On Herder, Human Nature, and the Antifa

Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.


antifa1

Portrait of a loser antifa: “He that has lost his patriotic spirit has lost himself and the whole world about himself.” — Johann Gottfried von Herder, Essay on the Origin of Language, 1772. 

In his Essay on the Origin of Language, the German philosopher Johann Gottfried von Herder (1744–1803) undertook a marked departure from earlier ruminations on human nature. Like Plato’s account of the soul, the majority of Enlightenment philosophers tended to see human nature in universal terms, assuming both that rationality was its most significant aspect, and that this rationality was evenly distributed throughout the human population. Man, they argued, was essentially the same creature wherever he was found. Adopting a very different approach, Herder argued that since peoples from different historical periods and cultures varied so much in their concepts, beliefs and abilities, human nature must also be radically different in different cultures. Writing before the discovery of racial and genetic science, Herder argued that broad differences between cultures could be partly explained by two basic observations. The first was that man was indisputably a creature of his herd, society. Or to express is another way, man was, whether he liked it or not, bound to the group from which he was begotten. Secondly, and relatedly, man’s values and sense of himself were shaped by this surrounding society and culture, especially its language.

This notion of the ‘shaping’ of man by his surrounding tribe and its culture led to a further, connected idea of Herder’s — that man was not born ‘complete.’ As Herder expressed it, “a bee was a bee as soon as it built its first cell, but a person was not human until he had achieved completeness. People continued to grow as long as they lived …. We are always in process, unsettled, unsatiated. The essence of our life is never satisfaction, rather always progression, and we have never been human until we have lived to the end.” At the risk of misinterpretation, it is worth stressing that Herder was no existentialist. He did not suggest that we can never be satisfied and therefore that we should each seek to fulfil our own hyper-individual destiny. Rather, Herder argued that this movement towards becoming who we are, our identity, is determined to a great extent by how effectively we fulfil our destiny as part of our group. We can achieve completeness, and that completeness is fulfilled when we become part of our tribe, and play our role in the tribe by passing on its attributes to a new generation. Therefore, our identity, while certainly involving being true to ourselves, has an inescapable national and collectivist dimension to it. This part of our personal identity is handed down to us, and a significant part of who we are is therefore simply not a matter of choice.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Any interference with this process of becoming part of one’s nation would, according to Herder, be catastrophic. He argued that each nation was separate, distinguished by climate, education, custom, tradition, and heredity. Herder wrote that Providence “wonderfully separated nationalities not only by woods and mountains, seas and deserts, rivers and climates, but more particularly by languages, inclinations and characters.” National culture was so crucial to the formation and validity of one’s personal identity and nature that to be without it would render the individual incomplete. “He that has lost his patriotic spirit has lost himself and the whole world about himself. … In a certain sense every human perfection is national.” Becoming a person involves growing and learning to fully identify with one’s culture and values. Only by embracing this growth and identification can one ever discover one’s ‘true’ nature and fulfil one’s destiny.

For Herder the key to this becoming — the make-or-break aide to one’s individual development — was language. Language was developed organically by the group to transmit its cultural essence. Language can determine thought or behavior, and language habits within groups can predispose its members to certain choices of interpretation. Language habits within families or nations can therefore not only transmit factual information about the surrounding world to their youth, but also values and perceptions of the world. A useful example might be the fact that all European languages have a word for ‘love’ and a concept of ‘romantic love.’ The word, and the concept it described, emerged from and reinforced a distinctly European value-set and worldview. By contrast, until their nation was opened up to the infant globalist project in the nineteenth century, the Japanese had no word for ‘love,’ nor anything remotely approaching a cultural concept or understanding of romantic love. Only when western novels were translated into Japanese, introducing this most European of concepts, were the Japanese forced to phoneticize the word as ra-bu. Tellingly, it remains rarely used, and the concept as it exists in Japan would be barely recognized by the European.

Herder’s emphasis on language, values and culture reinforces his view of nationality and human nature: to compose a genuine part of the national entity, it was simply not enough to be a genetic component of it. A German, even one of unadulterated German genetic inheritance, remains not fully German until he has been made ‘complete’ through the transmission of cultural Germanness. This illustrates the precarious nature of individual and national growth being dependent on language, values and culture. Changes and departures in language can interrupt the transmission of values, and they can corrupt the reproduction of the national unit, even if its birth rate might be stable. Or to express it more simply, unless a nation can effectively transmit its values, worldview and culture to its racial progeny, birth rates are irrelevant since the births produce only potential nationals who are never ‘fully formed.’ Such a nation will eventually die.

We see this today. People of European origin might be having children (though at a slower pace than previous generations), but they are not necessarily producing Europeans in the truest sense. By corrupting language, one can introduce a kind of cultural prophylaxis. Cultural prophylaxis will of course lead inevitably to its biological corollary.

Orwell masterfully illustrated this weakness of linguistic and cultural transmission (and anticipated its exploitation) in 1984, where his idea of ‘Newspeak’ is built on the premise that if words and concepts are banned and eliminated, then they cannot be thought. Culture in the world of 1984 was dramatically changed as a result. Words like ‘freedom’ were banned while words like ‘thoughtcrime’ were introduced. Within a generation, Orwell’s society stopped believing in freedom, and started believing in the validity of ‘thoughtcrimes’ as if they were something that had always existed.

Words can of course be ‘hijacked’ or made taboo, as well as created. One need only point to words and phrases like ‘White supremacist,’ ‘Fascist,’ ‘racist,’ ‘hate crime,’ ‘human rights,’ ‘tolerance,’ ‘diversity,’ and ‘multiculturalism’ to make the point that many of our contemporary woes are due to the manipulation of language, and with it the warping of our values and the destruction of our processes of cultural reproduction. Just imagine a world where words like ‘capitalist’ and ‘proletariat’ had never been introduced; a world where such concepts had never taken root.

Herder’s observations about the vulnerability of language seem remarkably consonant with later concerns about language purity and about the impact of Jewish intellectuals on the linguistic lives of European nations. In 1793 Johann Gottlieb Fichte published On the French Revolution, in which he cautioned the nations of Europe to preserve their linguistic purity and accused the Jews of introducing foreign ideas into the European consciousness by speaking in the native tongues of Europe “sugar-sweet words about toleration and human rights and civic rights, by which you infringe on our basic rights.”   In 1819 Jacob Grimm published Deutsche Grammatik, developing Fichte’s ideas on the purity of the German and stressing the unifying force of language as völkische Sprachenheit. Grimm’s book appears to have marked the beginning of a steady increase in the attention paid to language by völkisch thinkers. Many of these scholars and thinkers would later argue against the assimilation of Jews on the grounds that increased use by Jews of the German language would increase the infiltration of Jewish thought into German linguistic culture, diluting and corrupting it.

Herder has occasionally been represented by modern scholars as a cultural relativist, refusing to see one national culture above another, or one race above another. Such biased and subversive interpretations miss entirely the central thrust of his treatment of human nature — that he was greatly concerned with the authenticity of both personal and national identity, and the interdependency of both on language as a mode of cultural transmission and reproduction. In this vein, to Herder the honest African savage could actually be superior to the culturally and racially alienated European because he was more authentic to himself and his nature. The White man who denied his racial and cultural roots in favor of seeing himself as some kind of ‘world citizen’ was a sham and a caricature of a human being; incomplete and ultimately meaningless. There was no ‘world’ one should claim citizenship in; no one single grand ‘human species’ that one could claim to be part of. Or as Herder put it:

The savage who loves himself, his wife and child with quiet joy and glows with joy at the limited activity of his tribe as for his own life, is in my opinion a more real being than that cultivated shadow who is enraptured with the shadow of the whole species. [Emphasis added].

Herder wouldn’t have been fooled by the cultural critiques of Jewish intellectuals and their allies. He believed that there was more truth and virtue in following the time-worn values of one’s family and society than in questioning and criticizing them. He praised the dignity of the organic national community (‘das Volk’) and was critical of fashionable Enlightenment trends that feigned concern for an imagined ‘whole species.’ Assuming that they weren’t calculating foreigners, people who pursued such fashions and ideas were clearly, in Herder’s mind, stunted and incomplete in the development of their human nature. They were alienated from their Folk and its culture. They pursued a false path. They were nothing more than biological shadows chasing ideological shadows.  Herder would have mocked, and been disgusted by, the many ‘world citizens’ who today parade their alien, pathological ‘virtues’ on our streets. These individuals, who in their hubris assume themselves to be the pinnacle of human enlightenment (!), would have been seen by Herder as quite the opposite — lower even than the worst savages that yet inhabit the jungles and rainforests of this Earth.

antifa2

“I wrestled with my innermost soul: are these people human, worthy to belong to a great nation? … I pondered with anxious concern on the masses of those no longer belonging to their people and saw them swelling to the proportions of a menacing army.”  — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Although we in the West have more than our fair share of pathological race-deniers, there is perhaps no greater example of the ‘cultivated shadows’ than the so-called ‘anti-Fascists’ or Antifa. These people may be our genetic brothers and sisters, but they are incomplete members of our nation. They follow a false path that is very distant from that laid down by their ancestors. They feign concern for the ‘whole species,’ as Herder put it, while assisting in the destruction of their own branch of that species. While we are greatly concerned at TOO with the pathological altruism displayed by large numbers of Whites, White anti-Fascists seem to up the ante a considerable degree. Indeed, what we witness among anti-Fascists is not pathological altruism but aggressive pathological self-destruction. This phenomenon deserves closer study.

I believe that Herder’s instruction on human nature can assist in our understanding of White Antifa. Anti-Fascism, ignoring for a moment its manipulators and the occasional befuddled old hippie, is overwhelmingly a youth phenomenon and this is precisely what one would expect of a movement composed of the ‘incomplete.’ The Antifa demographic reflects its immature, stunted and stagnant ideological roots. It is staffed by those who cannot grow. And, for all its pretensions to radicalism, when its members reach middle age and leave the movement, they gracefully re-enter bourgeois liberalism. Here they remain stunted but form part of a larger, quieter, mass of the incomplete. Their ‘radicalism’ is both transient and superficial. As they enter their 30s and 40s, they refrain from confrontational self-destruction, but remain distant from patriotism and alienated from their human nature. They continue to vote, act, and raise children as ‘world citizens,’ and thus remain mere shadows until their day of their miserable and meaningless deaths.

I’ve heard it remarked on more than one occasion that our movement should strive to achieve a younger demographic, and, indeed, so often have I heard this refrain that one would think that we should strive for an overwhelmingly young demographic. I disagree. A young demographic is desirable only to the extent that it might help attract more young people to the cause. But we should also be trying to bring more middle-aged and elderly Whites to the cause. Added to this, I believe that nothing truly lasting, durable and constructive would come from a movement staffed predominantly by those in their early 20s, such as is the case with Antifa. The Antifa can certainly muster numbers of unemployed agitators from this age group for violence against Nationalists, but what have they ever produced or built? What political programme is advanced by Antifa, beyond glib screeching about ‘humanity’ and hysterical bleating about ‘fighting racism’? Antifa is, as its very name suggests, an anti-ideology. It is lacking in imagination. It exists only to destroy. When a body produces cells that grow uselessly, malignantly and destructively, we term it cancer. Antifa is a particularly aggressive and acute cancer in the body of the nation.

By contrast, the fact that we have all age groups represented in our movement, particularly the wisdom of a generation of elders, conveys both its organic nature and its greater claim to ideological truth. It possesses what Herder would have perceived as a natural lifespan. Its appeal is both ageless and timeless. Our movement is in keeping with our human nature. When I was informed late last year that an esteemed veteran of our cause had been assaulted by a contingent of the local Antifa at the NPI conference in Washington D.C., I was not only disgusted with the attack, but also struck by the mental image it conjured up. According to attendee Matt Forney, just before the closing of the conference he was approached by another attendee. The attendee warned Forney that Antifa had posted members at each exit of the conference venue, the National Press Building: “These guys aren’t fighting fair. They’ll gang up on you, sucker punch you, attack the elderly; we’re gonna have to figure out a way to leave without getting attacked. We don’t want them going after our elderly or following people home on the Metro.”

It was the attack on Sam Dickson, one of our movement’s elder statesmen, and the reference by the attendee to “our elderly” that drove home, in my mind, a very pertinent point about the difference between our movement and that of the Antifa. We have, in our movement, a large number of elders who have been through thick and thin, good times and bad, and have stayed the course. They have fought, grown, and worked creatively to adapt our movement for shifting times, and they have been a source of great encouragement and support for younger generations of Nationalists. They have been successful businessmen, scholars, servicemen, educators, artists and lawyers. The incomplete shadows that comprise the Antifa don’t even remotely match their calibre. The targeting of our movement’s elders by opportunistic and cowardly non-entities merely accentuates and makes more obvious the loathing that the dysfunctional have for the healthy. And when these cowards attempt to target those who are alone or over 65? Some photographs of Anti-fascists following a recent Nationalist demonstration in Dover, England say more than words can appropriately convey.

Clashes as anti-immigration groups including the National Front (NF) and the English Defence League (EDL) protest in Dover. In an attempt to disrupt the far-right, anti-fascist groups including Unite Against Fascism (UAF) and the Kent Anti-Racism Network (KARN) hold a counter-protest. Featuring: View Where: Dover, United Kingdom When: 30 Jan 2016 Credit: WENN.com

Clashes as anti-immigration groups including the National Front (NF) and the English Defence League (EDL) protest in Dover, UK. In an attempt to disrupt the far-right, anti-fascist groups including Unite Against Fascism (UAF) and the Kent Anti-Racism Network (KARN) hold a counter-protest.

Another ‘shadow’ European receives instruction in reality

I am in full agreement with the concept of pathological altruism as it affects White populations globally. As we seek to better understand this phenomenon, Herder’s philosophical rather than scientific exploration of patriotism and ethnocentrism may offer a valuable and complimentary addition to the manner in which we analyze and interpret self-destructive White behavior. I remain convinced that we must never fail to acknowledge the importance of alien ideological influence over White populations, and this is certainly a poison that needs to be exposed and reckoned with. However, to me it appears inarguable that we are prone to sick levels of ethno-masochism. Herder’s ideas about patriotism and transmission of culture and values may shed further light on how the capture of our culture in the twentieth century could be so catastrophic to the sense of racial identity among our youth. It may explain why we find ourselves, on so many occasions, fighting ethnic brothers and sisters who seem barely human. It explains why they are mere shadows of what they could and should have been.

 

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

77 Comments to "On Herder, Human Nature, and the Antifa"

  1. roy albrecht's Gravatar roy albrecht
    March 13, 2016 - 11:12 am | Permalink

    “…the majority of Enlightenment philosophers tended to see human nature in universal terms, assuming both that rationality was its most significant aspect, and that this rationality was evenly distributed throughout the human population.”

    For me, the term; “…Enlightenment…”, has always been associated with a first-hand experience of what it is like to exist in a Form devoid of flesh and blood. That is, existence in a body composed of “Light-like” material.
    So whenever I see this same word being used in conjunction with an Intellectual Movement, which is essentially an activity derived from central nervous system or “flesh and blood” activity, my “…Awareness Blinkers…” begin to flash. Nevertheless, I simply ignore the warning because more intellectual …hair splitting… is not something “We” really have time for anymore.
    However, this essay brings up some questions of ethereal relevance that need to be touched upon in order to formulate a general consensus among “Our People” before “We” can proceed to advocate a Truly Lasting Solution to the Problem of the Cunning Jew.
    _______________________

    “…The first was that man was indisputably a creature of his herd, society. Or to express this another way, man was, whether he liked it or not, bound to the group from which he was begotten. Secondly, and relatedly, man’s values and sense of himself were shaped by this surrounding society and culture, especially its language.”

    In the times before man had, in comparison to today’s standards, complex linguistic systems, he was probably more in tune with his instincts. Communication probably revolved around experiences similar to those of his fellow tribe members. In a far less contaminated world, where fate and endurance played as much a role in survival as planning and consumption habits, the “inner world” was probably just as important as the “outer world”.

    ____________________________

    “…Language was developed organically by the group to transmit its cultural essence. Language can determine thought or behavior, and language habits within groups can predispose its members to certain choices of interpretation. Language habits within families or nations can therefore not only transmit factual information about the surrounding world to their youth, but also values and perceptions of the world.”

    So the arguably “purposeful transformation” of “Our” language, –
    from one that has replaced notions of “success” from striving for Spiritual Depth to that of placing emphasis on striving for Material Achievement, –
    has in fact resulted in the loss of both Spiritual and Material well-being.
    “The Enemy”, who one can arguably say has been behind this linguistic transformation, is well aware of the importance of Spiritual Acuity in the pursuit of Malevolent Dominance.
    ______________________________

    “…A useful example might be the fact that all European languages have a word for ‘love’ and a concept of ‘romantic love.’ The word, and the concept it described, emerged from and reinforced a distinctly European value-set and worldview. By contrast, until their nation was opened up to the infant globalist project in the nineteenth century, the Japanese had no word for ‘love,’ nor anything remotely approaching a cultural concept or understanding of romantic love.”

    The Shinto (Japanese national “philosophy”) Path is focused on Spiritual Acuity through Asceticism. Once “Enlightenment” has been achieved, the Monk/Adept is capable of leading his people along the Correct Path regardless of his own personal sacrifices.
    Self-sacrificial Objectivity becomes a logical by-product of the Path and has little to do with emotional concepts of “Love”.

    The questionably attributed, “Greek”, concepts of “Love”, from my understanding, seem to revolve more around bio-chemical sensations and fail to consider the need to self-verify one’s own Spiritual Existence as a precondition to being a complete person.
    ______________________________________________

    “…By corrupting language, one can introduce a kind of cultural prophylaxis. Cultural prophylaxis will of course lead inevitably to its biological corollary.”

    I would substitute the word, “prophylaxis”, with the word, “antigens”.
    __________________________________________________

    “…in… 1984 … Words like ‘freedom’ were banned while words like ‘thought-crime’ were introduced. Within a generation, Orwell’s society stopped believing in freedom, and started believing in the validity of ‘thought-crimes’… …One need only point to words and phrases like ‘White supremacist,’ ‘Fascist,’ ‘racist,’ ‘hate crime,’ ‘human rights,’ ‘tolerance,’ ‘diversity,’ and ‘multiculturalism’ to make the point that many of our contemporary woes are due to the manipulation of language, and with it the warping of our values and the destruction of our processes of cultural reproduction… …In 1793 Johann Gottlieb Fichte published On the French Revolution, in which he cautioned the nations of Europe to preserve their linguistic purity and accused the Jews of introducing foreign ideas into the European consciousness by speaking in the native tongues of Europe “sugar-sweet words about toleration and human rights and civic rights, by which you infringe on our basic rights.”… …Many of these scholars and thinkers would later argue against the assimilation of Jews on the grounds that increased use by Jews of the German language would increase the infiltration of Jewish thought into German linguistic culture, diluting and corrupting it.
    Or as Herder put it:
    The [African] savage who loves himself, his wife and child with quiet joy and glows with joy at the limited activity of his tribe as for his own life, is in my opinion a more real being than that cultivated shadow who is enraptured with the shadow of the whole species. [Emphasis added].”

    Whereas the Japanese tourist can be seen combing the beaches of Iceland in a seemingly “unproductive” search for WILD sea-weed/kelp to accompany his evening meal, the CULTIVATED Icelander would simply buy hydroponically, mass-produced greens from his local, oligarch-ical, big-box grocer.
    The former, seeing the intrinsic value of conserving and reallocating resources away from his “enemies” while strengthening the vessel that holds his Spirit and the latter focuses entirely upon the perceived short-term material and temporal advantages of a green product that is devoid of resilience and laced with toxins.
    ________________________________________

    “He [Herder] believed that there was more truth and virtue in following the time-worn values of one’s family and… …was critical of fashionable Enlightenment trends that feigned concern for an imagined ‘whole species.’ …people who pursued such fashions and ideas were clearly, in Herder’s mind, stunted and incomplete….”

    “I wrestled with my innermost soul: are these people human, worthy to belong to a great nation? … I pondered with anxious concern on the masses of those no longer belonging to their people and saw them swelling to the proportions of a menacing army.” — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

    “Although we in the West have more than our fair share of pathological race-deniers, there is perhaps no greater example of the ‘cultivated shadows’ than the so-called ‘anti-Fascists’ or Antifa.”

    “I’ve heard it remarked on more than one occasion that our movement should strive to achieve a younger demographic, and, indeed, so often have I heard this refrain that one would think that we should strive for an overwhelmingly young demographic. I disagree… …By contrast, the fact that we have all age groups represented in our movement, particularly the wisdom of a generation of elders, conveys both its organic nature and its greater claim to ideological truth. It possesses what Herder would have perceived as a natural lifespan.”

    If a life is conceived of, incubated in and raised within a “Spiritually Incomplete Milieu”, then no amount of rational wisdom will prepare it for the Spiritual Onslaught of an Adept Enemy with malignant designs (Chief-Jew Incarnate).
    The Virile Life Force required for the attainment of Spiritual Enlightenment wanes with passing of time and the advancement of old age.
    However, once experienced, Spiritual Knowledge can be tapped into for the remainder of one’s earthly and often solution seeking life and transmitted with a sense of surety to the next generation of White Cultural Warriors.

  2. No cuckoldry allowed's Gravatar No cuckoldry allowed
    March 10, 2016 - 6:17 pm | Permalink

    What is the philosophical basis for calling the valuing of tradition and ethnonationalism as ‘fascism’ the way the Left / antifa does?

    I have also been seeing this term used frequently by our (politically correct, or at least neutral on race) distant cousins, the truthers and libertarians. They use it to describe the close connection, or cronyism, between the government and corporate world, (often also protected by a brutal police force that spies on and oppresses powerless citizens).

    So fascism is both ‘racism’ and ‘government and corporate power coming together’ at the same time, depending on who is making the accusation. Metapedia mostly talks about Italian fascism of the early 20th century, and mentions neither of the two other definitions used by either the antifa or the truthers.

    I can understand the rationale behind antifa calling us ‘racists’ or ‘Nazis’ because of our critique of the Jews and race realism, but ‘fascism’ just seems out there. Anyway, they have rocks in their heads so maybe we’ll never know.

    But the truthers (who unfortunately don’t discuss group differences and predatory ethnic groups subverting the majority) seem pretty level headed and clued up regarding the state of the world otherwise. So where do they get their definition of fascism from?

    Surely it must take the cake when it comes to misused terms.

    • March 14, 2016 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

      ‘National Socialism’ sounds too much like ‘socialism’. So they switch to ‘fascism’. i think that’s about it, really. A lot of them call it ‘facism’ which shows they have no serious concept.

  3. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    March 9, 2016 - 11:47 am | Permalink

    What we have is a problem of

    for/form.

    Intellectual institutions need two basic qualities for meet their true goals.

    (1) absolute freedom to consider all views, ideas, theories, narratives, facts, etc.

    (2) the proper manner by which the various, competing, contradictory, and divergent views and visions are put forth, discussed, and debated.

    An intellectual institution must allow all sorts of FOR arguments. For this, for that, for whatever that the thinker believes has value.

    But the institution must also enforce the propriety of certain forms by which the many ‘for’ arguments are made.

    There has to be an agreed-upon process, a set of rules, a way of manners, a way of mutual respect, and etc. People may disagree, indeed very strongly, but the disagreements must be aired in a civilized manner. Otherwise, the institution will just turn into a barbarian shouting match and bully pulpit where volume and threat of violence win the day. Rhetoric, as important as it is, must not trump reason on the academic setting.

    So, a college should be FOR anything but must enforce the proper FORM by which the FOR arguments are made and discussed.

    But US colleges have been going in the opposite direction since the 60s.
    The so-called ‘free speech’ movement was bound to work against genuine free speech since it was more a free sCreech movement. The radical students and activists didn’t want to put forth their argument logically and coherently and debate them with the other side. They were into shouting, screaming, taking over buildings, using violence, shouting slogans, using intimidation, making threats, and acting like barbarians at the gate. They didn’t want to win debates with logic, facts, and reason. They just wanted to out-shout and overpower the competition. And when these freaks eventually took over colleges in the late 80s, they began to institutionalize what they’d really been fighting for in the 60s and 70s. It was about control more than freedom. Freedom was only for their side to destroy, a weapon to destroy the other side. Is it any wonder that radical boomers came up with the notion of ‘free speech’ vs ‘hate speech’. These radicals and their Gen X puppets hate true free speech. The only love their own speech and hate any competing speech and seek to ban it as ‘hate speech’.

    So, the current PC university has a strange way of “for/form” dynamics. It doesn’t protect the freedom of ‘for’ arguments, no matter how congenially and civilly they are made. John Derbyshire, who was recently banned from Williams college as a guest-speaker, isn’t a boor. He doesn’t act like Mr. T, Big Boss Man, Sam Kinison, Bluto, or Yosemite Sam. He doesn’t even act like Lou Grant. He has the proper collegiate form and is willing to make his argument in the proper manner that may be agreed or disagreed by others. But no matter how good, decent, and reasonable his ‘form’, what he is ‘for’ makes him a persona-non-grata.
    So, the present college policy is that no ‘for’ argument, however rationally made with proper form and gathered facts, is permissible if it is ‘for’ the wrong kinds of views.
    But, if the ‘for’ argument is approved by PC, the ‘form’ can be as gross, ugly, vile, demented, retarded, hysterical, loony, delirious, insane, rabid, virulent, putrid, bullying, threatening, and infantile.

    Just look at the current state of college debates. Just because the ‘for’ arguments by Negroes are favored by PC, their ‘forms’ can be wild, savage, and gross as can be.
    In other words, if you have the right ‘for’ argument, your can carry on with the ‘form’ of an anti-civilizational savage. It’s the narcissism of the stupid and savage, as long as the message is approved by the armchair radical class. This is why Allan Bloom left Cornell. The administration caved to black thugs. Once radicals and thugs smelled the blood of weakness in the 60s, colleges have been losing more and more ground to the radicals and thugs.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmO-ziHU_D8

    https://youtu.be/kn200lvmTZc?t=26s

    So, if the classic ideal of higher education was “you can say anything but you have to put forth your argument in proper form”, the new way is “you can only say what we approve but you can say it it in the most hysterical and demented manner.” The wild antics of SJW and Negroes give the impression of freedom and lively discourse on campus but it is really the kind of climate of fear and intimidation used by Mao with Red Guards.

    As for Conservatism Inc., it is useless and irrelevant. While folks at National Review and New Criterion are indeed into proper ‘form’, they don’t have the courage to make the controversial ‘for’ arguments. Just because the ‘form’ should be civil, Conservatism Inc. assumes that ‘for” arguments must be ‘respectable’. But truth is often dark, disturbing, and troublesome. So, even though Jason Richwine made his argument in a civil manner, he was purged. Conservatism Inc. is also hypocritical because, even as it derides the ‘vulgar’ style of Trump, it looks the other way when it comes to the ethno-vulgarity of Neocons who throw fits about people they don’t like.

    True higher education is not about nice tea parties and congenial get-togethers, though there are occasions for that. It is about dealing with tough, hard, dark, and difficult topics BUT in the with the proper form so that reason and open debate will prevail over intimidation, threats, violence, tempers, and rage. It’s about coming with a skullful of mush and leave thinking like lawyers.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zruWCuNmWV8

    Higher education should be “you can go anywhere but you must obey the traffic signals”. But in the current situation, it is “you must drive on the approved highways but you can do all the road rage you want.” Limit the ‘for’ and barbarize the ‘form’ by which the approved ‘for’ is promoted.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 9, 2016 - 3:27 pm | Permalink

      All universities are under control of the Feds.

      A free university has no ties whatsoever to any government.

  4. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    March 8, 2016 - 6:51 pm | Permalink

    We’ve gone way beyond political correctness.

    We are now in the stage of Political Coercion.

    It is not enough to silence certain kind of speech.

    They now force people to voice support of the PC consensus.

    They say torture is worthless as a method since the torturee will say ANYTHING to please the torturer. If the torturer wants you to say A, you will say A whether A is true or not because you fear the pain. Forced confession is BS.

    Likewise, Political Coercion is worthless on moral grounds since people will say ANYTHING just to get the PC inquisition off their backs.

    In the US, you don’t physically torture people, but there are ways to apply such pressure on them socially and economically that most people bend under pressure. They will say just about anything to avoid being denounced, shunned, fired, and blacklisted.

    Coerced consensus is as worthless as forced confession.

    Colleges have become Libbyankas.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubyanka_Building

  5. March 8, 2016 - 9:24 am | Permalink

    Children trust and believe in authority. Even in Santa Claus.

    Adults suspect and question authority. Even in sacred taboos.

    Jews want us to be like children. They call us ‘anti-semites’ if we question and counter Jewish power and authority.

    But we are only being mature than childish.

    We are being critical Judeo-Skeptics than credulous Judeo-Maniacs.

    It is adult to question authority. Isn’t it ironic that Jews take pride in the culture of critique but throw fits when others develop their own?

    Trust must be based on Truth, not on Naivete.
    If in truth, Jews were trustworthy, we should trust them. But in fact, it is so obvious that they are weasels and liars. Trusting them is like kids believing in Santa. It is worse because while Santa doesn’t exist, the hostile Jew is very much a reality.

    • Anon's Gravatar Anon
      March 8, 2016 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

      Zio-Skeptics or Skepto-Semites.

  6. Tudor's Gravatar Tudor
    March 7, 2016 - 11:34 pm | Permalink

    Antifa’s people, among others, are the result of the public schools, private too, indoctrination.

    • ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
      March 8, 2016 - 7:54 am | Permalink

      As an afterthought to this article. When I first saw the picture of this young Antifa looser, my minds eye flashed to me the picture of a poor unemployed white youngster in South Africa begging for jobs on a street corners, holding a card board in his hands.

      This youngster would not have the luxury to play the role of an Antifa in South Africa. His stomach would have been too empty for that.

      • Tudor's Gravatar Tudor
        March 8, 2016 - 11:49 pm | Permalink

        I am aware about the situation of the white South-Africans. I found strange, from my brother’s stories who spent half a year in South Africa, that some white people have high regard of Nelson Mandela. Probably because they were businessmen , maybe Jews, and the lift of economical sanctions was beneficial for them. On the other side, it was 5-6 years ago, he told me that the infrastructure was better than in Canada and the climate the best you can get.

        • Sir Winston Londonstan's Gravatar Sir Winston Londonstan
          March 10, 2016 - 5:39 am | Permalink

          Its called the Stockholm Syndrome Hypocrony . Essentially self interested self deception . Other might call this adaptability anyway its human nature And the left is expert in siding with the money that pays for their feelings ALL you have to do is vilify the Other cast the victim as like one of You .

  7. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    March 7, 2016 - 8:57 pm | Permalink
    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      March 8, 2016 - 12:07 am | Permalink

      Thanks to Dr. Joyce for that insight – unforgettable – on ra-bu.

  8. Deep North's Gravatar Deep North
    March 7, 2016 - 4:32 pm | Permalink

    If you look at the average white Antifa, they are social outcasts from the white community. The men are ultra beta-males (physically weak and un-masculine). The women are physically unattractive. They know they will never be one of the “cool kids”. Every person wants to fit into a social structure; and for some people, the Antifa movement works for them. People use to accept their position in society and not be bitter about it. You could be short, fat, ugly not rich etc., now people want to destroy what others have or water it down.

    • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
      March 9, 2016 - 5:36 pm | Permalink

      People use to accept their position in society and not be bitter about it. You could be short, fat, ugly not rich etc., now people want to destroy what others have or water it down.

      ===

      Exactly Deep-N!

      Back when society was more traditional and patriarchal, everybody ‘knew their place’ and very few were ‘bitter’ about it because at least everybody had a place in society in the first place, a place or position that, regardless of rank, were all honored and respected, because they were all members of the nation, and all knew that (virtually) every co-ethnic is valuable toward the betterment of the whole.

      The classical (German) sociological concept that captures this Geist, is Gemeinschaft/Gesellschaft. When European people are represented in an organic Volks-Gemeinschaft (organic folk community) – verses a Gesellschaft (mechanic ‘society’) or even worse, a Handelsgesellschaft – a kosher-korporate-kontrolled society like we find in the Anglo-Judaic “West” today:

      Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft – Relationships in Societies

      Definition: Gemeinschaft, or community, relations are based on a relatively homogenous culture and tend to be intimate, informal, cooperative, and imbued with a sense of moral obligation to the group. These relationships are typical of hunter-gatherer, horticultural, and other relatively small preindustrial societies.

      In contrast, gesellschaft relations are more formal, goal-oriented, heterogeneous, and based on individual self-interest, competition, and complex division of labor.

      These relationships are typical of agrarian and industrial societies.

      […]

      http://sociology.about.com/od/G_Index/g/Gemeinschaft-Gesellschaft.htm

      • March 9, 2016 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

        Deep North, Veritas
        both of you describe the situation in my country, Germany, exactly. We have a core of Germans who hold together. It does not matter if you are a professor or a worker,
        you are part of our folk. This togetherness is re-enforced each and every day. And by the utmost simple methods. — For example in our small town we have made away the traffic signs (reduced by 90%), and therefore all car drivers drive extremely carefully and if the street is to small for two cars, one waits for the other. And most times this is accompanied with a smile and a move of the hand. — A similar thing is that Germans often obey the rules too carefully, despite the fact that it might not be necessary at a given moment. But it gives us the inner feeling” This is the way we are”. That thought gives a flash inside the body: I am a part of my folk. This inner feeling is a big part of our life. — I add another example: If one stands as first driver at a traffic light changing from red to green and he does not see that and time goes by and there is red again and several cars stand behind him: Sometimes it happens, that none of the others uses the acustical signal of his car, but all prefer to be silent and to wait all the time for the next green traffic light. But inside the cars all have a broad grin in their face and they think: This is Germany.

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          March 10, 2016 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

          Karlfried,

          You are a very inspirational fellow. In fact, I remember a comment, which I believe was from you, nearly two years ago where you expressed the same beautiful sentiments .. embodying the same sense of noble generosity, and Geist.

          Is this following comment yours? –

          […]

          “At any place where Germans meet, the multicultiquestion (to many third world foreigners, at a magnitude that shall be deadly for us) is the thing number one that will be talked about. In private talk in very clear words. In non-private talks, maybe at a state office or in the public we speak in chiffre (secret language, in pictures).

          The main sentence is “Wir müssen wieder mehr zusammenhalten .” (“We must stand together and help each other”.) And it is clear, that the “we” means “we Germans”.

          This small tiny things come daily (frequently). This very small things make a good effect in your soul, in your feeling: You feel well, you know, that many others in your folk feel and think the same way that you do yourself. And that gives strength to you. You walk through life on a straight line.”

          […]

          Again, not exactly sure of the author, because the comment section on this thread has been closed and doesn’t populate on the thread anymore, but it sure sounds like you, meine guten kamerad.

          *Such an inspiring quote/commentary, I have sent it to many friends as an example of how ALL White Nationalists and European Advocates should strive to be in their own personal lives, everyday, in matters great and small, with one another .. IF we are to survive as a distinct People.

        • March 10, 2016 - 11:22 pm | Permalink

          To Veritas, March 10, 2016 – 5:18 pm 
          Thank you very much for your friendly comment. I like your comments, too. I see it to be a duty and to be a highly positive thing that we can (=we are allowed to…, we are able to…) be part of this blog of Kevin MacDonald and others. Each of us is doing his part. My part is to speak about those tiny things which are very important. — And there are many other things: The highly scholarly and very interesting stories in this blog about the background of many evil things in the world (for us most important the ongoing destruction of our folks and our race) is another important part of our movement. We need all parts, all aspects, all methods of learning and acting in the struggle for our survival. — The text that you quoted is from me.

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          March 11, 2016 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

          Guten tag, Herr Karlfried,

          Yes, I could tell almost immediately from reading the first few words that it had to come from you (this was the article I got it from, btw):

          http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/10/get-into-twitter-be-depressed/

          All what you say is so true about us needing “…all parts, all aspects, all methods of learning and acting in the struggle for our survival.”

          I liken society, a healthy, sane, constructive and productive society, that is, to a military organization, and, like in any good military, there is an important, esteemed place for everyone – from the ‘lowest’ gefreiter .. all the way up to a Generalfeldmarschall – and even though both have different roles, tasks and duties, each man is just as vital (“Wir alle stehen dann, Mutig für einen Mann”), and more importantly, is just as valuable in the fulfillment of his sacred role and duty to the Greater Good, the Cause that transcends them both (“Krieger und Heldentat,
          Finden ihr Lorbeerblatt”
          ).

          This ennobling, enervating spirit, to me, is the fundamental, sublime essence of what makes Germany German. The long, historic, and generational transcendence of the love and care of the Volk – treu Brüder und Schwestern – no matter who they are, or their station in life (“Liebe des Vaterlands, Liebe des freien Manns), is what earned for me the love, respect, and profound admiration that I personally have for Germany.

          Deutschtum is the *ultimate antidote* to oligarchy – and this is the first, most salient and pressing reason that the global judaic elites and their new world orderlies hate, and envy, the Fatherland so much.

          And these are all the more reasons for us to love it so much.

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          March 11, 2016 - 6:41 pm | Permalink

          Karlfried,

          In honor of the Fatherland and dem Deutschen Volke – for all they have been through, both past and present – and especially the sentiments we expressed in our conversation, sentiments, die sind so schön captured and expressed in the (full version of) the Deutsche national anthem (nationalhymne) – with the relevant words bolded for effect – a marvelous rendition performed by der hervorragend held, Heino:

          Deutsche Hymne Das Lied der Deutschen – Heino (mit Orchester)

          Deutschland, Deutschland über alles,
          Über alles in der Welt,
          Wenn es stets zu Schutz und Trutze
          Brüderlich zusammenhält.

          Von der Maas bis an die Memel,
          Von der Etsch bis an den Belt,

          |: Deutschland, Deutschland über alles,
          Über alles in der Welt! :|

          Germany, Germany above all things,
          Above everything in the world,
          When, for protection and defense,
          it always stands brotherly together.

          From the Meuse to the Memel,
          From the Adige to the Belt,

          |: Germany, Germany above all things,
          Above everything in the world! :|

          ~

          Deutsche Frauen, deutsche Treue,
          Deutscher Wein und deutscher Sang

          Sollen in der Welt behalten
          Ihren alten schönen Klang,
          Uns zu edler Tat begeistern
          Unser ganzes Leben lang.

          |: Deutsche Frauen, deutsche Treue,
          Deutscher Wein und deutscher Sang! :|

          German women, German loyalty,
          German wine and German song

          Shall retain in the world
          Their old beautiful chime
          And inspire us to noble deeds
          During all of our life.

          |: German women, German loyalty,
          German wine and German song! :|

          ~

          Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit
          Für das deutsche Vaterland!
          Danach lasst uns alle streben
          Brüderlich mit Herz und Hand!

          Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit
          Sind des Glückes Unterpfand;

          |: Blüh’ im Glanze dieses Glückes,
          Blühe, deutsches Vaterland! :|

          Unity and justice and freedom
          For the German fatherland!
          Let us all strive for this purpose
          Brotherly with heart and hand!

          Unity and justice and freedom
          Are the pledge of happiness;

          |: Bloom in the glow of happiness,
          Bloom, German fatherland! :|

          ~

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          March 11, 2016 - 7:18 pm | Permalink

          @ Karlfried:
          My thanks, too. It’s encouraging to hear that this feeling of brotherhood prevails even when public discourse is so highly circumscribed. Ironically, it’s probably all the more intense for not being allowed a voice.

      • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
        March 11, 2016 - 8:48 pm | Permalink

        Sorry the video is seemingly to have a hard time posting, but just in case look up Heino on YouTube, and watch any of his versions of the song.

        *Also, didn’t intend to put smilie faces in the song lyrics (blog software must’ve did it accidentally) – but I guess they’re not such a bad fit, coincidentally.

  9. March 7, 2016 - 4:16 pm | Permalink

    We need a word that is the opposite of paranoia.

    A paranoia is excessively anxious, fearful, or suspicious of something or someone who may mean to harm to him.

    What Europeans and whites suffer from seem to be the opposite.

    They are so willfully naive and eager to trust and invest hope in that is obviously ruinous and dangerous: massive non-white immigration, black thuggery and sexual debauchery, homo decadence and degeneration, and Jewish cunning fueled by obvious contempt for goyim.

    I thought of afelinoia. Afelis in Greek means ‘naive’.

    Or we might try gullinoia, a thought process of being gullible.

    Or suckonoia which should be obvious: sucker-noia.

    Or maybe cuckonoia will work.

    Excessively trusting is more dangerous than excessively suspicious.

    In nature, the paranoid animals have a better chance of survival than afelinoid ones. World is a dangerous place filled with competitors, predators, parasites, rivals, enemies, and etc. And even those who don’t mean to destroy you physically wanna gain control over you and exploit you. After all, whites didn’t destroy blacks physically and let them live but blacks had to be slaves.

    Jews don’t want equality with us. They have a plantation mentality over us.

    • March 7, 2016 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

      ParaLoia? Paralysis-Noia.

      A bunch of deer in the headlights.

      Just like Eternals in the final scene in Boorman’s ZARDOZ.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 7, 2016 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

      The word you want is Pronoia.

      Pronoia philosophy

      Pronoia can be defined as the opposite of paranoia. A person suffering from paranoia suspects that persons or entities (e.g. governments/deities) conspire against them. A person experiencing pronoia feels that the world around them conspires to do them good.

      The writer Philip K Dick referred to pronoia as an antidote to paranoia in his private work, Exegesis, in which it is mentioned in relation to his perceived protection by an entity he called, V.A.L.I.S., an acronym for Vast Active Living Intelligence System. Published posthumously in 2011, the word ‘pronoia’ first turns up in his Exegesis in January 1980.[5] Dick suggested his own pronoia was based on an ‘intelligent analysis’ of his mystical experiences, and was not, ‘reflexive or mechanical’ in its nature.[6]

      Pronoia is also a prevalent theme in the 1988 novel The Alchemist, by Paulo Coelho. In it, the protagonist, a young boy is told by an older man to pursue his dreams. He tells the boy, “When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.”[7] The book also deals with omens, signs that the universe wants the boy to follow a specific path, which will lead to his goal of fulfilling a dream.

      In the 1997 movie Fierce Creatures, Jamie Lee Curtis’s character describes Kevin Kline’s character as excessively pronoid: “It means that despite all the available evidence, you actually think that people like you. Your perception of life is that it is one long benefit dinner in your honor, with everyone cheering you on and wanting you to win everything. You think you’re the prince, Vince.”

      Pronoia philosophy has been proposed by the astrologer Rob Brezsny. Brezsny’s book, Pronoia Is the Antidote for Paranoia: How the Whole World Is Conspiring to Shower You with Blessings, published in 2005, explores the philosophy of pronoia.[8] [source- the usual]

      https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=pronoia

      Yes- Whites are insufficiently paranoid- insufficiently suspicious.

      • March 8, 2016 - 9:34 am | Permalink

        Altrunoia.

      • wiggins's Gravatar wiggins
        March 8, 2016 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

        Sounds like the outrageous Linda character from the TV show, Gimme Gimme Gimme. Her sister remarked: “Linda, I don’t know what you see when you look in the mirror, but it is not what the rest of us see…”
        Thankfully I got rid of my TV years ago…

    • TZ's Gravatar TZ
      March 8, 2016 - 8:39 am | Permalink

      The Jew has three long-term goals for all non-Jews: a) wipe them out b) enslave them c) make them “Jewish” (only to select minority who can help achieving a or b.

      The Jew doesn’t have a concept of afterlife like the rest. They exist in rational materialist plane and material – instead of spiritual – is their vision of afterlife too. Their hope is to pass a New World to their children and grandchildren where they rule the full known region, the planet Earth, and all past “evil” (against Jews) has been punished and will be punished in the future. This is why they have a perpetually restless soul, always hearing the call of fanatism to do something – the constant neurosis – to achieve their eternal vision of “world domination”, their promised land where peace rule all over the planet. If Jews ever get there, and they most certainly are ready to wait… wait… and wait for infinitely for it. It’s achieved because they have destroyed all the rest of humanity there exist on this planet. Franky, it wouldn’t shock me slightest if one day Jews because of their rational materialist outlook of existance manage once to make the Earth unliveable for all human beings, including themselves.

      The Jew is the grestest misfortunate of all living things.

      • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
        March 8, 2016 - 7:01 pm | Permalink

        Franky, it wouldn’t shock me slightest if one day Jews because of their rational materialist outlook of existance manage once to make the Earth unliveable for all human beings, including themselves.

        ===

        Great point.

        I don’t think Jews, especially the Ashkenazi colonists from Europe – have any kind of natural immunity to depleted uranium, which much of the Middle East having being turned into a DU wasteland – thanks to all these neo-cohen inspired wars they get America and England to do at their imperial behest, in order to make way for their ‘Eretz Yisroel’ (‘greater Israel’) delusions.

    • March 14, 2016 - 2:11 pm | Permalink

      The white mentality has been formed by its surroundings: and some security and control over the environment means whites are evolved to be more trusting, since for millennia they were surrounded by mostly supportive people. (There must be some level of genetic reaction, in any population, to possible threats). we have a level which on balance is too low, when faced with vicious parasites. I hope it won’t end too badly, but everyone here must be pessimistic.

  10. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    March 7, 2016 - 5:57 am | Permalink

    We sell ourselves short by allowing the term antifa to be used. A better name for these boys might be “corporate thugs.” The up side for us is that each of them, for the most part, is a eunuch.

  11. ArchibaldMcGillicuddy's Gravatar ArchibaldMcGillicuddy
    March 7, 2016 - 4:14 am | Permalink

    Great article, Herder seems one of the few intellectuals of his time who offer valuable insights as to who European man is and what his needs are.

    “the premise that if words and concepts are banned and eliminated, then they cannot be thought. ”

    Neuro-linguistic programming is a discipline that shows humans think in words, and language is easily manipulated with sleight-of-mouth techniques to change thoughts.

    “it appears inarguable that we are prone to sick levels of ethno-masochism.”

    Many rivers have frog populations where over half have severe mutations like four legs. Therefore, it appears inarguable that frogs are prone to gross malformity. However, this isnt just happening for no reason. The frogs are becoming malformed because there are toxins and contaminants in the water. Similarly, Europeans are developing malformed minds from a toxic and contaminated media and education system. Both frogs and Europeans are normally completely healthy in the environment they are designed for, and the malformations are due to extreme levels of toxicity.

    • Puzzled's Gravatar Puzzled
      March 7, 2016 - 9:48 am | Permalink

      Huh? “Severe mutations like four legs”? I believe four is the standard number of legs for a frog.

  12. March 6, 2016 - 8:15 pm | Permalink

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/collection/most-popular-concealed-carry-pistols/
    You, YES You, should be armed in a Vibrant Manner!
    get those conceal carry permits !

  13. Charles Jansen's Gravatar Charles Jansen
    March 6, 2016 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Great piece. It is worth noticing that Herder’s views came at the end of the XVIIIth, beginning of the XIXth century. After the so-called Enlightenment started legitimating universal liberalism, and along it the destruction of “organic” regional and national identities; but before the apparition of virulent nationalisms, that went to the degree of motivating European nations to destroy each other in two fratricidal wars.
    Nationalism was a way to resist against the Enlightenment globalist/abstractizing trend. Without doubt it may have been motivated by the same diagnostic as Herder’s. No wonder why Herder is still relevant today. Yet one should not forget that nationalisms have essencialized the national identities to an absurd degree. It was paved with good intentions – anti-globalism, pro-social organicity, pro-authenticity – but ended up very badly. Perhaps there are other ways to make up for complete human beings, more precisely here complete Europeans.
    For my part, I would join Evola’s criticism of nationalism: the latter was a bastard child of modernity, looking for authenticity inside the modern, naturalist, anti-sacred domain the Enlightenment had shaped. The “genuine” Europe of the Middle Ages was far for nationalistic in the XIXth century sense. It had its own ecumenical religion, Christianity, and better than that, its own expressions of initiatory traditions: the Templars, the Devotees of Love (Fideli d’Amore) and others. Genuineness should perhaps not be looked for on our crumbling nations but in a new global White “nation” that would also have a spiritual aspect.

  14. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    March 6, 2016 - 4:52 pm | Permalink

    Neocons should welcome the rise of Donald Trump. It is actually good for Israel.

    Think…

    The media, academia, culture, government, and political activism in US and EU are dominated by Libs and Progs.

    One reason why Israel has ended up on the shi*t list is it has grown closer to the GOP. It pissed off many progs to see Netanyahu praise the likes of McCain and Romney while disrespecting Obama.

    So, the ‘left’ and people of color turned on Israel.

    But if it’s Trump vs Hillary and if Israel supports Hillary, progs and people of color will be less hostile to Israel.

    And since Hillary is a shillary for the Zionist-dominated military-industrial complex, the Neocons can leave the GOP and become Democrats again.

    If Nuland was given so much leeway to mess up Ukraine under Obama the Democrat, Neocons can cause a lot of mischief as Democrats. And if Israel follows the Neocon lead and backs the Democratic Party, then the prog rage against Israel will abide.

    It’s like progs stopped beating up on Microsoft once it got with the proggy program.

  15. Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
    March 6, 2016 - 2:53 pm | Permalink

    I think this “antifa” thing is at least partly inborn.

    Look at the Baldwin brothers from Hollywood. The oldest brother, Alec Baldwin, is an obnoxious hyper-emotional leftist, whereas the youngest brother, Stephen, is a normal, politically conservative human being. It has to be inborn.

    Its too bad we can’t control the “type” of white person who is born. If we could, then this problem would mostly be eliminated.

  16. March 6, 2016 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

    One of the left-wing groups gracing the punch-up in Dover was Jewdas. Gilad Atzmon has thoughts.

  17. March 6, 2016 - 12:22 pm | Permalink
    • Whitey Lew's Gravatar Whitey Lew
      March 7, 2016 - 2:14 am | Permalink

      I knew the Holycost was bad but I never dreamed it was this bad.
      This should be required reading in all our high schools.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        March 7, 2016 - 4:49 pm | Permalink

        Dreamworks SKG are working furiously to prepare the script (needs to be more histrionic).

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      March 7, 2016 - 8:54 am | Permalink

      Thanks for the link. It brought tears to my eyes – from laughing.

  18. FKA Max's Gravatar FKA Max
    March 6, 2016 - 12:18 pm | Permalink

    Thank you very much, Mr. Joyce.
    I have been doing research into evolutionary psychology lately, and maybe evolutionary psychology can offer a potential explanation for Antifa behavior.
    In my experience Antifa are consciously aware of the fact, that they are inferior and weak in many regards, and their radicalism and violence, etc., is a way for them to gain attention, stand out or impress in my opinion and experience, and therefore to up their chances of mating.
    I think if we look at Antifa as a fashion trend/statement and mating strategy, we can gain more clarity into their true motivations and behavior. Also open borders, non-traditionalism and cosmopolitanism increases the chances of mating for inferior specimen. Whites (both male and female) who would be out-competed by superior White specimen in a predominately White society increase their chances of mating and coupling in a multicultural society. Therefore, they advocate for multiculturalism not out of some higher idealism and morality, but, to put it crudely and simply, to get laid.
    Some interesting reading here:

    In a monogamous world, men will find young women especially attractive. My reasoning is this: if men have to commit to one woman for life, and not have sex before marriage, then the men who breed most will be the ones who pick young wives. Conversely, in a relaxed free-loving polygynous society, the men who do best will be the ones who have broader tastes, as these will have the most opportunities for fathering children.

    Let us start, though, with monogamy. In monogamous societies, I would expect there to be massive emphasis on youth when it comes to judging women’s beauty, and I would expect women to be more interested in fashion than men. Men would pick women according to their fertility, and unless women came up with a way to mimic youth and health that could fool men, a woman’s fashion sense would be of very little help to her in making herself attractive to men.

    However, a woman’s fashion sense would not be useless. Imagine a society in which there are not very many women around who are available. Such a society was the one in which we evolved. In the world of the forager, a potential mate came along seldom, and one usually only had a small selection of women from which to choose a life partner. In this society, a woman who had known the local men for ages and was on good terms with them, was very nice, but perhaps not the best looking or a little bit past her prime, might lose out to some slip of a thing who walked out of the forest. A foreign woman might out-compete all the local women, even if she hardly spoke the language, if she was young and pretty, and this would not please the local women. What could these women do to keep the stranger out? Well, just as language seems to have evolved partly to keep out outsiders (a human who has learned a language as an adult will almost never fully master it and pass as a local), so too could fashion. The local women could make it next to impossible for the foreigner to pass as a local, and become accepted in society, by coming up with many arbitrary and subtle rules of fashion.
    Does this fit the facts? Well, no one really knows how many affairs men of the past had, but it seems reasonable to imagine that in the days of the landed gentry, such as in pre-revolution France, the dandyish men who took great trouble to dress in the latest fashions were having more affairs outside of their marriages thanks to this fashion interest. Even though their world was officially monogamous, it was in effect, so far as genes were concerned, polygynous. In some polygynous tribal societies today, the men parade in gaudy face-paints and costumes, and are picked out by the women. Only the men who understand the language of the face painting and costume making get it right, thus excluding outsiders and cutting down competition. [Emphasis added. This mating strategy comes awfully close to Antifa and Hipster behavior and dress code in my opinion. Dress to impress or to stand out, not matter how ridiculous or pretentious it looks or comes across. Any type of attention is better than to be ignored.]

    So, that is my theory: that the fact that modern British women are more interested in fashion than men is down to a person’s ability to narrow the field of competition by excluding outsiders from the in-group of rivals. In my childhood, there were very few fashion magazines for men, and these generally dealt with the very up-market end of fashion, since only rich men were getting more mates through fashion. Today, marriage seems to be a fair bit less monogamous, and pre-marital sex is so common, that men have started to show some, but not much, interest in fashion.

    http://www.lloydianaspects.co.uk/evolve/fashion.html

    • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
      March 6, 2016 - 1:52 pm | Permalink

      Bravo Max! Superb evo-psych analysis for the motivations on the part of the antifa girlie-boyz – the evil untermensch – the ‘lesser brethren’ of our people.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      March 6, 2016 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

      I wish that the essay linked to above—as sad an excuse for rational thought as I have seen since I last looked at the New York Times—were classifiable as stand-up comedy material (i.e., frank rubbish), but evidently its author clamors to be taken seriously. What a pity that a commenter at this site is abetting him!

      • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
        March 8, 2016 - 5:58 pm | Permalink

        Pierre, although the evo-psych article Max provided is not the best or most scholarly choice for the post, he still made some great, very salient points on the deeper psychological motives of the antifa vermin.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          March 9, 2016 - 6:15 am | Permalink

          I don’t agree. I think that what the linked author deems psychological analysis is dorm-room bull-session stuff. He sees what he wants to see, gets a laugh out of it, but observable conduct and the limited, reasonable conclusions to be drawn from it be damned.

          To put the matter in the terms that the hard sciences would use, the “data” offered and conclusions advanced are not falsifiable, hence not verifiable, hence not genuinely useful to the reader or student—”useful” here meaning providing a material analysis that can serve to defend our position or undermine theirs.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      March 6, 2016 - 5:58 pm | Permalink

      FKA Max,

      I believe Norman Mailer’s essay “The White Negro” paints a picture of the hipster mindset.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_White_Negro

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      March 7, 2016 - 5:23 am | Permalink

    • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
      March 8, 2016 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

      In my experience Antifa are consciously aware of the fact, that they are inferior and weak in many regards, and their radicalism and violence, etc., is a way for them to gain attention, stand out or impress in my opinion and experience, and therefore to up their chances of mating.

      I think if we look at Antifa as a fashion trend/statement and mating strategy, we can gain more clarity into their true motivations and behavior. Also open borders, non-traditionalism and cosmopolitanism increases the chances of mating for inferior specimen. Whites (both male and female) who would be out-competed by superior White specimen in a predominately White society increase their chances of mating and coupling in a multicultural society.

      ===

      Max,

      I would have to say this is half-right observation, since this ‘rootless cosmopolitanism’ really helps average to below-average women waaayyy more than it does average to below-average men – the ‘lesser betas’ and omega males – who in a more traditional society, with the expectation of monogamy to keep female hypergamy in check, could be reasonably assured that they would find a female to marry (and yes, a woman that was their social and genetic equal, or very close to it).

      Thanks to liberal universalism and Open Borders, the pool of eligible men largely increases, which is why women typically favor these trends, because it puts the supply & demand curve strongly in their favor.

      This, up until recently, was presumptive of an ideal scenario, of course, where such a process in the past was more tolerable since it was largely an inter-European movement of peoples. Let’s hope the realities of the ‘riff-raff-ugee’ invasion will wake Europe’s women up to these biological facts – especially, and contrary to satanic feminist lies, that they absolutely need their native men if they are not merely to survive as an ethnic people, but merely to survive, period.

      ~

      The Lord says, “The women of Zion are haughty,
      walking along with outstretched necks, flirting with their eyes,
      tripping along with mincing steps, with ornaments jingling on their ankles. Therefore the Lord will bring sores on the heads of the women of Zion; the Lord will make their scalps bald.”

      ~ Isaiah 3:16-17

      &

      “In that day seven women will take hold of one man and say, “We will eat our own food and provide our own clothes; only let us be called by your name. Take away our disgrace!”
      ~ Isaiah 4:1

      • FKA Max's Gravatar FKA Max
        March 8, 2016 - 7:55 pm | Permalink

        Agreed, Veritas.

        Beta females/female SJWs benefit the most if the immigration influx is mostly male, as is the case currently in Europe. Higher supply of men/more competition among men means higher demand/more choices for women.
        Sex/gender ratios are extremely important to take into account in this regard. Thank you very much for pointing this out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_sex_ratio
        Still, White Beta males (and sometimes White Beta females) will have advantages with more attractive Third World women (men) because of economic superiority (higher incomes, higher net worth, etc. than Third Worlders), i.e. mail-order brides, etc., so globalization and open borders benefits both White Beta males and females. But you are correct traditional monogamy in a nationalist/nativist, balanced-gender ratio society would ensure most likely that White Beta males would marry White Beta females and have families, which I think is fair and reasonable, but they do not care about the survival and preservation of their culture and society, and are only interested in their own selfish sexual goals and pleasures.
        They rather hook up with Third World Alpha males or females than to protect their heritage and their genes by opting for a White Beta partner or to be single and childless.
        Thank you very much, again, for your feedback, Veritas.

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          March 9, 2016 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

          Max,

          You’re welcome, and thank you for your feedback, and we should make clear one thing – that much of the illegal alien interlopers in Europe are not ‘alphas’ in the a state of nature – they’re just massively propped up by the evil Judaist regimes, perhaps to appear so.

          Many of the young’ single, male criminal vermin are the flotsam, and low-social (and biological) status dregs of their native lands .. and this is often a huge motivation for them to relocate elsewhere in the first place. Again, whatever image of these losers to the contrary, are fully aided and abetted, backed-up and bankrolled by the Bolshevik basturds in Brussels.

          “An Exit Strategy For Traitors” (views on the ground from Germany)
          http://www.europeancivilwar.com/an-exit-strategy-for-traitors-views-on-the-ground-from-germany/

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          March 9, 2016 - 6:20 pm | Permalink

          Also Max, many of the antifa scum are so personally dirty, disgusting and mentally ill, that I doubt many of them, at least the males, is hooking up with any foreigners, ‘alpha’ or otherwise.

          Many of the ‘European’ males in these movements I additionally think crave a White women, not a short. squat, hirsute ausländer – you know, as a ‘reward’ for their mangina mania, and their tantrum-throwing histrionics (fully protected by the police and the state they’re supposedly soooo against – ROFLMAO).

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          March 9, 2016 - 6:48 pm | Permalink

          Max et al,

          One other thing.

          If we had a traditional, patriarchal society, like we did in the not-too-distant past, we wouldn’t have so damn many deformed, fa-tattooed, pink/blue haired androgynous grotesqueries passing themselves off as people – all in the name of Eeeequaliteee

          In other words, monogamy/patriarchy creates, and celebrates beauty, where equalism, universalism and cosmopolitanism, fundamentally, destroys it.

          Exhibit A –

          Male Choosiness, Female Beauty And Monogamy

          Here’s a hypothesis that I haven’t seen elsewhere: More beautiful women will be found in monogamous cultures, or among monogamously-inclined races.

          Where women don’t (or can’t) sleep around, and where men are expected to assume a heavy economic and emotional responsibility for the women they woo, men will be choosier about the women they date and marry. Monogamy selects for male choosiness.

          If you’re a man, and you’re limited to dating only a few women in your lifetime, and there are onerous familial and cultural pressures to marry the first or second woman you date, you are not going to throw away your one shot at a girl — not to mention all those resources you accumulated to win her over — on an Amanjaw Marcuntte. You’ll take your time assessing the available female goods, and aim for the hottest babe you can get. You’ll waste little time or energy spelunking slutty fat chicks or mustachioed feminists.

          Over eons, this results in the more monogamous races and cultures of humanity producing more beautiful women. Of course, seismic shifts in the mating market have been underway for the past 60 or so years, so I expect a future of less beautiful women, on average and proportionate to their overall numbers, compared to the recent past. The one exception to this uglification trend will be the total bifurcation into a female beauty oasis of the 1% ruling class from the Gorgonian masses

          […]

          https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/male-choosiness-female-beauty-and-monogamy/

  19. ex South African's Gravatar ex South African
    March 6, 2016 - 11:59 am | Permalink

    “The Antifa is overwhelmingly a youth phenomenon”.

    This reminds me of the book by one Wiebke Stelling, 1972, Jugend zwischen Schuld und Schicksal, Steigende Kriminalität einer bindungslosen Generation/A youth between guilt and fate, rising crime amongst an adrift generation.

    Excerpt from the introduction (loosely translated): “1945 everything was wiped out according to plan what could have served as a role model and guiding star. With the collapse of the Third Reich all concepts were destroyed, without which no nation and certainly no youth can live: loyalty, sense of duty and accomplishment.”

    Why was the Antifa phenomenon non-existant in South Africa? Most probably because all potential criminal youth material was absorbed by the draft and afterward by our “national guard” (military camps we had to do after the intial conscription phase) during the bush war phase. And before those years we had able leaders which one could look up to. The years of the rise of Christian Nationalism.

  20. gubbler chechenova's Gravatar gubbler chechenova
    March 6, 2016 - 11:34 am | Permalink

    When Communism collapsed in the USSR and Eastern Europe, the Western Left was unfazed. If anything, it was relieved cuz it no longer needed to be associated with the Totalitarian Left. It felt liberated from the association with Eastern Communism.

    So, why didn’t the same thing happen with the Western Right after WWII? With the fall of Fascist Italy and National Socialist Germany, the New Right could have felt liberated from association with those tyrannical and imperialist powers.

    But unlike the Western Left after the fall of communism, the Western Right wasn’t liberated by fall of the Far Right. Rather, it was burdened with the crimes of Hitler and Mussolini.

    Communism falls, the Western Left feels liberated from associations of its dark history.

    Fascism falls, the Western Right feels chained to associations of its dark history.

    So, what really matters is control of narrative.

    Since Libs control the academia and media, once communism fell and went away, the crimes of the Far Left could easily be swept under the rug and forgotten.

    But the crimes of fascism would be recycled over and over and over and over for public consumption.

    Also, while the Jews-as-victims-of-far-right narrative would be played over and over and over — every year has its new Holocaust movie — , the narrative of Jews-as-communist-villains could be banned.

    If anything, the narrative is usually about Jews-as-super-victims-under-the-far-right and Jews-as-main-victims-under-the-far-left(Soviet communism) while conveniently overlooking the fact that Jews played a prominent role in the rise of communism all over Russia and Eastern Europe.

    Those who control the narrative also control the context. It is true that Jews were victimized by Soviet communism in the long run, but they’d also helped create that system. Ignoring the larger context while only focusing on Jewish victim-hood misses the point. It’s like showing German citizens being tyrannized by Nazis and then overrun by beastly Soviets without taking into account that too many ordinary Germans had supported Hitler’s rise to power and the Nazi war-mongering that led to eventual defeat of Germany at the hands of USSR.

    Washington DC has a gigantic Holocaust Memorial and a pathetic Communist Terror Memorial. That sort of says it all. It’s all about the control of Narrative.

    If the Right controlled the Narrative, the fall of communism would not have liberated the Western Left from the ‘sins’ of history. The Right-controlled media and academia would have regurgitated over and over and over the evils carried out by the Left.

    But since the Left controlled media/academia, they could just shrug their shoulders and say, “It’s past history, forget about it, and let’s move on.” But these same people use TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD over and over and over to remind whites of ‘white guilt’. Control of Narrative.

    Someone should write an Right Novel like TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD and spread it all around and make it part of the canon. It would be about whites victimized by black crime, globalist economics, mass migration, cultural filth, and etc. An UNCLE TOM’S CABIN of the Right. After all, there have been countless white victims of the Rise of Color and Globalism.
    I haven’t read TURNER DIARIES and don’t want to because it’s stupidly fantastical. Much more effective would be a simple humanist novel about a simple white person who is done wrong by the system and by social/racial changes. This novel, if written, could be cheaply printed and left all over for people to pick up in college campuses, parks, malls, and etc for free.

    Stupid violent fantasies are for kids. Even if a political movement eventually needs to resort to violence, it must first win moral credits by tugging at heartstrings and making people aware of the injustice faced by so many ordinary Americans who are being assaulted physically, spiritually, morally, and culturally.

    PS. There has been a revival of anti-Sovietism lately in media and academia, but it has less to do with the ideological/moral failing of communism as a leftist ideology than with the fact that communism had been dominated by EVIL GENTILES like Stalin and all those Russians who, under Putin, are the monsters all over again because they won’t bend over to the Jewish-funded agenda of Homo Imperialism.

    Timothy Snyder’s attack on the USSR isn’t really ideological. It’s about bashing Stalin as the representative of ‘Russian’ imperialism and autocraticism. He has no interest in the Jewish role in the conception and development of the most totalitarian system known to man. He is essentially just a shill of Globalist Jews who own publications like the New York Review of Books, aka the Soros Rag.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      March 7, 2016 - 9:17 am | Permalink

      “With the fall of Fascist Italy and National Socialist Germany, the New Right could have felt liberated from association with those tyrannical and imperialist powers. ”

      National Socialism and Fascism (even Italian style) were “right”, only in the context of being “right” of Communism. While it is true that Mussolini sought, in some way, to restore the Roman Empire, Germany and Italy were neither tyrannical nor imperialistic in any real sense of the words.
      In my view, the “right” in the English speaking world dropped the ball by allowing the “left’s” false narrative of WWII to be unchallenged. War and jingoism go hand in hand, but at the end of the day an honest retrospective view would have done more good than harm. Failure to challenge that narrative encouraged the tribe to up the ante.

    • Bob's Gravatar Bob
      March 7, 2016 - 10:12 am | Permalink

      Precisely! It is all about control of the narrative.

  21. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    March 6, 2016 - 11:07 am | Permalink

    He argued that each nation was separate, distinguished by climate, education, custom, tradition, and heredity.

    I don’t know what to make of this. Nothing in this world is static. It can’t be; if you think it is, forces will come along and disabuse you of that conviction. At what point does a nation (any white nation, that is) decide that a custom or a tradition is either wrong and must be abandoned, no matter that it’s been kept for hundreds of years, even so ancient that its origins have been lost in the mists of time?

    Every generation inherits traditions and customs from its fathers and mothers, but precious few seem to have the guts to sort through them and decide which are good, deserving to continue, and which need to be laid to rest. As I see it, it is our people’s desire to refrain from self-examination that makes us sitting ducks for those will force change (“Progress”) on us in their own interests.

  22. Anon's Gravatar Anon
    March 6, 2016 - 11:04 am | Permalink

    George Clooney or Looney says Trump is a ‘xenophobic fascist’. (In truth, I’m the only true fascist, and nationalism isn’t ‘xenophobia’. Nationalism is ethno- or geno-protection, the opposite of genocide. Globalists are ethnophobes who hate the idea of culture, history, identity, and nation.)

    Super-rich whites like George Looney can afford to talk ‘generous’ and pretend to care about Sudanese and travel around the world with the likes of Bono and act the celebrity saints while living in giant mansions, making 20 million per movie, and staying in five star hotels.

    But when working class Americans want some job security and border control in a globalizing world of endless scab immigration/migration and globo-Zionist war-mongering, they are demeaned as ‘xenophobic racists’ supporting a ‘fascist’.

    The moral narcissism of the globo-Liberal elites is hilarious.
    This is why National Humanism is the only thing that will work. National Humanism is the only real force that can take on globo-elitism dominated by the GLOB.

    Also, nationalism is best since, when used properly, it is anti-imperialist. It says every nation should defend itself and mind its own business. But globalism is a form of imperialism, and it uses the homo agenda as ‘moral’ weapon to attack the cultures and values of other nations. Homo flag is the victory flag of Globo-supremacism. And Clooney is just a Hollywood dog of the Studio moguls who support nationalism for Israel but globalist destruction for Palestinians, Europeans, and American working class folks.

    • rosa's Gravatar rosa
      March 8, 2016 - 9:40 am | Permalink

      Very well said.
      Ben Affleck went to Calais to film the “Jungle” and ask Cameron to get all the immigrants from there.
      As soon as he left the scene, his crew was attacked and robbed of PC, phones, cameras, etc.
      Then after few days the French government finally decided to close the “Jungle”.
      I suppose if Affleck would have attacked, Holland would have sent the Army and would have ordered all razed.

  23. John's Gravatar John
    March 6, 2016 - 10:57 am | Permalink

    I just can’t get my brain around it. Wouldn’t a simple pros and cons type argument make it plain that mass third world immigration into the West is a very bad idea?

    Pro:

    Maybe they have some good food.

    Con:

    They make the West more like the toilet societies they come from which is a consequence of their innate qualities, culture and religion.

    The crime rate goes up considerably.

    http://www.dw.com/en/identifying-the-roots-of-immigrant-crime/a-1953916

    Social cohesion is greatly diminished.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/bumbling-along-in-search-of-the-new-we/article1080080/

    They make the country dumber.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1285815/Bundesbanks-Thilo-Sarrazin-Immigrants-making-Germany-dumber.html

    http://www.dw.com/en/saxony-moves-to-front-of-german-education-class/a-3801926

    There is the constant threat of terror attack which also allows the authorities to justify the Surveillance State.

    http://markhumphrys.com/islamic.attacks.west.html

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      March 7, 2016 - 9:22 am | Permalink

      In the eyes of the tribe, you have your pros and cons reversed.

  24. March 6, 2016 - 10:56 am | Permalink

    I fully understand dislike of ‘Antifa’. However, in my view this article doesn’t take into account economic and other pressures. (This is a mistake in many philosophers’ work, and generally in accounts by people whose lives are stable). Human beings are alone in the natural world in needing shelter, warmth, food and so on, and also defence against marauders, from ages zero to say twelve years. There’s no alternative to planning and organisation if human beings are to survive. There has to be joint action, joint language, groups, herds, folk; and there have to be many people who do what they’re told. Herder of course wrote long before Darwin. And long before serious measurements were made of Africans and their mentality. The poor chap in the first photo is the same type as men with sandwich boards in the 19th century, getting a meagre living from advertising with someone else’s sign. He is a beaten-down type, a sort of negative of vicious mercenaries who take money, when they can, for destruction and cruelty and rape and torture. In both cases, the common factor is the result of money being deployed irresponsibly behind the scenes, and, for centuries, this has been Jewish money. A solution, if it’s possible at all, has to take all this into account. (I’m not suggesting Andrew Joyce doesn’t know this – I’m certain he does).

    • Flossie's Gravatar Flossie
      March 7, 2016 - 11:16 am | Permalink

      “The poor chap in the first photo . . . getting a meagre living . . . a beaten-down type.” Are you kidding?! These antifa types aren’t beaten-down types! Most of them come from middle- and upper-middle-class homes, and I suspect they’ve got daddy issues. In any case, they have much more in common with Marie Antoinette playing at shepherdess.

      • March 7, 2016 - 4:44 pm | Permalink

        Well, it’s hard to be sure. I don’t suppose there’s much accurate information; or if there is, it would be hidden, as it is with black academic performance. But why should students take £10 for yelling at some demo, following a sort of sea-shanty type? Why should the ‘antifa’ person hold a ridiculous sign? Why do some European women hold up a sign in English saying ‘Welcome Immigrants’? I don’t deny there are some, for example Gilmore of Pink Floyd, whose son did a protest – which may have been serious rather than just Jewish. But most of these as in the photo I doubt are middle class. I remember going to Socialist Worker meetings in London in the 1990s, and when questions were asked all, and I mean every single one, was a shambling speaker, from Scotland, or the north of England, or Ireland, or somewhere like Newcastle, all taken in by the Jewish rotten carrot dangled before them of class war or whatever.

        • rosa's Gravatar rosa
          March 8, 2016 - 9:34 am | Permalink

          Rerevisionist,
          in the ’90 and in UK, perhaps. Here in Italy the “Antifa” (like those portrayed in the picture: “Bologna…”) are mostly from the middle-upper class, radical-chic, “Gauche-caviar”, you name it.
          And a recent survey in Berlin has shown the German Antifas too belong to the same class as the Italians. They are usually in the 16-30 years range of age, live with their parents,more or less study at University, are single men. On a German newspaper a design was published: a young, bearded man is dressing himself for the daily manifestation, while her beloved mother is preparing sandwich (-Nutella, dear? or cheese and mayonnaise ? or perhaps “prosciutto” ?-) for him.
          I met a lot of “antifa” people in my life: they were seldom poor or coming from woking class milieu; they graduated later than the others, but they were quickly to grab jobs thank to their connections (political or familial ones) and became rapidly very “bourgeois”, even though they kept voting for leftist parties and championing anything very progressive, from abortion(not for their sisters or daughters) to gay marriage (they are all very straight and, if divorced, remarry with a richer or younger woman), from vegan food to alternative energies (but they have all got expensive and gas drinking cars), and so on. If they hire an immigrant as baby sitter or maiden, they usually pay her “in nero” and of course they live in elegant, safe and very “white” neighborhood (by instance on the hills surrounding Bologna or Turin). They work in the banks or at the Universities, they are journalists, lawyers, judges, doctors, etc.
          I think you, in the USA, don’t really know the true “Antifa”, even though a young Bernie Sanders could be a good representative.

        • Veritas's Gravatar Veritas
          March 9, 2016 - 6:59 pm | Permalink

          I met a lot of “antifa” people in my life: they were seldom poor or coming from woking class milieu; they graduated later than the others, but they were quickly to grab jobs thank to their connections (political or familial ones) and became rapidly very “bourgeois”, even though they kept voting for leftist parties and championing anything very progressive, from abortion(not for their sisters or daughters) to gay marriage (they are all very straight and, if divorced, remarry with a richer or younger woman), from vegan food to alternative energies (but they have all got expensive and gas drinking cars), and so on. If they hire an immigrant as baby sitter or maiden, they usually pay her “in nero” and of course they live in elegant, safe and very “white” neighborhood (by instance on the hills surrounding Bologna or Turin). They work in the banks or at the Universities, they are journalists, lawyers, judges, doctors, etc.

          ===

          Exactly Rosa.

          Antifa; useful idiots & tools of the Capitalist System

          […]

          Next we have the Antifa degenerates, the progeny of the Anarchist movement, and self proclaimed ‘rebels’ against the system. So rebellious are these inner city hipsters, that they purposely break all patriarchal norms, such as bathing, the use of shampoo, and basic grooming. When these slimy & effeminate social justice warriors aren’t illegally squatting in abandoned buildings, they receive funding from government agencies to operate ‘anti-racist’ activities. Unfortunately, this proved to be another case of anarchists biting the hand that feeds them, with the Liberal Abbott government closing funding for the ‘Building Community Resilience Program’, which proved to be a front for ‘Exit White Power’ Australia. Not only was the capitalist government funding the ‘anti-racist’ Marxists, but the sterile university students parade in their designer, mass produced Che Guevara shirts, while getting a pat on the back from their ageing leftist professor, who is about as radical & edgy as an episode of Ellen Degeneres.

          […]

          http://goldendawnaus.blogspot.com/2015/10/antifa-useful-idiots-tools-of.html

  25. March 6, 2016 - 9:49 am | Permalink

    The Golden Dawn has shown what must be done to counteract the “antifa” faction. The problem is, like their Jew masters, the antifa have become perpetual victims to whom the Jews have applied the old Polish proverb. “The (Jew) antifa agent cries out in pain as he strikes you.” Thus, those defending themselves from an attack by the antifa become criminals for doing so.

    Nationalists should tear out a leaf from the Jew’s big book of social terrorism. Nationalists must become like mad dogs, too dangerous to bother. A bloody nose is not enough, the antifa need to see their brethren swinging in the breeze from lampposts with signs around their necks reading – “I’m an antifascist, that’s why I committed ethnosuicide.”

    It’s going to get ugly, really ugly. Jews are running the show and they will not allow any other outcome. They have said and written it repeatedly throughout their history, “Its either us or them, one shall not remain.”

    White people can either anticipate the ugliness and respond in kind with double the effort, or they can wait until they are being massacred as the whites have been massacred in Africa.

    Either way its going to get ugly because Jews will not allow any other outcome. Jews revel in war, bloodshed, violence and terrorism. As Nathan Rothschild said, (I paraphrase) “War is the best bizness I’ve ever done.” (meaning the Battle of Waterloo).

    There is no longer any possibility of soft-soaping the situation. Those insisting on doing so are merely deferring their terrible future fate. Like putting off treatment for a fatal illness, the longer it is deferred, the worse it will be in the end. There will be no peace until the Jew is no more among white civilization.

    • royalbrecht's Gravatar royalbrecht
      March 7, 2016 - 5:47 am | Permalink

      I Concur…

      This is, IMO, the most logical comment on this topic so far…, BY far!

      We White Nationalists/Separatists/Advocates can either take the bloody and messy way out and let ourselves be maneuvered into WW3 by the cunning Jew…, and probably lose everything in the process (because WN/S/A are severely outnumbered and outgunned).

      OR

      “We” will need to…,
      “accelerate the growth of our problem solving abilities by an exponential factor”…,
      so as to leap frog ahead of the Malignant-Jew narrative and “head it off at the pass”.

      So the question for me is;

      “How can I (or “We”) transmit the required information to a global population
      (for in order to prevent the Jews from sparking a Third World War,
      that Whites will surely pay dearly for,
      we will need to work on ALL Racial cohorts.
      [i.e. the Chinese, Blacks, Islamics, Mestizos, and almost every other Race that has Jew-implanted misguided thoughts of victimhood “at the hands of ‘evil Whites’ ”
      AND
      are brainwashed just as much as most Whites are…, only in a different way]
      in order to contain the Jew and avoid global WMD meltdown?

      The present “healing-charade” [at least I hope it is a charade] of Donald Trump getting “repeatedly accused”…,
      first malignantly by a cunning Jew and later,
      “repeatedly being questioned on the David Duke topic”,
      by previously shown to be “otherwise friendly” reporters, shows me that Trump is either;

      A) a Stupid Coward…, judging by his “tail between his legs response” to “Our” clearly, and almost only, well thought out global model of the Psychological and Geopolitical Theatre,
      and repeatedly ‘DISAVOWING’ one of the leading players with one of the most complete “Psycho-Geo-Bio-Political-Models” of the global situation on the planet.

      OR

      B) Trump has anticipated that the festering, rat-like, Jewish-controlled Media would pull a,
      “David Duke-KKK-defamation-by-association Psychological Attack”,
      on him and,
      like any good lawyer,
      anticipated that the Malignant-Jew-Plaintiff would eventually
      “open this can of worms” and has “turned it” on his opponent by passing “it” off to “Us” WN/S/As to let “Us” be the ones to do the dirty work of “breaking the White masses into the topic of,
      and eventually curing it of,
      the reflexive, Jew-induced, knee-jerk, hate-filled reaction that is an essential component of any eventual “Racial-Jewish-Genetic-Psychological” cure.
      In a nut shell;
      “We White Nationalists” have been given the Assignment, “in a covert manner”, of curing the balance of the world so that Donald Trump can take over,
      once “We” have gotten the ball rolling,
      to avoid the one political land-mine that Donald Trump may not be able to survive this early in the game.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        March 8, 2016 - 5:09 pm | Permalink

        https://aryanskynet.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/supermarket-superstar-trump-and-the-tabloids/

        Aryan Skynet have run a thought-provoking series of articles setting out the case for Trump as the Likud’s man, GOP outsider though he is.

        • roy albrecht's Gravatar roy albrecht
          March 11, 2016 - 3:47 am | Permalink

          Look at what you see around you and decide.
          The Jew-Stream Media generally hates Trump, but the people, as seen by the over-flowing, capacity crowds of veiled Nazi Saluting well wishers, seem to love Trump.

          Is it not possible that the majority of Jews refuse to accept the finality that the majority of the people have given up on trying to find truth in the lying Jew-stream mass media and are therefore frantically pumping out anti-Trump propaganda with their last breath?

          Is it not possible some Jews have accepted that the “Critical Mass of Awakened Whites” has been reached and are therefore eager to get on the “Frontal Wave Band Wagon” with their own media and make a profit?

          Does there not come a time when one needs to accept that one has lost the game and decide to make the best of the world that is about to come?

          Where is the profit of being a “Liar with the Losers” when one can be a “Truth Teller with the Winners” and be on the good side of the next president of the USA?

  26. Stogumber's Gravatar Stogumber
    March 6, 2016 - 7:31 am | Permalink

    German “Volk” and “voelkisch” could perfectly be translated by “ethny” and “ethnic”.
    In fact, “ethnic” and “ethnies” have become popular in the Anglosphere only under German influence. (The origin is of course, Greek, in both cases.)

  27. Theodora's Gravatar Theodora
    March 6, 2016 - 7:08 am | Permalink

    I remember a wise man once saying ´if you are not a socialist in your twenties, you have no heart, but if you are still a socialist in your thirties, you have no brain.´

    I found that rather charming although I disagreed on the first part of the frase because socialism is a fake ideologie, it is a surrogate for Christianity.

    • Curmudgeon's Gravatar Curmudgeon
      March 7, 2016 - 9:41 am | Permalink

      True socialism is nationalism, as is true fascism. There have been few “true” Socialist governments or fascist governments that have existed. Those that were successful, such as Sweden pre Olaf Palme were turned into parodies. The same could be said for Spain, post Franco.
      As long as the tribe controls the issuance of money, alternate economic models will not be allowed to survive.

      • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
        March 7, 2016 - 11:01 pm | Permalink

        The right tribe should control issuance of money.

        I nominate the Semi-holes- the half-fast Indians of Florida.

Comments are closed.