Britain’s Jewish Communist Traitors

Francis Carr Begbie


In his plea for Britain to take in thousands more “Syrian refugees”  Lord Alf Dubs tearfully recalls how he was brought to Britain, aged six, from Prague, as a Kindertransport Jewish refugee.  His former parliamentary colleague, wealthy publisher Lord George Weidenfeld too, was fond of recalling how he found sanctuary in Britain after fleeing Austria just before the war. He said it was the main factor in his decision to help pay for the transport of thousands of Syrian refugees into the west.

The Kindertransport has been exposed as a confection of distortions, myths and omissions previously in TOO, but there is another little awkward fact about the Jewish refugees taken in by Britain before the war. And that is the remarkably high proportion of them who chose to actively betray the country which gave them sanctuary by acting as spies for Britain’s deadly enemy, the Soviet Union.

They not only ensured that many British agents were sent to their deaths or capture, torture and long periods of imprisonment, but played a crucial part in stealing the atomic bomb secrets that allowed the Soviet Union to catch up and have its own atomic bomb by 1949. Their treachery compromised the security of Britain and the West and probably extended the length of the Cold War and the enslavement of the subject peoples of Eastern Europe.

What is more astonishing is that in many cases the British authorities took no action against them to avoid official embarrassment. As a result some of Britain’s foulest traitors were left free to enjoy their retirements in comfort and security.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

It is well-known that Jews were prominently involved in the left throughout the twentieth century, including communism, that leftist politics was mainstream within Jewish communities during much of that period, and that leftist Jews typically continued to have a strong Jewish identity. Information on Jewish involvement in communist spying increased greatly in the last 20+ years because in 1995 the USA began to open up its Venona Soviet code decryption archive. Another eye-opening tranche of incriminating material came via the publication of the Mitrokhin Archive spirited to the West by a KGB archivist defector in 1992. Finally, in a spirit of damage control, in 2001, the British intelligence services began to open up some of their older files for inspection in the National Archive. This led to the launch of something of a cottage industry for authors who found an eager audience for true-life stories about wartime espionage and derring-do.

Despite the seriousness of their crimes the media has chosen to portray these traitors as colourful romantics and their actions as the understandable acts of misguided conscience. This murderous stab in the back by many Jewish refugees towards the people who took them in, has gone completely unremarked.

Up until recently this subject has been overshadowed by the Cambridge non-Jewish spies of Kim Philby, Guy Burgess and Donald MacLean who all defected to Moscow. They lived upper-class, raffish lifestyles and their bohemian milieu lent the story a kind of perverted glamour.  But they were not even the most important spies in an enormous communist network which reached into many institutions — a network of Russian and German exiles who seem to have been overwhelmingly Jewish.

One of MI5’s most embarrassing lapses concerned its failure to catch Edith Tudor-Hart. She was born Edith Suschitzky in Vienna and on her first visit to Britain was deported from Britain for suspicious communist activities but she returned in 1933 as a political refugee after marrying an English doctor. From the moment she arrived she was working as a Soviet agent and set up as a professional photographer in an apartment opposite Abbey Road recording studio in north London.

She was really working for another Jewish refugee — and Soviet spy controller — Arnold Deutsch, and she couriered for the  Soviet Union’s most successful spy in Britain, the senior MI5 officer Kim Philby. As early as May, 1934 the three were meeting on park benches in Regents Park. By the time of the Cambridge ring defections in 1952 she was strongly under suspicion but under interrogation denied everything. Soon after she was admitted to psychiatric hospital after suffering a nervous breakdown which MI5 interrogators took as an indication of guilt.

An old MI5 file, released for view last year, said “From such evidence as is on record (letters, observations etc.) she would appear to be a rather typical, emotional, introspective and somewhat intellectual Viennese Jewess …. (L)ike so many leftwing intellectuals of her generation, she displayed an unhealthy interest in psychology and psychiatry”.

No further action was taken against her despite the strong suspicions including her photographic equipment being found in possession of another group of Jewish communist spies. She ended her days running an antique shop in Brighton. A major exhibition of her photography took place at the Scottish National Gallery in 2013 and a sympathetic Guardian article said her files not only confirmed MI5’s suspicions “they also betray a degree of anti-semitism and xenophobia within the agency.” (!) A Telegraph article described her as “the spy with a conscience.”

The most important Jewish spy was Melita Norwood who was born in England as Melita Stedman to Latvian immigrant parents who were committed bolshevik revolutionaries and spies themselves. She joined the Party in the thirties and got a secretarial job at the offices of the innocuous-sounding British Non-Ferrous Metals Association. This was to be her gateway into the heart of the atomic bomb research establishment because she became secretary to Dr G. L. Bailey, the head of Britain’s atom bomb project throughout the war, with access to both his home and office safe. For decades she passed documents and secrets to both the KGB and the Red Army’s GRU. She was identified as a security risk in 1965 but no action was taken and she retired to leafy suburbia. Her spying was confirmed by the Mitrokhin archive in 1992 but she was never prosecuted. More recent files show she was more highly valued than the Cambridge spies and was secretly awarded the Order of the Red Banner by the KGB. She never hid her left-wing sympathies and when she leafleted her neighbourhood she was tolerated as just another harmless English eccentric.  Throughout her spying days she was helped by her husband Hilary Nussbaum, who was also a committed communist and who took her surname.

Because of her treachery the Soviets were able to create a copy of the British atom bomb within a year, and to catch up with the underlying technology within two years. She ended her days comfortably in a sheltered housing complex in south London while the Mail ran a breezy article about the “jam-making granny” spy who tended a garden allotment. Like all the unmasked Jewish spies she expressed no regrets for spying for Stalin.

Another important Jewish refugee spy who inexplicably escaped prosecution was Ursula Kuczynski, also known as Ruth Werner though she had at least three other names. Born in Berlin to a wealthy Jewish family she enjoyed an expensive schooling and rich lifestyle but rejected it all to become a communist revolutionary and spy. After working for the Soviets in China and Switzerland throughout the war, she and her second husband Leonard Breurton came to live in Oxfordshire where she worked as a courier for the Atom bomb secrets of yet another Jewish refugee spy, the traitor scientist Klaus Fuchs who was caught by the Venona interceptions and jailed in 1950 for passing atomic secrets.  The file on Fuchs, who had joined the Communist Party in his youth in Berlin, suggests he was helped in his endeavours by a host of Jewish women including his sister, his mistress and many others.  Kuczynski also received eager help from her sister and brother who were also communists.

Some Jewish communist women were married to non-Jewish traitors and acted as “handlers” for the various Soviet intelligence agencies.  A good example was Kim Philby’s wife Litzi Friedmann who was born Alice Kohlmann in Vienna. She initially fled to Britain as a refugee in 1933 and in fact married Philby to get a British passport.

Philby rose to become head of the anti-Soviet section of the Secret Intelligence Service as MI5 is formally known and until recently was thought to be the KGB’s most successful agent.  Because of him, probably hundreds of agents who were sent into the Ukraine and Albania, were caught and executed. After a long career of helping Philby and betraying the country that gave her sanctuary and after Philby’s defection, Friedmann was allowed to return to East Germany.

There were many other Jewish women communist spies. In 1939 one of the Cambridge spies, Donald MacLean, was working at the British embassy in Paris where the Soviet spy overseeing him was Kitty Harris, a Jewess from the East End of London, with whom he was having an affair.  Her real NKVD courier role was not revealed until 2001 via the Venona files. (She eventually married Earl Browder, chairman of the CPUSA, the American Communist Party). She fled to the Soviet Union and died of alcoholism in Gorky in 1966.

Then there was Hildegard Pauline Ruth Gerwig, of German Jewish extraction, who married two non-Jewish scientist traitors in turn and is thought to have “run” both for the Soviets. First was Engelbert Broda, and the second was Alan Nunn May who worked deep within the British atomic bomb project.  Long suspected, Broda was only named as a spy in 2009.

The wartime BBC may have been a hive of communist fellow travellers but the groupthink leftism was not shared by every employee, and one in particular was patriotic and independent-minded enough to take his suspicions further. Eric Blair, who wrote under the pen name George Orwell, may have been a socialist but he detested Stalinism. Orwell listed those he thought too untrustworthy to be allowed to work in propaganda and sent it to his bosses; they included those who  “in my opinion are crypto-communists, fellow-travellers or inclined that way and should not be trusted as propagandists”.

When, in 2004, George Orwell’s list of unreliables and potential traitors was revealed it was met with outrage in left-wing circles. The list is not perfect. But as time has passed more and more of Orwell’s judgements have proved to be spot on. One of those he suspected was a Jewish political asylum seeker who became one of the most important spies in Britain. Peter Smollet was the name of a Daily Express correspondent who was born Hans Peter Smolka to a wealthy Jewish family in Vienna. He was already an NKVD agent when he hurriedly left Austria for Britain in the early thirties to escape a crackdown on communists. He arrived in Britain ostensibly working as a journalist, but MI5 already had a file on him because he was expelled from France for photographing a French armaments factory.

Nevertheless, well-connected, he soon landed plum jobs with the Daily Express, The Times and eventually BBC as roving European correspondent while at the same time being an agent for the Comintern (Communist International).

He covered the German entry into Prague at the behest of his boss at the BBC, Soviet mole Guy Burgess, and was also reporting to the other Soviet master spy Kim Philby. In 1961 Smollett was interrogated but was released through lack of evidence. He eventually fled, not to the Eastern bloc, but to the family landed estate in Austria and died, wealthy and comfortable, in 1980. He was finally confirmed as a Soviet agent by the Mitrokhin archive in 2003. Smollett, incidentally, got his revenge on George Orwell by persuading several publishers not to publish his allegorical novel Animal Farm, a seminal work of anti-totalitarianism.

In its coverage the BBC prefers to portray these wartime spy investigations as hysterical “Red Scares.” But in 1953 there was concern about the Jewish emigre head of the BBC’s Russian service who seemed to be bending over backwards to portray the Soviet Union in a positive light. He is said to have made the BBC Russian service as left-wing as the New Statesman and Nation. The name of this man Anatol Goldberg  was on a list of suspected fellow-travellers — or worse — submitted by a worried Conservative MP. Goldberg was initially defended but later discreetly shunted sideways and removed from this post, although he stayed as a commentator. In retirement Goldberg wrote an admiring biography of Stalin’s notorious genocidal propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg which was so one-sided even the New York Times found it hard to take. So what was the truth about Anatol Goldberg? The answer presumably lies in the archives of the KGB or MI5.

And what of Lord Victor Rothschild who, like his friend Kim Philby, was a wartime MI5 officer.  He owned an apartment at 5 Bentinck Street in Marylebone. At various times this raucous establishment hosted soirees that included at least three of the Cambridge spies as well as the notorious Zionist traitor John Strachey who became a Labour MP.

No conclusive proof of betrayal by Nathaniel Mayer Victor Rothschild has ever emerged, but rumours continue to swirl around his name. He denied any wrongdoing to the end of his life, but an Australian author and espionage expert Roland Perry was not convinced and accused him of being a spy in a book called The Fifth Man. Perhaps more time will tell.

Incidentally, what was the wealthy publisher, Viennese-born Lord Weidenfeld, doing among that nest of traitors in Bentinck Street? When he died last month he was lauded for his work in flying thousands of “Syrian refugees” into Poland and said it was the least he could do, having been a wartime refugee into Britain himself. What did he have in common with Philby, Burgess and MacLean?

It would be appropriate here to mention the well-known case of George Blake, who was born in Egypt to a Jewish father and English mother.  As a communist schoolboy he fled from wartime Netherlands to Britain and returned the country’s generosity by spying for the Soviets. He was caught, sentenced to 42 years in prison, but then escaped and was spirited behind the Iron Curtain by British peace campaigners. He is still alive at 93 and the unusual circumstances of his escape created a mini book and film industry which invariably treats him and his co-conspirators with great affection.

How sad so few of these authors and film makers sought to spare a thought for Blake’s victims.

Britain’s failure to prosecute wartime spies has become impossible to hide in recent years thanks to the opening of these archives. But there seems to be a silent consensus that there is one aspect of these failures which should not be probed too hard, and that is the ethnic dimension. As glaringly obvious as the predominant Jewishness of these spies, it is totally off limits as regards scrutiny or even comment.

This is a very brief survey but there are many other cases in the archives and many more questions than answers. What is in the unpublished files on notorious Stalinist apologist Eric Hobsbawm who was honoured by Tony Blair but kept under close wartime surveillance by MI5? Was the friendship between this fanatical wartime communist historian and Cambridge spy Guy Burgess entirely innocent?

And what of another Cambridge friend of the gregarious Guy Burgess and an open supporter of the Soviet Union, the Marxist physicist don J. D. Bernal? Today university buildings  are named after Bernal, a pioneer of crystallography, but in 1931 he organised two trips to Moscow where Cambridge scientists were politely grilled by their Soviet counterparts, much to the alarm of many.  Mysteriously, Bernal’s post-war scientific reputation has survived his espousal of the bogus Stalinist science of “Lysenkoism.” It also survived his receipt of the Stalin Peace Prize and his membership in the notorious communist-front World Peace Council. There are also worries about Churchill’s chief scientific adviser Lord Zuckerman, some of whose files remain closed.

And MI5 built a huge file on science popularizer Jacob Bronowski who became famous through his 1970’s television series The Ascent of Man. Bronowski, who worked in military research, was so loud and abrasive about his Soviet sympathies that he alarmed his colleagues, and MI5 labelled him a security risk. The BBC has since portrayed him as the victim of a monstrous injustice. But why was he blocked from working in atomic research?

The few of the proven Jewish traitors who have sought to exculpate themselves have explained that they were doing it for world peace, that in passing the secrets of the Atom Bomb to the Soviets that they helped create a fairer, more equal world.  How sad that in doing so it involved such a murderous stab in the back to the people who so generously took them in.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

74 Comments to "Britain’s Jewish Communist Traitors"

  1. Gustav Wasa's Gravatar Gustav Wasa
    February 27, 2016 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

    “Jewish refugee spy, the traitor scientist Klaus Fuchs”

    To my understanding Fuchs wasn’t Jewish.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      February 27, 2016 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

      A very good catch!

  2. T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
    February 26, 2016 - 5:58 pm | Permalink

    “Moscow State University has issued a textbook on Russian history that some are calling anti-Semitic because it counts the number of Jews in Soviet governments.

    The Russian Ministry of Education approved the book, which for the first time in a university history textbook provides the exact percentage of Jews in Soviet governments, and recommended it for history students.

    Co-authored by Moscow State history professors Alexander Barsenkov and Alexander Vdovin, the publication deals with Russian history between 1917 and 2004. Its underlying theme is interethnic relations in the Soviet Union focusing on the research of Alexander Barsenkov, who heads the laboratory of interethnic relations at Moscow State’s Social Systems Research Center.

    Part of the textbook’s foreword reads, “For the greater part of its 70-year history, the USSR was ruled by people of non-Russian nationality.” The authors write later, “By the 1930s, the Jewish nation was the leader among those represented in the Communist party and the state machinery, in Science and Art.”

    http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-News/Russian-textbook-seen-as-anti-Semitic

  3. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    February 26, 2016 - 1:59 pm | Permalink

    David Ashton,

    “Know your enemy at least as well as he thinks he knows himself.”

    Know your enemy at least as well as he or she thinks they know themselves.

    Today marks the anniversary of the Buffalo Creek Massacre. Do you think Hillary Rodham Clinton shed a tear then or now for the white working class victims?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_Creek_flood

  4. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    February 26, 2016 - 11:17 am | Permalink

    My short answer to Pierre de Craon now appears at the top of this thread, rather than after his request. I have already noticed and weighed the new Spectre haunting Europe, along with much else, including e.g. the Gatestone Institute and other “ziocon” opposition to non-white immigration.

    We should base our ideas on maximum evidence, not on conspiratorial suspicions, and avoid reactions like bludgeoning critics into “insensibility”. On Lenin’s imported Jewish revolutionaries, I have read Possony, Katkov, Zeman, Futrell, Sutton, the Sisson Documents & a few other sources, but have just ordered Michael Pearson’s “Sealed Train” to see if my information on this aspect needs much correction and expansion – as Keynes reputedly said, “When the facts change, I alter my opinions – what do YOU do?”

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      February 26, 2016 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

      Ashton is on the jewish surnames index:

      http://www.avotaynu.com/csi/csi-home.htm

      Some good evidence here:

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        February 27, 2016 - 7:37 am | Permalink

        So Ashton is a Jewish name, and therefore I must be a Jew! That would make my arguments ipso facto unsound!

        Ashton is a Gentile surname and town name in England, and my father was a Plymouth patriot, a church chorister, who volunteered to serve in the Navy, following family tradition, in WW1 and later joined Mosley’s British Union. My mother was of Berkshire ancestry with the Anglo-Saxon surname Dear. They married in an Essex Church where I was christened.

        My nose measurements and intact foreskin data on request if the Moderator or your resident SS lineage experts require them.

        I have not yet bothered to get David Duke’s particular booklet on Jewish supremacy, but books by (among others) Father Fahey, Arnold Leese, Frank Britton, William Joyce, Colin Jordan (who quotes the “Djugashvili” nonsense), Douglas Reed, the “Barnes Review” Udo Walendy booklet on Solzhenitsyn, Boris Brasol…&c &c are on my shelves with very many detailed, more scholarly studies.

        I have no sympathy for Hillary Goddamn Clinton and have said so on the American Renaissance website.

        I was thinking of subscribing to the print TOQ but the caliber of these comments about me are not encouraging.

      • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
        February 27, 2016 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

        Two brief comments, please, on these Duke videos, which are interesting, containing important and some perfectly defensible statements. (1) He notes the existence of decent Jews. (2) I listened to his talk on Trump (while finding it difficult to take my eyes off his pretty interviewer), but should mention that “The Jewish Chronicle” (London), February 24, reports that the Donald describes himself as a “great friend of Israel” and a Netanyahu ally who would come 100% to Israel’s defense. No more from me now.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      February 26, 2016 - 2:33 pm | Permalink

      We should base our ideas on maximum evidence, not on conspiratorial suspicions, and avoid reactions like bludgeoning critics into “insensibility”.

      It’s helpful to learn that Mr. Ashton’s self-proclaimed fair-mindedness doesn’t render him too shy to twist someone else’s words in aid of underlining his own virtuousness.

  5. scm's Gravatar scm
    February 26, 2016 - 10:37 am | Permalink

    I have not read all the comments here but wanted to point out that in the February 2016 issue of Town and Country magazine under the heading of “Philanthropy”, is a brief article on David Miliband the jew politician/diplomat. He is called a “Border Warrior” and a leader of the world’s largest organizations for resettling refugees: International Rescue Committee. The NGO “founded in 1933 with the help of Albert Einstein”, manages more than $675 million in grants which allows them to assist migrants.
    Isn’t it brilliant the way organized jews get to look like philanthropists as they pursue their genocidal agenda?

  6. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    February 26, 2016 - 6:09 am | Permalink

    I carry my own water, without fear or favor.

    The false implication that I am some sort of shabbas goy, hired or just stupid, who should be beaten with a blunt weapon, tells us more about Pierre de Craon than about me, my motives or my extensive study over many years of both communism and “antisemitism”. I did not actually recite the names of Jewish achievers or of Jewish anti-communists, and will forgo any such temptation, pointlessly here.

    I hold that any study of historical or sociological phenomena should be as thorough and as objective as possible, and this also applies to groups or individuals correctly identified as opponents. This include the analysis of motivations – religious, commercial, political, &c. Kevin MacDonald himself attempted precisely this with his original trilogy, and in my view did an excellent job on Freudians and the New Left, though less so on the Bolsheviks.

    Know your enemy at least as well as he thinks he knows himself.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      February 26, 2016 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

      I carry my own water, without fear or favor.

      And you carry it right to the top of the thread rather than reply in the context where the critique was made!

      NB: Mr. Ashton’s grand dismissal of me was prompted by a comment to be found at the bottom of this thread.

  7. David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
    February 25, 2016 - 11:12 am | Permalink

    There are differences of opinion about various statistics available in the Soviet case. Denis Fahey is not the only source. That people of Jewish background were prominent and influential in the USSR, despite Stalin’s purges in the later 1930s and again after the war, is generally acknowledged, but the real issue is why Jews joined communist and socialist movements: anti-Tsarism and later anti-Nazism were – unsurprisingly – factors. Regarding motives, it is only fair to read critically what Jews have said and thought; e.g. the autobiographies of Henry Miller, Eugene Lyons, David Aaronovitch. As Norman Cantor noted in “Sacred Chain” there were empirical data supporting the view in the 1920s-30s that Jews were conspicuous in both international communism and international finance, as Bakunin had observed long before. Important links existed between the two, but one must beware of disinformation and some forgeries in their assessment.

  8. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    February 25, 2016 - 10:46 am | Permalink

    Sir Charles Pipkins

    It is not just David Cameron and his Jewish roots.

    I have met several English people at various fora who in private confidented to me there is an “Immigrant” problem and the solution is “washing out” the “Black ” and “Brown” through intermarriages, trying to upgrade Africans/Blacks/Indians into “elite society” etc. Tony Blair, another crooked person like Cameron, began this upgrade after 1997.

    The fundamental problem is England (less Scotland, Ireland or Wales) is a class-based society. So it seems to Jews and Cameron the solution to an African/Black underclass (who commit most crimes and dependency) is “upgrading” them i.e create Black English Lords and Black Scotsmen etc.

    However, its a different matter for the muslim underclass who are not interested in becoming Englishmen, Scotsmen, Welshmen or Irishmen but want to impose their culture on the host nation.

    This is the nonsense that nationalists in Britain must reject or face extinction. Someone called “Endzog” has posted somewhere a “Oxford White Students Union.” This is self-preservation instinct the Britons need. The time for pretences is gone. Jews are your worst enemy not Africans or Imdians or muslims. We on the continent know Jews better.

  9. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    February 24, 2016 - 5:27 am | Permalink

    Florian,

    Can’t never did anything. As for Trump, he’s called a start!

  10. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    February 24, 2016 - 4:04 am | Permalink

    Are Andrea Ostrov Letania (aka Freiboden) and Gubbler Chechenova the same person?

  11. Sir Charles Pipkins's Gravatar Sir Charles Pipkins
    February 24, 2016 - 4:03 am | Permalink

    The current British leader David Cameron is continuing the proud Jewish trend of subverting White Britain. He wants to increase blacks at elite British institutions and less in prisons (as always at the expense of the common White Man). You won’t be surprised to learn his mom is mostly Jewish!

    • John's Gravatar John
      February 24, 2016 - 7:41 am | Permalink

      “He wants to increase blacks at elite British institutions”

      That oughta be interesting. In the US, the average SAT score for wealthy black students is less than that of poor whites.

      http://www-cgi.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/presents/index.gap.html

      • Lou's Gravatar Lou
        February 24, 2016 - 10:42 pm | Permalink

        Old news. research Prince George County in Maryland and its freeway, aka,’The Congo Bypass.’

  12. David W's Gravatar David W
    February 24, 2016 - 12:43 am | Permalink

    I hope everyone here is doing their bit to remove Jewish propaganda books and publications from their libraries etc. Just remove them and dispose of them. I know it is a daunting task as there is so much of this rubbish but we have to start somewhere, and the more people who do it…
    All these fictional ‘holocaust’ memoirs and disgustingly biased biographies etc., simply get rid of them.
    Our young should not be subjected to this Jewish filth as we have been.

    Let’s hear people’s own ideas for activism/resistance, for ending the Jewish empire forever.

    We are at war with these degenerates, we just didn’t know it.

  13. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    February 23, 2016 - 10:29 pm | Permalink

    (Mod. Note: Gubbler, perhaps you didn’t take my last warning seriously. The comment section is for COMMENTS, not book-length articles. I’ve truncated your comment to only a few lines. Feel free to re-write it and re-submit, but edit it down to NO MORE than 25% of your usual length. On-Topic COMMENTs of a few paragraphs, with one or two links at most, are welcome. Long essays are not.)

    The Conservative vs Liberal conflict is like between Jews vs Christians.

    This may seem counter-intuitive because in the US(and the West), Jews have often been associated with the ‘left’ and Christianity was associated with the ‘right’.

    But the core dynamics between Jews and Christians is conservative vs liberal, with Jews standing for conservatism.

    ….

    • gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
      February 24, 2016 - 11:51 pm | Permalink

      Rotfl. You don’t have to post/publish them.

      I wrote that stuff more in the manner of ‘letter to the publisher’.

      It’s too nutty for an Occidental Observer article, and I don’t expect my stuff to be used as such.

      If you wanna read them, read em.

      If you wanna just toss them, just toss them and delete them.

      It doesn’t matter.

      Just offering ‘food for thought’ in case you got the taste for that stuff.

  14. Stritchplatte's Gravatar Stritchplatte
    February 23, 2016 - 8:28 pm | Permalink

    Alfonse does not let on about the affair he had in Cairo with Mohammad. Intense, seductive, exciting, orgasmic and delightful! His asshole was sore for the next three days. When he arrive in Tel Avi his anal warts had burst and he had lost a lot of blood. Nearly unconscious, he was rushed to Ben Gurion Bethhamas Hospital and was openly lauded as a “survivor”, one of the 6 million chosen by god himself to survive the Holocaust. The searing hot boiling Holocaust of having his ass repeatedly penetrated by more than a dozen of his fellow Sinagog queer multicultural homo faggot Imans and rabid rabbis was of such an ecstatic experience that he was declared the Hanku, the anointed one. Covered with shit and spewing it out of his mouth and enjoying every moment as a moment as if a short sell on wall street.

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      February 24, 2016 - 8:46 am | Permalink

      What is that ? A short novel? A real fact ? Who’s Alfonse ?

  15. February 23, 2016 - 8:17 pm | Permalink

    Thanks to Francis Carr Begbie for this excellent article about a subject long forgotten.

    Once you notice the pattern everything becomes very clear.

    Intelligence agencies are at the heart of every tribe; White/European people are supposed to forget ours, while Jews are supposed to idealize theirs.

  16. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    February 23, 2016 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

    It seems like the world is learning all the wrong lessons from WWII, but then, what-happened matters less than how-it-is-spun. As long as Jews spin the narrative, things will get worse for Arabs/Muslims in the Middle East and worse for Germans in Europe.

    We know that the main lesson of WWII is LEAVE OTHER NATIONS ALONE.
    But Jewish-controlled US invades and messes up the Middle East and North Africa. And then Jews urge Europe to be invaded by massive numbers of migrants.

    So, the world learns nothing.
    Russians learned the proper lesson from the 1990s. DO NOT TRUST GLOBALIST JEWS AND DON’T HAND THE KEY TO YOUR NATION TO THE GLOB. But Jewish Glob seems very angry that Russians drew their own lessons than relying on the Jewish Narrative that says Russia’s only hope is to… have massive homo parades and celebrate the likes of Pussy Riot desecrating churches.

    Same goes for blacks and Nazi Germany. There is new movie out about Jesse Owens called RACE. I haven’t seen it and don’t intend to. It sounds pretty dumb.
    According to the Jewish narrative, Jews and blacks are brothers under the skin. Just as Nazis persecuted Jews, white American ‘racists’ oppressed blacks. And there was ideological commonality between Nazis and American ‘racists’ as part of the ‘right’.
    In contrast, blacks and Jews, as part of the ‘left’, were for more equality and social justice.
    There is no doubt some truth to this. Hitler was a radical racist, and there were elements in the American Right that held extreme and demented views on race.
    And Jews and blacks had some of the same problems, and as minorities in white gentile majority nations, they had something to gain by working together.
    So, there is some truth to the Jewish narrative.

    But there’s another way to see this. First, the Jewish-black alliance is extremely problematic because the two groups excel in opposite fields. Jews are masters of brain power, blacks are masters of brawn power. So, for all their talk of equality, Jews were bound to become a helluva richer and more influential than blacks in elite fields. Indeed, Jews are many times more successful and more powerful than white gentiles. Jews make all this noise about ‘white privilege’ to distract us from Jewish privilege. Also, as blacks are tougher and more aggressive, many were bound to grow resentful of Jews and attack Jews in the streets, and this is why Jewish Ed Koch referred to black males as ‘animals’ and why Jewish Bloomberg pushed ‘stop and frisk’ very hard.

    But there’s another reason why it’s too simplistic to go with the narrative of wonderful Jews and wonderful blacks united against evil Nazis who hated both Jews and blacks.
    For one thing, Nazis, loathsome as they were, did not rule over blacks, and as such, don’t have a negative record against them. Whatever their ideology, the Nazis treated black athletes very well in the 36 games, and Hitler shook Jesse Owen’s hands. Also, most black POWs in German camps were treated like any other soldier. Many said that Germans treated them better than they were treated by whites in America.

    Furthermore, contrary to Jewish mythology, plenty of Jews(even Liberal and leftist ones) harbored hostile and distrusting attitude about blacks. If we judge Jews by their actions than their words, the fact that so many fled to white suburbs once integration became a reality tells us a lot about how they really feel about the Negroes.
    Also, plenty of Jewish agents and businessmen ripped off black athletes and artists, even though, to be sure, even blacks who make a lot of money tend to use them badly. Also, Jews ripped off not only blacks but whites and even fellow Jews, as Bob Dylan found out.

    But here’s the most important aspect of how the Jewish Narrative fails when it comes to blacks and Nazis. While it’s true that National Socialism had a vile racial element to it, much of its themes and focus would actually have been better for the black community than the kind of foul filth that that the Jewish entertainment industry pushed onto blacks.

    Indeed, black-Americans would do much better if they went National Socialist than listened to Jewish advice on culture and morality. Of course, we mean National Socialism minus its demented racial ideology of supremacism, imperialism, and annihilationism. There was much that was good about the domestic and national policy of National Socialism. It was about the importance of culture, health, unity, togetherness, family, order, discipline, balance of capitalism and socialism, respect for nature, love of community, preservation of roots and tradition, acceptance of the good things of modernity, and etc.

    The problem of Nation of Islam, of course, is that it mirrors the racial pathologies of National Socialism, i.e. it is a black supremacist ideology. But some of its themes about family, personal responsibility, men acting like serious adults than stupid punks, women acting like serious women than bitch ass ho’s, and etc are positive. To be sure, Farrakhan the black Grinch is a vile and loathsome character who, despite all his talk of virtue and morality, shamelessly hogs spotlight like a diva and gets himself involved with nonsense issues like Mike Tyson’s rape trial and Beyonce’s idiotic trash act.

    But the thing is the mode of National Socialism would be much better for blacks. Blacks need to develop some kind of immunity and resistance to the culture of excess, depravity, mayhem, indulgence, and trashiness that is pushed onto them by Jews everywhere. It’s like Jews wanna reduce everyone into a pimp or whore addicted to MTV. Jews want white girls to end up like Miley Cyrus and black kids to ape gangster rappers and ruin their lives.

    National Socialism said NO to Jewish financial exploitation, pop cultural degradation, moral decadence, and etc. Unfortunately, Hitler and his henchmen turned out to be perverts of justice in their own way.
    But we can save the baby while tossing the bathwater, just like the good side of communism — respect for the worker, humanist ethos, and decent kind of feminism that values women as comrades in work and life — can be salvaged while the radical elements are rejected.

    Yes, the Nazis had racially hostile views about blacks, whereas Jews claimed to sympathize with them(though not so much about Palestinians who ended up like Poles under German rule), but Nazis were nevertheless moralists(at least domestically) invested in reviving the German nation, whereas Jews are immoralists(at least when it comes to goyim whose minds, souls, and bodies are degraded and debased by Jewish control of culture and entertainment)invested in demoralizing and degrading gentile communities with stuff like ‘pussy riot’, ‘homo celebration’, and lena dunham’s mainstreaming of pornography.

    It just so happens that blacks won’t fix their problems unless they turn moralist, and they won’t get moralism from Jews who encourage blacks to act like animals and indulge in dumb politics of throwing apelike tantrums(at white goyim).

    So, while blacks have a right to appreciate Jewish role in the Civil Rights Movement, they need to be wary of Jewish role in the Moral Degradation Movement.
    If blacks were to take anti-racism of the Civil Rights Era and fuse it with the cultural moralism of National Socialism, they will be better off.

    Just as there is something to learn from Jews, there is something to condemn in Jews.
    Just as there is something to condemn in Nazi Germans, there is something to learn from Nazi Germans Though Hitler threw away a great opportunity, his formula for national renewal and re-invigoration was in many ways successful, and it owed a lot to clamping down on the dark side of Jewish influence in finance, culture, and media.
    We’ve seen what Jews are capable of in the Russia of the 1990s. They raped Russia worse than Jews raped Germany in the Weimar period.

    So, blacks should say to Jews , “Thank you for the help in civil rights but NO THANK YOU for the moral degradation of our community.”
    And blacks should say to Nazi Germany, “No thank you for your white supremacist racial attitudes, but THANK YOU for showing what a people can do when they unite and work towards building a healthy culture of order, unity, and discipline independent of nasty and hostile Jewish influence.”

    In America, blacks got the freedom but also the degeneration that comes from falling prey to the influence of Jewish machinations of decadence and degeneration among goyim.
    Look at Hyman Roth’s vision for Cuba. A whore house. As Jews like Sheldon Adelson see it, the world should be casino owned by Jews, and goyim should work like animals and spend their money on meaningless vice that will just make Jews richer.
    We need to be free of such moral degradation that makes Jews richer while making us more dependent and addicted to the industry and culture of vice.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      February 23, 2016 - 5:27 pm | Permalink

      DON’T HAND THE KEY TO YOUR NATION TO THE GLOB.

      Amazingly enough there was a Steve McQueen movie [1958] called The Glob.

      Plot

      During one long night in a small rural Pennsylvania town in July 1957, teenager Steve Andrews (Steve McQueen) and his girlfriend, Jane Martin (Aneta Corsaut), are kissing on a lovers’ lane when they see a meteor crash beyond the next hill. Steve decides to look for it. An old man (Olin Howland) living nearby finds it first. When he pokes the meteorite with a stick, it breaks open, and the small jelly-like glob inside attaches itself to his hand. In pain and unable to scrape or shake it loose, the old man runs onto the road, where he is nearly struck by Steve’s car. Steve and Jane take him to Doctor Hallen (Stephen Chase).
      Doctor Hallen is about to leave for a medical conference, but anesthetizes the man and sends Steve and Jane back to the impact site to gather information. Hallen decides he must amputate the man’s arm since it is being consumed by the growing Glob. Before he can, however, the Glob completely consumes the old man, then Hallen’s nurse, and finally the doctor himself, all the while increasing in size.

      Steve and Jane return to the office in time for Steve to witness the doctor’s death. They go to the police station and return to the house with Lieutenant Dave (Earl Rowe) and Sergeant Bert (John Benson). However, there is no sign of the creature or its victims, and Bert dismisses Steve’s story as a teenage prank. Steve and Jane are taken home by their parents, but they later sneak out.
      In the meantime, the Glob consumes a mechanic at a repair shop. The Glob grows in size every time it consumes something. At the Colonial Theater, which is showing a midnight screening of Daughter of Horror, Steve recruits Tony (Robert Fields) and some of his friends to warn people about the menace. When Steve notices that his father’s grocery store is unlocked, he and Jane go inside. The janitor is nowhere to be seen. Then the couple are cornered by the Glob; they seek refuge in the walk-in freezer. The Glob oozes in under the door, but retreats. Steve and Jane gather their friends and set off the town’s fire and air-raid alarms. The townspeople and police still refuse to believe Steve. Meanwhile, the Glob enters the Colonial Theater and engulfs the projectionist before oozing into the auditorium consuming a number of the audience. Steve is finally vindicated when screaming people flee from the theater.

      Jane’s young brother, Danny (Keith Almoney), fires at the Glob with his cap gun before running into the nearby diner. Jane, Danny, and Steve become trapped in that diner, along with the manager and a waitress. The Glob—now an enormous red mass from the people it has consumed—engulfs the diner. Dave has a connection made from his police radio to the diner’s phone, telling those in the diner to get into the cellar before they try to bring a live power line down onto the Glob.

      When it sounds quiet over the phone line, Bert shoots the wire, it falls onto the Glob, but the Glob is unaffected, and the diner is set ablaze. The manager uses a CO2 fire extinguisher on the fire. Steve notices that this causes the Glob to recoil, then remembers that the creature also retreated from the freezer. Shouting in hopes of being picked up on the open phone line, Steve manages to tell Dave about the Glob’s vulnerability to cold. Jane’s father, Mr. Martin (Elbert Smith), knows there are 20 such extinguishers at the school, and leads Steve’s friends to the high school to retrieve them. Returning, the brigade of extinguisher-armed students and police first drive the Glob away from the diner, then freeze it, saving Steve, Jane and the others.

      Dave requests an Air Force heavy-lift cargo aircraft to transport the Glob to the Arctic, where it is parachuted to the ice. Dave says that while the Glob is not dead, at least it has been stopped. To this, Steve Andrews replies with the last line in the film, “Yeah, as long as the Arctic stays cold.” [Ickipedia]

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        February 23, 2016 - 11:34 pm | Permalink

        Thanks for lightening the tone, T. J. After gubbler’s book-length comment, heaven knows we could all benefit from a wink and a poke in the ribs.

    • Islandman's Gravatar Islandman
      February 24, 2016 - 4:47 am | Permalink

      “For one thing, Nazis, loathsome as they were” I stopped reading at that point.

  17. Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
    February 23, 2016 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

    By pure chance I have found another guy, I believe: the writer Erich Fried, a rich ( first surprise) Jew from Wien, leftist (second surprise) who fled Austria as soon as the Anschluss happened, arriving in London. He worked at BBC (third surprise), took Engliah citizenship, without renouncing his Austrian one, wrote novels, poems and articles, came back to Austria to live in his country estate and then died in Baden Baden ( fourth surprise), in the ’80.
    If you read his page on Wiki, it seems almost copied from the article, except for the spying ( but who knows ?).

  18. stefanovitch's Gravatar stefanovitch
    February 23, 2016 - 11:54 am | Permalink

    “Britain’s Jewish Communist Traitors” Traitors? To whom/what? certainly not to Jewish interests. It is a pity we do not take a leaf out of the Jewish manual and put our interests before everyone elses. It’s not the Jews who are traitors, but our own elites who are perfectly happy to sell us out for a shekel or two.

    • February 24, 2016 - 3:48 am | Permalink

      This would mean that we should accept Jews as a foreign and ever secluded group which never works for anyone else than themselves.
      It would be realistic as history again and again show thats what is happening, but how would it be possible to officially go for such a policy?
      The answer is as you say – our elite are traitors misrepresenting us.

      And the history of UK that also effects US is the “Norman” conquest, followed up by the Plantagenet Kings, and then followed by the Marrano conquest in the name of Liberalism in the time of the “English civil war”. Cromwells failure to rule were fixed by William Orange’s revolution.
      And today English aristocracy is saturated by those alien to English interests.

  19. LDWP's Gravatar LDWP
    February 23, 2016 - 9:03 am | Permalink

    I’ve given up on Americans exercising critical thinking any longer. The last election with 84% of incumbents returning to their seats is proof. You can go on Tea Party and various other Conservative venues and witness otherwise intelligent, well-meaning people writing “Obama did it”. Like dumb driven cattle…they are following the call. Allow me to tell you that Obama is just a useful tool who loves seeing whitey suffer. People are so ignorant now, and know so little about history that they can’t understand the innate characteristics of Blacks to be distrustful of whites…has been nurtured to the point that Blacks are no more than robots programed to hate and destroy.

    People, to this day, still have not completely connected the dots as to why the Black POTOS, who can’t string three sentences together without a teleprompter, came from nowhere, almost unknown, and in a very short time, with the help of the clueless whites, cult controlled medias, (who are the modern day Bolsheviks) and Blacks, was PLACED as dictator of the once brightest beacon of freedom ever known to man…America. The modern day Bolsheviks believed they had sufficiently enmeshed into the consciousness of Western culture, the white guilt and self-hate needed to allow the genocide of their own kind. The divide and conquer worked as planned. Can’t you just see clueless fools, all in lockstep, calling me “racist” while drawing little tin hats? Fools not knowing that the word “racist” was a Leon Trotsky, Joseph Stalin bullet to silence dissent. Have any of you read about Russia being a white orthodox Christian country prior to the Russian Revolution? Anyone know about who created Communism? Ever heard of the Holodomor and the cult that murdered millions by starvation? Have you always just believed the Bolsheviks were Russian?

    Aleksandra Solzhenitsyn, a survivor of that era, prior to his death revealed much of what has been censored in Western countries. He offers an eye witness testimony:

    Solzhenitsyn writes: “You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured & slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion & conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”
    (As you read, understand history is repeating itself…this time not in Russia but across America and Europe).

    No one uttered a word when Ted Kennedy, at the directives of Jewish Jacob Javits, declared “America too white”, then proceeded, with the blessings of all the cult owned Medias and cult directed congress to craft legislation to bring people of very diverse, heathen, waring cultures into our borders with zero checks and balances. The actions of those in the shadows stopped our ancestral families that wished to also legally migrate to America while placing a dagger to the heart of our values, institutions, and culture. Our white ancestry would have assimilated and built a future for our children. Put into your search engine, “leaders of white countries that have called for whites to be a minority in their own country”, and it will amaze you. Joe Biden and Cameron are the latest. Wars planned behind curtains to enrich bankers tend to shed light on why whites are extinct. However, unlike the eagles, we will not be given a safe haven and protected from usury so that we may heal and grow in numbers.

    When you view the videos of savagery in Italy, Sweden, Germany, Austria, Greece, etc…understand not one person entering is a refugee. What you are viewing is a well thought out plan for the equal distribution of starvation, murder and mayhem. Have you yet taken my advice and read about the Holodomor? Has anyone bothered to read and share the book, “Practical Idealism”, written by the Father of the European Union, Richard Kalergi?

    Why do so many foolishly parrot the lies of the Medias? Here is a lesson in critical thinking:
    Lie (1) “The invaders are temporary workers needed to fill the work force”.
    What work force? Our jobs were outsourced to other countries. We have by a conservative estimate…93 million unemployed and another 60 million underemployed.
    Lie (2) “America needs high tech workers”.
    There are not enough high tech jobs created in the course of a year to accommodate all the LEGAL young graduates leaving colleges and universities.
    Lie (3) “They are a multiracial experiment”.
    Understand people are not rats in a lab. ”All races and ethnicities are “tribal” & separatist in nature – these innate characteristics of human nature must be accepted and public policy should be developed with such characteristics in mind. Hence, racial/ethnic homogeneity should be encouraged by policy makers. Pursuing racial/ethnic homogeneity is the most humane way to organize the world’s peoples”.
    Lie (4) “Europe and America are being invaded because it’s the answer to a shrinking population”.
    If it is “low birthrates” this cult is worried about, why not get the banks and continuous invading parasites off the backs of Americans so they can afford families. The same cult of evil controls all Medias, Hollywood, they have insinuated themselves in every form of media in the host countries. With the weapon of denying free speech to you to name who they are…they have been able to float any lie. They are in positions of control in the alphabet soup of governmental departments in every Western Country. Know that these are the same people who can be found at the other end of the cameras promoting Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood and using the wealth they have acquired through usury to buy scientists to develop food to change sexes and DNA while spouting the lie of man-made global warming. They can also be found promoting more death to accommodate their 500 million max population desires.
    Each and every time I see reports pointing to America’s demise, I understand there is nothing new under the sun. The same old cult with the same old methodology: Intimidation with political correctness and charges of racism as weapons… are at it again. Winston Churchill, like him or not, and he, whether meaning to or not, certainly called this one right…except the enormous empire this time is America:
    “A world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America has gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and has become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”
    http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/WSC/WSCwrote1920.html

  20. Last Saxon's Gravatar Last Saxon
    February 23, 2016 - 5:04 am | Permalink

    The three destructive tools Jews have used to destroy the West are;

    1. Christianity especially philosemitic variants of the American Biblebelt.
    2. Parasitic Capitalism whose full manifestation is America Fortune 500 Inc and City of London plc.
    3. Marxism with its variants like Cultural Marxism under which you can list multiculturalism, feminism, gay rights, race-mixing and more.

    The most maligned man in history saw these evils hence his war on Slavic Jewish Commies. Others like Heinrich Himmler and Alfred Rosenberg looked to less Jewish-tainted pre-Christian Germanic history for inspiration.

    Our salvation lies in reclaiming our history and rejecting all these Jewish-corrupted systems. We need a theology of blood not universalism.

    • Whitey Lew's Gravatar Whitey Lew
      February 23, 2016 - 3:36 pm | Permalink

      Even if you were right you’ve got lay off the anti-Christian haranguing. You do more harm than good.

      • February 24, 2016 - 4:25 am | Permalink

        The prime example of philosemitism is the Scofield Bible. Scofield the petty gangster were picked out to insert pro-zionistic comments in the Bible and thus create zionist loving Christians. They are now many and Hagee is one of the most visible.
        What I find even more amazing than the appearance of the Scofield bible is that the publisher is Oxford university press, and they have been updating the Zionist propaganda in all new versions of the book, meaning Oxford U Press is actively pursuing a prophet role. Much of these commentaries are very assertive and bringing new information and also new threats – such as God is very vengeful against those who harm Jews. I find that highly revolutionary as Christianity always have been the most conservative of all. And shouldn’t Oxford University Press rather take care of being a voice of science?
        The whole of the Scofield story is worth reading about.

        Isn’t it good for Christianity to avoid being hijacked for alien purposes? Why doesn’t Christians themselves search for who is behind the OU press and who writes themselves into their Bible?

    • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
      February 24, 2016 - 2:48 am | Permalink

      I disagree with the premise that Christianity is destructive.

      Iceland is a kind of “Christian backwater” where these Jewish led destructive, anti-White movements have only taken root in the core of the city and then only in the past ten or twenty years. They are markedly behind the rest of the White world with respect to “boots on the ground” Judeo-liberalism.

      My young Icelandic friends here can tell of stories where they remember their grand parents living in earthen floor, stone built semi-subterranean sod covered huts.

      Although the Jew influenced press here (pulp and paper industries, printing presses, and media content are mostly procured from Jewish Terrorist interests) has ensnared the minds of the masses, the population has not yet given up its common sense to the deformed Jew.

      The working class are surprisingly open minded and intellectually malleable
      (markedly different from the violent spasms exhibited by psychotic by Jewish Induction Liberals in the rest of the West) and impeccably honest!
      Meth addicts find pricy Apple iPhones on public transport and when discovering that the owner is a little ten year old girl, they return the iPhone! Only in Iceland!!

      I can not help but attribute this behaviour at least in part to the very strong legacy-influence of the Icelandic Lutheran Church.

      The trust and cooperation within society (a legacy of its extremely pious Christian past) is being constantly undermined by the Jewish media onslaught.

      The threat is not Christianity, but the predators dressed as Christians preying upon the Christians.

      But the way things are going, Icelanders are poised to avoid the massive Jew engineered influx of Foreign Incompatibles and skip directly ahead to Hungarian style lockdowns and deportations.

      • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
        February 24, 2016 - 8:26 am | Permalink

        And they don’t enter the EU! Happy people!

        • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
          February 27, 2016 - 1:37 pm | Permalink

          There are many politicians pushing for EU entry, which would be suicide for them. Bad enough that they are in the Schengen Agreement.

      • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
        February 27, 2016 - 1:35 pm | Permalink

        @roy
        Indeed, their view of religion is different and deeply rooted.
        Ask your Icelandic friends about the Icelandic version of Roman Catholicism as practised at Skalholt.

    • John's Gravatar John
      February 24, 2016 - 7:50 am | Permalink

      The “Christian” church has changed as radically as the rest of western society over the last fifty years or so. Openly gay clergy and support for homosexuality in general etc. Some denominations are even willing to get rid of the cross which proves that they aren’t Christians at all.

      Matthew 5:13
      13 “You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot.

  21. Florian's Gravatar Florian
    February 23, 2016 - 1:33 am | Permalink

    I just don’t see how English-peaking countries will come out of this horrible mess.

    Jewish power is so entrenched in almost all white English-speaking countries even South Africa.

    Even if Trump wins as Professor MacDonald and nationalists are hoping, how he will even beginning to reverse the Jewish powerbase? He has only talked of a wall but US foreign policy and other issues in favor of Israel nothing. He is just speaking what nationalists what to hear. Think about it, if Jews can gang up against Jimmy Carter for his views on Palestine what about if Trump as president tries to cut aid to Israel or theor measures? I see impeachment or removal since most politicians are in Jewish pay pockets.

    Jewish economic, soial and political power as seen in Britain is so entrenched plus as some commentators are pointing out the local people see Jews as friends not enemies. Even those who know Jews are a problem are too afraid to speak out for profession, social or economic sanctions especially with all the Holocaust laws etc. Some of these Jewish people are even your relatives from the many intermarriages.

    Sorry. I think America like Britain, Canada, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand are doomed. It will just take another economic crisis to shake things up or some other natural event.

    In America there are already separatist groups. It is even surprising these people have not done anything under the almost four years of Obama.

    A very deadly love affair.

    • February 23, 2016 - 11:07 am | Permalink

      The solution could lie in Trump following through on his hint at opening a real inquiry into 9/11. If the light gets shone on that can of worms their jig is up.

    • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
      February 23, 2016 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

      In Germany most could not imagine the wall coming down. But it did, whether on purpose or for other reasons. The Soviet Union is history. So is the Roman Empire. The ANC in South Africa is fast on its way to become history. So is Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe.

      If all fails, history will eventually set the narrative. By that I mean that everyone eventually dies, even the evil persons of high intellect. This remixes the cards and opens new possibilities. But for that there always must be a core of decent and able people who have in depth insight, and pass that knowledge on to able and willing descendants, so that they can carry on the struggle.

      If all fails, well, then we will not know about it, since we will have long passed away by then. But for now someone must be willing to carry the flame of civilization, or everything will fail much sooner, that is for sure.

    • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
      February 24, 2016 - 2:12 am | Permalink

      I’ve seen almost every rally, interview, press conference, and Jew-spoof of Trump in the LSM (Lame Stream Media) available on the web.

      Trump has broken many taboo topics successfully:
      1) Media lies
      2) Mexican criminal invasion and referred to Israel’s success with walls
      3) Islamic terror and banning them outright
      4) Outsourcing industrial output and taxing offending conglomerates and nations
      5) Hedge fund manager (euphemism for “Jews” if ever I saw one) tax loop holes
      6) Parable of “The Snake”
      7) Calling himself a WASP and promising to represent WASP and Christian interests
      8) Cleaning up the drug addiction problem
      9) Corruption in the political class vis-à-vis Special Interest Lobby Groups (Even a retard in the USA knows Jews are at the top of the mother of all Lobby Groups)
      10) Started calling people “Liars” instead of the politically correct “speaking untruths” or “not true”
      11) Made repeated reference to Racial Groups (i.e Chinese, Japanese, Mexicans…, even used “you people” (meaning “Jews”) at the RJC appearance)
      12) Waterboarding, gun control, military support, throwing out disruptors mercilessly, being too nice, getting tough, PC BS,
      13) Insurance premium increase via Obongo-care
      14) and there must be many more…

      I’ve even seen a Youtube of Ted Cruze being booed off stage by anti-Israeli Christians during an evangelical rally while he spouted unflinchingly about Israel being the USA’s staunch ally…
      Really inspiring to see Christians finally waking up to the snake that is Jewry.

      It’s only a matter of time before there will be no taboo topic left to shatter except the 800 tonne, naked, Jewish gorilla-camel hybrid in the room.

      Even our own people admit that support for White nationalist causes has never been stronger.

      Whether you are correct or not about the White countries being doomed has yet to be decided, but one thing is for sure…, the fight in “our” favour has taken a marked turn for the better and we had better keep double down on the pressure in any way possible if we want to prove you wrong!!

  22. Gordo's Gravatar Gordo
    February 22, 2016 - 5:39 pm | Permalink

    Lord This, Lord That, sick joke, to Hell with them.

  23. Arthur's Gravatar Arthur
    February 22, 2016 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

    THE INSANE THINGS JUDAISTS SAY—“WE WERE ONCE REFUGEES.”

    Thanks for the great article, Mr. Begbie. The Judaist Alf Dubs claims that he was once a refugee so UK must admit more refugees is strange in every way you look at it.

    First of all, if Judaists support the alien invasion, why don’t they take the Syrian “refugees” to Israel, which is much closer? Instead, they call aliens “infiltrators” there, and are building fences and the world’s largest prison there and even expelling asylum speakers or sending them to Sweden, each of which facts can be verified by online searches.

    About his second claim that we were once refugees, that is odd too. When I was young, suppose, I was lazy but my uncle let me stay with him. Does that mean my uncle must now let every lazy man in the world stay with him?

    About their lie that we were once “refugees” in Egypt, that is a hoax of the highest proportion. Just imagine, how could a white person be a slave in Egypt of black people? It is impossible to have been in that situation, and for white women to have even survived, because the white woman slave would have been assaulted by her black Egyptian master in a day. It is just impossible for white women (like modern Jewish) to have been slaves for black Egyptians in ancient times, where there was no law or order, no roads, no phones, no electricity, etc. and have survived.

    The fact is, white-skinned Judaists never were slaves in Egypt, there was no Exodus and there was no Moses.

    See: mosesneverexisted.zohosites.com

    This hoax of claiming that we were once “refugees” in Egypt (so must support 3rd world immigration) shows the moral bankruptcy. lunacy and depravity of the Judaists.

  24. February 22, 2016 - 3:58 pm | Permalink

    It’s been said that women are more ‘liberal’ than men, and politically/ideologically this may be true. But at the fundamental biological level, women are more hierarchical and ‘rightist’ than men. If the ‘right’ is about hierarchy, women are all about hierarchy when it comes to sex and marriage.

    Women don’t seek men who equal with women in every respect. They seek out men who are bigger, stronger, smarter, richer, and more aggressive.

    The rise of feminism was less against white male oppression as white female disgruntlement at increasing white male wimpiness. Though feminism was ostensibly about equality, women were breaking out in search of stronger and tougher men. Look at the latest installment of feminism, and it’s all about whores putting out to rapper thugs and athletes, often black.

    So, feminism is a lie. Ideologically, it talks the talk of equality, but biologically, it craves men who represent power and aggression way beyond that of any woman.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      February 23, 2016 - 5:14 am | Permalink

      Women are hierarchical but the girls “putting out” for rappers and athletes prove only that media has effectively overpowered our best instincts, brainwashing a generation into embracing their lower natures as good goyim/cattle should. The ‘strength’ shown by black rappers and athletes would be useful in a zombie apocalypse scenario but in the 21st century impulse control and the ability to think and reason are superior tools to brawn.

      • Ace's Gravatar Ace
        February 23, 2016 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

        During a ZA that “strength” would be useful for carrying stuff and digging holes, but that’s about it. Leadership, planning, Intel? Ha.

    • roy albrecht's Gravatar roy albrecht
      February 23, 2016 - 8:55 am | Permalink

      This is so true of women in Iceland. They really seek strong men to breed with even if they end up single mothers. This is because the state helps support the single mother and the child.
      The draw back is that although these women are “up-breeding” their off-spring, the lack of a strong father figure in these childrens’ lives leaves a crop of Icelandic gigantic monster-men with the hearts of emasculated pussy cats.

      This is an excellent comment in my opinion.
      Comments like these are worth their weight in platinum because it encourages all these White, video-gaming, girly-men grow a pair if they want to be taken seriously by women.

      Thank you for this comment and keep the female out-of-the-box perspective coming.

  25. FKA Max's Gravatar FKA Max
    February 22, 2016 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    From the moment she arrived she was working as a Soviet agent and set up as a professional photographer in an apartment opposite Abbey Road recording studio in north London.

    I don’t think it was a co-incidence, that Ms. Suschitzky was housed on Abbey Road.

    One time I visited London, I stayed at a family friend’s flat right next to the St John’s Wood United Synagogue on Grove End Road (which was previously located on Abbey Road), which is literally just a stone’s throw away from Abbey Road Studios. This family friend had worked for the Rothschild Bank and was close friends with the children of several Russian oligarchs (probably Jews, I was not Jew-wise at the time), which he introduced me to. Quite a surreal experience.

    St John’s Wood is a Jewish hotbed.

    The synagogue in Abbey Road bears witness to the importance placed by Anglo-Jewry on the St John’s Wood community.
    —————-
    Between the world wars, St. John’s Wood became an even more fashionable Jewish area. In the 1950’s flat dwelling became convenient and desirable and there was a move back from the outer suburbs to the areas close to the West End. Consequently our membership grew. It was the increasing size, importance and affluence of the congregation that led the Honorary Officers to undertake the construction of a new Synagogue and Community Centre at Grove End Road. The community centre was opened in 1957 and the Synagogue completed in 1964.

    http://www.shulinthewood.com/the-shul/history

    Reference to St John’s Wood in this Rolling Stone’s song. Also an appropriate theme song for this excellent article, in my opinion:
    The Rolling Stones Play With Fire 1965
    Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gKmmaZrJpc

  26. glb's Gravatar glb
    February 22, 2016 - 2:06 pm | Permalink

    Well, there has to be some reason why Stanley Kubrick (of course Jewish) once said to Jewish screenwriter Frederic Raphael, “Hitler was right about almost everything.”

    • thm's Gravatar thm
      February 22, 2016 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

      Curiously enough, Stanley Kubrick’s wife, Christiane, was the niece of the talented German film director Veit Harlan, who produced and directed Jud Süß, which, though labelled anti-Semitic, is, aside from that, quite a fine film. Kubrick’s long time collaborator, Jan Harlan, who was the executive producer for a lot of Kubrick’s films, was Veit Harlan’s nephew.

  27. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    February 22, 2016 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

    The Judeo-Anglo one sided love affair seems to know no bounds. Jewish “gratitude” to the Anglo/White world is now coming full circle: they are now working overtime to subvert, degrade, debase, and racially destroy their extremely foolish English speaking “hosts”.
    Not that they were not warned 80 years ago by the German guy that tried to befriend them, and who was “rewarded” with a firestorm of hatred and bombs.

    • James O'Meara's Gravatar James O'Meara
      February 23, 2016 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

      It’s a cliche because it’s true: the frog and the scorpion. They just can’t help themselves. It’s in the blood.

  28. Ed's Gravatar Ed
    February 22, 2016 - 1:18 pm | Permalink

    So Cameron has to be aware of all this, and instead of shunning Jews, this half Jew just passed a law that makes it illegal to boycott Israel! WTF! The Jews must be removed from all nations, and exiled to an island from which they can never leave! Jews in the JewSA have continued to screw us for decades- Lavon Affair, USS Liberty, Jonathan Pollard, 9/11 PNAC Jews, financial schemes that loot the wealth from America, etc. Enough is enough!

    • Rosa's Gravatar Rosa
      February 23, 2016 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

      An island? Madagascar perhaps ? You just bombed who was thinking to send them all there.

  29. Mike's Gravatar Mike
    February 22, 2016 - 11:33 am | Permalink

    An excellent article. You just might think that we deserved gratitude for taking them in when Adolf Hitler was giving them a hard time. We did and do. It wasn’t forthcoming. Was Adolf wrong about them? He knew about their take overs in Bavaria and Hungary. Then there was their attempt to conquer Berlin. Some things don’t change.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      February 23, 2016 - 3:49 am | Permalink

      The Jew repays you for saving his life by killing you.

      • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
        February 23, 2016 - 12:26 pm | Permalink

        That’s the jew’s way of saying…’thanks sucker!’
        Or a better analogy of jew behavior is given by Aesop’s fable of the Frog and the Scorpion.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        February 23, 2016 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

        Showing that they really do not know the difference between mental health and mental illness.

      • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
        February 24, 2016 - 12:10 am | Permalink

        Israel’s decision in September of 1987 to join the rest of the world in imposing sanctions on South Africa left the apartheid regime totally dumbstruck, so much so that its leader at the time, president P.W. Botha (long known as the “Great Crocodile”), sent a secret letter to prime minister Yitzhak Shamir accusing him of stabbing him in the back. “How could you do this to us, after so many years of friendship and alliance?” Botha railed.

        http://www.jpost.com/International/Late-SA-president-PW-Botha-felt-Israel-had-betrayed-him

        • John's Gravatar John
          February 25, 2016 - 4:30 pm | Permalink

          That JP article makes it seem that Jews were supporters of the White South African government. Here’s some reality:

  30. John's Gravatar John
    February 22, 2016 - 11:15 am | Permalink

    They are a cancer on the West.

  31. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    February 22, 2016 - 10:20 am | Permalink

    Thank you Mr Begbie for a concise thesis.

    We cannot forget even Karl Marx settled in Britain where he was accepted and was a reader of the Economist magazine.

    This welcome mat to Communist East European Jews has been a complete disaster. At least in America their activities were curtailed by local resistance like Joseph McCarthy and others until recently where we have an openly communist Jew like Bernie Sanders now hoping to be president. In Britain they could do anything and their children are still around like Ed Milliband and his brother.

    This almost caused the US not trust Britain due to the damage the also the Cambridge Spy Ring did. I once read also that some elements within the CIA like James Xaxier Angleton (not very sure about the name) even accused former Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson of being a communist spy of the Soviet Union.

    • T.J.'s Gravatar T.J.
      February 22, 2016 - 1:44 pm | Permalink

      “. . .James Xaxier Angleton. . .”

      James Jesus Angleton.

      Perhaps you were thinking of Xavier Krement [X. Krement], or Ex Savior Krement.

    • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
      February 23, 2016 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

      The “Jewishness” of Communism is much more complicated and more comprehensible than some contributors here suppose; see the studies by Julius Carlebach, Andre Gerrits, Jerry Muller, &c.

      With the postwar defeat of Hitler and the rise of Israel, the “defense” focus and ideological attachments have shifted from the New Jerusalem in Russia to the Old Jerusalem in the Middle East. We are now seeing a lot more selective but useful anti-communist research from Jewish scholars, albeit with an often noticeable neo-con slant; e.g. Harvey Klehr, Ronald Radosh, Herbert Romerstein, Guenter Lewy, &c &c.
      One interesting thing such people have – not unexpectedly but usefully noted – is the Communist/Comintern undermining of British and allied defenses against Germany during 1940-1 – whereas false accusations of “fifth column” dispositions were made against patriots like Mosley.

      Regarding Harold Wilson, the only British PM to have been invited to private interviews with both Molotov and police officials in Moscow, he was originally for a long time a Soviet sympathizer, and an asset in supplying technological aid to the USSR war-economy, a self-declared personal friend of the Kosygin family. The Mitrokhin files state that his (GRU) codename was OLDING, quite typically using some letters from the actual name (as with Hiss, Norwood, Hollis &c).

      It is said that he was not “developed”. It is my guess – just a guess – that he was “rescued” by his many Jewish friends, leftist and Zionist, who turned his support from Russia to Israel, then in conflict over Arab nationalism and the need to get scientists out of the USSR as refugees/emigrants.

      • Jake Grant's Gravatar Jake Grant
        February 24, 2016 - 4:42 am | Permalink

        There is a very interesting review on Amazon of Andre Gerritt’s The Myth of Jewish Communism. The reviewer seems less than convinced.

        “This book is the latest academic attempt to explain away some well-known but highly sensitive facts about the Jewish overrepresentation in communism. Gerrits doesn’t try to explain away the facts outright as that would be impossible. Instead, he engagingly asserts that the documented facts about Jewish involvement in communism tells less about Jews than about the psychological dimensions of anti-Semites. The basic parameters of Gerrits approach is laid out in the opening paragraph of Chapter Three. He writes:

        “Jews have played a role out of all proportion to their numbers in the socialist and communist movements in Europe. Their participation in the early communist regimes of post-1917 Russia and the countries of Eastern Central Europe after the Second World War, in particular, bolstered anti-Jewish sentiments. The myth of Jewish Communism became one of the most powerful and destructive political stereotypes in Europe during the first half of the twentieth century. The most crucial feature of a (xenophobic) myth, as discussed earlier, is that it renders the abstraction of the group as more real than any of its specific, individual components. On this basis, one could argue that the actual involvement of the Jews in the communist movements is of only minor importance for the study of Jewish communism. The myth of Jewish Communism tells us more about anti-Semites, and perhaps communists, than it does about Jews. It should be considered, first and foremost, in the tradition of politically motivated anti-Jewish thinking. If the question of Jewish communism is basically a chimera, a political fantasy, there would seem to be little need for historians to tread beyond either its mythical or fantastic dimensions. The problem is compounded by the fact that Jewish participation in the communist movement lacks a reliable, empirical basis. Figures are fragmentary and limited and therefore difficult to assess. Jewish communism is as controversial as it is elusive. No wonder then, that so few historians have risked burning their fingers by it.”

        Let us analyze what Professor Gerrits has just said. He begins by admitting the basic fact under dispute – that Jews were very disproportionately involved in Communist movements everywhere. He then asserts that this fact has no significance in itself but tells us more about the anti-Semites and their evil mind set than it tells us about the Jews, those eternally innocent people. Thus, he converts a factual dispute already settled into an attempt to pathologize those who reason from facts to justifiable conclusions (e.g., the Jews did it). This short essay does not intend to review “The Myth of Jewish Communism” in its entirety but merely to indicate the general approach of the book. It is certainly not without merit. The volume covers a vast amount of material which, although not all-encompassing, provides more than enough evidence of where the “myth” of Jewish communism came from. However, the volume most definitely follows the usual apologetic techniques of trying to ascribe Jewish involvement in communism to particular circumstances rather than to inherent characteristics of the Jewish people as a whole.

        “The Myth of Jewish Communism” is hardly unique in the general approach it employs. But it must be said that Andre Gerrits does an exceedingly good job in trying to explain away the unexplainable. The book is well written and superficially plausible. The slant is obvious, however. Despite the slanting all kinds of inconvenient facts keep popping up. Thus, Gerrits has to admit that various Jewish authors such as Jaff Schatz, maintain that there were important similarities between Jewish messianic ideology and communist ideology. He also takes note of “anti-Jewish” academics like Albert Lindemann, Kevin MacDonald and Yuri Slezkine who have written extensively on the Jewish involvement in revolutionary socialism. Andre Gerrits basic problem, as anyone who reads the book can tell, is that the facts are simply against him.

        No matter how masterfully he writes, it turns out that “The Myth of Jewish Communism” was the “Reality of Jewish Communism”. Too many people saw the face of the murderous tyrrany up close for there to be any doubt. Andre Gerrits “The Myth of Jewish Communism: An Historical Interpretation” is an important book because it shows that a century old charge has yet to die. It never will die because the evidence in support of it is simply too vast to be explained away. The fact that the Jews feel compelled to produce an expensive academic paperback rebutting the charge shows how concerned over it they are even to this day. “The Myth of Jewish Communism” may be a response to Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s “Two Hundred Years Together”; it may be a response to massive Internet publishing on the Jewish-Communist connection; it may be a combination of these things. It is unlikely that a better job of attempted refutation of the Jewish communist charge can be penned than “The Myth of Jewish Communism”. If the rebuttal fails – and it does – then the charge must be conceded as true. Andre Gerrits has given the subject his best shot. The reader who perceives the deficiencies of his account will have no further illusions on the subject of Jews and communism.”

        • David Ashton's Gravatar David Ashton
          February 24, 2016 - 12:38 pm | Permalink

          I would simply suggest that readers go through Gerrits and the other writers mentioned, noticing their merits as well as faults.

          The important issue is WHY so many though not all Jews (widely defined) were attracted to and took leading roles in communist movements, notably in Hungary and the USA. I see their position as a unique predicament of an intelligent ethnicity scattered across the territories of other ethnicities, and faced with the dilemma noted by the late Rabbi Hugo Gryn, “We never feel secure unless we are supreme.” It is not that the Protocols were authentic. The interaction between Jews has had its own cultural characteristics, especially in Church v Synagogue conflicts; and good and bad results on both sides.

          Hitler by mistaken and ruthless policy (see e.g. his typical statements to Horthy in 1943) created the exact opposite of what he ostensibly desired, and the power of the “Holocaust” – irrespective of facts per se – has led to a situation where “Zionist conspiracy” has become a self-fulfilling prophecy for both Jewish and Gentile observers.

          Personally I think Jews have had good and creative people as well as harmful and destructive people, but their high IQs, and unity when specifically threatened as a “group”, are largely responsible for their ascendant position in both respects, and on-going influence, politically, commercially and culturally. However, the most sensible response of courageous and honest critics has never been ignorant abuse or counter-productive violence.

        • John's Gravatar John
          February 24, 2016 - 2:16 pm | Permalink

          He writes:

          “Jews have played a role out of all proportion to their numbers in the socialist and communist movements in Europe.”

          “The problem is compounded by the fact that Jewish participation in the communist movement lacks a reliable, empirical basis.”

          Seems like a straight out contradiction to me.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          February 24, 2016 - 5:59 pm | Permalink

          Dear John,

          The seeming contradiction you cite is easily explained, at least in the terms outlined by the Amazon reviewer that Mr. Grant is quoting. As he says (I paraphrase slightly), Gerrits makes an admission or two anent Jewish perfidy and then proceeds to treat the admissions as nugatory, even though they are anything but. In the specific instance you cite, Gerrits’s sleight-of-hand consists in the factitious suggestion that without something like an exact tabulation of the number of Jews involved in a given communist movement (or in all of them), no generalization about Jews—a fortiori no indictment of their conduct—can reasonably be proffered. The claim is rubbish, of course, and its tool is choplogic, as the reviewer aptly notes.

          One illustration of the foregoing would be easier to make if I could recall the TOO article and thread from last year that included a list of the names of the roughly 200 revolutionaries that rode on the now fabled sealed train that brought Lenin and his associates from neutral Zurich through combatant Germany, whence they made their way to Saint Petersburg/Petrograd. (Perhaps Trenchant or another equally assiduous commenter might come to my aid here.) The clear indication there was that all but one or two were Jewish. Yet even a much earlier source (1931) says that of 165 published names, 128 were certainly Jewish.

          This degree of uncertainty—were 128 or 198 Jews on board?—is evidently enough for Gerrits to declare that further discussion of the matter is pointless. No one here need agree with such a purposefully, sycophantically exculpatory rationale, of course.
          ______________________
          When it comes to being purposefully exculpatory, Mr. Ashton’s comments are a dismaying exhibit A. His sentence “The important issue is WHY so many though not all Jews (widely defined) were attracted to and took leading roles in communist movements, notably in Hungary and the USA” is, sad to say, worthy of Gerrits—at least if one takes the Amazon reviewer at his word. Indeed, the issue just cited is in fact a contender for the title of least important! Were Mr. Ashton speaking, say, of impulses that drove the Aztecs to slaughter and eat their neighbors and subjects in pre-Columbian Central America, his point might be entertained for several minutes before any reasonable man’s distaste for dime-store psychoanalysis drove him either to change the subject or to beat Mr. Ashton into insensibility with a heavy blunt instrument. But as the behavior of the Jews has been so obviously marked by gross immorality, ill-concealed hatred, and poisonously egocentric megalomania, only a fool or a knave would try to direct attention away from their barbarous conduct and toward what sad experience justifies one in thinking will be a wilfully misleading “explanation” for it.

          What is more, Mr. Ashton’s recitation of sundry Jewish excellencies and accomplishments—offered, mind you, as facts rather than assertions—leaves one to wonder precisely whose water he is carrying. I would be interested in reading his answer.

        • John's Gravatar John
          February 25, 2016 - 11:42 pm | Permalink

          ” However, the most sensible response of courageous and honest critics has never been ignorant abuse or counter-productive violence.”

          Maybe, when they are succeeding in destroying you, your people and your entire culture and they consider you to be an unclean animal in spite of the fact that your people have contributed more to math, science and the arts than they have, you do want to get abusive and violent back.

          http://i.imgur.com/rmdN5oX.jpg

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q90kmUbEv7c&feature=youtu.be

Comments are closed.