If you think Donald Trump is getting a hard time from an openly one-sided media, then consider what is happening in Britain where the Labour Party has been punished for months for the temerity to reject the Jewish political agenda.
But now the law of unintended consequences has finally caught up with the manufactured “Labour anti-Semitism” pseudo-crisis. No-one could have predicted that it would backfire so deliciously — or that it would turn into such a potential “red pill” moment on the realities of Jewish power in Britain today.
It happened during a BBC interview with leading Labour left-winger and former London Mayor Ken Livingstone. He was being interrogated about a witless female Muslim Labour MP who had lost her job over a re-tweet she made two years ago, despite apologising in public four times. Pressed to repent, Livingstone finally snapped and came out with the fated words.
Hitler was supporting Zionism… Let’s remember when Hitler won his election in 1932, his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel.
For good measure he then said the woman, Naz Shah, was the victim of a “well-orchestrated campaign by the Israel lobby” and repeated it all later.

It was a jaw-dropper, a real moment to savour. The heavens duly fell in on him courtesy of the media slime machine that never sleeps. Buckets of ordure were duly tipped over his head while the pack set off in pursuit. The most surreal moment came when one notorious non-Jewish Friend of Israel, John Mann, chased Livingstone into a toilet.
Livingstone refuses to backtrack or apologize. He has been duly suspended and an inquiry into his comments has been announced. In all the uproar no-one initially noticed one small detail — everything he said was true. Why stating a historical truth amounts to anti-Semitism is not clear, although apparently many Jews were “offended.”
Here is where the law of unintended consequences kicks in. People (who would never read TOO) have tapped the words “Haavara agreement” into search engines and been astonished at what they read. The 1933 Haavara agreement between the World Zionist Organisation and National Socialist Germany allowed Jews to emigrate with all their wealth to Palestine. The Nazi agreement on the transfer of Jews to their “historic homeland” runs completely against everything most people have been taught. It is one of those non-secret secrets which has been effectively buried in contemporary teaching of history. In one of the largest archives of twentieth-century history, the BBC, there is not one word about this, let alone a TV or radio documentary. (The only documentary is this one from 1984.)
That is the way our political establishment want to keep it. The delicate and complicated issue of German-Jewish relations before the war is a story they do not want the public investigating at all. For them, it all has to begin and end with what they call “the Holocaust.”
Now many astonished, curious young people will be able to ask — what else do we not know? What is this about a Jewish boycott, for instance? Did world Jewry really declare war on Germany on March 24, 1933 and attempt to cripple the country with an economic sabotage? Why is Livingstone called an anti-Semite for repeating what Netanyahu admitted not long before? Is it true that former Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Shamir belonged to a gang that offered to ally with Nazi Germany to fight against the British?
The Haavara agreement is especially excruciating because various Zionist leaders clearly said that they were in the same business as the German national socialists — creating an ethnic homeland based on racial purity and exclusionism. They were clearly were a mirror of each other and understood each other very well.
Who knows where the questions will end? (At his disciplinary inquiry Livingstone will cite a book by Marxist historian Lenni Brenner who has written extensively about collusion between campaigners for a Jewish homeland and the Nazis.)
This could be the beginning of the unravelling of one of the most grotesque and relentless media campaigns of recent years. For months now, the media have been insisting that the failure of the Labour Party to make Jewish issues its main priority is akin to a national emergency. The ensuing PR firestorm has been so obviously out of proportion that it has drawn widespread attention to the domination of the media by Jewish priorities.
Thanks largely to the Muslim bloc vote, the Labour Party leadership was won by the far-left and long-standing Palestinian supporter Jeremy Corbyn last year, and he has been under constant attack ever since. To an organized Jewish community used to having the Labour Party in its pocket, this was totally unacceptable and had to be reversed.
The subsequent assault has been veiled as an attack on “growing anti-Semitism” which seems to usually manifest itself in the Twitter and Facebook comments of various low-level Muslim activists and councillors.
Labour MPs’ minds will no doubt have been concentrated by being reminded in fairly blunt terms who pays the piper. And just in case the point was missed, a Labour MP called Michael Foster pointed out that private Jewish sources contributed a third of the general election war chest. This funding has all but dried up now. Another former Jewish financial backer called David Abrahams has been reported as linked to an attempted leadership coup to depose Jeremy Corbyn. It would be interesting to see how this goes down with the Muslim bloc vote. One of Corbyn’s Jewish supporters has hit back, suggesting the Board of Deputies of British Jews has dropped its stated political impartiality to organize opposition from behind the scenes.
Wherever you turned in the British media in the last week it seemed impossible to get away from the finger-wagging, scolding and barracking of Jewish columnists from across the political spectrum. Jewish Chronicle editor Stephen Pollard even rolled out his tired old story about how his granny kept a suitcase under the bed in case “they” come again.
At some point even the least perceptive are going to be struck by this. At some point people are going to tire of being lectured and ordered around in this condescending way. They might start asking why so much more coverage has been devoted to this issue than to the Muslim child rape gangs in Rotherham and other towns, for example.
Part of this battle is being fought on a semantic front and there is a blatant attempt to widen the definition of anti-Semitism and to narrow the discourse. Non-Jews are to be chastised for repeating what some Jews say openly and the prominent Labour Friend of Israel John Mann wants to place phrases such as the “Jewish lobby” and “dual loyalty” out of bounds.
Labour’s dissidents are all at sea when they try to suggest that the problem is one of “Zionism” as opposed to Jewish ethnic aggression. This video shows how one Labour politician, Gerry Browning, flailing around and completely unable to explain the meaning of the “Jewish question” in non-racial terms.
There is an interesting parallel in which both sides cannot admit the existence of race in this argument. The Jewish lobby cannot admit that the “anti-Semitism” is largely driven by the same Muslims which Jewish organizations have so assiduously conspired to flood into the country.
At the same time the Labour Party cannot admit that it will have eventually to choose between the Muslim mass vote on which it increasingly depends and on Jewish financial clout and media influence which is indispensable if it is to carry on as a mass party.
And where are ordinary Whites in all this? They are nowhere. They were made surplus to requirements a long time ago and if they could all be replaced tomorrow, many in Labour would secretly heave a sigh of relief.
It took an amused Conservative neo-con Douglas Murray to gently slip in a truth.
The modern Labour party claims to be an anti-racist movement, but because of demographic changes in the UK in certain areas it has to run on a covertly racist ticket.
But the racism that Murray wanted to condemn was that anyone supporting Israel would not be able to stand as a Labour candidate in a Muslim constituency. And what of the racism that the indigenous people of this country, the Whites, have to suffer from both Jews and Muslims? There is not a word about that because that is the racism that dare not speak its name.










Dealing with Dysfunction: A Review of "What It Is Like to Teach in Failing Schools," Part 1
Björn Höcke and the Potential Return of Sanity in German Politics
Words as Weapons: Asymmetry and Advantage in Linguistic Competition
A Review of "Fistfights with Muslims in Europe: One Man's Journey through Modernity"



“Hurrah!” London Forum gives ‘three cheers’ for “anti-semitic” Ken Livingstone!
The expression
‘Anti Semitic’ must be legislated into the Hate Speech laws.
Whenever a Jew wants to smear anyone who criticises anything Jewish or Jewish State they bleat
‘ANTI SEMITIC’
The purpose is clear– to smear- to destroy free speech and to muzzle the facts-
It is a Hate ploy and must therefore be legally defined as ‘Hate Speech’ so that the user can be hauled in a court of law and explain!!
Try Gerry Downing’s “Zionist persuasion” it’s a real delicacy! So what will it be, the Brown vote demographic; or jewish oligarchic money?
I didn’t see it that it was a red pill moment. I see it as brilliantly twisted triangulated pro-jewish/ pro-Israel – anti-white- anti-Britain Anti-American and anti- Hitler ( to the Arab mind) statements and subsequent follow up.
goy is being fooled.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch. London mayor is a muslim. They cahoot in the West dont’ ya know.
The Stern Gang was anti-British in cahoots with their enemies.
and then there was the hard core commies too.
so it’s all bad for average British. Real British.
This is a war and my heart is breaking because they are better at this stuff than we are. They have no traitors. We have too many. We have no natural defenses or psychological defense against this. and the semites ( all of them) are so good at it.
We are taking such a whooping at moment.
and they put on quite the show. The “teaching moments” in the media and elsewhere and the impressions it is meant to implant in the average person. Its a chess move for the future.
It’s also worth noting how much attention this is getting (on both sides of the Atlantic) compared to the revelation three months ago that male Muslim members of the Labour party were sabotaging the campaigns of, and in some cases threatening, Muslim women who sought to become Labour party councilors. Now we know where brown women stand in the victimhood Hebrarchy, er, hierarchy: higher than white children who were gang-raped, but lower than Jews who may have heard something that offended their delicate sensibilities.
We have a ‘class hierarchy’ after all. Someone ought to write a witty, entertaining, but crucifying accurate account of the theoretical status of e.g. sex criminals, ‘gays’, fraudsters, illegals in country a and b, victims, Asians, old white people, and so on. Many years ago books described ‘U’ behaviour; perhaps ‘J’ might do. Humour can sometimes work wonders.
Lighten up a bit, Volksgenossen, and get the anthologies of Jewish jokes by David Minkoff and Michael Winner.
Evening May 5 clicked on the TV 2 Channels devoted to Auschwitz for the entire evening
Think I’ll just watch Netflix for the rest of the month
A Muslim named Khan won election and is London Mayor. I wonder if things will change? Probably not, Jews have ruled England since the Amsterdam Jews got rid of James2 and put their puppet Durch William on the throne instead so as to take over the British financial system.
Seems Khan is backed by Milliband. ‘Nuff said.
This case needs more people with real bravery to just speak out. The whole pandering to Jewish narcissism in the United Kingdom and Europe generally has got so out of control, so institutionalized as a norm it’s long ago gone past delusional to become suicidal. The lopsided narrative on Jewish identity just needs kicking away by some really brave individuals in the UK who will not back down. Corbyn’s problem was just to crumble and back down. Big mistake. As soon as you back down to psychotic demands about how Jews want to be percieved you have no position at all.
Corbyn has himself claimed to have jewish roots, so maybe his “crumbling down” could be analyzed in that light ?
Whites could use white guilty for their own, not by fraudulent morality of course. Whites, seems, are the only ones who are or become aware about their ‘own’ (abstract-collectively speaking) severe faults in the past (in the present too). This singularity could be used to their own. Whites past-(greater) faults and in the present must be a white department and not a kazharian diseased collectivity.
Typical reactionary attitudes is exactly what jews and their tard-comrades want.
The most aberrant and flamboyant were the aware whites reaction, greater will be the reaction of ”zombified” whites and their mental masters. Exactly like a greater feever, the disproportional reaction of the immune system to attack a bio-invaders. The white cells ”have” good intentions too, but their over-reaction can kill the body.
The Lady Vanishes movie, Hitchcock, 1938, seems a very good cinematographic metaphor to understand when you believe and said the true but none or most people don’t believe in you.
Jewish-tard narrative would destroyed if white’s’ used the white guilty to their own, but not selfishly. Own interests are the same the interests of most of all.
Ppight1931
May 4 got home clicked on the TV some garbage about how Turkey saved Jews in WW2 and the Pope did something bad to Jews
Nothing on TV I’ll read my book about skulduggery and murder in the Medici family.
Hope this doesn’t go on for the rest of the month
Jews have power of media to vilify Trump’s immigration as wicked, thereby dividing the white vote sufficiently enough to make Trump crash and burn.
There is NO virtue-signaling among blacks and browns. They are GOOD and JUSTIFIED merely for what they ARE.
There is virtue-signaling among whites cuz they are ‘tainted’ with ‘white guilt’ for what they ARE.
So, the ONLY way whites can be GOOD and JUSTIFIED is by what they believe and say, what they signal.
If you very BEING is good, it doesn’t matter what you believe.
But if your very BEING is suspect, your goodness is all about BELIEVING.
This is why the white vote is divided.
Media say GOP loses cuz it fails to get enough brown and black vote.
It actually loses cuz it fails to get enough white vote that is divided due to cult of ‘virtue signaling’ as the ONLY way for whites to be good and feel redeemed.
Blacks being black for blacks is good.
Browns being brown for browns is good.
But whites being white for whites is terrible!! Whites must be for non-whites(and homos and Jews) to be good.
That mindset has to go in order for there to be white unity.
White Guilt must go.
Guiltdown Man must be exposed as a moral hoax.
Whites being white for whites must the new template.
re Changing the public mind: Research has shown that all you need is 10%. Once that threshold is reached the view becomes basically unanimous.
That is, instead of a move from 10% to 11%, the move is to 70,80, or 90%.
Minority Rules: Scientists Discover Tipping Point for the Spread of Ideas
Scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have found that when just 10 percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, their belief will always be adopted by the majority of the society. The scientists, who are members of the Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center (SCNARC) at Rensselaer, used computational and analytical methods to discover the tipping point where a minority belief becomes the majority opinion. The finding has implications for the study and influence of societal interactions ranging from the spread of innovations to the movement of political ideals.
“When the number of committed opinion holders is below 10 percent, there is no visible progress in the spread of ideas. It would literally take the amount of time comparable to the age of the universe for this size group to reach the majority,” said SCNARC Director Boleslaw Szymanski, the Claire and Roland Schmitt Distinguished Professor at Rensselaer. “Once that number grows above 10 percent, the idea spreads like flame.”
– See more at: http://news.rpi.edu/luwakkey/2902#sthash.AQGSm7V2.dpuf
Hello T. J.
In my opinion your point is very important and I agree with it. — There is no need that we convince 51% of the folk about the truth of the “14 words”. The masses will gladly go along with us as soon as they see that we are the “winning team”. Therefore it is important to work quietly and successfully and steadily. We make our point clear (“We want to live and our children and grand children shall live”) and we do not not give our life and our land away to foreigners. — Anyone who wants to kill us cannot be our friend, but he is our potentially deadbringing enemy. — From this simple and clear standpoint many methods and tools for our survival will grow and come into action. — The way that our earth is functioning is not at all difficult: All groups of living things want to live, and survive as a group, may it be bacteria or worms or apes or lions or any other subgroup of life. And so do we, the German folk, the European folks, the white race: We want to live.
When can those who speak one of the Romance languages start labeling those who offend them anti-Romantic?
Ding, ding, ding. Excellent article. Every day it gets more clear the manipulative twist of the Jews. As the Western economies are increasingly hollowed out by financial manipulation people will more and more ask who, what, when, where and in many cases the Jews will be all of the above.
Have heart people in the history of the Jews they have been kicked out of every single country that they’ve been to in any significant numbers. Keep the pressure up. Tell every one you know the truth no matter what their pained stares at you. They will eventually come around to the truth.
Building #7 from 9-11 is an excellent awakener. How can a 49 story building, not hit by a plane, fall the same speed as a rock dropped in free air for roughly 108 feet from a few fires? It can’t. They may argue it can but inside they will know this is just a complete mystery if you believe the Jews account. It will cause great cognitive discognizance and make them question many other things.
Those Jewish expulsions were at the hands of monarchical or dictatorial governments. Democracies are much more porous and unfocused. The Jews, combining collective action and enduring focused effort, are well adapted to their niche and will very difficult to remove.
HK Wills, you have it backwards. Totalitarian governments protected jews during most pogroms. NSDAP Germany shows clearly that when the power of government is against jews the pogroms are much more complete. Governments have massive power and when they turn on jews jews suffer much more for their crimes.
Another possibility is that Jews, when the time was due, discreetly left these places, taking their loot, and pretending to have been expelled. You can see in e.g. France or Sweden that Jews exclaim in astonishment, having done their best to loot and ruin these places, that they face hostility and are being forced to leave. They don’t say they stayed as long as possible while working their evil.
May 3 I wanted to watch TV The first channel I turned on had a documentary about Jews who fled Nazi Germany’s and did well in Hollywood. So I clicked on another channel; a holofraud memorial in Florida. Next channel a holifraud memorial in Tennessee Then a tour of the holofraud museum in Los Angeles
So I read a book and cruised the Internet for the rest of the evening.
Is this standard programming or is May third some special day in the calendar of Jewish complaints? Maybe it’s to distract attention from the Armenian genocide observations? Or to celebrate the communist take over of E Germany in spring of 1945?
Not to mention movies about someone plotting to undermine the Nazis to help artists or scientists “escape” pre-WWII Germany.
My specialty online calendar lists 4 May 2016 as “Yom HaShoah” – perhaps it started the eve before?
– 4 May 2016 as “Yom HaShoah” –
For the Star Wars crowd, it’s “May the fourth be with you”.
I read Lenni Brenner’s book about the transfer agreement. There is also a book by an American anti Zionist Jew named Lielenthal that writes about the transfer agreement.
The Weissmandel dynasty of Rabbis has been writing about the transfer agreement and Zionist organizations complicity in whatever happened to Jews in WW2. It’s their opinion that the Zionists helped the Germans kil off Jewish adults so the Zionists could take the children and teens to Israel to found their brave new world of Jewish nationalist supremacy and a communist economy
“And what of the racism that the indigenous people of this country, the Whites have to suffer from both Jews and Muslims? There is not a word about that because that is the racism that dare not speak its name.”
Talk of words hidden, as Holocaust Remembrance Day begins this evening, we Europeans should pause and acknowledge holocausts past and present: the millions and millions of our brothers and sisters put to death by the Bolsheviks, the Holodomer, the Plaamoorde, the ongoing abortion holocaust in Europe and our Diasporas.
Freemasons and Judaism (Paul M. Bessel)
http://www.bessel.org/masjud.htm
Other English-speaking Countries
http://www.grandlodge.on.ca (Canada)
http://www.masons.org.au (Australia)
http://freemasonsnz.org (New Zealand)
http://www.grandlodge.co.za (South Africa)
http://www.grandlodgescotland.com (Scotland)
http://www.irish-freemasons.org (Ireland)
“Marxist-Muslim-Zionist-Homosexist”
Good observation. In fact that is the ruling power.
All English-speaking countries are the same – Australia, Canada, new Zealand and South Africa even a bit in Ireland. Jews have just taken over from Freemasons and other shadowy groups like those who founded America. As an addition to the last post by Andrew Joyce, do wonder why even in religion America and Anglosphere are home to so many cults like the Jehovah Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, the Church of Latter Day Saints of Jesus Christ etc?
Jews totally control the UK with the native Britons being treated like slaves and kids only to be given Kindergeld (children’s allowance) but Ken Livingstone is not our friend.
I agree with comments below. He and other useless British Left people have destroyed London and the UK. He also supported Ed Milliband who is going to impose a Muslim Sadiq Khan as mayor of London. Khan and Jews like Zac Goldmsith are not British or Europeans. Things for whites in the UK will get worse if Jeremy Corbyn becomes prime minister.
British nationalists must oppose Jews in both the Labour party and Conservatives plus the equally destructive British Left. It is war on two fronts.
I feel pity for the native British people. They are between what you say in English “a rock and a hard place.”
This just proves how totally under Jewish control the UK is. The Jews rule like kings and the British people are treated like kids and given so-called Kindergeld (allowance for children).
On the other side Ken Livingstone is not our friend. He is totally anti-European and a foolish man like Jeremy Corbyn, Lauren Booth (sister of the wife to Tony Blair), Goerge Galloway, Alec Salmond, Nicola Sturgeon and all those who support Muslims and the islamification of Britain. They think siding with Muslims against the Jews, Zionists and the Conservative Party is class struggle but instead are destroying a European nation by being totally blind to race. A Pakistani like Sadiq Khan or Malala Yousef (whom many useless British liberals camapigned for a Nobel Prize) are not Europeans and instead come from a primitive country.
Opposing zionism should not mean total support for non-Europeans. I know several people on the European Left who oppose Israel and expansion into Palestinian areas but are not advocating filling Paris with Algerians or Berlin with Turks. We know all these British Left people are being paid rich Arab countries or Iran through Press TV like George Galloway. It is Arab money that is also financing the building of mosques all over the UK.
The sad part is the British working class whites are just being used by Ken Livingstone and others. Even groups like the BNP and EDL began well but ended up as instruments of zionists. UKIP is no better. I suspect even Britain First has Jewish backers.
Red Ken has been throughout his political career rabidly pro-Muslim and one of the architects of the multicultural hellhole of Londonistan. That TOO sheds tears about his demotion shows how easily one-issue places can lose sight of the greater picture.
Note that Sadiq Khan also turned on him over this incident once it became politically expedient. underlining once again that the kuffar will be discarded once no longer of value.
@Why stating a historical truth amounts to anti-Semitism is not clear, although apparently many Jews were “offended.”
Maybe this can answer the question:
“43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. 46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me? 47 He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God… Then said the Jews unto him, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and thou sayest, If a man keep my saying, he shall never taste of death. 53 Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself?… Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. 59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.” (John, 8)
An answer 2000 years old.
Anti-Semetism is the new version of Heretic , it is designed to elicit a Pavlovian response of fear and shame. This is probably the real reason Livingston is being pilloried. Fear ye who hear this word.
It is essential that Masonic West maintain fearful pressure on the majority as they destroy he ethnic cohesion and identity of the European countries in preparation for their NWO. Jewish organizations are the front men of this Revolution and it is their Role to enforce this Pavlovian orthodoxy. The Zionists have fallen into a Masonic trap set at the beginning of last century.
“The Zionists have fallen into a Masonic trap set at the beginning of last century.”
Not disagreeing with you but how could you possibly know this with any degree of certainty?
Savant, I think Free Think meant to say:
“It is essential that Jews maintain fearful pressure on the majority as they destroy the ethnic cohesion and identity of the European countries in preparation for their JWO. Masonic organizations are the front men of this Revolution and it is their Role to enforce this Pavlovian orthodoxy. The Masonic goys have fallen into a Jewish trap set at the beginning of last century.”
———–
Mu latest blog post: The Realist Report Interviews Eric Hunt — TRANSCRIPT
I don’t agree Katana . The Masonics and Zionists are in opposing camps. The Zionists want Israel for Hereditory Jews , the Masonics want it as there Judicial capital of NWO and to takeover the Middle East they needed to set up a none Muslim wedge ; an irritant that can be used to divide aggrivate the region( as controlling Eurasia is crucial). This was a way of expanding the revolutionary drive started in France 1798 , a revolution that hope to put the world under their system of mind controlled puppet leaders that can never take things into their own hands. Then by rendering much of the pop in ignorence , decadence and false history humans can be pasified ,indoctrinated through education and controlled .This is their version of the age of Aquarius! Now without starting a WW the hopes of completing this are vanishing quickly .
.Rothcilds etc are in on it and where the money goes the tools follow.
Though there original intent was sensible as so often with organisations the become corrupt and obsessive and completely unreasonable .What they have now done is destabilise the whole planet .The survival of communism is a world disaster that has not been fully comprehended.
See a blog on WordPress , of their book The Hidden History of the First World War . The is enough circumstantial evidence in this Writing to convict beyond reasonable doubt.
The worrying thing is the same scam is being perpetrated as we discuss.
Free Thinker, I now see where you’re coming from.
The excellent book you mention is what I did a four part post on, starting here:
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of WW I — Chpt 1 and 2
By Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor
Dedicated to the victims of an unspeakable evil.
——
Although it talks of people like Cecil Rhodes and other very public goy figures, there’s a subtext that involves organized jewry, the Rothschilds, etc., that are the shadowy figures behind the scene.
UK is so much like the US in lies, lies, and lies. Why are things like this?
The media are repressed about the truth like Victorians were about sex. Correctorians have this notion of good and evil, but they must have repressed doubts about their own worldview since there is so much evidence to the contrary. After all, the media is, at least half the time, more hidea or obfuscatia or muzzlia or curbia or shushia or subduea or etc. Instead of serving as conveyor of news, it acts as hider and obfuscator of truth. Media are less about find the evidence than hide the evidence.
The media are like a crooked cop who works for certain interests. So, if certain evidence is found that might solve the puzzle(that might undermine the powers-that-be), the media go all out to hide the evidence and put forth false evidence. Altman is part of this scam. (Jews and Asians make a bad mix in the media where truth is concerned. Jews have much power and don’t want to lose it. So, Jewish media people are shhhhhhh in supporting their brethren in Wall Street, Las Vegas, Hollywood, and etc. As for Asians—who are becoming more prominent in media—, they are lacking in individuality and bark like running dogs according to what they’ve been taught in school. If Jews long ago challenged Wasp power, don’t expect Asians to challenge Jewish power. They’ll just do as told and think as told.)
It’s like the Corleones in THE GODFATHER said they got some newsman on the payroll. But I don’t think it’s all just corruption. Yes, media guys write what is Correct because they want to keep their jobs and gain access to important people.
But many of them really believe that their agenda is just. So, it’s corruption and correctness. The Noble Cause trumps evidence. If there is good and evil in the world, and if false evidence helps the good while true evidence helps the good, you go with false evidence. Media people see the world in terms of Nazi ‘racists’ vs ‘progressive anti-racists’. It’s that simple. So, evidence is only good when it serves the good side. If it helps the bad side, it must be suppressed in favor of false evidence that might help the good side. Now, of course, everyone knows that false evidence is bad in and of itself. But it’s the difference between facts and Truth. Facts are details, Truth is worldview. Media serve as lawyers whose purpose is to serve a side.
If you found a piece of factual evidence that might help the Nazis, would you reveal it? If you could help defeat the Nazis by spreading false evidence, would you do it? Since Nazis were really evil, that might be justified. But the problem of PC is it sees everything in terms of Nazis vs Goodies. World is not that simple.
Truth trumps facts. Of course, Truth is or should be made of little facts. But as it happens, there are many little facts that might help the Bad since no side is totally good and no side is totally bad. But if media people see the world as just good vs bad, then they might favor helpful falsehoods over subversive facts.
Journalism schools don’t teach neutrality and objectivity as the highest virtue, at least not anymore. They teach (1) careerism and (2) commitment as the highest virtues. A fusion of ultra-capitalism and radicalism. Everyone knows that it’s a dog-eat-dog competition to make it in the media. So, students become aware of the rules of game to make the climb. If PC are rules of the game, they learn to opportunistically spout PC stuff regardless of true or false. Career trumps truth.
And there is the cult of radical commitment. Since kids have been raised to worship MLK and Civil Rights Movement and Holocaust and Homo celebration and Diversity and etc., they think those are Absolute Truths that cannot be questioned. So, their warped minds think that PC is truth and facts must serve PC.
Your last paragraph has great merit, gubbler. It is like a cult indoctrination, with a moral self-righteousness combined with the exclusion of alternative opinions and sufficient information.
We have to reach the independent and intelligent young, and show them how they have been hoodwinked – some will rebel. We can also utilize the confusions caused by the divisions and sectarian heresy-hunting among their own present circles, of which the Marxist-Muslim-Zionist-Homosexist quadrille is a recent example.
UK is so much like the US in lies, lies, and lies.
And therein lies the truth.
Ask (((Andrew Neather))) this: ‘And where are the ordinary Whites in all of this?’
It would be wonderful if Britain’s accidental “red pill” moment was really a “red pill moment”, but that will not be allowed.
I recall the firestorm surrounding Edwin Black’s release of “The Transfer Agreement” in 1984. As benign as the book was in discussing the evil Nazis, the local Jewish mafia worked hard to distance itself from the truth. Black “exaggerated” or “oversold” the Agreement and its importance was the cry of the day. Why? Because it laid bare the fraud of Holocaustianity.
The BBC’s Andrew Neil is clearly a useful idiot. His game of interrupting responses to his questions, as soon as the response shows signs of truth, is despicable. It is notable that the likes of long-winded George Galloway seem to have his number and continue with the answer. In the current “controversy” Galloway has openly stated that “Blairites” had been operating a slow motion coup against Corbyn. He leaves little doubt to whom he is referring, except of course they are Zionists, not Jews.
The idea that Labour, or any of its followers is “anti-Semitic” can only be seen as satire. Jeremy Corbyn is as opposed to organized Jewry, in all its forms, as Yitzhak Rabin was to Zionism.
Lesson for the Jews: you cannot keep adding new victims/competitors to the hierarchy of grievances and expect to remain on top
‘Rape Culture’ and the Hierarchy of Grievances
http://acculturated.com/hierarchy-of-grievances/
JEWISH INTELLECTUAL SUPREMACISM: A REFUTATION
by Andrew Ryan and Peter J. White
https://thechosenites.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/refutation.pdf
I’m not very familiar with British politics but I think this guy (George Galloway) is a leftist who has been accused of antisemitism. What he has to say about the Jews’ role in South Africa is very interesting though.
“At some point even the least perceptive are going to be struck by this.”
Sorry, but a great majority of mankind (the LESS perceptive) will NEVER “be struck [enlightened] by this.”
This “great majority” or “least perceptive”, whatever we call them, will die or kill rather than correct an error of knowledge, quit a self-destructive habit, or distinguish guilt from innocence (that is, truth from lies). They are actually engaged in a struggle with their consciences – that judge that sits in every man’s brain and has the power to produce life-threatening nightmares; if their errors or guilt are sufficiently numerous or heinous, those nightmares can drive them to complete insanity or suicide; the latter sometimes accompanied by mass killings as well.
This is why it is literally a life or death matter that they suppress their conscience. The psychological dynamics they develop to support this aim leads them to trust no one but those who deny reason and justice; and to hate those who adhere to reason and justice.
Go ahead, tell them the truth about 9/11, the USS Liberty, the DoJ operation “Fast and Furious”. If they didn’t previously know the government’s complicity in such crimes, your explanation will only make them support the government more slavishly than before.
These people are easy to identify: most of them sit in front of their indoctrination screen night after night, just waiting to die – a choice required by guilt, and loaded with shame. Some of them will engage in political actions that can only advance rule by terror. (http://redressone.wordpress.com/cults/)
These people live by sets of pleasing lies to shield them from their failures and crimes – and, if destruction of civilized society is necessary to establish their sets of lies, it will be done.
Their psychological dynamics is quite fantastic, as I try to make clear in the above link.
It will occur to only a very few men to take proactive measures to correct grievances – who have the intelligence and strength to do so. And this points to the reason most people just wait to die; for, intelligence forbids self-destructive actions, guilt without supporting facts, and so on.
There’s nothing that can help them, absolutely nothing.
It is best to leave them to their fate – and to make sure ONLY THEY a) pay the price of their choice, and b) make them accountable for the billions of lives they have ruined.
The problem, from our perspective, is that the “price of their choice” will result in the destruction of all – including those who rejected their choice. These (who rejected) are the only ones worth saving – but only if they take the proactive measures necessary, which are historically-proven methods, that is – as American Founders exercised their sovereignty, so we must exercise ours.
This is how we should “form into groups and seek [sovereign] power”. (http://redressone.wordpress.com/)
Otherwise there is no difference between the two classes of people – and no one to “save” either one.
“Sorry, but a great majority of mankind (the LESS perceptive) will NEVER “be struck [enlightened] by this.”
This is how I perceive this matter:
Well, there was a time where the malleable masses acted healthy, and then were convinced to act otherwise by means of disinformation. By this example, it should theoretically be possible to turn them around again, this time with information.
It took a long way for the other side to get the masses up to the point they are today. It is an illusion to think that with a snap of a finger they will turn around to our point of view overnight.
All over Europe, and also in the USA, more and more people are turning to our point of view. Donald Trump already has changed the narrative inside the USA. The Front National in France is growing. Lots of Eastern Europan countries, once hard-line communists, now have leaders whose heads would have flown during communism. In Germany you have the AFD, who is making the established parties quite nervous.
There is a restlessness all over the West in the masses of voters, in a manner and scale never known during the Cold War. This is a fire which has to be nurtured and kindled, until it becomes a raging firestorm.
The outrage will erupt over the monumental extent of the lying.
I agree that the average can understand. Mainstreaming has begun- viewers of FOX news will be called tin-foil hatters.