effectively, a great big wall run by Leviathan, or Minutemen given a comparatively free hand?)

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      January 25, 2016 - 5:58 pm | Permalink

      “prime ministers and presidents are selected for their proven efficiency as morally uninhibited demagogues. Thus, democracy virtually assures that only bad and dangerous men will ever rise to the top of government.”

      Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        January 25, 2016 - 11:20 pm | Permalink

        Trenchant,

        This Hoppe quote reads so remarkably like things I heard spoken (and later on, read) by Erik von Kühnelt-Leddihn—and this was back in the seventies!—that I am led to ask you whether to your knowledge EKL and Hoppe knew each other. I recall that in the mid-nineties Rothbard invited EKL to contribute a piece to Triple R (Tom Fleming did likewise for Chronicles in the same period), though at that time EKL was already fifteen years older than I am now and not far from his life’s end.

        May I add parenthetically, too, that as much as I miss Ron Paul’s presence on the political scene—for his focus, insight, and integrity—in some ways I miss Harry Browne even more.

        • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
          January 26, 2016 - 9:40 am | Permalink

          Dr. Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn is one of the intellectuals on whose shoulders Dr. Hans-Hermann Hoppe stands for his theories about monarchy, Bertrand de Jouvenel being a notable other. Kuehnelt-Leddihn proclaimed himself to be a monarchist, but he certainly did not believe retaining or restoring monarchy would solve all our problems.

          http://tinyurl.com/hx6g752

          https://mises.org/profile/erik-von-kuehnelt-leddihn

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          January 26, 2016 - 11:42 am | Permalink

          Very helpful, T.J. Thanks.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          January 26, 2016 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

          Yes, thanks T.J. (I liked your old moniker better, however).

          King Don, I can just visualize it.

        • Emil Claus's Gravatar Emil Claus
          January 27, 2016 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

          :..in some ways I miss Harry Browne even more.”

          I do too. Harry’s early books, more than any other source – scholarly or otherwise – helped me, simple-minded that I am, to grasp basic monetary theory and the utmost economic and political importance of honest money, particularly as applied to the usurious debt-based modern central banking system and the enormity of the theft, fraud, and tyranny which it enabled for its cunning, sinister masterminds.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          January 27, 2016 - 8:39 pm | Permalink

          @Emil Claus:

          Cheers! Many thanks for chiming in. My only fear is that you and I constitute a sizable proportion of the HB fan club!

          As for your being simple-minded, let’s just say that this looks to be a matter on which reasonable men might disagree. Specifically, if you were reading Harry’s early books, you saw the truth of what he was flogging a good many years before I did. Nor am I prepared to bet that even a simple majority of TOO commenters has yet reached a similar plateau.

          We can but hope.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      January 25, 2016 - 7:41 pm | Permalink

      Is Leviathan some new government contractor? Never heard of it.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        January 25, 2016 - 11:41 pm | Permalink
        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          January 26, 2016 - 12:43 pm | Permalink

          Thanks for the link, Trenchant.

          Perhaps I should be grateful for an essay on Hobbes that scants SJW jargon as thoroughly as Ms. Wolfenden’s does. But being a grumpy old fart, my rapture is modified to the max. First off, although her capsule synopsis of Hobbes’s thought is accurate as far as it goes, as well as being respectfully stated (i.e., no PC editorializing masquerading as exposition), it doesn’t go particularly far. She doesn’t seem to comprehend that the schematic difficulties—one may even call them bêtises—she notes in Hobbes are almost entirely unrelated to the moral, psychological, and political wellsprings of his thought. (I almost added “metaphysical” to that list before I caught myself. Is there a major Western thinker less interested in metaphysics than Hobbes?)

          In short, Ms. Wolfenden’s summary suggests that she fails to grasp the profundity and breadth of his thought and the ongoing danger it represents for healthy and humane political and intellectual discourse. I hope that those who read her paper don’t come away thinking that they now know all they need to about what Hobbes was up to.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        January 26, 2016 - 1:00 pm | Permalink

        This was intended as humor.

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          January 26, 2016 - 5:08 pm | Permalink

          @ T.J.:
          Ouch! It was the deadpan delivery that baffled me. I’m going to crank up my irony-detector from “American” to “European”.

Comments are closed.