“To be born an Englishman is to win first prize in God’s lottery”. The phrase is often misattributed to Johnson or Kipling, but was most likely uttered by Sir Cecil Rhodes. If it is true, then any White Englishman today could be forgiven for wondering just how bad second prize is. England has not declined to the level of Zimbabwe, as Rhodesia was renamed when Sir Cecil’s name was removed and White governance ended, but it has started on the journey. When Rhodesia was given back to Blacks in 1980, it soon followed a predictable downward spiral from the “bread-basket of Africa” to its current state of vying with South Africa for the title of most violent and wretched country among Africa’s many contenders for that honor. Perhaps Britain doesn’t have a sufficient Black population to compete in that field. At least, not yet.

When “Britain” is under discussion, “England” is what is generally meant, and the British Empire was essentially the English Empire. Of course, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland provided men and material, the Scottish shipyards built ships and the Welsh provided coal and copper. But England was both engine-room and pilot of Empire, and so is the country least forgiven for what is now seen as one of history’s unforgiveable sins against the brown races, despite all evidence to the contrary. When the Right talk of “anti-Britishness”, it is England that the political class and their fellow travelers really despise. This can be traced back at least to John Prescott, Tony Blair’s token working-class Deputy Prime Minister around the turn of the millennium. He would regularly talk of “Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the regions.” That is what the Left would love to see: England as merely regional, divested of even its name.

England is, for all that, still a part of the United Kingdom which, if it were a consumer product, would surely be in breach of the Trade Descriptions Act. “Division” is a key word in the government’s lexicon of lies, and the phrase “those who seek to divide us” rolls off the tongue of the political class with a practiced ease. It is the government, however, that seeks to divide, specifically the White population from the various sects and sub-sects attendant on identity politics. In terms of diversity, equally routinely referred to as “our strength”, you can have it in any color as long as it is not white. In various pieces of government propaganda, Whites are portrayed as toxic, non-Whites as put-upon victims or heroes. In reality, a zone which is anathema to the ruling class, it is Whites who are being victimized.

That Britain faces a bleak future affords no pleasure in the observation. Acerbic English journalist Julie Burchill coined a word to describe a particular style of doom-laden, pessimistic journalism produced merely to sell newspapers; Amockalyptic. (She had actually forgotten that this was her invention, and was rather grateful when I reminded her). But any serious observer of the state of Britain at present would be hard put to strike an optimistic note. Politically, economically, culturally, and societally, Britain is headed inexorably towards what Guillaume Faye, the French co-founder of the nouvelle droite, called a “convergence of catastrophes”:

A series of ‘dramatic lines’ are approaching one another and converging like a river’s tributaries with perfect accord… towards a breaking point and a descent into chaos.

Of the various tributaries currently threatening to burst the dam in the UK, the first and most serious problem is the economy.

The public finances would not stand an independent audit if the UK were a company. The ratio of debt against GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is estimated as anything between 97% and 104%. It is scant consolation that the debt/GDP ratio in America is 105%, and 112% in France. Britain is far from being the only Western country currently swimming in shark-infested waters, financially speaking. The consensus among economists seems to be that the ratio should not exceed 40/100, but it seems that this yardstick is invalidated by Japan, which is currently running at a ratio of 250% and don’t seem to be suffering economic hardship.

But there is one crucial difference in that Japan does not borrow externally but only from Japanese banks, creating a financial virtuous circle which does not exist in the UK or other European countries which borrow from the type of pirates who bury their treasure in tax havens such as the Cayman Islands. The annual interest on the British debt now exceeds the defense budget, taxes are at their highest since the end of World War II, and shortfalls in public-sector spending are increasing steadily with no signs of slowing. Welfare benefits in Britain have just exceeded the revenue from income tax for the first time in history, reaching £333 billion against the £331 billion raised annually in tax weal. One in five British people do not work, and 2.8 million are registered sick or disabled. There has been a whole new raft of what counts as a disability, with nervous “disorders” such as anxiety and stress now being valid reasons to be signed off as sick and therefore under no requirement to look for work. Britain is the only G7 country to have lower employment than before the Covid pandemic. And every day, the shirking class are joined by largely unemployable migrants who are housed, fed, and paid by the tax-paying, mostly White public. Local government is shambolic and just as profligate as the public sector. Over half of British councils report that they expect to be bankrupt within five years. There has been a 29% cut in funding overall in the last 15 years, and the services which tend to be cut or removed are youth services, libraries, and social services rather than diversity teams and migrant services. Britain’s NHS (National Health Service) pays over £60 million annually just for translation services.

The waste is truly scandalous. I have worked for the NHS in four different capacities, one of which was handling CSSD (Central Sterile Supplies Department) for Britain’s second-largest hospital, St. George’s in Tooting, south London. In the last week of March, the end of the British financial year, all sorts of mystifying things would turn up in the delivery bay: paintings, vinyl chairs, curtains. I asked one of the depot guys what this was all about. He told me that if the hospital failed to spend the same amount as it spent the previous year, its budget would be cut by the amount of shortfall. The fault in this scarcely needs pointing out. Hospitals are not subject to the same laws of supply and demand that private-sector companies are. You decide whether you want to buy a car or a computer or a ladder. You do not choose to break your leg or get Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. And yet hospital accounting is run along private-sector lines.

As for management, all NHS trusts have full diversity teams, and it is not easy to see why they are required. As a youngster, in 1977, I spent a long time in hospital in Surrey, a county bordering London. It was the first place I had seen Black people in any number. I played for a hospital cricket team in my home town, and was one of two Whites in the team, the other being a Kiwi wicket-keeper. And yet diversity officers on high salary are felt necessary for probably the most diverse employer outside football’s Premier League. They do nothing that is required for anyone’s health, and spend most of their time looking for examples of racism.

And nothing will change. The NHS, begun in 1948 by Labour Prime Minister Clement Attlee, is a sacred beast in the UK, and no politician aiming at election would dare to suggest streamlining it. I once spoke to an asset-stripper, hedge-fund type at a party, and asked him which section of the British public sector he would most like to get his hands on if it were a private company, and he didn’t miss a beat in his reply: the NHS. And that was 20 years ago. There are 7.25 million people currently on NHS waiting-lists, around 10% of the population. That population is itself ageing, and the strain on health resources worsens daily with more illegal immigrants arriving on the coasts of Kent. Some of this influx is “health tourism”, whereby immigrants take advantage of a free service which was originally designed for the indigenous British, and for which they pay a large proportion of their income tax. Long-vanished diseases such as TB and diphtheria are on the rise as the arrivistes bring their scurvy into the country with them, and the National Health Service is actually an international health service.

In terms of infrastructure, it is hard to believe that Britain once built an empire, as today it is unable even to build a railway. The HS2 railway program to link the south and the north is now many years, even decades, over schedule, and it cost £66 billion to build the 140 miles of track which have been laid. By comparison, Spain laid 2,500 miles of track for $70 billion. Britain pays over eight times the European average for infrastructure, and convoluted requirements for planning permission and land use rival those here in Central America, notorious for its reams of necessary documentation.

As for food, the UK is composed of islands, and imports are made more expensive by a lack of road linkage (excepting the Channel Tunnel). Britain imports 48% of its food, and 83% of its fruit. This is absurd, as anyone who has ever flown over Britain and seen how green it is will know. Britain could be food-independent, but instead 12% of British households are food insecure. Any supply-chain interruption exposes Britain’s vulnerability. With education, the sector lies in a state of economic and ideological ruin. There is approximately £260 billion in unpaid student debt, most of which will never be repaid. This means that my brother in England is paying tax to fund White students who are being taught to hate him.

School buildings are crumbling, educational standards are dropping, and truancy and violence in the classroom are also at highs. University courses are increasingly useless, and more likely to render a student both unemployable, and ideologically slanted when they do find a job. An arts graduate is more likely to bring a list of grievances to the workplace than efficiency. The head of the CBI (Confederation of British Industry) reported that the standard of graduate interviewees was increasingly woeful. That was 25 years ago. Things are unlikely to have improved in the interim.

Education itself is now entirely run by Leftist ideologues at every level, and one piece of apocrypha serves as an example of the occupation of the education system by the hard Left. An English YouTuber recently recounted a story told to him by the 14-year-old son of a friend. The boy was in class and the lesson was on slavery, as these ideological topics gradually replace worthwhile subjects of the past now deemed too White for consideration. The mostly White class was told by the teacher that if anyone even mentioned either Britain’s role in the dismantling of the slave trade, or William Wilberforce, architect of that culmination, they would be ejected from the classroom.

As for defense, the country which held out against the Nazis as European countries fell like dominoes is unable even to join its supposed allies in current conflicts. The British Army’s equipment plan is £15 billion short, and the UK is seriously underprepared for a war, as President Trump’s Iranian offensive showed. The British Navy, who once famously “ruled the waves”, was unable to send more than one ship to the Gulf, HMS Dragon, and that broke down en route. The rest of the fleet is undergoing maintenance. Trump was understandably incensed at this pathetic response, and the “special relationship” is becoming a thing of the past.

Crime is rising exponentially. Prisons are 72% overcrowded and at 99.7% occupancy. The British government’s response to this is to arrest and imprison more people for social media comments than any other country in the world, meaning that violent criminals are being released to make room for this new class of lawbreaker. £2.8 billion is required to stabilize prisons, with just over half a billion having been allocated. Prisons are largely Muslim-run, micro-caliphates which will radicalize a low-IQ Muslim faster than the internet ever could.

There are currently over 50,000 immigrants who are currently on the missing list, 736 of them with criminal records. When one or more of them strikes, as they surely will, the tinderbox that England currently is will flare. The Surrey town of Epsom, idyllic and bucolic, has just seen anger take to the streets after the brutal gang-rape of a woman outside a church. The police have yet to release the details of the suspects, despite Epsom having as many-high resolution CCTV cameras in place as the rest of the country, the most surveilled in the Western world. Coulter’s Law applies here, after Ann Coulter: The longer the police refuse to describe an assailant, the more likely he is to be non-White. Essex police recently dropped a new facial recognition scheme as it proved 30% more efficient in recognizing Black faces than White.

Demographically, the seeds of Britain’s demise as a majority White nation are currently being sown, to the undisguised glee of the BBC. The White British, and this extends across Europe, are breeding at well below the replacement rate, while Muslims have children at well above that rate. This is why the government recently removed the two-child benefit cap. This check on benefit payments was designed to stop the type of welfare harvesting Blacks operate in the US, but the British government will be absolutely aware that removing the cap benefits Muslims and not Whites. In fact, it penalizes Whites as they pay the vast majority of taxes.

Then there is the political stance of the current government, whose authoritarianism no one saw coming. The most difficult thing for the British people to accept is that its government is not incompetent but malevolent. When Starmer’s policy advisers see that their boss’s popularity is at an all-time low in the polls, the most rock-bottom figures for any PM since polling began, they are not concerned. If government policy is hated by the people it affects, then these people are performing their duties as globalist shills, just as their masters would wish and have installed them to do. The British uniparty may be coming to an end, but there is no guarantee of a new dawn. Nigel Farage is hardly Right-wing, even if such a thing did exist in any significant way. He is a Thatcherite libertarian who wants revenge on the political system that has shut him out for so long. He has already been corrupted by power, even before he has got it, and his “CivNat” approach to candidature in local elections has repelled many on the Right. While Rupert Lowe is the best bet in terms of old-school conservatism, it is unclear whether he will achieve anything more than splitting the Reform vote.

One thing can be said with certainty. The coming summer in the UK is not going to be a summer of love. There are three events in the cards, and one or more will happen. Firstly, a political assassination similar to that of Charlie Kirk. It could easily have happened to Konstantin Kisin, a Russian Jewish émigré who has relocated to the UK. He is nothing like Kirk; he’s a center-Right, very intelligent, very capable commentator, and he does not have a clearly insane wife. But someone rushed him with a box-cutter recently and it could have gone either way.

Secondly, a serious terrorist attack framed under the false flag of the “far Right” will almost certainly be in the planning stages. Accusations of being “far Right” fulfil the same function as those of “White supremacy” used by the Biden and Obama administrations. White supremacy is just another word for history correctly interpreted, but the Democrats have weaponized it and it is a formless smear, lacking in definition and reduced to a pure performative, in the sense used by the philosopher of language, J. L. Austin. Thus, the word is not descriptive nor is it meant to be. It is used purely to create a pejorative brand, a “word-spell”, in the same way Orwell described the use of “fascist” in Politics and the English Language.

Thirdly, street-level clashes between White British and Muslims are already occurring and will proliferate. There will be war, amockalyptic as that may sound. England today is more Burchillian than Churchillian, but the English will have to “fight them in the streets and towns”.

So, it is difficult to give a cheery prognosis for the old place. There is a trend among British YouTubers on the dissenting Right for showing clips of the United Kingdom, and England in particular, as it once was. These idyllic, nostalgic videos have become almost memetic, and show White people in the streets and parks during my 65-year lifetime, unconcerned and untroubled, and living lives that may as well be as far removed in time as those of the Tudors. Against these tableaux, they juxtapose footage from modern Britain. Black youths rampage down once-quiet streets like cockroaches from a septic drain. Muslims occupy Trafalgar Square for their obeisance. The streets of Britain’s second city, Birmingham, are filled with rubbish through which rats skitter, after a two-year strike by rubbish-collectors in one of the first cities whose council is officially bankrupt. Their response has been to bring in vermin experts, and charge the residents for people who will surely fail in their appointed task.

Some of this footage of erstwhile Britain comes from the 1960s and 1970s, when Whites were in charge of Rhodesia, then the bread-basket of Africa due to its maize crops — “mealy-meal” as the illiterate Africans called it. Things have changed somewhat since the colonial heyday of Sir Cecil and the other Englishmen who had no idea what the world they had created would become and how their ability and firmness of purpose would create a new Africa in the old country. Now, to be born an Englishman is just a lottery, and there are no prizes.

When I think about Ian Brady, I think about a bench. Ian Brady was a British serial-killer who raped and murdered five children in the 1960s. And what about the bench? It had no direct connection with Brady. It was simply a memorial put up beside a footpath by the parents of a son who had died young. One day I happened to pass the bench and noticed that there was a little printed notice on a stick stuck in the ground beside it. The notice politely requested that dog-owners remove any feces left by their dogs there, saying that the parents were distressed by the fouling.

Two faces of evil: indigenous Ian Brady and imported Axel Rudakubana

I also noticed that someone had responded to the notice by placing a lump of dog-shit on the seat of the bench. Mindless malice? If only. There was definitely a mind behind that malice. A foul one.[1] I flicked the lump off with a twig and wiped the seat clean with a tuft of grass, glad to have been able to do that before the parents saw anything. It was an unpleasant but interesting experience. And I thought of it again a few years later when I was reading a book called Ian Brady: The Untold Story of the Moors Murders (2017). In the scale of things, raping and murdering children is considerably worse than fouling a memorial bench with shit. But the two things are linked by another four-letter word: evil. At their very different levels, Brady and the bench-fouler did evil things. They both struck at parental love by enacting one of the central rites of evil. Perhaps it’s the sine qua non of evil: the inversion and contradiction of a key phrase in the Lord’s Prayer. The phrase runs like this: Fiat Voluntas Tua – “Thy Will Be Done.” That’s the will of God, the loving creator and sustainer of all life and all being. Evil naysays that prayer with Fiat Voluntas Mea – “My Will Be Done.” And the malevolence of evil – which literally means the ill-will of evil – is expressed in destruction and defilement, not creation or sustainment. That’s the pleasure and attraction of evil, the thrill of ill-will that is also explained in this passage from Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949):

[O’Brien said:] “The real power, the power we have to fight for night and day, is not power over things, but over men.”

He paused, and for a moment assumed again his air of a schoolmaster questioning a promising pupil: “How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?”

Winston thought. “By making him suffer,” he said.

“Exactly. By making him suffer. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation. […]” (Nineteen Eighty Four, Part 3, chapter 3)

Brady and the bench-fouler both wanted to make parents suffer by imposing their ill-will and negating what the parents willed. On a Christian understanding of the world, what the parents willed is also what God wills: that children grow up safe and happy; that parents be permitted to mourn a dead son with dignity. But how exactly did I make the link between Brady and the bench-fouler? It was when I read in that book about Brady how vandals had attacked the grave of one of his victims. The vandals reminded me of the bench-fouler, then I realized that Brady’s crimes themselves were like the bench-fouling. They were acts of ill-will, expressions of Fiat Voluntas Mea designed to inflict pain on parents, to mark and mar God’s creation with malice.[2] The bench-fouler willed ill with a foul mind and so did Brady.

A very different killer

In 2026 one or more vandals have reminded me again of Brady and the bench-fouler. These vandals have attacked the grave of Jamie Bulger in Liverpool. He was the two-year-old toddler kidnapped, tortured and murdered by two ten-year-old boys back in 1993. It was a horrific crime, but that’s why the vandals got their thrill of ill-will from attacking the victim’s grave. They were proclaiming Fiat Voluntas Nostra, “Our Will Be Done,” against the will not just of Jamie Bulger’s parents but of all benevolent – “well-willed” – people.

DNA is destiny: tiny White Britain has contributed vastly more to the world than giant Black Africa

I’ve also been reminded of Brady and the bench-fouler by another news-story in 2026. There’s an enquiry under way into three murders committed in Nottingham three years ago by a killer who may be very different from anyone I’ve previously mentioned in this article. Brady and the bench-fouler, the Bulger-killers and the vandals, are either certainly White or probably White. But the killer in Nottingham was a Black from Africa called Valdo Calocane. And he wasn’t evil but insane. Unlike Brady, he didn’t kill with determined malevolence and malice, gloating at the thought of the misery he would inflict on those who loved the victims.[3] No, Calocane killed because he was a psychotic schizophrenic. As the leftist media are not eager to inform you, Blacks are far more likely to suffer from mental illness like that and to kill as a result. This is what I said about Calocane in an earlier article at the Occidental Observer:

A few days before that Afghan called Abdul Ezedi began throwing flesh-eating alkali in London, a psychotic Black called Valdo Calocane was sent to mental hospital for stabbing three people to death in Nottingham [in 2023]. Two of the victims were White and one was half-White, half-Indian. The Guardian didn’t reveal that Calocane came to Britain from Guinea-Bissau in West Africa at the age of 16, but it did say that his vibrancy “has disturbing similarities to that of Zephaniah McLeod, who killed 23-year-old Jacob Billington and injured seven others in a violent and random stabbing spree in Birmingham in September 2020.”

McLeod was also psychotic and also well-known to the authorities before the murder, you see. But in fact his “stabbing spree” wasn’t so random after all, because McLeod is also Black and his victim was also White. The Guardian didn’t mention those highly relevant facts or the “disturbing similarities” with the psychotic Black Phillip Simelane, who murdered a White schoolgirl called Christina Edkins in 2013, and the psychotic Black Timchang Nandap, who murdered a White scientist called Jeroen Ensink in 2015, and the psychotic Black Darren Pencill, who murdered a White father called Lee Pomeroy in 2019. The newspaper is dedicated to the cult of minority worship, so it never admits either that Blacks commit murder, rape, and other violent crimes at much higher rates than Whites do or that, just as in America, Blacks are far more likely to harm Whites than Whites are to harm Blacks. (“Alkali-Throwing for Allah,” The Occidental Observer, 6th February 2026)

One psychotic Black in a never-ending sequence: Valdo Calocane and his White victims

Blacks are also far more likely to harm other Blacks than Whites are to harm Blacks. The psychotic Blacks Valdo Calocane and Axel Rudakubana each killed three people; the psychotic Black Joshua Jacques went one better and killed four people, all from the same Black family. But those Black killers aren’t like the White killer Ian Brady. They killed because they were insane, not because they were evil. However, evil was certainly involved in all those killings by psychotic Blacks. It was the evil of those who have imported Blacks into Britain against the clearly expressed will of Britain’s native Whites. And it was the evil of those who have insisted on the giant lie that Blacks are the virtuous victims of White villainy. Here is some entirely unsurprising news from that enquiry into Valdo Calocane’s triple killing in Nottingham:

[The lawyer Rachel] Langdale also told the inquiry of an incident three years prior to the attacks in May 2020, when Calocane was assessed by a mental health team after being arrested for damaging a flat door trying to gain entry, with officers observing he seemed to be hallucinating. Mental health workers and doctors had been “leaning towards” [detaining] Calocane [for compulsory treatment], but he was released into the community by the team who had considered the “over-representation” of young black men in detention, the inquiry heard. Hours after his release, Calocane kicked at a woman’s door while experiencing psychosis, prompting her to jump from the first-floor window out of fear, damaging her spine. (“Killer watched shooting videos online, inquiry hears,” BBC News, 23rd February 2026)

It’s absolutely no surprise that leftists were lenient with Calocane. They enabled him to inflict increasing levels of pain and misery on a White-majority country until he finally went too far even for leftist leniency to excuse. Such enquiries into murders committed by psychotic Blacks have been taking place for decades in Britain. And they all reveal the same two things: first, that there were clear early warnings of the danger posed by the Blacks in question; second, that the authorities repeatedly refused to act on those clear warnings.

Carry on Killing!: leftist leniency enables Black crime all over the West

That refusal to act was revealed in the enquiry about the psychotic Black Phillip Simelane, born in Swaziland, who murdered the White schoolgirl Christina Edkins in 2013. It’s being revealed thirteen years later in the enquiry about the psychotic Black Valdo Calocane, born in Guinea-Bissau. And it will be revealed in inevitable future enquiries after more psychotic Blacks, home-grown or imported, commit more horrific murders and are detained at more huge expense in mental hospitals. There’s a fixed pattern: Leftists hold expensive enquiries into the vibrancy of psychotic Blacks imposed on Britain by leftists and discover that leftists failed to act on clear early warnings that the psychotic Blacks were highly dangerous.

“Rubbing the right’s nose in diversity”

Leftist journalists then report the findings of the leftist enquiries before all the leftists involved return with renewed vigor to importing, enabling and excusing Black pathologies. Which brings me back to those four-letter words: “shit” and “evil.” Some or even all of the psychotic Blacks I’ve described in this article were in Britain because the Labour government elected in 1997 opened the flood-gates of migration from the Third World. One of the central figures in that Labour government was a Machiavellian Jew called Peter Mandelson. I’ve recently described at the Occidental Observer how Mandelson’s habitual lying was central to yet another of the scandals that have dogged his career. But Mandelson wasn’t lying in 2013 when he said Labour had willed ill against their traditional supporters in the White working-class. No, he spoke the truth. Maybe he was gloating:

Labour sent out “search parties” for immigrants to get them to come to the UK, Lord Mandelson has admitted. In a stunning confirmation that the Blair and Brown governments deliberately engineered mass immigration, the former Cabinet Minister and spin doctor said New Labour sought out foreign workers. He also conceded that the influx of arrivals meant the party’s traditional supporters are now unable to find work. […] Lord Mandelson’s remarks come three years after Labour officials denied claims by former adviser Andrew Neather that they deliberately encouraged immigration in order to change the make-up of Britain. Mr Neather said the policy was designed to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”. He said there was “a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural”. (“Immigrants? We sent out search parties to get them to come…,” The Daily Mail, 13th May 2013)

That’s an interesting metaphor Andrew Neather used there: “rub the Right’s nose in diversity.” It’s a reference to a crude old pet-training technique. You rub a dog’s or cat’s nose in its own feces when it fouls the floor. And that’s supposed to teach it not to do it again. In other words, Neather was equating “diversity” — all those wonderfully enriching Black and Brown folk — with feces and foulness. Of course, he supposedly meant that the wicked right regards diversity as foul, but I think he was secretly admitting the sadistic evil of open borders.

Preventable pathologies

Like that bench-fouler I mentioned at the beginning, the left want to use shit to inflict pain. The bench-fouler used literal shit in the hope of inflicting mental and spiritual pain. The left use metaphorical shit to inflict pain of all kinds, mental, spiritual and physical. As Kevin DeAnna has explained at American Renaissance, “the strongest force in politics is spite” and “mass immigration, racial resentment, and demographic replacement are fueled by power rather than empathy.” The White Ian Brady and the White killers of Jamie Bulger prove that Britain would never have been free of evil even if it were a true democracy and had avoided mass migration by non-Whites. Brady and the killers of Jamie Bulger belonged here by blood. Their evil was indigenous and probably inescapable. Brady was a White man who killed White children in what was still an overwhelmingly White society. And it’s very difficult or impossible to see how his indigenous evil could have been prevented.[4]

Two giant leftist lies: that non-Whites can be Western and that men can be women

But the left import and enable alien evil, ensuring that easily preventable horrors happen again and again in Britain. The three murders committed by the psychotic Black Valdo Calocane could have been prevented by not allowing Calocane to enter Britain from Africa. The three murders committed by the psychotic Black Axel Rudakubana could have been prevented by not granting his parents “asylum” from Africa. The twenty-two murders committed by the suicide-bomber Salman Abedi could have been prevented by not granting his parents “asylum” from Libya. The rape, murder and torture inflicted on White girls by Muslim rape-gangs could have been prevented by not allowing non-White Muslims to colonize Britain from Pakistan and Bangladesh. The same is true across the West of all pain, misery and expense imposed on Whites by the preventable pathologies of non-Whites who belong only in the Third World, never in the First. A certain amount of indigenous evil is inevitable. Alien evil has been imposed on us by the malevolence of leftists and Jews.

[1]  The mind of the bench-fouler was probably adolescent and stupid too. Given the demographics of the area I was in at the time, it was also the mind of a White or possibly of a Gypsy or Traveller.

[2]  I say “God’s creation” advisedly. Although Brady pronounced himself an atheist, there’s a well-documented story that, after one murder, he “looked up to the sky, shook his fist and proclaimed, ‘Take that, you bastard!’”

[3]  Brady was also very unlike his female accomplice Myra Hindley, in that he fully accepted his guilt, never tried to mitigate his crimes, and never sought release from jail. He may also have tried to atone when he worked to transcribe printed books into Braille for the blind, although there is a cynical reading of such work. Myra Hindley, by contrast, seems an excellent example of the “female solipsism” identified by the leading hate-thinker Vox Day, in that she thought only of herself after she was caught and jailed. She always tried to evade guilt and mitigate her crimes, blaming Brady and working for release. If she’d never met Brady, she’d very likely have led an ordinary life, but she would still have been a solipsist.

[4]  White men built Britain and are responsible for its greatness. The crimes of the White man Brady don’t contradict that. As the provocateur Camille Paglia once put it: “There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper.” Something else that separates Brady from Black killers like Valdo Calocane and Axel Rudakubana is that Brady was highly intelligent and might have bettered rather than blighted Britain if he had made different choices or avoided the influences that turned him to evil. That’s part of the tragedy of the Moors Murders: Brady sank to the depths when he could have risen to the heights. Calocane and Rudakubana would never have bettered Britain even if they’d avoided murder and other crimes.

Dying young. It turns performers into legends and politicians into footnotes. For proof of that, just compare James Dean (1931-55) with John Smith (1938-94). Seventy-one years after he died in a car-crash, the actor James Dean is still famous, still at the heart of a devoted cult. Thirty-two years after he died of a heart-attack, the politician John Smith is a footnote to the dazzling career of Tony Blair, the man who succeeded Smith as leader of the British Labour Party.

Skeptic out, sycophant in

Blair dazzled in the early days, that is, before the voters reached the same conclusion about him as voters in America and France would later reach about the very similar Obama and Macron. As I pointed out in “Blobamacron: Three Gentile Narcissists with One Jewish Agenda,” voters realized in all three cases that they’d been fooled by con-men who promised big and delivered small. But Blair wouldn’t have had the chance to dazzle if John Smith hadn’t died so prematurely. And so conveniently for Britain’s energetic Israel lobby, which had found Smith far less amenable than Blair. Someone else who found Smith’s death very convenient was Peter Mandelson, the half-Jewish, wholly homosexual Labour grandee who had just hit the headlines in the biggest of the scandals that have dogged his entire career. Smith rejected Mandelson: “when he succeeded Neil Kinnock as leader in 1992, John Smith would have nothing to do with Mandelson].” Blair embraced Mandelson and allowed him to control his career. So after Smith died, the sun began to shine on two men and one country: Blair, Mandelson, and Israel.

Premier and Pedo-Pal #1: Tony Blair grins with Peter Mandelson back in the 1990s (image from The Independent)

That’s why I suspect the Israel-skeptic Smith was assassinated to clear the way for the Israel-sycophantic Blair. I suspect the same of two earlier Labour leaders: the almost-forgotten Hugh Gaitskell (1906-63), who died young like John Smith, and the still-famous Harold Wilson (1916-95), who succeeded Gaitskell and enjoyed dazzling success like Blair. A Jewish politician once said of Wilson: “I don’t think Harold [had] any doctrinal beliefs at all. Except for one, which I find utterly incomprehensible, which is his devotion to the cause of Israel.” I disagree with that assessment: I think Wilson’s devotion was very comprehensible. Blair also displayed “devotion to the cause of Israel” and probably for the same reason: that Israel was blackmailing him about secret misbehavior. But aren’t those shocking claims to make about a close ally of Britain? How can I suggest that Israel would assassinate or blackmail politicians in Britain or anywhere else in the world? Well, I can do that very easily and very plausibly. The Jewish state of Israel embodies three core traits of Jewish psychology: selfishness, arrogance and amorality. Only one consideration matters: “Is it good for Jews?” And it was good for Jews – very good – when John Smith and Hugh Gaitskell died young and were replaced by Tony Blair and Harold Wilson.

Mandelson the Magnet

That isn’t proof of Israel’s involvement in those early deaths, of course, but it is highly suggestive. I would certainly put nothing past the Jew Peter Mandelson, who long ago won the same nickname from some of his gentile colleagues as the Jew Richard Perle won in America. Mandelson and Perle are both nicknamed “The Prince of Darkness.” In other words, gentiles accurately recognized that Mandelson and Perle are predatory and amoral men who are not in politics to serve the general (or gentile) public. But there’s one big difference between Machiavellian Peter Mandelson and Machiavellian Richard Perle. Unlike Mandelson, Perle isn’t a giant shit-magnet and hasn’t been dogged by scandal and accusations of sleaze throughout his career.

Premier and Pedo-Pal #2: Keir Starmer (right) grins with Peter Mandelson despite knowing of Mandelson’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein (image from The Independent)

The latest scandal to engulf magnetic Mandelson has confirmed his long-standing nickname. Emails and texts released in the latest tranche of the “Epstein Files” have confirmed that Mandelson was a firm friend and helper of the Jewish sex-criminal Jeffrey Epstein, endlessly eager to give Epstein exploitable financial secrets, entirely unconcerned about Epstein’s predation on under-aged shiksas. Britain’s current prime minister Keir Starmer, who appointed Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to Washington, has expressed utter dismay and outrage over these revelations. Yes, Starmer knew that Mandelson had been “friends” with Epstein well after Epstein had been exposed as a sex-criminal, but Epstein has committed sex-crimes only against unimportant White girls, so Starmer was happy to accept Mandelson’s assurances that the friendship hadn’t been close. After all, who could have guessed that Peter “Prince of Darkness” Mandelson, with his decades-long reputation for sleaze, self-service and amorality, might be lying and might prove less than suitable as Britain’s most important ambassador?

Geographically, not genuinely

Starmer and others in the Labour elite certainly didn’t guess. Or so they’re now saying. They’re angrily accusing Mandelson of telling endless “lies” and of having “betrayed our country, our parliament and [our] party.” The first accusation is entirely accurate; the second is only part-accurate. Yes, Mandelson is a liar, but no, he isn’t a traitor to Britain. He isn’t British, so he could never betray this country. Instead, Mandelson is trans-British, with the same entitlement to genuine British identity as a “transwoman” has to genuine female identity. Jews like Mandelson can be geographically British or European, but never genuinely British or European. The same goes for Jeffrey Epstein: he was trans-American, not American. Like Mandelson, he worked on behalf of two overwhelmingly important entities: himself and Israel. That’s why he supplied under-aged shiksas to rich and powerful gentiles like Bill Clinton and Bill Gates, gathering abundant material for permanent blackmail.

And that’s why Epstein referred so often and so disdainfully to “goyim” in his emails and texts. But his use of that fascinating Hebrew term hasn’t been discussed in the Jew-dominated mainstream media. You see, it wouldn’t be good for Jews if ordinary gentiles became aware of what Kevin MacDonald calls Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism and started to wonder whether Israel was really such a good and faithful ally of the West. It isn’t, of course. If Israel can’t blackmail important goyim in the West, it will assassinate or otherwise destroy them, then replace them with goyim who can be blackmailed. The unblackmailable Labour leaders John Smith and Hugh Gaitskell were assassinated; the unblackmailable Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was destroyed by other means.[i]

Twinky, Twinky, Brittle Starmer

Corbyn was then replaced by Keir Starmer, whose suitability for blackmail may be apparent in an extraordinarily under-reported story about young male prostitutes from Ukraine committing arson against his property in London. The twinks haven’t provoked any thinks in the mainstream media. As Nick Griffin has pointed out: “So, whichever explanation you prefer [for the arson], you will surely agree that the strangest thing of all in this very queer story is that it isn’t a story. That the mass media continue to censor themselves; that they refuse to share this very profitable story with the masses at all.” If Starmer is a secret user of young male prostitutes (or worse), Israeli intelligence would certainly know and Israel would certainly be eager to blackmail him over it, like Tony Blair and Harold Wilson before him. This would explain why, like Tony Blair and Harold Wilson before him, Starmer displays “devotion to the cause of Israel” — and equal disdain for the cause of Britain.

Twinky, Twinky, Brittle Starmer: the three alleged rent-boys whose connection to Keir Starmer is being ignored by the mainstream media (image from BBC)

It was not in Britain’s interests to appoint a sleazy Jew like Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington. But it was in the interests of Israel and of other sleazy Jews, like those running Palantir, the surveillance-state specialists ushered into Britain by Mandelson’s lobbying firm. That’s why Mandelson’s appointment was welcomed by the Conservative grandee Danny Finkelstein, who described Mandelson as the “ideal person” to be Britain’s most important ambassador. Finkelstein further gushed: “My question was always: would Keir Starmer be bold enough to pick Peter Mandelson? I’m pretty impressed that he was.” Finkelstein is supposedly a political opponent of Labour figures like Mandelson, but his warm words for the sleazy slitherer prove that the so-called Conservative Party and the so-called Labour Party are merely two wings of a uniparty devoted to serving the interests of Israel and Jews.

Indeed, Finkelstein played the same role for the Conservatives as Mandelson played for Labour. These two Jews completed the “modernization” of their respective parties. In other words, they trashed the last traces of tradition in these parties and converted them into vehicles for the same pro-Israel, pro-minority, pro-migration agenda. Mandelson is often hailed as the chief architect of New Labour, which would much more accurately be called Jew Labour. His close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein is a perfect embodiment of Labour’s new “values”: the party now works for the plutocracy, not the proletariat. And Mandelson’s utter unconcern for the under-aged shiksas on whom Epstein preyed for so long also embodies Labour’s new “values.” Throughout Britain, Labour councils have not just ignored but actively assisted Muslim gangs in the rape, torture and enforced prostitution of women and girls from the White working-class whom the Labour Party was founded to serve at the beginning of the twentieth century.

White Awareness Awakens

By the end of the twentieth century, Labour had completed its transformation from party of the proletariat to party of the plutocracy. That’s why I’ve suggested that Labour would have to be re-named the “Lawyer Party” if there were a rule that the names of political parties had to accurately reflect their true principles. But the “Lawyer Party” wouldn’t be fully accurate either. So what would be? I suggest the “Slaves of Israel Party.” Or rather, I suggest the “Red Servants of Israel Party” for so-called Labour and the “Blue Servants of Israel Party” for the so-called Conservatives.

A suggestion like that would have been greeted with horror and disgust by the vast majority of British Whites when Peter Mandelson first became prominent in British politics back in the 1980s. Forty years later, awareness of Jewish arrogance, selfishness and amorality is much more widespread. And few people have done more to waken Whites to awareness than the Prince of Darkness himself, the selfish, arrogant and utterly amoral Peter Mandelson, firm friend of Jewish Jeffrey and extreme enemy of the White West.

[i]  Corbyn was endlessly accused of anti-Semitism by his Jewish opponents, who were outraged that he wasn’t making Jewish interests his first and overwhelming concern. One piece of evidence for Corbyn’s anti-Semitism was that, in discussing earlier developments in the Epstein scandal, he had pronounced the name “Ep-shtine” rather than “Ep-steen,” supposedly trying to emphasize Epstein’s completely irrelevant Jewishness. Was Corbyn sardonically getting his own back when, in discussing the latest development in the scandal, he used the pronunciation “Ep-stine”? I don’t blame him if he was.